User talk:Aliman5040

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Aviso: Este wikipedista se encuentra trabajando y contribuye de manera esporádica
Avis: Ce wikipédien est actif dans le monde du travail et ne contribue que de manière sporadique

Help with Flag[edit]

I see you created a lot of pictures of the flags for town in switzerland. Could you create one for Kiental (the place I live in). --Rudy23 (talk) 19:56, 14 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Gracias[edit]

Gracias, verdaderamente por tu ayuda. Alessandro Zangrilli (talk)

Ayudame, por favor[edit]

Ola, hay 3 fotografias que yo he puesto en el sitio hace tiempo, pero las personas fotografadas nunca me dieron permiso de publicarlas. Como puedo hacer para borrar estas fotos de Commons? Puedes ayudarme? Te lo agradezco muchissimo. Las fotos son A woman's portrait.JPG Portrait d'une femme.jpg A girl looking at herself in the mirror.jpg--Alessandro Zangrilli (talk) 11:18, 1 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for uploading images on Commons.

Please copy all information from original image (author, uploader (if not the same), description, licence tag(s)) when you move it to Commons from other Wiki. Please note that Commons policy doesn't allow non-commercial use only images.

EugeneZelenko 13:55, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Pictures of Botero sculptures[edit]

In many countries, pictures of statues are covered by the copyright of the sculptor, in addition to the copyright of the photographer. In some countries, there is an exception to this for statues visible from a public place.

I do not know about Colombian law, but it would be nice if you could provide information on that. David.Monniaux 19:23, 11 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Afrikaans  العربية  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  Esperanto  español  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  magyar  íslenska  italiano  日本語  ქართული  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  +/− Hello!

Thank you for providing images to the wikimedia commons. Please keep in mind that images uploaded to the commons should be useful to all users of wikimedia projects. This is possible only if the images can be found by other people.

To allow others to find the images you uploaded here, the images should be in some place that can be found by navigating the category structure. This means that you should put the images into appropriate category and optionally place the images on topic pages (galleries), or do both (see Commons:Categories). To find good categories for your images, the CommonSense tool may help.

You can find a convenient overview of your uploaded files in this gallery.

The important point is that the images should be placed in the general structure somewhere. There is a large number of completely unsorted images on the commons right now. If you would like to help to place some of those images where they can be found, please do!

Thank you. --pfctdayelise (translate?) 12:43, 16 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, you tagged this image as GFDL but did not provide a source who can verify that it is indeed licensed under GFDL. Additionally, the image is an exact copy of en:Image:1936 wolympics logo.jpg, who is used under the fair use clause in US copyright law. Could you please explain your reasoning for tagging the image as GFDL? The same information would also be useful for the other Winter Olympics logos you uploaded.

If you have uploaded images and knowingly added false information you could be blocked from using this service. Thuresson 04:25, 8 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]


العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Parquedelaluz2.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{GFDL-self}} to release it under the GFDL or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Rüdiger Wölk 03:39, 24 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Banderas[edit]

Veo que has estrado subindo muchas banderas en PNG. Aunque es un buen formato, yo te sugeriría usar SVG. Para los diseños sencillos de esas bnaderas (cuadrados, triángulos) estaría mejor. Platonides 20:51, 13 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

No hacen falta grandes programas. http://www.inkscape.org/ es software libre, multiplataforma y trabaja muy bien con SVG. Platonides 17:01, 14 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Universidad Pontificia Bolivariana (artículo)[edit]

Con toda razón colega. No existen motivos para defender la existencia del artículo Universidad Pontificia Bolivariana en commons. Fue un acto de la más completa ingenuidad. Por favor borrarlo sin ninguna misericordia. Un abrazo User:Albeiror24

Flag of Amalfi[edit]

Hi, can you please make here a short statement which of the both Flags Image:Banderaamalfi.PNG or Image:Banderaamalfi.svg has the more accurate colour? --jed 05:33, 22 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image deletion warning Image:Banderabarbosa.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans  Bahasa Indonesia  bosanski  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  eesti  English  español  Esperanto  français  galego  hrvatski  íslenska  italiano  magyar  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  occitan  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  shqip  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Tiếng Việt  Türkçe  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  українська  հայերեն  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  조선말  한국어  日本語  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  עברית  العربية  پښتو  فارسی  ދިވެހިބަސް  +/−

ALE! ¿…? 15:37, 27 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Imágen errónea[edit]

Hola Aliman. He intentado subir un escudo que necesitaba para un artículo, pero lo he hecho mal y no se borrarlo. ¿Puedes hacerl tú? es File:Escudo Maldonado.PDF, pero la imagen no es esa. Lo intenté también sustituyendolo por File:Escudo Maldonado.SVG, y he creado otro, también mal.--Mercedes 09:26, 16 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

No te molestes, ya he encontrado la plantilla, gracias de todas formas.--Mercedes 09:44, 16 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Félicitations, cher administrateur ![edit]

Offert par le nouvel administrateur à ses confrères...

Félicitations Aliman5040 ! Tu es maintenant pourvu des droits d'administrateur sur le site. Merci d'ajouter ton nom et tes coordonnées à la liste des administrateurs.
Il n'est pas inutile de relire attentivement la page Commons:Administrateurs et les pages liées (notamment Commons:Administrators' noticeboard, Commons:Deletion requests), avant de te lancer dans les effacements de page, protections de page, blocages de compte ou modifications de pages protégées. La plupart des actions d'administrateurs sont réversibles par les autres sysops, à l'exception des fusions d'historiques qui doivent donc être traités avec précaution.

Cary "Bastiqe" Bass demandez 19:52, 20 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]


Berliner Mauer[edit]

Hi, I just saw that you deleted [1] this picture and that your comment was duplicate. But which one is the other duplicate? --Svens Welt 14:22, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Información de Imágenes[edit]

Pues mira; cuando subo una fotografía o algo que "valga la pena" le coloco la plantilla de información, pero una imagen SVG tan simple pienso que esta demás esa plantilla y me limitaba a seleccionar la licencia; pero pues ya que haces la observación, lo seguiré haciendo. Saludos, --Jyon 01:35, 3 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ayuda[edit]

Hola, espero que hayas pasado unas buenas vacaciones. Necesito ayuda para traducir la cita de Ibn Khaldoun.jpg ya que no se ni jota de alemán. Es muy breve. gracias por la ayuda. 200.89.34.18 15:40, 6 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Bello-coat of arms.svg[edit]

As rendered in Wikimedia SVG renderer, this image has strange black rectangles... AnonMoos 00:58, 6 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Gracias[edit]

Hola, gracias por la bienvenida en la página de discusión de mi nombre de usuario. Estos son los detalles que van construyendo una real comunidad en torno a Wikipedia. ulises 19:27, 8 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

I think there was mistakes in the list you added in User:Orgullobot/commands (see [2]). So, you deleted Category:Coats of arms of municipalities of the canton of Graubünden, though it had a right name. I have requested its undeletion. --Juiced lemon 15:32, 23 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

POTY 2006[edit]

The arrangements for the Commons Picture of the Year 2006 competition are now complete, and voting will start tomorrow, Feb 1st. All the featured pictures promoted last year are automatically nominated. As the creator of one or more images nominated for the election we invite you to participate in the event. Alvesgaspar 11:45, 31 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Me das tu opinión?[edit]

Hola paisano... te escribo para pedirte que me des tu opinión sobre el artículo de Cúcuta.

Muchas gracias. --Qwerty2 07:36, 5 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Genève[edit]

Bonjour,

Non, la langue du lieu soit être utilisée pour le nom des catégories. Cordialement, Yann 19:22, 18 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Qu'est-ce qu'une "ville internationale" ? Ça ne veut rien dire. C'est de toute façon une mauvaise idée. Il est possible de faire des redirections pour les articles et les catégories, je ne vois pas pourquoi on n'utiliserait pas cette fonctionnalité. Cordialement, Yann 19:55, 18 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Duplicate images[edit]

Hi, please don't delete duplicate images before having checked that the images have been replaced on other wikipedia projects. /Lokal_Profil 23:27, 22 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Logos[edit]

Hi, you deleted Image:Swb-Logo.jpg and Image:Melchers Logo.png with remark "logo". Please undelete them. Both logos are not eligible to copyright. Each has a simple design, consisting of no more than three characters. --Romwriter 12:48, 24 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Gracias[edit]

Hola, muchas gracias, quedó perfecto. --JuanCamilo 00:48, 3 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Bloqueo[edit]

Hola Aliman5040

Porfavor, me gustaria que me explicaras porque un administrador puede bloquear la dirección IP de un usuario y como puedo desbloquearla.

Gracias --81.203.3.143 13:57, 17 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Todo fué, por que subí a Commons una imagen varias veces (cada vez que me la borraba el administrador) y la última vez, además fué cuando me bloqueó la dirección IP, con el motivo siguiente: upload fu. Además de que no entiendo muy bien el inglés, he intentado traducirlo y no se a que se refiere. A ver si me puedes ayudar...

Gracias --81.203.3.143 17:56, 17 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Ok, puede ser. Me ha quedado claro. Muchas Gracias por la aclaración. --81.203.3.143 21:53, 17 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Categorías de iglesias de Colombia[edit]

Hola Juan,

¿Cómo estás? me alegra escribirte. Pues te cuento que ya he estrenado mis botones en Wikipedia, haciendo mucho mantenimiento y ahora estoy comenzando a molestar también por estos lados y últimamente un poquito también por Wikinoticias.

Precisamente estoy dándole una organizadita a las fotos de las iglesias de Colombia, hice dos categorías para iglesias de Boyacá y de Bogotá que habían bastantes, hasta se podría hacer una pequeña galería solo con ese tema, pues la categoría completa debe tener más de 100 fotos y hasta he visto algunas repetidas. De todas maneras vi que tu hiciste hace unos meses la categoría de las iglesias de Antioquia, pero se llama "Churches of Antioquia" y no "Churches in Antioquia", no sé si ese nombre cuadre mejor, pero te escribo a ver cómo podemos dejar más unificado todo.

Saludos, Frank --> (Opinión) 00:41, 26 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Muchísimas gracias Juan, muy buen trabajo. :)) Por cierto, quería aprovechar para preguntarte si hay algún modelo de monobook para Commons o algo así por el estilo. --Frank --> (Opinión) 16:48, 26 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Revert sur Defaultsort[edit]

Bonjour,

Je vois que vous avez annulé les modifications que j'avais apportées hier sur la catégorisation de deux de vos dessins, Thunstetten et Saint-Légier-La Chiésaz. Dommage, elles avaient pour seul but d'assurer un classement alphabétique correct quelle que soit la catégorie.

Par ailleurs faites attention, lorsque vous-même vous précisez un alias, de l'écrire sans accent. En effet, les caractères accentués sont mal interprétés par Wikipedia et le tri alphabétique s'en trouve faussé. C'est ainsi que Saint-Légier-La Chiésaz se trouve maintenant classé par erreur après Saint-Leu-la-Forêt dans la catégorie Crosses in heraldry.

Cordialement, Bruno 13:22, 29 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Bien reçu et pardon de cette négligence de ma part. Bonne fin de journée, Bruno 13:35, 29 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Bild:Schwanden bei Brienz-coat of arms.svg[edit]

Hi

Thank you for creating the flag of my home-village :)

But the Flag isn't exactly correct...

the red mountain only goes up until 2/3 of the image.

please have a look to their website:

http://www.schwandenbrienz.ch


Hallo Danke für das Erstellen des Wappens meiner Heimatgemeinde :)

Leider ist das Wappen nicht ganz korrekt. Denn der rote Berg (das Rothorn...) geht nur bis 2/3 der Gesamthöhe des Wappens und ist nicht ganz so spitz.

Hier siehst du die korrekte Version: http://www.schwandenbrienz.ch

Vielleicht kannst du das ja noch korrigieren?

Grüsse und Danke! Simu

Wappen: 3298 Oberwil bei Büren[edit]

Hallo Juan, Du hast eine sehr gute Arbeit mit den Orts-Wappen gemacht! Aber bei Oberwil-bei-Büren ist Dir ein Fehler passiert. Du hast das Wappen von Oberwil-Gachnang TG eingefügt. Auf der Seite von Oberwil bei Büren habe ich das Wappen ausgetauscht. Bitte korrigier doch die anderen Seiten auch noch. Das richtige Wappen hat eine goldene Egge mit einem Silberring, auf blauem Grund. Herzlichen Dank und beste Grüsse

Samuel Otti Biogemüse 3298 Oberwil bei Büren

Hallo Aliman5040,

Danke für die Aenderung des Wappen von Oberwil bei Büren. Leider ist das Bild nicht korrekt. Normalerweise ist die Egge viereckig, mit vier Querbalken (vier Zähne, fünf Zähne, vier Zähne , fünf Zähne), und mit dem Silberring. Du kannst das Wappen auf der Homepage der Gemeinde Oberwil bei Büren anschauen (www.oberwil-bueren.ch). Herzlichen Dank und beste Grüsse

Samuel Otti 3298 Oberwil bei Büren

Gemeindewappen[edit]

Lieber Juan

Ich habe gesehen, dass Du viele Wappen von Schweizer Gemeinden sehr schön ausgeführt hast.

Ich würde Dich gerne direkt kontaktieren bezüglich weiterer Gemeindewappen.

Kannst Du mir bitte ein Mail schicken mit Deiner Mailadresse?

--Ernestp 08:21, 22 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Aliman :-)[edit]

Après une longue période de travail intensif dans la vie active, me revoilà de retour pour bosser un peu sur commons. Cela fait près de deux ans que je me suis absenté et je dois te donner des félicitations pour ton travail et ta persévérance sur ce projet des blasons pour la Suisse.
Ben dis donc tu t'es drôlement fait la main, tu touches bien maintenant c'est du travail de pro, bravo. ;-)

De mon coter j'ai repris là ou je m'étais arrêter, et j'arrive bientôt au bout de toutes les communes du cantons du Tessin. Dès que j'ai fini je me lancerais sur un autre canton. :-p N'hésite pas à venir causer sur ma page d'accueil aussi, si cela nous permet de mieux avancer ensemble...
++ et encore félicitation l'ami et bravo pour ton grade d'admin :-)

Delta-9 00:52, 26 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Pregunta[edit]

Hola Aliman. Vi que hablabas en español, entonces decidi preguntarte algo con respecto a commons.

En las wikipedias francesas e inglesas vi muchas fotografias, imagenes y logos de partidos políticos. Y me preguntaba si yo puedo subirlos a commons con mi sesión para poder usarlas en la wikipedia en español. O si esta prohibido?

Desde ya muchas gracias!

Carlosbenitez26

Coat of arms[edit]

Hi Aliman5040. I noticed that you created many SVG coat of arms of Swiss municipalities. Could you also create one for Altstätten? The current one (de-WP only) is very bad. --Leyo 22:23, 11 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ich habe bei mir geantwortet. --Leyo 20:10, 21 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please explain deletion of Image:Swiss Coop Logo.png[edit]

Was there a deletion request for this image?

Most text logos like this get kept, as they don't meet the threshold of originality for copyright. One example: Commons:Deletion requests/Image:AMD-Frankfurt.png. {{PD-textlogo}} seems to apply here too.

--Hroðulf (talk) 16:53, 29 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your kind explanation. Why did you use speedy deletion rather than a deletion request?
There was a similar deletion request for a logo that is not a photo:

Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2007/08#Image:IBM_logo.svg

There is some originality, but perhaps not enough, and no more than in IBM or others at Special:WhatLinksHere/Template:PD-textlogo. I don't know Swiss copyright law.
-Hroðulf (talk) 15:59, 6 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
AFAIK there is no problem with the Swiss copyright law (see Bild:Coop.svg and Kategorie:LogoSH-Bild). It's a Commons problem. --Leyo 19:00, 6 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

sobre las fotos[edit]

Hola paisano,(yo también de colombia peor vivo en Paris) Desde hace poco que colaboro con wikipeida. Como debo hacer para realizar lo que me pides? Como puedo acceder nuevamente amis imagenes subidas? Gracias

Logos de partidos[edit]

Hola Aliman.

Porque en la wiki hispana no se pueden usar los logos de los partidos? Pregunto porque en otras wikipedias si se puede.

Saludos Usuario:Carlosbenitez26

Ahh ok, ya entiendo. Gracias por tu respuesta Aliman
Saludos Usuario:Carlosbenitez26

Chuch elements in Antioquia[edit]

Hola Aliman!

oee no se ingles, pero no le falta una "r" a la palabra Chuch? saludos --SajoR (talk) 01:52, 6 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, du hast die Datei erstellt. Auf der offiziellen Seite http://www.oberwil-bueren.ch/cms/front_content.php?idart=1 findet sich eine andere Darstellung. Was ist richtig? --Jodo (talk) 17:34, 22 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Gracias...!!![edit]

Oye Juan muchas gracias por haber situado algunas imágenes que subí en sus categorías, pues no soy muy bueno categorizando las imágenes q subo o no encuentro en donde ponerles entre tantas sub-sub-subcategorias je, je, je!!! ;n) --Jorelo 03:05, 18 March 2009 (UTC)

Tip: Categorizing images[edit]

Afrikaans  العربية  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  Esperanto  español  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  magyar  íslenska  italiano  日本語  ქართული  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  +/−


Hello, Aliman5040!
Tip: Add categories to your files
Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

BotMultichillT 06:39, 7 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Why interference Category:Gastronomy?[edit]

See also Why interference Category:Gastronomy? (Category:Gastronomy --> Category talk:Gastronomy)--Tom778 (talk) 10:25, 26 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Bundesrat 2009[edit]

Hallo, OK, wie gewünscht werde ich gleich das neue Bundesratfoto 2009 mit D. Burhkalter hochladen. Der "Trick" dabei: Auf http://www.admin.ch/br/dienstleistungen/00094/index.html?lang=de rechts das gezippte hochauflösende TIFF-File laden, in jpg exportieren und dann so hochladen. So ist es in der grossen Auflösung. Mache ich noch heute Abend. Noebu (talk) 16:56, 3 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Nachtrag: neues Foto hier: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Bundesrat_der_Schweiz_2009_in_Besetzung_gueltig_ab_2009-11-01.jpg Noebu (talk) 17:25, 3 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

A4[edit]

Hallo Aliman5040, du hast ja die Karte der A4 Schweiz erstellt. Könntest du die aktualisieren? Die Autobahn zwischen Zürich und Zug wurde eröffnet. Gruss --Glugi12 (talk) 19:10, 27 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please help replace this outdated license[edit]

Hello!

Thank you for donating images to the Wikimedia Commons. You have uploaded some images in the past with the license {{PD}}. While this was a license acceptable in the early days of Wikimedia, since January 2006, this license has been deprecated and since October 2008 no new uploads with this license was allowed.

The license on older images should be replaced with a better and more specific license/permissions and you can help by checking the images and adding {{PD-self}} if you are the author or one of the other templates that you can see in the template on the image page.

Thank you for your help. If you need help feel free to ask at Commons talk:Licensing or contact User:Zscout370.

The images we would like you to check are:

BotMultichillT 20:11, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion[edit]

Hi, please note that uploader's request is not a reason to speedy-delete an image (especially when said image is in use on many projects, like File:A girl looking at herself in the mirror.jpg). Please have the uploader open a DR for these, or open one yourself if you know what their reason is. Thanks. –Tryphon 12:59, 1 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

@Aliman5040, just for your information. Alessandro has asked 12 admins at the same time to perform these deletions. In between, regular DRs have been filed for Commons:Deletion requests/File:Portrait d'une femme.jpg and Commons:Deletion requests/File:A woman's portrait.JPG, whereas the third image is heavily used on many projects. I would recommend not to file a speedy without any further input from the uploader. --Túrelio (talk) 13:30, 1 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo Aliman5040,

das Wappen von Oberwil bei Büren auf http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Oberwil_bei_Büren-coat_of_arms.svg ist definitiv falsch. Die richtige Version kannst Du auf der Website von Oberwil bei Büren ansehen. Bitte ersetz doch die falsche Version mit einer richtigen. Besten Dank und herzliche Grüsse

samotti

Samuel Otti Oberwil bei Büren

Árvore alada[edit]

Paz e bem!

Aliman5040:

Com teus desenhos fiz este:

Logo Servitiu

A inspiração é a seguinte citação:

"Há duas coisas que devemos dar aos nossos filhos: uma é raízes e a outra é asas." Hodding Carter, 1907-1972


Eugenio Hansen, OFS (talk) 15:53, 26 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DR[edit]

Could you please have a look at http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Charmar.jpg. Difficult to decide without profound knowledge of french... --Mbdortmund (talk) 23:20, 5 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

OTRS[edit]

Hi, I'm writing you regarding the following matter: As you probably know, the OTRS team handles emails, in which user confirm the copyright for files they uploaded. We have different queues for different languages and volunteers who reply to them. Unfortunatly our spanish speaking volunteers became inactive a while ago. Now the queue for spanish e-mails is growing and noone is able to handle them in a timely fashion.

Thus: Are you, as a native Spanish speaker, interested in becoming an OTRS member? If yes, you can formaly apply here --DieBuche (talk) 22:14, 9 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Julián Rodriguez Blanco[edit]

Para decirle que la foto que ud borró, de Julián Rodriguez "Julianrodriguezrcn.jpg" no era un screenshot, pues si se fijo no había logo de rcn, esa fue una foto que se tomó en el estudio de rcn y tengo el permiso de Julián Rodriguez, mañana la subiré de nuevo, a menos que ud me diga que de verdad no está permitido.

Y con respecto a la otra imagen de la carátula del Cd no sé si está permitido colocarla, se llamaba así "Guitarraapasionada2.jpg" tengo el permiso de Julián Rodriguez, el motivo del borrado fue que era de contenido Promocional, pero no se muestra ni precio, ni lugares para conseguirlo ni nada de eso, si realmente no está permitido aún con el permiso de Julián Rodriguez, hágamelo saber para conseguir otra foto, Gracias. --Marioabn (talk) 04:37, 4 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This talk page in other languages:

De-adminship warning[edit]

Dear Aliman5040. I am writing to you to inform you that you are in danger of losing your adminship on Commons because of inactivity.

If you want to keep your adminship, you need both to sign at Commons:Administrators/Inactivity section/Aug-Sep 2011 within 30 days of today's date, and also to make at least five further admin actions in the following six months. Anyone who does not do so will automatically lose administrator rights.

You can read the de-admin policy at Commons:Administrators/De-adminship.

Thank you a×pdeHello! 16:58, 15 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion of duplicates[edit]

Hello Aliman5040, please do not delete files that are marked as duplicates as long as they are still in use! See e.g. File:North Yemen.png and [3] (still used on 3 projects at the moment, not replaced yet), and File:Joskin.jpg (1 project). Template:Duplicate gives clear hints on how to handle "duplicate deletions". Thanks --:bdk: 21:45, 20 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hola Aliman5040! que mas pues, mira tengo este arti como candidato para D, lo nominé el 18 de junio, pero solo el 30 de julio salio de la lista de espera, y aun nadie comenta ni vota, sinceramente estas candidaturas son muy muy lentas. Por fa, cuando tengas algo de tiempo revisa el arti y según lo que te parezca comenta y/o vota. Saludos --SajoR (talk) 02:07, 21 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

PoeMaRío[edit]

Hola. No entiendo por qué borraste la imagen del logo de PoeMaRío. Verás, yo trabajo con ellos y es mi deber realizar la página en Wikipedia. De ahí a que haya subido el logo y todo lo demás. --Msorel

Hola. Lo de PoeMaRío no es publicidad, es un logo que, por cierto, hace parte de un evento de carácter gratuito dirigido al público en general de la ciudad. Saludos. --Msorel

File:A whisper to Jenn Turcott.jpg[edit]

Hi, could you please review your deletion of File:A whisper to Jenn Turcott.jpg

I've uploaded a number of self-created images to Commons. My upload and declaration made them free images. I coincidentally also uploaded them to FlickR. On FlickR, I normally mark everything as "All Rights Reserved". It's easier that way. This image wasn't taken from FlickR, so there should be no FlickR review. Many free images are listed on other websites as "All Rights Reserved". This doesn't make them unfree if the owner of the rights freely releases them (as I did). Once rights are released under CC, they can not be taken back. Somebody mistakenly tagged it to require a FlickR review, which is wrong, because they're not from FlickR. --Rob (talk) 00:03, 30 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Aliman5040. Please make sure you keep this guideline in mind. --Leyo 13:41, 15 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

De-adminship warning[edit]

This talk page in other languages:

Dear Aliman5040. I am writing to you to inform you that you are in danger of losing your adminship on Commons because of your inactivity in the past six months.

If you want to keep your adminship, you need both to sign at the current inactivity run page within 30 days of today's date, and also to make at least five further admin actions in the following six months. Anyone who does not do so will automatically lose administrator rights.

You can read the de-admin policy at Commons:Administrators/De-adminship.

Thank you, OdderBot (talk) 11:05, 17 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

De-adminship[edit]

Hello Aliman5040! It is with a regret that I inform you that, following our de-adminship policy, you had your administrator rights on Wikimedia Commons removed today by a Wikimedia steward.

I would like to use this opportunity to thank you for your efforts and contributions in making Wikimedia Commons what it is today (no big words intended!). If you'll feel like doing so at some point, please feel free to re-apply for adminship at COM:RFA. Again, thanks for all the help you gave us, and (hopefully) see you back soon! odder (talk) 14:17, 18 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Banderas de Antioquia[edit]

Hola Aliman, quiero pedirte disculpas por haber cambiado el nombre y colores de muchas d elas banderas SVG que confeccionaste para wikipedia, pero necesitaba hacerlo para estandarizar los nombres y colores de acuerdo a las convenciones del taller de heráldica y vexilología en español. Espero comprendas y gracias por tu atención.--Shadowxfox (talk) 23:35, 11 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Gradient in Flags / Verlauf in Wappen[edit]

Dear Aliman5040 - You produced a lot of town flags of Switzerland villages and did a great work. However the flags have a gray gradient in the white background and differs from the original. White areas has to keep white (e.g. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Lyssach-coat_of_arms.svg). I ask urgently to remove the gradient in the background. Otherwise we have to remove all the flags from the official town pages in.

Kind regards, DHR


Hallo Aliman5040 - Du hast viele Flaggen von Schweizer Ortschaften gestaltet und einen sehr tollen Job gemacht. Allerdings beinhalten die Wappen einen Grauverlauf im Hinterrund, wodurch die Wappen nicht mehr originalgetreu sind. Weisse Flächen sollten auch weiss bleiben (z.B. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Lyssach-coat_of_arms.svg). I bitte Dich deshalb eindringlich, den Hintergrundverlauf in den Wappen zu entfernen. Ansonsten sehen wir uns gezwungen, die Wappen von den offiziellen Ortsseiten zu entfernen.

Beste Grüße, DHR

categorías sobre San Andrés y Providencia[edit]

Hola, que tal. Como vi que creaste 2 categorías sobre el archipiélago (Category:San Andrés y Providencia Archipelago-del año 2013 y Category:San Andrés y Providencia-del año 2008), tuve que unificarlas porque no le ve sentido a tener dos categorías que tratan de lo mismo. Si me puedes dar una razón del porqué creaste un duplicado te agradecería.--Shadowxfox (talk) 14:24, 26 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File source is not properly indicated: File:Cartago, Valle, Colombia (ubicación).PNG[edit]

العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Cartago, Valle, Colombia (ubicación).PNG, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Cartago, Valle, Colombia (ubicación).PNG]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Jcb (talk) 11:10, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Cartago, Valle, Colombia (ubicación).PNG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Jcb (talk) 17:12, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Colombia Visa Free.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Luisfege (talk) 08:29, 10 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File source is not properly indicated: File:Flag of La Cumbre (Valle).svg[edit]

العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Flag of La Cumbre (Valle).svg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

The Photographer (talk) 08:34, 4 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Flag of La Cumbre (Valle).svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Coordinador de Turismo (talk) 22:50, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:LocatieBenelux.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Jahoe (talk) 11:05, 2 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Flag of Girardot.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Lepsyleon (talk) 15:22, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File source is not properly indicated: File:Obando, Valle, Colombia (ubicación).PNG[edit]

العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Obando, Valle, Colombia (ubicación).PNG, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Obando, Valle, Colombia (ubicación).PNG]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 10:24, 5 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted content[edit]

Afrikaans  العربية  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  বাংলা  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  suomi  français  galego  עברית  हिन्दी  magyar  Bahasa Indonesia  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  Nederlands  polski  português  русский  sicilianu  svenska  Türkçe українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文  繁體中文  +/−


Hello Aliman5040, the following content you uploaded violates one or more of our policies and therefore has been or will soon be deleted:

File:Obando, Valle, Colombia (ubicación).PNG

The Wikimedia Commons (this website) only hosts media files with a realistic educational purpose and that can be used for any purpose, including:
  • use in any work, regardless of content
  • creation of derivative works
  • commercial use
  • free distribution

See Commons:Licensing for the copyright policy on Wikimedia Commons, and Commons:Image casebook for some specific examples. Some other Wikimedia projects have different licensing policies. For example, the English Wikipedia allows fair use of sounds and photographs. This is not the case on Wikimedia Commons; "fair use" materials are not acceptable here.

Please make sure that you only upload educational content you have created yourself, those which are out of copyright, or those for which you have the required permission for the work to be used in all the ways described above. Please note that derivative works of copyrighted material are also considered copyrighted. Again, please read through Commons:Licensing, which is quite crucial, to understanding how Wikimedia Commons works. Thanks for your contribution, and please do leave me a message if you have further questions.

Yours sincerely, Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 03:30, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File source is not properly indicated: File:Restrepo, Valle, Colombia (ubicación).PNG[edit]

العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Restrepo, Valle, Colombia (ubicación).PNG, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Restrepo, Valle, Colombia (ubicación).PNG]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Jcb (talk) 08:51, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File source is not properly indicated: File:Riofrio, Valle, Colombia (ubicación).PNG[edit]

العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Riofrio, Valle, Colombia (ubicación).PNG, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Riofrio, Valle, Colombia (ubicación).PNG]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Jcb (talk) 21:52, 3 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sevilla, Valle, Colombia (ubicación).PNG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Jcb (talk) 17:42, 8 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

neues Wappen Vechigen BE[edit]

Ich habe Vechigen-new_coat_of_arms.png hinaufgeladen und auf den deutschen und alemannischen Seiten eingegeben. Um alle anderen Verwendungen anzupassen, wäre es einfacher, das alte File Vechigen-coat of arms.svg zu ersetzen. Ich will dort aber nicht hineinpfuschen. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Danigold3 (talk • contribs) 20:58, 6 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Vechigen-coat of arms.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Schofför (talk) 23:06, 7 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Flag of Necoclí.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

·×ald·es 04:52, 27 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:LBMM.PNG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Jdapenao (talk) 03:41, 1 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:LAMM.PNG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Jdapenao (talk) 03:44, 1 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:LJMM.PNG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Jdapenao (talk) 03:50, 1 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:LKMM.PNG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Jdapenao (talk) 03:54, 1 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Category discussion warning

Caucasia has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


E4024 (talk) 16:20, 6 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File source is not properly indicated: File:Flag of Cartago (Valle).svg[edit]

العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Flag of Cartago (Valle).svg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

And also:

Yours sincerely,   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 05:00, 19 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Flag of Fredonia.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

·×ald·es 21:40, 4 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Category discussion warning

Category:Piedra_del_Peñon has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


·×ald·es 15:29, 2 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Trujillo, Valle, Colombia (ubicación).PNG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Jcb (talk) 21:03, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Category discussion warning

Railway stations in Basel has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Enhancing999 (talk) 12:22, 14 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Flag of biel.PNG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

SpinnerLaserzthe2nd (talk) 04:09, 29 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]