User talk:So9q

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, So9q!
Vær opmærksom på ophavsret Image:Christiandenmark godparents.jpg er blevet markeret som en overtrædelse af ophavsretten. Wikimedia Commons accepterer kun frit indhold - dvs. billeder og andre mediefiler, der kan bruges af enhver til ethvert formål. For detaljer omkring, hvad der accepteres så læs venligst Commons:Licensing (på engelsk). Du kan stille spørgsmål omkring Commons' politikker på Commons:Help desk.

Den fil du lagde op vil blive slettet inden længe. Hvis du ikke mener, at dette billede er en overtrædelse af ophavsretten, så forklar venligst hvorfor på billedets diskussionsside.


Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

Vær opmærksom på, at tv-selskabet også ejer rettighederne til eventuelle stillbilleder andre tager. Ovenstående billede er dermed ikke dit eget værk, hvilket betyder, at du ikke har ret til at udgive det som offentligt eje. |EPO| 21:03, 17 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:OIL&GAS Production Profiles 2005BC.PNG. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:OIL&GAS Production Profiles 2005BC.PNG]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Nillerdk (talk) 07:24, 17 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:OIL&GAS Production Profiles 2005BC.PNG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

--Sv1xv (talk) 10:37, 16 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

County categories[edit]

Hej,

Kategorier uppdelade på län brukar namnges på engelska här på commons, se exempelvis category:Culture of Västra Götaland County osv. --Vogler (talk) 14:50, 17 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

OK, kan du @Vogler: hjälpa mig döpa om dem?--So9q (talk) 15:17, 17 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File tagging File:Q96622062.jpg[edit]

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Q96622062.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Q96622062.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Gbawden (talk) 12:49, 29 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Q96623267 inside.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Q96623267 inside.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Gbawden (talk) 12:49, 29 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Q96623267 outside.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Q96623267 outside.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Gbawden (talk) 12:49, 29 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Gbawden (talk) 12:54, 29 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the notification.--So9q (talk) 14:35, 29 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Proof-of-license-VIN-release-text.png[edit]

العربية  català  čeština  Deutsch  English  español  hrvatski  italiano  slovenščina  Tiếng Việt  беларуская‎  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  русский  ไทย  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This file may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Proof-of-license-VIN-release-text.png, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright.

Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

JuTa 02:50, 8 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Could you clarify what part you consider deriviative? The images of faces? So9q (talk) 13:40, 8 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Proof-of-license-VIN-names-of-likers.png[edit]

العربية  català  čeština  Deutsch  English  español  hrvatski  italiano  slovenščina  Tiếng Việt  беларуская‎  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  русский  ไทย  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This file may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Proof-of-license-VIN-names-of-likers.png, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright.

Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

JuTa 02:50, 8 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Problemer med tilladelser[edit]

Hej!

Jeg kan se, at du har fået slettet nogle billeder og nogle screenshots af en samtale du har haft med andre.

Der er 2 måder at få godkendt billeder, der ejes af andre.

1) Du får ejeren til på et offentligt synligt sted skriftligt bekræfter, at de har taget billedet og at de frigiver det under en konkret licens (fx cc-by-sa-4.0) og herefter sætter du {{Licensereview}} på filsiden.

2) Du får ejeren til at sende en tilladelse som angivet på COM:OTRS.

Skærmdumps og kopier af mails mv. accepteres ikke længere da de bevismæssigt er dårlige. Det er jo let at rette teksten fra fx "Nej, du kan rende og hoppe!" til "Ja det må du gerne!" :-)

Jeg håber, at det kan hjælpe dig. --MGA73 (talk) 10:33, 1 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Tusen tack för ditt meddelande. Jag har gett upp på båda dem vägarna. Nu har jag en ide till en tredje väg som jag hoppas kommer funka, likt fruktkartan.se fast för lägerplatser i naturen. Hovsa det blev på svensk, håber du forstår!—So9q (talk) 15:20, 1 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Wrong naming of imports from the Shtooka project[edit]

Correct me if I'm wrong, but you demand from me to do a mass edit fixing an import done 13 years ago.

I don't remember how this upload was done. Perhaps I used a code supplied by someone else. I don't remember how I extracted metadata like speaker and word spoken. Files I can now download from Shtooka don't have any metadata - neither as text files, nor inside .flac files. I don't see an easy way to fix those recordings automatically. --Derbeth talk 14:45, 28 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Derbeth: No, I requested you to fix it :) I understand if you don't want to do it. You can do it only based on the metadata on the commons files, see "short title" e.g. here: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Sv-and.ogg so if you can find a way to parse the metadata it should be fairly straight forward IMO. I know python myself, but I have never parsed from a commons page, nor have I batch edited names of files, so I would like to leave it to others more experienced users if possible.--So9q (talk) 18:09, 28 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
What is this 'short title'? I tried to find 'en and' in File:Sv-and.ogg but it does not appear anywhere. --Derbeth talk 17:02, 30 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Derbeth: See under metadata heading and click extended to see all--So9q (talk) 17:11, 30 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Metadata
This file contains additional information such as Exif metadata which may have been added by the digital camera, scanner, or software program used to create or digitize it. If the file has been modified from its original state, some details such as the timestamp may not fully reflect those of the original file. The timestamp is only as accurate as the clock in the camera, and it may be completely wrong.
Copyright holder	
Image title	
Software used	Xiph.Org libVorbis I 20050304
Short title	en and
Usage terms	Creative Commons BY

ISS056 overcat[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikimedia Commons! Thank you for you contributions. When you add categories generally just use the most specific category. For example if you categorize an image of a yellow circle, it should generally only be in Category:Yellow circles and not also Category:Yellow shapes or Category:Circles, thank you.

@So9q: du har kopieret en masse billeder fra Category:ISS Expedition 56 Crew Earth Observations (dump) til Category:Earth photography from the International Space Station. Dette er i strid med COM:OVERCAT da Category:ISS Expedition 56 Crew Earth Observations (dump) allerede er en underkategori til Category:Earth photography from the International Space Station. Kunne du venligst få rullet denne fejl tilbage? På forhånd tak Askeuhd (talk) 21:40, 18 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Tack för meddelandet. Jag är ny på cat-a-lot och det var ett misstag. OK nu?--So9q (talk) 12:11, 19 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Nej, f.eks. File:ISS056-E-91 - View of Earth.jpg findes i både Category:Earth photography from the International Space Station og Category:ISS Expedition 56 Crew Earth Observations (dump) og bør kun være tilgængelig i Category:ISS Expedition 56 Crew Earth Observations (dump) hvilket er den mest specifikke kategori af de to. Askeuhd (talk) 12:39, 19 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Eh, den är alltså redan åtgärdat enligt den här senaste redigeringen (gjort 1 minut innan jag skrev ovan) https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File%3AISS056-E-91_-_View_of_Earth.jpg&type=revision&diff=553898717&oldid=553623994--So9q (talk) 13:48, 19 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not sufficiently proficient in Swedish to understand your reply - you indicated on your user page that your native tongue is Danish which is why I contacted you in Danish, but let us proceed in English to avoid any further confusion. While I am referring to a single file in the following example, this problem applies to all the images you erroneously moved to Category:Earth photography from the International Space Station. First of all, the parent category, Category:Earth photography from the International Space Station should only contain images that cannot otherwise be sorted into the expedition-specific categories such as Category:ISS Expedition 56 Crew Earth Observations and thus Category:Earth photography from the International Space Station should contain very few if any images at all, almost all of them will be sorted into the more specific category of Category:ISS Expedition 56 Crew Earth Observations (or other, depending on the applicable expedition). Furthermore, the category Category:ISS Expedition 56 Crew Earth Observations (dump) is a subcategory of Category:ISS Expedition 56 Crew Earth Observations intended for the batch-uploaded, unsorted and uncurated photographs. A select few of the images from Category:ISS Expedition 56 Crew Earth Observations (dump) maybe moved to Category:ISS Expedition 56 Crew Earth Observations if they have any specific useful quality on their own. Note that the images must be moved, as it should not be present in both categories.
So let us go over that example file:
  1. [1] you added both the dump category and the main expedition category, which is wrong as it should only be present in one of these. Since it was hundreds of sequential images from the dump category, they should probably have remained in the dump category.
  2. [2] you added the image to the Category:Earth at night seen from space - this is great, and just what is needed for the images. Try to find a specific subcategory of Category:Earth at night seen from space if you can, as to not flood this category.
  3. [3] you added the images to the category Category:Earth photography from the International Space Station this is once again overcategorization, because as explained above Category:ISS Expedition 56 Crew Earth Observations is a subcategory of Category:Earth photography from the International Space Station and Category:ISS Expedition 56 Crew Earth Observations (dump) is subcategory of Category:ISS Expedition 56 Crew Earth Observations and thus the image should only be present in Category:ISS Expedition 56 Crew Earth Observations (dump).
  4. [4] you removed the Category:ISS Expedition 56 Crew Earth Observations but this only solved some of the overcategorization as you also need to remove Category:Earth photography from the International Space Station to be fully complaint with COM:OVERCAT.
I hope this make sense to you. If we did not try to prevent overcategorization the category Category:Earth photography from the International Space Station would contain millions of images and be completely un-navigable. Askeuhd (talk) 14:41, 19 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Tak for forklaringen. Nu har jeg fixet så de kun har dump og Category:Earth at night seen from space. Håber det er ok nu og så skal jeg holde et godt øje med kategorihierarkien inden jeg lægger kategorier til objekt næste gang...So9q (talk) 15:25, 19 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Velbekomme, god fornøjelse og held og lykke med kategorisering. Cat-a-lot er et kraftfuldt værktøj så det betaler sig at planlægge før eksekvering. Tøv endelig ikke med kontakte mig hvis du skulle have nogen yderligere spørgsmål, eller tvivls-tilfælde hvor du kan bruge et par ekstra øjne. Bare {{ping}} mig! Askeuhd (talk) 15:37, 19 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:Naturstig vindskydd front.jpg

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Naturstig vindskydd front.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 04:33, 12 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:Naturstig vindskydd front.jpg

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Naturstig vindskydd front.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 08:05, 12 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:Koleragraven sabra.jpg

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Koleragraven sabra.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 11:05, 19 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]