User talk:Grillo/Arkiv 1

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search

Hej Grillo. Detta angår bara wikimedia så därför skriver jag här.

Tänkte bara tipsa dig om templaten "self" som finns på wikimedia. skriv t.ex. {{self|GFDL}} för bilder du tagit själv som du licenserar under GFDL. Eller {{self2|GFDL|cc-by-sa}} för bilder du tagit själv och licenserar under både GFDL och cc-by-sa. I det förstnämda fallet dyker denna ruta upp:

I, the copyright holder of this work, hereby publish it under the following license:
GNU head Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation; with no Invariant Sections, no Front-Cover Texts, and no Back-Cover Texts. A copy of the license is included in the section entitled GNU Free Documentation License.

Creative Commons license
Creative Commons Attribution Creative Commons Share Alike
If this file is eligible for relicensing, it may also be used under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 license.

The relicensing status of this image has not yet been reviewed. You can help.


català | čeština | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | español | eesti | فارسی | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | lietuvių | македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | occitan | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | slovenščina | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | +/−

Licensing update unknown


Vänliga Hälsningar.

Image:Hunter Stockton Thompson.jpg[edit]

Did Mr Arpadi agree to this image being put under CC? Regards, David.Monniaux 12:07, 16 January 2006 (UTC)

Don't ask me, ask the one who uploaded it to English Wikipedia, which I provided as the source. /Grillo 17:33, 16 January 2006 (UTC)
Deleted as copyvio, following emails to the photographer. The authorization was fake. David.Monniaux 00:18, 28 February 2006 (UTC)

Your message[edit]

I've answered your message by email. Basically: please mind your own business, and read carefully what I wrote. David.Monniaux 23:57, 27 February 2006 (UTC)

Answer[edit]

I know what GFDL and CC-BY-SA say, and, contrary to what you pretend, I do not demand payment for my GFDL or CC-BY-SA images. It is not my problem if you don't understand English correctly, and I strongly advise you to stop harassing other users because you don't.

I'll reexplain what I told you in the email that you apparently haven't read.

Here's what happens: some commercial publishers have emailed me asking that I give them explicit permission for my photographs. That is, they are not happy with the CC or GFDL license (perhaps of some of the obligations involved) and they ask me to give them a specific permission (writing "I authorize <publisher foobar> to publish bla bla").

Instead of having a lawyer read the GFDL or CC licenses, they essentially ask me to explain them their rights, and give them an additional legal insurance. Basically, they ask me a supplemental service: they could use the image for free, but they ask me to write them a specific email saying they can do so.

I consider this a service that I can perform, but only for a fee. I don't wish to work for free for the legal department of a commercial publisher. David.Monniaux 06:55, 28 February 2006 (UTC)

Great, that wasn't that hard right? Why was it more important to remove the question form your talk page than answering the simple question that apparantly had an easy answer? And no reason to go to personal attacks. And sorry, I didn't get any email cause I forgot to change my email address on Commons when I switched mail. And I understand English just fine, I think personally that you should clarify the note on your user page. /Grillo 10:46, 28 February 2006 (UTC)
Again, you are a busybody. What is on my user page is clear enough, and you have no business in dealing with it. David.Monniaux 12:08, 28 February 2006 (UTC)

Please accept apologies. I went a bit overboard.. But you apparently hadn't paid attention to my email, which I considered rude. Also, I'm of the opinion that user pages are personal in the sense that as long as what they carry is not adverse to Wikipedia's goals (for instance, promoting partisanship in articles, or deliberately making bad publicity, etc.), users should be free to write what they wish without others meddling. David.Monniaux 12:59, 28 February 2006 (UTC)

No problem, no offence taken and hopefully none given. The reason I didn't see your mail was that I simply don't use that email address anymore, sorry about that, I've changed it in the settings now. I understand now why you choose to do as you do. /Grillo 15:20, 1 March 2006 (UTC)

Licenstaggar[edit]

Hej, tack för att du orkar göra det jag inte orkar, dvs fixa mina licenstaggar. Är alla fixade eller bara några? MVH Grillo 19:14, 28 March 2006 (UTC)

Nej, tyvärr, bara några av dem. Själv ser jag det mest som ett avkopplande, hjärndött, underhållningsätt. Som MS-Röj eller Sudoku... :) —Gabbe 21:10, 28 March 2006 (UTC)

PD-Sweden[edit]

Hej Grillo. Jag vet fortfarande inte om PD-Sweden och liknande mallar kommer att raderas. Ett tag verkade det solklart, men nu har diskussionen lugnat ner sig. Diskussionens kärna är huruvida andra Wikipediaproject -- spanska, portugisiska, japanska, engelska, tyska, osv -- är emot mallen. Jag hade väntat mig att få ett uttalande från andra projekt, men då detta inte skett saknas grund för radering. Så du behöver kanske inte märka om bilder med PD-Sweden. Jag önskar jag kunde uttyda framtiden, men det hela är ett gråområde -- som du nog ser om du kollar debatten -- och det är kanske lika bra i så fall att inte slita sitt hår i onödan.

Slutligen så drar jag slutsatsen att du är bortrest över jul eftersom jag minns att du var det förra julen (du skrev det någonstans), så det kommer kanske ta ett par dagar innan du ser detta meddelandet. Önskar dig därför en god jul, och god fortsättning. Fred Chess 00:51, 24 December 2006 (UTC)

Jag har redan märkt om alla mina inscannade bilder, men jag är tveksam till vissa bilders status. Låter dock de flesta ligga kvar som anonymous work. Det tog ett tag innan jag såg det här men det var mest för att jag inte kollar av Commons så ofta :) Tack för svaret och gott nytt år. /Grillo 21:08, 1 January 2007 (UTC)

Image:DSC01571.JPG[edit]

català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | français | galego | עברית | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | lietuvių | Nederlands | norsk bokmål | polski | português | русский | slovenčina | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


Hello, and thank your for sharing your files with Commons. There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. Please remember that all uploads require source, author and license information. Could you please resolve these problems, which are described on the page linked in above? Thank you. Siebrand 16:08, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
This message was placed by an automated process. Please go to Commons:Help desk if you need help.

It's a duplicate, just delete. /Grillo 13:13, 11 September 2007 (UTC)


Image Tagging Image:PacalTree.JPG[edit]

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:PacalTree.JPG. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-3.0}} to release it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. 88.134.232.95 03:29, 10 October 2007 (UTC)

That was ages ago, probably copied it from enwp, delete if a source can't be found. /Grillo 19:22, 11 October 2007 (UTC)


Image Tagging Image:Niihausatellite.jpg[edit]

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Niihausatellite.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multilicense GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. -- Bryan (talk to me) 22:38, 24 November 2007 (UTC)

FP Promotion[edit]

Carta Marina.jpeg
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image Image:Carta Marina.jpeg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Carta Marina.jpeg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

Cscr-featured.svg

Benh 21:30, 27 November 2007 (UTC)


Image Tagging Image:Mustasch_kb_malmö.jpg[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Česky | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lietuvių | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Română | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Türkçe | Українська | اردو | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Mustasch_kb_malmö.jpg. This image is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org).

Unless the permission information is given, the image may be speedy deleted after seven days. Thank you. Cecil 01:06, 16 February 2008 (UTC)

Bah, the quality is stupid anyway. If you don't believe my word, delete the stupid picture. Commons is getting out of hand if trusted old contributors can't be trusted in copyright questions. Hell, you could delete all the images I've ever uploaded, because why would you believe my word that it was I who took the photos? If I lie about my friend giving GFDL permission, why would I not lie about all the other images I've uploaded? /Grillo 23:34, 16 February 2008 (UTC)

TUSC token 7fd4ef6d01bc19012a533b2f15d6e1f8[edit]

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!

Image:Karta över Södra Sandby.png[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 21:31, 11 December 2008 (UTC)

Tip: Categorizing images[edit]

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | magyar | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски / srpski | svenska | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


Hello, Grillo!

Tip: Add categories to your images

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

Uploadwizard-categories.png

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations"). Pro-tip: The CommonSense tool can help you find the best category for your image.

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

BotMultichillT (talk) 05:54, 12 December 2008 (UTC)

Filbot[edit]

Sorry, but I was really busy and I can answer you only now. Your idea could be fine, but it's a bit difficult to be done in reality. Also because the bot should check if the text in permission can be a valid license and it's not that easy. I think that a manual check is really better and that should avoid problems. --Filnik\b[Rr]ock\b!? 13:40, 18 February 2009 (UTC)