User talk:Stas Lobov/Archive 1

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Pay attention to copyright Image:Vladimir Mayakovski.jpg has been marked as a copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content, that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added will soon be deleted. If you believe this image is not a copyright violation, please explain why on the image description page.


Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

--jonny-mt 13:53, 3 July 2008 (UTC)


العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Dinis_Davidov_Grab.jpg. This image is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org).

Unless the permission information is given, the image may be speedy deleted after seven days. Thank you. -Nard 15:53, 6 July 2008 (UTC)

По поводу Мельникова

Здравствуйте. Ещё один московский фотограф - это хорошо. Что нехорошо - это продолжающееся обсуждение удаления работ французских архитекторов (в т.ч. московского Центросоюза на Мясницкой) Commons:Deletion_requests/French_architects. Вкратце, раз нет во Франции "свободы панорамы" и архитектор имел счастье умереть в июле 1938 года или позже (-70 лет) - в топку. Всё то же самое напрямую касается фотографий российских - только порог не 1938, а 1941. А архитекторы в СССР жили долго. NVO (talk) 07:18, 7 July 2008 (UTC)

Hi! I saw your articles about Melnikov and the worker clubs in Moscow. I am writing my thesis about the svoboda club and have some questions. Hope to hear from you soon, cu bettina

A cколько ныне МХАТов?

В связи вот с этим диффом [1] - Category:Moscow Art Theatre это и театр в Камергерском и театр на Тверском, или только первый из них? NVO (talk) 12:28, 19 November 2009 (UTC)

Вы правы, МХАТов ныне (с 1987 г) два - один им. Чехова, второй имени Горького. Только первый уже не МХАТ, а МХТ. -- Moreorless (talk) 21:24, 20 November 2009 (UTC)

Предложение по расчистке/ревизии "Истории Москвы"

см. Category talk:History of Moscow. NVO (talk) 09:22, 15 December 2009 (UTC)

Tip: Categorizing images

Afrikaans  العربية  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  Esperanto  español  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  magyar  íslenska  italiano  日本語  ქართული  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  +/−


Hello, Stas Lobov!
Tip: Add categories to your files
Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

CategorizationBot (talk) 10:50, 19 April 2010 (UTC)

missing categories

Hello Moreorless, can you add some categories to the file File:Melnikov house plan.jpg, moreorless :) - I cannot read Russian. Best wishes Cholo Aleman (talk) 14:38, 17 June 2010 (UTC)


Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Fernrohr (talk) 20:14, 20 August 2010 (UTC)

Типовое дореволюционное

Вот такие есть дома в Москве - большие и жёлтые

Что-то подсказывает, что их один человек проектировал - а кто бы он мог быть? И что там изначально было - конторы? училища? телефонные станции? Ненадёжный источник wikimapia про Каретный говорит "Швейная фабрика Якова Альшванга. Фабричные здания строились по проекту архитектора П. П. Висневского", про Спасскую "Бывшее здание ломбарда". Вот тут на жж про Спасскую сказано "большое здание Сухаревского отделения городского ломбарда (архитектор И. М. Рыбин)". - ???

Еще есть похожие арки на углу Образцова и площади Борьбы, но подозреваю что это позднейшая надстройка. NVO (talk) 13:41, 2 January 2011 (UTC)

Новое

Commons:Categories for discussion/2011/01/Category:Buildings in Russia - NVO (talk) 08:57, 12 January 2011 (UTC)

Интересная дискуссия)) А Вы в русской вики теперь не пишите?--Moreorless (talk) 13:55, 30 March 2011 (UTC)
Уже три года как. В английской тоже. Стар я для "охраны границ" - скайпочаты и без меня проживут. NVO (talk) 15:59, 31 March 2011 (UTC)

Строгое

Второй раз ловлю вас на неверной категоризации домиков по архитекторам. Усадьба Татарникова постройки архитектора Юдицкого - это не File:Moscow, Aristarkhovsky Lane.jpg, a File:B Drovyanoy 13 14.JPG. На другом конце квартала. Который весь принадлежал Татарниковым, включая и красный угловой домик. У Нащокиной в книге, с одной стороны, много ошибок, опечаток, или же исторические адреса не соответствуют современным - всё неочевидное надо перепроверять. A ещё есть много случаев, когда к зданию приложили руку много архитекторов и не сразу ясно, кто из них уместен в категоризации фото. Скажем, во дворе морозовской усадьбы в Подсосенском были (есть?) службы постройки Бондаренко и Шехтеля, а к интерьерам приложили руку Шехтель и Врубель. Но снаружи-то ни того, ни другого, ни третьего нет!

И присматривайте, пожалуйста, за своими статьями - в карточке ru:Вебер, Август Егорович сейчас нечто чуждое. Вебер - ещё одна печальная иллюстрация сказанному выше - практически все его московские постройки были перелицованы, надстроены и пр., так что теперь и непонятно - осталось ли там что-то от Вебера или нет?

Удачи, NVO (talk) 03:35, 13 May 2011 (UTC)

Спасибо за замечания. Действительно, пользуюсь Нащокиной, сам замечаю много ошибок. Но где взять иные?) -- Moreorless (talk) 04:21, 13 May 2011 (UTC)
ДА, в Вебера кто-то церковь впихнул). Сейчас поправлю-- Moreorless (talk) 04:23, 13 May 2011 (UTC)
Если Вебер изначально строил здание (а не изменял фасад), то осталась его структура, основа, возможно, что и планировка, другие элементы. В таком случае, думаю, нужно категоризировать иллюстрации и на него, и на последующих "перелицовщиков" --Moreorless (talk) 04:30, 13 May 2011 (UTC)

Угол Петровки и Кузнецкого

Тот самый Торгсин, где Бегемот хулиганил.

Тут Butko загрузил удивительные вручную крашеные фото 1931 года (Category:Branson_DeCou), там есть вот такое: . NVO (talk) 21:30, 16 May 2011 (UTC)

Супер! Использую в статье. -- Moreorless (talk) 19:33, 17 May 2011 (UTC)
Создал служебную статью ru:Архитекторы Москвы, для координации работы. Если еще кого вспомните - добавляйте! --Moreorless (talk) 19:36, 17 May 2011 (UTC)

Петровские жандармы

Вот это фото "Петровскiя казармы жандармскаго дивизiона" - а это вообще Петровка? или что-то другое? NVO (talk) 20:27, 24 June 2011 (UTC)

Сложно сказать, какое место изображено на фото, но Петровские казармы стояли на месте здания ГУВД (Петровка, 38) --Moreorless (talk) 17:55, 26 June 2011 (UTC)


Deutsch  English  español  فارسی  français  hrvatski  italiano  日本語  മലയാളം  Nederlands  sicilianu  Tiếng Việt  +/−


A file that you uploaded to Wikimedia Commons from Flickr, File:Schechtel. Sokha fon Derviz.jpg, was found available on Flickr by an administrator or reviewer under the license Noncommercial (NC), No derivative works (ND), or All Rights Reserved (Copyright), which isn't compatible with Wikimedia Commons, per the licensing policy. The file has been deleted. Commons:Flickr files/Appeal for license change has information about sending the Flickr user an appeal asking for the license to be changed. Only Flickr images tagged as BY (CC BY), BY SA (CC BY-SA), CC0 (CC0) and PDM (PDM) are allowed on Wikimedia Commons. If the Flickr user has changed the license of the Flickr image, feel free to ask an administrator to restore the file, or start an undeletion request.

Bencmq (talk) 11:29, 8 October 2011 (UTC)


Deutsch  English  español  فارسی  français  hrvatski  italiano  日本語  മലയാളം  Nederlands  sicilianu  Tiếng Việt  +/−


A file that you uploaded to Wikimedia Commons from Flickr, File:Schechtel. Starozhilovo.jpg, was found available on Flickr by an administrator or reviewer under the license Noncommercial (NC), No derivative works (ND), or All Rights Reserved (Copyright), which isn't compatible with Wikimedia Commons, per the licensing policy. The file has been deleted. Commons:Flickr files/Appeal for license change has information about sending the Flickr user an appeal asking for the license to be changed. Only Flickr images tagged as BY (CC BY), BY SA (CC BY-SA), CC0 (CC0) and PDM (PDM) are allowed on Wikimedia Commons. If the Flickr user has changed the license of the Flickr image, feel free to ask an administrator to restore the file, or start an undeletion request.

Bencmq (talk) 11:33, 8 October 2011 (UTC)

File:Gorki_Leninskiye.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

PereslavlFoto (talk) 13:46, 8 December 2011 (UTC)

dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 05:59, 24 October 2012 (UTC)

Информация с сайта ГД РФ

Доброго времени суток! Подобные фото (File:Aparina Alevtina Viktorovna.jpg, File:Kostunov Ilya Evgenievich.jpg) не лицензируются на условиях свободных лицензий, поскольку эти условия использования не равноценны лицензии. Например, для сайта kremlin.ru есть специальное письмо, несмотря на то, что есть [2]. Обратите также внимание на то, что в подобных условиях использования нет указания на то, что работы могут использоваться в коммерческих целях и изменяться. А эти две свободы являются обязательным условием свободной лицензии.— Redboston 18:05, 2 January 2013 (UTC)

File:Aparina Alevtina Viktorovna.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Redboston 18:07, 2 January 2013 (UTC)

File:Kostunov Ilya Evgenievich.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Redboston 18:07, 2 January 2013 (UTC)

File:Abubakirov Rishat Fazlutdinovich.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Redboston 18:08, 2 January 2013 (UTC)

File:Abros'kin Nikolaj Pavlovich.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Redboston 18:08, 2 January 2013 (UTC)

File:Bychkova Evdokija Ivanovna.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Redboston 18:08, 2 January 2013 (UTC)

File:Zhukov Aleksandr Dmitrievich.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Redboston 18:09, 2 January 2013 (UTC)

File:Pekhtin Vladimir Alekseevich.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Redboston 18:09, 2 January 2013 (UTC)

File:Kosachev Konstantin Iosifovich.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Redboston 18:09, 2 January 2013 (UTC)

File:Beljakov Anton Vladimirovich.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Redboston 18:09, 2 January 2013 (UTC)

File:Savickaja Svetlana Evgen'evna.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Redboston 18:09, 2 January 2013 (UTC)

File:Lahova Ekaterina Filippovna.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Redboston 18:10, 2 January 2013 (UTC)

File:Osipov Vjacheslav Konstantinovich.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Redboston 18:10, 2 January 2013 (UTC)

File:Morozov Oleg Viktorovich.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Redboston 18:10, 2 January 2013 (UTC)

File:Stepanova Zoja Mihajlovna.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Redboston 18:10, 2 January 2013 (UTC)

File:Fabrichnyj Sergej Jur'evich.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Redboston 18:10, 2 January 2013 (UTC)

File:Hamchiev Belan Bagaudinovich.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Redboston 18:10, 2 January 2013 (UTC)

File:Chetverikov Aleksandr Vladimirovich.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Redboston 18:10, 2 January 2013 (UTC)