User talk:Halleypo

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Halleypo!

Tip: Categorizing images[edit]

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | magyar | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски / srpski | svenska | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


Hello, Halleypo!

Tip: Add categories to your images

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

Uploadwizard-categories.png

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations"). Pro-tip: The CommonSense tool can help you find the best category for your image.

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

CategorizationBot (talk) 10:43, 9 January 2011 (UTC)

File:Ministério da Agricultura na Praia Vermelha.jpg[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 12:38, 18 March 2012 (UTC)

Fotos das estátuas de Pedro II[edit]

Halleypo, se você é o autor das fotografias das estátuas de Pedro II em Petrópolis, gostaria que soubesse que são ambas de excelente qualidade. Parabéns e obrigado por enriquecer o acervo do Commons. --Lecen (talk) 22:57, 7 January 2013 (UTC)

File:Prefeito Pereira Passos.png[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Prefeito Pereira Passos.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Túrelio (talk) 09:17, 21 February 2013 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:MNBA Pedro Américo A Carioca.jpg[edit]

български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | فارسی | suomi | français | magyar | italiano | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | 日本語 | norsk bokmål | polski | português | română | slovenščina | svenska | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:MNBA Pedro Américo A Carioca.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

JuTa 02:38, 30 March 2013 (UTC)

I forgot to fill the license field. Problem solved. Halley Pacheco de Oliveira Halley Pacheco de Oliveira 05:51, 30 March 2013 (UTC-3)

File:Augusto Malta - Imprensa Nacional.jpg[edit]

Olá Halleypo, me tira uma dúvida, como que essa foto se encontra em domínio público? Augusto Malta somente completa 70 anos de morto em 2027, não? Leandro Rocha (talk) 16:07, 1 June 2013 (UTC)

Prezado Leandro Rocha. Li em algum lugar, e sinceramente não me lembro onde, que as fotos do Augusto Malta estariam em Domínio Público. Como também não me lembro quais foram os motivos alegados para estas fotos estarem em Domínio Público, solicitei a remoção desta foto da Wikimedia. Grato, Halley.

Sítio Arqueológico de São Miguel Arcanjo[edit]

adorei suas fotos, já usei várias, estavam muito em falta!!!! abraços! tetraktys (talk) 00:03, 10 December 2013 (UTC)

File:Igreja de Santo Antonio da Barra.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Igreja de Santo Antonio da Barra.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Gunnex (talk) 14:51, 24 March 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Bondinho chegando ao Pão de Açúcar.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bondinho chegando ao Pão de Açúcar.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Ilha Fiscal.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ilha Fiscal.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Fugro Explorer.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fugro Explorer.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

CBO Carolina.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! CBO Carolina.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Jardim Botânico Fanchette Rischbieter em Curitiba 09.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Jardim Botânico Fanchette Rischbieter em Curitiba 09.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Jardim Botânico Fanchette Rischbieter em Curitiba 02.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Jardim Botânico Fanchette Rischbieter em Curitiba 02.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Deletar[edit]

Olá. Creio que você entenda português, vi que carregou algumas imagens referências ao Brasil. Não tenho familiaridade com o commons e houve uma discussão sobre uma imagem na wiki Adolfo Lutz II.jpg


Chegamos a conclusão [1] que esta imagem não é de Adolfo Caminha e sim de outra pessoa. Por isso devemos deletar, para não gerar novos equívocos. Sera que você pode solicitar para deletar ou como se solicita isso? O revolucionário aliado (talk) 23:05, 16 October 2014 (UTC)

Tabebuia heptaphylla[edit]

Olá Halleypo, você pode ver File:Ipê Rosa no Parque do Flamengo.jpg com ipê-rosa (Category:Tabebuia rosea sin. Tabebuia pentaphylla auct.). Ele é classificado na categoria ipê-roxo (Category:Handroanthus heptaphyllus sin. Tabebuia heptaphylla (Vell.) Toledo))? Merci, Minerv (talk) 18:11, 20 October 2014 (UTC)

Olá Minerv, infelizmente meu conhecimento de botânica é nulo, achei que esta seria a classificação correta e coloquei, mas não tenho condições de rever a classificação. Se você, ou alguém que você conheça, puder classificar melhor eu agradeço. Sinta-se a vontade para mudar. Atenciosamente, Halley Pacheco de Oliveira.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Forte de Copacabana 07.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Forte de Copacabana 07.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

File:Monumento visconde maua praca maua rio.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Monumento visconde maua praca maua rio.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Gestumblindi (talk) 23:50, 26 November 2014 (UTC)

File:Franklin Roosevelt e Getúlio Vargas.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Franklin Roosevelt e Getúlio Vargas.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Gunnex (talk) 23:47, 16 January 2015 (UTC)