Commons:Kandidate für exzellänti Bilder
Alemannisch | asturianu | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | English | فارسی | español | suomi | français | galego | हिन्दी | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lëtzebuergesch | молдовеняскэ | norsk bokmål | português | polski | română | русский | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | українська | Tiếng Việt | 粵語 | 中文(中国大陆) | 中文(简体) | 中文(繁體) | հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia |+/−
Uff derre Site findsch Bilder, wo d Allmänd-Nutzer für bsunders güet halte und sällewäg in d Galery vo de Exzellänte Bilder uffgnoh hän. Stimm mit ab!
Obacht: D Abstimmig betrifft nit s Bild vom Dag!
Formalitäte
[edit]Bild vorschla
[edit]Wenn dr e Bild gfunde häsch, wo dr für bsunders glunge haltsch, no chasch dem Gleich folge und's yfiege. Dodezüe müesch kei Chonto ha; Vorschläg ßin au vo anonyme Nutzer willcho.
Bitte stell im Fall vo-n-re Nominierig unbedingt sicher, dass s Bild e geigneti Bildbeschrybig und Lizänz hät.
Abstimmigsregle
[edit]- De Abstimmigs-Zitruum isch 14 Dag. Am 15. Dag wird s Ergebnis festgstellt.
- Au anonymi Nutzer chönne e Bild vorschla und an de Diskussione deilneh
- Stimmabgabe vo IP-Adrässe werre nit zällt.
E Kandidat wird in d Galery vo de uszeichnete Bilder uffgnoh, wenn
- 's e geigneti Lizänz hät
- Mindestens 5 Nutzer defür ßin
- d Azahl Pro-Stimme mindestens doppelt so groß isch wie die vo de Kontra-Stimme (neutrali Stimme zälle nit).
Kandidate
[edit]Gstimmt cha mit {{Pro}}
(defür), {{Contra}}
(defür) und {{Neutral}}
.
Featured picture candidates
[edit]File:Utagawa Yoshikazu - 亜墨利加國蒸気車往來 (The Comings and Goings of an American Steamship) (1861).jpg
[edit]Voting period ends on 4 Oct 2024 at 00:24:01 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Non-photographic media/People#Groups
- Info Interesting example of yokohama-e, works of ukiyo-e depicting non-Japanese that emerged following the opening of Yokohama to foreigners. Created by Utagawa Yoshikazu - uploaded and nominated by Crisco 1492 -- — Chris Woodrich (talk) 00:24, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- — Chris Woodrich (talk) 00:24, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 3 Oct 2024 at 20:29:55 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Thailand
- Info High resolution, sharp photo of interesting place with beautiful light + colours. No FPs of this place, and this is the only QI. created by BigDom - uploaded by BigDom - nominated by Cmao20 -- Cmao20 (talk) 20:29, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Cmao20 (talk) 20:29, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 00:29, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 3 Oct 2024 at 20:20:24 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Sports#Individual sports
- Info created by Shougissime - uploaded by Shougissime - nominated by Shougissime -- Shougissime (talk) 20:20, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Shougissime (talk) 20:20, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
- Comment - Would reframing this to avoid the flag/banner help? I see that the exposure is a bit high (highlights on helmet), but not to the point that I'd oppose. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 00:29, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 3 Oct 2024 at 17:34:13
- Info It is rare that I nominate an image for delisting but this one struck me in the category as obviously well below the standard. Not even 3 megapixels for a very common bird and nothing is really sharp, IMO not QI let alone FP. Barely passed in 2007. Also downsampled to make it appear sharper (see original nomination) which is against guidelines. I will soon nominate this as a replacement. (Original nomination)
- Delist -- Cmao20 (talk) 17:34, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
- Delist per nom. BigDom (talk) 00:07, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 3 Oct 2024 at 17:04:17 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes
- Info created by Mounir Neddi - uploaded by Mounir Neddi - nominated by Mounir Neddi -- Mounir Neddi (talk) 17:04, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Mounir Neddi (talk) 17:04, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Apologies but the amount of noise, the low depth of field, and the lack of definition and sharpness on the bird mean that this is some way short of FP, even though the composition is good. I'd recommend you have a look at similar pictures recently promoted in the gallery to get an idea of the image quality required of FP wildlife photos. Cmao20 (talk) 17:23, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose and also not enough space on all sides. Yann (talk) 17:32, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 3 Oct 2024 at 13:45:07 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Italy
- Info [Valadier] (Giuseppe) was a neoclassicist architect and designer and urban planner in Italy. Looking at the list of his works, there is not a work by Valadier that is not simply gorgeous. This is the Cathedral of Urbino's dome (1789-1810). Created, uploaded and nominated by Terragio67 -- Terragio67 (talk) 13:45, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Terragio67 (talk) 13:45, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 15:14, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 15:57, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 3 Oct 2024 at 11:47:39 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects
- Info created by Riad Salih - uploaded by Riad Salih - nominated by Riad Salih -- Riad Salih (talk) 11:47, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Riad Salih (talk) 11:47, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Great, interesting motif but IMO too noisy (EXIF data indicates ISO 5000, would explain why) and I don't like the fact that it seems to have been pasted onto a plain white background, I'd prefer a more natural or gradient background Cmao20 (talk) 13:05, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 3 Oct 2024 at 10:50:28 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Lepidoptera
- Info all by Anitava Roy -- Anitava Roy (talk) 10:50, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Anitava Roy (talk) 10:50, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Good composition Cmao20 (talk) 13:03, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 15:58, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 00:33, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 3 Oct 2024 at 10:29:02 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Historical#1940-1949
- Info created by unknown photographer from the Auschwitz Erkennungsdienst, restored, uploaded, and nominated by Yann -- Yann (talk) 10:29, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
- Info "Selection" of Hungarian Jews on the ramp at Auschwitz-II-Birkenau in German-occupied Poland, May/June 1944, during the final phase of the Holocaust. Jews were sent either to work or to the gas chamber. The photograph is part of the collection known as the Auschwitz Album, which was donated to Yad Vashem by Lili Jacob, a survivor, who found it in the Mittelbau-Dora concentration camp in 1945. See Auschwitz Album, Yad Vashem: "The Auschwitz Album is the only surviving visual evidence of the process leading to mass murder at Auschwitz-Birkenau."
- Support Historical image with high educational value, restored. FP on English Wikipedia. -- Yann (talk) 10:29, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support This is a very important testimony that should be promoted because of its significance to contemporary history. The technical quality should be disregarded in view of its significance. In the last 15 years I have visited Auschwitz and Birkenau several times and have studied the dark German history intensively. It is important to keep the memory alive in order to pass on the lessons to future generations. -- Radomianin (talk) 11:28, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Hard to look at, but that's why we should look at it Cmao20 (talk) 13:02, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support – A disturbing, but important photograph. —Bruce1eetalk 13:14, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Thi (talk) 13:32, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support per above... ... --Terragio67 (talk) 14:15, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 00:33, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 3 Oct 2024 at 09:45:37 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Castles and fortifications
- Info Ksar Aït Benhaddou, Marocco (أيت بن حدو، المغرب). My shot. -- Mile (talk) 09:45, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Mile (talk) 09:45, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Good composition + colours Cmao20 (talk) 13:01, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Tmv (talk) 13:58, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Great vibrance and composition. Terragio67 (talk) 14:10, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Your shot is a beautiful shot.--Famberhorst (talk) 15:41, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 00:34, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 05:48, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 3 Oct 2024 at 02:42:29 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Food_and_drink#Food
- Info All by -- Wilfredor (talk) 02:42, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
- Neutral The composition is IMO spoiled a bit by the line of bottles along the bottom Cmao20 (talk) 13:00, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 3 Oct 2024 at 00:31:35 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#United_States
- Info created by Frank Schulenburg – uploaded by Frank Schulenburg – nominated by Frank Schulenburg --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 00:31, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 00:31, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Lovely facade and nostalgic 80s look. The slope of the street not only causes discomfort, but also inevitably draws my gaze to the white line and the dirt accumulated on the pavement. Despite the many eye-catching elements of the facade, the place fails to stand out against the visual distractions of the building behind it. However, what really makes feel bad is the complete absence of people at the entrance, giving the impression of a place abandoned or on the verge of closing. Additionally, the crooked white sign on the right distracts. In summary, many elements, but none strong enough. --Wilfredor (talk) 01:46, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Good selfportrait Frank, i would support if you clean a bit of CA. Annoted. --Mile (talk) 07:10, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cool Cmao20 (talk) 12:59, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 13:15, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 15:38, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 00:35, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 2 Oct 2024 at 18:37:23 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Architecture/Castles_and_fortifications#Italy
- Info Mesola Castle is one of the 19 prestigious residences of the [Este] family, also called Delizie degli Este (Este's delights). It is located in the municipality of [Mesola] in the province of Ferrara, in the north-eastern part of Italy. To all intents and purposes it is a fortified palace, difficult to photograph due to the almost never cooperative light, with imposing dimensions for the small town that hosts it. it is almost 25 meters high with a square architectural layout with four crenellated square towers at the corners. I assure you that the amazement of having this building in front of you was certainly greater than this photo. C. U. N. by Terragio67 -- Terragio67 (talk) 18:37, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
Support-- Terragio67 (talk) 18:37, 23 September 2024 (UTC)- Support Amazing! Nice light, good image quality, superb resolution, and satisfying composition. Cmao20 (talk) 19:01, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Cmao20. -- Radomianin (talk) 22:12, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose -- Quality is superb, but the castle itself looks distorted and unnatural due to perspective correction. Sorry. -- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 00:57, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose More pic you put into panorama harder is to solve lines, especially looking upward. Why dont you put some angle and make it more natural. --Mile (talk) 06:52, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
Alternative three points perspective version
[edit]- Info According to @Екатерина Борисова and @Mile remarks, I decided to create a new thre points perspective version. @Cmao20 and @Radomianin , please, I kindly ask you again to check and evaluate this new version too. Thank you all. --Terragio67 (talk) 12:54, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support I don't really care that much about perspective correction in an example like this, as long as consistent and symmetrical. Both approaches have advantages and drawbacks. Cmao20 (talk) 12:59, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Regarding the first version, I admit that the optical effect seems exaggerated at first glance, but the geometric shape shows almost straight lines after perspective correction. Nevertheless, I find the wider version more pleasing in its composition than the alternative. -- Radomianin (talk) 13:08, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support I think beter, at least not loking as flower. If subject went to much high some middle lane perhaps help. Suppose crop also help. --Mile (talk) 14:43, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support This one looks better, The top photo seems a bit too steep.--Famberhorst (talk) 15:37, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 2 Oct 2024 at 17:57:22 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Settlements#Switzerland
- Info No FPs of this picturesque and well-known place. Bit of noise on the hills but I don't mind when the composition and light are this good. created by Elpi77 - uploaded by Elpi77 - nominated by Cmao20 -- Cmao20 (talk) 17:57, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Cmao20 (talk) 17:57, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 18:22, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Terragio67 (talk) 18:57, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 22:20, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 22:21, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 06:02, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
- Comment I miss coordinates and EXIF data. Not sure whether it's a drone photo. If it is, it should be categorized as such. --A.Savin 08:39, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 12:10, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support But see comment from A.Savin.--Famberhorst (talk) 15:33, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
- Comment I added coordinates, but there's not a lot I can do about EXIF. Cmao20 (talk) 16:08, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you very much for your effort.--Famberhorst (talk) 16:52, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
- Hmm, how do you come to this geolocation? Either the photographer was standing on the ground -- but then, looking at Google streetview, I don't think this location is correct (see the slopes at the left). Or this is indeed an aerial/drone shot -- but then not only this location is possible and without EXIF and response from the photographer we never can be sure, right? --A.Savin 22:08, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
- I'm quite sure that the houses in the picture are located in a place named Rivaz 15 kilometers North from Lausanne. The car park depicted is next to the Centrale Hidroelectrique le Forestay. According to the panorama's background, the camera location is compatibile with a place named Forestay, located in the south part of Chexbres, maybe, Chemin de la Plantaz. Can you double check, please? Terragio67 (talk) 03:34, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 2 Oct 2024 at 14:35:15 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic media/Printed#Posters and advertisements
- Info created by GTC, uploaded and nominated by Yann
- Support Huge resolution of a poster of the 1900 Paris World Fair. -- Yann (talk) 14:35, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support.--Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 15:09, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cool, I can't view it in full size but it looks very sharp at 6000px across. Cmao20 (talk) 17:59, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Terragio67 (talk) 19:01, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 06:04, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 15:30, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 00:36, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 2 Oct 2024 at 13:11:36 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious_buildings#Germany
- Info Main nave of St. Ursula, Munich, Germany. The so called "Schwabing Cathedral" was inaugurated in 1897 and its exterior appearance is similar to the ta’ Pinu Basilica (Malta). c/u/n Poco a poco (talk) 13:11, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 13:11, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support.--Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 15:09, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Very good, as usual Cmao20 (talk) 17:58, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support ǃ --Terragio67 (talk) 19:04, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 22:15, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 00:34, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 06:05, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Wilfredor (talk) 11:25, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 15:29, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 00:37, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
File:Traditional hanok house with wooden doors along a steeply sloping street in Bukchon Hanok Village Seoul.jpg
[edit]Voting period ends on 1 Oct 2024 at 20:47:04 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#South Korea
- Info created - uploaded - nominated by Basile Morin -- Basile Morin (talk) 20:47, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 20:47, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --RodRabelo7 (talk) 23:13, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 00:39, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Nice interplay of light and shadows. Cmao20 (talk) 01:19, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:48, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support.--Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 15:09, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 22:21, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Clear shot. --Mile (talk) 07:13, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
File:Finely painted wooden ceiling of Jibokjae Hall seen from below at Gyeongbokgung Palace in Seoul.jpg
[edit]Voting period ends on 1 Oct 2024 at 20:43:18 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Architectural elements#Painted ceilings
- Info created - uploaded - nominated by Basile Morin -- Basile Morin (talk) 20:43, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 20:43, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Great motif, colours, and image quality. Cmao20 (talk) 01:19, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Peulle (talk) 10:49, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cool stuff Poco a poco (talk) 13:15, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:47, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support.--Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 15:09, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support ǃ --Terragio67 (talk) 19:05, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Ermell (talk) 19:11, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --C messier (talk) 20:09, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 22:18, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 22:21, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 06:06, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --XRay 💬 11:26, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 15:28, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 00:37, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 1 Oct 2024 at 19:46:33 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic media/People#Paintings
- Info created by Jef Leempoels - uploaded by Isha - restored/nominated by Ezarate -- Ezarateesteban 19:46, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Ezarateesteban 19:46, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 1 Oct 2024 at 15:44:20 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#France
- Info created by Gzen92 - uploaded by Gzen92 - nominated by Gzen92 -- Gzen92 (talk) 15:44, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Gzen92 (talk) 15:44, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
- Comment why f/2,5? Ezarateesteban 19:56, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose 1) Perspective issues. All the buildings are leaning to the left. The middle building very heavily (check the clock tower). 2) The detail/compression is like from a smartphone. I have checked the camera from EXIF and surely it can produce much better quality ;-) --Lynx1211 (talk) 21:32, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
- Weak support Nice light and composition, very warm and inviting. Agree perspective correction could be better and level of detail is not that high. Cmao20 (talk) 01:18, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 1 Oct 2024 at 13:53:29 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants#Family : Nymphaeaceae
- Info created by Ministério da Ciência, Tecnologia e Inovação (Luara Baggi) - uploaded by Luiz79 - nominated by ★ -- ★ 13:53, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Nice textures. -- ★ 13:53, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
- Weak support Cool textures for sure but so little of the image is actually sharp. Cmao20 (talk) 15:48, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 00:41, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Low DoF and there appears to be motion blur in some places.--Peulle (talk) 10:50, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose per Peulle and also badly underexposed IMO, sorry. BigDom (talk) 11:11, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 04:19, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 1 Oct 2024 at 07:35:49 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds#Family_:_Psittaculidae_(True_Parrots)
- Info created by Giles Laurent - uploaded by Giles Laurent - nominated by Giles Laurent -- Giles Laurent (talk) 07:35, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 07:35, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Excellent, and worth pointing out that this is the only QI of this species on Commons, so it is probably the best free-license photo of this bird. Cmao20 (talk) 15:48, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 16:52, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 18:08, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:42, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support.--Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 15:09, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Terragio67 (talk) 19:05, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Ermell (talk) 19:12, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 22:22, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 22:23, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 06:07, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 15:27, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:00, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 1 Oct 2024 at 04:43:55 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Industry#Australia
- Info created and uploaded by DXR - nominated by SHB2000 --SHB2000 (talk) 04:43, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 04:43, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 15:46, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Good technical rendition and certainly QI, but IMHO not enough wow for FP. --GRDN711 (talk) 18:43, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Per GRDN711. -- Karelj (talk) 11:58, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Agree with GRDN711, sorry. Maybe a more interesting sky and/or a long exposure to smooth out the water would take this to the next level? BigDom (talk) 12:23, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 04:19, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 30 Sep 2024 at 21:31:45 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious_buildings#Austria
- Info Panoramic view (cylindrical projection) of the interior of Bad Traunstein parish church, Lower Austria. All by me. --Uoaei1 (talk) 21:31, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 21:31, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 04:34, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Sharpness is amazing, really well done Cmao20 (talk) 15:46, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 16:52, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support High technical quality.--Peulle (talk) 10:51, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:40, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support.--Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 15:09, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Peulle. --Terragio67 (talk) 19:06, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Are there no Copright problems in Austria with contemporary art in interiors? Unfortunately, the creator is not mentioned anywhere.--Ermell (talk) 19:27, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
- Honestly, I am no copyright expert. The question for me is whether a church is a public place or not. At least, I am not aware of issues for images like this. Uoaei1 (talk) 08:59, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
- And finally: this image has been checked without concerns by the team of WikiDaheim / WLM in Austria contest executed by Wikimedia Austria. --Uoaei1 (talk) 09:33, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 16:02, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 30 Sep 2024 at 18:39:52 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places#Architecture#Exteriors
- Info Wiki Loves Monuments contest participant. Created - uploaded by Елена Нечипоренко - nominated by FBilula -- FBilula (talk) 18:39, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- FBilula (talk) 18:39, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Any translation possible? And please correct the geo coding, it is obviously wrong. --Uoaei1 (talk) 18:58, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support I added an English caption. Beautiful picture of an amazing building. Cmao20 (talk) 20:15, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 06:26, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 07:39, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Saw it on IQ, said this must pass FP. Nice image. --Mile (talk) 08:52, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 13:54, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 22:29, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 23:40, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --BigDom (talk) 12:25, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:38, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support.--Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 15:08, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
- Neutral Great picture if there weren't these foreground trees. Yann (talk) 18:25, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 19:29, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 22:22, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --XRay 💬 11:27, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Leaning in slightly, but still OK. --C messier (talk) 13:17, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 15:27, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 30 Sep 2024 at 04:24:45 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants #Family : Verbenaceae
- Info Inflorescence of a Verbena bonariensis. Focus stack of 29 photos. The plant blooms from July until autumn with fragrant flowers that attract many butterflies.
All by -- Famberhorst (talk) 04:24, 21 September 2024 (UTC) - Support -- Famberhorst (talk) 04:24, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support El Golli Mohamed (talk) 12:45, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 15:52, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 15:58, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --A.Savin 17:35, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Lovely colors. Wolverine XI 20:17, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 04:38, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 06:25, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 07:39, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support.--Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 15:10, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Terragio67 (talk) 19:07, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 06:11, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 12:07, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:02, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
File:NASA-Apollo8-Dec24-Earthrise.jpg (delist)
[edit]Voting period ends on 29 Sep 2024 at 22:04:57
- Info Much better copy: higher resolution, better colors, less compression, etc. (Original nomination)
- Delist and replace -- Yann (talk) 22:04, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Delist and replace --Wilfredor (talk) 23:14, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Delist and replace --Zzzs (talk) 01:36, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
- Delist and replace per above. --SHB2000 (talk) 01:53, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
- Delist and replace --Terragio67 (talk) 05:08, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
- Neutral, I like the colors of the existing file, but the others’ comments are too numerous not to be convincing. - Jarrod Baniqued (talk) 07:42, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
- Delist and replace --Thi (talk) 10:19, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
- Keep With a picture like 'Earthrise' that has gained so much of its value from its iconic status, it is IMO appropriate to feature the version of it that is most similar to the 'famous' version, as opposed to a version that may be of higher technical quality. The proposed replacement is clearly a better quality image but if we want to feature a good quality photo of the Earth above the lunar surface, we shouldn't feature this image at all because it has long been superseded by photos from new space probes. Its value comes from its historical and cultural importance, not its technical quality. The iconic version of the picture, the one used by most sources including NASA themselves, is the current FP, and so that is the one we should feature. See also 1, 2, 3. 16:03, 21 September 2024 (UTC)Cmao20 (talk)
- Keep I agree with Cmao20. --FreCha (talk) 14:01, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
- Keep The two pictures are two different things, even though they reproduce the same data. The older one has an historical value. It has been reproduced as such on newspapers, books, stamps, etc.: en:Earthrise. The newer one shows a more realistic version of the other, as "it had must be" if all colours would had been well balanced. There is a lot of technical job behind, and it has also a very important value, but mainly in the comparison with the other one. According to me, the newer one deserves to be enlisted among the featured picture, but not in substitution of the other one. --Harlock81 (talk) 12:06, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 29 Sep 2024 at 21:19:32 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Hungary
- Info created, uploaded and nominated by MrPanyGoff -- MrPanyGoff 21:19, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- MrPanyGoff 21:19, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Sharp and attractively lit photo of interesting architecture. Sky is pretty bland, would be better still with a more interesting sky. Cmao20 (talk) 21:28, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:50, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 15:58, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
- Neutral Nice shot and looks like best available photo of this theater so far, but still I miss some more wow for an FP. --A.Savin 17:30, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 14:29, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support.--Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 15:10, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
File:Close wing mud pudding position of Delias hyparete (Linnaeus, 1758) - Painted Jezebel WLB IMG 1197.jpg
[edit]Voting period ends on 29 Sep 2024 at 19:09:05 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Lepidoptera#Family : Pieridae (Whites and Sulphurs)
- Info created by Thamblyok - uploaded by Thamblyok - nominated by Atudu -- Atudu (talk) 19:09, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Atudu (talk) 19:09, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you 🙏 Thamblyok (talk) 13:43, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
- Weak support Good composition, quality and colours, however the damage to the wing is a bit of a shame. Cmao20 (talk) 19:55, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you 🙏 Thamblyok (talk) 13:43, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Nice. -- -donald- (talk) 11:47, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you 🙏 Thamblyok (talk) 13:43, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:48, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you 🙏 Thamblyok (talk) 13:42, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 15:57, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you 🙏 Thamblyok (talk) 13:42, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 07:38, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you 🙏 Thamblyok (talk) 13:42, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support.--Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 15:10, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 11:48, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 15:24, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 00:38, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 29 Sep 2024 at 16:18:31 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds#Family : Lybiidae (African_Barbets)
- Info created by Giles Laurent - uploaded by Giles Laurent - nominated by Giles Laurent -- Giles Laurent (talk) 16:18, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 16:18, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 16:25, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 17:16, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Atudu (talk) 19:11, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Amazing colors. Yann (talk) 22:08, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support El Golli Mohamed (talk) 00:01, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Zzzs (talk) 01:29, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 01:33, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 01:53, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --GRDN711 (talk) 03:07, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Terragio67 (talk) 05:10, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 05:29, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Thi (talk) 10:21, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:47, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 15:57, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Nice stance. Wolverine XI 20:18, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --C messier (talk) 09:23, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 12:45, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Very nice light -- Basile Morin (talk) 20:52, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support.--Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 15:04, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 06:11, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:05, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
File:Stucco decoration, Bou Inania Madrasa, Fez, Marocco (المدرسة البوعنانية, ⴰⵙⵉⵏⴰⵏ ⴱⵓ ⵉⵏⴰⵏⵉⵢⴰ).jpg
[edit]Voting period ends on 28 Sep 2024 at 18:45:27 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious buildings
- Info Stucco decoration, Bou Inania Madrasa, Fez, Marocco, my shot. -- Mile (talk) 18:45, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Mile (talk) 18:45, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Neutral Interesting, but I miss the corner at the bottom . Cmao20 (talk) 20:06, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support JukoFF (talk) 23:05, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support El Golli Mohamed (talk) 00:02, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 15:54, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 14:28, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support.--Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 15:03, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 06:16, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
- Weak Support The corner at the bottom ... :-( --XRay 💬 11:28, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 28 Sep 2024 at 13:21:14 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Germany#Bavaria
- Info created by Llez - uploaded by Llez - nominated by Llez -- Llez (talk) 13:21, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
This is a picture of the protected area listed at WDPA under the ID 395954
|
This is a picture of the protected area listed at WDPA under the ID 555522234
|
This is a picture of the protected area listed at WDPA under the ID 555522275
|
- Support -- Llez (talk) 13:21, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
-
weaksupport Beautiful but IMO oversharpened (haloes). Cmao20 (talk) 20:05, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- New version is a considerable improvement. Cmao20 (talk) 16:54, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 17:05, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
* Weak support Agree with Cmao20... --Terragio67 (talk) 05:21, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
- Info I made a new version from RAW with a bit less sharpening and without haloes. --Llez (talk) 10:45, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
- Well done, Support Terragio67 (talk) 18:41, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
- Info I made a new version from RAW with a bit less sharpening and without haloes. --Llez (talk) 10:45, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:44, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 07:38, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 14:27, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose The haze makes the scene a bit too soft, IMO.--Peulle (talk) 10:53, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support.--Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 15:03, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 06:18, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:06, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 27 Sep 2024 at 15:40:57 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Italy#Trentino-Alto Adige
- Info Schneespitze in the Stubai Alps seen on the ascent from the Magdeburg hut. All by me. -- Milseburg (talk) 15:40, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Milseburg (talk) 15:40, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 05:53, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 11:21, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 13:12, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 20:03, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Sharp image, great color contrast between the deep blue of the sky and the rust tinged rocks. Seems a little bit over sharpened at full resolution. Needsmoreritalin (talk) 02:35, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 11:40, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Zzzs (talk) 12:01, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 14:10, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Not sure WB is fine, but noise for sure. --Mile (talk) 16:46, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support What a view! Wolverine XI 08:32, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support.--Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 15:02, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 27 Sep 2024 at 10:12:35 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family : Hirundinidae (Swallows)
- Info created, uploaded and nominated by Yerpo — Yerpo Eh? 10:12, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 13:32, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support I'm not always that keen on birds on wires but this one is very sharp and well composed. Cmao20 (talk) 20:01, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 14:09, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:56, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support El Golli Mohamed (talk) 00:05, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Thi (talk) 10:24, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:42, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support.--Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 14:58, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Zzzs (talk) 22:40, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 26 Sep 2024 at 13:10:53 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Land_vehicles#Rail_vehicles
- Info created by David Gubler - uploaded by David Gubler - nominated by Bruce1ee -- —Bruce1eetalk 13:10, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- —Bruce1eetalk 13:10, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 20:25, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Laitche (talk) 20:29, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Perspective (left is leaning in), and I think it's also a bit too soft, looking at the mountain in particular.--Peulle (talk) 10:48, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Thanks for your feedback! I've uploaded a new version with corrected perspective (you may need to use SHIFT+Reload to see the changes), not much I can do about the sharpness. --Kabelleger (talk) 10:57, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 11:43, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Colors seem a little too saturated and overall, the image appears dark. Consider lightening to increase detail in the mid-tones. --GRDN711 (talk) 16:37, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 05:29, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 20:00, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 11:31, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Weak support per GRDN117. --SHB2000 (talk) 01:55, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Nice picture. Wolverine XI 20:13, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support.--Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 14:57, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --XRay 💬 11:28, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 25 Sep 2024 at 20:37:57 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious_buildings#Moldova
- Info Interior of the church of the Nativity of the Virgin Mary in Butuceni, Orhei, Moldova. c/u/n by Poco a poco (talk) 20:37, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 20:37, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Image full of details, without noise and well defined despite obvious difficulties due to the side lighting alone. -- Terragio67 (talk) 00:37, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 11:22, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 05:28, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support I really like this photo and feel it should be highlighted. I saw the light coming through the window and thought, "WOW, those rays of light are beautiful." But then I moved up to the top right corner and noticed how light pollution prevents the details of the wall fresco from being visible (it looks washed out). I think this can be fixed in Lightroom (something opposite to the process of correcting vignetting). --Wilfredor (talk) 17:31, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support A beautiful religious space. I could quibble about a couple of things e.g. the top crop but I am willing to accept them as part of the compromises needed to capture this lovely space in a single frame. Cmao20 (talk) 19:58, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
Request The perspective is a bit distorted, I don't know if it's beacause the building is not exactly symmetrical or because the camera was leaning a bit more to the left than it should. Can this be corrected? --Lynx1211 (talk) 09:23, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you for the review. I made some perspective improvements, Lynx1211. FYI, too Mile. --Poco a poco (talk) 08:23, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
- Neutral It is much better, thank you. However, some perspective issues reimaned. Currently, the top part of the image is leaning to the top right corner. I played with the original photo so I know it could be improved a bit ;-) Also there is a lot of color noise and artifacts after using an AI tool to improve the sharpness. Is there any Wiki policy on that? I believe such edits can be at least made less obvious :-) Lynx1211 (talk) 21:23, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you for the review. I made some perspective improvements, Lynx1211. FYI, too Mile. --Poco a poco (talk) 08:23, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
- Can you get crop above, to clear chopred Saint ? --Mile (talk) 16:39, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Seeing candlebars ane around, you did a lot "looking for center". I dislike Saint above is cut, instead you could crop candlebears and save Saint. Distortion. --Mile (talk) 16:50, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 25 Sep 2024 at 12:39:36 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Photo techniques/Black and White#Portraits
- Info created by crommelincklars - uploaded by Cybertrip - nominated by ★ -- ★ 12:39, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- ★ 12:39, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support JukoFF (talk) 18:39, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 11:45, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --GRDN711 (talk) 16:39, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 05:28, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Thi (talk) 10:24, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Something different --Wilfredor (talk) 17:32, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Visibly heavily JPEG artefacted (see her neck and chin - compression artefacts are v obvious). Cmao20 (talk) 19:57, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- The grayscale works so well with this portrait and adds drama. Needsmoreritalin (talk) 02:50, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Well-done portrait, matches the character of some of her songs very well. – Aristeas (talk) 09:14, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 11:25, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support.--Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 14:57, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose As Cmao20 said, the artifacts are just too prominent for my taste --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 16:28, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --XRay 💬 11:29, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 25 Sep 2024 at 11:43:22 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/In_their_habitats#Carnivora_(Carnivores)
- Info All by -- Wilfredor (talk) 11:43, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Grand. Epic. Cinematic. Wanderer above the sea of fog vibes Henrysz (talk) 16:28, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 17:35, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 05:28, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 11:22, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Not FP-standards in my heavily biased opinion. Wolverine XI 15:13, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- all the opinions are welcome :) Wilfredor (talk) 17:29, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Great, and please do not lower the highlights on the snow - snow should be this blindingly white. Cmao20 (talk) 19:56, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support The higher perspective works here to really add depth to the image. The dog doesn't seem to be afraid of heights. The sun on the dog's face provides warmth in an otherwise cold image. --Needsmoreritalin (talk) 02:55, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Good dog picture but not enough wow for FP. --GRDN711 (talk) 03:44, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- @GRDN711: Do you want to cast an oppose vote or did you use
((o))
intentionally? (With(())
your vote has no defined meaning.) Just asking, because in the end somebody must count the votes … – Aristeas (talk) 09:12, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Done Sometimes round versus curly brackets are a struggle for me…😊. Thank you for your comment. --GRDN711 (talk) 03:02, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
- @GRDN711: Do you want to cast an oppose vote or did you use
- Support Beautiful environmental portait of a proud creature. – Aristeas (talk) 09:12, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 11:23, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Zzzs (talk) 11:50, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:49, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support.--Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 14:57, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
File:Battle of Sutjeska Memorial Monument.jpg, not featured
[edit]Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 24 Sep 2024 at 22:32:23 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Sculptures#Monuments_and_memorials
- Info created by Tracychapmanfan5 - uploaded by Tracychapmanfan5 - nominated by Henrysz -- Henrysz (talk) 22:32, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Henrysz (talk) 22:32, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Crop too tight at the top -- Basile Morin (talk) 05:58, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- Weak support Superb subject, great interplay of light and shadows, but I must agree with Basile that the top crop is very tight. Cmao20 (talk) 19:53, 19 September 2024 (UTC)