User talk:JotaCartas

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search

English | Español | Magyar | +/−

Bem-vindo(a) à Wikimedia Commons, JotaCartas!
Afrikaans | Alemannisch | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | বাংলা | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Euskara | Estremeñu | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Frysk | Galego | עברית | हिन्दी | Hrvatski | Magyar | Հայերեն | Interlingua | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | 한국어 | Latina | Lietuvių | Македонски | മലയാളം | मराठी | Bahasa Melayu | Plattdüütsch | नेपाली | Nederlands | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Scots | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Kiswahili | தமிழ் | ไทย | Türkçe | Українська | Vèneto | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | 中文(台灣)‎ | +/−

Contents

File:Light Code VQ.gif[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 00:46, 20 March 2009 (UTC)


File:Light Code Q (3) G 9s.gif[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 01:06, 20 March 2009 (UTC)


File:Light Code IQ R 14s.gif[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 02:02, 20 March 2009 (UTC)


File:Light Code VQ (3) G 4s.gif[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 02:20, 20 March 2009 (UTC)


File:Light Code IUQ R 6s.gif[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 02:38, 20 March 2009 (UTC)


File:Light Code IVQ R 9s.gif[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 02:56, 20 March 2009 (UTC)


File:Light Code Oc R 6s.gif[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 04:21, 20 March 2009 (UTC)


File:Light Code Oc(2+3) W 5s.gif[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 04:38, 20 March 2009 (UTC)


File:Light Code LFl 10s.gif[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 04:55, 20 March 2009 (UTC)


File:Light Code Fl(3) R 15s .gif[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 05:19, 20 March 2009 (UTC)


File:Light Code Fl(2+1) W 5s.gif[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 05:37, 20 March 2009 (UTC)


File:Light Code Al WR.gif[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 05:54, 20 March 2009 (UTC)


File:Light Code Mo(K) Y 4s.gif[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 05:55, 20 March 2009 (UTC)


File:Light Code FFl Y 5s.gif[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 06:54, 20 March 2009 (UTC)

Tip: Categorizing images[edit]

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | magyar | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски / srpski | svenska | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


Hello, JotaCartas!

Tip: Add categories to your images

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

Uploadwizard-categories.png

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations"). Pro-tip: The CommonSense tool can help you find the best category for your image.

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

BotMultichillT 05:58, 4 April 2009 (UTC)

File:Igreja cedofeita.jpg[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 14:21, 3 February 2010 (UTC)

TUSC token aaa9163e1a5c207ad1c800c4af980ed9[edit]

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!

Lighthouses[edit]

Thanks for the note. I've added Guernsey and Mann to the by country cat:. Man vyi (talk) 13:29, 6 March 2010 (UTC)

File:Ana_Gomes-_José_Jorge_Letria.jpg[edit]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Ana_Gomes-_José_Jorge_Letria.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may find Commons:Copyright rules useful. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion.

Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.


Afrikaans | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Luxembourgish | Македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | Malti | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | Українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Lupo 08:08, 18 June 2010 (UTC)

File:Bloco_de_Esquerda-01.jpg[edit]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Bloco_de_Esquerda-01.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may find Commons:Copyright rules useful. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion.

Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.


Afrikaans | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Luxembourgish | Македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | Malti | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | Українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Lupo 08:09, 18 June 2010 (UTC)

File:Bloco_de_Esquerda-02.jpg[edit]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Bloco_de_Esquerda-02.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may find Commons:Copyright rules useful. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion.

Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.


Afrikaans | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Luxembourgish | Македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | Malti | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | Українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Lupo 08:09, 18 June 2010 (UTC)

File:CDU-01.jpg[edit]

Pay attention to copyright
File:CDU-01.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may find Commons:Copyright rules useful. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion.

Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.


Afrikaans | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Luxembourgish | Македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | Malti | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | Українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Lupo 08:09, 18 June 2010 (UTC)

File:CDU-02.jpg[edit]

Pay attention to copyright
File:CDU-02.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may find Commons:Copyright rules useful. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion.

Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.


Afrikaans | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Luxembourgish | Македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | Malti | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | Українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Lupo 08:10, 18 June 2010 (UTC)

File:Fernando_Seara-01.jpg[edit]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Fernando_Seara-01.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may find Commons:Copyright rules useful. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion.

Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.


Afrikaans | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Luxembourgish | Македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | Malti | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | Українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Lupo 08:10, 18 June 2010 (UTC)

File:Fernando_Seara-02.jpg[edit]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Fernando_Seara-02.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may find Commons:Copyright rules useful. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion.

Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.


Afrikaans | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Luxembourgish | Македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | Malti | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | Українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Lupo 08:10, 18 June 2010 (UTC)

Lighthouses[edit]

Hello:

You and I are both working on Category:Lighthouses by name right now -- I'm doing the same things you are, for the whole list -- I'm using AWB, which is faster, so you may want to stop and wait until I am done...      Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 17:21, 23 July 2010 (UTC)


I have already stopped. Sorry, I just wanted to help. I didn’t knew you were using a bot. Hope have not disturbed your work. Best regards, --[[User:JotaCartas|JotaCartas
No problem at all, just trying to save you time.      Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 17:37, 23 July 2010 (UTC)

File:Aqueduto de Pontes 09.jpg[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 16:38, 9 August 2010 (UTC)

Lighthouses in Sweden by name[edit]

Is it really useful to have that category when lighthouses should already be sorted by name in Category:Lighthouses in Sweden? /Ö 14:08, 16 October 2010 (UTC)

1. Hi Ö: it is useful when inside de country category there are others categories (by region/nation/state/etc.) like in Category:Lighthouses in the United States. If inside Category:Lighthouses in Sweden, someone decide to create counties categories (like Lighthouses in Gotland, Lighthouses in Blekinge, Lighthouses in Västernorrland, etc.) then this rule will be justifiable.
2. I am just following established rules (it seems that in the Category:Lighthouses by name there are no single lighthouses categories, only country categories by name - (some months ago it was no so, but someone decide to change that). I am not sure about this rule, but before there were about 1 400 lighthouses ind the Category:Lighthouses by name, not easy to consult also. Best regards. --JotaCartas (talk) 15:58, 16 October 2010 (UTC)

Template:IGESPAR[edit]

Muito obrigado, bom trabalho. Do you think we could create a projecto monumentos históricos português sobre Commons ? Regards, Otourly (talk) 18:35, 19 October 2010 (UTC)

Hi Otourly, thank you (and I mean YOU) for caring about portuguese monumentes. I will gladly support such a project, I have time but maybe I lack attendance, leadership and wikimedia technical knowledge (it took me 1,5 years to complete portuguese lighthouses in Commons, and still missing Madeira island) .. please feel free to contact me on this or others matters. best regards, --JotaCartas (talk) 18:59, 19 October 2010 (UTC)
Visto ! Bem trabalho ! Otourly (talk) 04:37, 25 October 2010 (UTC)
O projecto é nacido: Commons:Projecto Monumentos Portugueses Otourly (talk) 19:25, 27 October 2010 (UTC)

About portuguese monuments[edit]

Hi, we try to start a project on the French Wikipedia. but we need to know something. For example in this notice: [1] in the line cronologia: there is two dates... what are the differences between « decreto » and « DG » ? Muito obrigado. Otourly (talk) 18:15, 13 November 2010 (UTC)

Muito obrigado, fui bem recebido. Otourly (talk) 22:15, 13 November 2010 (UTC)

File:Porto de Leixões - Titã 83.JPG[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 12:24, 21 December 2010 (UTC)


File:Antigo Colegio Maristas (Porto).JPG[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot

File tagging File:Alegreweb.jpg[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Česky | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lietuvių | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Română | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Türkçe | Українська | اردو | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Alegreweb.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own.

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the OTRS-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Alegreweb.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Art-top (talk) 10:30, 27 February 2011 (UTC)

Porto - Recent uploads[edit]

Explica lá pra que serve essa categoria, porque até agora não entendi pra que ela existe Béria Lima msg 10:13, 23 August 2011 (UTC)

File:Elevador Santa Justa nacht 0881.JPG by Alfredte[edit]

Your comment:38° 42' 43.6" N, 9° 8' 21.86" W - Elevador de Santa Justa, também conhecido como Elevador do Carmo, localiza-se na cidade de Lisboa em Portugal. Esta estrutura neogótica foi construída na viragem do século XIX para o XX pelo engenheiro Raoul Mesnier du Ponsard. I love to stay in Portugal, but I dont speak your language. Could you please translate your comment in English, especially "também conhecido como Elevador do Carmo, localiza-se na cidade de Lisboa em Portugal. Esta estrutura neogótica foi construída na viragem" I will add the english and my translated German comment to the picture. Kind regards --Alfredte (talk) 19:23, 25 August 2011 (UTC)alfredte PS: where do you come from in Portugal ? Obrigado for the quick answer. I arrrived at Porto in October 2001 and enjoyed the city in the evening - it was warm after a sunny day. The next day I wanted to explore the city - but there was only rain the whole day. I stood an hour under an umbrella near the cathedral. This day was not funny - but I intend to come back to your very nice town. Perhaps we can meet us then. muitas saudações e à noite linda --Alfredte (talk) 20:36, 25 August 2011 (UTC)alfredte

Revisão de imagens Wiki Loves Monuments[edit]

Olá JotaCartas, obrigado pelas correcções nas imagens do Wiki Loves Monuments. Se puder abusar da boa vontade alheia, posso pedir-te para quando verificares uma imagem da categoria Category:Not reviewed images from Wiki Loves Monuments 2011 in Portugal colocares o parâmetro |yes dentro da predefinição {{WLM-PT}}? Serve para termos uma ideia das fotos que já foram revistas por alguém (categorias incluídas e número de identificação do monumento correcto ou que pelo menos indique um monumento). Já agora, na Esplanada indico uma ferramenta que poderá ajudar nessa revisão. Cumprimentos, GoEThe (talk) 12:16, 9 September 2011 (UTC)

Mais que autorizado ;). Obrigado, GoEThe (talk) 12:36, 9 September 2011 (UTC)
Olá Jota, quando estás na página do utilizador podes ver no menu geral da esquerda, sob "Ferramentas", se tem o sub-menu "contactar este utilizador". Se sim, é porque tem a conta de e-mail activada, caso contrário não pode ser contactado e então essa opção não aparece. Obrigada pela ajuda :) Lusitana (talk) 20:56, 10 September 2011 (UTC)
Olá Jota, sim, é assim que tenho feito também :) Lusitana (talk) 09:36, 11 September 2011 (UTC)

Re : Projecto Monumentos Portugueses[edit]

Olá ! Estou bem ! I also participate to Wiki loves monuments. No worries about the templates, I created them for the project, not for myself ;) I hope you are OK too. Otourly (talk) 16:14, 16 September 2011 (UTC)

Oi JotaCartas. Obrigado pela indicação. As DRAC-RAM e DRAC-RAA são clones da IGESPAR apenas para distinguir, porque não existem IDs RAM nem RAA (sic), mas eu queria distinguir que "são objectos classificados, mas não pelo IGESPAR". -- Nuno Tavares PT 18:42, 16 September 2011 (UTC)

Mudança dos titulos[edit]

OK! Recebi a sua mensagem sobre o renomear os títulos ( nome do ficheiro). Pensei que o titulo era o que se punha na caixa e não o nome do ficheiro. Não me custa nada alterá-lo e já mo podia ter dito, assim não teria, tanto trabalho. As que já estão inseridas vão ter vocês que o fazer. Se existir mais algum problema por favor digam Um abraço António Amen

Anúncio[edit]

Wiki Loves Monuments 2011 Caro JotaCartas, já estamos na recta final do Wiki Loves Monuments 2011!

A partir de hoje, a organização do Wiki Loves Monuments alargou o âmbito do concurso de cerca 5000 monumentos (classificados/protegidos) para cerca de 30000, fruto da parceria com o SIPA - Sistema de Informação para o Património Arquitectónico. A densidade de monumentos perto de si agora é bastante superior, pelo que recomendamos que saia de casa sempre com a máquina pois é bem possível cruzar-se com vários imóveis válidos para o concurso. Procure na lista quais calham em caminho!

Para mais informações, regulamento e ferramentas de ajuda, consulte o site oficial em http://www.wikilovesmonuments.org.pt

Wikimedia Portugal.svg
Messagem enviada em 09:28, 27 September 2011 (UTC) usando Lucia Bot, se tem alguma dúvida por favor contacte um dos organizadores.

Ferramenta de verificação[edit]

Olá JotaCartas. Desde já agradeço a ajuda na validação das imagens. Criámos uma ferramenta para acelerar o processo (estamos atentos ao elevado número de fotografias!). Por favor, envie-me um e-mail (pode ser via Special:Emailuser/Nuno Tavares) para lhe enviar as instruções como activar a ferramentas. Saudações, -- Nuno Tavares PT 22:04, 28 September 2011 (UTC)

Strange categories[edit]

This user seems to create mainly self categorized categories. Best. --Foroa (talk) 05:21, 2 October 2011 (UTC)

Strange categories/ Nelson Teixeira[edit]

Oi Jota. obrigado pela sua nota, estou só à espera do OK da Béria (talvez ela tenha uma solução mais ágil), acho mesmo que vou precisar de ajuda :( Abrç. Nelson Teixeira talk 19:51, 2 October 2011 (UTC)

Viva, passados alguns dias sobre o despoletar do assunto a Béria ainda não respondeu (talvez não seja assim tão urgente), no entanto eu já fiz algumas poucas correcções, algumas das categorias são coincidentes com as suas, pelo que na maior parte dos casos apenas é necessário recategorizar as imagens. A categoria que fica vazia (a errada) que eu deixo marcada com {{category redirect|new name}} têm vindo a ser eliminadas pela Foroa, mas não todas pelo que vou continuar a proceder do mesmo modo. Infelizmente esta semana eu tenho muito pouco tempo livre e uma montanha de assuntos que foram deixados para traz na WIKI:PT, nomeadamente o artigo Acidente do ônibus espacial Columbia que finaliza a votação para Artigo Destacado, no próximo dia 13 e têm estado abandonado. Assim se vc puder pelo menos verificar as alterações que eu fiz e confirmar se estão correctas, já seria uma grande ajuda que eu agradeço efusivamente. Cumprimentos. --Nelson Teixeira talk 09:21, 4 October 2011 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Monuments 2011 has finished[edit]

Logo Wiki Loves Monuments 2011 català | dansk | Deutsch | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | français | galego | magyar | Lëtzebuergesch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk bokmål | polski | português | română | русский | svenska | +/−

Dear JotaCartas,

Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments and sharing your pictures with the whole world. You are very welcome to keep uploading images, even though you can't win prizes any longer. To get started on editing relevant Wikipedia articles, click here for more information and help.
You can find all uploaded pictures in our central media collection Wikimedia Commons. Many photos are already used in Wikipedia. The contest was very successful with more than 165,000 images submitted throughout Europe. To make future contests even more successful, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in this survey.

Kind regards,
the Wiki Loves Monuments team

Map of participating countries of Wiki Loves Monuments 2011
Message delivered by Lucia Bot in 22:34, 17 October 2011 (UTC)

Categories in Portuguese name-space[edit]

Hello JotaCartas. I will apologize firstly for not communicating in Portuguese, as my Portuguese skills are not as eloquent as yours (although a native Portuguese, I spent most of my life in Canada). Regarding your comments on my talkpage about recategorization: I have already addressed your point on the Commons:Categories for discussion/2011/10/Category:Cathedrals in Portugal, with my aspiration to rename all categories into a format that corresponds to the Commons:Language policy. You may have noticed that I have already begun this process, and have gone as far as Leiria district on Religious buildings. I comprehend that the WikiLoves project was important in expanding the Portuguese content on Wikimedia Commons, but it should not preclude valid naming, as stipulated in that Language policy. I am not, on the other hand, a strict purist, since it would water-down the discovery. I have already addressed this points with other administrators, and used the Commons:Categories for discussion in order to address this point. Ruben JC (Zeorymer) (talk) 17:03, 8 November 2011 (UTC)

Sincerely, all your points and examples are justifiable. It is not my intention to specifically alter all names into a English variant: as I said I am not a purist. You will notice that the name changes that I have instituted only replace the more obvious translations: for example "Church of...", "Chapel of...", "Castle of...", and do not alter the sacred-cows of the Portuguese language. I refer you to your examples for make my point: "Vila da Feira" = "Feira (Santa Maria da Feira)"; "Castelo do Queijo" = "Fort of São Francisco Xavier do Queijo (Porto)"; "Casa do Infante" = "House of the Infante (Porto)". I should be clear, that this technique developed more from the extremists on the project: I have encountered editors on the both sides of this divide who have promoted a nationalist-centric method of naming: those who purposely convert all categories into English, and those who don't even attempt to follow the Commons:Language policy, nor justify their uni-lingual naming. The result was conflict. Unfortunately Wikimedia is not multilingual (except on Pages). I note, that eventually, someone will raise the issue of the Commons:Language policy on the subcategories in French-, German- and Spanish-oriented sections in the future, and there will be edit-warring. But, that last point is a personal opinion only. Ruben JC (Zeorymer) (talk) 19:00, 8 November 2011 (UTC)


Category:Faro Cabo de San Sebastian[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Category:Faro Cabo de San Sebastian has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

JuTa 20:29, 15 November 2011 (UTC)

TUSC token 51dee655e59f5612cf084f63dd2dec1a[edit]

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!

New message[edit]

At least one new message has been posted here: Commons:Help_desk#Image_from_de.WP_to_Commons --Tito Dutta (Send me a message) 09:00, 23 July 2012 (UTC)

You have a new message in help page (link above)! --Tito Dutta (Send me a message) 09:29, 23 July 2012 (UTC)

File:Paisagem no choupal, Coimbra.jpg[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 09:18, 23 August 2012 (UTC)

Our Lady of Limpet[edit]

Olá Jotacartas!

Vi esta sua edição, e fiquei curioso sobre onde foi buscar essa informação. Isso é mesmo assim, um sinónimo? Ou é como a Our Lady of Sorrows que tem 30 nomes em português (Angústias, Dores, Piedade, etc etc)? É que mais tarde ou mais cedo algum gringo vai trocar o nome da cat para "Our Lady of Limpet", e convém saber se é legítimo ou não. Se for, até se troca já. Abraço, --- Darwin Ahoy! 02:39, 28 August 2012 (UTC)

Que parvoíce, pois claro que limpet é o bicho, e a Lapa aqui é evidentemente no sentido de "rocha", e nem sei se tem tradução fácil. Logo vi que tinha que ter o dedo do Zeorymer, ele é perito nessas traduções apressadas (mas apesar de tudo, fez uma coisinha jeitosa lá na wiki-en no artigo dessa Capela da Lapa). É por essas e por outras que eu detesto a mania de tentarem encaixar à força os nomes dos nossos edifícios e monumentos no inglês, é foleirice que se dá a comer a turistas de 5ª categoria, não a leitores de uma enciclopédia. Eu tenho uma réplica dum postal aqui, do início do século XX, que na legenda chama à nossa Fonte do Monte (um fontanário bastante conhecido, na freguesia do Monte), source in the mount. E nem é preciso ir mais longe, basta ver que o nosso Curral das Freiras aparece numa série de roteiros como "Nuns Valley", que parece que veio substituir o "Grand Corral" dos tempos do turismo vitoriano. E volta e meia aparecem umas almas iluminadas que pegam nessas "fontes" e usam para mostrar que existe nome inglês estabelecido. Traduções de nomes próprios de lugares, edifícios e monumentos não são minimamente aceitáveis, a menos que sejam do conhecimento universal, como Lisbon, e não derivem de algum equívoco cretino como "Oporto".
Com as designações da virgem, é igual. Eu julgo que nunca devem ser traduzidas, a menos que seja uma designação comprovadamente internacional, como Guadalupe ou Lurdes. Isto de tentar encaixar as tradições de um país católico na língua bárbara de um país maioritariamente protestante com pouco em comum, não pode dar bom, o correcto é deixar em português e nem nos preocuparmos mais com o assunto. E quem não gostar, que arranje fonte sólida que demonstre que de facto há tradução directa (e não genérica, como de Piedade para Sorrows).
Em relação ao Benoliel e ao Arquivo de Lisboa... Pois, parece que alguém teve as vistas curtas e tratou de meter a marca de água naquilo tudo, apesar de serem já amostras de baixa qualidade. Eu quando comecei a carregar o Benoliel não estava assim, e ainda tenho aqui uma série delas que tirei mas não cheguei a carregar, e que estão normais. Com alguma sorte, ainda se conseguem encontrar sem a marca de água pela net, pelo menos algumas delas. Tirei duas amostras de lá, e ambas estão online ainda sem a marca de água em sites de terceiros - uma aqui, e outra aqui (Largo do Conde Barão e Rua dos Bacalhoeiros). Eu quando comecei a carregar nunca pensei que eles fossem destruir as amostras com aquela marca de água horrenda, senão tinha me empenhado mais na coisa, que estava a dar um bocado de trabalho e acabou por ficar para as Calendas Gregas, até porque tenho um outro repositório para transferir para cá (e este inclusivamente com o conhecimento de quem o mantém, embora não seja necessário, como se sabe), que é o do site Arquipélagos, com milhares de imagens em domínio público em especial sobre os arquipélagos atlânticos e o Império, mas também de Portugal em geral.
O ideal, no caso do Arquivo da CML, era contactar a Wikimedia Portuguesa e de forma oficial tentar estabelecer um protocolo com a CML. Eu fiz isso com a Câmara de Loures, embora de modo informal, e eles ficaram extremamente interessados em colaborar connosco e fornecer o que tivessem de imagens históricas do concelho em domínio público. Infelizmente não pude dar continuidade a isso para já, pois agora estou no Funchal, mas se alguém da zona de Lisboa tivesse interesse, podia fazer o mesmo com a CML (e até dar continuidade a esse projecto de Loures?).
É uma chatice a Internet ser algo tão volátil. Num dia tínhamos essas imagens todas em condições razoáveis de utilização, agora está tudo conspurcado com essa marca de água. De qualquer modo, é melhor tê-las cá mesmo com a marca de água que não as ter, pelo que nesse aspecto podem ser carregadas sem problemas, apenas colocando a {{watermark}}. Claro que o ideal seria, como disse acima, fazer um protocolo ou embaixada com a CML e tentar conseguir as amostras "limpas", até porque ao carrega-las aqui não somos "nós" que ganhamos, quem ganha é a humanidade e a CML, que tem o serviço de arquivo divulgado internacionalmente a custo zero. Abraço, --- Darwin Ahoy! 01:04, 29 August 2012 (UTC)

PD-old-70[edit]

Olá Jotacartas, nem de propósito. Ainda há pouco abri um tópico no COM:VPC relacionado de perto com esse assunto. Não sei se sabe, mas um restauro de copyrights levado a cabo nos EUA em 1996 de modo infeliz e atabalhoado (o URAA) veio colocar dentro de copyright nos EUA tudo o que na altura estava em copyright em Portugal, estendendo esse copyright entre 1923 e 1978 aos termos absurdos dos EUA na época, entre 95 e 120 anos. À partida a PD-old-70 basicamente nem poderia ser mais usada para material daqui, já que as primeiras coisas que entrariam em DP nos EUA seriam-no só em 2019, mesmo já estando em domínio público aqui e em todo o lado há imenso tempo. Entretanto, descobri que a nossa lei só passou a 70 anos de protecção em 1997, pelo que o que parece ter sido restaurado em 1996 são apenas os copyrights de 50 anos, que no caso das fotografias até são apenas 25, e parece que nos vamos safar dos efeitos dessa bestialidade gringa. Como ainda não há nenhuma tag específica para esse material, julgo que por enquanto se pode usar a PD-old-70, quando é pseudónimo ou obra de pessoa colectiva, ou a PD-EU-anonymous quando é obra realmente anónima. Se tudo correr como espero, em breve teremos uma licença específica que nos vai livrar por uns bons anos dessa parvoíce de ter gringos a postular sobre o que é ou não domínio público na terra dos outros. Abraço, --- Darwin Ahoy! 10:58, 21 September 2012 (UTC)

Olá Jotacartas, fiz uma chave dicotómica para facilitar a escolha da licença adequada nos casos de obras publicadas em Portugal - User:Darwinius/CDLicPortugal - Espero que isto responda à sua pergunta e facilite a escolha da licença certa em outras situações semelhantes. De facto esta história do licenciamento aqui no Commons é um labirinto terrível, e basta qualquer deslize que a imagem, mesmo não sendo violação de copyright, corre o risco de ser eliminada... Mas seguindo estes passos, creio que ficam vacinadas contra esse tipo de situações. Abraço,--- Darwin Ahoy! 18:21, 22 September 2012 (UTC)

Duvida sobre Copyright de Livro publicado em 1922 - Jaime Cortesão[edit]

Viva Darwinius, uma dúvida que tem a ver com um livro online da internet aqui.

  • A página afirma "NOT_IN_COPYRIGHT", possivelmente porque foi publicado em 1922, mas o autor, Jaime Cortesão, morreu em 1960 (há 52 anos) donde, não está no Domínio Público em Portugal - Certo?
  • Assim, não poderia ser carregado na Commons, ou pode?
  • E no caso de poder, não poderá ser usado na pt.WP nem na pt.Wikisource? Obrigado desde já. --JotaCartas (talk) 05:52, 29 September 2012 (UTC)
R: Olá JotaCartas, o texto de facto não está no DP em Portugal, e não pode ser carregado em nenhum destes projectos, mas parece-me que as gravuras todas ou quase todas são reproduções de material mais antigo e no DP. Creio que essas sim, podem ser carregadas, mas convém antes tentar averiguar a sua proveniência.--- Darwin Ahoy! 08:12, 29 September 2012 (UTC)
P: OK .. era o que eu pensava, mas .. na dúvida mais vale perguntar . Obrigado. --JotaCartas (talk) 08:40, 29 September 2012 (UTC)

User:Darwinius/CDLicPortugal - (gralha?)[edit]

Viva de novo, cá estou eu a incomodar. Nas suas instruções User:Darwinius/CDLicPortugal está indicado nos pontos 5.1.1 e 5.1.2 o template *{{PD-old-auto-1929|ano da publicação ou divulgação}}, mas esse não existe. Penso que que pretendia dizer *{{PD-old-auto-1923|ano da publicação ou divulgação}}. Foi esse que usei nesta foto File:Antomio Jose Almeida 1919.jpg - pode verificar se está tudo Ok. Abraço --JotaCartas (talk) 10:22, 1 October 2012 (UTC)

R: Olá, deve ser o PD-old-1923-auto... Eu nunca uso isso assim justamente por ter uma sintaxe confusa, prefiro usr o redirect que é muito mais simples: {{PD/1923|[ano]}}. Esses casos das fotos anónimas não estão bem ainda, deveria ser usado o {{PD-1923}} junto com um {{PD-EU-Anonymous}}. Eu não acertei isso ainda porque o {{PD-EU-Anonymous}} não cobre todas as situações, e andava com a ideia de fazer uma espécie de PD-1923 para anónimos e colectivos, mas ainda não tive pachorra. :| --- Darwin Ahoy! 10:28, 1 October 2012 (UTC)
P: {{PD-old-auto-1923|19xx}} = {{PD/1923|19xx}}

Re: Cultural heritage monuments in Portugal[edit]

OK, Jota. Vou dar uma vista de olhos e ver se posso dar uma ajuda. (Já agora, adorei o "Our Lady of Limpets" aí acima). Abraço, GoEThe (talk) 10:05, 24 October 2012 (UTC)

Notifying you of an image removal under the DMCA[edit]

An image that you uploaded to http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Pa_-_Serralves.jpg was removed based on the receipt of a takedown notice made pursuant to the Digital Millennium Copyright Act, 17 U.S.C. 512 (the “DMCA”). The Wikimedia Foundation (“WMF”) takes alleged copyright infringement very seriously and carefully examines each takedown notice received and the image in question for compliance with U.S. copyright law. This image was one of 59 photographs included in a DMCA takedown notice received by WMF of various publicly-installed sculptures around the world created by Claes Oldenburg and Coosje van Bruggen.

Some of these sculptures are located in countries that recognize “freedom of panorama” for sculptures, while others are not. Currently, U.S. copyright law does not recognize freedom of panorama for works of art, such as sculptures, and thus the copyright holder of a sculpture has the right to exclude others from publishing images of that sculpture, so long as it still enjoys copyright protection. While it is true that some of the sculptures in question here are located in countries whose copyright regime conflicts with the U.S’s regime, current U.S. conflict of law principles indicate that U.S. copyright law would apply in evaluating the scope of a copyright holder’s rights.

WMF strongly supports a change in U.S. copyright law that would extend freedom of panorama to artwork so that more people can experience beautiful and thought-provoking works of art that they would not otherwise be able to enjoy. However, WMF is a U.S.-based organization that must comply with U.S. laws as they presently exist, including U.S. copyright law, conflict of law principles, and the DMCA.

What can you do?[edit]

If you want to express your support for the extension of freedom of panorama to works of art (and you are a resident of the United States), you can write your U.S. senators and/or representative.

If you feel that this particular image does not infringe the alleged copyright holder’s rights, you can contest the takedown notice by submitting a “counter-notice” to us. Before doing so, you should understand your legal position and you may wish to consult with an attorney. If you submit a counter-notice, the alleged copyright holder can stop us from restoring the content by suing you. Please note that WMF will not be a party to any legal action that arises from you sending a counter-notice, and that WMF is unable to provide you with legal advice.

More information on DMCA compliance may also be found at:

Filing a Counter-Notice[edit]

If you choose to submit a counter-notice, you must send a letter to legal@wikimedia.org asking WMF to restore this image. The letter must comply with DMCA standards and must contain the following:

  • A link to where the content was before we took it down;
  • A statement, under penalty of perjury, that you believe the content was taken down mistakenly;
  • Your name, address, and phone number;
  • If your address is in the United States, a statement that says “I consent to the jurisdiction of the Federal District Court in the district where my address is located, and I will accept service of process from the person who complained about the content I posted”; or if your address is outside the United States, a statement that says “I agree to accept service of process in any jurisdiction where I can be found”; and finally,
  • Your physical or electronic signature.

Pursuant to the DMCA, WMF must inform the alleged copyright holder that you sent us a counter-notice and give the alleged copyright holder a copy of the counter-notice. We will restore this image within ten (10) to fourteen (14) business days, provided that the alleged copyright holder does not give notice of suit to restrain re-posting of the material. Philippe Beaudette, Wikimedia Foundation (talk) 21:23, 9 November 2012 (UTC)

Dúvida[edit]

Olá!

Não tenho lá muita prática na parte "administrativa" do Commons e por isso gostaria de uma ajuda sua. O usuário Mhmrodrigues (talk · contribs) excluiu da categoria House of Braganza 29 itens referentes à família imperial do Brasil, deixando lá apenas itens referentes à família real portuguesa. Ora, fotos de dom Pedro II, da princesa Isabel, da princesa Maria Amélia (filha de dom Pedro I) e dos filhos da princesa Leopoldina (netos de dom Pedro II e, durante algum tempo, herdeiros do trono do Brasil) estavam naquela categoria porque essas pessoas pertenciam à Casa de Bragança (lembrando que, somente os descendentes da princesa Isabel é que passaram a formar a Casa de Orléans e Bragança, mas não seus ascendentes). Como o usuário não justificou a exclusão nos respectivos sumários de edição e por não dominar a "maquinária" do Commons, gostaria que você me orientasse sobre isso (estaria eu errado?). Desde já agradeço. Boas! Biólogo 32 What? 00:21, 14 December 2012 (UTC)

File:Peneda-Gerês National Park, Portugal (5145621388).jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Peneda-Gerês National Park, Portugal (5145621388).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Morning (talk) 10:29, 24 February 2013 (UTC)


Don't overwrite images[edit]

Hi JotaCartas, please don't overwrite images as you did in case of File:Around the lighthouse.jpeg seven times! -- Ies (talk) 16:07, 20 March 2013 (UTC)

File:Dungeon Portuguese Castle.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Dungeon Portuguese Castle.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Sven Manguard Wha? 16:43, 17 May 2013 (UTC)

File:Aeroporto Maputo.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:2006 night Maputo Mozambique 203789466.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Ramaksoud2000 (talk) 23:43, 21 May 2013 (UTC)

Probleminha[edit]

Oi Jota, bom dia! Alguma coisa não deu certo na sua última passagem com o AWB! Veja esta imagem, por exemplo. José Luiz disc 11:35, 21 June 2013 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:

Eleassar (t/p) 07:11, 16 October 2013 (UTC)

File:Mozambique Island - Garden of Memory.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Mozambique Island - Garden of Memory.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Eleassar (t/p) 19:31, 1 December 2013 (UTC)

File:Vasco da Gama - Ilha Moçambique.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Vasco da Gama - Ilha Moçambique.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Eleassar (t/p) 20:40, 1 December 2013 (UTC)

File:Aeroporto Maputo.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Aeroporto Maputo.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Eleassar (t/p) 21:22, 1 December 2013 (UTC)

File:Universidade Eduardo Mondlane.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Universidade Eduardo Mondlane.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Eleassar (t/p) 21:26, 1 December 2013 (UTC)

File:Villa Algarve.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Villa Algarve.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Eleassar (t/p) 21:28, 1 December 2013 (UTC)

File:Teatro Gil Vicente.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Teatro Gil Vicente.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Eleassar (t/p) 21:49, 1 December 2013 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Eleassar (t/p) 22:03, 1 December 2013 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Eleassar (t/p) 22:27, 1 December 2013 (UTC)

File:Ministério dos Negocios Estrangeiros.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Ministério dos Negocios Estrangeiros.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

- Darwin Ahoy! 05:11, 9 December 2013 (UTC)

File:Edificio Abreu Santos e Rocha - Wall.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Edificio Abreu Santos e Rocha - Wall.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

- Darwin Ahoy! 17:50, 9 December 2013 (UTC)

File:Edificio Abreu Santos e Rocha.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Edificio Abreu Santos e Rocha.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

- Darwin Ahoy! 19:00, 9 December 2013 (UTC)

File:Conselho Municipal de Maputo-02.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Conselho Municipal de Maputo-02.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

- Darwin Ahoy! 15:56, 12 December 2013 (UTC)

File:Edifício dos Correios.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Edifício dos Correios.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

- Darwin Ahoy! 14:25, 14 December 2013 (UTC)

File:Sugar 5 - spraying (4749669120).jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Sugar 5 - spraying (4749669120).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

- Darwin Ahoy! 21:20, 16 December 2013 (UTC)

Moçambique[edit]

Olá JotaCartas, desculpa lá encher-te a talk de avisos de delecção, mas temos de respeitar esta chatice da lei Moçambicana não permitir FOP. De qualquer modo, não queria que isso de modo algum afectasse o trabalho que tens estado a fazer de popular o Commons com material Moçambicano. Em caso de dúvida de alguma imagem poder ou não vir para cá, podes sempre pedir-me ajuda. Abraço, --- Darwin Ahoy! 23:13, 16 December 2013 (UTC)

Já agora, tudo o que encontrares anterior a 1975 pode vir, pois aí não entra a FOP Moçambicana. Tudo o que for anterior a 2001 (data de publicação) possivelmente estará OK também. Além disso, qualquer edifício com linhas básicas (como são a maioria deles) também não deverá estar coberta pela FOP. Em caso de dúvida carrega cá e pergunta, ou envia tu mesmo para DR. Abraço, --- Darwin Ahoy! 01:49, 17 December 2013 (UTC)

File:Wall painting of man and woman (9504380106).jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Wall painting of man and woman (9504380106).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

- Darwin Ahoy! 05:22, 17 December 2013 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:


Yours sincerely - Darwin Ahoy! 11:17, 18 December 2013 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:


Yours sincerely - Darwin Ahoy! 11:36, 20 December 2013 (UTC)

File:1920 - Guimaraes (8647973520).jpg[edit]

Hi, are you sure the categories you added here [2] are ok? I can't find any mention of the years 1902 and 1929 in the image or at the source page. --Eleassar (t/p) 09:52, 11 January 2014 (UTC)

Hi, of course it was my error (late in the night). corrected! Thanks, best regards --JotaCartas (talk) 10:24, 11 January 2014 (UTC)

Santa Clara Lighthouse[edit]

Oi. I don't understand the need to interlink the Santa Clara Lighthouse and the Torre de Belém Lighthouse imagery: one is located Santa Clara (Ponta Delgada) and the other in Lisbon. If there is a familiarity between both, then imagery on the Torre de Belem page would show this, and it does not. I live in Ponta Delgada, know its location and have taken some of the images of this light: there can be no doubt that those images can not be confused with the light in Santa Maria de Belém. At one point you tagged one of the Santa Clara Lighthouse images with the "Torre de Belem" subcategory: once again, what is the relationship/rationale? ruben jc ZEORYMER (talk) 10:40, 19 January 2014 (UTC)

Jota, o que foi a sua intenção com o comentário na minha página pessoal? Nunca respondestes aqui, nem na minha, sobre alguma problema especifico com a minha pergunta em cima. ruben jc ZEORYMER (talk) 13:04, 25 January 2014 (UTC)

Picture of the Year 2013 R1 Announcement[edit]

Round 1 of Picture of the Year 2013 is open![edit]

2012 Picture of the Year: A pair of European Bee-eaters in Ariège, France.

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2013 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eighth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2013) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topical categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you may vote for as many images as you like. The top 30 overall and the most popular image in each category will continue to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just one image to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 1 will end on . Click here to learn more and vote »

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2012 Picture of the Year contest.

Category:Tram_rail_tracks_in_Porto[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Category:Tram_rail_tracks_in_Porto has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Deutsch | English | Español | Français | עברית | Magyar | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | Polski | Português | Русский | +/−

-- Tuválkin 19:46, 27 January 2014 (UTC)

File:Elevador da Bica de lado (rot.97½°) cropped.jpg[edit]

Message tied up in Ribbon.jpg Hello, JotaCartas. You have new messages at Tuvalkin's talk page.
You may remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Asturianu | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | বাংলা | Català | Čeština | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | Español | Suomi | Français | Galego | हिन्दी | Magyar | Italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Português | Română | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Türkçe | +/−

File:Casquette-IMG 0922.jpg[edit]

Hello,

regarding File:Casquette-IMG 0922.jpg, I understand that this cap has all the appearance of that of a general officer in armed forces, but it is in fact that of a préfet, a type of high-ranking civil servant in the French administration. They wear uniforms for official occasions, but they are not part of the military -- just like members of the Académie française have a uniform and even a ceremonial weapon irrespective of whether they have served in the military or not.

Thank you for your understanding and best regards, Rama (talk) 17:05, 25 February 2014 (UTC)

Hi, thanks for the correction. I have been moving more than 200 files from "Peaked caps" to "Military peaked caps", and inevitably I made some mistakes. In this case, I was misled because the file is also in the category "Musée de l'armée". Also, I only noticed now that you had reverted it before. Again, sorry and thank you. --JotaCartas (talk) 17:30, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
No sweat, really. Thank you for your much-appreciated work of categorisation, a good part of the good side of Commons rests on unglamourous but useful work like that.
Cheers and good continuation! Rama (talk) 07:14, 26 February 2014 (UTC)

Category:Two of[edit]

Salut, JotaCartas (il m'est plus simple d'écrire en français, qu'en anglais, et j'ai vu que tu le lis). Tu pouvais bien laisser les photos de Belém dans la catégorie: je les avais tout simplement réunies sous un attribut "|Belém" pour faire un peu d'ordre. En effet, j'ai créé hier cette catégorie un peu par caprice, un peu pour voir l'effet d'une séquence casuelle d'objects liés entre eux seulement par une qualité absoluement abstraite comme être "Two of" quelque chose, quelle que ce soit. Il s'agit enfin surtout d'un divertissement, mais comme ça occupe un espace publique chacun a tout le droit de l'utiliser, et ça pourrait même enrichir l'affaire. Fais donc ce que tu crois mieux; je te remercie quand même pour ton attention :). -Lalupa (talk) 18:10, 3 March 2014 (UTC)
P.S. Salue pou moi ton beau pays, si tu y vit.

Panoramic images[edit]

Generally, panoramic photos are seen as images that have been stitched together from several images. Many of the images that you are now categorising as being panoramic images are not stitched from several images but just straightforward photos which might have been cropped such that they look like panoramic -stitched- photos. See en:Panorama#Photographs for more info. - Takeaway (talk) 19:28, 30 March 2014 (UTC)

Categorization[edit]

Thank you for your help with categorizing aircraft. I was just wondering about these two edits: Edit 1 and Edit 2. Both of images are of aircraft clearly identified, their registration appear both in the file name and can be clearly seen in the image. Why not categorize them to their unique category? (See my categorization)Oyoyoy (talk) 17:03, 26 April 2014 (UTC)

Hi, you are right, but I will try to explain my actions here. I came to category Aircraft 2/3 weeks ago by chance, and noticed that it was very crowded (about 8.5000 photos). I knew nothing or very little about aircraft and my intention was to move at least one category down for a great number of photos. I moved all the pictures of helicopters to the category Helicopters, not minding to try to put them in its unique category. I did the same about Gliders, Boeing, Airbus, Military aircraft and many more. As today, "Aircraft" has now about 2.500 photos. I did this hoping that people with more knowledge about helicopters put them (in the future) in its proper category, and the same about all the other moves I made.
Just yesterday I moved more than 500 photos to "Aircraft at London Heathrow Airport", and to do so, it was not possible to examine every photo to put it in its unique category. I am using "CatScan", "Autowikibrowser" worksheets "Exel", and all the help I can get from database tools to perform this, not minding each photo, treating them as groups.
As an example, you can see here that there are 490 (almost hidden) photos of aircraft in Heathrow Airport, that I can transfer (in one move) to category "Aircraft" and category "Aircraft at London Heathrow Airport", not minding each specific photo (5 minutes), or examine one by one and try to put them in the more specific category according to my best knowledge (5 hours ???). Where they are, nobody know they exist. If I move them to "Aircraft", someone can find them (p.ex. some Boeing aircraft) and classified them in its proper categories. «... that is the question» ???
I understand that, using my method, at the end, each photo will have four or five editions instead of one, if it was moved directly to is unique category and all related categories (like location and operator). As I said, I was doing "mass transfers", and indeed I am not sure that I am using the the correct way. By now, I start to know a little more about aircraft and maybe I should start classifying has you propose, witch I really started already to do in some cases.
Indeed I prefer "mass transfers" than examine each picture one by one; it is a matter of personal preference. Well, this is already very long. Please express your opinion if you wish so (I do not write English well, but I understand it very well). Best regards. --JotaCartas (talk) 03:50, 27 April 2014 (UTC)
I truly appreciate you effort, but this is not helping, just causing me and other editors double work. If you'll go back just a month in history, you'll see that I've emptied the category "aircraft" after very much effort, each image to exact categories as possible. Categorizing aircraft is not difficult, and I'll be happy to assist you to learn the trade, but please don't create extra work. It is best to find all image of aircraft that need categorization in one big category, instead of looking for them all over the category tree. Oyoyoy (talk) 04:52, 27 April 2014 (UTC)
OK, I understand, and indeed I was already thinking that perhaps I was disrupting the work of others instead of helping. I am not new in commons, so I understand it clearly, but until now I have been classifying things I new about (mostly my town and my country). I will stop "my kind" of classification, but I will gladly continue to help in classifying aircraft "more slowly" the way you referred. One question: should the above referred 490 aircraft be moved to category "Aircraft", and only to that one? I think they should, but I will respect your opinion. Thank you. --JotaCartas (talk) 05:18, 27 April 2014 (UTC)
Thank you for the kind response. I agree that those images should be moved to the aircraft category, or otherwise, categorized individually. You are welcome to join in the effort to categorize aircraft, I'll appreciate any help in this unending chore. Oyoyoy (talk) 08:11, 27 April 2014 (UTC)

Category:Sunset_files_used_(JotaCartas)[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Category:Sunset_files_used_(JotaCartas) has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Deutsch | English | Español | Français | עברית | Magyar | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | Polski | Português | Русский | +/−

P 1 9 9   14:50, 20 May 2014 (UTC)

Please use sub-categories[edit]

dansk | Deutsch | English | español | suomi | français | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk bokmål | polski | русский | svenska | +/−


Over-categorization.svg
Start hand.svg
When categorising files, please avoid placing them into several categories that are directly linked within the same tree (e.g. a parent category and a child category – like Category:United Kingdom and Category:London), to prevent over-categorization of files and over-population of categories. Usually, only the most specific category should be used. See Commons:Categories for more details. Thank you.

––Apalsola tc 14:44, 21 June 2014 (UTC)

File:64739 10150619595839143 464683901 n (7874717192).jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:64739 10150619595839143 464683901 n (7874717192).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Pierpao.lo (listening) 03:59, 6 July 2014 (UTC)

File:Graffiti Porto (5076273558).jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Graffiti Porto (5076273558).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Pierpao.lo (listening) 12:17, 11 July 2014 (UTC)

File:Graffiti stencil Porto (5351807730).jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Graffiti stencil Porto (5351807730).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Pierpao.lo (listening) 12:28, 11 July 2014 (UTC)

File tagging File:Irina Shayk 2011.jpg[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Česky | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lietuvių | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Română | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Türkçe | Українська | اردو | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Irina Shayk 2011.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own.

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the OTRS-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Irina Shayk 2011.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Humatiel (talk) 18:00, 18 July 2014 (UTC)


absurd, ridiculous[edit]

keep calm! Don't have to be rude. The reason I have crated this "absurd, ridiculous" category was to select the files with more links to Wikipedias in order to include them in the page Sunsets, assuming they are the more representative (wich could not be true), but is a criteria like any other. I don't understand why you assume I want to get the ownership of the files? It say "Sunsets files used" an abbreviation for "Sunsets files more used in other wikipedias". The "(JotaCartas)" is there to sate that That is a personal category for "work" purposes. I think there is nothing more to say. --JotaCartas (talk) 17:52, 24 July 2014 (UTC)

  • Oh....I think there's plenty more to say. Commons has become more and more accessible to those who have jealousy issues regarding other photographer's work, and where that work is displayed. I am calm, but I'm not happy. You contradict yourself in the discussion page. You post there that you agree the category should be removed, and then you do nothing about it, and in all irony you were the one that created the category. Over the years, I have donated almost 100 photos to Commons. However, because of editors like you, I will never donate another photograph to this site. In my humble opinion, no one belongs tinkering in a photo file, but the person who took the photo, or the one whom up-loaded it, unless an admin has to go in and make a correction. PERIOD.-Pocketthis (talk) 18:19, 24 July 2014 (UTC)
    • P.S. If every editor created a category for his user gallery page, think of the insanity that would cause here. Do the right thing, think logically, and remove all of your personal categories.-Pocketthis (talk) 18:19, 24 July 2014 (UTC)
Pictogram voting info.svg Info There's no rule that prevents a user to add a temporary category for work purposes. Frankly, I don't see any problem, we have tons of maintenance categories, some have been created by users for a very specific job they want to tackle. Adding his name to the cat is no problem either, it's clearly indicating who's working on it. That's about it from an admin-standpoint. Best regards, --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 18:50, 24 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Please allow me to share a short story: This morning I get an email from a friend who was on the "Sun" article in Wiki.org. He said: "it appears that someone has hijacked the ownership of one of your Sunset photos: Actual Sunset". I went to the article, and when I clicked on the photo, I got the "new Viewer" version of the photo. The problem isn't so much the category, as it is where it showes up on the viewing page. It comes up on the right side right under the user that uploaded it. When you read the categories in that sentence, it appears like the photo was submitted and taken by JotaCartas. If the Categories were to be lowered to the place they belong, which in my opinion is "Uses", it could reluctantly work. JotaCartas has closed the category today due to public opinion, and what he perceived to be "rudeness" on my part. Personally, I think Commons is just too Liberal on Photo issues. I don't think "anyone" belongs in anothers photo file, unless it's an admin making a correction. As far as the category situation is concerned in my opinion; a category is the place on Commons where a particular photo belongs....PERIOD. If folks want to play in their sandboxes with designing a userpage or just using a photo to express an idea or mood for his userpage, that's just fine. Evan a user page with 800 photos of others work is fine in a "Gallery Setting". However, everyone being able to move photos, create new categories for photos (especially categories that include a user's name.......NO WAY! It opens up too many areas for abuse. My days uploading photos here on Commons is over because I'm too tired of discussions just like this one. As far as I'm concerned, "Its Anything Goes On Commons". That's about it from a user's-standpoint, and other photographers standpoints as well. I am not the only photo contributor that won't be uploading here anymore.-Pocketthis (talk) 20:21, 24 July 2014 (UTC)

Eine Tasse Tee für dich![edit]

Meissen-teacup pinkrose01.jpg Relax with a nice cup'o tea! :) Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 18:52, 24 July 2014 (UTC)

Delete[edit]

File:James Rodriguez Official Photo.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:James Rodriguez Official Photo.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Delete Es Hoy![edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Un archivo ha sido listado en Commons:Solicitud de borrado para que la comunidad pueda discutir si debería ser conservado o borrado. Agradeceríamos fueras a dar tu opinión acerca de esto en su consulta.

Si has creado este archivo, por favor, ten en cuenta que el hecho de que haya sido propuesto para borrado no significa que no valoramos tus contribuciones, esto simplemente significa que una persona cree que hay algún problema específico con él, como un problema de derechos de autor.
En todo caso, por favor, no tomes la solicitud de borrado como personal, no es nuestra intención que lo sea. ¡Gracias!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
NOTE: Please do not use this template directly! This is just for translation.


Category:SVG coat of arms elements - aircrafts[edit]

Hi - why did you change this ame? -- Maxxl² - talk 08:00, 13 August 2014 (UTC)

Hi, I am not native English speaker, but, "aircraft" is a singular/collective noun, i.e aircraft is already plural, although increasingly we can see written "aircrafts", but ... in commons its used aircraft both to singular and plural. If you do a little search, you will find 61,346 categories with "aircraft" many of them meaning plural, and only about 10 "aircrafts" alredy redirected to "aircraft", so ... it is a standard in commons. Best regards --JotaCartas (talk) 08:21, 13 August 2014 (UTC)
Thanks a lot. My mistake. -- Maxxl² - talk 08:54, 13 August 2014 (UTC)
Not at all, my pleasure. To help each other is also good reason to be here, regards --JotaCartas (talk) 09:03, 13 August 2014 (UTC)

Categorising aircraft images[edit]

Hi, I'm very pleased to see all the work you are doing in categorising aircraft images. Personally, I am now more busy than ever cataloguing and archiving an even larger collection of aviation images than here on Commons. I think it might be worth pointing out that many people photographing and uploading aircraft images often refer to them (esp warbirds) by using the registrations, but the primary and sometimes only identifier on the image is the 'tail number'. For example, you recently added G-BTCD (aircraft) to images that are already categorised with 463221 (aircraft) or 413704 (aircraft), which are both sub-cats of G-BTCD. So, G-BTCD exists simply for bringing everything together, and never appears on any of the images, see also com:overcat. On a similar categorisation issue, we have images of aircraft that were once in service (eg G-ANTK) but are now in museums. Once again, I believe that we should try to separate the images to avoid a categorisation clash. So, strictly, one image of G-ANTK at Gatwick should not be in the Category:Avro York museum aircraft nor in Category:Aircraft at Imperial War Museum Duxford. My mantra is that we are categorising images, not aircraft. I welcome your comments, watching here.PeterWD (talk) 15:47, 14 August 2014 (UTC)

Hi, I aknowlwdge your message, but I'am runing out of time; I'll be out for three days and when returned I'll get in contact. Best regards. --JotaCartas (talk) 09:16, 15 August 2014 (UTC)
hi again, I agree with all your opinions on aircraft categorization. The bad categorization I made with the exemple you gave was due to lack of attention on my part. I will correct them acordingly. Best regards. --JotaCartas (talk) 20:16, 18 August 2014 (UTC)

Category:08-8191_(aircraft)[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Category:08-8191_(aircraft) has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Deutsch | English | Español | Français | עברית | Magyar | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | Polski | Português | Русский | +/−

71.255.175.219 01:39, 22 November 2014 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Josve05a (talk) 17:10, 6 February 2015 (UTC)

Charles Chusseau-Flaviens[edit]

Atenção: A data de falecimento deste autor é desconhecida! (Ver en:Charles Chusseau-Flaviens.) Por isso, não é correto substituir {{PD-old}} por {{PD-old-auto|deathyear=1919}}; ainda que seja quase certo que tenha falecido antes de 1935, a data de 1919 (ou mesmo, por vezes, 1920) é apenas o limite máximo estimado para o seu período de atividade como fotógrafo. -- Tuválkin 12:50, 24 May 2015 (UTC)

OK, já repus {{PD-old}}, mas esta licença não é válida para os USA, e as fotos poderão ser todas eliminadas. Possivelmente, sendo ele Francês, e caso as fotos já estivessem no domínio publico em França em 1996 poderá ser usada a licença {{PD-1996|country=France}}, o que resolveria o problema. Não conheço a lei de copyright Francesa, mas vou tentar informar-me e posteriormente direi qualquer coisa. --JotaCartas (talk) 14:48, 24 May 2015 (UTC)
(Vamos ver se isto se safa!) A 11 mil chapas negativas em vidro (inc., salvo erro, todas as 500 e tal fotos tiradas em Portugal) foram doadas à George Eastman House, nos Estados Unidos, pela Pathé-Kodak (francesa) em 1972. Não sei se a catalogação e musealização prévias contam como publicação, mas há que levar isso em conta. Além disso muitas destas fotos (ainda que uma fração mínimas, sendo eslas tantas) foram publicadas na imprensa em diversos países em 1895~1919. -- Tuválkin 15:11, 24 May 2015 (UTC)