Commons:Amministratori

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
(Redirected from Commons:Amministratori)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This page is a translated version of a page Commons:Administrators and the translation is 94% complete. Changes to the translation template, respectively the source language can be submitted through Commons:Administrators and have to be approved by a translation administrator.

Outdated translations are marked like this.

Shortcut: COM:A · COM:ADMIN · COM:SYSOP

Other languages:
Bahasa Indonesia • ‎Bahasa Melayu • ‎Canadian English • ‎Deutsch • ‎English • ‎Lëtzebuergesch • ‎Tiếng Việt • ‎Türkçe • ‎als • ‎asturianu • ‎brezhoneg • ‎català • ‎dansk • ‎español • ‎français • ‎galego • ‎interlingua • ‎italiano • ‎magyar • ‎occitan • ‎polski • ‎português • ‎português do Brasil • ‎sicilianu • ‎suomi • ‎svenska • ‎Ελληνικά • ‎български • ‎русский • ‎українська • ‎հայերեն • ‎עברית • ‎العربية • ‎فارسی • ‎مصرى • ‎پښتو • ‎नेपाली • ‎मराठी • ‎हिन्दी • ‎বাংলা • ‎中文 • ‎日本語 • ‎한국어
Commons Administrator.svg

Questa pagina spiega il ruolo degli amministratori (a volte chiamati admins o sysops) su Wikimedia Commons. Tieni presente che i dettagli sul ruolo e il modo in cui sono nominati potranno differire dagli altri siti.

Se si vuole richiedere l'aiuto di un amministratore scrivere un post su Administrators' noticeboard.

Ci sono attualmente 227 amministratori su Commons.

Un admin che brandisce uno spazzolone, simbolo comune degli amministratori. Vedi anche: The good admin.

Chi è un amministratore?

Administrators as of gennaio 2019 [+/−]
Listing by language
Listing by date
Listing by activity

Number of Admins: 227

  1. -revi, ko, en-3 (steward)
  2. ~riley, en, fr-1, es-1
  3. 1Veertje, nl, en-4, de-1, fr-1
  4. 32X, de, en-2, hsb-1, ru-1
  5. 4nn1l2, fa, en-3, ar-1
  6. 99of9, en (bureaucrat)
  7. A.Savin, ru, de-4, en-2
  8. Abuse filter (automated tool)
  9. Achim55, de, en-3, nds-3, la-2
  10. AFBorchert, de, en-3
  11. Ahonc, uk, ru-4, en-2, de-1 (global renamer)
  12. Aka, de, en-3
  13. Alan, es, eu-3, en-2
  14. Alno, fr, en-3, es-2, pt-1
  15. Amada44, de, en-3, fr-1
  16. Ankry, pl, en-2, ru-1
  17. AnRo0002, de, en-2, fr-2, es-1
  18. Anthere, fr, en-3
  19. Arthur Crbz, fr, en-4, es-3
  20. Aude, en, ar-2, de-2, es-3
  21. AzaToth, sv, en-4
  22. Barcex, es, en-2, fr-1
  23. Basvb, nl, en-3, de-2
  24. Benoît Prieur,fr, en-3, pt-2, es-1, it-1, hy-1
  25. Benoit Rochon, fr, en-4
  26. Billinghurst, en
  27. Blackcat, it, en-3, fr
  28. BrightRaven, fr, en-3, nl-2, es-2, zh-1
  29. Butko, ru, uk-2, en-1
  30. Cambalachero, es, en-3
  31. Captain-tucker, en
  32. ChrisiPK, de, en-3, fr-1
  33. Christian Ferrer, fr, en-2, es-2
  34. Ciell, nl, en-2, de-1
  35. Common Good, en
  36. Cookie, es, en-2
  37. Courcelles, en, es-2, fr-2
  38. Czar, en
  39. DaB., de, en-1
  40. Dantadd, it, pt, en-3, es-3, fr-3, gl-3, ca-2, ro-1, el-1
  41. DarwIn, pt, en-3, es-2, fr-2, gl-2, ca-1, it-1, oc-1
  42. Davepape, en
  43. David Levy, en
  44. De728631, de, en-5
  45. Dereckson, fr, en-3, de-1, nl-1
  46. DerHexer, de, en-3, grc-3, la-3, es-1 (steward)
  47. Dharmadhyaksha, mr, en-3, hi-3
  48. DMacks, en
  49. Didym, de, en-2, fr-2
  50. Dschwen, de, en-3, fr-1 (bureaucrat)
  51. Dyolf77, ar, fr-5, en-2, it-1, es-1
  52. D-Kuru, de, en-2, it-1
  53. Ebrahim, fa
  54. Edgar181, en, de-1, fr-1, es-1
  55. Elcobbola en, de (checkuser)
  56. Eleassar, sl, en-3, de-2, fr-2
  57. Elitre, it, en-3, fr-2
  58. Ellin Beltz, en (bureaucrat)
  59. Emha, de, bar, en-3, fr-1
  60. Érico, pt, en-2, es-1 (global renamer)
  61. EugeneZelenko, ru, be, en-2, bg-1, pl-1 (bureaucrat)
  62. Explicit, en, es, ko-2
  63. Ezarate, es-3, en-1
  64. Flominator, de, als, en-3
  65. FunkMonk, da, en-4, no-3, fo-2, sv-2, de-1, es-1
  66. Geagea, he, ka-3, en-3, ru-1
  67. Geni, en
  68. George Chernilevsky, ru, uk-3, de-2, en-2, bg-1, la-1, be-1, fr-1
  69. Gestumblindi, als, de, en-3
  70. Gnangarra, en, nys-1
  71. Golbez, en, ja-2
  72. Green Giant, en, de-1, fr-1 (steward)
  73. grin, hu, en-3, de-1
  74. Gruznov, ru, en-1, fr-1
  75. Guanaco, en, es-1
  76. Hedwig in Washington, de, en-4, nds-1
  77. Hekerui, de, en-4
  78. Herbythyme, en, fr-2, es-1, it-1
  79. Hesperian, en
  80. Howcheng, en, ja-2
  81. Huntster, en
  82. Hystrix, de, en-1
  83. Indeedous, de, en-3, fr-2
  84. Infrogmation, en, es-1
  85. Jameslwoodward, en, fr-1 (bureaucrat, checkuser)
  86. January, en
  87. Jaqen, it, en-2
  88. Jarekt, pl, en
  89. JarrahTree, en, id-1
  90. Jastrow, fr, en-3, ro-2, de-1, it-1
  91. Jcb, nl, en-3, es-3
  92. Jcornelius, de, lt-2, la-2, en-2, pt-2, fr-1
  93. Jdforrester, en
  94. Jdx, pl
  95. Jean-Frédéric, fr, en-4, es-1
  96. JGHowes, en, fr-2, de-1
  97. Jianhui67, en, zh-3, ms-1 (global renamer)
  98. Jmabel, en, es-3, ro-2, de-1, ca-1, it-1, pt-1, fr-1
  99. Joergens.mi, de, en-3
  100. Jon Kolbert, en, fr-4, de-2
  101. Josve05a, sv, en-3
  102. Juliancolton, en
  103. Julo, pl, en-2, de-1, ru-1
  104. JuTa, de, en-2, fr-1 (bureaucrat)
  105. Jusjih, zh, en-3, fr-2, ko-1
  106. Kaldari, en
  107. Kallerna, fi, en-3, sv-2, de-1
  108. Kelly, en
  109. King of Hearts, en, zh-3, es-2, ja-1
  110. Klemen Kocjancic, sl, en-3, de-2, hr-1, bs-1
  111. Krd, de, en-3 (bureaucrat, checkuser)
  112. Krinkle, nl, en-3, de-2
  113. KTo288, en, zh-4
  114. Kwj2772, ko, en-3
  115. Leit, de, en-3, fr-1
  116. Léna, fr, en-3, es-1
  117. Leyo, gsw, de, en-3, fr-3, es-1, la-1
  118. Lokal Profil, sv, en-4, pt-2, fr-1
  119. Lymantria, nl, en-3, de-2, fy-2, fr-1, zea-1
  120. Magog the Ogre, en, es-2 (checkuser)
  121. Mahagaja, en, de-4, fr-2, ga-2, la-2, cy-1
  122. Maire, pl, en-4, es-2, fr-2, de-2, ru-1 (global renamer)
  123. Majora, en, fr-2, it-1
  124. Marcus Cyron, de, en-2
  125. Mardetanha fa, az, en-3, tr-2, ar-1 (steward)
  126. Martin H., de, en-2
  127. Masur, pl, en-3, de-1
  128. Matanya, en, he (steward)
  129. Materialscientist, en-4, ru-4, nl-3, fr-1, es-1
  130. Mates, cs, en-3, sk-4, de-1
  131. Mattbuck, en, fr-1, la-1
  132. Maxim, ru, en-3, fr-2
  133. MBisanz, en (steward)
  134. Mentifisto, en, mt, it-2 (steward)
  135. Mhhossein, fa, en-3, ar-1
  136. Micheletb, fr, en-3, it-1, es-1
  137. Mike Peel, en, pt-2, fr-1
  138. Missvain, en
  139. Mitchazenia, en, es-2
  140. Miya, ja, en-2
  141. Moheen, bn, as-1, bpy-1, en-3, hi-1, hif-1
  142. Morgankevinj, en, es-1, la-1
  143. MPF, en, da-2, de-1, fr-1
  144. Multichill, nl, en-3, de-1, fr-1
  145. Mys 721tx, zh, en-3 (global renamer)
  146. Nagy, de, en-3, fr-2, es-1, sv-1
  147. NahidSultan, bn, en-3, bpy-1 (steward)
  148. Natuur12, nl, en-3, de-1
  149. Neozoon, de, en-4, nl-4, fr-2
  150. Nick, en, sco-2, fr-1
  151. Nilfanion, en, fr-1
  152. notafish, fr, en-4, de-3, es-2, it-2
  153. Nyttend, en, ang-1
  154. odder, pl, en-4, de-2 (bureaucrat, oversighter)
  155. Otourly, fr, en-2, it-1
  156. P199, en, nl, fr-2, tl-2, de-1
  157. Perhelion, de, en-3
  158. Pi.1415926535, en, es-2
  159. PierreSelim, fr, en-3, es-1 (oversighter)
  160. Pitke, fi, en-4, sv-2
  161. Platonides, es, en-2, fr-1
  162. Pleclown, fr, en-3
  163. Poco a poco, es, de-4, en-3, fr-2, it-2, pl-2, pt-1
  164. Podzemnik, cs, en-2
  165. Polarlys, de, en-2, fr-1, no-1
  166. Putnik, ru, en-2
  167. Pyb, fr, en-2
  168. Pymouss, fr, en-3, de-2, it-2, he-1
  169. Racconish, fr, en-4
  170. Ragesoss, en, de-1, fr-1
  171. Ra'ike, de, en-2
  172. Rama, fr, en-3, de-2, la-2, es-1, it-1, ja-1 (oversighter)
  173. Rastrojo, es, en-3, fr-2, eo-1
  174. Raymond, de, en-3, nl-1 (oversighter)
  175. Rehman, en, si-1
  176. Reinhard Kraasch, de, en-3
  177. Rimshot, de, en-4, fr-2, it-1
  178. Rodhullandemu, en, fr-1, de-1, sv-1
  179. Romaine, nl, en-3, de-2, af-1, fr-1
  180. Ronhjones, en, fr-1
  181. Rosenzweig, de, en-3, fr-1, la-1
  182. Royalbroil, en, es-1
  183. RP88, en, de-1
  184. Rudolphous, nl, en-3, de-2
  185. Ruthven, it, fr, en-4, es-4, nap-4, ca-2, de-1
  186. Sanandros, als, de, en-3, fr-1
  187. Sealle, ru, en-4, pl-2, sk-2, uk-2
  188. Shizhao, zh, en-1, ru-1
  189. Sphilbrick, en
  190. Spiritia, bg, en-3, ru-2, mk-2, de-1
  191. Sreejithk2000, ml, en-3, hi-3, ta-1, kn-1
  192. Srittau, de, en-3
  193. Steinsplitter, bar, de-4, it-3, en-1 (global renamer)
  194. Stifle, en, ga, fr-2, de-1
  195. Storkk, en, fr-3, de-2, eo-2
  196. Strakhov, es, en-2
  197. Tabercil, en
  198. Taivo, et, en-3, ru-3, de-1
  199. Tarawneh, en, ar, de-1
  200. Techman224, en
  201. Teles, pt, en-3, es-2 (steward)
  202. Themightyquill, en, fr-2, de-1, hu-1
  203. Thibaut120094, fr, en-2, ja-2
  204. Thuresson, sv, en-3, no-2
  205. Trijnstel, nl, en-4, de-1, fr-1 (checkuser, steward)
  206. Túrelio, de, en-3, es-1
  207. VIGNERON, fr, de-2, en-2, zh-1
  208. Waldir, pt, en-3
  209. Wdwd, de, en-2
  210. Well-Informed Optimist, ru, uk-4, en-3
  211. Whym, ja, en-2
  212. Wikitanvir, bn, en-3, as-2, bpy-1
  213. Wutsje, fy, nl, en-3, de-2, fr-1
  214. Wuzur, de, en-3
  215. wvk, de, en-4, fa-3, fr-2
  216. Yann, fr, en-4, hi-2, gu-1
  217. Yarl, pl, en-2, de-1, ru-1
  218. Yasu, ja, en-2, de-1
  219. Y.haruo, ja, en-1
  220. Ymblanter, ru, en-3, de-2, fr-2, nl-2, it-1, es-1
  221. Yuval Y, he, en-3
  222. Zhuyifei1999‎, zh, en-4
  223. Zzyzx11, en, es-1, fr-1
  224. CommonsDelinker, (bot)
  225. CommonsMaintenanceBot, (bot) see request
  226. Embedded Data Bot, (bot) see request
  227. GifTagger, (bot) see request
  228. KrinkleBot, (bot) see request

The system currently recognizes 227 administrators. If that is not the last number in the list above, there is an error in the list.

Questioni tecniche

Gli amministratori sono utenti con la capacità tecnica su Wikimedia Commons per:

  • Cancellare o recuperare immagini e altri file caricati, verificare e ripristinare le versioni cancellate
  • Cancellare o recuperare pagine, verificare e ripristinare le revisioni cancellate
  • Proteggere o togliere l'eventuale protezione alle pagine, modificare quelle stesse pagine che sono state protette da altri amministratori
  • Bloccare o sbloccare le utenze degli utenti, come pure gli indirizzi IP individuai o la gamma di indirizzi IP
  • Modificare il spazio nome
  • Rinominare i file
  • Rimuovere gruppi di utenti (requests for rights)
  • Configurare campagne per il caricamento con procedura guidata
  • Cancellare e ripristinare voci come pure revisionare il registro specifico di una pagina
  • Importare pagine da altre wiki
  • Unire la cronologia delle pagine
  • Modificare i filtri di abuso
  • Non creare reindirizzamenti di pagine quando queste devono essere spostate e modificate dal nome di originale
  • Ignorare i controlli di spoofing e il titolo, o il nome utente dalla blacklist
  • Inviare un messaggio a più utenti e contemporaneamente (massmessage)
  • Utilizzare i limiti più alti per le interrogazioni API

Questi sono noti nella collettività come gli strumenti degli amministratori.

Ruolo nella Comunità

Gli amministratori sono membri esperti ed affidabili della comunità Commons, i quali hanno intrapreso un ulteriore lavoro di manutenzione: a essi sono stati affidati gli strumenti d'amministratore e hanno un permesso pubblico per quello che può essere un voto/consenso. Diversi amministratori hanno differenti aree di interesse e competenza, nonostante che i tipici compiti degli amministratori comprendono: la determinazione e conclusione di richieste di cancellazione; la cancellazione di violazione del copyright; il ripristino di file se dovrebbe essere necessario; la protezione nei confronti di Commons da parte di quelle utenze che dalle loro modifiche ne fanno motivo di vandalismo; lavorare sui modelli (usualmente chiamati e conosciuti dal termine templates), ed altre eventuali modifiche nelle pagine che sono protette. Naturalmente, alcuni di questi compiti potranno anche essere svolti da utenti non-amministratori.

Ci si aspetta che gli amministratori comprendano gli scopi di questo progetto, e siano preparati a lavorare costruttivamente con gli altri per questi fini. Gli amministratori dovrebbero inoltre comprendere e seguire le politiche di Commons, e dove appropriato rispettare la collegialità della comunità.

Oltre al ruolo che richiede l'uso degli strumenti di amministrazione, gli amministratori non possiedono compiti editoriali speciali in virtù della loro posizione, e nelle discussioni e votazioni pubbliche i loro contributi sono considerati allo stesso modo di un normale utente. Naturalmente alcuni amministratori hanno più influenza, ma ciò non deriva tanto dalla loro posizione quanto dalla fiducia che hanno guadagnato all'interno della comunità.

Suggerimenti per gli amministratori

Leggi Commons:Guide to adminship.

Rimozione dei privilegi di amministratore

Secondo la de-admin policy, i privilegi di amministratore possono essere revocati per inattività o uso errato degli strumenti.

Richiesta per diventare amministratore

Tutti i potenziali amministratori devono passare attraverso questo processo e sottoporsi a una RFA, inclus tutti gli ex-amministratori che vorrebbero ritornare in ruolo.

Come prima cosa bisogna andare sulla pagina Amministratori/Howto e leggere le informazioni che sono riportate lì. Dopodiché si potrà tornare qui per effettuare la vostra richiesta nella sezione sottostante.

  • Dopo aver fatto click sul pulsante apposito e creare una sottopagina, copia il link nella sottopagina creata, per esempio "Commons:Administrators/Requests/Username", modifica Commons:Administrators/Requests ed incollalo in testa alla sezione, poi inseriscile fra doppia parentesi graffa (es. {{Commons:Administrators/Requests/Username}} ) per includerla.
  • Se un altro utente ti ha candidato, accetta la candidatura scrivendo "Accetto" o qualcosa di simile e firma sotto. La sottopagina dovrà sempre essere inclusa.
Usa il riquadro qui sotto, sostituendo Username col tuo nome utente:


Votazione

Qualsiasi utente registrato può votare, ma in certi casi potrebbero non essere presi in conto gli utenti con poche o nessuna modifica previa. È preferibile dare le ragioni sia per i voti Symbol support vote.svg Support che Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose, poiché ciò aiuta il burocrate che dovrà chiudere la candidatura e prendere una decisione. Gli argomenti hanno maggior peso dei semplici voti, specialmente se sono apportare prove a supporto della propria opinione.

Normalmente l'approvazione del candidato necessita del 75% dei voti a favore, con un minimo di 8 voti favorevoli. Non vengono contati voti da utenti non registrati. In ogni modo, il burocrate che chiude la candidatura userà il suo giudizio per valutare il consenso della comunità; la decisione potrebbe quindi non basarsi sul semplice valore numerico.

I voti Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral sono commenti che non vengono contati nel totale dei voti per il calcolo della percentuale. Sono però commenti che fanno parte della decisione ed il burocrate che chiuderà la procedura ne terrà conto.

Purge the cache Usa il collegamento qui sotto per modificare la pagina in inclusione.

Requests for adminship

When complete, pages listed here should be archived to Commons:Administrators/Archive.

  • Please read Commons:Administrators before voting here. Any logged in user may vote although those who have few or no previous edits may not be fully counted.

Gbawden

Vote

Gbawden (talk · contributions · deleted user contributions · recent activity · logs · block log · global contribs · SULinfo)

Scheduled to end: 08:40, (UTC)

Today I would like to introduce Gbawden to become an administrator for Commons. They have over 189,000+ edits in total, with 167,000+ live and 22,000+ deleted. They are a file mover, patroller, and rollbacker. They are experienced with DR, CSD, and assist in categorization work. With their familiarity of how things work here, they could help clear the admin backlogs. Thanks again! -- 1989 (talk) 08:40, 21 January 2019 (UTC)

Acceptance of Nomination

I accept the nomination and thank User:1989 for noticing me and nominating me. At the outset I need to mention that my early years on Commons I didn't have the appreciation for the policies and guidelines that I do now and during that time I did upload images that I believed should be PD but weren't. I am now a lot wiser and have realised the error of my ways. Gbawden (talk) 08:50, 21 January 2019 (UTC)

Votes

Comments

Elisfkc

Vote

Elisfkc (talk · contributions · deleted user contributions · recent activity · logs · block log · global contribs · SULinfo)

Scheduled to end: 01:11, (UTC)

Today I would like to introduce Elisfkc to become the next Commons administrator. They have over 700,000+ edits in total, with 670,000+ live and 39,000+ deleted. They obtain the license reviewer, file mover, and rollbacker rights. They are thoroughly experienced with CSD and DR, and with their knowledge, they could help the admin backlogs. Thanks for your time and I hope you agree! 1989 (talk) 01:11, 17 January 2019 (UTC)

Acceptance of Nomination I humbly expect the nomination to be an administrator. --Elisfkc (talk) 01:44, 17 January 2019 (UTC)

Votes

@Elcobbola: small world is a mistake, Gringotts can be argued that it is part of the building. Also, besides Gringotts, they are over a year old, and I've learned a lot in the time since. The Cincy vs. Crew photos offer different versions so that users can chose which one fits what they want best. --Elisfkc (talk) 23:27, 23 January 2019 (UTC)
That actually couldn't be argued, no. In regards to copyright, "The term 'building' means structures that are habitable by humans", which Gringotts is unambiguously not. And even if it were, you seem entirely unfamiliar with the conceptual separability doctrine. It's troubling to see such an uninformed response, and it rather supports my concern. One also wonders why you've not used your purported knowledge to review your uploads an nominate the "mistake[s]" for deletion. Эlcobbola talk 00:23, 24 January 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Per Elcobbola, sorry. --A.Savin 06:54, 22 January 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose, good knowledge of copyright issues still looks unconvincing, and the habit of working with large volumes of files can lead to a lack of attention to details. Moreover, the applicant seemed to have lost interest in the request - it was somewhat unusual that other users answered questions for them. Sealle (talk) 08:15, 22 January 2019 (UTC)
@Sealle: Still interested, just busy. --Elisfkc (talk) 23:27, 23 January 2019 (UTC)
A word before is worth two after. Sealle (talk) 01:31, 24 January 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose, echoing Elcobbola and Sealle. I certainly appreciate the work Elisfkc has put into the project, but the sheer number of copyright issues concerns me, as does the silence in a lesser way. The heart in me wants to chalk up the copyright problems as an artefact of uploading so many files, but the logic side says that, if so many copyright issues are coming up, little discrimination is being applied to what is being uploaded. Huntster (t @ c) 19:14, 22 January 2019 (UTC)
  • GA candidate.svg Weak support (which, in the end, counts as support, but I wanted to acknowledge the candidate is not completely perfect.. then again who is) Generally appears to be friendly. Missing some copyvios isn't nearly as much of a problem as deleting images that aren't copyvios, and I see no evidence of that currently. Also, Elisfkc actively contributes with uploads (not a user who is merely active producing DRs), which I find important as it allows them to understand the point of view of "the other side". - Alexis Jazz ping plz 06:23, 24 January 2019 (UTC)

Comments

@Лушников Владимир Александрович: Many of the uploads that are found to be license laundering cases (I'm not sure about every single one of them) I had uploaded because they were uploaded using the wrong format or something else similar from Flickr, causing them to end up in Category:Flickr images needing human review. I try my best to see if the files are license laundering, but unfortunately I cannot catch every single one. One of my biggest initiatives in the past was going through this category and many of its subcategories and fixing the files in them. Unfortunately, I took a Wikibreak a couple of months ago and the categories got full again. --Elisfkc (talk) 02:14, 19 January 2019 (UTC)
And what about this particular upload: File:Galatea lakes exploring (36087121320)-video.webm? --Лушников Владимир Александрович (talk) 12:25, 20 January 2019 (UTC)
@Лушников Владимир Александрович: They made a mistake adding the {{licensereview}} instead of {{flickrreview}}, causing it to be part of a backlog that isn't monitored by a bot. The file wasn't reviewed in nearly a year, and the recently promoted LR just got to the file. During that duration, the author could of changed the license. @Hedwig in Washington: Could you verify this? -- 1989 (talk) 12:59, 20 January 2019 (UTC)
@Herbythyme, Jeff G.: They responded to your concerns. Reconsideration? – 1989 (talk) 02:24, 19 January 2019 (UTC)

Service: Deleted file:

=={{int:filedesc}}==
{{Information
|description=A spot of video with the wrong lens at Galatea lakes.
|date=2017-08-10
|source=[https://www.flickr.com/photos/davebloggs007/36087121320/ Galatea lakes exploring - Flickr]
|author=[https://www.flickr.com/photos/davebloggs007/ Thank you for visiting my page]
|permission=
|other_versions=
|other_fields=
}}

=={{int:license-header}}==
{{cc-by-2.0|Thank you for visiting my page}}
{{LicenseReview}}
[[Category:Alberta images by Artix Kreiger]]
[[Category:Nature of Alberta]][[Category:Images by davebloggs007]]

[[Category:WebM videos]]
[[Category:Uploaded with video2commons]]

It's possible that the license changed. @Zhuyifei1999: Does video2commons check the license at the time of upload? --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 17:54, 20 January 2019 (UTC)

Yes, but it is not enforced, only as a prefilled file description page that can be altered before upload. It is less trustworthy than UW's Flickr review. --Zhuyifei1999 (talk) 18:35, 20 January 2019 (UTC)
Thx! AFAIK the Flickr user ist LTA Wyntersteppe, aka Artix Kreiger,.... I assume that the file has been correctly uploaded and the license changed later because of anger that he was found out. Again. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 09:12, 21 January 2019 (UTC)

Ijon

Vote

Ijon (talk · contributions · deleted user contributions · recent activity · logs · block log · global contribs · SULinfo)

Scheduled to end: 15:13, (UTC)

I am a longtime Wikimedian, and have been an OTRS agent for a couple of years. In my OTRS work on the (severely backlogged) Hebrew queue, I sometimes run across files that have already been deleted (due to said OTRS backlog), and it would be useful if I could undelete the files as I process the OTRS permission. This is the immediate reason making me request adminship right now, but of course, I will be helping out as an admin in any other way I can. Ijon (talk) 15:13, 16 January 2019 (UTC)

Votes

  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Barely active, no CSD experience, etc. I’d be more active here if you want the bit. There’s more to it than OTRS. -- 1989 (talk) 17:09, 16 January 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 17:19, 16 January 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Being an OTRS volunteer is not sufficient. Commons benefits from well rounded administrators, with an active interest in content related issues and solid contributions on this project. Knowing you from other contexts, you are clearly experienced and trusted, but the nomination needs a better explanation of your relevant activities within this community and how that would continue. -- (talk) 18:21, 16 January 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per above. Sorry. The idea isn't bad, but will never be accepted here. Commons is too complicated. Cheers! C(_) --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 20:12, 16 January 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support I understand the concerns about inactivity here on Commons but Ijon is a vast and experienced user with a sound knowledge of copyright policies. Knowledge of copyright precede activity and I'll be very reluctant to oppose people like Ijon who has a grasp knowledge of copyright. OTRS works are thankless and Commons benefit from activities of users like Ijon at OTRS. Many of these users works at OTRS focus primarily on request about images uploaded to Commons, that they are not workaholic on Commons Wiki does not mean they don't contribute to this project. In general, I trust Ijon and I believe they will be net positive to this project. Regards. T Cells (talk · contribs · email) 16:31, 18 January 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral per Hedwig in Washington. Idea is good, but ofcourse you also need to know a bit about our project and it's rules. Marcus Cyron (talk) 02:42, 19 January 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support I do not really see a problem with having admins that are not well rounded but excel in a few areas.--Cabeza2000 (talk) 11:19, 20 January 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral I'm not a priori against, and Ijon has experience with copyright releases. However a little more of dealing with Commons usual admin's work would be appreciated from a lot of users here. I invite you to participate more to Commons talks and procedures, and reapply later on. --Ruthven (msg) 10:28, 21 January 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose - Per COM:A, "Administrators are experienced and trusted members of the Commons community." Edits on the Commons are too few for this experience and trust on Commons. Indeed, for example, This sort of upload is completely unacceptable and the classic example of just slapping PD-Old on an old looking image with no appropriate thought or evidence (e.g., uses a pma tag, despite source giving, at best, (vague) date of creation and claims author as "unknown" merely because this particular source fails to attribute an author.) This seems to demonstrate an unawareness of the difference between date of author death and date of creation, a lack of diligence (claiming "unknown" because it is unknown to them/us as opposed to researching to determine whether unknown to anyone) and, frankly, carelessness. Эlcobbola talk 12:26, 21 January 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral per Ruthven.   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 13:04, 21 January 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support. -- Geagea (talk) 16:02, 21 January 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per above. Sealle (talk) 08:17, 22 January 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support I see no reason to distrust Ijon and have seen evidence of knowledge of copyright and actions that indicate he would readily learn and defer to community norms were necessary. Though I understand the calls for more commons activity before application, I see no reason to deny the application given his vast experience with the Wikimedia communities as a whole and Commons in specific. If this does fail, I do hope Ijon persists with the community and reapplies . Chico Venancio (talk) 15:07, 22 January 2019 (UTC)

Comments

  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment - I don't think the experience in e.g. DR's is sufficient at the moment. Are you aware that you can always request temporary undeletion at COM:UDR to handle a ticket? Jcb (talk) 17:20, 16 January 2019 (UTC)
    Sure. It would just help me process more tickets if I could undelete myself. I did not realize participation at CSD was considered mandatory for adminship (it does not appear to be required in the Howto page linked from the instructions). If it is indeed mandatory, I definitely don't qualify. If it is only desired as a proxy to assessing one's understanding of copyright, I think that can be established by other aspects of my overall contribution, including e.g. this talk, contributed using my work account. Ijon (talk) 18:12, 16 January 2019 (UTC)
    The problem is imho your activety level as well, you have 3,595 (Including VFC, POTY, ...) total edits here. Not active enoigh imho. --Steinsplitter (talk) 18:27, 16 January 2019 (UTC)
    CSD experience is to determine you understand COM:L, COM:DW, etc. No, it’s not mandatory (but a few here and there would be nice). You could do a lot of sucessful DRs and still receive the bit, as you have the knowledge to close them. However, you haven’t been involved in the process a lot (8 DRs – very low number), so I can’t determine you’ll be active in clearing the DR backlogs if you were to receive the bit. Your main purpose is solely OTRS, and that’s an issue. -- 1989 (talk) 18:32, 16 January 2019 (UTC)
    @Ijon: If you need to reduce the backlog of he queues, feel free to ping me to temporary undelete files (here or on OTRS wiki). Generally, having one (or more) supporting admins, helps the work a lot. --Ruthven (msg) 10:25, 21 January 2019 (UTC)
  • Ijon is experienced and knowledgeable about Wikimedia Commons and its guidelines, probably also about its general customs, but I'm not sufficiently aware of his track record in sysop or sysop-like activities here or on other wikis to have a definite opinion. Nemo 20:14, 16 January 2019 (UTC)

Requests for bureaucratship

When complete, pages listed here should be archived to Commons:Bureaucrats/Archive.

  • Please read Commons:Bureaucrats before posting or voting here. Any logged in user may vote although those who have few or no previous edits may not be fully counted.

No current requests.

Requests for CheckUser rights

When complete, pages listed here should be archived to Commons:Checkusers/Archive.

  • Please read Commons:Checkusers before posting or voting here. Any logged in user may vote although those who have few or no previous edits may not be fully counted.

No current requests.

Requests for Oversight rights

When complete, pages listed here should be archived to Commons:Oversighters/Archive.

  • Please read Commons:Oversighters before voting here. Any logged in user may vote, although those who have few or no previous edits may not be fully counted.

No current requests.

Archivio

Le precedenti candidature ad amministratore si trovano in Archivio.

Pagine correlate