User talk:Sharper

Gallery

Talk

Statistics

This is a Wikimedia Commons user talk page.

This is not an article, file or the talk page of an article or file. If you find this page on any site other than the Wikimedia Commons you are viewing a mirror site. Be aware that the page may be outdated and that the user to whom this talk page belongs may have no personal affiliation with any site other than the Wikimedia Commons itself. The original page is located at https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Sharper.

This is the user talk page of Sharper, where you can send messages and comments to Sharper.

• Be polite.
• Be friendly.
• Assume good faith.
• No personal attacks.

• Please sign and date your entries by clicking on the appropriate button or by typing four tildes (~~~~) at the end.
• Put new text under old text.
• New to Wikimedia Commons? Welcome! Ask questions, get answers as soon as possible.
• Click here to start a new topic.

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Parks Canada Jeep – Sable Island, NS – (2018-07-15).jpeg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK. --Peulle 18:36, 19 August 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 22 August 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Akademik Ioffe (ship, 1988).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Most useful in scope. I don't think the category "cruise ships in Canada" is correct, though.--Peulle (talk) 22:10, 19 August 2018 (UTC)

•  Comment @Peulle: Yeah, I was a bit uncertain as to whether or not to add that category. The ship was originally built as a research vessel but it's since been refitted and is now used as an expedition cruise ship (proof). Don't know if that qualifies it to the category or not though – should I leave it or remove it? Sharpery (talk) 00:13, 20 August 2018 (UTC)

• Leave it in. If it's being used as a cruise ship for paying tourists, it's a cruise ship. :) --Peulle (talk) 07:33, 20 August 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:15, 24 August 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Carcross Desert sign – Yukon – (2017-05-20).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:28, 24 August 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:11, 27 August 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Profile view of Percé Rock – southwest face.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment Couple things, It needs to be geotagged. Also I think in the scope something along the lines of: Profile view - looking (insert cardinal direction) is better. -- Sixflashphoto (talk) 16:16, 2 September 2018 (UTC)

---

Scope changed from Rocher Percé (head-on view) to Profile view of Percé Rock – southwest face --Sharpery (talk) 16:25, 2 September 2018 (UTC)

• Please notify previous voters of this change. Remember: "A support vote that was made before a change of scope is not counted unless it is reconfirmed afterwards; an oppose vote is counted unless it is changed or withdrawn".

---

•  Done @Sixflashphoto: Geotagged the photo and change of scope. Sharpery (talk) 16:25, 2 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support Best in Scope, Useful and Used. -- Sixflashphoto (talk) 16:40, 2 September 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 17:33, 6 September 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zwicker House – Lunenburg, NS – (2018-08-29).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 13:16, 5 September 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 8 September 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Sign for the Carcross Desert.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment A little dark but for what looks like a cloudy day I can live with that (still would be nice). It will need geocoding nonetheless. Also is there project this could be used on? -- Sixflashphoto (talk) 00:43, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
  • @Sixflashphoto: Coordinates added, thanks for that. I suppose I could see the image being used as illustration for Wikipedia articles, especially if they're expanded on further. It could also be used on Wikivoyage. Sharpery (talk) 00:21, 6 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support Useful. -- Sixflashphoto (talk) 10:44, 6 September 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:03, 8 September 2018 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Vincent Coleman (ship, 2018).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment We must add a geocoding. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:19, 4 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support Unique within scope. useful & used. ~MOHEEN ^{(keep talking)} 06:00, 4 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Comment I'd support this myself but with photos of boats if geocoding can be provided it should be. -- Sixflashphoto (talk) 13:24, 6 September 2018 (UTC)
  •  Info @Sixflashphoto: The geocoding was added a couple of days ago :) Sharpery (talk) 20:05, 6 September 2018 (UTC)

haha Sorry, my mistake. -- Sixflashphoto (talk) 22:55, 6 September 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:06, 8 September 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Kuwaiti Embassy, Ottawa.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:37, 25 September 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St. John's Anglican Church bell – Lunenburg, NS – (2018-08-29).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 17:05, 27 September 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 30 September 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Halifax Hopper.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Oppose Not geocoded. Also, the scope is quite narrow. --Reinhard Müller (talk) 11:13, 30 September 2018 (UTC)
  • @Reinhard Müller: I've added the geocoding. I can't think of a scope that's any more broad, personally; the Harbour Hopper is quite a common sight around Halifax. Sharpery (talk) 13:17, 30 September 2018 (UTC)
    • Thank you. Now  Support, best image in the (rather narrow) scope. --Reinhard Müller (talk) 15:58, 30 September 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:24, 2 October 2018 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Northern gannet colony – Île Bonaventure, QC – (2018-07-19).jpg

Copyright status: File:Northern gannet colony – Île Bonaventure, QC – (2018-07-19).jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Northern gannet colony – Île Bonaventure, QC – (2018-07-19).jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 23:17, 17 October 2018 (UTC)

Autopatrol given

Hello. I just wanted to let you know that I have granted autopatrol rights to your account; the reason for this is that I believe you are sufficiently trustworthy and experienced to have your contributions automatically marked as "reviewed". This has no effect on your editing, it is simply intended to make it easier for users that are monitoring Recent changes or Recent uploads to find unproductive edits amidst the productive ones like yours. In addition, the Flickr upload feature and an increased number of batch-uploads in UploadWizard, uploading of freely licensed MP3 files, overwriting files uploaded by others and an increased limit for page renames per minute are now available to you. Thank you.

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Siem Pilot (ship, 2010).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:25, 28 November 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 17:39, 30 November 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Brethour Island.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:21, 25 January 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:09, 29 January 2019 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Regina International Airport (aerial view).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment Must connect the scope to the category that contains the image --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:23, 25 January 2019 (UTC)
• ----

Scope changed from Regina International Airport (aerial view) to Regina International Airport (aerial view) {{{3}}}

• Please notify previous voters of this change. Remember: "A support vote that was made before a change of scope is not counted unless it is reconfirmed afterwards; an oppose vote is counted unless it is changed or withdrawn".

---

•  Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:59, 26 January 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:10, 29 January 2019 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Yarmouth War Memorial.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment it's almost perfect, it only misses a geocoding in the caption.--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:45, 18 May 2019 (UTC)
  •  Comment @Archaeodontosaurus: Geocoding has been added. --Sharper {talk} 13:12, 18 May 2019 (UTC)
    •  Support Perfect now --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 15:39, 18 May 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. --BoothSift 04:46, 22 May 2019 (UTC)

Airport diagrams categories

Hi Sharper,

regarding your move of Category:Airport diagrams of Logan International Airport to Category:Diagrams of Logan International Airport: please note that "airport diagram" is a fixed term in aviation. It refers to a very specific, standardized kind of diagram that you'll find in the AIP. (Unfortunately, Category:Airport diagrams contains many diagrams of airports that are not airport diagrams …). May I suggest to keep Category:Airport diagrams of Logan International Airport as a subcategory of Category:Diagrams of Logan International Airport, where the former holds the actual airport diagrams and the latter holds all other kinds of diagrams that do not follow the standards? Cheers, --El Grafo (talk) 11:31, 24 June 2019 (UTC)

• 
  this is a diagram showing a part of an airport, but it is not an "airport diagram"
• 
  this is an "airport diagram"
• 
  this is based on an "airport diagram", but it does not follow the standards of an "airport diagram" any more.

@El Grafo: Yes, that sounds like the best way forward. I suppose it's an issue that should be addressed across the board for all subcategories of Category:Airport diagrams, along with some sort of explanation on the category pages to explain the difference. Is it a task you'd like to undertake or would you prefer that I did it? There's quite a few categories and it would take some time. Sharper {talk} 15:39, 24 June 2019 (UTC)

Hi Sharper, I'm totally maxed out IRL right now, so if you'd like to go ahead that would be very much appreciated. There are more standardized diagrams that could use their own categories, btw. (visual approach charts, etc.). I might be able to join there next month, but I can't really promise anything right now … Best, --El Grafo (talk) 08:50, 25 June 2019 (UTC)

September 2019: it's Wiki Loves Monuments time again!

Hi

You're receiving this message because you've previously contributed to the annual Wiki Loves Monuments contest in the UK. We'd be delighted if you would do so again this year and help record our local built environment for future generations.

You can find more details at the Wiki Loves Monuments UK website. Or, if you have images taken in other countries, you can check the international options. This year's contest runs until 30 September 2019.

Many thanks for your help once more! MichaelMaggs (talk) 15:35, 3 September 2019 (UTC)

Community Insights Survey

Share your experience in this survey

Hi Sharper,

The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey about your experience with Wikimedia Commons and Wikimedia. The purpose of this survey is to learn how well the Foundation is supporting your work on wiki and how we can change or improve things in the future. The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation.

Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.

This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).

Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.

Sincerely,

RMaung (WMF) 01:14, 10 September 2019 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Monuments France 2019

Bonjour,

Le concours Wiki Loves Monuments France est de retour et ouvert jusqu'à 31 septembre ! Déjà 8309 photos ont été importés cette année, vous aussi rejoignez le concours !

Le concours concerne tous les monuments présents dans la base Mérimée (qu'ils soient classés, inscrits ou simplement classés). De l'imposant château aux ruines industrielles, de la chapelle au coin de la rue aux mégalithes en forêt, c'est un impressionnant patrimoine qui attend d'être photographié et documenté. Où que vous soyez il y a des monuments autour de chez vous. Enfin, vous pouvez mettre en ligne autant de photos que vous le souhaitez de ces monuments. Pour information, le règlement est disponible sur le site du concours. Nous attendons vos photos avec impatience !

Les plus belles photos seront sélectionnées par un jury national composé d'amateurs et de professionnels, de contributeurs à Wikimedia Commons et d'acteurs du patrimoine. Un jury international sélectionnera ensuite des meilleures photographies mondiales.

Si vous avez des questions, l'équipe organisatrice se fera un plaisir d'y répondre.

P.S. : vous recevez ce message parce que vous avez participé au concours Wiki Loves Monuments en France les années précédentes. Si vous avez déjà ou si ne pouvez pas participer au concours cette année, faites passer le message autour de vous pour que de nouveaux et nouvelles photographes rejoignent l'aventure !

Bonne journée,

Sarah Krichen WMFr et Nicolas Vigneron, pour l'équipe de Wiki Loves Monuments France, 14:51, 12 September 2019 (UTC)

Reminder: Community Insights Survey

Share your experience in this survey

Hi Sharper,

A couple of weeks ago, we invited you to take the Community Insights Survey. It is the Wikimedia Foundation’s annual survey of our global communities. We want to learn how well we support your work on wiki. We are 10% towards our goal for participation. If you have not already taken the survey, you can help us reach our goal! Your voice matters to us.

Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.

This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).

Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.

Sincerely,

RMaung (WMF) 15:24, 20 September 2019 (UTC)

Reminder: Community Insights Survey

Share your experience in this survey

Hi Sharper,

There are only a few weeks left to take the Community Insights Survey! We are 30% towards our goal for participation. If you have not already taken the survey, you can help us reach our goal! With this poll, the Wikimedia Foundation gathers feedback on how well we support your work on wiki. It only takes 15-25 minutes to complete, and it has a direct impact on the support we provide.

Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.

This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).

Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.

Sincerely,

RMaung (WMF) 20:04, 3 October 2019 (UTC)

File tagging File:Pablo Rodriguez-2017 (cropped).jpg

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Pablo Rodriguez-2017 (cropped).jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case. Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Pablo Rodriguez-2017 (cropped).jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

 

Patrick Rogel (talk) 23:07, 21 November 2019 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Earth 2020 in Canada is open!

Hello! We are happy to announce that Wiki Loves Earth 2020 in Canada is now open. Your participation will help us to document the nature of Canada and show it to the world through Wikipedia and other projects. Please go to the page of the contest to read the rules: wmca:Wiki_Loves_Earth/Home. There you can also find out how to take part in the contest. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact us: wmca:Talk:Wiki_Loves_Earth/Home. Thanks,
the organising committee of Wiki Loves Earth 2020 in Canada - 09:14, 20 July 2020 (UTC)
You are receiving this message because you took part in the contest before

Wiki Loves Earth 2020 au Canada débute !

Bonjour ! Il nous fait plaisir de vous annoncer que Wiki Loves Earth 2020 au Canada est maintenant en cours. Votre participation nous aidera à documenter la nature du Canada et de la montrer au monde à travers Wikipédia et d'autres projets. Veuillez vous rendre sur la page du concours pour lire les règles: wmca:Wiki_Loves_Earth/Accueil. Vous pouvez également y trouver comment participer au concours. Si vous avez des questions, n'hésitez pas à nous contacter: wmca:Talk:Wiki_Loves_Earth/Accueil. Merci,
le comité d'organisation de Wiki Loves Earth 2020 au Canada - 09:14, 20 July 2020 (UTC)
Vous recevez ce message parce que vous avez participé à la compétition auparavant.

Use of your photo with credit

Hello Sharper,

Would it be ok if I use your CHI-CHEEMAUN picture for a mailer I'm going to be sending out to the island? I live there and I simply love that picture, it's super clean and gorgeous. If I credit your image may I use it? Thank you

Hi @Seanwgray87, thank you for the kind words and yes, you are absolutely welcome to use it. Please attribute it to Ryan Sharpe/Wikimedia Commons, and if room permits please mention the license as well: CC BY-SA 4.0. Also, I would be very appreciative if you would be willing to share a digital copy of the mailer with me. You can contact me by email at Special:EmailUser/Sharper for this purpose. Thank you for choosing to use my photo! Cheers, Sharper {talk} 15:58, 27 August 2020 (UTC)

File:China administrative alt.svg

File:China administrative alt.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

JuTa 20:09, 20 September 2020 (UTC)

Automatic categorization by country

hello, after having found some of the images you uploaded here on Commons I'm here to kindly ask you about you can modify the template you created to categorize the shooting date also by country, for example File:FedEx C208 C-FEXH – Victoria CYYJ – (2019-08-10).jpg from Category:Photographs taken on 2019-08-10 to Category:Canada photographs taken on 2019-08-10 without having to make an overcategorization. (as well as inserting the parameter "|location=" in the {{Taken on}}). Thanks for your patience :-) --Threecharlie (talk) 05:12, 23 April 2021 (UTC)

File tagging File:Dane Lloyd (cropped).jpg

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Dane Lloyd (cropped).jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case. Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Dane Lloyd (cropped).jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

 

JuTa 07:06, 22 August 2021 (UTC)

Plus que quelques jours pour participer à Wiki Loves Monuments France !

Bonjour,

Le concours Wiki Loves Monuments France est ouvert pour une semaine encore, jusqu'au 30 septembre. Déjà plus de 6 000 photos ont été importées cette année alors vous aussi rejoignez le concours ! Cette campagne de contribution concerne tous les monuments et objets mobiliers présents dans la base Mérimée et dans la base Palissy. De l'imposant château aux ruines industrielles, de la verrière décorative au reliquaire, c'est un impressionnant patrimoine qui attend d'être photographié et documenté. Vous pouvez dès à présent mettre en ligne autant de photos que vous le souhaitez de ces monuments et objets du patrimoine français. Nous attendons vos photos avec impatience !

Les plus belles photos seront sélectionnées par un jury national composé d'amateurs et de professionnels, de contributeurs à Wikimedia Commons et d'acteurs du patrimoine. Un jury international constituera ensuite une sélection des meilleures photographies mondiales.

Si vous avez des questions, l'équipe organisatrice se fera un plaisir d'y répondre.

P.S. : vous recevez ce message parce que vous avez participé au concours Wiki Loves Monuments en France

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:32, 26 September 2021 (UTC)

File:AEB-Brazil.svg

File:AEB-Brazil.svg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that. The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request. This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: User:Chronus Chronus Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

 

User who nominated the file for deletion (Nominator) : Chronus.

I'm a computer program; please don't ask me questions but ask the user who nominated your file(s) for deletion or at our Help Desk. //Deletion Notification Bot (talk) 00:35, 19 October 2021 (UTC)

Category:Diagrams_of_airports_by_country

Diagrams of airports by country has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Enyavar (talk) 17:54, 1 January 2022 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Joyce DSC07985 0005 (cropped).jpg

Yours sincerely, -M.nelson (talk) 22:58, 31 January 2022 (UTC)

File:Michael-Spavor-2010 (cropped).jpg

File:Michael-Spavor-2010 (cropped).jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that. The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request. This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: Not own work. "Michael Spavor making friends on a trip to North Korea in 2010. Photo: Jon Dunbar" https://www.koreatimes.co.kr/www/nation/2022/04/177_316042.html Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

 

Cryptic-waveform (talk) 15:45, 2 December 2022 (UTC)