Commons:Segnalazioni per la vetrina
Segnalazioni per la vetrina in altre lingue:
Alemannisch | asturianu | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | English | فارسی | español | suomi | français | galego | हिन्दी | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lëtzebuergesch | молдовеняскэ | norsk bokmål | português | polski | română | русский | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | українська | Tiếng Việt | 粵語 | 中文(中国大陆) | 中文(简体) | 中文(繁體) | հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia |+/− |
Shortcut: [[:]] |
Queste immagini sono candidate per la vetrina. Fare attenzione a non confondere questa pagina con le immagini del giorno.
Guida
[edit]Candidare un immagine
[edit]Linee guida per candidare un'immagine
[edit]È importante leggere le linee guida prima di candidare un'immagine.
A seguito è riportato un riassunto dei punti essenziali per candidare e valutare le immagini candidate:
- Risoluzione - Le fotografie con una risoluzione inferiore a 2 milioni di pixel vengono generalmente rifiutate e rimosse ad eccezione di motivi contrari di particolare importanza. Si noti che le immagini con risoluzione 1600 x 1200 hanno 1.92 Mpx, appena inferiore al limite minimo di 2Mpx.
- Ricordiamo che le immagini caricate su Commons vengono visualizzate non solo su schermi tradizionali di PC ma sono utilizzate anche per stampa e visualizzazione su schermi ad alta risoluzione. Non possiamo certo prevedere quali tecnologie verranno utilizzate nel futuro quindi è importante che le immagini scelte per la vetrina abbiano una risoluzione quanto più alta è possibile.
- Scansioni - È consigliabile seguire la guida alla scansione, che propone suggerimenti per l'ottenimento di immagini ottimali
- Fuoco - ovviamente ogni oggetto significativo dell'immagine deve essere ben definito e a fuoco.
- Primo piano e sfondo - Oggetti in primissimo piano o di sfondo possono distrarre dalla vista dal oggetto principale dell'immagine. È il caso di controllare se qualche elemento in primo piano non copra nessun elemento importante e che lo sfondo non distolga l'attenzione e renda confusa l'immagine (per esempio evitare che vi sia una luce forte alle spalle di un viso)
- Qualità generale - le immagini candidate devono essere di alta qualità tecnica.
- Le manipolazioni digitali non devono essere effettuate per ingannare, ma vanno usate solo limitatamente e con cura per correggere difetti fotografici. Le manipolazioni comunemente accettate sono il ritaglio e la correzione di prospettiva, focale, colore ed esposizione. Manipolazioni più estese, come può essere la rimozione di un elemento di distrazione dello sfondo, vanno chiaramente descritte nel testo di descrizione per mezzo del template {{Retouched picture}}. Manipolazioni non descritte o descritte in modo insufficiente non permettono la candidatura alla vetrina.
- Valore - il nostro principale obiettivo è eleggere le immagini con il maggior valore rispetto a tutte le loro simili. Le immagini devono essere in qualche modo speciali, perciò fai attenzione:
- quasi tutti i tramonti sono esteticamente piacevoli, infatti molte immagini sono simili alle altre,
- gli scatti notturni sono gradevoli ma generalmente le foto scattate di giorno mostrano molti più dettagli,
- non tutte le belle foto hanno in realtà un valore che non sia esclusivamente personale.
Per quanto riguarda l'aspetto tecnico abbiamo come parametri l'esposizione, la composizione, il controllo del movimento e la profondità di campo.
- L'esposizione si riferisce alla combinazione tra tempo di esposizione e diaframma. Questa combinazione permette generalmente di avere una curva di tono che è in grado di rappresentare ombre e luci con un dettaglio accettabile. Questa curva viene detta latitudine di posa. Un'immagine può essere nella banda bassa, media o alta. Le fotocamere digitali (e le loro foto) hanno una latitudine di posa più stretta delle macchine a pellicola. La mancanza di dettagli nelle zone d'ombra non è necessariamente una caratteristica negativa. Infatti questa può essere parte dell'effetto desiderato, mentre ampie zone eccessivamente sovraesposte possono distrarre la vista.
- La composizione si riferisce alla distribuzione degli elementi nell'immagine. La “Regola dei Terzi” è una buona linea guida per la composizione e eredita molto dagli studi di disegno. Il concetto principale considera l'immagine divisa con due linee orizzontali e due verticali, che dividono l'immagine in tre parti. Generalmente se l'oggetto viene centrato si ha un effetto poco interessante, mentre se l'oggetto viene posizionato in uno dei punti di interesse, ovvero l'intersezione delle quattro linee, si ottiene un effetto decisamente migliore. Le linee dell'orizzonte infatti non dovrebbero essere posizionate nel centro, perché taglierebbero la foto a metà; è invece preferibile scegliere una delle linee orizzontali. Complessivamente bisogna tendere a creare un'immagine dinamica.
- Il controllo del movimento si riferisce al modo viene rappresentato il movimento nell'immagine. Il movimento può essere bloccato (seguito dalla fotocamera) oppure può essere lasciato scorrere, tuttavia l'oggetto principale dell'immagine deve essere visibile. Nessuna delle due tecniche è migliore dell'altra, la buona riuscita dipende esclusivamente dal tipo di effetto ricercato. Per esempio, fotografando una vettura da corsa che appare statica in relazione allo sfondo, che invece scorre sul retro, si ottiene l'oggetto principale in una condizione statica mentre lo sfondo crea il senso di movimento. (questa tecnica è chiamata "panning"). D'altra parte, fotografando un giocatore di basket in salto, bloccato in relazione a tutto il resto dello sfondo, si otterrebbe un buono scatto proprio per la posa innaturale.
- La profondità di campo (PdC o DOF dall'inglese depth of field) è la distanza davanti e dietro il soggetto principale che appare nitida (a fuoco). Questo parametro viene scelto a seconda delle necessità di ogni immagine e può parimenti migliorare o peggiorare la qualità di una fotografia. Generalmente viene utilizzata una PdC ridotta per mettere al centro dell'attenzione il soggetto principale, separandolo da tutto il resto dello sfondo. Invece viene utilizzata una grande PdC per enfatizzare la profondità di un immagine. Gli obiettivi grandangolari in genere una grande PdC mentre i teleobiettivi ne hanno una decisamente ridotta. In gran parte la PdC dipende dall'apertura del diaframma: aumenta con il diminuire dell'apertura e viceversa.
Per quanto riguarda l'aspetto grafico prendiamo invece in considerazione nitidezza, profondità, colore, superficie, prospettiva, bilanciamento, proporzione, ecc.
- La nitidezza si riferisce alle linee di contorno del soggetto principale.
- La profondità si riferisce alla qualità dell'aspetto tridimensionale del soggetto. Ciò si ottiene soprattutto tramite un'adeguata illuminazione laterale (come quella della prima mattinata o del tardo pomeriggio) e non esclusivamente frontale, al fine di evitare l'appiattimento del soggetto.
- Il colore è un elemento molto importante e non deve essere né troppo né poco saturo.
- La superficie si riferisce alla qualità della superficie degli oggetti fotografati.
- La prospettiva si riferisce all'angolazione dalla quale è stata scattata la fotografia. Essa crea una serie di rette immaginarie che seguono gli spigoli paralleli degli oggetti e si incontrano in un punto che può essere dentro o fuori l'immagine.
- Il bilanciamento si riferisce alla disposizione degli oggetti nell'immagine e può essere equilibrato o porre maggior peso verso una direzione.
- La proporzione si riferisce alla relazione tra le dimensioni degli oggetti all'interno dell'immagine. Generalmente si tende a rappresentare oggetti con ridotta relazione, ma una buona tecnica è quella di rappresentare gli oggetti di dimensioni minori in modo più esteso, contrariamente a quanto è in realtà. Per esempio, un piccolo fiore che viene rappresentato con le stesse dimensioni di una grande montagna: questa tecnica viene chiamata inversione di scala.
- Ovviamente, non tutte le caratteristiche devono essere necessariamente presenti. Le immagini possono essere giudicate sia per una sola caratteristica che per diverse caratteristiche, anche contemporaneamente.
- Significato simbolico o rilevanza particolare …Le guerre d'opinione possono iniziare!…. Va ricordato che una pessima fotografia di un soggetto difficilissimo da fotografare è sicuramente migliore di un'immagine ordinaria e tradizionale (come un comune tramonto).
- Le immagini possono essere scelte da un fotografo o da un osservatore anche per motivi culturali, tenendo però sempre conto del contesto dello scatto e non di quello dell'osservatore. Un'immagine inoltre può "parlare" alle persone e avere la capacità di evocare emozioni, che tuttavia non devono essere necessariamente piacevoli.
Per ottimizzare le possibilità di successo delle candidature delle tue immagini è consigliabile leggere le linee guida complete.
Come candidare un'immagine
[edit]Se credi di aver trovato o creato un immagine che può essere presa in considerazione per la vetrina, che abbia una appropriata descrizione e una licenza adeguata, allora segui queste indicazioni.
Punto 1: copia il nome dell'immagine dentro la casella di testo (includendo anche il prefisso Image: ) a seguito del testo già presente nella casella (per esempio Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:IL-NOME-DELLA-TUA-IMMAGINE.JPG.) ed infine clicca il pulsante candida una nuova immagine.
Punto 2: segui le istruzioni della pagina alla quale vieni collegato e salva le modifiche apportate.
Punto 3: inserisci manualmente un collegamento alla pagina creata in cima alla lista candidati:
Clicca qui e aggiungi il testo che segue all'inizio della lista di candidature:
- {{Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:IL-NOME-DELLA-TUA-IMMAGINE.JPG}}
Votare
[edit]Per votare puoi usare i seguenti templates:
- {{A favore}} ( Support) per supportare la candidatura,
- {{Contrario}} ( Oppose) per opporsi alla candidatura,
- {{Neutrale}} ( Neutral) per esprimere un parere neutrale,
- {{Commento}} ( Comment) per esprimere solo un commento,
- {{Info}} ( Info) per aggiungere delle informazioni riguardanti l'immagine,
- {{Domanda}} ( Question) per chiedere informazioni.
Puoi inoltre evidenziare che l'immagine non ha possibilità di essere eletta con il template {{FPX|motivo}}, inserendo al posto di motivo le ragioni per cui è chiaramente inaccettabile per la vetrina.
Ogni votante è pregato di motivare il proprio voto con qualche parola, in particolar modo se si vota contro. Ricorda inoltre di aggiungere la tua firma (~~~~). I voti anonimi non sono accettati.
Candidare un'immagine alla rimozione dalla vetrina
[edit]Gli standard della vetrina cambiano col tempo. Può succedere che un'immagine che era stata eletta per la vetrina non sia più adatta agli standard attuali.
Questa lista è perciò composta dalle immagini considerate non più adatte a rimanere nella vetrina. Vota:
- {{Mantenere}} Keep per far sì che l'immagine rimanga nella vetrina.
- {{Rimuovere}} Oppose per far sì che l'immagine venga rimossa dalla vetrina.
Se consideri che un'immagine non rispetti più i criteri delle immagini in vetrina, candidala per la rimozione copiando il nome dell'immagine dentro questa casella di testo (includendo il prefisso dell' Image:) a seguito del testo già presente in essa:
Nella pagina appena creata includi:
- Le informazioni sull'origine dell'immagine (autore dell'immagine, autore della candidatura);
- Un collegamento all'iniziale candidatura per l'inserimento nella vetrina (che va inserito sotto ==Collegamenti== nella descrizione dell'immagine);
- Il motivo per cui l'hai candidata per la rimozione dalla vetrina e il tuo Nome utente.
Dopo aver fatto ciò devi inserire manualmente un collegamento alla pagina creata all'inizio della lista di rimozione dalla vetrina.
Politica di elezione per la vetrina
[edit]Regole generali
[edit]- Il periodo di votazione è di 9 giorni completi, a partire dalla candidatura. I risultato verrà determinato alla fine di questo periodo. I voti aggiunti il decimo giorno o a seguito non verranno considerati.
- Sono benvenuti i contributori anonimi.
- I contributi di anonimi alle discussioni sono benvenuti.
- I voti di contributori anonimi non saranno accettati.
- La candidatura non conta come voto. Il voto di supporto va esplicitato.
- Gli autori delle candidature possono ritirare le loro immagini candidate in ogni momento. Questo si ottiene scrivendo semplicemente "I withdraw my nomination" (in inglese: ritiro la mia candidatura)
o aggiungendo il testo{{withdraw|~~~~}}
. - Ricorda che l'obiettivo del progetto Wikimedia Commons è di costruire una raccolta di immagini utilizzabili da tutti i progetti Wikimedia, inclusi possibili progetti futuri. Perciò non bisogna pensare che questo sia una raccolta dedicata esclusivamente al progetto Wikipedia e per tanto le immagini non vanno valutate in funzione di ciò.
- Le immagini vengono rimosse dalla lista di candidature se non hanno voti a supporto (escluso quello dell'autore della candidatura) entro il quinto giorno dalla candidatura (La regola del quinto giorno)
- Le immagini dotate del template {{FPX}} non devono essere rimosse dalla lista entro le 48 ore successive al momento in cui è stato applicato il template, purchè non vi sia nessun voto a supporto oltre quello dell'autore della candidatura.
Regole di ammissione e rimozione dalla vetrina
[edit]Un'immagine candidata viene ammessa alla vetrina se si verificano le seguenti condizioni:
- La licenza è adeguata (ovviamente).
- Se ha almeno 5 voti a supporto.
- Se il rapporto tra voti pro/contro è almeno 2/1 (se ha due terzi di maggioranza).
- Non possono essere ammessi alla vetrina diverse versioni della stessa immagine, ne deve essere scelta una sola versione.
I criteri per la rimozione dalla vetrina sono gli stessi per l'ammissione ad essa, compreso il periodo di voto e la regola del quinto giorno (vedi nelle Regole generali).
Ogni utente esperto può portare a termine una votazione: per istruzioni su come compiere questa operazione vedi la guida per portare a termina la votazione.
Infine, sii cortese
[edit]Per piacere non dimenticare che l'immagine che stai giudicando è frutto del lavoro di qualcuno. Evita di usare frasi come è orribile: se devi opporti non fare spiacevoli considerazioni. Inoltre ricorda che è necessario scrivere in inglese se vuoi essere compreso dagli altri utenti e che il tuo utilizzo di questa lingua e quello degli altri utenti può comunque generare incomprensioni se non si ha un'ottima conoscenza, perciò scegli le parole con cura.
Buon voto… e ricorda che.... tutte le regole possono avere qualche eccezione.
Vedi anche
[edit]- Per modificare la lista di candidature: Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list
- Per una lista cronologica delle candidature: Commons:Featured_pictures/chronological
- Per un archivio delle precedenti candidature: Commons:Featured picture candidates/Log
- Per istruzioni su come portare a termine una procedura di voto: Commons:Featured picture candidates/What to do after voting is finished
- Lista di termini base del linguaggio fotografico
- Candidature per le immagini di qualità
- Critica fotografica
- Guida alla scansione
Indice
[edit]Candidati per la vetrina
[edit]Featured picture candidates
[edit]Voting period ends on 1 Oct 2024 at 15:44:20 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#France
- Info created by Gzen92 - uploaded by Gzen92 - nominated by Gzen92 -- Gzen92 (talk) 15:44, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Gzen92 (talk) 15:44, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 1 Oct 2024 at 13:53:29 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants#Family : Nymphaeaceae
- Info created by Ministério da Ciência, Tecnologia e Inovação (Luara Baggi) - uploaded by Luiz79 - nominated by ★ -- ★ 13:53, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Nice textures. -- ★ 13:53, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 1 Oct 2024 at 07:35:49 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds#Family_:_Psittaculidae_(True_Parrots)
- Info created by Giles Laurent - uploaded by Giles Laurent - nominated by Giles Laurent -- Giles Laurent (talk) 07:35, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 07:35, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Excellent, and worth pointing out that this is the only QI of this species on Commons, so it is probably the best free-license photo of this bird. Cmao20 (talk) 15:48, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 1 Oct 2024 at 04:43:55 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Industry#Australia
- Info created and uploaded by DXR - nominated by SHB2000 --SHB2000 (talk) 04:43, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 04:43, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 15:46, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 30 Sep 2024 at 21:31:45 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious_buildings#Austria
- Info Panoramic view (cylindrical projection) of the interior of Bad Traunstein parish church, Lower Austria. All by me. --Uoaei1 (talk) 21:31, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 21:31, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 04:34, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Sharpness is amazing, really well done Cmao20 (talk) 15:46, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 30 Sep 2024 at 19:15:01 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious buildings#Brazil
- Info Side view of the Church of Saint Francis of Assisi, a example of modernist architecture designed by Oscar Niemeyer, and partial view of Lake Pampulha, an artificial lake constructed in Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil. In July 2016, the Pampulha Modern Ensemble was declared an UNESCO World Heritage Site. Created and uploaded by Jani Pereira - nominated by ★ -- ★ 19:15, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- ★ 19:15, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose A rather grainy picture of a dull building. Lack of definition and sharpness, and dull light. Cmao20 (talk) 20:16, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose The quality is too poor for FP. Wolverine XI 08:24, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
- I withdraw my nomination Ok. ★ 13:53, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 30 Sep 2024 at 18:39:52 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places#Architecture#Exteriors
- Info Wiki Loves Monuments contest participant. Created - uploaded by Елена Нечипоренко - nominated by FBilula -- FBilula (talk) 18:39, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- FBilula (talk) 18:39, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Any translation possible? And please correct the geo coding, it is obviously wrong. --Uoaei1 (talk) 18:58, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support I added an English caption. Beautiful picture of an amazing building. Cmao20 (talk) 20:15, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 06:26, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 07:39, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Saw it on IQ, said this must pass FP. Nice image. --Mile (talk) 08:52, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 13:54, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 30 Sep 2024 at 04:24:45 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants #Family : Verbenaceae
- Info Inflorescence of a Verbena bonariensis. Focus stack of 29 photos. The plant blooms from July until autumn with fragrant flowers that attract many butterflies.
All by -- Famberhorst (talk) 04:24, 21 September 2024 (UTC) - Support -- Famberhorst (talk) 04:24, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support El Golli Mohamed (talk) 12:45, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 15:52, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 15:58, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --A.Savin 17:35, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Lovely colors. Wolverine XI 20:17, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 04:38, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 06:25, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 07:39, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
File:NASA-Apollo8-Dec24-Earthrise.jpg (delist)
[edit]Voting period ends on 29 Sep 2024 at 22:04:57
- Info Much better copy: higher resolution, better colors, less compression, etc. (Original nomination)
- Delist and replace -- Yann (talk) 22:04, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Delist and replace --Wilfredor (talk) 23:14, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Delist and replace --Zzzs (talk) 01:36, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
- Delist and replace per above. --SHB2000 (talk) 01:53, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
- Delist and replace --Terragio67 (talk) 05:08, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
- Neutral, I like the colors of the existing file, but the others’ comments are too numerous not to be convincing. - Jarrod Baniqued (talk) 07:42, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
- Delist and replace --Thi (talk) 10:19, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
- Keep With a picture like 'Earthrise' that has gained so much of its value from its iconic status, it is IMO appropriate to feature the version of it that is most similar to the 'famous' version, as opposed to a version that may be of higher technical quality. The proposed replacement is clearly a better quality image but if we want to feature a good quality photo of the Earth above the lunar surface, we shouldn't feature this image at all because it has long been superseded by photos from new space probes. Its value comes from its historical and cultural importance, not its technical quality. The iconic version of the picture, the one used by most sources including NASA themselves, is the current FP, and so that is the one we should feature. See also 1, 2, 3. 16:03, 21 September 2024 (UTC)Cmao20 (talk)
- Keep I agree with Cmao20. --FreCha (talk) 14:01, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 29 Sep 2024 at 21:19:32 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Hungary
- Info created, uploaded and nominated by MrPanyGoff -- MrPanyGoff 21:19, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- MrPanyGoff 21:19, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Sharp and attractively lit photo of interesting architecture. Sky is pretty bland, would be better still with a more interesting sky. Cmao20 (talk) 21:28, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:50, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 15:58, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
- Neutral Nice shot and looks like best available photo of this theater so far, but still I miss some more wow for an FP. --A.Savin 17:30, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 14:29, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
File:Close wing mud pudding position of Delias hyparete (Linnaeus, 1758) - Painted Jezebel WLB IMG 1197.jpg
[edit]Voting period ends on 29 Sep 2024 at 19:09:05 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Lepidoptera#Family : Pieridae (Whites and Sulphurs)
- Info created by Thamblyok - uploaded by Thamblyok - nominated by Atudu -- Atudu (talk) 19:09, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Atudu (talk) 19:09, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you 🙏 Thamblyok (talk) 13:43, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
- Weak support Good composition, quality and colours, however the damage to the wing is a bit of a shame. Cmao20 (talk) 19:55, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you 🙏 Thamblyok (talk) 13:43, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Nice. -- -donald- (talk) 11:47, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you 🙏 Thamblyok (talk) 13:43, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:48, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you 🙏 Thamblyok (talk) 13:42, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 15:57, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you 🙏 Thamblyok (talk) 13:42, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 07:38, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you 🙏 Thamblyok (talk) 13:42, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 29 Sep 2024 at 16:18:31 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds#Family : Lybiidae (African_Barbets)
- Info created by Giles Laurent - uploaded by Giles Laurent - nominated by Giles Laurent -- Giles Laurent (talk) 16:18, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 16:18, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 16:25, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 17:16, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Atudu (talk) 19:11, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Amazing colors. Yann (talk) 22:08, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support El Golli Mohamed (talk) 00:01, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Zzzs (talk) 01:29, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 01:33, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 01:53, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --GRDN711 (talk) 03:07, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Terragio67 (talk) 05:10, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 05:29, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Thi (talk) 10:21, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:47, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 15:57, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Nice stance. Wolverine XI 20:18, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --C messier (talk) 09:23, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 12:45, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 29 Sep 2024 at 12:44:39 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Photo techniques/Black and White#Places
- Info created by Antonio Thomás Koenigkam Oliveira - uploaded by Simtegrity - nominated by ★ -- ★ 12:44, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- ★ 12:44, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Weak oppose Image quality is fine. I don't understand the reason for black and white though, especially when the sky is so featureless and lacking in contrast. I like these pictures looking upwards at skyscrapers and tall buildings but I think this one lacks a strong composition and that the little bits of streetlamps poking in at the edges of the frame detract from the image. Cmao20 (talk) 13:49, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- I withdraw my nomination ★ 19:14, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 28 Sep 2024 at 20:23:31 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Settlements#Austria
- Info A risky nomination and I don't know what you'll think to this. But there is something about the composition that I find really interesting and I like it more the longer I look at it. I think it's the warm and inviting light, the leading lines from the sweep of the road and the brickwork, the rich colours, and the contrast between the almost aggresive regularity of the brickwork and the repeating patterns in the roofs, compared with the somewhat eclectic architecture of the house. Anyway, it's subtle, but this is IMO a really good example of how to shoot a street in a small town. created by Johann Jaritz - uploaded by Johann Jaritz - nominated by Cmao20 -- Cmao20 (talk) 20:23, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Cmao20 (talk) 20:23, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support – I like the composition, I find it arresting. —Bruce1eetalk 07:08, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Indeed. At the first glance I am not that happy about some of the elements (e.g. the walls at the right), but the short telephoto perspective (70mm) combines all them to a really convicing composition. It’s often very difficult to find satisfying compositions in small city streets, and this is indeed a greaat example. – Aristeas (talk) 09:20, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 11:52, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Where to focus ? Nothing special for FP. --Mile (talk) 16:32, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support The overall picture is attractive to me, also because the trees are bare.--Famberhorst (talk) 17:15, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 01:54, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose I understand your doubts and respect your work. But no wow for me, sorry. --Uoaei1 (talk) 18:51, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Nothing special for me either. Wolverine XI 08:26, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 28 Sep 2024 at 20:23:33 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious_buildings#Russia
- Info I love the golden winter lighting in this photo of a lesser known religious building. Created by Саня Новиков - uploaded by Саня Новиков - nominated by Cmao20 -- Cmao20 (talk) 20:23, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Cmao20 (talk) 20:23, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 04:40, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support according to the nomination statement. // Welcome back, Cmao20! -- Radomianin (talk) 06:20, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 07:48, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Great find – I’m happy we have you back here as nominator, Cmao20! – Aristeas (talk) 09:18, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks. I had some laptop trouble plus a major contract at work. But I never mean to leave, it just sort of happens. Will always come back after a break. Cmao20 (talk) 13:44, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 11:50, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 16:25, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Mile (talk) 16:43, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 17:11, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support JukoFF (talk) 23:05, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Terragio67 (talk) 05:15, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 15:55, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 28 Sep 2024 at 19:10:55 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious buildings#Germany
- Info created by KaiBorgeest (talk) 19:10, 19 September 2024 (UTC) - uploaded by KaiBorgeest (talk) 19:10, 19 September 2024 (UTC) - nominated by KaiBorgeest -- KaiBorgeest (talk) 19:10, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- KaiBorgeest (talk) 19:10, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support I like the shadows and the light. Subtle and pretty. Cmao20 (talk) 20:06, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 04:41, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Beautiful composition for me.--Famberhorst (talk) 17:08, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Milseburg (talk) 18:51, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --GRDN711 (talk) 03:12, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Thi (talk) 10:22, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:46, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 15:55, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 07:37, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
File:Stucco decoration, Bou Inania Madrasa, Fez, Marocco (المدرسة البوعنانية, ⴰⵙⵉⵏⴰⵏ ⴱⵓ ⵉⵏⴰⵏⵉⵢⴰ).jpg
[edit]Voting period ends on 28 Sep 2024 at 18:45:27 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious buildings
- Info Stucco decoration, Bou Inania Madrasa, Fez, Marocco, my shot. -- Mile (talk) 18:45, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Mile (talk) 18:45, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Neutral Interesting, but I miss the corner at the bottom . Cmao20 (talk) 20:06, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support JukoFF (talk) 23:05, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support El Golli Mohamed (talk) 00:02, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 15:54, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 14:28, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
File:Close wing moisture sucking of Appias galba (Wallace, 1867) - Indian Orange Albatross WLB.jpg
[edit]Voting period ends on 28 Sep 2024 at 13:40:28 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Lepidoptera#Family : Nymphalidae (Brush-footed Butterflies)
- Info create, uploaded, and nominated by Anitava Roy -- Anitava Roy (talk) 13:40, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Anitava Roy (talk) 13:40, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 20:05, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 07:08, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 07:48, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 11:47, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 16:24, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Thi (talk) 16:57, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 17:05, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Terragio67 (talk) 07:17, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Zzzs (talk) 14:45, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 15:54, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 28 Sep 2024 at 13:21:14 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Germany#Bavaria
- Info created by Llez - uploaded by Llez - nominated by Llez -- Llez (talk) 13:21, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
This is a picture of the protected area listed at WDPA under the ID 395954
|
This is a picture of the protected area listed at WDPA under the ID 555522234
|
This is a picture of the protected area listed at WDPA under the ID 555522275
|
- Support -- Llez (talk) 13:21, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
-
weaksupport Beautiful but IMO oversharpened (haloes). Cmao20 (talk) 20:05, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- New version is a considerable improvement. Cmao20 (talk) 16:54, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 17:05, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
* Weak support Agree with Cmao20... --Terragio67 (talk) 05:21, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
- Info I made a new version from RAW with a bit less sharpening and without haloes. --Llez (talk) 10:45, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
- Well done, Support Terragio67 (talk) 18:41, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
- Info I made a new version from RAW with a bit less sharpening and without haloes. --Llez (talk) 10:45, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:44, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 07:38, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 14:27, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 28 Sep 2024 at 12:29:36 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Settlements#Greece
- Info All by C messier -- C messier (talk) 12:29, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- An aerial view of Kounos, Mani, Greece, a village populated with tower houses, some up to five stories high, built by families to protect them from thieves or hostile families. Support -- C messier (talk) 12:29, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Lovely Cmao20 (talk) 20:04, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Excellent overview of that picturesque village, and the sun illuminates it like a spotlight. – Aristeas (talk) 09:17, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 11:45, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 16:23, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --A.Savin 21:53, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support JukoFF (talk) 23:05, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 01:38, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 01:55, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Terragio67 (talk) 05:23, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support —Bruce1eetalk 06:38, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Thi (talk) 10:24, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 15:53, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Yerpo Eh? 19:53, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Not bad. Wolverine XI 08:30, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 28 Sep 2024 at 09:39:32 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious_buildings#Austria
- Info High altar at the parish church Schönbach, Lower Austria. Anonymous master, around 1490. All by me --Uoaei1 (talk) 09:39, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 09:39, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 13:13, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 20:04, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 11:43, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 16:23, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 16:56, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Even the windows are not (partially) burned.--Famberhorst (talk) 17:03, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 01:42, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Terragio67 (talk) 05:25, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Thi (talk) 10:26, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
File:Cesenatico - Museo della Marineria di Cesenatico - Sezione galleggiante - Barche storiche - 2024-09-18 19-09-09 001.jpg
[edit]Voting period ends on 27 Sep 2024 at 19:14:37 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Water_transport#Sailing_ships
- Info In the center is the Maritime Museum of Cesenatico, on the left you can see the historic boats of the Adriatic Sea, the only floating museum in Italy located on the oldest and most evocative part of the Leonardo's canal port of Cesenatico. This Museum Is the custodian of the maritime history of sailing boats coming from the north of the Adriatic Sea. C.U.N. by Terragio67 -- Terragio67 (talk) 19:14, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Terragio67 (talk) 19:14, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Nice, colorful -- George Chernilevsky talk 05:51, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 13:12, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Pretty Cmao20 (talk) 20:03, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 11:41, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 16:56, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Per Chernilevsky.--Famberhorst (talk) 17:00, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Milseburg (talk) 18:53, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support per George. --SHB2000 (talk) 01:55, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --GRDN711 (talk) 03:15, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Laitche (talk) 04:50, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --C messier (talk) 07:46, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 27 Sep 2024 at 15:40:57 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Italy#Trentino-Alto Adige
- Info Schneespitze in the Stubai Alps seen on the ascent from the Magdeburg hut. All by me. -- Milseburg (talk) 15:40, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Milseburg (talk) 15:40, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 05:53, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 11:21, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 13:12, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 20:03, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Sharp image, great color contrast between the deep blue of the sky and the rust tinged rocks. Seems a little bit over sharpened at full resolution. Needsmoreritalin (talk) 02:35, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 11:40, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Zzzs (talk) 12:01, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 14:10, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Not sure WB is fine, but noise for sure. --Mile (talk) 16:46, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support What a view! Wolverine XI 08:32, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 27 Sep 2024 at 12:14:04 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Astronomy#Nebulae
- Info created by NASA ESA CSA / Science leads and image processing: M. McCaughrean S. Pearson, uploaded and nominated by Yann
- Support Huge resolution image of the Orion Nebula and Trapezium Cluster by the James Webb Space Telescope. -- Yann (talk) 12:14, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 13:34, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Thi (talk) 18:20, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Hard to say no to JWST Cmao20 (talk) 20:02, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Fascinating, especially the red center that reminds me of a crystal. -- Radomianin (talk) 06:25, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 11:38, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Zzzs (talk) 11:55, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 14:10, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support El Golli Mohamed (talk) 00:03, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --C messier (talk) 17:42, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Terragio67 (talk) 18:49, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 27 Sep 2024 at 10:35:18 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Sculptures#Sculptures_indoors
- Info All by -- Wilfredor (talk) 10:35, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Peulle (talk) 10:56, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Good picture of this famous statue. Yann (talk) 11:39, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 13:19, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
- Comment With respect to the original photograph, there are some artifacts introduced by removing the background: the tail shows a double contour, what seems a casting defects has been removed from the right-hand leg, and three cusps are present below the neck. I added three notes about them. --Harlock81 (talk) 13:30, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
- Done thanks Wilfredor (talk) 13:59, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support. Reminded me of this, pretty hilarious! --Gnosis (talk) 22:37, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cool Cmao20 (talk) 20:01, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 11:36, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 14:09, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Thi (talk) 17:00, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support El Golli Mohamed (talk) 00:04, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 27 Sep 2024 at 10:12:35 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family : Hirundinidae (Swallows)
- Info created, uploaded and nominated by Yerpo — Yerpo Eh? 10:12, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 13:32, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support I'm not always that keen on birds on wires but this one is very sharp and well composed. Cmao20 (talk) 20:01, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 14:09, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:56, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support El Golli Mohamed (talk) 00:05, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Thi (talk) 10:24, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:42, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 26 Sep 2024 at 22:16:58 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Industry#France
- Info The one and only quality image of this building is from 2006 so I tried to catch the current look with current technical quality. The shape of the building is a truncated cone, which means that the vertical lines in the photo cannot be exactly vertical. Created/uploaded/nominated by Lynx1211 -- Lynx1211 (talk) 22:16, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Ah, sod it - yes, I support. I was going to oppose it when I saw the thumbnail, as I thought of it as "just another windmill", but after looking at the full size, I think the technical quality is very high and the light is just right for the composition.--Peulle (talk) 10:33, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --A.Savin 15:17, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 05:29, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 13:09, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 13:12, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Peulle. Cmao20 (talk) 20:00, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 11:34, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 16:21, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Milseburg (talk) 18:54, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Thi (talk) 10:27, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 26 Sep 2024 at 13:10:53 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Land_vehicles#Rail_vehicles
- Info created by David Gubler - uploaded by David Gubler - nominated by Bruce1ee -- —Bruce1eetalk 13:10, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- —Bruce1eetalk 13:10, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 20:25, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Laitche (talk) 20:29, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Perspective (left is leaning in), and I think it's also a bit too soft, looking at the mountain in particular.--Peulle (talk) 10:48, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Thanks for your feedback! I've uploaded a new version with corrected perspective (you may need to use SHIFT+Reload to see the changes), not much I can do about the sharpness. --Kabelleger (talk) 10:57, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 11:43, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Colors seem a little too saturated and overall, the image appears dark. Consider lightening to increase detail in the mid-tones. --GRDN711 (talk) 16:37, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 05:29, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 20:00, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 11:31, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Weak support per GRDN117. --SHB2000 (talk) 01:55, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Nice picture. Wolverine XI 20:13, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 25 Sep 2024 at 20:37:57 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious_buildings#Moldova
- Info Interior of the church of the Nativity of the Virgin Mary in Butuceni, Orhei, Moldova. c/u/n by Poco a poco (talk) 20:37, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 20:37, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Image full of details, without noise and well defined despite obvious difficulties due to the side lighting alone. -- Terragio67 (talk) 00:37, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 11:22, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 05:28, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support I really like this photo and feel it should be highlighted. I saw the light coming through the window and thought, "WOW, those rays of light are beautiful." But then I moved up to the top right corner and noticed how light pollution prevents the details of the wall fresco from being visible (it looks washed out). I think this can be fixed in Lightroom (something opposite to the process of correcting vignetting). --Wilfredor (talk) 17:31, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support A beautiful religious space. I could quibble about a couple of things e.g. the top crop but I am willing to accept them as part of the compromises needed to capture this lovely space in a single frame. Cmao20 (talk) 19:58, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
Request The perspective is a bit distorted, I don't know if it's beacause the building is not exactly symmetrical or because the camera was leaning a bit more to the left than it should. Can this be corrected? --Lynx1211 (talk) 09:23, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you for the review. I made some perspective improvements, Lynx1211. FYI, too Mile. --Poco a poco (talk) 08:23, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
- Can you get crop above, to clear chopred Saint ? --Mile (talk) 16:39, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Seeing candlebars ane around, you did a lot "looking for center". I dislike Saint above is cut, instead you could crop candlebears and save Saint. Distortion. --Mile (talk) 16:50, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 25 Sep 2024 at 12:39:36 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Photo techniques/Black and White#Portraits
- Info created by crommelincklars - uploaded by Cybertrip - nominated by ★ -- ★ 12:39, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- ★ 12:39, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support JukoFF (talk) 18:39, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 11:45, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --GRDN711 (talk) 16:39, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 05:28, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Thi (talk) 10:24, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Something different --Wilfredor (talk) 17:32, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Visibly heavily JPEG artefacted (see her neck and chin - compression artefacts are v obvious). Cmao20 (talk) 19:57, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- The grayscale works so well with this portrait and adds drama. Needsmoreritalin (talk) 02:50, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Well-done portrait, matches the character of some of her songs very well. – Aristeas (talk) 09:14, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 11:25, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 25 Sep 2024 at 11:43:22 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/In_their_habitats#Carnivora_(Carnivores)
- Info All by -- Wilfredor (talk) 11:43, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Grand. Epic. Cinematic. Wanderer above the sea of fog vibes Henrysz (talk) 16:28, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 17:35, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 05:28, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 11:22, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Not FP-standards in my heavily biased opinion. Wolverine XI 15:13, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- all the opinions are welcome :) Wilfredor (talk) 17:29, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Great, and please do not lower the highlights on the snow - snow should be this blindingly white. Cmao20 (talk) 19:56, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support The higher perspective works here to really add depth to the image. The dog doesn't seem to be afraid of heights. The sun on the dog's face provides warmth in an otherwise cold image. --Needsmoreritalin (talk) 02:55, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Good dog picture but not enough wow for FP. --GRDN711 (talk) 03:44, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- @GRDN711: Do you want to cast an oppose vote or did you use
((o))
intentionally? (With(())
your vote has no defined meaning.) Just asking, because in the end somebody must count the votes … – Aristeas (talk) 09:12, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Done Sometimes round versus curly brackets are a struggle for me…😊. Thank you for your comment. --GRDN711 (talk) 03:02, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
- @GRDN711: Do you want to cast an oppose vote or did you use
- Support Beautiful environmental portait of a proud creature. – Aristeas (talk) 09:12, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 11:23, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Zzzs (talk) 11:50, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:49, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 24 Sep 2024 at 22:32:23 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Sculptures#Monuments_and_memorials
- Info created by Tracychapmanfan5 - uploaded by Tracychapmanfan5 - nominated by Henrysz -- Henrysz (talk) 22:32, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Henrysz (talk) 22:32, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Crop too tight at the top -- Basile Morin (talk) 05:58, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- Weak support Superb subject, great interplay of light and shadows, but I must agree with Basile that the top crop is very tight. Cmao20 (talk) 19:53, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 24 Sep 2024 at 19:22:03 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Brazil
- Info created and uploaded by Bruno Tamm, nominated by me. RodRabelo7 (talk) 19:22, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- RodRabelo7 (talk) 19:22, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
Neutral Perspective correction required. ★ 19:55, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Corrected. ★ 01:09, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- wide-angle don't need perspective fix, you changed it to another image completely different from the original author conception, IMHO, should be uploaded in another image Wilfredor (talk) 02:37, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Gorgeous colors and light Henrysz (talk) 22:35, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 17:35, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- Comment There seems to be 2 dust spots in the sky. Notes added -- Basile Morin (talk) 20:54, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 12:33, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support JukoFF (talk) 18:39, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Coordinates and English description should be added. --Milseburg (talk) 15:26, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
- Done, Milseburg. RodRabelo7 (talk) 18:44, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks. I want to support. I just found an issue to fix bottom rigth, see note. --Milseburg (talk) 18:50, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Done, Milseburg. RodRabelo7 (talk) 18:44, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 05:27, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 19:51, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Aristeas (talk) 09:05, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 24 Sep 2024 at 16:27:42 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Historical#1850-1899
- Info created by Charles Marville (1813–1879), restored, uploaded, and nominated by Yann, after a suggestion of LucaLindholm
- Support Old picture of Paris, before the time of Haussman's renovation. -- Yann (talk) 16:27, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- @Yann, Thank you so much for having done it by yourself. In the last two weeks I switched to Mac from Windows and I'm also developing also a little web site, so I was mentally occupied with those and other things. ;D LucaLindholm (talk) 18:03, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --LucaLindholm (talk) 18:03, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 12:31, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Mile (talk) 10:56, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 13:20, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 05:27, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support V nice - an old photo that really feels like you can step inside it. Cmao20 (talk) 19:50, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Nice document of the old Paris, before Haussman. – Aristeas (talk) 09:04, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Thi (talk) 10:29, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 24 Sep 2024 at 06:44:06 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Castles and fortifications
- Info Kasbah Amridil, Marocco (قصبة امريديل), old Fortress in Marocco. My shot. -- Mile (talk) 06:44, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Mile (talk) 06:44, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Captures the large subject in a single exposure without artifacts or atmospheric distortion. The only things missing from the image are Joe Strummer, Mick Jones, Paul Simonon and Topper Headon. --Needsmoreritalin (talk) 15:55, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 14:29, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 16:20, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 13:33, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Good one. Nice colours, composition + sharpness. Cmao20 (talk) 19:48, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support El Golli Mohamed (talk) 00:00, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 23 Sep 2024 at 17:44:17 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Architectural elements#Doors
- Info created by Riad Salih - uploaded by Riad Salih - nominated by Riad Salih -- Riad Salih (talk) 17:44, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Riad Salih (talk) 17:44, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Nice, considering it was taken from a cell phone. ★ 17:51, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Agree with ★. --Mile (talk) 09:00, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Weak Support Really nice composition, but details looks flat (due to taking with a cell phone) --XRay 💬 09:40, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 04:31, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Thi (talk) 10:29, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
- Neutral The composition is very nice, but I agree with XRay about the level of detail and the resolution is rather small in this day and age. BigDom (talk) 05:29, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose with respect to the author who has presented at least a high quality QI, but I don't think 'considering it was taken from a cell phone' is the right attitude. Either it's good enough for FP or it's not, we shouldn't make allowances for the quality of equipment. I love the motif but I'm not convinced by the level of detail at this relatively small resolution (less than 6 megapixels) and I don't think the bottom crops in the corners are perfect. Cmao20 (talk) 19:46, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Hey @Cmao20
- Thank you for your feedback. I acknowledge the points you've made about the quality. If the image has the potential to become a featured picture, I commit to returning to the location to capture it again using a Nikon camera. As for the cropping, Here is an overview of the building. Please share any suggestions you might have for a better crop. Riad Salih (talk) 17:13, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
File:Close wing mud-puddling position of Charaxes bharata C. & R. Felder, 1867 - Indian Nawab 10.jpg
[edit]Voting period ends on 23 Sep 2024 at 13:04:04 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Lepidoptera#Family : Nymphalidae (Brush-footed Butterflies)
- Info created by Atanu Bose Photography - uploaded by Atanu Bose Photography - nominated by Atudu -- Atudu (talk) 13:04, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Atudu (talk) 13:04, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose You present an impressive collection of beautiful butterfly images here but in this case I think the detail is not at FP level. Sorry. --Ermell (talk) 20:59, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
- Comment IQ is fine, but position and left crop - more space. --Mile (talk) 09:08, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Good for me considering high resolution and high pixel level detail. I feel like if we say this one isn't good enough, we are getting close to mandating focus-stacking for this kind of image. There is a bit of colour noise but it's not enough to put me off too much. Cmao20 (talk) 19:44, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 22 Sep 2024 at 19:35:33 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Castles_and_fortifications#Spain
- Info View of the Alcázar of Segovia during sunrise, Segovia, Castile and León, Spain. The UNESCO World Heritage Site dates from the 12th century and has been home to twenty-two kings. The Alcazar of Segovia has made its mark on cinema and popular culture. It was used by Orson Welles in the film "Chimes at Midnight" and served as inspiration for Cinderella castle in the Walt Disney movie and also in the Disneyworld sites. It's one of the most renowed medieval castles in the world and one of the most visited landmarks in Spain. c/u/n by me, Poco a poco (talk) 12:52, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 19:35, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Not the best perspective, IMO. Wolverine XI 16:44, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Good interplay of light, clouds and the building.--Ermell (talk) 20:52, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose the composition feels aimless. The lighting makes the castle appear flat Henrysz (talk) 21:03, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Interesting to see a different perspective of a much-photographed building, but the lighting here isn't really working for me, sorry. I agree with Henrysz regarding the 'flat'ness. BigDom (talk) 02:39, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Neutral per above. --SHB2000 (talk) 06:05, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support I am fine. Would say fort is very good and sharp. I wish other around could be similar sharp. Those 2-3 storks on trees solved. --Mile (talk) 09:04, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support I like the light and the perspective/angle. ★ 22:26, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 18:55, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Amazing and clearly FP to me. Very sharp on the building. Lovely light and colours. I think there is possibly a point in that this is the duller side of the castle to photograph and a lot of it is featureless wall. But still very good and well composed. Cmao20 (talk) 19:42, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose There are too many visible artificial transitions between sharp and blurry areas. Probably from merging two images or two layers (original and sharpened). I would be OK with using software to adjust sharpness, but the transitions are too artificial. Also, there is a lot of color noise on the castle and roof, probably created by increasing the sharpness. The light makes the picture too flat and not very interesting.
File:Ravenna - Basilica di Sant'Apollinare in Classe - Vista esterna - 2024-09-13 23-38-55 001.jpg
[edit]Voting period ends on 22 Sep 2024 at 22:19:23 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious_buildings#Italy
- Info The Basilica of Sant'Apollinare in Classe, located in Ravenna, is truly a jewel surrounded by greenery. Internally, the mosaic of the apse also depicts Sant'Apollinare in a lush green lawn, surrounded by trees, flowers and animals, creating an atmosphere of peace and serenity. This scenario symbolizes heaven and eternal life, making the basilica a place of great beauty and spirituality. All by Terragio67 -- Terragio67 (talk) 22:19, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
* Support -- Terragio67 (talk) 22:19, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support I find both versions attractive, but I personally like this one better. The group of sculptures on the left adds to the overall appeal of the scene. -- Radomianin (talk) 06:29, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks, you are right. I decided to upload a new version in order to preserve the full scenery. I will correlate the two images as other version. I also really like this image, but I decided to opt for the alternative image because the depiction being too broad becomes difficult to interpret and perhaps even distracting. Terragio67 (talk) 07:54, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support I find the original more balanced. Cmao20 (talk) 19:40, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Wonderful golden light. Per Radomianin and Cmao20 I prefer the wide version. – Aristeas (talk) 09:01, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
Alternative cropped version
[edit]- Info I decided to crop the left part of the image above to give centrality and the right importance to the basilica immersed in the greenery of nature, trying in the same way to represent an atmosphere of peace and serenity, similar to the [internal mosaic of the apse] where the tone of the colors resemble each other. This scenario symbolizes paradise and eternal life, making the basilica a place of great beauty and spirituality. Created, 2nd version uploaded, and nominated by Terragio67 -- Terragio67 (talk) 19:36, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Terragio67 (talk) 19:36, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support For me this crop is better.--Famberhorst (talk) 05:02, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 06:33, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:54, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support, clearly better than the original crop. --PierreSelim (talk) 14:19, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 14:26, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 18:55, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Thi (talk) 10:30, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 12:27, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 13:32, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 13:21, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
- Neutral Would be support if I'd not seen the original but it's just better. In the original we have the gentle sweep across the scene with the trees getting larger and drawing the eye towards the basilica, plus the carved animal figures all pointing in the same direction that give a sense of movement as we look across the frame. The alternative lacks any of this and feels comparatively static. Cmao20 (talk) 19:40, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support El Golli Mohamed (talk) 00:08, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
File:Phare du Paon (Île-de-Bréhat) (3).jpg, not featured
[edit]Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 22 Sep 2024 at 08:30:51 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Towers#France
- Info created by Gzen92 - uploaded by Gzen92 - nominated by Gzen92 -- Gzen92 (talk) 08:30, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Gzen92 (talk) 08:30, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 16:30, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 18:55, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support A little bit dark but interesting and high quality. Cmao20 (talk) 19:37, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Cmao20. – Aristeas (talk) 09:00, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
Candidati per la rimozione dalla vetrina
[edit]Featured picture candidates
[edit]Voting period ends on 1 Oct 2024 at 15:44:20 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#France
- Info created by Gzen92 - uploaded by Gzen92 - nominated by Gzen92 -- Gzen92 (talk) 15:44, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Gzen92 (talk) 15:44, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 1 Oct 2024 at 13:53:29 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants#Family : Nymphaeaceae
- Info created by Ministério da Ciência, Tecnologia e Inovação (Luara Baggi) - uploaded by Luiz79 - nominated by ★ -- ★ 13:53, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Nice textures. -- ★ 13:53, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 1 Oct 2024 at 07:35:49 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds#Family_:_Psittaculidae_(True_Parrots)
- Info created by Giles Laurent - uploaded by Giles Laurent - nominated by Giles Laurent -- Giles Laurent (talk) 07:35, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 07:35, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Excellent, and worth pointing out that this is the only QI of this species on Commons, so it is probably the best free-license photo of this bird. Cmao20 (talk) 15:48, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 1 Oct 2024 at 04:43:55 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Industry#Australia
- Info created and uploaded by DXR - nominated by SHB2000 --SHB2000 (talk) 04:43, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 04:43, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 15:46, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 30 Sep 2024 at 21:31:45 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious_buildings#Austria
- Info Panoramic view (cylindrical projection) of the interior of Bad Traunstein parish church, Lower Austria. All by me. --Uoaei1 (talk) 21:31, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 21:31, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 04:34, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Sharpness is amazing, really well done Cmao20 (talk) 15:46, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 30 Sep 2024 at 19:15:01 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious buildings#Brazil
- Info Side view of the Church of Saint Francis of Assisi, a example of modernist architecture designed by Oscar Niemeyer, and partial view of Lake Pampulha, an artificial lake constructed in Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil. In July 2016, the Pampulha Modern Ensemble was declared an UNESCO World Heritage Site. Created and uploaded by Jani Pereira - nominated by ★ -- ★ 19:15, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- ★ 19:15, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose A rather grainy picture of a dull building. Lack of definition and sharpness, and dull light. Cmao20 (talk) 20:16, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose The quality is too poor for FP. Wolverine XI 08:24, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
- I withdraw my nomination Ok. ★ 13:53, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 30 Sep 2024 at 18:39:52 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places#Architecture#Exteriors
- Info Wiki Loves Monuments contest participant. Created - uploaded by Елена Нечипоренко - nominated by FBilula -- FBilula (talk) 18:39, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- FBilula (talk) 18:39, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Any translation possible? And please correct the geo coding, it is obviously wrong. --Uoaei1 (talk) 18:58, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support I added an English caption. Beautiful picture of an amazing building. Cmao20 (talk) 20:15, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 06:26, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 07:39, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Saw it on IQ, said this must pass FP. Nice image. --Mile (talk) 08:52, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 13:54, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 30 Sep 2024 at 04:24:45 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants #Family : Verbenaceae
- Info Inflorescence of a Verbena bonariensis. Focus stack of 29 photos. The plant blooms from July until autumn with fragrant flowers that attract many butterflies.
All by -- Famberhorst (talk) 04:24, 21 September 2024 (UTC) - Support -- Famberhorst (talk) 04:24, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support El Golli Mohamed (talk) 12:45, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 15:52, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 15:58, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --A.Savin 17:35, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Lovely colors. Wolverine XI 20:17, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 04:38, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 06:25, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 07:39, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
File:NASA-Apollo8-Dec24-Earthrise.jpg (delist)
[edit]Voting period ends on 29 Sep 2024 at 22:04:57
- Info Much better copy: higher resolution, better colors, less compression, etc. (Original nomination)
- Delist and replace -- Yann (talk) 22:04, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Delist and replace --Wilfredor (talk) 23:14, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Delist and replace --Zzzs (talk) 01:36, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
- Delist and replace per above. --SHB2000 (talk) 01:53, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
- Delist and replace --Terragio67 (talk) 05:08, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
- Neutral, I like the colors of the existing file, but the others’ comments are too numerous not to be convincing. - Jarrod Baniqued (talk) 07:42, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
- Delist and replace --Thi (talk) 10:19, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
- Keep With a picture like 'Earthrise' that has gained so much of its value from its iconic status, it is IMO appropriate to feature the version of it that is most similar to the 'famous' version, as opposed to a version that may be of higher technical quality. The proposed replacement is clearly a better quality image but if we want to feature a good quality photo of the Earth above the lunar surface, we shouldn't feature this image at all because it has long been superseded by photos from new space probes. Its value comes from its historical and cultural importance, not its technical quality. The iconic version of the picture, the one used by most sources including NASA themselves, is the current FP, and so that is the one we should feature. See also 1, 2, 3. 16:03, 21 September 2024 (UTC)Cmao20 (talk)
- Keep I agree with Cmao20. --FreCha (talk) 14:01, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 29 Sep 2024 at 21:19:32 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Hungary
- Info created, uploaded and nominated by MrPanyGoff -- MrPanyGoff 21:19, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- MrPanyGoff 21:19, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Sharp and attractively lit photo of interesting architecture. Sky is pretty bland, would be better still with a more interesting sky. Cmao20 (talk) 21:28, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:50, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 15:58, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
- Neutral Nice shot and looks like best available photo of this theater so far, but still I miss some more wow for an FP. --A.Savin 17:30, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 14:29, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
File:Close wing mud pudding position of Delias hyparete (Linnaeus, 1758) - Painted Jezebel WLB IMG 1197.jpg
[edit]Voting period ends on 29 Sep 2024 at 19:09:05 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Lepidoptera#Family : Pieridae (Whites and Sulphurs)
- Info created by Thamblyok - uploaded by Thamblyok - nominated by Atudu -- Atudu (talk) 19:09, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Atudu (talk) 19:09, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you 🙏 Thamblyok (talk) 13:43, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
- Weak support Good composition, quality and colours, however the damage to the wing is a bit of a shame. Cmao20 (talk) 19:55, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you 🙏 Thamblyok (talk) 13:43, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Nice. -- -donald- (talk) 11:47, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you 🙏 Thamblyok (talk) 13:43, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:48, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you 🙏 Thamblyok (talk) 13:42, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 15:57, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you 🙏 Thamblyok (talk) 13:42, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 07:38, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you 🙏 Thamblyok (talk) 13:42, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 29 Sep 2024 at 16:18:31 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds#Family : Lybiidae (African_Barbets)
- Info created by Giles Laurent - uploaded by Giles Laurent - nominated by Giles Laurent -- Giles Laurent (talk) 16:18, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 16:18, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 16:25, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 17:16, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Atudu (talk) 19:11, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Amazing colors. Yann (talk) 22:08, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support El Golli Mohamed (talk) 00:01, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Zzzs (talk) 01:29, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 01:33, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 01:53, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --GRDN711 (talk) 03:07, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Terragio67 (talk) 05:10, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 05:29, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Thi (talk) 10:21, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:47, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 15:57, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Nice stance. Wolverine XI 20:18, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --C messier (talk) 09:23, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 12:45, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 29 Sep 2024 at 12:44:39 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Photo techniques/Black and White#Places
- Info created by Antonio Thomás Koenigkam Oliveira - uploaded by Simtegrity - nominated by ★ -- ★ 12:44, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- ★ 12:44, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Weak oppose Image quality is fine. I don't understand the reason for black and white though, especially when the sky is so featureless and lacking in contrast. I like these pictures looking upwards at skyscrapers and tall buildings but I think this one lacks a strong composition and that the little bits of streetlamps poking in at the edges of the frame detract from the image. Cmao20 (talk) 13:49, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- I withdraw my nomination ★ 19:14, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 28 Sep 2024 at 20:23:31 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Settlements#Austria
- Info A risky nomination and I don't know what you'll think to this. But there is something about the composition that I find really interesting and I like it more the longer I look at it. I think it's the warm and inviting light, the leading lines from the sweep of the road and the brickwork, the rich colours, and the contrast between the almost aggresive regularity of the brickwork and the repeating patterns in the roofs, compared with the somewhat eclectic architecture of the house. Anyway, it's subtle, but this is IMO a really good example of how to shoot a street in a small town. created by Johann Jaritz - uploaded by Johann Jaritz - nominated by Cmao20 -- Cmao20 (talk) 20:23, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Cmao20 (talk) 20:23, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support – I like the composition, I find it arresting. —Bruce1eetalk 07:08, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Indeed. At the first glance I am not that happy about some of the elements (e.g. the walls at the right), but the short telephoto perspective (70mm) combines all them to a really convicing composition. It’s often very difficult to find satisfying compositions in small city streets, and this is indeed a greaat example. – Aristeas (talk) 09:20, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 11:52, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Where to focus ? Nothing special for FP. --Mile (talk) 16:32, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support The overall picture is attractive to me, also because the trees are bare.--Famberhorst (talk) 17:15, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 01:54, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose I understand your doubts and respect your work. But no wow for me, sorry. --Uoaei1 (talk) 18:51, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Nothing special for me either. Wolverine XI 08:26, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 28 Sep 2024 at 20:23:33 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious_buildings#Russia
- Info I love the golden winter lighting in this photo of a lesser known religious building. Created by Саня Новиков - uploaded by Саня Новиков - nominated by Cmao20 -- Cmao20 (talk) 20:23, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Cmao20 (talk) 20:23, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 04:40, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support according to the nomination statement. // Welcome back, Cmao20! -- Radomianin (talk) 06:20, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 07:48, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Great find – I’m happy we have you back here as nominator, Cmao20! – Aristeas (talk) 09:18, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks. I had some laptop trouble plus a major contract at work. But I never mean to leave, it just sort of happens. Will always come back after a break. Cmao20 (talk) 13:44, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 11:50, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 16:25, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Mile (talk) 16:43, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 17:11, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support JukoFF (talk) 23:05, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Terragio67 (talk) 05:15, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 15:55, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 28 Sep 2024 at 19:10:55 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious buildings#Germany
- Info created by KaiBorgeest (talk) 19:10, 19 September 2024 (UTC) - uploaded by KaiBorgeest (talk) 19:10, 19 September 2024 (UTC) - nominated by KaiBorgeest -- KaiBorgeest (talk) 19:10, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- KaiBorgeest (talk) 19:10, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support I like the shadows and the light. Subtle and pretty. Cmao20 (talk) 20:06, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 04:41, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Beautiful composition for me.--Famberhorst (talk) 17:08, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Milseburg (talk) 18:51, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --GRDN711 (talk) 03:12, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Thi (talk) 10:22, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:46, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 15:55, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 07:37, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
File:Stucco decoration, Bou Inania Madrasa, Fez, Marocco (المدرسة البوعنانية, ⴰⵙⵉⵏⴰⵏ ⴱⵓ ⵉⵏⴰⵏⵉⵢⴰ).jpg
[edit]Voting period ends on 28 Sep 2024 at 18:45:27 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious buildings
- Info Stucco decoration, Bou Inania Madrasa, Fez, Marocco, my shot. -- Mile (talk) 18:45, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Mile (talk) 18:45, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Neutral Interesting, but I miss the corner at the bottom . Cmao20 (talk) 20:06, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support JukoFF (talk) 23:05, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support El Golli Mohamed (talk) 00:02, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 15:54, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 14:28, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
File:Close wing moisture sucking of Appias galba (Wallace, 1867) - Indian Orange Albatross WLB.jpg
[edit]Voting period ends on 28 Sep 2024 at 13:40:28 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Lepidoptera#Family : Nymphalidae (Brush-footed Butterflies)
- Info create, uploaded, and nominated by Anitava Roy -- Anitava Roy (talk) 13:40, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Anitava Roy (talk) 13:40, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 20:05, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 07:08, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 07:48, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 11:47, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 16:24, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Thi (talk) 16:57, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 17:05, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Terragio67 (talk) 07:17, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Zzzs (talk) 14:45, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 15:54, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 28 Sep 2024 at 13:21:14 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Germany#Bavaria
- Info created by Llez - uploaded by Llez - nominated by Llez -- Llez (talk) 13:21, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
This is a picture of the protected area listed at WDPA under the ID 395954
|
This is a picture of the protected area listed at WDPA under the ID 555522234
|
This is a picture of the protected area listed at WDPA under the ID 555522275
|
- Support -- Llez (talk) 13:21, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
-
weaksupport Beautiful but IMO oversharpened (haloes). Cmao20 (talk) 20:05, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- New version is a considerable improvement. Cmao20 (talk) 16:54, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 17:05, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
* Weak support Agree with Cmao20... --Terragio67 (talk) 05:21, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
- Info I made a new version from RAW with a bit less sharpening and without haloes. --Llez (talk) 10:45, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
- Well done, Support Terragio67 (talk) 18:41, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
- Info I made a new version from RAW with a bit less sharpening and without haloes. --Llez (talk) 10:45, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:44, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 07:38, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 14:27, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 28 Sep 2024 at 12:29:36 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Settlements#Greece
- Info All by C messier -- C messier (talk) 12:29, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- An aerial view of Kounos, Mani, Greece, a village populated with tower houses, some up to five stories high, built by families to protect them from thieves or hostile families. Support -- C messier (talk) 12:29, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Lovely Cmao20 (talk) 20:04, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Excellent overview of that picturesque village, and the sun illuminates it like a spotlight. – Aristeas (talk) 09:17, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 11:45, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 16:23, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --A.Savin 21:53, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support JukoFF (talk) 23:05, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 01:38, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 01:55, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Terragio67 (talk) 05:23, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support —Bruce1eetalk 06:38, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Thi (talk) 10:24, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 15:53, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Yerpo Eh? 19:53, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Not bad. Wolverine XI 08:30, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 28 Sep 2024 at 09:39:32 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious_buildings#Austria
- Info High altar at the parish church Schönbach, Lower Austria. Anonymous master, around 1490. All by me --Uoaei1 (talk) 09:39, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 09:39, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 13:13, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 20:04, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 11:43, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 16:23, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 16:56, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Even the windows are not (partially) burned.--Famberhorst (talk) 17:03, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 01:42, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Terragio67 (talk) 05:25, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Thi (talk) 10:26, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
File:Cesenatico - Museo della Marineria di Cesenatico - Sezione galleggiante - Barche storiche - 2024-09-18 19-09-09 001.jpg
[edit]Voting period ends on 27 Sep 2024 at 19:14:37 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Water_transport#Sailing_ships
- Info In the center is the Maritime Museum of Cesenatico, on the left you can see the historic boats of the Adriatic Sea, the only floating museum in Italy located on the oldest and most evocative part of the Leonardo's canal port of Cesenatico. This Museum Is the custodian of the maritime history of sailing boats coming from the north of the Adriatic Sea. C.U.N. by Terragio67 -- Terragio67 (talk) 19:14, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Terragio67 (talk) 19:14, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Nice, colorful -- George Chernilevsky talk 05:51, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 13:12, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Pretty Cmao20 (talk) 20:03, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 11:41, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 16:56, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Per Chernilevsky.--Famberhorst (talk) 17:00, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Milseburg (talk) 18:53, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support per George. --SHB2000 (talk) 01:55, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --GRDN711 (talk) 03:15, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Laitche (talk) 04:50, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --C messier (talk) 07:46, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 27 Sep 2024 at 15:40:57 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Italy#Trentino-Alto Adige
- Info Schneespitze in the Stubai Alps seen on the ascent from the Magdeburg hut. All by me. -- Milseburg (talk) 15:40, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Milseburg (talk) 15:40, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 05:53, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 11:21, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 13:12, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 20:03, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Sharp image, great color contrast between the deep blue of the sky and the rust tinged rocks. Seems a little bit over sharpened at full resolution. Needsmoreritalin (talk) 02:35, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 11:40, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Zzzs (talk) 12:01, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 14:10, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Not sure WB is fine, but noise for sure. --Mile (talk) 16:46, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support What a view! Wolverine XI 08:32, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 27 Sep 2024 at 12:14:04 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Astronomy#Nebulae
- Info created by NASA ESA CSA / Science leads and image processing: M. McCaughrean S. Pearson, uploaded and nominated by Yann
- Support Huge resolution image of the Orion Nebula and Trapezium Cluster by the James Webb Space Telescope. -- Yann (talk) 12:14, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 13:34, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Thi (talk) 18:20, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Hard to say no to JWST Cmao20 (talk) 20:02, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Fascinating, especially the red center that reminds me of a crystal. -- Radomianin (talk) 06:25, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 11:38, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Zzzs (talk) 11:55, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 14:10, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support El Golli Mohamed (talk) 00:03, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --C messier (talk) 17:42, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Terragio67 (talk) 18:49, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 27 Sep 2024 at 10:35:18 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Sculptures#Sculptures_indoors
- Info All by -- Wilfredor (talk) 10:35, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Peulle (talk) 10:56, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Good picture of this famous statue. Yann (talk) 11:39, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 13:19, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
- Comment With respect to the original photograph, there are some artifacts introduced by removing the background: the tail shows a double contour, what seems a casting defects has been removed from the right-hand leg, and three cusps are present below the neck. I added three notes about them. --Harlock81 (talk) 13:30, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
- Done thanks Wilfredor (talk) 13:59, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support. Reminded me of this, pretty hilarious! --Gnosis (talk) 22:37, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cool Cmao20 (talk) 20:01, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 11:36, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 14:09, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Thi (talk) 17:00, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support El Golli Mohamed (talk) 00:04, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 27 Sep 2024 at 10:12:35 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family : Hirundinidae (Swallows)
- Info created, uploaded and nominated by Yerpo — Yerpo Eh? 10:12, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 13:32, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support I'm not always that keen on birds on wires but this one is very sharp and well composed. Cmao20 (talk) 20:01, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 14:09, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:56, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support El Golli Mohamed (talk) 00:05, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Thi (talk) 10:24, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:42, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 26 Sep 2024 at 22:16:58 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Industry#France
- Info The one and only quality image of this building is from 2006 so I tried to catch the current look with current technical quality. The shape of the building is a truncated cone, which means that the vertical lines in the photo cannot be exactly vertical. Created/uploaded/nominated by Lynx1211 -- Lynx1211 (talk) 22:16, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Ah, sod it - yes, I support. I was going to oppose it when I saw the thumbnail, as I thought of it as "just another windmill", but after looking at the full size, I think the technical quality is very high and the light is just right for the composition.--Peulle (talk) 10:33, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --A.Savin 15:17, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 05:29, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 13:09, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 13:12, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Peulle. Cmao20 (talk) 20:00, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 11:34, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 16:21, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Milseburg (talk) 18:54, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Thi (talk) 10:27, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 26 Sep 2024 at 13:10:53 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Land_vehicles#Rail_vehicles
- Info created by David Gubler - uploaded by David Gubler - nominated by Bruce1ee -- —Bruce1eetalk 13:10, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- —Bruce1eetalk 13:10, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 20:25, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Laitche (talk) 20:29, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Perspective (left is leaning in), and I think it's also a bit too soft, looking at the mountain in particular.--Peulle (talk) 10:48, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Thanks for your feedback! I've uploaded a new version with corrected perspective (you may need to use SHIFT+Reload to see the changes), not much I can do about the sharpness. --Kabelleger (talk) 10:57, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 11:43, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Colors seem a little too saturated and overall, the image appears dark. Consider lightening to increase detail in the mid-tones. --GRDN711 (talk) 16:37, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 05:29, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 20:00, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 11:31, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Weak support per GRDN117. --SHB2000 (talk) 01:55, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Nice picture. Wolverine XI 20:13, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 25 Sep 2024 at 20:37:57 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious_buildings#Moldova
- Info Interior of the church of the Nativity of the Virgin Mary in Butuceni, Orhei, Moldova. c/u/n by Poco a poco (talk) 20:37, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 20:37, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Image full of details, without noise and well defined despite obvious difficulties due to the side lighting alone. -- Terragio67 (talk) 00:37, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 11:22, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 05:28, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support I really like this photo and feel it should be highlighted. I saw the light coming through the window and thought, "WOW, those rays of light are beautiful." But then I moved up to the top right corner and noticed how light pollution prevents the details of the wall fresco from being visible (it looks washed out). I think this can be fixed in Lightroom (something opposite to the process of correcting vignetting). --Wilfredor (talk) 17:31, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support A beautiful religious space. I could quibble about a couple of things e.g. the top crop but I am willing to accept them as part of the compromises needed to capture this lovely space in a single frame. Cmao20 (talk) 19:58, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
Request The perspective is a bit distorted, I don't know if it's beacause the building is not exactly symmetrical or because the camera was leaning a bit more to the left than it should. Can this be corrected? --Lynx1211 (talk) 09:23, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you for the review. I made some perspective improvements, Lynx1211. FYI, too Mile. --Poco a poco (talk) 08:23, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
- Can you get crop above, to clear chopred Saint ? --Mile (talk) 16:39, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Seeing candlebars ane around, you did a lot "looking for center". I dislike Saint above is cut, instead you could crop candlebears and save Saint. Distortion. --Mile (talk) 16:50, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 25 Sep 2024 at 12:39:36 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Photo techniques/Black and White#Portraits
- Info created by crommelincklars - uploaded by Cybertrip - nominated by ★ -- ★ 12:39, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- ★ 12:39, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support JukoFF (talk) 18:39, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 11:45, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --GRDN711 (talk) 16:39, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 05:28, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Thi (talk) 10:24, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Something different --Wilfredor (talk) 17:32, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Visibly heavily JPEG artefacted (see her neck and chin - compression artefacts are v obvious). Cmao20 (talk) 19:57, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- The grayscale works so well with this portrait and adds drama. Needsmoreritalin (talk) 02:50, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Well-done portrait, matches the character of some of her songs very well. – Aristeas (talk) 09:14, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 11:25, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 25 Sep 2024 at 11:43:22 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/In_their_habitats#Carnivora_(Carnivores)
- Info All by -- Wilfredor (talk) 11:43, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Grand. Epic. Cinematic. Wanderer above the sea of fog vibes Henrysz (talk) 16:28, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 17:35, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 05:28, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 11:22, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Not FP-standards in my heavily biased opinion. Wolverine XI 15:13, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- all the opinions are welcome :) Wilfredor (talk) 17:29, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Great, and please do not lower the highlights on the snow - snow should be this blindingly white. Cmao20 (talk) 19:56, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support The higher perspective works here to really add depth to the image. The dog doesn't seem to be afraid of heights. The sun on the dog's face provides warmth in an otherwise cold image. --Needsmoreritalin (talk) 02:55, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Good dog picture but not enough wow for FP. --GRDN711 (talk) 03:44, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- @GRDN711: Do you want to cast an oppose vote or did you use
((o))
intentionally? (With(())
your vote has no defined meaning.) Just asking, because in the end somebody must count the votes … – Aristeas (talk) 09:12, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Done Sometimes round versus curly brackets are a struggle for me…😊. Thank you for your comment. --GRDN711 (talk) 03:02, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
- @GRDN711: Do you want to cast an oppose vote or did you use
- Support Beautiful environmental portait of a proud creature. – Aristeas (talk) 09:12, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 11:23, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Zzzs (talk) 11:50, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:49, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 24 Sep 2024 at 22:32:23 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Sculptures#Monuments_and_memorials
- Info created by Tracychapmanfan5 - uploaded by Tracychapmanfan5 - nominated by Henrysz -- Henrysz (talk) 22:32, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Henrysz (talk) 22:32, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Crop too tight at the top -- Basile Morin (talk) 05:58, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- Weak support Superb subject, great interplay of light and shadows, but I must agree with Basile that the top crop is very tight. Cmao20 (talk) 19:53, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 24 Sep 2024 at 19:22:03 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Brazil
- Info created and uploaded by Bruno Tamm, nominated by me. RodRabelo7 (talk) 19:22, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- RodRabelo7 (talk) 19:22, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
Neutral Perspective correction required. ★ 19:55, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Corrected. ★ 01:09, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- wide-angle don't need perspective fix, you changed it to another image completely different from the original author conception, IMHO, should be uploaded in another image Wilfredor (talk) 02:37, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Gorgeous colors and light Henrysz (talk) 22:35, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 17:35, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- Comment There seems to be 2 dust spots in the sky. Notes added -- Basile Morin (talk) 20:54, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 12:33, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support JukoFF (talk) 18:39, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Coordinates and English description should be added. --Milseburg (talk) 15:26, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
- Done, Milseburg. RodRabelo7 (talk) 18:44, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks. I want to support. I just found an issue to fix bottom rigth, see note. --Milseburg (talk) 18:50, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Done, Milseburg. RodRabelo7 (talk) 18:44, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 05:27, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 19:51, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Aristeas (talk) 09:05, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 24 Sep 2024 at 16:27:42 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Historical#1850-1899
- Info created by Charles Marville (1813–1879), restored, uploaded, and nominated by Yann, after a suggestion of LucaLindholm
- Support Old picture of Paris, before the time of Haussman's renovation. -- Yann (talk) 16:27, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- @Yann, Thank you so much for having done it by yourself. In the last two weeks I switched to Mac from Windows and I'm also developing also a little web site, so I was mentally occupied with those and other things. ;D LucaLindholm (talk) 18:03, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --LucaLindholm (talk) 18:03, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 12:31, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Mile (talk) 10:56, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 13:20, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 05:27, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support V nice - an old photo that really feels like you can step inside it. Cmao20 (talk) 19:50, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Nice document of the old Paris, before Haussman. – Aristeas (talk) 09:04, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Thi (talk) 10:29, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 24 Sep 2024 at 06:44:06 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Castles and fortifications
- Info Kasbah Amridil, Marocco (قصبة امريديل), old Fortress in Marocco. My shot. -- Mile (talk) 06:44, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Mile (talk) 06:44, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Captures the large subject in a single exposure without artifacts or atmospheric distortion. The only things missing from the image are Joe Strummer, Mick Jones, Paul Simonon and Topper Headon. --Needsmoreritalin (talk) 15:55, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 14:29, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 16:20, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 13:33, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Good one. Nice colours, composition + sharpness. Cmao20 (talk) 19:48, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support El Golli Mohamed (talk) 00:00, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 23 Sep 2024 at 17:44:17 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Architectural elements#Doors
- Info created by Riad Salih - uploaded by Riad Salih - nominated by Riad Salih -- Riad Salih (talk) 17:44, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Riad Salih (talk) 17:44, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Nice, considering it was taken from a cell phone. ★ 17:51, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Agree with ★. --Mile (talk) 09:00, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Weak Support Really nice composition, but details looks flat (due to taking with a cell phone) --XRay 💬 09:40, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 04:31, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Thi (talk) 10:29, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
- Neutral The composition is very nice, but I agree with XRay about the level of detail and the resolution is rather small in this day and age. BigDom (talk) 05:29, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose with respect to the author who has presented at least a high quality QI, but I don't think 'considering it was taken from a cell phone' is the right attitude. Either it's good enough for FP or it's not, we shouldn't make allowances for the quality of equipment. I love the motif but I'm not convinced by the level of detail at this relatively small resolution (less than 6 megapixels) and I don't think the bottom crops in the corners are perfect. Cmao20 (talk) 19:46, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Hey @Cmao20
- Thank you for your feedback. I acknowledge the points you've made about the quality. If the image has the potential to become a featured picture, I commit to returning to the location to capture it again using a Nikon camera. As for the cropping, Here is an overview of the building. Please share any suggestions you might have for a better crop. Riad Salih (talk) 17:13, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
File:Close wing mud-puddling position of Charaxes bharata C. & R. Felder, 1867 - Indian Nawab 10.jpg
[edit]Voting period ends on 23 Sep 2024 at 13:04:04 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Lepidoptera#Family : Nymphalidae (Brush-footed Butterflies)
- Info created by Atanu Bose Photography - uploaded by Atanu Bose Photography - nominated by Atudu -- Atudu (talk) 13:04, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Atudu (talk) 13:04, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose You present an impressive collection of beautiful butterfly images here but in this case I think the detail is not at FP level. Sorry. --Ermell (talk) 20:59, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
- Comment IQ is fine, but position and left crop - more space. --Mile (talk) 09:08, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Good for me considering high resolution and high pixel level detail. I feel like if we say this one isn't good enough, we are getting close to mandating focus-stacking for this kind of image. There is a bit of colour noise but it's not enough to put me off too much. Cmao20 (talk) 19:44, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 22 Sep 2024 at 19:35:33 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Castles_and_fortifications#Spain
- Info View of the Alcázar of Segovia during sunrise, Segovia, Castile and León, Spain. The UNESCO World Heritage Site dates from the 12th century and has been home to twenty-two kings. The Alcazar of Segovia has made its mark on cinema and popular culture. It was used by Orson Welles in the film "Chimes at Midnight" and served as inspiration for Cinderella castle in the Walt Disney movie and also in the Disneyworld sites. It's one of the most renowed medieval castles in the world and one of the most visited landmarks in Spain. c/u/n by me, Poco a poco (talk) 12:52, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 19:35, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Not the best perspective, IMO. Wolverine XI 16:44, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Good interplay of light, clouds and the building.--Ermell (talk) 20:52, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose the composition feels aimless. The lighting makes the castle appear flat Henrysz (talk) 21:03, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Interesting to see a different perspective of a much-photographed building, but the lighting here isn't really working for me, sorry. I agree with Henrysz regarding the 'flat'ness. BigDom (talk) 02:39, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Neutral per above. --SHB2000 (talk) 06:05, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support I am fine. Would say fort is very good and sharp. I wish other around could be similar sharp. Those 2-3 storks on trees solved. --Mile (talk) 09:04, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support I like the light and the perspective/angle. ★ 22:26, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 18:55, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Amazing and clearly FP to me. Very sharp on the building. Lovely light and colours. I think there is possibly a point in that this is the duller side of the castle to photograph and a lot of it is featureless wall. But still very good and well composed. Cmao20 (talk) 19:42, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose There are too many visible artificial transitions between sharp and blurry areas. Probably from merging two images or two layers (original and sharpened). I would be OK with using software to adjust sharpness, but the transitions are too artificial. Also, there is a lot of color noise on the castle and roof, probably created by increasing the sharpness. The light makes the picture too flat and not very interesting.
File:Ravenna - Basilica di Sant'Apollinare in Classe - Vista esterna - 2024-09-13 23-38-55 001.jpg
[edit]Voting period ends on 22 Sep 2024 at 22:19:23 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious_buildings#Italy
- Info The Basilica of Sant'Apollinare in Classe, located in Ravenna, is truly a jewel surrounded by greenery. Internally, the mosaic of the apse also depicts Sant'Apollinare in a lush green lawn, surrounded by trees, flowers and animals, creating an atmosphere of peace and serenity. This scenario symbolizes heaven and eternal life, making the basilica a place of great beauty and spirituality. All by Terragio67 -- Terragio67 (talk) 22:19, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
* Support -- Terragio67 (talk) 22:19, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support I find both versions attractive, but I personally like this one better. The group of sculptures on the left adds to the overall appeal of the scene. -- Radomianin (talk) 06:29, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks, you are right. I decided to upload a new version in order to preserve the full scenery. I will correlate the two images as other version. I also really like this image, but I decided to opt for the alternative image because the depiction being too broad becomes difficult to interpret and perhaps even distracting. Terragio67 (talk) 07:54, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support I find the original more balanced. Cmao20 (talk) 19:40, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Wonderful golden light. Per Radomianin and Cmao20 I prefer the wide version. – Aristeas (talk) 09:01, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
Alternative cropped version
[edit]- Info I decided to crop the left part of the image above to give centrality and the right importance to the basilica immersed in the greenery of nature, trying in the same way to represent an atmosphere of peace and serenity, similar to the [internal mosaic of the apse] where the tone of the colors resemble each other. This scenario symbolizes paradise and eternal life, making the basilica a place of great beauty and spirituality. Created, 2nd version uploaded, and nominated by Terragio67 -- Terragio67 (talk) 19:36, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Terragio67 (talk) 19:36, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support For me this crop is better.--Famberhorst (talk) 05:02, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 06:33, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:54, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support, clearly better than the original crop. --PierreSelim (talk) 14:19, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 14:26, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 18:55, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Thi (talk) 10:30, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 12:27, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 13:32, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 13:21, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
- Neutral Would be support if I'd not seen the original but it's just better. In the original we have the gentle sweep across the scene with the trees getting larger and drawing the eye towards the basilica, plus the carved animal figures all pointing in the same direction that give a sense of movement as we look across the frame. The alternative lacks any of this and feels comparatively static. Cmao20 (talk) 19:40, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support El Golli Mohamed (talk) 00:08, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
File:Phare du Paon (Île-de-Bréhat) (3).jpg, not featured
[edit]Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 22 Sep 2024 at 08:30:51 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Towers#France
- Info created by Gzen92 - uploaded by Gzen92 - nominated by Gzen92 -- Gzen92 (talk) 08:30, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Gzen92 (talk) 08:30, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 16:30, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 18:55, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support A little bit dark but interesting and high quality. Cmao20 (talk) 19:37, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Cmao20. – Aristeas (talk) 09:00, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
Tabella dei periodi di voto per la regola del quinto giorno (5 giorni dopo la candidatura)
[edit]Tue 17 Sep → Sun 22 Sep Wed 18 Sep → Mon 23 Sep Thu 19 Sep → Tue 24 Sep Fri 20 Sep → Wed 25 Sep Sat 21 Sep → Thu 26 Sep Sun 22 Sep → Fri 27 Sep
Tabella dei periodi di voto (9 giorni dopo la candidatura)
[edit]Fri 13 Sep → Sun 22 Sep Sat 14 Sep → Mon 23 Sep Sun 15 Sep → Tue 24 Sep Mon 16 Sep → Wed 25 Sep Tue 17 Sep → Thu 26 Sep Wed 18 Sep → Fri 27 Sep Thu 19 Sep → Sat 28 Sep Fri 20 Sep → Sun 29 Sep Sat 21 Sep → Mon 30 Sep Sun 22 Sep → Tue 01 Oct