Commons:Propositions d'images remarquables

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Les règles des Propositions d'images remarquables ont changé.
Conformément aux règles générales, une image est promue avec 7 (sept) votes "support" ou plus (et un ratio de 2/1 de # supports/opposes) et le nombre de nominations actives par utilisateur est limité à 2 (deux)
Désormais, seuls peuvent voter les membres inscrits depuis plus de 10 jours ayant procédé à au moins 50 interventions dans "Commons"


Skip to current candidates Aller directement aux propositions en cours

Cette page recense les images qui sont proposées pour être affichées dans les Images remarquables. Notez qu'il ne s'agit pas de la même chose que l'image du jour ou que les images de qualité.

Les archives des votes précédents se trouvent sur cette page.

Il existe également une liste chronologique des images remarquables.

Voir aussi les Images de qualité, les propositions d'images de qualité et les critiques photographiques.

Procédure[edit]

Conseils avant de proposer une image[edit]

partie en cours de traduction depuis la version anglaise, votre avis est le bienvenu.
Lisez entièrement le guide avant de commencer
Quelques règles informelles à retenir avant de proposer une image (les termes en italiques sont la traduction anglaise des termes).

  • Définition (display resolution) : les images de Commons peuvent être utilisées sur d'autres supports qu'un écran d'ordinateur, par exemple pour être imprimées ou vues à très haute résolution. Il est important que les images proposées aient la plus haute résolution possible. Au moins 2 millions de pixels (par ex. 2000 x 1000) semble raisonnable à présent. Les images de définition inférieure sont systématiquement rejetées sauf s'il y a une bonne raison.
  • Mise au point (focus) : tous les objets importants de l'image devraient être nets. Dans l'idéal les objets non primordiaux sont nets.
  • Avant-plan et arrière-plan (background and foreground): ils peuvent être dérangeants. Le sujet principal ne devrait pas être caché par le premier plan, ni se confondre avec l'arrière-plan.
  • Qualité générale (general quality) : Les images proposées devraient avoir une très haute qualité technique.
  • Une retouche (digital manipulations) ne doit pas tromper l'observateur. La correction de quelques défauts dans l'image est acceptée pour autant que ce soit limité, bien fait, et non pour tromper. Les retouches courantes sont le recadrage, la correction de la perspective, de netteté, des couleurs ou de l'exposition. Des manipulations plus importantes, tels quel l'élimination d'éléments dans l'arrière plan, doivent être décrites dans la description de l'image, par le biais du modèle {{RetouchedPicture}}. Les retouches non décrites ou mal décrites qui transformeraient le sujet sont inacceptables.
  • Utilité (value) : notre but principal est de présenter des images utiles et précieuses. Les images devraient ainsi être spéciales d'une façon ou d'une autre, donc, entre autres :
    • La plupart des coucher de soleil sont beaux, et la plupart ne sont pas différents des autres existant déjà.
    • Les photos de nuit sont souvent belles mais davantage de détails sont visibles de jour.
    • "Beau" ne veut pas dire "utile".

Au niveau technique, nous avons l'exposition, la composition, le mouvement et la profondeur du champ.

  • L'exposition (exposure) est l'obturation du diaphragme qui modifie la luminosité (brightness) pour rendre avec qualité les ombres et les lumières au sein de l'image. Le manque d'ombres dans le détail n'est pas nécessairement négatif, cela peut être un effet désiré.
  • La composition (composition) est l'arrangement des éléments dans l'image. La "Règle de trois" est un bon guide pour la composition, c'est un héritage des écoles de peintures. L'idée est de diviser l'image par deux lignes horizontales et deux lignes verticales, nous avons donc trois parties dans chaque sens. L'objet ne doit pas forcément être centré. Les sujets intéressants doivent êtres placés aux 4 croisements des lignes. L'horizon ne doit jamais être mis au milieu, car il couperait l'image en deux. L'idée principale ici est de rendre l'image dynamique.
  • Netteté (sharpness) renvoie à la manière dont les mouvements sont représentés dans l'image. Ils peuvent être nets ou flous. Ils ne sont pas mieux l'un que l'autre, cela dépend de l'intention du photographe. L'impression de mouvement dépend des différents objets de l'image. Par exemple, photographier une voiture de course qui apparaît nette par rapport à l'arrière plan ne donne pas une idée de la vitesse. Il faudrait en fait que la voiture soit représentée nette, mais avec un arrière plan flou, créant ainsi le mouvement. D'un autre coté, représenter le saut d'un joueur de basket net avec le reste de l'image flou, en raison de la nature peu habituelle de la photo, lui conférerait de l'intérêt.
  • La profondeur de champ (depth of field or DOF) renvoie à la zone de mise au point devant et au delà du sujet principal. La profondeur de champ est choisie en fonction des besoins spécifiques à chaque image. Une profondeur grande ou petite peut améliorer ou dégrader la qualité de l'image. Une faible profondeur de champ peut attirer l'attention sur le sujet principal, en le séparant de son environnement. Les lentilles à petite distance focale (grand angle) ont une grande profondeur de champ, et vice versa, les lentilles à grande distance focale (petite ouverture) ont une petite profondeur de champ.

Proposition[edit]

Si vous pensez avoir trouvé ou créé une image qui puisse être considérée comme parmi les meilleures de Commons, avec une description et une licence appropriée, copiez le nom de l'image dans la boîte ci-dessous (en incluant le préfixe File:), après le texte déjà présent :


Après cela, vous devrez insérer un lien vers la page que vous venez de créer en haut de Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list.

Vote[edit]

A l'exclusion de tous autres, vous pouvez utiliser les modèles suivants:

  • {{Pour}} (Symbol support vote.svg Support),
  • {{Contre}} (Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose),

Ainsi que :

  • {{Neutre}} (Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral),
  • {{Comment}} (Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment),
  • {{Info}} (Pictogram voting info.svg Info),
  • {{Question}} (Pictogram-voting-question.svg Question).


IMPORTANT: veuillez notamment NE PAS UTILISER les modèles {{weak support}} (GA candidate.svg Weak support) ni {{weak oppose}} (BA candidate.svg Weak oppose), ils ne sont pas reconnus par le robot, et votre vote serait considéré comme non valide.

Merci d'inclure quelques mots expliquant pourquoi vous soutenez ou non la promotion de l'image, surtout si vous votez contre. N'oubliez pas de signer avec ~~~~.

Règles[edit]

Règles générales[edit]

  1. Le résultat est donné 9 jours après la proposition (voir le planning en bas de page). Les votes ajoutés le 10e jour ou après ne sont pas décomptés.
  2. Les utilisateurs non-enregistrés peuvent proposer des images, faire des commentaires, mais pas voter.
  3. La proposition elle-même ne compte pas comme un vote : il faut l'ajouter explicitement.
  4. Le proposant peut retirer une image à tout moment, en écrivant : {{Withdraw}} ~~~~
  5. Souvenez-vous que le but de Wikimedia Commons est une bibliothèque pour tous les projets Wikimedia, y compris des projets futurs ; les images n'ont pas à être utiles uniquement pour Wikipédia.
  6. Les images peuvent être retirées de la liste dès le 5e jour si elles n'ont reçu aucun vote "pour".
  7. Soyez attentifs et très sélectifs dans les choix que vous faites, car il ne peut y avoir que deux propositions actives par proposant. Toute proposition supplémentaire sera rejetée sans examen.
  8. Seulement 2 nominations actives par même utilisateur (qui est, en nomination sous "review" et non encore close) sont autorisées. Le principal but de cette mesure est de contribuer à une meilleure qualité moyenne des nominations, par un choix plus judicieux des photos présentes en nominations.

Règles de promotion[edit]

L'image candidate devient une image remarquable si elle remplit les conditions suivantes :

  1. Une licence appropriée (bien sûr !)
  2. Au moins sept votes "pour".
  3. un ratio de 2/1 de votes "pour"/"contre".
  4. Deux versions différentes de la même image ne peuvent pas être promues en même temps, mais seulement celle avec le plus grand score.

Contestations[edit]

Avec le temps, les critères d'évaluation évoluent, et il peut être décidé qu'une image qui était auparavant assez bonne pour être dans la liste ne peut plus l'être.

Pour qu'une image soit déchue, il faut qu'une majorité de 2/3 avec au moins 5 votes accepte de retirer l'image, autrement elle reste "remarquable". Pour voter, utiliser les modèles {{Keep}} (Symbol keep vote.svg Keep : mérite de rester "remarquable") ou {{Delist}} (Symbol oppose vote.svg Delist  : ne mérite plus le label).

Pour contester une image, copiez son nom avec le préfixe dans la boîte ci-dessous à la suite du texte déjà présent :


Vous devriez inclure les informations suivantes :

  • Informations sur l'origine de l'image (créateur, importateur).
  • Un lien vers le vote d'origine.
  • La raison pour laquelle vous contestez le label, avec votre signature.

Insérez ensuite un lien en haut de Commons:Featured picture candidates/removal.

Sommaire[edit]

Contents

Pour ajouter votre proposition à la liste[edit]

Pour ajouter votre proposition à la liste, cliquez ici et ajoutez votre proposition en haut de la liste : {{Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:FILENAME}}

Propositions en cours[edit]

Featured picture candidates[edit]

File:Columba livia Luc Viatour.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 30 Oct 2019 at 17:33:13 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Common pigeon (Columba livia).

File:Gran Mezquita de Isfahán, Isfahán, Irán, 2016-09-20, DD 43-45 HDR.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 30 Oct 2019 at 15:15:48 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Jameh Mosque of Isfahan is the grand, congregational mosque (Jāmeh) of Isfahān city, within Isfahān Province, Iran. It has been a UNESCO World Heritage Site since 2012.[1]


File:Signac - Portrait de Félix Fénéon.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 30 Oct 2019 at 13:43:33 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION

File:01 Magura, Romania - Piatra Craiului mountains.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 30 Oct 2019 at 11:16:18 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Magura village in Romania

File:Rotdrossel.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 30 Oct 2019 at 10:04:12 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Red Wing (Turdus iliacus)

File:Faloria Cortina d'Ampezzo 25.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 30 Oct 2019 at 06:29:49 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Faloria cable car, Cortina d'Ampezzo, Italy.

File:Cap Leucate - lighthouse 01.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 30 Oct 2019 at 05:08:21 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Phare du Cap Leucate (Cap Leucate lighthouse), Leucate, Département Aude, France

File:Zur Elektrodynamik bewegter Körper.pdf[edit]

Voting period ends on 30 Oct 2019 at 04:22:04 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

A 1905 paper by Albert Einstein in which he first proposed the theory of special relativity.

File:Sukkah at Congregation Emanu-El (05326p).jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 30 Oct 2019 at 03:32:20 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

A large sukkah at Temple Emanu-El in New York City
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious buildings
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Today marks the end of Sukkot, for which this grand sukkah was constructed last week in Temple Emanu-El in New York City. It happened to overlap with Open House New York (open doors days), so I was able to take a few pictures this morning. (This image is three stitched together). created/uploaded/nominated by — Rhododendrites talk |  03:32, 21 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg SupportRhododendrites talk |  03:32, 21 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Andrei (talk) 06:59, 21 October 2019 (UTC)

File:Messier 78.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 29 Oct 2019 at 22:54:21 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

This new image of the reflection nebula Messier 78 was captured using the Wide Field Imager camera on the MPG/ESO 2.2-metre telescope at the La Silla Observatory, Chile. This colour picture was created from many monochrome exposures taken through blue, yellow/green and red filters, supplemented by exposures through a filter that isolates light from glowing hydrogen gas. The total exposure times were 9, 9, 17.5 and 15.5 minutes per filter, respectively.

File:20160805 Inle Lake 7434.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 29 Oct 2019 at 19:24:19 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Fisherman on Inle Lake in Myanmar

File:Édouard Manet, en buste, de face - Nadar.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 29 Oct 2019 at 16:27:19 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Édouard Manet

File:Pont de Bir-Hakeim at night, Paris 3 February 2019.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 29 Oct 2019 at 13:18:54 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION

File:Старе єврейське кладовище у Чернівцях.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 29 Oct 2019 at 12:30:51 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Old Jewish cemetery in Cherniwtsi

File:Alouatta seniculus Global.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 29 Oct 2019 at 10:31:13 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION

File:A large electric phosphate smelting furnace used to make elemental phosphorus in a TVA chemical plant in the vicinity of Muscle Shoals, Ala.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 29 Oct 2019 at 10:24:54 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION

File:Pont de Bir-Hakeim at night as seen from Promenade d'Australie 140223 5.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 29 Oct 2019 at 07:23:42 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION

File:Rue de l'Abreuvoir, Paris 30 September 2019.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 29 Oct 2019 at 06:49:58 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Other
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Pierre Blaché - uploaded and nominated by Paris 16 -- Paris 16 (talk) 06:49, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Paris 16 (talk) 06:49, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Nice view but over-processed (over-sharpened+too much gamma?) leading to strong black lines in the images and white halos around all structures. Time in "date" and Exif do not match, it doesn't look like a midnight shot. --Cart (talk) 07:08, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Oversharpened --Michielverbeek (talk) 07:50, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose sorry, overprocessed --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 08:59, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per others. --Basotxerri (talk) 12:04, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting delete.svg I withdraw my nomination Paris 16 (talk) 13:17, 20 October 2019 (UTC)

First female spacewalk[edit]

Voting period ends on 28 Oct 2019 at 21:55:55 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page

Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Rhododendrites Because that is a continuation of photographs and according to the rules, they can all go if they are related, but if you think it is better to just put one, I have no problems, the last image on the right. -- LLs (discussion) 02:15, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
Yes, I didn't mean to imply it was against the rules. It is certainly within the rules. The sequence itself, to me, just seems very minimal as compared to the content of any one of these individually, which don't seem that different from one another. We'll see what others say, though. — Rhododendrites talk |  02:18, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment The title and description are wrong. This is not the first female space walk. It's the first all-female space walk. The first woman to walk in space was Svetlana Savitskaya in 1984 when she space walked with a man. Seven Pandas (talk) 02:34, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Seven Pandas Correct, but this is the first where there are only women, so it is recognized as a historical event, the same American government recognized it as such. -- LLs (discussion) 02:40, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment - The fact that Trump called it the first female spacewalk - I hope that isn't your reason for using the term. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:55, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Ikan Kekek No, the detail of the difference between the first woman to make a walk (1984) and the first space walk made only by women (2019) has already been added. -- LLs (discussion) 03:02, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
Language is important for image titles. As stated above, having a space walk by only women is called an "all-female space walk" in English and that is how this is decribed in media. "First female space walk" is the first time a woman in any company makes a space walk, there is a difference, so in this case the set title is wrong. --Cart (talk) 06:44, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Even though I'm clearly biased about this event (Jessica Meir's mother is Swedish, so this is huge in media here), I don't see this as a good set nom. The images are only slightly different, and in any other environment they could almost be seen as just zooming in on a subject. Having three images seems superfluous. First human on the moon was also huge and it didn't get a set nom. I would recommend that you {{withdraw}} this and select one image for a single nom. The titles of the images are also incorrect English and should be changed from "female" to "all-female" per my comment above. --Cart (talk) 06:58, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting keep.svg Fixed Files renamed. --Cart (talk) 07:20, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Agree Cart. Plus the photo on the left isn't good at all. Seven Pandas (talk) 11:51, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Firstly I don't think this meets the requirement of a "set" nomination. The point of a "set" nomination is that one can describe the criteria for a finite number of images. Front/back; day-time/evening/night-time. This is just three images arbitrarily taken where the women are posing for the camera. Us photographers have lots of such sets on our hard discs, and typically pick one from them that is the best. I'm not really seeing any one of them at FP level. If the "spacewalk" is the "wow" then, well, they aren't space walking. I think generally that historic events are best nominated sometime afterwards. This gives plenty time to collect some photos and distance to judge objectively. -- Colin (talk) 16:00, 20 October 2019 (UTC)

File:2019 - НПП Подільські Товтри - 02.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 28 Oct 2019 at 10:55:59 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Podilski Tovtry National Nature Park

File:Shah Mosque (Isfahan).jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 28 Oct 2019 at 10:18:19 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Interior view of the dome of the Shah Mosque, Isfahan, Iran
✓ Done fixed. Hanooz 12:11, 19 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Ivar (talk) 19:04, 19 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support because of the architecture AND because of the clouds. --A.Savin 13:28, 19 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 15:12, 19 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Cmao20 (talk) 16:13, 19 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support--Michielverbeek (talk) 17:33, 19 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support, overall, but I'd like to see a photo with the dome on the left included in full, for comparison. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 17:54, 19 October 2019 (UTC)
By another photographer: File:Shah(Emam ) Mosque , Isfahan.jpg. Hanooz 19:55, 19 October 2019 (UTC)
Thanks. That composition could also be an FP if done in high resolution. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:03, 20 October 2019 (UTC)

File:Dead Vlei Tree.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 28 Oct 2019 at 08:06:23 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Old tree in "Dead Vlei", Namibia
  • Category: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Natural#Namibia
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Domob - uploaded by Domob - nominated by Domob -- Domob (talk) 08:06, 19 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Domob (talk) 08:06, 19 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Vignettage could be corrected but I love the colors and composition --Dinkum (talk) 15:01, 19 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 15:12, 19 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Cmao20 (talk) 16:13, 19 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose This may be one of the most exciting photography spots on earth but this composition doesn't work for me, sorry. --Basotxerri (talk) 16:29, 19 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Nice, but the plants in the back ruin it for me. It would have been somewhat better with only the trees and the dunes. Also, the ground in front is not that appealing--Boothsift 16:45, 19 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral I love this composition, but I don't like the right crop. I would like to see the whole shadow and please place the tree in the center of the photo --Michielverbeek (talk) 17:50, 19 October 2019 (UTC)
I actually had the tree in the centre of the original shot, and then cropped it like that because it seemed too central to me. You can take a look at the original version of the image to see what it looked like. If you prefer that one, I'm happy to provide it (or a similar crop) as alternative. --Domob (talk) 08:21, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Here's the thing: we have a surprising number of very similar FPs from the same area: 1, 2, 3, 4. I do rather like this one, and like the striking colors, but when comparing, the colors do look much more orange in this one. Might it be a different spot with a different mineral composition? Was the light that different (looks to have been around the same time of day as #3/4)? To be clear I'm neutral-leaning-support at this stage. — Rhododendrites talk |  23:04, 19 October 2019 (UTC)
I know, but I personally think that this shot looks much better than at least 3, 4 (who look rather bland to me). I like the other two (1, 2) a lot better, but still think that my nomination has more "wow" at least to me. That's why I nominated it. But of course all this is purely subjective, and I'm probably less experienced as a photographer than most of you. --Domob (talk) 08:21, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Yellowish, and per Rhododendrites -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:07, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
It was early morning light, but I agree that it was too red/yellow. Corrected the WB. --Domob (talk) 08:26, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
  • GA candidate.svg Weak support per my comments above. Thanks for editing. I do think the sky is rather still too saturated fwiw. — Rhododendrites talk |  12:45, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose - Composition isn't really working for me. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:30, 21 October 2019 (UTC)

Alternative[edit]

Dead Vlei Tree central.jpg

  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Here's an alternate crop, which is slightly wider on the right. The tree is more central here and the shadow visible. --Domob (talk) 11:50, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
  • GA candidate.svg Weak support I like the other crop better personally, but also support this one. --Domob (talk) 11:50, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Llez (talk) 04:57, 21 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - This composition works for me. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:30, 21 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Michielverbeek (talk) 17:50, 21 October 2019 (UTC)

File:Grey headed flying fox - skimming water - AndrewMercer - DSC00530.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 28 Oct 2019 at 07:29:17 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Grey-headed Flying Fox
  • Answer: No - just the edge of the pond or maybe a tree. In some locations the flying foxes come in groups, especially if its hot and there's a large colony. In this case it was just infrequently, one at a time, given that its just a very small colony and not yet summer. --Bald white guy (talk) 09:49, 19 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Ivar (talk) 11:02, 19 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Very good. Made me smile a bit, because at first sight I thought it was yet another bird ;-) And an excellent performance of the new α7R IV, I'm really jealous. --A.Savin 13:21, 19 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Excellent --Dinkum (talk) 14:51, 19 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 15:12, 19 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support A typical "bird over water" shot, but it's a bat. :) --Peulle (talk) 15:35, 19 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Wow, that's not something you see every day. Cmao20 (talk) 16:12, 19 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Thanks for the explanation--Boothsift 16:38, 19 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Very impressive. -- Axel (talk) 16:55, 19 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Wow, excellent, only not very sharp but in this case it is also very difficult (impossible?) --Michielverbeek (talk) 17:52, 19 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - Very dynamic, and quite a striking animal with an interesting facial expression. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 17:56, 19 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --GRDN711 (talk) 19:26, 19 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support The focus is on the wings, but nice composition and difficult shot, looking good at half the size -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:03, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Schnobby (talk) 06:54, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:02, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Ermell (talk) 07:03, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Cart (talk) 07:50, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 08:55, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Cayambe (talk) 10:23, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Llez (talk) 04:56, 21 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Per Cmao20 Poco2 17:48, 21 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support wow :) - Benh (talk) 18:06, 21 October 2019 (UTC)

File:Lophocampa caryae caterpillar.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 28 Oct 2019 at 02:58:18 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Lophocampa caryae

File:Impatiens capensis.jpeg[edit]

Voting period ends on 28 Oct 2019 at 02:48:02 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Impatiens capensis

File:Casa de Julio Cesar Tello en Marcahuasi.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 28 Oct 2019 at 00:47:14 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Stone house of the anthropologist Julio César Tello in Marcahuasi, Peru
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Other#Peru
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Stone house of the anthropologist Julio César Tello in Marcahuasi, Peru. Marcahuasi is a plateau of the Andes mountain range located east of Lima, has a lot of influence on the development of Peruvian culture. Julio César Tello spent time in his life as a hermit on the plateau to study his surroundings by me, LLs-.- 00:47, 19 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- LLs-.- 00:47, 19 October 2019 (UTC)
  • BA candidate.svg Weak oppose for now. Quite a lot of purple CA around the image. Is it possible for you to fix that, and then I think I could support? Cmao20 (talk) 07:18, 19 October 2019 (UTC)

File:Catedral de Salzburgo, Salzburgo, Austria, 2019-05-19, DD 33-35 HDR.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 27 Oct 2019 at 20:30:14 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Central dome of Salzburg Cathedral, Austria.
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious_buildings#Austria>
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Central dome of Salzburg Cathedral, Austria. The cathedral was founded in 774 and rebuilt in 1181 after a fire but it become its present Baroque style appearance under Prince-Bishop Wolf Dietrich von Raitenau in the 17th century. c/u/n by me, Poco2 20:30, 18 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Poco2 20:30, 18 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg weak support Symbol support vote.svg Support I'm not shy to say it: I'm happy we don't have those crappy ceilings from Livio anymore. My suggestion on that one: a square centered crop and CCW rotation so that the light shaft comes from the top? And also maybe pushing the exposure up. - Benh (talk) 21:31, 18 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 02:50, 19 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Nice to see you submitting new material again. Excellent quality and good corner sharpness. At first I agreed with Benh that the exposure might be a little too low, but looking at it in full-res, I think it's more or less right. Cmao20 (talk) 07:13, 19 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment @Benh, The Cosmonaut, Cmao20: Ok, I've applied a crop and brightened it a little bit. I prefer this orientation to keep the pigeon in the center the way it's and to avoid an asymmetry between left and right as the top arch in the current version is darker Poco2 08:42, 19 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Not sure the crop was necessary tbh, but it doesn't affect my support. However, would it be possible to keep the original as a separate file, as in some ways I prefer it? Cmao20 (talk) 10:15, 19 October 2019 (UTC)
Cmao20, one of the (additional) reasons why I followed Benh's advice was because I had already uploaded another file with more crop and landscape format. This one I will definitely not crop, maybe this in is what you are looking for: File:Catedral de Salzburgo, Salzburgo, Austria, 2019-05-19, DD 30-32 HDR.jpg --Poco2 11:53, 19 October 2019 (UTC)
Understood, that's a nice one too. Cmao20 (talk) 12:12, 19 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Hanooz 10:34, 19 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Ivar (talk) 11:07, 19 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - I like the edits, which IMO improve the picture. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 18:00, 19 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:59, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support--Ermell (talk) 07:04, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support It's a dove btw, not a pigeon. ;-) --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 08:54, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support @Martin Falbisoner: It makes no difference as pigeons and doves are basically the same bird, hence Columbidae--Boothsift 01:22, 21 October 2019 (UTC)
  • You're right, of course, as far as biological taxonomy is concerned. From a linguistic - and especially an iconographic - point of view, there are some differences. Not that it would matter much for this nom :-) --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 05:51, 21 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Llez (talk) 04:54, 21 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Fischer.H (talk) 14:16, 21 October 2019 (UTC)

File:Isaac Lake during golden hour, moments before a storm (DSCF2631).jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 27 Oct 2019 at 19:45:42 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Isaac Lake during golden hour, moments before a storm
✓ Done found it, thank you! --Trougnouf (talk) 17:54, 21 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Daniel Case (talk) 15:42, 21 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Poco2 17:52, 21 October 2019 (UTC)

File:Sent, (1430 m.) dorp in kanton Graubünden in Zwitserland 09-09-2019 (actm.) 20.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 27 Oct 2019 at 15:04:56 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Detail of the church door. The beautiful carved handle. When I look at this photo, I tend to turn the handle.
    All by -- Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 15:04, 18 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 15:04, 18 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Seven Pandas (talk) 21:38, 18 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:44, 19 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Pictogram-voting-question.svg Question - That's beautiful, and I may support, but I'd like to know what your thoughts are about the reasons why you cropped in those places on the right and left. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:45, 19 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Answer: rivets appear on the left. Not on the right. In my mind the symmetry will be lost too much.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 04:50, 19 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - I'm more concerned with the decorations being cut, but that would be a trivial reason not to support. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:04, 19 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Very nice motif. Cmao20 (talk) 07:16, 19 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Schnobby (talk) 08:32, 19 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 02:20, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Cart (talk) 07:54, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Sorry to be a party pooper, but this just doesn't wow me. It also bothers me that the handle is off-center. Percival Kestreltail (talk) 13:57, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Llez (talk) 04:52, 21 October 2019 (UTC)
  • GA candidate.svg Weak support A little shallow on the DoF, but I love the earth tones. Daniel Case (talk) 15:39, 21 October 2019 (UTC)

File:Naqsh-e Jahan Square from the gheisariye Vault.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 27 Oct 2019 at 11:15:56 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Naqsh-e Jahan square from the Qeysarie vault
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Iran
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by and uploaded by Amirpashaei - nominated by Hanooz (Possibly taken from the second floor of Qeysarie bazaar) -- Hanooz 11:15, 18 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Hanooz 11:15, 18 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support I see from the history that the photographer has altered the photo several times since first upload. Most of the changes seem harmless though I would caution against making changes to permanent features. The original upload had a litttle more height top and bottom, and I'm not sure why that was cropped out -- can it be restored? -- Colin (talk) 11:52, 18 October 2019 (UTC)
If the edits are not constructive we can simply revert to the earlier versions. If they are I can send an email to the uploader and ask him to upload a bigger version. Hanooz 13:41, 18 October 2019 (UTC)
  • The sky is fake?--Claus 13:45, 18 October 2019 (UTC)
    • I think you are right. The clouds near the horizon do not have the appearance of clouds near a horizon. Hanooz can you ask the uploader about this. It is one thing to remove tourists from an image but sky replacement is a big no no. The WLM Iran team should also be informed. Compare File:Naghshejahan.jpg from 2018. -- Colin (talk) 13:57, 18 October 2019 (UTC)
      • Time2wait.svg On hold I'm speaking with him on email. Hanooz 16:30, 18 October 2019 (UTC)
      • For me fake sky is also a no go (especially when it's communism propaganda quality like here), but we have cases of sky substitution which got close to POTY in the past ;) - Benh (talk) 17:06, 18 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Cropped because of fixing perspective errors and straight vertical lines. The clouds are fake but I clone them because I thought that manipulation dont cause the main subject to be misrepresented and not intended to deceive. this image merged from 25 picture with 24mm tilt shift lens . (5*5) 5 frame and 5 level exposure for each frame and finaly merged to this picture
    — Preceding unsigned comment added by Amirpashaei (talk • contribs)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose The composition is gorgeous. The thorough photoshopping that went on top is less... The lighting of the clouds doesn't even match the one on the ground. And I don't get how the dark area of the inside "dome" is of so poor quality despite the many raw pictures which served as a basis. - Benh (talk) 17:16, 18 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose No fake skies, please. --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 22:58, 18 October 2019 (UTC)
  • BA candidate.svg Weak oppose Other than the sky, this is great. Kestreltail (talk) 01:04, 19 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose It's quite startlingly impressive to look at, but it really isn't accurate to reality. The sky simply doesn't look natural, and I feel that the image is quite oversaturated too. Cmao20 (talk) 07:15, 19 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support. FP now with the proper sky. Cmao20 (talk) 16:15, 19 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Per above, as member of the WLM jury in Iran I'll have to make sure that we discard this image, a pity. Poco2 09:08, 19 October 2019 (UTC)
  • @Colin, Benh, Frank Schulenburg, Kestreltail, Poco a poco: Could you please take a look at the new version (with the real sky)? Hanooz 12:46, 19 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Hanooz:This kind of editing are not welcome here at FPC nor in WLM. WLM contest's rules there are clear, and this kind of editing is clearly violating them. Reverting that edit doesn't make things fine again. I'm only ready to change my vote if the photographer assures you that no other images are edited like this one was or in that case that a new version is uploaded where deceiving edits are reverted. The photographer should take this seriously, if we find such an editing again in any other of the images submitted to WLM I'd recommend the other members of the jury not to let pass any of the photographer's images. Poco2 15:38, 19 October 2019 (UTC)
Poco a poco He says this one's clouds are also from another image and this one is edited as he mentioned in the caption. Hanooz 16:14, 19 October 2019 (UTC)
Ok, thanks, Hanooz, I Symbol support vote.svg Support now Poco2 16:39, 19 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Not as impressive with the blank sky, but still FP in my opinion. Kestreltail (talk) 12:57, 19 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 15:13, 19 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - The light and possibly the sharpness could be better, but this is a very big panorama and a fine picture of a very striking motif. Support per others. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 18:04, 19 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Why not--Boothsift 01:21, 21 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Daniel Case (talk) 06:16, 21 October 2019 (UTC)

File:Camp - Notes on Fashion at the Met - Burberry rainbow cape (73854).jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 27 Oct 2019 at 05:29:29 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Rainbow cape by Christopher Bailey/Burberry, Camp: Notes on Fashion at The Metropolitan Museum of Art
  • Category: Commons:Featured_pictures/Objects
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info A rainbow cape by Christopher Bailey for Burberry, on display at the recent Camp: Notes on Fashion exhibition at the Metropolitan Museum of Art in New York. created/uploaded/nominated by — Rhododendrites talk |  05:29, 18 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Would've loved to get in there with some better lighting [for photography] and with a tripod (or at least without the throngs of people), but I'm nominating because it's not the sort of thing we see often at FPC and, well, it's a rainbow cape. :) — Rhododendrites talk |  05:29, 18 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Everybody seems to be ignoring this, but it's good for me. Nice clear blue background, the cape is sharp and well-captured. Could be a fashion illustration. Cmao20 (talk) 07:23, 19 October 2019 (UTC)
  • GA candidate.svg Weak support The hearts on the head could be more organized, it's just a little mess --Boothsift 07:41, 19 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- King of ♠ 23:17, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support For one of Renly Baratheon's personal guard, no doubt, had the show ever shown them. Daniel Case (talk) 05:49, 21 October 2019 (UTC)

File:Stormy sunset over Waimakariri River basin, New Zealand.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 27 Oct 2019 at 01:34:30 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Stormy sunset over Waimakariri River basin, New Zealand
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/New Zealand
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info All by me. It was quite cloudy that day. Before the sunset it got really dark as heavy blackish clouds were bringing a lot of rain and snow. This is a moment when the sun managed to peak through for a while. Taken from the northern slopes of Black Range, New Zealand. -- Podzemnik (talk) 01:34, 18 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Podzemnik (talk) 01:34, 18 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Nice--Boothsift 05:19, 18 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Ivar (talk) 05:35, 18 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - Wonderful scenery and a great moment. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:39, 18 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support wow! Biblical. — Rhododendrites talk |  05:41, 18 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Beautiful light --Michielverbeek (talk) 07:22, 18 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:05, 18 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support per Ikan. Cmao20 (talk) 09:22, 18 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Hanooz 11:10, 18 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 03:13, 19 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Schnobby (talk) 08:34, 19 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --GRDN711 (talk) 19:38, 19 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Daniel Case (talk) 02:21, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 02:21, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- King of ♠ 23:15, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Dzaky17 (talk/bicara) 11:27, 21 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support epic :) - Benh (talk) 17:59, 21 October 2019 (UTC)

File:Panoramic view of Lake Tekapo 01.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 25 Oct 2019 at 20:02:53 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Panoramic view of Lake Tekapo in Canterbury Region, South Island of New Zealand
  • I concur with Ivar, there's still a bit of waterline that isn't quite right. Cmao20 (talk) 19:53, 18 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment ✓ New version uploaded, I corrected as much as possible. Tournasol7 (talk) 12:55, 18 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral Better, but not good enough for me to support. Waterline looks unnatural. --Ivar (talk) 14:14, 18 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - Whatever the problem may be, I'm not seeing it, but I am seeing a beautiful, peaceful composition and scene. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:42, 19 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Dinkum (talk) 14:49, 19 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Daniel Case (talk) 02:16, 20 October 2019 (UTC)

File:Banz Klosterkirche Decke P5161650 2.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 25 Oct 2019 at 19:42:21 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Ceiling fresco in the former abbey church St. Peter and Dionysius Koster Banz created by Melchior Steidl about 1715
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious buildings
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Ceiling fresco in the former abbey church St. Peter and Dionysius Koster Banz. All by me -- Ermell (talk) 19:42, 16 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Ermell (talk) 19:42, 16 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 19:54, 16 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 20:11, 16 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 07:22, 17 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Berthold Werner (talk) 08:25, 17 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Aristeas (talk) 15:09, 17 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 02:22, 18 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose - I dissent. Beautiful frescoes, but for FP, I'd like more sharpness. To me, this is a QI. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:43, 18 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Sorry, I have to agree with Ikan Kekek --Uoaei1 (talk) 05:57, 18 October 2019 (UTC)
    • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral I finally decided to change my vote --Uoaei1 (talk) 18:42, 18 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Most of it is quite sharp. Size covers many details and gives a better overview than an even sharper shot of some part. --Axel (talk) 07:09, 18 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 08:59, 18 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support It's 58 megapixels, so a bit of unsharpness is forgiveable. Certainly it's sharper in the middle than at the edges, but ultimately we shouldn't expect anything different. Cmao20 (talk) 09:20, 18 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment - I'm judging based on the observed size of the frescoes at full size, not the number of megapixels. If there were more of a closeup, I'd be happy to judge it based on sharpness at less than full size. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:40, 19 October 2019 (UTC)

File:Berkenzwam (Piptoporus betulinus) (d.j.b.) 14.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 25 Oct 2019 at 15:00:10 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Fungi # Piptoporus betulinus.
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info The underside of a weathered Birch mushroom (Piptoporus betulinus) on a broken dead birch branch between fallen leaves in mild sunlight.
    All by -- Famberhorst (talk) 15:00, 16 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Famberhorst (talk) 15:00, 16 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment I don’t understand the composition – why is the main subject so small? Fill the frame with it, for better detail. --Kreuzschnabel 18:53, 16 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Answer: the photo shows a natural process. The birch branch was already dead. The mushroom has used it. The mushroom is now also dying. All that between (Dead) autumn leaves. How beautiful can the natural cycle be.--Famberhorst (talk) 04:52, 17 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Nice but your intention doesn’t really work with me, sorry. --Kreuzschnabel 14:08, 18 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Seven Pandas (talk) 23:44, 16 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Doesn't quite work for me.--Peulle (talk) 07:16, 17 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - Beautiful, rich composition. Let your eyes move around the picture frame as if it were a painting. I'm not sure about the alternative. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:45, 18 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support per Ikan. Cmao20 (talk) 09:19, 18 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose This is the better of these two but this still doesn't make FP for me. Daniel Case (talk) 02:58, 19 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Per Daniel Case -- Karelj (talk) 20:42, 19 October 2019 (UTC)

Alternative[edit]

Berkenzwam (Piptoporus betulinus) (d.j.b.) 17.jpg

  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Famberhorst (talk) 15:48, 17 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Not an exzellent picture for me.--Fischer.H (talk) 14:22, 21 October 2019 (UTC)

File:2017.07.17.-21-Tiefer See oder Grubensee-Storkow (Mark)--Ringelnatter.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period ends on 25 Oct 2019 at 09:09:01 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Grass snake - Natrix natrix


Confirmed results:
Result: 21 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Laitche (talk) 18:08, 21 October 2019 (UTC)
This image will be added to the FP category: Animals/Reptiles#Family : Colubridae (Colubrids)

File:Bergtocht van Lavin door Val Lavinuoz naar Alp dÍmmez (2025m.) 11-09-2019. (d.j.b) 18.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 24 Oct 2019 at 15:11:49 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Switzerland
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info A beautifully drawn gneis. The brown color was probably already on the stone before it fell. It is rust, iron, therefore, that probably formed in a crack in the rock when air and / or water could be added. The apparent layering is a characteristic of gneiss. Due to the pressure, the minerals have fallen into parallel paths.
    All by -- Famberhorst (talk) 15:11, 15 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Famberhorst (talk) 15:11, 15 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Sorry for the early oppose – its nice but I am not at all sure about the composition. Is it meant to show a) the stone’s surface as such? Then, there’s too much surrounding, too little detail on the stone and too much noise. Why not fill the entire frame with it? Or is it b) the stone within its surrounding? Then, there’s too little surrounding, no depth. In either case, this is not the best possible image that could have been taken IMHO. --Kreuzschnabel 19:00, 15 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Framing doesn't match description. If the subject is the layers, then the framing should be tighter, or even show just the layers IMO. - Benh (talk) 19:59, 15 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Too ordinary -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:19, 16 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Hate to say this, but it's too ordinary: there are many more impressive rocks along the trails here in Switzerland -- Axel (talk) 06:21, 16 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Thank you for your comment. This photo is specifically about a gneiss.--Famberhorst (talk) 06:41, 16 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment @Famberhorst: Not sure if I'm wrong (if so: forgive my geological ignorance), but I always took gneiss for one of the most common rock variants of the Alps. -- Axel (talk) 15:48, 16 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Answer: @Axel Tschentscher: we went into the mountains of Switzerland with an archaeologist for a week. He knows the area like the back of his hand. All the photos that I have taken that contain something special, I first send to that archaeologist. He then makes the description with that photo. I then place that description under the photo. I think the description is correct! I therefore assume that the text is correct.--Famberhorst (talk) 16:44, 16 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Too ordinary. -- Pofka (talk) 11:37, 16 October 2019 (UTC)

Alternative[edit]

Bergtocht van Lavin door Val Lavinuoz naar Alp dÍmmez (2025m.) 11-09-2019. (d.j.b) 18b.jpg

  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose As I said above, this is too poor in detail for an FP on the stone surface. Too small as well (only 4 megapixels now). Nevertheless it’s VI for sure. --Kreuzschnabel 07:11, 16 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment The leucosome content is rather high; not the best example of common gneissic rock. —kallerna (talk) 10:53, 16 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Sorry, but this looks even worse and more ordinary to me. -- Pofka (talk) 11:37, 16 October 2019 (UTC)
Pictogram voting delete.svg I withdraw my nomination Thanks for your reviews.--Famberhorst (talk) 14:50, 16 October 2019 (UTC)

File:Phyllidia elegans (23806633304).jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 24 Oct 2019 at 14:21:42 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Phyllidia elegans

File:Gymnadenia odoratissima alba - Niitvälja.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 24 Oct 2019 at 08:29:36 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gymnadenia odoratissima
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants/Asparagales
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info All by Ivar (talk) 08:29, 15 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Ivar (talk) 08:29, 15 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment - It's quite an excellent photo of buds and flowers, but what caused the background to be so dark? Just shadow? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:26, 15 October 2019 (UTC)
    • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Yes, it's the shadow of a tree. Imho it gives nice contrast. --Ivar (talk) 09:48, 15 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - Maybe greater than ideal contrast, but that's a bit nitpicky. Fine photo. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:54, 15 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support--Peulle (talk) 10:00, 15 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support The background is good for me. Very sharp and well composed. Cmao20 (talk) 12:10, 15 October 2019 (UTC)
  • BA candidate.svg Weak oppose Sorry, but this plant somehow doesn't wow me. --A.Savin 13:32, 15 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Christian Ferrer (talk) 14:23, 15 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Quality is great but it lacks wow to me Poco2 18:44, 15 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Beautiful specimen, sharp image and good light -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:13, 16 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support.--Vulphere 04:10, 16 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 14:39, 16 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Not wow for me, sorry. Tournasol7 (talk) 20:07, 16 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Llez (talk) 05:20, 17 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Daniel Case (talk) 15:45, 17 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg SupportRhododendrites talk |  20:55, 17 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 08:51, 18 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support. ··· 🌸 Rachmat04 · 11:12, 18 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Claus 13:47, 18 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Nothing extra for FP. Common image. -- Karelj (talk) 20:48, 19 October 2019 (UTC)

File:Ragondin (Myocastor coypus) (animal) (3).jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 24 Oct 2019 at 02:49:59 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Myocastor coypus (coypu, nutria) in Colmar (Haut-Rhin, France)
Yes that was it. But it was not me, I only give bread to attract them. Gzen92 [discuter] 07:58, 16 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg OpposeThanks for the explanation. Feeding wild animals inappropriate food for photography is not something we should encourage. Charles (talk) 09:43, 16 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Pictogram-voting-question.svg Question - For an FPC nomination of a great portrait you took of a squirrel in your yard, I thought you mentioned you fed him so that you could get a better portrait. Please correct me if I'm wrong. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:28, 16 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Indeed I did. With food appropriate for the species. Charles (talk) 09:39, 17 October 2019 (UTC)
  • I see a number of sources listing melons as something nutria eat, to the point of being considered a pest to melon farmers. But if we're just going to say that it wouldn't eat melons if humans weren't nearby, that's starting down a path into very gray area. Many species now only exist in relation to humans. Others have their diet modified by what humans make available. For example, squirrels probably wouldn't encounter little piles of seeds, probably of various types that may or may not grow where it lives (I am of course making an assumption that it was some store-bought medley of bird seed, which may not be the case, or may be carefully chosen to replicate exactly what squirrels eat in that particular habitat). — Rhododendrites talk |  03:33, 18 October 2019 (UTC)
  • So it sounds like cantaloupe isn't a harmful food for nutrias. Whether it's a good idea to feed an invasive species is another question, but that the food is not appropriate for the species, I'd have to see documentation for. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:52, 18 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Christian Ferrer (talk) 14:25, 15 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Poco2 18:46, 15 October 2019 (UTC)
    Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Changing my vote. I agree with Frank about feeding wild animals to get a nice photo Poco2 20:21, 18 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support.--Vulphere 04:10, 16 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral pending revision: There are suspiciously round light gray spots in the water that seem to be dust spots rather than drift. -- Axel (talk) 06:24, 16 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Pofka (talk) 11:36, 16 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 20:10, 16 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Llez (talk) 05:19, 17 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Aristeas (talk) 15:11, 17 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Daniel Case (talk) 15:42, 17 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg SupportRhododendrites talk |  20:58, 17 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Per Charles. --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 02:24, 18 October 2019 (UTC) 
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Both Charles and Frank have ignored the fact that animals living near urban areas tend to get influenced by people. Is it rare to find a gull or crow feeding on chips on the sidewalk? According to [1], nutria are also known to feed on vegetation near the water. There is no "set diet". Even the University of Oregon states that nutria have been known to invade gardens and yes they do eat the melons: [2]. That is why they are considered invasive in many places, they are just too able to adapt. And as for eating the water, they naturally bring food to the water to eat. Plus, other animals like raccoons do this also, so it's not only the nutria eating melons. A groundhog once ate a watermelon in my garden. Is a watermelon not part of their normal diet? Maybe. But did it eat it voluntarily(I didn't feed it)? Yes. Enough with the "appropriate food". Nutria are opportunistic animals and will eat anything they can find. As long as it doesn't kill it, then it's appropriate. Plus, do you think zoos would even feed them the appropriate food? I think not --Boothsift 05:32, 18 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment I stick with my opinions, but have removed my oppose vote. It is a grey area for introduced species. 09:25, 18 October 2019 (UTC) Charles (talk) 21:49, 18 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment - Gray squirrels are a notoriously invasive species in the UK, right? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:53, 19 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Quote: "I only give bread to attract them" – I am against feeding wildlife in order to take a photo, see this article. --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 15:40, 18 October 2019 (UTC)
  • @Frank Schulenburg: But the food that the Nutria is eating is clearly not bread. However, I also agree with your article. There is no value of baiting animals as the shot would not be as authentic and it may introduce negative habits. --Boothsift 07:39, 19 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Famberhorst (talk) 15:12, 18 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Karelj (talk) 20:50, 19 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Pictogram-voting-question.svg Question - Frank, I agree that you really shouldn't be feeding wild animals in order to photograph them, but is it unethical to take a photo of an animal that someone else fed without your say-so, and should we oppose the photo of a particular photographer because he said he sometimes feeds animals of a given species but did not do so in this instance? Also, do you think it was wrong for us to feature this photo, in which the photographer admitted specifically to feeding a wild animal in order to get a "mouth-open shot"? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:14, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment I'm generally opposed to feeding wild animals in order to get a shot. --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 02:28, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Right, which I respect, but I don't think that really answered my questions, except for the last one, by implication. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:56, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Would it be best if I withdrew this nomination despite the support? --Boothsift 03:06, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
  • That would disrespect a clear consensus in this thread. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:23, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
  • If you want to withdraw your hosting of this nomination, I'll gladly take it over. I think it's totally absurd to deny a photograph a feature because the photographer admitted to feeding this species of animal on other occasions and not this occasion. Let's be straight about the implications of that. Does it mean Gzen92's pictures, or perhaps animal pictures only, can never be featured? If so, since Charles also admitted feeding a wild squirrel in order to get a better picture, should that picture be stripped of its FP status, and should all his other nominations be automatically failed? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:41, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
  • @Ikan Kekek: I don't want another incident to happen. I will respect the majority here. --Boothsift 17:13, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
  • But if you don't support the photo anymore because the photographer admits to feeding nutrias bread at other times, go ahead and oppose and I'll take over the nomination. Just don't withdraw before I have a chance to do that. Ikan Kekek (talk) 18:11, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
  • @Ikan Kekek: Desperate? I clearly said I changed my mind. I do not plan on opposing nor withdrawing, thank you. --Boothsift 18:54, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Why would I be desperate? This has gotten weird, and I'm outta here. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:32, 21 October 2019 (UTC)
  • @Ikan Kekek: Were you interpreting my sentence the wrong way ... Did you not ask me to oppose this image and hand it over to you? Wait, didn't this already happen before. How did that go? Well, this conversation has turned the wrong direction. --Boothsift 07:32, 21 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per Frank. --Ivar (talk) 05:33, 21 October 2019 (UTC)

File:La Mont y l bosch de Resciesa d'inviërn Gherdëina.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 23 Oct 2019 at 19:21:36 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Winter on the alpine pasture Resciesa in Gherdëina, South Tyrol - Unesco World Heritage Dolomites, Puez-Geisler Nature Park
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Italy
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info All by Moroder -- Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 19:21, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 19:21, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Not wowed by the lighting or colors. In terms of composition, zigzags are a nice idea in general but here it doesn't really lead anywhere and there is no foreground interest. -- King of ♠ 22:57, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose somewhat along the lines of KoH. Too much of the composition feels rather static to me. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:09, 15 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per above. Sorry, it's very scenic and great quality as ever with you, but I don't see too much in the way of composition. Probably one of these sights that's really beautiful in real life but is hard to translate to a good snap. Cmao20 (talk) 12:07, 15 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose washed out colors, and unsharp. - Benh (talk) 19:57, 15 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per above -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:19, 16 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per others.--Vulphere 04:10, 16 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per others; probably time to withdraw the nomination. Daniel Case (talk) 06:29, 17 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Per others. You don't have to withdraw though, maybe someone will support this in one day--Boothsift 05:25, 18 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Yes, someone has finally supported this. This impressed me very much, probably won't make FP but I wanted to give it at least one support. Kestreltail (talk) 12:25, 18 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support best one of the current candidates --Milseburg (talk) 20:15, 20 October 2019 (UTC)

File:Catedral de María Reina del Mundo, Montreal, Canadá, 2017-08-11, DD 37-39 HDR.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 23 Oct 2019 at 18:03:36 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Cathedral-Basilica of Mary, Queen of the World, Montreal, Canada.
  • I tend to agree a lot. It's more that there's a bias toward sharp pictures. Church interiors and, to a higher extent, ceilings are easy topics to shoot sharp, so we have heaps of them, and they are often promoted. - Benh (talk) 18:10, 21 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per Karelj.--Fischer.H (talk) 14:35, 21 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral Needs perspective correction. - Benh (talk) 18:10, 21 October 2019 (UTC)

File:2019 - Pshav-Khevsureti National Park - Khidotani ridge and Tebulosmta.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 23 Oct 2019 at 06:56:26 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Blossoming of white rhododendron on the Khidotani ridge with mountain Tebulosmta on the background, Pshav-Khevsureti National Park, Mtskheta-Mtianeti region, Georgia.
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Georgia
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Moahim - uploaded by Moahim - nominated by Moahim -- Moahim (talk) 06:56, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Moahim (talk) 06:56, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support although the composition looks a bit unbalanced to me --Uoaei1 (talk) 12:35, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
  • BA candidate.svg Weak oppose unfortunately per Uoaei1. It's a nice landscape, but there's a bit too much foreground for me, and that makes it good not great. Cmao20 (talk) 15:30, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Basotxerri (talk) 17:21, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- King of ♠ 22:59, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
  • BA candidate.svg Weak oppose per Cmao20 --GRDN711 (talk) 01:08, 15 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - Really good to me. I really enjoy moving my eyes around the picture frame and love the variations of light, sharpness, texture and color. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:56, 15 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral Nice, but the shadowed hills is a bit too protuberant. Christian Ferrer (talk) 14:29, 15 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support At first, I also thought the foreground was too dominant. Then I realised what a perfect contrast the (perfectly sharp) flowers make to the green slopes in the background. Then I noticed the purple ones … then the sunlight playing with the flowers on the right … this is masterful handling of the given lighting. --Kreuzschnabel 19:09, 15 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Besides the above, the foreground and background make for a VERY encyclopedic image. Adam Cuerden (talk) 00:20, 16 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support.--Vulphere 04:12, 16 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Daniel Case (talk) 16:34, 16 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral The lower corners are unsharp and distorted --Llez (talk) 05:16, 17 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Neither the subject itself nor the lighting are at FP level to me. The mountain in shadow on the right and the excesive foreground are not helping either Poco2 20:11, 17 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Per Poco -- Karelj (talk) 20:56, 19 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Per Poco--Boothsift 22:38, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Per Poco --Fischer.H (talk) 14:37, 21 October 2019 (UTC)

The main altar of St. Georg, Mundelfingen[edit]

Voting period ends on 23 Oct 2019 at 05:09:19 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page

  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious buildings#Germany
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Llez - uploaded by Llez - nominated by Llez -- Llez (talk) 05:09, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Llez (talk) 05:09, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Famberhorst (talk) 15:02, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Cmao20 (talk) 15:29, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 20:18, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support The ceiling painting of the ascension would also be a good addition to the gallery --GRDN711 (talk) 00:58, 15 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment File:St. Georg - Mundelfingen - Chancel.jpg doesn't seem quite an FP to me, as I find it a little unsharp and a little grainy. The rest are FPs. Do you see what I'm getting at? I'm not so sure how much I like the light in that photo, either, but I don't think you can do anything about that. If you could get more definition and keep it looking natural, perhaps I could support. At this point, I'd be inclined to oppose the set, as I should support every photo in it for FP in order to support the set nomination. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:02, 15 October 2019 (UTC)
  • For what it's worth, I definitely see Ikan's point, I thought the same when I looked at it first-off. It seems to me that the focus might have been slightly missed on the chancel and that the sharpness has been increased to compensate. It looks better when downsized to around 6.5 mpx, but it's definitely the weakest of the set. I wasn't sure whether I'd support after only having looked at that one, but decided after viewing the others that overall the set together makes it to FP. Cmao20 (talk) 12:15, 15 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:15, 15 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 08:50, 15 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment For me, FPs of artwork require an outstanding artistic quality. For me, neither the paintings nor the statues reach this quality. Thus, I would support the first image only. --Uoaei1 (talk) 09:55, 15 October 2019 (UTC)
    • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose for the reasons stated above --Uoaei1 (talk) 13:25, 15 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support.--Vulphere 04:12, 16 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per my comment above. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:48, 16 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Daniel Case (talk) 16:32, 16 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Aristeas (talk) 15:14, 17 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Agree with Uoaei1, I wouldn't support all these pictures separetaly, although in this case the set rule is given Poco2 20:13, 17 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose The photos provide an excellent documentation of the church but I don't find them interesting from photographical point of view. I'd like to see something more special for FP star on Commons. Sorry Lez! --Podzemnik (talk) 03:22, 18 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Per Uoaei1--Boothsift 22:38, 20 October 2019 (UTC)

File:Tad Hang waterfalls at sunset, Tad Lo village, Bolaven Plateau, Laos.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 23 Oct 2019 at 00:31:43 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Tad Hang waterfalls at sunset, Bolaven Plateau, Laos
  • Thanks, GRDN711. Agree but there is a rock in the foreground below and this framing is really the last limit I could reach with my tripod -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:09, 15 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral Beautiful photo. But the waterfall is too unnatural for me.--Famberhorst (talk) 05:21, 15 October 2019 (UTC)
  • This is a 3 seconds photograph. The water is frozen yes, due to the long exposure. I like it like this personally, but even if I had preferred it fluid like moving, at this late sunset that would not have been possible at low ISO (here 50) -- Basile Morin (talk) 05:56, 15 October 2019 (UTC)
  • actually I do agree, somehow, with the criticisms. 3 sec is maybe a tad too long. Half a second gives a vert nice motion already without "smearing" everything. It's a matter of tastes, but I'm not getting your iso50 comment? you could have made it shorter by bumping ISO up. - Benh (talk) 20:07, 15 October 2019 (UTC)

File:Yasaka-dori early morning with street lanterns and the Tower of Yasaka (Hokan-ji Temple), Kyoto, Japan.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 23 Oct 2019 at 00:35:57 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Yasaka-dori early morning with street lanterns and the Tower of Yasaka (Hokan-ji Temple), Kyoto, Japan
  • This is an iconic view of Kyoto and this temple is one of the most important of the city. It was 5 o'clock in the morning. Thanks -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:21, 21 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Famberhorst (talk) 15:16, 18 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Common image, no reason for FP nomination. -- Karelj (talk) 21:07, 19 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral Per Karelj--Boothsift 22:37, 20 October 2019 (UTC)

File:Klonglan waterfall 03.jpg (delist)[edit]

Voting period ends on 23 Oct 2019 at 01:07:46
Khlong Lan Waterfall

  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Misleadingly fake colours. Even with the retouched image template, inattentive viewers will be misled to think that the trees look like this. See user's other upload File:Klonglan waterfall 01.jpg for what the place actually looks like. (Original nomination)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Delist -- Paul_012 (talk) 01:07, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Pictogram-voting-question.svg Question - Should this be a delist and replace? I think the other photo is an FP. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:08, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Delist And I wouldn't touch their other photos with a barge pole. If they are this dishonest with the photo, who knows what other dishonesty is involved with the others (e.g., not their photos). -- Colin (talk) 07:16, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Delist Replace doesn't work here, the other one is totally different. --Ivar (talk) 07:38, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Pictogram-voting-question.svg Question This was awarded the star only 3 years ago. Should a delist discussion take place so soon?--Peulle (talk) 07:48, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
  • @Peulle: I think it's clear from the original nomination that at the time nobody noticed the fake. Afair, we don't really have any rules for when a delist can take place, but I think in cases like this it would be ridiculous to wait a single day. --El Grafo (talk) 07:57, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Fake and misleading. Given that Khlong Lan National Park lies well in the tropical zone I'd like to question whether this kind of autumn colors would even be possible there. I think I'm going to slap a {{Factual accuracy}} on this and #7. Anyway, as soon as you zoom in a bit, the fake is quite obvious. --El Grafo (talk) 07:57, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Delist , preferrably speedy. --A.Savin 11:43, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Commons:Deletion requests/File:Klonglan waterfall 03.jpg -- Colin (talk) 11:47, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Delist absolutely per above --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 12:52, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Delist Clearly very much altered. Cmao20 (talk) 15:28, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Delist per above. -- King of ♠ 23:05, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Delist - I'm a bit embarrassed that I suspended belief, figuring during the original nomination that maybe it was high up in the mountains in northern Thailand and there was a fall season there. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:49, 15 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Delist Unnatural -- Basile Morin (talk) 05:59, 15 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Delist Clear case of a too much altered image. --Cart (talk) 08:35, 15 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Speedy delist; my support !vote in the original nomination is now deeply embarrassing. Daniel Case (talk) 03:01, 16 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Delist .--Vulphere 04:12, 16 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Delist -- Pofka (talk) 11:32, 16 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Delist Per others--Boothsift 05:21, 18 October 2019 (UTC)


File:2017.06.17.-10-Reinheimer Teich-Reinheim--Knollen-Platterbse.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 21 Oct 2019 at 07:20:06 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Tuberous pea - Lathyrus tuberosus
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants#Family : Fabaceae
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info All by me. -- Hockei (talk) 07:20, 12 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Hockei (talk) 07:20, 12 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Famberhorst (talk) 17:58, 13 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 11:45, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose I don't know, just doesn't move me like other flower photos do. Daniel Case (talk) 05:58, 15 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support.--Vulphere 04:14, 16 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Per Daniel Case. Probably because it is quite dark and has poor lighting. -- Pofka (talk) 11:24, 16 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per others. Nice flower, but something's not quite right. Lighting, background, maybe the squarish aspect? — Rhododendrites talk |  21:06, 17 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Nothing special --Boothsift 22:37, 20 October 2019 (UTC)


Confirmed results:
Result: 4 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--A.Savin 17:01, 21 October 2019 (UTC)

File:Dome of Panthéon de Paris - 2012-05-28.jpg[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 21 Oct 2019 at 05:04:39 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Other
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created & uploaded by PierreSelim - nominated by Paris 16 -- Paris 16 (talk) 05:04, 12 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Paris 16 (talk) 05:04, 12 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Well-framed, dramatic background. Cmao20 (talk) 09:14, 12 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Hanooz 12:57, 12 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment: the pediment cut off on three sides is rather unfortunate. --The Cosmonaut (talk) 14:36, 12 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose The asymmetry is bothering me. Either it should be perfectly symmetrical, or it should be clearly and artistically positioned off-center. -- King of ♠ 00:03, 13 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment I fully agree with you King of ♠, it's a shame I did not had time to frame it better. --PierreSelim (talk) 18:36, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per King, nothing special. -- Karelj (talk) 10:42, 13 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Cut-off pediment per Cosmo, plus I am not fond of the dark-grey background, making the left part almost invisible. --Kreuzschnabel 11:43, 13 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose The light is okay, but not too special.--Peulle (talk) 07:50, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per others. Daniel Case (talk) 04:54, 15 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per others. -- Pofka (talk) 11:23, 16 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Not that special--Boothsift 16:41, 19 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting delete.svg I withdraw my nomination Paris 16 (talk) 15:58, 20 October 2019 (UTC)


Contestations en cours[edit]

Featured picture candidates[edit]

File:Columba livia Luc Viatour.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 30 Oct 2019 at 17:33:13 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Common pigeon (Columba livia).

File:Gran Mezquita de Isfahán, Isfahán, Irán, 2016-09-20, DD 43-45 HDR.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 30 Oct 2019 at 15:15:48 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Jameh Mosque of Isfahan is the grand, congregational mosque (Jāmeh) of Isfahān city, within Isfahān Province, Iran. It has been a UNESCO World Heritage Site since 2012.[2]


File:Signac - Portrait de Félix Fénéon.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 30 Oct 2019 at 13:43:33 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION

File:01 Magura, Romania - Piatra Craiului mountains.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 30 Oct 2019 at 11:16:18 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Magura village in Romania

File:Rotdrossel.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 30 Oct 2019 at 10:04:12 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Red Wing (Turdus iliacus)

File:Faloria Cortina d'Ampezzo 25.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 30 Oct 2019 at 06:29:49 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Faloria cable car, Cortina d'Ampezzo, Italy.

File:Cap Leucate - lighthouse 01.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 30 Oct 2019 at 05:08:21 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Phare du Cap Leucate (Cap Leucate lighthouse), Leucate, Département Aude, France

File:Zur Elektrodynamik bewegter Körper.pdf[edit]

Voting period ends on 30 Oct 2019 at 04:22:04 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

A 1905 paper by Albert Einstein in which he first proposed the theory of special relativity.

File:Sukkah at Congregation Emanu-El (05326p).jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 30 Oct 2019 at 03:32:20 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

A large sukkah at Temple Emanu-El in New York City
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious buildings
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Today marks the end of Sukkot, for which this grand sukkah was constructed last week in Temple Emanu-El in New York City. It happened to overlap with Open House New York (open doors days), so I was able to take a few pictures this morning. (This image is three stitched together). created/uploaded/nominated by — Rhododendrites talk |  03:32, 21 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg SupportRhododendrites talk |  03:32, 21 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Andrei (talk) 06:59, 21 October 2019 (UTC)

File:Messier 78.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 29 Oct 2019 at 22:54:21 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

This new image of the reflection nebula Messier 78 was captured using the Wide Field Imager camera on the MPG/ESO 2.2-metre telescope at the La Silla Observatory, Chile. This colour picture was created from many monochrome exposures taken through blue, yellow/green and red filters, supplemented by exposures through a filter that isolates light from glowing hydrogen gas. The total exposure times were 9, 9, 17.5 and 15.5 minutes per filter, respectively.

File:20160805 Inle Lake 7434.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 29 Oct 2019 at 19:24:19 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Fisherman on Inle Lake in Myanmar

File:Édouard Manet, en buste, de face - Nadar.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 29 Oct 2019 at 16:27:19 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Édouard Manet

File:Pont de Bir-Hakeim at night, Paris 3 February 2019.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 29 Oct 2019 at 13:18:54 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION

File:Старе єврейське кладовище у Чернівцях.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 29 Oct 2019 at 12:30:51 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Old Jewish cemetery in Cherniwtsi

File:Alouatta seniculus Global.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 29 Oct 2019 at 10:31:13 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION

File:A large electric phosphate smelting furnace used to make elemental phosphorus in a TVA chemical plant in the vicinity of Muscle Shoals, Ala.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 29 Oct 2019 at 10:24:54 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION

File:Pont de Bir-Hakeim at night as seen from Promenade d'Australie 140223 5.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 29 Oct 2019 at 07:23:42 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION

File:Rue de l'Abreuvoir, Paris 30 September 2019.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 29 Oct 2019 at 06:49:58 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Other
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Pierre Blaché - uploaded and nominated by Paris 16 -- Paris 16 (talk) 06:49, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Paris 16 (talk) 06:49, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Nice view but over-processed (over-sharpened+too much gamma?) leading to strong black lines in the images and white halos around all structures. Time in "date" and Exif do not match, it doesn't look like a midnight shot. --Cart (talk) 07:08, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Oversharpened --Michielverbeek (talk) 07:50, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose sorry, overprocessed --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 08:59, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per others. --Basotxerri (talk) 12:04, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting delete.svg I withdraw my nomination Paris 16 (talk) 13:17, 20 October 2019 (UTC)

First female spacewalk[edit]

Voting period ends on 28 Oct 2019 at 21:55:55 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page

Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Rhododendrites Because that is a continuation of photographs and according to the rules, they can all go if they are related, but if you think it is better to just put one, I have no problems, the last image on the right. -- LLs (discussion) 02:15, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
Yes, I didn't mean to imply it was against the rules. It is certainly within the rules. The sequence itself, to me, just seems very minimal as compared to the content of any one of these individually, which don't seem that different from one another. We'll see what others say, though. — Rhododendrites talk |  02:18, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment The title and description are wrong. This is not the first female space walk. It's the first all-female space walk. The first woman to walk in space was Svetlana Savitskaya in 1984 when she space walked with a man. Seven Pandas (talk) 02:34, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Seven Pandas Correct, but this is the first where there are only women, so it is recognized as a historical event, the same American government recognized it as such. -- LLs (discussion) 02:40, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment - The fact that Trump called it the first female spacewalk - I hope that isn't your reason for using the term. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:55, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Ikan Kekek No, the detail of the difference between the first woman to make a walk (1984) and the first space walk made only by women (2019) has already been added. -- LLs (discussion) 03:02, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
Language is important for image titles. As stated above, having a space walk by only women is called an "all-female space walk" in English and that is how this is decribed in media. "First female space walk" is the first time a woman in any company makes a space walk, there is a difference, so in this case the set title is wrong. --Cart (talk) 06:44, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Even though I'm clearly biased about this event (Jessica Meir's mother is Swedish, so this is huge in media here), I don't see this as a good set nom. The images are only slightly different, and in any other environment they could almost be seen as just zooming in on a subject. Having three images seems superfluous. First human on the moon was also huge and it didn't get a set nom. I would recommend that you {{withdraw}} this and select one image for a single nom. The titles of the images are also incorrect English and should be changed from "female" to "all-female" per my comment above. --Cart (talk) 06:58, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting keep.svg Fixed Files renamed. --Cart (talk) 07:20, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Agree Cart. Plus the photo on the left isn't good at all. Seven Pandas (talk) 11:51, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Firstly I don't think this meets the requirement of a "set" nomination. The point of a "set" nomination is that one can describe the criteria for a finite number of images. Front/back; day-time/evening/night-time. This is just three images arbitrarily taken where the women are posing for the camera. Us photographers have lots of such sets on our hard discs, and typically pick one from them that is the best. I'm not really seeing any one of them at FP level. If the "spacewalk" is the "wow" then, well, they aren't space walking. I think generally that historic events are best nominated sometime afterwards. This gives plenty time to collect some photos and distance to judge objectively. -- Colin (talk) 16:00, 20 October 2019 (UTC)

File:2019 - НПП Подільські Товтри - 02.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 28 Oct 2019 at 10:55:59 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Podilski Tovtry National Nature Park

File:Shah Mosque (Isfahan).jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 28 Oct 2019 at 10:18:19 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Interior view of the dome of the Shah Mosque, Isfahan, Iran
✓ Done fixed. Hanooz 12:11, 19 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Ivar (talk) 19:04, 19 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support because of the architecture AND because of the clouds. --A.Savin 13:28, 19 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 15:12, 19 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Cmao20 (talk) 16:13, 19 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support--Michielverbeek (talk) 17:33, 19 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support, overall, but I'd like to see a photo with the dome on the left included in full, for comparison. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 17:54, 19 October 2019 (UTC)
By another photographer: File:Shah(Emam ) Mosque , Isfahan.jpg. Hanooz 19:55, 19 October 2019 (UTC)
Thanks. That composition could also be an FP if done in high resolution. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:03, 20 October 2019 (UTC)

File:Dead Vlei Tree.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 28 Oct 2019 at 08:06:23 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Old tree in "Dead Vlei", Namibia
  • Category: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Natural#Namibia
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Domob - uploaded by Domob - nominated by Domob -- Domob (talk) 08:06, 19 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Domob (talk) 08:06, 19 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Vignettage could be corrected but I love the colors and composition --Dinkum (talk) 15:01, 19 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 15:12, 19 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Cmao20 (talk) 16:13, 19 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose This may be one of the most exciting photography spots on earth but this composition doesn't work for me, sorry. --Basotxerri (talk) 16:29, 19 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Nice, but the plants in the back ruin it for me. It would have been somewhat better with only the trees and the dunes. Also, the ground in front is not that appealing--Boothsift 16:45, 19 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral I love this composition, but I don't like the right crop. I would like to see the whole shadow and please place the tree in the center of the photo --Michielverbeek (talk) 17:50, 19 October 2019 (UTC)
I actually had the tree in the centre of the original shot, and then cropped it like that because it seemed too central to me. You can take a look at the original version of the image to see what it looked like. If you prefer that one, I'm happy to provide it (or a similar crop) as alternative. --Domob (talk) 08:21, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Here's the thing: we have a surprising number of very similar FPs from the same area: 1, 2, 3, 4. I do rather like this one, and like the striking colors, but when comparing, the colors do look much more orange in this one. Might it be a different spot with a different mineral composition? Was the light that different (looks to have been around the same time of day as #3/4)? To be clear I'm neutral-leaning-support at this stage. — Rhododendrites talk |  23:04, 19 October 2019 (UTC)
I know, but I personally think that this shot looks much better than at least 3, 4 (who look rather bland to me). I like the other two (1, 2) a lot better, but still think that my nomination has more "wow" at least to me. That's why I nominated it. But of course all this is purely subjective, and I'm probably less experienced as a photographer than most of you. --Domob (talk) 08:21, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Yellowish, and per Rhododendrites -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:07, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
It was early morning light, but I agree that it was too red/yellow. Corrected the WB. --Domob (talk) 08:26, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
  • GA candidate.svg Weak support per my comments above. Thanks for editing. I do think the sky is rather still too saturated fwiw. — Rhododendrites talk |  12:45, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose - Composition isn't really working for me. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:30, 21 October 2019 (UTC)

Alternative[edit]

Dead Vlei Tree central.jpg

  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Here's an alternate crop, which is slightly wider on the right. The tree is more central here and the shadow visible. --Domob (talk) 11:50, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
  • GA candidate.svg Weak support I like the other crop better personally, but also support this one. --Domob (talk) 11:50, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Llez (talk) 04:57, 21 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - This composition works for me. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:30, 21 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Michielverbeek (talk) 17:50, 21 October 2019 (UTC)

File:Grey headed flying fox - skimming water - AndrewMercer - DSC00530.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 28 Oct 2019 at 07:29:17 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Grey-headed Flying Fox
  • Answer: No - just the edge of the pond or maybe a tree. In some locations the flying foxes come in groups, especially if its hot and there's a large colony. In this case it was just infrequently, one at a time, given that its just a very small colony and not yet summer. --Bald white guy (talk) 09:49, 19 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Ivar (talk) 11:02, 19 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Very good. Made me smile a bit, because at first sight I thought it was yet another bird ;-) And an excellent performance of the new α7R IV, I'm really jealous. --A.Savin 13:21, 19 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Excellent --Dinkum (talk) 14:51, 19 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 15:12, 19 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support A typical "bird over water" shot, but it's a bat. :) --Peulle (talk) 15:35, 19 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Wow, that's not something you see every day. Cmao20 (talk) 16:12, 19 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Thanks for the explanation--Boothsift 16:38, 19 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Very impressive. -- Axel (talk) 16:55, 19 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Wow, excellent, only not very sharp but in this case it is also very difficult (impossible?) --Michielverbeek (talk) 17:52, 19 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - Very dynamic, and quite a striking animal with an interesting facial expression. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 17:56, 19 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --GRDN711 (talk) 19:26, 19 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support The focus is on the wings, but nice composition and difficult shot, looking good at half the size -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:03, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Schnobby (talk) 06:54, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:02, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Ermell (talk) 07:03, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Cart (talk) 07:50, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 08:55, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Cayambe (talk) 10:23, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Llez (talk) 04:56, 21 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Per Cmao20 Poco2 17:48, 21 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support wow :) - Benh (talk) 18:06, 21 October 2019 (UTC)

File:Lophocampa caryae caterpillar.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 28 Oct 2019 at 02:58:18 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Lophocampa caryae

File:Impatiens capensis.jpeg[edit]

Voting period ends on 28 Oct 2019 at 02:48:02 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Impatiens capensis

File:Casa de Julio Cesar Tello en Marcahuasi.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 28 Oct 2019 at 00:47:14 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Stone house of the anthropologist Julio César Tello in Marcahuasi, Peru
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Other#Peru
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Stone house of the anthropologist Julio César Tello in Marcahuasi, Peru. Marcahuasi is a plateau of the Andes mountain range located east of Lima, has a lot of influence on the development of Peruvian culture. Julio César Tello spent time in his life as a hermit on the plateau to study his surroundings by me, LLs-.- 00:47, 19 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- LLs-.- 00:47, 19 October 2019 (UTC)
  • BA candidate.svg Weak oppose for now. Quite a lot of purple CA around the image. Is it possible for you to fix that, and then I think I could support? Cmao20 (talk) 07:18, 19 October 2019 (UTC)

File:Catedral de Salzburgo, Salzburgo, Austria, 2019-05-19, DD 33-35 HDR.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 27 Oct 2019 at 20:30:14 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Central dome of Salzburg Cathedral, Austria.
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious_buildings#Austria>
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Central dome of Salzburg Cathedral, Austria. The cathedral was founded in 774 and rebuilt in 1181 after a fire but it become its present Baroque style appearance under Prince-Bishop Wolf Dietrich von Raitenau in the 17th century. c/u/n by me, Poco2 20:30, 18 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Poco2 20:30, 18 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg weak support Symbol support vote.svg Support I'm not shy to say it: I'm happy we don't have those crappy ceilings from Livio anymore. My suggestion on that one: a square centered crop and CCW rotation so that the light shaft comes from the top? And also maybe pushing the exposure up. - Benh (talk) 21:31, 18 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 02:50, 19 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Nice to see you submitting new material again. Excellent quality and good corner sharpness. At first I agreed with Benh that the exposure might be a little too low, but looking at it in full-res, I think it's more or less right. Cmao20 (talk) 07:13, 19 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment @Benh, The Cosmonaut, Cmao20: Ok, I've applied a crop and brightened it a little bit. I prefer this orientation to keep the pigeon in the center the way it's and to avoid an asymmetry between left and right as the top arch in the current version is darker Poco2 08:42, 19 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Not sure the crop was necessary tbh, but it doesn't affect my support. However, would it be possible to keep the original as a separate file, as in some ways I prefer it? Cmao20 (talk) 10:15, 19 October 2019 (UTC)
Cmao20, one of the (additional) reasons why I followed Benh's advice was because I had already uploaded another file with more crop and landscape format. This one I will definitely not crop, maybe this in is what you are looking for: File:Catedral de Salzburgo, Salzburgo, Austria, 2019-05-19, DD 30-32 HDR.jpg --Poco2 11:53, 19 October 2019 (UTC)
Understood, that's a nice one too. Cmao20 (talk) 12:12, 19 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Hanooz 10:34, 19 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Ivar (talk) 11:07, 19 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - I like the edits, which IMO improve the picture. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 18:00, 19 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:59, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support--Ermell (talk) 07:04, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support It's a dove btw, not a pigeon. ;-) --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 08:54, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support @Martin Falbisoner: It makes no difference as pigeons and doves are basically the same bird, hence Columbidae--Boothsift 01:22, 21 October 2019 (UTC)
  • You're right, of course, as far as biological taxonomy is concerned. From a linguistic - and especially an iconographic - point of view, there are some differences. Not that it would matter much for this nom :-) --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 05:51, 21 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Llez (talk) 04:54, 21 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Fischer.H (talk) 14:16, 21 October 2019 (UTC)

File:Isaac Lake during golden hour, moments before a storm (DSCF2631).jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 27 Oct 2019 at 19:45:42 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Isaac Lake during golden hour, moments before a storm
✓ Done found it, thank you! --Trougnouf (talk) 17:54, 21 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Daniel Case (talk) 15:42, 21 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Poco2 17:52, 21 October 2019 (UTC)

File:Sent, (1430 m.) dorp in kanton Graubünden in Zwitserland 09-09-2019 (actm.) 20.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 27 Oct 2019 at 15:04:56 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Detail of the church door. The beautiful carved handle. When I look at this photo, I tend to turn the handle.
    All by -- Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 15:04, 18 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 15:04, 18 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Seven Pandas (talk) 21:38, 18 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:44, 19 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Pictogram-voting-question.svg Question - That's beautiful, and I may support, but I'd like to know what your thoughts are about the reasons why you cropped in those places on the right and left. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:45, 19 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Answer: rivets appear on the left. Not on the right. In my mind the symmetry will be lost too much.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 04:50, 19 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - I'm more concerned with the decorations being cut, but that would be a trivial reason not to support. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:04, 19 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Very nice motif. Cmao20 (talk) 07:16, 19 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Schnobby (talk) 08:32, 19 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 02:20, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Cart (talk) 07:54, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Sorry to be a party pooper, but this just doesn't wow me. It also bothers me that the handle is off-center. Percival Kestreltail (talk) 13:57, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Llez (talk) 04:52, 21 October 2019 (UTC)
  • GA candidate.svg Weak support A little shallow on the DoF, but I love the earth tones. Daniel Case (talk) 15:39, 21 October 2019 (UTC)

File:Naqsh-e Jahan Square from the gheisariye Vault.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 27 Oct 2019 at 11:15:56 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Naqsh-e Jahan square from the Qeysarie vault
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Iran
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by and uploaded by Amirpashaei - nominated by Hanooz (Possibly taken from the second floor of Qeysarie bazaar) -- Hanooz 11:15, 18 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Hanooz 11:15, 18 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support I see from the history that the photographer has altered the photo several times since first upload. Most of the changes seem harmless though I would caution against making changes to permanent features. The original upload had a litttle more height top and bottom, and I'm not sure why that was cropped out -- can it be restored? -- Colin (talk) 11:52, 18 October 2019 (UTC)
If the edits are not constructive we can simply revert to the earlier versions. If they are I can send an email to the uploader and ask him to upload a bigger version. Hanooz 13:41, 18 October 2019 (UTC)
  • The sky is fake?--Claus 13:45, 18 October 2019 (UTC)
    • I think you are right. The clouds near the horizon do not have the appearance of clouds near a horizon. Hanooz can you ask the uploader about this. It is one thing to remove tourists from an image but sky replacement is a big no no. The WLM Iran team should also be informed. Compare File:Naghshejahan.jpg from 2018. -- Colin (talk) 13:57, 18 October 2019 (UTC)
      • Time2wait.svg On hold I'm speaking with him on email. Hanooz 16:30, 18 October 2019 (UTC)
      • For me fake sky is also a no go (especially when it's communism propaganda quality like here), but we have cases of sky substitution which got close to POTY in the past ;) - Benh (talk) 17:06, 18 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Cropped because of fixing perspective errors and straight vertical lines. The clouds are fake but I clone them because I thought that manipulation dont cause the main subject to be misrepresented and not intended to deceive. this image merged from 25 picture with 24mm tilt shift lens . (5*5) 5 frame and 5 level exposure for each frame and finaly merged to this picture
    — Preceding unsigned comment added by Amirpashaei (talk • contribs)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose The composition is gorgeous. The thorough photoshopping that went on top is less... The lighting of the clouds doesn't even match the one on the ground. And I don't get how the dark area of the inside "dome" is of so poor quality despite the many raw pictures which served as a basis. - Benh (talk) 17:16, 18 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose No fake skies, please. --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 22:58, 18 October 2019 (UTC)
  • BA candidate.svg Weak oppose Other than the sky, this is great. Kestreltail (talk) 01:04, 19 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose It's quite startlingly impressive to look at, but it really isn't accurate to reality. The sky simply doesn't look natural, and I feel that the image is quite oversaturated too. Cmao20 (talk) 07:15, 19 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support. FP now with the proper sky. Cmao20 (talk) 16:15, 19 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Per above, as member of the WLM jury in Iran I'll have to make sure that we discard this image, a pity. Poco2 09:08, 19 October 2019 (UTC)
  • @Colin, Benh, Frank Schulenburg, Kestreltail, Poco a poco: Could you please take a look at the new version (with the real sky)? Hanooz 12:46, 19 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Hanooz:This kind of editing are not welcome here at FPC nor in WLM. WLM contest's rules there are clear, and this kind of editing is clearly violating them. Reverting that edit doesn't make things fine again. I'm only ready to change my vote if the photographer assures you that no other images are edited like this one was or in that case that a new version is uploaded where deceiving edits are reverted. The photographer should take this seriously, if we find such an editing again in any other of the images submitted to WLM I'd recommend the other members of the jury not to let pass any of the photographer's images. Poco2 15:38, 19 October 2019 (UTC)
Poco a poco He says this one's clouds are also from another image and this one is edited as he mentioned in the caption. Hanooz 16:14, 19 October 2019 (UTC)
Ok, thanks, Hanooz, I Symbol support vote.svg Support now Poco2 16:39, 19 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Not as impressive with the blank sky, but still FP in my opinion. Kestreltail (talk) 12:57, 19 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 15:13, 19 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - The light and possibly the sharpness could be better, but this is a very big panorama and a fine picture of a very striking motif. Support per others. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 18:04, 19 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Why not--Boothsift 01:21, 21 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Daniel Case (talk) 06:16, 21 October 2019 (UTC)

File:Camp - Notes on Fashion at the Met - Burberry rainbow cape (73854).jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 27 Oct 2019 at 05:29:29 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Rainbow cape by Christopher Bailey/Burberry, Camp: Notes on Fashion at The Metropolitan Museum of Art
  • Category: Commons:Featured_pictures/Objects
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info A rainbow cape by Christopher Bailey for Burberry, on display at the recent Camp: Notes on Fashion exhibition at the Metropolitan Museum of Art in New York. created/uploaded/nominated by — Rhododendrites talk |  05:29, 18 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Would've loved to get in there with some better lighting [for photography] and with a tripod (or at least without the throngs of people), but I'm nominating because it's not the sort of thing we see often at FPC and, well, it's a rainbow cape. :) — Rhododendrites talk |  05:29, 18 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Everybody seems to be ignoring this, but it's good for me. Nice clear blue background, the cape is sharp and well-captured. Could be a fashion illustration. Cmao20 (talk) 07:23, 19 October 2019 (UTC)
  • GA candidate.svg Weak support The hearts on the head could be more organized, it's just a little mess --Boothsift 07:41, 19 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- King of ♠ 23:17, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support For one of Renly Baratheon's personal guard, no doubt, had the show ever shown them. Daniel Case (talk) 05:49, 21 October 2019 (UTC)

File:Stormy sunset over Waimakariri River basin, New Zealand.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 27 Oct 2019 at 01:34:30 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Stormy sunset over Waimakariri River basin, New Zealand
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/New Zealand
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info All by me. It was quite cloudy that day. Before the sunset it got really dark as heavy blackish clouds were bringing a lot of rain and snow. This is a moment when the sun managed to peak through for a while. Taken from the northern slopes of Black Range, New Zealand. -- Podzemnik (talk) 01:34, 18 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Podzemnik (talk) 01:34, 18 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Nice--Boothsift 05:19, 18 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Ivar (talk) 05:35, 18 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - Wonderful scenery and a great moment. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:39, 18 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support wow! Biblical. — Rhododendrites talk |  05:41, 18 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Beautiful light --Michielverbeek (talk) 07:22, 18 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:05, 18 October 2019 (UTC)