Commons:Featured picture candidates/Log/September 2023

File:Sayornis saya GNP 01.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 4 Sep 2023 at 20:07:01 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family_:_Tyrannidae (Tyrant Flycatchers)
Info created by Cephas - uploaded by Cephas - nominated by Cephas -- Cephas (talk) 20:07, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Cephas (talk) 20:07, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:03, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 01:35, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support ★ 03:06, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:31, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 09:47, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 10:49, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 12:55, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support noice! - ABAL1412^{🇻🇳🇸🇺🇷🇺} (talk ☭) 14:42, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 15:36, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Charlesjsharp (talk) 16:28, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Ivar (talk) 17:47, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support great the bird, but also a nice and natural composition. --Harlock81 (talk) 11:46, 28 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 01:46, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 03:14, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Harlock81. --Aristeas (talk) 09:20, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Ermell (talk) 12:48, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 17 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 00:15, 1 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family_:_Tyrannidae (Tyrant Flycatchers)

File:Quant Zurlauben.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 4 Sep 2023 at 11:49:44 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic media/Exteriors#Towns
Info Created by Fritz Quant in 1920 - reproduced from an original lithography, uploaded and nominated by -- Palauenc05 (talk) 11:49, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Palauenc05 (talk) 11:49, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice painting. But in my opinion, the category should be Non-photographic media/Exteriors. - ABAL1412^{🇻🇳🇸🇺🇷🇺} (talk ☭) 16:58, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:55, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:29, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 10:48, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 15:36, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 19:36, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice view, and a very good scan of an exemplary lithograph (allows to study the wax crayon strokes used to prepare the lithograph). --Aristeas (talk) 09:18, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 18:13, 30 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Spurzem (talk) 13:50, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 10 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 00:15, 1 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Non-photographic media/Exteriors#Towns

File:Lady Peak panorama2.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 5 Sep 2023 at 01:30:51 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Canada#British Columbia
Info: Lady Peak; all by -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 01:30, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 01:30, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support ★ 01:56, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support bc BC mountains are amazing. --SHB2000 (talk) 09:46, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral Great panorama, but could be sharper --Llez (talk) 10:51, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support - ABAL1412^{🇻🇳🇸🇺🇷🇺} (talk ☭) 14:43, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Ivar (talk) 17:46, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Beautiful view, well composed, and sharp enough at that size. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:01, 28 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral Per Llez. -- -donald- (talk) 08:33, 28 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Llez. --Aristeas (talk) 09:21, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Llez.--Famberhorst (talk) 15:45, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 18:13, 30 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:40, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 10 support, 0 oppose, 2 neutral → featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:16, 1 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural/Canada#British Columbia

File:Gabrielle Aplin 03 10 2018 -1 (27078864258).jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 5 Sep 2023 at 12:13:36 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People#Musicians and singers performing
Info Gabrielle Aplin performing live at The Troubadour in Los Angeles, California. Created by Justin Higuchi - uploaded by Tm - nominated by ★ -- ★ 12:13, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- ★ 12:13, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support This is excellent... but it appears to be only a third the size of what the camera is capable of. Given what we've seen in this category for musicians performing, I'm not entirely there. (As an aside, I wish I could get permission to take a decent camera into concerts...) — Chris Woodrich (talk) 12:54, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support - ABAL1412^{🇻🇳🇸🇺🇷🇺} (talk ☭) 14:34, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Ezarateesteban 17:31, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 19:35, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Not huge resolution, but nice composition and good focus -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:55, 28 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good light and compo. --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 10:52, 28 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Though quite likely downsampled. — Rhododendrites ^talk | 02:41, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Per Chris Poco a poco (talk) 03:13, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Basile. --Aristeas (talk) 13:28, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 14:09, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 15:47, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I like this photo, but it's a little small for a current-day feature. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 18:10, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 10:19, 30 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:39, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 14 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 13:15, 1 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: People#Musicians and singers performing

File:Blaugrüne Mosaikjungfer im Flug-20230813-RM-144903.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 5 Sep 2023 at 10:15:27 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Odonata#Family : Libellulidae (Chasers, Skimmers, Darters and others)
Info Blue-green mosaic damselfly over a pond in Bavaria. All by Ermell -- Ermell (talk) 10:15, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ermell (talk) 10:15, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 12:54, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support - ABAL1412^{🇻🇳🇸🇺🇷🇺} (talk ☭) 14:45, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 15:35, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Ivar (talk) 17:46, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 21:35, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 23:32, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support This is not easy to take. The framing is perhaps a bit large, but central the subject is well frozen -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:46, 28 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Amazing! -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:59, 28 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Schnobby (talk) 11:59, 28 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:22, 28 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support —UnpetitproleX (Talk) 20:08, 28 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 01:44, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Rhododendrites ^talk | 02:41, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 03:14, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Congrats! --Aristeas (talk) 09:25, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 10:19, 30 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Jakubhal 17:09, 30 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 18 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 13:14, 1 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Arthropods/Odonata#Family : Libellulidae (Chasers, Skimmers, Darters and others)

File:Lion's Head PP.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 1 Sep 2023 at 18:08:32 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Canada#Ontario
Info: cold waters of Lake Huron producing deceptively tropical impression; all by -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 18:08, 23 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 18:08, 23 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 19:11, 23 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 22:57, 23 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- I prefer the earlier image with the coastline included (please add the cropped version as an alternative). ★ 11:34, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- --Palauenc05 (talk) 05:01, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Princess 🍵 Rosalina 33560 05:10, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 10:21, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 14:08, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- Still a support, though I did prefer the earlier image as the coastline felt more dynamic. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 19:16, 25 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose The half tree on the left. Charlesjsharp (talk) 21:31, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment tiny bit of rock left. Charlesjsharp (talk) 17:51, 25 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

All gone. --The Cosmonaut (talk) 18:45, 25 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose per Cherlesjsharp. Please crop it out. - ABAL1412^{🇻🇳🇸🇺🇷🇺} (talk ☭) 16:00, 25 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Done: cropped. Pinging the voters: Uoaei1, ArionEstar, Palauenc05, Princess Rosalina, SHB2000, Chris Woodrich, Charlesjsharp, ABAL1412. --The Cosmonaut (talk) 17:41, 25 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- Support Cool! - ABAL1412^{🇻🇳🇸🇺🇷🇺} (talk ☭) 15:54, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
LGTM. --SHB2000 (talk) 22:39, 25 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support In some ways, the previous version was more interesting, but this one is cleaner. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:14, 25 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 16:02, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per ArionStar. --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 23:48, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Good image but would like to see more wow for FP. --GRDN711 (talk) 15:26, 28 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 04:42, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 10 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 22:45, 1 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural/Canada#Ontario

File:VitorJubini TerceiraPonte Vitoria ES (27121005458).jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 1 Sep 2023 at 13:57:02 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Cityscapes#Brazil
Info Night view of Vitória, Espírito Santo: the Third Bridge, the fifth longest in Brazil, is visible in the foreground; spanning the mouth of Vitória's bay, which has many other features, including the Penha Convent, Moreno's hill, freight ships, coastline, islands and modern buildings, the bridge has become one of Espirito Santo's main landmarks. Created by Victor Jubini (MTur Destinos) - uploaded by Sintegrity - nominated by ★ -- ★ 13:57, 23 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support I love this view in person! (P.S.: I live in Colatina, 127 km north of the state capital Vitória) -- ★ 13:57, 23 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support. --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 16:05, 23 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Wow! - ABAL1412^{🇻🇳🇸🇺🇷🇺} (talk ☭) 16:23, 23 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 18:05, 23 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Kritzolina (talk) 18:32, 23 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 19:27, 23 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Beautiful. --SHB2000 (talk) 21:37, 23 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:43, 23 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Striking view -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:18, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 04:49, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Princess 🍵 Rosalina 31217 05:10, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Aristeas (talk) 08:44, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 14:10, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Jakubhal 19:35, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose The buildings on the left appear to be leaning out.--Peulle (talk) 10:45, 25 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per Peulle. The picture should have perspective correction. --imehling (talk) 12:51, 25 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 17:50, 25 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Wilfredor (talk) 01:17, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 16:01, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 04:39, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 18 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 22:48, 1 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Cityscapes#Brazil

File:Linaria vulgaris flowers - Keila.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 5 Sep 2023 at 17:43:38 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants#Family_:_Scrophulariaceae
Info all by Ivar (talk) 17:43, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Ivar (talk) 17:43, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support - ABAL1412^{🇻🇳🇸🇺🇷🇺} (talk ☭) 18:08, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 20:30, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 23:31, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Impressive as usual! -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:49, 28 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 07:36, 28 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- -donald- (talk) 08:26, 28 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Almost perfect. Why the distance of the flower from the right border is slightly bigger than that from the left border? At least, it seems me so.--Harlock81 (talk) 11:32, 28 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comment yes, there is slight difference, but the stem is on the center. Can't have it all with the nature. -- Ivar (talk) 13:57, 28 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Lol ;-) --Harlock81 (talk) 14:54, 28 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:31, 28 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Charlesjsharp (talk) 15:14, 28 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 15:37, 28 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 01:46, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 03:10, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Again excellent work, Ivar. --Aristeas (talk) 13:32, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 15:49, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support High level of detail -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:41, 30 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 10:22, 30 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 10:48, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 14:52, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 19 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 22:36, 1 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Plants#Family_:_Scrophulariaceae

File:Cynomys ludovicianus GNP 21.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 5 Sep 2023 at 16:18:17 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals#Family_:_Sciuridae_(Squirrels)
Info created by Cephas - uploaded by Cephas - nominated by Cephas -- Cephas (talk) 16:18, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Cephas (talk) 16:18, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ivar (talk) 17:44, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 18:03, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support - ABAL1412^{🇻🇳🇸🇺🇷🇺} (talk ☭) 18:07, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 19:33, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 23:31, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Back light but the angle of view is excellent, and the lighted side particular -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:26, 28 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 05:26, 28 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Excellent photo and cute! -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:51, 28 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support —Bruce1ee^talk 06:38, 28 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 11:39, 28 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 13:16, 28 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:27, 28 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 15:38, 28 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 01:45, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 03:10, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Ikan. --Aristeas (talk) 13:31, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 15:48, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 10:21, 30 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Rhododendrites ^talk | 16:44, 30 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Jakubhal 17:09, 30 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 10:38, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 22 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 22:40, 1 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Mammals#Family_:_Sciuridae_(Squirrels)

File:TCDD MT 30000 Konaklar - Türmentepe.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 5 Sep 2023 at 17:38:52 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Bridges#Turkey
Info created & uploaded by David Gubler – nominated by Ivar (talk) 17:38, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Ivar (talk) 17:38, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support - ABAL1412^{🇻🇳🇸🇺🇷🇺} (talk ☭) 18:09, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 19:33, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Ermell (talk) 20:23, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 23:31, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:50, 28 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support —Bruce1ee^talk 06:37, 28 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 07:36, 28 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support You can almost count both the stones on the top of the hill, and those on the slope ahead of the train. Impressive work. --Harlock81 (talk) 11:39, 28 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 13:14, 28 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:28, 28 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 15:38, 28 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 01:45, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 03:10, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Aristeas (talk) 13:32, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice light -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:40, 30 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 10:22, 30 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 10:55, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 18 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 22:38, 1 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Bridges#Turkey

File:Двойная радуга над собором Василия Блаженного.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 5 Sep 2023 at 15:25:12 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious buildings#Russia
Info created and uploaded by Leokand - nominated by ABAL1412 -- ABAL1412^{🇻🇳🇸🇺🇷🇺} (talk ☭) 15:25, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Info Double rainbow over St. Basil’s cathedral in Moscow. - ABAL1412^{🇻🇳🇸🇺🇷🇺} (talk ☭) 15:25, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- ABAL1412^{🇻🇳🇸🇺🇷🇺} (talk ☭) 15:25, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 19:35, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 23:32, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Really good, and really impressive that it's an iPhone photo! -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:52, 28 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Wait. How do you know that it was taken by an iPhone? I'm a Microsoft's fan and didn't even realize that! - ABAL1412^{🇻🇳🇸🇺🇷🇺} (talk ☭) 06:50, 28 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
EXIF data on the bottom of the file. --SHB2000 (talk) 07:43, 28 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Didn't realize that small part. Thanks! - ABAL1412^{🇻🇳🇸🇺🇷🇺} (talk ☭) 13:38, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support and it was taken by an XS?!? It would take a lot of effort to take a photo like this with my 14. --SHB2000 (talk) 07:37, 28 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Schnobby (talk) 11:57, 28 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:24, 28 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Yes, iPhones can take good photos too! ★ 15:26, 28 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Was a bit iffy on this, but throwing in the tech used and the "Wow" factor sends me right over that threshhold. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 19:40, 28 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 01:44, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral Great capture but it lacks perspective correction and the level of detail is not the best Poco a poco (talk) 03:11, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 10 support, 0 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 22:42, 1 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Religious buildings#Russia

File:Basilica of the National Shrine of Our Lady of Aparecida 2019 46.jpg[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 9 Sep 2023 at 10:05:26 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious buildings/Ceilings#Brazil
Info Ceiling of the Basilica of Our Lady of Aparecida, Aparecida, Brazil. The religious building is the world's largest cathedral and the second largest Catholic church in interior area after the St. Peter's Basilica. Created and uploaded by Mike Peel - nominated by ★ -- ★ 10:05, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Let's go again. -- ★ 10:05, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Too dark (not that it should be brightened, but maybe it should be shot when there is more light), and why are you renominating a photo that didn't pass recently? Do you think that when people don't vote for a photo, they secretly support it? Your closing comment last time was "Voters didn’t see this nomination." You are mistaken, and I don't understand why you think we can't or don't see. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 16:36, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my nomination Ikan has a point. ★ 09:01, 1 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Шманьківці, Фоторобота Максима Огородника «Пишно «квітне» груднева пора».jpg[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 9 Sep 2023 at 12:28:06 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Settlements#Ukraine (section will be added if nom is successful)
Info Winter in Shmankivtsi, Ternopil region, Ukraine. Created by Максим Огородник - uploaded by Максим Огородник - nominated by Максим Огородник -- Maks (talk) 12:28, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Maks (talk) 12:28, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination denied. Thank you for nominating this image. Unfortunately, it does not fall within the Guidelines because only two active nominations per user are allowed. You are welcome to nominate this again when one of the other nominations is done. --Cart (talk) 06:39, 1 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Pez payaso (Amphiprion bicinctus) en una anémona magnífica (Heteractis magnifica), mar Rojo, Egipto, 2023-04-18, DD 93.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 7 Sep 2023 at 03:23:10 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Fish#Family_:_Pomacentridae_(Clownfish_and_Damselfish)
Info Red Sea clownfish (Amphiprion bicinctus) in a magnificent sea anemone (Heteractis magnifica), Red Sea, Egypt. This clownfish species is found in the Western Indian Ocean, the Red Sea, Socotra and the Chagos archipelago. The fish's body is yellow-orange to dark brown. Males grow to a length of 10 centimetres (3.9 in), and females grow to a length of 14 centimetres (5.5 in). Clownfish and sea anemone form together one of the most known symbiotic mutualism. The sea anemone protects the clownfish from predators, as well as providing food through the scraps left from the anemone's meals and occasional dead anemone tentacles. In return, the clownfish defends the anemone from its predators, and parasites and are unaffected by the stinging tentacles of the host anemone. In a group of clownfish, there is a strict dominance hierarchy. The largest and most aggressive fish is female and is found at the top. Clownfish are sequential hermaphrodites, meaning that they develop into males first, and when they mature, they become females. c/u/n Poco a poco (talk) 03:23, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support And I promise, I take a break with underwater noms :) Poco a poco (talk) 03:23, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Don't take a break if you have others of comparable quality to this! -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:57, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your feedback, Ikan Kekek! Still I believe that it is beneficial for both, author and reviewers, to deal with more diverse material (and WLM is also coming ;)) Poco a poco (talk) 15:01, 29 August 2023 (UTC) PD: As you know, but maybe other don't I have an own cat with the material I consider that has a chance to become FP here, in the case somebody would like to help with the backlog. You can ask upfront for improvements or advice or just nom them.[reply]

Support --Harlock81 (talk) 09:18, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 11:30, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:12, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 19:56, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Ermell (talk) 20:33, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support fish colors, good light and this bulbous environment! -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:48, 30 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 10:24, 30 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support It's time to find Nemo. jk. :))) - ABAL1412^{🇻🇳🇸🇺🇷🇺} (talk ☭) 10:55, 30 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support — UnpetitproleX (Talk) 14:56, 30 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Jakubhal 17:08, 30 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support WOW --Wilfredor (talk) 21:25, 30 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Aristeas (talk) 07:52, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 10:35, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Overwhelmingly Nemoesque — Rhododendrites ^talk | 12:28, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 16 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Aristeas (talk) 09:21, 3 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Fish#Family_:_Pomacentridae_(Clownfish_and_Damselfish)

File:Panicum miliaceum Botanical Garden Zurich.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 3 Sep 2023 at 15:45:00 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants#Family_:_Poaceae
Info created and uploaded by Ephramac - nominated by ABAL1412 -- ABAL1412^{🇻🇳🇸🇺🇷🇺} (talk ☭) 15:45, 25 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support - ABAL1412^{🇻🇳🇸🇺🇷🇺} (talk ☭) 15:45, 25 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Mostly unsharp and not comparable to the great plant pictures we've been featuring. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:56, 25 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comment If you oppose, can you please stay respectful? "not comparable to the great plant pictures we've been featuring" is not the kind of comment which is appropriate for an online community as it discourages further involvement in the project. -- Ephramac (talk) 08:28, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Ephramac: I disagree. Ikan has valid criteria for expressing his/her opinion on what should or should not be featured on Commons. And remember: constructive criticism helps to evolve (taking this from my own experience). ★ 11:22, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I am fine with people voicing contructive critisism (e.g. the photo being too unsharp), but saying that someone elses work is "not comparable" to other work can be perceived as very arrogant. Also keep in mind that in my case the feedback is unsolicited, as I did not ask for my photo being 'reviewed' here. I wish more people were aware of the fact that their behavior can make a difference in another persons day. Have a nice weekend! --Ephramac (talk) 12:34, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I know that landing at FPC can be a rather turbulent experience, and unfortunately you don't know all the rules and practices. The reason given for the 'oppose' was not a review. The guidelines say that you can 'support' a photo without giving any reason for it, but if you vote 'oppose' you must give a reason for it. The idea behind this practice is that you shouldn't be able to 'oppose' photos just because you don't like them, a valid reason must be given. It is also common that a photographer wants to know why the photo was opposed so that they might improve something for their next photo and nomination. Also, after reviewing thousands of photos over the years, the tone of many reviewers gets curt and harsh in short posts. It's a very hard school (lots of tears and drama!) but we also learn from each other that way. All the best, --Cart (talk) 13:18, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ephramac, when you nominate a photo for a possible feature as one of the very best photos on Commons, you are asking for people to judge your work. You can't expect people to avoid comment, even if it weren't for the fact that opposing votes have to be justified by comments per Featured Picture Candidates rules. And it's a little odd to accuse me of arrogance when I'm comparing photos to one another and don't have a personal stake in any of this. If you want to know more about the basis for my remarks, you should look at the current and recent nominations of plant photos that have gotten unanimous support, to see just how sharp they've been and what kind of contrast there is between the plant and the background. But stating that a photo is not (in my opinion) comparable to the very cream of the crop is not meant to be disrespectful; instead, it's a way to uphold very high standards that make the "Featured" designation meaningful. I am sorry, though, that my remarks were so painful for you. I had no intention of being mean, just clear. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 14:58, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I was not the one nominating this photo, but whatever. You do you... --Ephramac (talk) 15:18, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Excuse me. I nominate this picture, not him. The reason I nominate it here is the artistic of the picture. I'm also new to Wiki Commons. I've been on Vietnamese Wiki for a year, but I've just hoped in Commons recently. Maybe I should change the category. - ABAL1412^{🇻🇳🇸🇺🇷🇺} (talk ☭) 16:06, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@ABAL1412 Thank you for nominating the picture I took. I appreciate it. Also, I did not mean to start a big discussion here. I just thought the tone was a little bit off and it would not hurt to mention it. --Ephramac (talk) 16:35, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I'm studying classical music, not art or photography. I know nothing about photography, but there's no rule that says I can't nominate. I put this pic here basically just because its artistic. Photography, for me, is also art. From my perspective, everyone who work in art should have their own thinking, their own style, not trying to be like everyone else. Otherwise, art is just a boring stuff. And you've just done that. Thank you for uploading your picture to Wikimedia. I truly love this one.

About the rules, there's a line that says "all rules can be broken". The featured picture has no category for artistic photo, so I have to put it in the Plants category. That breaks the rules, but this is a nice work of art, and I think it's a shame if it can't be an FP just because it's not like every other pictures.

Btw, having a big discussion on the nomination pages is super normal. It's OK.

- ABAL1412^{🇻🇳🇸🇺🇷🇺} (talk ☭) 17:00, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Don't worry, for now artistic photos are kept in the same galleriers as the regular photos (perhaps they can inspire other photographers by being seen there), but if/when we get plenty of them, new galleries will be created. Some examples: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 ,6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, The site is always evolving. --Cart (talk) 18:08, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, Ephramac, I see that you weren't the nominator. ABAL1412, I'm a professional musician with classical training. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:55, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ikan Kekek's subjective review is totally acceptable in my opinion. The criticism is related to the picture, not to the photographer. There are different ways to appreciate or non-appreciate an image, and I understand this particular point of view in the diversity -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:23, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Kinda weird light too. ★ 22:57, 25 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per Ikan Kekek --Tagooty (talk) 06:45, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment This is a perfectly lovely and artistic photo displaying soft focus pastels. It's a shame that Commons FPC is so notorious for dismissing artistic photo styles that are valued in the rest of the world. Sure, the Wikipedias have plenty of articles about photo styles, but heavens forbid we should have FPs of them <sarcasm>. Unfortunately, if you nominate something outside the normal "National-Geographic-style" that is so dominant here, you have to prepare for battle. (Been there, done that, got the scars, gave up.)

That said, you were a bit unlucky with the light and shadow. You got the center of the plant in shadow, with two lit parts on either side. It would have been better if it was the other way around, --Cart (talk) 12:05, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the helpful feedback. As I am not a very experienced amateur photographer, there is of course a lot for me to learn. ;-) --Ephramac (talk) 12:48, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support Honestly, this is one of those examples where artistic intent outweighs documentarian merit to me. This would not look out of place on a waiting room wall, or any of those other locations where one could reasonably expect a beautiful and non-controversial image to be hung for decoration. A big part of that is the brown background, which allows the buds in the rear to blend into it, creating a wistful impression. I like it; I've even tried to achieve it albeit less effectively. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 13:22, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support I love the soft tones and the out-of-focus areas. For me, this image has a lot of artistic merit. I wish our photographic language here was more elaborated. --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 13:31, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Chris/Frank — Rhododendrites ^talk | 14:02, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support per avove. --The Cosmonaut (talk) 01:37, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose The most interesting parts (sunny sides) are out of focus. Thus I don't think it would make a "non-controversial image to be hung for decoration". We often meet candidates with nice bokeh at FPC, like 1, 2, or 3. Unfortunately the tones here are not contrasted enough.

The shady side of the plant is too close to the background color. The subject awkwardly pops up. I would say this is more random than "artistic", even if that sounds harsh. The right part is a blurry mass. Narrow depth of field sometimes creates nice effects, but here the shade combination doesn't work. Camouflaged plant with distracting highlights -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:23, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose Per Ikan Kekek --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:59, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:21, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per Ikan Kekek. -- Karelj (talk) 10:48, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per above. --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 23:46, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Too much out of focus and the background is distracting. I don't see artistic merit that would compensate for these shortcomings. Charlesjsharp (talk) 21:10, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Per Frank. We have plenty of realistic, detailed photographs of flowers. What's wrong with one more artsy, that perfectly captures a late-summer mood? Daniel Case (talk) 05:29, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Frank and Daniel. --Aristeas (talk) 07:49, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support according to other reviewers above. -- Radomianin (talk) 13:12, 1 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Wow! I'm so happy to see that at the end, almost 50% oppose and 50% support. What a balance! No matter whether you opposed or supported it, I respect you all. For me, different points of view when you see art is also art. Thanks for joining this vote. - ABAL1412^{🇻🇳🇸🇺🇷🇺} (talk ☭) 17:55, 3 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 9 support, 7 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--SHB2000 (talk) 02:59, 4 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Göllspiegelung.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 7 Sep 2023 at 18:33:31 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Looking over the Hintersee to the Hoher Göll

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Germany#Bavaria
Info Looking over the Hintersee in the Berchtesgaden Alps to the Hoher Göll -- Milseburg (talk) 18:33, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Milseburg (talk) 18:33, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 19:57, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support - ABAL1412^{🇻🇳🇸🇺🇷🇺} (talk ☭) 20:27, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 22:26, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 10:25, 30 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Classic. --Aristeas (talk) 07:53, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 10:33, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 05:18, 1 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 07:34, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Per Aristeas. Classic, but it still works well. --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 16:27, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support yes, it works... --Terragio67 (talk) 15:27, 3 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 11 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /FPCBot (talk) 21:00, 3 September 2023 (UTC), -- 20 upper 03:40, 4 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural/Germany#Bavaria

File:Morro da Igreja - Sobre as nuvens 01.jpg[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 9 Sep 2023 at 21:59:30 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Brazil
Info View from Morro da Igreja, in Urubici, Santa Catarina, Brazil; the São Joaquim National Park valley is covered by fog in the morning and the Pedra Furada (Drilled Stone) is visible on the left. The park is in the Atlantic Forest biome, covering an area of 48,300 hectares (119,000 acres). Created and uploaded by Nilton Röhricht Junior - nominated by ★ -- ★ 21:59, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Yes, it was taken by a Galaxy S7 Edge, but as in U.S. politics, the winner (wow factor) takes all. -- ★ 21:59, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment It doesn't lack wow, but it's a lot smaller than we expect, nowadays, for this kind of photo, and the lack of warm light on the land attenuates the wow a lot. I'm leaning toward opposing but will wait a little. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:22, 1 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think 3,817 × 2,147 pixels is that small, IMO. --SHB2000 (talk) 07:56, 1 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It's smaller than we usually get, nowadays, for landscape FPs. And of course this isn't Quality Image Candidates; featured pictures are supposed to be the very best on the site. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:28, 1 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

"Warm light"? It's a foggy morning! Lol ★ 10:06, 1 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

And? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 17:21, 1 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Warm light from? ★ 18:35, 1 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A bulb. What do you think? Fog does not preclude sunlight. And look, you can't argue that I should find this wowing because x or y is the reason it doesn't contain something I said would have helped it to wow. Also, note that the fog is lit nicely but the unfoggy land is not. That's the point. It's too dark. Would you like to interrogate me further, or is that sufficient? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:13, 1 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose Lack of detail and the composition make it not FP for me. Increasing exposure could improve the image. --Tagooty (talk) 04:00, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I would tolerate the small size, but at the same time the detail resolution is low, instead of fine details we see (when zooming in) the exagerrated sharpening typical for smartphones. Therefore, while this is a very photogenic location, I fear that even making the photo brighter would not improve it, sorry. --Aristeas (talk) 09:29, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my nomination I'm convinced. ★ 12:59, 3 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Blue-eyed Angle-headed Lizard (Gonocephalus liogaster) at night (15503032639).jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 4 Sep 2023 at 07:20:04 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Reptiles#Family : Agamidae (Dragon Lizards)
Info Gonocephalus liogaster, the tropical forest dragon, blue-eyed anglehead lizard, or orange-ringed anglehead lizard, is a species of agamid lizard. It is found in Indonesia and Malaysia. There are no FPs of this species. Created by Bernard DUPONT - uploaded by Josve05a - nominated by 20 upper -- 20 upper 07:20, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- 20 upper 07:20, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose When the animal is being held out on a stick for the photographer, the tail should be included. Charlesjsharp (talk) 07:28, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Charlesjsharp: Damn, this is my first time using a computer in days, but anyway, I notice you have your own standards for wildlife photography, and the number of FPs, VIs, and QIs on your wildlife shots indicates that you are an expert photographer who will not put up with even the smallest errors. Before you decide to oppose my candidacy (again), I'm hoping you can give me some guidance because I want to nominate another lizard picture. 20 upper 13:58, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Do post a message on my talk page about any image that has passed QI. Best wishes, Charles

Support Good and impressive photo. AFAICS the tail was covered by leaves anyway, so it doesn’t bother me that it is cropped. --Aristeas (talk) 09:54, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose per Charles. Aristeas does have a point and I'm willing to be swayed by this one. --SHB2000 (talk) 10:08, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Per Aristeas --Llez (talk) 16:13, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support - I agree with both Charlesjsharp and Aristeas. But since it's nice to me, I'm not gonna oppose. - ABAL1412^{🇻🇳🇸🇺🇷🇺} (talk ☭) 16:25, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 01:36, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Unappealing flash light and distracting leaves cutting the tail -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:38, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:56, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose The flash is a bit annoying and the right side is unfortunately completely out of place.--Ermell (talk) 08:42, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Even forgetting about the tail, the crop on the right side is too close to the visible portion of the lizard. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:04, 28 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per others. --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 17:36, 30 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose In addition to other concerns, I find this just too busy and awkward. Daniel Case (talk) 03:08, 1 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 6 support, 7 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Yann (talk) 17:54, 4 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Phuktal Gompa Tsarap Zanskar Oct22 A7C 04463.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 5 Sep 2023 at 08:46:58 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Settlements#India
Info created and uploaded by Timothy Gonsalves - nominated by UnpetitproleX (Talk) 08:46, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Wide shot of the Tsarap Valley near the Phugtal Gompa, showing the river and riverside village below and the cave monastery rising above. -- UnpetitproleX (Talk) 08:46, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support - ABAL1412^{🇻🇳🇸🇺🇷🇺} (talk ☭) 14:45, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment There are a bunch of dust spots in the sky that need to be edited out before I could vote for this. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:00, 28 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
They were edited out earlier, but seems that when @Tagooty: re-edited the image from the RAW file to fix the highlights and sharpness, he must’ve forgotten to remove the dust spots. Should be easy to correct. UnpetitproleX (Talk) 07:58, 28 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Done @Ikan Kekek: I recently upgraded to Lightroom 12.5 and did not notice that the default changed from clone tool to heal tool which reduces spots but does not remove them. I've now reedited with the clone tool. Sorry for my carelessness. Please see the new version. --Tagooty (talk) 15:00, 28 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support No need to apologize! This is a pretty amazing sight. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 17:29, 28 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Super nice sky! But I've just noticed that there's something white at the top right. Maybe the cloud or something? - ABAL1412^{🇻🇳🇸🇺🇷🇺} (talk ☭) 20:26, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@ABAL1412: Yes, that is a wisp of cloud. The full cloud is seen here. --Tagooty (talk) 01:46, 30 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support Was already in my favourites list … (And yes, that change of the default tool setting in Lightroom and ACR was really irritating and still annoys me ;–).) --Aristeas (talk) 09:24, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support @UnpetitproleX: Thanks for the nomination. --Tagooty (talk) 09:35, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 17:51, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 10:19, 30 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 18:14, 30 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 12:58, 3 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 23:56, 3 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 10 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Yann (talk) 17:54, 4 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Settlements#India

File:Sitting Spotted Hyena Luangwa Jul23 A7C 06244.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 4 Sep 2023 at 06:37:07 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals/Carnivora#Family_:_Hyaenidae_(Hyenas)
Info Spotted hyena in the warm evening light, Upper Lupande GMA, Zambia. Created by Tagooty - uploaded by Tagooty - nominated by Tagooty -- Tagooty (talk) 06:37, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support The hyena is mostly regarded as ugly and cowardly, greedy and gluttonous, and potentially dangerous. The two existing FPs reinforce this perception. This image has the endearing appeal of a favourite pet dog. -- Tagooty (talk) 06:37, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support I still think Charles' File:Spotted hyena (Crocuta crocuta).jpg is the best of the hyena FPs, but this one is also deserving to me. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:51, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Question Can you widen the crop please? You've cut off some of the animal at the bottom. Charlesjsharp (talk) 07:29, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comment You're right. I didn't see that. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:59, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Done @Charlesjsharp: Pl. see the new version. --Tagooty (talk) 08:32, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks. I have voted for the other one. Charlesjsharp (talk) 16:31, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support Very good, and helps to free the hyena from it’s unjust reputation as very ugly etc. --Aristeas (talk) 09:52, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support ★ 11:30, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
~~Support~~ — Chris Woodrich (talk) 12:52, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- Supporting the wider crop — Chris Woodrich (talk) 13:01, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 16:11, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support - ABAL1412^{🇻🇳🇸🇺🇷🇺} (talk ☭) 16:17, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 01:36, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Nice but tight crop at the bottom. I prefer this composition -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:46, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I agree. Tagooty, would you be willing to offer that as an alternate? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:34, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Done I prefer the tighter crop to emphasise the hyena. However, I'm okay with the alternate also. --Tagooty (talk) 04:19, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:57, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Alternative[edit]

Info Another version, wider view, suggestion by @Basile Morin and Ikan Kekek: --Tagooty (talk) 04:19, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice composition -- Basile Morin (talk) 04:48, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:31, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 08:44, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:26, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 09:48, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 10:47, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 13:01, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 13:26, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Definitely this one. ★ 14:54, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 15:36, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Charlesjsharp (talk) 16:30, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Ivar (talk) 17:48, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support — UnpetitproleX (Talk) 19:27, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Even better. --Aristeas (talk) 19:34, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 19:37, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support for the alternative. -- Radomianin (talk) 21:32, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support As nominator --Tagooty (talk) 01:08, 28 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support - ABAL1412^{🇻🇳🇸🇺🇷🇺} (talk ☭) 06:58, 28 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 01:47, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support for this crop. --Harlock81 (talk) 09:17, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Another likely POTY finalist, if not winner. Daniel Case (talk) 05:33, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 21 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Yann (talk) 18:00, 4 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Mammals/Carnivora#Family_:_Hyaenidae_(Hyenas)

The chosen alternative is: File:Sitting Spotted Hyena Luangwa Jul23 A7C 06239.jpg

File:Idalia storm surge Bayshore Blvd Tampa.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 8 Sep 2023 at 17:07:06 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Natural phenomena#Storms
Info created and uploaded by AHeneen - nominated by WeatherWriter -- WeatherWriter (talk) 17:07, 30 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- High-quality photograph (5,568 × 3,712 pixels) of storm surge from Hurricane Idalia, which made landfall in the U.S. hours ago. WeatherWriter (talk) 17:07, 30 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment as photographer/uploader, I uploaded several more images from Idalia, including a few more from this area and different angles see Category:Hurricane Idalia. I have dozens from this area, but the one uploaded are my best with quick editing. I rushed to edit/upload my best Idalia photos before sleep and work, so I may not reply for several hours after this comment. AHeneen (talk) 17:12, 30 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Interesting moment and wow factor but, IMHO, the moment deserved better --Wilfredor (talk) 21:24, 30 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose The view doesn't quite good. I'm sorry. - ABAL1412^{🇻🇳🇸🇺🇷🇺} (talk ☭) 09:25, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Too dull, but it might as well be the intent of the scene. --SHB2000 (talk) 10:43, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for uploading these images, AHeneen! Very useful and important documentation. What you're seeing above is that FPC just might not be the right venue for recognition. The conditions necessary for these images (cloudy, difficult to access, etc.) make it very difficult to satisfy the technical photography requirements most people expect for Featured Picture. I do think there's a COM:VI candidate among your uploads, though. — Rhododendrites ^talk | 12:25, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Well, it is definitely possible to take FPs in bad weather. Examples for inspiration: File:Falling rain in mexico.jpg, File:Evolution of a Tornado.jpg, File:Riiulpilv - Shelf cloud (2) copy.jpg. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:02, 1 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 00:36, 5 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Western gull (77528).jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 8 Sep 2023 at 15:16:29 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Animals/Birds/Charadriiformes#Genus_:_Larus
Info Western gull (Larus occidentalis) head in California. all by — Rhododendrites ^talk | 15:16, 30 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Rhododendrites ^talk | 15:16, 30 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 16:47, 30 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Really impressive, but please edit out two dust spots in the upper right corner. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 17:06, 30 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- Done Got em. — Rhododendrites ^talk | 02:55, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support Yep. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:31, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support - ABAL1412^{🇻🇳🇸🇺🇷🇺} (talk ☭) 17:22, 30 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Ikan.--Ermell (talk) 19:25, 30 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support ★ 22:07, 30 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Ikan. High level of detail but the dust spots are distracting -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:44, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 04:49, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:49, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 11:37, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 11:52, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Impressive bird portrait. --Aristeas (talk) 16:16, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 15:34, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Beautiful details. --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 16:30, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ivar (talk) 12:09, 3 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 15 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 00:35, 5 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Birds/Charadriiformes#Genus_:_Larus

File:Flame-faced tanager (Tangara parzudakii parzudakii) Cundinamarca.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 7 Sep 2023 at 21:24:43 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family : Thraupidae (Tanagers and Allies)
Info No FPs of the 27 species in this genus. All by Charlesjsharp -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 21:24, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 21:24, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Colorful and outlines of the background create like a natural highlight -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:54, 30 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Really striking bird and very well photographed, as usual. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:58, 30 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 10:25, 30 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support - ABAL1412^{🇻🇳🇸🇺🇷🇺} (talk ☭) 10:50, 30 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 12:56, 30 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Ermell (talk) 20:02, 30 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Wilfredor (talk) 21:25, 30 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cephas (talk) 22:09, 30 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:44, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Great highlighting of the bird by the background. --Aristeas (talk) 07:55, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Aristeas. -- Radomianin (talk) 10:27, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Rhododendrites ^talk | 12:27, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 14:17, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Schnobby (talk) 06:35, 1 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ivar (talk) 12:08, 3 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 12:58, 3 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support beautiful... --Terragio67 (talk) 15:28, 3 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 18 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 00:34, 5 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family : Thraupidae (Tanagers and Allies)

File:Stazione di Roma Termini vuota - COVID-19 - aprile 2020 -- Roma Termini train station empty - COVID-19 - April 2020.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 9 Sep 2023 at 01:42:55 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Historical#1990-now
Info created by LucaLindholm - uploaded by LucaLindholm - nominated by LucaLindholm -- LucaLindholm (talk) 01:42, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Could be also categorized as FP/Places/Interiors if it suits more... -- LucaLindholm (talk) 01:42, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Not an extraordinary interior in my view. Although it's taken during lock-down, the scene looks quite common. Technically the highlights are blown -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:50, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Quite common having a 500k passengers-per-day train station completely empty, with all the shops closed and the trains departure aborted? LucaLindholm (talk) 02:53, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Visit a train station at night (or very early in the morning), and you'll get almost the same -- Basile Morin (talk) 03:58, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose I agree. Might be a valuable image. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:49, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I'm sorry to say that it's not special for me either. - ABAL1412^{🇻🇳🇸🇺🇷🇺} (talk ☭) 09:28, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose No way can I ever support this as an FP with those blown-out highlights near the centre. --SHB2000 (talk) 10:42, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Sorry but clearly not up to the standards of FP. --PierreSelim (talk) 12:03, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per others and not the best interior views IMO. 20 upper 08:54, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 6 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 07:51, 5 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Alcatraz Kitchen (2023)-L1003585.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 9 Sep 2023 at 04:47:37 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors#United_States
Info The kitchen adjacent to the dining hall at Alcatraz Federal Penitentiary, a former maximum security federal prison on Alcatraz Island in the San Francisco Bay, on July 13, 2023. I particularly liked the cold and formal atmosphere of that place. (c/u/n) --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 04:47, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 04:47, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Yes, this picture basically tells the story of "prison" all by itself --Kritzolina (talk) 06:54, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support - ABAL1412^{🇻🇳🇸🇺🇷🇺} (talk ☭) 09:40, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Kritzolina. -- Radomianin (talk) 10:10, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 11:48, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Kritzolina. --Aristeas (talk) 16:21, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 21:38, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Because the historical moment --Wilfredor (talk) 02:12, 1 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:13, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 15:29, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 12:58, 3 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 11 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 07:35, 5 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Interiors#United_States

File:Boat passing under Elgin Bridge during blue hour (2023)-L1003785.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 9 Sep 2023 at 04:42:04 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Architecture/Bridges#Singapore
Info The Elgin Bridge, a vehicular box girder bridge across the Singapore River, built between 1925 and 1929. The bridge links the Downtown Core to the Singapore River Planning Area located within Singapore’s Central Area. The bridge was named after James Bruce, 8th Earl of Elgin, a colonial administrator and diplomat who had served as Governor-General of Canada and India. This long exposure image shows a boat passing under the bridge during blue hour on August 18, 2023. (c/u/n) --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 04:43, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 04:42, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Impressive performance of the M11 and its prime lens: no noise, incredible sharpness! The motion blur of the excursion boat creates a pleasant contrast to the clarity of the image. -- Radomianin (talk) 10:30, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 11:47, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice lighting and indeed a pleasing contrast to the motion blur of the boat. --Aristeas (talk) 16:20, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support - ABAL1412^{🇻🇳🇸🇺🇷🇺} (talk ☭) 17:30, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Ermell (talk) 21:39, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 05:17, 1 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 07:57, 1 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:12, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support ★ 10:18, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ivar (talk) 12:10, 3 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 12:58, 3 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Wow! 20 upper 15:28, 3 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support agree with Radomianin --Terragio67 (talk) 15:35, 3 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 14 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 07:48, 5 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Bridges#Singapore

File:Pygargue à queue blanche (Haliaeetus albicilla) - tête.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 9 Sep 2023 at 10:30:14 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Accipitriformes#Genus_:_Haliaeetus
Info created by Gzen92 - uploaded by Gzen92 - nominated by Gzen92 -- Gzen92 (talk) 10:30, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Gzen92 (talk) 10:30, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 11:49, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support I’m sure our wildlife experts will find some weak points, but for me this is an impressive portrait. Good detail, good focus on the eye, sweet soft background. Maybe contrast could be increased a bit. --Aristeas (talk) 16:25, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak support Not a wildlife expert, but I suspect the main weakness for wildlife experts will be that this is not wildlife but a captive bird (however, it's so detailed that you can see the enclosure in the reflection in its eye). The standard for detail and "wow" is generally higher for captive bird, but this one probably meets those requirements IMO. — Rhododendrites ^talk | 16:33, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  - Comment As you say, this isn't wildlife. Enough said. Charlesjsharp (talk) 21:47, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Aristeas. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 16:34, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support - ABAL1412^{🇻🇳🇸🇺🇷🇺} (talk ☭) 17:29, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 18:16, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Ermell (talk) 21:35, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 05:16, 1 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Schnobby (talk) 06:32, 1 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 09:32, 1 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 09:59, 1 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Love the yellow beak! 20 upper 08:47, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:17, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support I am not voting for political consideration. The quality is there. --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 16:33, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:50, 3 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ivar (talk) 12:10, 3 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 12:58, 3 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 18 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Yann (talk) 14:19, 5 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Birds/Accipitriformes#Genus_:_Haliaeetus

File:Écomusée d’Alsace 06.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 5 Sep 2023 at 11:40:51 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#France
Info created by Llez - uploaded by Llez - nominated by Llez -- Llez (talk) 11:40, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Llez (talk) 11:40, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support - ABAL1412^{🇻🇳🇸🇺🇷🇺} (talk ☭) 14:40, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 15:34, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 23:32, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- -donald- (talk) 08:28, 28 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:25, 28 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Like the color of the shutters that ompliments the sky but need more wow as an FP image for me. --GRDN711 (talk) 15:22, 28 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very good quality – and this shows once again the subjective nature of the “wow”: for me this is one of the most impressive photos on this page right now. :–) --Aristeas (talk) 09:33, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 15:47, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I agree with GRDN711. I like the house, but I find that the cut-off tree above it, and to a lesser extent the bisected tree next to it, hinder eye movement. Also, the sign, while great in providing information for visitors, is somewhat distracting in a photo, but I think that could be worked around. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 18:13, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Milseburg (talk) 18:35, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral Because harsh contrast --Wilfredor (talk) 21:26, 30 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:15, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 13:05, 1 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Just a nicely done photograph of a house. Nothing more. Daniel Case (talk) 23:58, 3 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 11 support, 3 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 14:32, 5 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Exteriors#France

File:Поселення Шманьківці I, 3.JPG, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 9 Sep 2023 at 12:17:54 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Ukraine
Info Pond with the archaeological site of the Shmankivtsi I settlement in Shmankivtsi, Ternopil region, Ukraine. Created by Максим Огородник - uploaded by Максим Огородник - nominated by Максим Огородник -- Maks (talk) 12:17, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Maks (talk) 12:17, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Too hazy. --SHB2000 (talk) 07:55, 1 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose too blurry. - ABAL1412^{🇻🇳🇸🇺🇷🇺} (talk ☭) 16:17, 1 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I don't think this image has what it takes to become featured. The image is not very clear and there's nothing special about it. 20 upper 08:29, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Yann (talk) 14:18, 5 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Unidentified bride by Tati Photo Studios, Jakarta (c1964).jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 5 Sep 2023 at 12:51:04 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People#Standing people
Info Created by Tati Photo Studios - Restored, uploaded, and nominated by Crisco 1492 -- — Chris Woodrich (talk) 12:51, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - Western-style wedding dresses were worn by wealthier Chinese Indonesians as early as the 1910s (see Peter Post (2019), The Kwee Family of Ciledug: Family, Status, and Modernity in Colonial Java, p. 40; an example from the 1930s is on p. 225), and they have remained popular in the century since then. This offers an excellent example of a mid-century studio portrait.
Support -- — Chris Woodrich (talk) 12:51, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support As an Asian, this hits me so hard! I really love old pictures like this one. Thank you for restoring and nominating this one, Chris. - ABAL1412^{🇻🇳🇸🇺🇷🇺} (talk ☭) 14:48, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support —UnpetitproleX (Talk) 19:25, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 19:34, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose This is not a subtle restoration in my view, but rather a heavy modification of a historical photograph. The new background is too dark and hiding important details. With this modification, the "historical" aspect of the picture disappears, and the goal of the candidature questionable. Although the original work is damaged, the natural appearance of the background is still important. Sorry but it seems to be like a photomontage now, combining modern and ancient elements. Incidentally, some scratches remain -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:20, 28 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- Thank you for the considered remarks. I will look at the scratches; I see that, when I went back to the PSD file after five years, there were some scratches that had been removed originally but not on that copy. As for the background, I respectfully disagree. It appears that Tati used their parquet floor and plain wall for this shot (also seen in File:Chitra Dewi, c. 1960, by Tati Studio - Before restoration.jpg), with more of a low-key approach (not as dark as File:Suzzanna, c 1963, Tati Photo Studio - Before restoration.jpg, but still enough to obscure the baseboards). I did adjust the midtones on the background as a means of reducing the glare from the texture of the print, but the more low-key approach was in the original. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 01:54, 28 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  - I have hunted down those wayward scratches. (And as an aside, I just realized that this file shows the set-up that they would likely have used for this image... it appears to be the same part of the studio). — Chris Woodrich (talk) 02:02, 28 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

One big scratch is still there but whatever. You darkened the background by covering it with an artificial black shade, and it totally changes the original contrasts. This is not a historical picture anymore, sorry, now it is part 1964 and part 2023's style. The original is grey, not black. And there is a visible texture all over, which should be preserved. One can also see reliefs and realistic transitions in the scattering of light -- Basile Morin (talk) 03:02, 28 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

On the face of it, Basile's remarks seem reasonable to me. This doesn't seem like a humble restoration that eliminates only damage. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:55, 28 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I can take a better look after work. It was getting late, so I must have missed it. As for the tone, the midtones did affect the brightness. I can see about going back to the original upload's avoidance of touching the midtones. The only thing is, of course, that the crackleature will be more prominent. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 09:07, 28 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It is a studio photograph, so the quality should be excellent. Here the face and the hand are very blotchy, like after a Photoshop filter. The hair is full of blue spots. Even at low resolution. Please compare with normal pictures taken at the same period, for example 1964 (same year, interior shot). With good equipment, the quality can easily reach this level: taken in 1918 (your own current nomination). A professional studio is supposed to reach high standards of quality. Some old photographs are still very well conserved, and thus represent great testimonies of their period. The best results come from professional scans of original films. Unfortunately there's a huge difference with what we see here. This candidature is a photo or a scan of a very damaged print. I think previous nominations of pictures by the same studio were much better, like this one (1960). -- Basile Morin (talk) 09:50, 28 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, Basile. This print, as well as the aforementioned Suzanna one, appeared to be on different media than some of the others (I no longer have access, which is detrimental). The white "specks" were much more prominent in this one, unfortunately. I suspect that they changed media at some point in the 1960s, as the economic crisis was ongoing. Anyways, I will take a look when I get home, just for the sake of ensuring we have as high a quality as feasible from this print. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 15:24, 28 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I've fixed the scratch on her veil and reduced the midtone modifications. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 19:42, 28 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comment The white balance is a little yellow. I don't think you meant to colorize the photo. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:00, 28 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for your effort but the background is still too dark. The face is a mosaic of facets, particularly visible in the teeth and earring -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:42, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 21:42, 30 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Basile. Daniel Case (talk) 06:23, 5 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 5 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Yann (talk) 14:21, 5 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Fiéis celembram o 12 de outubro no Santuário de Aparecida (37659285931).jpg[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 12 Sep 2023 at 13:32:04 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People#Events
Info Devotees celebrating the Aparecida's Feast Day at the Basilica of Our Lady of Aparecida, Brazil. Created by Agência Brasil Fotografias - uploaded by NMaia - nominated by ★ -- ★ 13:32, 3 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support This image made me impressed since the first time I found it. -- ★ 13:32, 3 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Question Intrusive? Charlesjsharp (talk) 09:35, 4 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I don't think so; it was taken by the Brazilian government's official news agency Agência Brasil. ★ 10:16, 4 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The uploader's discussion page has many possible copyright violations but I imagine the Agency free release their images do they? Charlesjsharp (talk) 15:21, 4 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I withdraw my nomination Good point; license verification is invalid due to the broken link. ★ 16:14, 4 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Pez halcón de cabeza moteada (Paracirrhites forsteri) sobre un coral (Pocillopora verrucosa), parque nacional Ras Muhammad, Egipto, 2022-03-29, DD 59.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 9 Sep 2023 at 13:27:09 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Fish#Family_:_Cirrhitidae_(Hawkfishes)
Info A majestic blackside hawkfish (Paracirrhites forsteri) watching for a prey on top of a coral (Pocillopora verrucosa), Ras Muhammad National Park, Red Sea, Egypt. It is from the Indo-Pacific and occasionally found in the aquarium trade and is also of minor importance to local commercial fisheries. It grows to a total length of 22 cm (9 in). One of the main characteristics of this speices are the speckles of the head. The black-sided hawkfish is an ambush predator; it usually lies in wait on a head of coral, propped up by its stiff pectoral fins, ready to dart out at passing crustaceans or small fish.[ It is mainly a solitary fish, but may be seen in pairs or may form small harems with one dominant male and several females. Like other members of the family, it is a sequential hermaphrodite; adults start life as females but the largest female in a group changes sex to a male if that position is vacated. c/u/n by Poco a poco (talk) 13:27, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Ok, sorry, one last uw try before moving to architecture :) -- Poco a poco (talk) 13:27, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Charlesjsharp (talk) 14:09, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 14:16, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good environmental portrait of the blackside hawkfish with the corals. --Aristeas (talk) 16:27, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Ermell (talk) 21:33, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 05:15, 1 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Schnobby (talk) 06:31, 1 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 09:30, 1 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 09:43, 1 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Aristeas. I think you should add categories for more of the creatures that are visible in the photo. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 17:23, 1 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Not so sure here, there are two elements here in focus, the hawkfish and the coral below it. I could add a category of the species of the white pulse coral in the back (Xenia umbellata), but then it is as prominent as the other coral. Why do you think that it's important? Poco a poco (talk) 06:20, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The white thing in the near right corner is very sharp, so I'd say at least add that. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:33, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Not really convinced because for me there are main actors and minor actors in a picture and adding cats for both is like putting them all at the same level, but ok, added. No big deal. Poco a poco (talk) 08:18, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support Impressive composition and striking colours. --Tagooty (talk) 04:01, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice colors. 20 upper 08:44, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:10, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 15:28, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Composition coral + fish -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:06, 3 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ivar (talk) 12:10, 3 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 05:58, 4 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support - ABAL1412^{🇻🇳🇸🇺🇷🇺} (talk ☭) 15:23, 4 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 18 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 01:04, 6 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Fish#Family_:_Cirrhitidae_(Hawkfishes)

File:Edward Alexander Bouchet Yale College class of 1874.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 9 Sep 2023 at 22:09:30 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People/Portrait#Men
Info created by George Kendall Warren - restored, uploaded, and nominated by Adam Cuerden -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 22:09, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 22:09, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Beautiful restoration job on a fine photo. I think it could have been nice to keep the handwriting, but that's just my taste. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:14, 1 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 09:27, 1 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 13:02, 1 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support - ABAL1412^{🇻🇳🇸🇺🇷🇺} (talk ☭) 16:35, 1 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Ikan. --Aristeas (talk) 08:14, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:09, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support ★ 10:23, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ivar (talk) 12:11, 3 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Another portrait of a human being who lived long before us, then some 150 to 190 years later, we find ourselves here. 20 upper 18:28, 3 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Ikan -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:08, 6 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 11 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:44, 6 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: People/Portrait#Men

File:Kakadu (AU), Kakadu National Park, Gunwarrdehwarrde Lookout -- 2019 -- 4118.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 6 Sep 2023 at 05:48:59 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Australia#Northern Territory
Info created and uploaded by XRay - nominated by SHB2000 --SHB2000 (talk) 05:48, 28 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support I'm mainly nominating this for the contrast between the sky and the landscape – that said, I can understand if someone opposes this due to the lack of a wow factor. --SHB2000 (talk) 05:48, 28 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support - ABAL1412^{🇻🇳🇸🇺🇷🇺} (talk ☭) 06:51, 28 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Info SHB2000, thank you for nominating. FYI: I made some minor improvements. IMO better for a FPC. --XRay 💬 06:57, 28 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - Looking at the clouds, I can't help but wonder if this is slightly overexposed. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 15:37, 28 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It's fine for me, but maybe it's presented differently for me. I have reduced the sky a bit from the structure. --XRay 💬 16:42, 28 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I've opened the most recent version of this file in Photoshop and applied the clipping warnings in Camera Raw. It's highlighting large swatches of three clouds, as well as a few smaller areas. Having said that, I've shot in near-equatorial conditions before and know how difficult it can be to capture the entire range, and this is an excellent representation of the area, so...

Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 19:51, 28 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Weak support The contrast between landscape and sky is really intriguing; it’s just a pity that IMHO the sky (espec. the clouds) is a bit too bright. --Aristeas (talk) 07:51, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 14:52, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral I'd like to see if the clouds can be darkened. Daniel Case (talk) 06:25, 5 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 5 support, 0 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 14:43, 6 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Tornadic Debris lofted over 30,000 feet.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 10 Sep 2023 at 05:57:45 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic media/Computer-generated#Other
Info created by the National Weather Service - uploaded by Highteeld99 - nominated by WeatherWriter -- Additional information: Radar depiction of debris being thrown 30,000 feet (9,100 m) was reported by media outlets.[1][2], confirming the radar model’s factual accuracy. WeatherWriter (talk) 05:57, 1 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Factually accurate modeling from a National Weather Service NEXRAD radar during the 2021 Western Kentucky tornado. This is a support from me as it seems as good as the only other tornado radar-related featured picture File:05june-dow7-wide.gif. WeatherWriter (talk) 05:57, 1 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Question How is it possible that there are gaps in the debris field? Can you reference the source material for this image? Needs date/time to be specified. Charlesjsharp (talk) 07:53, 1 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Tornadoes don’t produce just a straight “wall of debris”, so air gaps are created as debris is thrown up and out. The tornado entered the town of Mayfield at 9:26 p.m. CST (03:26 UTC) on December 10, 2021 (so radar imagery used would have been within a few minutes of that), and this data would have been from the KPAH NEXRAD radar owned by the National Weather Service. Sources stating that debris was thrown 30,000 feet are listed above in the info section, which included one from NBC News, where they stated, “One such indicator was debris lofted high into the air. Radar suggested that the Mayfield tornado threw debris over 30,000 feet into the air. That's the altitude commercial airplanes fly.” Should note that the data is from the National Weather Service. WeatherWriter (talk) 14:29, 1 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Perhaps the density/density gradient (with a scale) of the debris in different parts of the sky might be helpful. It is not convincing as illustrated. Minor quibbles: there are unmarked yellow and red lines and the white Kft lines have inconsistent thickness. Charlesjsharp (talk) 15:57, 1 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This internet page may be rubbish, but the timing (after the tornado hit?) and analysis (not all debris?) make me wonder. Charlesjsharp (talk) 16:11, 1 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Small for an FP but would be a great VI if nominated at COM:VIC. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:39, 6 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 14:38, 6 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Aboriginal Rock Art in Keep River National Park.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 6 Sep 2023 at 05:57:17 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Other#Australia
Info created and uploaded by Jtagi - nominated by SHB2000 --SHB2000 (talk) 05:57, 28 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support It's also worth noting that the park this is in (Keep River National Park) very far away from almost anywhere else – I can't exactly find the distance from the rock art to the nearest town, but I can say with confidence that it's a lot. --SHB2000 (talk) 05:57, 28 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support - ABAL1412^{🇻🇳🇸🇺🇷🇺} (talk ☭) 06:52, 28 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 15:36, 28 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Kritzolina (talk) 06:38, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose The wow effect I see in the artwork and the performance of the artist, with the photo I can not see that. Ermell (talk) 20:38, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
It's around 5,000 years old – of course it's not going to be striking as a piece of rock art today or even 1,000 years ago. --SHB2000 (talk) 22:17, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose I agree with Ermell, and you misread what he said, which is that the art is wowing but the photograph is not. I think the inclusion of other parts of the rock face that are the same color as the artwork or that have what I consider in context an overly active texture distracts from it, and a much closer crop around the art would give it a much better presentation. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 17:11, 30 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Personally, I've always found Indigenous rock art more interesting (and more appealing) when it has a bit of its surrounds, primarily because you can actually tell it is rock art, whereas you can't if it's cropped (this is something I learned from my personal photos, though the rock art in my area tends to be more red hands and less on animals, which can be a differing factor). --SHB2000 (talk) 10:51, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Llez (talk) 10:23, 30 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 09:37, 1 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per above, I don't really see the exceptionality of this subject, sorry Poco a poco (talk) 08:20, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 15:53, 4 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose, not really that special. Daniel Case (talk) 03:43, 6 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 7 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 14:40, 6 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Interior da Capela das Velas.jpg[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 13 Sep 2023 at 16:24:18 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious buildings#Brazil
Info Basílica of Our Lady of Aparecida - Interior of the Candles Chapel. Created and uploaded by Marceloff7 - nominated by ★ -- ★ 16:24, 4 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support A bit noisy, but wow factor, perspective and mood just ended the game. -- ★ 16:24, 4 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support - ABAL1412^{🇻🇳🇸🇺🇷🇺} (talk ☭) 16:30, 4 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I sort of get the "wow" of the cross surrounded by light, but I do not get the crop here at all. — Rhododendrites ^talk | 16:54, 4 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose the top is basically solid black --Wilfredor (talk) 17:17, 4 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Just open the image in full resolution to see the ceiling lines. ★ 17:33, 4 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my nomination ★ 12:42, 5 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I think you withdrew too quickly. I was thinking of supporting and just wanted to take more time to consider whether or not to do so. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 17:57, 5 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No chance; look at the nomination above, and how many voters skipped this one. ★ 22:09, 5 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Leiothlypis peregrina Malus sp JRVdH 01.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 11 Sep 2023 at 09:14:02 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family_:_Parulidae_(New_World_Warblers)
InfoThis photo is the first in a whole series illustrating the foraging behavior of Tennessee Warblers seeking food (larvae and caterpillars) in Malus spp. flowers in Roger-Van den Hende botanical garden. All by Cephas -- Cephas (talk) 09:14, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Cephas (talk) 09:14, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 14:44, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support - ABAL1412^{🇻🇳🇸🇺🇷🇺} (talk ☭) 17:02, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Ermell (talk) 19:53, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 20:01, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:02, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:43, 3 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Excellent. --Aristeas (talk) 09:19, 3 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 12:58, 3 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support ★ 13:46, 3 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Terragio67 (talk) 15:16, 3 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 18:07, 3 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Rhododendrites ^talk | 13:23, 4 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Excellent clarity and good composition. --Tagooty (talk) 16:02, 4 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support I think I've seen that same bird in the same place where squirrels eat in that same park --Wilfredor (talk) 17:52, 4 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 07:54, 5 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 16 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 14:48, 7 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family_:_Parulidae_(New_World_Warblers)

File:Junco hyemalis UL 09.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 11 Sep 2023 at 10:35:18 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family_:_Passerellidae_(New_world_sparrows)
Info All by Cephas -- Cephas (talk) 10:35, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Cephas (talk) 10:35, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 14:44, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 15:24, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support - ABAL1412^{🇻🇳🇸🇺🇷🇺} (talk ☭) 17:02, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 18:13, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Beautiful bird. 20 upper 19:40, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Ermell (talk) 19:52, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 20:01, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:58, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 23:19, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:45, 3 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Aristeas (talk) 09:19, 3 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ivar (talk) 12:11, 3 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 12:58, 3 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support ★ 13:45, 3 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Terragio67 (talk) 15:15, 3 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 05:55, 4 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tagooty (talk) 15:56, 4 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 07:58, 5 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --BigDom (talk) 07:58, 6 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 20 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 14:50, 7 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family_:_Passerellidae_(New_world_sparrows)

File:Seberang Pebayan Village, Padang 2017-02-14.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 7 Sep 2023 at 20:06:37 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Settlements #Indonesia (will have to be created)
Info all by Crisco 1492 -- — Chris Woodrich (talk) 20:06, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- — Chris Woodrich (talk) 20:06, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support ★ 09:58, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Interesting, but the boat cut on the left makes it suboptimal. Do you have more of it? Yann (talk) 09:37, 1 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Too busy, really. Daniel Case (talk) 03:44, 6 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 2 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 06:11, 8 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Teatro Olimpico, Vicenza.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 11 Sep 2023 at 17:33:24 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors#Italy
Info created and uploaded by Nicola Quirico - nominated by ABAL1412 - ABAL1412^{🇻🇳🇸🇺🇷🇺} (talk ☭) 17:33, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Info Inside Teatro Olimpico, Vicenza, Italy. At first, I thought it was a gate. But when I looked closer, I realized that it was a painting. - ABAL1412^{🇻🇳🇸🇺🇷🇺} (talk ☭) 17:33, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The funny thing is that it is both a gate, a stage and a painting :–) – see the floor plan and the cross section (we need better scans of them). --Aristeas (talk) 06:30, 3 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support -- ABAL1412^{🇻🇳🇸🇺🇷🇺} (talk ☭) 17:33, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Interesting subject, I didn't know it, but there are severe issues here. It's too dark, there is lots of noise and the crop is too tight. Poco a poco (talk) 20:00, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I’m very sorry. The Teatro Olimpico by Palladio and Scamozzi is one of my favourites in the abundance of wonderful buildings in Italy; it is of highest historical and theoretical interest. Some theatre theorists have even claimed that thanks to its sophisticated scenery the Teatro Olimpico is the only stage of the world who plays itself and by itself – it does not need any actors but still enacts the Oedipus Rex every day since 1585 ;–). But even more we need better photos of the Teatro Olimpico. It is difficult to take photos there, yes, but with today’s cameras with anti-shake systems etc. and today’s excellent lenses it should finally be possible to take adequate photos. This one is not, sorry. --Aristeas (talk) 06:20, 3 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per Aristeas. Perspective correction seems to be very difficult here, but it's not enough. In addition, the picture is too dark, it even looks like there is vignetting in the corners. Sorry. --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 18:21, 3 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 06:09, 8 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Plain-capped ground-tyrant (Muscisaxicola alpinus) on Senecio niveo-aureus Chingaza.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 7 Sep 2023 at 21:18:12 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family : Tyrannidae (Tyrant Flycatchers)
Info A bird that lives at high altitude in the páramo of Colombia and Ecuador resting on a perennial plant that is also only found in the wild in Colombia and Ecuador between 3100m and 4600m. The senecio is cultivated as an ornamental garden plant. No ground-tyrant FPs. All by Charlesjsharp -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 21:18, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 21:18, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support Low resolution but appealing color combination with the plant -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:56, 30 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Basile. Very nice composition. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:56, 30 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Sorry, but low resolution and not exceptional IMO. 20 upper 05:17, 30 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Basile --Llez (talk) 10:26, 30 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support - ABAL1412^{🇻🇳🇸🇺🇷🇺} (talk ☭) 10:51, 30 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Ermell (talk) 20:01, 30 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Wilfredor (talk) 21:25, 30 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support ★ 22:11, 30 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cephas (talk) 22:11, 30 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:46, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Aristeas (talk) 16:17, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 09:53, 1 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 12:58, 3 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:50, 5 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 06:36, 7 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 15 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 06:14, 8 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family : Tyrannidae (Tyrant Flycatchers)

File:Autumn in Hrubý Jeseník mountains, Czech Republic 01.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 8 Sep 2023 at 12:13:18 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Czech_Republic
Info all by Pudelek -- Pudelek (talk) 12:13, 30 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Pudelek (talk) 12:13, 30 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support Nice view, but it's too dark (at the bottom left), and not so sharp. - ABAL1412^{🇻🇳🇸🇺🇷🇺} (talk ☭) 17:24, 30 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support OK for me. ★ 22:08, 30 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Not special enough in my view. Dark foreground, dull light -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:41, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I agree with Basile. There's not much for the eyes to move around, mostly because of the effects of the fog in this case. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 16:26, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Poor lights condition. --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 16:25, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Nothing special. Daniel Case (talk) 06:38, 7 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support I like the special atmosphere. The lighting and focus looks natural. Not so artificial like the many HDR pictures here. --Ephramac (talk) 16:38, 7 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 4 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 18:00, 8 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Pilsumer Ziegelei-2021-2118-.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 12 Sep 2023 at 12:29:17 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Industry#Germany
Info created & uploaded by Matthias Süßen – nominated by Ivar (talk) 12:29, 3 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Ivar (talk) 12:29, 3 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support ★ 12:50, 3 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 12:58, 3 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: very impressive, but the discarded cup really ruins the wow for me. Would support if it is removed. --The Cosmonaut (talk) 13:22, 3 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 13:27, 3 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cephas (talk) 15:37, 3 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support ★ 13:45, 3 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 13:57, 3 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Terragio67 (talk) 15:10, 3 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support Per The Cosmonaut. I will change it to support if you remove it. Thanks for your contribution. - ABAL1412^{🇻🇳🇸🇺🇷🇺} (talk ☭) 17:46, 3 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support - ABAL1412^{🇻🇳🇸🇺🇷🇺} (talk ☭) 10:35, 7 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Harlock81 (talk) 17:54, 3 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Ermell (talk) 21:59, 3 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Rhododendrites ^talk | 22:21, 3 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:12, 4 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support The combination of mirroring effect added to the regular alternation of light and dark areas is successful -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:46, 5 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Great! -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:47, 5 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 08:07, 5 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support but I would also prefer that the cup is cloned out. —UnpetitproleX (Talk) 12:35, 5 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Benh (talk) 12:40, 5 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support JukoFF (talk) 19:14, 5 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support The mirror effect is great but I just wish the photographer had taken half a step to their left to get the symmetry a little better. BigDom (talk) 07:57, 6 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 17:30, 6 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Wonderful subject. --Aristeas (talk) 07:31, 7 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Done @Matthias Süßen, The Cosmonaut, ABAL1412, and UnpetitproleX: Matthias Süßen is very busy in real life, he will probably have no time to look at that discarded cup. I agree that the cup does not help the photo (if it was in the sharp zone I would regard it as a piece of circumstantial evidence, but it is out of focus). Therefore I have uploaded a version with the cup cloned out (no other changes). @Matthias: Das soll nur ein kleines Hilfsangebot sein, falls Dir das Bild mit Becher besser gefällt, reverte es einfach auf Deine Version! --Aristeas (talk) 08:39, 7 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 22 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /FPCBot (talk) 13:01, 8 September 2023 (UTC)--20 upper 16:03, 8 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Industry#Germany

File:Yellow cherry tomatoes.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 12 Sep 2023 at 12:15:44 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Food and drink#Fruits (raw)
Info all by Ivar (talk) 12:15, 3 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ivar (talk) 12:15, 3 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Yummy! ★ 12:17, 3 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support - ABAL1412^{🇻🇳🇸🇺🇷🇺} (talk ☭) 12:26, 3 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 12:58, 3 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 13:23, 3 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Terragio67 (talk) 15:11, 3 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Not particularly appetizing but good quality. 20 upper 18:09, 3 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Ermell (talk) 22:01, 3 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 05:53, 4 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice presentation -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:41, 5 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support I've never seen hairs on a tomato before, but with this close a view, we can see them! -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:49, 5 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 08:03, 5 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 18:08, 5 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Too bright overall, I believe but nice Poco a poco (talk) 17:30, 6 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Aristeas (talk) 07:31, 7 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 15 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /FPCBot (talk) 13:01, 8 September 2023 (UTC) - ABAL1412^{🇻🇳🇸🇺🇷🇺} (talk ☭) 16:33, 8 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Food and drink#Fruits (raw)

File:Griffon vulture (Gyps fulvus).jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 8 Sep 2023 at 05:11:35 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Accipitriformes#Genus : Gyps
The Eurasian griffon vulture (Gyps fulvus) is a large Old World vulture in the bird of prey family Accipitridae. It may also be known as the Griffon vulture, though it may be used for the genus as a whole. It is not to be confused with the Rüppell's griffon vulture (Gyps rueppellii) and Himalayan griffon vulture (Gyps himalayensis). It is closely related to the white-backed vulture (Gyps africanus). Info created & uploaded by Alexis Lours - nominated by 20 upper -- 20 upper 05:11, 30 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- 20 upper 05:11, 30 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice close-up. --SHB2000 (talk) 05:16, 30 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Great close-up, indeed, but there are 3 really apparent small stray white pixels to the left of the lower part of the bird's head that should be edited out or explained. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:21, 30 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oh, didn't see that; will get to work. 20 upper 12:55, 30 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, but I couldn't get it down due to technical issues, I'll do it tomorrow when the issues are resolved. 20 upper 16:50, 30 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I'm happy to wait. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:02, 30 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not sure I got all of it. 20 upper 14:16, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I don't see any difference. Maybe you found some other hot pixels I hadn't seen. I'll make an image note. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 16:28, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Yann (talk) 09:06, 30 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Question Can @Alexis Lours: recover the blown highlights? Charlesjsharp (talk) 09:09, 30 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose Blown highlights still there. ps Size error in your recent upload 20 Charlesjsharp (talk) 14:19, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Charlesjsharp Fixed size problem; I just downloaded the low version. I'm not sure what you mean by "blown highlights". 20 upper 14:42, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I've added a note - the white feathers on the bird's 'collar' are overexposed and 'blown'. Sometimes details can be recovered from the RAW file. Charlesjsharp (talk) 15:43, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support - ABAL1412^{🇻🇳🇸🇺🇷🇺} (talk ☭) 10:56, 30 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 12:56, 30 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Wilfredor (talk) 21:23, 30 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cool hair! ;P ★ 22:10, 30 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Bluish fringe around the white feathers at the bottom, also visible at thumbnail size -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:36, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 04:50, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:13, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:47, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support It’s a pity about that highlight area, but otherwise expression and detail are too good to resist. --Aristeas (talk) 16:14, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Schnobby (talk) 06:34, 1 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 09:46, 1 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Ermell (talk) 20:10, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ivar (talk) 12:09, 3 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 12:58, 3 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 06:01, 4 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 06:38, 7 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 18 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /FPCBot (talk) 13:01, 8 September 2023 (UTC) - ABAL1412^{🇻🇳🇸🇺🇷🇺} (talk ☭) 16:36, 8 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Birds/Accipitriformes#Genus : Gyps

File:Basílica, Javier, Navarra, España, 2023-01-05, DD 80-82 HDR.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 12 Sep 2023 at 10:24:33 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious_buildings#Spain
Info Basilica, Xavier, Navarre, Spain. The basilica belongs to the ensemble of the Castle of Xavier, built in the 10th century, although the basilica was not built until end of the 19th and beginning of the 20th century. Of eclectic style, the interior has a unique neogothic nave built with grey stone and white marble. The stained glass is a work of painter Marcelino Santamaría from Burgos. The main altar is an artistic decorative work, carved in stone inlaid with mosaics, bronzes and enamels by the Biais house in Paris. The tabernacle is located on a high relief that represents San Francisco baptizing and preaching. c/u/n by Poco a poco (talk) 10:24, 3 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 10:24, 3 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Automatic support ★ 12:17, 3 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support - ABAL1412^{🇻🇳🇸🇺🇷🇺} (talk ☭) 12:25, 3 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 12:58, 3 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 13:20, 3 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 13:27, 3 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Terragio67 (talk) 15:13, 3 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cephas (talk) 15:39, 3 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice view. 20 upper 18:11, 3 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Ermell (talk) 22:02, 3 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 20:54, 4 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:50, 5 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very beautiful! -- Radomianin (talk) 08:00, 5 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 18:06, 5 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --BigDom (talk) 07:47, 6 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Great view and very atmospheric. --Aristeas (talk) 07:30, 7 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 16 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /FPCBot (talk) 13:01, 8 September 2023 (UTC) - ABAL1412^{🇻🇳🇸🇺🇷🇺} (talk ☭) 16:34, 8 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Interiors/Religious_buildings#Spain

File:Lukmanierpass, Passo del Lucomagno. 20-09-2022. (actm.) 29.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 11 Sep 2023 at 04:26:13 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Natural/Switzerland#Grisons (Graubünden)
Info Lukmanierpas Passo del Lucomagno. (Detail of the shelter near the pass)
All by -- Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 04:26, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 04:26, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cephas (talk) 10:36, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support - ABAL1412^{🇻🇳🇸🇺🇷🇺} (talk ☭) 17:00, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I like the door and the rest of the outside wall of the cabin that's showing, but could you dial back the blown highlights just a bit? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:05, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your comment: do you mean that the colors should be a little less warm?--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 04:50, 3 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No. When I say "blown," I mean that it is so bright that it's really glary and lacks any detail. When I look at the highlights at full size, they actually hurt my eyes. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:19, 3 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Highlights pushed back slightly. Thank you. for your reviews. --Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:16, 3 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I guess the details are unrecoverable. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:52, 5 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

In retrospect I think you meant the bottom part of the photo and I thought the top part.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 13:34, 7 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, the brightest area. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 15:12, 7 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. Is probably okay now.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 15:34, 7 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support --SHB2000 (talk) 23:20, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:48, 3 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support ★ 13:46, 3 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 20:24, 3 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support The quality of the details is really high, with strong lights and colors... --Terragio67 (talk) 20:45, 3 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support Very good, it’s just a pity that the highlights at the bottom are unrecoverable. --Aristeas (talk) 07:28, 7 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 05:11, 8 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 10 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 17:56, 8 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural/Switzerland#Grisons (Graubünden)

File:Сор Кендирли. Три батыра.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 12 Sep 2023 at 20:23:03 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Kazakhstan
Info created by Максат79 — uploaded by Максат79 — nominated by Красный — Красный ^{wanna talk?} 20:23, 3 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Красный ^{wanna talk?} 20:23, 3 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Lovely composition! ★ 20:26, 3 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Ermell (talk) 21:54, 3 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 22:18, 3 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:17, 4 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 15:20, 4 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support - ABAL1412^{🇻🇳🇸🇺🇷🇺} (talk ☭) 15:25, 4 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Rhododendrites ^talk | 16:55, 4 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support I'm glad you nominated the photo here. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:44, 5 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Question Beautiful, the more I see it the more I think it is beautiful. To a photo like this even the small defects are negligible and take a back seat. I just ask if you can correct the anomaly on sea level that I added to the notes, please. -- Terragio67 (talk) 07:54, 5 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- Support Please ignore my previous comment. The lack of glare of the sun made the right side bluish which I mistook for water...
Terragio67 (talk) 08:11, 5 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support K is lovely. --SHB2000 (talk) 09:27, 5 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support JukoFF (talk) 19:14, 5 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 16:58, 6 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Beautiful. --Aristeas (talk) 07:38, 7 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 14 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:25, 8 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural#Kazakhstan

File:Оредеж, Железнодорожная 9, кот (2).jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 8 Sep 2023 at 15:44:53 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals/Carnivora#Family : Felidae (Felids)
Info created by Красный - uploaded by Красный - nominated by Красный -- Красный ^{wanna talk?} 15:44, 30 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Красный ^{wanna talk?} 15:44, 30 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose For a picture of a domestic cat to be featured, it would have to be really outstanding. This is a nice composition, but the cat is not particularly sharp, so it's not a really outstanding picture that would make it one of the greatest on the site. The sour-looking facial expression of the senior cat also makes it less than wowing to me, though others could well disagree. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 16:40, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If the quality would be there, it could be a great picture. This cat has a really funny look, and looks like a casting for Tom. Yann (talk) 20:08, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I take your point. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:34, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose Good concept but agree with Ikan. --GRDN711 (talk) 02:30, 1 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Moral support This is a very moving photo, it makes me feel deep sympathy for the old and probably ill cat. It also has high documentary value, and you can even interpret this as an allegory on the poor life of ordinary people in ~~Russia~~ many countries … This makes this photo much more valuable than 99% of the countless pretty cat photos from the web. Of course, as Yann as stated, the technical quality is the crux. For “ordinary” subjects we usually require excellent technical quality. But personally I have the strange feeling that even the limited technical quality is apt in this case: It would be tasteless to paint misery in bright colours and with mannerist brushwork, so I also can’t require brilliant photos of a poor old cat. --Aristeas (talk) 08:09, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comment You guys have sold me on the cat, but I still disagree that not representing the cat more sharply actually makes it an outstanding photo. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:27, 3 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose Although I love cats, I have to agree with Ikan Kekek on this. 20 upper 08:41, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I love cats, too. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:14, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support per Aristeas. --The Cosmonaut (talk) 15:32, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per Ikan. --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 16:22, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment In addition to above comments, it is better cropped: File:Оредеж, Железнодорожная 9, кот (cropped).jpg. Yann (talk) 10:32, 4 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 3 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:27, 8 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Kargah Buddha (cropped).jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 11 Sep 2023 at 05:39:24 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Sculptures#Reliefs
Info created and uploaded by Shah zaman baloch - nominated by UnpetitproleX (Talk) 05:39, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- UnpetitproleX (Talk) 05:39, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 14:44, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support - ABAL1412^{🇻🇳🇸🇺🇷🇺} (talk ☭) 17:01, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support ★ 13:46, 3 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 05:57, 4 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 10:29, 4 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:52, 5 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 18:05, 5 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support Very interesting subject (just wish the technical quality was even better). --Aristeas (talk) 07:29, 7 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support per Aristeas -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:37, 9 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 10 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /FPCBot (talk) 05:01, 9 September 2023 (UTC) - ABAL1412^{🇻🇳🇸🇺🇷🇺} (talk ☭) 08:53, 9 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects/Sculptures#Reliefs

File:Larus dominicanus in Cabo frio, RJ, Brazil.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 8 Sep 2023 at 21:21:47 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Charadriiformes#Genus_:_Larus
Info All by -- Wilfredor (talk) 21:21, 30 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support ★ 22:06, 30 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose A good image but I'm not blown away by it. The light is a bit boring, so it looks like just another picture of a gull.--Peulle (talk) 06:51, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support - ABAL1412^{🇻🇳🇸🇺🇷🇺} (talk ☭) 09:27, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice composition. 20 upper 08:57, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 15:54, 4 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 4 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /FPCBot (talk) 05:01, 9 September 2023 (UTC) - ABAL1412^{🇻🇳🇸🇺🇷🇺} (talk ☭) 08:51, 9 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bow Bridge (86746p).jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 9 Sep 2023 at 03:16:06 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Architecture/Bridges#United_States_of_America
Info The Bow Bridge in Central Park. 8-frame panorama (51 MP). More commonly photographed during spring/fall. What I like about the image is the people -- a couple kissing, tourists taking pictures, a guy playing a guitar... very typical scene. all by — Rhododendrites ^talk | 03:16, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Rhododendrites ^talk | 03:16, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Oh, it looks like I jumped the gun. This nom is past the 5-day point, but still waiting for the bot to close it. No objections to this one being closed if it's too soon. Sorry. — Rhododendrites ^talk | 03:17, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No worries. The bot has counted the votes, I have reviewed the result and therefore that nomination is closed now. This one can continue. --Aristeas (talk) 07:46, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:31, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support This is epic! I'm happy to see a kissing couple in the middle of the bridge when I zoom in. - ABAL1412^{🇻🇳🇸🇺🇷🇺} (talk ☭) 09:34, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

And a guitarist at the left :-) But where's Wally? :-) Basile Morin (talk) 00:41, 1 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- Nah. As a classical music learner, I don't know what guitar is. I only see 2 ducks that inspiring Tchaikovsky on the right.
  (jk, of course :)))). - ABAL1412^{🇻🇳🇸🇺🇷🇺} (talk ☭) 16:42, 8 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Llez (talk) 11:47, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support lovely --PierreSelim (talk) 12:02, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Aristeas (talk) 16:19, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support At full page, I wanted a more generous crop on the bottom to see more of a reflection, but at full size, I really feel like the people worked for the composition, just as you said, and that, even more than the pretty, luminous bridge and reflections, makes the picture great! -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 16:23, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment There are still some small stitching errors to fix on the water surface.Ermell (talk) 21:48, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- Could you add a note? I fixed a couple that seemed obvious. In a few other areas, it's hard for me to distinguish between a stitching error and reflected vertical objects. — Rhododendrites ^talk | 21:58, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Notes added -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:41, 1 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Now that I focus on looking for stitching errors, I can clearly see the ones in the water on the near side closer to the middle, because they're mostly vertical lines. The one further left isn't as obvious, so look harder for it. Do see if you can fix those. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:25, 1 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose A lot of your panoramas have stiching errors. This one too. Look at the left on the bridge. Just at the bottom of the two people who are discussing. --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 21:45, 1 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- @Sebring12Hrs: there's a new version. — Rhododendrites ^talk | 12:43, 5 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  - @Rhododendrites: Thank you for your efforts !! I see one another, just under the vase and the women wearing the black coat and sun glasses (and a phone). --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 20:57, 5 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    - Can you see it ? In other terms, it's on the bridge masonry patterns. I have just notice them, sorry. --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 21:00, 5 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
      - I see it. Might have time tonight to fix it. — Rhododendrites ^talk | 15:21, 6 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
New version uploaded - Attempted to address several stitching errors in the bridge and especially in the water (those marked and some others I came across -- pesky water). — Rhododendrites ^talk | 19:05, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Ermell (talk) 20:08, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support light and viewpoint -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:04, 3 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 14:03, 3 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 10:28, 5 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 11 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /SHB2000 (talk) 08:38, 9 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Bridges#United States of America

File:Сидорівський замок, 2020, 10.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 9 Sep 2023 at 12:24:16 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Castles and fortifications#Ukraine
Info Sydoriv Castle. Created by Максим Огородник - uploaded by Максим Огородник - nominated by Максим Огородник -- Maks (talk) 12:24, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Maks (talk) 12:24, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Small for a landscape photo, nowadays, but please eliminate the dust spots. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:17, 1 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Nice photo, the detail resolution is good. Maks, if you want help with removing the dust spots, just drop me a note. --Aristeas (talk) 09:24, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Done On behalf of the author I have removed the dustspots. While I was at it I spotted some small red and green chromatic aberrations at high-contrast edges; I have taken the liberty to remove/reduce them, too. --Aristeas (talk) 10:05, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! It's a pretty photo, but I'm still undecided, because of its size. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:09, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support Impressive photo with a beautiful sky. Not big for a landscape photo, indeed, but because the detail resolution is very good this does not decrease its value. --Aristeas (talk) 10:05, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support ★ 10:17, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Electricity pylons are distracting. Harsh light, crop too tight at the left, and the resolution is relatively small -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:47, 3 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 3 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /FPCBot (talk) 13:01, 9 September 2023 (UTC) - ABAL1412^{🇻🇳🇸🇺🇷🇺} (talk ☭) 16:15, 9 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Chocó grasshopper (Opaon varicolor) male.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 13 Sep 2023 at 09:48:13 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods#Family : Acrididae (Short-horned grasshoppers and locusts)
Info A wingless grasshopper endemic to the Andes in Colombia. All by Charlesjsharp -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 09:48, 4 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 09:48, 4 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cephas (talk) 10:41, 4 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 15:18, 4 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support - ABAL1412^{🇻🇳🇸🇺🇷🇺} (talk ☭) 15:31, 4 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 17:27, 4 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Rjcastillo (talk) 02:34, 5 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support This is one of the best insect pictures I've ever seen from you or anyone else! -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:36, 5 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very impressive focus-stacked image. --Tagooty (talk) 09:06, 5 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:32, 5 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ivar (talk) 16:46, 5 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support JukoFF (talk) 19:14, 5 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 21:42, 5 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Ikan & Tagooty --Terragio67 (talk) 22:33, 5 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --BigDom (talk) 07:48, 6 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cool guy Poco a poco (talk) 17:28, 6 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Schnobby (talk) 07:24, 7 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very good, and certainly a hot POTY candidate – good luck! --Aristeas (talk) 07:40, 7 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Harsh light but high level of detail -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:48, 9 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 18 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /FPCBot (talk) 13:01, 9 September 2023 (UTC) - ABAL1412^{🇻🇳🇸🇺🇷🇺} (talk ☭) 16:17, 9 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Arthropods#Family : Acrididae (Short-horned grasshoppers and locusts)

File:Zebra Family Luangwa Zambia Jul23 A7C 05903.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 13 Sep 2023 at 08:57:23 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals#Family_:_Equidae_(Equids)
Info Plains zebra (Equus quagga) family - mare (left), foal (middle), stallion (right). South Luangwa National Park, Zambia. Created by Tagooty - uploaded by Tagooty - nominated by Tagooty -- Tagooty (talk) 08:57, 4 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Tagooty (talk) 08:57, 4 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment May be too late in the morning - they're already in the shade and is that heat haze? Charlesjsharp (talk) 09:32, 4 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Info It was 9:15 am. Heat and dust are part of the landscape in southern Africa. Tagooty (talk) 02:39, 5 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support - ABAL1412^{🇻🇳🇸🇺🇷🇺} (talk ☭) 15:31, 4 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Rjcastillo (talk) 02:35, 5 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very good, and I like how their stripes sort of combine when I'm looking at the photo, though I'm not saying we can't tell there are three different zebras. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:38, 5 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:30, 5 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support I don't like the foreground it's too annoying, on the other hand the position of the zebras is beautiful and above all I think they noticed you, even though you were very far from them. - Terragio67 (talk) 07:27, 7 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support exactly per Ikan. Maybe a bit too much sharpening on the ground, but this seems to be a matter of taste. --Aristeas (talk) 07:39, 7 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice one --PierreSelim (talk) 09:47, 7 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Liridon (talk) 08:43, 8 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support The combination of patterns around these biological shapes is fascinating -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:46, 9 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 10 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /FPCBot (talk) 13:01, 9 September 2023 (UTC) - ABAL1412^{🇻🇳🇸🇺🇷🇺} (talk ☭) 16:16, 9 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Mammals#Family_:_Equidae_(Equids)

File:BentoXVI-74-13052007.jpg[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 16 Sep 2023 at 13:54:24 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Pope Benedict XVI waving to a crowd outside the Basilica of Our Lady of Aparecida, state of São Paulo, Brazil.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People#Others
Info Pope Benedict XVI waving to a crowd outside the Basilica of Our Lady of Aparecida, state of São Paulo, Brazil. Created by Valter Campanato - uploaded by Dantadd - nominated by ★ -- ★ 13:54, 7 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- ★ 13:54, 7 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose It's not really sharp. The size is also not too big. Sorry. - ABAL1412^{🇻🇳🇸🇺🇷🇺} (talk ☭) 03:50, 8 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per ABAL1412.--Peulle (talk) 07:42, 8 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my nomination ★ 16:28, 8 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bloemknop van een Dahlia 'Moonfire'. 20-08-2023. (d.j.b).jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 13 Sep 2023 at 15:19:55 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants/Asterales#Subfamily : Asteroideae
Info Morning dew-covered flower bud of a Dahlia 'Moonfire' Focus stack of 50 photos.
All by -- Famberhorst (talk) 15:19, 4 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Famberhorst (talk) 15:19, 4 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Impressive focus-stacked image. --Tagooty (talk) 16:04, 4 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support - ABAL1412^{🇻🇳🇸🇺🇷🇺} (talk ☭) 16:29, 4 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 17:27, 4 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Terragio67 (talk) 17:31, 4 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 20:52, 4 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Rjcastillo (talk) 02:33, 5 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Really impressive! -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:35, 5 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ivar (talk) 16:46, 5 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Ermell (talk) 21:41, 5 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 14:37, 6 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 17:28, 6 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Beautiful, and very good focus stacking. --Aristeas (talk) 07:41, 7 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Actually, there are focus-stacking errors all over. Charlesjsharp (talk) 21:01, 7 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Nothing about the size of flower. --Mile (talk) 07:47, 8 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The diameter of the flower bud is ~17 mm. and I have mentioned it with the photo.--Famberhorst (talk) 11:37, 8 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support Sticky-looking plant 20 upper 15:58, 8 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I see a couple of white hot pixels to the right of the lower leaf. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:25, 8 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Done. hot pixels removed. Thanks for your reviews.--Famberhorst (talk) 04:52, 9 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 14 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:57, 9 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Plants/Asterales#Subfamily : Asteroideae

File:At Jewel Changi, Singapore 2023 36.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 13 Sep 2023 at 20:04:28 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors#Singapore
Info created by Mike Peel - uploaded by Mike Peel - nominated by Mike Peel -- Mike Peel (talk) 20:04, 4 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Mike Peel (talk) 20:04, 4 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Welcome to FPC, Mike! ★ 22:09, 4 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Impressive to me. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:33, 5 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Yes, it is. I supported it as QI too... -- Terragio67 (talk) 07:30, 5 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support - ABAL1412^{🇻🇳🇸🇺🇷🇺} (talk ☭) 08:30, 5 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support The coloured lights at night are more impressive. As there are no FPs of The Rain Vortex, I'm supporting this. --Tagooty (talk) 09:04, 5 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support You can't say no to the Jewel. --SHB2000 (talk) 09:26, 5 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 14:16, 5 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:34, 5 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ivar (talk) 16:46, 5 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 04:32, 6 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support When I visited it to take this shot there was no water :( Poco a poco (talk) 17:22, 6 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Aristeas (talk) 07:41, 7 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Amazing indoor waterfall that greeted me when I arrived in Singapore, next to the impressive Avengers Iron Man statue :) -- Radomianin (talk) 06:30, 8 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Charlesjsharp (talk) 08:07, 8 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 15 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:56, 9 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Interiors#Singapore

File:Igreja de São Gonçalo Vitória Espírito Santo 2019-3104.jpg[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 17 Sep 2023 at 16:50:32 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious buildings#Brazil
Info Igreja de São Gonçalo (Church of Saint Gonçalo de Amarante), Vitória, Espírito Santo. Created and uploaded by Prburley - nominated by ★ -- ★ 16:50, 8 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- ★ 16:50, 8 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Unsharp. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 17:46, 8 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Unsharp, as Ikan says, and not a particularly interesting subject (to me at least) in any case. BigDom (talk) 19:21, 8 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per others. - ABAL1412^{🇻🇳🇸🇺🇷🇺} (talk ☭) 20:46, 8 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination denied. Thank you for nominating this image. Unfortunately, it does not fall within the Guidelines because only two active nominations per user are allowed.

File:Gray catbird with a berry (16665).jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 14 Sep 2023 at 00:36:58 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family_:_Mimidae_(Mockingbirds_and_Thrashers)
Info Gray catbird (Dumetella carolinensis) with a chokeberry (Aronia). all by — Rhododendrites ^talk | 00:36, 5 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Rhododendrites ^talk | 00:36, 5 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Shot at the perfect moment. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:31, 5 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Yes; will support if slight overexposure/highlights sorted. Charlesjsharp (talk) 08:21, 5 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support Thanks. Charlesjsharp (talk) 14:35, 6 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Weak support per Charlesjsharp - ABAL1412^{🇻🇳🇸🇺🇷🇺} (talk ☭) 08:36, 5 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support Chirp! - ABAL1412^{🇻🇳🇸🇺🇷🇺} (talk ☭) 04:08, 8 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 21:16, 5 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 14:34, 6 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 15:12, 6 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Schnobby (talk) 07:22, 7 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Ikan. --Aristeas (talk) 07:45, 7 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Liridon (talk) 08:42, 8 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:42, 8 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 16:34, 8 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 12 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:34, 10 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family_:_Mimidae_(Mockingbirds_and_Thrashers)

File:Assisi - Chiesa di San Pietro - Crocifisso - 2023-09-05 01-25-30 001.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 14 Sep 2023 at 00:08:13 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious_buildings#Italy
Info The foundation of the Monastery of San Pietro in Assisi is documented in 1029 AD. At the center of the apse stands a large wooden crucifix from the 15th century made by an unknown craftsman. It is one of the many wooden crucifixes of the Middle Ages. Only a little later, in the period of the beginning of the Renaissance (1500-1550), the authors begin to get noticed and undertake to create their works that will be attributed to them forever (a sort of copyright that gave value to the work).

created by Terragio67 - uploaded by Terragio67 - nominated by Terragio67 -- Terragio67 (talk) 00:08, 5 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support -- Terragio67 (talk) 00:08, 5 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support - ABAL1412^{🇻🇳🇸🇺🇷🇺} (talk ☭) 08:31, 5 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Beautiful incidence of light.--Famberhorst (talk) 16:47, 5 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 18:11, 5 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support ★ 22:11, 5 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Striking contrast between light, shadow and shade. --Tagooty (talk) 13:51, 6 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 16:55, 6 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support It’s often difficult to take a good photo of these hanging crucifixes, you have found a great perspective. --Aristeas (talk) 07:44, 7 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Liridon (talk) 08:43, 8 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Amazing! 20 upper 15:57, 8 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 10 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:34, 10 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Interiors/Religious_buildings#Italy

File:Captain John W. Tarleton by John Jabez Edwin Mayall.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 9 Sep 2023 at 22:05:03 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People/Portrait#Men
Info created by John Jabez Edwin Mayall - restored, uploaded, and nominated by Adam Cuerden -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 22:05, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 22:05, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Great photo, already in good condition and very well restored, as usual. It's interesting: it looks almost like a painted portrait, and I'm guessing the oval-shaped dark area behind him is not a shadow that was there but something added to brilliant effect in post-processing. Am I right or totally off-base? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:19, 1 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
It's overpainted; most obvious in the hair. Basically, it was hard to get proper enlargements from the negatives at the time, so photographers took to adding some details back in themselves after printing the photo. Given this is the only surviving image of him I can find, and the overpainting was contemporary, I think it's fine. Adam Cuerden (talk) 15:18, 1 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sure it's fine! -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 17:20, 1 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support - ABAL1412^{🇻🇳🇸🇺🇷🇺} (talk ☭) 16:34, 1 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Great restoration job! -- Radomianin (talk) 16:38, 1 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Interesting portrait; at first glance the oval-shaped dark area and the orange background made it look like a totally overdone restauration to me, but both are in the original scan, too, so it seems the original photographer was after a special effect here. (And Adam’s restauration is great, as always.) --Aristeas (talk) 08:13, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:18, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support ★ 10:23, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 21:58, 5 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 8 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:35, 10 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: People/Portrait#Men

File:Schwerin Castle (7).jpg[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 12 Sep 2023 at 12:50:47 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Castles and fortifications#Germany
Info all by Tournasol7 -- Tournasol7 (talk) 12:50, 3 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Abstain As author. Tournasol7 (talk) 12:50, 3 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 13:24, 3 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support ★ 13:44, 3 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice perspective and atmosphere. --Terragio67 (talk) 15:03, 3 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support - ABAL1412^{🇻🇳🇸🇺🇷🇺} (talk ☭) 17:47, 3 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I'm not particularly wowed by this one, sorry.--Peulle (talk) 07:02, 4 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per Puelle. -- Karelj (talk) 18:56, 4 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Interesting perspective but the light is very dull, which just stops this being a wow for me, sorry. BigDom (talk) 07:50, 6 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Not the best angle. 20 upper 15:43, 6 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral Finally another perspective of Schwerin Castle, thank you! (I just can’t stand the usual view anymore, despite it’s so beautiful.) However the light is not great and the waste container etc. in the background a bit irritating. I have taken the liberty to change the gallery link because all other photos of this and similar buildings are in the Castles and fortifications gallery. --Aristeas (talk) 07:35, 7 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my nomination --Tournasol7 (talk) 09:39, 9 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Yellow-billed Stork Breeding Juvenile Lupande Jul23 A7R 06393.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 14 Sep 2023 at 08:58:03 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds#Family_:_Ciconiidae_(Storks)
Info Juvenile yellow-billed stork (Mycteria ibis) begging adult for food, Upper Lupande Game Management Area (GMA), Zambia. Adult in breeding plumage. Created by Tagooty - uploaded by Tagooty - nominated by Tagooty -- Tagooty (talk) 08:58, 5 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support There are no FPs of this species. -- Tagooty (talk) 08:58, 5 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support - ABAL1412^{🇻🇳🇸🇺🇷🇺} (talk ☭) 09:09, 5 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Really beautiful... -- Terragio67 (talk) 13:28, 5 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support ★ 16:44, 5 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ivar (talk) 16:45, 5 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support That is a really beautiful composition and has beautiful bokeh, not usually something I see. The youngster is in what looks to me like an odd, awkward posture, whereas the parent looks relaxed and poised, but I'm not an expert on stork behavior. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 17:54, 5 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Info @Ikan Kekek: The youngster was frantically asking for food while the parent was staying aloof! A common sight in that flock. --Tagooty (talk) 01:54, 6 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Understood, thanks. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:50, 6 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 18:13, 5 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Ermell (talk) 21:15, 5 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Great sharpness.--Peulle (talk) 08:26, 6 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support — UnpetitproleX (Talk) 11:08, 6 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Charlesjsharp (talk) 14:32, 6 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Schnobby (talk) 07:21, 7 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very good, beautiful light. --Aristeas (talk) 08:00, 7 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 14:31, 7 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 15:37, 7 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Peulle -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:00, 9 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 16 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /FPCBot (talk) 13:01, 10 September 2023 (UTC) - ABAL1412^{🇻🇳🇸🇺🇷🇺} (talk ☭) 15:25, 10 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Birds#Family_:_Ciconiidae_(Storks)

File:View from Coliseum Mountain.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 10 Sep 2023 at 05:12:46 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Canada#British Columbia
Info: north view from Coliseum Mountain; all by -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 05:12, 1 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 05:12, 1 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose The composition does not have a strong element for wow-factor. --Tagooty (talk) 03:54, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support The central sunlit ridge with its glowing snowfields is strong enough for me. There are some traces of CAs and I would like more detail resolution (maybe the ƒ number was too high?), but given the huge resolution it’s good. --Aristeas (talk) 08:38, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support ★ 10:16, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:54, 3 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Aristeas. -- Radomianin (talk) 17:00, 6 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 18:51, 6 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:38, 8 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 7 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /FPCBot (talk) 13:01, 10 September 2023 (UTC) - ABAL1412^{🇻🇳🇸🇺🇷🇺} (talk ☭) 15:24, 10 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural/Canada#British Columbia

File:Santuário Nacional 20161110 (cropped).jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 10 Sep 2023 at 09:11:30 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious buildings#Brazil
Info View of Basilica of Our Lady of Aparecida with the walkway called "Passarela da Fé", connecting the old and the new church, in the foreground. The religious building is the world's largest cathedral and the second largest Catholic church in interior area after the St. Peter's Basilica. Created and initially uploaded by Arquidiocese - cropped and nominated by ★ -- ★ 09:11, 1 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- ★ 09:11, 1 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I'm not in favour of nominators cropping/editing other people's images. Charlesjsharp (talk) 15:54, 1 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral The pic is nice. But like Charlesjsharp, I don't like the cropped/editing without original the author's agree. I will change it to support only if you prove that the original author agreed. - ABAL1412^{🇻🇳🇸🇺🇷🇺} (talk ☭) 16:43, 1 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support I see no problem with cropping as long as (a) the cropped version is uploaded as a new file under a new name and (b) the crop is documented and links to the original version. That’s what the CC licenses are talking about when they say you can “remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose”; and that’s why we use these licenses – we want to allow other people to built upon our work. --Aristeas (talk) 08:34, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Charlesjsharp and ABAL1412: Aristeas has a (good) point. ★ 10:21, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Needs a slight perspective correction. Aristeas is correct legally speaking, and also morally speaking for this particular image, but as far as best practices at FPC in general are concerned, I think the editor should run it by the original photographer first unless they have clearly been inactive for months or years. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:53, 3 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Which this one has. One contribution, in 2016. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 17:59, 8 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Ikan Kekek: Yes - which is why I said "for this particular image". -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 07:02, 10 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@King of Hearts: I renominated it after the perspective corrected. See it here. ★ 11:49, 10 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I withdraw my nomination ★ 13:33, 7 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- @King of Hearts: Perspective corrected thanks to Poco a poco. ★ 18:50, 7 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support Thanks, Poco. This is such an interesting sight, I think it deserves some love. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 17:57, 8 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support Yes, thanks. I think it's good, well depicted, and here you see something unique/original. -- Terragio67 (talk) 22:02, 8 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The large size of the church makes it imposing amidst the common landscape. ★ 01:31, 9 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The curvy pedestrian bridge is also important for the composition. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:58, 9 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, it makes the composition more dynamic. ★ 02:09, 10 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Voting period is ending, but obviously I will renominate it following Poco a poco's edits. ★ 02:39, 10 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 4 support, 0 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /FPCBot (talk) 13:01, 10 September 2023 (UTC) - ABAL1412^{🇻🇳🇸🇺🇷🇺} (talk ☭) 15:24, 10 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Gorizia - Duomo di Gorizia - 2023-09-03 21-21-16 001.jpg[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 12 Sep 2023 at 20:31:15 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious_buildings#Italy
Info The cathedral of Gorizia was built in the 11th century and rebuilt in the 14th century. It suffered serious damage during the First World War and was refurbished in 1928, but, it was not put back in the same way it was before. Rather it shows Central European influences, as if to demonstrate that this was not just a local church, but one of all. In 2025, almost 100 years later, Gorizia (Italy) will be the European capital of culture together with the modern city of Nova Gorica (Slovenia).
created by Terragio67 - uploaded by Terragio67 - nominated by Terragio67 -- Terragio67 (talk) 20:31, 3 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Terragio67 (talk) 20:31, 3 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support ★ 21:09, 3 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support - ABAL1412^{🇻🇳🇸🇺🇷🇺} (talk ☭) 15:26, 4 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral The surfaces have a washed out look, I think too much denoise was applied or the highlights were turned down too much. This category is unfortunately a higher standard due to the number of featured images in this theme --Wilfredor (talk) 17:19, 4 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for your comment regarding the Cathedral of Gorizia.

The washed-out vision issue was related to image acquisition (due to my previous decision). I decided to recover the image from the RAW file (DPP4 Canon) changing the profile from 'Neutral' to 'Fine'. Then, I enlarged the crop to the maximum allowed... Now the image should be more defined and less plasticky...

Let me know please... (remember to delete the browser's cache) Terragio67 (talk) 21:09, 4 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose When I looked down the nave, I was thinking this was an FP, but I don't like the sides, especially the left side, which are unsharp and noisy. Of course I know that there is a degree of loss of focus at the edges of the lens, but we've seen better sides than this. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:43, 5 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose not too keen on the camera put on (or very close to) the floor as this makes the benches unnecessarily prominent and a bit off-putting in my view. - Benh (talk) 12:39, 5 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I totally understand your point of view. It must be considered that it is a difficult place to take photographs due to the very strong front and side-lights which unfortunately disturbs the most interesting parts.

Therefore, there were two reasons that led me to choose to lower the position of the camera on the tripod to 60 cm. There are 8 side windows (4+4) on the ground floor and as many on the upper floor, so, lowering myself I protected the room from light disturbances that cannot be corrected in post-production, secondly it seemed nice to give the central perspective with the historic wooden benches as a guide towards the altar.

Thanks for your detailed review. Terragio67 (talk) 13:19, 5 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per others. - -Karelj (talk) 16:56, 5 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per Ikan.--Liridon (talk) 08:45, 8 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my nomination
For me it is important to clearly understand where there were problems in the photo to improve.
Thank you very much for yours detailed evaluations. --Terragio67 (talk) 16:42, 9 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Iglesia de San Salvador, Luesia, Zaragoza, España, 2023-01-04, DD 80-82 HDR.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 14 Sep 2023 at 20:54:41 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious_buildings#Spain
Info Church of El Salvador, Luesia, Zaragoza, Spain. The church is located in the highest area of the nucleus of the village of Luesia, next to the remains of the old medieval castle, to which it is historically and constructively associated. Its origin dates back to the end of the 11th century with the construction of the semicircular triple apse head with a double crypt at the bottom, while the body with three naves was built throughout the 12th century and the two portals on its southern fronts and occidental already respond to models from the beginning of the 13th century. The Romanesque building underwent a profound reform though in the mid-16th century. The main altarpiece is a Romanesque piece carved in wood; polychrome and gilt. The work is attributed to Gaspar Ramos, a sculptor from Sangüesa, who executed it around 1630. c/u/n by Poco a poco (talk) 20:54, 5 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 20:54, 5 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Ermell (talk) 21:46, 5 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco rules FPC! ★ 22:14, 5 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice details. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:40, 6 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support - ABAL1412^{🇻🇳🇸🇺🇷🇺} (talk ☭) 07:58, 6 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Peulle (talk) 08:25, 6 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Virtual-Pano (talk) 10:03, 6 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 12:54, 6 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Excellent image under difficult lighting conditions. --Tagooty (talk) 13:48, 6 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 15:10, 6 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Schnobby (talk) 07:19, 7 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Aristeas (talk) 08:01, 7 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 15:36, 7 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Charlesjsharp (talk) 20:55, 7 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 14:25, 8 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:34, 8 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 10:58, 10 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 17 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /FPCBot (talk) 21:02, 10 September 2023 (UTC)---Palauenc05 (talk) 21:14, 10 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Interiors/Religious_buildings#Spain

Stained glass windows in Church of Paróquia São Luiz Gonzaga, Avenida Paulista, São Paulo, Brazil[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 14 Sep 2023 at 12:41:26 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Architectural elements#Sets of stained glass windows
Info Stained glass windows in Church of Paróquia São Luiz Gonzaga, Avenida Paulista, São Paulo, Brazil. Created and uploaded by Wilfredor - nominated by ★ -- ★ 12:41, 5 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Masterpiece! -- ★ 12:41, 5 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Great! Yann (talk) 14:15, 5 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Extraordinary! - ABAL1412^{🇻🇳🇸🇺🇷🇺} (talk ☭) 16:26, 5 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Thanks Arion --Wilfredor (talk) 17:46, 5 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment The windows are beautiful, but I'm not as impressed as everyone who's commented so far, inclined to oppose, and don't understand the reactions, because the upper parts of the windows are notably unsharp, and I feel like the stained glass window series we've featured have been sharp throughout. Maybe someone would like to explain why this is so extraordinary as photography. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 17:51, 5 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I have the same objections as Ikan. The quality of the photos unfortunately decreases towards the top.--Ermell (talk) 21:13, 5 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Question Is this actually a valid set? following which criteria? In that church there are more than 5 windows (I had expected an even amount like 6, but I guess there are more), so why this 5? I also concur with Ikan's/Ermell's judgement Poco a poco (talk) 21:19, 5 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose It does not seem to qualify as a set. Charlesjsharp (talk) 08:06, 8 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my nomination I will nominate separately. ★ 00:47, 9 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comment It's irregular for me to reply to a withdrawn nomination, but why will you nominate partially unsharp photos of stained glass separately? I'd suggest you reconsider. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:55, 9 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Cala Praia dei Nacchi panorama.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 10 Sep 2023 at 23:32:36 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Italy#Sicily
Info: clear water of Cala Praia dei Nacchi; all by -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 23:32, 1 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 23:32, 1 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support ★ 10:17, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support - ABAL1412^{🇻🇳🇸🇺🇷🇺} (talk ☭) 16:59, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:55, 5 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 13:17, 7 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:40, 8 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very good 20 upper 05:17, 9 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support In my opinion there is an unusual perspective, because it is excessively prolonged in the lower part, which could lead to pitfalls, deformations and blurring. But this didn't happen in an obvious way, in fact, after all, it's a beautiful postcard. --Terragio67 (talk) 20:07, 9 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 8 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /SHB2000 (talk) 07:00, 11 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural/Italy#Sicily

File:Town hall of Dessau (11).jpg[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 12 Sep 2023 at 12:53:57 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Architectural_elements#Others
Info all by Tournasol7 -- Tournasol7 (talk) 12:53, 3 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Abstain As author. Tournasol7 (talk) 12:53, 3 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 13:24, 3 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support ★ 13:44, 3 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Impressive! - ABAL1412^{🇻🇳🇸🇺🇷🇺} (talk ☭) 17:48, 3 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice. 20 upper 18:07, 3 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 05:52, 4 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Question Why this crop; cutting the windows? Charlesjsharp (talk) 09:36, 4 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Here is a picture of the whole portal. Tournasol7 (talk) 14:54, 4 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. Surely we should have the whole portal or the crop to show the relief? This seems a poor compromise. Charlesjsharp (talk) 15:25, 4 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Indeed, it is difficult to find a compromise here. However, I have chosen the relief itself, as it seems to me more interesting than the portal as a whole. Tournasol7 (talk) 15:42, 4 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:15, 4 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose The crop spoils the effect for me. --Tagooty (talk) 16:01, 4 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I am missing the wow here. Sorry.Ermell (talk) 21:49, 5 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I agree with Ermell, sorry, Poco a poco (talk) 17:28, 6 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support After all it’s a photo of the balcony-like structure with the relief; so IMHO the crop is OK. --Aristeas (talk) 07:37, 7 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per Ermell. -- Karelj (talk) 18:12, 8 September 2023 (UTC).[reply]
Oppose Quality image but not an incredible subject. These kinds of ancient reliefs can be found almost everywhere in big cities. Also the windows with their tight crop at the top are distracting -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:41, 9 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my nomination --Tournasol7 (talk) 15:05, 10 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Rignano sull'Arno - Chiesa di San Pietro in Perticaia - 2023-09-05 13-27-07 002.jpg[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 14 Sep 2023 at 14:27:22 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious_buildings#Italy
Info created by Anna.Massini - uploaded by Anna.Massini - nominated by Anna.Massini -- (⧼Anna Massini alias PROPOLI87⧽) (talk) 14:27, 5 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- (⧼Anna Massini alias PROPOLI87⧽) (talk) 14:27, 5 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
InfoSan Pietro in Perticaia, is a small country church documented since the year 1066 in the municipality of Rignano sull'Arno in the province of Florence, in the Tuscany region. In this year it appears to belong to a certain Rolandino del fu Nero who sold it to his mother Gisla who, in turn, in the same year, donated it to the monastery of San Pier Maggiore in Florence. Together with the church, a series of rooms is also mentioned, including a cloister, where the canons were housed, i.e. a college of priests who lived in common and at the head of which was placed a prior. Even the rectory is mentioned in 1066. The facade of the church is extremely simple, with a stone portal. Above the portal is a pointed archivolt, with a niche inside which was placed a bust of St. Peter the Apostle, patron saint of the church. The perimeter walls are stripped of plaster and have a wall facing in filaretto d'alberese. The roof is supported by four exposed wooden trusses. An element that characterizes the entire building on the outside is the frame on which the gabled roof of the building rests: it is made up of a triple row of terracotta strips arranged in a herringbone pattern, probably from the Renaissance period.

I propose it because I photographed it this morning at dawn with a beautiful and particular light.

Support JukoFF (talk) 19:14, 5 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Beautiful motif, but not sharp or in places unnoisy enough for me, and the shadows look way too blue to me. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:42, 6 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I slightly corrected the chromatic aberration.I could have raised the temperature to mitigate the blue, but that would have been unreal. The colors were really as they appear in the photo. Or at least my eyes perceived them that way. (⧼Anna Massini alias PROPOLI87⧽) (talk) 11:12, 6 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I see the difference, but even if the colors are accurate, my other remarks stand. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 17:31, 6 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Sailko (talk) 07:27, 6 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support I agree with Ikan Kekek. The motif is really nice, but I miss the sharpness. - ABAL1412^{🇻🇳🇸🇺🇷🇺} (talk ☭) 07:51, 6 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose The quality of this smartphone pic is not excellent. Bluish hue in the dark areas. Tight crop at the left -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:35, 7 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose As much as I like the composition and the way the atmosphere has been captured - the overprocessed look and washed out details throughout the scene combined with highlight issues and CA (see left side) does not match minimum requirements for a FP imho --Virtual-Pano (talk) 10:13, 7 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice shot against the light. I love the contrast and composition. Not bad for a picture taken with a smartphone. ;-) --Ephramac (talk) 16:27, 7 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Could be better with some editig. This phone can do good shots. --Mile (talk) 07:45, 8 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - As Virtual-Pano and others commented, the composition is very beautiful but low quality.--Liridon (talk) 08:40, 8 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per Liridon. --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 17:36, 8 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my nomination (⧼Anna Massini alias PROPOLI87⧽) (talk) 08:49, 11 September 2023 (UTC)Anna.Massini[reply]

File:Region Nordhordland helsehus.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 12 Sep 2023 at 20:38:28 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Norway
Info Region Nordhordland Health Center, Knarvik. The building brings together communal and inter-municipal health services for the Nordhordland municipalities. The pattern in the facade is covered with light strips, which alternates illuminating the building after dark. Fading in and out, the lights gives an impression of a living, breathing building.

created by Anders - uploaded by Anders - nominated by Anders -- Anders (talk) 20:38, 3 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support -- Anders (talk) 20:38, 3 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Sorry, it's a nice shot, but the standard for Featured Pictures of architecture is higher than this, and would be very difficult to attain with a phone camera. There's just not enough capacity for detail. — Rhododendrites ^talk | 21:59, 3 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose +1. --Peulle (talk) 07:00, 4 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Perspective correction could be improved here. --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 07:49, 4 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Moral Support per above. The building is nice, though. - ABAL1412^{🇻🇳🇸🇺🇷🇺} (talk ☭) 15:30, 4 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Poor quality and unattractive perspective -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:52, 5 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per others. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:40, 5 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 2 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 22:02, 12 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:WalkingonIki.jpg[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 19 Sep 2023 at 03:30:01 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

The Kīlauea Iki trail goes to the surface of the crater, which is where this photo was taken, overlooking the crater floor.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/United States#Hawaii
Info created by Relativity - uploaded by Relativity - nominated by Relativity -- Relativity (talk) 03:30, 10 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Relativity (talk) 03:30, 10 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Welcome to FPC! This is a good picture at or near ground level that should be a COM:QI and might be a good COM:VI in the scope "Kilauea Iki Trail," but I think I prefer File:Dry lava lake and cone - Kiluea Iki trail - panoramio.jpg, partly because the sky was less hazy. My girlfriend and I were lucky that it was cloudy while we walked the Kilauea Iki trail, too, but I think a longer depth of field from less haze would make this view more impressive. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:51, 10 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose Not one of the best photos on the site for the reasons I stated above. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:46, 11 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose Low quality for FP, IHMO. -- Karelj (talk) 10:53, 10 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support A bit hazy, but still a nice shot. - ABAL1412^{🇻🇳🇸🇺🇷🇺} (talk ☭) 15:35, 10 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose The light is far from successful. Dark foreground, dull colors, bland sky. The people taking pictures with their smartphones are distracting -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:01, 11 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Basile. BigDom (talk) 07:18, 11 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my nomination Relativity (talk) 04:13, 12 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sword-billed hummingbird (Ensifera ensifera) Caldas.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 17 Sep 2023 at 08:47:35 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds#Family : Trochilidae (Hummingbirds)
Info The only bird that has a beak longer than the rest of its body, excluding the tail. One high quality 'studio' FP of the bird in flight. All by Charlesjsharp -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 08:47, 8 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 08:47, 8 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support You have taken so many good photos. I remember adding at least 10 of your FP to the POTD on Vi Wiki. Thank you so much for your contributions! - ABAL1412^{🇻🇳🇸🇺🇷🇺} (talk ☭) 16:28, 8 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support ★ 17:18, 8 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Awesome! And a strange sight because the beak is so long. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 17:48, 8 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cool! BigDom (talk) 19:23, 8 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Wow Poco a poco (talk) 20:23, 8 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 21:26, 8 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support That's a beak, wow! Also a nice bokeh and a great composition -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:10, 9 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 05:30, 9 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support DoF is spot on, as is the rest --Virtual-Pano (talk) 15:35, 9 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support, incredible! RodRabelo7 (talk) 22:38, 9 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Excellent and WTH is that --Wilfredor (talk) 01:58, 10 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:34, 10 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ivar (talk) 16:17, 10 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Wow! Gyrostat (talk) 16:51, 10 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Laitche (talk) 18:54, 10 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Aristeas (talk) 05:59, 11 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support !! -- Radomianin (talk) 13:11, 11 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --El Grafo (talk) 14:29, 11 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -Schnobby (talk) 14:40, 11 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 08:26, 12 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 12:43, 12 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 18:33, 12 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Terragio67 (talk) 19:43, 12 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Hamid Hassani (talk) 09:22, 13 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 25 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /FPCBot (talk) 13:00, 13 September 2023 (UTC) - ABAL1412^{🇻🇳🇸🇺🇷🇺} (talk ☭) 16:35, 13 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Birds#Family : Trochilidae (Hummingbirds)

File:TSJan29 1921.jpg[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 18 Sep 2023 at 19:05:24 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic_media/Printed#Magazine_and_newspaper_illustrations_in_black_and_white
Info uploaded by Thedailyclark - nominated by User:Thi -- Thi (talk) 19:05, 9 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cover of the Truth Seeker from 1921 with symbols of the Enlightenment. -- Thi (talk) 19:05, 9 September 2023 (UTC) I withdraw my nomination The picture is not sharp enough. --Thi (talk) 19:10, 12 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support - ABAL1412^{🇻🇳🇸🇺🇷🇺} (talk ☭) 21:50, 9 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Beautiful cover, but nowhere near as sharp as pages we've been featuring lately. I can see a degree of unsharpness even at mere full page, which is probably 1/5 of full size. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:51, 9 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Real Basílica de San Francisco el Grande, Madrid, España, 2023-01-03, DD 56-58 HDR.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 17 Sep 2023 at 15:36:47 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious_buildings/Ceilings#Spain
Info Dome in the Royal Basilica of Saint Francis the Great, Madrid, Spain. c/u/n by Poco a poco (talk) 15:36, 8 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 15:36, 8 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support There is only one word to describe this: beautiful. 20 upper 16:07, 8 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support This is pure astonishing! - ABAL1412^{🇻🇳🇸🇺🇷🇺} (talk ☭) 16:23, 8 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support ★ 17:18, 8 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 21:26, 8 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 05:29, 9 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Charlesjsharp (talk) 08:38, 9 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Virtual-Pano (talk) 15:37, 9 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:36, 10 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 16:57, 10 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Aristeas (talk) 06:00, 11 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 13:23, 11 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 08:26, 12 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 12:45, 12 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 18:33, 12 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Terragio67 (talk) 19:42, 12 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Hamid Hassani (talk) 09:19, 13 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 17 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 21:45, 13 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Interiors/Religious_buildings/Ceilings#Spain

File:VitorJubini PaneleirasdeGoiabeiras Vitoria ES (40735316325).jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 17 Sep 2023 at 17:49:35 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects#Containers
Info Pottery in Vitória, Espírito Santo, Brazil. Capixaba pans, specially panelas de barro, are made with black clay and glazed with mangrove tree sap. After being shaped and fired, sap is re-applied. This blackens the clay and makes it water resistant. The pan must be seasoned with oil a couple of times before use. These cassole pans are very important to Vitória, and the city is home to a grassroots organization of pan-makers known as Associação das Paneleiras de Goiabeiras. They are typically used to prepare the Moqueca capixaba dish in a clay pot cooking process. Created by Victor Jubini (MTur Destinos) - uploaded by Sintegrity - nominated by ★ -- ★ 17:49, 8 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- ★ 17:49, 8 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Sintegrity (talk) 20:11, 8 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support - ABAL1412^{🇻🇳🇸🇺🇷🇺} (talk ☭) 20:49, 8 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support, contingent on a more informative description being added to the file page. Dramatic! And I had no idea mangrove tree sap had a use. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:20, 8 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I added a slightly copy edited version of the description in the nomination to the file page. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:56, 10 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much for it. ★ 04:44, 10 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support —-Felino Volador (talk) 01:10, 9 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 05:26, 9 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 23:19, 9 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:38, 10 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Looks cool to be honest, and that's that. 20 upper 04:47, 11 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Aristeas (talk) 06:02, 11 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support (⧼Anna Massini alias PROPOLI87⧽) (talk) 08:36, 11 September 2023 (UTC)Anna.Massini(⧼Anna Massini alias PROPOLI87⧽) (talk) 08:36, 11 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 13:28, 11 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support I see a big Wow here --Kritzolina (talk) 13:50, 11 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 08:27, 12 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Incredible photo. Big wow! ZandDev (talk) 10:05, 12 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Peulle (talk) 10:48, 12 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Alexander-93 (talk) 17:23, 12 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Hamid Hassani (talk) 09:18, 13 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Jakubhal 10:40, 13 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 19 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 21:42, 13 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects#Containers

File:Apocalyptica Drive With Full Force 2018 20.jpg[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 19 Sep 2023 at 14:57:58 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People#Musicians and singers performing
Info created by S. Bollmann - nominated by Thi -- Thi (talk) 14:57, 10 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Thi (talk) 14:57, 10 September 2023 (UTC) I withdraw my nomination The picture is not sharp enough and there is already six opposing votes. --Thi (talk) 19:12, 12 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Don't know why but his face reminds me of Johny Depp. Anyway, this pic is really nice! - ABAL1412^{🇻🇳🇸🇺🇷🇺} (talk ☭)
Support ★ 17:04, 10 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I don't get why this picture is nominated here, nothing is sharp. --Selbymay (talk) 18:38, 10 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Insuficient quality. --Palauenc05 (talk) 21:07, 10 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per others.--Ermell (talk) 22:06, 10 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Poor quality, noisy with blurred parts, blown highlights -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:15, 11 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Nice face, but Oppose per others. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:48, 11 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose No wow factor, and not quality enough to be considered a featured picture. 20 upper 04:40, 11 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per others.--Alexander-93 (talk) 17:22, 12 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per others. – Hamid Hassani (talk) 21:16, 12 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Kazakh yurts at night in the Kyzylkum desert, Uzbekistan.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 14 Sep 2023 at 08:58:00 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Other#Uzbekistan
Info created and uploaded by Carsten Siegel - nominated by ABAL1412 -- ABAL1412^{🇻🇳🇸🇺🇷🇺} (talk ☭) 08:58, 5 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Info Kazakh yurts in the Kyzylkum desert, Uzbekistan. - ABAL1412^{🇻🇳🇸🇺🇷🇺} (talk ☭) 08:58, 5 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- ABAL1412^{🇻🇳🇸🇺🇷🇺} (talk ☭) 08:58, 5 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support but please rename after FPC — Rhododendrites ^talk | 14:06, 5 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Please fix the cat --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 15:21, 5 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks to SHB2000. He fixed it. I didn't know that I have to put it in "Other". The Template:Commons FP galleries has the "By country" at the "Places", so I just copy the page name there. - ABAL1412^{🇻🇳🇸🇺🇷🇺} (talk ☭) 16:22, 5 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Hi ABAL1412, you are confusing Categories (cat) and Galleries. The Gallery page Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Other#Uzbekistan is fine. The problem is with the Category "Zelt" on the file page. That Category is shown in red, meaning that it doesn't exist. Most users don't like so called "red-linked" Categories on a FPC. You should do one of these things: Remove it, create it (with proper links and all) or change it. My guess is that this German-speaking user was using the German word " Zelt" meaning "Tent" and the Category should be Category:Tents in Uzbekistan. Since that Category is already present, you can just remove the "Zelt" cat. Language mistakes like this are common on this multi-lingual site, and you need to check such things before you make a nomination. I could have just fixed this for you, but since you are fairly new to the FPC, I think it was best to give you an explanation. Best, ----Cart (talk) 13:32, 6 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oh. I didn't know that. Thanks for explaining. - ABAL1412^{🇻🇳🇸🇺🇷🇺} (talk ☭) 14:03, 6 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I guessed that. ;-) Now, please fix it. --Cart (talk) 14:17, 6 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Neutral until properly renamed. ★ 17:29, 5 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- Any file mover can just go ahead and move it afterwards. Doing so now means some extra work because of the FPC nom. — Rhododendrites ^talk | 17:32, 5 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support Yes, please support if you believe the photo should be featured. I certainly do! -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 17:55, 5 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Done @Rhododendrites and ArionStar: Have renamed the file (and the nomination). It’s indeed a bit difficult to do this during the nomination, but I hope I have got all links. --Aristeas (talk) 07:58, 7 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Good job! I Support now. ★ 16:47, 7 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks you for your effort! - ABAL1412^{🇻🇳🇸🇺🇷🇺} (talk ☭) 03:51, 8 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose Interesting light but too noisy.--Ermell (talk) 21:21, 5 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per Ermell. In addition, the moon and the clouds are too unsharp to me, and it is very dark. Are the yurts really leaning on like that ? --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 23:04, 5 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
"[I]t is very dark" – I mean, isn't that partially the motif of the photo? --SHB2000 (talk) 10:51, 7 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support The clouds aren't the main subject so I find that issue negligible for FP (but not POTY). --SHB2000 (talk) 13:27, 6 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Sorry, but the unsharp sky cannot be overlooked. 20 upper 15:39, 6 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The night sky has to be sharp when the yurts are the subject? Getting a sharp night sky requires a longer exposure. I respect your taste but don't agree with it. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 17:32, 6 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support Great subject and atmosphere. Quality is good for a nightshot. Yes, it’s dark, but it’s not uncommon that nights are dark, after all ;–) – this is Uzbekistan, not the far North with its polar night. It’s impossible to get the yurts and the sky sharp at the same time with a single shot; we would have to combine at least 2 shots. Or we could use a very high ƒ number, but then everything would be somewhat sharp and nothing really sharp. --Aristeas (talk) 07:50, 7 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support The composition works for me in full screen view, even if I would have cropped the image a bit at the top. Therefore, after consideration, I tend to agree with the convincing opinions of the supporters. Thanks to Aristeas for the effortful renaming during the ongoing nomination process. -- Radomianin (talk) 14:44, 7 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:44, 8 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Underexposed Night shot, but not a reason to be so dark -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:54, 9 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose the mood has been captured in this well composed shot, but several technical shortcomings (i.e. noise, focusi) are not up to FP standard --Virtual-Pano (talk) 20:56, 9 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 14:08, 10 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose see my comment above -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:56, 11 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support: per Aristeas --The Cosmonaut (talk) 03:52, 14 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 10 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:27, 14 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Other#Uzbekistan

File:Centro Histórico, 16.9 -- 2023 -- Córdoba, España.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 18 Sep 2023 at 21:19:24 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Architecture/Cityscapes#Spain
Info all by Alu. -- Señor Aluminio (talk) 21:19, 9 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Señor Aluminio (talk) 21:19, 9 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Welcome back to FPC! ★ 02:29, 10 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Muito obrigado!! Alu (talk) 18:42, 14 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 21:11, 10 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support - ABAL1412^{🇻🇳🇸🇺🇷🇺} (talk ☭) 07:08, 11 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 18:17, 11 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice veduta of the famous city, not spoiled by too many modern buildings. --Aristeas (talk) 08:58, 12 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
thank you, I didn't know the veduta concept, thank you very much. Alu (talk) 18:45, 14 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support I think the f-number was a little high for the DX camera (very rarely go above f/8 on my D3500 as you start to get diffraction), but it's sharp enough overall and a nice composition. BigDom (talk) 12:57, 12 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you, I will keep it in mind for future landscape photographs. Alu (talk) 18:47, 14 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 18:33, 12 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Hamid Hassani (talk) 09:16, 13 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 04:28, 14 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 10 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /FPCBot (talk) 05:00, 15 September 2023 (UTC) - ABAL1412^{🇻🇳🇸🇺🇷🇺} (talk ☭) 05:43, 15 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Cityscapes#Spain

File:KastroKritiniasRhodesMay112023 09.jpg[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 21 Sep 2023 at 10:13:58 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Castles and fortifications#Greece
Info created &- uploaded by Agmonsnir - nominated by Tomer T -- Tomer T (talk) 10:13, 12 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Tomer T (talk) 10:13, 12 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support ★ 10:14, 12 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- Per above. ★ 18:35, 12 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Nice and useful image but I don't feel like the sharpness is good enough for an FP. Drone photos were sensational when they first became available, and they have revolutionized amateur photography and made lots of new imagery available on Commons, but at the same time it means that standards are rising because there are more and more of these photos out there.--Peulle (talk) 10:45, 12 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I'm sorry, but the sharpness is not enough. - ABAL1412^{🇻🇳🇸🇺🇷🇺} (talk ☭) 10:48, 12 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per others--Alexander-93 (talk) 17:19, 12 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I withdraw my nomination Tomer T (talk) 08:25, 14 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:CastelloDiFénisJuly292023 06.jpg[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 21 Sep 2023 at 10:12:43 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Castles and fortifications#Italy
Info created & uploaded by Agmonsnir - nominated by Tomer T -- Tomer T (talk) 10:12, 12 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Tomer T (talk) 10:12, 12 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support Nice view, but it's kinda unsharp when I zoom in. - ABAL1412^{🇻🇳🇸🇺🇷🇺} (talk ☭) 10:45, 12 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Sharpness could be better and perspective correction necessary --Llez (talk) 12:10, 12 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Quality is not too bad for a drone shot, but I agree with Llez that it badly needs perspective correction. BigDom (talk) 12:12, 12 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose Amazing countryside, but quality is IMO not sufficient.--Alexander-93 (talk) 17:20, 12 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I withdraw my nomination Tomer T (talk) 08:25, 14 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Katharine Hepburn publicity photograph.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 15 Sep 2023 at 06:46:29 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People/Portrait#Women
Info created by Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer - restored, uploaded, and nominated by Adam Cuerden -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 06:46, 6 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 06:46, 6 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support - ABAL1412^{🇻🇳🇸🇺🇷🇺} (talk ☭) 07:59, 6 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 12:51, 6 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 15:10, 6 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Strongly dislike the lighting. 20 upper 15:35, 6 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
It's very much a lighting of its age. The "pale beauty" was a thing then. Adam Cuerden (talk) 21:43, 6 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
~~Support~~ The lighting is strong, but this is a classic photo to me. However, in this case, Adam, I prefer the original to your version, which as far as I can see, mainly crops out a bit of the photo. Would you be willing to offer the original as an alternate? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 18:17, 6 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I mean, there's a lot of other fixes, scratches and such. I do have a restored version in similar state, though, but this was the version preferred at en-wiki, so I'd rather not have the mess of multiple versions unless there's strong opinions. Adam Cuerden (talk) 21:42, 6 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Shouldn't crop the right edge Adam. Charlesjsharp (talk) 11:43, 7 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I decided to cross out my supporting vote on this basis. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 15:26, 10 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The right edge has a blurry insert poking into it. I can't imagine that was intended to be printed, as you don't see photos from the era with things like that published. It also looks vaguely like an overlap between two photos printed at the same time. Adam Cuerden (talk) 15:54, 10 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Aristeas (talk) 08:02, 7 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per 20upper, light is far from ideal. Saw this before. --Mile (talk) 07:43, 8 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:32, 10 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 17:02, 10 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Hamid Hassani (talk) 09:27, 13 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support JukoFF (talk) 08:37, 14 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 9 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 13:23, 15 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: People/Portrait#Women

File:Mold on a strawberry.jpg[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 23 Sep 2023 at 15:58:12 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Fungi#Mold
Info created by Давид Андронов - uploaded by Давид Андронов - nominated by [[User:{{subst:Давид Андронов}}|]] -- Давид Андронов (talk) 15:58, 14 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Давид Андронов (talk) 15:58, 14 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination denied. Thank you for nominating this image. Unfortunately, it does not fall within the Guidelines because only two active nominations per user are allowed. You are welcome to nominate this again when one of your other nominations is finished. --Cart (talk) 16:44, 14 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Stentor infusorium.jpg[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 23 Sep 2023 at 16:04:23 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals#Phylum : Ciliophora
Info created by Давид Андронов - uploaded by Давид Андронов - nominated by [[User:{{subst:Давид Андронов}}|]] -- Давид Андронов (talk) 16:04, 14 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Давид Андронов (talk) 16:04, 14 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination denied. Thank you for nominating this image. Unfortunately, it does not fall within the Guidelines because only two active nominations per user are allowed. You are welcome to nominate this again when one of your other nominations is finished. --Cart (talk) 16:43, 14 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Southern Scrub-Robin 0A2A1672.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 19 Sep 2023 at 13:54:50 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family_:_Petroicidae_(Australasian_Robins)
Info created & uploaded by JJ Harrison – nominated by Ivar (talk) 13:54, 10 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Ivar (talk) 13:54, 10 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Chirp! - ABAL1412^{🇻🇳🇸🇺🇷🇺} (talk ☭) 15:47, 10 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Gyrostat (talk) 16:50, 10 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Question slightly overexposed? Charlesjsharp (talk) 18:34, 10 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Ermell (talk) 22:26, 10 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 01:11, 11 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Appealing light and homogeneous background -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:12, 11 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:53, 11 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:20, 11 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 08:30, 12 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 13:35, 12 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 18:33, 12 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support JJ, you've done it again. --SHB2000 (talk) 08:11, 13 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Hamid Hassani (talk) 09:00, 13 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 04:27, 14 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support ★ 11:13, 14 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Señor Aluminio (talk) 18:39, 14 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 19:18, 14 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 17 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 21:20, 15 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family_:_Petroicidae_(Australasian_Robins)

File:Seehornsee im Herbst.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 15 Sep 2023 at 14:10:00 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Austria#Salzburg
Info The Seehornsee in the Berchtesgaden Alps. On the right the normal route to the Seehorn. All by me. -- Milseburg (talk) 14:10, 6 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Milseburg (talk) 14:10, 6 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 15:09, 6 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I dunno, the image isn't good enough, especially the water, which isn't that clear. 20 upper 15:30, 6 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support - ABAL1412^{🇻🇳🇸🇺🇷🇺} (talk ☭) 17:43, 6 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Beautiful, and I don't see a degree of opacity in the water as any kind of problem. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 18:13, 6 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support ★ 19:06, 6 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Ermell (talk) 19:50, 6 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support I'm not too pleased with the shadows, but the rest of the image works for me. --SHB2000 (talk) 21:26, 6 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:46, 8 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 20:23, 8 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Aristeas (talk) 06:02, 11 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 13:07, 11 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 08:25, 12 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Hamid Hassani (talk) 09:25, 13 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 13 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 21:24, 15 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural/Austria#Salzburg

File:Thymelicus sylvestris underside - Keila.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 19 Sep 2023 at 13:58:59 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Lepidoptera#Family_:_Hesperiidae_(Skippers)
Info all by – Ivar (talk) 13:58, 10 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Ivar (talk) 13:58, 10 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support I can see the details of the eye when I zoom in. This one is perfect! - ABAL1412^{🇻🇳🇸🇺🇷🇺} (talk ☭) 15:49, 10 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support OK for a second FP on the underside of this species. Charlesjsharp (talk) 18:29, 10 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 22:25, 10 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 01:12, 11 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Special light and very high level of detail -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:13, 11 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:51, 11 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:23, 11 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Schnobby (talk) 14:37, 11 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 08:31, 12 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 13:33, 12 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 18:32, 12 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Hamid Hassani (talk) 21:18, 12 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 04:26, 14 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 19:17, 14 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support 20 upper 14:38, 15 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 16 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 21:18, 15 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Arthropods/Lepidoptera#Family_:_Hesperiidae_(Skippers)

File:Columba livia in Saint-Petersburg.jpg[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 23 Sep 2023 at 15:48:11 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds#Family : Columbidae (Pigeons and Doves)
Info created by Давид Андронов - uploaded by Давид Андронов - nominated by Давид Андронов -- Давид Андронов (talk) 15:48, 14 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Давид Андронов (talk) 15:48, 14 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Info Please note, the file has no license, description, categories or caption. You need to fix those for a nomination. Thank you, --Cart (talk) 16:53, 14 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Please, nominate first your images to QI. This one would have been declined there, too noisy, common subject, ... Poco a poco (talk) 19:15, 14 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Poor-quality picture of one of the most common birds in the world. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:22, 14 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Surprising, so hard to admit that your own work worse than mine. Давид Андронов (talk) 19:41, 14 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Lmfao 20 upper 20:52, 14 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for nominating this image. Unfortunately, it does not fall within the Guidelines and is unlikely to succeed for the following reason: Too much noise, no author or license, and no categories. 20 upper 21:03, 14 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Anyone other than the nominator who disagrees may override this template by changing {{FPX}} to {{FPX contested}} and adding a vote in support. Voting will then continue in the usual way. If not contested within 24 hours, this nomination may be closed.

File:PL Wwa, Cmentarz Prawoslawny - praw - Raskuwarkin,2023.09.10, fot Ivonna Nowicka (1)a.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 20 Sep 2023 at 01:02:20 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Sculptures#Monuments and memorials
Info created by Ivonna Nowicka - uploaded by Ivonna Nowicka - nominated by Ivonna Nowicka -- Ivonna Nowicka (talk) 01:02, 11 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ivonna Nowicka (talk) 01:02, 11 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Low quality, cluttered background, limited wow factor -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:19, 11 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per Basile 20 upper 04:35, 11 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I'm sorry, but this one is too noisy. - ABAL1412^{🇻🇳🇸🇺🇷🇺} (talk ☭) 07:14, 11 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per others.--Alexander-93 (talk) 17:21, 12 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per Basile Morin. Sorry! – Hamid Hassani (talk) 09:05, 13 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /FPCBot (talk) 05:01, 16 September 2023 (UTC) - ABAL1412^{🇻🇳🇸🇺🇷🇺} (talk ☭) 07:20, 16 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Catedral de la Encarnación, Málaga, España, 2023-05-19, DD 43-45 HDR.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 19 Sep 2023 at 21:31:48 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious_buildings/Ceilings#Spain
Info Málaga Cathedral, Andalusia, Spain. The Roman Catholic church was built in the Renaissance architectural tradition between 1528 and 1782 following the plans drawn by Diego de Siloe. The temple is considered one of the Renaissance jewels in all Andalusia. All domes in the church are 41.79 metres (137.1 ft) high, what makes them the highest in Andalusia. c/u/n by Poco a poco (talk) 21:31, 10 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 21:31, 10 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support DD's fan here. Come to Brazil! 🇧🇷 ★ 22:01, 10 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 22:04, 10 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 01:12, 11 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I love this except for the mesh, which makes me question whether to support or possibly oppose. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:47, 11 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The mesh isn't really bothering me today. Now, I have to think about the blown parts of the stained glass, which are of course understandable because the sun is shining on them. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:56, 12 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ikan Kekek: I've reduced the highlights a bit, maybe that helps. Poco a poco (talk) 06:52, 12 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Do you like it better this way? I think it should be up to you. I certainly won't oppose, either way, and might support. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:38, 12 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I do. I believe it was an improvement Poco a poco (talk) 22:38, 12 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support OK. I think the ceiling is outstanding and beautiful, so I support. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:15, 13 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support - ABAL1412^{🇻🇳🇸🇺🇷🇺} (talk ☭) 07:12, 11 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 15:08, 11 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 08:32, 12 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Virtual-Pano (talk) 13:01, 12 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support !! -- Radomianin (talk) 13:19, 12 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Alexander-93 (talk) 17:21, 12 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 18:32, 12 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Hamid Hassani (talk) 09:07, 13 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 02:51, 14 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 04:26, 14 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support JukoFF (talk) 08:36, 14 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ivar (talk) 05:52, 15 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 17 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /FPCBot (talk) 05:01, 16 September 2023 (UTC) - ABAL1412^{🇻🇳🇸🇺🇷🇺} (talk ☭) 07:21, 16 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Interiors/Religious_buildings/Ceilings#Spain

File:Coliseum Mountain Tarn.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 20 Sep 2023 at 01:07:31 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Canada#British Columbia
Info:Coliseum Mountain Tarn. Second nomination; redeveloped from RAW. All by -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 01:07, 11 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 01:07, 11 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Frozen version of the turquoise tropical lagoons surrounded by white sand beaches -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:24, 11 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Very nice, but the sky is a bit blotchy/posterized. Could you smooth it out a bit? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:43, 11 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Done: denoised. --The Cosmonaut (talk) 00:35, 12 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Question Did you upload the right version? I'm not seeing any change in the sky, after I looked at 3 screens' worth. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:54, 12 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support - ABAL1412^{🇻🇳🇸🇺🇷🇺} (talk ☭) 07:16, 11 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support ★ 13:50, 11 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 16:12, 11 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Rhododendrites ^talk | 16:33, 11 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Alexander-93 (talk) 17:20, 12 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 18:32, 12 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Hamid Hassani (talk) 21:07, 12 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 04:25, 14 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support JukoFF (talk) 08:36, 14 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 19:18, 14 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 13:32, 15 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 13 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /FPCBot (talk) 05:01, 16 September 2023 (UTC)-- 20 upper 05:34, 16 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural/Canada#British Columbia

File:Flammulina velutipes on a tree.jpg[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 23 Sep 2023 at 15:51:54 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Fungi#Family : Physalacriaceae
Info created by Давид Андронов - uploaded by Давид Андронов - nominated by Давид Андронов -- Давид Андронов (talk) 15:51, 14 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Давид Андронов (talk) 15:51, 14 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Sharpness is not good enough. ~Moheen ^{(keep talking)} 16:23, 14 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I'm sory, but this is very noisy, and not sharp enough. Btw, you can only nominate 2 pictures at once. If you want to nominate others, please wait until the voting time end. - ABAL1412^{🇻🇳🇸🇺🇷🇺} (talk ☭) 17:27, 14 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per others. This is not of good technical quality. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:21, 14 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Image doesn't enough qualify for QI. 20 upper 21:11, 14 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Давид Андронов, my advise would be that you place the {{Withdraw}} on these two nominations and open up the two nominations above instead. They have a greater chance since they are very unusual. You just place the withdraw --~~~~ text on this and the next nomination, and I can open up the two other for you. Best, --Cart (talk) 12:05, 15 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for nominating this image. Unfortunately, it does not fall within the Guidelines and is unlikely to succeed for the following reason: quality issues are too severe -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:17, 15 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Anyone other than the nominator who disagrees may override this template by changing {{FPX}} to {{FPX contested}} and adding a vote in support. Voting will then continue in the usual way. If not contested within 24 hours, this nomination may be closed.

File:Suomineito.jpg[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 19 Sep 2023 at 11:28:23 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic_media/Others#Historical
Info uploaded by MPorciusCato, current version by Fenn-O-maniC - nominated by Thi -- Thi (talk) 11:28, 10 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support The Attack is one of the most famous Finnish paintings. -- Thi (talk) 11:28, 10 September 2023 (UTC) I withdraw my nomination We must wait until there is bigger reproduction. --Thi (talk) 19:14, 12 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support ★ 11:56, 10 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- Striking my support due to the opposers. ★ 01:20, 11 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
~~Support~~ - ABAL1412^{🇻🇳🇸🇺🇷🇺} (talk ☭) 15:45, 10 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- Oppose Supported because the artistic of the art, and the history behind it. After reading other's POVs, I oppose this one. - ABAL1412^{🇻🇳🇸🇺🇷🇺} (talk ☭) 06:57, 11 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Much too small reproduction to be a featured painting on Commons, specially as the painting is 140 x 200 cm. Yann (talk) 16:53, 10 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Why only 2.8 Mpx from a camera that takes 50 Mpx? Low level of detail -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:09, 11 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Very small for a reproduction, per others. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:55, 11 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment The painting is totally up-to-date, of course ;), and today the eagle does not stand only for the Russia emperor, but also for Mr. Trump and all the other populists who attack the lex = foundation of our states on constitutional law and on the separation of powers – but I also wish for more resolution, sorry. --Aristeas (talk) 09:03, 12 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- Just like how the US attacked Mexico. :))) What's wrong? - ABAL1412^{🇻🇳🇸🇺🇷🇺} (talk ☭) 09:18, 12 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Do you really think you'll find FPC regulars who will defend the U.S. invasion of Mexico in 1846? What's wrong? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:48, 12 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- We all forgot the war in Vietnam. What's wrong?
  Though I love Russia, I still hope that they will soon find a peace solution for Ukraine and stop the war. As you can see, before I opposed this one, I had supported it. Like every other Vietnamese, I hate wars. We want peace. That was just a joke, in case you misunderstand. - ABAL1412^{🇻🇳🇸🇺🇷🇺} (talk ☭) 18:53, 12 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

What's wrong is that you seemed to assume that people who oppose the Russian aggression against Ukraine and the Ukrainian people support previous U.S. wars of aggression. None of us were around during the Mexican-American War, and I was too young to really know in detail what was happening in Vietnam through 1973, but an early memory of mine is as a 4- or 5-year-old being carried piggyback by my mother on a candlelight march on 5th Avenue. My parents were very early opponents of U.S. involvement in the Vietnam War, before most of their friends had turned against it. Not that I have to prove anything. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:34, 13 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- Well, I know that not every people who against this war actually support the US. But of course, most of them are. Most doesn't mean all. And after all, as I said, I was just joking. But I guess it was terrible.
The joke is toward those who support Ukraine and the US to continue the war. I have to make it clear that though I'm with Russia, I really want both Russia and Ukraine to stop the war immediately and find a peace solution. Everyday, when I check the news, I see thousands of people die out there. This is more than terrible.

I think I need a little explain about my POV here.

1) When Russia attack Ukraine, the whole NATO, US and US allies start yelling. But decades ago, when the US attack Middle East (Iraq, Afghanistan,...), no one says anything. When NATO starts bombing Yugoslavia, no one says anything.

2) When Russia jumps in to help Donbass and Lugansk separate from Ukraine, everyone against them. But in 1999, when NATO join the war in Yugoslavia (at that time, were already separated into 2 countries: Serbia and Montenegro), separate them into even smaller countries, including Kosovo, no one says anything. Those countries then, guess what, join NATO. Bruh.

3) When Putin annex Crimea, later, Donbass land Lugansk into Russia, the whole word start yelling. But they forgot how the US annexed Mexico's land into their land. They all do it by a referendum. Yep. The joke is here. The US do some bad stuff. "Alright, no problem". Russia start doing the same thing. "Arg, get your bloody hands off, P*sstin!"

4) Russia want Ukraine to be neutral, because they don't want NATO to get that super close to their country. They did negotiate with Ukraine about that. But Ukraine is kinda "nah." That leaves Russia no other choices.

That's just my POV. No matter you agree or not, I still respect you. Again, I support no war. I was just joking why people talk about the Russian war so much, but no one talks about what the US and NATO has done (and doing too). Of course, there's still many historical and political reasons for me to stand with Russia. But since Wiki is a neutral site, I don't want to talk too much about that. I want to be neutral as much as I can. Anyway, please help me to give your parents a warm "Xin chào" (Hello) as well as "cảm ơn" (thank you) for against the US involvement. We really appreciate that! - ABAL1412^{🇻🇳🇸🇺🇷🇺} (talk ☭) 12:27, 13 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

My parents have been dead since 2010 and 2011. I won't argue with your point of view here. I agree with part of it and strongly disagree with other parts, and I'll leave it at that. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 16:35, 13 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- WTH? An UN forum? ★ 23:47, 13 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  Well, this is still better than on a discussion page of the article about the Russia-Ukraine war on Vi Wiki. People start saying bad words there, cause someone break the neutral rule, and call the Russians "invader." Also, that article is blocked, so just some guys can edit it. Very bruh move.
  
  Well, after all, I just wanna make a joke. I'm gonna stop this joke here, cause I don't wanna start an argument. Sorry if you feel offended.
  
  ABAL1412^{🇻🇳🇸🇺🇷🇺} (talk ☭) 17:35, 14 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- Oh. I'm sorry to hear that. - ABAL1412^{🇻🇳🇸🇺🇷🇺} (talk ☭) 17:23, 14 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It's OK. Thanks. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:49, 15 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose Per others. Sorry! – Hamid Hassani (talk) 09:12, 13 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sieben prismatische Farben 001 2020 09 25.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 17 Sep 2023 at 04:01:02 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Natural_phenomena#Atmospheric_optical_phenomena
Info created and uploaded by Friedrich Haag - nominated by ABAL1412 - ABAL1412^{🇻🇳🇸🇺🇷🇺} (talk ☭) 04:01, 8 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Info Rainbow over a chimney in Ruppertsberg, Germany. - ABAL1412^{🇻🇳🇸🇺🇷🇺} (talk ☭) 04:01, 8 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support - ABAL1412^{🇻🇳🇸🇺🇷🇺} (talk ☭) 04:01, 8 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Love the salience. --SHB2000 (talk) 08:51, 9 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support 🌈 ★ 12:31, 9 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 20:29, 9 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 14:10, 10 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Sorry, this is certainly a nice photo of a portion of a rainbow, but given how picky many regulars here are regularly about composition, sharpness, brightness etc. of photos I wonder about this one. The chimney is ugly and ordinary, the whole roof very dark (out of focus, but that’s OK given that the rainbow is the subject) and the sky boring and dark. Given that rainbows are not infrequent I would think we would want a more interesting sky and, if there is a foreground, also a more interesting foreground for a FP. --Aristeas (talk) 17:55, 11 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Aristeas, sorry. BigDom (talk) 12:54, 12 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support The reason to support is that the rainbow is the "smoke" from the chimney, and that's cool. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:42, 13 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I agree with Aristeas appreciation Poco a poco (talk) 19:22, 14 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose The idea of "chimney rainbow" is interesting, but it's very clear from the image that the rainbow, larger at the bottom than at the top, starts from behind the roof. Making the illusion much less successful than in other situations. Moreover, I agree with the remarks pointed out by Aristeas (ugly chimney, dark roof, etc.) -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:01, 15 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per Aristeas. ~Moheen ^{(keep talking)} 14:26, 16 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral 20 upper 21:41, 16 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 6 support, 5 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /FPCBot (talk) 05:00, 17 September 2023 (UTC)--Palauenc05 (talk) 08:12, 17 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:False-colour image of Kumbunbur Creek, Northern Territory, Australia.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 17 Sep 2023 at 06:42:54 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

False-colour image of Kumbunbur Creek, Northern Territory, Australia

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Satellite images#Oceania
Info created by ESA - uploaded and nominated by SHB2000 --SHB2000 (talk) 06:42, 8 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support I'm not sure if it's just me, but I find the false-colouring quite interesting and cool. --SHB2000 (talk) 06:42, 8 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Cool idea, but the resolution isn't high enough to really impress me. The image is over a decade old, so I guess it isn't surprising, but if it hasn't been made FP by now, I feel the time has passed.--Peulle (talk) 07:41, 8 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support per Peulle. - ABAL1412^{🇻🇳🇸🇺🇷🇺} (talk ☭) 16:21, 8 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Tempered Support per others. Somewhat small, but a great sight. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 17:51, 8 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support ★ 12:38, 9 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 14:10, 10 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 23:15, 15 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Love the northern territory. 20 upper 21:33, 16 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Copyright violation As the ESA page indicates, this image was captured by the South Korean satellite KOMPSAT 2 and so, the copyright is shared with the Korea Aerospace Research Institute. --StellarHalo (talk) 11:45, 17 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 7 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 07:18, 18 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Satellite images#Oceania

File:Conasprella viminea 01.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 21 Sep 2023 at 08:44:12 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Shells#Family : Conidae
Info created by Llez - uploaded by Llez - nominated by Llez -- Llez (talk) 08:44, 12 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Llez (talk) 08:44, 12 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support - ABAL1412^{🇻🇳🇸🇺🇷🇺} (talk ☭) 09:21, 12 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Ermell (talk) 13:03, 12 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 18:32, 12 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 19:58, 12 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Hamid Hassani (talk) 21:05, 12 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 21:52, 12 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Charlesjsharp (talk) 21:52, 12 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Outstanding! -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:22, 13 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Jakubhal 10:38, 13 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 04:24, 14 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Señor Aluminio (talk) 18:36, 14 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 19:17, 14 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 21:37, 14 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Simply beautiful. 20 upper 14:32, 15 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Schnobby (talk) 06:48, 17 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 16 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 07:13, 18 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Shells#Family : Conidae

File:Náměstí Zachariáše z Hradce in the fog.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 17 Sep 2023 at 07:01:23 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Cityscapes#Czech_Republic
Info all by Pudelek -- Pudelek (talk) 07:01, 8 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Pudelek (talk) 07:01, 8 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Blown sun. --SHB2000 (talk) 10:51, 8 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support - ABAL1412^{🇻🇳🇸🇺🇷🇺} (talk ☭) 16:22, 8 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Low quality for FP, IHMO. -- Karelj (talk) 18:01, 8 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support: lovely atmosphere --The Cosmonaut (talk) 23:20, 9 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 14:11, 10 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Terrible lighting, and blurry. 20 upper 19:30, 10 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support More of the sun is in the picture than I would prefer, but it's clearly Pudelek's intention to emphasize the sun beating down through the fog, and the photo succeeds in doing what he intended. And I like the fogscape. To address some of the critics: Of course the sun is blown! On what setting would the sun not be blown, and why indeed shouldn't it be blown? And of course the photo is blurry! Everyone knows that fog blurs - that's the point! As for the light, it is what it is, and showing it this way is the photographer's intention. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:04, 11 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Ikan, exactly. --Aristeas (talk) 05:59, 11 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support (⧼Anna Massini alias PROPOLI87⧽) (talk) 08:37, 11 September 2023 (UTC)Anna.Massini(⧼Anna Massini alias PROPOLI87⧽) (talk) 08:37, 11 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Ikan. ZandDev (talk) 10:03, 12 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral I get what the photographer was going for, and he certainly achieved it. But does that make it an FP? Not so sure. My main issue is that it's not especially useful as an illustration of the place or any of the buildings (relevant if it is to be placed in the Architecture gallery). BigDom (talk) 12:09, 12 September 2023 sing(UTC)

That might be a reason to place it in a natural phenomena gallery (or whatever it's called). It doesn't seem like a sound basis for having doubts about whether to feature or not. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 17:07, 12 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Pudelek, BigDom, Ikan Kekek, I've taken the liberty of placing this in the 'Cityscapes' gallery. You can't see any Architecture in the image, but a Cityscape in fog is still a cityscape. True, it could fit in 'Fog' if the nominator would prefer that, but I think Cityscapes is a good compromise. --Cart (talk) 12:33, 16 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support -- Radomianin (talk) 05:28, 13 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support ★ 19:13, 14 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Low quality for FP. ~Moheen ^{(keep talking)} 14:28, 16 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 10 support, 4 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 07:15, 18 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Cityscapes#Czech_Republic

File:Mannahill railway station, 2017 (01).jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 18 Sep 2023 at 08:44:47 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Transport#Train stations
Info created and uploaded by Bahnfrend - nominated by SHB2000 --SHB2000 (talk) 08:44, 9 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support There isn't really anything "special" with this station – it's just very idyllic with the chosen composition. --SHB2000 (talk) 08:44, 9 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

As a side note, the station is no longer used, if anyone was wondering (and hence the chosen gallery). --SHB2000 (talk) 08:48, 9 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The 'Train stations' gallery can contain stations, past and present, just like the Water transport gallery also contains 'Shipwrecks'. It's a lovely old building. --Cart (talk) 11:35, 9 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Fair – I just didn't consider it one since it's nothing more than a historic building today, but I wasn't aware of the shipwrecks. --SHB2000 (talk) 12:57, 9 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The building's biggest "clame to fame" is that it was a station house (and still looks like it). Always better to use a specialized gallery than getting lost in a big general one. ;-) --Cart (talk) 13:42, 9 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support - ABAL1412^{🇻🇳🇸🇺🇷🇺} (talk ☭) 08:49, 9 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support This is the only one of my more than 10,000 Commons pictures that has ever won me a prize in a Wikimedia contest. Bahnfrend (talk) 08:55, 9 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Perfectly OK QI/VI-type photo, but the light and sharpness are on the mediocre side for an FP nominee, in my opinion. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:52, 9 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral IMHO, it’s a QI but no wow. ★ 02:33, 10 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose QI, not FP, per Ikan. --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 17:20, 10 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per Ikan. -- Karelj (talk) 15:59, 11 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah, not surprised by this vote. --SHB2000 (talk) 21:42, 11 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comment And to be honest, I'm not surprised by this comment, but I am disappointed by it and would ask you to please stop. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:17, 13 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I'm free to make remarks, as long as it falls within Commons policies – I'm not going to stop just because one person found it "disappointing". --SHB2000 (talk) 08:13, 13 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You're free to single out one voter for "remarks"? Think about the implications of that. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 16:40, 13 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 18:16, 11 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Info Photo is about as sharp as I could get it with the camera I was using (Nikon D5100 - obsolete upper entry level DX DLSR) and in the applicable (mainly overcast) lighting conditions. Bahnfrend (talk) 07:13, 13 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Not so clear to me that this is a QI, detail is rather low Poco a poco (talk) 19:21, 14 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per Ikan. ~Moheen ^{(keep talking)} 14:30, 16 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per Poco. 20 upper 21:36, 16 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 4 support, 6 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 14:49, 18 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Cosmos bipinnatus Blüte-20230819-RM-123333.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 22 Sep 2023 at 20:42:23 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants/Asterales#Subfamily_:_Asteroideae
Info Flower of a cosmea plant in a garden in Bavaria. Focus stack of 24 frames using Helicon Focus. All by me -- Ermell (talk) 20:42, 13 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ermell (talk) 20:42, 13 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 04:21, 14 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Impressive. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:06, 14 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment As I said at QI, lovely flower, but background distracts. Charlesjsharp (talk) 08:53, 14 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support On second thoughts, the light and sharpness are too good to ignore. Charlesjsharp (talk) 15:16, 14 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support - ABAL1412^{🇻🇳🇸🇺🇷🇺} (talk ☭) 11:50, 14 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Wonderful light and colors. Very high level of detail -- Basile Morin (talk) 13:48, 14 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 19:17, 14 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 21:33, 14 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Aristeas (talk) 08:07, 15 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 13:34, 15 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Virtual-Pano (talk) 15:09, 15 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support ~Moheen ^{(keep talking)} 16:55, 15 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 16:41, 16 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 08:06, 17 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Laitche (talk) 17:30, 18 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 15 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 21:22, 18 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Plants/Asterales#Subfamily_:_Asteroideae

File:Templo de Debod, Madrid, España, 2023-01-03, DD 89-91 HDR.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 22 Sep 2023 at 20:56:23 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious_buildings#Spain
Info Temple of Debod at dusk, Parque de la Montaña, Madrid, Spain. The shrine was originally erected 15 kilometres (9.3 mi) south of Aswan in Nubia, very close to the first cataract of the Nile and to the great religious centre in Philae dedicated to the goddess Isis. In the early 2nd century BC, Adikhalamani (Tabriqo), the Kushite king of Meroë, started its construction by building a small single-room chapel dedicated to the god Amun. Later, during the reigns of Ptolemy VI, Ptolemy VIII, and Ptolemy XII, it was extended on all four sides. In 1960, due to the construction of the Aswan High Dam and the consequent threat posed by its reservoir to numerous monuments and archeological sites, UNESCO made an international call to save this rich historical legacy. As a sign of gratitude for the help provided by Spain in saving the Abu Simbel temples, the Egyptian state donated the Temple of Debod to Spain in 1968, an activity of the International Campaign to Save the Monuments of Nubia. c/u/n by Poco a poco (talk) 20:56, 13 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 20:56, 13 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 04:21, 14 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support ★ 11:11, 14 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Love the low-light photo. --SHB2000 (talk) 11:37, 14 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support - ABAL1412^{🇻🇳🇸🇺🇷🇺} (talk ☭) 11:51, 14 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support per SHB2000. Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:24, 14 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 21:33, 14 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Virtual-Pano (talk) 23:16, 15 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 09:39, 16 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 16:02, 16 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 16:41, 16 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support 20 upper 21:25, 16 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 12 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 21:20, 18 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Religious_buildings#Spain

File: Santuário Nacional 20161110 (cropped).jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 19 Sep 2023 at 03:00:02 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious buildings#Brazil
Info created and initially uploaded by Arquidiocese - cropped and nominated by ★ -- ★ 03:00, 10 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Perspective corrected thanks to Poco a poco. -- ★ 03:00, 10 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Isn't the nomination below still active? Besides, you're assuming again that people didn't see it? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:44, 10 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

People (example: King of Hearts) didn't see the image with the corrected perspective (September 3 – September 7 without Poco's edits). That's why there is the renomination marking (/2); let's wait for the post-improvement review. ★ 04:02, 10 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

After changes have been done on a nom photo, you should always 'ping' all the voters, to make sure they see the improved version. That way you don't have to make these very hasty renominations. You are breaking down voter's patience with them. That might make people less inclined to stop and review your many noms carefully. --Cart (talk) 11:48, 10 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose Should not be nominated a second time like this. Charlesjsharp (talk) 18:40, 10 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I still Support, but all the remarks above stand, and please take them to heart. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:47, 11 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oh, thanks for your effort! ★ 22:50, 11 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
BTW, pinging all the previous supporters (Terragio67, Aristeas). ★ 22:54, 11 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Unless you ping all previous voters, you are canvassing. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:59, 12 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ABAL1412. Done. ★ 09:10, 12 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support per my comment in the previous nomination. --Aristeas (talk) 08:55, 12 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support I confirm my previous nomination. --Terragio67 (talk) 19:14, 12 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 04:41, 14 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Shame about the scaffolding, but I like the composition and it's an impressive building. BigDom (talk) 05:42, 16 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Yes! BTW, it's the second largest church in the world! ★ 10:11, 16 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 11:55, 16 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 7 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:47, 19 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Religious buildings#Brazil

File:White-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus goudotii) male head Chingaza.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 18 Sep 2023 at 23:20:51 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals/Artiodactyla#Family : Cervidae (Deer)
Info Rain deer. One FP of the Florida subspecies from 2009. All by Charlesjsharp -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 23:20, 9 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 23:20, 9 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support I want to tell the deer "Hey! You've got stuff on your right antler!" But seriously, great photo! -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:47, 9 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 01:37, 10 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support The rain makes it even nicer. ★ 02:31, 10 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose The raindrops(?) distract me from the subject. --SHB2000 (talk) 10:57, 10 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry. That is the essence of the photo and the hugely witty (?) description of "rain deer". Charlesjsharp (talk) 18:31, 10 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Eh, as a native English speaker, the pun didn't immediately scream at me when I saw this image – I doubt most people will, either, unless it's clearly mentioned (which is not possible through a photo). --SHB2000 (talk) 06:58, 11 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support It's weird to see a deer in the rain without raindrops. - ABAL1412^{🇻🇳🇸🇺🇷🇺} (talk ☭) 15:20, 10 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support This is a white-tailed deer, not a rain deer (whatever that is), and it is a stunning animal that appears to be strong and healthy. A preferred prey item for human hunters, along with elk, moose, and you know the rest. I think the rain enhances the main subject, and that's that. 20 upper 18:33, 10 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry. For non-English speakers: "rain deer" is a pun on "reindeer". Charlesjsharp (talk) 18:37, 10 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Why did you just refer to me as a non-English speaker, excuse me? 20 upper 19:06, 10 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I humbly believe that what he meant by the term "non-English speakers" was in fact those who do not have English as their mother tongue. I assure you, his intention was never to cause any offense. To clarify his point, he even provided an example, noting that "rain deer" is a playful pun on "reindeer". I sincerely hope you won't take it the wrong way. We are all here to uplift and support one another in our learning journey. --Wilfredor (talk) 03:21, 11 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

*non-native English speakers, not not-English speakers. --SHB2000 (talk) 06:59, 11 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

He doesn't mean to offense you. I guess he thought that there was an "eggcorn", and then try to explain it. Btw, that's also how I improve my English. Write something wrong, and then, some native speakers appear to help me fix it. -

ABAL1412^{🇻🇳🇸🇺🇷🇺} (talk ☭) 07:04, 11 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No offence was intended 20 upper - after all, you supported my nomination. Charlesjsharp (talk) 13:44, 11 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I was never offended :), I just needed clarification. BTW the ping didn't work :( 20 upper 18:23, 11 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support (And thank you for the rain deer ;).) --Aristeas (talk) 06:05, 11 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 08:29, 12 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 18:33, 12 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 22:06, 12 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 04:28, 14 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 19:21, 14 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support ~Moheen ^{(keep talking)} 14:31, 16 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 13 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:48, 19 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Mammals/Artiodactyla#Family : Cervidae (Deer)

File:Buff-tailed coronet (Boissonneaua flavescens flavescens) Caldas.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 23 Sep 2023 at 08:59:32 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds#Family : Trochilidae (Hummingbirds)
Info No FPs. All by Charlesjsharp -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 08:59, 14 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 08:59, 14 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support ★ 11:11, 14 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support - ABAL1412^{🇻🇳🇸🇺🇷🇺} (talk ☭) 11:52, 14 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Señor Aluminio (talk) 18:35, 14 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 19:14, 14 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very good for a hummingbird pic. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:23, 14 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 21:31, 14 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Beautiful iridescent plumage and the bird stands out well from the homogeneous background -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:15, 15 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- RodRabelo7 (talk) 04:59, 15 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ivar (talk) 05:51, 15 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 21:15, 15 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 16:42, 16 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Schnobby (talk) 06:46, 17 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 13 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 15:21, 19 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Birds#Family : Trochilidae (Hummingbirds)

File:SNCF Z 100 Mont-Louis-La Cabanasse - Planés.jpg[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 26 Sep 2023 at 15:10:32 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Land_vehicles#Rail_vehicles
Info created & uploaded by David Gubler – nominated by Ivar (talk) 15:10, 17 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ivar (talk) 15:10, 17 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support - ABAL1412^{🇻🇳🇸🇺🇷🇺} (talk ☭) 15:18, 17 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment poor light and you don't see much of the train. Not up with the usual. Charlesjsharp (talk) 19:32, 17 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Agree with Charles. In his train images, David Gruber has set a high bar. I am sure there were difficulties on the day, but this one is not at the level of the others. --GRDN711 (talk) 15:40, 18 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my nomination -- Ivar (talk) 18:30, 18 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Praia do Ribeiro do Cavalo2.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 19 Sep 2023 at 13:15:13 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Portugal
Info: Ribeiro do Cavalo beach; all by -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 13:15, 10 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 13:15, 10 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support ★ 13:30, 10 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support - ABAL1412^{🇻🇳🇸🇺🇷🇺} (talk ☭) 15:46, 10 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 21:08, 10 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 08:30, 12 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Hamid Hassani (talk) 09:10, 13 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 10:26, 14 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 7 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:07, 19 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural#Portugal

File:Joseph Bazalgette by Lock & Whitfield.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 19 Sep 2023 at 14:32:26 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People/Portrait#Men
Info created by Lock & Whitfield - restored, uploaded, and nominated by Adam Cuerden -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 14:32, 10 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 14:32, 10 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment His shoulders and his hair are blurry. - ABAL1412^{🇻🇳🇸🇺🇷🇺} (talk ☭) 16:04, 10 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Photos of the era didn't have huge depth of field. Adam Cuerden (talk) 17:09, 10 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Then it shouldn't be featured. 20 upper 17:30, 13 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

But nowadays, with the rise of technology, such as AI, and many photo editing tools, I think it can be fixed. I'm no expert, but I know there're a lot of tools out there. - ABAL1412^{🇻🇳🇸🇺🇷🇺} (talk ☭) 05:57, 15 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
You get the content you show you want. If you block off historic photos from any sort of featured process, then there's little motivation to try and prepare and find photos, as you have no way to get them noticed and found. I'd like to think I'm very good at image restoration, and very careful to preserve the original while doing so (which AI does not). But the work I do isn't going to go much further than en-wiki if the English Wikipedia featured pictures is the only one accepting historic photographs. Recentism is not a virtue for an image archive, and Commons serves a lot of encyclopedias. I think Commons' mission should be considered before excluding things from FPC. Adam Cuerden (talk) 08:14, 15 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support (BTW, could you remove/reduce the posterization in the background of this photo? Thanks for your contributions!) ★ 17:03, 10 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@ArionEstar: Maybe you should have another glance at it. Adam Cuerden (talk) 17:10, 10 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Nice! It will be my next nomination! Thank you! ★ 17:29, 10 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 08:32, 12 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 13:24, 12 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Hamid Hassani (talk) 21:13, 12 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Señor Aluminio (talk) 18:38, 14 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 20:30, 14 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 7 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:06, 19 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: People/Portrait#Men

File:Avatr 12 IAA 2023 1X7A0578.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 19 Sep 2023 at 10:23:29 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Land vehicles#Automobiles
Info created by Alexander-93 - uploaded by Alexander-93 - nominated by MB-one -- MB-one (talk) 10:23, 10 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Super clean composition and striking lighting. -- MB-one (talk) 10:23, 10 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Per nominator. ★ 12:00, 10 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support - ABAL1412^{🇻🇳🇸🇺🇷🇺} (talk ☭) 15:39, 10 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Sorry, but that's just a car. I don't see the value for a featured picture. However, in all technical aspects the picture is good. --Ephramac (talk) 20:09, 10 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Ephramac It's not the car, that makes this image special, but the composition and execution which are outstanding and create tremendous value IMO. We have many FP of generic or mundane objects. That's not really the point. MB-one (talk) 12:30, 11 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I think, it is not very special either. It is a car photographed like cars have been photographed a million times. Often when it comes to "mundane objects" they can be photographed in an interesting way, for example playing with the lighting and composition, or for moving objects with the timing or exposure. Here, the picture is not special, albeit the exposure and focus being flawless. --Ephramac (talk) 18:00, 11 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comment What's special to me is the gray-against-gray-against-gray of the floor, car and wall, and the lack of distracting elements to the background like lots of bisected people that we often see in photos from car expos, but I haven't decided whether that's enough to support a feature. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:43, 11 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Maybe I can give you some more information about the car: The world premiere took place at IAA 2023, so it is one of the first models in the series to be shown to the public. Avatr is currently selling cars only in China, so it is unsure, if we get other images of the 12 in the near future. Moreover it might show the improvements of Chinese cars in the last few years.--Alexander-93 (talk) 21:32, 11 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 19:40, 11 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nah, it's more than "just a car". --SHB2000 (talk) 11:34, 12 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
It is literally just a car. :-D --Ephramac (talk) 18:10, 12 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I used to ride this baby in Need for Speed, but really, like the comment above, it's just a car. 20 upper 19:24, 12 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment IMO a car ceases to be "just a car" when it is photographed in such an extraordinary artistic way. Applying good light and photography skills to an ordinary object will move the photo into another zone. Looking at just the object and not how it's captured, is a slightly naïve way of looking at photos. Often, simplicity in a photo is the very hardest thing to do. Having shot many shiny cars/motorcycles/shiny machines, I simply marvel at how clean this is. And oh yes, I've also had my fair share of "It's just a XXX". ;-) --Cart (talk) 22:07, 12 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support JukoFF (talk) 08:36, 14 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Not bad, but lacks perspective correction and it was taken too close + wide angle lens --> too much distortion Poco a poco (talk) 19:20, 14 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Crop too tight at the bottom (shadow is cut off, lead room missing) and extreme distorsions due to the short distance between the camera and the subject -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:07, 15 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per Ephramac and others. ~Moheen ^{(keep talking)} 14:04, 16 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 6 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:07, 19 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mekong bank with stilt dwellings and clouds at golden hour in Don Det Laos.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 24 Sep 2023 at 01:28:36 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Cityscapes#Laos
Info created - uploaded - nominated by Basile Morin -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:28, 15 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:28, 15 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support - ABAL1412^{🇻🇳🇸🇺🇷🇺} (talk ☭) 06:07, 15 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support I like the composition although I would have liked it sharper. Charlesjsharp (talk) 16:34, 15 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 18:32, 15 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Per Charles.--Ermell (talk) 21:27, 15 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 23:16, 15 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 14:15, 16 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Per Charlesjsharp --Llez (talk) 16:43, 16 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Lovely! 20 upper 21:38, 16 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support ~Moheen ^{(keep talking)} 09:21, 17 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Reminds me of some of your older photos. --SHB2000 (talk) 10:08, 17 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support per SHB2000. -- Radomianin (talk) 21:55, 18 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 12 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:05, 20 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Cityscapes#Laos

File:Rignano sull'Arno - Chiesa di San Cristoforo in Perticaia - 2023-09-01 12-32-50 001.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 20 Sep 2023 at 08:24:10 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious_buildings#Italy
Info created by Anna.Massini - uploaded by Anna.Massini - nominated by Anna.Massini -- (⧼Anna Massini alias PROPOLI87⧽) (talk) 08:24, 11 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- (⧼Anna Massini alias PROPOLI87⧽) (talk) 08:24, 11 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

InfoImmersed in the heart of the Rignano countryside, the Church of San Cristoforo in Perticaia is a jewel to be admired in its beauty and an unexpected place full of history, as described on the sign placed right outside the church which reads: Documented since the first half of the 11th century, it was richly decorated in the 15th century as demonstrated by some traces of frescoes, but its current elegant layout, both structural and decorative, dates back to the modernization carried out in the 18th century. A refined restoration linked to the settlement of Benedictine monks, which also led to the recovery of the adjacent convent after decades of abandonment, has further enriched the building allowing the return to the church, on the wall to the right of the altar, of a triptych depicting the Virgin and Child with saints by Cenni di Francesco, a late fourteenth-century work of great coloristic and compositional elegance, typical of late Gothic culture.

Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 18:32, 12 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose A little too much of the noise typical of cellphone photos, and the sky and light aren't really helping. Pretty good simple-feeling composition, though, and deserves the QI designation. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:27, 13 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Mobile phone low quality, chromatic aberrations in the trees, too much ground and unappealing sky -- Basile Morin (talk) 07:06, 13 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I'm sorry. The view is OK, but not that wow for me. Also, it's not sharp. - ABAL1412^{🇻🇳🇸🇺🇷🇺} (talk ☭) 12:39, 13 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Ikan. ~Moheen ^{(keep talking)} 17:04, 15 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 2 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:57, 20 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Frankfurt Skyline 2022 bei Nacht.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 20 Sep 2023 at 16:08:02 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Cityscapes#Germany
Info View from the Deutschherrnbrücke to the high-rise district of Frankfurt am Main, Hesse, Germany. All by me. -- Milseburg (talk) 16:08, 11 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Milseburg (talk) 16:08, 11 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I really do like the view and it's certainly a very well made image. But I'm afraid, in the end it's just "a" typical night shot of the Frankfurt skyline. It's not special enough to me to support this for FP. :-( --MB-one (talk) 08:00, 12 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support - ABAL1412^{🇻🇳🇸🇺🇷🇺} (talk ☭) 09:15, 12 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Technically good and has higher resolution than this existing FP of the Frankfurt skyline at dusk, but the other has a more interesting sky and colours in general. Taking this one on its own merits though, it meets the FP threshold for me. BigDom (talk) 12:23, 12 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Ermell (talk) 13:06, 12 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Radomianin (talk) 13:21, 12 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 18:32, 12 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 21:53, 12 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Mild Oppose: Well-taken, valuable, but not a very interesting sight or great composition to me. You did the best you could with what you had, but that doesn't make it great to me. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:24, 13 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Sehr schöne Nachtaufnahme. --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 02:50, 14 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 04:24, 14 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support JukoFF (talk) 08:36, 14 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support ★ 11:12, 14 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Señor Aluminio (talk) 18:37, 14 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support I got nothing to say 20 upper 21:06, 14 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 21:38, 14 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 16:38, 16 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 15 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:57, 20 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Cityscapes#Germany

File:Kurt Vonnegut by Bernard Gotfryd (1965).jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 24 Sep 2023 at 16:46:40 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People/Portrait#Men
Info created by Bernard Gotfryd - restored, uploaded, and nominated by Adam Cuerden -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 16:46, 15 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 16:46, 15 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 18:24, 15 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Felino Volador (talk) 05:27, 16 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support —Bruce1ee^talk 06:58, 16 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support - ABAL1412^{🇻🇳🇸🇺🇷🇺} (talk ☭) 07:16, 16 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 09:34, 16 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support ★ 18:38, 16 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support JukoFF (talk) 13:19, 18 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Karelj (talk) 14:36, 18 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment File:Kurt Vonnegut by Bernard Gotfryd (1965) - Original.tif not exist Ezarateesteban 20:29, 18 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
~~Ach, probably typo'd the name. A moment.~~ Adam Cuerden (talk) 20:46, 18 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Ezarate: Sorry, it's File:Kurt Vonnegut by Bernard Gotfryd (1965) - Original.tiff, because moving a file only allows it to be moved to .tiff, in one of the stranger little quirks of Commons. I had accidentally uploaded it as File:04376a.tif and had to move it, and apparently forgot to update my link lists as I uploaded them all at once. Adam Cuerden (talk) 20:51, 18 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support good restoration Ezarateesteban 22:38, 18 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 10 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:56, 20 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: People/Portrait#Men

File:Waschbär Procyon lotor-7318.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 20 Sep 2023 at 05:25:48 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals/Carnivora#Family : Procyonidae (Raccoons and Allies)
Info created and uploaded by Isiwal - nominated by 20 upper -- 20 upper 05:25, 11 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- 20 upper 05:25, 11 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support - ABAL1412^{🇻🇳🇸🇺🇷🇺} (talk ☭) 07:17, 11 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support (⧼Anna Massini alias PROPOLI87⧽) (talk) 08:35, 11 September 2023 (UTC)Anna.Massini(⧼Anna Massini alias PROPOLI87⧽) (talk) 08:35, 11 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support ★ 11:10, 11 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Question Nice, but the top crop is a but short. @Isiwal: Could you give us a bit more? Yann (talk) 16:11, 11 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- CommentI have already deleted the files from 2018. Also, the cropped part is not very big, it wouldn't make the image much better. --Isiwal (talk) 07:19, 12 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose IMO considering the noise and the crop, the standard for photos of captive zoo animals is higher — Rhododendrites ^talk | 16:31, 11 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Rhododendrites: This is not a zoo photo, the animal is in a wildlife park. 20 upper 17:53, 11 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
A wildlife park is a zoo with large enclosures. Some other photos from this park: [3] [4] — Rhododendrites ^talk | 18:00, 11 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
That's not what Google say. 20 upper 18:32, 11 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose It is an awkward crop and technical quality is modest. We can expect very much more from shots of captive animals. Charlesjsharp (talk) 18:07, 11 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Fair enough. I can't find any quality pictures on Commons :(. I might as well search Flickr for images to upload. 20 upper 18:31, 11 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Well, many of the regulars here have a backlog of possible FP nominations!! Charlesjsharp (talk) 21:52, 11 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose Common animal, at least in North America, so a more outstanding photo would be desired, and the upper crop is close enough that some of its ear fur is cropped out. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:28, 13 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Just because it's common in your part of the world, doesn't mean you have to oppose it. Given that eastern green mambas are relatively prevalent around here, I guess you would respond in the same way if I proposed an FPC for one. 20 upper 17:23, 13 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If it were of the same quality and I supported it, you would be right to point out that it's a common and easy-to-photograph snake, if it is in fact easy to photograph. The unsaid part of my remark is that raccoons are often pretty comfortable around people. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:52, 13 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Eastern green mambas are extremely difficult to shoot. Their camouflage just makes them completely blend in with the surroundings, which is typically a tree. Raccoons are pests, so I suppose that's why they feel at ease near people. We don't have pests that are as large as raccoons, but I guarantee you that our wildlife is highly deadly, so perhaps I should stick with the fauna I grew up with. I'm ten-years-old, by the way. 20 upper 16:40, 14 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I'm impressed. You're a very intelligent 10-year-old! -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:25, 14 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I'm kidding, buddy; I'm shocked that you took my word for it. I believe you are aware that no 10-year-old would be interested in Commons. 20 upper 20:47, 14 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

There's no reason why no 10-year-old would be interested in a site with beautiful photos. If there were websites for geography enthusiasts in 1971, when I was 6, I would have probably been a member. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:14, 14 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I firmly believe that lifelong interests can be discovered at an early age. At age 6, I discovered my love of animals. I think that Gen Xers make the finest nominations and reviews, but perhaps FPC needs to hear from us Gen Zers who have fresher, and more diverse ideas. 20 upper 04:57, 15 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

More diversity is definitely a good thing! -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:48, 15 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 09:25, 16 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 5 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:58, 20 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Catedral de la Encarnación, Málaga, España, 2023-05-19, DD 37-39 HDR.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 25 Sep 2023 at 08:09:49 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious_buildings#Spain
Info Choir of the Málaga Cathedral, Andalusia, Spain. The Roman Catholic church was built in the Renaissance architectural tradition between 1528 and 1782 following the plans drawn by Diego de Siloe. The temple is considered one of the Renaissance jewels in all Andalusia. c/u/n by Poco a poco (talk) 08:09, 16 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 08:09, 16 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support - ABAL1412^{🇻🇳🇸🇺🇷🇺} (talk ☭) 16:31, 16 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 18:26, 16 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 08:01, 17 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support well captured atmosphere, the stained-glass windows may benefit from a slight highlight reduction imho --Virtual-Pano (talk) 09:46, 17 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Virtual-Pano: Thanks for your comments, Done, along with other slight changes to improve the symmetry Poco a poco (talk) 11:09, 17 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support Ermell (talk) 12:44, 17 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 06:25, 18 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 15:05, 19 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support 20 upper 09:30, 21 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Aristeas (talk) 12:39, 21 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 10 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Yann (talk) 15:08, 21 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Interiors/Religious_buildings#Spain

File:Schützenmuseum Trogen AR Medaillen.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 21 Sep 2023 at 10:28:39 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects#Others
Info created by Mario Balonchelli - uploaded by Eva Scrittura - nominated by ZandDev -- ZandDev (talk) 10:28, 12 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- ZandDev (talk) 10:28, 12 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose None of the medals is fully in focus --Kritzolina (talk) 10:37, 12 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Nice colours, but the depth of field is narrow and the resolution isn't very high either, so I don't think this is "one of the finest images on Commons".--Peulle (talk) 10:43, 12 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support Nice! But the size is not that big. - ABAL1412^{🇻🇳🇸🇺🇷🇺} (talk ☭)
Oppose Per others.--Alexander-93 (talk) 17:18, 12 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per Kritzolina. – Hamid Hassani (talk) 21:11, 12 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per others. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:20, 13 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Small resolution, low DoF -- Basile Morin (talk) 06:59, 13 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Kritzolina and Peulle. --SHB2000 (talk) 08:11, 13 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 2 support, 7 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Yann (talk) 15:10, 21 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:St Thomas church in Haro (3).jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 21 Sep 2023 at 18:27:35 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious_buildings#Spain
Info all by Tournasol7 -- Tournasol7 (talk) 18:27, 12 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Abstain As author. Tournasol7 (talk) 18:27, 12 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice. But the signs in front of the doors, and the pipe on the left distract me. Can you remove them? - ABAL1412^{🇻🇳🇸🇺🇷🇺} (talk ☭) 18:56, 12 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I don't know if I can, after processing this photo will be misrepresented, not reflecting reality... Tournasol7 (talk) 19:29, 12 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your standpoint in this, Tournasol7. Only minor things that could have been avoided might be removed. Altering what's attached to a building is for social media and wall art, not FPC, we work in the real world with all its flaws. --Cart (talk) 21:45, 12 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to keep it, fine then. I'm still supporting it. This is just different tastes of different people. - ABAL1412^{🇻🇳🇸🇺🇷🇺} (talk ☭) 12:32, 13 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- Question I've found a version without the sign here. Just a little bit curious, do you know when did they set up the sign there, and what do they mean? - ABAL1412^{🇻🇳🇸🇺🇷🇺} (talk ☭) 12:46, 13 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Entrada=entrance; salida=exit. Horario de invierno: winter hours. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:45, 14 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- I don't even look at the white board under the blue one. This is a proof that this picture is spectacular. Anyway, thank you for the translation.
ABAL1412^{🇻🇳🇸🇺🇷🇺} (talk ☭) 16:43, 16 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support Please keep the signs. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:14, 13 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 04:23, 14 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Per Ikan. ★ 11:12, 14 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 21:34, 14 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 06:12, 15 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 16:39, 16 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 08:10, 17 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support ★ 23:49, 20 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Aristeas (talk) 12:34, 21 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 10 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Yann (talk) 15:09, 21 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Religious_buildings#Spain

File:St Thomas church in Haro (11).jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 21 Sep 2023 at 18:29:08 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious_buildings#Spain
Info all by Tournasol7 -- Tournasol7 (talk) 18:29, 12 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Abstain As author. Tournasol7 (talk) 18:29, 12 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I recommend you to always support your own nominations. ★ 13:40, 21 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice. I'll support, but please identify all the individuals depicted in your file description. Adding that information will make this a true FP. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:06, 13 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I found 4 names of six apostles showed here. Unfortunately I can't find the names of the other two... Tournasol7 (talk) 12:24, 13 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe someone else will be able to help. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:50, 13 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 23:17, 15 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 11:14, 16 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Please, renominate it. ★ 23:49, 20 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Question Renominate??? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:09, 21 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, 'cause it probably won't be featured this time. ★ 09:45, 21 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If so, it should not be renominated. Please stop thinking that way! -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 10:07, 21 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sometimes and for some reason, voters don't seem to see the nominations (example, example). ★ 10:24, 21 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Please stop thinking that way. We can see every nominations here. Besides contributing for Wiki, we also have to work for our living. We can only check them on our free time. We are not paid to contribute here, you know. We do everything here for free. Money is not everything, but we can't buy food, drink and medicine without money. Some people are just too busy, so they can't check every nominations. Renominating right after a decline is super annoying. I hope that you understand.
ABAL1412^{🇻🇳🇸🇺🇷🇺} (talk ☭) 15:59, 21 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support Exemplary detail. --Aristeas (talk) 12:35, 21 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 12:53, 21 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support - ABAL1412^{🇻🇳🇸🇺🇷🇺} (talk ☭) 16:00, 21 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 7 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 21 September 2023 (UTC) - ABAL1412^{🇻🇳🇸🇺🇷🇺} (talk ☭) 06:50, 22 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Religious_buildings#Spain

File:Mount Garfield, Palisade, Colorado.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 25 Sep 2023 at 18:58:25 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Natural/United_States#Colorado
Info created by WClarke - uploaded by WClarke - nominated by WClarke -- wclarke 18:58, 16 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Took this picture a few years ago near Palisade, CO. It was shot on a Hasselblad 500C with Portra 400. -- wclarke 18:58, 16 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I would have leant over the railings. Charlesjsharp (talk) 19:37, 16 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose It's super noisy! - ABAL1412^{🇻🇳🇸🇺🇷🇺} (talk ☭) 20:31, 16 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Not even a QI. --SHB2000 (talk) 04:09, 17 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Extreme noise. Is that a deliberate photographic technique, though? It's kind of interesting. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:21, 17 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- Ikan Kekek: The noise is from the film grain. I think it gives the image more texture and emulates the look of an old western film, which felt fitting for a western landscape. The photo doesn't contain much digital noise, but rather film grain, which can be attractive. It is a mistake to put such an emphasis on every photo needing to be 100% polished and free of noise, which is so common at FPC. It deprives them of character and they feel sterile. I think too many photos here use the same digital techniques and there is little variation in photographic styles. - wclarke 14:49, 17 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Lake of FP quality. ~Moheen ^{(keep talking)} 08:35, 17 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I don't mind the grain, this is argentic photography. But the railing is distracting. Yann (talk) 18:31, 17 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I could let the sky pass as a variation of pointilism, but the blurred gate in the foreground combined with the flutter tape at the pasture fence are not matching my FP expectation, sorry --Virtual-Pano (talk) 21:16, 17 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Kudos for trying a film shot! I think I see why you took that one. There is a FP hiding somewhere in that scene, and the fence has got a role to play in it. But something's not quite right yet, and I'm not even sure what it is ... --El Grafo (talk) 12:18, 19 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 21 September 2023 (UTC) - ABAL1412^{🇻🇳🇸🇺🇷🇺} (talk ☭) 06:48, 22 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Castillo de Montefrío.jpg[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 27 Sep 2023 at 02:12:44 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Settlements#Spain
Info Montefrío, Spain. Created by Daniel Sebastián Cueto - uploaded by Tyk - nominated by ★ -- ★ 02:12, 18 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- ★ 02:12, 18 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Nice, but the sky is blotchy. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:47, 18 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Showing its age. Charlesjsharp (talk) 16:03, 19 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
? ★ 17:12, 19 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Showing its age = Heavily cropped image taken in 2011 using entry-level camera. Charlesjsharp (talk) 19:06, 19 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per my comments above, per Charles, and also due to the watermark in the lower right corner. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:06, 21 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my nomination ★ 10:31, 21 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Montefrío.JPG, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 29 Sep 2023 at 20:05:31 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Other#Spain
Info created and uploaded by Parlamento~commonswiki - nominated by ★ -- ★ 20:05, 20 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- ★ 20:05, 20 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Good picture, but not very large - it's from 2009, after all! - and the left crop bugs me. I think it's still a QI if nominated. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:03, 20 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
3 888 × 2 592 pixels? Not very large? ★ 23:09, 20 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No, not for an FPC-nominated photo of an entire village. Compare similar nominations of views of Italian villages down the page. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:17, 20 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Weak oppose It's not very sharp when I zoom in. But this is a nice view. - ABAL1412^{🇻🇳🇸🇺🇷🇺} (talk ☭) 03:53, 21 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Ikan – would still be a good QI, though. --SHB2000 (talk) 10:37, 21 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my nomination ★ 10:45, 21 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--BigDom (talk) 06:57, 29 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:01665 ITA Tuscany Pitigliano S from viewpoint V-P.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 26 Sep 2023 at 09:36:50 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Cityscapes#Italy
Info View towards to Pitigliano from the south - taken from a viewpoint on national road L74 - stitched image of 4 frames - equirectangular projection
created by Virtual-Pano - uploaded by Virtual-Pano - nominated by Virtual-Pano -- Virtual-Pano (talk) 09:36, 17 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Virtual-Pano (talk) 09:36, 17 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support - ABAL1412^{🇻🇳🇸🇺🇷🇺} (talk ☭) 11:33, 17 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Charlesjsharp (talk) 13:21, 17 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 18:32, 17 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support I'm much happier with this one than with the other one. I look forward to hopefully seeing similar work from you that shows other villages and small towns. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:28, 18 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 00:32, 18 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support ★ 23:52, 20 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 04:35, 21 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 19:29, 21 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support But I'd remove the dust spots (birds) in the sky --08:14, 22 September 2023 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Llez (talk • contribs) 08:14, 22 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

*

Comment If I missed a dust spot, I would happily remove it - For the birds, I actually like them to be part of the picture especially the two circling high in the centre --Virtual-Pano (talk) 08:41, 22 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 10 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 13:48, 22 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Cityscapes#Italy

File:Senador Tancredo Neves.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 22 Sep 2023 at 11:35:03 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Historical#1980-1990 or Commons:Featured pictures/People/Portrait#Men
Info Brazilian politician Tancredo Neves as senator. Created by Senado Federal do Brasil (Agência Senado) - initially uploaded by Paladinum2 - restored by Adam Cuerden - nominated by ★ -- ★ 11:35, 13 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- ★ 11:35, 13 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Very important person, but I question whether this is a really good photo for 1979-83. The brightest light is on the right (viewer's left) side of the upper part of his jacket, which is blown; and on the top of his head, which is also blown. There are some deep shadows on his face. This is definitely a useful photo, but is it really an FP? Why? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 16:31, 13 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Because it portrays a classic serious expression of a high-profile 1980s politician (wow factor). The light probably comes from the ceiling of the Brazilian Senate. ★ 17:28, 13 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I understand. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:06, 14 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support per ArionStar after several days' consideration. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:05, 19 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much! ★ 00:16, 21 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support -- RodRabelo7 (talk) 05:00, 15 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 09:29, 16 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 14:14, 16 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support, of course. Adam Cuerden (talk) 20:10, 17 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support I am only voting because I know the story behind this image and his facial expression. --Wilfredor (talk) 22:54, 21 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 7 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 13:52, 22 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: People/Portrait#Men

File:Cesenatico - Porto Canale Leonardesco - 2023-09-01 14-43-50 019.jpg[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 28 Sep 2023 at 11:22:51 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Water_transport#Boats
Info created by Anna.Massini - uploaded by | - nominated by Anna.Massini -- (⧼Anna Massini alias PROPOLI87⧽) (talk) 11:22, 19 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- (⧼Anna Massini alias PROPOLI87⧽) (talk) 11:22, 19 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
InfoThe ancient boats of the maritime museum on the Leonardo canal of Cesenatico
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 14:04, 19 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Very good for a cellphone, and a good composition, but not that big, and the sky looks like it has dirt all across it. Can you fix that, so that we see only blue sky and clouds? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:03, 20 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
̽ CommentI corrected noise on the sky. Thank you(⧼Anna Massini alias PROPOLI87⧽) (talk) 08:15, 20 September 2023 (UTC)Anna.Massini(⧼Anna Massini alias PROPOLI87⧽) (talk) 08:15, 20 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. It's much better, but I'm still uncertain that it's one of the very best photos on the site. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:55, 20 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I wouldn't have placed the boat in the centre and would have less water at the bottom. Charlesjsharp (talk) 09:45, 20 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
For me, however, the water on the bottom is necessary because you can see the reflection of the boat on the water, and in turn it also makes you understand the reflection of the water on the boat. And in my opinion it is a small and precious detail. (⧼Anna Massini alias PROPOLI87⧽) (talk) 09:52, 20 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Looks a bit too much like an ordinary "tourist" shot to me, not very extraordinary. Also, as a side note, I think there are some compression artefacts, especially visible around the boat's name.--Peulle (talk) 09:50, 20 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
It is a seaside place, but in a canal with an open-air museum, and which oozes with history, so a place where there is still something to learn. And you should never get tired of learning, and if you do it in a nice place, I don't find anything wrong with it.the lines near the name of the boat are the reflection of the water on the boat (⧼Anna Massini alias PROPOLI87⧽) (talk) 09:57, 20 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Peulle. --SHB2000 (talk) 10:38, 21 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support The quality shows the cellphone, but it’s OK, and the composition works for me. --Aristeas (talk) 12:49, 21 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per above - ABAL1412^{🇻🇳🇸🇺🇷🇺} (talk ☭) 18:58, 21 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my nomination(⧼Anna Massini alias PROPOLI87⧽) (talk) 19:30, 21 September 2023 (UTC)Anna.Massini(⧼Anna Massini alias PROPOLI87⧽) (talk) 19:30, 21 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Stradivarius Madrileno.tif[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 26 Sep 2023 at 12:01:30 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Objects#Musical_instruments
Info This is Madrileño, a violin that was made by Antonio Stradivari, one of the most famous violin makers that ever lived on Earth. This one was made in 1720. It was owned by Deborah Read, wife of Benjamin Franklin, and later, famous violinist Ruggiero Ricci. Since Stradivarius are very rare, and super expensive, I think this picture should be an FP. Created and uploaded by Immologic - nominated by ABAL1412 -- ABAL1412^{🇻🇳🇸🇺🇷🇺} (talk ☭) 12:01, 17 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- ABAL1412^{🇻🇳🇸🇺🇷🇺} (talk ☭) 12:01, 17 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Minimal depth of field which is silly. Don't know the camera/lens but even with F18 chosen, it hasn't worked. Charlesjsharp (talk) 13:18, 17 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment It's a Phase One IQ140, a medium format camera from 2010 or so. If I got my maths right, it has a crop factor of 0.77x, so the f18 is equivalent to about f14 in full-frame terms. I doubt that somebody with access to a $20,000+ camera makes silly depth of field decisions, it rather seems like a deliberate choice to highlight the Stradivarius f-hole --Julesvernex2 (talk) 16:31, 17 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I agree with Charles here. I don't understand the point to have a mostly blurry image. Yann (talk) 18:27, 17 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment There's nothing silly about using selective focus with a shallow DOF to direct viewer attention on a particular detail – I'm with Julesvernex2 on that. Still, this doesn't really strike me as an exceptional image. --El Grafo (talk) 09:57, 19 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Not enough quality for a FP IMO. ~Moheen ^{(keep talking)} 16:34, 19 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per others. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:59, 19 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Doesn't meet FP standards. 20 upper 09:28, 21 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my nomination - ABAL1412^{🇻🇳🇸🇺🇷🇺} (talk ☭) 14:40, 21 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:01844b ITA Tuscany Sorano blue hour 3 to 1 V-P.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 26 Sep 2023 at 17:08:22 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Cityscapes#Italy
Info Blue hour view towards Sorano - taken from San Rocco viewpoint (W of Sorano) - stitched image of 7 frames cropped to 3:1 format - equirectangular projection
This is an image exceeding 180 Megapixel - the full size (4:1) version has more than 230 Megapixel native resolution (uploaded as an alternative versions) - you may want to make sure that your viewer is capable of handling the information load, enjoy exploring
created by Virtual-Pano - uploaded by Virtual-Pano - nominated by Virtual-Pano -- Virtual-Pano (talk) 17:08, 17 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Virtual-Pano (talk) 17:08, 17 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 17:54, 17 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Charlesjsharp (talk) 20:59, 17 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Yes, it's really big, but I don't like the right crop, and to prove it's possible to have a more comprehensive view from left to right, I present the Wikivoyage banner for Sorano. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:23, 18 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I have chosen my viewpoint on a steep cliff with trees to the south obstructing the view to the right or southernmost part of Sorano for two reason.
1) it enables me to include the cliff Sorano is nesting on
2) it places the viewer on eye level with the fortified part of the town.
This is vital to get a better feeling of the unusual setup of Sorano and Pitigliano imho.
The banner you are referring to was taken from further south and down from the valley. The cliff Sorano is sitting on can not be seen from there.
The partly obstructed, but complete view has been uploaded as well for reference. My preference is the cropped 3:1 over the complete but tree obstructed 4:1 view though. --Virtual-Pano (talk) 07:13, 18 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 00:33, 18 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 05:55, 18 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 11:42, 18 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very impressive at full size! -- Radomianin (talk) 21:28, 18 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Liridon (talk) 07:39, 19 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support the high resolution is a welcome bonus, but what I find most impressive is that it also works very well as a whole image. So many wide aspect ratio composites are incredibly boring unless you zoom in or print them at wall size. This one not only has a composition to speak of, it's a very pleasing one to my eyes. --El Grafo (talk) 11:38, 19 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support ~Moheen ^{(keep talking)} 16:37, 19 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 21:43, 19 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support - ABAL1412^{🇻🇳🇸🇺🇷🇺} (talk ☭) 11:26, 20 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Well thought out and well done. --GRDN711 (talk) 16:36, 21 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support per El Grafo. BigDom (talk) 17:35, 21 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 08:15, 22 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Schnobby (talk) 08:43, 22 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very nice light, high resolution -- Basile Morin (talk) 12:14, 22 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 13:17, 22 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support I like images with many details. Technically good work, and the motif is very appealing! --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 17:22, 22 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 19 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 21:15, 22 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Cityscapes#Italy

File:Blackberry (Rubus fruticosus).jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 26 Sep 2023 at 15:05:37 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Food_and_drink#Fruits_(raw)
Info all by Ivar (talk) 15:05, 17 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ivar (talk) 15:05, 17 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support - ABAL1412^{🇻🇳🇸🇺🇷🇺} (talk ☭) 15:17, 17 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 17:53, 17 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Yummy! ★ 19:37, 17 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Excellent closeup! I learned things about blackberries I never knew before because I hadn't seen those details. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:26, 18 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 00:35, 18 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Ermell (talk) 06:01, 18 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Micha (talk) 06:04, 18 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 06:19, 18 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- -donald- (talk) 07:39, 18 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Aristeas (talk) 12:43, 21 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 19:30, 21 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 08:14, 22 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Well done technically -- Basile Morin (talk) 12:19, 22 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 14 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 21:13, 22 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Food_and_drink#Fruits_(raw)

File:Poaceae plant at golden hour near the river in Laos.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 24 Sep 2023 at 01:35:02 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants#Family : Poaceae
Info created - uploaded - nominated by Basile Morin -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:35, 15 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:35, 15 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support - ABAL1412^{🇻🇳🇸🇺🇷🇺} (talk ☭) 06:09, 15 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Pretty. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 18:31, 15 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 23:16, 15 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 09:31, 16 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 16:44, 16 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
weak Support vibrant colours, good focus and excellent DoF - the composition is not my cup of tea though hence 'only' a weak support --Virtual-Pano (talk) 21:00, 17 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 15:03, 19 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Virtual-Pano, but the composition works for me. --Aristeas (talk) 12:36, 21 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 15:00, 22 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 10 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 21:11, 22 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Plants#Family : Poaceae

File:Coccinella in Parc du Bois-de-Coulonge.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 23 Sep 2023 at 04:12:15 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods#Family_:_Coccinellidae_(Ladybugs)
Info This is a live specimen, moving and landing after arriving in flight. All by -- Wilfredor (talk) 04:12, 14 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Cool photo, but is there any way to identify the species? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:04, 14 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Done --Wilfredor (talk) 02:01, 15 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. Support. I prefer this to the other version because it was subjected to noise reduction the larger version seems to lack. If the larger version is made equally free of noise, I may prefer it. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:44, 15 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I uploaded a new version with denoise (Topaz denoise). Thanks --Wilfredor (talk) 10:53, 15 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Should be possible. I don't think the crop is right for this image. Charlesjsharp (talk) 08:52, 14 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Done I added a new version without any crop. Thanks --Wilfredor (talk) 10:54, 15 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Per Charles, too tight on top Poco a poco (talk) 19:13, 14 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Needs a crop, have made a note with my suggestion. Also needs some reduction of highlights. Charlesjsharp (talk) 19:42, 16 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

* Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 21:32, 14 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Weak support The crop is too tight on the top and the bottom. But this is a very nice shot! - ABAL1412^{🇻🇳🇸🇺🇷🇺} (talk ☭) 05:41, 15 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Alternative version without cut[edit]

Support -- RodRabelo7 (talk) 04:59, 15 September 2023 (UTC) See the new version.[reply]
Support a square crop would work even better imho --Virtual-Pano (talk) 11:18, 15 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 18:34, 15 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Per Virtual-Pano. I'd support then. Poco a poco (talk) 20:34, 16 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Done Thanks --Wilfredor (talk) 22:17, 16 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, I Support now Poco a poco (talk) 13:22, 17 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 00:37, 18 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Better with this crop. --Yann (talk) 08:34, 18 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

See version below. Yann (talk) 17:13, 22 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose This crop looks unbalanced. The original is too tight at the top and too much at the sides. Charlesjsharp (talk) 11:47, 18 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 15:03, 19 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support ★ 23:48, 20 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Supporting the new version. ★ 22:38, 22 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support -- Radomianin (talk) 12:28, 21 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Aristeas (talk) 12:35, 21 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Alternative square version by Yann[edit]

Info Thanks @Yann: for this version based on Charles comment. --Wilfredor (talk) 15:15, 22 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Even better. --Yann (talk) 17:12, 22 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Yann. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 18:52, 22 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support ★ 22:38, 22 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --RodRabelo7 (talk) 01:20, 23 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 7 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 08:28, 23 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Arthropods#Family : Coccinellidae (Ladybugs)

The chosen alternative is: File:Coccinella in Parc du Bois-de-Coulonge uncut version.jpg

I think it's a good replace and delist candidate. ★ 10:02, 23 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Renato Soares Morro da Igreja Parque Nacional de São Joaquim Urubici SC (26277080367).jpg[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 30 Sep 2023 at 10:43:29 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Brazil
Info View of the Pedra Furada (Drilled Stone) from Morro da Igreja, Urubici, São Joaquim National Park, Santa Catarina, Brazil. Created by Renato Soares (MTur Destinos) - uploaded by Sintegrity - nominated by ★ -- ★ 10:43, 21 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- ★ 10:43, 21 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 10:56, 21 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose The light is not very interesting and the image lacks sharpness. Sorry. --Ermell (talk) 07:48, 22 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per Ermell. Sorry. - ABAL1412^{🇻🇳🇸🇺🇷🇺} (talk ☭) 14:18, 22 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my nomination Sharpnessless. ★ 16:06, 22 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mosuo Mountain Pony (31013006637).jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 24 Sep 2023 at 06:25:19 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Animals/Mammals#Family_:_Equidae_(Equids)
Info A Mosuo Mountain Pony in Yunnan, China. Created by Rod Waddington - uploaded by RodRabelo7 - nominated by ABAL1412 - ABAL1412^{🇻🇳🇸🇺🇷🇺} (talk ☭) 06:25, 15 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support - ABAL1412^{🇻🇳🇸🇺🇷🇺} (talk ☭) 06:25, 15 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Strange to photograph a captive animal against an unflattering background. Charlesjsharp (talk) 16:33, 15 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support The background is not optimal, it could have been a bit blurrier to isolate the subject better. Nevertheless, I find the subject pleasing and would like to give it some love. The eye is in focus and the colors are good. Also, a little less vignetting would have made the image better. -- Radomianin (talk) 21:42, 18 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support per Radomianin. --Aristeas (talk) 12:36, 21 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 3 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--MZaplotnik^(talk) 15:30, 24 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Red-tailed squirrel (Sciurus granatensis chrysuros) male Caldas.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 28 Sep 2023 at 08:54:45 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals#Family : Sciuridae (Squirrels)
Info No FPs of this species. All by Charlesjsharp -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 08:54, 19 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 08:54, 19 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support - ABAL1412^{🇻🇳🇸🇺🇷🇺} (talk ☭) 09:19, 19 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 13:57, 19 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Really nice portrait of a cute animal. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:48, 19 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Ikan. --Aristeas (talk) 12:47, 21 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --BigDom (talk) 14:46, 21 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 19:27, 21 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 06:10, 22 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Ermell (talk) 07:57, 22 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Although I'd rather "...want to look into the eyes..." --Llez (talk) 08:24, 22 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Schnobby (talk) 08:41, 22 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Composition -- Basile Morin (talk) 12:23, 22 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 13:17, 22 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ivar (talk) 09:38, 23 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support ★ 11:26, 23 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 15 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /FPCBot (talk) 13:01, 24 September 2023 (UTC) - ABAL1412^{🇻🇳🇸🇺🇷🇺} (talk ☭) 14:08, 24 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Mammals#Family : Sciuridae (Squirrels)

File:Петергоф, Знаменка, конюшни сверху.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 28 Sep 2023 at 20:34:34 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Russia
Info created by Красный - uploaded by Красный - nominated by Красный -- Красный ^{wanna talk?} 20:34, 19 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Красный ^{wanna talk?} 20:34, 19 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Very good, with the possible exception of the gray thing near the near right corner, to the right of the former stables. What is that? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:11, 19 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
It's a piece of clean dirt in a grass. Красный ^{wanna talk?} 03:54, 20 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support OK, thanks. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:05, 20 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comment It is a good picture, but I do feel like it's a bit off-centered. Maybe this could use a crop? Relativity (talk) 00:55, 20 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
SupportКнижная пыль (talk) 06:18, 20 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support - ABAL1412^{🇻🇳🇸🇺🇷🇺} (talk ☭) 11:31, 20 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 09:07, 21 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 19:27, 21 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support ★ 00:06, 22 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Ermell (talk) 07:53, 22 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 08:27, 22 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 14:02, 22 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 10 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 00:42, 25 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Russia

File:Hooded mountain tanager (Buthraupis montana cucullata) Caldas.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 28 Sep 2023 at 16:24:01 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family : Thraupidae (Tanagers and Allies)
Info No FPs. All by Charlesjsharp -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 16:24, 19 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 16:24, 19 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support - ABAL1412^{🇻🇳🇸🇺🇷🇺} (talk ☭) 17:13, 19 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Beautiful. What's the contrail-like thing at the top? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:36, 19 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

My guess is a drop of water from a tree blowing sideways (or a very very small UFO). Gone now. Charlesjsharp (talk) 08:50, 20 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't request deletion. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:52, 20 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support--Liridon (talk) 08:24, 20 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --LexKurochkin (talk) 06:35, 21 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Great. --Aristeas (talk) 12:49, 21 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --BigDom (talk) 14:38, 21 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 19:27, 21 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Ermell (talk) 07:54, 22 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 08:26, 22 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Schnobby (talk) 08:38, 22 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support per nom -- Basile Morin (talk) 12:24, 22 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 13:16, 22 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 13:57, 22 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 15:15, 22 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very high quality, really good work --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 17:36, 22 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ivar (talk) 09:37, 23 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Charles' top quality as always. ★ 11:24, 23 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 18 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 00:39, 25 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family : Thraupidae (Tanagers and Allies)

File:Лаврики, брошеная градирня сверху (2).jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 28 Sep 2023 at 15:48:28 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Industry#Russia
Info created by Красный - uploaded by Красный - nominated by Красный -- Красный ^{wanna talk?} 15:48, 19 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Красный ^{wanna talk?} 15:48, 19 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support - ABAL1412^{🇻🇳🇸🇺🇷🇺} (talk ☭) 17:12, 19 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 21:37, 19 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Not huge but definitely cool! -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:39, 19 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Книжная пыль (talk) 06:16, 20 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --LexKurochkin (talk) 06:32, 21 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 19:27, 21 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Ermell (talk) 07:55, 22 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 08:25, 22 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 13:17, 22 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 13:54, 22 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 15:14, 22 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support ★ 11:24, 23 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 13 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 00:38, 25 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Industry#Russia

File:Kadalundi Bird Sanctuary Ardea alba 09138.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 24 Sep 2023 at 16:52:21 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Pelecaniformes#Genus : Ardea
Info created by Vengolis - uploaded by Vengolis - nominated by Moheen -- ~Moheen ^{(keep talking)} 16:52, 15 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- ~Moheen ^{(keep talking)} 16:52, 15 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment We have 19 FPs of this very common species. More than enough. They are not all the finest on Commons and this, though high technical quality, is not a compelling no. 20. Charlesjsharp (talk) 20:23, 15 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support even though Charles J Sharp has a very valid point, this shot is of better quality and offers more documentary value than some of those currently featured imho. If this one does reach sufficient support I would like to suggest to delist one or several of the featured ones if one wants to keep the numbers of featured Ardea Albas low --Virtual-Pano (talk) 23:11, 15 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Conditional Support Per Virtual-Pano; it is really high quality, but we'd have to delist some of the other photos of the same subject. Relativity (talk) 02:11, 16 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support - ABAL1412^{🇻🇳🇸🇺🇷🇺} (talk ☭) 07:17, 16 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support I see at least two that should be delisted anyways --Kritzolina (talk) 08:35, 16 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

this one, this one and this one might be a start. Charlesjsharp (talk) 21:32, 16 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

All 3 still look good to me. I have lower standards for delisting an FP than for supporting a new one. But the picture in the mangroves is nice as an environmental picture and one I'd probably vote for if it were newly nominated. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:39, 17 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Tricky decisions. But 20 FPs of one species just cannot be right. It devalues the award. We have 15 lion FPs, but the diversity of compositions and 'Wow!' is so much greater. Charlesjsharp (talk) 08:44, 17 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Llez (talk) 16:45, 16 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Charles: good, but a little dark and not terribly exciting to me. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:23, 17 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 08:04, 17 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good enough for me. 20 upper 12:41, 17 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support --Aristeas (talk) 12:38, 21 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral Per Charles. High quality but trivial background. ★ 11:31, 23 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 09:40, 24 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 10 support, 1 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 00:37, 25 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Birds/Pelecaniformes#Genus : Ardea

File:Falka - Weir Collection.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 28 Sep 2023 at 19:07:10 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Non-photographic_media/Entertainment#Music_and_Opera
Info created by David Allen & Sons - restored, uploaded, and nominated by Adam Cuerden -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 19:07, 19 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 19:07, 19 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very good and just about life size on my 23.5-inch monitor, but I think some people may complain about the size, which is smaller than usual for this kind of nomination. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:14, 19 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
And if anyone wishes to oppose on that basis, I'd say that's fair. Adam Cuerden (talk) 00:49, 21 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support - ABAL1412^{🇻🇳🇸🇺🇷🇺} (talk ☭) 11:30, 20 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --LexKurochkin (talk) 06:34, 21 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice! 20 upper 09:18, 21 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Aristeas (talk) 12:50, 21 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support @Adam Cuerden: BTW, please restore this Santos Dumont's photo too. ★ 00:08, 22 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 08:26, 22 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 13:59, 22 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 13:38, 23 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 10 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 00:41, 25 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Non-photographic_media/Entertainment#Music_and_Opera

File:Persicaria capitata iki.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 25 Sep 2023 at 02:05:21 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants#Family : Polygonaceae
Info created by Relativity - uploaded by Relativity - nominated by Relativity -- Relativity (talk) 02:05, 16 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Relativity (talk) 02:05, 16 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment -- While walking on the Kīlauea Iki trail, you'd see Persicaria capitata on the path, seemingly growing out of nowhere (i.e. [5], which was on the path to the crater, where the path was rock) This specimen that I'm nominating is actually on the crater. Relativity (talk) 02:05, 16 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support - ABAL1412^{🇻🇳🇸🇺🇷🇺} (talk ☭) 07:19, 16 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Regretful oppose – it's a nice QI and would make for a nice VI for its outstanding motif – however, it's hard to call this one of this site's best pictures when much of the Persicaria capitata is out of focus. --SHB2000 (talk) 10:01, 16 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment @SHB2000: Part of it is in focus, and you can see that part clearly. Plus, one of the requirements for QI has to do with focus, and it wouldn't have passed QI if the focus hadn't been serving a purpose. Relativity (talk) 18:34, 16 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

For it to be an FP, I would expect all of it to be in focus. --SHB2000 (talk) 04:09, 17 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose Yes, or at least some left and right. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:22, 17 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose Per SHB2000. ~Moheen ^{(keep talking)} 13:31, 16 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice macro-shot. It is true to the source, as it is not focus-stacked as so many featured macro pictures here. Macro photos having a shallow depth-of-field is just natural and we should accept that. --Ephramac (talk) 19:46, 24 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 3 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:40, 25 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:New ski lift, Kodra e Diellit, North Macedonia.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 25 Sep 2023 at 10:49:35 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Other#North Macedonia
Info created/uploaded/nominated by -- Liridon (talk) 10:49, 16 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Liridon (talk) 10:49, 16 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I think Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Land vehicles#Cableways would be more appropriate. --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 11:51, 16 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Could be, but the ski lift is a rather small part of the photo, perhaps not exactly what you'd expect from an FP of a ski lift. I think this is up to the nominator and voters, please change if you think it's appropriate. --Cart (talk) 12:17, 16 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Agree, even though image name and description is for "new ski lift", this would be better categorised under "places". Liridon (talk) 14:15, 16 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comment This sort of image is better landscape. Whites are overexposed. Charlesjsharp (talk) 15:47, 16 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Done uploaded a new version where I lowered a litle bit white and highlights. Liridon (talk) 16:40, 16 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment The sky is a bit noisy when I zoom in. - ABAL1412^{🇻🇳🇸🇺🇷🇺} (talk ☭) 16:35, 16 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Done uploaded a new version where I fixed noise a little. Liridon (talk) 16:43, 16 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 00:30, 18 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support - ABAL1412^{🇻🇳🇸🇺🇷🇺} (talk ☭) 04:18, 19 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 20:14, 19 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Good QI/VI, but not a compelling composition to me. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:08, 21 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Normally I would agree with Ikan, but (I can’t explain it) somehow I like the unusual composition here. --Aristeas (talk) 12:41, 21 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Like the image but agree with Ikan. --GRDN711 (talk) 16:46, 21 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Charles and Ikan -- Basile Morin (talk) 12:17, 22 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Per Aristeas. ★ 11:29, 23 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per Basile Poco a poco (talk) 11:04, 24 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 6 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 15:27, 25 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Town hall of Leuven[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 1 Oct 2023 at 13:01:07 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page

Windows of the western facade
Upper part of the gable wall
Architectural elements on the corner
Windows of the northern facade
Windows of the eastern facade

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Belgium
Info all by Tournasol7 -- Tournasol7 (talk) 13:01, 22 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Abstain As author. Tournasol7 (talk) 13:01, 22 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support - ABAL1412^{🇻🇳🇸🇺🇷🇺} (talk ☭) 14:22, 22 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Question Does this qualify as a set? Charlesjsharp (talk) 14:34, 22 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I don't think this qualifies as set, but some of these images probably deserve the star. Please nominate again individually. Yann (talk) 14:56, 22 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral Per Yann ("Windows of the northern facade" is the best of the set, though). ★ 16:30, 22 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Per Yann, this is not a valid set Poco a poco (talk) 11:03, 24 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my nomination --Tournasol7 (talk) 15:45, 24 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Cala Berretta2.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 25 Sep 2023 at 14:05:44 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Italy#Sicily
Info: Cala Berretta beach; all by -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 14:05, 16 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 14:05, 16 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support ★ 19:43, 17 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 20:15, 19 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment This is a really nice picture. I find the composition offbeat, and that's not a bad thing, but I'd like to see further to the left, to the end of the cape, which is shown in File:Cala Berretta1.jpg. I think that photo has a better and more satisfying, albeit more standard composition. It's possible some people would object to the unsharpness at distance in that composition, but it has a very long depth of field. I would vote for that photo if nominated. I don't know if I will vote for this one, though I might, and it was worth nominating, regardless. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:14, 21 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 3 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:27, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Macaca sylvanus - Vogelpark Steinen 09.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 26 Sep 2023 at 05:25:23 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals#Family : Cercopithecidae (Old World Monkeys)
Info created by Llez - uploaded by Llez - nominated by Llez -- Llez (talk) 05:25, 17 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Llez (talk) 05:25, 17 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Just not a compelling image for a captive animal - I really want to look into the eyes. Charlesjsharp (talk) 08:37, 17 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support I want to give this photo a little love. The human-like baby head and excellent composition make this an FP to me. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:01, 19 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support ★ 00:00, 21 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 04:35, 21 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support So cute!! Wow!! 20 upper 09:29, 21 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Ikan. --Aristeas (talk) 12:42, 21 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Charles, sorry. BigDom (talk) 14:48, 21 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Also per Charles, Poco a poco (talk) 19:28, 21 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 09:51, 23 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Princess 🍵 Rosalina 30420 05:55, 25 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 15:24, 25 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Why should you look the baby in the eye? It's an endearing image to me. --Famberhorst (talk) 04:59, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 10 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:47, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Mammals#Family : Cercopithecidae (Old World Monkeys)

File:Claustro de San Gregorio Armeno, Nápoles, Italia, 2023-03-25, DD 97.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 30 Sep 2023 at 19:23:33 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Sculptures#Fountains
Info Garden and fontana di Gesù e la Samarintana, cloister of San Gregorio Armeno, Naples, Italy. The monumental cloister is located in the religious complex of the same name. The precise date of the foundation of the structure is somewhat unknown, however some written sources have suggested that the cloister already existed in a period prior to the 11th century. In fact, in a political document, the then small church of San Gregorio Armeno is mentioned, flanked by three other small churches. All together, located a short distance from each other, they were then united to form a single complex dedicated to San Gregorio Armeno. The cloister is characterized by the baroque fountain of disputed attribution shown here. The fountain is flanked by two statues depicting Christ and the Samaritan woman, sculptural works by Matteo Bottiglieri and is the central element of four flowerbeds on which there are orange trees. c/u/n by Poco a poco (talk) 19:23, 21 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 19:23, 21 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Nice photo. There's what looks like a very subtle dust spot just diagonally up to the right of the right edge of the highest part of the roof. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:58, 21 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment supporting Ikan's remark and why not removing the tip of a leaf? very upper rim far right while you are touching the frame? --Virtual-Pano (talk) 22:18, 21 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ikan Kekek, Virtual-Pano: Done, thanks for your feedback Poco a poco (talk) 05:29, 22 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comment The leaked water is kinda distracting. - ABAL1412^{🇻🇳🇸🇺🇷🇺} (talk ☭) 06:54, 22 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my nomination This is going nowhere, thank you anyhow, Poco a poco (talk) 18:24, 25 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--Poco a poco (talk) 18:24, 25 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sophienschule, Uhr mit Verzierungen 20230915 HOF09127 RAW-Export.jpg[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 1 Oct 2023 at 17:17:48 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Architectural elements#Others
Info Gable with clock of a neo-renaissance school in Hof, Germany, created by PantheraLeo1359531 - uploaded by PantheraLeo1359531 - nominated by PantheraLeo1359531 -- PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 17:17, 22 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 17:17, 22 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support - ABAL1412^{🇻🇳🇸🇺🇷🇺} (talk ☭) 20:41, 22 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Perfectly good QI, but nothing amazing to me. I'd prefer a photo of the whole school, though in better light than File:Sophienschule 20211020 HOF07229 RAW-Export 20220510002781CORR01 Kopie.jpg. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:35, 22 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I withdraw my nomination Okay, thank you for your comment, this helps me to classify :) --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 16:27, 25 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Alberto Olmedo como Piluso en Canal 7-restored.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 15 Oct 2023 at 22:26:05 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People#People at work
Info created by Canal 7, Argentina - uploaded by Galio - nominated/restored by Ezarate -- Ezarateesteban 22:26, 6 October 2023 (UTC) and improved by Wilfredor[reply]

Previous nomination

Support -- Ezarateesteban 22:26, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Better, but still not an FP-level restoration. There are a few random vertical lines and the right margin is messy. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:00, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose As stated in the previous nomination, the resolution is too small in my opinion -- Basile Morin (talk) 03:35, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Alt restoration Hey! I'd love to jump in on this image restoration game. I've removed any vertical lines and also got rid of that annoying cable on the right. Cleaned up the grime on the photo and the specks from wear and tear too. I've always had Ezarate's back in the past, and this time's no different in this job! --Wilfredor (talk) 13:40, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Please Wilfredor, it's not very polite to just "jump in" and create an alt on someone else's nomination, you should ask first if this is ok. Also, when you create an 'Alt', you need to make a subsection to the original nom, not just a bold heading, otherwise the FPC Bot might not treat the nom the right way. You constantly make this mistake. I have fixed it for you, again. --Cart (talk) 17:08, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Wilfredor, I uploaded your fixed version over my version (next time you can use my uploads to do your fixed, this is a collaborative project, so your job is welcome, thanks!!! Ezarateesteban 22:05, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry, but what are you doing now? Placing the 'withdraw' template here will withdraw the whole nom, and it's not your nomination. If you want to cancel your 'Alt', just strike it and remove your image. It's good that you try to fix things, but this just made it worse.--Cart (talk) 22:00, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ok done, We will continue over the firts nomination. --Wilfredor (talk) 22:33, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

We can continue over the first version, thanks @W.carter: --Ezarateesteban 22:07, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support Finally it’s good now! ★ 17:12, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@ArionStar: Please, consider move your vote above, thanks!!! Ezarateesteban 22:07, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Done. ★ 22:53, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comment This really is much better, but on reflection, I tend to think Basile is right about the size of the picture. But I still think the restoration is worthwhile. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:46, 9 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /FPCBot (talk) 05:01, 12 October 2023 (UTC) - ABAL1412^{🇻🇳🇸🇺🇷🇺} (talk ☭) 05:26, 12 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Inside of a hot air balloon.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 30 Sep 2023 at 09:00:07 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Air transport#Aerostats
Info created and uploaded by Hu Nhu, nominated by Yann
Support Beautiful colors, nice composition. Another Photo challenge finalist. -- Yann (talk) 09:00, 21 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 10:37, 21 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Strong support Certainly a POTY finalist. ★ 11:05, 21 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Aristeas (talk) 12:28, 21 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support - ABAL1412^{🇻🇳🇸🇺🇷🇺} (talk ☭) 13:47, 21 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Schnobby (talk) 14:03, 21 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Charlesjsharp (talk) 14:11, 21 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 15:57, 21 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Virtual-Pano (talk) 16:34, 21 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 19:27, 21 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice one. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:49, 21 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Ermell (talk) 07:49, 22 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 08:29, 22 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Eye-catching geometrical patterns, nice light -- Basile Morin (talk) 12:25, 22 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 13:16, 22 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 15:16, 22 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Princess 🍵 Rosalina 39703 05:56, 25 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 04:56, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 06:06, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:03, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --LexKurochkin (talk) 09:26, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 21 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 00:24, 27 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects/Vehicles/Air transport#Aerostats

File:Lençóis Maranhenses 2018.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 30 Sep 2023 at 10:10:05 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Brazil
Info Fresh water collecting in the valleys between sand dunes in the Lençóis Maranhenses National Park in Brazil. A layer of rock beneath the sand prevents the rain water from dissipating during the rainy season, resulting in a broad expanse of lagoons. Created and uploaded by Julius Dadalti - nominated by ★ -- ★ 10:10, 21 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- ★ 10:10, 21 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 10:56, 21 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support I’m a bit unsure about the detail on the sand dunes (some parts look as if they were overexposed = clipped and in processing the colour was recovered, but not the detail), but overall it’s a great view. --Aristeas (talk) 12:52, 21 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support - ABAL1412^{🇻🇳🇸🇺🇷🇺} (talk ☭) 13:49, 21 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support works well with the clouds. Charlesjsharp (talk) 14:09, 21 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Technically not amazing but a fascinating view with great colours. BigDom (talk) 14:37, 21 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 19:27, 21 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Really interesting but should be de-noised. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:50, 21 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Per Ikan.--Ermell (talk) 07:39, 22 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Per BigDom. Questionable settings and technical result, but nice place - Benh (talk) 09:51, 22 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 13:16, 22 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 15:18, 22 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- RodRabelo7 (talk) 01:32, 23 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ivar (talk) 09:36, 23 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Felino Volador (talk) 01:53, 24 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Princess 🍵 Rosalina 32376 05:56, 25 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 15 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 00:25, 27 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural#Brazil

File:Blå Porten (2023).jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 26 Sep 2023 at 21:19:40 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Sweden
Info Blå Porten (Blue Door, 1849) in Stockholm, framing the building Sirishov in the background. Created by ThibautRe - uploaded by ThibautRe - nominated by ThibautRe -- ThibautRe (talk) 21:19, 17 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- ThibautRe (talk) 21:19, 17 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Thi (talk) 14:37, 18 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 10:41, 21 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support A beautiful portal and a good framing effect. --Aristeas (talk) 12:44, 21 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support ★ 13:36, 21 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose IMHO - good quality but not enough wow for FP. --GRDN711 (talk) 16:38, 21 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Princess 🍵 Rosalina 36538 05:55, 25 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per GRDN711. The view through the gate is nice, as is the overall scene, but I don't find the overall composition really outstanding, rather than good. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:39, 25 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per GRDN711. -- Karelj (talk) 09:09, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 6 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:23, 27 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Agapornis roseicollis bird.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 27 Sep 2023 at 10:26:24 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds#Family : Psittacidae (True Parrots)
Info all by MSN12102001 (talk) 10:26, 18 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- MSN12102001 (talk) 10:26, 18 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Poor quality. I made what I had hoped was a helpful post at Valued Images. It was ignored. Charlesjsharp (talk) 11:42, 18 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I don't like the head being in darkness. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:48, 18 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support Per Ikan Kekek. The bird's head should be brighter. But since it's cute, I still give you a weak support. - ABAL1412^{🇻🇳🇸🇺🇷🇺} (talk ☭) 04:22, 19 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Caged bird. --SHB2000 (talk) 07:43, 20 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Low quality -- Basile Morin (talk) 12:21, 22 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 2 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /FPCBot (talk) 13:01, 27 September 2023 (UTC)--Palauenc05 (talk) 13:19, 27 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Fountain at Plaza de Sta Maria in Vitoria-Gasteiz (1).jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 1 Oct 2023 at 13:07:33 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Spain
Info all by Tournasol7 -- Tournasol7 (talk) 13:07, 22 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Abstain As author. Tournasol7 (talk) 13:07, 22 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support - ABAL1412^{🇻🇳🇸🇺🇷🇺} (talk ☭) 14:24, 22 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 21:33, 22 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support ★ 11:20, 23 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Milseburg (talk) 18:59, 23 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Ermell (talk) 22:19, 24 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Princess 🍵 Rosalina 34901 05:56, 25 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 16:20, 25 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice light.--Famberhorst (talk) 04:53, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:13, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 09:00, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Appealing light captured with long exposure -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:28, 27 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 11 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /BigDom (talk) 21:11, 27 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Spain

File:34. Ulica - TNT Shows - Moving Poles - 20210904 1316 1954.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 1 Oct 2023 at 20:06:03 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/People#Events
Info TNT Shows in the show "Moving Poles" at the festival of street theatres in Krakow. All be me -- Jakubhal 20:06, 22 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Jakubhal 20:06, 22 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support - ABAL1412^{🇻🇳🇸🇺🇷🇺} (talk ☭) 20:44, 22 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Impressive snapshot in any respect. -- Radomianin (talk) 21:25, 22 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cool! -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:32, 22 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support ★ 22:44, 22 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 07:12, 23 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 09:47, 23 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ivar (talk) 11:15, 23 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Charlesjsharp (talk) 14:03, 23 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 14:44, 23 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 11:02, 24 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Ermell (talk) 22:16, 24 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Radomianin Terragio67 (talk) 04:32, 25 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Princess 🍵 Rosalina 22378 05:57, 25 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 19:30, 25 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:06, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support I'd remove the unsharp bird --Llez (talk) 09:02, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support maar per Llez --Famberhorst (talk) 15:38, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support JukoFF (talk) 23:24, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Eye catching dress color, nice effect, and the vertical walls are well captured. (The bird evokes freedom, so even though it's small and ooF, it improved the background in my view) -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:36, 27 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 20 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /BigDom (talk) 21:12, 27 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: People#Events

File:Rufous-backed Dwarf-Kingfisher 0A2A6720.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 27 Sep 2023 at 18:42:59 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds#Family_:_Alcedinidae_(Kingfishers)
Info created & uploaded by JJ Harrison – nominated by Ivar (talk) 18:42, 18 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ivar (talk) 18:42, 18 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Superb colors, sharp, good composition. Yann (talk) 18:48, 18 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 19:54, 18 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Wow, what a color contrast. JJ's photos blow me away every time. -- Radomianin (talk) 21:25, 18 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support - ABAL1412^{🇻🇳🇸🇺🇷🇺} (talk ☭) 23:54, 18 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 01:37, 19 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support, and cute birb. RodRabelo7 (talk) 03:45, 19 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment The composition is great as are the colours, but there is little definition in the feathers. Charlesjsharp (talk) 08:47, 19 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 13:08, 19 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support JukoFF (talk) 15:03, 19 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Charles, sorry. I think our standard for sharp feathers on kingfishers is higher than this, though I've obviously been totally outvoted, so far. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:53, 19 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Contrary to Ikan and Charles, I believe the definition of the feathers is suitable for FP, however it is not the best among the FPs for kingfishers. So I don't see why I should oppose this nomination. 20 upper 09:25, 21 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Note that we already have 30 FPs of kingfishers. I therefore think we should be very selective about the quality of additional FPs of kingfishers. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:40, 21 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 13:17, 22 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral Per concerns above. RodRabelo7 (talk) 01:22, 23 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 09:51, 23 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support FP IMHO. ★ 11:14, 23 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Princess 🍵 Rosalina 29257 05:55, 25 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:02, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 14 support, 1 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /BigDom (talk) 21:09, 27 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Birds#Family_:_Alcedinidae_(Kingfishers)

File: Parque Nacional da Serra Geral - Raphael Sombrio (01).jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 1 Oct 2023 at 15:59:41 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Brazil
Info Canyon at Serra Geral National Park, Santa Catarina, Brazil. The park is in the Atlantic Forest biome and covers 17,302 hectares (42,750 acres). Created and uploaded by Raphael Sombrio - nominated by ★ -- ★ 15:59, 22 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- ★ 15:59, 22 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Really beautiful. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 18:43, 22 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Wow! What a panorama! Yann (talk) 18:47, 22 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Wilfredor (talk) 20:06, 22 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Jakubhal 20:07, 22 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support - ABAL1412^{🇻🇳🇸🇺🇷🇺} (talk ☭) 20:40, 22 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Wow! -- Radomianin (talk) 21:30, 22 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --RodRabelo7 (talk) 01:21, 23 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 07:13, 23 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice sky -- Basile Morin (talk) 08:22, 23 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ivar (talk) 11:16, 23 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Felino Volador (talk) 01:49, 24 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 11:02, 24 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Ermell (talk) 22:18, 24 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 00:16, 25 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Princess 🍵 Rosalina 22084 05:56, 25 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 04:51, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --LexKurochkin (talk) 06:59, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 09:00, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support JukoFF (talk) 23:25, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:57, 27 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Virtual-Pano (talk) 15:20, 27 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 22 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /BigDom (talk) 21:12, 27 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural#Brazil

File:Myosotis scorpioides - Niitvälja bog.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 2 Oct 2023 at 09:47:17 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants#Family_:_Boraginaceae
Info all by Ivar (talk) 09:47, 23 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ivar (talk) 09:47, 23 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Ivar's top quality as always. ★ 11:16, 23 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Question The composition is great, but the water droplets don't seem as sharp as they could be on the petals - like on this one. Charlesjsharp (talk) 13:33, 23 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Really pretty specimen enhanced with nice light -- Basile Morin (talk) 14:26, 23 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 15:27, 23 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 09:37, 24 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support - ABAL1412^{🇻🇳🇸🇺🇷🇺} (talk ☭) 14:14, 24 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Ermell (talk) 22:15, 24 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Princess 🍵 Rosalina 38939 05:57, 25 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 15:30, 25 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 09:03, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Jakubhal 15:07, 27 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 11 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 13:15, 28 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Plants#Family_:_Boraginaceae

File:Panteón de la Duquesa de Sevillano, Guadalajara, España, 2023-01-02, DD 37-39 HDR.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 28 Sep 2023 at 05:49:59 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious_buildings#Spain
Info Pantheon of the Duchess of Sevillano, Guadalajara, Spain. María Diega Desmaissières y Sevillano (1852–1916), Countess of Vega del Pozo, commissioned the project for the construction of a mausoleum for herself to Ricardo Velázquez Bosco. The construction of funerary architecture built in eclectic style began in 1887 and ended in 1916, the year in which the Countess died. c/u/n by Poco a poco (talk) 05:49, 19 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 05:49, 19 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support JukoFF (talk) 15:03, 19 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Thi (talk) 17:48, 19 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 10:57, 21 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Showing the mausoleum trough the trees of the allée is an excellent choice. --Aristeas (talk) 12:46, 21 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Interesting composition but not sure it works for me, I find all the trees a little distracting from the main subject unfortunately. Dull light tips it over the edge, sorry Poco. BigDom (talk) 14:45, 21 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I will happily support once the 2 processing artefacts? above and to the upper left of the foremeost left tree are removed --Virtual-Pano (talk) 22:42, 21 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Virtual-Pano: Thanks for the hint but I cannot see any artifacts in that area, could you please add a note? --Poco a poco (talk) 05:35, 22 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

*

Comment I have added three boxes with remarks in the affected areas yesterday and included the coordinates for the center of the artefacts just now --Virtual-Pano (talk) 16:16, 23 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Virtual-Pano: My problem was not to figure out the location but rather that I couldn't see anything there. Anyhow, I cloned those areas and uploaded a new version, maybe I fixed the problem with covered eyes :) Poco a poco ( talk) 16:44, 23 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support The composition takes the viewer along the path towards the mausoleum, which works well for me --Virtual-Pano (talk) 17:46, 23 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 13:17, 22 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support ★ 11:00, 23 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Princess 🍵 Rosalina 30755 05:55, 25 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 9 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 13:10, 28 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Religious_buildings#Spain

File:Montefrío.JPG, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 29 Sep 2023 at 20:05:31 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Other#Spain
Info created and uploaded by Parlamento~commonswiki - nominated by ★ -- ★ 20:05, 20 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- ★ 20:05, 20 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Good picture, but not very large - it's from 2009, after all! - and the left crop bugs me. I think it's still a QI if nominated. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:03, 20 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
3 888 × 2 592 pixels? Not very large? ★ 23:09, 20 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No, not for an FPC-nominated photo of an entire village. Compare similar nominations of views of Italian villages down the page. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:17, 20 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Weak oppose It's not very sharp when I zoom in. But this is a nice view. - ABAL1412^{🇻🇳🇸🇺🇷🇺} (talk ☭) 03:53, 21 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Ikan – would still be a good QI, though. --SHB2000 (talk) 10:37, 21 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my nomination ★ 10:45, 21 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--BigDom (talk) 06:57, 29 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Monumento funebre Guasco di Bisio Spinola.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 3 Oct 2023 at 00:15:18 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Cemeteries
Info created by Brigante mandrogno - uploaded by Brigante mandrogno - nominated by Brigante mandrogno -- Brigante mandrogno (talk) 00:15, 24 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Brigante mandrogno (talk) 00:15, 24 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Nice compositional idea, but serious posterization and vignetting. Could you redevelop this from the RAW file? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:35, 24 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for your feedback. I'd like to clarify that no filters, posterization, or vignetting were applied to the image. The effects you're noticing were actually the result of the natural light conditions on that cold morning. Brigante mandrogno (talk) 08:33, 25 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:01, 29 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Oriental garden lizard (Calotes versicolor) in a mango tree in Laos.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 2 Oct 2023 at 01:57:07 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Reptiles#Family : Agamidae (Dragon Lizards)
Info created - uploaded - nominated by Basile Morin -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:57, 23 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:57, 23 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 07:10, 23 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support ★ 11:16, 23 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support - ABAL1412^{🇻🇳🇸🇺🇷🇺} (talk ☭) 14:11, 24 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Princess 🍵 Rosalina 34531 05:57, 25 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 05:07, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 09:03, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --LexKurochkin (talk) 09:23, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Jakubhal 15:07, 27 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 04:49, 29 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 10 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /FPCBot (talk) 05:00, 29 September 2023 (UTC)-20 upper 07:42, 29 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Reptiles#Family : Agamidae (Dragon Lizards)

File:Female spruce grouse.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 28 Sep 2023 at 14:01:54 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds#Family_:_Phasianidae_(Grouse,_Partridges,_Peafowl,_Pheasants,_Quail,_Turkeys)
Info: Spruce grouse hen; all by -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 14:01, 19 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 14:01, 19 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support - ABAL1412^{🇻🇳🇸🇺🇷🇺} (talk ☭) 15:10, 19 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support The contrast is not as great as I wanted at smaller sizes, but the photo looks amazing at full size, and what a beautiful bird! (Do something about the red-linked category, though.) -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:45, 19 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Nice bird, but the rock behind the head distracts. Charlesjsharp (talk) 08:52, 20 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 06:11, 22 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- --Palauenc05 (talk) 08:46, 22 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support ★ 11:25, 23 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Princess 🍵 Rosalina 37227 05:55, 25 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Virtual-Pano (talk) 23:34, 25 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 8 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:02, 29 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Birds#Family_:_Phasianidae_(Grouse,_Partridges,_Peafowl,_Pheasants,_Quail,_Turkeys)

File:Short-horned grasshoppers (Rhytidochrota risaraldae) mating.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 3 Oct 2023 at 16:54:01 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods#Family : Acrididae (Short-horned grasshoppers and locusts)
Info A grasshopper endemic to the Colombian Andes. All by Charlesjsharp -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 16:54, 24 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 16:54, 24 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:50, 24 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Wilfredor (talk) 03:03, 25 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Princess 🍵 Rosalina 20777 05:58, 25 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support - ABAL1412^{🇻🇳🇸🇺🇷🇺} (talk ☭) 06:10, 25 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 06:17, 25 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 19:21, 25 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --LexKurochkin (talk) 06:57, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:09, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 09:24, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Schnobby (talk) 14:19, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support ★ 00:12, 27 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good quality -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:39, 27 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 09:27, 27 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Jakubhal 15:06, 27 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --GRDN711 (talk) 21:43, 27 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 19:02, 28 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 04:48, 29 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice capture. 20 upper 07:52, 29 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 19 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 01:05, 30 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Arthropods#Family : Acrididae (Short-horned grasshoppers and locusts)

File:Quai du Louvre 1867, by Claude Monet.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 3 Oct 2023 at 15:54:16 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Non-photographic_media/Exteriors#Landscapes
Info Quai du Louvre, Paris, France in 1867. Painted by Claude Monet - uploaded by Andrew J.Kurbiko - nominated by ABAL1412 - ABAL1412^{🇻🇳🇸🇺🇷🇺} (talk ☭) 15:54, 24 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support - ABAL1412^{🇻🇳🇸🇺🇷🇺} (talk ☭) 15:54, 24 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment ~~Bottom of the painting has been cropped.~~ Charlesjsharp (talk) 17:50, 24 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Also the left side --Wilfredor (talk) 19:43, 24 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Done ~ ABAL1412^{🇻🇳🇸🇺🇷🇺} (talk ☭) 06:54, 25 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose We've been featuring absolutely humongous scans of paintings. This is not a super-high-res reproduction, so it just can't compete with those. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:35, 25 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Ikan. Красный ^{wanna talk?} 13:11, 25 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 01:06, 30 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Петергоф, Знаменка, левый фонтан перед усадьбой сверху.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 4 Oct 2023 at 08:09:24 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Other#Russia
Info created by Красный - uploaded by Красный - nominated by Красный -- Красный ^{wanna talk?} 08:09, 25 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Красный ^{wanna talk?} 08:09, 25 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I don't understand how this could be interesting. Charlesjsharp (talk) 14:13, 25 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per Sharp. --Palauenc05 (talk) 15:35, 25 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose Thank you for your contribution. It's weird, but not that interesting. Извините. - ABAL1412^{🇻🇳🇸🇺🇷🇺} (talk ☭) 18:17, 25 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment It's a good photo, and I understand why you nominated it. I suspect it would have gotten more support here if grain, rather than patchy grass, was growing except in the former fountain. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:31, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I can definitely see why this was nominated and I like the 'Japanese flag' composition. But like Ikan Kekek above, I agree that it needs something better than half-mown grass; some flowers, crops, whatever, just not a vast green-brown swathe. BigDom (talk) 07:21, 30 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /FPCBot (talk) 13:00, 30 September 2023 (UTC)--Palauenc05 (talk) 16:56, 30 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]