User talk:HaguardDuNord

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search
Bienvenue sur Commons, HaguardDuNord !
Afrikaans | Alemannisch | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | বাংলা | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Euskara | Estremeñu | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Frysk | Galego | עברית | हिन्दी | Hrvatski | Magyar | Հայերեն | Interlingua | Bahasa Indonesia | Italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | 한국어 | Latina | Lietuvių | Македонски | മലയാളം | मराठी | Bahasa Melayu | Plattdüütsch | नेपाली | Nederlands | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Scots | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Kiswahili | தமிழ் | ไทย | Türkçe | Українська | Vèneto | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | 中文(台灣)‎ | +/−

MBDF[edit]

Mèrcie bein des fais pouor aver pliaichi Le Rô d'la Mé au Betchet, Tourlaville! Man vyi 17:37, 22 September 2007 (UTC)

Commons:When to use the PD-Art tag[edit]

Tiens, à ce sujet, cette recommandation s'applique à tes photographies de Lalire. --Dereckson (talk) 22:43, 13 August 2009 (UTC)

Ah au fait, lorsque tu continues, conserve la licence actuelle pour les statues, PD-Art ne fonctionnant que pour tout ce qui est 2D (je sais, je radote). --Dereckson (talk) 23:06, 13 August 2009 (UTC)

File:Trinité, Cherbourg - Vitrail.JPG[edit]

Hi HaguardDuNord, please pardon me for addressing you in English. (Please feel free to respond in French, I can read French but unfortunately I can no longer write in French.) Unfortunately, this photograph has no description and does not tell which artist created this stained glass window (vitrail). As this looks like a 20th-century work and as there is no freedom of panorama in France, this is a crucial piece of information as this photograph is a derived from this artwork. Last year, I visited in Cherbourg as well and took some photographs of this basilique including some of the stained glass windows. And I wonder now if I can upload them. Hence it would be very helpful if this could be researched. Unfortunately, the article about the Basilique at fr-wp does not tell anything about the stained glass windows. Thanks for your help and kind regards, AFBorchert (talk) 20:11, 25 April 2010 (UTC)

Bonjour. Je crains en effet que ces vitraux soient modernes, probablement des années 1950. Je n'ai pas de sources sous la main, je vais vérifier dans la semaine, ou j'essaierai d'aller sur place la semaine prochaine. Cordialement. HaguardDuNord (talk) 09:26, 26 April 2010 (UTC)
Hi HaguardDuNord, thank you for your response and your offer to check this out. At the BNF catalogue I've found an entry for a 20-pages booklet which could be perhaps helpful in researching this: Jean Hervé-Commereuc: Basilique Sainte-Trinité, Cherbourg, Lyon, 1985. It is most likely hard to get in Germany but perhaps you've more luck at your local libraries. Kind regards, AFBorchert (talk) 09:42, 26 April 2010 (UTC)
Yes, the library of Cherbourg has this book [1] and an article by René Levavasseur [2]. I will be in Cherbourg next week. HaguardDuNord (talk) 11:11, 26 April 2010 (UTC)
So... I don't read this two books, but in Églises et Chapelles de Cherbourg-Octeville (2004), Nicolas Lecervoisier talks about fr:Jean Gaudin in 1950's for stained glass window la Visitation, la Nativité, la Présentation, la Crucifixion, Assomption, and 'l'Annonciation. So it's a derivative works :(. HaguardDuNord (talk) 16:24, 14 May 2010 (UTC)
Thank you, HaguardDuNord, for researching this. It is a pity but I've speedily deleted it now. BTW, I will be in Cherbourg on August 29 and 30. Any time for a meeting or a joined photo tour through Cherbourg or the surrounding area? Or a suggestion what could be worth visiting? Regards, AFBorchert (talk) 16:41, 14 May 2010 (UTC)
I don't know if I'll be in Cherbourg, but it's a good idea. I'll tell you that. In Cherbourg, there is la Cité de la Mer and this summer, an exhibition about Jean-François Millet. In the surrounding area, Valognes and his houses of the 18th century, the Hague peninsula (Vauville, Jobourg, Goury, Gréville...) and the Val de Saire, with Barfleur, Tatihou, Gatteville... Everything must be seen in Cotentin ! :o) . HaguardDuNord (talk) 17:47, 14 May 2010 (UTC)

File:De Gaulle-p012730.jpg[edit]

Bonjour,

J'ai restauré deux catégories que tu avais supprimées car, jusqu'à preuve du contraire je pense qu'elles sont pertinentes. Teofilo (talk) 15:53, 7 June 2010 (UTC)

En haut à gauche de l'image il y a un écriteau "musée de l'hôtel de ville". C'est en tant que photographie qui atteste de l'ancienne localisation et de l'ancien nom du musée aujourd'hui Thomas-Henry que j'ai catégorisé l'image dans la catégorie du musée.

Pour ce qui est de l'identification du personnage, l'argument de la vidéo parait être un argument de poids qui élimine l'hypothèse Edouard Lebas, qui était apparue durant la discussion sur fr:Discussion Projet:Histoire/Archive_6#Qui_est avec_le_général de Gaulle sur File:De_Gaulle-p012730.jpg_?. Les vidéos de l'INA ne marchent pas sur mon ordinateur. Ce serait intéressant de voir si le mystérieux personnage apparait quand même sur cette vidéo, et d'écouter si le speaker cite d'autres noms de personnalités, parmi lesquels on pourrait avoir le nom du personnage. Merci d'avoir corrigé la fausse hypothèse Lebas. Teofilo (talk) 18:09, 11 June 2010 (UTC)

Gare de Cherbourg - Barfleur[edit]

J'essaie de remanier la liste des gares de Basse-Normandie sur Wikipédia. J'essaie notamment de mettre une illustration pour chaque gare quand c'est possible. Sur Wikimanche, tu as téléversé une photo de la gare de Cherbourb - Barfleur. N'y aurait-il pas moyen de la mettre aussi sur Wikicommons ou Wikipédia ? --Karldupart (talk) 23:37, 13 August 2010 (UTC)

C'est très bien merci. J'ai regroupé le tout dans une catégorie pour que ce soit plus facile à retrouver. Voilà. --Karldupart (talk) 16:10, 7 September 2010 (UTC)

TUSC token f4ec725fc2f36f6bf07cb4a5bec549bb[edit]

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!

Revert d'avertissement sur fichier copié illégalement[edit]

Ta logique se conçoit, ok. La mienne est de signaler visiblement que les éditions Lafont Presse sont des voleurs. Cordialement, ----MGuf (d) 12:01, 25 April 2011 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Monuments 2011 has finished[edit]

Logo Wiki Loves Monuments 2011 català | dansk | Deutsch | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | français | galego | magyar | Lëtzebuergesch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk bokmål | polski | português | română | русский | svenska | +/−

Dear HaguardDuNord,

Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments and sharing your pictures with the whole world. You are very welcome to keep uploading images, even though you can't win prizes any longer. To get started on editing relevant Wikipedia articles, click here for more information and help.
You can find all uploaded pictures in our central media collection Wikimedia Commons. Many photos are already used in Wikipedia. The contest was very successful with more than 165,000 images submitted throughout Europe. To make future contests even more successful, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in this survey.

Kind regards,
the Wiki Loves Monuments team

Map of participating countries of Wiki Loves Monuments 2011
Message delivered by Lucia Bot in 22:07, 17 October 2011 (UTC)



Afrikaans | беларуская | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | español | eesti | français | עברית | हिन्दी | italiano | Lëtzebuergesch | മലയാളം | Nederlands | norsk bokmål | norsk nynorsk | polski | română | русский | српски (ћирилица)‎ | srpski (latinica)‎ | slovenčina | svenska | Kiswahili | தமிழ் | తెలుగు | Tagalog | українська | +/−

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2012!

Dear HaguardDuNord,
Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2012, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world!

Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 350,000 pictures of cultural heritage objects from 36 countries around the world, becoming the largest photography competition to have ever taken place.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet).

If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help.

To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey in your own language, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2012.

Kind regards,
the Wiki Loves Monuments team

Wiki Loves Monuments logo
Message delivered by the Wiki Loves Monuments 2012 notification system on 07:16, 27 October 2012 (UTC)

File:Cinematheque-Langlois.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Cinematheque-Langlois.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Yann (talk) 14:48, 17 November 2012 (UTC)

Demande d'autorisation[edit]

Bonjour, Nous sommes une maison d'édition spécialisée dans l'édition de livres scolaires pour l'Afrique Francophone. Nous éditons actuellement un manuel d'éducation civique pour le Sénégal et aimerions publier quelques unes de vos photos, notamment :Dakar - Hôtel de ville.JPG. Vous serait-il possible de nous en donner l'autorisation ? Nous mentionnerons bien entendu votre copyright. En vous remerciant par avance pour votre aide, Cordialement Patrice Anodin Les Classiques Africains patrice@lesclassiquesafricains.com

Copyright status: File:Gatteville - Eglise.JPG[edit]

български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | فارسی | suomi | français | magyar | italiano | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | 日本語 | norsk bokmål | polski | português | română | slovenščina | svenska | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Gatteville - Eglise.JPG. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. Thank you.

Yours sincerely, Jarekt (talk) 14:44, 4 October 2013 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:

Yours sincerely, VIGNERON (talk) 09:33, 13 October 2013 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:

Yours sincerely, Eleassar (t/p) 09:29, 19 November 2013 (UTC)

File:Dakar - Monument de la renaissance africaine, message à la jeunesse par Wade.JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Dakar - Monument de la renaissance africaine, message à la jeunesse par Wade.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Eleassar (t/p) 11:46, 19 November 2013 (UTC)


العربية | Català | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form) | Eesti | English | Español | Français | Galego | Magyar | Italiano | Nederlands | Polski | Română | Svenska | ไทย | Українська | +/−

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2013! Please help with this survey.

Dear HaguardDuNord,
Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2013, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! We would like to ask again a few minutes of your time.

Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 365,000 pictures of cultural heritage objects from more than 50 countries around the world, becoming the largest photography competition to have ever taken place.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet).

If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help.

To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey in your own language, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2013.

Kind regards,
the Wiki Loves Monuments team

Wiki Loves Monuments logo

العربية | Català | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | Español | Eesti | Français | Magyar | Nederlands | Polski | Svenska | ไทย | +/−

Thank you for taking part in the Wiki Loves Monuments participants' survey!

Dear HaguardDuNord,

Thank you for taking part in the Wiki Loves Monuments participants' survey. Your answers will help us improve the organization of future photo contests!

In case you haven't filled in the questionnaire yet, you can still do so during the next 7 days.

And by the way: the winning pictures of this year's international contest have been announced. Enjoy!

Kind regards,
the Wiki Loves Monuments team

Wiki Loves Monuments logo

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

File:Maquette-Ste Chapelle.JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Maquette-Ste Chapelle.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

.     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:39, 17 December 2014 (UTC)