Commons:Кандидаты в избранные изображения

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search
Кандидаты в избранные изображения на других языках:

Alemannisch | asturianu | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | English | فارسی | español | suomi | français | galego | हिन्दी | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lëtzebuergesch | молдовеняскэ | norsk bokmål | português | polski | română | русский | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | українська | 粵語 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Shortcut: COM:FPC Если вы считаете, что нашли или создали изображение, достойное стать избранным,— пожалуйста, добавьте его в нижеследующий раздел Кандидаты. Если в течение 15 дней ваше предложение будет принято собществом, то изображению будет присвоено звание избранного. Пожалуйста, обратите внимание: избранные изображения не имеют прямого отношения к Изображениям дня (однако выбор изображений дня производится преимущественно из «избранных изображений»).

Contents

Кандидаты[edit]

Для того чтобы проголосовать или добавить новое изображение-кандидат, перейдите по этой ссылке

Featured picture candidates[edit]

File:Albury railway station, Australia.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 30 Aug 2017 at 07:25:28 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Albury railway station, Australia

File:Neuberger Münster Innenraum 01.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 30 Aug 2017 at 06:53:12 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Interior of Neuberg Abbey Church

File:Neuhaus Haubentaucher füttert Küken am Nest P5RM1096.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 29 Aug 2017 at 21:30:32 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Great crested grebe feeding chicken

File:Archimollusc-en.svg[edit]

Voting period ends on 29 Aug 2017 at 18:24:46 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Hypothetical ancestral mollusc
Out of date clock icon.svg
Nomination denied. Thank you for nominating this image. Unfortunately, it does not fall within the Guidelines because only two active nominations per user are allowed.

King of ♠ 18:46, 20 August 2017 (UTC)

File:Subduction-en.svg[edit]

Voting period ends on 29 Aug 2017 at 16:23:37 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Subduction
Should be fine since it's an .SVG file, right? The Guidelines say that the "rule exclude images computer generated and constructed using a free licensed source code available in the image description."--Peulle (talk) 06:35, 21 August 2017 (UTC)
  • I agree with you, and therefore Symbol support vote.svg Support per my comment above. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:13, 21 August 2017 (UTC)

File:Nautilus diagram-en.svg[edit]

Voting period ends on 29 Aug 2017 at 18:07:41 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Female Nautilus pompilius
  • Not when taking the size into consideration. Symbol support vote.svg Support --Peulle (talk) 06:37, 21 August 2017 (UTC)
  • I agree with you. Symbol support vote.svg Support. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:02, 21 August 2017 (UTC)

File:Rock in Evia Greece.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 29 Aug 2017 at 16:21:32 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

cliff in Euboea

File:Aminah Cendrakasih, c. 1959, by Tati Photo Studio.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 29 Aug 2017 at 10:46:42 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Indonesian actress Aminah Cendrakasih
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/People
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Tati Studio, restored and uploaded by Crisco 1492, nominated by Yann (talk) 10:46, 20 August 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Nice portrait of Indonesian actress Aminah Cendrakasih. -- Yann (talk) 10:46, 20 August 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - Nice portrait, pretty actress. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 11:44, 20 August 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Per Ikan. -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 11:59, 20 August 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support As restorer/uploader  — Chris Woodrich (talk) 12:09, 20 August 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support PumpkinSky talk 02:07, 21 August 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Reasonable quality considering the age. Has historical value. VI? --Peulle (talk) 06:43, 21 August 2017 (UTC)
    • Considering I regularly find more images of her in the late 50s/early 60s, I'm somewhat loathe to go VI. Besides, we've got a color (3/4) portrait, the halftoning of which would not be a problem at VI.  — Chris Woodrich (talk) 10:01, 21 August 2017 (UTC)

File:Mésange (animal).jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 29 Aug 2017 at 10:19:44 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Passerine in the tree (Petergof, Russia)
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Gzen92 - uploaded by Gzen92 - nominated by Gzen92 -- Gzen92 [discuter] 10:19, 20 August 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Gzen92 [discuter] 10:19, 20 August 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Common bird, background disturbing. Yann (talk) 10:32, 20 August 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose The fact, that it is a common bird shall not taken into consideration, as quality matters. The bird has been captured in a good moment, but there are too many issues with this picture: overall sharpness and quality, DoF control, crop and las but not least, I agree with Yann, the background is disturbing. I am very sorry, but this picture is not FP. --Sputniktilt (talk) 11:03, 20 August 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per others. Rarity would matter, though. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 11:46, 20 August 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose I've never experienced FP voters voting for rarity and accepting less-than-usual-FP quality for wiildlife images. Charles (talk) 13:44, 20 August 2017 (UTC)
    • Yes, rarity is a criteria (at least to me). I could accept a less than optimal picture if the bird is very rare or specially difficult to catch. Regards, Yann (talk) 16:51, 20 August 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose nice Blue Tit, but not an FP.--Peulle (talk) 06:45, 21 August 2017 (UTC)

File:Ford Piquette Avenue Plant - Front Façade.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 29 Aug 2017 at 04:27:14 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

The front façade of the Ford Piquette Avenue Plant at 461 Piquette Avenue, Detroit, Michigan. Built in 1904, this building was the second home of the Ford Motor Company (and the oldest still standing), and was where the first Ford Model Ts were produced. Now a museum, it is the oldest, purpose-built car factory building in the world open to the public. The building's façade was fully restored and revealed to the public on September 27, 2008, the 100th anniversary of the first Ford Model T to roll out of the plant.
Nuvola apps important yellow.svg
Thank you for nominating this image. Unfortunately, it does not fall within the Guidelines and is unlikely to succeed because Perspective. Yann (talk) 10:28, 20 August 2017 (UTC) Anyone other than the nominator who disagrees may override this template by changing {{FPX}} to {{FPX contested}} and adding a vote in support. Voting will then continue in the usual way. If not contested within 24 hours, this nomination may be closed.
  • Comment: the perspective issue has been corrected. Jackdude101 talk cont 13:25, 20 August 2017 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment - Thanks. But it's still a little hazy/unsharp, among other issues (the crop and even presence of the stop sign would get some objections here). I think your best shot is to nominate this photo at COM:VIC, where it would have to be compared to all other photos of this facade. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:00, 20 August 2017 (UTC)

File:Old Paper Factory in Zurich.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 28 Aug 2017 at 21:58:31 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Old Paper Factory in Zurich.
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Shootzurich - uploaded by Shootzurich - nominated by Shootzurich -- Shootzurich (talk) 21:58, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Shootzurich (talk) 21:58, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Sorry, but while I like the scene, I think this is way too dark. HalfGig talk 22:54, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose - It's a pretty good picture, just not one of the very best on the site. I think the bottom left corner is probably too dark. Most of the rest is not too dark for me, and actually, what bothers me more is the soupy sky - a less glary day and/or time of day would look better. This picture is also extremely small for FP, as the absolute lower limit in size is 2,000 megapixels, but usually only an extraordinarily outstanding photo would be featured at that size. I think that if you submit this photo to Quality Images Candidates, it would probably miss being promoted, though possibly by a relatively narrow margin. You might find it useful to submit some of your photos to COM:Photography critiques or COM:QIC. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:54, 20 August 2017 (UTC)

File:Redoute du Pont-Levis, Sète cf01.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 28 Aug 2017 at 20:29:55 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
  • Thank you. Yes and no, I remember to have integrated voluntarily the yellow grass, because I liked the colour and the sunlight on it, and I'm a bit refractory to the idea of removing it now. Specially as I had a zoom and I clearly chose this crop... Further more I usually try not to go less wide than 16*10, otherwise I have the impression that something is missing... But you are right that this yellow grass distracts a bit the spectator's attention, however if I don't want to crop this one, I will try to avoid such distractions for my next compositions. Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:59, 20 August 2017 (UTC)

File:Cisles da Pieralongia Gherdeina.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 28 Aug 2017 at 17:52:00 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

The Cisles pasture and the Stevia group near Pieralongia in the Puez-Geisler Nature Park, Dolomites UNESCO World Heritage Site

File:Selaginella selaginoides - Niitvälja bog.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 28 Aug 2017 at 17:02:31 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Selaginella selaginoides

File:Monnaie en bronze, Pont Amisos, 85-65 BCE.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 28 Aug 2017 at 16:23:17 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Bronze coin, Amisos in Pontus, 85-65 BCE, 7,92 g

File:Hibiscus Rosa-sinensis.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 28 Aug 2017 at 12:25:25 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Red hibiscus flower
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Vespertunes - uploaded by Vespertunes - nominated by Vespertunes -- Moajjem Hossain 12:25, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Moajjem Hossain 12:25, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose I'm sorry but even if I were to accept the fairly shallow DoF and low resolution, that top crop is just too tight for me to accept this as a Featured Picture.--Peulle (talk) 12:43, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose -- As per Peulle Bijay Chaurasia (Talk) 16:45, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose -- F2? Try F8-F11 next time. Crop too tight. PumpkinSky talk 18:14, 19 August 2017 (UTC)

File:Vitoria - Seminario Diocesano 03.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 28 Aug 2017 at 07:25:40 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Diosesan Seminary. Vitoria-Gasteiz, Basque Country, Spain
  • ✓ Done Sorry Ikan, I should have seen this... And the reviewer at QIC, too Face-smile.svg. --Basotxerri (talk) 08:30, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose If the point of b&w is to be artistic then the car and the rubbish bins fail the image. The building on the far left also isn't in-keeping with the subject/mood. -- Colin (talk) 08:37, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- I like it. Maybe clone out the trash bin and car. PumpkinSky talk 18:15, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Personally I feel like this would be better in color, I don't see the artistic value added by the B&W. -- King of ♠ 21:02, 19 August 2017 (UTC)

Lyngør lighthouse[edit]

Voting period ends on 27 Aug 2017 at 22:20:37 (UTC)

  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info all by me, including the boat piloting. :) The lighthouse was first built in 1879, and is currently a listed building. Automated in 2004, it was opened as a tourist hut available for rent after refurbishing in 2011. -- Peulle (talk) 22:20, 18 August 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Peulle (talk) 22:20, 18 August 2017 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment The second picture seems a bit overexposed. --A.Savin 22:35, 18 August 2017 (UTC)
Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Hmmm ... not sure I agree. I do have the .RAW file so small tweaks can be made, but since other images in the series have the same exposure (800), I think perhaps the difference in light is due to the direction of the sun. What do you think?--Peulle (talk) 13:01, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
Some details on the facade are blown. And I would use more contrast on all three photos (perhaps matter of taste). --A.Savin 14:00, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
Yes, perhaps the "southwest" one could do with a bit more contrast, although I think the "west" image would look overprocessed if I increase it on that.--Peulle (talk) 15:28, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment - This is a very good effort, and if not FP, very close, IMO. I like the compositions of the first two pictures, find them restful and consider them FPs. The left crop of the 3rd picture feels to me too close to the bridge over the stream (I guess that is). Would it be possible to add more room to the left? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:19, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment No, it's already at the maximum, but other sides can be cropped if you think that would improve the compositional balance. Perhaps you could add a note if you have a specific crop in mind?--Peulle (talk) 12:56, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
I think nothing can really compensate for the lack of room to the left, so this is something else you can consider for your next go at photographing this motif. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:06, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Not seeing an FP in any of these. Also I don't think FP sets are designed so you can gain 3-for-1 FPs by photographing from a few angles. Photos one and three aren't significantly different. I think perhaps the "set" description of FP needs some work, as I can't recall anyone featuring a set like this. It would need to be a pretty amazing building to give "wow" from all facades. Even Diliff didn't nominate sets, vs choosing the best of many photos taken inside or out. -- Colin (talk) 08:34, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Yes, I agree that each of the images would have to satisfy FP status in order for the set to reach it (i.e. one should not be able to "sneak in" a non-FP amongst other images). As for the different angles, the reason I did it this way is that I noticed A.Savin using this strategy with his stadium photos. Thanks for reviewing. :) --Peulle (talk) 12:53, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment - I would like the horizon in the same height in picture and same distance to the lighthouse. --Villy Fink Isaksen (talk) 10:39, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment The "northwest" photo can certainly be cropped a bit at the bottom. Do you think that would improve the image?--Peulle (talk) 12:54, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
Yes it would, but the best solution is probably a new serie of pictures. --Villy Fink Isaksen (talk) 13:21, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
A project for next year, that. Summer's over. :) --Peulle (talk) 13:26, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
I see this set as a Triptych and that is the reason for my suggestions. --Villy Fink Isaksen (talk) 18:13, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment I might be able to get behind #2 as a FP but on # 1 and especially #3 my eye is drawn to the Power Lines too much and that just keeps spoiling it with if you don’t count the uninteresting water on #3. Nominating a set is hard. Sixflashphoto (talk) 19:25, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per Colin. Not a set, and not individually FPs either. -- King of ♠ 21:02, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Thanks for all comments; I will keep working on them and try nominating a single one later. :) --Peulle (talk) 06:48, 21 August 2017 (UTC)

File:Red-backed shrike.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 27 Aug 2017 at 19:49:07 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

A red-backed shrike at lake Kerkini-Beles Natura 2000 site

File:Skočivir (Скочивир, Македонија).jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 27 Aug 2017 at 15:34:35 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Panorama of village Skočivir, Republic of Macedonia
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Panoramas
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Panorama of village Skočivir, Republic of Macedonia. My work. -- Mile (talk) 15:34, 18 August 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Mile (talk) 15:34, 18 August 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Hockei (talk) 19:56, 18 August 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Looks overexposed ... that's easily fixed and I'd probably support it for QI after that, but as for FP the light doesn't really wow me.--Peulle (talk) 20:06, 18 August 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per Peulle. (looks slightly tilted too, in some houses) -- Colin (talk) 08:39, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose - Nice scene, but not particularly striking to me. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:56, 20 August 2017 (UTC)

File:Kopenhagen (DK), Sankt-Joergens-See -- 2017 -- 1455.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 27 Aug 2017 at 15:11:54 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Skt. Jørgens Sø in Copenhagen, Denmark
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places#Denmark
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created and uploaded and nominated by XRay -- XRay talk 15:11, 18 August 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- XRay talk 15:11, 18 August 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 15:48, 18 August 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Nothing special. The bush on the left side is very disturbing. Sharpness too low. --Hockei (talk) 20:03, 18 August 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose I was just thinking the same thing.--Peulle (talk) 20:07, 18 August 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support HalfGig talk 22:56, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose as per Hockei. Yann (talk) 10:29, 20 August 2017 (UTC)

File:Munich - Viktualienmarkt.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 27 Aug 2017 at 14:33:39 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Stall at the Viktualienmarkt in Munich, Germany

File:Spb 06-2017 img19 Moskovsky railway station.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 27 Aug 2017 at 13:34:40 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Building of Moskovsky Railway Station (built by Konstantin Thon in 1851) in Saint Petersburg, Russia

File:Montevideo, playa pocitos.tif[edit]

Voting period ends on 27 Aug 2017 at 13:06:56 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Rambla, Pocitos, Montevideo, Uruguay, aerial view.
Nuvola apps important yellow.svg
Thank you for nominating this image. Unfortunately, it does not fall within the Guidelines and is unlikely to succeed because of the remarks above. Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:59, 20 August 2017 (UTC) Anyone other than the nominator who disagrees may override this template by changing {{FPX}} to {{FPX contested}} and adding a vote in support. Voting will then continue in the usual way. If not contested within 24 hours, this nomination may be closed.

File:Looking up the center of the Eiffel Tower 2016.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 27 Aug 2017 at 11:01:59 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Looking up the center of the Eiffel Tower 2016
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info All by LivioAndronico (talk) 11:01, 18 August 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- LivioAndronico (talk) 11:01, 18 August 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Berthold Werner (talk) 11:07, 18 August 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose A very nice picture with an interesting composition. But Commons FPC is for outstanding pictures. And unfortunately for you, we have a large number of very similar images already (1, 2, 3 to name just a few in 1:1 aspect ratio; another FP). There are some that manage to stand out among the others, such as this night view, this diagonal composition or this zoomed-in VI. I don't see this candidate standing out in any kind of way, apart from some advantages in image quality maybe. Others have done it before, the wow is gone – that's the problem with FPs of major tourist attractions. Sorry, --El Grafo (talk) 11:36, 18 August 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support "View to a kill." -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 15:51, 18 August 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Laitche (talk) 20:09, 18 August 2017 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Has in fact better light and more detail than File:Sous la Tour Eiffel 1.jpg, but the symmetry is failed. A pity. --A.Savin 22:39, 18 August 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Basotxerri (talk) 07:22, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Per El Grafo. Also very uneven contrast brightness with some parts of the top half having high contrast and the bottom and centre very low. Almost like lens flare or lifting shadows too much. -- Colin (talk) 08:44, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose I like the composition (it's a very refreshing original view IMO, and I'm a local). But it's not proper centered, has barrel distorsion and is blurry on the top part. - Benh (talk) 17:38, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
Naturally the barrel distortion there isn't ....--LivioAndronico (talk) 12:52, 20 August 2017 (UTC)
No you just don't know what barrel distortion is, or you wouldn't write that. - Benh (talk) 15:11, 20 August 2017 (UTC)
Totally invented ..... as your usual--LivioAndronico (talk) 15:52, 20 August 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Sorry to Benh, I'm a local too, and this view is not very original, per El Grafo. Nevertheless, I agree with opposers arguments. Not centered. Symmetry and wow has gone.--Jebulon (talk) 16:29, 20 August 2017 (UTC)

File:Ruppell's warbler.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 27 Aug 2017 at 09:35:32 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
I've had another look. The eye is brilliantly sharp, but I agree that the tail etc. lets the image down. Charles (talk) 22:30, 18 August 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 15:51, 18 August 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 16:04, 18 August 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Too many noise artefacts and low DOF. --Hockei (talk) 20:08, 18 August 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Sorry to disagree with the distinguished gentlemen above; I think this looks overprocessed, too noisy and with the tail out of focus. Quality not high enough for FP for me - I'm not even sure I'd support it as a QI.--Peulle (talk) 20:11, 18 August 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Yann (talk) 10:30, 20 August 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose mostly per Hockei. Storkk (talk) 16:07, 20 August 2017 (UTC)

File:Close wing position of Female Lethe chandica Moore, 1857 – Angled Red Forester.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 27 Aug 2017 at 05:41:32 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Lethe chandica chandica
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals
  • Pictogram voting info.svg InfoClose wing position of Female Lethe chandica chandica (Moore, 1857) – Darjeeling Angled Red Forester created by Atudu - uploaded by Atudu - nominated by Atudu -- Atudu (talk) 05:41, 18 August 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Atudu (talk) 05:41, 18 August 2017 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Nice and sharp, but looks a bit underexposed. --Ivar (talk) 06:30, 18 August 2017 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment the foreground is a bit of a problem and the red eye. Charles (talk)

File:Close wing position of Charaxes solon, Fabricius, 1793 – Black Rajah WLB.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 27 Aug 2017 at 05:17:39 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Close wing position of Charaxes solon solon (Fabricius, 1793)-Pale Black Rajah,Chandannagar,West Bengal,India.

File:Speciale voertuigen worden ingezet voor onderhoud in het gebied. (Terra Gator 2104 Track Dumper) Locatie Noarderleech 03.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 27 Aug 2017 at 04:19:31 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects Terra Gator 2104 Track Dumper.
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Special vehicles are used for maintenance in the area. (Terra Gator 2104 Track Dumper) Location: Noarderleech. Noard Friesland Bûtendyks is a unique nature of It Fryske Gea. It consists of summer polders, drink dobben and salt marshes. For many birds an ideal habitat. All by -- Famberhorst (talk) 04:19, 18 August 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Famberhorst (talk) 04:19, 18 August 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 05:10, 18 August 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --LivioAndronico (talk) 11:03, 18 August 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- --fedaro (talk) 13:17, 18 August 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support interesting stuff--Mile (talk) 15:39, 18 August 2017 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting question-blue.svg Request Please reduce noise. Also, is that chroma noise I see on the tracks? Could something be done about that?--Peulle (talk) 20:13, 18 August 2017 (UTC)
    ✓ Done. reduced noise reduction. Thank you. for your reviews.--Famberhorst (talk) 04:30, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
Symbol support vote.svg Support btw. if these are dumper trucks, does that mean that this is a dumper track? :D--Peulle (talk) 18:25, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
Answer: A track has a drive with a caterpillar. A truck with tires.--Famberhorst (talk) 04:37, 20 August 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support. Never seen a track dumper before. —Bruce1eetalk 07:17, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Spurzem (talk) 14:24, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment - A consensus is clearly behind this, so I won't oppose just because I don't see a featurable motif there, but I'd like some remarks on why this is featurable. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:58, 20 August 2017 (UTC)
  • Answer: In my view, this is a special vehicle for work in special and drastic areas. Each wheel has its own caterpillar. Very special for lovers of special vehicles. --Famberhorst (talk) 06:06, 20 August 2017 (UTC)
  • Answer: For my part, it's the "wow" (which is hard to quantify, I know); the subject matter plays a big part, and the light and sky are good.--Peulle (talk) 06:51, 21 August 2017 (UTC)
  • Answer: The "wow" for me is that it is an unusual vehicle; other than that it is a good picture technically. —Bruce1eetalk 07:07, 21 August 2017 (UTC)
  • Thanks, guys. I understand. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:43, 21 August 2017 (UTC)

File:Aeronave A-29 Super Tucano em voo sobre a Floresta Amazônica.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 27 Aug 2017 at 02:13:35 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

A pair of Brazilian Air Force Embraer A-29 Super Tucanos in flight over the Amazon Rainforest.
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment - I realize you're trying to address criticism of dark shadows, but it seems a little washed out to me now. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:04, 21 August 2017 (UTC)
I fixed WB and I now look less washedout, let me know what do you think --The Photographer 00:16, 21 August 2017 (UTC)
Much better than the previous version, but I think I like the version that was submitted best of these three. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:47, 21 August 2017 (UTC)

File:Bensberg Germany Schloss-Bensberg-Panorama-01.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 26 Aug 2017 at 19:36:10 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Cylindrical Panorama of Bensberg Palace, Germany.
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Castles and fortifications
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Bensberg Palace, a historical building in Bensberg near Cologne, Germany. It is a former Hunting Lodge, commissioned by Johann Wilhelm, Elector Palatine for his wife Anna Maria Luisa de' Medici. It was converted to a 5-Star Hotel in 1997. Cylindrical panorama from 11 single images, taken from a normal tripod.
All by -- CEphoto, Uwe Aranas (talk) 19:36, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- CEphoto, Uwe Aranas (talk) 19:36, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Couldn't the viewpoint be much higher? We seem to be looking upwards. Charles (talk) 22:01, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
How? The tripod was extended to 1,80 m. --CEphoto, Uwe Aranas (talk) 05:24, 18 August 2017 (UTC)
Thanks. I guess the ground slopes up to the building. Charles (talk) 09:16, 18 August 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:09, 18 August 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - With the question of the slope apparently resolved, I focused on the photo, which looks like a great panorama to me. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:59, 18 August 2017 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment I'm not sure about the projection: the outer wings of the building appear as if they were curving outward. --El Grafo (talk) 12:44, 18 August 2017 (UTC)
I think that this is the normal effect when taking such huge building with a wide angle lense and forming it to a cylindrical panorama. It covers a view of 180° degrees and the distance of the left and right wing is perhaps 50 m while the main entrance in the far is 100 m from the tripod. I am not an expert on 180° or 360 ° panorama photos but some colleagues here are and probably can give a suitable explanation, why this has to be as it is. --CEphoto, Uwe Aranas (talk) 14:30, 18 August 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Hockei (talk) 20:10, 18 August 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support I'm supporting this image because I like it. No other reason. :) --Peulle (talk) 20:19, 18 August 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 06:35, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment I think if you use the "sperical Panini projection" in Hughin, you will get straight lines instead of the bent lines, which would look more natural in my opinion --Llez (talk) 13:32, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
  • There's always tradeoff. Either u curve the verticals or the horizontals (there's more than that, but I make it short). From my experience, the best compromise would be to use a panini general (maybe that's what u meant), which allows to fine tune the amount of distorsion. - Benh (talk) 11:16, 20 August 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support although some day I'd like to see it done without the distortion. Daniel Case (talk) 20:05, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
  • Pictogram-voting-question.svg Question Verry good, but what means "max resolution available: 17891 x 4494 px" Where is it available? --Milseburg (talk) 10:55, 20 August 2017 (UTC)
It's just a reminder for me and also where this photo in my archive is located. On request, I can provide interested individuals with the higher resolution (as stated in the section "Permission"). However 13.000 px width with 21 MB appeared to be more than sufficient for the majority of users. The max res is about 47 MB. --CEphoto, Uwe Aranas (talk) 13:01, 20 August 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral and not a support because I'm per El Grafo. But I am fairly sure this can be improved with a Panini general projection. - Benh (talk) 11:13, 20 August 2017 (UTC)
Fair enough. I installed Hughin and tried it yesterday evening. But surprisingly - though I took the photos in 20° interval steps with huge overlap - the program complaints, that it does not find enough stitching points. Probably, I am lacking experience to use this program after that short time of testing it. --CEphoto, Uwe Aranas (talk) 13:01, 20 August 2017 (UTC)
On reading again the technical informations of Benh (thanks for that!); I gathered, that a 180° panorama can never have rectilinear verticals and straight horizontals. This seems logical to me, as the image is not just a wide angle representation, but a flat projection of a cylindrical representation. So, for my personal taste, the curved buildings are more suitable than curved/inclined verticals, especially as I was standing in a distance of the building where it is desirable to have rectilinear verticals. If someone does not share that view, it is ok, but it seems not justified to perform a post processing, that can technically not give the requested result. —CEphoto, Uwe Aranas (talk) 14:07, 20 August 2017 (UTC)
  • BA candidate.svg Weak oppose Over the past couple days, I've really tried to like this. I'm sorry, though, I can't: it makes me feel like I've had one too many drinks. I think it may not be possible to photograph the whole building from this close up and obtain a panorama that I would like. Storkk (talk) 16:35, 20 August 2017 (UTC)

File:Kopenhagen (DK), Innenhafen -- 2017 -- 1699.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 26 Aug 2017 at 18:02:16 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Mooring rings at the port, Copenhagen, Denmark

File:Bombus lapidarius queen - Echium vulgare - Keila.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 26 Aug 2017 at 17:08:35 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Bombus lapidarius queen

File:Snow monkey baby milk time.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 26 Aug 2017 at 14:21:39 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
Nuvola apps important yellow.svg
Thank you for nominating this image. Unfortunately, it does not fall within the Guidelines and is unlikely to succeed because per above opposes based on blown-out upper right. Daniel Case (talk) 15:36, 19 August 2017 (UTC) Anyone other than the nominator who disagrees may override this template by changing {{FPX}} to {{FPX contested}} and adding a vote in support. Voting will then continue in the usual way. If not contested within 24 hours, this nomination may be closed.

File:Helicophanta vesicalis 01.JPG[edit]

Voting period ends on 26 Aug 2017 at 05:45:35 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Helicophanta vesicalis (Lamarck, 1822); Diameter 8.5 cm; Originating from Madagascar.

File:Sankt Georgen am Laengsee Sankt Sebastian Pfarrkirche hl Sebastian 02122015 9333.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 26 Aug 2017 at 03:54:30 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Parish church Saint Sebastian in Sankt Sebastian #15, Sankt Georgen am Längsee, Carinthia, Austria
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious buildings
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Johann Jaritz - uploaded by Johann Jaritz - nominated by Johann Jaritz -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 03:54, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 03:54, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- King of ♠ 05:50, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support wonderful lighting and sky --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:09, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 07:01, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Nice composition and lighting. Charles (talk) 09:18, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 17:44, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --XRay talk 18:07, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Serene HalfGig talk 23:37, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
  • Mild Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose. I'm going to give you what I hope comes across as a high-level criticism, because the thing is, as others have said, this is indeed a beautiful picture, and the light is beautiful. However, the fields and sky are pretty inert (sure, the sky gradually gets darker going up, but that's not enough for a great composition in this case, in my opinion), so I think this photo lacks something that could make it better than merely quite good, but truly outstanding. It looks like I'm far outnumbered on this, though. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:58, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Your helpful in-depth reviews are highly appreciated as usual, even if they end up in a mild oppose like in this case. I will think about all items you wrote at the next opportunity when I will be out there taking open-air photos. -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 03:11, 18 August 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Same feeling as Ikan Kekek. Furthermore I find the light a bit harsh. All is nice, good, clear, very well composed, but I miss "something". Empty sky ? Enpty grass ? I don't know, this is just subjective and I'm sorry for that. And I've found one dust spot (at least), please see annotation. --Jebulon (talk) 08:55, 18 August 2017 (UTC)
* Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment De gustibus non disputandum. -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 17:08, 18 August 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support But tight blue sky is a little bit for me.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 16:13, 18 August 2017 (UTC)

File:Maria Gail Kirche Flügelaltar 01.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 25 Aug 2017 at 23:25:12 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Winged altar at the pilgrimage church Maria Gail, municipality of Villach, Carinthia, Austria. Anonymous master of the Villach Studio, around 1515.
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment - You're most welcome! -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:35, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Disturbing surroundings. --Karelj (talk) 09:36, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
  • Pictogram-voting-question.svg Question - I'm surprised. What are you finding disturbing? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 10:15, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Well I think I get his point. It's pretty cluttered and unbalanced because of the right pilar. - Benh (talk) 17:26, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Thanks for explaining your point of view. Of course we disagree about whether this is an FP photo of this altarpiece, but do you think it would be possible to take an FP of this altarpiece? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:49, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
  • Cameras have gotten so good that today anyone can take a sharp picture of that with basic knowledge of photography. But maybe with a crop... - Benh (talk) 15:03, 20 August 2017 (UTC)
  • mild Symbol support vote.svg Support When you see this as a thumbnail I agree that it’s too cluttered but when you really look at it I see what Ikan sees. The whole photo is very complex and is excellently photographed. DoF is right on, it’s just that the other elements in the photo (except for the red rope and plant) subtract a bit. Lack of symmetry isn't a dealbreaker here for me. -- Sixflashphoto 20:13, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose The main subject is more than excellent, The picture and the work are very good with a lot of details. But yes, there are many surrounding disturbing elements. I've suggested a crop, which could make me support.--Jebulon (talk) 09:03, 18 August 2017 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment - I appreciate your detailed review. The result of your crop would be a very different picture. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:23, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Weak support I wish that yellow section of wall on the right wasn't there, but otherwise it qualifies. Daniel Case (talk) 06:17, 19 August 2017 (UTC)

File:Balkan fritillary (Boloria graeca balcanica) underside Bulgaria.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 25 Aug 2017 at 17:28:03 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Balkan fritilliary (Boloria graeca balcanica) in Bulgaria
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Lepidoptera
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info This little butterfly (see thumbnail on right) lives at 2,300m above sea level at the top cable car station at the ski resort of Borovets in Bulgaria.
    Balkan fritillary on finger.jpg
    All by Charlesjsharp -- Charles (talk) 17:28, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Charles (talk) 17:28, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- PumpkinSky talk 23:55, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support seen from a technical standpoint, there are some little issues (for example DoF control around the head). One could relativize that, as it is a tiny butterfly and a difficult one to shoot I guess. But what makes this picture FP for me is the composition. Beautiful. --Sputniktilt (talk) 00:24, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
  • This was a difficult image from a technical standpoint. Being small you have to get very close, but it's windy at 2,300m so I needed 1/800. Charles (talk) 07:17, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 02:00, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- King of ♠ 02:22, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
  • Pictogram-voting-question.svg Question - I agree with Sputniktilt, but Charles, does this meet your own standards of image quality for a butterfly, considering that you consistently argue in Consensual Review that pictures of insects without sharp heads should be declined, even if the picture is large? I'd like you to answer that before I vote, although left to my own devices, I would certainly normally vote to support this picture. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:01, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
  • Yes it does, very much so. The sharpness of the hairs around the head is what I wanted to achieve. But I only have 2mm DoF available. I have two other images on different flowers, which I also considered to be FPC
    Balkan fritillary (Boloria graeca balcanica) underside Bulgaria 2.jpg
    Balkan fritillary (Boloria graeca balcanica) underside Bulgaria 2 on epilobium.jpg
  • I can't get the third photo to display, supposedly because of errors, though my browser sometimes crashes. Anyway, I Symbol support vote.svg Support per others, my own opinion and your explanation. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:39, 17 August 2017 (UTC)

File:Parque Alameda, Santiago de Compostela, España, 2015-09-23, DD 56.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 25 Aug 2017 at 20:59:25 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info View of the Alamesa park, Santiago de Compostela, Spain. Poco2 20:59, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Poco2 20:59, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose - Oppressive dull light. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:34, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per Ikan; also tight bottom crop. Daniel Case (talk) 04:24, 19 August 2017 (UTC)

File:Faro, Mahdia, Túnez, 2016-09-03, DD 22-24 HDR.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 25 Aug 2017 at 20:51:32 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Towers
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Lighthouse of Mahdia, Tunisia. -- Poco2 20:51, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Poco2 20:51, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Nice atmosphere. -- King of ♠ 02:21, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Nothing special, no wow for me. --Karelj (talk) 09:13, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
  • Sorry, mild Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per Karelj - very good photo, excellent light, but most of the composition feels too pedestrian for FP to me, what with the concrete walls, cars, scrub, debris and dirt. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:01, 18 August 2017 (UTC) I'm having second thoughts about this one because I like the light so much. I'll live with it longer. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:21, 18 August 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per Ikan. I can (ahem) see what you were thinking but it just didn't come through. Maybe if it had been just the building ... Daniel Case (talk) 04:24, 19 August 2017 (UTC)

File:20170815 Zalipie 5497 DxO.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 25 Aug 2017 at 19:25:52 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Zalipie - a well and a cottage in the front of the Paintresses' House
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Zalipie - a well and a cottage in the front of the Paintresses' House. All by me -- Jakubhal 19:25, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- -- Jakubhal 19:25, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 02:02, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support very nice - although a bit underexposed imo -Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:06, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Berthold Werner (talk) 06:08, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Please add the geo location. --XRay talk 18:09, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Someone added the geo info. HalfGig talk 23:38, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - Relaxing composition, pretty painted designs, and it's nice to see something different from the usual FPC fare. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:05, 18 August 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Maybe some pixellisation in the sky at top right, but per others.--Jebulon (talk) 09:08, 18 August 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support ----fedaro (talk) 13:20, 18 August 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support good and rare--Mile (talk) 15:46, 18 August 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Folksy and picturesque. Daniel Case (talk) 22:10, 18 August 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 06:38, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Should like to live there, if I hadn't another pretty home. --Schnobby (talk) 13:57, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --The Photographer 14:36, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Maybe just slightly oversaturated though. -- King of ♠ 21:04, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Famberhorst (talk) 17:38, 20 August 2017 (UTC)

File:Santa Maria del Popolo (Rome) - Cappella Cybo.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 25 Aug 2017 at 19:19:54 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Santa Maria del Popolo (Rome) - Cappella Cybo
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info The Cybo or Saint Lawrence Chapel (Italian: Cappella Cybo or Cappella di San Lorenzo) is the second side chapel in the right-hand aisle of the Basilica of Santa Maria del Popolo in Rome. For the beauty of its paintings, the preciousness of marble revetments covering its walls and the importance of the artists involved in its construction the chapel is regarded one of the most significant sacral monuments erected in Rome in the last quarter of the 17th century. All by LivioAndronico (talk) 19:19, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- LivioAndronico (talk) 19:19, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 02:03, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment - The furthest back row of chairs is really distorted - the one furthest to the right looks so tilted it should fall over. If you cropped out the closest row of chairs, I think that would greatly improve the picture, and I'd probably vote to support it at that point, though I'd have to see to be positive. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:08, 18 August 2017 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Better if centered IMO. Please look at annotation: too many useless and dark parts, to be cropped out.--Jebulon (talk) 09:11, 18 August 2017 (UTC)
    ✓ Done thanks --LivioAndronico (talk) 11:06, 18 August 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Nice composition for me. The left window is a little disturbing.--Famberhorst (talk) 18:11, 18 August 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - I'm still a little bothered by the remaining distortion to the appearance of the chairs, but I think I'm just looking for that too much now. The motif is beautiful, and I like how the speckled surfaces are captured. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:03, 18 August 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Moderate support per Ikan. Daniel Case (talk) 22:07, 18 August 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Spurzem (talk) 14:50, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support I like the marbles, real and false. The new version is better. IMO you should remove the reflection on the left part of the painting, by cloning or so.--Jebulon (talk) 16:36, 20 August 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Filo gèn' (talk) 06:07, 21 August 2017 (UTC)

File:Sa la crëusc sun Resciesa Gherdeina.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 25 Aug 2017 at 17:52:46 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Summit cross on the Raschötz mountain in Gröden

File:Bielerhöhe - Silvrettastausee - Wasserleitung 07.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 25 Aug 2017 at 16:01:12 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Water pipeline between Silvretta Reservoir and Lake Vermunt; concrete dam. Vorarlberg, Austria
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info All by me. -- Basotxerri (talk) 16:01, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment This is the wide-angle version of this image. --Basotxerri (talk) 16:01, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Basotxerri (talk) 16:01, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 16:02, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --LivioAndronico (talk) 19:23, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- PumpkinSky talk 20:37, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - Much better than the narrow-angle version, in my opinion. In that photo, the mountains in the background looked sort of artificial, not natural. Here, they look real, with resulting great improvement to the composition, IMO. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:51, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Sorry to spoil the party, but I'm not seeing the "wow" factor. In general, on a cloudy day it makes for a better composition to exclude the sky altogether (which you did in the other version, which I supported). Here the sky is brighter than the ground, and exposing the whole scene properly (as you have done) makes the subject look grey and boring. While the sky is not completely featureless, the clouds are too soft to have a dramatic effect. -- King of ♠ 02:20, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Daniel Case (talk) 13:55, 18 August 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Famberhorst (talk) 18:14, 18 August 2017 (UTC)

File:2016.08.27.-19-Viernheimer Heide Viernheim--Brauner Grashuepfer-Weibchen.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 24 Aug 2017 at 19:10:36 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Chorthippus brunneus, female

File:Moon Bridge and Fountain, Friendship Pond 4 NBG LR.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 24 Aug 2017 at 18:57:15 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Moon Bridge and Fountain, Friendship Pond, Norfolk Botanical Garden
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Glad you like this one. I had to stand in the mud just several cm from the water to get this shot. The entire left side of the stream is useless as a spot to take a good photo of the bridge. PumpkinSky talk 21:58, 15 August 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 02:04, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose This is a better view of the bridge but the fountain is still ruining the composition IMO. Sorry. Light also a bit washed out in the upper part of the photo. Standing in a bit of mud still doesn't beat Jee who had leeches crawling on him during one shoot. Face-wink.svg --cart-Talk 08:17, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment As mentioned in the other one, I find the juxtaposition of the fountain and bridge fascinating. As for the leeches, YUCK. I'll probably never top that one. Glad we don't have them where I live. I've uploaded a version where I tried to work on the upper light part you mention. PumpkinSky talk 10:01, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
  • We'll just have to agree to disagree on this then. :) Upper part looks ok though now. --cart-Talk 10:35, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Looks washed out compared to the alt. -- King of ♠ 02:14, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per KoH. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:51, 17 August 2017 (UTC)

Alternative version[edit]

Johann Jaritz has done an alternative processing. Right now I can't decide which one I like better. PumpkinSky talk 11:25, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
Your's is too little processing and his is too much IMO. Some 50/50 version might be better. Please try too do as much of this editing before you make a nom. This is not the place for fixing photos. --cart-Talk 12:41, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
I did my processing. But we don't know what is or may be wrong until we get additional feedback. It's at QIC waiting for the bot and no one made suggestions there. PumpkinSky talk 12:52, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
It was not my intention to bring disconcertment to the FPC. I was simply curious, if the photo could be edited in a way that it possibly meets the taste of W.carter and others. Another version was uploaded. -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 13:52, 16 August 2017 (UTC)

Different processing by Johann

  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- With this modified version of his own modification, I'm now really having trouble deciding which is better, so I'm supporting both versions. PumpkinSky talk 13:56, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Basotxerri (talk) 15:57, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 16:01, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --LivioAndronico (talk) 19:21, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
  • Pictogram-voting-question.svg Question - I definitely prefer this version, but is that light really how it looked, or is the other one more true to life? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:04, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
  • Thanks. So here's my dilemma: I would support this version and oppose the other, but I'm not sure if that makes sense if the other version is the truer one. In that case, maybe it's not justifiable to support this version. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:48, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
  • Ikan Kekek I can certainly understand your position. Trying to be neutral, I looked again at the other photos I made of this bridge and the coloring in this alt nom version is consistent with how the bridge can with certain lighting. PumpkinSky talk 15:34, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support per remarks above, with reservations but surely liking this version. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:51, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Great colors. -- King of ♠ 02:14, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support I agree with KoH and Mr. Pumpkin. HalfGig talk 23:39, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral per cart. Daniel Case (talk) 06:20, 18 August 2017 (UTC)

File:Kathputli (Puppet)-IMG 0335.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 24 Aug 2017 at 15:16:30 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Kathputli (Puppet) near Kathmandu Durbar Square

File:Portnaluchaig beach.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 24 Aug 2017 at 14:05:47 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Portnaluchaig beach

* Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Pz (talk) 18:15, 15 August 2017 (UTC)

  • Sorry, invalid vote. The rules are: "Editors whose accounts have at least 10 days and 50 edits can vote." You have only made 39 edits so far. Welcome back later when you have made more edits. :-) --cart-Talk 08:24, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Sorry... I think waiting a few minutes (or hours or days) for the lighting to be more favorable on the foreground rocks would make it a more compelling photo. As is, to me they are distracting. The composition is also not compelling... perhaps a longer lens from further away would be better, but I'm not sure. As it is, we have a tiny house on some bright green grass with dark shadows in the foreground and my eye is struggling to find any wow. Storkk (talk) 15:23, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per Storkk. Also, too soft throughout ... was there a reason for using ISO 400? Daniel Case (talk) 04:07, 18 August 2017 (UTC)
Hi Daniel Case, thank's for your comments. The ISO 400 was simply to allow faster exposure (no tripod) and greater dof in the subdued late-evening Scottish daylight (20:29 UTC = 21:29 local time). DeFacto (talk). 09:06, 18 August 2017 (UTC)
OK, I understand the tradeoff there. Daniel Case (talk) 13:54, 18 August 2017 (UTC)

Montreal from Mount Royal[edit]

Voting period ends on 24 Aug 2017 at 13:13:22 (UTC)

  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info High resolution panorama of Montreal seen from Mount Royal. Created, uploaded and nominated by -- Arild Vågen (talk) 13:13, 15 August 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- ArildV (talk) 13:13, 15 August 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 14:08, 15 August 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 15:17, 15 August 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Bijay Chaurasia (Talk) 15:19, 15 August 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Nice...--LivioAndronico (talk) 19:52, 15 August 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support very nice. PumpkinSky talk 22:18, 15 August 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- King of ♠ 00:32, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Wow, our first FP from this year's Wikimania, already (And I suppose, since I was climbing Lyon Mountain, visible in the background right of center, at the time you took the daytime picture I'm in it in a weird way. The view from Lyon's summit was not clear enough to make out the Montreal skyline, alas, although I think I could see Mount Royal). Daniel Case (talk) 05:22, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Alexander Leisser (talk) 06:25, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Nice! :D --Peulle (talk) 06:48, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 07:39, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Sputniktilt (talk) 08:53, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Very good! --cart-Talk 10:36, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --KSK (talk) 11:37, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Especially the night photo is about perfect, hardly any noise. --A.Savin 14:13, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Btw, some geocodes plus Template:Panorama with some details about how many photos were used would be nice. --cart-Talk 15:20, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Especially the night shot. The day time is also great , but has some visible stitching artifacts from (I think) two bad seams, that would be nice to correct. One seam is most visible at (8492, 1363) going about 212 pixels horizontally right. The other seam is more minor and looks like it affects (7378, 2147), (7431,2189), (7492, 2625), (7476, 2563). There is also some Moiré on the sides of buildings in the approximate boxes (5700+65, 1170+345), (6210+130, 1795+70), (6700+110,1780+180), (7115+100, 2145+430)... some of these may be more simple to desaturate or fix than others. Also, per W.carter, {{location}} templates would be good. Storkk (talk) 15:51, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
    • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment I have added an image note for the worst seam. Storkk (talk) 09:49, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
    • Great job on the seam :) added Moiré notes per your request below. Storkk (talk) 15:06, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
      • ✓ Done Thank you for your help.--ArildV (talk) 06:13, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
        • I've added one more note. Thanks for your efforts! Storkk (talk) 13:50, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Yann (talk) 16:12, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
          • ✓ Done--ArildV (talk) 12:05, 20 August 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - Awesome shot in an awesome city. Sportsguy17 21:40, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Excellent. Charles (talk) 22:20, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - I agree that the night shot is more beautiful, but that's partly because I just like the lights more than many of the buildings. Either way, great achievement and great documentation. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:41, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Very good!!! --Karelj (talk) 09:40, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
  • ✓ Done {{panorama}} and geocode and new version uploaded. Please add images notes for Moiré, I will do it tomorrow. Im going back to Europe tonight and will not have time or opportunity to read and answer here before tomorrow. Thank you for all votes and comments.--ArildV (talk) 14:50, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Each of two are eligible for FP, but I would have prefered two exactly superposable pictures, exactly symetrical, and exactly taken from the very same point of view. I'm sorry.--Jebulon (talk) 09:18, 18 August 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- KTC (talk) 19:43, 18 August 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Excellent composition.--AutomobilePassion (talk) 12:45, 20 August 2017 (UTC)

File:Herfstwandeling door natuurreservaat It Wikelslân 09.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 24 Aug 2017 at 04:16:53 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects American Windmill
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Autumn walk through natural reserve It Wikelslân. The blades of this American Windmill stabbing beautifully against the bright cold frosty air. created All by -- Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 04:16, 15 August 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 04:16, 15 August 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support how un-Nederlands ;-) --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:10, 15 August 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --cart-Talk 07:13, 15 August 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose The crop is too tight for my taste. I would prefer something like this, as it gives the main subject more room for breathing and has the frost on the ground as a bonus. This one would be my favourite from this day of shooting, had the windmill been placed more off-centre towards the right (in a golden rule/rule of thirds kind of way). --El Grafo (talk) 07:18, 15 August 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 08:38, 15 August 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Nice composition...--LivioAndronico (talk) 19:51, 15 August 2017 (UTC)
  • Weak Symbol support vote.svg Support, the composition could be better. The windmill isn't in the centre but it's not enough off-centre and the result is a bit unharmonic to me. --Basotxerri (talk) 15:01, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose as per El Grafo. Yann (talk) 16:13, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Per El Grafo. --Karelj (talk) 09:45, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support HalfGig talk 23:43, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per El Grafo. Daniel Case (talk) 00:42, 18 August 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Personally the composition works for me. Nice lighting. -- King of ♠ 21:05, 19 August 2017 (UTC)

File:Castel del Monte BW 2016-10-14 13-04-18 stitch.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 23 Aug 2017 at 07:48:39 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Castel del Monte, view from the courtyard to the sky
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture#Italy
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Castel del Monte (Italian for "Castle of the Mountain") is a 13th-century citadel and castle situated on a hill in Andria in the Apulia region of southeast Italy. It was built during the 1240s by the Emperor Frederick II, who had inherited the lands from his mother Constance of Sicily. In the 18th century, the castle's interior marbles and remaining furnishings were removed. It has neither a moat nor a drawbridge and some considered it never to have been intended as a defensive fortress; however, archaeological work has suggested that it originally had a curtain wall. Described by the Enciclopedia Italiana as "the most fascinating castle built by Frederick II", the site is protected as a World Heritage Site. It also appears on the Italian version of the one cent Euro coin.
    created User:Berthold Werner with help from LivioAndronico - uploaded and- nominated by -- Berthold Werner (talk) 07:48, 14 August 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Berthold Werner (talk) 07:48, 14 August 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 09:14, 14 August 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:38, 14 August 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 17:05, 14 August 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Already in the QI nomination the stiching errors have not been removed! (see notes) --Llez (talk) 17:37, 14 August 2017 (UTC)
Pictogram-voting-question.svg Question Are you sure you have erased your browser cache? --Berthold Werner (talk) 18:00, 14 August 2017 (UTC)
Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Oops, sorry --Llez (talk) 19:20, 14 August 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Excuse me Berthold, this could have been a great picture (I especially like the shape), but I'm worried about the very unsharp areas at the edges. Not sure if stitching was necessary here. --A.Savin 23:34, 14 August 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support yes, there are a couple of minor stitching errors visible at 100% - if you look carefully. I'm sure Berthold will take care of these as well. And yes, edges appear somewhat unsharp, again only at 100%. But it's a large file. Scale it down a bit, let's say to 3000x3000, and everthing's fine. So that's not a dealbreaker at all. Subject, colors, and composition are excellent, therefore I see no reason why this nom should not be featured. --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:00, 15 August 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Wolf im Wald 12:13, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support per Martin. Daniel Case (talk) 18:12, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support MZaplotnik (edits) 09:18, 20 August 2017 (UTC)

File:Zwanenbloem (Butomus umbellatus) 04.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 23 Aug 2017 at 04:18:39 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Butomus umbellatus

File:Choca-de-chapéu-vermelho (Thamnophilus ruficapillus).jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 21 Aug 2017 at 19:18:39 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Rufous-capped Antshrike
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created and uploaded by Clodomiro Esteves Junior - nominated by Arion -- 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 19:18, 12 August 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 19:18, 12 August 2017 (UTC)
  • Mild Symbol support vote.svg Support - I could nitpick the composition, and a little more sharpness on the bird's head would have been welcome, but it's a pretty large file for a bird picture, the sharpness is solid, in my opinion, and it's a nice bird that took a nice pose. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:55, 12 August 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Per Ikan. -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 06:00, 13 August 2017 (UTC)
  • Weak Symbol support vote.svg Support Nice, but IMO minor JPEG artifacts. Should be a 100% JPEG. --XRay talk 10:14, 13 August 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --LivioAndronico (talk) 18:07, 13 August 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Stains in the backround and strange colour around the feather above the head (for example) and the head and beak. See note. --Hockei (talk) 19:20, 13 August 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Yann (talk) 13:29, 14 August 2017 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Too many processing errors. --Laitche (talk) 17:15, 14 August 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Good shot, bad and undeclarated retouching --Uoaei1 (talk) 06:18, 15 August 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose processing. Charles (talk) 22:26, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per Hockei and opposes following him. Daniel Case (talk) 23:05, 16 August 2017 (UTC).

File:Japacanim (Donacobius atricapilla).jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 21 Aug 2017 at 19:08:34 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Black-capped Donacobius
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created and uploaded by Clodomiro Esteves Junior - nominated by Arion -- 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 19:08, 12 August 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 19:08, 12 August 2017 (UTC)
  • Pictogram-voting-question.svg Question - What are the things that look like water color boundaries (if you get my meaning) in the background, such as right above and slightly to the right of the bird's eye? They're a little distracting. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:52, 12 August 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral Looks like unsharpened with a mask. Some problems at the beak. --XRay talk 10:19, 13 August 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --LivioAndronico (talk) 18:08, 13 August 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Stains in the backround and strange colour around the beak (for example). See note. --Hockei (talk) 19:16, 13 August 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Yann (talk) 13:30, 14 August 2017 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Too many processing errors. --Laitche (talk) 17:16, 14 August 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Good shot, bad and undeclarated retouching --Uoaei1 (talk) 06:19, 15 August 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose processing again. Charles (talk) 22:27, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per Hockei. Daniel Case (talk) 23:03, 16 August 2017 (UTC).

File:Neuhaus Mühlweiher 17RM2099.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 20 Aug 2017 at 07:24:58 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

The mill pond near Neuhaus castle is used for carp breeding as well. The building of the mill is abandoned.
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info all by me Ermell -- Ermell (talk) 07:24, 11 August 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Ermell (talk) 07:24, 11 August 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - This is gorgeous, immediately struck me at thumbnail size and doesn't disappoint me at larger sizes. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:58, 11 August 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - Staggering. Per Ikan. -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 10:30, 11 August 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose It's nice, but for me the wow is spoiled by those branches poking in from various directions.--Peulle (talk) 11:05, 11 August 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 11:12, 11 August 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Lovely. Those branches give depth and dimension. PumpkinSky talk
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Casual topic and "zero wow effect". Very annoying branch on the upper left corner. - Benh (talk) 08:07, 12 August 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support and wow! --Milseburg (talk) 10:03, 12 August 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support and 7....For above! --LivioAndronico (talk) 18:10, 13 August 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose I'm sorry, but neither the light nor the composition is featured for me. --Ivar (talk) 10:14, 14 August 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Very weak oppose So much went right with this picture, but I've looked at an inordinate amount of water-reflection pictures while creating and diffusing that category and this one just doesn't stand out enough for me. Maybe a zoomed shot of the mill opposite? As it is it just doesn't seem to have a subject, pretty through the background and foreground are. Daniel Case (talk) 16:48, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support very nice HalfGig talk 23:45, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Per opposers.--Jebulon (talk) 09:29, 18 August 2017 (UTC)


Confirmed results:
Result: 8 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /MZaplotnik (edits) 14:39, 20 August 2017 (UTC)

File:Octopus Vulgaris - Poulpe commun.webm, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 20 Aug 2017 at 06:39:44 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

*Symbol support vote.svg Support --Floralesta (talk) 14:18, 11 August 2017 (UTC)

  • Sorry, invalid vote. The rules are: "Editors whose accounts have at least 10 days and 50 edits can vote." This vote was only your second edit. --cart-Talk 12:40, 11 August 2017 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment - Nice video, but I'm reluctant to support because I feel like there should be more explanation of what we're looking at for FP. Is the octopus catching and eating an organism at the end of the video? What species? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:51, 11 August 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose The video lingers too much on just the eyes of the octopus, it would have been nice to get more glimpses of other parts of the creature. The file is also lacking info on where and how the video is made; aquarium, open sea, where and so on. --cart-Talk 17:00, 11 August 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Per Cart. --Karelj (talk) 21:08, 14 August 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral per Ikan and cart. I would like to see subtitles added with TimedText. Daniel Case (talk) 16:44, 16 August 2017 (UTC)


Confirmed results:
Result: 2 support, 2 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /MZaplotnik (edits) 14:38, 20 August 2017 (UTC)