User talk:Soul Train/Archive
File:Zico.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
--Laim (talk) 20:34, 16 May 2009 (UTC)
- Обломайся и выкуси. Это файл с фликра, на который даже отдельный шаблон есть. Так что отдыхай.--Soul Train (talk) 23:09, 16 May 2009 (UTC)
- Файл находится там под неприемлемой лицензией, поэтому будет удален. И не советую писать оскорбления, здесь достаточно русскоговорящих администраторов, чтобы это пресечь. --Panther (talk) 09:09, 17 May 2009 (UTC)
- Скорее фраза "Обломайся и выкуси." относится к тебе Soul Train. Laim (talk) 10:56, 17 May 2009 (UTC)
- Файл находится там под неприемлемой лицензией, поэтому будет удален. И не советую писать оскорбления, здесь достаточно русскоговорящих администраторов, чтобы это пресечь. --Panther (talk) 09:09, 17 May 2009 (UTC)
- А вы бы вместо того чтобы заниматься удализмом, лучше бы сами нашли изображение Великого футболиста с нужной ВАМ лицензией, ибо отсутствие изображения Зико - это позор для всей википедии. Существуют тысячи фото Зико, и никто никогда не предъявлял никаких претензий по лицензиеям, а вы тут сидите аки чиновники и упиваетесь своей властью админской, диреспект вам подобным--Soul Train (talk) 11:49, 17 May 2009 (UTC)
- А что Зико живёт на другой планете? Можно спокойно сфотографировать его, ибо находится он сейчас постоянно в Москве! Laim (talk) 11:53, 17 May 2009 (UTC)
- А вы бы вместо того чтобы заниматься удализмом, лучше бы сами нашли изображение Великого футболиста с нужной ВАМ лицензией, ибо отсутствие изображения Зико - это позор для всей википедии. Существуют тысячи фото Зико, и никто никогда не предъявлял никаких претензий по лицензиеям, а вы тут сидите аки чиновники и упиваетесь своей властью админской, диреспект вам подобным--Soul Train (talk) 11:49, 17 May 2009 (UTC)
File:Zico1.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
--Laim (talk) 11:53, 17 May 2009 (UTC)
- Ты бесишь уже! Это фото специально было сделано во время матча сборной Бразилии для всех, для ВСЕХ! Может я не хочу грузить фото Зико в его нынешнем состоянии? Зико - это великий футболист, и именно в виде футболиста должно быть его изображение. Ты докажи сначала, что изображение нарушет авторские права. Я его загружу ещё и ещё раз, под разными аккаунтами. Фото с официального сайта в общем доступе, так что не надо ля-ля--Soul Train (talk) 11:57, 17 May 2009 (UTC)
- Можешь грузить сколько хочешь, когда хочешь, и под любыми аккаунтами. Но это так просто не пройдёт. Это скорее тебе не нужно "ля-ля". Займись лучше делом, а не закачиванием поддельных фоток. Laim (talk) 12:01, 17 May 2009 (UTC)
- Каких ещё "поддельных фоток", что за чушь?--Soul Train (talk) 13:55, 17 May 2009 (UTC)
- А что первая загруженная фотка с Фликра не имела поддельной лицензии? Laim (talk) 13:59, 17 May 2009 (UTC)
- Я ничего не "подделывал". Человек сфоткал Зико в 1989 году и закинул эту фотку на Фликр, вот и всё. Такой фотки больше нет нигде, кроме Фликра. Какой был шаблон, касаемый Фликра, такой я и приделал. Тогда зачем вообще было эти шаблоны создавать?--Soul Train (talk) 20:47, 17 May 2009 (UTC)
- Если ты не заметил, то лицензия там стояла "All rights reserved". 03:41, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
- Я ничего не "подделывал". Человек сфоткал Зико в 1989 году и закинул эту фотку на Фликр, вот и всё. Такой фотки больше нет нигде, кроме Фликра. Какой был шаблон, касаемый Фликра, такой я и приделал. Тогда зачем вообще было эти шаблоны создавать?--Soul Train (talk) 20:47, 17 May 2009 (UTC)
- А что первая загруженная фотка с Фликра не имела поддельной лицензии? Laim (talk) 13:59, 17 May 2009 (UTC)
- Каких ещё "поддельных фоток", что за чушь?--Soul Train (talk) 13:55, 17 May 2009 (UTC)
- Можешь грузить сколько хочешь, когда хочешь, и под любыми аккаунтами. Но это так просто не пройдёт. Это скорее тебе не нужно "ля-ля". Займись лучше делом, а не закачиванием поддельных фоток. Laim (talk) 12:01, 17 May 2009 (UTC)
This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot
File:FIFA_World_Cup_2010_Netherlands_Uruguay_6.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Martin H. (talk) 20:39, 14 October 2011 (UTC)
File:Alvaro Recoba 2005.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
Martin H. (talk) 20:45, 14 October 2011 (UTC)
File tagging File:Mauricio Victorino cropped.jpg
[edit]This media may be deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Mauricio Victorino cropped.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you. |
Túrelio (talk) 13:32, 17 October 2011 (UTC)
File:Mauricio Victorino cropped.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
Túrelio (talk) 06:08, 19 October 2011 (UTC)
Crimea
[edit]Thank you for thanking for the category renaming of Crimean places from Ukraine to Russia. I invite you to participate with your opinion on the subject in the now opened forum discussion posted on Community HELP needed on the subject of renaming Crimea categories from Ukraine to Russia Good evening --Walta (talk) 21:44, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
Crimea
[edit]Stop adding Russian mention from Creimea-related categories and files. If you'll continue edit warring, your actions can be qualified as vandalism and your account may be blocked. P.S. As I understand, you are from Russia. I recommend you to explore Russian literature about Adolf Hitler and Joseph Stalin (Molotov–Ribbentrop Pact, annexation of Czechoslovakia, annexation of Finland, Katyn massacre, etc). It will be fascinating reading about the idol of current Russian authorities, the idols who killed Polish, Russian and Ukrainian people. But this is just personal recommendation. Make peace not war, Brother. – Bobek (talk) 04:27, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
- How can you talking like that? Talking about Hitler to us, people who crushed nazists during the Great Patriotic War? What do you know about Crimea? Have you ever been there? Do you know that almost everybody in Crimea and in Sevastopol never loved Ukraine? ...that even all Ukrainians in Crimea always speak in Russian? When Western Ukrainians from Lvov take the power in Kiev, the first decision was to ban the law about minorities' languages. OK, we can talk that Maidan was the good and Peoples Revolution, but... to whom stirred this law? Different nations live in Russia. Almost all ethnic minorities have official recognition of their languages at the level of the republics. You are talking about Hitler, how can you doing like that? I was in Katyn last year, it was real terrible situation. But the fact is one: Poles, as well as Russians, and Ukrainians, had one enemy - fascists. Millions of Poles died during WW2, and now you are writing to me that Bandera was the good guy, BUT Putin is "like a Hitler"-bad guy. And after all, people in Crimea voted in referendum to not living with Maidan, with Bandera-fans, they do not want Ukrainisation, they do not want to go to European Union and in NATO. This was their choise. And what should we do? To spit on them?--Soul Train (talk) 20:01, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
- My advice: less TV, more thinking. Bobek (talk) 21:26, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Nurken Abdirov, Mamayev Kurgan.jpg
[edit]This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Nurken Abdirov, Mamayev Kurgan.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
And also:
No required license templates were detected at this file page. Please correct it, or if you have any questions please contact me on my talk page. Yours sincerely, Jarekt (talk) 17:13, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
- File:Alexander Almetov gravestone.jpg
- File:Igor Chislenko gravestone.jpg FDMS 4 12:57, 2 August 2014 (UTC)
Vandalism warning
[edit]
Obviously, per my talkpage, you know how to categorise Crimea-related categories, so immediately stop removing valid categories. FDMS 4 17:41, 3 August 2014 (UTC)
- Иди к чёрту.--Soul Train (talk) 20:40, 4 August 2014 (UTC)
File:ESC 2015 Map real borders.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |