User talk:QueerEcofeminist
|
No evidence of a free license at the claimed source
[edit]Hello QueerEcofeminist: Tagging files that claim to be own work for speedy deletion with a rationale like No evidence of a free license at the claimed source is nonsensical. Please stop. If you doubt the licensing status of an image, but have no information to add that directly contradicts the claim of own work, please use {{subst:npd}} or open a DR. Thanks, AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 21:59, 10 November 2020 (UTC)
- I will remember it for next time and do as you suggested, when in doubt leaving files unpatrolled or opening DR would be an option. QueerEcofeminist "cite! even if you fight"!!! [they/them/their] 15:41, 14 November 2020 (UTC)
Congratulations, dear license reviewer
[edit]![](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/8/82/Licensereview.png/220px-Licensereview.png)
Hi QueerEcofeminist, thanks for your request for license reviewer status. The request has been closed as successful, and you've been added to the list of reviewers. You can now start reviewing files – please see Commons:License review and Commons:Flickr files if you haven't done so already. We also have a guide how to detect copyright violations. Potential backlogs include Flickr review and files from other sources. You can enable the LicenseReview gadget from Preferences.
Important: You should not review your own uploads, nor those of anyone closely related to you!
Please feel free to join us on IRC: #wikimedia-commons webchat on irc.libera.chat. You can also add {{User license reviewer}} to your user page if you wish. Thank you for your contributions on Commons! --C1K98V (💬 ✒️ 📂) 03:39, 4 June 2022 (UTC)
- Sure, I will use the gadget and remember to not get into coi reviewing. Thanks QueerEcofeminist[they/them/their] 03:48, 4 June 2022 (UTC)
- Hi
- संजय_सुशील_भोसले.jpg
- Anandraj_Ambedkar_1.jpg
- this is my original content. if I am using some others persons camera and camera have default his original details then it is not my fault but the data I have uploaded is clicked by myself. I am not violating any copyright policy.
- thanks for your review and requesting to not delete the content. Sumedhdmankar (talk) 07:36, 14 October 2022 (UTC)
- It's up to the admin. I just thought that those files should be reviewed and I felt that those are not your own work as in you did not actually capture those photos. So I marked it for deletion. @Sumedhdmankar QueerEcofeminist[they/them/their] 08:45, 14 October 2022 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Is the Government Really Poor Edition 2.pdf
[edit]Copyright status: File:Is the Government Really Poor Edition 2.pdf
![]() |
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Is the Government Really Poor Edition 2.pdf. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
And also:
- File:FascistAttack eng.pdf
- File:Booklet-the-unemployment-crisis-sharing-edition-2-dec2020.pdf
- File:Fdi eng 3ed.pdf
- File:Rationalist Scientific Socialis Vivekananda.pdf
- File:Who was shivaji.pdf
- File:Fascism Eng.pdf
- File:Nuke small english wRefs.pdf
- File:We-The-People.pdf
- File:IradeEnglish.pdf
- File:Booklet-english-support-farmers-struggle-23feb21-v1.pdf
- File:Religion of temples.pdf
- File:India becoming.pdf
- File:Demonetisation.pdf
This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 05:18, 28 January 2023 (UTC)
Regarding College Wikipedia Page
[edit]Respected Sir, How tO create College Wikipedia Page Kindly Guide Gsadguru16 (talk) 09:31, 8 April 2023 (UTC)
Pl guide about wikibook.
[edit]Pl guide about wikibook. Swamijidevi (talk) 09:31, 8 April 2023 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Chance encounter between two species of ancient man (42463867230).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Abzeronow (talk) 17:12, 19 July 2023 (UTC)
![]() |
File:A slightly farther view of the map showing tectonics (42463904140).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Enyavar (talk) 22:33, 3 September 2023 (UTC)
![]() |
File:A copy of one of the Ajanta frescoes (44271885841).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 09:42, 26 September 2023 (UTC)
File tagging File:We-The-People.pdf
[edit]![]() |
This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:We-The-People.pdf. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:We-The-People.pdf]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Omphalographer (talk) 06:19, 9 October 2023 (UTC)
![]() |
File:The museum is another of Le Corbusier's creations (43366076425).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
A1Cafel (talk) 03:13, 27 December 2023 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Bangalore Bengaluru Kempegowda International Airport (48186335991).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Sunnya343 (talk) 02:43, 10 March 2024 (UTC)
Reminder to vote now to select members of the first U4C
[edit]- You can find this message translated into additional languages on Meta-wiki. Please help translate to your language
Dear Wikimedian,
You are receiving this message because you previously participated in the UCoC process.
This is a reminder that the voting period for the Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) ends on May 9, 2024. Read the information on the voting page on Meta-wiki to learn more about voting and voter eligibility.
The Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) is a global group dedicated to providing an equitable and consistent implementation of the UCoC. Community members were invited to submit their applications for the U4C. For more information and the responsibilities of the U4C, please review the U4C Charter.
Please share this message with members of your community so they can participate as well.
On behalf of the UCoC project team,
RamzyM (WMF) 23:16, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Wahlplakate (5070776091).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |