User talk:Bukk

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search

Question for Diotallevi[edit]

Hi Bukk! Please tell me what can I do for the File:Diotallevi di Angeluccio -Esanatoglia.jpg. Thank you. --Antonella (talk) 23:23, 16 April 2013 (UTC)

Hi, Antonella! I've moved the description infos from template:information to template:artwork. Please check if I did it correctly. I'm not quite sure if the title "Esanatoglia" is right. Thank you. Greetz! Bukk (talk) 09:00, 17 April 2013 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Mahnmal für Sinti und Roma 2012-10-31 06.jpg[edit]

български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | فارسی | suomi | français | magyar | italiano | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | 日本語 | norsk bokmål | polski | português | română | slovenščina | svenska | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Mahnmal für Sinti und Roma 2012-10-31 06.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Jarekt (talk) 17:58, 24 July 2013 (UTC)

license added. Greetz! Bukk (talk) 08:21, 25 July 2013 (UTC)
Thank you. --Jarekt (talk) 12:07, 25 July 2013 (UTC)

Sprachvorlage[edit]

Hallo Bukk. Da scheint etwas schiefgegagen zu sein. Magst du's korrigieren? --Leyo 03:05, 18 September 2013 (UTC)

Hallo Leyo! Danke für den Hinweis. Habe ich gemacht. Grüße! Bukk (talk) 07:12, 18 September 2013 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Hist. Museum Bhv.jpg[edit]

български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | فارسی | suomi | français | magyar | italiano | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | 日本語 | norsk bokmål | polski | português | română | slovenščina | svenska | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Hist. Museum Bhv.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

JuTa 21:42, 18 September 2013 (UTC)

Category:Pages using Artwork template with incorrect parameter[edit]

Hallo Bukk. In dieser Kategorie bin ich schon mehrfach über Tippfehler von dir (Beispiel) gestolpert. Magst du bei der Abarbeitung der restlichen Dateien mithelfen? --Leyo 14:20, 16 October 2013 (UTC)

Moin, Leyo!Ja, kann ich machen! Grüße! Bukk (talk) 14:57, 16 October 2013 (UTC)
Du bist ja echt fleissig, danke! Als ich die Kategorie neu angelegt hatte, enthielt sie etliche Tausend Dateien. Mit VisualFileChange konnte ich schon viele Fälle korrigieren. --Leyo 15:47, 16 October 2013 (UTC)
Wenn ich das richtig verstehe, kommen die Dateien wegen der Fehlermeldungen (automatisch) in die Kategorie. Und die Fehlermeldungen gibt es auch noch nicht so lange. Außerdem: Was ist VisualFileChange? Bukk (talk) 15:55, 16 October 2013 (UTC)
Ja, genau. Unter Help:VisualFileChange.js findest du die Beschreibung/Anleitung. --Leyo 16:12, 16 October 2013 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Magdeburg cathedral.jpg[edit]

български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | فارسی | suomi | français | magyar | italiano | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | 日本語 | norsk bokmål | polski | português | română | slovenščina | svenska | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Magdeburg cathedral.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

No required license templates were detected at this file page. Please correct it. If you have any questions please contact me on my talk page. Yours sincerely, Jarekt (talk) 16:08, 19 November 2013 (UTC)

Template:Or conj[edit]

Hello, you should rather use {{conj|type=or}} this way (Template:Or conj may result in fault syntax, like unwanted spaces in some languages). Can I replace usage and delete Template:Or conj ?--Zolo (talk) 21:32, 3 December 2013 (UTC)

Hi, Zolo. I've been looking for an "or", but couldn't find it. THX. Bukk (talk) 21:41, 3 December 2013 (UTC)

Bild-Verortung[edit]

Hi, weißt Du noch, wo das hier aufgenommen wurde? File:S-Bahn Berlin ZAT.JPG Dann ware es gut, wenn Du die entsprechende Bahnhofs-Kategorie ergänzen kannst. Danke! --Andre de (talk) 15:27, 8 February 2014 (UTC)

Moin! Ich ergänze das (Jungfernheide). Grüße! Bukk (talk) 09:51, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
Danke! Habs jetzt nochmal etwas korrigiert (auf die richtige Kategorie). --Andre de (talk) 12:40, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
Ah! Nicht bei "S-Bahnhof". Daher habe ich die Kategorie nicht gefunden. Hätte ich auch selbst darauf kommen können, denn es gibt ja Fernbahngleise. Grüße! Bukk (talk) 13:52, 10 February 2014 (UTC)

{{artwork}} template[edit]

I'm not always consistent with giving myself credit on older work I did, but, because of MediaViewer, I think I have to insist that, where I've credited myself for a restoration, that it get put in the "artist" field, because I don't think MediaViewer shows notes, but does show artists. Otherwise it's very likely that I won't be credited at all when it's reused. Only way around that is changes to both the artwork template and Mediaviewer, which probably isn't happening.

Cheers! Adam Cuerden (talk) 22:34, 8 March 2015 (UTC)

Do you have an example for that? And what about the author field? --Leyo 10:06, 9 March 2015 (UTC)
Checking, MediaViewer is a piece of crap when it comes to attribution. Creator templates throw it still. Like they did a few months ago, and I was assured it'd be fixed.

"Title"[edit]

I see where you are making many changes from "Description" to "Title" for old artwork, but the titles of many of those old paintings are not actually what your'e giving them as such. Problem, I think. The title of a painting is the actual name the painter or someone else gave that work of art. --SergeWoodzing (talk) 21:56, 11 March 2015 (UTC)

Please reply! --SergeWoodzing (talk) 11:04, 12 March 2015 (UTC)
Hi, SergeWoodzing! Usually I transfer the string of the description field that is formated as Italic type into the {{title}} field. Greetz! Bukk (talk) 11:30, 12 March 2015 (UTC)
Right, that's what I've seen, and that's why I wrote to you. Example result (not actual):
  • Description: Princess Aurora of Kersa in 1666. OK
  • Title: Princess Aurora of Kersa in 1666. Not OK unless that is the actual name of the painting, which it usually wouldn't be.
See what I mean? "Description" and "Title" are usually not the same. --SergeWoodzing (talk) 15:28, 12 March 2015 (UTC)
Ok, I see. Bukk (talk) 15:43, 12 March 2015 (UTC)

File[edit]

hi, I am writing to ask if you could insert Questro portrait in the character's voice in Italian :)?

I'm so sorry, but I don't understand your question. Greetz! Bukk (talk) 12:47, 26 August 2015 (UTC)