User talk:Phe

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search

Slinky[edit]

Quand j'ai copié cette image pour la première fois il n'y avait pas de bandeau comme quoi elle aurait été douteuse. Actuellement j'en recherche l'origine, et ce n'est pas évident, j'ai bien l'intention de demander le droit de l'utiliser. Jean-Jacques MILAN 21:09, 13 Dec 2004 (UTC)

File:CD2 33-Equator-Expedition.png[edit]

Salut Phe,

Peux-tu donner la source de cette carte ? Site web, livre, etc. Merci, Yann 01:50, 14 February 2007 (UTC)

Image:Cathédrale de la Nativité-de-Marie de Rieux (détail, vue arrière).jpg[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 10:07, 27 August 2008 (UTC)

Fixed Phe (talk) 10:18, 27 August 2008 (UTC)


Image:Cathédrale de la Nativité-de-Marie de Rieux (beffroi).jpg[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 10:10, 27 August 2008 (UTC)

Fixed Phe (talk) 10:18, 27 August 2008 (UTC)

File:D’Archiac - Introduction à l’étude de la paléontologie stratigraphique - Tome 2, fig 12.jpg[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 13:21, 31 March 2009 (UTC)

Fixed Phe (talk) 18:41, 31 March 2009 (UTC)

File:Delamétherie - Leçons de géologie I.djvu[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 17:38, 9 April 2009 (UTC)

Fixed Phe (talk) 17:42, 9 April 2009 (UTC)

File:Nietzsche - Ainsi parlait Zarathoustra.djvu[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 11:21, 7 December 2009 (UTC)

Fixed Phe (talk) 11:25, 7 December 2009 (UTC)

Catégorie[edit]

Salut Phe,

Est-il possible de renommer par bot les :Category:Charles Duclos|catégories Charles Duclos en catégories Charles Pinot Duclos ? Merci de ton aide ! --Zyephyrus (talk) 15:26, 7 September 2010 (UTC)

Fait à la main, j'ai demandé la destruction de la catégorie mal nommé. Phe (talk) 16:41, 7 September 2010 (UTC)

Heads-up[edit]

Gday phe,

To give you a heads-up to the discussion Commons:Village pump#A best practice in Creator/Category/Gallery layout? as it mentions your author fill script at enWS (and presumably frWS), which I had previously mentioned to Jarekt (talk · contribs) for something to assist pre-fill in {{Creator}}.  — billinghurst sDrewth 01:52, 16 January 2011 (UTC)

thanks for the notice. Phe (talk) 20:15, 16 January 2011 (UTC)

Category:L’Arbre (Rodenbach)[edit]

Sorry, but these illustrations are not in the public domain in their home country (France). The illustrator, fr:Joseph Pinchon, died 1953, so these illustration will enter the public domain in France only on January 1, 2024 and can therefore not be hosted at the Commons until then. See Commons:Deletion requests/Category:L’Arbre (Rodenbach). Lupo 12:16, 7 March 2011 (UTC)

My bad, I should have double checked it before uploading them... Phe (talk)

Cervantes images[edit]

Salut, Phe, and thank you for uploading all those images by Johannot. Please note though that in this case {{PD-old-100}} or {{PD-art-100}} should be used because the author died early enough, so to speak. The normal PD-old license with 70 years of copyright post mortem is apparently not valid in the U.S., there is even a small disclaimer on that template: "You must also include a United States public domain tag to indicate why this work is in the public domain in the United States." Please consider replacing that license with a 100 years equivalent. Regards, De728631 (talk) 17:03, 12 August 2011 (UTC)

Is there any place on commons to ask for a bot to do the replacement ? Phe (talk) 17:05, 12 August 2011 (UTC)
Commons:Bots/Requests seems to be the place. De728631 (talk) 17:08, 12 August 2011 (UTC)

Tip: Categorizing images[edit]

Transmitted to the right person. Phe (talk) 17:07, 19 September 2011 (UTC)

Cutters Practical Guide[edit]

Thank You ! :) Sfan00 IMG (talk) 01:17, 15 March 2012 (UTC)

Commons:Bots/Requests/Phe-bot[edit]

If you're still interested in getting your bot up and running, could you comment as to whether you've resolved the problem that Eugene identified? i.e. is the bot now more careful about missing "date=" tags? --99of9 (talk) 01:16, 22 May 2012 (UTC)

Answer on the request page. Phe (talk) 14:44, 28 May 2012 (UTC)
Ping! Still interested in the bot request? --Dschwen (talk) 21:56, 15 November 2012 (UTC)

File:Copyright Act, 1956 (United Kingdom).djvu[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Copyright Act, 1956 (United Kingdom).djvu has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Sfan00 IMG (talk) 16:37, 23 August 2013 (UTC)

Editor @ ar.wiki[edit]

Hello. I would like to inform you that I have granted you editor flag at the Arabic Wikipedia, all your edits there will be automatically marked as patrolled. Best regards.--Avocato (talk) 07:24, 6 December 2013 (UTC)