Commons:Кандидаты в избранные изображения

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Кандидаты в избранные изображения на других языках:

Alemannisch | asturianu | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | English | فارسی | español | suomi | français | galego | हिन्दी | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lëtzebuergesch | молдовеняскэ | norsk bokmål | português | polski | română | русский | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | українська | 粵語 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | հայերեն | +/−

Shortcut: COM:FPC Если вы считаете, что нашли или создали изображение, достойное стать избранным,— пожалуйста, добавьте его в нижеследующий раздел Кандидаты. Если в течение 15 дней ваше предложение будет принято собществом, то изображению будет присвоено звание избранного. Пожалуйста, обратите внимание: избранные изображения не имеют прямого отношения к Изображениям дня (однако выбор изображений дня производится преимущественно из «избранных изображений»).

Кандидаты[edit]

Для того чтобы проголосовать или добавить новое изображение-кандидат, перейдите по этой ссылке

Featured picture candidates[edit]

File:Bombus sp Villamontagna 03.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 11 Jul 2020 at 16:11:38 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Bombus sp Villamontagna

File:Stawa Młyny panorama.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 11 Jul 2020 at 15:58:53 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

panorama of mill in Świnoujście

File:Hidden Peak Fire Lookout at sunset, with smokey haze from nearby fires.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 11 Jul 2020 at 15:50:04 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Hidden Peak Fire Lookout

File:Wegerich Scheckenfalter Paarung.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 11 Jul 2020 at 15:33:12 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Melitaea cinxia

File:Brattåsberget by Hanneviken with migratory birds in Norrkila, Lysekil.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 11 Jul 2020 at 13:51:21 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Brattåsberget cliff overlooking the mudflats in the inner part of Hanneviken, a part of Trommekilen, with migratory birds in Norrkila, Lysekil Municipality, Sweden.
  • Sorry, no more foreground to be had since it's brambles and a road. --Cart (talk) 14:03, 2 July 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Excellent. The light is really lovely and it's a very scenic vista. Cmao20 (talk) 16:29, 2 July 2020 (UTC)

File:Fishermen preparing lobster traps in Norra Grundsund 1.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 11 Jul 2020 at 13:49:24 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Two fishermen preparing and baiting lobster traps while another is using a pressure washer to clean traps in Norra Grundsund, Lysekil Municipality, Sweden.

File:Bielawa Zachodnia.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 11 Jul 2020 at 09:40:29 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

a photo of railway station "Bielawa Zachodnia" in Bielawa (Poland)

File:Adliswil Werdsteg dawn.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 11 Jul 2020 at 08:19:45 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Werdsteg in Adliswil, Switzerland, right before dawn

File:Golden monkey (Cercopithecus kandti) eating.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 10 Jul 2020 at 08:26:40 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Golden monkey (Cercopithecus kandti) eating bamboo, Rwanda
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Ivar: There is nothing wrong with the voting period. Charles created this page at 08:27, 23 June 2020‎. Take a look in the page history. However, he didn't add it to this list until now, so the very short voting period is a result of that. Not sure why it was done in this manner. We could "reset" the nom by tweaking it using the {{Bots}} template from when Charles actually added it to the list and made it public. I think that would be better than going through all the mess of withdrawing and making a second nomination. What say you? --Cart (talk) 10:37, 2 July 2020 (UTC)
  • Should be fixed now. --A.Savin 11:09, 2 July 2020 (UTC)
  • Thanks, you had a more elegant solution. --Cart (talk) 11:24, 2 July 2020 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Why is there sharp texture on the monkey's right hand? Shouldn't it be out-of-focus and blurred? Is this some AI Sharpening artifact? Can it be tweaked? The broken near end of the bamboo looks oddly crisp, like someone has cut it out of the image with scissors. Compare to the original upload which is soft. I can see how better software can improve the lighting of the first version, but bringing this degree of sharpness that wasn't there makes me a bit uncomfortable. Along the monkey's right cheek, you can see bits where the out-of-focus background has got weirdly sharpened. The overall improvement is very impressive and these glitches are only visible at 100%, but I am a bit worried if the AI is introducing texture and crisp hair that wasn't actually captured? What do you think? -- Colin (talk) 10:12, 2 July 2020 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment All sharpening introduces sharpness 'that wasn't there'. Topaz AI software can be aggressive and introduce artefacts. It's a balance which I try to manage by using layers, but of course a) I don't always get it right and b) voters have different opinions of sharpness, noise etc. I can reduce the artefacts on the hand. The end of the bamboo is just carelessness where I reduced exposure, but didn't do it very well. New version on its way. Charlesjsharp (talk) 11:36, 2 July 2020 (UTC)

File:Eunateko Andra Maria ekainaren amaieran 13.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 10 Jul 2020 at 11:22:53 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Santa María de Eunate church is a very special church in the Camino de Santiago, because of it's octogonal shape and isollation. Here we can see it with a sunflower and wheat.

File:Wochenspruch der NSDAP 11 January 1943.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 10 Jul 2020 at 10:46:18 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Nazi wall newspaper, Wochenspruch der NSDAP, issue of 11 January 1943. These posters were widely displayed in wartime Germany.
  • Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic media/Printed#Posters and advertisements
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Werner von Axster-Heudtlass - restored and uploaded by Buidhe - nominated by Buidhe -- Buidhe (talk) 10:46, 1 July 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Buidhe (talk) 10:46, 1 July 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Pretty chilling stuff. The quality seems good so I think this can make a good if unpleasant historical FP. Cmao20 (talk) 16:27, 1 July 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Agreed. High quality print and scan, striking, and worth a feature. It's important to understand how propaganda in the service of evil can be artful and effective. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:41, 1 July 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support per others. Important historical documentation.--Peulle (talk) 22:14, 1 July 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- King of ♥ 01:22, 2 July 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support per above. Chilling, yes. --Cayambe (talk) 06:27, 2 July 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote oversat.svg Strong oppose until a proper description has been added that explains what this is. You've got to be kidding me: I can't believe that the only content of the decription of a file at Commons is an un-commented, verbatim Goebbels quote. Given that educational value seems to be the major reason for support here, we better make sure it actually has educational value. Keep in mind that this will become eligible for POTY voting. This is not just another painting of a random historical figure. This is not something you can have sitting around without context. --El Grafo (talk) 08:34, 2 July 2020 (UTC)
    • @El Grafo: The quote is the text displayed on the poster; I've expanded the description with more information about the publication. There are a lot of issues of this periodical, many of which are public domain (most of those can be found in Wochenspruch der NSDAP) however, in my opinion this is the one with the most "wow factor". I would not support this for POTY. Buidhe (talk) 08:59, 2 July 2020 (UTC)
  • That's good information. Could you include all of that in German, too? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:38, 2 July 2020 (UTC)
  • Sadly I can read German but not write it. Buidhe (talk) 09:55, 2 July 2020 (UTC)
  • Very nice, that's the kind of information I'd expect from a FP candidate file description page. Thank you, and apologies for my strong language. I might be able to translate this into German later if I find a quiet moment. --El Grafo (talk) 11:14, 2 July 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Here is a "neutral" description indifferent. --Neptuul (talk) 10:53, 2 July 2020 (UTC)
  • Pictogram-voting-question.svg Question What would you like to add to the description? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 11:29, 2 July 2020 (UTC)

File:DPortnoy Jan2015.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 10 Jul 2020 at 09:38:42 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Daniel A. Portnoy,is a microbiologist

File:Vakil Mosque, 13 July 2017.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 10 Jul 2020 at 09:34:56 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

one of iwans of Vakil mosque.
  • Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious buildings#Iran
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Yare zaman2000 - uploaded by Yare zaman2000 - nominated by Persia -- ahuR ☘ 09:34, 1 July 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- ahuR ☘ 09:34, 1 July 2020 (UTC)
  • BA candidate.svg Weak oppose Light and colours are nice, but I fear that the quality is not there, sorry. f/3.2 seems an odd choice for this kind of photograph, and indeed even important parts of the subject are very soft, e.g. the wall at the right. In addition, the crop at the top right is somewhat surprising; wouldn’t it be better to show more of the magnificent vault? Sorry again, --Aristeas (talk) 15:44, 1 July 2020 (UTC)
  • BA candidate.svg Weak oppose per Aristeas' thoughtful review. The golden light on the left hand side is lovely and might nudge it into FP were the quality better, but there is quite a bit of blurring and unsharpness, and I too am not convinced by the crop. It's a beautiful picture but I don't think it is quite up to the standard especially since we've had so many lovely photos of Iranian architecture from Poco a poco and more recently from Amirpashaei. Cmao20 (talk) 16:26, 1 July 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per others, and in addition, the floor looks odd with artifacts. It's a pity, because the motif is so beautiful, so I would have liked to support. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:44, 1 July 2020 (UTC)

File:ArT of opEN doors project - Rua de Santa Maria - Funchal 37.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 10 Jul 2020 at 07:54:22 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

One of the doors of the "ArT of opEN doors" project, showing the preparation of Poncha, a traditional drink of Madeira, with a "caralhinho", a kind of a beater

File:Duisburg, Landschaftspark Duisburg-Nord -- 2020 -- 7780.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 10 Jul 2020 at 04:15:03 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Rusty pipe at the steam house at Landschaftspark Duisburg-Nord, Duisburg, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany

File:Münster, Hafen, ehem. Schüttvorrichtung -- 2020 -- 8064.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 10 Jul 2020 at 04:12:03 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Former bulk bin (“Elephant”) in the port, Münster, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany

File:Water reflection of the mountains of Vang Vieng with crepuscular rays.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 10 Jul 2020 at 03:15:51 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Water reflection of the mountains of Vang Vieng with crepuscular rays

File:Front view of a stream with a tree as vanishing point, mountains and mist in the countryside of Vang Vieng.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 10 Jul 2020 at 03:17:25 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Front view of a stream with a tree as vanishing point, mountains and mist in the countryside of Vang Vieng
  • Spotted :-) Fixed. Thanks, Ikan -- Basile Morin (talk) 05:37, 1 July 2020 (UTC)
  • You bet. These are two particularly lovely nominations. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:49, 1 July 2020 (UTC)

File:Sanderling auf Spiekeroog - Nationalpark niedersächsisches Wattenmeer.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 9 Jul 2020 at 09:51:33 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Sanderling at Spiekeroog in winter plumage

File:Karte Deutsches Reich, Verwaltungsgliederung 1900-01-01.png[edit]

Voting period ends on 8 Jul 2020 at 17:23:26 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Administrative Map of the German Empire as of January 1st, 1900
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment You guys would know me as Alsakan but I just changed my username. As promised, I will switch between FP nomination and delisting nomination. StellarHalo (talk) 17:23, 29 June 2020 (UTC)
Pictogram-voting-question.svg Question Why the map is not in SVG? --Wilfredor (talk) 17:58, 29 June 2020 (UTC)
@Wilfredor: I am not the author so I am not sure but, I don't think this map was created using vector graphics to begin with. --StellarHalo (talk) 13:07, 30 June 2020 (UTC)
Thanks for your feedback, sorry I didn't remark that you're not the author --Wilfredor (talk) 13:31, 30 June 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose should be SVG, should be without German text and logo, sources in description are also only external links.--BevinKacon (talk) 17:02, 30 June 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Work out whatever technicalities you want to work out, but I'm impressed with this map. So what that it's in German? It's a map of the German Empire. Anyone who reads Roman letters can look up the German words and names if they like, as is common when using German references. I don't understand the objection that the source links are external. It's essential to type all that up in text? Maybe as part of a PhD dissertation project or something. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:07, 1 July 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Impressive work, laid out in an attractive manner. -- King of ♥ 01:27, 2 July 2020 (UTC)

File:Мистический каньон реки Ходзь, парк Тхач, Западный Кавказ.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 8 Jul 2020 at 16:23:55 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Canyon of Khodz River in heavy clouds, Adygea, Western Caucasus

File:Tjasker Zandpoel, windmolen bij Wijckel. Friesland. 10-06-2020 (actm.) 02.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 8 Jul 2020 at 15:56:53 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION

File:SL Ella asv2020-01 img29 Dhowa Temple.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 8 Jul 2020 at 11:27:47 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Interior of Dhowa Temple
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment I like this photo, but Basile’s suggestion seems very plausible to me, so I would suggest to try it. --Aristeas (talk) 10:05, 1 July 2020 (UTC)
  • ✓ Done I have applied a tighter crop (yet I'm not willing to crop away big parts of the ceiling, as Basile apparently suggests). --A.Savin 14:37, 1 July 2020 (UTC)
    Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Thank you! But I understand Basile in another way: I understand that he suggests not to crop, but to resize (to put it directly: to distort ;–) the photo in order to change the proportions. @Basile Morin: could you confirm or clarify this? Thank you! --Aristeas (talk) 15:35, 1 July 2020 (UTC)
  • Yes, exactly, I was suggesting to "resize" (I know this word can be ambiguous), not to crop anything. So, applying an homothetic transformation, with the height remaining as it is, and the width reduced. Then, the proportions of the people will look more natural. In Photoshop (although I've got the menu in French): Edition > Transformation > homothetic transformation. In Lightroom: Corrections of the lens > Manual > Aspect. Hope this is clearer. Thanks, Aristeas -- Basile Morin (talk) 15:40, 1 July 2020 (UTC)
  • Thanks for feedback, but this kind of distortion goes way behind "red line" for me. --A.Savin 18:30, 1 July 2020 (UTC)
  • On a second though, I've gone ahead and applied it a bit (+50 of 100 in the Lightroom feature you suggested) -- it's maximum for me, hopefully it is enough; if not, be it no FP. Thanks --A.Savin 19:39, 1 July 2020 (UTC)
  • I think it's an improvement tbh, but it was FP to me anyway. Cmao20 (talk) 00:21, 2 July 2020 (UTC)
  • Perfect. With the height enlarged and the tight cut you made up and down, the final ratio is exactly the same as the one I proposed -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:22, 2 July 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Really compelling now. --Aristeas (talk) 09:12, 2 July 2020 (UTC)

File:Syrian hamster - mating.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 8 Jul 2020 at 04:13:31 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Syrian hamster mating

File:African fish eagle (Haliaeetus vocifer) Ethiopia.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 7 Jul 2020 at 19:01:18 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

African fish eagle (Haliaeetus vocifer)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Yes, you are right, new version now. Charlesjsharp (talk) 21:38, 28 June 2020 (UTC)

File:Gescheine auf Weinrebe IMG 7292.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 7 Jul 2020 at 17:16:33 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

grapevine
  • Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants#Family : Vitaceae
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Fischer.H - uploaded by Fischer.H - nominated by Fischer.H -- Fischer.H (talk) 17:16, 28 June 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Fischer.H (talk) 17:16, 28 June 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose POV, leaves etc. Charlesjsharp (talk) 17:36, 28 June 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Yeah, the composition doesn't work for me.--Peulle (talk) 18:10, 28 June 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per others. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:25, 28 June 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per others. Technical issues: slight noise in the sky, small dust spots. --Basotxerri (talk) 12:06, 29 June 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose QI but not FP to me - the crops are a little bit random and the quality is good but not great. Cmao20 (talk) 16:14, 29 June 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per others. It's time to withdraw this one as it has received no supports beyond the nominator against six opposes in five days. Daniel Case (talk) 14:40, 2 July 2020 (UTC)

File:Annapurna South-4588.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 7 Jul 2020 at 16:35:47 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
  • Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Nepal
  • Pictogram voting info.svg InfoAnnapurna South, also called Annapurna Dakshin or Moditse, is a mountain in the Annapurna Himal range of the Himalayas, and the 101st-highest mountain in the world. It was first ascended in 1964, and is 7,219 metres tall. The nearby mountain Hiunchuli is in fact an extension of Annapurna South. created by Bijay chaurasia - uploaded by Bijay chaurasia - nominated by Bijay chaurasia -- Bijay chaurasia (talk) 16:35, 28 June 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Bijay chaurasia (talk) 16:35, 28 June 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Very beautiful, but there are weird sharpening artifacts, probably due to the image being insufficiently sharp to begin with and then oversharpening to compensate. (Also, I think you can crop out some of the featureless black area at the bottom.) -- King of ♥ 17:16, 28 June 2020 (UTC)
@King of Hearts: Thank you:) please review once again, weird sharpening artifacts are gone now. Best Regards Bijay chaurasia (talk) 18:33, 28 June 2020 (UTC)
Unfortuantely, at 9 MP this level of unsharpness is unforgivable IMO. Compare, for example, to File:Lago del Rey, Alemania, 2019-05-17, DD 25.jpg, which is worse at full res (46 MP), but much better at 4000px (10 MP). -- King of ♥ 20:47, 28 June 2020 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment LHS appears to be blurred (foreground and distant mountain). Charlesjsharp (talk) 19:06, 28 June 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per King. I'd love to see a bigger, sharp photo of this motif. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:27, 28 June 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose I agree with the above. Beautiful photo but just not quite sharp enough for the size. Cmao20 (talk) 16:13, 29 June 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Per King of ♥ --Llez (talk) 10:04, 30 June 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Great idea but huge technical issues remain ... the ridgeline to the right of the summit is still oversharpened-looking, and then it gets as unsharp as it does on the left. Lastly I find all that darkness up front a little distracting from what is admittedly pretty beautiful. Daniel Case (talk) 14:39, 2 July 2020 (UTC)

File:Menambang Belerang.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 7 Jul 2020 at 08:28:55 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Sulfur miners collecting frozen sulfur from the crater of Mount Ijen
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Note that I also support this nomination. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:07, 28 June 2020 (UTC)

File:Skyline of the Central Business District of Singapore with Esplanade Bridge in the evening.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 7 Jul 2020 at 07:22:09 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

File:Skyline of the Central Business District of Singapore with Esplanade Bridge in the evening.jpg

Downtown Core is the historical and downtown centre of the city-state of Singapore and the main commercial area in Singapore excluding reclaimed lands with many integrated resorts such as the Marina Bay Sands, one of the most expensive buildings in the world, with the most expensive standalone casino at Bayfront Avenue. There are many skyscrapers in Raffles Place, Tanjong Pagar and Marina Bay CBD with a height limit of 280m. It is one of the eleven planning areas located within the most urbanised Central Area,

If you think it has "Too much water" then you should see this featured picture of the same place and photographer, this proposed image is better in all aspects than another featured picture.--Editor-1 (talk) 03:52, 30 June 2020 (UTC)
I specifically cited that as having a better composition above, so I disagree that this one is "better in all aspects". Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:48, 30 June 2020 (UTC)
The other picture compensates it with a better crop on the left (too tight here) and the reflexions on the water, which don't stand out so good here --Poco a poco (talk) 08:38, 30 June 2020 (UTC)
  • BA candidate.svg Weak oppose per my remarks above and others. If the other picture is among the best on this site (and I think it is) and this one is IMO clearly not as good, I don't think this is one of the very best. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:11, 1 July 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Fine for me. --Aristeas (talk) 09:24, 1 July 2020 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Since Basile Morin has withdrawn the 'Alternative' and, for technical reasons, we can't put a partial 'Withdrawn' on a nom, I'm commenting out that section so it won't bug the voting on and closing of the nomination. Just rolling up the section is not enough. --Cart (talk) 14:05, 1 July 2020 (UTC)
I think commenting out was unnecessary, replacing the thumb image with a direct and bold link as you have suggested ("So please just give links (you can write them in bold) to photos you want to share with the voters in a non-Alt way.") is better and more useful.--Editor-1 (talk) 06:19, 2 July 2020 (UTC)
That's another way to do it and it works just fine. --Cart (talk) 12:39, 2 July 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support I think a dusk photo of this skyline from this angle goes well with a night photo; I'm not bothered by the crop since the reflections at dusk are inevitably shorter. Daniel Case (talk) 01:45, 2 July 2020 (UTC)
❎ Alternative withdrawn by photographer

Alternative[edit]

File:Skyline of the Central Business District of Singapore with Esplanade Bridge in the evening (cropped).jpg

@King of Hearts, Ikan Kekek, Poco a poco: What is your opinion about this cropped version? I removed the far right/most right building whish is short/low-rise and unnecessary, this lossless crop made more space for the right side of the image. If another crop is needed please tell me.--Editor-1 (talk) 04:32, 1 July 2020 (UTC)

💡 @Editor-1: 3 things :

  1. Do not display another image in a standard nomination, otherwise the bot will get misled at the end of the voting period.
  2. For alternatives, especially with a cropped version, it's always better to ask / notify the photographer (when active, and this is the case here, I'm currently active on Commons). Photography is not only taking a subject, it's also about the choice of a framing. And I'm not sure to support your choice here.
  3. When doing such modification from a file, please mention your name in addition to the author. Say you're the author of the new crop. A framing is about the management of the space, this is an important thing, not a minor detail. A crop can either reveal or ruin a picture, thus this is an artistic choice. -- Basile Morin (talk) 05:08, 1 July 2020 (UTC)
Also: please keep in mind the photographer can withdraw your nomination, if the candidature doesn't match the tastes. Concerning the oppose and neutral votes above (even if I don't share the ideas), they're perfectly legitimate. It's a matter of taste, and I find the arguments valid. In the other picture, I like the colors and the reflection. The large framing is wanted. In this one, the subtle light is interesting. Both pictures are different, and there is no "better" one in my opinion. Regards -- Basile Morin (talk) 05:16, 1 July 2020 (UTC)
For what it's worth, if the cropped version were offered as an alternative, I'd say I like its composition better than this picture but not as much as the night picture. The problem is the little bit of curved light pole that's cut off by the right crop. I'd seriously consider voting for it if it were offered. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:19, 1 July 2020 (UTC)
No major difference. The first one is fine. -- Basile Morin (talk) 05:24, 1 July 2020 (UTC)
"Alternatives are for different crops or post-processing of the original image, if they are suggested by voters" and "The FPCBot handles the vote counting and closing in most cases, current exceptions are candidates containing multiple versions of the image as well as FPXed and withdrawn nominations. Any experienced user may close the requests not handled by the bot." please don't worry yourself.
The first one is not fine enough, the far right building is obviously redundant.--Editor-1 (talk) 07:13, 1 July 2020 (UTC)
Unless the photographer approves of this alternative being nominated, I don't think we should vote on it. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:15, 1 July 2020 (UTC)
  • Editor-1, yes nominations can be closed manually, but it is a longstanding practice not to muddle up a nomination with other files than proper 'Alternatives'. Any file, even non-images like sound-files or small images in signatures that are not template or script based, will be read as 'Alts' and this will for example prevent fifth-day closings by the Bot. So please just give links (you can write them in bold) to photos you want to share with the voters in a non-Alt way. We are capable of following links. Displaying other files just because you can, is not the best strategy. --Cart (talk) 09:35, 1 July 2020 (UTC)

@Basile Morin: Are you really sure you don't want this alternative even if User:King of Hearts -- User:Ikan Kekek -- User:Poco a poco prefer this? @Ikan Kekek: Can you please at least strike your opposite vote? thanks.--Editor-1 (talk) 12:23, 1 July 2020 (UTC)

  • Editor-1, I find the bridge a bit short, here, sorry, the balance looks better in the first version -- Basile Morin (talk) 13:11, 1 July 2020 (UTC)

File:Aerial perspective of Fullerton Hotel, Singapore.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 7 Jul 2020 at 07:02:42 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

File:Aerial perspective of Fullerton Hotel, Singapore.jpg

description: The Fullerton Hotel Singapore is a five-star luxury hotel located near the mouth of the Singapore River, in the Downtown Core of the Central Area, Singapore. It was named after Robert Fullerton, the first Governor of the Straits Settlements (1826–1829). Commissioned in 1924 as part of the British colony's centennial celebrations.

  • Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Singapore
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created & uploaded by User:Ferylbob - nominated by Editor-1 -- Editor-1 (talk) 07:02, 28 June 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Editor-1 (talk) 07:02, 28 June 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose It is a nice building and good quality shot, but this perspective doesn't work very well for me (especially as FP). --Domob (talk) 07:14, 28 June 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Very odd perspective and the buildings in the background are very noisy. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:04, 28 June 2020 (UTC)
  • BA candidate.svg Weak oppose I actually don't mind the perspective too much, it's so unusual that it works quite well, but the image quality is not quite FP - a little too much noise and some compression artefacts in the shadows. Cmao20 (talk) 15:04, 28 June 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per Domob and Ikan. Even without the noise the background buildings and water are distracting. Daniel Case (talk) 14:39, 1 July 2020 (UTC)

File:Julemotiv tegnet av Jenny Nystrøm (24207693358).jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 7 Jul 2020 at 06:11:43 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Jultomte illustration by Jenny Nyström
  • Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic media/Printed#Other
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Jenny Nyström - restored, uploaded, and nominated by Adam Cuerden -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 06:11, 28 June 2020 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info "Nystrøm" is the Norwegian spelling (the letters are equivalent, but which one exists varies by language). This file is named after the Library of Norway catalogue records, so it can be found. Adam Cuerden (talk) 06:11, 28 June 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 06:11, 28 June 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Very good resolution and quality; well-restored; interesting backstory. Cmao20 (talk) 15:03, 28 June 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Good one. Worthy of a feature.--Peulle (talk) 18:15, 28 June 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Not one of her more noted images, but it's nice to have her represented at FP nevertheless. Childhood memories... --Cart (talk) 16:51, 29 June 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Llez (talk) 09:59, 30 June 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Well executed non destructive restoration and nice painting on big size --Wilfredor (talk) 12:27, 30 June 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 08:55, 1 July 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Good scan and restauration, you can even study the printing technique, as the dots are clearly visible. --Aristeas (talk) 10:19, 1 July 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Daniel Case (talk) 14:35, 1 July 2020 (UTC)

File:Dirt Bike IMG 4202.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 6 Jul 2020 at 17:36:51 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
  • Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Sports#Individual sports
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Fischer.H - uploaded by Fischer.H - nominated by Fischer.H -- Fischer.H (talk) 17:36, 27 June 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Fischer.H (talk) 17:36, 27 June 2020 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Could you do some selective NR on the sky? Given the small resolution of this image the noise is quite prominent in relative terms. -- King of ♥ 23:03, 27 June 2020 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment what do you mean by selective NR ?.--Fischer.H (talk) 08:28, 28 June 2020 (UTC)
    @Fischer.H: In Photoshop, select just the sky, and do noise reduction on that part. -- King of ♥ 17:21, 28 June 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Very good catch! Impressive acrobatics -- Basile Morin (talk) 08:12, 28 June 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support The noise is gentle and the picture is IMO compelling. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:09, 28 June 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Either the ground should explain how the bike ended up in the air, or the crop should be about the bike and biker. Now we have some ugly branches only, they do not fit in the context. —kallerna (talk) 14:45, 28 June 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support per Ikan. Cmao20 (talk) 15:02, 28 June 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support The ground and its branches add up to the photo well, in my opinion. Also per Ikan. --pandakekok9 04:57, 29 June 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:44, 29 June 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --XRay talk 11:02, 29 June 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Schnobby (talk) 07:20, 30 June 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Llez (talk) 09:58, 30 June 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Famberhorst (talk) 17:55, 30 June 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Simpler than the other one was. Daniel Case (talk) 04:24, 1 July 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Aristeas (talk) 09:20, 1 July 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Cart (talk) 13:57, 2 July 2020 (UTC)

File:Temporale in arrivo sulla campagna rignanese (Rignano sull'Arno - Fi).jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 5 Jul 2020 at 15:40:13 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Thunderstorm approaching the Rignanese countryside (Rignano sull'Arno - Fi)
OK thanks for the advice, I agree and I will do it when I can. I thank you for the beautiful compliment, between the lines you told me that I have an eye for photos.PROPOLI87 (talk) 19:47, 27 June 2020 (UTC)PROPOLI87PROPOLI87 (talk) 19:47, 27 June 2020 (UTC)
Oh, you do, no question. It's a nice moody composition. Cmao20 (talk) 20:17, 27 June 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per Cmao20, and I also see chromatic aberration in the sky. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:12, 27 June 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per others. --Fischer.H (talk) 17:15, 27 June 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose I can't find anywhere where it's really sharp, and the contrast is too stark. Daniel Case (talk) 23:36, 30 June 2020 (UTC)

File:Zicht op de Piz S-chalambert vanuit Val Sinestra (d.j.b) 01.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 5 Jul 2020 at 12:28:33 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
  • Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Switzerland#Grisons (Graubünden)
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Famberhorst - nominated by Tomer T -- Tomer T (talk) 12:28, 26 June 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Tomer T (talk) 12:28, 26 June 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose A sub-10 MP landscape without perfect noise/sharpness at the pixel level just isn't going to cut it these days, sorry. -- King of ♥ 12:46, 26 June 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support I get KoH's point, but it seems pretty good to me. I like the gentle light, and I don't find the noise severe. Cmao20 (talk) 16:16, 26 June 2020 (UTC)
  • BA candidate.svg Weak oppose I'm not so bothered by the softness (although KoH of course has a good point), but for me also the composition and view is not that special for FP (but it could certainly be a VI of this mountain depending on the scope and competition). --Domob (talk) 07:16, 28 June 2020 (UTC)
  • BA candidate.svg Weak oppose Might work under different lighting conditions. Daniel Case (talk) 23:32, 30 June 2020 (UTC)

File:Gilbert Studios photograph of Harriet Jacobs.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 5 Jul 2020 at 06:07:06 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Harriet Jacobs
  • Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/People#Sitting_people
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by C. M. Gilbert - restored, uploaded, and nominated by Adam Cuerden -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 06:07, 26 June 2020 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Carte-de-visite mount, which adds context, methinks. Could always be CSS-cropped if it's ever undesireable. Since it sometimes gets brought up: It would be misleading as to the nature of the photograph to turn it to a pure black-and-white. Also, for anything before about 1930 or so, that has a tendency to kill detail, as sepia seems to have been balanced differently than a black-and-white image is, as it allows additional contrast through varying saturation. Adam Cuerden (talk) 06:07, 26 June 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 06:07, 26 June 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Great portrait. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:24, 26 June 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Source photo is missing top and LHS and after restoration still missing some frame. Not one of the finest on Commons. Why do you think it is a carte de visite? Wikipedia says they went out of popularity in the 1870s. Charlesjsharp (talk) 11:45, 26 June 2020 (UTC)
Source photo is here --Wilfredor (talk) 12:15, 26 June 2020 (UTC)
  • OK, you must have more info than I could find. How do you know original was carte-de-visite size, not the larger cabinet card? I thought the image came from a reproduction in a book, in which case the original size could not be determined. Charlesjsharp (talk) 13:51, 26 June 2020 (UTC)
  • @Charlesjsharp: You are probably right that it's probably not the tiny size of the original carte-de-visites, but the term was used for cabinet cards as well, e.g. Brady's Imperial Carte-de-Visites. If you're asking for a file name change, I'm fine with that. Adam Cuerden (talk) 21:51, 26 June 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Good restoration work, non-destructive, maybe it is not the best photo in the world but what I am rewarding here is the restoration professionally done. It would be good to see the same level of restoration in other photos of greater importance --Wilfredor (talk) 12:15, 26 June 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Wow, she sounds like an heroic woman. Portrait and restoration are great. Cmao20 (talk) 16:15, 26 June 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:29, 28 June 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 08:24, 28 June 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Llez (talk) 09:56, 30 June 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support for historic importance as only known portrait. Daniel Case (talk) 17:13, 30 June 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Aristeas (talk) 09:18, 1 July 2020 (UTC)

File:Frigga crocuta 80114021.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 5 Jul 2020 at 03:27:20 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Male Frigga crocuta in Puerto Villamil, Ecuador

File:Stari Bar, Montenegro, 2014-04-18, DD 01.JPG[edit]

Voting period ends on 4 Jul 2020 at 19:44:50 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
  • Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Settlements#Montenegro
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info A misty, atmospheric picture of Stari Bar, an ancient walled town in Montenegro. This is a historic site that was on the frontiers of Europe's borders with the Ottoman Empire, and regularly saw conflict and changes of authority. created by Poco a poco - uploaded by Poco a poco - nominated by Cmao20 -- Cmao20 (talk) 19:44, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Cmao20 (talk) 19:44, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Nice catch, thank you Cmao20! Poco a poco (talk) 20:49, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral Composition cut on bottom --Wilfredor (talk) 01:00, 26 June 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Nice, but the overcast, gray afternoon makes the photo a lot less colorful than it might be in more attractive weather. I'm often totally fine with overcast skies, but I think they do detract here. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:49, 26 June 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Grey skies are certainly better than white skies, and I like the depth the clouds give to the mountains. The far left is a little bit busy; I would crop out that tiny sliver if I were you. -- King of ♥ 04:32, 26 June 2020 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Gray and white aren't the only two possibilities. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:50, 26 June 2020 (UTC)
  • For this scene I actually prefer grey sky to blue with no clouds. -- King of ♥ 05:50, 26 June 2020 (UTC)
  • I could imagine a partly cloudy day with some sunrays. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:25, 26 June 2020 (UTC)
  • Yes, that would also be excellent, but I don't see why there can't be multiple different lighting conditions under which the same scene could be featureable. -- King of ♥ 12:55, 26 June 2020 (UTC)
  • +1. The mistiness IMO makes this a more interesting picture. It adds a mysterious and moody quality to this picture of a historic, fortified location. Cmao20 (talk) 16:12, 26 June 2020 (UTC)
I agree in principle to the idea of featuring a scene in different light and have said so before, but not this particular photo, for the reasons stated above. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:52, 27 June 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Per KoH. --Domob (talk) 07:19, 28 June 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Per Ikan. The dark sky just does not make the cut for me. --StellarHalo (talk) 11:21, 28 June 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 14:08, 28 June 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per Ikan. Daniel Case (talk) 17:16, 29 June 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support per Cmao20. The mistiness gives the photo an atmosphere appropriate for the subject. --Aristeas (talk) 09:17, 1 July 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Agree with Ikan that this scene might work in different light. As it is, it does not say wow to me. --GRDN711 (talk) 19:07, 1 July 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 06:58, 2 July 2020 (UTC)

File:Three palm trees during the sunset, Ayia Marina Chrysochous, Paphos District, Cyprus 02.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 4 Jul 2020 at 19:45:13 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION

File:Ice crystals bud 20200121.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 4 Jul 2020 at 15:32:40 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Ice crystals on a bud of acer pseudoplatanus
  • Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants#Family_:_Sapindaceae
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Domob - uploaded by Domob - nominated by Domob -- Domob (talk) 15:32, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Domob (talk) 15:32, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Nice focus stack. A couple of blurry bits that I wish were sharp, but still, really good, and I like the bokeh in the background. Cmao20 (talk) 19:52, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose important bits out of focus Charlesjsharp (talk) 20:26, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose I can see why you've nominated this one, but the colours, composition and lack of sharpness don't work for me. --Basotxerri (talk) 11:35, 26 June 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per Charles and Basotxerri. Daniel Case (talk) 03:05, 29 June 2020 (UTC)

File:Vibidia duodecimguttata - La Pairelle.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period ends on 4 Jul 2020 at 15:12:23 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Vibidia duodecimguttata

Confirmed results:
Result: 15 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Cart (talk) 14:23, 2 July 2020 (UTC)
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Arthropods#Family_:_Coccinellidae_(Ladybugs)

File:Restanten voormalige rioolwaterzuiveringsinstallatie in Broek bij Joure. 01-06-2020 (d.j.b.) 07.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 4 Jul 2020 at 14:49:20 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
  • Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Architectural elements#Other Detail of a building.
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Remnants of the former sewage treatment plant on the Tramwei at the Trambrug in Broek near Joure. Detail of the remains of the iron pipe system. Photographed in the mild light of the early morning.The mild light in the early morning softens the harsh colors of the dilapidated object.
    All by -- Famberhorst (talk) 14:49, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Famberhorst (talk) 14:49, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Inclined, shadows, centered, lack of white balance, distracting elements --Wilfredor (talk) 15:57, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support I like the shadows, they add depth. This is the sort of picture where texture is everything - the composition at first looks a bit haphazard, but it's all about the contrasting colours and textures. Overall I like it a lot. Cmao20 (talk) 19:50, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support I like the colours --Llez (talk) 06:06, 26 June 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Nice abstract composition and texture. All: Note that the WB of the thumbnail is wrong due to phab:T256313. -- King of ♥ 12:58, 26 June 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Per king --Sonya7iv (talk) 21:46, 26 June 2020 (UTC)
  • BA candidate.svg Weak oppose It does have quite some appeal, but the balance seems off to me. --MB-one (talk) 22:06, 26 June 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose I like this composition better than the previous nominee, but it doesn't ultimately add up to me. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:30, 27 June 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Per Ikan Poco a poco (talk) 00:13, 28 June 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Per Ikan --StellarHalo (talk) 01:30, 28 June 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Love the abstraction and texture. Daniel Case (talk) 02:56, 29 June 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Like abstract painting.. --Grtek (talk) 17:20, 29 June 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Good light but the subject is not really interesting in my view -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:35, 1 July 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Nice abstraction, colours and texture. --Aristeas (talk) 09:13, 1 July 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Brave compo. --Cart (talk) 13:58, 2 July 2020 (UTC)

File:Zunderschwamm (Fomes fomentarius)-20191227-RM-145922.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period ends on 3 Jul 2020 at 21:58:16 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Tinder sponge (Fomes fomentarius) in the Bruderwald in Bamberg. Focus stack of 23 images.
  • Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Fungi#Family : Polyporaceae
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Tinder sponge (Fomes fomentarius) in the brother forest in Bamberg. Focus stack of 23 images. All by me -- Ermell (talk) 21:58, 24 June 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Ermell (talk) 21:58, 24 June 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support At least you got me a bug this time. Charlesjsharp (talk) 22:17, 24 June 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:05, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support. ··· 🌸 Rachmat04 · 09:27, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Gallery fixed. Please, please, please try to get it right. I have tried so many different way to explain to you how the code should be written, I'm at my wits end! I don't know how to make you understand how it is done. You are the only one of the current FPC regulars who can't get the gallery code right.
You take the page name and a # and then the section heading
In this case: Commons:Featured pictures/Fungi#Family : Polyporaceae
--Cart (talk) 12:04, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- King of ♥ 15:17, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol strong support vote.svg Strong support Again, these focus stacks are really raising the bar. Cmao20 (talk) 19:48, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol strong support vote.svg Strong support excellent Seven Pandas (talk) 19:54, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Wilfredor (talk) 01:02, 26 June 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Cayambe (talk) 04:45, 26 June 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 05:04, 26 June 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Llez (talk) 06:03, 26 June 2020 (UTC)
  • Pictogram-voting-question.svg Question Could you identify (and then mention) the name of the tree these fungi are on? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:27, 26 June 2020 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Good idea, I hadn't thought of that. Since it's dead wood, it will be very difficult. I can look for the location in the forest again. --Ermell (talk) 13:40, 26 June 2020 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info @Ikan Kekek: Unfortunately the branch was removed. It could be hazel.--Ermell (talk) 22:11, 26 June 2020 (UTC)
  • Fair enough. Thanks for checking. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:09, 27 June 2020 (UTC)

Confirmed results:
Result: 18 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Cart (talk) 14:21, 2 July 2020 (UTC)
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Fungi#Family : Polyporaceae

File:Berangkat ke Pura.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 3 Jul 2020 at 14:58:09 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Peoples in Lake Tamblingan, Bali use traditional boats to cross. They left early in the morning to pray at the temple

File:Ausblick von der Hindenburghöhe ins Rheintal.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 3 Jul 2020 at 12:56:28 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

View from the lookout point Hindenburghöhe into the Rhine Gore
  • Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Germany#Rhineland-Palatinate
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info View from the lookout point Hindenburghöhe into the Rhine Gorge. All by me. -- Milseburg (talk) 12:56, 24 June 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Milseburg (talk) 12:56, 24 June 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Very good quality pic and definite QI but not enough wow for FP to me. I'm not sure the leading lines quite work, and the slightly hazy landscape and featureless sky don't add up to an FP atmosphere. Cmao20 (talk) 13:43, 24 June 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral Lovely composition but so-so lighting. -- King of ♥ 16:13, 24 June 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 19:29, 24 June 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per Cmao20. --StellarHalo (talk) 02:19, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Beautiful to me, not a borderline case. Great composition and also would be a lovely motif for a landscape painting. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:39, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Fine! --Palauenc05 (talk) 08:57, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose, per Cmao20. ··· 🌸 Rachmat04 · 09:26, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per above --Andrei (talk) 10:08, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per Cmao20 -- Basile Morin (talk) 11:02, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per other opposers. --Ivar (talk) 15:16, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- I quite like it. MartinD (talk) 11:48, 26 June 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Strongly reminds me of the view up the Hudson River from Anthony's Nose. Daniel Case (talk) 05:28, 28 June 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Nice view, but for me it is not outstanding enough for FP and the harsh light doesn't help. Sorry! --Domob (talk) 07:21, 28 June 2020 (UTC)
  • GA candidate.svg Weak support Really a spledind view, but it’s a pity about the light. --Aristeas (talk) 09:09, 1 July 2020 (UTC)

File:Vieja melanura - Karlsruhe Zoo 01.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 3 Jul 2020 at 12:08:29 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Quetzal cichlid (Vieja melanura), Karlsruhe Zoo
  • Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Fish#Family : Cichlidae (Cichlids)
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Llez - uploaded by Llez - nominated by Llez -- Llez (talk) 12:08, 24 June 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Llez (talk) 12:08, 24 June 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose The quality of the fis is great but the shadow too obvious, in fact it spoils this nom IMHO Poco a poco (talk) 12:40, 24 June 2020 (UTC)
    • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment No light without shadow --Llez (talk) 13:01, 24 June 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Really good in quality and subject. You've really made the most of your visits to this zoo. Cmao20 (talk) 13:42, 24 June 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --StellarHalo (talk) 13:53, 24 June 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:22, 24 June 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose yes no light without shadow, but it is possible to move the source and avoid the harsh front flash... not a first time on a nom of yours. - Benh (talk) 16:33, 24 June 2020 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment I've not tried zoo photography, but surely there must be a more subtle lighting set up? Charlesjsharp (talk) 19:34, 24 June 2020 (UTC)
  • I'd like to elaborate my comment, which goes in the same direction like Charles's. Some sort of shadow would be acceptable, but in this case it is too obvious. We have had some FPCs in the past of good quality that I also supported where the viewer could actually believe that the picture was taken from underwater. Thi is not the case here. Poco a poco (talk) 11:16, 25 June 2020 (UTC)

File:Baram1.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 3 Jul 2020 at 10:06:35 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
  • Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious_buildings#Israel/Palestine
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Erez Ashkenazi - uploaded by Erez Ashkenazi - nominated by Danu Widjajanto -- Danu Widjajanto (talk) 10:06, 24 June 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Danu Widjajanto (talk) 10:06, 24 June 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Andrei (talk) 10:24, 24 June 2020 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment I think it needs perspective correction and removal of the CAs, also a bit oversharpened IMO --Llez (talk) 12:02, 24 June 2020 (UTC)
    FP to me if the issues pointed out by Llez are addressed --Poco a poco (talk) 12:42, 24 June 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Nice play with long exposure, but otherwise no wow for me. Plus strong vignetting. --A.Savin 12:21, 24 June 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Very dramatic picture but the vignetting and perspective needs to be corrected. I also think it would be better if the monument were more central in the frame, it's a bit off to the left atm. Cmao20 (talk) 13:40, 24 June 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Perspective etc. Charlesjsharp (talk) 19:35, 24 June 2020 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment I think this photo works well as a kind of slightly magical alternate reality, but I'd still like to know how long the exposure is, and the EXIF info is only about post-production. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:44, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Strong vignetting and unappealing perspective -- Basile Morin (talk) 11:01, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose perspective needs to be fixed but I'm still not sure it makes it for me with that as I don't find the juxtaposition of a long-exposure starfield and a building to be that striking in and of itself. Daniel Case (talk) 17:00, 27 June 2020 (UTC)

File:J.L. Gerome - The Wailing Wall - Google Art Project.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 3 Jul 2020 at 09:21:51 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Jean-Léon Gérôme: The Wailing Wall
  • Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Non-photographic_media/Exteriors#Monuments
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by J.L. Gerome - uploaded by DcoetzeeBot - nominated by Andrew J.Kurbiko -- Andrei (talk) 09:21, 24 June 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Andrei (talk) 09:21, 24 June 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Nice painting. Cmao20 (talk) 13:38, 24 June 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:24, 24 June 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose FP rulesː "Featured pictures are images from highly skilled photographers"ː the link defines photographers as Wiki photographers. Charlesjsharp (talk) 16:28, 24 June 2020 (UTC)
    This is a provocative statement which questions about half of the featured pictures. I would consider it to be trolling. You should also check "Artworks, illustrations, and historical documents" section of the guidelines above. --Andrei (talk) 17:08, 24 June 2020 (UTC)
    I do agree it is provocative and I have posted the same objection in other nominations. Commons:Featured pictures has the following statementː Featured pictures are images from highly skilled photographers and illustrators that the Wikimedia Commons community has chosen as some of the highest quality on the site. The link is to Commons:Meet our photographers. There is no contribution here from a Commons photographer. By all means, please propose a change to the guidelines. Charlesjsharp (talk) 19:50, 24 June 2020 (UTC)
    • Charlesjsharp, I have removed the links. Those are not "rules", merely an introduction to the collection of images. Those links were added in 2016 by User:John Cummings who was AFAICS just trying to be helpful rather than changing the rules without discussing with anyone. John's last FP nomination was from 2013 and was a photo by Annie Leibovitz (a copyvio, unfortunately). The Commons:Image guidelines, which are the actual rules, state FPs "may or may not have been created by a Commons user" whereas QI "must have been created by a Commons user". This is the community consensus, which has not changed since 2007. We are discussing your suggestion about the rules on the FPC talk page. You can't pretend the rules say what you want them to say. I agree with Andrew, this is disruptive. Please remove your oppose votes made on this basis. -- Colin (talk) 20:57, 24 June 2020 (UTC)
    Colin has removed the links which were the basis of my objection. If he is entitled to do that without any debate, that's the end of it. Is he? Charlesjsharp (talk) 21:47, 24 June 2020 (UTC).
    Colin has correctly pointed out that the FP image guidelines have been the same since 2007. I was reading a page that had been edited in error by ANO. Apologies to all. Charlesjsharp (talk) 23:41, 24 June 2020 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info The painting is a part of a "Wandering Jew" museum trail, which can be found at https://www.imj.org.il/en/content/wanderer --Andrei (talk) 17:15, 24 June 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support-- Great mood, setting, and lighting. I agree with Andrei. Where is this rule Charlies is citing? I thought FPs can be taken by anyone, that only QI had such a rule?? Seven Pandas (talk) 19:12, 24 June 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Good painting that seems significant to me, nicely reproduced. Andrei, that link gives a different date for this painting - 1868, whereas this file says 1880. Do you know which date is correct? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:47, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
    I can personally confirm that the museum sign next to the painting reads 1880. --Andrei (talk) 06:11, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Famberhorst (talk) 14:58, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support I thought it was a photo at low-res. Daniel Case (talk) 16:49, 27 June 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support per Seven Pandas and Ikan. --Aristeas (talk) 08:55, 1 July 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 06:59, 2 July 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- King of ♥ 15:47, 2 July 2020 (UTC)

File:Siegmund Breitbart2.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 3 Jul 2020 at 09:24:47 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Siegmund Breitbart
  • Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People#Others
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by National Photo Company; restored by Michel Vuijlsteke - uploaded by Mvuijlst - nominated by Andrew J.Kurbiko -- Andrei (talk) 09:24, 24 June 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Andrei (talk) 09:24, 24 June 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Cmao20 (talk) 13:36, 24 June 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose FP rulesː "Featured pictures are images from highly skilled photographers"ː the link defines photographers as Wiki photographers. Charlesjsharp (talk) 16:28, 24 June 2020 (UTC)
    Colin says on my talk page that I am not allowed to oppose. Charlesjsharp (talk) 21:36, 24 June 2020 (UTC)
    Colin has correctly pointed out that the FP image guidelines have been the same since 2007. I was reading a page that had been edited in error by ANO. Apologies to all. Charlesjsharp (talk) 23:43, 24 June 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support It would have been great if we could have seen the object he was pulling, but still a good and intriguing photo. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:51, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Daniel Case (talk) 05:35, 27 June 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Composition, especially the bottom crop.--Peulle (talk) 18:20, 28 June 2020 (UTC)

File:Sir Winston Churchill - 19086236948.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 3 Jul 2020 at 08:32:34 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
Colin has edited the page that I used as the basis of my oppose. Charlesjsharp (talk) 21:50, 24 June 2020 (UTC)
Only just now did he do so. I totally agree with Colin and the others and I think your opposes should be stricken as you are trying to force an issue on "rules" that don't exist. Were you planning the many other photos that are on Commons, including FPs, that you felt fell into this category? Seven Pandas (talk) 22:02, 24 June 2020 (UTC)
I interpreted the rules in good faith. Colin has edited the page I relied on. I apologise for annoying you Seven Pandas. Charlesjsharp (talk) 22:15, 24 June 2020 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment I really like this portrait, but as I argued in the nomination of this photo, the few bits of surface noise on this photo should perhaps be removed for FP. I don't understand why this photo was already showing up as "not featured", and I got rid of that stuff. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:56, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
  • Pictogram-voting-question.svg Question What's with the recurrent "Not featured" crap from the bot (I guess?) on this nomination? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:25, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
Sorry about that. I should have created a new nomination page instead of reusing this. The bot looks at the first revision in history, which is why it's attempting to close it prematurely. I will add the {{Bots}} template to make it stop. pandakekok9 05:51, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Great photograph, but the digital reproduction does not convince me. There seem to be heavy compression artifacts on his coat. --El Grafo (talk) 11:11, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per El Grafo. Daniel Case (talk) 05:34, 27 June 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose repair candidate, original source also needs updating.--BevinKacon (talk) 17:06, 30 June 2020 (UTC)

File:Stalin-Lenin-Kalinin-1919.jpg (delist)[edit]

Voting period ends on 3 Jul 2020 at 07:53:33
Stalin, Lenin, and Kalinin together in a 1919 photo

  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Reason to delist (Original nomination, First delisting attempt): Though this is a very rare, valuable photo, this falls short of our current standards. We now generally require non-vector, static images to have a resolution of at least 2 megapixels. This photo doesn't even reach 1 MP. There is also a higher-res version of this photo at File:Sztálin Lenin és Kalinyin.jpg, though I'm not going to make it a replacement nor nominate it for FP since it probably needs some retouching.
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Delist as nom. --pandakekok9 07:53, 24 June 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Delist --StellarHalo (talk) 08:48, 24 June 2020 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment I doubt the alternative has more information than this. This should be a VI at least. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:03, 24 June 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Delist We allow a bit of leeway for historical photos but this is really just too small. -- King of ♥ 12:54, 24 June 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Delist Great photo but 0.4mpx is just not enough for an FP in 2020. Cmao20 (talk) 13:34, 24 June 2020 (UTC)
  • Pictogram-voting-question.svg Question Would you guys oppose a nomination of the larger version of this photo, which adds no information? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:57, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
  • Pretty sure the larger version does add more information. This one in comparson is quite artefacty. Cmao20 (talk) 23:38, 26 June 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Delist per above --Andrei (talk) 10:08, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Delist --El Grafo (talk) 11:07, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Delist --Ivar (talk) 15:18, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Delist Daniel Case (talk) 23:52, 26 June 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Delist per others.--Peulle (talk) 18:21, 28 June 2020 (UTC)

File:Fishmarket 01.jpg (delist)[edit]

Voting period ends on 2 Jul 2020 at 20:17:11
SHORT DESCRIPTION

  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Low resolution for a photograph, crop too tight, and bad composition, to name a few. Take a close look at this image and ask yourself: is this one of the finest images on Wikimedia Commons? (Original nomination)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Delist We already have two much better FPs of fish markets. This image wouldn't even qualify as a QI let alone FP. I am honestly surprises it survives as FP for more than a decade. -- StellarHalo (talk) 20:17, 23 June 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol keep vote.svg Keep Sharp enough in the area of focus, so QI for me. I probably wouldn't vote to promote it today, but it doesn't meet the bar for delisting IMO. -- King of ♥ 23:23, 23 June 2020 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Isn't delisting made especially (as the guideline suggested) for images that are no longer "good enough" for FP due to changes in our standards? I mean, why keep it if you are not even sure you are not going to promote it if nominated today? --Alsakan (talk) 04:30, 24 June 2020 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Some of us think the lack of quality should be really obvious, or it's not worth the time or even appropriate. There are probably thousands of nominations we could relitigate. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:53, 24 June 2020 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment I have recently been going through the Featured Pictures galleries and there are actually very few images I want to delist. There is no reason to go through the old FP nomination logs and reconsider them all. However, this one in particular just stuck out to be as especially bad and lacking the quality that we would normally find in FP. To be blunt, it is just ugly, imo --Alsakan (talk) 06:13, 24 June 2020 (UTC)
  • I'm glad you're being selective. Beauty is only one criterion, though. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:21, 24 June 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol keep vote.svg Keep Yeah, pretty good photo, maybe with tight crops, but I don't think that's a reason to delist. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:27, 24 June 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Delist --Uoaei1 (talk) 07:20, 24 June 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Delist --Andrei (talk) 09:29, 24 June 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol keep vote.svg Keep per KoH. --A.Savin 12:17, 24 June 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Delist --Milseburg (talk) 13:01, 24 June 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Delist Not so bothered about the size, but the composition and crop are poor IMO. Cmao20 (talk) 13:30, 24 June 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol keep vote.svg Keep Striking photo. -- Colin (talk) 21:55, 24 June 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Delist per Cmao. Daniel Case (talk) 04:05, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Delist --El Grafo (talk) 11:05, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Delist too tight crop and weird composition. Renata3 (talk) 13:20, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol keep vote.svg Keep Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:31, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Delist Per Cmao. --Domob (talk) 07:24, 28 June 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol keep vote.svg Keep --Palauenc05 (talk) 08:37, 28 June 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Delist as not good enough anymore.--Peulle (talk) 18:23, 28 June 2020 (UTC)