User talk:Beeld en Geluid Collecties

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Openbeelden!
Afrikaans | Alemannisch | asturianu | azərbaycanca | Bahasa Banjar | català | čeština | Cymraeg | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | español | Esperanto | euskara | estremeñu | français | Frysk | galego | hrvatski | Bahasa Indonesia | interlingua | Interlingue | íslenska | italiano | Kiswahili | Kurdî | Latina | lietuvių | magyar | Bahasa Melayu | Mirandés | Nederlands | norsk bokmål | occitan | Plattdüütsch | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | rumantsch | Scots | shqip | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | Basa Sunda | suomi | svenska | Tagalog | Türkçe | vèneto | Tiếng Việt | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | беларуская | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | Ирон | македонски | нохчийн | русский | српски / srpski | тоҷикӣ | українська | ქართული | Հայերեն | नेपाली | भोजपुरी | मराठी | हिन्दी | অসমীয়া | বাংলা | தமிழ் | മലയാളം | සිංහල | ไทย | ၽႃႇသႃႇတႆး  | မြန်မာဘာသာ | 한국어 | 日本語 | 中文 | 中文（台灣）‎ | 中文（简体）‎ | 中文（繁體）‎ | 粵語 | עברית | اردو | العربية | تۆرکجه | سنڌي | فارسی | +/−
First steps tutorial

Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content).

You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki.

Getting help

More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump.

Goodies, tips, and tricks
  • Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your graphic abilities.
  • You can find the files you have uploaded in your Uploads.
  • Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~.
  • To link to an image page without embedding the image, type: [[:File:Foo.jpg]], which produces: File:Foo.jpg.
  • You may enable gadgets (custom features) for your account.
  • There are several tools to upload files.
  • Have you edited Wikipedia before? This guide might be useful.
Made a mistake?
  • Do you want to have a file renamed or moved? Use the move link and wait for an authorized user to rename it.
  • Do you want to have your recently uploaded picture removed? Tag it as {{speedy|reason here}}. For more information read the deletion guidelines.

Tip: Categorizing images[edit]

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ magyar ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ქართული ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ +/−

Hello, Beeld en Geluid Collecties!
Tip: Add categories to your files
Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

BotMultichillT 06:03, 12 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Stichting Natuurbeelden on Open Images[edit]

Even it didn't look this way when the project page was started, now you got more than 50 suggestions. Thanks for this great offer. Mvg -- Rillke(q?) 16:38, 15 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for getting involved! We're very happy with the result. We will now try to get the 50 videos on Open Images as soon as possible, so they can be used on Wikimedia Commons. Openbeelden (talk)

Autopatrol given[edit]

Hello. I just wanted to let you know that I have granted autopatrol rights to your account; the reason for this is that I believe you are sufficiently trustworthy and experienced to have your contributions automatically marked as "reviewed". This has no effect on your editing, it is simply intended to make it easier for users that are monitoring Recent changes or Recent uploads to find unproductive edits amidst the productive ones like yours. In addition, the Flickr upload feature and an increased number of batch-uploads in UploadWizard, uploading of freely licensed MP3 files, overwriting files uploaded by others and an increased limit for page renames per minute are now available to you. Thank you. -- Rillke(q?) 16:44, 22 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Waarom ?[edit]

Hi, I am wondering why you add the category Category:Beeld en Geluid on Open Images to items that are already in Category:Media from Open Beelden. Moreover, it looks like you are adding mainly video files, not images/photos, to the Category:Beeld en Geluid on Open Images category. Something escapes me ? (Nederlands kan ook) --Foroa (talk) 10:24, 4 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! The reason has to do with statistics. We use the BaGLAMa tool to track the reuse of the Open Images collection on Wikipedia, the data gathered by this tool gives us useful information on the reuse of our collections on Wikipedia. This is now done for Category:Media from Open Beelden. Recently we added some nature videos from the Stichting Natuurbeelden collection in Category:Stichting Natuurbeelden on Open Images. We would like to keep seperate statistics for these and the other material from Open Images. In the current situation this is not possible since the Natuurbeelden category is a subcategory of Category:Media from Open Beelden. This means that the statistics for Category:Media from Open Beelden will include the Natuurbeelden category. So we thought it was best to move these items to a category that is on the same level. This also in the case other collections will be added to Wikipedia via Open Images in the future. Then we will be able to track those seperately. The media that we place in Category:Beeld en Geluid on Open Images are mainly Polygoon newsreels that come from Open Images and photos that are made of screenshots from these videos.
I can see your need, but I have a problem on categories with names that don't correspond with a real category system. Please use proper and logical category names and don't call a category "xxx ... images" that needs to contain videos. Anyway, sooner or later, a person will come along and collapse (quite rightly) the redundant categories in one single one as there is no logic documented. --Foroa (talk) 08:11, 5 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Open Images is the English name for our Open Beelden platform, so the name refers to the platform, not so much to the sort of media used in the category. Do you have a better suggestion?
There is no problem with the name as such, the problem is that there are two categories Category:Beeld en Geluid on Open Images and Category:Media from Open Beelden, and the first one (... images) contain a subset (a number of videos) of the first one without any discernible logic or relation to the category names. --Foroa (talk) 09:41, 5 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Ah, I think I get your point. If I rename Category:Stichting Natuurbeelden on Open Images and Category:Beeld en Geluid on Open Images to 'Stichting Natuurbeelden on Open Beelden' and 'Beeld en Geluid on Open Beelden', will that help? Not all media on Open Images comes from Beeld en Geluid, other archives or users can also upload their media. So the contents of Category:Beeld en Geluid on Open Images and Category:Media from Open Beelden will not be entirely the same. Openbeelden (talk) 10:02, 5 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:Vakantie 1964-517746.ogg[edit]

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Vakantie 1964-517746.ogg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

No required license templates were detected at this file page. Please correct it, or if you have any questions please contact me on my talk page. Yours sincerely, Jarekt (talk) 12:38, 10 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

incorrectly uploaded files[edit]

There seems to be a problem with File:Hollumer Kwelder en Vogelpolle-4804247.png and File:Hollumer Kwelder en Vogelpolle-4804248.png, the actual files were apparently not uploaded, just a generic placeholder. --Didym (talk) 22:49, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

auteur radio oranje[edit]

Als auteur van een radiorede wordt nu Beeld en geluid neergezet. Auteur is bedoeld voor de oorspronkelijke maker van een creatief werk, dus dat lijkt me een foutje? Zie bijv --Hannolans (talk) 12:49, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Hanno, eens. Ik ga dat volgende week even aanpassen. Excuses, eerste upload met de vicuna uploader (hopelijk ook de laatste ;-)). 85jesse (talk) 12:53, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Invalid dates[edit]

The values given for dates in your recent batch of uploads are invalid (e.g File:Red-chested Cuckoo (Cuculus solitarius) (022A-WA03044X0017-0013M0).ogg -> "26053"). I started to replace them, but then thought better of it, as the values may have some other meaning, and need to be kept. Please investigate, and fix. Andy Mabbett (talk) 15:22, 10 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Andy Mabbett, I'm not sure yet what happened here. Will investigate and let you know how we'll fix it. Thanks for noticing! 85jesse (talk) 15:48, 10 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Andy Mabbett and 85jesse, thanks indeed, I see that there are 46 instances in which the dates are incorrect (I probably did something wrong when getting the data from spreadsheet to xml), but I will fix this myself today and let you know in this thread when this is done. Cheers, Harrrij (talk) 09:29, 11 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Andy Mabbett and 85jesse, all the recording dates are in place and correct now. Cheers, Beeld en Geluid Collecties (talk) 12:11, 11 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hartjesdag[edit]

File:PHOHI-dagblad over de Amsterdamsche Beurs.wav lijkt niet goed, het gaat nl niet over de Amserdamse beurs, maar is hetzelfde bestand als --Hannolans (talk) 12:42, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Dank voor het doorgeven Hannolans. Zonet heb ik de juiste file geupload maar deze is nog niet te zien (20 minuten, 45 seconden geleden toegevoegd aan de Job queue): https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:PHOHI_dagblad_over_de_Amsterdamse_Beurs.wav
Hoe kunnen we de andere file het beste (laten) verwijderen denk je? Deze zou dus verwijderd (of onder water) gezet moeten worden: File:PHOHI-dagblad over de Amsterdamsche Beurs.wav Beeld en Geluid Collecties (talk) 14:09, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Ik heb hem genomineerd voor verwijdering. Dat is volgens mij de makkelijkste manier. Je kan op Commons:Deletion_requests/File:PHOHI-dagblad_over_de_Amsterdamsche_Beurs.wav als uploader bevestigen dat dit bestand inderdaad wegkan --Hannolans (talk) 09:41, 16 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:PHOHI-dagblad over de Amsterdamsche Beurs.wav[edit]

File:PHOHI-dagblad over de Amsterdamsche Beurs.wav has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Hannolans (talk) 21:25, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Dank voor het in gang zetten van het verzoek tot verwijdering Hannolans, fijn! Groeten, Beeld en Geluid Collecties (talk) 11:32, 16 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Lijst voor beweerken de duitse project met de videos[edit]

Übersicht der Bearbeitung dort – zu mitmachen! --Hans Haase (talk,express talk) 12:31, 11 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:Artur Avila - Extra footage-VPRO-The Mind of the Universe.ogv[edit]

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Artur Avila - Extra footage-VPRO-The Mind of the Universe.ogv. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

And also:

Yours sincerely, Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:11, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Magog the Ogre (talk),

Thanks for your message, I've updated the licensing statements of all the mentioned files according to their status on Open Beelden. Unfortunately the licensing sjablone did not automatically got filled in when using the GLAMWikitoolset to upload these videos. Thanks again for your message.

Kind regards, Beeld en Geluid Collecties

Copyright status: File:Biochemist Lee Cronin on creating artificial life-VPRO-The Mind of the Universe.ogv[edit]

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Biochemist Lee Cronin on creating artificial life-VPRO-The Mind of the Universe.ogv. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

And also:

Yours sincerely, Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 15:48, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Magog the Ogre (talk),

Thanks for your message, I've updated the licensing statements of all the mentioned files according to their status on Open Beelden. Unfortunately the licensing sjablone did not automatically got filled in when using the GLAMWikitoolset to upload these videos. Thanks again for your message.

Kind regards, Beeld en Geluid Collecties

File:IAS-director and Leon Levy professor Robbert Dijkgraaf interviews George Whitesides on the world of chemistry shaping our future-VPRO-The Mind of the Universe.ogv[edit]

File:IAS-director and Leon Levy professor Robbert Dijkgraaf interviews George Whitesides on the world of chemistry shaping our future-VPRO-The Mind of the Universe.ogv has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

85jesse (talk) 07:33, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Martin Rees on the future of man in the cosmos-VPRO-The Mind of the Universe.ogv[edit]

File:Martin Rees on the future of man in the cosmos-VPRO-The Mind of the Universe.ogv has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

85jesse (talk) 07:56, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Networks expert Jennifer Chayes on how the world of technology will shape our future-VPRO-The Mind of the Universe.ogv[edit]

File:Networks expert Jennifer Chayes on how the world of technology will shape our future-VPRO-The Mind of the Universe.ogv has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

85jesse (talk) 07:59, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Rename of file --> File:Margrietjes bloeien op de restanten van een wrak-4885774.webm[edit]

Hello Beeld en Geluid Collecties, graag zou ik deze file hernoemen --> File:Sandalled anemone (Actinothoe sphyrodeta) on a wreck in the Netherlands-4885774.webm. Wat denk je? Lotje (talk) 09:27, 19 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hoi Lotje, Denk je dat deze daarmee makkelijker te vinden is voor internationale gebruikers? In principe levert de zoekopdracht 'Sandalled anemone' dit resultaat al op toch? Maar als je denkt dat de naam gebruikers helpt voel je dan vrij om de naamswijziging door te voeren! Groet! 85jesse (talk) 09:32, 19 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Voor mij is dit een margriet, ik vind de filename nogal verwarrend, vandaar. Lotje (talk) 09:40, 19 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Expiry of GWToolset user group memberships[edit]

There is a proposal on the Bureaucrat's noticeboard to automatically expire GWT memberships after one year unless the user requests an extension. Please add your views and suggestions to the discussion. The reasonably informal process for getting access to GWT access will remain as is.

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of Revi. 15:42, 31 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Voetbal 1947[edit]

Hoi, ik heb de Polygoon-voetbalvideo's uit 1947 op het Youtube-kanaal van mijn voetbalfilmpjes gezet. Mocht Beeld en Geluid dat liever op haar eigen kanaal willen zetten, dan haal ik deze er uiteraard wel weer vanaf. Ik hoor wel wat de voorkeur heeft. Met vriendelijke groet, Jeff5102 (talk) 15:31, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Goedemorgen Jeff5102, ga gerust je gang, dat is toch leuk! Dank voor je vraag. Vriendelijke groeten, Beeld en Geluid Collecties (talk) 07:59, 4 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:In bedrijf stellen van een nieuwe watermolen-508049.ogv[edit]

File:In bedrijf stellen van een nieuwe watermolen-508049.ogv has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Miho (talk) 15:56, 4 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Nederland waterland-522331.ogv[edit]

File:Nederland waterland-522331.ogv has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Miho (talk) 18:35, 4 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Biochemist Lee Cronin on creating artificial life-VPRO-The Mind of the Universe.ogv was nominated for MOTD[edit]

Your file has been nominated for a Media of the Day.

Your contribution to this project has been noticed. A file Biochemist Lee Cronin on creating artificial life-VPRO-The Mind of the Universe.ogv, which was uploaded by you, has been nominated to be displayed on the Main Page of this project as a Media of the Day. You can view this and other nominations at Commons talk:Media of the day. It is always a good idea to let other contributors know when you think your file would look good as a featured media file, provide descriptions in different languages, and perhaps spread the joy by nominating media of other uploaders, that you believe deserve that. ℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ • ✍ ⏿) 12:25, 24 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

MOTD Notification[edit]
⭐ A file you uploaded is on the main page! ⭐

File:Show van antieke- en zelfbouwvliegtuigen-33411.ogv, that you uploaded, is on the main page today. Thank you for your contributions to this project.

//EatchaBot (talk) 00:00, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Corrupted filenames[edit]

Hello,

Some Open Beelden videos have corrupted filenames and descriptions.

For example File:De offici‘le overname van de K-XVI.webm has an invisible unicode mark in "offici.le". Compare file page URL (https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:De_offici%C2%91le_overname_van_de_K-XVI.webm, which contains en:Percent-encoding in "offici%C2%91le". Attemptin to edit file description page shows the same problem in description text.

File:De plechtige uitvaart van h.m. koningin Astrid van Belgi‘.webm has a similar problem, note "Belgi". URL again contains "%C2%91" mark: https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:De_plechtige_uitvaart_van_h.m._koningin_Astrid_van_Belgi%C2%91.webm.

I presume these are character encoding problems, or maybe errors in source information? Perhaps such characters should be corrected or just removed?

MKFI (talk) 12:48, 19 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Dear MKFI, thank you for pointing this out to us. I have requested link changes for both files. Apologies for the inconvenience, it is indeed an encoding problem. Best! 85jesse (talk) 14:24, 19 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Hello User:85jesse, thank you for fixing those. However the problem is more widespread. A quick search found the following:
There are certainly more. Is just the letter 'ë' which causes problems, or do 'ï', 'ü' etc also cause errors? I presume you have a list of files you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons; is it possible you search for the problematic characters and create a list of files that would need to be renamed? I can the rename files if I know the correct original. MKFI (talk) 11:06, 20 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

OpenRefine starts SDC development! 💎[edit]

Hello Beeld en Geluid Collecties! I'm approaching you because you have been a heavy user of the GLAMWiki Toolset. OpenRefine has started development of features for Structured Data on Wikimedia Commons, which will likely create a viable alternative to the GWToolset which also supports structured data. Would you like to be informed about ongoing work? You can sign up here to receive occasional updates on a Wikimedia talk page of your choice. Also, feel free to contact me directly if you have any questions! SFauconnier (talk) 16:05, 20 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Beeld_en_Geluid_Collecties&oldid=592456296"