User talk:The Eloquent Peasant/Archive1

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, The Eloquent Peasant!

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 20:13, 25 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File tagging File:MIIC.svg

[edit]
العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:MIIC.svg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:MIIC.svg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Ronhjones  (Talk) 02:22, 24 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I apologize. How can a government agency's logo be included on a page? A derivative work? This image is a copy from a website and blurry at that. I understand Fair use is not allowed on Commons. So is via permission from the government agency the only way to include a ministry's logo or emblem on the article? Thank you. --Level C (talk) 03:14, 24 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Image without license

[edit]

dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner), if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner) 16:38, 8 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Wikimedia Commons has a specific scope

[edit]

العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | español | فارسی | suomi | français | Frysk | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | polski | português | русский | sicilianu | slovenščina | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | 简体中文 | +/−


Thank you for your contributions. Your image or other content was recently deleted, or will soon be deleted, in accordance with our process and policies, because it was not, or is not, within our scope. Please review our project scope, but in short, Commons is targeted at educational media files including photographs, diagrams, animations, music, spoken text and video clips. The expression “educational” is to be understood according to its broad meaning of “providing knowledge; instructional or informative”. Wikimedia Commons does not contain text articles like encyclopedia articles, textbooks, news, word definitions and such. Each of these other kinds of content have their own projects: Wikipedia, Wikibooks, Wikisource, Wikinews, Wiktionary and Wikiquote. If the content seems to fit the scope of one of those other projects, please consider contributing it there. Otherwise, consider an alternative outlet. If you think that the deletion was in error because the contribution really was in scope, you can appeal it at Commons:Undeletion requests, giving a reason why it fits our scope to help others evaluate the matter. Thank you for your understanding.

Herby talk thyme 08:21, 25 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Río Blanco Lares Puerto Rico 181458N665302W.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)


  • This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: Map appears to be copyright per watermark
Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

Herby talk thyme 08:22, 25 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Las fotos de Puerto Rico en Our Islands and Their People.djvu has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Aleator (talk) 22:43, 12 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Pachuca de Soto, Hidalgo, Mexico.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

--ghouston (talk) 06:17, 5 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, the Flickr-author of this image is banned (Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Images by Marco Verch). Therefore, this image cannot stay on Commons. --Túrelio (talk) 07:45, 29 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Loves Monuments in the United States – Back for 2019!

[edit]
This user participated in Wiki Loves Monuments 2019.

Want to show your participation in Wiki Loves Monuments 2019? Add {{User Wiki Loves Monuments 2019}} to your userpage!

Hello! Last year you contributed to Wiki Loves Monuments 2018 in the United States. Thanks to people like you it was a great success, with over 1,900 people contributing over 10,000 photos of cultural and historic sites from all over the country. Hundreds of these photos now help illustrate Wikipedia articles, improving our open knowledge about United States history, culture, and heritage. If you haven't seen the winners yet, be sure to check them out here.

I'm pleased to say that we're back this year with Wiki Loves Monuments 2019 in the United States, and I'd like to welcome you to participate once again in the event. Check out our updated event page for more information. Just like last year, you'll be able to upload your photos of any registered historical site in the United States through the end of September (even if the photos were taken before this month).

If you've traveled and taken photos of monuments in non-US countries, you can see if those countries are also participating here.

Once again, thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2018, and we hope to see you again in this year's event! If you'd like to respond to this message directly, please do so on on my talk page. ~Kevin Payravi (talk) 05:16, 1 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Loves Monuments in the United States 2019 – Last day to enter!

[edit]
This user participated in Wiki Loves Monuments 2019.
Want to show your participation in Wiki Loves Monuments 2019? Add {{User Wiki Loves Monuments 2019}} to your userpage!

September 30th is the last day to upload photos for Wiki Loves Monuments! We're thrilled that the United States has almost reached 4,000 contributions so far this year. Of these images, ~370 (~9%) have already been used to help illustrate Wikipedia articles and pages on other wiki projects, which is fantastic.

If you've already made a photo contribution this year, thanks so much! If you have any last-minute photos of U.S. historical sites to upload and enter into the contest, today's the day to do it. Check out the United States event page for more information. Judging will take place throughout the month of October, after which the top-ten national finalists will be announced in early November.

If you've traveled and taken photos of monuments in non-US countries, you can see if those countries are also participating here.

As always, thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments! If you'd like to respond to this message directly, please do so on on my talk page. ~Kevin Payravi (talk) 05:49, 30 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Parque Luis A. Wito Morales, Barrio Maragüez, Ponce, Puerto Rico.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Mercy11 (talk) 02:36, 20 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mausoleo Bomberos de Ponce, Cementerio Civil, Barrio Portugués Urbano, Ponce, Puerto Rico.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Mercy11 (talk) 02:46, 20 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Duplicate template

[edit]

Thank you, I've now processed the duplicate, and it will be automatically replaced in the projects that used the file. For reference, {{Duplicate}} is meant to be used with parameters, namely the "file" parameter specifying the file of which it's a duplicate :-) Gestumblindi (talk) 22:34, 19 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Gestumblindi: Thank you. Now I know.--The Eloquent Peasant (talk) 22:36, 19 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
File:BetancesPlaque.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:32, 27 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, MiguelAlanCS (talk) 08:59, 18 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Awesome!!

[edit]

Hi Eloquent: I think what you have posted on your User page HERE is awesome. If I was you I would put it in as a suggestion for a Commons policy adoption. Not sure where it's done, but you can ask at the COMMONS:Help_desk. I have used the Help Desk site with some success in the past. Wish you the best! Great idea!! Mercy11 (talk) 02:14, 12 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Mercy11: Thank you Mercy. I take my vitamin B, then C, then D and finally my Zinc. So yeah, I have an obsession with order. (BTW, I did copy that from other users' pages, from users who care.)--The Eloquent Peasant (talk) 10:38, 13 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Script

[edit]

Sorry – I answered your question at early morning but then forgot to submit/publish it... Fine that you found out a solution by yourself.
When you like more File generation description, this template is not (yet) supported by any script, sorry. It is just a more eloquent (or talkative) method to use Image generation, with somehow better explainable parameters. -- sarang사랑 10:48, 12 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Sarang: TY. -- The Eloquent Peasant (talk) 10:39, 13 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

To your information: when you really "have an obsession with order" you might know that: The display of a file description is always: date - source - author. Depending on the used upload tool, the source may be in another sequence, every mixture is possible. Of course, the sequence of parameters does not matter when using a template - but it can be an unnecessary disadvantage for the orientation within the source code. To ease the readability of the file description source, I asked Perhelion to correct missorted parameters; but he vanished before making it. Now I am somehow trying to continue his work with the script, and got a version which can rearrange the parameters. User:Sarang/simpleSVGcheck.js can what User:Perhelion/simpleSVGcheck.js can't. When you like also the same sequence in source and display, you may use it. -- sarang사랑 14:07, 13 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Parameter "image"

[edit]

Now you can use image=EP, lowercase is also possible. -- sarang사랑 15:08, 22 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much! --The Eloquent Peasant (talk) 00:27, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
File:Coat of arms of Guaynabo, Puerto Rico.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Cookieman1.1.1 (talk) 15:45, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Escudo de Cervantes

[edit]

Hola Eloquent. Para realizar un escudo así se necesitaría una descripción detallada del mismo, incluida las órdenes a las que pertenecen las cruces, porque hay varios cuarteles que no se identifican con nitidez. De todas maneras, buscaré información. Un saludo.--Erlenmeyer (talk) 15:10, 15 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Erlenmeyer: Yo también buscaré. Gracias. --The Eloquent Peasant (talk) 15:28, 15 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
File:La Barca Condado.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 00:20, 29 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

errors on your arecibo coat of arms

[edit]

my friend Nelson el Roman noticed some errors on your arecibo coat of arms

he says First, the turtle rings must be in gold since the rings in that color mean protection to what is inside the ring. The turtles represent Arecibo, therefore it means protection and defense of Arecibo. If a silver ring is used, it means that what is inside is free, implying that before it was a slave or descendant of slaves. The crown is fine and that crown symbolizes the chief Aracibo (or Arrazivo) from whom we take the name and indicates that he is from the Taino royalty. The turtles have the only thing that the face or head of the turtle must face towards the crown, if they look up the shield stops being heraldic because by rules they must be seeing how important it is in the center, which is the crown . The third thing is that the turtles he uses are not the correct ones, since he is using land turtles (They have legs) and they must be sea turtles (they must have fins) in Arecibo there were no land turtles, only sea turtles and these are the which symbolizes Arecibo. Another mistake is that the shell of the turtles is in gold and it is correct, but the design of the shell cannot be white since white means silver in heraldry and there could not be anything white on yellow (nothing silver on gold) because silver and gold are considered metals and in heraldry it is forbidden to place one metal on another metal. You can only use color on metal, in this case it must be black lines and not white.

if you can fix it that would be great Skunkcrew (talk) 23:04, 29 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Skunkcrew. It's nice to see you again. I agree that those are mistakes. I'll fix it shortly. --The Eloquent Peasant (talk) 00:02, 30 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

arecibo coat of arms error

[edit]

Nelson el roman just spoted anuther error the crown should not have jewels but should look like the crown shown on his version here http://areciboweb.50megs.com/pr/escarecibo2.gif also can you fix the buckle so it looks like the photo thanks and possibly change the font so it also maches the picture thanks Skunkcrew (talk) 19:00, 30 March 2021 (UTC)"[reply]

Going to this website downloads a .midi file onto my computer. --The Eloquent Peasant (talk) 23:41, 30 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Anyway. The shield is based on the written description seen here. I can not copy your friend's version because that would be a violation of copyright.
I can update the crown with the "su cerco o listel adornado de una greca taina de sable" specification.
Description is: 'Escudo losangeado de oro y azur (azul); el jefe de este color con una corona antigua de oro, su cerco o listel adornado de una greca taina de sable (negro), acostada de dos tortugas afrontadas, puesta cada una dentro de un anulete, todo de oro. Al timbre, una corona mural de oro de cuatro torres, mazonada de sable (negro) y aclarada de azur (azul), y rodeado el escudo, por sus flancos y punta, de una correa o cinturem de oro, con hebilla de plata, puesta a manera de un circulo, que interrumpe la corona mural. En la correa, escrito en letras de sable (negro) el lema MUY LEAL." Archivo en el INSTITUTO DE CULTURA PUERTORRIQUENA --The Eloquent Peasant (talk) 00:11, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Maybe your friend should update areciboweb to stop the auto download of midi files. 4 towers or 5 towers. Many times it states 4 towers but later the place becomes a "city" and then should have 5 towers. Arecibo is a city with 5 towers now. --The Eloquent Peasant (talk) 16:43, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

oh yes the midi nelson knows about that he made the websight when the midi would play when you enter now the place wher he made the sight updated so now i downloads to your computer when you enter it also nelson is fine with the edits looking like his Skunkcrew (talk) 01:50, 1 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

request from nelson about arecibo sheild

[edit]

nelson wants to know if he can use your arecibo coat of arms on his website hel give you credit also can you make the flag of arecibo useing your coat of arms let me know Skunkcrew (talk) 01:46, 1 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Skunkcrew, of course he can use it. I'll make the flag soon. Thank you. About the MIDI file downloading, I understand the explanation he / you gave but you know most people don't want things automatically downloading onto their computer. Take care.--The Eloquent Peasant (talk) 02:09, 1 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
BTW, my sister lived in Arecibo and I almost bought a home in Esperanza, Arecibo (years ago). There are some beautiful views of the ocean in Arecibo. --The Eloquent Peasant (talk) 02:15, 1 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
i told him he fixed it i think Skunkcrew (talk) 10:02, 1 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
To Skunkcrew: I forgot to mention that all Wikimedia Commons files may be used freely, subject to the terms of their Creative Commons licenses which should be present on each individual file description page (usually requires attribution). You might want to start your learning curve at Commons:Welcome. --The Eloquent Peasant (talk) 17:54, 9 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Flag of Barceloneta, Puerto Rico.svg

[edit]

the flag has 2 errores the saint George cros must be thicker and the red and yellow stripes must be equal in with Skunkcrew (talk) 21:33, 1 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I see that. I'll fix it. Thanks. --The Eloquent Peasant (talk) 21:56, 1 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Flag of Ponce, Puerto Rico - 1877 version.svg

[edit]

all of the coat of arms must be yellow Skunkcrew (talk) 21:36, 1 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Barceloneta flag

[edit]

the horrizantal bar on the cross is not in the center it should be on the center Skunkcrew (talk) 01:33, 7 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I see that. I fixed it. Thanks. --The Eloquent Peasant (talk) 11:43, 21 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

yuaco flag and coat of arms

[edit]

the crown must have 5 towers since yuaco is a city Skunkcrew (talk) 01:08, 8 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

See here. --The Eloquent Peasant (talk) 01:13, 8 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

yes but municipalitys do not have countrol on their crowns the head of state does yuaco must have 5 towers in its crown because its a city Skunkcrew (talk) 09:50, 8 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Skunkcrew! I'd like to see the reference on that statement you said above. If you see the photo that Eloquent Peasant shared and some other pics on the municipality's Facebook, you'll see a coat of arms with 4 towers on its mural crown. In that sense, some other versions with 3 or 5 towers could be incorrect unless you share some reference on that detail. Any comments that help correct errors are always welcome, but there're details that require proofs to validate them. Greetings! Yarfpr (talk) 03:02, 9 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Guayama coat of arms

[edit]

theirs one errore the towernot saposed to have a castle like wall on top the tower represents a suger cain mill tower in the town Skunkcrew (talk) 01:53, 27 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. It's nice to see you again, @Skunkcrew: I see that. I'll fix it. Thank you. --The Eloquent Peasant (talk) 11:40, 27 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

yuaco flag

[edit]

everything is good but thers a thin wight line seperating the black and yellow stripe their is not saposed to be a thin wight stripe also move the arms a bit down so i can be better centered Skunkcrew (talk) 01:12, 30 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. It's nice to see you again, @Skunkcrew: I fixed it. Thank you. --The Eloquent Peasant (talk) 20:58, 3 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Fake flags

[edit]

If you would just take them off whatever pages they are in use, and let me know, I can remove the images. You understand the issue better than the rest of us, please lend a hand and just clear through those pages. Replace if it's possible, remove if not. It would probably be a good idea to leave a message on the talk pages, you could refer them to me if you get any heat from other editors. And then, please ping me when done, and they will vanish. Cheers! Ellin Beltz (talk) 13:32, 4 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism

[edit]

Please do not call the good-faith contributions of other users "vandalism", as you did in this edit. "Vandalism" applies only to bad-faith editors purposefully acting to disrupt Commons, and should not be used to describe the contributions of editors with whom you have a content dispute. Using that term in that manner is a personal attack, and continuing to do so may result in you being blocked from editing. Please let me know if you have any questions. AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 14:17, 5 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, The Eloquent Peasant (talk) 18:54, 10 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Categories for WS works best as stated as editions

[edit]

Hi. When creating categories for works that are being reproduced at Wikisource, we are finding it better (AND SAFER) to indicate that they are edition specific. Firstly that allows us to link it directly to the WD item for the edition and hence allow category display in WS edition header, and not have it consumed by other wikicommons additions, and takeover bids. Plus if we ever have another edition of the same work with different illustrators, or there are shared illustrations though different text, it allows appropriate presentation of such information. Noting that we have had to do some recent rescues of editions of works so a bit of bitter sweet lessons learned.02:36, 11 May 2021 (UTC)

Heráldica PR

[edit]

Hola.

No conozco mucho de la heráldica de PR. He estado mirando la categoría de los escudos municipales y he visto que no hay criterios para establecer un diseño como el propio de PR para las coronas. Hay casos con un diseño característico y propio (como Guayanilla, Barceloneta y Barranquillas) pero están limitados a unos pocos casos. He visto algunas municipalidades con coronas murales con diseño brasileño o portugués o semejantes a los de otros países europeos. Lo más riguroso sería ir caso por caso y creando coronas con diseño propio de cada caso (si no aparecen los escudos en las webs oficiales de las municipalidades, una buena fuente es la de las banderas Flags of the World - Puerto Rico, aunque no saldrían todos o Heraldry of the World específica de escudos). Pero también que tener cuidado con el COPYRIGHT. No se pueden calcar imágenes o hacerlas tan parecidas que lo parezcan (imagino que por esta causa los usuarios estarán reutilizando otras coronas o tratando de adaptarlas para que recuerden a las existentes). Además desde hace tiempo, tampoco se pueden subir escudos si el trabajo se basa en una web con reserva de copyright en su contenido. Yo pensaba que si el diseño era propio no era violación pero las cosas son así. Es conveniente tener esto en cuenta y ser muy cuidadoso con el copyright porque evitará perder el tiempo subiendo trabajos que luego serán eliminados. No hay que pensar en términos negativos cuando no se conozca una materia determinada, nadie domina todos los campos, le invito a que no se desanime. La heráldica es muy visual y se aprende mirando los detalles y tratando de consultar otras fuentes, como las que le he comentado antes para tener un criterio e información rigurosos. La verdad que la situación de los escudos de PR, salvo el nacional, es muy compleja. Sería ideal que el gobierno encargara a un diseñador un modelo (con variantes) para los escudos municipales aunque ahora estamos en tiempos de profunda crisis en todo el mundo y otros problemas mayores se acumulan. Respecto a las discusiones, como no hay criterios claros en los estilos heráldicos para el conjunto de los municipios, yo trataría de invitar al usuario, con buenas maneras y agradeciendo sus contribuciones, a que adaptase las coronas en la medida de lo posible a las oficiales, pero indicándole las mejoras para asemejar el escudo, no dejándole todo el trabajo a él. De esta forma se trataría de alcanzar un acuerdo que sirva de consenso y las dos partes salgan satisfechas. Aunque como le he dicho las propias autoridades de PR han dejado una situación algo caótica a la hora de aprobar los escudos municipales. Un saludo, feliz Pentecostés y mucho ánimo --Heralder (talk) 22:27, 18 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Lin-Manuel Miranda Gallery, Vega Alta barrio-pueblo, Puerto Rico.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

 Mysterymanblue  00:01, 10 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Statue in honor of Lolita Tizol, a teacher, Ponce, Puerto Rico.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 22:27, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

How to categorize?

[edit]

Since PR and other US Territories / Insular areas are not states, these are good ways:

  • Category:Monuments_and_memorials_in_insular_areas_of_the_United_States
  • Category:Sportspeople from Puerto Rico

Lakes subcategory notes by Mercy11

  • Category:Reefs of Puerto Rico 
  • Category:16th-century architecture in Puerto Rico
  • Category:16th-century maps of Puerto Rico
  • Category:17th-century architecture in Puerto Rico
  • Category:17th-century maps of Puerto Rico ‎ 
  • Category:18th-century architecture in Puerto Rico 
  • Category:19th-century architecture in Puerto Rico
  • Category:20th-century architecture in Puerto Rico ‎
  • Category:Air pollution in Puerto Rico
  • Category:Alcoholic beverages from Puerto Rico 
  • Category:Animals of Puerto Rico ‎
  • Category:Archaeological sites in Puerto Rico
  • Category:Architecture of Puerto Rico by century
  • Category:Arthropods of Puerto Rico ‎ 
  • Category:Bays of Puerto Rico 
  • Category:Beaches of Puerto Rico 
  • Category:Birds of Puerto Rico ‎ 
  • Category:Bodies of water in Puerto Rico ‎ 
  • Category:Botanical gardens in Puerto Rico ‎ 
  • Category:Buildings in Puerto Rico by city 
  • Category:Cats of Puerto Rico ‎ 
  • Category:Caves of Puerto Rico
  • Category:Dams in Puerto Rico ‎ 
  • Category:Disasters and accidents in Puerto Rico
  • Category:Dogs of Puerto Rico ‎
  • Category:El Convento (San Juan, Puerto Rico) ‎
  • Category:Environment of Puerto Rico
  • Category:Faults in Puerto Rico 
  • Category:Fires in Puerto Rico ‎ 
  • Category:Fireworks in Puerto Rico ‎ 
  • Category:Flora of Puerto Rico by month 
  • Category:Flora of Puerto Rico by order 
  • Category:Flora of Puerto Rico by taxon ‎ 
  • Category:Flora of Puerto Rico ‎ 
  • Category:Forests in Puerto Rico
  • Category:Fortín de San Gerónimo ‎ 
  • Category:Fungi of Puerto Rico ‎ 
  • Category:Gardens in Puerto Rico ‎ 
  • Category:Geology of Puerto Rico ‎ 
  • Category:Haze in Puerto Rico ‎ 
  • Category:Highways in Puerto Rico by number
  • Category:Highways in Puerto Rico ‎ 
  • Category:Historians from Puerto Rico ‎ 
  • Category:Historical flags of Puerto Rico ‎ 
  • Category:Historical images of Puerto Rico
  • Category:History of Puerto Rico by period ‎ 
  • Category:Horse riding in Puerto Rico ‎ 
  • Category:Horses of Puerto Rico ‎ 
  • Category:Hydrology of Puerto Rico ‎ 
  • Category:Iglesia de San José (San Juan, Puerto Rico) 
  • Category:Iglesia del Convento Porta Coeli ‎ 
  • Category:Iguana iguana in Puerto Rico ‎ 
  • Category:Iguanas of Puerto Rico ‎ 
  • Category:Insects of Puerto Rico ‎
  • Category:Islands of Puerto Rico ‎ 
  • Category:Lagoons of Puerto Rico ‎ 
  • Category:Lakes of Puerto Rico ‎ 
  • Category:Landforms of Puerto Rico
  • Category:Landscapes of Puerto Rico
  • Category:Landslides in Puerto Rico ‎ 
  • Category:Lepidoptera of Puerto Rico ‎ 
  • Category:Locator maps of Puerto Rico ‎
  • Category:Maps of municipalities in Puerto Rico ‎ 
  • Category:Maps of protected areas in Puerto Rico ‎ 
  • Category:Mayors of Puerto Rico ‎
  • Category:Months in Puerto Rico ‎ 
  • Category:Mountains of Puerto Rico
  • Category:Municipalities in Puerto Rico ‎ 
  • Category:Natural disasters in Puerto Rico ‎
  • Category:Nature of Puerto Rico
  • Category:Newspapers of Puerto Rico 
  • Category:Night in Puerto Rico ‎ 
  • Category:Nymphalidae of Puerto Rico ‎ 
  • Category:Old maps of Puerto Rico ‎ 
  • Category:Paintings in the Museo de Arte de Ponce ‎ 
  • Category:Parks in Puerto Rico
  • Category:Parque de Bombas (Ponce, Puerto Rico)
  • Category:Peltophryne lemur 
  • Category:People of Puerto Rico by city
  • Category:Polvorín de Miraflores 
  • Category:Ponce, Puerto Rico by decade
  • Category:Ponce, Puerto Rico in the 1890s
  • Category:Ponce, Puerto Rico in the 1900s
  • Category:Ponce, Puerto Rico in the 1910s
  • Category:Ponce, Puerto Rico in the 1920s
  • Category:Ponce, Puerto Rico in the 1930s ‎ 
  • Category:Ponce, Puerto Rico in the 1930s
  • Category:Ponce, Puerto Rico in the 1940s
  • Category:Ponce, Puerto Rico in the 1950s ‎ 
  • Category:Ponce, Puerto Rico in the 1960s ‎ 
  • Category:Ponce, Puerto Rico in the 1970s ‎ 
  • Category:Ponce, Puerto Rico in the 1980s ‎ 
  • Category:Puerto Rico in the 1980s
  • Category:Ponce, Puerto Rico in the 1990s ‎ 
  • Category:Ponce, Puerto Rico in the 2000s ‎ 
  • Category:Ponce, Puerto Rico in the 2010s ‎ 
  • Category:Ponce, Puerto Rico in the 2020s ‎ 
  • Category:Ports and harbors in Puerto Rico
  • Category:Protected areas of Puerto Rico ‎ 
  • Category:Puerto Rican citizenship ‎ 
  • Category:Puerto Rico by year
  • Category:Rainbows in Puerto Rico
  • Category:Reptiles of Puerto Rico 
  • Category:Reservoirs in Puerto Rico
  • Category:Restoration works of the Iglesia de San José (San Juan, Puerto Rico) 
  • Category:San Gerónimo Powderhouse ‎ 
  • Category:San Juan National Historic Site ‎ 
  • Category:Sphingidae of Puerto Rico ‎ 
  • Category:Storms in Puerto Rico
  • Category:Sunsets of Puerto Rico ‎
  • Category:Trails in Puerto Rico ‎ 
  • Category:Transport in Puerto Rico by city ‎ 
  • Category:Tree planting in Puerto Rico ‎ 
  • Category:Trees in Puerto Rico ‎ 
  • Category:Unidentified Angiosperms in Puerto Rico
  • Category:Unidentified animals of Puerto Rico ‎ 
  • Category:Unidentified insects of Puerto Rico 
  • Category:Unidentified organisms in Puerto Rico ‎ 
  • Category:Urban squares in Puerto Rico ‎ 
  • Category:Waste containers in Puerto Rico ‎ 
  • Category:Waste in Puerto Rico ‎
  • Category:Water pollution in Puerto Rico ‎ 
  • Category:Waterfalls in Puerto Rico
  • Category:Weather and climate of Puerto Rico
  • Category:Weather in Puerto Rico ‎