User talk:Arachn0/Archive 2
This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Chołoniewski
Hello! I agree it is not typical to add string of pearls to count's crown, however it is based on the image from original diploma. Best regards. Avalokitesvara (talk) 17:55, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
- In this case Yes means Yes, let it be so. Thanks for attention --Arachn0 (talk) 05:02, 13 March 2012 (UTC)
Русские портреты из NYPL
А зачем их грузить из NYPL, если на сайте РГБ они выложены в лучшем качестве? Пример. --Kaganer (talk) 16:53, 31 August 2012 (UTC)
- Замечательно! А остальные тома? И как искать? --Arachno T 05:05, 20 September 2012 (UTC)
Re: Raczyński
You're right! Corrected. Avalokitesvara (talk) 18:12, 13 September 2012 (UTC)
Re: Jakubowski
Hello. It depends whether these supporters were on the original diploma from 1764 or not... I will try to find out. Avalokitesvara (talk) 14:07, 6 November 2012 (UTC)
File:Znak 4 gusar mariupol.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
PereslavlFoto (talk) 19:13, 4 December 2012 (UTC)
POL COA Górecki
POL COA Górecki - OK?, ???, Excelsior !!!! --Arachno T 13:27, 12 December 2012 (UTC)
Re: Myszkowski
Hello! You seem to be right, but I will also ask Mr. Gajl if it was his mistake, or did he took it from some older armorial. With regards. Avalokitesvara (talk) 09:41, 14 December 2012 (UTC)
- I am sorry that it took so long. Not only Mr Gajl admitted his mistake, but also promised to include the correction to supplement to his latest book. This supplement will be available online. Best wishes. Avalokitesvara (talk) 09:36, 25 January 2013 (UTC)
- It's a great privilege for me to take a small part in this outstanding work --Arachno T 10:26, 25 January 2013 (UTC)
RU COA Rutherford 12 57
Cześć! Do korekty. Pozdrawiam. Bastianow (talk) 22:33, 28 December 2012 (UTC)
Delwig-Wappen wwb 094-1.png
Hi. Can you, please, back your change of image on File:Delwig-Wappen wwb 094-1.png? And add your image as your own work with yours information about it? Thanks, Skim (talk) 19:54, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
- I don't know how to roll back changes. You may if You can --Arachno T 10:31, 8 January 2013 (UTC)
- Or alternate. Update, please information, copyright, sources, etc to yours. And i insert original image as new image. Skim (talk) 20:22, 8 January 2013 (UTC)
- As I remember, taken here, as source Siebmacher J. "Grosses und allgemeines wappenbuch in einer neuer vollstandig geordneten und reich verm." Band. IV, Abt. 11. Teil 1. Nurnberg. 1898 - PD-old-100 --Arachno T 05:21, 9 January 2013 (UTC)
RU COA Chwoszczynski
???. Bastianow (talk) 19:31, 18 January 2013 (UTC)
RU COA Dzhunkowski
Czekam na odpowiedź. ???. Bastianow (talk) 20:31, 21 January 2013 (UTC)
File:Yusupovirina-color.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Ras67 (talk) 17:19, 23 February 2013 (UTC)
Tormasov
Tormasov(?) Bastianow (talk) 19:59, 27 February 2013 (UTC)
File:Kgb1957 honoured officer emb n9537.gif has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Mickey32 (talk) 09:59, 21 July 2013 (UTC)
File tagging File:Metro St Petersburg.jpg
This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Metro St Petersburg.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Metro St Petersburg.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
A.Savin 09:48, 30 July 2013 (UTC)
Bibikov
Hello. I need some help deciphering blazon of coat of arms of Bibikov family. Could you tell me what is this bird in Bibikov arms? Is it random bird, or is it named by species? Regards. Avalokitesvara (talk) 08:33, 14 October 2013 (UTC)
- In ofiicial blazon it names "Турухтан" (TU-RU-KHTAN), it is pl: Batalion (ptak), I think --Arachno T 08:40, 14 October 2013 (UTC)
- Thank you! It is the first time I encountered this species in Coat of Arms. Also I have question about arms of Demidov. What are three green objects in chief? Are these some garden tools? Avalokitesvara (talk) 09:13, 14 October 2013 (UTC)
- Thanks for your help. I have further problem with arms of Starov. What is in the fess? A net perhaps? What is this black thing? Avalokitesvara (talk) 12:52, 15 October 2013 (UTC)
- Thanks a lot for your help! Avalokitesvara (talk) 12:17, 16 October 2013 (UTC)
Hi Arachn0. Please fix your wrong edits, see here. --Leyo 09:23, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
- Done
- Thank you. --Leyo 09:35, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Madatov Valer'ian Grigor'evich, 1782-1829.jpg
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Madatov Valer'ian Grigor'evich, 1782-1829.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
No required license templates were detected at this file page. Please correct it. If you have any questions please contact me on my talk page. Yours sincerely, Jarekt (talk) 16:08, 19 November 2013 (UTC)
Re: Łoś
Hello. You are right, it was my mistake. Regards. Avalokitesvara (talk) 10:31, 26 November 2013 (UTC)
Некачественная заливка
Соблаговолите прекратить некачественную заливку портретов из известного вам источника! Всё равно всё потом приходится перезаливать (File:RusPortraits v5-112 Ivan Nikolaevich Nepliuev, 1750-1823.jpg в качестве примера). В карточках эти поля и подписи на французском смотрятся кошмарно. --Ghirlandajo (talk) 11:47, 6 January 2014 (UTC)
- Понимаю Ваше негодование, но полностью разделить его не могу: подпись и номер представляются мне важными для идентификации портретируемого. Вы же заливаете, не смущаясь, бледные чёрно-белые изображения гербов поверх цветных - типа, первоисточник важнее? --Arachno T 05:20, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
- Громадное поле с подписями никакой не "первоисточник", а лишний в энциклопедии балласт. Первоисточник - собственно портрет; только он и востребован для иллюстрирования. Посмотрите для образца мои загрузки. --Ghirlandajo (talk) 06:00, 10 January 2014 (UTC)
Coats of arms of Russian noble families - A has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! |
TeleComNasSprVen (talk) 07:35, 16 February 2014 (UTC)
File:Orlov F G by-Shubin.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Túrelio (talk) 14:16, 29 March 2014 (UTC)
File:Faberge frame.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Ras67 (talk) 17:12, 16 September 2014 (UTC)
File:Faberge cup.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Ras67 (talk) 17:23, 16 September 2014 (UTC)
File:Ink-Pot.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Ras67 (talk) 17:31, 16 September 2014 (UTC)
File:Faberge stamp.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Ras67 (talk) 18:54, 16 September 2014 (UTC)
File:Notebook Cover.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Ras67 (talk) 19:21, 16 September 2014 (UTC)
File:Twig of Bilberry in a Vase.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Ras67 (talk) 19:25, 16 September 2014 (UTC)
File:Jug Shaped like a Beaver.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Ras67 (talk) 19:27, 16 September 2014 (UTC)
File:Ash-Tray Shaped like a Fish.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Ras67 (talk) 19:29, 16 September 2014 (UTC)
File:Trinket Shaped like a Squirrel.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Ras67 (talk) 19:30, 16 September 2014 (UTC)
File:Copy of the Imperial Regalia.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Ras67 (talk) 19:36, 16 September 2014 (UTC)
File:Spiridov Grigory Andreevich.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Ghirlandajo (talk) 09:21, 16 November 2014 (UTC)
File:Un-1-l-drag.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Gandvik (talk) 03:50, 22 December 2014 (UTC)
File:Butyrsky.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Gandvik (talk) 11:13, 25 December 2014 (UTC)
File:Un-Ekaterinoslav-1.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Gandvik (talk) 09:52, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
File:Coat of Arms of Elagin family.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Steinsplitter (talk) 17:15, 13 January 2015 (UTC)
File:Brullov COA.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Steinsplitter (talk) 17:16, 13 January 2015 (UTC)
File:Bogorya Rostr.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Steinsplitter (talk) 17:16, 13 January 2015 (UTC)
File:Wrangel COA.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Steinsplitter (talk) 17:16, 13 January 2015 (UTC)
File:Zaluski COA.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Steinsplitter (talk) 17:16, 13 January 2015 (UTC)
File:Madatov COA.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Steinsplitter (talk) 17:17, 13 January 2015 (UTC)
File:Shuvalovy COA.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Steinsplitter (talk) 17:17, 13 January 2015 (UTC)
File:RU COA Batyushkov 4-92.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Steinsplitter (talk) 17:17, 13 January 2015 (UTC)
File:Шервашидзе-герб.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Steinsplitter (talk) 17:17, 13 January 2015 (UTC)
File:Husar 5-Alexandr Regiment.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Gandvik (talk) 20:08, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
File:Morshan-139 1905.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Gandvik (talk) 20:57, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
File:Astrakhan 12 grenader.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Gandvik (talk) 16:41, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
Might be better to upload your different file under a new name. Also, indicate the source of your image version... AnonMoos (talk) 13:51, 23 April 2015 (UTC)
- Done, but is the b/w copy so necessary? --Arachno T 14:02, 23 April 2015 (UTC)