User talk:Bodoklecksel

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Image:Vukania.jpg[edit]

Pay attention to copyright Image:Vukania.jpg has been marked as a copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content, that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. For images, you may find Commons:Image casebook useful. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added will soon be deleted. If you believe this image is not a copyright violation, please explain why on the image description page.


Afrikaans  asturianu  Bahasa Melayu  Bahasa Indonesia  azərbaycanca  British English  dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  euskara  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  norsk bokmål  română  Lëtzebuergesch  español  português  English  hrvatski  Plattdüütsch  français  Nederlands  norsk  Malti  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Tiếng Việt  Türkçe  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ไทย  မြန်မာဘာသာ  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

-- Zil (d) 12:59, 23 September 2008 (UTC)


Image:Homersimpson2.jpg[edit]

Pay attention to copyright Image:Homersimpson2.jpg has been marked as a copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content, that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. For images, you may find Commons:Image casebook useful. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added will soon be deleted. If you believe this image is not a copyright violation, please explain why on the image description page.


Afrikaans  asturianu  Bahasa Melayu  Bahasa Indonesia  azərbaycanca  British English  dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  euskara  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  norsk bokmål  română  Lëtzebuergesch  español  português  English  hrvatski  Plattdüütsch  français  Nederlands  norsk  Malti  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Tiếng Việt  Türkçe  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ไทย  မြန်မာဘာသာ  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

-Belgrano (talk) 02:57, 8 November 2008 (UTC)


File tagging Image:Jungdo.jpg[edit]

dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  euskara  català  magyar  čeština  norsk bokmål  română  lietuvių  español  português  English  hrvatski  Plattdüütsch  français  Nederlands  norsk  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  polski  galego  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Tiếng Việt  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  ಕನ್ನಡ  മലയാളം  ไทย  မြန်မာဘာသာ  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  اردو  العربية  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading Image:Jungdo.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:OP}} on file description page.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own or work which is your own but has been previously published.

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the OTRS-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:Image:Jungdo.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Rosenzweig δ 23:26, 22 May 2009 (UTC)

File:Absetzer750.jpg[edit]

dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 15:21, 15 July 2009 (UTC)

Tip: Categorizing images[edit]

Afrikaans  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  Esperanto  français  galego  íslenska  italiano  magyar  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  suomi  Tiếng Việt  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  українська  ქართული  বাংলা  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−


Hello, Bodoklecksel!
Tip: Add categories to your images

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

Uploadwizard-categories.png

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

BotMultichillT 05:40, 22 July 2009 (UTC)


File:Manetasgrafik.jpg[edit]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Manetasgrafik.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk.

The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion.

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  Bahasa Melayu  Bahasa Indonesia  azərbaycanca  British English  dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  euskara  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  norsk bokmål  română  Lëtzebuergesch  español  português  English  hrvatski  Plattdüütsch  français  Nederlands  norsk  Malti  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Tiếng Việt  Türkçe  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ไทย  မြန်မာဘာသာ  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

Iconoclast (talk) 14:31, 10 September 2009 (UTC)

Lenin on Tour[edit]

Hallo Bodoklecksel,
ich fürchte, dass File:HerzLeninOnTourKöln02.jpg und File:HerzLeninOnTourKöln03.jpg nicht durch die Panoramafreiheit abgedeckt sind, da sie nicht dauerhaft angebracht sind. --Túrelio (talk) 15:47, 22 October 2009 (UTC)

Danke für den Hinweis, doch ist mir der Copyrightsachverhalt unklar. Wer hat denn das Copyright an den Portraitbüsten? Es handelte sich zumindest um ein öffentliches permanentes Denkmal (allerdings noch in Dresden) und ändert die Demontage den Sachverhalt? Wie sieht es mit der Gestaltungsfreiheit des Fotografen aus? Gilt nicht auch für deutschland der Passus public places? Da muss ich mich erst mal sachkundig machen und auch mal abwarten, was die Rechtsexperten hier so meinen... Gruß Bodoklecksel (talk) Bodoklecksel (talk) 16:12, 22 October 2009 (UTC)

Also in Dresden ist das ein dauerhaft aufgestelltes Denkmal? Abgesehen von der aktuellen Aktion, wer hat die Büsten denn gemacht bzw. seit wann ist der tot? --Túrelio (talk) 16:39, 22 October 2009 (UTC)
Es WAR bis 1990 ein "dauerhaftes Denkmal", aber was ist schon von Dauer wenn ein Denkmal zerlegt und in eine neue Kunstaktion eingeht...Bodoklecksel (talk) 15:51, 23 October 2009 (UTC)
Das ist rechtlich wirklich eine absurde Situation, vorher panoramafrei und nun? Keine Ahnung, was nun gilt. Der ursprüngliche Bildhauer ist wohl noch nicht 70 Jahre tot? --Túrelio (talk) 16:51, 23 October 2009 (UTC)
Es wäre noch herauszufinden, wer die Skulpturen überhaupt angefertigt hat. Aber die Copyrightfragen sind durchaus interessant: Ab wann wird es eine neue Kunstschöpfung? Gehört der LKW dazu? Was ist mit der bisherigen Panoramafreiheit? Als öffentliche Aktion spricht m.E. kaum etwas gegen eine Freigabe dieser Fotos. Vgl. die Fotos vom Aktionskünstler HA Schult (Category:HA Schult) oder Christo wo die Sache auch ok scheint. Gruß Bodoklecksel (talk) 19:27, 23 October 2009 (UTC)
Der Vergleich mit Schult greift m.E. nicht, weil das tatsächlich eine Dauerinstallation ist, während der verhüllte Reichstag m.W. sogar per Gericht als nicht unter FOP fallend erklärt wurde. Da die Sache m.E. nicht eilt, kannst du das in aller Ruhe klären lassen, sofern du die Möglichkeit dazu hast. --Túrelio (talk) 20:10, 23 October 2009 (UTC)
HA Schults "Trash People" (siehe category) standen nur kurze Zeit auf der Kölner Domplatte oder anderen Orten der Welt, somit durchaus vergleichbar Bodoklecksel (talk) 15:18, 24 October 2009 (UTC)
Wenn das Schult-Foto einem "schärferen" admin auffällt, könnte es durchaus verschwinden. Ich geh davon aus, dass es bislang durchgegangen ist, weil Schult halt das Hauptmotiv ist und der steht ja nicht unter Copyright ;-). De facto haben Argumente a la "das Bild liegt doch auch auf Commons" nicht so selten Folge-Löschungen nach sich gezogen. --Túrelio (talk) 15:45, 24 October 2009 (UTC)

File:CharlesEtYvonne1.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:CharlesEtYvonne1.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Cezarika1 (talk) 08:18, 19 August 2010 (UTC)

Mimoyecques[edit]

Hallo Bodoklecksel, hängst du sehr an dieser Galerie? Mich dünkt, sie macht neben der Kategorie wenig Sinn, da keine zusätzlichen Informationen drin sind und sie keine Struktur hat. Hingegen habe ich in der Kategorie jetzt noch Infos ergänzt → Koordinaten und Artikel.

Falls nicht, würde ich (natürlich mit deinem Einverständnis) die Galerie löschen lassen. Es geht mir um eine einheitliche Struktur, da ich auch die weiteren V3-Stellungen (Lampaden und Buhl) als Kategorien angelegt habe und die vier Kats in den kommenden Wochen «aufdotieren» werde. -- Хрюша ?? 06:58, 30 September 2011 (UTC)

Du darfst gerne die Galerie löschen lassen, wenn es ein sinnvolleres Ordnungsprinziop gibt.
Nur zu... Bodoklecksel (talk) 11:53, 4 October 2011 (UTC)
Danke für die Antwort und Zustimmung. Galerien machen meiner Meinung nach nur in sehr grossen Kategorien Sinn, wenn man einen essentiellen Auszug zeigen will und dann die Bilder auch gleich eine aussagekräftige Gruppierung und Beschreibung erhalten. Beispiel Bern: Kategorie und Galerie. Ansonsten fragt sich ein aussenstehender Betrachter, was der Unterschied zwischen Kategorie und Galerie ist. -- Хрюша ?? 13:58, 4 October 2011 (UTC)

Sangatte1[edit]

Hallo Bodoklecksel, meiner Meinung nach ist deine Bildbeschreibung irreführend. Das Bild zeigt ausschliesslich Sangatte, Blériot Plage liegt viel weiter rechts/östlich. Dazu ist das Bild bestimmt nicht vom Cap Blanc Nez aufgenommen, wohl eher vom Mont Fouret aus, Richtung NNO. -- Хрюша ?? 12:30, 28 June 2012 (UTC)

File:Bahnhof Sterzhausen.jpg[edit]

dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 12:36, 15 July 2012 (UTC)

File:Vicente Yáñez Pinzón.jpg[edit]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Vicente Yáñez Pinzón.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk.

The file you added may soon be deleted. If you believe this file is not a copyright violation, you may replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request.

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  Bahasa Melayu  Bahasa Indonesia  azərbaycanca  British English  dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  euskara  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  norsk bokmål  română  Lëtzebuergesch  español  português  English  hrvatski  Plattdüütsch  français  Nederlands  norsk  Malti  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Tiếng Việt  Türkçe  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ไทย  မြန်မာဘာသာ  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

Ecemaml talk to me/habla conmigo 14:00, 29 August 2012 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Stefan4 (talk) 18:00, 20 December 2012 (UTC)

Contact[edit]

CapFagnet01.jpg Contact
Hello, I'd like to get in touch with you, could you tell me what's your email adress ?

Regards,

Emmanuelle Champy emmanuellechampy@gmail.com Emmanuellechampy (talk) 09:04, 13 March 2014 (UTC)

bodoklecksel(at)yahoo.de

File:Napoleon Chemindesdames.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Napoleon Chemindesdames.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Poudou99 (talk) 11:55, 15 April 2015 (UTC)

File:Manetasgrafik.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Manetasgrafik.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Jbergner (talk) 12:49, 30 December 2016 (UTC)

File:LehavreRueFrederickLemaitre.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:LehavreRueFrederickLemaitre.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Culex (talk) 16:11, 11 July 2017 (UTC)

File tagging File:Austin Geschwader.jpg[edit]

dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  euskara  català  magyar  čeština  norsk bokmål  română  lietuvių  español  português  English  hrvatski  Plattdüütsch  français  Nederlands  norsk  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  polski  galego  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Tiếng Việt  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  ಕನ್ನಡ  മലയാളം  ไทย  မြန်မာဘာသာ  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  اردو  العربية  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Austin Geschwader.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:OP}} on file description page.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own or work which is your own but has been previously published.

Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

Sebastian Wallroth (talk) 11:08, 28 April 2018 (UTC)

File:Reggeagraffity.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Reggeagraffity.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:55, 1 September 2018 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Labattblueboy (talk) 21:27, 26 September 2018 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Roy17 (talk) 14:31, 26 July 2019 (UTC)

Bau der vertikalen Grosswindanlage «Vertical Sky® A32» auf dem Windtestfeld in Grevenbroich[edit]

Hallo Bodoklecksel, wäre schön, wenn Du auf einer Deiner gelegentlichen Fotosafaris in der Grevenbroicher Gegend ein paar Aufnahmen von dieser Baustelle: [1] machen und auf Commons veröffentlichen könntest. Siehst Du dafür eine Chance? Gruß --dontworry (talk) 10:41, 15 November 2019 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, VIGNERON (talk) 07:50, 4 October 2020 (UTC)