User talk:Bodhisattwa/Archive/2018

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Chowringhee Road

Hallo Bodhisattwa,

Please refer to this here [1], thank you. Gryffindor (talk) 16:04, 16 January 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kalachand Temple, Supur - DSC 3752.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 30 January 2018 (UTC)

File:XX trobada Peñas barcelonistas-1.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Nachosan (talk) 23:02, 25 March 2018 (UTC)

Deletion of M.S. Swaminathan photo

why you delete the images? It was taken by me.--Fotokannan (talk) 20:49, 26 March 2018 (UTC)

Hi, This file is corrupted. Could you please reupload it? Mentioned in phab:T192866. Regards, Yann (talk) 13:47, 24 April 2018 (UTC)

@Yann: , I have placed the book for IA conversion queue again. Lets see, what comes out of the output. -- Bodhisattwa (talk) 14:15, 24 April 2018 (UTC)
@Yann: , the new file looks good. Please delete the previous corrupted file. Thanks. Bodhisattwa (talk) 05:03, 25 April 2018 (UTC)
✓ Done Yann (talk) 05:05, 25 April 2018 (UTC)


Hi Bodhisattwa, I am a bored bot (this is kind of a computer program) that is watching the recent changes and tapping buttons like I did now.

Curious about the reason? Possibly not but I will tell you anyway:

  1. You edited User:Bodhisattwa/common.js. Glad to see you coding in javascript! Have you ever considered becoming a MediaWiki hacker?
  2. Though, that change appears to introduce 4 new jshint issues — the page's status is now having ERRORS. Note that invalid or ambiguous code often has unwanted side effects like breaking other tools for you. If you cannot find out how to fix it, I suggest blanking the page for now.
  3. To help you understanding where the issues are, I have aggregated a report here and now. If you have questions, don't hesitate to ask users experienced in javascript writing for help. But do not ask the bot's operators (chronically overwrought) unless you suspect an error of mine. If you prefer not getting spammed by me, you can opt-out reports by adding {{ValidationOptOut|type=all}} to your user page or cmb-opt-out anywhere on your your global user page on Meta. Good luck at Wikimedia Commons and happy hacking!
  1. ISSUE: line 17 character 17: Expected ']' to match '[' from line 9 and instead saw '{'. - Evidence: {
  2. ISSUE: line 17 character 18: Missing semicolon. - Evidence: {
  3. ISSUE: line 18 character 28: Missing semicolon. - Evidence: 'label': 'অস্পষ্ট',
  4. ISSUE: line 18 character 28: Expected '(end)' and instead saw ':'. - Evidence: 'label': 'অস্পষ্ট',

Your CommonsMaintenanceBot (talk) at 06:18, 3 May 2018 (UTC).


Hi Bodhisattwa, I am a bored bot (this is kind of a computer program) that is watching the recent changes and tapping buttons like I did now.

Curious about the reason? Possibly not but I will tell you anyway:

  1. You edited User:Bodhisattwa/common.js. Glad to see you coding in javascript! Have you ever considered becoming a MediaWiki hacker?
  2. Though, that change appears to introduce 1 new esprima issue — the page's status is now having ERRORS. Note that invalid or ambiguous code often has unwanted side effects like breaking other tools for you. If you cannot find out how to fix it, I suggest blanking the page for now.
  3. To help you understanding where the issues are, I have aggregated a report here and now. If you have questions, don't hesitate to ask users experienced in javascript writing for help. But do not ask the bot's operators (chronically overwrought) unless you suspect an error of mine. If you prefer not getting spammed by me, you can opt-out reports by adding {{ValidationOptOut|type=all}} to your user page or cmb-opt-out anywhere on your your global user page on Meta. Good luck at Wikimedia Commons and happy hacking!
  1. ERROR: Cannot parse line 17 column 17: Unexpected token {

Your CommonsMaintenanceBot (talk) at 06:18, 3 May 2018 (UTC).

File source is not properly indicated: File:Gaganendranath Tagore.jpg

العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Gaganendranath Tagore.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 17:37, 22 June 2018 (UTC)

Rollback

I have granted rollback rights to your account; the reason for this is that after a review of some of your contributions, I believe I can trust you to use rollback correctly by using it for its intended usage of reverting vandalism, and that you will not abuse it to revert-war. For information on rollback, see Commons:Rollback. If you do not want rollback, just let me know, and I'll remove it. Good luck and thanks. Steinsplitter (talk) 13:45, 22 July 2018 (UTC)

@Steinsplitter: , sorry for the late reply as I was travelling. Thanks a lot for your trust to grant me rollbacker rights. -- Bodhisattwa (talk) 18:09, 25 July 2018 (UTC)

WLM 2018

Good to see WLM is happening 2018. All wishes -- Naveenpf (talk) 00:34, 15 August 2018 (UTC)

Thanks @Naveenpf: -- Bodhisattwa (talk) 22:02, 15 August 2018 (UTC)

Message from Wiki Loves Monuments 2018 in India

Hi Bodhisattwa, thanks for your message. I propose to use this one for the jury page. Is it OK? If not, please let me know. --Llez (talk) 15:46, 28 August 2018 (UTC)

Hi Bodhisattwa

Can you help please check and approve this draft article? https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Bhanumathi_Narasimhan — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 49.206.115.39 (talk) 16:43, 1 September 2018 (UTC)

Many thanks

Hi Bodhisattwa,

very many thanks for your hard work, like Copyright Workshop, New Delhi and Category:Out of scope images from WLM 2018 India. --Hystrix (talk) 10:57, 2 September 2018 (UTC)

@Hystrix: , you are most welcome. The full credit for the copyright workshop in New Delhi goes to @Titodutta: , who has planned and organized the whole event. I am in my home far away from the venue, receiving updates from him and following the etherpad link, that's my only contribution there. -- Bodhisattwa (talk) 16:39, 2 September 2018 (UTC)

Leader board

I contributed 5 pictures for monuments of india photo contest, still my username is not visible in leader board? Did I violate any rule or what's wrong? Harshvardhankabra (talk) 09:37, 5 September 2018 (UTC)

Hi @Harshvardhankabra: , first of all, my heartiest thanks to you for your contribution in WLM photo contest. I checked your contribution and noticed everything is fine. You can find your name in this stat page. Can you please tell me, about which leaderboard are you talking about? Is it this page? If yes, then please don't worry, this page gets updated once daily. It will get updated tomorrow again and hopefully then you will find your name there. Regards, -- Bodhisattwa (talk) 11:18, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
Thankyou so much for your reply.I am talking about the leader board tab that appears at the end of home page of contest.Will surely find my name if it gets updated daily! Many Thanks! Harshvardhankabra (talk) 16:04, 5 September 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Jorbangla temple, Chandrakona - south face.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Valued Image Promotion

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Shobhanasundari Mukhopadhyay.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Old maps of Kolkata from 1842..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Shoshee Chunder Dutt.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Valued Image Promotion

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Old maps of Bengal from 1776 by Major James Rennell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Issues ?

What is happening on the winner gallery - I am fairly sure we did not rate this rather low resolution black and white image so high - https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:A_window_in_Sidi_Saiyed_Mosque_-_Ahmedabad.jpg Shyamal L. (talk) 15:42, 14 November 2018 (UTC)

@Shyamal: , Really!!!, as I had no access to Montage during the jury round, I have no clue about anything happened there. pinging @Sumitsurai: to look into the matter, as he was there in Montage. -- Bodhisattwa (talk) 16:04, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
I am also able to only see my rankings via montage but I have little reason to believe that any of the other jury members pushed this image so much ahead as to bring it into the top 10. Shyamal L. (talk) 16:15, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
Sorry, I see that this was already on the list in earlier emails and I should have probably been more diligent then. I guess the learning is that in future, the consensus list (which no jury member sees) should be sent to the juries and they should be able to confer and perhaps be allowed to rethink ratings before the list is finalized. Shyamal L. (talk) 16:49, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
Hi @Shyamal: , Thanks first of all for going back to the images and giving so much effort to quality check. After the last round Montage allowed us to download the results in excel format with rankings given by each judge and an average, based on which the final rankings are decided. As other than the judges, no one else could see which images went to the final round, I had to include myself in the final round as judge too. This was done so that I could see the final round images and work on them to nominate for quality images. However, my rankings were removed from the final excel and the averages re-calculated (within excel using formula) with ranking from 3 judges only. As the averages decided the winners, there might have been some images with low ranking from few judges. I am mailing you the excel downloaded from Montage and also the final CSV I made after removing my rankings. Once the jury rounds started, I can assure, no decisions were made from our end. We only removed one image of the Key Monastery following your suggestions. I think the Montage tool is designed in a way so that no juries can see others ratings and get influenced. But I agree with you that we learn in every step and we can surely discuss what can be the best way to avoid any situation like this in the future. Please do let me know if you want any other details from me. Best --Sumit Surai (talk) 17:17, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
Pay attention to copyright
File:The Giant Buddhas (2005) (491182418).jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)


  • This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: Unfree Al Jazeera footage, license laundered, see [2]
Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

BevinKacon (talk) 14:06, 27 December 2018 (UTC)

Your best shot 2018

Dear member of the Commons Photographers User Group,

I'm wishing you all the best for the New Year and I hope you're going to have many memorable photo opportunities in 2019. With 2018 coming to an end, it's time to look back at the past 12 months. I'm curious – what would you consider your best shot of 2018 and why? I invite you to share your image and your thoughts in order to provide others with the opportunity to celebrate, learn, and enjoy:

Your best shot 2018

Thanks for all your effort in sharing your vision of the world with others under a free license!

Warmly, --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 19:42, 30 December 2018 (UTC)