User talk:Helmlechner

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Helmlechner!

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 17:39, 1 July 2012 (UTC)

File:Abensberg Kuchlbauer-Turm 2010 09.JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Abensberg Kuchlbauer-Turm 2010 09.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | norsk bokmål | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Túrelio (talk) 15:50, 11 May 2013 (UTC)

File:Abensberg Kuchlbauer-Turm 2010 08.JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Abensberg Kuchlbauer-Turm 2010 08.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | norsk bokmål | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Túrelio (talk) 15:51, 11 May 2013 (UTC)

File:Abensberg Kuchlbauer-Turm 2010 10.JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Abensberg Kuchlbauer-Turm 2010 10.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | norsk bokmål | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Túrelio (talk) 15:51, 11 May 2013 (UTC)

File:Abensberg Kuchlbauer-Turm 2010 07.JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Abensberg Kuchlbauer-Turm 2010 07.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | norsk bokmål | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Túrelio (talk) 15:53, 11 May 2013 (UTC)

File:Abensberg Kuchlbauer-Turm 2010 06.JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Abensberg Kuchlbauer-Turm 2010 06.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | norsk bokmål | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Túrelio (talk) 15:57, 11 May 2013 (UTC)


Hallo Helmlechner, hast du bei der Aufnahme von File:Abensberg Kuchlbauerturm von Hundertwasser.JPG und File:Abensberg Kuchlbauer-Turm 2010 04.jpg sowie den anderen Fotos in Category:Brauerei Kuchlbauer definitiv auf öffentlichem Grund (z.B. Straße) gestanden? Die Frage ist auch in deinem Interesse, denn die Hundertwasser-Erben haben schon öfters geklagt. --Túrelio (talk) 15:58, 11 May 2013 (UTC)

c:File:Heiligenhafen 2006 018b 009a.jpg[edit]

Danke fuer das hochgeladene Bild. Leider musste es wieder geloescht werden, weil es ein aelteres Bild ueberschrieben hat. Da wir auch alte Bilder behalten, kannst du dein Bild bitte noch einmal mit dem upload wizard hochladen? --McZusatz (talk) 18:50, 29 January 2015 (UTC)

Habe das Bild unter dem Namen: Heiligenhafen Marktplatz 2012.jpg hochgeladen H. Helmlechner (talk) 15:34, 30 January 2015 (UTC)


Copyright status: File:Hannover Opernhaus.jpg[edit]

беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | español | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | ಕನ್ನಡ | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | norsk bokmål | norsk | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenščina | svenska | ತುಳು | українська | +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Hannover Opernhaus.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Robert Weemeyer (talk) 06:46, 25 March 2015 (UTC)

Clemens Hannover[edit]

Hallo Helmlechner, kannst du dir bitte abgewöhnen, Bilder anderer Leute mit der Funktion "eine andere Version hochladen" mit eigenen Bildern zu überschreiben? Dazu ist diese Funktion nicht da! mfg, --Rabanus Flavus (talk) 21:37, 1 April 2015 (UTC)

Ok. Habe die Bestimmungen gelesen. Es sollten nur eigene Bilder überschrieben werden. Wusste ich vorher nicht. MFG H. Helmlechner (talk) 20:08, 2 April 2015 (UTC)

- oder digitale Bearbeitungen (eindeutige Verbesserungen) der vorhandenen Datei. Gruß, --Rabanus Flavus (talk) 17:51, 6 April 2015 (UTC)

File tagging File:Lahn Stadt.jpg[edit]

беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | lietuvių | македонски | മലയാളം | मराठी | norsk bokmål | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | polski | português | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | اردو | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Lahn Stadt.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own.

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the OTRS-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Lahn Stadt.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Emha (talk) 14:01, 22 October 2015 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Schloss Rastatt 3.jpg[edit]

беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | español | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | ಕನ್ನಡ | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | norsk bokmål | norsk | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenščina | svenska | ತುಳು | українська | +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Schloss Rastatt 3.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

RP88 (talk) 07:42, 25 November 2015 (UTC)

File:Schloss Rastatt 2.jpg[edit]

You overwrote the content of File:Schloss Rastatt 2.jpg. I've performed a history split on that file. Your content is now at File:Schloss Rastatt 3.jpg. Because you did not supply a license I've marked the new content as lacking a license. If you can, please update the summary, license, and categories of the new file to match the depicted content. If by the time you see this note the file File:Schloss Rastatt 3.jpg has been deleted, leave me a note on my talk page and I'll undelete it so you can update the license. —RP88 (talk) 07:43, 25 November 2015 (UTC)

Thanks for updating the license on File:Schloss Rastatt 3.jpg. You may wish to update pages that are using File:Schloss Rastatt 2.jpg to instead use your photo File:Schloss Rastatt 3.jpg (I think your photo is superior for most uses). —RP88 (talk) 16:42, 27 November 2015 (UTC)

Einladung zur Teilnahme an Wiki Loves Monuments 2016 in Deutschland[edit]

Hallo Helmlechner!

Du erhältst diese Nachricht, weil du bei Wiki Loves Monuments 2016 teilgenommen hast.

Auch in diesem Jahr beteiligt sich Deutschland wieder am internationalen Fotowettbewerb rund um Bau- und Kulturdenkmale. Bisher wurden bereits mehr als 18.000 Bilder hochgeladen – und wir würden uns sehr über weitere Bilder von Dir freuen. Noch bis zum 30. September 2016 kannst Du Deine Bilder hochladen. Alles Wissenswerte erfährst du auf der Mitmach-Seite.

Außerdem möchten wir Dich einladen, ab 12. September 2016 an der Vorjury teilzunehmen. Diese sichtet und bewertet die hochgeladenen Bilder und ermittelt so gemeinsam mit der Jury, die im Oktober tagt, die Sieger von Wiki Loves Monuments 2016 in Deutschland.

Für Rückfragen steht das Organisationsteam gerne auf der Support-Seite oder unter info@wikilovesmonuments.de zur Verfügung.

Viel Spaß und Erfolg wünscht im Namen des Organisationsteams
(DCB, 18:46, 8 September 2016 (UTC))

File:Viechtach1979 (13).jpg[edit]

Hallo,

vor knapp zwei Jahren hast du die Aufnahme Viechtach1979 (13).jpg von Mike aus dem Bayerwald mit einem anderen Bild desselben Gebäudes überschrieben und als Kommentar „Aktuellere Aufnahme, begradigt” angegeben. So läuft es bei Wikimedia Commons eigentlich nicht (du hast ja seither und auch vorher viele andere Bilder hochgeladen); es kann und soll von einem Gebäude mehrere Aufnahmen geben, gerade aus verschiedenen Zeiten und Blickwinkeln. Bilder eines anderen Benutzers überschreiben sollte man nur in Ausnahmefällen, und dann muss auch der Urheber (author=…) geändert werden. Meinst du nicht auch?

Grüße, -- Renardo la vulpo (talk) 14:38, 8 October 2016 (UTC)

Share your experience and feedback as a Wikimedian in this global survey[edit]

  1. This survey is primarily meant to get feedback on the Wikimedia Foundation's current work, not long-term strategy.
  2. Legal stuff: No purchase necessary. Must be the age of majority to participate. Sponsored by the Wikimedia Foundation located at 149 New Montgomery, San Francisco, CA, USA, 94105. Ends January 31, 2017. Void where prohibited. Click here for contest rules.

Your feedback matters: Final reminder to take the global Wikimedia survey[edit]

(Sorry to write in Engilsh)

File:Berlin Skyline Fernsehturm 02.jpg[edit]

Ein schönes Bild, aber ist es wirklich vom Kollhoff-Tower aus aufgenommen? Wenn man auf dem Bild eine Linie vom Fernsehturm durch das Physikgebäude der TU zieht, führt diese direkt auf dem Betrachter, und auf der Karte führt diese Linie dann direkt auf den Funkturm, nicht jedoch auf den Kollhoff-Turm ... --188.102.48.175 13:38, 11 May 2018 (UTC)

Stimmt, das Foto wurde vom Berliner Funkturm aus aufgenammen.

Commons Fotos St. Ludgerus (Billerbeck)[edit]

Hallo Helmlechner

Du hast bei den Fotos des Artikels St. Ludgerus (Billerbeck) bei den commons in der Rubrik 'interior' einige Bilder des Inneren der Johanniskirche eingestellt. Meine Bitte: könntest du diese Bilder bitte in den korrekten Artikel verschieben? Es handelt sich um folgende Bilder::

File:St. Ludgerus Billerbeck Innenraum 05.jpg File:St. Ludgerus Billerbeck Innenraum 06.jpg File:St. Ludgerus Billerbeck Innenraum 07.jpg

Liebe Grüße, --Westerdam (talk) 05:31, 8 April 2019 (UTC)

Hallo Westerdam, Dateien kannst du mit dem HotCat-Helferlein komfortabel verschieben bzw. weiteren Kategorien zuordnen. Ich habe das für die drei genannten Bilder bereits erledigt und diese auch umbenannt. VG --Watzmann Talk 20:32, 8 April 2019 (UTC)
Hey Watzmann. Vielen Dank für den Hinweis und deine Hilfe! LG Westerdam