User talk:Jbribeiro1/Lixo2

Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Jbribeiro1!

First steps tutorial Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki. Getting help More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump.

Goodies, tips, and tricks Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your graphic abilities. You can find the files you have uploaded in your Uploads. Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~. To link to an image page without embedding the image, type: [[:File:Foo.jpg]], which produces: File:Foo.jpg. You may enable gadgets (custom features) for your account. There are several tools to upload files. Have you edited Wikipedia before? This guide might be useful. Made a mistake? Do you want to have a file renamed or moved? Use the move link and wait for an authorized user to rename it. Do you want to have your recently uploaded picture removed? Tag it as {{speedy|reason here}}. For more information read the deletion guidelines.

Catalunha

Boas Zé,

Com que então novamente pela Península Ibérica. E aí vêm mais umas carradas de excelentes fotos para o Commons... :D Um grande abraço! --Stegop (talk) 01:22, 9 December 2014 (UTC)

Isto está mal para viagens (falta o vil metal...). Se as coisas não mudam depressa, nos tempos mais próximos já me dou por feliz se continuar a dar umas voltas pela península e por Marrocos. PS: percebo perfeitamente o seu encantamento com a Catalunha... E possivelmente ainda vai gostar mais do País Basco! Mas a não ser que goste de chuva e frio, o inverno não deve ser das melhores estações para o visitar. Mas se gostou do resto do norte de Espanha há dois anos isso não vai ser problema para si. ;) Abç. --Stegop (talk) 02:13, 9 December 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Dominic - San Domenico - Palermo - Italy 2015.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 01:09, 13 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Detail - Building in Piazza Marina - Palermo - Italy 2015.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Bgag 00:18, 13 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ordo Praedicatorum - San Domenico - Palermo - Italy 2015.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Bgag 00:18, 13 February 2015 (UTC)

File:Abraham and Holy Trinity.jpg

There's a whole long tradition of Christian depictions of Abraham with the three angels as a Trinity symbol. Whether you like it or not, it goes back centuries... AnonMoos (talk) 02:24, 17 February 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Christ Pantocrator - Cathedral of Monreale - Italy 2015 (5).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 02:42, 16 February 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Main bronze door - Cathedral of Monreale - Italy 2015.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:13, 16 February 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! View of Cefalù - Cefalù - Italy 2015 (2).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 02:33, 21 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Roof tiles - Cathedral of Monreale - Italy 2015.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 06:10, 20 February 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Beach and rainbow - Cefalù - Italy 2015.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --C messier 14:32, 21 February 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Virgin enthroned - Capela Palatina - Palermo - Italy 2015.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 06:13, 22 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Cataldus - Capela Palatina - Palermo - Italy 2015.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Isiwal 22:58, 22 February 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Christ Pantocrator - Cathedral of Monreale - Italy 2015 (6).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --C messier 12:18, 24 February 2015 (UTC)

Re:FOP

Hello, Jbribeiro1. You have new messages at Gunnex's talk page. You may remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Beach in Eraclea Minoa - Italy 2015 (2).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Bgag 04:38, 1 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stairs - Ancient Greek theatre - Heraclea Minoa - Italy 2015 (2).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Bgag 04:38, 1 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Doric capital - Temple of Heracles - Agrigento - Italy 2015.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 06:26, 28 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Detail - Unidentified building - Agrigento - Italy 2015.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:48, 28 February 2015 (UTC)

FOP violation

I am afraid you are correct. This one could possibly be in the Public Domain already, due to its age, but a check about its author should be done first. For all of the others (btw, nice pictures!) the sculptor, who is alive, could be contacted asking for permission of publication. Greetings. --User:G.dallorto (talk) 10:33, 3 March 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Huge doric capital - Temple of Zeus - Valle dei Templi - Agrigento - Italy 2015.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:37, 1 March 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Erotic Scene mosaic - Villa Romana del Casale - Italy 2015 (a) - crop.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Isiwal 07:53, 3 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! East facade - Temple of Concordia - Agrigento - Italy 2015.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Halavar 10:57, 3 March 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pipe organ - San Francesco de Assisi - Agrigento - Italy 2015.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 08:28, 4 March 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! View of Tropea from La Sanità - Italy 2015 (4).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Bgag 03:49, 9 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Spolia at the stage - Ancient Roman Theatre - Taormina - Italy 2015.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 01:00, 9 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Catherine - Facade - Santa Caterina - Taormina - Italy 2015.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Isiwal 21:59, 8 March 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! View of Tropea from La Sanità - Italy 2015 (2).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments please rotate to correct horizon --Charlesjsharp 10:07, 9 March 2015 (UTC)  Done. Jbribeiro1 21:51, 9 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Historic centre of Agrigento seen from the Valle dei Templi - Italy 2015 (2).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --C messier 12:49, 9 March 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Santa Maria dell'Isola seen from Via Indipendenza - Tropea - Italy 2015 (3).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Some pincushion distortion (see horizon line) and a big dust spot (see note). Both fixable. --Cccefalon 09:09, 10 March 2015 (UTC) Uploaded a new version correcting the pincushing distortion (hopefully). I cannot see the dust spot. Are you sure it's not a wave? Certainly not a cloning out (I do not even know how to do that!). Jbribeiro1 00:39, 11 March 2015 (UTC) Good quality. And on second review, I also think that this circle in the sea is just coincidentally. --Cccefalon 06:08, 11 March 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Santa Maria dell'Isola seen from Via Indipendenza - Tropea - Italy 2015 (2).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 01:32, 13 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Columns - Maison Carrèe - Nîmes 2014.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 17:47, 12 March 2015 (UTC)

Hello

Hi Jose, can you translate some Georgia-related articles for Portuguese Wiki? Jaqeli 20:09, 15 March 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Door - Maratea - Italy 2015 (2).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 20:38, 13 March 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! View of Marina di Maratea from Cristo Redentore - Italy 2015 (2).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Not bad. But light up the shadow areas. --Hockei 14:47, 13 March 2015 (UTC)  Done Jbribeiro1 01:21, 14 March 2015 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Hockei 06:10, 14 March 2015 (UTC)

Paestum

Hi Jbribeiro 1. Thank you very much for all the interesting pictures of Paestum that you have uploaded. I put them in theyr sub-cats by monuments and locations. Now I see that almost 20 files have the same geo-location. This is not possible and is not correct. Please, can you correct these mistakes and give the correct geocode? Different way, I think it's better to cancel the wrong geocode. Thank you very much! Best regards, --DenghiùComm (talk) 11:11, 22 March 2015 (UTC)

Hi. For your information: I corrected the wrong geo-locations in the files where it was possible. Where it was not possible, I simply canceled the wrong geo-location. Best regards, --DenghiùComm (talk) 23:18, 22 March 2015 (UTC)

Thank you very much! I'm sorry that I could not identify precisely the locations of pictures of houses, mosaic floors, scattered ruins. Maybe you know more precisely where you saw and photographed them? Good night. --DenghiùComm (talk) 23:33, 22 March 2015 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Saint George - Interior of the Glory facade - Interior of Sagrada Família - Barcelona 2014.JPG

Yours sincerely, .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:44, 25 March 2015 (UTC)

Re:Favor

Hello, Jbribeiro1. You have new messages at Gunnex's talk page. You may remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

File move

Hello! I noticed that you moved File:SThereseEnfantJesus.jpg to File:SThereseAvila.jpg. The image depicts a reclining statue of Saint Thérèse of the Child Jesus. If you look closely you can see a tiny photograph of her behind her feet. And she is depicted with roses, which are her attribute. Best regards, Slånbär (talk) 00:40, 28 April 2015 (UTC)

Teresa

Yes, there is a chapel dedicated to St. Teresa of Avila, which is located in the right transept. But this reclining statue is located in the Chapel of the Assumption, the second chapel on the left. Most art books and travel guides overlook this modern statue which is in a glass box. [1] This image [2] shows the chapel in question with the statue and a well-known photograph of St. Teresa of the Child Jesus on top. By the way, this is the chapel of St. Teresa of Avila and there is no statue there. [3] Slånbär (talk) 01:07, 28 April 2015 (UTC)

Muito obrigado! Slånbär (talk) 02:03, 28 April 2015 (UTC)

File:Blessed Domenico Lentini - Addolorata - Maratea - Italy 2015.JPG

File:Blessed Domenico Lentini - Addolorata - Maratea - Italy 2015.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Morbius (talk) 15:12, 18 June 2015 (UTC)

The image you uploaded is an artwork of an unknown author who potentially is still alive or dead since less than 70 years; so you cannot have any right on that picture. --Morbius (talk) 15:30, 18 June 2015 (UTC)

Kept. José Luiz ^disc 21:54, 25 March 2016 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Milan from the Duomo - Milan 2014 (2).jpg

Yours sincerely, Josve05a (talk) 08:51, 25 July 2015 (UTC)

Deleted content

---

Hello Jbribeiro1/Lixo2, the following content you uploaded violates one or more of our policies and therefore has been or will soon be deleted:

File:Milan from the Duomo - Milan 2014 (2).jpg

The Wikimedia Commons (this website) only hosts media files with a realistic educational purpose and that can be used for any purpose, including:

• use in any work, regardless of content
• creation of derivative works
• commercial use
• free distribution

See Commons:Licensing for the copyright policy on Wikimedia Commons, and Commons:Image casebook for some specific examples. Some other Wikimedia projects have different licensing policies. For example, the English Wikipedia allows fair use of sounds and photographs. This is not the case on Wikimedia Commons; "fair use" materials are not acceptable here.

Please make sure that you only upload educational content you have created yourself, those which are out of copyright, or those for which you have the required permission for the work to be used in all the ways described above. Please note that derivative works of copyrighted material are also considered copyrighted. Again, please read through Commons:Licensing, which is quite crucial, to understanding how Wikimedia Commons works. Thanks for your contribution, and please do leave me a message if you have further questions.

Yours sincerely, Hedwig in Washington ^(mail?) 07:49, 28 August 2015 (UTC)

Santissimo Sacramento e Cinque Piaghe

Hello again!

I noticed that you added the category Santissimo Sacramento e Cinque Piaghe to the image Nolli 1748 San Filippo Neri in Via Giulia. I just want to let you know that Santissimo Sacramento e Cinque Piaghe and the oratory (No. 667) on Nolli's map are two different buildings. Santissimo Sacramento e Cinque Piaghe, in fact classified as a church [4], is located at Via dei Baullari, while the oratory on Nolli's map, Oratorio delle Piaghe di Gesù Cristo, is long gone. Slånbär (talk) 00:58, 13 September 2015 (UTC)

Thank you, Slånbär!! I've already corrected both articles in ptwiki! José Luiz ^disc 01:10, 13 September 2015 (UTC)

File:Pendente.png

File:Pendente.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Rodrigolopes (talk) 23:11, 6 December 2015 (UTC)

File:San Caio - Achille Pinelli.jpg

File:San Caio - Achille Pinelli.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Jolly Janner (talk) 23:42, 24 March 2016 (UTC)

Kept. Solved. José Luiz ^disc 21:42, 10 November 2016 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Bronze statue - Casino de Monte Carlo - Monaco 2014.jpg

And also:

• File:Le Pecheur - Beach - Monaco 2014.JPG

Yours sincerely, Ras67 (talk) 11:06, 30 April 2016 (UTC)

Lion hunt relief

Hi Jbribeero1, I came across a file uploaded by you ː"the Lion hunt relief". A fine image. But I'd like to know where you have taken the photo. (You see there are two locations in Turkey with the same name and with similar reliefs; one around Malatya and one around Adana) Thanks Nedim Ardoğa (talk) 09:44, 29 September 2016 (UTC)

I took it at the Museum of Anatolian Civilizations, in Ankara. José Luiz ^disc 11:05, 29 September 2016 (UTC)

File:Birth of Jesus - Capella dei Scrovegni - Padua 2016.jpg

File:Birth of Jesus - Capella dei Scrovegni - Padua 2016.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Sailko (talk) --Sailko (talk)

Kept. Solved. José Luiz ^disc 21:41, 10 November 2016 (UTC)

File:Saint Mother Teresa - Santa Maria del Suffragio - Ravenna 2016.jpg

File:Saint Mother Teresa - Santa Maria del Suffragio - Ravenna 2016.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Túrelio (talk) 10:47, 24 October 2016 (UTC)

File:Santa Gianna Beretta Molla - Chiesa del Gesù e dei Santi Ambrogio e Andrea - Genoa 2014.JPG

File:Santa Gianna Beretta Molla - Chiesa del Gesù e dei Santi Ambrogio e Andrea - Genoa 2014.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Giovanni Cerretani (talk) 19:37, 29 October 2016 (UTC)

File:Santa Lucia alle Botteghe Oscure.jpg

File:Santa Lucia alle Botteghe Oscure.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Jcb (talk) 18:36, 10 November 2016 (UTC)

Kept. Solved. José Luiz ^disc 21:41, 10 November 2016 (UTC)

Category:Leaning_Tower_(Pisa)_-_Exterior

Leaning Tower (Pisa) - Exterior has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

That's all I'm programmed to do! 🍺💲🚬 08:37, 15 December 2016 (UTC)

Kept. Solved. José Luiz ^disc 23:28, 15 December 2016 (UTC)

Category:Hall_of_Justice,_Alcázar_of_Seville

Hall of Justice, Alcázar of Seville has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Alberto Bravo (talk) 16:05, 2 January 2017 (UTC)

File:Capitoline Antinoo - Palazzo Nuovo - Musei Capitolini - Rome 2016 (2).jpg

File:Capitoline Antinoo - Palazzo Nuovo - Musei Capitolini - Rome 2016 (2).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Mhhossein ^talk 20:11, 10 January 2017 (UTC)

Kept. Solved. José Luiz ^disc 12:26, 20 January 2017 (UTC)

Your VFC installation method is deprecated

Hello Jbribeiro1, we are aware that using the old installation method of VFC (via common.js, which you are using) may not work reliably anymore and can break other scripts as well. A detailed explanation can be found here. Important: To prevent problems please remove the old VFC installation code from your common.js and instead enable the VFC gadget in your preferences. Thanks! --VFC devs (q) 16:24, 22 May 2017 (UTC)

Hello, Jbribeiro1. Check your email—you've got mail! You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{YGM}} template.

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Antero de Quintal (talk • contribs) 02:09, 13 June 2017 (UTC)

The Events IN Cologne Cathedral

are obviously in front of the cathedral. Could you please revert your changes? Thank you, --Nicola (talk) 06:57, 29 July 2017 (UTC)

Ajuda com localização

Olá, como vai? Talvez possa me ajudar (ou indicar alguém que possa); pedi ajuda na esplanda em abril desse ano, mas parece que fui ignorado. Algumas imagens que carrego e indico a localização utilizando a {{Location}} não aprecem nos mapas do OpenStreetMap e do Google Earth. Essa imagem aparece corretamente (1), mas essa outra, na mesma cidade, não (2). Essa e essa são exemplo de outras que apresentam o mesmo problema. O que pode estar errado? Sds! --HVL talk 22:13, 7 August 2017 (UTC)

@HVL: , não tenho ideia. Eu sempre geolocalizo com location também, mas não sei como funciona a interface com o Google e com o OpenstreetMap. José Luiz ^disc 22:32, 7 August 2017 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Sweet Dreams Baby by Roy Lichtenstein - The Great Graphic Boom expo - Staatsgalerie - Stuttgart - Germany 2017.jpg

And also:

• File:The Melody Haunts my Reverie by Roy Lichtenstein (no 87) - The Great Graphic Boom expo - Staatsgalerie - Stuttgart - Germany 2017.jpg

Yours sincerely EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:14, 3 September 2017 (UTC)

Panorama

Hallo! Vielen Dank für die Präzisierung der Kategorien bei meinen Bildern File:Berlin, Berliner Dom -- 2013 -- 4514.jpg und File:Berlin, Berliner Dom -- 2013 -- 4519.jpg. Die beiden Kategorien Category:Panoramics of Berlin und Category:Panoramics of churches in Germany habe ich allerdings wieder ergänzt, denn es sind Panorama-Aufnahmen und es sind auch Panorama-Aufnahmen von Berlin und auch von Kirchen in Deutschland. Mein Bot, der die Dateien immer wieder auch auf Konsistenz bei etlichen Angaben prüft, ist direkt darüber gestolpert. Ein Panorama muss halt nicht immer deutlich breit oder hoch sein, es muss nur auch mehreren Aufnahmen zusammengesetzt worden sein. Ich hoffe es ist so auch für dich OK. --XRay ^talk 07:50, 22 September 2017 (UTC)

Oh, I just have seen your babel information. So let's add a short information in english. Thank you for modifieng the categories at File:Berlin, Berliner Dom -- 2013 -- 4514.jpg and File:Berlin, Berliner Dom -- 2013 -- 4519.jpg. I added Category:Panoramics of Berlin and Category:Panoramics of churches in Germany again because the photographs are panoramics of Berlin and churches in Germany. A panorama photographs must exist of at leat two photographs. Both photographs are panoramics. So the categories are OK. My bot checks my images and he shows the mistake (of missing panoramics categories) this morning. --XRay ^talk 07:54, 22 September 2017 (UTC)

XRay, no problems! It's such a hardwork trying to organize such huge cats that it's reconforting to know that there are people fixing any mistakes I might make. Thank you! José Luiz ^disc 14:41, 22 September 2017 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
	nice uploads. i have been converting into artwork template, i.e. [5] i would encourage you to consider Commons:Pattypan - it allows mass uploads with better metadata - cheers. Slowking4 § Sander.v.Ginkel's revenge 15:13, 19 October 2017 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Ponte della Costituzione - Venice - 2016.jpg

Yours sincerely, Themightyquill (talk) 14:39, 15 November 2017 (UTC)

File:Sundial, marble (3rd century A.D.) - Ephesus Museum.JPG

File:Sundial, marble (3rd century A.D.) - Ephesus Museum.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

E4024 (talk) 14:24, 5 January 2018 (UTC)

Photo of stained glass window in Milan Duomo

Dear Jose Luiz,

Just want to inform you that I used your beautiful photo in my video/ vlog. You can watch in YouTube at GkJmdx6yrAo Thank you for sharing the photo.

Best Regards S. Toha Stef Toha (talk) 09:12, 14 May 2018 (UTC)

Cleopatra

Your picture of Cleopatra was used on the English Wikipedia on Template:Cleopatra. Векочел (talk) 17:27, 12 July 2018 (UTC)

Great! Thank you for letting me know! José Luiz ^disc 21:04, 12 July 2018 (UTC)

Palazzo Firenze (Rome)

See Palazzo Firenze: era troppo piccolo x un ministero, e fu solo residenza del ministro della Giustizia, x un po' di tempo. Ciao, buon lavoro. --Lalupa (talk) 21:08, 8 August 2018 (UTC)

File:Campbell Soup by Andy Warhol - The Great Graphic Boom expo - Staatsgalerie - Stuttgart - Germany 2017.jpg

File:Campbell Soup by Andy Warhol - The Great Graphic Boom expo - Staatsgalerie - Stuttgart - Germany 2017.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Carl Ha (talk) 14:41, 18 August 2018 (UTC)

File:Teatro di marcello (3723301117).png

File:Teatro di marcello (3723301117).png is considered to fulfill the criteria for speedy deletion and has been marked on its page. The following reason has been specified: CSD G1 (test page, accidental creation, or page containing nonsense or no valid content) If you believe the content does not meet the criteria for speedy deletion, you may replace the speedy deletion tag with a regular deletion request (if the content has not been deleted) or request undeletion (if the content has already been deleted). All your uploads, including deleted ones, are listed in your upload log. If you need help, please read our frequently asked questions or visit the help desk. Please do not remove this message from your talk page. You may set up archiving instead. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Elisfkc (talk) 14:23, 27 August 2018 (UTC)

Flickr2Commons

I have just come across a few images you have recently uploaded from Flickr. I would appreciate it if in the future, you used the Flickr2Commons tool. This tool allows images to be moved to Commons from Flickr without having to download the images to your own computer. It also brings in the largest resolution of the image, as well making sure to list the correct license and url, making it easy for the automated Flickr Review system. Also, it is fairly easy to categorize images with this tool. To use it, you just need to go to the url and authorize it (where it says "authorise first"). Elisfkc (talk) 14:24, 27 August 2018 (UTC)

Hello Elisfkc, I always use Flickr2commons. I do not know what happened in the case you just deleted. José Luiz ^disc 01:25, 28 August 2018 (UTC)

Government Buildings in Rome

Why do you remove that Category from the images I’ve been loaded? Those are GOVENRMENT BUILDINGS, owned by the State, Agenzia del demanio and used from Government offices... --Carlo Dani (talk) 08:37, 13 September 2018 (UTC)

Carlo Dani First of all, congratulations on the great job taking pictures of all of them. As for the removing of the categories in the picture, I only did it when I created a category on its own for the building and put the picture in it, as is the case here (the new category is here). And I also geolocalized all of them. If it was not the case in any instance, it was a mistake. José Luiz ^disc 22:41, 13 September 2018 (UTC)

Category:Palazzo Mattei a Villa Celimontana

Hi, the correct name for the building is "Palazzetto Mattei", not "Palazzo". The cat should therefore be moved to a coherent title. Thank you :-) --g (talk) 23:27, 24 September 2018 (UTC)

 Done @Gianfranco: . José Luiz ^disc 23:37, 24 September 2018 (UTC)

Thank you for being that fast :-))) --g (talk) 23:45, 24 September 2018 (UTC)

no source?

Hi

you removed the source and then added the 'no source' tag? What happend? Amada44  ^{talk to me} 21:07, 18 November 2018 (UTC)

Amada44, this version obviously is not "Photographed the original in the Jardins d’Alfàbia" (this one possibly is). The "no source" tag simply indicates that no source was provided for the original upload of this black-and-white version. José Luiz ^disc 01:45, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

Sorry, What?? Of course it is. It is just a black and white version of the photograph. If you say: 'possibly' are you implying that I am not telling the truth? The 'no source' tag means it will be deleted because it has no source. Again: You removed my legitimate source and then added the no source tag to an image from the 17th century. Would you mind reflecting that for a moment? Amada44  ^{talk to me} 13:21, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

Am I going to get a reply? Amada44  ^{talk to me} 12:27, 23 November 2018 (UTC)

Amada44 Actually I would not answer because I do not really care. I did something, you disagreed and reverted. That is a pretty normal wiki process. Curiously, this picture you say you took is available for sale elsewhere. An identical image not a similar one. "Your" image lacks EXIF information also (the one I pointed out to you clearly indicate that the picture was taken by a Nikon and etc.). But who am I to judge? José Luiz ^disc 21:07, 23 November 2018 (UTC)

I wonder why then the color image and the black and white one have the exact same resolution, have been uploaded on the same day and are identical when you put them on top of each other? Oh and I made a few more of color and b/w versions if you want to check out this cat. Its a PD image. Anyone can download it from wikipedia and try to sell it. This is not the normal wiki process. You made a clear mistake and you are either to proud to admit that or you really just don’t get it (removing a valid source and then adding a no source tag). You should care though, because behavior like this is disruptive to wikipedia. Now either you stop making suggestions that I am lying or put a DR on the image where you question my source. Amada44  ^{talk to me} 07:37, 24 November 2018 (UTC)

Er... No. Actually I do not care because my goal is not Commons. Toxic environment as proven by this. I'll leave you a heartfelt and perfectly sincere "sorry mr. sysop, I'll behave" if that is what you are expecting, so let me know. Besides this, forget about me: I have a LOT of work to do. (No wonder the reputation this place have.... ) José Luiz ^disc 12:07, 24 November 2018 (UTC)

You are right, I should probably just forget about such a busy man as you are. But because of your honest and sincere apology I cannot resist to write you a line or two.

I don’t know what being a sysop has anything to do with this. I did not bring it up.

I just want to make sure you understand this: Its not wikipedia where you can just change anything. Source, author and license are not allowed to be changed by anyone (unless there is a very clear and obvious mistake)

You are complaining about a toxic environment?

1. You removed a source, added a no source tag
2. I asked what happened? You accuse me of lying.
3. I state that this is not true.
4. you ignore me.
5. I ask why and you say because you don’t care (wow, how nice of you) AND you still accuse me of lying.
6. I make a clear statement, and you say commons is toxic and MY behavior is part of this.
7. Oh and a sarcastic apology

I feel that a lot of toxicity is actually coming from you. Amada44  ^{talk to me} 10:03, 1 December 2018 (UTC)