User talk:Meho29

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Meho29!

Slike Slovenije[edit]

Zdravo. Ko nalagaš slike slovenskih krajev, jih prosim uvrsti samo v čimbolj specifične možne kategorije. Torej ne Category:Slovenia, ampak recimo za panoramski posnetek Pirana v Category:Piran in Category:Panoramics in Slovenia. Ali za Tromostovje, v Category:Bridges in Ljubljana. Zelo zaželjeno je tudi, da napišeš čim bolj natančen opis, ker sicer ne bo noben vedel, kaj točno predstavlja recimo slika Jezero2.jpg. Je to mlin v vasi Jezero na Cerkniškem jezeru? Na kakšnem drugem jezeru? Pomaga tudi, če se potrudiš z geolokacijo. Hvala, --Yerpo (talk) 09:59, 16 November 2009 (UTC)

Prosim. Če ne moramo to počet za tabo drugi. Glej zgled: [1]. — Yerpo Eh? 10:51, 15 April 2011 (UTC)

Kategorizacija[edit]

Slike naj bi bile v najnižjih možnih kategorijah, da je kategorizacija čim bolj uporabna in pregledna. Zato sem mdr. npr. odstranil kategorijo Bovec municipality iz slike Trdnjava Kluže 02.jpg, ker je že kategorija Fort Kluže v tej kategoriji, zato bi to pomenilo podvajanje. --Sporti (talk) 12:20, 6 January 2012 (UTC)

- Hvala

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Šmarjetna gora 03.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Šmarjetna gora 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Moonik 14:54, 25 January 2012 (UTC)
Dobar.svg Excellent! --Iifar 15:40, 25 January 2012 (UTC)
Very good! --Avda 10:31, 26 January 2012 (UTC)


Da se ne boš spraševal preveč za kaj gre, fotko sem nominiral jaz, ker mi je od tvojih (tudi sicer enkratnih) najbolj všeč, očitno je bila tudi drugim. V bodoče lahko svoja dela sam nominiraš po navodilih zgoraj. — Yerpo Eh? 18:03, 28 January 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Dovžanova soteska 02.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dovžanova soteska 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Iifar 11:29, 30 January 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Gibraltar 03.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gibraltar 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Sfu 21:04, 30 January 2012 (UTC)
Šmarjetna gora 04.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Šmarjetna gora 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Very nice colors, good quality. --Iifar 11:31, 30 January 2012 (UTC) Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment + good composition for me. PierreSelim 13:24, 30 January 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Granada 02.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Granada 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality to me. --NorbertNagel 21:05, 31 January 2012 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Črnuče 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Very nice appearence, and shows structure of bridge. Focus OK given 2 sec exposure. --Rwendland 09:20, 31 January 2012 (UTC) Yes, but a bit tilted (see above) and not perfectly centered, a pity for this kind of pictures.--Jebulon 17:22, 31 January 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Sevilla Plaza de Espana 01.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sevilla Plaza de Espana 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality --LC-de 16:53, 1 February 2012 (UTC)

FP Promotion[edit]

Šmarjetna gora 03.jpg
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Šmarjetna gora 03.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Šmarjetna gora 03.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

Cscr-featured.svg

/FPCBot (talk) 22:07, 5 February 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Tower Bridge 02.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tower Bridge 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Interesting angle. --Mattbuck 10:29, 8 February 2012 (UTC)
Sevilla 01.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sevilla 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
OK. --Mattbuck 10:29, 8 February 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Granada 03.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Granada 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Nice place, isn't it ?--Jebulon 17:27, 31 January 2012 (UTC)
Unsharp and a bit overexposed, but promotable if sharpened. Mattbuck 10:29, 8 February 2012 (UTC)
Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Image has been sharpened --Meho29 10:29, 9 February 2012 (UTC)
A bit better, but still could do with more. Also, there are quite a few black specks in the sky - insects maybe? - which should be cloned out. Mattbuck 18:20, 9 February 2012 (UTC)
Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment I hope that the picture is OK now. It has been re-stiched, re-cropped, sharpened, ... --Meho29 11:44, 11 February 2012 (UTC) Good now. --Jebulon 11:41, 12 February 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

CapoDelFalcone.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! CapoDelFalcone.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Pretty. --Mattbuck 19:44, 23 February 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Boats on the river Cam.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Boats on the river Cam.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Tight crop, but good quality. --Coyau 23:52, 3 March 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Old Town Square Praga 01.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Old Town Square Praga 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality for me. --Jkadavoor 05:50, 13 March 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Mala Strana 01.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mala Strana 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 16:02, 14 March 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Karlov most - mala strana.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Karlov most - mala strana.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 19:38, 21 March 2012 (UTC)
Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment maybe a bit closer crop would remove the distracting building parts in the lower foreground---Martin Kraft 09:37, 22 March 2012 (UTC)~

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Česky Krumlov 03.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Česky Krumlov 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment I corrected the tilt. --Meho29 17:10, 24 March 2012 (UTC)
Better now. --Moonik 17:58, 24 March 2012 (UTC)

Česky Krumlov 03b.jpg[edit]

I did a slightly different crop and changed the lighting somewhat. Feel free to use it. Saffron Blaze (talk) 12:29, 28 March 2012 (UTC)

Česky Krumlov 03b.jpg

Wow[edit]

Sorry for unrelated message, but your images are STUNNING! Bravo! Keep up the great work! :) --WhiteWriter speaks 14:18, 2 July 2012 (UTC)

A barnstar for you![edit]

Photographer Barnstar.png The Photographer's Barnstar
Fantastic work! Bravo! WhiteWriter speaks 14:19, 2 July 2012 (UTC)

Gimnazija Kranj 02.jpg[edit]

Please fix stitching errors or withdraw your candidate. It will be not very nice to promote image with so many errors. --Ivar (talk) 06:13, 16 July 2012 (UTC)

File:Lublana 125.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Lublana 125.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Eleassar (t/p) 16:47, 25 August 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Portoferraio panorama 01.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Portoferraio panorama 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Nice view --Poco a poco 20:34, 11 September 2012 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

Eleassar (t/p) 22:35, 26 September 2012 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

File:Črnuče 02.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Črnuče 02.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Eleassar (t/p) 11:14, 19 October 2012 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

Eleassar (t/p) 15:33, 21 October 2012 (UTC)


File:Presernov gaj 4.jpg[edit]

Copyright-problem.svg
Wikimedia Commons does not accept derivative works of non-free works such as File:Presernov gaj 4.jpg. It only accepts free content, which is images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Reproductions of copyrighted works are also subject to the same copyright, and therefore this file must unfortunately be considered non-free. For more information, please read Commons:Derivative works and Commons:Freedom of panorama. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk. The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that this file was not a derivative work of a non-free work, you may request undeletion.

čeština  dansk  Deutsch  English  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  polski  português  português do Brasil  sicilianu  slovenščina  svenska  suomi  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  ไทย  日本語  中文  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  +/−

Eleassar (t/p) 19:59, 28 October 2012 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

Eleassar (t/p) 20:25, 2 November 2012 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

Eleassar (t/p) 08:11, 6 November 2012 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

Eleassar (t/p) 16:46, 13 November 2012 (UTC)

Picture of the Year voting round 1 open[edit]

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2012 Picture of the Year competition is now open. We're interested in your opinion as to which images qualify to be the Picture of the Year for 2012. Voting is open to established Wikimedia users who meet the following criteria:

  1. Users must have an account, at any Wikimedia project, which was registered before Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000 [UTC].
  2. This user account must have more than 75 edits on any single Wikimedia project before Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000 [UTC]. Please check your account eligibility at the POTY 2012 Contest Eligibility tool.
  3. Users must vote with an account meeting the above requirements either on Commons or another SUL-related Wikimedia project (for other Wikimedia projects, the account must be attached to the user's Commons account through SUL).

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. From professional animal and plant shots to breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historically relevant images, images portraying the world's best architecture, maps, emblems, diagrams created with the most modern technology, and impressive human portraits, Commons features pictures of all flavors.

For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topic categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you can vote for as many images as you like. The first round category winners and the top ten overall will then make it to the final. In the final round, when a limited number of images are left, you must decide on the one image that you want to become the Picture of the Year.

To see the candidate images just go to the POTY 2012 page on Wikimedia Commons

Wikimedia Commons celebrates our featured images of 2012 with this contest. Your votes decide the Picture of the Year, so remember to vote in the first round by January 30, 2013.

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee


Delivered by Orbot1 (talk) at 09:53, 19 January 2013 (UTC) - you are receiving this message because you voted last year

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Arriate 01.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Arriate 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
{{{3}}}

File:Colnarna - Blejsko jezero 01.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Colnarna - Blejsko jezero 01.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Eleassar (t/p) 10:44, 5 March 2013 (UTC)

Picture of the day[edit]

I saw your picture File:Šmarjetna gora 03.jpg today as it showed up as picture of the day. Very nice. Thank you for contributing such high quality images. /Dcastor (talk) 13:47, 12 March 2013 (UTC)

FP Promotion[edit]

Panorama Bled 01.jpg
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Panorama Bled 01.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Panorama Bled 01.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

Cscr-featured.svg

/FPCBot (talk) 13:08, 6 July 2013 (UTC)

Picture change[edit]

One of your pictures File:Marciana marina 01.jpg is mistakenly named. It turns out that the picture is actually the promenade in Rio Marina, not Marciana Marina. I changed the description and added the coordinates. You might want to request a name change for the picture. •••Life of Riley (TC) 00:15, 4 September 2013 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Česky Krumlov 01.jpg[edit]

Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  norsk bokmål  norsk  norsk nynorsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  suomi  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  עברית  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Česky Krumlov 01.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Yours sincerely, Jarekt (talk) 13:28, 20 September 2013 (UTC)

File:Šmarjetna gora 04.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Šmarjetna gora 04.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Eleassar (t/p) 09:56, 4 November 2013 (UTC)

File:Kranj Center 03.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Kranj Center 03.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Eleassar (t/p) 21:24, 1 February 2014 (UTC)

File:Kranj Main Square 01.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Kranj Main Square 01.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Eleassar (t/p) 22:16, 1 February 2014 (UTC)

File:Trnovo 001.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Trnovo 001.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Eleassar (t/p) 14:06, 4 March 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Srednja vas pond 01.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Srednja vas pond 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality -- Spurzem 14:38, 2 October 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Univerza v Ljubljani 01.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Univerza v Ljubljani 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support QI --A.Savin 11:04, 23 October 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Bled Castle 05.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bled Castle 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Not the sharpest, but impressive view. I loved Bled. --Kadellar 13:15, 28 October 2014 (UTC)

File:Kranj - mestna knjižnica Kranj 01.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Kranj - mestna knjižnica Kranj 01.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Eleassar (t/p) 07:55, 4 June 2015 (UTC)

Jelovica[edit]

Živjo, kje pa je tu Jelovica? (slika je opisana kot pogled proti Jelovici)? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Eleassar (talk • contribs) 15:15, 4. junij 2015‎ (UTC)

File:Rakovniska Grascina 01.jpg[edit]

Na tej sliki ni Rakovniška graščina, pač pa verjetno en pomožen objekt Salezijancev, ki mu ne najdem imena. Taprava graščina je enonadstropni dvorec v obliki križa, ki stoji v neposredni bližini (kako zgleda, lahko vidiš tukaj). Če imaš možnost, prosim pobrskaj in vprašaj, kaj je to na tvoji sliki, če boš še kdaj hodil naokoli pa bo tudi fotka pravega dvorca zelo dobrodošla. Hvala, — Yerpo Eh? 10:42, 28 October 2015 (UTC)

Na sliki je nekdanji konvikt oz. pozneje tovarna pletenin Angora, zdaj pa pastoralni center;[2] EŠD 9225.[3] --Eleassar (t/p) 08:17, 29 October 2015 (UTC)
Slika se lahko uporabi za ilustracijo članka sl:Konvikt, Rakovnik. --Eleassar (t/p) 08:26, 29 October 2015 (UTC)
Hvala za tole, sem popravil opis. — Yerpo Eh? 08:52, 30 October 2015 (UTC)

FP Promotion[edit]

Jamnik 05.jpg
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Jamnik 05.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Jamnik 05.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

Cscr-featured.svg

/FPCBot (talk) 05:01, 17 November 2015 (UTC)

FP Promotion[edit]

Kranj - panorama 03.jpg
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Kranj - panorama 03.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Kranj - panorama 03.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

Cscr-featured.svg

/FPCBot (talk) 21:02, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

File:Cerkev sv. Mihaela na Barju 01.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Cerkev sv. Mihaela na Barju 01.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Eleassar (t/p) 17:10, 1 February 2016 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Sporti (talk) 09:30, 21 December 2016 (UTC)