Commons:Candidatas a imagens especiais

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Estas imagens são as candidatas para se tornarem em Imagens especiais. Por favor note que isto não é a mesma coisa que a imagem do dia.

Para ver o arquivo de nomeações prévias veja: Commons:Featured picture candidates/Log

Contents

Formalidades[edit]

Nomeação[edit]

Se acha que encontrou ou criou uma imagem que possa ser considerada especial, então por favor adicione-a em baixo na secção de nomeações, no topo da página, editando este link.

Mas antes de o fazer, assegure que a imagem tem uma descrição apropriada e licenciamento.

Por favor vote ao usar a palavra na sua linguagem nos modelos em baixo:

Política de candidatura a imagem especial[edit]

  • Período de votação de 9 dias. O resultado será determinado no 10º dia após a nomeação.
  • As nomeações feitas por anónimos são bem vindas.
  • As contribuições para a discussão feitas por anónimos são bem vindas.
  • Votos de anónimos não são contados.
  • As nomeações não contam como votos. O voto deve ser feito usando o modelo de voto.

A imagem candidata passará a ser uma imagem especial de acordo com as seguintes condições:

  1. Licença apropriada.
  2. Pelo menos 5 votos positivos.
  3. A relação de votos positivos/votos negativos terá de ser pelo menos 2/1 (uma maioria de dois terços, ou seja pelo menos 67% de apoio).

Para ver instruções sobre como lidar com nomeações antigas, veja Template talk:Featured pictures candidates#What to do after voting is finished.

Propostas[edit]

Featured picture candidates[edit]

File:Starting the charcoal.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 30 Aug 2018 at 13:52:25 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

White smoke rising from charcoal briquettes as they start to catch fire and burn
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created and uploaded by Tomascastelazo - nominated by W.carter -- Cart (talk) 13:52, 21 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support I asked Tomas for some of his other photos and he delivered! :) Not an easy subject to shoot, the smoke is beautifully captured. Ok, the briquette in the foreground is a bit unsharp but that is forgiven since all the focus is on the smoke. The small graininess is very appropriate since smoke is minute particles and not something smooth and fluid. I'm a bit uncertain about the file name though, it doesn't sound like totally correct English to me, perhaps some native English speaker has a suggestion. -- Cart (talk) 13:52, 21 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Very good! --GeXeS (talk) 14:06, 21 August 2018 (UTC)

File:Cinnyris jugularis ornatus (p2, 5s).jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 30 Aug 2018 at 13:32:14 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Cinnyris jugularis ornatus at Kuala Lumpur

File:Cinnyris jugularis ornatus (p1, 5s).jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 30 Aug 2018 at 13:32:16 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Cinnyris jugularis ornatus at Kuala Lumpur

File:Rusty crane in Tsaghkadzor.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 30 Aug 2018 at 12:10:12 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Rusty crane in Tsaghkadzor
Nuvola apps important yellow.svg
Thank you for nominating this image. Unfortunately, it does not fall within the Guidelines and is unlikely to succeed because the image is of too low quality to feature; it is tilted, low on detail and the subject lies in shadow.--Peulle (talk) 13:18, 21 August 2018 (UTC) Anyone other than the nominator who disagrees may override this template by changing {{FPX}} to {{FPX contested}} and adding a vote in support. Voting will then continue in the usual way. If not contested within 24 hours, this nomination may be closed.

File:Dülmen, Wiesmann Sports Cars, Wiesmann Spyder Concept -- 2018 -- 9576.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 30 Aug 2018 at 06:19:16 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Third brake light of the Wiesmann Spyder Concept at Wiesmann Sports Cars, Dülmen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany

File:Ncisles Forces de Sieles Muntijela Stevia Gherdeina.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 30 Aug 2018 at 06:15:07 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

The Forces de Siëles in the Puez-Geisler Nature Park, Dolomites UNESCO World Heritage Site.
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - Much better. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:22, 21 August 2018 (UTC)

File:Leopard (Panthera pardus).jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 30 Aug 2018 at 05:46:24 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Leopard (Panthera pardus)

File:Hausziege 04.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 30 Aug 2018 at 05:41:32 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Goat, located in Fiesch, Valais (Switzerland).
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Kuebi - uploaded by Kuebi - nominated by The NMI User -- The NMI User (talk) 05:41, 21 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- The NMI User (talk) 05:41, 21 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment - I like the goat. I'm not sure this is an FP, though it's a good photo. The dark thing on the lower right is a bit distracting, but it could be cropped out. Unfortunately, another dark blob near the goat's hind hoofs cannot be. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:14, 21 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support A fine capture of the mood. The crop and DoF aren't perfect but the face is sharp and I think the image tells a story. :) --Peulle (talk) 13:23, 21 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Yann (talk) 13:34, 21 August 2018 (UTC)

File:AltarIglesiaConsolaciónHDR.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 29 Aug 2018 at 23:20:13 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION

File:Sinakarintra Stit Mahasantikhiri Pagoda - Mae Salong.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 29 Aug 2018 at 20:41:45 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION

File:Jal Mahotsav Dance.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 29 Aug 2018 at 20:25:44 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Traditional Malwa Dancer

File:Caldera de las Cañadas - Echium wildpretii - 02.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 29 Aug 2018 at 11:48:20 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Part of the inflorescence of a "Tower of Jewels"; Caldera de las Cañadas, Tenerife
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Llez (talk) 11:48, 20 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment There is a strange blurry line at the bottom of the image. See on the left side for the most visible part -- Basile Morin (talk) 13:22, 20 August 2018 (UTC)
    • ✓ Done Thanks, correction done --Llez (talk) 13:57, 20 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Discovering this plant, "Tower of Jewels" : nice name -- Basile Morin (talk) 14:18, 20 August 2018 (UTC)

File:Hawa Khana, Puthia.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 29 Aug 2018 at 05:36:39 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
  • Cart: Actually, it is better to have the environment here. Hopefully, it could be retaken on a sunny day. Regards, Yann (talk) 09:07, 21 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Yes, some environment is good and as you say, the light on a sunny day could make it better. As it is now, the light unfortunately makes the environment uninteresting. I was referring to how it looks in this particular photo. --Cart (talk) 09:21, 21 August 2018 (UTC)
  • @Yann: I have seen this building quite a lot since I was on the Bangladesh WLM jury. This here is a better photo of it in sunlight and with some environment. --Cart (talk) 09:30, 21 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Indeed, this one is better. Regards, Yann (talk) 09:35, 21 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose I agree with Cart.--Peulle (talk) 07:45, 20 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose - I agree, too, but this is a good motif, so I hope RockyMasum tries photographing it more. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 10:32, 20 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Per W.carter --The NMI User (talk) 05:36, 21 August 2018 (UTC)

File:Lounge InterContinental Singapore.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 29 Aug 2018 at 04:49:34 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Lounge InterContinental Singapore
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture#Singapore
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created - uploaded - nominated by Basile Morin -- Basile Morin (talk) 04:49, 20 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 04:49, 20 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose It is certainly a well executed photo, but it has no element that makes me go wow for it. It is the kind of photo of a fairly standard city hotel lounge you see in a glossy booklet you pick up at an airport or tourist information. It depicts the venue in a neutral way for clients. Sorry. The chairs and painting would have made a nice photo though, see note. --Cart (talk) 06:13, 20 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Thanks, Cart, for your opinion. I agree with your note. Perhaps you're also right this photo could be found in a glossy booklet, the floor is glossy too, and that could make people think "wow, I want to stay there !" Face-grin.svg It's a simple picture, but I find it well balanced, with a lot of space, and two attractive armchairs. Tastefully decorated, it's an invitation to sit and to climb -- Basile Morin (talk) 06:51, 20 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Yep, it's a good photo to bring guests to the hotel, but it doesn't make the artistic part of my brain sit up and take notice. I'm sure you could have come up with some more creative angle if you had experimented a bit. The note is only an approximation. I follow Chen Man on Instagram and she always photographs the hotels she's staying in. She goes for the smaller details and crops of bigger structures that captures the essence of the hotel; it makes for good and interesting photos. --Cart (talk) 07:21, 20 August 2018 (UTC)
  • No worry, your note is of great value, but don't judge my work too quickly here, because I made a lot of shots from different angles that day, including your suggestion. But I prefer this version because of the stairs -- Basile Morin (talk) 08:11, 20 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support I like it a lot. I find the reflection, lightening, staircase lines and objects (like plants, paintings and chairs) in appealing order making the composition pleasant to my eye. --Podzemnik (talk) 08:50, 20 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 10:48, 20 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support I like it. -- KTC (talk) 18:01, 20 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support--Famberhorst (talk) 18:03, 20 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Photo makes it attractive to sit in this lounge --Michielverbeek (talk) 22:34, 20 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Cart's critique notwithstanding, I still like the way the diagonals play with each other in this image. Daniel Case (talk) 03:02, 21 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --The NMI User (talk) 05:34, 21 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support. --Gnosis (talk) 05:43, 21 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 05:55, 21 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 07:39, 21 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Very good, and useful for Wikivoyage. --Yann (talk) 09:05, 21 August 2018 (UTC)

File:Древесина ели.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 28 Aug 2018 at 22:26:53 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

The picture shows the structure of spruce tree cells.
Nuvola apps important yellow.svg
Thank you for nominating this image. Unfortunately, it does not fall within the Guidelines and is unlikely to succeed because it has been up-sized, the pixels are visible - Basile Morin (talk) 01:49, 20 August 2018 (UTC) Anyone other than the nominator who disagrees may override this template by changing {{FPX}} to {{FPX contested}} and adding a vote in support. Voting will then continue in the usual way. If not contested within 24 hours, this nomination may be closed.

File:Mausoleo de Emir Ali, Shiraz, Irán, 2016-09-24, DD 24-26 HDR.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 28 Aug 2018 at 18:56:11 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Dome of Mausoleum of Emir Ali, Shiraz, Iran.
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Dome of Mausoleum of Emir Ali, Shiraz, Iran. The current temple was built in the 19th century to replace the former one damaged over the centuries due to earthquakes. In this site rest the remains of Ali Ibn Hamz, niece of shah of Cheragh. Poco2 18:56, 19 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Poco2 18:56, 19 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --XRay talk 19:02, 19 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose The crop doesn't suit me - the chandelier (or whatever it is that hangs down from the ceiling) is cut too abruptly. It's a tricky building to photograph, I guess... Oh and notice those air-condition vents! Those are crazy. --GeXeS (talk) 20:19, 19 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Dэя-Бøяg 01:33, 20 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Certainly an extraordinary ceiling, unfortunately the composition is not great and the air-conds really ugly. I agree with GeXeS this chandelier abruptly sectioned in the middle makes the image looking like cut. It's a main element of the picture, since located in the center, and also of a particular color clearer than the background, so becoming intriguing and eye-catching. Concerning the A/Cs, definitely not your fault, but the architects could have invented another solution since here they clearly spoil the beautiful art work -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:09, 20 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support--Ermell (talk) 07:40, 20 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per others.--Peulle (talk) 07:47, 20 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - Works for me including the air conditioners, though I'm more in agreement with GeXeS. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:55, 20 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 10:45, 20 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support The cropped chandelier isn't a deal breaker, as it's rather small and can go unnoticed. Overall, I find no better image to demonstrate what Aldous Huxley wrote in "Heaven and Hell" about how religious architecture has, throughout history, emulated the experience of taking hallucinogens. Daniel Case (talk) 00:24, 21 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --The NMI User (talk) 05:32, 21 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support. It's a really hard photo. --Gnosis (talk) 05:45, 21 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Per Basile Morin. -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 05:57, 21 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment - Poco, especially since FP search is again not working tonight, I think you should mention in this nomination which other photos of this mausoleum are FPs. I believe there are 3 or 4 already. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:21, 21 August 2018 (UTC)

File:Caldera de las Cañadas 03.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 28 Aug 2018 at 18:11:59 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Roques de García, Roque Cinchado, and Mount Teide, Tenerife
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Panoramas
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Llez - uploaded by Llez - nominated by Llez -- Llez (talk) 18:11, 19 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Llez (talk) 18:11, 19 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Regards, Christoph Braun (talk) 18:31, 19 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Bad light --Tomascastelazo (talk) 18:44, 19 August 2018 (UTC)
    • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment I tried to improve it --Llez (talk) 20:41, 19 August 2018 (UTC)
      • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment It is the time of day, the image is flat, no shadows... this type of picture is better taken at after sunrise or before sunset. --Tomascastelazo (talk) 00:16, 20 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - Works for me. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:56, 20 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support I like that lone rock, it's like it's showing the finger. Kinda also reminds me of the troll dick. --Peulle (talk) 09:59, 20 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support The light is good. Everything is well lit. Maybe the light at day´s boarder has a special mood, but the normal midday light is often better for instructive or encyclopedial use. By the way I like the midday mood too. --Milseburg (talk) 11:30, 20 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Qualified support per most others; there's purple fringing on the rock and the ridgeline but it's eminently fixable. Daniel Case (talk) 18:20, 20 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 20:02, 20 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --The NMI User (talk) 05:32, 21 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 07:39, 21 August 2018 (UTC)

File:Rathaus der Stadt Wanfried, Hessen, Deutschland IMG 6238-HDR edit.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 28 Aug 2018 at 16:53:27 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Wanfried town hall
The wires are permanently attached and used for displaying banners during local festivities (like so). I wouldn't consider retouching them. I went for a slightly brighter exposure to compensate for the harsh midday sun. Regards, Christoph Braun (talk) 18:59, 20 August 2018 (UTC)

File:Feu d'artifice 2016-07-14 Loire Tours 2.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 28 Aug 2018 at 08:08:29 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Fireworks for Bastille Day 2016 in Tours
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Antoine Montulé - uploaded by User:Ant°AM - nominated by Ant°AM -- Ant°AM (talk) 08:08, 19 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Ant°AM (talk) 08:08, 19 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Nice.--Peulle (talk) 12:34, 19 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 12:59, 19 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Weak Symbol support vote.svg Support Sharpness could be better. --XRay talk 19:02, 19 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Sorry. Difficult subject, but there's too much lingering smoke from earlier fireworks. Timing is perfect for the top one (the biggest one), but it's cropped. The middle fireworks from earlier in time distract from the frame, and the bottom small lots are partially hidden behind the trees. Overall, good photo of fireworks, but not FP for me. -- KTC (talk) 22:12, 19 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per KTC. Daniel Case (talk) 03:04, 20 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Weak oppose per XRay and KTC -- Basile Morin (talk) 03:46, 20 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 19:59, 20 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --The NMI User (talk) 05:30, 21 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per KTC. Nice capture and a pretty but not quite outstanding composition, IMO. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:26, 21 August 2018 (UTC)

File:Hosta 'Grand Slam'. (d.j.b.) 02.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 27 Aug 2018 at 16:54:26 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Hosta 'Grand Slam'

File:Jëuf de Crespëina Cir Chedul Parc Naturel Puez.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 27 Aug 2018 at 09:26:49 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

The Crespëina pass with the Val de Chedul on the left and the Puez mountains on the right. The Puez-Geisler Nature Park, Dolomites UNESCO World Heritage Site.

File:Hotel 3 Nagas with old red Citroen at blue hour in Luang Prabang.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 27 Aug 2018 at 01:42:46 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Hotel 3 Nagas with old red Citroen at blue hour in Luang Prabang
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture#Laos
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created - uploaded - nominated by Basile Morin -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:42, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:42, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --The NMI User (talk) 03:47, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - Crop is a little tight on the right, but a charming photo. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:10, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Great mood and composition. Looks a little bit oversharpened (sharpening halos almost everywhere) but that's a minor flaw IMO. --Code (talk) 05:48, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Basotxerri (talk) 07:07, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Cart (talk) 09:00, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Sure, --Podzemnik (talk) 09:53, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Lovely light. Good control of the noise level.--Peulle (talk) 10:45, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 11:10, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - Benh (talk) 12:24, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 12:55, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Nice compo --Poco2 17:59, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Llez (talk) 18:04, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Ermell (talk) 20:57, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose What is this picture of? An empty restaurant? A well lit building? A beautiful old car in a no contrast zone? --Tomascastelazo (talk) 21:07, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Seriously Cart, what does the image advance in the way of culture, knowledge? It is beautifully exposed, but 35% of the image area is unusable. The great car is lost in a no contrast zone, it could have been moved to the front of the building to great effect. So besides good exposure in the afternoon, I really do not find any redeeming encyclopedic value. --Tomascastelazo (talk) 18:49, 19 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Yes Tomas, I'm very serious. Commons is a collection of all kind of pictures, not only encyclopedic ones. If you look at the rules on COM:FPC, you can see that is says: "7. Remember, the goal of the Wikimedia Commons project is to provide a central repository for free images to be used by all Wikimedia projects, including possible future projects. This is not simply a repository for Wikipedia images, so images should not be judged here on their suitability for that project." That means that all sorts of beautiful, artistic and outstanding photos are very welcome here. I'm sure that a skilled photographer like you have plenty of photos that could come into consideration. I would love to see some of your non-encyclopedic photos nominated here. They will be preserved for all those Wikimedia Projects we have no idea about yet. Excellent encyclopedic photos are easy to take, non-encyclopedic are much harder, that is why we see so few of them here. As you can see, the rest of the voters know this and that is why so many users have voted for this. --Cart (talk) 19:04, 19 August 2018 (UTC)
* Pictogram-voting-question.svg Question Good thinking! Does this also apply to public health related photographs? --Tomascastelazo (talk) 17:46, 20 August 2018 (UTC)
  • As long as it follows the rules of COM:PEOPLE. Health-related photos often include people and if they are identifiable, they should give their consent since such photos can be rather intrusive. --Cart (talk) 10:29, 21 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Btw, did you know that there is already a Wiki-project called Wikibooks? This is the sort of image that would make a beautiful book cover if someone made a book there about moods or any other subject that needs a calm classic blue hour photo. Or if Wikivoyage (a Wiki travel guide) needs a nice photo of this hotel. Only your imagination will set the limits for where a photo can be used. --Cart (talk) 19:28, 19 August 2018 (UTC)

File:Ranularia sarcostoma 01.JPG[edit]

Voting period ends on 27 Aug 2018 at 00:13:29 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Ranularia sarcostoma

File:Cantina Hussong in Ensenada, Baja California, Mexico.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 26 Aug 2018 at 17:36:11 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Cantina Hussong in Ensenada, Baja California, Mexico
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info All by -- Tomascastelazo (talk) 17:36, 17 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Tomascastelazo (talk) 17:36, 17 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Oh yes! So a late night indoors grainy photo, but who cares! Guys, this is art. The crowd in the photo emulates the painting in the background and it brings to mind all those murals in Los Angeles of celebrities like [1] or even paintings in the style of Nighthawks. I just love it! I also see that Ensenada is still as swinging as when I was there back in the 70s. :) --Cart (talk) 18:28, 17 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support absolutely per Cart --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 18:55, 17 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Ezarateesteban 00:37, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --The NMI User (talk) 03:47, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Technically the lens is not adapted, and artistically the photographer is intrusive. This telephoto zoom lens is not made for interior shots. At f/4, the image is blurry because 1/40s handheld is too long. Canon sells fixed focal lenses specially designed for this kind of photography, like the 50mm f/1.4 for example, providing much better results with less noise and more sharpness in the same lighting conditions. Here the people are moving and the lady wearing glasses is really ghostly. The photographer is highly visible in the mirror and drawing attention of two other people in the foreground, becomes distracting. Not everybody care, but at least the lady in black and the bearded man seem to wonder "What's happening here with a camera ? Does one want my face in picture ? -- Basile Morin (talk) 04:54, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment I don't think the photographer is distracting here. He's well hidden behind his camera so you can't see his eyes or face, in this photo he's a nobody. Yes, people are aware they are being photographed, could probably have said something if they were uncomfortable about it and we would not see this photo here. It's not like the photographer is skulking with his mobile in a sly way. If you dress up for a night out today, you are aware that there are cameras everywhere. I also think that the wow and artistry overcomes all technical nitpicking here. It's an impressionist photo. For some strange reason we even create blurs of water or panning blur, but anything else moving is intolerable. --Cart (talk) 10:39, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
  • The main subject of this photograph is the photographer. All the action is centered here, around this camera. "What's this photographer doing ?" is the main question coming before we understand there's a mirror behind. So "not distracting" and "well hidden" couldn't be more wrong, IMO.The fact that there are cameras everywhere today is absolutely not relevant to justify the intrusion here, and I wish these cameras can take better pictures Face-grin.svg. 6400 ISO is far too noisy, and in the context the level of blurriness suggests a drunk operator -- Basile Morin (talk) 11:38, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Please do not make assumptions about the state of the operator/photographer, keep it factual without personal attacks. You should know the rules better by now. --Cart (talk) 12:14, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Yes I think this is an obvious feeling you normally have when you see a photographer taking part of the party and shooting among so many bottles. I'm not saying this is the reality and I don't Face-surprise.svg "attack" anyone. I specified "in the context", since here the technical problem of this lens opening at f/4, creating noise & blur, gives this feeling. Even if the operator has only drunk water, that's the natural thought coming in mind unfortunately -- Basile Morin (talk) 12:33, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
  • You have a very active and vivid imagination, it makes for great photos but it can sometimes be less good when put into text on this forum. --Cart (talk) 13:02, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Not sure this is my imagination to suppose the photographer came here to get a drink. But that can be discussed -- Basile Morin (talk) 13:14, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Doesn't work for me. Basile putting into words my thoughts better than I ever can. -- KTC (talk) 11:43, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Reducing this image to its technical shortcomings doesn't do it justice. Unlike most static architecture or landscape shots this scene can't be easily re-created. While most images that make it to FP are of outstanding technical quality, very few of them tell a story. And I think that's an achievement of its own right. At first I was opposed to the idea of the photographer being part of the image. On second thought Tomas' incidental self portrait helps the viewer to understand that the scence was taken against a mirror. I'd also like to point out that I wholeheartedly disagree with Basile's unnecessary personal attack. This kind of behaviour is unfitting of a frequent contributor to COM:FPC. Regards, Christoph Braun (talk) 13:08, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol delete vote.svg  If you don't understand the idea I explain, it's not complicated. Imagine a picture from a boat with the horizon tilted. What do you guess ? The photographer is sick or the boat induces this tilt ? The second solution probably. So that's the same here, except that the problem is created by the equipment -- Basile Morin (talk) 13:23, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose I'm not really wowed by the scene, I'm afraid. The left crop bothers me, as does the sharp light at the top.--Peulle (talk) 14:45, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per others, although I give Cart a lot of credit for her vigorous defense of the image. Daniel Case (talk) 19:12, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support like a movie still --Neptuul (talk) 22:31, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose The idea is good, but I don't think the execution is at the FP level: the colors are off, the left crop is too short (painting and woman cut), the flare is disturbing, etc. Regards, Yann (talk) 18:43, 19 August 2018 (UTC)

File:Ciudad del Cabo desde Cabeza de León, Sudáfrica, 2018-07-22, DD 20-23 PAN.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 26 Aug 2018 at 13:51:28 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Panoramic view of Cape Town viewed from Lion's Head, South Africa
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Cityscapes
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Panoramic view of Cape Town viewed from Lion's Head, South Africa. All by me, Poco2 13:51, 17 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Poco2 13:51, 17 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment I´m not sure about horizon alignment. It's too straight considering that the mountains in the distance seem actually to become higher from left to right.--Milseburg (talk) 19:13, 17 August 2018 (UTC)
    I'm not sure about your comment, Milseburg, looking at the bottom half of the images buildings look fine. Do you expect more inclination of the horizon? should the left are be higher or lower? I haven't edited the image after the stitching --Poco2 07:45, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
    I would expect the horizon to increase from left to right in the distance with the mountains. At present, the distant mountains in the middle part of the picture appear at the same elevation as the lower mountains on the left. In this picture, the course of the horizon is more natural for me. On the other hand, in this one the horizon looks similary arched. --Milseburg (talk) 10:11, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
    Ok, I understand what you talk about now, Milseburg, but I don't believe that this is a problem. The image that you say looks good is a portion of the others and in that area the mountains in the back are actually higher that those being closer. But that does not apply (and it is consistent) to the mountains in the area over Signal hill and further to the left. I'm always willing to improve my pictures but to be honest I don't think there is any problem here. I checked other panoramic views from that spot in the Internet and I cannot see a problem comparing to this or this one. --Poco2 14:50, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
    The "quality" of the other panos you mentioned are out of question, but a FP need a correct horizon. See here, how it is calculated by peakfinder. In comparison, the horizon in your pano is bent slightly down to the right. By the way it would be nice, if you could add the coordinates and direction of viewing to your image. --Milseburg (talk) 18:57, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Milseburg yes, the horizon was not straight, or better said the image was tilted. I applied a 0,5 degree tilt. Not sure whether that mitigates your concerns. I also added metadata (template location), what do you mean with "direction of viewing"? which template do you use for that? --Poco2 19:19, 20 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Weak support I wondered how long it would be after Wikimania before we started seeing pictures like this (I've uploaded some too, so far from the hotel roof). I'll reserve judgement on the horizon question, and it's wonderfully detailed; I think I can find my hotel (the other one, not the conference hotel). However, I do wish that distracting shadow of Lion's Head itself weren't there. Daniel Case (talk) 05:49, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Llez (talk) 18:03, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Dэя-Бøяg 01:36, 20 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 10:38, 20 August 2018 (UTC)

File:Dülmen, Dülmener Sommer, Open-Air-Konzert -- 2018 -- 9316-18.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 26 Aug 2018 at 13:44:14 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Preparations for the open-air concert of the Dülmen Summer at Wiesmann Sports Cars, Dülmen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture#Germany
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created and uploaded and nominated by XRay -- XRay talk 13:44, 17 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- XRay talk 13:44, 17 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info For your information: It isn't monochrom. It's a tone-mapped HDRI with a algorithm for a realistic illustration, the building is illuminated inside with different color. --XRay talk 17:06, 17 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support dramatic "monochrome". Plus yellow. Works --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 17:01, 17 August 2018 (UTC)
BTW: It is natural, not colorkey. So it looks like monochrom, but it isn't. --XRay talk 17:03, 17 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Oops, I did not intend to imply that. It's obvious that the image is not really monochrome: there's shades of red in the sky, a red traffic sign, the blueish roof, etc. Face-smile.svg --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 17:27, 17 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Looks sort of ... alien. :) --Cart (talk) 18:57, 17 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Impressive. Do you have a few pixels left on the far right? A small piece of the wood construction seems to be missing. --Milseburg (talk) 19:21, 17 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Very impressive. --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 00:32, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- King of ♠ 02:04, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 02:08, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --The NMI User (talk) 03:45, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral The highlights in the spaces between the lower clouds are blown, or almost ... is it possible this could be addressed? Daniel Case (talk) 05:40, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
  • ✓ Done I've improved this (a little bit). Thank you for your advice. --XRay talk 05:49, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
Symbol support vote.svg Support now. I know it's not perfect, and probably can't ever be, but those areas aren't the subject of the image, and they're very small. Daniel Case (talk) 19:10, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Code (talk) 05:45, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - Very interesting picture, though I'd second Milseburg's question. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:19, 18 August 2018 (UTC)

File:Gamebird (27147095490).jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 26 Aug 2018 at 09:40:02 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Narrowboat Gamebird
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Tim Green on Flickr - uploaded by INeverCry - nominated by Gbawden -- Gbawden (talk) 09:40, 17 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Gbawden (talk) 09:40, 17 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose While it is a pleasant landscape photo, I think the sharpness and technical quality of it is below what I would like in an FP. The gray plastic storm cover also looks rather ugly as a main feature in a photo of a nice traditional canal boat. --Cart (talk) 10:39, 17 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose - Very gray, composition not IMO great. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 14:28, 17 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per others; also overexposed-looking even given the fast ISO. Daniel Case (talk) 03:30, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per Cart, Ikan Kekek, and Daniel Case --The NMI User (talk) 03:45, 18 August 2018 (UTC)

File:Daikanransha.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 25 Aug 2018 at 20:36:57 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Detail of Daikanransha, Ferris wheel in Odaiba, Tokyo, Japan.
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created, uploaded and nominated by Gzzz -- Gzzz zz 20:36, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral -- Gzzz zz 20:36, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support You have to wonder what's going on with No 8. :) --Cart (talk) 21:19, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
    • You're right ! I had seen the curtain, but not the bloody hand marks ! Gzzz zz 21:42, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
  • There's another crazy car in this photo of the wheel. Intriguing. :) --Cart (talk) 21:59, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
  • It's just a full glazed (and air conditioned !) car. There are 4 of that kind on the wheel and the ride is more expensive ! Gzzz zz 22:14, 16 August 2018 (UTC)

File:ET Amhara asv2018-02 img068 Lake Tana at Bahir Dar.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 25 Aug 2018 at 14:54:11 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Two hippos at Lake Tana

File:Sailor directs an EA-18G during snow storm in Japan (8367035559).jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period ends on 25 Aug 2018 at 11:15:20 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION


Confirmed results:
Result: 11 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Basile Morin (talk) 13:15, 21 August 2018 (UTC)
This image will be added to the FP category: Objects/Vehicles/Air_transport

File:PAL118773 Basis Joigny.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period ends on 25 Aug 2018 at 08:01:14 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Joigny and the banks of the Yonne river, France
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Robert Palomba - uploaded by Locaboat holidays - nominated by Dmottl -- Dmitry A. Mottl (talk) 08:01, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Dmitry A. Mottl (talk) 08:01, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment I'm not sure about the policy here. This and a bunch of other photos of these boats seems to have been uploaded by the boat company, perhaps to get some publicity. At the very least the user name Locaboat holidays, is not according to COM:UPOL#Inappropriate usernames since it is a company name. --Cart (talk) 09:54, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose I'm not really wowed by this; the light is fairly ordinary and it just looks like a normal tourist shot someone took while walking along the marina. Nothing spectacular.--Peulle (talk) 11:25, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose - I agree. And the town is a lot more interesting and a lot prettier than the boats. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:25, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose because while I actually like the image, the metadata attributes the copyright not to the company that uploaded it but the photographer it hired. I don't know how this work for hire thing works in France but there is enough doubt here as to whether this is truly a free image. Daniel Case (talk) 18:27, 17 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per Peulle, Ikan Kekek, and Daniel Case --The NMI User (talk) 03:43, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per others. --Basotxerri (talk) 07:15, 18 August 2018 (UTC)


Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--Basile Morin (talk) 13:14, 21 August 2018 (UTC)

File:Grutte Griene, eiland in het natuurreservaat “Sneekermeer”. (d.j.b.) 04.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 23 Aug 2018 at 17:38:18 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Industry Windmill.
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Maybe this picture is too simple for FP. It is a simple metal mill which dominates the water level of Grutte Griene, island in the nature reserve "Sneekermeer". I personally like this picture because of its simplicity. All by -- Famberhorst (talk) 17:38, 14 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Famberhorst (talk) 17:38, 14 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 01:57, 15 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Sorry, not enough wow for me.--Peulle (talk) 12:26, 15 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Ezarateesteban 17:21, 15 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Σπάρτακος (talk) 18:46, 15 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Daniel Case (talk) 02:06, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose - Good QI but doesn't do enough for me for FP. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:23, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Per Ikan.--Ermell (talk) 07:41, 17 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 10:36, 20 August 2018 (UTC)

Alternative, another version[edit]

Grutte Griene, eiland in het natuurreservaat “Sneekermeer”. (d.j.b.) 05.jpg

File:Siem Reap, Victory Gate.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 22 Aug 2018 at 21:50:35 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Angkor Thom, South gate
  • ✓ Done centered shot without any vehicles in the background, thank you for your advice. Regards.--Pierre André (talk) 19:41, 15 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Washed-out sky, lots of purple fringing and generally static composition. I know it wasn't taken with a DP/S but it reminds me of so many of my earlier pictures for Wikimedia when I used one. Daniel Case (talk) 21:55, 15 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per Daniel Case --The NMI User (talk) 03:38, 18 August 2018 (UTC)

File:PIA07763 Rhea full globe5.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 22 Aug 2018 at 08:10:31 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Cassini mosaic of Saturn's moon Rhea
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment - The bottom doesn't look fixed to me. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:46, 15 August 2018 (UTC)
  • ✓ Done Try to make a little bit darker instead of fixing borders. --The NMI User (talk) 10:11, 15 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Why are you avoiding fixing the borders? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 14:39, 15 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Don't know how to fix borders. --The NMI User (talk) 05:14, 21 August 2018 (UTC)

File:Detail of the Central Branch of Greater Victoria Public Library, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada 01.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 22 Aug 2018 at 04:34:08 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture#Canada
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info All by me. I like the play of the sun and shadows here together with the reflection of unusual construction of the glass roof. -- Podzemnik (talk) 04:34, 13 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Excellent. I was making a similar comment before reading the line above -- Basile Morin (talk) 06:58, 13 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support truly excellent --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 10:50, 13 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Basotxerri (talk) 14:45, 13 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Nice rule of thirds execution. Interesting use of shadows, highlights, reflections and structure in a single shot. Well done. Regards, Christoph Braun (talk) 15:54, 13 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support per Martin -- P999 (talk) 16:40, 13 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - Really interesting to look at. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:21, 13 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose - Dirty glasses, muddy reflections. I don't see anything interesting. Not the FP for me. --KSK (talk) 04:41, 15 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support The image seems to be finding some order it cannot explain to us in its chaotic rectilinearity. Daniel Case (talk) 18:47, 15 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 19:58, 20 August 2018 (UTC)

File:Granite cliff with feldspar crystals in Loddebo 2.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 21 Aug 2018 at 20:09:46 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Granite cliff with feldspar crystals in Loddebo
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places#Sweden
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info For some strange reason I think the portrait orientation creates more drama here than landscape. At first I wasn't too happy about the old handrail, but then I realized it provides size reference. All by me, -- Cart (talk) 20:09, 12 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Cart (talk) 20:09, 12 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:33, 12 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support This one works really well. Patterns, lines, clouds, colours. Very well done! --Code (talk) 21:29, 12 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Mild Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose - Very good subject, but I demur on the composition, as I don't think the sky is helping. Either a purely blue sky or a sky with something going on in the upper left corner would probably help the composition more, IMO. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:28, 13 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Crispy. Good light and colors. I also like the composition with the clouds. Positive impression at first sight with the thumbnail, then confirmed at full size -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:50, 13 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 10:47, 13 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:31, 13 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support per Code -- P999 (talk) 20:59, 13 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Per Basile Poco2 19:24, 14 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support A nice juxtaposition of the orange granite and the cool blue sky. Daniel Case (talk) 15:18, 15 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Llez (talk) 16:07, 15 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Tomascastelazo (talk) 17:27, 17 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Dэя-Бøяg 01:39, 20 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support--Famberhorst (talk) 18:12, 20 August 2018 (UTC)

File:Ледяные парусники.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 21 Aug 2018 at 10:40:22 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Before sunrise on Lake Baikal
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created and uploaded by Discoverynn - nominated by SKas -- KSK (talk) 10:40, 12 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- KSK (talk) 10:40, 12 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Resolution could be better, but very nice composition. --XRay talk 11:41, 12 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Resolution is too low for me; 6 megapixels from a 36MP camera. Images should not be downsized and I can't see a good reason why this one should be. There's also the adage that "all sunsets are beautiful", so while this is a pretty picture in itself, there are so many pretty sunsets on Commons that an FP must give us something extra special. This doesn't, since it's so small.--Peulle (talk) 11:54, 12 August 2018 (UTC)
    Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment @Peulle and others. The full size is uploaded. 34 megapixels are enough? Please, look at the bigger size. --KSK (talk) 10:24, 14 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Still not quite sure. I'll go with Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral.--Peulle (talk) 14:26, 15 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per Peulle. It's a very nice idea but the execution of it plus processing could be better. --Cart (talk) 20:25, 12 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per XRay, but mostly per Peulle. Gerifalte Del Sabana 23:59, 12 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per Peulle --The NMI User (talk) 08:57, 13 August 2018 (UTC)
    @The NMI User. The full size is uploaded. Please, look at the bigger size. --KSK (talk) 09:20, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Regretful oppose per others; it's a great image that unfortunately falls apart technically at the edges. Daniel Case (talk) 04:26, 15 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support I love Baikal lake. - Benh (talk) 06:38, 15 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Good size now but it still doesn't wow me. Btw, it looks tilted to me. Ok, we have no real horizon, but the opposite shoreline is far enough to be used as level gauge. --Cart (talk) 09:33, 15 August 2018 (UTC)
    ✓ Done--KSK (talk) 12:09, 15 August 2018 (UTC)
  • KSK, I Symbol support vote.svg Support, conditional on your fixing one dust spot that's on the right in the sky a bit above the lake. Otherwise, the photo with the ice forms is beautiful and special. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:12, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
    ✓ Done Dust spot removed.--KSK (talk) 09:20, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support A lot of wow, and good quality. Yann (talk) 13:30, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose The motif is outstanding, but die technical quality is below FP requirement, I guess especially regarding the loss of sharpness towards the edges. --Milseburg (talk) 16:20, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Good work.--Naturephotographers (talk) 17:01, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Tomascastelazo (talk) 17:29, 17 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Dэя-Бøяg 01:39, 20 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 10:35, 20 August 2018 (UTC)


Confirmed results:
Result: 10 support, 4 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /--Basile Morin (talk) 13:13, 21 August 2018 (UTC)
This image will be added to the FP category: Places/Natural