User talk:MMFE

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search


Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, MMFE!

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 14:05, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

File:Kierch Lampertsbierg.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Kierch Lampertsbierg.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

MGA73 (talk) 16:39, 8 August 2012 (UTC)



Afrikaans | беларуская | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | español | eesti | français | עברית | हिन्दी | italiano | Lëtzebuergesch | മലയാളം | Nederlands | norsk | norsk nynorsk | polski | română | русский | српски (ћирилица)‎ | srpski (latinica)‎ | slovenčina | svenska | Kiswahili | தமிழ் | తెలుగు | Tagalog | українська | +/−

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2012!

Dear MMFE,
Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2012, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world!

Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 350,000 pictures of cultural heritage objects from 36 countries around the world, becoming the largest photography competition to have ever taken place.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet).

If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help.

To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey in your own language, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2012.

Kind regards,

the Wiki Loves Monuments team
Wiki Loves Monuments logo
Message delivered by the Wiki Loves Monuments 2012 notification system on 22:44, 27 October 2012 (UTC)

Autopatrol given[edit]

Commons Autopatrolled.svg

Hello. I just wanted to let you know that I have granted autopatrol rights to your account; the reason for this is that I believe you are sufficiently trustworthy and experienced to have your contributions automatically sighted. This has no effect on your editing, it is simply intended to help users watching Recent changes or Recent uploads to find unproductive edits amidst the productive ones like yours. In addition, you can now share images from Flickr using the UploadWizard, batch-upload up to 500 files with UploadWizard instead of 50 and upload freely licensed audio files in the MP3 format. Thank you. INeverCry 22:21, 4 September 2013 (UTC)


العربية | Català | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form) | Eesti | English | Español | Français | Galego | Magyar | Italiano | Nederlands | Polski | Română | Svenska | ไทย | Українська | +/−

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2013! Please help with this survey.

Dear MMFE,
Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2013, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! We would like to ask again a few minutes of your time.

Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 365,000 pictures of cultural heritage objects from more than 50 countries around the world, becoming the largest photography competition to have ever taken place.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet).

If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help.

To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey in your own language, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2013.

Kind regards,

the Wiki Loves Monuments team
Wiki Loves Monuments logo

elevated tank[edit]

Moien,

Den "elevated tank" ass net den Tuerm, mä de Koup dee virdru läit. Dofir huet d'Bild jo eng Annotatioun oder wat hätte se soss do verstoppt? --Jwh (talk) 20:20, 3 December 2013 (UTC)

Merci fir d'Info, d'Annotatioun hat ech net bemierkt. Ech hunn d'Kategorie nees dobäi gesat.--M.E. (talk) 20:30, 3 December 2013 (UTC)



العربية | Català | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | Español | Eesti | Français | Magyar | Nederlands | Polski | Svenska | ไทย | +/−กิ๊ฟ สายแข็ง

Thank you for taking part in the Wiki Loves Monuments participants' survey!

Dear MMFE,

Thank you for taking part in the Wiki Loves Monuments participants' survey. Your answers will help us improve the organization of future photo contests!

In case you haven't filled in the questionnaire yet, you can still do so during the next 7 days.

And by the way: the winning pictures of this year's international contest have been announced. Enjoy!

Kind regards,

the Wiki Loves Monuments team
Wiki Loves Monuments logo

Nomination of obvious spam uploads for speedy deletion[edit]

Hi there,

I notice you that nominated some obvious spam uploads for deletion:-

File:Best html website design company los angeles.png and
File:Sacredcowstudios provides custom web development los angeles.webm,

For clear-cut cases of worthless spam like this (and other blatantly out-of-scope or inappropriate uploads), it's perfectly acceptable- and much quicker- to mark them for speedy deletion, by placing this at the top of the file page:-

{{speedy|reason}} ~~~~

(replace "reason" with the reason, typically something like "Blatant spam"). If the administrator disagrees that it warrants "speedy" nomination, they can convert it to a regular Deletion Request.

Obviously, cases that aren't as clear-cut should still be done the usual way, but "speedy" is fine if everyone is likely to agree that it's garbage! :-)

All the best, Ubcule (talk) 22:40, 11 March 2014 (UTC)

bd Royal[edit]

Salut, misst da vläit déi ganz Kategorie Boulevard Royal an d'Kategorie N7 gesat ginn, oder ass nëmmen een Deel vum Boulevard Royal dovu betraff? --Jwh (talk) 19:26, 26 March 2014 (UTC)

Moien, du hues Recht, et ass de ganze Boulevard Royal. Ech hunn et geännert. --MMFE (talk) 21:48, 26 March 2014 (UTC)

Category:Skylines in Luxembourg[edit]

Salut, ech froe mech op déi Kategorie sou richteg bei eis Dierfer passt, déi bis lo jo vu many tall buildings (bon, ofgesi vun deem een oder anere Silo) a many skyscrapers verschount bliwwe sinn:

English: A skyline is best described as the overall or partial view or relief of a city's tall buildings and structures consisting of many skyscrapers. It can also be described as the artificial horizon that a city's overall structure creates.

Sou ähnlech och bei aneren Wikipedien.

"Views of Luxembourg" kléngt mir do net sou bombastesch, obwuel déi bei "Cityscapes" fällt - vläit beméie se sech iergendwann do och hei bei d'Populated places...

Doran hat ech dann Category:Views of Luxembourg by municipality wëlle weider ausbauen.

Wat mengs Du?

Ech wënschen nach eng friddlech Hënt. --Jwh (talk) 21:09, 10 August 2014 (UTC)

Salut. Eng gutt Fro dat do. Ech ka mech erënneren datt ech déi Kategorie eréischt benotzt hunn nodeem iergendeen aneren se bei esou Fotoe benotzt hat. Ech hunn dee Moment net laang no aneren Méiglechkeete gesicht, mee et ass mer awer och ëmmer e bëssche komesch virkomm a mir kënnen och gär aner Kategorie benotzen. D'Fro déi ech mer och ëmmer stellen ass wou d'Limite vun esou Kategorie sinn. Ass eng Foto wou 3 Haiser drop si schonn eng "View of xyz" oder gëtt et dofir nach aner Méiglechkeeten? --MMFE (talk) 23:21, 10 August 2014 (UTC)
Ech géing soe Jo, zu Lëtzebuerg hu mir eben aner Gréissteverhältnisser. Wann d'Foto dee gréissten, oder e groussen Deel vun der Uertschaft weist, sou wéi hei File:Vue op Aasselscheier.jpg, dann ass dat eng View of XYZ. Ech menge bei deene Fotoën ass mir och d'Iddi komm Category:Views of Lorentzweiler --Jwh (talk) 07:39, 11 August 2014 (UTC)
Ech hunn emol alles wat an der Skylines-Kategorie war an d'Views of Luxembourg geholl. Ech hunn awer elo festgestallt datt et zwou verschidde Gruppe Views gëtt, déi eng gehéieren zu de "Cityscapes in Luxembourg", déi aner net. An da gëtt et och nach "Panoramics in Luxembourg" wou d'Panoramas of Luxembourg City dra si, wat awer net alles Panoramae si, mee éischter Views. Am grousse ganzen also en zimlechen Duercherneen, dat gëtt nach Aarbecht :-) --MMFE (talk) 10:32, 11 August 2014 (UTC)
Genee, ech mengen wéi ech dat gesinn hunn ech mol opgehal a wollt driwwer nodenken an denken an denken... Bei deenen anere Länner huet et och net besser ausgesinn?
Panoramics, denken ech solle richteg Panorama-Fotoë sinn, also datt Kamera se gemaach huet oder datt ee se duerno mat enger Soft zesumme bitzt. Ech mengen ech hat sou Definitiounen bei en, fr, de fonnt.
Wat mir eis ploen ;-) --Jwh (talk) 14:15, 11 August 2014 (UTC)

File:Izeg, rue de Sandweiler.jpg[edit]

Salut, hues du eng Ahnung wat dat ass?

Hunn et mol ënner "wayside shrines" gesat - fir eng Weekapell denken ech do misst ee kënne rantrëppelen, op do dran de Kapp vun engem Weekräiz steet, ass och d'Fro - 't kinnt grad sou gutt en Deel vun engem Grafstee sinn.

An dann déi wéineg chrëschtlech Verzierungen rondërem?

Any guess? --Jwh (talk) 08:01, 13 August 2014 (UTC)

Salut,
Dat dengen do hunn ech och scho geknipst, awer bis elo nach net veraarbecht well d'Qualitéit net esou gutt ass an natierlech well ech net genuch Zäit fannen all déi Fotoen ze verschaffen déi sech um Computer usammelen.
Zu Izeg steet och net wäit ewech dovun e Panneau wou déi Weekapell, wéi se do schreiwen, drop ze gesinn ass, esou guer an enger aler an enger neier = där aktueller Versioun. Do steet och den Text drop, deen op denger Foto duerch d'Blumme verstoppt ass: Johannes Wintringer, Margreta Entringer, 1839.
Deng Problemer mat der Kategoriséierung kann ech awer novollzéien, et passt am Fong a keng Kategorie esou richteg, esou eppes nennt e wuel en Hybrid, mee déi Kategorie hu mer nach net. :-) Looss se mol roueg bei de "Wayside shrines", da gëtt déi och e bëssche méi voll. --MMFE (talk) 12:18, 13 August 2014 (UTC)
Jo eng fäi Gemeng, mat deene Panneauen. Da kucken ech mol deemnächst drop. Als Hybrid dierft e sech jo net zevill fortplanzen... --Jwh (talk) 18:51, 13 August 2014 (UTC)

Miersch[edit]

'n Owend, déi ganz Stroosse si jo awer schon a "Buildings in Mersch" - sollen dann d'Haiser nach eng Kéier eenzel dra kommen? --Jwh (talk) 19:35, 13 August 2014 (UTC)

Nee dat war net gewollt, just net opgepasst. Ech brengen dat an d'Rei. --MMFE (talk) 21:29, 13 August 2014 (UTC)
Wat ee sech plot, mä dat sot ech wuel schonn.--Jwh (talk) 07:20, 14 August 2014 (UTC)

Wagener, Weber Kindermehl[edit]

Salut, Souwäit ech wees ass de Wagener vum Weber iwwerholl ginn. --Jwh (talk) 09:58, 14 September 2014 (UTC)

Moien och. Dat ass mer nei. Ech hunn et geännert well ech gemengt hunn du häss eppes verwiesselt. Leider fënnt sech och néierens eng Informatioun am Internet driwwer, mee villäicht ass et jo och nach net esou laang hier. Wéi sécher ass deng Informatioun? --MMFE (talk) 12:06, 14 September 2014 (UTC)
Lo wou's Du et sees sinn ech mir net méi sou sécher. Ech kucken dat no, kann awer dauere well ech an nächster Zäit net zu Lëtzebuerg sinn. --Jwh (talk) 19:49, 14 September 2014 (UTC)
Moien, ech denken ech war am falsche Film... --Jwh (talk) 08:20, 2 October 2014 (UTC)

File:Chantier allée Pierre de Mansfeld-001.jpg[edit]

Moien, eng Bréck mengen ech baue se do awer net, oder dach? --Jwh (talk) 23:24, 11 November 2014 (UTC)

Du hues natierlech Recht, ech hu Building construction mat Bridge construction verwiesselt. --MMFE (talk) 00:17, 12 November 2014 (UTC)

Staircase[edit]

Moien, ass en Trapenhaus, wat hei mam Duxall an eng besser Welt geschéckt gouf. Ech hunn et dofir op "Stairs" gesat. --Jwh (talk) 10:04, 7 December 2014 (UTC)

Moien och, du hues Recht, mä do ass déi Kéier den online-Dictionnaire Schold wou ech gekuckt hunn, do steet bei staircase souwuel Trape wéi och Trapenhaus a bei stairs steet och Trapen an Trapenhaus. --MMFE (talk) 15:40, 7 December 2014 (UTC)

Gebaier Stad Lëtzebuerg[edit]

Salut, ech froe mech op dat eng gutt Iddi ass fir déi Gebaier an der Stad, déi eng eege Kategorie hunn, déi Kategorie aus dem Quarier eraus ze huelen, well se schonn an der Strooss sinn déi och an deem Quartier ass. Um Enn bleiwe dann am Quartier just nach d'Stroosen an e puer verweeste Biller ouni Kategorie.

Stéiert et datt sou eppes wéi d'Kategorie: Villa Clivio an der Kategorie: Goethestrooss an och am Quartier Gare opgezielt gëtt? Oder anescht: wann et eng Kategorie rue du Fort Elisabeth géing ginn, da géing d'Garer Kierch aus der Kategorie Gare verschwannen?

Just sou eng Fro déi ech lo net zu Enn geduecht hunn; pro Quartier misst een da vläit Stroosen an d'Gebaier separate mat Hëllef vun "|" gruppéieren... --Jwh (talk) 22:18, 5 February 2015 (UTC)

Moien och,

Wat mech gestéiert huet ass virun allem datt et net eenheetlech war. Ausserdeem gëllt jo och de Prinzip eng Iwwerkategoriséierung ze vermeiden. Ech weess zwar och datt mer do Ausnahme maachen, mee déi sinn néierens definéiert. Et wier villäicht gutt wa mer eis mol eng Kéier géifen zesummesetzen fir ons selwer Regelen ze ginn, soss wäerten där Problemer do nach méi oft optrieden.--MMFE (talk) 10:07, 6 February 2015 (UTC)

Mat der "Iwwerkategoriséierung" - déi gesinn ech hei egal wéi gehandhabt, wéi iwwregens sou villes. Deen ee mengt et wir jo net schlecht wann eppes nach en dëser oder enger anerer Kategorie dra wier, da kënnt iergendeen de gesäit net a firwat, geheit se eraus. Da get et e Revert. Dann zerklappe se sech wéi d'Raibereie, fir um Enn op en Noticeboard kreischen ze goen, wou da Leit, déi 3 Editen am Mount maachen, menge se missten och nach hire Pefferkär beileeën... Beim nächste geet dat Ganzt nees vu virun.
D'Fro stellt sech bei eis jo och nëmmen an der Stad a vläit nach an e puer Uertschaften am Süden. Vläit eng Kategorie:Buildings by name in XYZ - fällt mir einfach sou an, bréngt et weider? Ech wees et net. Ech wees och net op eng gutt Iddi war, wéi ech domat ugefaangen hat d'Stroosen a "Streets" an a "Buildings" ze setzen (oder war et ëmgekéiert?), firwat ech net domat weidergefuer si wees ech net - wahrscheinlech hat ech Bessseres ze din...
Sech nees mol ze gesinn, ass emmer gutt an dach ni falsch, dat muss awer lo net onbedengt heifir sinn. 't war just eng Fro.
Anyway, d'Welt dréint weider. Ech wënschen eng friddlech Hënt. --Jwh (talk) 21:34, 6 February 2015 (UTC)
Du hues d'Problemer gutt beschriwwen. Ech wëll elo och net weider an d'Detailer goen an der Hoffnung datt mer eis hoffentlech geschwë gesinn op engem allgemenge Wiki-Meeting. Et wier jo nees sou lues ee fälleg. Da kënne mer jo mol iwwer sou Kategoriséierungs-Problemer an aneres diskutéieren.--MMFE (talk) 17:48, 7 February 2015 (UTC)
Yeaph! --Jwh (talk) 23:30, 7 February 2015 (UTC)

D'Morguen op eise Kierfechter[edit]

Salut,

Ech hunn lo léischt, nodeems ech eng Kategorie: Mortuaries in Luxembourg gebastelt hat, donnt dass Du schonn eng Morgues in Luxembourg ugeluecht hues. Wann ech dat gläich gesinn hätt, dann hätt ech mir d'Aarbecht erspuert...

Wat bei eis op de Kierfechter steet, a mir och allgemeng "Morgue" nenn, sinn eigentlech keng Morguen.

Morgue fanne mir an de Spideeler an och am Staatslaboratoire - et ass do wou se am "Tatort" aus an aginn. D'Beschreiwung bei .en a .fr entsprecht deem, a weist op "Leichenhaus" bei .de hin - dat sinn eis "Kierfechtmorgue" jo awer net.

Beim sichen hunn ech do Mortuaries fonnt, do sinn all sou Fotoe vun deene Kierfechtsmorguen dran, also in Austria, Germany, Holland jiddefalls. D'Franzousen an d'Belsch schénge sech net weider domat ofzeginn...

Dann hunn ech awer och nach "Funeral chapels" fonnt, dat schéngt mir och ze passen, mä mat eiser Trennung vu Gott an der Welt wäert dat an Zukunft net méi sou klappen - ausser fuerwege Fënsteren sinn déi nei "Morgue" jo scho wéineg kapellesch...

Soit ech hu lo mol d'Fotoe vun de "Morguen" an d'"Mortuaries" geréckelt, vlàit kinnt een en Deel dovun dann a Funeral chapels setzen.

Fir d'Morgue fanne mir och eppes - vun engem Spidol oder sou.

Ech wënschen eng schéin Hënt --Jwh (talk) 23:12, 17 February 2015 (UTC)

Salut,
Jo, leider ass déi englesch Definitioun vu Morgue net déiselwecht wéi déi di mir hei zu Lëtzebuerg hunn. Am Dictionnaire, deen ech online benotzen, steet fir morgue a mortuary och genee déiselwecht Iwwersetzung, nämlech Leichenhaus oder Leichenhalle. Kee Wonner wann esou konfus Kategorien dobäi eraus kommen. Fir Lëtzebuerg géif jiddefalls "Morgues in Luxembourg" besser passen. Villäicht sollte mer einfach e Redirect vu morgue op mortuary ariichten, jiddefalls soulaang mer keng korrekt Foto vun enger Morgue hunn?
Alt nees en Thema fir deemnächst ze diskutéieren. --MMFE (talk) 19:25, 18 February 2015 (UTC)


Doberzinecker[edit]

I reckon that all of Doberzinecker's files are copyvios. mr.choppers (talk)-en- 17:54, 4 June 2015 (UTC)

DOL[edit]

Moien a merci datts du déi falsch Koord. gesinn hues. Déi vun der Gënzebléi hunn ech verbessert.
Awer déi vum Wunnhaus zu Dol weess ech am Ament net ze fannen, well ech vergiess hat mer d'Nummer an d'Strooss ze mierken. Duerfir hunn ech emol hannen alles op 00 gesat. BG, --Cayambe (talk) 20:20, 11 July 2015 (UTC)

Hunn elo och d'Haus op der 16, Duerfstrooss fonnt. Ass dat och dat Haus daats du mengs? Wann net, verbesser du w.e.g. --Cayambe (talk) 19:37, 12 July 2015 (UTC)?

Gekierfechs[edit]

Salut, gesais Du et sou, datt am Cemeteries in Luxembourg keng méi sole stoen, mä um Enn dofir 105 Kategorien am Cemeteries by municipality stinn? --Jwh (talk) 11:53, 18 December 2015 (UTC)

Salut, jo wa mer schonn déi Kategorie Cemeteries by municipality hu, sollte mer déi och benotzen. Et muss een natierlech fir ee Bild dat an der Kategorie Cemeteries in Luxembourg steet och net ëmmer direkt eng nei Kategorie opmaachen, ausser et huet ee grad soss näischt ze dinn.--MMFE (talk) 12:38, 18 December 2015 (UTC)

in other words, déi Gemengen an Uertschaften mat Fotoen vun engem Kierfecht géingen an der Haaptkategorie stoen, awer soubal zwéi Kierfechter vun der Gemeng gelisted sinn, sprengt se do raus a get nëmmen nach bei de Municipalities gewisen. Enn Deel vun de Kierfechten kann dann an der Haaptkategorie gesi ginn, bei deenen aneren geet ee mol kucken a wat fir enger Gemeng e läit an triwwelt en dann aus de Municipalities eraus - firwat ass dat gutt? --Jwh (talk) 16:53, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
Nee, sou war dat net gemengt. Ech hu just vun eenzelne Biller geschwat fir déi et nach guer keng aner Kategorie gëtt ausser Cemeteries in Luxembourg, fir déi emol provisoresch doran ze loossen.--MMFE (talk) 19:01, 18 December 2015 (UTC)

Awer guer keng gutt Iddi[edit]

People heescht hei Persounen, voire Perséinlechkeeten, net Leit.

Kuck dach wat do bei deenen anere Länner dran ass.

Wann d'Preisen no Dengen Iwwerleeunge géinge virgoen, dann hätte se an där Kategorie net nëmmen hir onséilech Pedigaen, mä och hir Fuesend- a Sportfans, an net ze vergiesse all hir Migranten, déi grad sou wéineg "People of Germany" sinn, wéi d'Russen op enger Konferenz vum IEIS als "People of Luxembourg" (Lëtzebuerger Perséinlechkeeten) kënnen duerchgoen. --Jwh (talk) 10:43, 12 February 2016 (UTC)

Du hues vollkomme Recht, ech hunn do net déi richteg Kategorie geholl, déi gehéieren éischter ënner Groups of people in Luxembourg oder nach anerer. Ech këmmere mech drëm. --MMFE (talk) 11:21, 12 February 2016 (UTC)

Exact duplicate is quite specific[edit]

We can have multiple images of the same object without them being duplicates. Duplicates means exactly the same image.  — billinghurst sDrewth 14:01, 12 February 2016 (UTC)

I know, but i didn't recognize the difference in this case. --MMFE (talk) 15:46, 12 February 2016 (UTC)

Wat bei "Cityscapes" erauskënnt[edit]

Mir hu kaum eng éierbar City, an doduerch och keng "Scapen" dovun, mä haaptsächlech besser Koudierfer op déi een, deemno wéi, och mol eng Vue huet... --Jwh (talk) 17:40, 14 March 2016 (UTC)

Ech versti leider net esou richteg wéi's de dat mengs. --MMFE (talk) 18:14, 14 March 2016 (UTC)

Treffen im Juegdschlass[edit]

Hi MMFE,

danke für die Einladung, die hat mich sehr gefreut. Lëtzebuergesch verstehe ich schon, werde es aber zeitlich wahrscheinlich nicht schaffen. Wieviele seid Ihr dort?

Gruß --Palauenc05 (talk) 21:12, 17 May 2016 (UTC)

Hallo Palauennc05,
Es sind 11 Leute angemeldet. Einer mehr dürfte auch kein Problem sein. Wir werden dort ab Mittag bis etwa 16 - 17 Uhr bleiben. Falls du nicht soviel Zeit hast könntest du auch nur kurz vorbeischauen.
Beste Grüße, --MMFE (talk) 17:42, 18 May 2016 (UTC)

étrange modif[edit]

Bonjour MMFE, je ne comprend pas ta modif sur la catégorie de la galerie Automobile, c'est peut être une erreur ?--Camulogene77 (talk) 19:19, 26 October 2016 (UTC)

Oui, je dois m'excuser, c'était naturellement une erreur. --MMFE (talk) 21:35, 26 October 2016 (UTC)

Share your experience and feedback as a Wikimedian in this global survey[edit]

  1. This survey is primarily meant to get feedback on the Wikimedia Foundation's current work, not long-term strategy.
  2. Legal stuff: No purchase necessary. Must be the age of majority to participate. Sponsored by the Wikimedia Foundation located at 149 New Montgomery, San Francisco, CA, USA, 94105. Ends January 31, 2017. Void where prohibited. Click here for contest rules.

Echternach[edit]

Hi MMFE, Das hier kennst Du bestimmt noch nicht, oder? :) --Palauenc05 (talk) 16:36, 23 February 2017 (UTC)

Hallo Palauenc5, Nein, kenne ich nicht und ich kann leider auch nichts drüber finden. Aber danke für das Bild.--MMFE (talk) 16:58, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
Vom Stil her müsste es ca. 16. Jh. sein. --Palauenc05 (talk) 17:07, 23 February 2017 (UTC)

Your feedback matters: Final reminder to take the global Wikimedia survey[edit]

(Sorry to write in Engilsh)

dat ass kloer, se ass awer schonn an der Kategorie "2014 at Luxembourg-Findel International Airport"[edit]

Ma jo an, wann dat sou kloer ass da wells Du sécher och gläich déi aner 26 Fotoen do raus huelen ?? --Jwh (talk) 00:44, 25 March 2017 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:

And also:

Thank you very much for your kind help, really appreciated. Moyanbrenn (talk) 18:10, 16 May 2017 (UTC)

File:Mondorf Bildstock.jpg[edit]

Hallo MMFE, habe dieses Exemplar fotografiert, kann es aber nicht eindeutig einem Ort zuordnen. Kannst Du bitte mal nachschauen. Danke! --Palauenc05 (talk) 20:42, 26 August 2017 (UTC)

Hallo Palauenc05,
Das Wegkreuz hab ich auch schon mal fotografiert, aber leider vergessen zu veröffentlichen. Es gehört zu einem Kreuzweg aus ursprünglich 7 Kreuzen die von Emerange bis Elvange stehen oder gestanden haben. Wenn man es einem Ort zuordnen möchte, wäre Emerange wohl am nächsten und hier fängt auch dieser Kreuzweg an. --MMFE (talk) 08:06, 27 August 2017 (UTC)
Danke für die Info. Du kannst das Bild gerne in die Liste aufnehmen. Gruß --Palauenc05 (talk) 08:30, 27 August 2017 (UTC)

Image without license[edit]

File:Informal meeting of ministers for agriculture and fisheries (iAGRIFISH). Arrivals Fernand Etgen (36641495740) - CROP ETGEN.jpg[edit]

беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | hrvatski | magyar | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | sicilianu | slovenščina | svenska | українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner), if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner) 14:12, 6 September 2017 (UTC)

Distrikt[edit]

Moien, a merci fir d'Rektifikatoun. Ech duecht, do géif eppes feelen, dofir hat ech et ewechgemaach. Mee du hues natierlech Recht, well de "fréieren Distrikt Lëtzebuerg" domat gemengt ass, an net, wéi ech ufanks geduecht hat, de "fréiere lëtzebuerger Ditstrikt ...(?)":. Schéi Feierdeeg! --Zinneke (talk) 12:34, 24 December 2017 (UTC)

File:Planned route for the tram line in Luxembourg City 01.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Planned route for the tram line in Luxembourg City 01.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Lyon-St-Clair (talk) 22:03, 15 February 2018 (UTC)

File:Flaxweiler Bildstock (1).jpg, File:Flaxweiler Bildstock (2).jpg[edit]

Hallo MMFE, habe den Bildstock neu fotografiert (ohne Hecke davor). Wenn Du willst, kannst du das Bild in der Liste ersetzen. Gruß --Palauenc05 (talk) 17:41, 17 June 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Buderscheid Panorama 01.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Buderscheid Panorama 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 24 May 2019 (UTC)