Commons:Propositions d'images remarquables

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Shortcut
Cette page du projet dans d’autres langues :
Les règles des Propositions d'images remarquables ont changé.
Conformément aux règles générales, une image est promue avec 7 (sept) votes "support" ou plus (et un ratio de 2/1 de # supports/opposes) et le nombre de nominations actives par utilisateur est limité à 2 (deux)
Désormais, seuls peuvent voter les membres inscrits depuis plus de 10 jours ayant procédé à au moins 50 interventions dans "Commons"


Skip to current candidates Aller directement aux propositions en cours

Cette page recense les images qui sont proposées pour être affichées dans les Images remarquables. Notez qu'il ne s'agit pas de la même chose que l'image du jour ou que les images de qualité.

Les archives des votes précédents se trouvent sur cette page.

Il existe également une liste chronologique des images remarquables.

Voir aussi les Images de qualité, les propositions d'images de qualité et les critiques photographiques.

Procédure[edit]

Conseils avant de proposer une image[edit]

partie en cours de traduction depuis la version anglaise, votre avis est le bienvenu.

Lisez entièrement le guide avant de commencer

Quelques règles informelles à retenir avant de proposer une image (les termes en italiques sont la traduction anglaise des termes).

  • Définition (display resolution) : les images de Commons peuvent être utilisées sur d'autres supports qu'un écran d'ordinateur, par exemple pour être imprimées ou vues à très haute résolution. Il est important que les images proposées aient la plus haute résolution possible. Au moins 2 millions de pixels (par ex. 2000 x 1000) semble raisonnable à présent. Les images de définition inférieure sont systématiquement rejetées sauf s'il y a une bonne raison.
  • Mise au point (focus) : tous les objets importants de l'image devraient être nets. Dans l'idéal les objets non primordiaux sont nets.
  • Avant-plan et arrière-plan (background and foreground): ils peuvent être dérangeants. Le sujet principal ne devrait pas être caché par le premier plan, ni se confondre avec l'arrière-plan.
  • Qualité générale (general quality) : Les images proposées devraient avoir une très haute qualité technique.
  • Une retouche (digital manipulations) ne doit pas tromper l'observateur. La correction de quelques défauts dans l'image est acceptée pour autant que ce soit limité, bien fait, et non pour tromper. Les retouches courantes sont le recadrage, la correction de la perspective, de netteté, des couleurs ou de l'exposition. Des manipulations plus importantes, tels quel l'élimination d'éléments dans l'arrière plan, doivent être décrites dans la description de l'image, par le biais du modèle {{RetouchedPicture}}. Les retouches non décrites ou mal décrites qui transformeraient le sujet sont inacceptables.
  • Utilité (value) : notre but principal est de présenter des images utiles et précieuses. Les images devraient ainsi être spéciales d'une façon ou d'une autre, donc, entre autres :
    • La plupart des coucher de soleil sont beaux, et la plupart ne sont pas différents des autres existant déjà.
    • Les photos de nuit sont souvent belles mais davantage de détails sont visibles de jour.
    • "Beau" ne veut pas dire "utile".

Au niveau technique, nous avons l'exposition, la composition, le mouvement et la profondeur du champ.

  • L'exposition (exposure) est l'obturation du diaphragme qui modifie la luminosité (brightness) pour rendre avec qualité les ombres et les lumières au sein de l'image. Le manque d'ombres dans le détail n'est pas nécessairement négatif, cela peut être un effet désiré.
  • La composition (composition) est l'arrangement des éléments dans l'image. La "Règle de trois" est un bon guide pour la composition, c'est un héritage des écoles de peintures. L'idée est de diviser l'image par deux lignes horizontales et deux lignes verticales, nous avons donc trois parties dans chaque sens. L'objet ne doit pas forcément être centré. Les sujets intéressants doivent êtres placés aux 4 croisements des lignes. L'horizon ne doit jamais être mis au milieu, car il couperait l'image en deux. L'idée principale ici est de rendre l'image dynamique.
  • Netteté (sharpness) renvoie à la manière dont les mouvements sont représentés dans l'image. Ils peuvent être nets ou flous. Ils ne sont pas mieux l'un que l'autre, cela dépend de l'intention du photographe. L'impression de mouvement dépend des différents objets de l'image. Par exemple, photographier une voiture de course qui apparaît nette par rapport à l'arrière plan ne donne pas une idée de la vitesse. Il faudrait en fait que la voiture soit représentée nette, mais avec un arrière plan flou, créant ainsi le mouvement. D'un autre coté, représenter le saut d'un joueur de basket net avec le reste de l'image flou, en raison de la nature peu habituelle de la photo, lui conférerait de l'intérêt.
  • La profondeur de champ (depth of field or DOF) renvoie à la zone de mise au point devant et au delà du sujet principal. La profondeur de champ est choisie en fonction des besoins spécifiques à chaque image. Une profondeur grande ou petite peut améliorer ou dégrader la qualité de l'image. Une faible profondeur de champ peut attirer l'attention sur le sujet principal, en le séparant de son environnement. Les lentilles à petite distance focale (grand angle) ont une grande profondeur de champ, et vice versa, les lentilles à grande distance focale (petite ouverture) ont une petite profondeur de champ.

Proposition[edit]

Si vous pensez avoir trouvé ou créé une image qui puisse être considérée comme parmi les meilleures de Commons, avec une description et une licence appropriée, copiez le nom de l'image dans la boîte ci-dessous (en incluant le préfixe File:), après le texte déjà présent :


Après cela, vous devrez insérer un lien vers la page que vous venez de créer en haut de Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list.

Vote[edit]

A l'exclusion de tous autres, vous pouvez utiliser les modèles suivants:

  • {{Pour}} (Symbol support vote.svg Support),
  • {{Contre}} (Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose),

Ainsi que :

  • {{Neutre}} (Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral),
  • {{Comment}} (Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment),
  • {{Info}} (Pictogram voting info.svg Info),
  • {{Question}} (Pictogram-voting question.svg Question).


IMPORTANT: veuillez notamment NE PAS UTILISER les modèles {{weak support}} (GA candidate.svg Weak support) ni {{weak oppose}} (BA candidate.svg Weak oppose), ils ne sont pas reconnus par le robot, et votre vote serait considéré comme non valide.

Merci d'inclure quelques mots expliquant pourquoi vous soutenez ou non la promotion de l'image, surtout si vous votez contre. N'oubliez pas de signer avec ~~~~.

Règles[edit]

Règles générales[edit]

  1. Le résultat est donné 9 jours après la proposition (voir le planning en bas de page). Les votes ajoutés le 10e jour ou après ne sont pas décomptés.
  2. Les utilisateurs non-enregistrés peuvent proposer des images, faire des commentaires, mais pas voter.
  3. La proposition elle-même ne compte pas comme un vote : il faut l'ajouter explicitement.
  4. Le proposant peut retirer une image à tout moment, en écrivant : {{Withdraw}} ~~~~
  5. Souvenez-vous que le but de Wikimedia Commons est une bibliothèque pour tous les projets Wikimedia, y compris des projets futurs ; les images n'ont pas à être utiles uniquement pour Wikipédia.
  6. Les images peuvent être retirées de la liste dès le 5e jour si elles n'ont reçu aucun vote "pour".
  7. Soyez attentifs et très sélectifs dans les choix que vous faites, car il ne peut y avoir que deux propositions actives par proposant. Toute proposition supplémentaire sera rejetée sans examen.
  8. Seulement 2 nominations actives par même utilisateur (qui est, en nomination sous "review" et non encore close) sont autorisées. Le principal but de cette mesure est de contribuer à une meilleure qualité moyenne des nominations, par un choix plus judicieux des photos présentes en nominations.

Règles de promotion[edit]

L'image candidate devient une image remarquable si elle remplit les conditions suivantes :

  1. Une licence appropriée (bien sûr !)
  2. Au moins sept votes "pour".
  3. un ratio de 2/1 de votes "pour"/"contre".
  4. Deux versions différentes de la même image ne peuvent pas être promues en même temps, mais seulement celle avec le plus grand score.

Contestations[edit]

Avec le temps, les critères d'évaluation évoluent, et il peut être décidé qu'une image qui était auparavant assez bonne pour être dans la liste ne peut plus l'être.

Pour qu'une image soit déchue, il faut qu'une majorité de 2/3 avec au moins 5 votes accepte de retirer l'image, autrement elle reste "remarquable". Pour voter, utiliser les modèles {{Keep}} (Symbol keep vote.svg Keep : mérite de rester "remarquable") ou {{Delist}} (Symbol oppose vote.svg Delist  : ne mérite plus le label).

Pour contester une image, copiez son nom avec le préfixe dans la boîte ci-dessous à la suite du texte déjà présent :


Vous devriez inclure les informations suivantes :

  • Informations sur l'origine de l'image (créateur, importateur).
  • Un lien vers le vote d'origine.
  • La raison pour laquelle vous contestez le label, avec votre signature.

Insérez ensuite un lien en haut de Commons:Featured picture candidates/removal.

Sommaire[edit]

Pour ajouter votre proposition à la liste[edit]

Pour ajouter votre proposition à la liste, cliquez ici et ajoutez votre proposition en haut de la liste : {{Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:FILENAME}}

Propositions en cours[edit]

Featured picture candidates[edit]

File:FrankfurtOder asv2022-07 img01 Holy Cross Church.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 11 Dec 2022 at 11:09:05 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Holy Cross Church in Frankfurt (Oder)

File:LVM3 M2, OneWeb India-1 campaign 19.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 11 Dec 2022 at 07:02:04 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Launch Vehicle Mark-3, a launch vehicle developed by the Indian Space Research Organisation, one day before its launch on October 22

File:Althaea cannabina. 04-08-2022 (actm.).jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 11 Dec 2022 at 05:30:50 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION

Image:Vollkorn Muffins und schwarzer Bio-Kaffee.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 10 Dec 2022 at 23:26:54 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Muffins and a cup of coffee

File:Tartu Kunstimuuseum detsembriõhtul.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 10 Dec 2022 at 05:30:54 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Tartu Art Museum building
  • Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Estonia
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created & uploaded by Hendrik Mändla - nominated by Kruusamägi (talk) 05:30, 1 December 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Kruusamägi (talk) 05:30, 1 December 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Beautiful blue hour, however the ghosts (6 people in the center plus 2 at the left) are distracting. It would have been possible to avoid them, either by waiting the right moment, or by taking 2 pictures, merged together afterwards. Moreover, I think this nomination promoted last month is showing the spectacular inclination of the building better. In this case, due to the point of view, the angle appears less explicit. We notice the edges are not vertical, but they give the feeling that "the perspective should be fixed", more than "the building is special" -- Basile Morin (talk) 08:55, 1 December 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose The blue hour is one of my appreciated time of the day to take pictures, especially architecture. In excellente architecture photography, the edges of buildings must be vertical. The most disturbing objects in this picture are the electric wires with the light bulbs -- Marc-Lautenbacher (talk) 23:54, 1 December 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Your subjective appreciation of the light bulbs is respectable, however, note that the building itself is not vertical in reality. Due to the inclination, it is named the Tartu Pisa Tower. But your feeling confirms mine: this specificity is not obvious enough, from that angle. -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:41, 2 December 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Mostly for the ghosts, but also the verticals on the building to the left are not vertical. BigDom (talk) 11:22, 2 December 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Notre-Dame de Montréal Basilica 12.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 10 Dec 2022 at 00:24:03 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Notre-Dame de Montréal Basilica

File:Vista de Florencia desde Piazzale Michelangelo, Italia, 2022-09-18, DD 212-214 HDR.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 10 Dec 2022 at 00:02:41 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION

File:Schweriner Schloss - Schlosskirche - Decke (0302).jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 10 Dec 2022 at 00:02:40 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION

File:A unique frame of Humayun Tomb, Delhi.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 9 Dec 2022 at 20:20:48 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Humayun's Tomb in Delhi

File:Blue-throated macaw in flight.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 9 Dec 2022 at 19:23:53 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Blue-throated macaw (Ara glaucogularis) in flight, Loro Parque, Tenerife, Spain

File:Gelada (Theropithecus gelada gelada) male 3.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 9 Dec 2022 at 15:38:29 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gelada (Theropithecus gelada gelada) male

File:Mountain gorilla (Gorilla beringei beringei) eyes.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 9 Dec 2022 at 15:42:10 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Mountain gorilla (Gorilla beringei beringei) eyes

File:Pedde du Coin des Hasards in Thiers (1).jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 9 Dec 2022 at 08:09:00 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Pedde du Coin des Hasards in Thiers, Puy-de-Dôme, France

File:Town hall of Cournon-d'Auvergne (2).jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 9 Dec 2022 at 08:07:29 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Town hall of Cournon-d'Auvergne, Puy-de-Dôme, France

File:Marie-Elisabeth-Lüders-Haus-msu-0719-.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 9 Dec 2022 at 08:04:26 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

The Marie-Elisabeth-Lüders-Haus is a legislative building in Berlin near the Reichstag. It is part of the “Federal Belt” of buildings in the urban design concept for Germany's government quarter.
  • Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Matthias Süßen - uploaded by Matthias Süßen - nominated by Matthias Süßen -- Matthias Süßen (talk) 08:04, 30 November 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Matthias Süßen (talk) 08:04, 30 November 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 08:12, 30 November 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 12:48, 30 November 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Cmao20 (talk) 14:36, 30 November 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Exellent light, mood and composition. Because the verticals are almost vertical (we are not looking up or down), you may want to make them perfectly vertical (perspective correction); and you may want to correct the green chromatic aberration on the edge at the right. --Aristeas (talk) 18:33, 30 November 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support, but I agree with Aristeas, in that there are borders in various places that would ideally be edited out. I think this is a very good low-light photo, though, and the motif is interesting. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:09, 30 November 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose (Switching to Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral per discussion below) My eyes keep drifting to that bit of boardwalk at the bottom. Looking at the location it seems possible to place the camera right at the edge of the boardwalk to capture a full reflection without any distractions. On the technical side, I subscribe to the shortcomings listed by Aristeas and would add low sharpness to the mix, seemingly caused by slight camera shake and/or diffraction. --Julesvernex2 (talk) 20:15, 30 November 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per Julesvernex2, sorry. --A.Savin 00:21, 1 December 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Striking but barrel distortion at the top, in addition to the other problems. I will oppose if this is not fixed -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:37, 1 December 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Thank you for the comments. I have uploaded a new version. I made a perspective correction and removed the chromatic aberrations. I also adjusted the cropping so that more foreground is now visible. In fact, I even tried to get closer to the water. There it was difficult to get all the reflection on the picture. Also, the front step was so half submerged, which didn't look so good, see here. The roof in the foreground is actually round. It fits exactly into the roof of the building opposite, as you can see on satellite images. --Matthias Süßen (talk) 07:04, 1 December 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
    • Ah, indeed that half submerged step spoils the reflection! The idea of matching the curvature of the foreground to the opposing roof is awesome, but I'm not sure it comes across as intentional without the accompanying explanation. One last point on technicalities: the chromatic aberration correction went overboard and left a thick orange border across the entire building. I see you use Lightroom, so would propose instead one of these corrections: i) using the Defringe tool with around 14 on the green amount and 62/84 on the green hue; or ii) using the clone stamp tool at max magnification to manually remove the green fringing. The latter produces better results but is a but time consuming. Happy to help further if useful --Julesvernex2 (talk) 08:16, 1 December 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
      • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Thank you so much for your tips! I had already worked with the Defringe tool (after the automatic correction did not give good results): Now I have adopted the parameters you suggested. --Matthias Süßen (talk) 08:41, 1 December 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
        • You're welcome! I still see the orange border but it's probably just a temporary cache issue --Julesvernex2 (talk) 09:08, 1 December 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
          • Hi Julesvernex2. That is strange. They weren't there yet during the upload. But now I have also seen them and uploaded the file again. --Matthias Süßen (talk) 09:16, 1 December 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
            • Yep, can see it now! --Julesvernex2 (talk) 11:34, 1 December 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
            • Thank you very much, Matthias, for the new version! Perspective etc. are IMHO much better now. But I still see some orange areas at the right of the building, around the crane etc., even when I refresh the cache. That’s a pity because I really would like to support this photo. --Aristeas (talk) 08:28, 2 December 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
            • Good eye, Aristeas! Matthias, when I apply the parameters above (14 on the green amount and 62/84 on the green hue) I get slightly better results (e.g., no orange borders on the right of the building) but the crane is still not perfect. I think this will require a bit of manual cloning to solve, happy to help you with this if useful --Julesvernex2 (talk) 10:05, 2 December 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
              • Thank you for the tips. Thank you for the tips. I have tried to fix the problem and uploaded a new version. --Matthias Süßen (talk) 10:17, 2 December 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Greater white-fronted goose in flight-1045.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 9 Dec 2022 at 03:02:59 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

A greater white-fronted goose (Anser albifrons) in flight

File:Czech Republic - landscape near Koryčany.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 8 Dec 2022 at 17:54:35 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Czech Republic - landscape near Koryčany

File:Haare und Frisuren 001 2010 05 23.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 8 Dec 2022 at 09:59:47 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION

File:Middelburg (NL), Stadhuis -- 2022 -- 4928.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 8 Dec 2022 at 09:55:06 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
  • BTW: There is no vignette added. It's natural. --XRay 💬 15:18, 1 December 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
    • my bad then. But it's really remarkable how the brightness drops around the tower. So I'm a bit surprised. - Benh (talk) 18:22, 1 December 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • It's just a cloud in the right place. --XRay 💬 18:34, 1 December 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • ✓ Done Thanks to Benh. I made some improvements in the sky (more noise reduction, colors). --XRay 💬 15:24, 1 December 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • I had the same impression as Benh, but now that kind of vignetting (or cloud?) has disappeared with the new version uploaded -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:08, 2 December 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • I've reduced blue luminance in the sky. --XRay 💬 04:32, 2 December 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Bad Homburg - Erlöserkirche - Decke (3106).jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 8 Dec 2022 at 09:01:19 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Church of the Redeemer, Germany

File:SBB Re 4-4 II and Re 6-6 above Erstfeld.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 7 Dec 2022 at 15:41:52 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

A Re 4/4 II and a Re 6/6 haul a southbound intermodal freight train on the Gotthard line just outside Erstfeld (visible in the background), Switzerland.

File:Padum Zanskar View From Karsha Oct22 A7C 03984.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 7 Dec 2022 at 15:24:14 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Padum tri-valley and the Zanskar mountains
  • Contre-jour. The sun is in front. What we see is the shadowy side of these mountains, with a characteristic bluish tint. Also the clouds are very bright. The problem comes from the orientation of the camera in my opinion -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:52, 29 November 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support--Ermell (talk) 11:27, 29 November 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Per Basile, sorry Poco a poco (talk) 18:48, 29 November 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support On the one hand Basile is certainly right about the difficult light. On the other hand I still like the result: it’s a magnificent view and I love the transition in the valley from shadow to light. --Aristeas (talk) 09:34, 30 November 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Cmao20 (talk) 14:31, 30 November 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Llez (talk) 16:13, 30 November 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Yann (talk) 13:06, 2 December 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support I understand Basile's and Diego's points of view, but (IMHO) I still see a natural purplish sky near the incredibly beautiful mountain sunset... --Terragio67 (talk) 14:07, 2 december 2022 (UTC)

File:Tree shrouded in kudzu (40589p).jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 7 Dec 2022 at 04:41:17 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Tree shrouded in kudzu
  • Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Plants#Family_:_Fabaceae
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info A tree covered and ultimately killed by kudzu, an invasive vine here in the US which can cover large areas, depriving plants and trees of sunlight. You can see the scope in photos like this one. I was attracted to this subject because the effect here is kind of monstrous, a figure overtaken by vines. all by — Rhododendrites talk |  04:41, 28 November 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Symbol support vote.svg SupportRhododendrites talk |  04:41, 28 November 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support — Draceane talkcontrib. 15:18, 28 November 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Ordinary pattern of a dead mass, in my view. Wild natural sites may be rare in New York, but in any countryside of the world, these sorts of vines wrapped around trees are very common. Here this heavy gray web is insignificant to me -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:56, 29 November 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose The linked picture is actually more impressive and shows the problem better. This photo lacks the wow effect although it is very instructive.--Ermell (talk) 11:36, 29 November 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Per above, sorry Poco a poco (talk) 18:49, 29 November 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Seems it depends on how we look at this photo (as often ;–). I first thought this was one of Cart’s photos – this bizarre dead tree immediately evokes associations of a bad witch, a giant insect or a monster, so it reminds me a lot of Cart’s point that we should not only depict beauty, but also the wicked and strange. The contrast between the gloomy associations of the tree and the glorious cloudy sky further enhances the impact of the image for me. --Aristeas (talk) 09:02, 30 November 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support per Aristeas' eloquent comment, plus I think the composition is better than the previous nomination. Cmao20 (talk) 14:29, 30 November 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Llez (talk) 14:53, 30 November 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Per Basile Morin. -- Karelj (talk) 16:43, 30 November 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:House sparrow male in Prospect Park (53532).jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 7 Dec 2022 at 04:33:22 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Male house sparrow

File:Gilpinia hercyniae larvae - Keila.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 6 Dec 2022 at 19:01:47 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gilpinia hercyniae
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Note that sawfly larvae are much smaller than caterpillars. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:13, 30 November 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:File, Asuán, Egipto, 2022-04-01, DD 142.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 6 Dec 2022 at 11:45:34 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Trajan's Kiosk, Philae, Aswan, Egypt

File:Templo de Ramsés II, Abu Simbel, Egipto, 2022-04-02, DD 74-76 HDR.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period ends on 6 Dec 2022 at 11:55:20 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
  • Ikan Kekek: The corridors are pretty thigh there, getting a panel of the whole wall is complicated, that's why I had to focus on Ramesses II and its chariot. The picture was taken in his temple, so I guess there is nothing wrong with that. Poco a poco (talk) 20:10, 27 November 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]


Unconfirmed results: (info)
Result: 12 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /FPCBot (talk) 13:01, 2 December 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:2022-01-22 Men's World Cup at 2021-22 St. Moritz–Celerina Luge World Cup and European Championships by Sandro Halank–257.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period ends on 6 Dec 2022 at 11:55:02 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Men's World Cup at the 2021/22 Luge World Cup Final and 2022 European Luge Championships in St. Moritz–Celerina: Wolfgang Kindl (Austria)
Confirmed results:
Result: 11 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Aristeas (talk) 13:33, 2 December 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Sports#Individual snow sports

File:RAI 40-012 Sepid Dasht - Dorud.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 6 Dec 2022 at 10:02:24 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Local train between Sepid Dasht and Dorud, Iran

File:Pauline Kirby (5493900611).jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 6 Dec 2022 at 08:03:16 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Pauline Kirby

File:Kleines Wiesenvögelchen am frühen Morgen.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 4 Dec 2022 at 18:20:42 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Coenonympha pamphilus

File:Vanalinna aia raamatukapp.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 4 Dec 2022 at 13:24:55 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Tallinn Old Town book case
Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Yes, that is a public bookcase next to the Tallinn City Wall. I previously wrote an English description to it, but struggled to think up on how something like this should be called, and that is why I only mentioned that this is book case in Tallinn Old Town. Kruusamägi (talk) 16:06, 27 November 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
And the text on it reads as follows: "Old Town Garden bookcase / Read on-site, borrow, bring back, and donate more books." Kruusamägi (talk) 16:14, 27 November 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Thank you very much for the clarification, Kruusamägi! --Aristeas (talk) 19:19, 29 November 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Daniel Case (talk) 03:09, 30 November 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • GA candidate.svg Weak support And indeed the surprise that there is a bookcase standing right here outside between some wild plants and the old wall has the certain something. I would just wish for more interesting light, etc. --Aristeas (talk) 09:07, 30 November 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Per Ikan. -- Karelj (talk) 16:47, 30 November 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Schors van een berk (Betula) 23-10-2022 (d.j.b.).jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 4 Dec 2022 at 05:32:45 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
  • ✓ Done. Removed several false pixels. + made several small improvements. FYI: I hadn't cloned anything! Of course I can't fix what I didn't do.--Famberhorst (talk) 17:06, 25 November 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose I think I'm looking at the latest version where I see large areas of pixelation (see notes); the stacking errors are still there. Charlesjsharp (talk) 22:26, 28 November 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Note: You see more than me. Then clone errors again. The other time stack errors. What you are pointing at again is a totally rotten wet birch trunk. Thank you for your constructive contribution.--Famberhorst (talk) 05:51, 29 November 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]


Contestations en cours[edit]

Featured picture candidates[edit]

File:FrankfurtOder asv2022-07 img01 Holy Cross Church.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 11 Dec 2022 at 11:09:05 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Holy Cross Church in Frankfurt (Oder)

File:LVM3 M2, OneWeb India-1 campaign 19.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 11 Dec 2022 at 07:02:04 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Launch Vehicle Mark-3, a launch vehicle developed by the Indian Space Research Organisation, one day before its launch on October 22

File:Althaea cannabina. 04-08-2022 (actm.).jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 11 Dec 2022 at 05:30:50 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION

Image:Vollkorn Muffins und schwarzer Bio-Kaffee.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 10 Dec 2022 at 23:26:54 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Muffins and a cup of coffee

File:Tartu Kunstimuuseum detsembriõhtul.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 10 Dec 2022 at 05:30:54 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Tartu Art Museum building
  • Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Estonia
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created & uploaded by Hendrik Mändla - nominated by Kruusamägi (talk) 05:30, 1 December 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Kruusamägi (talk) 05:30, 1 December 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Beautiful blue hour, however the ghosts (6 people in the center plus 2 at the left) are distracting. It would have been possible to avoid them, either by waiting the right moment, or by taking 2 pictures, merged together afterwards. Moreover, I think this nomination promoted last month is showing the spectacular inclination of the building better. In this case, due to the point of view, the angle appears less explicit. We notice the edges are not vertical, but they give the feeling that "the perspective should be fixed", more than "the building is special" -- Basile Morin (talk) 08:55, 1 December 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose The blue hour is one of my appreciated time of the day to take pictures, especially architecture. In excellente architecture photography, the edges of buildings must be vertical. The most disturbing objects in this picture are the electric wires with the light bulbs -- Marc-Lautenbacher (talk) 23:54, 1 December 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Your subjective appreciation of the light bulbs is respectable, however, note that the building itself is not vertical in reality. Due to the inclination, it is named the Tartu Pisa Tower. But your feeling confirms mine: this specificity is not obvious enough, from that angle. -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:41, 2 December 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Mostly for the ghosts, but also the verticals on the building to the left are not vertical. BigDom (talk) 11:22, 2 December 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Notre-Dame de Montréal Basilica 12.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 10 Dec 2022 at 00:24:03 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Notre-Dame de Montréal Basilica

File:Vista de Florencia desde Piazzale Michelangelo, Italia, 2022-09-18, DD 212-214 HDR.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 10 Dec 2022 at 00:02:41 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION

File:Schweriner Schloss - Schlosskirche - Decke (0302).jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 10 Dec 2022 at 00:02:40 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION

File:A unique frame of Humayun Tomb, Delhi.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 9 Dec 2022 at 20:20:48 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Humayun's Tomb in Delhi