User talk:Amada44/Archive 1

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search
Archive This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.
Archive 1 Archive 2 →
Archive This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

FP promotion

Longhorn Beetle Whitespotted Sawyer USA.jpg
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image Image:Longhorn Beetle Whitespotted Sawyer USA.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Longhorn Beetle Whitespotted Sawyer USA.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

Cscr-featured.svg

Alvesgaspar 11:39, 21 December 2006 (UTC)

I cannot convert images to SVG

Despite your tagging to my uploaded Taiwanese road signs, I am unable to convert images to SVG, nor can I save images as SVG. I already replaced 187 GIFs with PNGs, but I cannot bother replacing them again.--Jusjih 12:10, 28 December 2006 (UTC)

How many SVGs have you made? How did you convert? While the new SVG that you show me is clearer, I cannot do it myself, so unless you know someone willing to convert, please have him/her contact me. Otherwise, tagging convertions to SVG is NOT okay to me while I still have hundreds of images to upload. You cannot read Chinese and I cannot upload SVGs mean that for now, I can only continue uploading PNGs or wait until my computer is capable of supporting SVGs. That will not happen within three months.--Jusjih 14:22, 30 December 2006 (UTC)
Or I can put off further uploading for three months until I can ascertain whether my computer supports SVG or not. If not, I will continue uploading the rest in PNG, though anyone capable may offer to convert to SVG. Now I am deleting my own GIF duplicates. After I finish uploading Taiwanese road signs and markings, I plan to upload Macanese and American road signs, which are also in the public domain.--Jusjih 16:51, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
Are Illustrator and Inkscape different browsers? I usually use Mozilla FireFox and rarely Internet Explorer.--Jusjih 18:14, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
I don't know how to download it, so I am holding off further uploading of Taiwanese signs until late March 2007. If I eventually know how to save PDF images as SVG, I will make my own Taiwanese sign replacements. Once saved as SVG, I need not make further conversions, right?--Jusjih 16:53, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
I now have Inkscape, but as a new user, I do not fully know how to use it. Please see my recently uploaded Image:TW-Art135.2.svg. I would like to have it replace Image:TW-Art135.2.png, but no good yet.--Jusjih 15:57, 25 April 2007 (UTC)

Few questions from a newbie

I'm the author of the messy svg http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Image:DBD-EnergyLevels.svg that you mercifully correct. If you don't mind I want to ask few questions about it:

1.- In the new svg archive in the xml-tree everything are converted in path objects. It's necessary that change to properly render the image?

2.- If it's necessary and if you use inkscape, how do you do that?

Thanks for reading (I'm apologize for my english)

Lector 13 23:51, 29 December 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for your help.

Lector 13 13:00, 10 January 2007 (UTC)

Convert to SVG

Weit über 90 % der deutschen Wappen sind nicht in svg. Wenn jemand diese Wappen zu SVG konvertieren möchte, kann er dies gerne tun. Aber dieser klobige Baustein in tausenden Bildbeschreibungsseiten vergeudet Zeit und beschleunigt sicher nicht die Umwandlung zu svg. Zudem gibt es teilweise noch Streit, ob SVG wirklich das bessere Format ist, da es noch längst nicht so etabliert ist wie png.--Borheinsieg 11:38, 30 December 2006 (UTC)

Es sind sogar weit über 90% der derzeit hochgeladenen ca. 9.000 dt. Wappen nicht im svg-Format. Die Umstellung wird Jahre dauern und auch ich frage mich ernsthaft, was die Umstellung der nie größer als 140px angezeigten Wappenbilder auf svg dem Leser überhaupt bringen soll. Geograv 20:02, 30 December 2006 (UTC)
Hi! Das scheint wieder mal ein thema zu sein bei dem es in der wikimedia keinen Konsens gibt ;) egal. Es ist meine persönliche Überzeugung, dass das svg ein geniales format ist. Klein, Verlustfrei, Skalierbar. Natürlich wird es lange dauern bis die Wappen alle convertiet sind. Vielleicht werden auch nie alle konvertiert. Ich bin der Meinung, dass das Tag keinem was Schadet und die Umwandlung doch beschleunigt. So kann man durch die convert to svg gallerie browsen und wenn man was nettes sieht, es konvertieren. Amada44 09:37, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
Nein, die sinnbefreite Kategorienflut erreicht hier fast schon en-wp-Züge. Kategorien sollen das Dargestellte einordnen, nicht die Art und Weise der Darstellung. Es ist so, als würden Text-Artikel nach Autoren, Anzahl der darin enthaltenen Listen oder Artikel mit nur vier Bildern kategorisiert werden. Und was man mir mal erklären müsste: wenn ein svg-Format ein png-Format ersetzt, erscheinen per Vorlage gleich drei (!) Kategorien (Category:Superseded Category:SupersededSVG und Category:Vector version available). Welchen Sinn hat denn das? Sollte es nur Spielerei sein, schmeiße ich die Vorlage raus - ganz einfach. gruss Geograv 00:50, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
Hi! du hast recht, das sind etwas viel kategorien! und der sinn dahinter ist mir auch nicht ganz klar! was ich als wichtig empfinde ist, dass man am bitmap bild sieht, dass ein vector bild verfügbar ist. drum mache ich den tag rein wenn das der fall ist. und für mich ist es keine spielerei denn vector formate haben einen riesen vorteil gegenüber bitmaps!! man kann es zB runterladen, in ein eps umwandeln und direkt in einem layout programm wie InDesign oder XPress platzieren und in beliebiger grösse drucken! das finde ich geil als ehemaliger grafiker *smile* und das macht auch einen grossen teil meiner arbeit hier aus. ich stöbere in dieser Kategorie: Category:Images_that_should_use_vector_graphics und wenn mir ein Bild gefällt, mache ich ein SVG draus. Drum tagge ich auch viele der neuen Bilder mit Convert to SVG damit sie in diese Kategorie kommen bis sie jemand konvertiert hat. SVG hat noch andere Vorteile. Weil die einzelnen Objekte im Bild nicht auf eine ebene reduziert werden wie bei PNG kann man schnell ein bild aufmachen und korrigieren wenn man zB sieht, dass da was nicht perfekt stimmt. das ist in einem bitmap sehr viel aufwendiger! Ich hoffe, dass du jetzt mich ein bisschen besser verstehst warum ich bilder tagge und Konvertiere! Wenn du einen Vorschlag hast wie das ginge ohne den vielen zusätzlichen Kategorien bin ich gerne offen für vorschläge! --Amada44 09:12, 21 January 2007 (UTC)

Untagged images -

Be sure to notify the uploader if you tag an image! -- Rüdiger Wölk 19:39, 10 January 2007 (UTC)

Hi! which tags do you mean? Amada44 20:25, 11 January 2007 (UTC)

Image:Thornapple TIGER Irving dam area map3c.PNG

Hi. w:TIGER provides .gif files. Converting to .svg is beyond my time/ability/interest, unfortunately. I dumped 2 hours into this already, and I'm not that good with inkscape. If someone else wants to take a crack at it, that would be cool! ++Lar: t/c 01:48, 16 January 2007 (UTC)

Hi! yea sure! I am just tagging the image and i hope you don't mind! By tagging the image I am not asking you to to it. The only thing it says in my opinion is: this image would be better of in SVG. Anybody with spare time can do it. I hope, thats okay with you and that you dont mind the tag :) (cause some people do,... like this person here:[[1]]) --Amada44 08:04, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
(refactored to stay threaded) OK. Works for me. I may even actually do it someday, who knows. I need a good svg map in standard color and style to crib from I think. But as long as this tag doesn't carry the connotation that there is a particular expectation that it will get done it's fine by me. And yes, that person overreacted. ++Lar: t/c 15:26, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
Hi! I did an SVG of the map. Thornapple TIGER Irving dam area map3c.svg. What do you think? Please feel free to edit the description. In fact I would be happy if you did. any suggestions? changes? Ach, yes. plz check spelling of the roads!!! greetings Amada! --Amada44 22:19, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
Wow! That is gorgeous work! I will update the images that use it in their description. thanks! ++Lar: t/c 19:31, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
A TINY nit, it's McCann Road, not McConn Road ... (A instead of O) I'll fix it if the letters are still text and I can coerce Inkscape into doing it... Want a harder one? :) how about this one: Image:US Army Transport museum context map.png (that would be a lot to ask of anyone!!!) Thanks again, that is an awesome piece of work.++Lar: t/c 19:35, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
Hi. I redid the information box on the svg image... please take a look and see if you are happy. Then I went into Inkscape and changed the McConn Rd. text to McCann Rd.... the file got a K bigger when I uploaded but it did seem to take. Again, please take a look and if I flubbed, let me know. I'm not that good with Inkscape. Finally, I replaced all the usages of the PNG with the SVG... Again, thanks so MUCH for doing this, your image is much nicer and really adds a lot! ++Lar: t/c 02:58, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
Hi! yep, the description page looks allot better :) and the text correction is also fine. I had a look at this image: Image:US Army Transport museum context map.png. problematic is the small map in the map as I can hardly recognize the details there and,... it is quite a lot of work *smile* Lets see if I get round to doing that. I am really happy, that you like the other map!! --Amada44 08:54, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
Smile. I was mostly pulling your leg about doing that, that small map would be monstrous to do as an SVG unless there was an automatic edge detector. I tried inkscapes but I either wasn't very smart or it wasn't very good as all it did was hang my machine. Thanks again for all your help! ++Lar: t/c 20:36, 14 February 2007 (UTC)

Image:POL gmina Małkinia Górna COA.svg

Bezüglich w:de:Benutzer Diskussion:32X#Image:POL gmina Małkinia Górna COA.svg: Danke. --32X 15:47, 16 January 2007 (UTC)

Corrupt file

I wrongly upload a corrupt version of Image:Recycling_symbol3D.svg. Because i'm register by only 2 days i can't upload the correct version, can you please upload it for me? [2] This is the correct file. Thanks =) --Krdan Ielalir 04:17, 17 January 2007 (UTC)

coat of arms Kanton St. Gall

Hi there! I hope that english is okay? You might want to put a bable on you usersite?[[3]]?

anyhow: I found a really messy coat of arms in SVG in the commons and I spent ages to clean it up just to find out, that it is on the sg.ch homepage as an eps. [4] (if that link doesnt work here is an other one: [5]. I have now uploaded it. Do you think we should overwrite yours? because it is the official versions and the colors are quite different than yours?

Blason-CH-Canton-Saint-Gall.svg St.Gallen-coat of arms.svg

--Amada44 20:47, 16 January 2007 (UTC)

I am going to follow up a concrete procedure for "blazon project" for Switzerland. I am at the origin of the first blazon of Switzerland in SVG in Wikipedia, because I followed the most complete directive found on wikipedia : French blazon project -> [6] FriendShip Schuss Delta-9 20:30, 17 January 2007 (UTC)

Dienstgrade

Hello Amada, answer see with here --regards K@rl 21:36, 22 January 2007 (UTC)

Image:Austria-Hungary-flag-1869-1918-naval-1786-1869-war.svg

Thank you for taking your time and effort to improve on the image, it is greatly appreciated. with kind regards Gryffindor 18:57, 23 January 2007 (UTC)

problems with SVG

Thankyou for fixing the SVG files. i do have quite some probles with svg files. and honestly do not know what i am doing wrong. more often than not, the file will not show on the image page, and or on the thumbnails. it will not show at 200px, but will do at 201px. all in all it is a pest :P. [here] you can see the options illustrator gives me to save them. if you want to sugest any change let me know. nothing would make me happier to find a way arround this problem -LadyofHats 04:27, 26 January 2007 (UTC)

Commons Picture of the Year 2006 Competition

POTY barnstar 1.svg
Interested in honouring the best of the best? Vote now in the
Commons Picture of the Year competition 2006
Voting to select the finalists is open until 14th February.

Deutsch | English | español | français | italiano | 日本語 | Nederlands | português | svenska | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

The arrangements for the Commons Picture of the Year 2006 competition are now complete, and voting will start tomorrow, Feb 1st. All Featured Pictures promoted last year are automatically nominated. As a past contributor to Featured Pictures, we invite you to participate in the competition (but please wait until tomorrow to vote).--MichaelMaggs 21:40, 31 January 2007 (UTC)

Image:Odontodactylus_scyllarus1.jpg + Image:Odontodactylus_scyllarus2.jpg

Hi, thanks for making those color corrections. May I ask what photo editing tool you used? And how you made the changes?

Jnpet 05:32, 6 February 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for the tip. Also, thanks for the offer. I think I'm going to try the editing myself first though. Have downloaded a freeware photo editing software called GIMP which looks promising. Cheers! --Jnpet 14:43, 8 February 2007 (UTC)

== Image:POTY_barnstar_1.svg ==

Hi! hey, I have seen that you have retreated from the POTY. Shame, dont know the story though so I cant comment on it.

Something related: I have cleaned up this image:POTY barnstar 1.svg to this: 50px . Main topic for me was to reduce file size and its now 44kb instead of 234kb. also the centre was quite messy and not exact. I couldn't replace the file because it is protected. Can you replace it? would be cool. thx. --Amada44 21:09, 9 February 2007 (UTC)


Thank you for your help. I'll try to replace it myself with your version. If I can't, maybe the author, LadyofHeats, can help.

I'm back to POTY, I really hope it will work out. Alvesgaspar 22:32, 9 February 2007 (UTC)

  • I tried ... and failed. The file is protected and I have no idea who did it. Maybe Bryan?
I just came across this page by chance. The image is protected because it is included in the Hauptseite where "cascading protection" is activated. --Matt314 12:06, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
siehe übrigens auch hier. Gruß, Matt314 18:38, 10 February 2007 (UTC)

Image:Islamic Feminism Symbol.svg

The image looks very nice... but... does it have any basis in reality or is it something you've made up? I've never seen it before and I am curious. gren 15:19, 10 February 2007 (UTC)

Yacht schemes

Thanks for nice words about them :) I'm still working at colours schemes - I don't think so that those "pinkies" are the best ones. I think that I'll try more neutral ones and see how will it be with them. BTW, from which part of Germany are You? Masur 18:47, 10 February 2007 (UTC)

  • aha. The Great Forest of Schwarzwald - nicee :D Currently I live in Dresden - so that's why I was askin. Masur 22:38, 10 February 2007 (UTC)

Flag borders

Sure, I know that trick. I can't recall uploading new bordered flags. Actually, I've uploaded a new version Image:Flag of Jersey (bordered).svg because the old one was incorrect. Conscious 09:51, 14 February 2007 (UTC)

FP Promotion

Hemerocallis-Taglilie.jpg
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image Image:Hemerocallis-Taglilie.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Hemerocallis-Taglilie.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

Cscr-featured.svg

--Simonizer 08:15, 22 June 2007 (UTC)


Image Tagging Image:Znak A-32.svg

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Znak A-32.svg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-3.0}} to release it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. 78.54.212.102 14:01, 21 October 2007 (UTC)

- it has PD-User. Don´t edit things like that without logging in! Thanxs! Amada44 15:12, 21 October 2007 (UTC)

Image:Airplanstb8.svg

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | magyar | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски / srpski | svenska | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


Hello!

Thank you for providing images to the Wikimedia Commons. Please keep in mind that images uploaded to the Commons should be useful to all users of Wikimedia projects. This is possible only if the images can be found by other people.

To allow others to find the images you uploaded here, the images should be in some place that can be found by navigating the category structure. This means that you should put the images into appropriate topic pages, categories, optionally galleries, or both of them (see Commons:Categories). To find good categories for your images, the CommonSense tool may help.

You can find a convenient overview of your uploaded files in this gallery.

The important point is that the images should be placed in the general structure somewhere. There are a large number of completely unsorted images on the Commons right now. If you would like to help to place some of those images where they can be found, please do!

Thank you. 78.54.214.73 06:59, 22 November 2007 (UTC)

Help needed with my SVG file!

Hi!
I'm trying to create the flag of Chabad Lubavitch in SVG format, and i have a problem with adding the text Mashiach (משיח) to the flag.
I'm hoping u might be able to help me with it.
Thanking you in advance - Oren neu dag 23:42, 19 December 2007 (UTC)

Hi! jep, I would like to help you but I am not sure what your problem is exactly. I am guessing, that you want the text not to be merged as a path? I would not recommend that, because every system renders it differently depending on what fonts are installed. I tried it and it doesn't look good: 100px
In my opinion it is perfectly okay to have the text as path! I checked your link to the original bitmap flag and I found, that the crown looks quite different from what you put into the flag. I would try and adapt it a little. It is quite difficult, because the bitmap picture is of bad quality :-( Amada44 09:19, 20 December 2007 (UTC)
Thank u for trying to solve my problem, i'm sure u'll be glad to know that it was resolved and that now it looks fine.
If u wish to know were did it went wrong for u (as i'm sure u would like to perfect your Computer graphics skills) u are welcome to ask F l a n k e r who helped me solve the problem.
All The Best of wishes and Happy Holidays - Oren neu dag 14:51, 25 December 2007 (UTC)


Image:Test File Override.svg

català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | français | galego | עברית | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | lietuvių | Nederlands | norsk bokmål | polski | português | русский | slovenčina | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


Hello, and thank your for sharing your files with Commons. There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. Please remember that all uploads require source, author and license information. Could you please resolve these problems, which are described on the page linked in above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which information may be missing. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 09:36, 20 December 2007 (UTC)

Commons Picture of the Year 2007 Competition

Hi, I'm writing to let you know that an image of yours that become a Commons Featured Picture during 2007 is now part of the 2007 Picture of the Year competition. If you have > 200 edits you are welcome to vote too. Thanks for contributing your valuable work and good luck. --miya 16:12, 13 January 2008 (UTC)

svg blütenstand

hi wie ich sehe konvertierst du gerade meine vielen bildchen. ich hab davon leider keine ahnung, wenn du mir also kurz die wichtigsten schritte dazu erklaeren kannst oder mir zeigst, wo ich das ganze nachlesen kann, dann erspar ich dir zukuenftig die arbeit. lg, --Supermartl 10:34, 26 January 2008 (UTC)

Große große Bitte!

Hallo Amada44. Könntest du Image:Anarchic a.svg zufällig nochmal in weiß machen, ich brauch's nämlich für das Portal. Beste greetings --Sargoth 13:53, 29 January 2008 (UTC)

Thank you. It looks great. --Sargoth 14:44, 29 January 2008 (UTC)

Wappen Bergenhusen

Hall Amada44, warum hast du die Schildform geändert? Diese Form ist in Schleswig-Holstein absolut unüblich und auch in der Gemeinde Bergenhusen nicht gebräuchlich. --ClausG 16:50, 19 March 2008 (UTC)

Hi Claus! also das ist so ein thema hier mit der blassionierung. es gibt mehrere diskussionen darüber zB. hier [[7]] und hier [[8]].
Ich dachte, dass ich mich mal daran halte. Mir hat mal jemand erklärt, dass die Form nicht so wichtig sei (er schien eine Ahnung zu haben,...). Ehrlich gesagt habe ich gar keine Ahnung sonder mache nur die Grafiken. Allerdings finde ich es schon wichtig, dass man sich hier einigen kann und nicht jedes Wappen in einer anderen Form zeichnet.
Ich kann aber gerne das Wappen wieder in die alte Form bringen, wenn du das Gefühl hast, dass das wichtig sei und absolut falsch so wie es jetzt ist. Amada44 14:07, 23 March 2008 (UTC)
Es ist natürlich nicht absolut falsch. Es hat viele Diskussionen um Standards gegeben. Letzlich wurde beschlossen, keinen allgemeinen Standard einzuführen. Ich halte das auch für schwierig, da in S.-H. üblicherweise eine andere Schildform als in z. B. Hessen gewählt wird. Diese "Wappen neuzeichnen"-Seite stammt letzlich von einem einzelnen Benutzer, der einen Standard massiv vortreiben wollte, aber auf wenig bis keine Gegenliebe stieß. In Sachen Schildform halte ich es bei S.-H. grundsätzlich so, dass die gerade Schildform verwendet wird, wie bei Schlothfeldt (1964) und in der Wappenrolle bzw. bei Reißmann. Bei fast jeder Kommune (Ausnahmen bilden hier eigentlich nur Kiel und Lübeck) wird die gerade halb-runde Form verwendet, wie man sich auf den Webseiten der Ämter und Gemeinden überzeugen kann. Ich weiß nicht, welche Änderungen du noch durchgeführt hast, deshalb möchte ich es nicht einfach zurücksetzen, sondern dich darum bitten. Es sei denn es sind sonst keine Änderungen vorgenommen worden. Grüße --ClausG 12:57, 24 March 2008 (UTC)
Ja, ich hab viele andere Änderungen gemacht! Ich bringe es in die alte Form zurück! Und wenn du meinst, dass fast alle die gerade Form haben,.... könnte man ja das zum quasi Standard erklären ;-) LG, Amada44 14:55, 24 March 2008 (UTC)

Mistaken colour

Hi! Thank you for your work :-) Unfortunately I had to revert your edition because it was about wrong colour. "duplicate" template says about same image or scaled down while my image used different colour (intentionally): #ee82ee is not #ff00ff (magenta). Best regards, ABX - (O mnie dyskutuj) 12:17, 23 March 2008 (UTC)

I know that it is not exactly the same color. but its not that differnent and only your userpage is using that object. I am trying to clean up all those discs with differnet sizes and shapes. It wouldnt really make much sense to upload the magenta and a very close to magenta disc in my eyes! Amada44 14:07, 23 March 2008 (UTC)


Image Tagging Image:Wappen_Itingen.svg

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Wappen_Itingen.svg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multilicense GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Lokal_Profil 18:35, 10 April 2008 (UTC)

Image:Test File Override.svg

Hi Amada, kann Image:Test File Override.svg wieder weg? ChristianBier (talk) 13:17, 15 August 2008 (UTC)

SVG

I just noticed your upload of Image:Australian Alphanumeric State Route B324.svg. I'm wondering what program you use? Bidgee (talk) 10:58, 8 November 2008 (UTC)

I tried to use Inkscape once but couldn't work out how to convert the png files to svg. No problem to convert all the png files as it will make Wikipedia happier. Bidgee (talk) 11:11, 8 November 2008 (UTC)

Image:Test File Override.svg

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 11:30, 8 November 2008 (UTC)

Tip: Categorizing images

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | magyar | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски / srpski | svenska | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


Hello, Amada44!

Tip: Add categories to your images

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

Uploadwizard-categories.png

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations"). Pro-tip: The CommonSense tool can help you find the best category for your image.

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

BotMultichillT (talk) 05:37, 12 January 2009 (UTC)

Panorama Fix

Thank you for fixing my panoramas. They were great, and I have no idea how you were able to do it, but amazing job!

Deathgleaner (talk) 18:55, 27 January 2009 (UTC)

You must have taken all-new pictures! 19:04, 27 January 2009 (UTC)

Rosebud

Hi Amada44 - many thanks for the Roesbud picture, which I have now incorporated in my video for Schumann's song Nänie:
Nänie
Many thanks
David
Dwsolo (talk) 15:38, 22 February 2009 (UTC)

Thanks

Hai brother,

i am from Tamil Nadu state of India.Thanks indeed for your lossless removal of watermark.

In future, i' ll not repeat the same mistake. (the lossless removal of watermark files 1 & 2) (த*உழவன் (talk) 13:01, 20 July 2009 (UTC))

File:Das frische am bayern.jpg

Mein Revert ist sicher nichts gegen deine Arbeit, ich würde mich sogar sehr freuen wenn du das Wasserzeichen am oberen Bildrand nochmal entfernen kannst? Der untere Teil sollte aber schon erhalten bleiben, auch wenn er jetzt seit einem Jahr abgeschnitten war ist das Bild in den Wikipedia Artikeln immer noch in Verwendung und zwar als Plakat. Der Zusammenhang war dem Erstbearbeiter scheinbar nicht so ganz klar. --Martin H. (talk) 11:55, 15 October 2009 (UTC)

done. Amada44 (talk) 12:11, 15 October 2009 (UTC)
Super, vielen Dank! --Martin H. (talk) 12:14, 15 October 2009 (UTC)

frogs

Hi Amada44

first of all, thanks for your great job of removing watermarks on lot of frogs pictures ! just on a technical point of view, how do you proceed to make it datelossless ?!... (and if you search other pictures, you may take a look here)... bye ! Poleta33 (talk) 20:54, 4 November 2009 (UTC)

Hi Poleta33
It's my plesure!
I use a PS plugin that only re-codes the parts that have changed in the image. its called Better jpeg. There is a plugin version and a standalone version.
yep, I will check that category!! Amada44 (talk) 07:44, 5 November 2009 (UTC)

Old German Roadsigns

The font I used is from the German font series part of the roadgeek-fonts. I tweeked the letters to match the example by adjusting the heights / placement.

Can you do a favour for me? Can you go through the images I made and suggest appropriate names following your naming convention? Just tag them {{rename|Historisches deutsches Verkehrszeichen XXX.svg|(naming convention)}}. --Svgalbertian (talk) 13:30, 10 November 2009 (UTC)

  • Oh, just to let you know there is a subtle difference between:
Signs without words have an indent at the top. Cheers! --Svgalbertian (talk) 13:49, 10 November 2009 (UTC)

File:Goldstumpfnasen (Rhinopithecus roxellanae).jpg

File:Goldstumpfnasen (Rhinopithecus roxellanae).jpg is not an exact duplicate of File:Goldstumpfnasen (Rhinopithecus roxellanae)-2.jpg, in fact it is the source image for that one. We only delete exact duplicates, and certainly not source images. :-) --Tony Wills (talk) 05:44, 15 November 2009 (UTC)

Hi Tony!
well, you see I was on the "removing the watermark" mission and both images were marked as watermarked. So I thought I could save some work and mark the watermarked image as duplicate. But... you are right that it was the original. Anyhow, I removed the watermark of the original and you can delete the upscaled version (if you like) as both are now without watermark they are quite identical except that this File:Goldstumpfnasen (Rhinopithecus roxellanae)-2.jpg image is an upscaled version of this one File:Goldstumpfnasen (Rhinopithecus roxellanae).jpg ;-) --Amada44 (talk) 10:54, 15 November 2009 (UTC)
Ahh, I see, thanks :-). Yes the upscaled version is more or less a duplicate, so I have marked that one. --Tony Wills (talk) 22:05, 15 November 2009 (UTC)
Archive This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.