User talk:Vunz

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search


Junction+crossing[edit]

Moved to Talk:BSicon/Renaming/k.

rename needed[edit]

Happy New Year :)

New Year, new job, there are still some "parallel icons" that need a decent name including the "v"-prefix, e.g. 20px (File:BSicon exSTRel.svg). Groetjes axpdeHello! 08:02, 15 January 2011 (UTC)

You too :-)

Actually, those were duplicates, I marked them and put them on the delete candidate list. Wiebevl (talk) 19:07, 17 January 2011 (UTC)

Category: Icons for railway descriptions/delete candidate[edit]

removed to Talk:BSicon/Obsolete and deletions#Category: Icons for railway descriptions/delete candidate

File:BSicon exvSTRr-exKRZo.svg[edit]

moved to Talk:BSicon/Renaming/Archive 1

Icon request[edit]

Can you create metrorail version (dark blue #003399) of this file BSicon vxABZg+l-KRZ.svg , but without left up light blue not in use section. Thanks in advance. --Triglav 2000 (talk) 12:02, 9 May 2011 (UTC)

That would be this one: BSicon uvSTR+l-KRZ.svg, however you could also use combination of BSicon udSTR+l.svg & BSicon udKRZ.svg. Cheers! Wiebevl (talk) 13:09, 9 May 2011 (UTC)
Thanks, I have another request. Can you create combined version of this two icons 20px + 20px , BSicon uSTRlg.svg + rotatted -90° BSicon uvSTRg+l.svg and this one rotated -90° BSicon vSTRr-STR.svg in dark blue metrorail version. --Triglav 2000 (talk) 13:16, 9 May 2011 (UTC)
✓ Done:   (uvSTRelf)
(uvABZq+r-STRlq)   (uSTRl-ABZq+r)
(uvSTR+rq-STRq)   (uSTRq-STR+r). Useddenim (talk) 01:42, 10 May 2011 (UTC)
Renamed. Useddenim (talk) 01:57, 6 September 2011 (UTC)
Why do we need these horizontal parallel icons? You could easily stack two on top of each other... Wiebevl (talk) 06:34, 10 May 2011 (UTC)
Thank you, Useddenim. I'll also try stacking. --Triglav 2000 (talk) 09:55, 10 May 2011 (UTC)
@Wiebevl: it seems that not all wikipediae support multiple overlay layers. Useddenim (talk) 11:52, 10 May 2011 (UTC)

pt:Discussão:Ramal de Matosinhos[edit]

removed to Talk:BSicon/Renaming

File:BSicon vSTRlf-rotccw90.svg[edit]

Moved to Talk:BSicon/Renaming/Archive 1.

Rename request[edit]

Hi Wiebevl. Just to drop you a note that the two BSicon files have been renamed. Have a nice day --Ben.MQ (talk) 12:23, 22 June 2011 (UTC)

Thanks, you too! Wiebevl (talk) 19:27, 22 June 2011 (UTC)

Your assistence ...[edit]

Moved to Talk:BSicon/Renaming/Archive 1.

More icon renaming...[edit]

removed to Talk:BSicon/New icons and icon requests#More icon renaming...

file move[edit]

Moved to Talk:BSicon/Renaming/Archive 1.

Tip: Categorizing images[edit]

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | magyar | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски / srpski | svenska | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


Hello, Vunz!

Tip: Add categories to your images

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

Uploadwizard-categories.png

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations"). Pro-tip: The CommonSense tool can help you find the best category for your image.

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

CategorizationBot (talk) 15:54, 14 September 2011 (UTC)

Category was and is present. Wiebevl (talk) 09:35, 15 September 2011 (UTC)

BSicon TUNNELa legende & BSicon TUNNELe legende[edit]

Moved to Talk:BSicon/New icons and icon requests.

Parallel rail proposal[edit]

Moved to Talk:BSicon/Renaming/Archive 2.

File:BSicon TUNNELa legende.svg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:BSicon TUNNELa legende.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

JuTa 03:13, 16 October 2011 (UTC)


File:BSicon TUNNELe legende.svg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:BSicon TUNNELe legende.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

JuTa 03:16, 16 October 2011 (UTC)

Commons:WikiProject BSicon‎[edit]

You are invited to join Commons:WikiProject BSicon‎. Useddenim (talk) 19:48, 21 July 2013 (UTC)

File:BSicon udtABZg+l.svg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:BSicon udtABZg+l.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Stefan4 (talk) 22:45, 19 January 2014 (UTC)

File:BSicon vSHST- legende.svg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:BSicon vSHST- legende.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Stefan4 (talk) 22:45, 19 January 2014 (UTC)

File:BSicon dtABZgl.svg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:BSicon dtABZgl.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Stefan4 (talk) 15:04, 20 January 2014 (UTC)

File:BSicon exdDSTr.svg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:BSicon exdDSTr.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Stefan4 (talk) 15:04, 20 January 2014 (UTC)

File:BSicon vKBHFme.svg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:BSicon vKBHFme.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Stefan4 (talk) 15:05, 20 January 2014 (UTC)

File:BSicon vKBHFle.svg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:BSicon vKBHFle.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Stefan4 (talk) 15:05, 20 January 2014 (UTC)

File:BSicon udKBHFre.svg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:BSicon udKBHFre.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Stefan4 (talk) 15:05, 20 January 2014 (UTC)

File:BSicon tvBHFl.svg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:BSicon tvBHFl.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Stefan4 (talk) 18:30, 20 January 2014 (UTC)

Maps of railway lines in Germany[edit]

Hi, I have just seen that you moved many maps from the proper subcats (mainly Category:Rail transport maps of North Rhine-Westphalia and Category:Rail transport maps of Lower Saxony ) to their overcat Category:Rail transport maps of Germany, which is already overcrowded. Why? I cannot really see a point in this, the maps are definitely easier to find in the subcat, which belongs to the respective federal state. And it's easier to avoid producing duplicates, as there often are (or migth be) further maps of the same railway lines in those state specific subcats. Regards, Kleeblatt187 (talk) 23:14, 25 February 2015 (UTC)

I did exactly that since over categorising doesn't help in finding these pictures, furthermore when they're all together in one category that exactly helps avoiding duplicates. Either way, some were and some weren't in subcategories which undesirable. Vunz (talk) 06:41, 26 February 2015 (UTC)
Well, the Category:Rail transport maps of Germany with more than 400 files is more than confusing. And of course, as there are many files, it is a big work to clarify it by the subcats. This cannot be done in one day, it is a process step by step (that's why some files still are in the national category, while others already were in the proper federal states category). I am not talking about "atomizing" categories down to district or even municipality level, only down to the federal states, by the way the same as Category:Railway lines in Germany, which is also split into federal states. So railway lines and maps would be found on the same level. Furthermore the Category:Rail transport maps of Germany truly is confusing not only by the amount of files but also by all those different naming patterns, which the various users use. So finding duplicates (or even avoiding double work with creating duplicate maps) should be easier if one can find them on the state level. Thirdly, lots of your nice and helpful files cannot be found when searching down for example from Category:Maps of Lower Saxony, as long as they are only in the national level at the railway category tree. Being categorized at Category:Rail transport maps of Lower Saxony they could be found from both trees. And they are worth to be found! Regards, Kleeblatt187 (talk) 10:23, 26 February 2015 (UTC)
Thank you for appreciating my work. If you feel that all maps should be placed in their respective federal states feel free to do so. From now I will consider that when uploading new files. Vunz (talk) 11:16, 27 February 2015 (UTC)
Ok, I will do so... :-) Step by step. Greetings, Kleeblatt187 (talk) 19:43, 2 March 2015 (UTC)
Finished! :-) In some obvious cases I have also added your maps to articles in de-WP and en-WP as well as to wikidata. Cheers, Kleeblatt187 (talk) 21:18, 23 March 2015 (UTC)
Good work, hats off! Vunz (talk) 22:09, 25 March 2015 (UTC)

BSicon uhWSTR[edit]

I have reverted your revert of this icon as we are currently in the process of narrowing the formation lines for elevated icons per the standards at BSicon/Icon geometry and SVG code neatness. You can read the rationale for this change here. Cheers. Lost on  Belmont 3200N1000W  (talk) 23:07, 7 March 2015 (UTC)

ok, thanks for notifying Vunz (talk) 15:40, 8 March 2015 (UTC)

PD-shape[edit]

Could you please use {{PD-shape}} for your uploads of BSicons? The matter was (last) discussed at Talk:BSicon#Icon attributions. YLSS (talk) 23:23, 13 April 2015 (UTC)

Missed the discussion, but I will Vunz (talk) 22:03, 18 April 2015 (UTC)