User talk:Taiwankengo: Difference between revisions

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Content deleted Content added
Kai3952 (talk | contribs)
Kai3952 (talk | contribs)
Line 251: Line 251:
::{{ping|Taiwankengo}} 為什麼你用我的名義上傳呢?--[[User:Kai3952|Kai3952]] ([[User talk:Kai3952|<span class="signature-talk">{{int:Talkpagelinktext}}</span>]]) 20:17, 7 March 2020 (UTC)
::{{ping|Taiwankengo}} 為什麼你用我的名義上傳呢?--[[User:Kai3952|Kai3952]] ([[User talk:Kai3952|<span class="signature-talk">{{int:Talkpagelinktext}}</span>]]) 20:17, 7 March 2020 (UTC)
:::你最近都有登入編輯,可是為什麼你沒有去處理?如果你不處理,你必須告訴我為什麼用我的名義上傳?--[[User:Kai3952|Kai3952]] ([[User talk:Kai3952|<span class="signature-talk">{{int:Talkpagelinktext}}</span>]]) 14:30, 15 August 2020 (UTC)
:::你最近都有登入編輯,可是為什麼你沒有去處理?如果你不處理,你必須告訴我為什麼用我的名義上傳?--[[User:Kai3952|Kai3952]] ([[User talk:Kai3952|<span class="signature-talk">{{int:Talkpagelinktext}}</span>]]) 14:30, 15 August 2020 (UTC)
::::*請你仔細看,[[File:View through trees to Xinwei Village.jpg|100px]]這張才是我上傳,而[[File:View through trees to Xinwei Village (cropped).jpg|100px]]這張是有寫「cropped」,很明顯的,那不是我上傳,怎麼會有所謂「[[:Category:Flickr files uploaded by Kai3952|Flickr files uploaded by Kai3952]]」?
::::*當初我創建「[[:Category:Flickr files uploaded by Kai3952|Flickr files uploaded by Kai3952]]」這個類別,那是只有我自己上傳Flickr照片時才能使用的,不可能是別人和我上傳同樣的照片,Commons系統一定會擋下,唯一可能性就是你從我之前上傳過Flickr照片,經由你的裁剪、改圖,才會變成是你上傳,否則不可能發生是我上傳的,我根本就沒裁剪、改圖,因此你是不是對「[[:Category:Flickr files uploaded by Kai3952|Flickr files uploaded by Kai3952]]」這個類別有什麼誤解?
::::*但是我已經很禮貌地多次問你,我從2月就問你,這期間你都有編輯紀錄,顯示出你有登入,我以為你沒看見,5月再通知你一次,結果你仍照樣編輯你的,好像你當成沒看見有人在[[:User talk:Taiwankengo]]找你似的,8月15日又再發出通知你,結果你卻消失了。你的行為令我感覺很不受尊重,因為你明明有處理的機會,卻選擇避而不見。這件事已經被你拖了半年,我不希望你繼續無視,建議你盡快面對並處理,謝謝。--[[User:Kai3952|Kai3952]] ([[User talk:Kai3952|<span class="signature-talk">{{int:Talkpagelinktext}}</span>]]) 05:15, 19 August 2020 (UTC)


== [[:File:Dadaocheng Cisheng Temple2018大法師姻緣祭改.jpg]] ==
== [[:File:Dadaocheng Cisheng Temple2018大法師姻緣祭改.jpg]] ==

Revision as of 05:15, 19 August 2020


Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Taiwankengo!

-- 00:03, 17 June 2011 (UTC)

Tip: Categorizing images

Afrikaans  العربية  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  Esperanto  español  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  magyar  íslenska  italiano  日本語  ქართული  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  +/−


Hello, Taiwankengo!
Tip: Add categories to your files
Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

CategorizationBot (talk) 11:32, 18 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your account will be renamed

23:05, 17 March 2015 (UTC)

Share your experience and feedback as a Wikimedian in this global survey

  1. This survey is primarily meant to get feedback on the Wikimedia Foundation's current work, not long-term strategy.
  2. Legal stuff: No purchase necessary. Must be the age of majority to participate. Sponsored by the Wikimedia Foundation located at 149 New Montgomery, San Francisco, CA, USA, 94105. Ends January 31, 2017. Void where prohibited. Click here for contest rules.

Your feedback matters: Final reminder to take the global Wikimedia survey

(Sorry to write in Engilsh)

In this edit, I see you added note: "達觀部落" , but I did not see "部落" in the picture. Since there are only a few scattered houses in this place. I ask you to tell me why do you think this place is 達觀部落. If you can not to accurately point out the location of 達觀部落, I might have to delete the annotation.--Kai3952 (talk) 03:44, 10 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

基隆靈泉寺開山堂

Look at "File:基隆靈泉寺開山堂002.jpg" and "File:基隆靈泉寺開山堂001.jpg". The date in the summary is not filled out. When did you take these two pictures?--Kai3952 (talk) 09:43, 23 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Kai3952,

基隆靈泉寺開山堂這兩張照片所儲存的DVD有問題無法讀取, 依照小弟使用D60所拍, 日期應在2009年至2010年間, 感恩啦! 萬里區崁腳國小手水舍水盤就是在之前一點拍的 --Taiwankengo

2009年至2010年間?這樣我無法分類,我需要一個明確的年份。請問是2009年,還是2010年?如果你不知道,你可以從相機的記憶卡去追查EXIF,應該會找到拍攝時間。--Kai3952 (talk) 06:17, 24 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Kai3952, 因為儲存相片的DVD毀損,而之前用NIKON D60的時間甚短,不好意思無法十分確定,最可能是2009年,不好意思,也感謝您十分用心分類。--Taiwankengo

很抱歉,現在才答覆你。當時是三月,數隔幾個月後,現在我想到方法:一種是添加「Category:2000s photographs of Keelung」;另一種是對照片加註說明,然後將2009與2010二個添加。我是建議第二種,因為這卡在2010,有可能會是2010年拍攝,那麼會變成是「Category:2010s photographs of Keelung」。如果你沒有異議,我會像「這樣」,附上我的編輯是根據何人答覆去進行的。--Kai3952 (talk) 17:54, 26 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Kai3952, 請依照您的分類,早期上傳小弟實在不用心也已經遺失原檔案,感謝您的細心分類。 --Taiwankengo

File:梅山玄秀.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

--Kai3952 (talk) 20:53, 29 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

這是在山上拍攝的嗎?--Kai3952 (talk) 11:18, 9 June 2018 (UTC) 觀音山頂硬漢嶺的平台拍的, 感恩啦![reply]

--Taiwankengo

這是在山上拍攝的嗎?--Kai3952 (talk) 10:57, 10 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Kai3952,

以上這兩張都在觀音山頂硬漢嶺的平台拍的, 感恩啦!

--Taiwankengo

請問你是在建築物裡拍攝嗎?看上去,又像是在半山腰的馬路上拍攝。--Kai3952 (talk) 08:52, 13 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Kai3952,

這張確實是在半山腰廟前的廣場拍的, 感恩啦!

--Taiwankengo

你說的公園怎麼沒在照片裡?--Kai3952 (talk) 08:54, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Kai3952,

這張可能是檔案名的問題~~其實是在往盟軍戰俘紀念公園入口的路上, 感謝!

--Taiwankengo

請問拍攝時間是在哪一年?--Kai3952 (talk) 05:34, 23 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Kai3952,

這張是2015年拍攝~~ 感謝!

--Taiwankengo

沒有遮住太陽,怎麼會是雲隙光?如果是雲層太薄才透光,照片上看不出來太陽有被雲層給遮住。更何況,你已經強調是「夕照」,那就是有看見太陽才會這麼說。--Kai3952 (talk) 03:06, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

我會找別人討論看看,因為也有人將「夕照」是這樣麼用的,你看「他們的作品」。--Kai3952 (talk) 03:17, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Dear Kai3952,

這張照片麻煩刪除, 以前亂亂上傳~不好意思~~ 感謝!

--Taiwankengo

不但不必刪除,而且質感極佳。如果提名,很有機會被獲選為「特色圖片」。只不過我問的問題,純粹是出於我自己,並不是你拍不好。--Kai3952 (talk) 10:09, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Dear Kai3952,

感恩, 小弟只是想表達富貴角燈塔是個很好欣賞落日的點~ 大部分的人都匆匆來去繞燈塔就走, 實在可惜~ 感謝!

--Taiwankengo

Your photographs are overexposed

之前我有發現到,但是看到你之後上傳的照片時,仍然有過度曝光,我想你似乎沒發現。舉例而言,你看File:Upper Taishan Temple 2018.jpg,為了要拍廟宇,結果地面是白色的,我認為你的鏡頭光線要平衡,所以我將你的照片添加「Category:Overexposed images」。--Kai3952 (talk) 06:12, 29 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Kai3952,

感謝指正, 許多照片是故意過曝, 因為正中午光線造成明暗差距太大, 如果用相機P模式, 會造成暗部全黑,很多細節就會有缺失~ 另外的原因是因為富士X-E2這類低階相機的dynamic range不足, 如果要拍好就必須挑日落後的30分鐘, 再用不同曝光的照片去組合, 建物與環境就可以很調和~ 感謝!

--Taiwankengo

我只是建議給你,並沒有要求你不可以過度曝光,請你不要會錯意了。使用減光鏡就可以解決,不必受限於中午光線所造成明暗差距太大的問題。若是無法更換鏡頭或提升相機的機能,就要另外花錢去購買,這是看你自己。--Kai3952 (talk) 04:33, 19 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Dear Kai3952,

攝影技巧持續精進中^^~ 感謝!

--Taiwankengo

請問「Door」在哪裡?--Kai3952 (talk) 04:42, 19 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Kai3952,

圍牆後門已經標註~ 感謝!

--Taiwankengo

請你不要開我玩笑,因為我不是瞎子,我自己看也能知道「後門」在哪裡。如果你不知道什麼是「Door」,你可以直接回答不知道。--Kai3952 (talk) 05:26, 21 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Dear Kai3952,

或許圍牆後門 可以改成entry gate~ 感謝!

--Taiwankengo

File:Dadaocheng Cisheng Temple2018 哼哈二將

哼哈二將看起來像是木雕,你有摸過它的質感嗎?或者說,你有問過廟內的工作人員嗎?--Kai3952 (talk) 12:37, 30 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Kai3952,

以觸感可以發現不是銅雕~是否為木雕則無法確認..當時並沒有請教廟方人員..... ~ 感謝!

--Taiwankengo

Category discussion warning

New Dazhong Temple has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Sorry, I forgot to inform you earlier.Kai3952 (talk) 01:22, 26 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Kai3952,

Appreciated! Thank you!

--Taiwankengo

對不起,我忘了找你是要用中文說的。那類別裡的照片全是拍攝墳墓,因此我提出討論,類別是否需要重新命名。--Kai3952 (talk) 21:03, 27 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Dear Kai3952,

No problem! This issue is worthy of discussion. Thank you!

--Taiwankengo

Taiwankengo, is your health OK? You had not done what I had asked, why did you say "no problem"?--Kai3952 (talk) 10:47, 29 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

這是在桃園拍攝還是臺中呢?--Kai3952 (talk) 14:00, 18 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Kai3952,

此為桃園龍潭大平紅橋附近之自行車道. Thank you!

--Taiwankengo

Pay attention to copyright
File:2018Wenchang Temple愛情來了.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)


  • This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: Copyright poster of Wenchang Temple, Xinzhuang.
Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  العربية  asturianu  azərbaycanca  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  Bahasa Indonesia  italiano  日本語  한국어  Lëtzebuergesch  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  Bahasa Melayu  Malti  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  தமிழ்  тоҷикӣ  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−

Solomon203 (talk) 00:15, 20 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Solomon203,

I will avoid making the same mistake again. Thank you very much!

--Taiwankengo

File source is not properly indicated: File:大武崙砲臺望外木山 IMG 5962 (banner).JPG

العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:大武崙砲臺望外木山 IMG 5962 (banner).JPG, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Jcb (talk) 23:15, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

我在你的編輯看到你添加「Category:Illuminated buildings in New Taipei」,但是它本身是廢棄建築物,裡頭沒有照明設備及燈具。你在這裡有寫「點燈」,這表明了建築物需要仰賴外面的光源投射,或是派人在裡頭架設臨時的照明。種種跡象顯示,這不叫「Illuminated building」,所以我已經更改成「Category:Structures in New Taipei at night」。--Kai3952 (talk) 02:30, 10 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

我在Help desk問過他們了,你是正確的。你看圖中顯示光源照射建築物算是Illuminated building,所以我修正。--Kai3952 (talk) 20:18, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

請看這一筆編輯:special:diff/340251748,這是你上傳時所添加的類別。Category:Xikou Terrace已經有中文寫著「溪口台河階俗稱溪口台地」,而且該類別全部的照片都是拍攝「溪口台地」,唯獨你這一張照片很突兀。你不知道什麼是台地?什麼是河階嗎?我會這麼問,是因為照片是你拍攝的,你拍攝什麼,你自己是知道,所以我想知道為什麼你選擇與你拍攝景物不符合的類別?--Kai3952 (talk) 14:53, 13 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Monsieur Kai3952,

Please read the following article to identify what the definition of Xikou Community (溪口部落 ou 溪口台部落). No matter what superior Xikou Community or inferior Xikou Community belong to the Xikou Terrace geologically.

https://ep.swcb.gov.tw/EP/File/REGENERATION/%E5%BE%A9%E8%88%88%E5%8D%80%E6%BA%AA%E5%8F%A3%E5%8F%B0%E7%A4%BE%E5%8D%80%E8%BE%B2%E6%9D%91%E5%86%8D%E7%94%9F%E8%A8%88%E7%95%AB--%E6%A0%B8%E5%AE%9A%E7%89%88_201509151349158317.pdf

Thank you!

--Taiwankengo

Monsieur? Call me "Kai", not monsieur! You have no manners! 部落 means tribe, so it is not a terrace. I think it is the common sense that everyone knows. Don't you know that? I'm surprised you made this mistake. You can choose to create a category for Xikou Tribe(溪口部落), or you can add the "Fuxing District, Taoyuan" category to your photos. Just be careful you don't make the same mistake. I can't always spend time to check your edits. “I'm going to the hospital later this afternoon, so I'm busy.--Kai3952 (talk) 08:01, 27 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

為何照片會有二種拍攝時間?1960年?2019年?--Kai3952 (talk) 15:35, 13 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Monsieur Kai3952,

No dout this is digitalization of my own old picture in 1960! Thank you!

--Taiwankengo

可是你沒有更正。光是「2019 The Gate of Pingtung Senior High School in 1960」這樣命名就不太妥當,更何況你在Summary是寫著13 August 2019, 13:16:23。查看Exif顯示Date and time of data generation,如果真的是1960年,那麼你一定是翻拍。--Kai3952 (talk) 16:57, 17 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
請問為什麼沒有更正呢?--Kai3952 (talk) 14:26, 15 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

早在11月12日,我已為您創建你個人的攝影集,由於我即將離開Wikimedia Commons,無法再幫你的照片繼續添加Category:Photographs by Taiwankengo,所以來通知你。你之前上傳的2,301張照片,我都有添加了,只剩下你最新上傳的還沒有添加。此外,對於那些照片沒有EXIF日期顯示拍攝時間,我就另創Category:Files uploaded by Taiwankengo來放置,剩下不屬於照片的文件也是放在這。就交給你了,多多利用。--Kai3952 (talk) 20:29, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

解禁之後,我就回來了。但是我發現File:View through trees to Xinwei Village (cropped).jpg是你上傳的,你不添加Category:Files uploaded by Taiwankengo,反而是添加Category:Flickr files uploaded by Kai3952,為什麼你要用我的名義上傳呢?--Kai3952 (talk) 16:49, 17 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Taiwankengo: 為什麼你用我的名義上傳呢?--Kai3952 (talk) 20:17, 7 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
你最近都有登入編輯,可是為什麼你沒有去處理?如果你不處理,你必須告訴我為什麼用我的名義上傳?--Kai3952 (talk) 14:30, 15 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • 請你仔細看,這張才是我上傳,而這張是有寫「cropped」,很明顯的,那不是我上傳,怎麼會有所謂「Flickr files uploaded by Kai3952」?
  • 當初我創建「Flickr files uploaded by Kai3952」這個類別,那是只有我自己上傳Flickr照片時才能使用的,不可能是別人和我上傳同樣的照片,Commons系統一定會擋下,唯一可能性就是你從我之前上傳過Flickr照片,經由你的裁剪、改圖,才會變成是你上傳,否則不可能發生是我上傳的,我根本就沒裁剪、改圖,因此你是不是對「Flickr files uploaded by Kai3952」這個類別有什麼誤解?
  • 但是我已經很禮貌地多次問你,我從2月就問你,這期間你都有編輯紀錄,顯示出你有登入,我以為你沒看見,5月再通知你一次,結果你仍照樣編輯你的,好像你當成沒看見有人在User talk:Taiwankengo找你似的,8月15日又再發出通知你,結果你卻消失了。你的行為令我感覺很不受尊重,因為你明明有處理的機會,卻選擇避而不見。這件事已經被你拖了半年,我不希望你繼續無視,建議你盡快面對並處理,謝謝。--Kai3952 (talk) 05:15, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

「姻緣祭改」意思是照片中這一對男女是情侶或夫妻嗎?--Kai3952 (talk) 16:41, 5 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Pay attention to copyright
File:ShuLin JiAn Temple 生財錢母 2018.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)


  • This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: Copyrighted poster.
Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  العربية  asturianu  azərbaycanca  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  Bahasa Indonesia  italiano  日本語  한국어  Lëtzebuergesch  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  Bahasa Melayu  Malti  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  தமிழ்  тоҷикӣ  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−

Solomon203 (talk) 00:59, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Solomon203,

Please delete this file permanently. Thank you! --Taiwankengo