User talk:Grashoofd/Archive

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search


Tip: Categorizing images[edit]

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ magyar ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ქართული ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ +/−

Hello, Grashoofd!
Tip: Add categories to your files
Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

CategorizationBot (talk) 10:58, 20 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File tagging File:MirandaC.jpg[edit]

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:MirandaC.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

Saibo (Δ) 22:19, 31 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done - Grashoofd (talk) 11:03, 1 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

AWB access request[edit]

Hi Grashoofd, your AWB access request has been archived. If you'd like to make a new request, please go to COM:RFR, and be sure to explain more clearly what you need access for. You mentioned "pre-parse mode" but that's not clear enough. Thanks, Rd232 (talk) 21:32, 13 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

TUSC token 3c20420e9fc86be3278a8a661562351f[edit]

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!

knakworst[edit]

vergeet niet deze ook te nomineren, ik heb slechts een gecropte versie gemaakt. JethroT (talk) 16:24, 6 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, ja, bedankt voor de melding! Grashoofd (talk) 17:00, 6 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Ik heb daar ook wat commentaar gegeven. De nominatie verbaast me een beetje gezien de grote hoeveel commerciele producten die ook met een foto op Commons staan. Verder zal het me een zorg zijn of de foto wel of niet blijft staan, hij wordt toch niet meer gebruikt en ik heb er persoonlijk ook niets mee. Groet, Joris (talk) 19:54, 6 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
In 2009 heb ik ook zo'n reeks foto's gemaakt, een hele middag mee bezig geweest, die ALLEMAAL werden verwijderd wegens copyright/merkenschending. Het mag dus niet, maar in de praktijk blijkt dat veel reviewers het wel gedogen. Slechte zaak! Grashoofd (talk) 20:07, 6 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Eens met Joris, en dat bij de 2 foto's ook aangegeven. JethroT (talk) 09:24, 7 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Afbeelding Grijskopijsvogel[edit]

Zie je eigen OP op nl-wiki, Met vriendelijke groet, --HWN 14:54, 29 September 2012 (UTC)

Gelezen. Grashoofd (talk) 15:36, 29 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:HollywoodTowerofTerror.jpg[edit]

File:HollywoodTowerofTerror.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Yann (talk) 15:51, 17 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Boete[edit]

Terecht! Rijdend bellen is nog tot daar aan toe maar rijdend fotograferen gaat echt te ver :) Kattenkruid (talk) 13:27, 4 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hahaha! :) Grashoofd (talk) 13:30, 4 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Welcome[edit]

Welcome to the OTRS-team. You might want to add this the OTRS-userbox to your userpage. {{User OTRS}} Good luck and you know where to find me if you have any questions :) Natuur12 (talk) 18:27, 17 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Categorieen[edit]

Natalia Druyts en Koen Wauters hebben al een eigen categorie op Commons. Het is dan beter de foto daarin te zetten, ipv "vocalist from Belgium" of iets van dien aard. Edoderoo (talk) 18:47, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! De categorieboom is (in mijn ogen) echt een chaos op Commons dus ik ben al blij als ik de goede categorie kan vinden haha. Groetjes Grashoofd (talk) 19:11, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Dat is ook zo ja. Gelukkig komen de meeste foto's in de "chose few" categorieen terecht, maar ik check vaak of een naam niet al bestaat, en als ik in een goede bui ben dan maak ik zo'n categorie aan (heel soms zelfs voor 1 foto). Als ik me echt verveel ga ik eens zo'n categorie navlooien of er personen met meer dan 1 foto bij staan. Edoderoo (talk) 21:17, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Transferring images from another project[edit]

Hello, Grashoofd. Would you please consider adding the original upload log of files you transfer to Commons? This can help people track it down at a later time. The best tool is CommonsHelper, but if that's down (which it often is), you can use File upload history generator, which is almost never down. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 21:24, 23 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there. Absolutely!! I did not know this existed, what a handy tool! Thanks! Grashoofd (talk) 21:28, 23 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File tagging File:JaapReesema.jpg[edit]

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:JaapReesema.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

MoiraMoira (talk) 12:16, 29 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:BudColligan.jpg[edit]

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:BudColligan.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

No required license templates were detected at this file page. Please correct it, or if you have any questions please contact me on my talk page. Yours sincerely, Jarekt (talk) 18:57, 31 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed, thanks. Grashoofd (talk) 19:21, 31 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
As the photographer, Rebecca Colligan is the presumed copyright owner. Unless you are the copyright owner, please consider replacing "pd-self" with "pd-author" for this image. See Template:Pd-author for instructions on using this template. Thanks. Davidwr (talk) 20:29, 1 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
What in the... First: PD? It's not public domain, and it doesn't say that anywhere.. are we even talking about the same image? (Also, I only transfered the image from enwiki, so obviously I'm not the owner.) Permission states: "I, the copyright holder of this work, hereby publish it under the following license: This file is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported license." Seems okay to me, right? Grashoofd (talk) 15:00, 2 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I've emailed the company that's named in the metatags to confirm their permission, too. Grashoofd (talk) 15:07, 2 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Re: 15:00 2 Feb. comment: I was wrong. I meant to say that if you are not the copyright owner, replace "self" with "Cc-by-sa-3.0" or some similar template that does not falsely claim that you are the copyright owner. There is already an OTRS ticket on file for this image, so the actual permissions aren't an issue. The only issue is whether you, the uploader, own the copyright and if not, using a template that doesn't say you do. Davidwr (talk) 23:35, 2 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for clearing this up, I've changed the template. Best, Grashoofd (talk) 10:49, 3 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Verzoek[edit]

Dag Grashoofd, hier verwijderde je het verwijdersjabloon omdat de toestemming binnen was. Zou je deze in het vervolg alsjeblieft willen laten staan en op de verwijderpagina aangeven dat alles in orde is? Dan kan een moderator het verzoek afhandelen. Dank! Groet, JurgenNL (talk) 15:19, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

OK! Grashoofd (talk) 15:44, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Transferring images from another project[edit]

Hello. I am glad to see that you are making use of the tools to move images from another project. One note: when transferring images that aren't self-created, please try to remove the {{Own work by original uploader}} template. Thanks. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:05, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Will do, thank you. Grashoofd (talk) 09:52, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Picture of the Year 2013 R2 Announcement[edit]

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2013 is open![edit]

2012 Picture of the Year: A pair of European Bee-eaters in Ariège, France.

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2013 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eighth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2013) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. The top 30 overall and the most popular image in each category have continued to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just one image to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 2 will end on 7 March 2014. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:MyLanguage/Commons:Picture_of_the_Year/2013/Introduction/en Click here to learn more and vote »]

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.

This Picture of the Year vote notification was delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:22, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Drotops megalomanicus Giethoorn.jpg[edit]

Hi, I was so free to crop the image - if you don't like it, please change it back. Marcus Cyron (talk) 22:02, 5 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Looks good, thanks! Also, thanks a bunch for all the renaming today! ;-) Best, Grashoofd (talk) 22:03, 5 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
You're welcome :) Marcus Cyron (talk) 16:42, 17 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Picture of the Year 2013 Results Announcement[edit]

Picture of the Year 2013 Results[edit]

The 2013 Picture of the Year. View all results »

Dear Grashoofd,

The 2013 Picture of the Year competition has ended and we are pleased to announce the results: We shattered participation records this year — more people voted in Picture of the Year 2013 than ever before. In both rounds, 4070 different people voted for their favorite images. Additionally, there were more image candidates (featured pictures) in the contest than ever before (962 images total).

  • In the first round, 2852 people voted for all 962 files
  • In the second round, 2919 people voted for the 50 finalists (the top 30 overall and top 2 in each category)

We congratulate the winners of the contest and thank them for creating these beautiful images and sharing them as freely licensed content:

  1. 157 people voted for the winner, an image of a lightbulb with the tungsten filament smoking and burning.
  2. In second place, 155 people voted for an image of "Sviati Hory" (Holy Mountains) National Park in Donetsk Oblast, Ukraine.
  3. In third place, 131 people voted for an image of a swallow flying and drinking.

Click here to view the top images »

We also sincerely thank to all 4070 voters for participating and we hope you will return for next year's contest in early 2015. We invite you to continue to participate in the Commons community by sharing your work.

Thanks,
the Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.

Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:00, 26 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Cyclic Corrosion Test Chamber[edit]

Hi, I noticed you changed the tag at File:Cyclic Corrosion Test Chamber.jpg.

I'm somewhat inexperienced here at Commons. Please have a look at my query at Commons:Administrators' noticeboard#Mismatched copyright and OTRS due diligence, which relates to that image as well as several others uploaded by the same person that don't have any OTRS ticket. I am unsure what tag is appropriate, or what procedure to use to nominate for deletion. Amatulic (talk) 19:06, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, nevermind. I just looked at the ticket again and noticed you've been trying to straighten it out. Thanks. The situation will get resolved one way or another, I guess! Amatulic (talk) 19:10, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
:-) Grashoofd (talk) 12:59, 10 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

image beppe costa[edit]

Hi dear, i noticed you put that tag for the images, I did personally that image. So can I send a mail to permissions-commons? But if a send now the email, the image will be deleted before they give me the permission, or is there a tag that I can put to say "I sent permission just wayt some days"? or something like?

Thanks --Stefiro (talk) 07:10, 24 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, if you send your permission today or tomorrow, I will take care of it straight away, since I have access to the permissions-commons account. Best, Grashoofd (talk) 07:26, 24 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
hi, i sent permission just 10 minutes ago, I fixed the permission tag in beppecosta.jpg because I sent permission with gfdl so I put the same license under the image. I was right or I was wrong? Thanks again--Stefiro (talk) 07:39, 24 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, I just found your email in the database. Thanks for sending it to us. I've made the necessary modifications to the files. Grashoofd (talk) 07:50, 24 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you dear, I sent the last permission, that one about the file Beppe_Costa.jpg. The author of the photos is Dino Ignani. Thanks again --Stefiro (talk) 15:21, 24 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Photographs by Jac. de Nijs[edit]

What does a description "fotograaf" mean when you hide the category? Jan Arkesteijn (talk) 17:25, 27 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hoi Jan, ik verberg de categorieën omdat het persoonlijke categorieën van de fotografen zijn. Deze 'verbergen' we altijd. Groeten Grashoofd (talk) 12:30, 28 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Dat is niet terecht, Grashoofd. Misschien als de fotograaf ook de uploader is, maar dit zijn fotografen die professioneel voor ANEFO werkten. Hun werk is een eenheid, een artistieke uitdrukking. Jan Arkesteijn (talk) 12:33, 28 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
"Dat is niet terecht", zeg je. Dit doe ik niet om persoonlijke redenen hoor. I don't make the rules Jan. Dit is de policy op Commons, zie ook Category:User categories. Gebruikerscategorieën zijn verborgen. Ik volg alleen maar de regels op. Grashoofd (talk) 12:41, 28 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
PS: Als je je er echt aan stoort, mag je het wat mij betreft terugdraaien, maar daarmee breek je officieel wel de regels. Ik geloof echter niet dat iemand zich daaraan zal storen dus ga je gang. Grashoofd (talk) 12:42, 28 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Je vergist je Grashoofd, dat is geen gebruikerscategorie. Jan Arkesteijn (talk) 13:14, 28 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Ok. Het kan me werkelijk geen sier schelen dus doe vooral wat je niet laten kan. Grashoofd (talk) 13:19, 28 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi[edit]

1 Pleas use the otrs pending template the next time. --Steinsplitter (talk) 10:51, 2 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Will do. Grashoofd (talk) 10:52, 2 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Own en niet en-wiki[edit]

Hallo Grashoofd, Heel mooi werk dat je talloze afbeeldingen verplaatst, er viel me echter iets op. Je plaatst bij het verplaatsen diverse keren geen eigen werk (own) als bron maar een of ander sjabloon dat zegt dat het van en-wiki afkomstig is. In mijn ogen is dat onvoldoende bron-informatie omdat daarmee in zijn geheel niet wordt verteld waar het werk oorspronkelijk vandaan komt, terwijl dat wel wezenlijk van belang is. Oorspronkelijk is het eigen werk en is {{own}} de correcte weergave. Bovendien staat onder het kopje Oorspronkelijk uploadlogboek al vermeld dat het verplaatst is, daarmee is de vermelding van en-wiki dubbel. Het kopje eronder staat ook nog eens dat het verplaatst is. Verder nog twee puntjes:

  • Zorg dat de datum in het formaat 2014-05-13 komt te staan, zodat de software deze automatisch omzet naar de in de specifieke taal gebruikelijke weergave. Niet een format als 15/2/2008 laten staan graag, wat dat kan de software niet lezen.
  • Onder het kopje licentie dient de weer te geven tekst mijn inziens alleen de gebruikersnaam te zijn en niet met de naamruimte User: er voor.

Groetjes - Romaine (talk) 01:27, 13 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Romaine. Dankjewel voor de tips, ik zal ze gebruiken! Groeten Grashoofd (talk) 10:32, 13 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Animals in zoos cats[edit]

Hi, I'm glad to see you've done some work on zoo cats. However in the future, when creating any type of "Animal in zoos" category, please remember to include it not only in the respective zoo category (for instance, "Birds in Saratoga Zoo" but also the correct taxonomical "in zoos" category (such as "Sciuridae in zoos"). --Pitke (talk) 23:45, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

License of File:Jovanna-verheyen-hugues-van-holderbeke-1408293857.jpg[edit]

Grashoofd, Why do you keep on removing {{No license}} template from File:Jovanna-verheyen-hugues-van-holderbeke-1408293857.jpg without adding the actual license? See here and here. All files are required to have license at the time of the upload or they are tagged with {{No license}} template. Having or not having OTRS templates has nothing to do with need for a license. I looked up the ticket and added the proper license to this file but in the future please do not remove {{No license}} tags without adding license templates. --Jarekt (talk) 17:16, 29 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The license was included, but was hidden (<!- -->) due to the fact that I hadn't received the proper permissions yet. We can't place the CC-template while that permission hasn't been received yet (meaning that people can use the file under the CC-terms). Please let me do my thing, I'll take care of it. Grashoofd (talk) 15:51, 31 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Photographers from the Netherlands[edit]

Hoi Lars, ik zag dat je bovengenoemde categorie hebt toegevoegd aan Category:Photographs by Lars Curfs. Bij mijn weten is die categorie niet bestemd voor Commonsgebruikers die geen professioneel fotograaf zijn en ben jij ook de enige uit die groep die erin staat. Is dat niet wat apart? Groet, Apdency (talk) 10:05, 21 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Dank voor je actie ter plekke. Apdency (talk) 19:55, 21 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Apdency, graag gedaan. Ik lees in het weekend mijn berichten op mijn mobiel. Een wijziging is dan snel gedaan, een reactie op een bericht gaat wat minder soepel. Maar als reactie op je eerste bericht: Je hebt helemaal gelijk; ik stond daar verkeerd. Groeten Grashoofd (talk) 09:05, 22 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Grashoofd/Archive&oldid=284104377"