User talk:Nitot

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

You must add copyright tags to all the images you upload to the commons. Preferrably {{GFDL}}, PD or a creative commons tag. Nice pic!. ed g2stalk 23:41, 12 Jan 2005 (UTC)

Just wanted to say wow and to thank you for uploading Image:Tour eiffel at sunrise from the trocadero.jpg - it's beautiful!
I hope you don't mind, but I've nominated it to be our featured picture in the next available slot, which will be the 4th of February.
James F. (talk) 09:51, 13 Jan 2005 (UTC)
And as chance would have it, this photograph is also due to be the Featured Picture on the English Wikipedia on the 2nd Feb. You can check the caption at en:Wikipedia:Picture of the day/February 2, 2005. -- Solipsist 09:36, 1 Feb 2005 (UTC)

Standblog.org[edit]

Content de vous voir ici, je suis un lecteur silencieux mais régulier de votre excellent Standblog. Greudin 16:42, 13 Jan 2005 (UTC)

idem tout pareil :) notafish }<';> 10:53, 27 Jan 2005 (UTC)
plop ! Salut Tristan (et maman nota ;) Meanos 02:28, 17 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Tout idem pareil quoi ;) fr:Utilisateur:Saccagator

RE-création d'une galerie[edit]

D'après la discussion sur la page de suppression un simple renommage serait suffissant. En effet, ton simple nom risque de poser de questions aux personnes qui consultent la page de description de tes images téléchargées. Les noms proposés pourraient être du style Categorie:User/Nitot ou Categorie:User:Nitot.

Cependant, l'existant même d'une catégorie par utilisateur semble être remise en cause. Alors je te conseille de transférer manuellement toutes tes images sur ta page. Le mieux serait même de créer une nouvelle page du type User:Nitot/gallery. Il suffit de mettre le modèle : <gallery> images </gallery>. Pour le faire plus rapidement utilse ta liste de contributions et fait copier-coller en enlevant la date. --Pseudomoi 00:08, 10 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Donc... tu as déjà ta réponse. L'inconvénient de cette solution est qu'elle est un peu envahissante, mais c'est ok ~~ bye :] Yug talk 01:07, 10 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Je te conseilles plutot d'effacer cette catégorie et d'entretenir la page User:Nitot/gallery elle est construite comme un article elle donc plus facile à organiser. J'espère que tu apprécies la mise en page. --Pseudomoi 01:11, 10 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Merci à Yug et Pseudomoi pour le coup de main, mais ça ne résoud en rien mon probleme, qui est d'avoir une gallerie *automatique* de mes contributions sans avoir à faire des copier-coller systèmatiques (que j'ai tendance à oublier de faire). Je veux bien renommer la catégorie, mais bon... C'est bcp de boulot manuel, et si c'est pour qu'on me redise qu'il faut faire à nouveau une categorie, je risque de mal le prendre ;-) —Nitot 11:43, 12 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

C'est quoi votre appareil photo ?[edit]

Je trouve vos photos excellentes et à défaut d'avoir votre talent, je me disais que je pourrais avoir votre appareil photo, je voulais connaitre la marque et si vous avez quelques infos dessus ce serait sympa. Merci ( Axel584 sur le wiki FR)

J'ai trouvé la réponse sur l'une des photos : "Canon EOS 20D" User:Axel584

Photos[edit]

Quelles photos! J'aimait en particulier "la tour Eiffel aux aurores". gren 21:21, 19 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

      • This pictures are wonderfull! It was incredibly to see them! Very goog work!

--84.57.164.152 14:38, 25 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Recadrage d'une photo[edit]

J'ai recadré la photo de l'Institut de France à Paris. Merci pour l'original.

Voir le résultat à Image:Institut de France - Académie française et pont des Arts.jpg

PRA 14:18, 30 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Catégories[edit]

Bonjour Tristan. Bravo pour la qualité de tes photos. Mais ce serait bien si tu les catégorisais (du genre "Category:Cities and villages in Seine-Maritime" ou "Category:Castles in Haute-Normandie". Cela permettrait de les trouver sans compter sur le hasard et ainsi d'illustrer des articles parfois bien ternes. Au plaisir de voir de nouvelles images de ta part. (Birdie sur fr:) Gato76680 12:21, 28 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  English  español  Esperanto  français  galego  italiano  lietuvių  magyar  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  português  polski  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  Tiếng Việt  Ελληνικά  македонски  русский  українська  հայերեն  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  فارسی  +/−


Hello, and thank your for sharing your files with Commons. There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. Please remember that all uploads require source, author and license information. Could you please resolve these problems, which are described on the page linked in above? Thank you. --Siebrand 15:44, 19 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  English  español  Esperanto  français  galego  italiano  lietuvių  magyar  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  português  polski  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  Tiếng Việt  Ελληνικά  македонски  русский  українська  հայերեն  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  فارسی  +/−


Hello, and thank your for sharing your files with Commons. There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. Please remember that all uploads require source, author and license information. Could you please resolve these problems, which are described on the page linked in above? Thank you. --Siebrand 13:08, 23 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Projet Communes de France[edit]

Tristan,

merci pour la proposition de mettre les photos nous intéressant sous GFDL. En voyant les photos en liens sur le standblog, j'en bavé d'envie, donc, nous les mettre à disposition est vraiment le bienvenu.

Cordialement,--DudeFromFrance 15:30, 13 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  English  español  Esperanto  français  galego  italiano  lietuvių  magyar  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  português  polski  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  Tiếng Việt  Ελληνικά  македонски  русский  українська  հայերեն  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  فارسی  +/−


Hello, and thank your for sharing your files with Commons. There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. Please remember that all uploads require source, author and license information. Could you please resolve these problems, which are described on the page linked in above? Thank you. Siebrand 17:37, 19 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
This message was placed by an automated process. Please go to Commons:Help desk if you need help.


dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 21:06, 10 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]


dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 21:06, 10 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]


dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 10:06, 8 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]


dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 16:48, 15 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Liens entre page perso de photographes Commons[edit]

Bonjour.

J'ai créé sur ma page un chapitre appelé "D'autres photographes talentueux". Vous pourriez créer un chapitre similaire sur votre page perso Commons et m'inclure dedans. --ComputerHotline (talk) 10:40, 10 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Tip: Categorizing images[edit]

Afrikaans  العربية  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  Esperanto  español  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  magyar  íslenska  italiano  日本語  ქართული  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  +/−


Hello, Nitot!
Tip: Add categories to your files
Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

BotMultichillT 06:12, 18 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Photographers Blackbelt[edit]


THE PHOTOGRAPHER'S BLACKBELT
J'ai l'honneur de vous décerner la Photographers Blackbelt (ceinture noire des photographes) pour vos photos remarquables et excellentes.
--ComputerHotline (talk) 07:34, 6 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

your NC-labeling[edit]

Hi Nitot, did you enter private property to shoot File:Coupesarte-14-manoir-2.JPG, File:Coupesarte-14-manoir-1.JPG, File:Coupesarte-14-manoir-3.JPG and File:Coupesarte-14-manoir-4.JPG? --Túrelio (talk) 06:22, 22 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Licenses are not revocable, therefore once the file has been released as GFDL, the license can't be changed as "non commercial only". Yann (talk) 19:05, 22 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Eiffel Tower Deletion[edit]

File:Tour eiffel at sunrise from the trocadero.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

--Massimo Catarinella (talk) 15:00, 25 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]


File:Omaha-beach-cemetery-monument.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

---Nard (Hablemonos)(Let's talk) 01:16, 21 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Pompage illicite et intensif de photos[edit]

Ce site http://www.infotourisme.net/tourisme/breancon a récupéré ta photo sans indiquer les mentions nécessaires : type de licence + ton nom. Je viens d'ajouter sur leur page ce qui est nécessaire ... mais l'affichage n'est pas automatique. Je crois constater depuis hier soir que les responsables (sous la pression) ne refusent plus de citer Commons et les auteurs ! Gonflé, hein ! Voir http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikip%C3%A9dia:Le_Bistro/16_mars_2011#Suivi_de_l.27affaire_Infotourisme.net et le Bistro des jours précédents, ainsi que User:Markus3/Photos réemployées . Amicalement - Marc ROUSSEL - --Markus3 (talk) 07:52, 18 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

... et aussi http://www.infotourisme.net/tourisme/chars - Marc ROUSSEL - --Markus3 (talk) 08:28, 18 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Et encore http://www.infotourisme.net/tourisme/boury-en-vexin - Amicalement - Marc ROUSSEL - --Markus3 (talk) 09:00, 23 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Nouvelles "trouvailles" :
http://www.infotourisme.net/tourisme/henonville
http://www.infotourisme.net/tourisme/lavilletertre
http://www.infotourisme.net/tourisme/liancourt-saint-pierre
http://www.infotourisme.net/tourisme/lierville
- Amicalement - Marc ROUSSEL - --Markus3 (talk) 15:03, 25 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Un petit poem[edit]

Merci M. Nitot Vos photos sont beau J'espere que vous know Et que nos sentiments Sont pas de trop

Good to meet you last night at the London opening.

Sorry about the bad French/English poem.

Jon Davies and Daria Cybulska

Wikimedia UK chapter.

Photo pour livre[edit]

Bonjour Nitot. Je prépare actuellement un livre sur l'histoire des Pyrénées-Orientales qui reprend notamment des chroniques parues cet été 2013 dans le journal L'Indépendant et dans un de mes blogs. Il se peut que j'utilise une de tes photos (File:Fort-Saint-Elme-66.JPG), avec mention des crédits, bien sûr et telle que déjà parue dans une de mes chroniques. Je tenais à t'en avertir et j'espère que cela ne te pose pas de problème. Merci d'avance. Culex (talk) 16:00, 10 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mondadori-headquarters-with-pond.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Josve05a (talk) 01:36, 19 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

New level {{User PH-4}}[edit]

Hi ; new level 4 for you ?--Medium69 You wanted talk to me? 00:11, 12 December 2014 (UTC) [reply]

VG-4


Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 13:04, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Harley Davidson Fat Boy 2018 FLFBS.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request.


Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

User who nominated the file for deletion (Nominator) : 185.24.184.194.

And also:

I'm a computer program; please don't ask me questions but ask the user who nominated your file(s) for deletion or at our Help Desk. //Deletion Notification Bot (talk) 13:40, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]