User talk:Incnis Mrsi/Archive1

Welcome to the Commons, Incnis Mrsi!

First steps tutorial Our first steps help file and our FAQ will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy. You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold contributing here and assume good faith for the intentions of others. This is a wiki ‒ it is really easy. Getting help More information is available at the Community Portal. You may ask questions at the Help desk, Village Pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons. You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at Commons talk:Licensing.		Goodies, tips and tricks Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your Graphics abilities. All your uploads are stored in your personal Gallery Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~ Use the CommonSense tool to find good categories for your files (then other people can find them too!) To link to an image page, write this: `[[:Image:Foo.jpg]]`, it makes this: `Image:Foo.jpg` If you're copying files from another project, be sure to use the CommonsHelper Made a mistake? Did you want to rename or move a file? Simply upload the file again and mark the old one like this: `{{bad name\|Correct name}}` For more information read the full Deletion guidelines
(P.S. Would you like to provide feedback on this message?)

--SieBot 18:08, 21 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

File:1 Boğaziçi Köprüsü.jpg

català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ italiano ∙ lietuvių ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

Thank you for providing images to Wikimedia Commons. Please keep in mind that images and other files on Commons must be under a free license and should be useful to the Wikimedia projects. To allow others to use your files, some additional information must be given on the description page. Most importantly:

Describe what it is about in a short sentence. (What does the image show?)
State the author and the date of creation. If you made it yourself, say so explicitly. If it is from another Wikimedia user, link to the person's local user page. Best to use CommonsHelper.
If you did not create the file yourself, state the source you got it from.
Add a copyright tag - images without an appropriate license tag will be deleted.
Add the image to one or more gallery pages and/or appropriate categories, so it can be found by others. To find out where an image belongs, you can use CommonsSense.

If you copied the file from another wiki, please copy all information given there and say who uploaded it to that wiki. Use CommonsHelper.

It is recommended to use Template:Information to put that information on the description page. Have a look at Template talk:Information for details of the use of this template.

You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file.

Please add as much information as possible. If there is not sufficient information, the file may have to be deleted. For more information, follow the Commons:First steps guide. If you need help or have questions, please ask at the Help desk.

Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 18:57, 13 March 2009 (UTC)

SVG

Could you please use {{Convert to SVG}} instead of only "SVG". Cheers --Cwbm (commons) (talk) 08:49, 18 December 2009 (UTC)

TUSC token bafadf7e2ff576e9fab3fc1b90124cf4

TUSC account. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 19:11, 28 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:12crossings-rose-limacon-knot.svg

Unfortunately, your use of Template:En on that page completely blanked out the description (and there's no real use for such templates anyway when there's text in only one language, and no info template). Also, you added a non-existent category. Please try to exercise more care in future. AnonMoos (talk) 01:22, 29 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I mistyped the name of category. I am busy in real life for yet about 3 days, and will answer later. If you think that I made a mistake with some images, please, recategorise these images in a way which you think correct. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 19:47, 29 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:12crossings-rose-rhodonea-limacon-symmetrical-knot.svg

You also blanked out the description on that page. Please try to pay attention to what you're doing! AnonMoos (talk) 01:24, 29 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Cropping images

CSS solution for cropping image is also:

<div style="width:400px; height:300px; overflow:hidden;">
<div style="margin-top:-100px; margin-left:-400px;">
[[Image:2010-07-10-gdansk-by-RaBoe-053.JPG|800px]]
</div>
</div>

--Domen (talk) 09:30, 3 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Redirect_with_possibility.png

File:Redirect_with_possibility.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Teofilo (talk) 15:30, 30 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

bullet character

Thanks a lot for your valuable advice. I must admit that my knowledge in html is very primitive. :/. -- Rafy (talk) 14:18, 4 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Poné

Hello ! Ok, for example : File:КҮЧ СИЛА.jpg

What File:КҮЧ СИЛА.jpg is depicting ? I suppose it's the logo of something ? What is the source ? Can a website be found already publishing it ? (copyvio ?) I can't even write the text into google KYU kblpsbl3... See my problem --Lilyu (talk) 18:21, 26 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The logo of a non-notable organization, created a week ago and speedily deleted in ru.wiki. They even do not have a website, only Twitter. This really may be an own work. The language is Kyrgyz. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 17:54, 27 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much

--Lilyu (talk) 19:41, 27 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Russiæ vulgo Moscovia pars australis.jpg

I will answer briefly, because i agree with most of your observations. I know of Hot Cat, but sometimes it's easier edit directly the file, mosttly if you only move from a more to a less general category or viceversa. I remember too that some similar observations to the ones in modifying categories, are also valid for creating some new ones: normally a subcategory is created when the main category have too much files similar for characteristics. Because i saw a new unclear category ("incorrect maps" seemed to have the same means of "maps that requires adjustements") with a file that doesn't seems incorrect, but only an "old map" i moved it. Now i can see that you probaly create it because of highlighting a non existent channel (fossa kamouz), and probly that's the goal of a category like this. Cheers.Ciaurlec (talk) 22:36, 27 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I noted that you yet corrected the categorisation for the italy maps... tahnks a lot!Ciaurlec (talk) 22:42, 27 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:CO2-variations hg.svg

thank you very much for refurbishing this important graf - Hannes Grobe (talk) 05:52, 24 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Worst images

Commons:Worst images has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this project page, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Rd232 (talk) 12:59, 24 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Все проблемы

Вы писали: «Не надо мешать все проблемы администратирования Викисклада в одну большую кучу». Будьте добры, просветите меня хотя бы кратко, какие проблемы есть? Я вижу две: неудаление копивио и невольная предвзятость англоязычных участников (то есть: они не могут разбираться в вопросах на других языках). Всё остальное мне кажется чисто технологическим мелочами.--PereslavlFoto (talk) 19:16, 25 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Два года назад самому Джимбо Уэйлсу устроили чудовищную обструкцию по поводу беззаконного удаления изображений. Не какому-нибудь парню с метлой. Сейчас косячно удаляют изображения, но сообщество Викисклада молчит. А что какая-то отрава вовремя не убирается, так кто Вам мешает взять метлу в руки самому и убрать? Тут же не рувикипедия чтобы толпы ханжей повылезли на ЗСА и мстили за одно-другое-третье-четвёртое. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 20:20, 25 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  - Метлу мне мешают взять две причины. Во-первых, участник A.Savin убеждён, что я вики-карьерист и действую на складе ради того, чтобы пробраться в администраторы. Для такого тезиса я не могу придумать рассудочный контр-аргумент, и единственное, чем могу отрицать это убеждение — так это не карьеризмом. Во-вторых, тут есть поправка-22: если я буду администратор, я не смогу подводить итоги по своим номинациям, то есть либо итоги по чужим номинациям (что будет и без меня), либо номинации без итогов (что могу теперь). Так что я не вполне понимаю, для какой конкретной общественно-полезной деятельности мне браться за это. Да и времени у меня мало... Но буду рад подсказке.--PereslavlFoto (talk) 20:58, 25 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
    - Подведение итогов по каким бы то ни было номинациям уменьшит бэклог, т.е. ускорит процесс подведения итогов по всем номинациям. А насчёт A.Savin я так и не понял, чем же особенно важно мнение изгнанного из de.wiki участника. Если всяко бояться, что кто-то посчитает тебя кем-то, так ничего сделать невозможно. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 21:35, 25 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
      - Про этику нельзя рассуждать, у разных участников она разная, так что умолкаю. А для конструктивных административных поступков — надо иметь другую психологию: надо иметь интерес к тому, чтобы разбираться в проблемах и искать им пути решения. И ещё надо иметь время на это, увы.--PereslavlFoto (talk) 07:47, 26 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

- - «Косячности» мало по сравнению с полезным результатом. Давайте вернёмся к случаю, о котором вы трубили. Если была номинация и за 1 месяц загрузивший участник ничего не возразил, значит, возражать нечего и можно удалять не глядя. Так я думаю. Отсюда получается, что Фастили прав.--PereslavlFoto (talk) 20:58, 25 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
    - См. ниже. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 21:35, 25 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
      - Про Golart не помню, так что вернусь к Фастили. На мой взгляд, дело не в нём самом, а в пустом обсуждении запроса к удалению. Кабы там были реплики, объясняющие ситуацию с правами — тот же Фастили закрыл бы заявку с «keep». А видя, что никто не защищает картинку, он решил, что защитить её нельзя.--PereslavlFoto (talk) 07:47, 26 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

- - Другие-то проблемы есть?--PereslavlFoto (talk) 20:58, 25 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
    - Мало хороших годных участников, причём тех кто реально работает. И огромные завалы оформленных как попало описаний (включая категоризацию). Incnis Mrsi (talk) 21:35, 25 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
      - Идеальное описание можно дать только в сотрудничестве с автором. Если вы покажете мне конкретные примеры, я могу взяться и что-то покатегоризировать, что-то описать. Не ахти как много, но всё-таки полегче станет. Однако на постоянной основе таким заниматься нельзя — просто потому, что никто лучше автора не знает, что там снято.--PereslavlFoto (talk) 07:47, 26 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

NB: Вы используете игру слов hastily — Fastily. Это нехорошо, потому что сам участник Фастили может обидеться. Имейте в виду, пожалуйста. И кстати, слово «Incnis Mrsi» — это на каком языке? Оно что-то значит? Спасибо.--PereslavlFoto (talk) 19:16, 25 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Ну допустим. Только что теперь поделаешь, когда обсуждение уже идёт? Тут я уже отвечал о моём нике. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 20:20, 25 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  - Спасибо за ссылку; там о произношении, а не о значении.--PereslavlFoto (talk) 20:58, 25 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
    - По сути, сокращение от имени-фамилии. В 2009-м об этом, должно быть, ещё помнили. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 21:35, 25 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

АП

Вы писали: «Why should one prove that an image is not copyrighted?» Потому что закон указывает, что все произведения are copyrighted. Это не нужно доказывать, это умолчание. А вот отличие от умолчания надо подтверждать, так как законы карают за самовольное отличие от этого умолчания. Собственно, вокруг этого и вертится вопрос FOP. Закон охраняет права архитектора, а если я пожелаю использовать фотоснимок его произведения, я должен не просто уговорить архитектора дать разрешение, но и доказать это разрешение. Многие архитекторы не чинят препятствий и не желают ограничивать обращение фотоснимков своих построек, однако это не следует из документов, и потому нужно идти к таким архитекторам и писать разрешения.--PereslavlFoto (talk) 19:35, 25 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Я стараюсь не вмешиваться в конфликты касательно сложных произведений, т.к. не особо разбираюсь в сроках истечения, свободах панорамы и подобных материях. Но в случае с ‎File:ОХС.jpg ситуация была ясна как день: рисунок был накорябан ручкой на бумаге и засунут в сканер — можно было даже различить характерное вдавливание. Это был просто рисунок, чёрт подери! Причём мои пометки в описании файла, содержавшие эту информацию, ещё и подвергались саботажу со стороны участников Philosopher (talk · contribs) и 84user (talk · contribs). Остальные картинки из Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Golart, насколько я помню, были или сосканированы из книг (что даёт основание к удалению по линии а/п), или тривиальны (что даёт основание к удалению по бесполезности). Придирка по поводу «все произведения are copyrighted» мне кажется неуместной: и я, и Fastily оба имели в виду возможную кражу чужого копирайта уч-ком Golart, тут не было недопонимания. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 20:20, 25 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  - Ну, это не совсем саботаж . В аналогичной ситуации меня стали прямо-таки травить в обсуждениях . А тут в обсуждении удаления я вижу ваше точное и чёткое слово: «likely». Почему-то сам Golart не заявил в обсуждении, что картинка нарисована им же, и не подтвердил чистоту прав. Видимо, он не против удаления, и для него это вовсе не likely.--PereslavlFoto (talk) 21:04, 25 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
    - В какой аналогичной ситуации? С хамским удалением правок я до того встречался только в разделах где права патруля или сисопа понараздавали кому попало, а тут пакостит сисоп англовикипедии, вроде бы респектабельного проекта. Для меня это был шок. А что до Golart, то полагаю, что ему лениво было оправдываться. Остаюсь при своём мнении и, при желании, могу отправиться в рувику и попытаться этот вопрос выяснить у него самого. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 21:35, 25 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
      - Я сделал подробное и ясное описание к фотографии. Другой участник вырезал его и дал короткое и неясное. Попытки вернуть подробное и понятное — привели к тому, что меня стали травить. Обсуждения на форуме подстегнули травлю. Я помучался и бросил затею. Если желаете подробности, могу расписать , но они тоскливые, честное слово.--PereslavlFoto (talk) 07:42, 26 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
        Сам отыщу по истории правок, датам и Special:Whatlinkshere. Знать бы только, в котором файле это случилось. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 08:54, 26 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
        File:Terlezky-2010-doloi.jpg --PereslavlFoto (talk) 09:32, 26 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

	Hello, Incnis Mrsi. You have new messages at Materialscientist's talk page. You may remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template. asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ English ∙ español ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ हिन्दी ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ქართული ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ Tagalog ∙ Türkçe ∙ 简体中文 ∙ 繁體中文 ∙ +/−

Please remain calm and collegial

català ∙ čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ עברית ∙ +/−

It is important to keep a cool head, especially when responding to comments against you or your edits. Personal attacks and disruptive comments only escalate a situation; please keep calm and remember that action can be taken against other parties if necessary. Please try to remain civil with your comments. Thanks!

While you are free to oppose a rfa or rfcu, such ad hominem claims clearly constitute an inacceptable personal attack. Túrelio (talk) 09:06, 19 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

LoL. Certain people, including sysops, sometimes engage in "ad hominem claims" (unlike my case, in purely content-related disputes) and breaches of WP:AGF, but nobody cares about it. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 09:46, 19 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

There's nothing funny about your inappropriate comments/personal attack at Commons:Checkusers/Requests/Trijnstel. I asked her for a second opinion in regard to your technical question at Commons:Administrators/Requests/January, and I also asked 99of9 for a second opinion. One admin asking other admins for their opinions is a common practice. 99of9 basically disagreed with me and supported your asking of the question, and I don't see any objections to him or his comment on your part. As a matter of fact, I see something completely different in your response to the last question at the bottom of the January RFA. Your comment "But the enthusiasm of supporters, apparently baseless, is suspicious." at Commons:Administrators/Requests/Lobo was a borderline personal attack as well, and was atleast inappropriate and inaccurate. Your comment above is also groundless by the way. No admin, and especially myself, has made anything close to a personal attack on you. All I did was to question the validity of your technical questioning. In future, I won't discourage or interfere with your technical questions, but if I see more personal attacks I may very well block you for them. INeverCry 18:10, 19 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Re:File:Royal portraits - 004 01.jpg

I converted this image losslessly due to a then-apparent lack of a proper thumbnail — the original image is a progressive JPG, and I converted it using ImageMagick into a baseline JPG; thererefore there shouldn't be any losses in quality, and I cannot see any difference between the two images, but I am willing to look into it if you can provide me with more information. Thanks in advance, odder (talk) 13:22, 21 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

That's OK, don't worry :-) odder (talk) 13:29, 21 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Re:Category:Orbitals energy levels

Thank you. ;) --Aushulz (talk) 00:07, 9 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:To Commons.svg

(Previous conversation on my user page)

I don't care that you don't believe me. That is your problem, not mine. The attribution is already perfectly specified and clear. If there are portions of images there that you don't think I created myself, then I used public domain images that don't require attribution. So stop menacing me, s.v.p. --Bastique ^{☎ appelez-moi!} 22:15, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This likely fixed the problem. I mean your misdemeanor about licenses, of course. Or you found something wrong on my side? Incnis Mrsi (talk) 12:23, 20 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

AN

Hi, as part of closing this AN thread I removed your comment, because it was not about the thread topic, and because it made a number of accusations that the evidence did not back up. If you actually want something to happen in relation to that user, start a new thread at COM:AN/U - and provide rather better evidence. However, you might want to discuss it with me first, because your description of those diffs was significantly wrong, and at AN/U this could easily prevent discussion of real problems (if there are any). Note for example that removing posts from your own talk page is normally acceptable, and your diff of that happening didn't fall outside those norms. Rd232 (talk) 09:12, 30 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

OK, you do not see the problem yet. Commons is an environment where many conflicts from other Wikimedia projects are spilled – it is inevitable. If one attempts to censor other people because they engage in conflicts which he does not understand, then he probably has to be "censored" himself from meddling into such conflicts. Otherwise… I think, you will see which detrimental consequences will this attitude have. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 09:36, 30 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I vaguely see the general point you're making. If you want to discuss specific problems, feel free. Rd232 (talk) 09:58, 30 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

MediaWiki talk:Gadget-RenameLink.js#New translation to ru

Hi, could you please check this translation. I doubt that any admin speaking Russian as native language will appear there soon. Thank you. -- Rillke^(q?) 12:33, 7 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

RE: File:Naturally_occuring_points_along_a_complex_plane.JPG

I'm not sure, but it's my mistake. I gave it a more appropriate title. --Michaeldsuarez (talk) 12:36, 3 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A request at Commons Bots

Your input here is appreciated, given your recent concerns. Commons:Bots/Work_requests#Updating_links_to_local_project_files_.(when_the_image_concerned_is_now_at_Commons.) Sfan00 IMG (talk) 01:41, 26 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Barnstar of Diligence
	Your edit comment ``throwing - "x" away" was brilliant. Thanks! MarkWarren (talk) 00:53, 24 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I think the edit in question was in File:35 mm Full Frame.svg. I never edited the “common formats” image. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 07:49, 28 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Editor @ ar.wiki

Hello. I would like to inform you that I have granted you editor flag at the Arabic Wikipedia, all your edits there will be automatically marked as patrolled. Best regards.--Avocato (talk) 07:09, 6 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Lorentz transforms 2.svg

File:Lorentz transforms 2.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Maschen (talk) 23:47, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Code issues in User:Incnis Mrsi/vector.css

Hi Incnis Mrsi, I am a bored bot (this is kind of a computer program) that is watching the recent changes and tapping buttons like I did now.

Curious about the reason? Possibly not but I will tell you anyway:

You edited User:Incnis Mrsi/vector.css. Glad to see you coding in css! Have you ever considered becoming a MediaWiki hacker?
Though, that change appears to introduce 2 new prettyCss issues — the page's status is now having warnings. Note that invalid or ambiguous code often has unwanted side effects like breaking other tools for you. If you cannot find out how to fix it, I suggest blanking the page for now.
To help you understanding where the issues are, I have aggregated a report here and now. If you have questions, don't hesitate to ask users experienced in css writing for help. But do not ask the bot's operators (chronically overwrought) unless you suspect an error of mine. If you prefer not getting spammed by me, you can opt-out reports by adding {{ValidationOptOut|type=all}} to your user page or cmb-opt-out anywhere on your your global user page on Meta. Good luck at Wikimedia Commons and happy hacking!

WARNING: font-family-one-generic: line 7 char number 2 - Evidence: font-family
WARNING: suggest-relative-unit:px: line 16 char number 10 - Evidence: 2px
WARNING: suggest-relative-unit:px: line 21 char number 10 - Evidence: 1px

Your CommonsMaintenanceBot (talk) at 07:54, 5 July 2017 (UTC).[reply]

Category:Atmospheric carbon dioxide

I'm quoting you : how one will guess to look for CO₂ in this pointless “… diagrams” mess?

The logic is that this category is only diagrams of the atmosphere, the logical place is in Category:Earth's atmosphere diagrams which is a subcategory of Category:Earth's atmosphere. You are redundant in putting both.

Pierre cb (talk) 13:53, 7 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This (Pierre_cb’s) logic is consistent, but cryptic. First of all, nothing precludes category: Atmospheric carbon dioxide to contain media other than “diagrams” (e. g. satellite imaging in some CO₂-related EM band). If it contains mostly “diagrams” (BTW how about “charts”?), then inclusion to category: Earth's atmosphere diagrams is warranted. Of course, I know what overcategorization is and why/how to avoid it, but here we have not the case. Again, a user may not necessarily guess to look for CO₂ in the “… diagrams” mess. There is nothing that hints about “diagrams” in carbon dioxide. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 14:08, 7 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Category: Wikipedians

I haven’t an opinion whether should File:Joana Castillo.jpg belong to the maintenance category: Unused personal files (although it’s arguably has both attributes). But as for “Wikipedians”… do you deem this person should mix with real Wikipedians? Incnis Mrsi (talk) 14:17, 5 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you do not think she is an "active" Wikipedian, propose the deletion of the file. I will not oppose. Thanks. --E4024 (talk) 14:52, 5 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Wanted to let you know

Hi,

I owe you an explanation. Regarding the edit, to be honest, I had noticed the person had made numerous bad edits, so I had reverted them because I neither had the patience nor time to review all of them. Commons:Requests for checkuser/Case/Musée Annam had made me pay attention to edits. Some edits are good, but most are questionable and dubious in truth, but it seems the person has a revisionist agenda for history and seem to be against the current Vietnamese political climate. Wanted to let you know.

I also appreciate it. I don't care if you revert any of my edits, if the revert is better. Cheers Artix Kreiger (talk) 21:19, 14 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Gps-atmospheric-efects.png

Could you redraw it to more realistically demonstrate diffraction? — Jeff G. ツ_{please ping or talk to me} 01:47, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Jeff G.: of course, I can draw some physics topics, but:

am not an expert on microwaves and have no idea how exactly do they behave;
can’t read editors’ intentions – which namely effects of refration do they deem essential for GPS receivers.

I frequently fix other guys’ mistakes when understand exactly which things must be drawn: «−» and «′» signs, serif font, fixing incorrect units notation… But in such case as e.g. File:Determinant example.svg I didn’t know what namely to fix – either fix geometry based on the matrix, or vice versa. The present case is very far from that kind of situation where I am willing to intervene positively. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 16:16, 23 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Gymnasium Alpenstrasse Eingangstor

Indeed, De gustibus et coloribus non est disputandum :) Lotje (talk) 05:16, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

User talk:Incnis Mrsi/Archive1

Contents

File:1 Boğaziçi Köprüsü.jpg

SVG

TUSC token bafadf7e2ff576e9fab3fc1b90124cf4

File:12crossings-rose-limacon-knot.svg

File:12crossings-rose-rhodonea-limacon-symmetrical-knot.svg

Cropping images

File:Redirect_with_possibility.png

bullet character

Poné

Russiæ vulgo Moscovia pars australis.jpg

File:CO2-variations hg.svg

Commons:Worst images

Все проблемы

АП

Please remain calm and collegial

Re:File:Royal portraits - 004 01.jpg

Re:Category:Orbitals energy levels

File:To Commons.svg

AN

MediaWiki talk:Gadget-RenameLink.js#New translation to ru

RE: File:Naturally_occuring_points_along_a_complex_plane.JPG

A request at Commons Bots

A barnstar for you!

Editor @ ar.wiki

File:Lorentz transforms 2.svg

Code issues in User:Incnis Mrsi/vector.css

Category:Atmospheric carbon dioxide

Category: Wikipedians

Wanted to let you know

File:Gps-atmospheric-efects.png

Gymnasium Alpenstrasse Eingangstor

Navigation menu

User talk:Incnis Mrsi/Archive1

SVG

TUSC token bafadf7e2ff576e9fab3fc1b90124cf4

Cropping images

bullet character

Poné

Russiæ vulgo Moscovia pars australis.jpg

File:CO2-variations hg.svg

Все проблемы

АП

Please remain calm and collegial

Re:File:Royal portraits - 004 01.jpg

Re:Category:Orbitals energy levels

File:To Commons.svg

AN

RE: File:Naturally_occuring_points_along_a_complex_plane.JPG

A request at Commons Bots

A barnstar for you!

Editor @ ar.wiki

Code issues in User:Incnis Mrsi/vector.css

Category:Atmospheric carbon dioxide

Category: Wikipedians

Wanted to let you know

Navigation menu

Search