User talk:Namile17

Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Namile17!

First steps tutorial Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki. Getting help More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump.

Goodies, tips, and tricks Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your graphic abilities. You can find the files you have uploaded in your Uploads. Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~. To link to an image page without embedding the image, type: [[:File:Foo.jpg]], which produces: File:Foo.jpg. You may enable gadgets (custom features) for your account. There are several tools to upload files. Have you edited Wikipedia before? This guide might be useful. Made a mistake? Do you want to have a file renamed or moved? Use the move link and wait for an authorized user to rename it. Do you want to have your recently uploaded picture removed? Tag it as {{speedy|reason here}}. For more information read the deletion guidelines.

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 11:03, 23 October 2019 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Revista Yorokobu.jpg

Copyright status: File:Revista Yorokobu.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Revista Yorokobu.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Yours sincerely, JuTa 18:36, 20 June 2021 (UTC)

File tagging File:Cabeza yin.jpg

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Cabeza yin.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case. Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Cabeza yin.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

 

—Teles «Talk to me ˱_{C L @ S}˲» 15:53, 26 June 2023 (UTC)

File:Certeza Exhibition AmoakoBoafo&NickCave.jpg

File:Certeza Exhibition AmoakoBoafo&NickCave.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

19h00s (talk) 15:24, 5 July 2023 (UTC)

Pictures of copyrighted art

Hi Namile! I noticed you've been uploading a few photos of art from art exhibitions in Spain. Per Commons rules, photos of copyrighted art do not belong on Commons - the artists who made the works would need to give specific permissions for Commons to use images of their work. When an artwork is still in copyright, most countries require photographers to get permission before publishing an image of that artwork - this is called a derivative image, and they are not allowed on Commons. You can find more info on fair use images here. Thanks! 19h00s (talk) 13:53, 6 July 2023 (UTC)

Thank you for your message.

The photos are mine and I have the artists permission to publish the photos.

let me know next steps.

best!

namile 88.29.167.88 19:12, 6 July 2023 (UTC)

Just an FYI, you do need written permission from the artists to use images of these works for *any* purposes, not just for educational purposes or for use on Commons/Wikipedia. Even if you are an employee of Collección SOLO and you contacted each artist individually for permission, or were given permission when each work was acquired, I assume at least some of the artists gave permission only for educational purposes or for use on Commons/Wikipedia. If you do have written proof that each artist has given you irrevocable free permission (including, crucially, for commercial use), then you can follow the process laid out here to send documentation to the Commons Volunteer Response Team. 19h00s (talk) 01:38, 7 July 2023 (UTC)

Also, I do have to note -- these photographs are very clearly taken directly from the Collección SOLO's website. Unless you are the photographer who made these images and you can prove the museum allowed you to release them under a free license (in addition to the artists providing free licenses), they will all need to be removed from Commons. I would also add that if you are indeed the photographer and/or a staff member at the museum, you should not continue editing articles on Wikipedia about the museum. That would constitute a conflict of interest, as defined here. 19h00s (talk) 20:52, 7 July 2023 (UTC)

Do artists have to write a permission form giving their rights for all uses? I thought only educational or wikipedia. That would be logical, why would they give it for commercial use, for example?

All photos on Wikipedia are with permission for all uses?

I would like users to confirm me that artists have to give their images for all uses?

In case they decide that they do give their permission for all uses, where should I send the letter? 81.35.77.255 09:21, 11 July 2023 (UTC)

Ok. Yes I know how to send it. I'll send it by Friday. Please don't remove the images as they are going to send the all purposes permission. 81.35.77.255 09:24, 11 July 2023 (UTC)

The photos definitely won't be deleted soon, it takes 2 weeks at a minimum for nominated images to be deleted through this process. But yes, the photos can stay if the artists can provide written agreements allowing for images of their work to be used for all purposes. Commons is a place for free content, meaning images that can be used for *any* purpose by *anyone*. That includes commercial use - businesses often use freely licensed images from Commons, as is their right if they adequately credit the authors. Because of this, images of art generally don't belong here, unless an artist is willing to release their artwork under a free license that allows all uses, including commercial use. But, again, if you get written permission and have the artists send their permissions to the Volunteer Response Team as linked above, the images can stay on Commons. I just really don't know if artists like Nick Cave and Amoako Boafo, who regularly sell prints and photographs of their work, will release their work for any use.

Wikipedia, which is separate from Commons, has different standards for images of art. You are able to upload images of art without permission from an artist, directly to Wikipedia, as a non-free, fair use image. There are stricter standards for crediting and licensing when uploading images directly to Wikipedia, and all images of copyrighted art must be reduced in size to respect the artist's ability to make their own high quality copies available for sale. You can find more info on non-free images on Wikipedia here. 19h00s (talk) 16:27, 11 July 2023 (UTC)

Thank you so much for your answer. It's really useful, I'll remove the photos from comms just to no get mad the artists. Namile17 (talk) 08:29, 12 July 2023 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

--19h00s (talk) 18:07, 10 July 2023 (UTC)