User talk:Nichole Ouellette

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Image:James Gray, cameraman[edit]

català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ italiano ∙ lietuvių ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

Hello, and thank your for sharing your files with Commons. There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. Please remember that all uploads require source, author and license information. Could you please resolve these problems, which are described on the page linked in above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which information may be missing. Thank you. Siebrand 12:47, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
This message was placed by an automated process. Please go to Commons:Help desk if you need help.

Image:Rue Principale 005.jpg[edit]

català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ italiano ∙ lietuvių ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

Hello, and thank your for sharing your files with Commons. There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. Please remember that all uploads require source, author and license information. Could you please resolve these problems, which are described on the page linked in above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which information may be missing. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 19:01, 12 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Pochettes de la Flore laurentielle[edit]

Bonjour, je doute que l'auteur de la photo de l'édition de 1965 (File:Flore pochette.jpg) soit mort avant 1972, qui se pourrait que la couverture viole les droit d'auteurs. Pour celle de 1935, elle est sous les seuils d'originalité de Commons, pas de problème, mais je vais chercher une meilleure façon de la décrire et une licence plus appropriée. Fralambert (talk) 13:53, 3 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Photo couverture Jean-Louis Frund (1965)
bonjour, pour la Flore laurentienne, j'ai un contrat de publication du manuel édition 1964, avec l'éditeur qui possède les droits, Chenelière éducation, pour toutes autres photos, je suis toujours l'auteur, il y a peut-être une meilleure manière de le dire, je me plierai à vos règles.
Le site Internet florelaurentienne.com est un organisme à but non lucratif, j'en suis la responsable, je travaille à la publication de la Flore depuis plus de 22 ans, tous les jours, c'est un très grand site 1800 pages, qui grandit s'afine, s'enrichit tout le temps, c'est l'histoire d'une vie
florelaurentienne.com est un site gratuit
sans aucune publicité
je suis l'auteur de la photo Rue Principale 005.jpg Nichole Ouellette (talk) 18:14, 3 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Je ne suis pas admin, mais vous pouvez toujours demander une restauration de l'image ici Commons:Demandes de restauration. Pour ce qui est de l'image de couverture, il fait faire une demande OTRS Commons:OTRS/fr. Fralambert (talk) 18:33, 3 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Flore pochette.jpg[edit]

File:Flore pochette.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Fralambert (talk) 17:45, 3 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

pour les pochette de livre, j'ai consulté l'éditeur, il semble bien que les pages couvertures de livre soient libres de droits, j'ai quand même donné le crédit photo à l'auteur Nichole Ouellette (talk) 15:33, 16 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
mieux vaut supprimer cette photo, erreurs dans les métadonnées
merci Nichole Ouellette (talk) 11:31, 7 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
je reçois à répétition des avis pour ces photos, je n'ai rien à ajouter, sinon que dans le doute, il vaut mieux s'abstenir plutôt que risquer une erreur irrattrapable, il arrive qu'en classant des photos, des métadonnées soient modifiés par accident Nichole Ouellette (talk) 13:15, 8 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sur-catégorisation[edit]

Bonjour,

Merci des photos comme File:Rivière Batiscan en territoire forestier 001.jpg. Cependant, il ne faudrait pas sur-catégoriser. Ainsi, la catégorie Mauricie est dans celle Québec qui est elle-même dans celle Canada, rendant le tout redondant. La même chose pour Snow et Winter. J'ai élagué les catégories et laissé seulement les plus pertinentes. S.V.P. faites de meême à l'avenir.

Pierre cb (talk) 15:20, 16 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Merci de votre aide, j'en suis encore a essayer de comprendre comment bien utiliser les outils, est-ce qu'il est possible d'accéder à l'ensemble des photos que je télécharge, en ce moment je prepare une présentation galerie pour la rivière Batiscan, ce n'est pas encore facile, je taponne, mais j'y arriverai, votre aide est importante pour moi, merci Nichole Ouellette (talk) 15:31, 16 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Nichole Ouellette (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log)  votre liste est dans l'un des items Pierre cb (talk) 22:24, 16 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
je tiens compte de vos avis
avec beaucoup d'attention Nichole Ouellette (talk) 11:33, 7 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:Plage 029.jpg[edit]

Copyright status: File:Plage 029.jpg

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Plage 029.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 14:05, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

je m'occupe de ce fichier, merci Nichole Ouellette (talk) 20:24, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
il vaut mieux supprimer cette photo, il semble qu'elle ne soit pas libre de droit - merci Nichole Ouellette (talk) 20:20, 6 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Flore pochette.jpg[edit]

File:Flore pochette.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

gpesenti (talk) 13:53, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

je ne sais pas trop, faites pour le mieux, Nichole Ouellette (talk) 20:57, 7 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

mieux vaut jeter cette photo, conflits des métadonnées — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nichole Ouellette (talk • contribs) 11:29, 7 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:Riviere aux Rats 001.jpg[edit]

Copyright status: File:Riviere aux Rats 001.jpg

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Riviere aux Rats 001.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 04:05, 19 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

j'ai fait des changements sur File:Riviere aux Rats 001.jpg, pouvez-vous vérifier si tout est conforme maintenant
Note : je suis absolument certaine du copyright
l'image date de 1900
est libre de droit au Canada
merci pour votre temps et merci de m'aviser Nichole Ouellette (talk) 09:02, 19 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
je ne comprends pas comment ca marche, il serait peut-être plus simple de re - téléverser l'image, j'ai du faire une erreur quelque part, je ne sais pas comment corriger
merci de votre temps Nichole Ouellette (talk) 17:31, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
just erase, merci et bonne journée Nichole Ouellette (talk) 09:49, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

024 et 024a[edit]

Bonjour, Y a-t-il une différence entre les fichiers File:Reserve ecologique Lac a-la Tortue 024.jpg et File:Reserve ecologique Lac a-la Tortue 024a.jpg ? Ils semblent plutôt identiques. Vous avez utilisé le second dans Wikipédia. Si les deux fichiers sont identiques, il y en aurait probablement un de trop et celui qui n'est pas utilisé pourrait être supprimé. -- Asclepias (talk) 16:58, 17 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

oui, ce sont 2 copies de la même photo, je me suis reprise parce
que Lac a-la Tortue 024.jpg est beaucoup trop lourde
je pense qu'il vaut mieux l'effacer Nichole Ouellette (talk) 17:30, 17 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Les photos d'Anselme Trudel[edit]

Bonjour, En consultant votre site web, j'ai vu dans la section Shawinigan les photos d'Anselme Trudel. Je me demandais : Est-ce que ce sont des numérisations que vous avez effectuées depuis les stéréogrammes imprimés (ou depuis les plaques) ? Savez-vous si ces photos ont été publiées ailleurs ? Peut-on en faire des copies sur Commons ? (Une note en passant : si les photos sont de 1905 ou 1906 comme indiqué sur le site, Anselme Trudel n'était pas encore à ce moment curé de Saint-Marc, puisque la paroisse a été fondée en 1911 et il y a été curé de 1931 à 1948.) -- Asclepias (talk) 16:59, 17 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

oui j'ai numérisé 20 originaux en 2014 en haute résolution, non retouchée
je ne crois pas que ce soit publié ailleurs
en fait je n'ai pas d'autre droits que de publier dans mon site Internet
ces photos appartiennent maintenant aux héritiers (que je ne connais pas) de Louis Trudel
un patrimoine familial
je crois me souvenir qu'Anselme Trudel faisait de la photo depuis toujours
je n'aime pas l'idée que des copies soient faites sans autorisation
et moi
je n'utiliserai pas ces photos ailleurs
j'en serais très mal à l'aise
je suis souvent allée dans les familles
on m'a ouvert les albums
permis de les publier dans mes pages
ceci ne me donne aucun autre droit
merci de demander
on se sert parfois Nichole Ouellette (talk) 17:44, 17 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Nichole_Ouellette&oldid=764544599"