Commons:Undeletion requests/Archive/2018-08

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

This image was published in the Latin Australian times, the release form was sent in by Carmen Novoa writer of the article representing the newspaper with the form signed by the photos's creator for it use in print media and wikimedia. Ticket:2018071110005428.(Australianblackbelt (talk) 12:15, 30 July 2018 (UTC))

  •  Oppose If a free license has been sent to OTRS, then the file will be restored automatically when and if the email is received, processed, and approved. Note that OTRS, like Commons, is entirely staffed by volunteers, and, also like Commons, is shorthanded, so it may be close to 7 days before the email is processed and the file is restored.
If the message was sent to the English language version of OTRS and the email has been properly received there the sender will receive an automatic reply with the ticket number. If the sender has not had a reply, please check that it was sent correctly and try again. Other language versions may or may not provide the automatic reply. @Australianblackbelt: Did you tag the file {{subst:OP}} as instructed at OTRS and COM:CONSENT?   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 12:26, 30 July 2018 (UTC)
User:Jeff G./talk I do not believe I did sorry.(Australianblackbelt (talk) 12:33, 30 July 2018 (UTC))

 Not done Waiting for an OTRS agent action. Ankry (talk) 05:09, 1 August 2018 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Cheka files

ticket:2018072210000288, regarding files from www.chekaonline.com, alleges permission for these files:

Request temporary undeletion to assess the validity of that allegation and mark as {{subst:OR}} or otherwise appropriately. Regards. --Ganímedes (talk) 03:31, 31 July 2018 (UTC)

 Doing… Ankry (talk) 18:05, 31 July 2018 (UTC)

@Ganímedes: ✓ Done Ankry (talk) 20:46, 31 July 2018 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

The file was originally deleted for unfree copyright information per EXIF data. The uploader has requested an email from the author, and the permission email has been accepted per Ticket #2018072710006675 for other 5 files. According to the uploader's statement, the file regarding is also listed in the permission email. Please review the file and undelete it if necessary.廣九直通車 (talk) 10:18, 31 July 2018 (UTC)

  •  Oppose If a free license has been sent to OTRS, then the file will be restored automatically when and if the email is received, processed, and approved. Note that OTRS, like Commons, is entirely staffed by volunteers, and, also like Commons, is shorthanded, so it may be close to 7 days before the email is processed and the file is restored.
If the message was sent to the English language version of OTRS and the email has been properly received there the sender will receive an automatic reply with the ticket number. If the sender has not had a reply, please check that it was sent correctly and try again. Other language versions may or may not provide the automatic reply. Did you tag the file {{subst:OP}} as instructed at OTRS and COM:CONSENT?   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 10:26, 31 July 2018 (UTC)
Thank you, I am just doing my liaison work with the uploader. The uploader said that the email was sent to the Hungarian queue of OTRS, so I do not know whether the Hungarian queue have an automatic reply mechanism. Perhaps you may want to explain the situation at here? I am not too experienced about undeleting files.廣九直通車 (talk) 12:35, 31 July 2018 (UTC)
 Oppose If the permission has really been accepted, the request should be made by the OTRS agent who did accept the permission. Otherwise, it must wait until processed. Ankry (talk) 17:45, 31 July 2018 (UTC)

 Not done per above.

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: Will be used in https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GitLab as the new screenshot as the old one is dated Brodock (talk) 13:07, 1 August 2018 (UTC)

 Support per above. Ankry (talk) 20:32, 1 August 2018 (UTC)

✓ Done @Brodock: Please feel free to add it to the article. De728631 (talk) 08:48, 2 August 2018 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

I took that picture, upload it to Wikimedia and I need it to be accepted since there is no copyright infringement.

--Dyego Senesi (talk) 00:08, 31 July 2018 (UTC)Dyego Senesi


 Not done This was published elsewhere online without a free licence and without attribution before you uploaded it at Commons. If you are the copyright holder, please send an email as suggested above. De728631 (talk) 14:29, 2 August 2018 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

This is a corporate photo and can be used. The Corporate Comunication of Bankinter share it to be used. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dmontero1977 (talk • contribs) 14:28, 31 July 2018 (UTC)

 Oppose This photo was published in 2011 or earlier Please use COM:OTRS to verify the copyright status. Thuresson (talk) 15:40, 31 July 2018 (UTC)

 Not done per Thuresson. Ankry (talk) 14:19, 2 August 2018 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: I have a permit from himself to use his photo and details to complete his profile. Liehos97 (talk) 19:28, 31 July 2018 (UTC)

 Oppose We need a permission by email coming directly from the copyright holder. Most often, this is not the subject depicted in a photo but the original photographer. Please see COM:OTRS for instructions. Note also that a permission to use it in a Wikipedia article would not be sufficient. All media at Commons must be free for anyone to use for any purpose even outside Wikipedia. De728631 (talk) 19:48, 31 July 2018 (UTC)


 Not done per De728631. Ankry (talk) 14:18, 2 August 2018 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: Hi! As OTRS agent, I need to verify permission provided with Ticket:2018080210003767. Could you please restore these files temporarily? Please ping me when it's done. Ty Arthur Crbz (talk) 10:36, 2 August 2018 (UTC)


✓ Done @Arthur Crbz: Please let me know if the permission is unrelated or insufficient. De728631 (talk) 14:08, 2 August 2018 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

And also:

see OTRS # ticket:2018080210002339 -- Slowking4 § Sander.v.Ginkel's revenge 10:55, 2 August 2018 (UTC)


✓ Done by Mike Peel. De728631 (talk) 14:04, 2 August 2018 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Queste immagini dovrebbero essere foto di opere che stanno all'interno del museo della Specola di Firenze, non rientrano nella libertà di panorama (Not allowed by freedom of panorama in Italy) sicuramente, però a mio avviso si dovrebbe considerare decaduto il copyright visto che il creatore è deceduto da oltre 70 anni e quindi ricadere nel pubblico dominio. (PD by age). "Le statue e i modellini, tutti in cera e incredibilmente verosimili, furono realizzati tra il 1771 e la seconda metà del XIX secolo ed ammontano a circa 1400"; " a collection of anatomical waxes (including those by Gaetano Giulio Zumbo and Clemente Susini), an art developed in Florence in the 17th century for the purpose of teaching medicine. This collection is very famous worldwide for the incredible accuracy and realism of the details, copied from real corpses. " Assianir (talk) 07:16, 25 July 2018 (UTC)

 Info They were missing appropriate author / copyright information. If the sculptures are indeed PD and somebody declares to add the required information in no more that few days, I would support undeletion. But no evidence for that at the moment. Ankry (talk) 08:00, 25 July 2018 (UTC)

i cannot give any evidence because cannot see any photo now. But, if you can read about this wax sculpure in the museum page you can see by yourself that were made, from 1771, by the same person, Clemente Susini, died in 1814.Assianir (talk) 15:37, 26 July 2018 (UTC)

So  Support undeletion per above. Ankry (talk) 17:40, 27 July 2018 (UTC)

✓ Done: per discussion. Ruthven (msg) 15:32, 2 August 2018 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Hi,

I request the undeletion of the following files (logos)

These are logos which can exist under PD-TextLogo in my opinion. There are some similar cases of logos, which are uploaded here.

--P170 (talk) 10:22, 29 July 2018 (UTC)


✓ Done: Undeleted the 3 files that were text logos. Ruthven (msg) 16:14, 2 August 2018 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

My name is Syed Obaid and I am the official writer for The Protesting Orator. The image is copyright free. — Preceding unsigned comment added by O.Syed (talk • contribs) 14:54, 30 July 2018 (UTC)


 Not done: please go through the COM:OTRS process. Ruthven (msg) 16:15, 2 August 2018 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

This file is my own work and I accidentally removed the license when I was copying the descriptions from related images that I had uploaded as well. Andrew. Z. Colvin • Talk 15:45, 1 August 2018 (UTC)

 Support per above. Ankry (talk) 20:18, 1 August 2018 (UTC)

✓ Done: per request. Obvious mistake. Ruthven (msg) 16:24, 2 August 2018 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

yes I had copyright it but please don't delete it — Preceding unsigned comment added by Annoimot (talk • contribs) 17:47, 1 August 2018 (UTC)

 Oppose Get real, you Googled "Devanshi Sharma" and found this photo on her official web site. Thuresson (talk) 19:42, 1 August 2018 (UTC)

 Not done: per Thuresson. If you hold the copyright, follow the instructions at COM:OTRS. Thanks. Ruthven (msg) 16:28, 2 August 2018 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Je détiens les droits de cette image. cdt — Preceding unsigned comment added by Axel Hatchuel (talk • contribs) 13:46, 1 August 2018 (UTC)

Google translate: "I hold the rights of this image.". Translation added by Thuresson (talk) 18:54, 1 August 2018 (UTC)

Please clarify how it has come to pass that you do. Please respond within 24 hours. Thuresson (talk) 18:54, 1 August 2018 (UTC)

 Not done No explanation. Ankry (talk) 03:58, 3 August 2018 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

estas fotos no tiene ningún problema he obtenido permisos directos de efigie y Lavinia Ekaterina,

https://www.facebook.com/Efigie.raw/ fuente y lugar donde se me otorgo el permiso, para usarlas en la biografia de Lavinia Ekaterina músico que lucha contra la violencia a los derechos de la mujer y la igualdad

AnthonyOlivano (talk) 21:10, 1 August 2018 (UTC)

  •  Oppose This image has (or these images have) appeared on the Internet without a free license prior to being uploaded here (or appear(s) to have based on the small size and lack of EXIF metadata), and was (or were) thus deleted by an Administrator. Therefore, policy requires that the actual copyright holder, which is almost always the photographer or image designer, must send a free license directly using OTRS. De728631 (talk) 08:38, 2 August 2018 (UTC)

 Not done procedural close: images not deleted. Either OTRS permission should be sent to OTRS following COM:OTRS instructions or the permission requests converted to DRs and copyright status resolved there. Ankry (talk) 03:51, 3 August 2018 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: Hi! As OTRS agent, I need to verify permission provided with Ticket:2018080310009321. Could you please restore these files temporarily? Please ping me when it's done. Ty Arthur Crbz (talk) 21:52, 3 August 2018 (UTC)


@Arthur Crbz: ✓ Done Ankry (talk) 05:40, 4 August 2018 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: A valid OTRS permission has been provided – ticket:2018071810007137.

As an OTRS agent (verify), I will investigate the undeleted media and verify that the permission is sufficient to keep it (rights on media work + depicted work, FOP, copyright owner, country specific restrictions, etc.). I will also update the license (if needed) and add the appropriate OTRS template.
If you want, you can add {{subst:OR|id=2018071810007137|reason=processing}} or {{Temporarily undeleted}} on the media page to make sure a follow-up is done.

Feel free to notify me and thank you in advance for your help. Arthur Crbz (talk) 22:40, 3 August 2018 (UTC)


@Arthur Crbz: ✓ Done Ankry (talk) 05:40, 4 August 2018 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: Hi! As OTRS agent, I need to verify permission provided with Ticket:2018071810007235. Could you please restore these files temporarily? Please ping me when it's done. Ty Arthur Crbz (talk) 22:41, 3 August 2018 (UTC)


@Arthur Crbz: ✓ Done Ankry (talk) 05:45, 4 August 2018 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: Hi! As OTRS agent, I need to verify permission provided with Ticket:2018072410004468. Could you please restore these files temporarily? Please ping me when it's done. Ty Arthur Crbz (talk) 13:58, 3 August 2018 (UTC)


✓ Done: @Arthur Crbz:  ; temporary undeletion. Ruthven (msg) 06:47, 4 August 2018 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: Hi! As OTRS agent, I need to verify permission provided with Ticket:2018072410003629. Could you please restore these files temporarily? Please ping me when it's done. Ty Arthur Crbz (talk) 14:25, 3 August 2018 (UTC)


✓ Done: temporary undeletion. Ruthven (msg) 06:46, 4 August 2018 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: Hi! As OTRS agent, I need to verify permission provided with Ticket:2018072410003585. Could you please restore these files temporarily? Please ping me when it's done. Ty Arthur Crbz (talk) 14:28, 3 August 2018 (UTC)


✓ Done: per request. Ruthven (msg) 06:46, 4 August 2018 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: Hi! As OTRS agent, I need to verify permission provided with Ticket:2018072310008466. Could you please restore these files temporarily? Please ping me when it's done. Ty Arthur Crbz (talk) 14:32, 3 August 2018 (UTC)


✓ Done: temporary undeletion. Ruthven (msg) 06:48, 4 August 2018 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: Hi! As OTRS agent, I need to verify permission provided with Ticket:2018072210003865. Could you please restore these files temporarily? Please ping me when it's done. Ty Arthur Crbz (talk) 14:52, 3 August 2018 (UTC)


✓ Done: @Arthur Crbz: temporary undeletion. Ruthven (msg) 06:49, 4 August 2018 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: Hi! As OTRS agent, I need to verify permission provided with Ticket:2018072210003829. Could you please restore these files temporarily? Please ping me when it's done. Ty Arthur Crbz (talk) 15:14, 3 August 2018 (UTC)


@Arthur Crbz: ✓ Done Ankry (talk) 06:56, 4 August 2018 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: Hi! As OTRS agent, I need to verify permission provided with Ticket:2018072210003534. Could you please restore these files temporarily? Please ping me when it's done. Ty Arthur Crbz (talk) 15:16, 3 August 2018 (UTC)


@Arthur Crbz: ✓ Done Ankry (talk) 06:52, 4 August 2018 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: Hi! As OTRS agent, I need to verify permission provided with Ticket:2018070910008859. Could you please restore these files temporarily? Please ping me when it's done. Ty Arthur Crbz (talk) 15:25, 3 August 2018 (UTC)


@Arthur Crbz: ✓ Done Ankry (talk) 06:53, 4 August 2018 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: Hi! As OTRS agent, I need to verify permission provided with Ticket:2018072110005025. Could you please restore these files temporarily? Please ping me when it's done. Ty Arthur Crbz (talk) 15:29, 3 August 2018 (UTC)


@Arthur Crbz: ✓ Done Ankry (talk) 06:47, 4 August 2018 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: Hi! As OTRS agent, I need to verify permission provided with Ticket:2018072110004821. Could you please restore these files temporarily? Please ping me when it's done. Ty Arthur Crbz (talk) 15:32, 3 August 2018 (UTC)


@Arthur Crbz: ✓ Done Ankry (talk) 06:47, 4 August 2018 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

hi there, so i spoke with the girl who's wikipedia page im creating and sent her the creative commons liscence creator i found on wikipedia itself, and then re-posted the photo, i wasn't aware that that wasn't allowed, i apologize. i am hoping to get the photo republished because she gave me full permission to use the photo and even tried to figure out how to make it creative commons herself. she said she put the caption and html below the photo. is this good enough? if not what should we do.

you can see the caption and html at www.lironmusic.com

thanks hope to hear from you soon Liora — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lovelyliora123 (talk • contribs) 22:49, 3 August 2018 (UTC)


✓ Done and added a license review request. Ankry (talk) 06:38, 4 August 2018 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: Hi! As OTRS agent, I need to verify permission provided with Ticket:2018072210003856. Could you please restore these files temporarily? Please ping me when it's done. Ty Arthur Crbz (talk) 15:12, 3 August 2018 (UTC)


@Arthur Crbz: ✓ Done Ankry (talk) 07:21, 4 August 2018 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: All content by Fars News Agency are published under a CC BY 4.0 license, including their logo. We even have a custom license template for works published by the news agency: {{Fars}}. 4nn1l2 (talk) 16:43, 2 August 2018 (UTC)

 Support per above. Ankry (talk) 18:30, 2 August 2018 (UTC)

✓ Done per above. Undeleted with {{Fars}} tag. De728631 (talk) 12:17, 4 August 2018 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

pls restore the file Liron in 2016

it has the creative commons licence and you can see it if you look at the artists website https://www.lironmusic.com

Lovelyliora123 (talk) 12:55, 4 August 2018 (UTC)


 Not done Procedural close, file was already restored, please check your cache.   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 13:00, 4 August 2018 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Files uploaded by MathewMunro

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: Hi! As OTRS agent, I need to verify permission provided with Ticket:2018072110000262. Could you please restore these files temporarily? Please ping me when it's done. Ty Arthur Crbz (talk) 15:35, 3 August 2018 (UTC)


@Arthur Crbz: ✓ Done Ankry (talk) 06:49, 4 August 2018 (UTC)

@Ankry: Thank you. Could you please delete again these files as copyright is mentioned in page 2 of the following document [1]? The uploader didn't provide appropriate permission. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 08:10, 4 August 2018 (UTC)
So  Not done finally. @Arthur Crbz: just use {{Speedy}} for that. Ankry (talk) 14:20, 4 August 2018 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: Hi! As OTRS agent, I need to verify permission provided with Ticket:2018072110001511. Could you please restore these files temporarily? Please ping me when it's done. Ty Arthur Crbz (talk) 13:10, 4 August 2018 (UTC)


@Arthur Crbz: ✓ Done Ankry (talk) 14:40, 4 August 2018 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: Hi! As OTRS agent, I need to verify permission provided with Ticket:2018072010002173. Could you please restore these files temporarily? Please ping me when it's done. Ty Arthur Crbz (talk) 13:23, 4 August 2018 (UTC)


@Arthur Crbz: ✓ Done Ankry (talk) 14:38, 4 August 2018 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: Hi! As OTRS agent, I need to verify permission provided with Ticket:2018072010002146. Could you please restore these files temporarily? Please ping me when it's done. Ty Arthur Crbz (talk) 13:27, 4 August 2018 (UTC)


@Arthur Crbz: ✓ Done Ankry (talk) 14:36, 4 August 2018 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: Hi! As OTRS agent, I need to verify permission provided with Ticket:2018072010002137. Could you please restore these files temporarily? Please ping me when it's done. Ty Arthur Crbz (talk) 13:28, 4 August 2018 (UTC)


@Arthur Crbz: ✓ Done Ankry (talk) 14:37, 4 August 2018 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Very upset with this deletion. I am not aware that Wikilover90 has such issue with her real name, if really she has such issue then she has to wear don't take my photograph tag with her wikimania batch. Coming to the deletion reason- Quite satisfied after looking into the Photographs of identifiable people but requester has only issue with the name so I belive file renaming is the best way to get rid out of it. I hope this will work for the Wikilover90 as well as the commons policy. Thanks--Bijay Chaurasia (Talk) 15:36, 29 July 2018 (UTC)

 Support Undelete + change file name. Thuresson (talk) 17:42, 29 July 2018 (UTC)
 Comment Given that she has her real name and photo on her user page, not sure what the exact issue is. It's possible the person in the photo should not be identified at all. Might be better to discuss with the user directly (perhaps via email) to see what kind of compromise is acceptable. Carl Lindberg (talk) 19:40, 29 July 2018 (UTC)
I asked the user via email. Ankry (talk) 09:06, 30 July 2018 (UTC)
@Ankry: Hi, Is there any reply from Wikilover90. Please let us know. Thank you --Bijay Chaurasia (Talk) 04:44, 1 August 2018 (UTC)
None yet. Ankry (talk) 04:47, 1 August 2018 (UTC)
And as I have no idea what is an appropriate replacement for her name, the only rename I would suggest at the moment is s/Wikimaina/Wikimania/ Ankry (talk) 04:51, 1 August 2018 (UTC)

✓ Done restored and fixed a typo in filename. Feel free to do forther reanames and/or delete unneeded redirects. If Wikilover90 responds, I will handle her requests myself or take any further action I find appropriate. Ankry (talk) 15:11, 4 August 2018 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

The image is not mine, but it is edited by me, and the image is free usable, and the entity that was using the image is no longer existing.--Victortime2601 (talk) 18:37, 2 August 2018 (UTC)


 Not done per Jeff. Ankry (talk) 15:03, 4 August 2018 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

This image contributes to the information stated on the recently created page 'Oscar Heyman & Brothers'. This image was purchased by the Oscar Heyman team from the photographer. The Oscar Heyman team would like the image they purchased to be able to be used for this page. A receipt of the purchase can be provided if necessary.

--Prkkinsella (talk) 16:01, 31 July 2018 (UTC)

 Oppose The copyright owner should send a written free license permission together with a proof of copyright transfer to OTRS and wait until the appropriate ticket is processed. Read COM:OTRS for instructions. Ankry (talk) 17:49, 31 July 2018 (UTC)
Not done, per above. Thuresson (talk) 19:24, 4 August 2018 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Dear Team,

As I am the photographer of this portrait I'm requesting undeletion. I'd be very glad if this worked out.

Thanks a lot, Theresa Pewal --Theresapewal (talk) 10:52, 1 August 2018 (UTC)

@Theresapewal: This declaration contradicts wit information on the https://theresapewalartistportraits.com/ website: "All of my images are under Copyright Theresa Pewal. They may not be reproduced, downloaded, or processed in any way without prior written permission from the copyright holder". And we have no evidence that the anonymous Wikimedia user Theresapewal is the same person as Theresa Pewal, owner of the above-mentioned website. And this cannot be proven or verified in on-wiki discussion. What we need is either clear declaration on the website (either that the particular photo is licensed under the specified free license or that the anonuymous Wikimedia user Theresapewal is authorized to do so) (faster way) or free license permission send to Wikimedia OTRS using an identifiable Theresa Pewl's email address and following instructions at COM:OTRS page (slower way; this may take few months to be processed).
If neither of the ways is used, I  Oppose undeletion due to Wikimedia Commons rules. Ankry (talk) 20:12, 1 August 2018 (UTC)
Not done. Web site has not changed its licensing as of today. Thuresson (talk) 19:27, 4 August 2018 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

I'm the author of the photo and posted it on Wikipedia. Just downloaded it from my Facebook gallery and uploaded it here. -- FraguelsRock — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 85.137.120.56 (talk) 02:01, 2 August 2018 (UTC)

The file hasn't been deleted yet, so there is nothing to undelete. But I think what you meant to say is you grabbed the file from https://www.instagram.com/p/BhuVv0Cn-rT/ (before cropping out the Integratemedia watermark). Obviously if you created the photo yourself, you'd already have the original and wouldn't have to download it from Facebook or Instagram (which has the same type of metadata as Facebook). LX (talk, contribs) 08:33, 2 August 2018 (UTC)

 Oppose Contact COM:OTRS and include the unedited photograph from your camera, not a photo with watermarks or Facebook metadata. Thuresson (talk) 22:49, 2 August 2018 (UTC)


 Not done per Thuresson & LX Ankry (talk) 19:32, 4 August 2018 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Ce logo représente le check amical entre les deux associés fondateurs de Save Ferris Studios, amis depuis 33 ans. Mais il cache bien des secrets!La chemise rouge est celle que porte Al Pacino dans « Scarface ». Le bouton de manchette est un pouce relevé symbolisant l’état d’esprit positif.La chemise blanche celle que porte Elvis Presley dans « Blue Hawaii ».Le bouton de manchettes est le signe « Shaka », signe de ralliement des surfeurs et qui signifie « Relax ».Le logo a été imaginé est conçu par le directeur artistique français « Diez Dedos ».

Hello, We have paid and signed a contract for the rights on our logo (for a while now). Is there any way for it to be restored? Thank you very much. --MarieBénédicteAntonini (talk) 12:42, 2 August 2018 (UTC)MarieBénédicteAntonini

Please send an email to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org and attach a copy of the rights contract. Note though, that our volunteer email team is totally overworked and it may take some four months until your email gets evaluated. Once the permission has been approved, the file will be restored. De728631 (talk) 14:20, 2 August 2018 (UTC)

 Not done we are wating for an OTRS action as De728631 suggested. Ankry (talk) 19:34, 4 August 2018 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

The original local government news and photo deleted for security reasons [The original photo]

the requested URL "564830.com" cannot be found or is not available. [The original government web]

Deleted: copyvio. --shizhao (talk) 09:39, 3 August 2018 (UTC)

How it is possible to ask Chinese government permission for a photo which indicating human rights violation in China, I think shizhao is deleting photos which are related to Uyghur human rights in China. I ask an investigation for his activities.--Tarim116 (talk) 12:44, 3 August 2018 (UTC)

 Oppose Published here in larger size one month before uploaded to Wikicommons. This is not the forum to request investigation of a co-user. Thuresson (talk) 14:30, 3 August 2018 (UTC)
 Oppose Thanks for your comment, this photo [here]was first published by Xinjiang local government on June 9, 2015(note the date in URL: 2015%2F6%2F201506091031320700) , but the authorities later deleted for unknown reasons, this media here just reused it, the copyright should not belong to anyone but the local government.--Tarim116 (talk) 17:45, 3 August 2018 (UTC)

 Not done per Tarim116 & Thuresson. Ankry (talk) 19:50, 4 August 2018 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Hi, the file "馬文君.jpg" was deleted at May 21 because of No OTRS permission for 30 days. That is a photo about 馬文君 (Ma Wen-chun), a member of Taiwan Congress. Her office want to change the photo on her Wikipedia article but sent permission too late. They re-uploaded the photo as anther name File:馬文君辦公室提供.jpg then mail the permission again, but the new file was deleted again because under the reason "Previously deleted file File:馬文君.jpg".

Could we request to undelete the "馬文君.jpg", and finished OTRS again?--Reke (talk) 08:23, 4 August 2018 (UTC)

I, an OTRS agent (verify), found that the copyright holder of the file(s) send a permission request to OTRS (Ticket:2018041710003666). I checked this ticket and confirmed that the declaration of the permission is valid. Please restore the file(s) and, if necessary, add the {{PermissionOTRS}} on the description(s) of the file(s). Thanks! This is Taiwania Justo speaking (Reception Room) 08:28, 4 August 2018 (UTC)

@Taiwania Justo: ✓ Done Ankry (talk) 19:48, 4 August 2018 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: A valid OTRS permission has been provided – ticket:2018080410000801.

As an OTRS agent (verify), I will investigate the undeleted media and verify that the permission is sufficient to keep it (rights on media work + depicted work, FOP, copyright owner, country specific restrictions, etc.). I will also update the license (if needed) and add the appropriate OTRS template.
If you want, you can add {{subst:OR|id=2018080410000801|reason=processing}} or {{Temporarily undeleted}} on the media page to make sure a follow-up is done.

Feel free to notify me and thank you in advance for your help. Arthur Crbz (talk) 11:25, 4 August 2018 (UTC)


@Arthur Crbz: ✓ Done Ankry (talk) 19:45, 4 August 2018 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: Hi! As OTRS agent, I need to verify permission provided with Ticket:2018080410000524. Could you please restore these files temporarily? Please ping me when it's done. Ty Arthur Crbz (talk) 22:57, 4 August 2018 (UTC)


✓ Done: @Arthur Crbz: ✓ Done. --Guanaco (talk) 23:12, 4 August 2018 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: Hi! As OTRS agent, I need to verify permission provided with Ticket:2018080410003432. Could you please restore these files temporarily? Please ping me when it's done. Ty Arthur Crbz (talk) 23:08, 4 August 2018 (UTC)


✓ Done: @Arthur Crbz: ✓ Done. --Guanaco (talk) 23:12, 4 August 2018 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: Hi! As OTRS agent, I need to verify permission provided with Ticket:2018080410003398. Could you please restore these files temporarily? Please ping me when it's done. Ty Arthur Crbz (talk) 23:09, 4 August 2018 (UTC)


✓ Done: @Arthur Crbz: ✓ Done. --Guanaco (talk) 23:12, 4 August 2018 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: Hi! As OTRS agent, I need to verify permission provided with Ticket:2018080410000837. Could you please restore these files temporarily? Please ping me when it's done. Ty Arthur Crbz (talk) 23:11, 4 August 2018 (UTC)


✓ Done: @Arthur Crbz: ✓ Done. --Guanaco (talk) 23:12, 4 August 2018 (UTC)

@Guanaco: The Department of Redundancy Dept. would like a word with you. :)   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 02:10, 5 August 2018 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Rdsgp2018

Erroneous (paranoidal) deletion. Ticket:2018080210003392 should contain necessary formalities. See user talk:Ymblanter #File:Rdsgp2018_01.jpg_-_File:Rdsgp2018_21.jpg (in Russian) for details. @Ellin Beltz: FYI. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 13:29, 3 August 2018 (UTC)

 Oppose Please hold for an OTRS member to process the ticket in due time. Thuresson (talk) 14:23, 3 August 2018 (UTC)
Dogad75 and Krassotkin indeed are OTRS agents. But it is me who is fluent in English. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 07:39, 4 August 2018 (UTC)
Restore Я обрабатывал Ticket:2018080210003392. Лично переписывался с автором фотографий и его разрешения на свободные лицензии. Сомнений, что авторские права на все снимки принадлежать автору, нет. Просьба, восстановить данные файлы. С уважением, --Dogad75 (talk) 08:12, 4 August 2018 (UTC)

@Dogad75: ✓ Done Ankry (talk) 14:58, 4 August 2018 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Files uploaded by Festinalotus

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: Hi! As OTRS agent, I need to verify permission provided with Ticket:2018072410004904. Could you please restore these files temporarily? Please ping me when it's done. Ty Arthur Crbz (talk) 13:45, 3 August 2018 (UTC)

 Doing… Ankry (talk) 06:58, 4 August 2018 (UTC)

@Arthur Crbz: {{D}}, however I doubt their educational value. Most of them (if not all) seem to be promotional content, out of scope. Ankry (talk) 07:19, 4 August 2018 (UTC)

@Ankry: Thank you! Yes I agree... --Arthur Crbz (talk) 07:44, 4 August 2018 (UTC)
@Arthur Crbz: redeleted. The logo may be in scope for eg. this article so I am leaving it for your decision. Ankry (talk) 14:28, 4 August 2018 (UTC)

Logo ✓ Done, the rest  Not done as OoS. Ankry (talk) 04:04, 5 August 2018 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: uploader fr:Thierry Ehrmann is the painter of fr:Demeure du chaos, permission is given. B dash (talk) 08:27, 31 July 2018 (UTC)


 Not done per above discussion. Ankry (talk) 12:48, 5 August 2018 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

This is a photo of myself done by our University staff (Massey University). I have the rights to use it at any time and it is in the public domain. So please put it back! Prof. Dr. Peter Schwerdtfeger — Preceding unsigned comment added by Paschwer (talk • contribs) 20:40, 3 August 2018 (UTC)


 Not done waiting for OTRS permission. Ankry (talk) 12:44, 5 August 2018 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: A valid OTRS permission has been provided – ticket:2018071810007897.

As an OTRS agent (verify), I will investigate the undeleted media and verify that the permission is sufficient to keep it (rights on media work + depicted work, FOP, copyright owner, country specific restrictions, etc.). I will also update the license (if needed) and add the appropriate OTRS template.
If you want, you can add {{subst:OR|id=2018071810007897|reason=processing}} or {{Temporarily undeleted}} on the media page to make sure a follow-up is done.

Feel free to notify me and thank you in advance for your help. Arthur Crbz (talk) 22:42, 3 August 2018 (UTC)


✓ Done

@Arthur Crbz: Please note that there are two different images there: if the permission covers both, they need splitting; if not, one of them need to be revdeleted. Ankry (talk) 05:48, 4 August 2018 (UTC)
Hi Ankry, permission has been provided for both files. Can you split them? Not sure how to do that unless uploading a new time the first version... Can you ping me when it's done? Thank you so much! --Arthur Crbz (talk) 23:01, 4 August 2018 (UTC)
@Arthur Crbz: The older version is now as File:Assaf Granit 2.jpg. Please mark it also with OTRS teplate if aplicable. Ankry (talk) 04:00, 5 August 2018 (UTC)
@Ankry: ✓ Done thank you! --Arthur Crbz (talk) 12:10, 5 August 2018 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

The photo was sent to me by the owner of the photo, he instructed me to upload it to his wikipedia page. I saved the photo to my computer before I uploaded it, so I do not understand why it was marked as derivative. I have permission to upload it, could it please be un-deleted from the page. --Claire hageman (talk) 02:45, 4 August 2018 (UTC)Claire Hageman, August, 3 2018.


✓ Done restored by Guanaco: OTRS is being processed. Ankry (talk) 12:43, 5 August 2018 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: OTRS Ticket#2018070310005211 Olaf Kosinsky (talk) 11:06, 5 August 2018 (UTC)


@Olaf Kosinsky: ✓ Done Ankry (talk) 12:36, 5 August 2018 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: OTRS / Permission provided with Ticket:2018021410007804. Arthur Crbz (talk) 12:35, 5 August 2018 (UTC)


@Arthur Crbz: ✓ Done Ankry (talk) 12:41, 5 August 2018 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Daughters of Africa

File:Cover der Amerikanischen Ausgabe Daughters of Africa.jpg

O.g. Bilddatei wurde mit Lizenz des Rechteinhabers Penguinrandomhouse erstellt. Das Vorliegen dieser Lizenz wurde auf der Bildseite innerhalb weniger Stunden nach gewiesen. Ich bitte um umgehende Wiederherstellung! Mit freundlichen Grüßen --Fritzober (talk) 13:15, 1 August 2018 (UTC)

File:British Cover Daughters of Africa.jpg

Die Datei wurde mit Lizenz des Rechteinhabers Penguinrandomhouse erstellt. Auf das Vorliegen dieser Lizenz wurde auf der Bildseite innerhalb weniger Stunden hingewiesen! Ich bitte um die umgehende Wiederherstellung der Datei! Mit freundlichen Grüßen --Fritzober (talk) 13:18, 1 August 2018 (UTC)

File:Margaret-Busby, photographer Horace Ové.jpg

Die Datei wurde mit Lizenz des Rechteinhabers Penguinrandomhouse erstellt, auf das Vorliegen dieser Lizenz wurde innerhalb weniger Stunden nach der Löschwarnmitteilung auf der Bildseite hingewiesen! Ich bitte um umgehende Wiederherstellung der Datei! Mit freundlichen Grüßen --Fritzober (talk) 13:20, 1 August 2018 (UTC)

Diskussion

 Oppose Die Genehmigungen durch Penguinrandomhouse beziehen sich nur auf die Nutzung in Wikipedia, aber das reicht nicht aus. Alle Dateien auf Commons müssen für jedermann frei nutzbar sein – auch außerhalb von Wikipedia und für kommerzielle Zwecke. Falls Penguinrandomhouse eine solche Freigabe nachträglich erteilen sollte, muss sie allerdings an OTRS gehen. De728631 (talk) 13:41, 1 August 2018 (UTC)


 Not done per De728631. Ankry (talk) 15:36, 5 August 2018 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

The photo is an official white house photograph that was taken during the Reagan administration, I filled out the photo part on wikicommons that it was an official white house photograph taken by one of their photographers, could it please be reinstated --Claire hageman (talk) 02:28, 4 August 2018 (UTC) Claire Hageman, August 3, 2018

@Claire hageman: source please. Thuresson (talk) 02:42, 4 August 2018 (UTC)
@Thuresson: I could not locate the original source, but I found the same photo on the wikicommons site with proper sources uploaded already that I didn't catch before. Am I able to upload that to the page? --Claire hageman (talk) 04:03, 4 August 2018 (UTC)
@Claire hageman: What is the "same photo" you found?   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 04:10, 4 August 2018 (UTC)
@Jeff G.: The photo was uploaded by another user with the proper copyright information. I found it in my search for the copyright information. It is on the wikicommons sight and looks to be the same photo that I tried to use --Claire hageman (talk) 04:17, 4 August 2018 (UTC)
@Claire hageman: What's the filename?   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 04:27, 4 August 2018 (UTC)
@Jeff G. and Thuresson: File:William Flynn Martin at National Security Council meeting.pdf & File:William Flynn Martin at National Security Council meeting.jpg; not marked as a governement work, however. I am also unable to fine an older source in the Internet. IMO, this can really be own work of the initial uploader. And I see no reason to restore the photo here as it is low resolution. So  Oppose. Ankry (talk) 06:14, 4 August 2018 (UTC)

 Not done per above. Ankry (talk) 15:01, 5 August 2018 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Request for undelete. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kahwye (talk • contribs) 06:11, 4 August 2018 (UTC)

 Question Why? For already published images, an evidence that they were published under a free license is needed. Ankry (talk) 06:18, 4 August 2018 (UTC)

 Not done per Jeff and no response. Ankry (talk) 15:02, 5 August 2018 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

My name is Jessica Yatrofsky. I am the author of I Heart Girl photograph. I am making an Undeletion request of File:I Heart Girl photograph.jpg JYStudios (talk) 05:33, 4 August 2018 (UTC)

@JYStudios: Any Wikimedia user is anonymous and we are unagle to verify your identity on-wiki. Contact OTRS <info-commons@wikimedia.org> for that or send a written free license permission following COM:OTRS. But this is a slow way, as there is a huge backlog in OTRS. Faster way is to provide information on your official page that this particular image is under a specified free license and provide a link here. Ankry (talk) 06:26, 4 August 2018 (UTC)
Not done. User has been informed about OTRS. Thuresson (talk) 22:32, 5 August 2018 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Hello,

I hereby affirm that I, Jessica Yatrofsky, am the creator and/or sole owner of the exclusive copyright of the media work File:I Heart Girl photograph.jpg

In my website, https://www.jessicayatrofsky.com/work same picture is visible. Email is STUDIO@JESSICAYATROFSKY.COM

Jessica Yatrofsky 2018-08-05 --JYStudios (talk) 22:19, 5 August 2018 (UTC)

Not done. User requested undeletion of same file on August 4 and has been informed about OTRS. Website is not licensed under any free license. Thuresson (talk) 22:34, 5 August 2018 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Files uploaded by Mw007

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: Hi! As OTRS agent, I need to verify permission provided with Ticket:2018022510003252. Could you please restore these files temporarily? Please ping me when it's done. Ty Arthur Crbz (talk) 12:43, 5 August 2018 (UTC)


@Arthur Crbz: ✓ Done Ankry (talk) 13:16, 5 August 2018 (UTC)

✓ Done@Ankry: File:Toverland_Blitz_Bahn.jpg, File:Dwervel Djengu River Toverland.jpg and File:Toverland Avalon aankondigingsbord.jpg can be deleted again. File temporarly undeleted. Artwork located in Toverland (amusement park in Netherlands). Plus, FOP doesn't apply as Toverland is not a public place (see Commons:Freedom_of_panorama#Netherlands).--Arthur Crbz (talk) 09:32, 6 August 2018 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: Permission provided with Ticket:2018030710008173. Arthur Crbz (talk) 13:02, 5 August 2018 (UTC)


@Arthur Crbz: ✓ Done per OTRS request. —RP88 (talk) 19:37, 5 August 2018 (UTC)

✓ Done Permission template added. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 09:28, 6 August 2018 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Files uploaded by Michedomi

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: Hi! As OTRS agent, I need to verify permission provided with Ticket:2018031010001271. Could you please restore these files temporarily? Please ping me when it's done. Ty Arthur Crbz (talk) 13:22, 5 August 2018 (UTC)

@Arthur Crbz: I've temporarily undeleted the indicated files in order that you can verify permission provided with Ticket:2018031010001271. Please note that the the user themselves requested deletion of File:Seabreeze Magazine.pdf and that File:Seabreeze Magazine 1987.pdf is malformed and Embedded Data Bot found it suspicious. —RP88 (talk) 18:31, 5 August 2018 (UTC)
✓ Done @RP88: Thank you! File:Seabreeze Magazine.pdf can be deleted (uploader is unlikely to provide sufficient permission). File:Seabreeze Magazine 1987.pdf per malformed file. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 09:21, 6 August 2018 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: Photo was a bit blurred and copyrighted objects are somehow unidentifiable, may be de minimis. 219.78.191.175 16:28, 4 August 2018 (UTC)


 Not done no response. Ankry (talk) 13:35, 6 August 2018 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Hello, This logo is owned by Association ADAN Tétouan and has been uploaded in order to be attached to the Association ADAN Tétouan page. There is no copyright violation. Plese undeleate the file. Thank you. Regards. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Samdalila (talk • contribs) 21:13, 4 August 2018 (UTC)

 Info The Wikipedia article that this logo was used to illustrate has been deleted for being out of scope, see talk. Thuresson (talk) 21:35, 4 August 2018 (UTC)

 Not done per Jeff and Thuresson. Ankry (talk) 13:34, 6 August 2018 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Logo was deleted but I helped design the logo and have copyright use to it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nascarfan1999 (talk • contribs) 02:41, 5 August 2018 (UTC)

  • Signing your posts on talk pages is required and it is a Commons guideline to sign your posts on deletion requests, undeletion requests, and noticeboards. To do so, simply add four tildes (~~~~) at the end of your comments. Your user name or IP address (if you are not logged in) and a timestamp will then automatically be added when you save your comment. Signing your comments helps people to find out who said something and provides them with a link to your user/talk page (for further discussion). Thank you.   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 02:52, 5 August 2018 (UTC)
  •  Oppose @Nascarfan1999: Sorry, the logo is probably too complex to be under TOO in the US. Please send permission via OTRS with a copy to you.   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 02:52, 5 August 2018 (UTC)

 Not done per Jeff. Ankry (talk) 13:34, 6 August 2018 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: I uploaded this picture on behalf of Ms.Liah Greenfeld. In this case, if any better option, please let me know. AcCeNt\n (talk) 03:10, 5 August 2018 (UTC)


 Not done per Jeff. Ankry (talk) 13:30, 6 August 2018 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: Permission provided with Ticket:2018031210000447. Arthur Crbz (talk) 15:58, 6 August 2018 (UTC)


✓ Done @Arthur Crbz: Please add the OTRS tags. De728631 (talk) 16:17, 6 August 2018 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: Hi! As OTRS agent, I need to verify permission provided with Ticket:2018031810006771. Could you please restore these files temporarily? Please ping me when it's done. Ty Arthur Crbz (talk) 16:14, 6 August 2018 (UTC)


✓ Done @Arthur Crbz: please let me know if the file needs to be deleted again. De728631 (talk) 16:19, 6 August 2018 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

I believe this file should be undeleted. As I have stated before, all of the photos in it have been publicly shared on facebook and all of the authors have permitted their free usage. I can add all the names needed with any further information required, as long as the collage gets undeleted. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bookmoron (talk • contribs) 11:02, 5 August 2018 (UTC)

 Oppose Facebook photos are not free. If you make a free-licensed collage of photos, you have to ensure not only that all photos used are free but also if their licenses are compatible with the license of the collage. Links to clear licensing information of all photos is necessary to restore the image. Ankry (talk) 12:34, 5 August 2018 (UTC)
Not done. Please go through Commons:First steps before making additional contributions. Thuresson (talk) 21:10, 6 August 2018 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Dobrý den,

napsal jsem pro Wikipedii heslo Bohuslav Trojan a už tři roky se marně snažím doplnit do infoboxu jeho fotografii. Fotografie vznikla tak, že si Bohuslav Trojan pořídil někde v automatu, ale sám nedokáže říci kdy.

Pro mne i pro něho je proces uploadování obrázků tak složitý, že ho sám nezvládne a já jen s velkými potížemi. Jak bych prohlásil jeho vlastnictví a autorství z mé pozice editora, to nevím, on i já to považujeme za prkotinu.

Snažně prosím, abyste opravili můj návrh na vsunutí fotografie do infoboxu, podle přesnějších údajů, které máte k dispozici a které mi scházejí. Podstatné je pouze to, aby tam ta fotografie už konečně byla. Právoplatný autor a vlastník tuto opravu sám nezvládne, pro velkou vzdálenost mu sám v editaci přes WikipediaCommonssubmissions pomáhat nemohu.

Prosím Vás, abyste kontaktovali mailem přímo autora skrze jeho adresu

knihytrojan@seznam.cz

a vše dořešili s ním.

Děkuji

PhDr Pavel Bělíček — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pavel Bělíček (talk • contribs) 11:45, 25 July 2018 (UTC)

File:Example.jpg

Dobrý den,

obracím se na Vás s žádostí, aby nebyla smazána moje stávající fotografie v infoboxu mého hesla Pavel Bělíček ve Wikipedii a nebyla nahrazena jinou fotografií, kterou navrhujete vy. Důvody mám pro svou žádost následující.

Nemám k dispozici žádné bytelné fotografie než ty, které byly za posledních 40 let pořízeny v automatech a byly určeny do občanských průkazů. Snímek, který navrhujete, je vzhledem k mému věku sice aktuálnější, ale není příliš vydařený, dává mi poněkud pokřivený výraz.

Jsem už kmet ve věku 72 let, lepší snímky už nepořídím. Ve svém hesle figuruji jako autor desítky básnických literárních prací, které vznikly v mladém věku, a proto je pro důležité, abych byl v paměti literárně zachován v podobě, kdy ty básnické práce vznikaly. A aby na čtenáře mluvil člověk ve věku, kdy svá slova k němu pronášel. A nikoli až po čtyřiceti létech, kdy jeho knihy začaly vycházet knižně.

Povězme, že by mladistvý Mácha nebo Březina figuroval v encyklopedických přehledech a byla zachován v paměti jako osmdesátiletý plešoun, tak ho takovou fotografií ve Wikipedii naprosto odpravíte. Jeho fotografie přestane být důvěryhodná, je to stejné, jako kdyby jste do role Hamleta nebo Romea obsadili na jevišti tlustého sešlého páprdu s bříškem. Divák to odmítne sledovat a odejde domů zhnusen. A odmítne také číst knihy takového nesympatického autora, protože se nedokáže s ním duchovně ztotožnit.

Netýká se to jen mne, ale také mnoha našich dalších autorů, kteří dříve nemohli publikovat a většinou už nemají fotografie z mladších let. Dejte jim do příruček snímky z důchodcovského věku, a česká Wikipedie se stane popravištěm básníků, prozaiků i výtvarníků. Neplatí to jen o vědcích, kterým staří naopak propůjčuje vážný, seriózní a důstojný vzhled a fotografie z mládí by naopak působila rušivě.

Děkuji vřele vám za pochopení a shovívavost k pozdním debutantům.

PhDr. Pavel Bělíček — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pavel Bělíček (talk • contribs) 11:46, 25 July 2018 (UTC)

@Podzemnik and Mormegil: Could either of you please check this request and the one right above? Perhaps this is a reply to Commons:Deletion requests/File:Občanská fotografie literárního historika Pavla Bělíčka pro Wikipedii, která má nahradit neautorizovaný snímek.jpg? De728631 (talk) 16:34, 25 July 2018 (UTC)

Fixed filename and closing as  Not done: image not deleted. Case handled in above-mentioned DR. Ankry (talk) 05:19, 7 August 2018 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: Permission provided with Ticket:2018030910009301. Arthur Crbz (talk) 21:26, 6 August 2018 (UTC)


@Arthur Crbz: ✓ Done Ankry (talk) 05:40, 7 August 2018 (UTC)

@Ankry:  Not done Can you delete the file? This document is a book which contains texts and pictures. It's hard for us to determine if the author of the book is the copyright holder of all the pictures used in the book. Uploader is unlikely to provide evidence that he owns copyright on all the pictures used. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 09:14, 7 August 2018 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: Hi! As OTRS agent, I need to verify permission provided with Ticket:2018040310002497. Could you please restore these files temporarily? Please ping me when it's done. Ty Arthur Crbz (talk) 22:01, 6 August 2018 (UTC)


@Arthur Crbz: ✓ Done PD-textlogo, IMO. Ankry (talk) 05:40, 7 August 2018 (UTC)

✓ Done --Arthur Crbz (talk) 09:06, 7 August 2018 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Please restore the following page:

Reason:I request the undeletion of that file because it has only letters and simple geometric forms, thus it doesn't surpass the threshold of originality, and it's correct license is PD-textlogo. Bye, --Elisardojm (talk) 10:59, 1 August 2018 (UTC)

 Oppose This goes beyond simple geometry. Thuresson (talk) 19:30, 4 August 2018 (UTC)

 Not done per Thuresson. Ankry (talk) 10:35, 7 August 2018 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

The photographer release all her images with the following copyright document - http://boriskomitov.com/release-form/ . Please check. --Nikincce (talk) 09:15, 7 August 2018 (UTC)

 Support per above Ankry (talk) 10:07, 7 August 2018 (UTC)
Frankly, I do not understand why the image has been deleted: it was nominated as no source by Leoboudv (and later deleted by Ronhjones) while the file already had a clear link to a freely licensed site as a source then. Same applies to the section below. Ankry (talk) 10:29, 7 August 2018 (UTC)

✓ Done: Sorry, looks like my bad. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 15:01, 7 August 2018 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: Permission provided with Ticket:2018072410011441. Arthur Crbz (talk) 09:54, 7 August 2018 (UTC)


@Arthur Crbz: ✓ Done Ankry (talk) 10:05, 7 August 2018 (UTC)

✓ Done --Arthur Crbz (talk) 16:22, 7 August 2018 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: Hi! As OTRS agent, I need to verify permission provided with Ticket:2018070610000041. Could you please restore these files temporarily? Please ping me when it's done. Ty Arthur Crbz (talk) 19:15, 7 August 2018 (UTC)

@Arthur Crbz: I've temporarily undeleted the indicated file in order that you can verify permission provided with Ticket: 2018070610000041. Please note that an identical version of this file was uploaded at File:Tusche-Zeichnung-1983-Marlis-Jermutus.jpg about a month ago by a different editor under a claim of own work. —RP88 (talk) 22:24, 7 August 2018 (UTC)
✓ Done --Arthur Crbz (talk) 08:02, 8 August 2018 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Blekinge categories

7 categories were hastily deleted during the moving process. Please restore them and move to the new name. --ŠJů (talk) 10:00, 8 August 2018 (UTC)

@Achim55:

Rename Category:1624 in Blekinge County‎ to Category:1624 in Blekinge (2 entries moved, 0 to go) (Requested by ŠJů) naming unification
Rename Category:1679 in Blekinge County‎ to Category:1679 in Blekinge (1 entries moved, 0 to go) (Requested by ŠJů) naming unification
Rename Category:1682 in Blekinge County‎ to Category:1682 in Blekinge (2 entries moved, 0 to go) (Requested by ŠJů) naming unification
Rename Category:1685 in Blekinge County‎ to Category:1685 in Blekinge (2 entries moved, 0 to go) (Requested by ŠJů) naming unification
Rename Category:1686 in Blekinge County‎ to Category:1686 in Blekinge (2 entries moved, 0 to go) (Requested by ŠJů) naming unification
Rename Category:1696 in Blekinge County‎ to Category:1696 in Blekinge (2 entries moved, 0 to go) (Requested by ŠJů) naming unification
Rename Category:1699 in Blekinge County‎ to Category:1699 in Blekinge (2 entries moved, 0 to go) (Requested by ŠJů) naming unification

✓ Done: Cats undeleted and moved as requested. --Achim (talk) 11:45, 8 August 2018 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: Hi! As OTRS agent, I need to verify permission provided with Ticket:2018041910007239. Could you please restore these files temporarily? Please ping me when it's done. Ty Arthur Crbz (talk) 16:34, 7 August 2018 (UTC)

@Arthur Crbz: I've temporarily undeleted the indicated file in order that you can verify permission provided with Ticket:2018041910007239. —RP88 (talk) 22:13, 7 August 2018 (UTC)

✓ Done: OTRS permission added by Arthur Crbz. —RP88 (talk) 13:42, 8 August 2018 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

The image contains only a list of the names of God found in the Hebrew Bible. It is not copyrightable. --Jonund (talk) 16:36, 6 August 2018 (UTC)

You mean the background texture is too complex? I didn't think about that. I'm afraid the creator is not willing to send an OTRS permission, since it appears on a commercial stock site. --Jonund (talk) 17:27, 7 August 2018 (UTC)

 Not done: Likely exceeds the threshold of originality and permission from the author does not appear to be forthcomming. —RP88 (talk) 14:43, 8 August 2018 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

The photographer release all her images with the following copyright document - http://boriskomitov.com/release-form/ . Please check. --Nikincce (talk) 09:16, 7 August 2018 (UTC)

 Support per above. Ankry (talk) 10:07, 7 August 2018 (UTC)
I had this image deleted. However, it could be restored if the image is on the source link due to this permission statement. There are only 2 sources This source and this other Possible source I know of. If the image is not there...then it still has no source. I did not know of the permission statement until today. Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 19:24, 7 August 2018 (UTC)
Maybe Ankhry can locate the image as it is currently deleted. Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 22:00, 7 August 2018 (UTC)

✓ Done: Per discussion above, linked permission statement, and CC license in site footer. —RP88 (talk) 15:02, 8 August 2018 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: Hi! As OTRS agent, I need to verify permission provided with Ticket:2018070610003216. Could you please restore these files temporarily? Please ping me when it's done. Ty Arthur Crbz (talk) 09:24, 8 August 2018 (UTC)

@Arthur Crbz: I've temporarily undeleted the indicated file in order that you can verify permission provided with Ticket:2018070610003216. —RP88 (talk) 14:09, 8 August 2018 (UTC)
✓ Done --Arthur Crbz (talk) 20:03, 8 August 2018 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

This photo was taken by Ethan Kay himself for his Instagram profile. His instagram handle is @spaceboyethan.

The image in question belongs to Ethan Kay, who is an upcoming rapper artist in Sri Lanka. I obtained the image from his Instagram page, with his permission to include it as the thumbnail in the Wikipedia article I'm gonna publish.

It would be much appreciated if this image is undeleted.

--Lahiruabsinghe (talk) 10:25, 7 August 2018 (UTC)Lahiru Abeysinghe 2018.08.07

 Oppose Instagram is not a freely licensed site. Either link to clear free licence declaration there is needed or an OTRS permission. See COM:OTRS for more information. Ankry (talk) 10:41, 7 August 2018 (UTC)
Not done per above. Please note that use in Wikipedia only is not acceptable. Thuresson (talk) 21:24, 8 August 2018 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: Hi! As OTRS agent, I need to verify permission provided with Ticket:2018071810007904. Could you please restore these files temporarily? Please ping me when it's done. Ty Arthur Crbz (talk) 09:07, 8 August 2018 (UTC)

@Arthur Crbz: I've temporarily undeleted the indicated file in order that you can verify permission provided with Ticket: 2018071810007904. —RP88 (talk) 14:01, 8 August 2018 (UTC)
In progress More information required from the uploader. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 14:07, 8 August 2018 (UTC)
 Not done Uploader unable to identify author and so provide permission. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 13:05, 9 August 2018 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: Hi! As OTRS agent, I need to verify permission provided with Ticket:2018042710010291. Could you please restore these files temporarily? Please ping me when it's done. Ty Arthur Crbz (talk) 13:54, 8 August 2018 (UTC)

@Arthur Crbz: I've temporarily undeleted the indicated files in order that you can verify permission provided with Ticket:2018042710010291. Please note that for the first file the author is indicated as Lisa Rich and the second says "Own work", but for both the Exif says "© 2013 Steven Zimmer".—RP88 (talk) 14:25, 8 August 2018 (UTC)
In progress Waiting for more information. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 19:56, 8 August 2018 (UTC)
✓ Done --Arthur Crbz (talk) 13:20, 9 August 2018 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Hello, I believe that the declaration email about this file was already sent to OTRS by the author, could you please make a double check? Thank you. --No1lovesu (talk) 04:34, 25 July 2018 (UTC)

File:616大遊行 1.jpg

Hello, I believe that the declaration email about this file was already sent to OTRS by the author, could you please make a double check? Thank you. --No1lovesu (talk) 04:35, 25 July 2018 (UTC)

 Oppose The images should wait in queue till the appropriate tickets are processed by an OTRS agent. Plase note that the queue is currently 117 days long and be patient. Ankry (talk) 07:50, 25 July 2018 (UTC)

@Ankry: I see, is this recommended if I ask the author to directly upload the files to flicker since I need them at this moment? --No1lovesu (talk) 07:57, 25 July 2018 (UTC)
@No1lovesu: If the Facebook / Flickr accounts are associated: yes. It is faster to license files on net than via OTRS. However, we generally require the free license appears at the initial publication site (elsewhere only if there is clear indication that the images were published by the same person - the author). Ankry (talk) 08:05, 25 July 2018 (UTC)
@Ankry: Okay, I will ask the author to release license CC-by-sa 4.0 (will be posted at the file’s description site I think). Once the author does that, does that mean it is possible that these files can be undeleted?—No1lovesu (talk) 09:21, 25 July 2018 (UTC)

 Not done No free license evidence provided. Ankry (talk) 14:42, 9 August 2018 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Pictures related to the article "Martin von Hase"

the rights for the pictures were with Susanne von Hase who took those pictures herself. After passing away in 1993, the licenses are with Dr. Ulrike von Hase-Schmundt, who gave all necessary permissions for the article related on her father. A license agreement was already send to the permissions-team twice but not answered yet. I would ask you to recover the following pictures

File:Abb. 4-Der Wiederanfang von Breitkopf & Härtel im Pariser Hof.tif File:Dr. Martin von Hase (1939-1945).jpg File:Dr. Martin von Hase.jpg

Also the following file that was not taken by Susanne von Hase was deleted:

File:Berghaus Jena.tif

It was taken in 1891 by an unknown photographer and is license free in the meanwhile.

Thanks for recovering those pictures, best, 1813Leipzig — Preceding unsigned comment added by 1813Leipzig (talk • contribs) 17:36, 5 August 2018 (UTC)


  •  Oppose If a free license has been sent to OTRS, then the file will be restored automatically when and if the email is received, processed, and approved. Note that OTRS, like Commons, is entirely staffed by volunteers, and, also like Commons, is shorthanded, so it may be close to 7 days before the email is processed and the file is restored.
If the message was sent to the English language version of OTRS and the email has been properly received there the sender will receive an automatic reply with the ticket number. If the sender has not had a reply, please check that it was sent correctly and try again. Other language versions may or may not provide the automatic reply.

Concerning the 1891 photo, anonymous photos are generally copyrighted in EU 70 years since they were first published. So publication evidence (place, date) may be needed here. Ankry (talk) 18:13, 5 August 2018 (UTC)


 Not done no required information from uploader nor from an OTRS agent. Ankry (talk) 14:49, 9 August 2018 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Johnting0001.jpg 丁鉉羿宣傳照

我是這位丁鉉羿的工作人員 我可以確認這張照片絕對不是別人的版權! 而是我們擁有的 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 詹涓涓 (talk • contribs) 06:33, 6 August 2018 (UTC)

Ding Wei publicity photo

I am the Ding Wei staff. I can confirm that this photo is definitely not the copyright of others!

But what we have
translator: Google Translate via   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 07:14, 6 August 2018 (UTC)
  •  Oppose @詹涓涓: 照片的所有者和主题通常不是版权所有者,摄影师通常是。 请让摄影师通过OTRS/zh发送许可,并附上一份副本。The owner and subject of a photo is not usually the copyright holder, the photographer usually is. Please have the photographer send permission via OTRS with a copy to you.   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 13:07, 6 August 2018 (UTC)

isiNdebele: (missing text)
per Jeff. Ankry (talk) 14:51, 9 August 2018 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Hello Josve05a,

Hereby I want to request the undelation of the file File:Loge_wfk_logo.jpg with you marked as violation of copyright. It is the official logo of our Freemason's Lodge, with also can be found at www.logedenhelder.nl

As Secretary and webeditor this Lodge (Willem Frederik Karel, Den Helder, The Netherlands) I've the permission to use this picture/file/logo on our letterheads, website www.logedenhelder.nl and also for our Wikipedia-paga Loge Willem Frederik Karel.

There I'm new in the use and working with Wikipedia I wasn't familiar with the right way to upload this file without a violation of the copyright, and as the function I have in our Lodge (Secretary/webeditor) I thought it wouldn't give any problems.

So hereby I sent you my request to undelete this file so I can use it again on our Wiki-page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Steef2912 (talk • contribs) 07:12, 6 August 2018 (UTC)


 Not done per Jeff. Please, contact OTRS. Ankry (talk) 14:52, 9 August 2018 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: I got mr indatissas Permission before posting it on Wikimedia Pasindu parakrama (talk) 08:28, 6 August 2018 (UTC)


 Not done No evidence of valid permission from copyright owner(s). Ankry (talk) 14:54, 9 August 2018 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Why would this image https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Atlantic_Wall_in_Norway#/media/File:Festung_Norwegen.jpg be acceptable while this image https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Festung_Norwegen_155mm_cannon.jpg would be deleted? They are the same gun from two different angles, taken by the same person, same time and from the same flickr slideshow. They should have the same license. Why do I need a Masters Degree in Copyright Law just to post an image? Snowdawg (talk) 23:51, 7 August 2018 (UTC)

  •  Oppose - They don't have the same license. File:Festung Norwegen.jpg was uploaded to Commons in 2008 and a CC-by-2.0 license was confirmed at that time. It is now "all rights reserved," meaning the Flickr user changed the license sometime in the past 10 years (which is precisely why we have the Flickr review process). Your image, conversely, was uploaded to Commons only ten days ago, 29 July 2018, when the Flickr license was already "all rights reserved"; we have no way of knowing whether it too was once freely licensed. Going forward, please base uploads (or abstain therefrom, in this case) based on the license at the source rather than OTHERSTUFF comparisons. Эlcobbola talk 08:45, 8 August 2018 (UTC)

 Not done per Эlcobbola. Ankry (talk) 14:40, 9 August 2018 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: Hi! As OTRS agent, I need to verify permission provided with Ticket:2018071810004425. Could you please restore these files temporarily? Please ping me when it's done. Ty Arthur Crbz (talk) 13:08, 9 August 2018 (UTC)


@Arthur Crbz: ✓ Done Ankry (talk) 14:00, 9 August 2018 (UTC)

✓ Done --Arthur Crbz (talk) 15:09, 9 August 2018 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: Hi! As OTRS agent, I need to verify permission provided with Ticket:2018040310010442. Could you please restore these files temporarily? Please ping me when it's done. Ty Arthur Crbz (talk) 15:23, 9 August 2018 (UTC)

@Arthur Crbz: I've temporarily undeleted the indicated file in order that you can verify permission provided with Ticket:2018040310010442. —RP88 (talk) 19:52, 9 August 2018 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: A valid OTRS permission has been provided – ticket:2018061810007701.

As an OTRS agent (verify), I will investigate the undeleted media and make sure that the permission is sufficient to keep it (rights on media work + depicted work, FOP, copyright owner, country specific restrictions, etc.). I will also update the license (if needed) and add the appropriate OTRS template.
If you want, you can apply {{Temporarily undeleted}} on the media page to make sure a follow-up is done.

Feel free to notify me and thank you in advance. .

Could you also please consider unblocking the uploader who was in constant communication with us? I think we can assume good faith here. AntonierCH (d) 13:08, 9 August 2018 (UTC)


@AntonierCH: ✓ Done. Uploader's block has expired already. Ankry (talk) 13:59, 9 August 2018 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Olga Sharij.jpg

Obviously free

De728631 deleted it by mistake, he recognized it but refused to restore. --Алый Король (talk) 10:11, 9 August 2018 (UTC)

✓ Done I have now undeleted the image. De728631 (talk) 10:23, 9 August 2018 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

I take this image. I am the author. I already reported this to wikimedia. What is the real reason why it was eliminated? I need you to re-enable it. Dyego Senesi (talk) 13:27, 7 August 2018 (UTC)


 Not done: Missing permission. Low resolution. Please write to OTRS to clarify the matter. Ruthven (msg) 05:54, 10 August 2018 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

I take this image. I am the author. I already reported this to wikimedia. What is the real reason why it was eliminated? I need you to re-enable it. Dyego Senesi (talk) 13:34, 7 August 2018 (UTC)


 Not done: Low resolution. Please write to OTRS to clarify the matter, especially if it comes from "lasole" website. Ruthven (msg) 05:55, 10 August 2018 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

I take this image. I am the author. I already reported this to wikimedia. What is the real reason why it was eliminated? I need you to re-enable it. Dyego Senesi (talk) 13:35, 7 August 2018 (UTC)


✓ Done: per OTRS. Ruthven (msg) 05:44, 10 August 2018 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

I take this image. I am the author. I already reported this to wikimedia. What is the real reason why it was eliminated? I need you to re-enable it. Dyego Senesi (talk) 13:35, 7 August 2018 (UTC)


✓ Done: per OTRS. Ruthven (msg) 05:45, 10 August 2018 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

I take this image. I am the author. I already reported this to wikimedia. What is the real reason why it was eliminated? I need you to re-enable it.Dyego Senesi (talk) 13:36, 7 August 2018 (UTC)


✓ Done: per OTRS. Ruthven (msg) 05:45, 10 August 2018 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

I take this image. I am the author. I already reported this to wikimedia. What is the real reason why it was eliminated? I need you to re-enable it. Dyego Senesi (talk) 13:37, 7 August 2018 (UTC)


✓ Done: per OTRS. Ruthven (msg) 05:52, 10 August 2018 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

I take this image. I am the author. I already reported this to wikimedia. What is the real reason why it was eliminated? I need you to re-enable it. Dyego Senesi (talk) 13:38, 7 August 2018 (UTC)


✓ Done: per OTRS. Ruthven (msg) 05:45, 10 August 2018 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

I take this image. I am the author. I already reported this to wikimedia. What is the real reason why it was eliminated? I need you to re-enable it. Dyego Senesi (talk) 13:38, 7 August 2018 (UTC)


✓ Done: A little repetitive as a request. OTRS ticket arrived. Ruthven (msg) 05:46, 10 August 2018 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

I take this image. I am the author. I already reported this to wikimedia. What is the real reason why it was eliminated? I need you to re-enable it. Dyego Senesi (talk) 13:39, 7 August 2018 (UTC)


 Not done: See Commons:Deletion requests/File:Perfume " Emoción de Soledad ".jpg. Ruthven (msg) 05:51, 10 August 2018 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

I take this image. I am the author. I already reported this to wikimedia. What is the real reason why it was eliminated? I need you to re-enable it. Dyego Senesi (talk) 13:40, 7 August 2018 (UTC)


✓ Done: Per OTRS. Ruthven (msg) 05:47, 10 August 2018 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

I take this image. I am the author. I already reported this to wikimedia. What is the real reason why it was eliminated? I need you to re-enable it.Dyego Senesi (talk) 13:40, 7 August 2018 (UTC)


✓ Done: per OTRS. Ruthven (msg) 05:47, 10 August 2018 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

I take this image. I am the author. I already reported this to wikimedia. What is the real reason why it was eliminated? I need you to re-enable it.Dyego Senesi (talk) 13:41, 7 August 2018 (UTC)


✓ Done: per OTRs. Ruthven (msg) 05:47, 10 August 2018 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

I take this image. I am the author. I already reported this to wikimedia. What is the real reason why it was eliminated? I need you to re-enable it. Dyego Senesi (talk) 13:42, 7 August 2018 (UTC)


 Not done: It's a duplicate of File:Soledad (2018).jpg. Ruthven (msg) 05:50, 10 August 2018 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

I take this image. I am the author. I already reported this to wikimedia. What is the real reason why it was eliminated? I need you to re-enable it. Dyego Senesi (talk) 13:42, 7 August 2018 (UTC)


✓ Done: per OTRS. Ruthven (msg) 05:47, 10 August 2018 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: It is a historical, non-commercial, public domain archive Bnc97 (talk) 18:59, 9 August 2018 (UTC)


 Not done: Non-commercial license aren't accepted on Commons. Ruthven (msg) 05:56, 10 August 2018 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: Hi! As OTRS agent, I need to verify permission provided with Ticket:2018080710009029. Could you please restore these files temporarily? Please ping me when it's done. Ty Arthur Crbz (talk) 14:18, 8 August 2018 (UTC)

@Arthur Crbz: I've temporarily undeleted the indicated file in order that you can verify permission provided with Ticket:2018080710009029. —RP88 (talk) 14:35, 8 August 2018 (UTC)
In progress Waiting confirmation from sender. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 16:55, 8 August 2018 (UTC)

✓ Done @Arthur Crbz: replied in ticket:2018080710008913, looks okay to me. Removed templates and inserted new OTRS id. --grin 07:33, 10 August 2018 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: Hi! As OTRS agent, I need to verify permission provided with Ticket:2018070610000371. Could you please restore these files temporarily? Please ping me when it's done. Ty Arthur Crbz (talk) 09:25, 8 August 2018 (UTC)

@Arthur Crbz: I've temporarily undeleted the indicated file in order that you can verify permission provided with Ticket:2018070610000371. Please note that there appear to have been two identical versions of this file deleted under this name, one uploaded on 6 July 2018 and one on 9 July 2018. I restored the description and file associated with the upload on 9 July 2018. —RP88 (talk) 14:16, 8 August 2018 (UTC)
In progress --Arthur Crbz (talk) 19:57, 8 August 2018 (UTC)
✓ Done --Arthur Crbz (talk) 09:40, 10 August 2018 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

kept image file because in usage on ht.wikipedia.org/wiki/J-Pimp including uploader is not same as author. (new version of File:J-Pimp & Shai (band).jpg has be uploaded)--BelPolitik (talk) 15:00, 10 August 2018 (UTC)


Procedural close, file is not deleted, posts are welcome at Commons:Deletion requests/File:J-Pimp & Shai (band).jpg.   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 17:50, 10 August 2018 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: Hi! As OTRS agent, I need to verify permission provided with Ticket:2018072410006055. Could you please restore these files temporarily? Please ping me when it's done. Ty Arthur Crbz (talk) 13:41, 3 August 2018 (UTC)

@Arthur Crbz: done. Thuresson (talk) 19:09, 3 August 2018 (UTC)
In progress Waiting information from the uploader. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 09:35, 6 August 2018 (UTC)

 Not done: redeleted. Request again when the required information appears. Ankry (talk) 12:38, 11 August 2018 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: Hi! As OTRS agent, I need to verify permission provided with Ticket:2018072410005681. Could you please restore these files temporarily? Please ping me when it's done. Ty Arthur Crbz (talk) 13:43, 3 August 2018 (UTC)

@Arthur Crbz: done. Thuresson (talk) 19:11, 3 August 2018 (UTC)

In progress Waiting information from the uploader. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 09:34, 6 August 2018 (UTC)

 Not done: redeleted. Request again when the required information appears. Ankry (talk) 12:38, 11 August 2018 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: Permission provided with Ticket:2018030110006364. Arthur Crbz (talk) 12:54, 5 August 2018 (UTC)


@Arthur Crbz: ✓ Done Ankry (talk) 13:15, 5 August 2018 (UTC)

In progress More information required from the uploader. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 09:29, 6 August 2018 (UTC)

 Not done: redeleted. Request again when the required information appears. Ankry (talk) 12:39, 11 August 2018 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: Hi! As OTRS agent, I need to verify permission provided with Ticket:2018080510001558. Could you please restore these files temporarily? Please ping me when it's done. Ty Arthur Crbz (talk) 15:55, 5 August 2018 (UTC)

@Arthur Crbz: I've temporarily undeleted the indicated file in order that you can verify permission provided with Ticket: 2018080510001558. —RP88 (talk) 18:38, 5 August 2018 (UTC)
In progress@RP88: Thank you! Need more information from the uploader.--Arthur Crbz (talk) 08:40, 6 August 2018 (UTC)

 Not done: redeleted. Request again when the required information appears. Ankry (talk) 12:40, 11 August 2018 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

The photo of my father was made by my grandfather --Ukrdrama (talk) 17:50, 5 August 2018 (UTC)

@Ukrdrama: So the author is your grandfather and according to our rules he was the only person authorized to declare a license for the file at upload time. You may be his heir or not or the photo may be PD already (eg. if your grandfather died more than 70 years ago). This should be explained via COM:OTRS. Note: if the heir is your father and he lives, his permision is required together with an explanation.  Oppose now, please contact OTRS. Ankry (talk) 18:05, 5 August 2018 (UTC)

 Not done per above. Ankry (talk) 12:44, 11 August 2018 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

لطقا تصاویر را احیا کنید این تصاویر انصاری برای کاربری یم است و حق استفتده از آن رادارم — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 91.251.176.158 (talk) 14:06, 6 August 2018 (UTC)

Google Translator: "Please restore the images. These images are for reference and I have the right to use it." De728631 (talk) 16:22, 6 August 2018 (UTC)

Which files do you mean? If you uploaded any pictures at Commons that got deleted, please log in with your account. De728631 (talk) 16:22, 6 August 2018 (UTC)
 Info and also: permission "to use" is not enough to store the image in Wikimedia Commons; free license permission is needed from the actual copyright holder that have to be in a written form due to legal requirements. Ankry (talk) 05:24, 7 August 2018 (UTC)

 Not done unclear request: no file specified. Ankry (talk) 12:45, 11 August 2018 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

needs a pic for guru randhawa page — Preceding unsigned comment added by Miamiheat2014 (talk • contribs) 02:15, 8 August 2018 (UTC)

 Oppose Cropped from the subject's instagram profile. Please follow the instructions at COM:OTRS if you are the copyright owner. Thuresson (talk) 21:21, 8 August 2018 (UTC)

 Not done per Thuresson. Ankry (talk) 12:59, 11 August 2018 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

To Whom It May Concern,

I am requesting the undeletion of a file uploaded as Squire.jpg. This file is a photograph of American Record Producer, Matt Squire and while I do not own the copyright of the work, I do represent the company that manages Mr. Squire and oversees his online presence. It is imperative that this photograph is uploading to his wikipedia page, as the page is used quite often for professional endeavors on behalf of Mr. Squire.

I would be humbly gracious for Wikipedia to lift the deletion of the file and allow it to be placed on Mr. Squire's page to put a face to our client and complete the boiler plate template we've created for our clients.

Thank you for your consideration,

Jacobfishman (talk) 15:37, 6 August 2018 (UTC)Jacob FishmanJacobfishman (talk) 15:37, 6 August 2018 (UTC)


 Not done waiting for an OTRS permission. Ankry (talk) 14:00, 11 August 2018 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Torpezas de la.inteligencia

Thais book has been writen by the same person Jorge Carrillo , he has the copyright of the book. So, the action of upload that image doesnt violate any copyright. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gusmosqueda (talk • contribs) 15:45, 8 August 2018 (UTC)

 Oppose When you uploaded the file you declared the book cover as your own work. You cannot grant a free licence for something that you did not create. This file can only be undeleted with permission from the copyright holder Jorge Carillo. He would have to send an email via COM:OTRS. De728631 (talk) 15:50, 8 August 2018 (UTC)

 Not done An OTRS permission is required here. Ankry (talk) 13:53, 11 August 2018 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: Photographer Ann Dean formally submitted her permission to use the photograph to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org on May 18, 2018. Harshaw61 (talk) 00:54, 10 August 2018 (UTC)


  •  Oppose If a free license has been sent to OTRS, then the file will be restored automatically when and if the email is received, processed, and approved. Note that OTRS, like Commons, is entirely staffed by volunteers, and, also like Commons, is shorthanded, so it may be close to 7 days before the email is processed and the file is restored.
If the message was sent to the English language version of OTRS and the email has been properly received there the sender will receive an automatic reply with the ticket number. If the sender has not had a reply, please check that it was sent correctly and try again. Other language versions may or may not provide the automatic reply. De728631 (talk) 09:30, 10 August 2018 (UTC)

 Not done Waiting for an OTRS agent action. Ankry (talk) 13:56, 11 August 2018 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

This image was taken by me and uploaded directly from my laptop and does not exist anywhere else on the internet. I claim sole ownership. Can you please undelete it. Thank You. --Mikebeatz (talk) 04:50, 10 August 2018 (UTC)M.Barnett.

 Oppose The same photograph was uploaded to Third World Don's Facebook profile in May 2018 via Instagram, so it is not clear that you are the copyright holder. De728631 (talk) 09:25, 10 August 2018 (UTC)

 Not done per De728631. Ankry (talk) 13:41, 11 August 2018 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Picture is from the official web page of the Deputy Prime Ministers Office and it´s freely downloadable. — Preceding unsigned comment added by KT OKaP (talk • contribs) 09:36, 10 August 2018 (UTC)

 Oppose The fact that you can download online content free of charge does not mean that there is no copyright on it. Photographs are copyrighted and non-free by default, so we need evidence that this portrait was either released into the public domain or comes with a free licence. That said, only the text part of official works by the Slovak government is in the public domain, but photographs would not be free. De728631 (talk) 11:37, 10 August 2018 (UTC)

 Not done per De728631. Ankry (talk) 13:39, 11 August 2018 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: A valid OTRS permission has been provided – ticket:2018070510003852.

As an OTRS agent (verify), I will investigate the undeleted media and make sure that the permission is sufficient to keep it (rights on media work + depicted work, FOP, copyright owner, country specific restrictions, etc.). I will also update the license (if needed) and add the appropriate OTRS template.
If you want, you can apply {{Temporarily undeleted}} on the media page to make sure a follow-up is done.

Feel free to notify me and thank you in advance. AntonierCH (d) 12:22, 9 August 2018 (UTC)


@AntonierCH: ✓ Done Ankry (talk) 14:15, 9 August 2018 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: Problem has been resolved Clergywestern (talk) 07:04, 8 August 2018 (UTC)


 Not done per Эlcobbola. Ankry (talk) 07:57, 12 August 2018 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

   Bonjour je suis le créateur de ce fichier je suis le fils de la personne RUDEAU Raoul. Tous les documents publiés proviennent de documents personnel ou de sources indiquées sur le document.
       Cordialement G.R — Preceding unsigned comment added by RUDEAU.G (talk • contribs) 17:32, 11 August 2018 (UTC)

 Not doneprocedural close: the file is not deleted.
@RUDEAU.G: : as the deletion nomination is on the COM:SCOPE basis, in order to keep this file you need to prove its usefulness for Wikipedia or other educational purpose. Do it it the DR discussion. Ankry (talk) 07:58, 12 August 2018 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

 Bonjour
  Ce fichier que j'ai publié de mon oncle RUDEAU Georges Résistant .Je l'ai rédigé avec mes documents personnels et les sources de certains écrits sont publiés dans le document.
                                           Cordialement G.R — Preceding unsigned comment added by RUDEAU.G (talk • contribs) 17:37, 11 August 2018 (UTC)

 Not doneprocedural close: the file is not deleted.
@RUDEAU.G: : as the deletion nomination is on the COM:SCOPE basis, in order to keep this file you need to prove its usefulness for Wikipedia or other educational purpose. Do it it the DR discussion. Ankry (talk) 07:55, 12 August 2018 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: Hi! As OTRS agent, I need to verify permission provided with Ticket:2018032910011672. Could you please restore these files temporarily? Please ping me when it's done. Ty Arthur Crbz (talk) 16:24, 6 August 2018 (UTC)


@Arthur Crbz: ✓ Done Ankry (talk) 05:32, 7 August 2018 (UTC)

In progressPermission from subject not photographer. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 09:45, 7 August 2018 (UTC)
 Not done redeleted. Request redeletion again if needed. Ankry (talk) 08:10, 12 August 2018 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: Hi! As OTRS agent, I need to verify permission provided with Ticket:2018033110001535. Could you please restore these files temporarily? Please ping me when it's done. Ty Arthur Crbz (talk) 16:29, 6 August 2018 (UTC)


@Arthur Crbz: ✓ Done Ankry (talk) 05:32, 7 August 2018 (UTC)

In progress Uploader needs to send additional information. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 09:43, 7 August 2018 (UTC)
 Not done redeleted. Request redeletion again if needed. Ankry (talk) 08:13, 12 August 2018 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: Hi! As OTRS agent, I need to verify permission provided with Ticket:2018033110004167. Could you please restore these files temporarily? Please ping me when it's done. Ty Arthur Crbz (talk) 16:37, 6 August 2018 (UTC)


@Arthur Crbz: ✓ Done Ankry (talk) 05:39, 7 August 2018 (UTC)

In progress Wainting for information from the uploader. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 09:16, 7 August 2018 (UTC)
 Not done redeleted. Request redeletion again if needed. Ankry (talk) 08:15, 12 August 2018 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: Hi! As OTRS agent, I need to verify permission provided with Ticket:2018040310006626. Could you please restore these files temporarily? Please ping me when it's done. Ty Arthur Crbz (talk) 22:02, 6 August 2018 (UTC)


@Arthur Crbz: ✓ Done Ankry (talk) 05:41, 7 August 2018 (UTC)

In progress Waiting for information from the uploader. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 09:03, 7 August 2018 (UTC)
 Not done redeleted. Request redeletion again if needed. Ankry (talk) 08:16, 12 August 2018 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

I am requesting undeletion of the file SSC_NA_(Full_Color)-01.png. I am the designer of the artwork and am uploading it to the company's page on behalf of the company.

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:SSC_NA_(Full_Color)-01.png

Please contact me with any questions or concerns. Thank you.

Sincerely,

Corbin Harder Creative Designer SSC North America — Preceding unsigned comment added by SSCNA (talk • contribs) 00:32, 8 August 2018 (UTC)

  • Signing your posts on talk pages is required and it is a Commons guideline to sign your posts on deletion requests, undeletion requests, and noticeboards. To do so, simply add four tildes (~~~~) at the end of your comments. Your user name or IP address (if you are not logged in) and a timestamp will then automatically be added when you save your comment. Signing your comments helps people to find out who said something and provides them with a link to your user/talk page (for further discussion). Thank you.   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 17:38, 10 August 2018 (UTC)
  •  Oppose @SSCNA: Sorry, the image is probably too complex to be under TOO in the country of origin. Please send permission via OTRS.   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 17:38, 10 August 2018 (UTC)

 Not done per Jeff. Ankry (talk) 08:08, 12 August 2018 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

First, this is the first time I am posting in wikipedia, so please bear with me. The image in question belongs to me. I believe I was told to put in a tag. However,it was past the deadline and the image was deleted. As I do not check my messages all the time, I have missed the deadline. Please help me reinstate the image and give me instructions of what other tags/steps I need to include in order to successfully post my article. Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kiatsing (talk • contribs) 13:05, 8 August 2018 (UTC)

The metadata of the image file attributed the copyright to a certain Tan Ngiap Heng. This name does not match your user name, so the file was deleted as a potential copyright infringement. Please note that owning a copy of a photo does not automatically make you own the copyright even if you are depicted in the photo. The copyright is almost always held by the photographer, so we need a permission from the original photographer to undelete the file. De728631 (talk) 15:55, 8 August 2018 (UTC)
@Kiatsing: can you provide here an evidence that it is freely licensed by the photographer or can this section be closed? Ankry (talk) 14:58, 9 August 2018 (UTC)

 Not done no response. Ankry (talk) 08:04, 12 August 2018 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Michel Sogny is the sole owner of the exclusive copyright of the photography and have legal authority in his capacity to release the copyright of that work. He sent a mail to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org in this direction and was answered thanks for his permission to use media files on Wikimedia Commons. The mail asked too the specific name or URL of the page on Wikimedia Commons to which he has uploaded it in order to process the contribution. He's just done this. Can you please undelete the picture ? Thanks. Triumpf123416 (talk) 09:50, 9 August 2018 (UTC)


  •  Oppose If a free license has been sent to OTRS, then the file will be restored automatically when and if the email is received, processed, and approved. Note that OTRS, like Commons, is entirely staffed by volunteers, and, also like Commons, is shorthanded, so it may be close to 7 days before the email is processed and the file is restored.
If the message was sent to the English language version of OTRS and the email has been properly received there the sender will receive an automatic reply with the ticket number. If the sender has not had a reply, please check that it was sent correctly and try again. Other language versions may or may not provide the automatic reply. De728631 (talk) 10:02, 9 August 2018 (UTC)

 Not done per De728631. Ankry (talk) 08:03, 12 August 2018 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Bonjour; Je ne retrouve plus sur wikimédia commons deux pages que j'avais publié en Aout 2018 une page sur RUDEAU Raoul ainsi qu'une autre page sur la personne RUDEAU Georges parcours . J'avais demandé l'ancienne RUDEAU-GEORGES Résistant Déporté à la suppression avec une autre page de cette personne. Je demande donc la restauration avant suppression de la page RUDEAU-GEORGES 1922-1944 Résistant Déporté . Je souhaiterai également t l'aide d'un contributeur français pour m'ouvrir une page sur Wikipédia pour chacune de ces personnes

Merci Cordialement G.RUDEAU — Preceding unsigned comment added by RUDEAU.G (talk • contribs) 10:14, 9 August 2018 (UTC)

Hello; I can not find on wikimedia two pages that I published in August 2018 a page on RUDEAU Raoul and another page on the person RUDEAU Georges course. I had asked the old RUDEAU-GEORGES Resistant Deported to the deletion with another page of this person. I therefore ask the restoration before removal of the page RUDEAU-GEORGES 1922-1944 Resistant Deported. I would also like the help of a French contributor to open a page on Wikipedia for each of these people
Thank you Best regards
translator: Google Translate via   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 13:04, 10 August 2018 (UTC)

 Not done No evidence that the files are in scope. Ankry (talk) 08:07, 12 August 2018 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

I just want to use a photo of the main brand product. I should've given it a simple description, but it seems like I overdid it. Do you have any advice that pertains to this type of upload? I know other brand pages have logos/products displayed and they're not deleted. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Avasilebugarin (talk • contribs) 10:37, 9 August 2018 (UTC)

Avasilebugarin (talk) 10:38, 9 August 2018 (UTC)

 Oppose It always depends on the creativity of the packaging design. While there are brand products with very simple packagings that cannot be copyrighted at all, this one with two coffee cups, an image of coffee beans plus a complex logo is really creative enough to be copyrighted. So I'm afraid we can't host any derivative photo without permission from the copyright holder of the brand's design. De728631 (talk) 10:43, 9 August 2018 (UTC)

 Not done per De728631. Ankry (talk) 08:18, 12 August 2018 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

I want to upload this file as an example of the brand's products. What am I doing wrong?

Cheers, Avasilebugarin (talk) 12:38, 9 August 2018 (UTC)

 Oppose Please read COM:PACKAGING.
You need a free license permission from the design copyright owner or you need to prove either that it is too simple for copyright in the country of origin or that its copyright expired (eg. because published more than 70 years ago). Without an evidence that it is FREE FOR ANY USE, you may not upload the image to Wikimedia Commons. We do not accept Fair Use images regardless of what do you want to use them for. Ankry (talk) 14:10, 9 August 2018 (UTC)

 Not done per above. Ankry (talk) 08:20, 12 August 2018 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: it is a public domain file Bnc97 (talk) 18:55, 9 August 2018 (UTC)

 Oppose Why do you think it is in the public domain? According to your description, the photo was taken in 1964 in Quinta Vergara, Chile. The copyright term in Chile is the lifetime of the photographer plus 70 years, and even anonymous works are protected for 70 years after the date of first publication. We don't know when this was first published, but even if was published in 1964 without the photographer's name, it would still be copyrighted until 2034. See Template talk:PD-Chile for a table of public domain works. De728631 (talk) 09:38, 10 August 2018 (UTC)

 Not done per De728631. Ankry (talk) 13:49, 12 August 2018 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Nctechnology (talk) 22:17, 10 August 2018 (UTC) It's my won work no one will claim


 Not done per Эlcobbola. Ankry (talk) 13:45, 12 August 2018 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

حسین قاسمی جامی — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bbnnddbbnndd (talk • contribs) 23:28, 10 August 2018 (UTC)

 Oppose as said by deleting admin: No source, no description, no date, no author. Also no license and no evidence of free license permission. No information here, nothing has changed. Ankry (talk) 13:36, 11 August 2018 (UTC)
Please indicate why this should be undeleted. De728631 (talk) 13:35, 11 August 2018 (UTC)

 Not done no information from the uploader. Ankry (talk) 13:47, 12 August 2018 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

I own the file on behalf of ViSenze.

Ireneatvisenze (talk) 07:29, 10 August 2018 (UTC)Ireneatvisenze 8/10/18

Please note that you should not have reuploaded the image at File:ViSenze logo file.png. Doing so is a severe breach of our policies. As to the logo, I don't see any problems here because it appears to be unoriginal anyway. {{PD-textlogo}} would apply if you hadn't granted a Creative Commons licence. De728631 (talk) 09:29, 10 August 2018 (UTC)

 Not done per De728631. Ankry (talk) 17:05, 12 August 2018 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

This file represents the Official Anthem of Grupo Desportivo Águias de Camarate by Luis António (Música a Gasóleo). I stated in the file description that this file was originally created by Luis António, however its use is in the public domain and can be shared as it is done in other places such as http://www.zerozero.pt/equipa.php?id=3908 Its purpose is to share culture and recognition by the club and the work itself. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Daniel AR Pires (talk • contribs) 10:49, 10 August 2018 (UTC)

 Oppose This is no evidence that the musical recording itself is in the public domain. Musical recordings have a copyright for the text, the music and the performance by the orchestra – all of which would be the lifetime of the author(s) plus 70 years in this case. We cannot keep the file without an explicit permission from the copyright holder. De728631 (talk) 11:44, 10 August 2018 (UTC)

I know the author and the President of the club, and both granted me permission to used it on Wikipédia in a way to share it with our community. So if possible I would like to have it undeleted and available to use please. It's very important.--Daniel AR Pires (talk) 13:52, 10 August 2018 (UTC)

We need a permission by email coming directly from the copyright holder of this particular recording. Please see COM:OTRS for details. Note also that all uploads at Commons must be free for anyone to use for any purpose, and not just for Wikipedia. De728631 (talk) 13:54, 10 August 2018 (UTC)

So I was searching more and discovered that the date of creation of the anthem was more than 70 years ago (August 1, 1938), the original author of the lyrics and music (Luis Antonio Sr.) died October 23, 1945, after his death, Luis António Jr recorded in his voice the anthem in 1948 with the intention of Grupo Desportivo Águias de Camarate to use it freely, that is to say, its use is allowed without any additional requirements.--Daniel AR Pires (talk) 19:50, 10 August 2018 (UTC)

Thank you for your effort, but then this needs to be confirmed by Luis António Jr. or his heirs. Unless there is no explicit statement at the homepage of Grupo Desportivo Águias de Camarate, we can't keep the file here. De728631 (talk) 13:33, 11 August 2018 (UTC)

 Not done OTRS permission is needed here. Ankry (talk) 17:06, 12 August 2018 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Dear administrators,


I would like to ask for undeletion of the files mentioned in the subject of this email.

I was directly given those pictures from the author Mr Marco Stradella, who gave his consent to their disclosure. Moreover those pictures are already of public domain on the Facebook/Instagram page @visitlenola.

Many thanks for your understanding.

Best Manuel Offidani --ManuelOffidani (talk) 09:16, 11 August 2018 (UTC)

@ManuelOffidani: For the image to be in public domain a legally valid reason described in a valid copyright template is needed; you set none. Note, that in most legal systems the authors cannot relinquish their copyright even if they wish so: so their works cannot be Public Domain earlier than 50-70 years after the author's death. A written free license is required for Wikimedia Commons publication in such cases which can be emailed to us by the author (read COM:OTRS) or declared at the initial image publication site (Facebook/Instagram): provide a clear, publicly available link to the license, then. Ankry (talk) 13:15, 11 August 2018 (UTC)

 Not done per above. Ankry (talk) 17:04, 12 August 2018 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Files of Sry88

I am just finishing editing it the photo has Flickr public domain license — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sry88 (talk • contribs) 21:28, 12 August 2018 (UTC)

am just finishing editing it the photo has Flickr public domain license

am just finishing editing it the photo has Flickr public domain license — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sry88 (talk • contribs) 21:31, 12 August 2018 (UTC)

  • Signing your posts on talk pages is required and it is a Commons guideline to sign your posts on deletion requests, undeletion requests, and noticeboards. To do so, simply add four tildes (~~~~) at the end of your comments. Your user name or IP address (if you are not logged in) and a timestamp will then automatically be added when you save your comment. Signing your comments helps people to find out who said something and provides them with a link to your user/talk page (for further discussion). Thank you.   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 21:53, 12 August 2018 (UTC)

Procedural close, files are not deleted, please read COM:PDM and COM:DW before converting the speedy deletion tags to DRs.   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 21:57, 12 August 2018 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

This is album art for the band Scarlet Sails. It was uploaded to go on the album's wiki page. Alexmarie (talk) 04:44, 12 August 2018 (UTC)

 Oppose @Alexmarie: you provided no evidence that it is freely licensed by the copyright holder. We cannot host Fair Use content in Wikimedia Commons. In order to undelete the image we need to receive written free-license permission following COM:OTRS instructions from the actual copyright holder (assuming Scarlet Sails). Ankry (talk) 07:31, 12 August 2018 (UTC)

 Not done: per above. --Jianhui67 TC 16:32, 13 August 2018 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: I am an OTRS agent (verify). I want to process Ticket:2018072410002997 which is in Persian. Please restore the file temporarily so that I can assess it. Thank you. 4nn1l2 (talk) 12:42, 13 August 2018 (UTC)


✓ Done: File restored. Please add the necessary templates. --Jianhui67 TC 16:30, 13 August 2018 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: Hi! As OTRS agent, I need to verify permission provided with Ticket:2018042110007145. Could you please restore these files temporarily? Please ping me when it's done. Ty Arthur Crbz (talk) 16:39, 7 August 2018 (UTC)

@Arthur Crbz: I've temporarily undeleted the indicated file in order that you can verify permission provided with Ticket:2018042110007145. —RP88 (talk) 22:15, 7 August 2018 (UTC)
In progress Additionnal permission required. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 08:07, 8 August 2018 (UTC)

 Not done redeleted. Request undeletion again, if needed. Ankry (talk) 18:39, 13 August 2018 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: Hi! As OTRS agent, I need to verify permission provided with Ticket:2018062710009192. Could you please restore these files temporarily? Please ping me when it's done. Ty Arthur Crbz (talk) 16:41, 7 August 2018 (UTC)

@Arthur Crbz: I've temporarily undeleted the indicated file in order that you can verify permission provided with Ticket:2018062710009192. —RP88 (talk) 22:08, 7 August 2018 (UTC)
In progress Additionnal permission required. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 08:05, 8 August 2018 (UTC)

 Not done redeleted. Request undeletion again, if needed. Ankry (talk) 18:40, 13 August 2018 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

It is the original Picture of Sujata Parashar — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sujataparashar (talk • contribs) 04:29, 8 August 2018 (UTC)

Nobody claims it is not. But There are two files there: one is "© 2017, All Rights Reserved With Sujata Parashar" which is not a free license. And for the 2nd one, two different wikimedia users claim to be the photographers. Contact OTRS and provide the original file from your camera, if you are the photographer.  Oppose Ankry (talk) 14:38, 9 August 2018 (UTC)

 Not done per above. Ankry (talk) 18:44, 13 August 2018 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

I ask for the undeletion because I can ask the authorization of the girl who published the photo on Twitter. Where do I have to send this authorization?--Kyrieevlogison (talk) 16:13, 9 August 2018 (UTC)

 Oppose We need an email coming directly from the copyright holder. In most cases this is the photographer and not the person depicted in the photograph. Since Mrs Asdourian is also shown in the original photo, it's rather unlikely that she is also the photographer. For instructions about the permission email, please see COM:OTRS. --De728631 (talk) 09:45, 10 August 2018 (UTC)

 Not done per De728631. Ankry (talk) 18:47, 13 August 2018 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

The picture Sergio Jerez Arellano.jpg was a courtesy from Sylvio García who was the autor of the photo and he gave permission to Sergio Jerez for any use. This picture also was a courtesy from Sergio Jerez, who is the same who appear in the image. Jaime Liencura (talk) 17:29, 9 August 2018 (UTC)Jaime LiencuraJaime Liencura (talk) 17:29, 9 August 2018 (UTC)

 Oppose Please have the copyright holder sent a permission by email. See COM:OTRS for instructions. De728631 (talk) 09:40, 10 August 2018 (UTC)

 Not done per De728631. Ankry (talk) 18:36, 13 August 2018 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: I have written permission from the guys behind the brand to use it, and that's exactly why I uploaded it, so why have you deleted it, please? Bart Versieck (talk) 23:14, 12 August 2018 (UTC)


 Not done per discussion. Ankry (talk) 19:00, 13 August 2018 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: Hi! As OTRS agent, I need to verify permission provided with Ticket:2018070710003803. Could you please restore these files temporarily? Please ping me when it's done. Ty Arthur Crbz (talk) 09:19, 8 August 2018 (UTC)

@Arthur Crbz: I've temporarily undeleted the indicated files in order that you can verify permission provided with Ticket:2018070710003803. —RP88 (talk) 14:06, 8 August 2018 (UTC)
In progress --Arthur Crbz (talk) 20:09, 8 August 2018 (UTC)

 Not done redeleting. Request undeletion again if needed. Ankry (talk) 04:53, 14 August 2018 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Uzasadnienie zmian: Do artykułu https://pl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Baltic_Pipe została dołączona mapa obrazująca przebieg projektu. Właścicielem praw autorskich był Operator Gazociągów Przesyłowych GAZ-SYSTEM S.A., który przesłał w dniu 2018-08-08 o godzinie 11:03 maila z adresu balticpipe@gaz-system.pl na adres permissions-pl@wikimedia.org zrzekając się ich i wyrażając zgodę na publikację na zasadach licencji Creative Commons: uznanie autorstwa, na tych samych warunkach, wersja 3.0. Mapa przedstawiona na obrazku jest publikowana na stronie projektu https://www.baltic-pipe.eu/pl/o-projekcie/

--Lemiel (talk) 09:40, 8 August 2018 (UTC)

Justification for changes: A map showing the course of the project has been attached to the article https://pl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Baltic_Pipe. The owner of the copyright was Operator Gazociągów Przesyłowych GAZ-SYSTEM SA, who sent on 2018-08-08 at 11:03 an e-mail from the address balticpipe@gaz-system.pl to the address permissions-pl@wikimedia.org renouncing them and expressing consent to publication under a Creative Commons license: recognition under the same conditions, version 3.0. The map presented in the picture is published on the project website https://www.baltic-pipe.eu/pl/o-projekcie/
 
translator: Google Translate via   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 14:23, 10 August 2018 (UTC)
 Oppose @Lemiel: Przetwarzanie pozwolenia w systemie OTRS trwa zwykle od tygodnia do kilku tygodni. Możesz się skontaktować w tej sprawie z polskojęzycznymi operatorami OTRS. Plik zostanie odtworzony, jeśli poprosi o jego odtworzenie któryś z operatorów. Ankry (talk) 14:07, 11 August 2018 (UTC)

 Not done waiting for OTRS processing. Ankry (talk) 04:59, 14 August 2018 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: Hi! As OTRS agent, I need to verify permission provided with Ticket:2018080710010535. Could you please restore these files temporarily? Please ping me when it's done. Ty Arthur Crbz (talk) 14:04, 8 August 2018 (UTC)

I am the copyright holder of the photo that was deleted, and would like it to be undeleted, please.

Thanks, Zach Smith Christendom College 08/07/18 18:44, 7 August 2018 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by TruthExists77 (talk • contribs) 18:44, 7 August 2018 (UTC)

@Arthur Crbz: I've temporarily undeleted the indicated file in order that you can verify permission provided with Ticket:2018080710010535. —RP88 (talk) 14:28, 8 August 2018 (UTC)
In progress Waiting for more specific statement of permission. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 16:57, 8 August 2018 (UTC)

 Not done redeleted. Request undeletion again if needed. Ankry (talk) 04:51, 14 August 2018 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

The file File:Arnab Ray.jpg was given to me by the original author

Hello,

The file File:Arnab Ray.jpg was given to me by the original author who holds the copyright with the understanding that I will be uploading it to Wikipedia for updating his own wikipedia page. Please suggest what would be the appropriate copyright license to use under this scenario. I was not sure so I may have selected an option that conveyed the wrong information. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gayatri9876 (talk • contribs) 18:19, 11 August 2018 (UTC)

 Oppose According to our rules, for previously published images, a written permission from actual copyrigt holder (following COM:OTRS instructions) is needed or an evidence that initial publication was under a free license (Facebook is not free). Moreover, to accept a permission from the person depicted, an evidence is needed that the image is selfie (does not seem to be) or that the photographer has transferred copyright to him. Ankry (talk) 07:50, 12 August 2018 (UTC)

 Not done per above. Ankry (talk) 04:58, 14 August 2018 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

I had the authorization of Giancarlo Sturloni, author of the photo — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lascribaegizia (talk • contribs) 17:06, 12 August 2018 (UTC)

 Oppose First, every permission concerning copyright must be in written form; otherwise invalid. We cannot verify on-wiki whether you have appropriate permission and whether it is valid. Second, as Giancarlo Sturloni is the depicted person; he is unlikely the photographer, so his permission may be void. Third, we generally do not accept permissions from third parties; a permission should come directly from the actual copyright owner. That all can be resolved via email in OTRS, read COM:OTRS. And be patient, this is not a short way. Ankry (talk) 17:27, 12 August 2018 (UTC)

 Not done per above. Ankry (talk) 05:01, 14 August 2018 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

I am the copyright owner of this portrait. I have emailed my permission for its use to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org. The original, uncropped photo is on my website, www.farazshibli.com/travel. The cropped version of the photo appears on some of my social media and other accounts. You can see that the email address I sent my permission from matches the email address on my website, where the original photo appears. Please could you restore the photo? Thank you.

Grempletonian (talk) 20:51, 12 August 2018 (UTC)

  •  Oppose If a free license has been sent to OTRS, then the file will be restored automatically when and if the email is received, processed, and approved. Note that OTRS, like Commons, is entirely staffed by volunteers, and, also like Commons, is shorthanded, so it may be close to 7 days before the email is processed and the file is restored.
If the message was sent to the English language version of OTRS and the email has been properly received there the sender will receive an automatic reply with the ticket number. If the sender has not had a reply, please check that it was sent correctly and try again. Other language versions may or may not provide the automatic reply. Did you tag the file {{subst:OP}} as instructed at OTRS and COM:CONSENT?   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 21:59, 12 August 2018 (UTC)

 Not done per Jeff. Ankry (talk) 05:02, 14 August 2018 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: This copyright of this photo is held by the Abjeez band and this page also belongs to the Abjeez Band. The Facebook page that you are referring to also belongs to the Abjeez band. I hereby request undeletion. A.razzavi (talk) 03:19, 13 August 2018 (UTC)


 Not done per Jeff. Ankry (talk) 05:03, 14 August 2018 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: Hi! As OTRS agent, I need to verify permission provided with Ticket:2018080710009565. Could you please restore these files temporarily? Please ping me when it's done. Ty Arthur Crbz (talk) 12:45, 9 August 2018 (UTC)


@Arthur Crbz: ✓ Done Ankry (talk) 13:56, 9 August 2018 (UTC)

Thank you! In progress --Arthur Crbz (talk) 15:12, 9 August 2018 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: Hi! As OTRS agent, I need to verify permission provided with Ticket:2018040310009678. Could you please restore these files temporarily? Please ping me when it's done. Ty Arthur Crbz (talk) 22:21, 9 August 2018 (UTC)

✓ Done @Arthur Crbz: For your information. De728631 (talk) 09:32, 10 August 2018 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

https://commons.m.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Professor_Doctor_Thitiporn_Rangsitpol_Suwatanapongched,Sukavich_Rangsitpol_%E2%80%98s_Daughter.jpg#mw-jump-to-license — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sry88 (talk • contribs) 16:17, 14 August 2018 (UTC)


Procedural closure Nothing to undelete since the image is still being discussed. Please comment at Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Sry88. De728631 (talk) 16:57, 14 August 2018 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:MobileDiff/854812991 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sry88 (talk • contribs) 16:19, 14 August 2018 (UTC)


Procedural closure Nothing to undelete as the file is still being discussed. Please comment at Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Sry88. De728631 (talk) 16:59, 14 August 2018 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:MobileDiff/854852245


File:His Excellency Mr.Sukavich Rangsitpol,Harvard University.png is not yet deleted so there is nothing to do here. De728631 (talk) 17:11, 14 August 2018 (UTC)



The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Tv_Azteca_Logo.png

--TELEDIARIO 19:15, 14 August 2018 (UTC) File:Tv_Azteca_Logo.png El logotipo es muy complejo para ser original. TELEDIARIO 19:15, 14 August 2018 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by DAVID MAS V. (talk • contribs) 19:15, 14 August 2018 (UTC)

The logo is very complex to be original.
 
translator: Google Translate via   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 14:46, 15 August 2018 (UTC)

Cierre de procedimiento, el archivo no se elimina, las publicaciones son bienvenidas en Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:TV Azteca#Files in Category:TV Azteca 2. Procedural close, file is not deleted, posts are welcome at Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:TV Azteca#Files in Category:TV Azteca 2.   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 14:53, 15 August 2018 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

I want to keep this screenshot.


1. This is my screenshot. This is nobody elses. 2. This was taken on my phone, nobody elses. 3. I have the full rights to it, NOT infoscout.


Tornadosurvivor2011 (talk) 21:49, 14 August 2018 (UTC) Bryce M 8/14/18

 Oppose Did you also create the background graphics, i.e. the hogs and the stack of coins? If not, this is in fact a copyright infringement because taking a screenshot does not transfer the copyright on the displayed content to you. Screenshots of non-free content are derivative works and may not be published without permission from the software company or the original graphic artist. If you did create these icons, please send a confirmation by email via COM:OTRS. 13:28, 15 August 2018 (UTC)
Not done This is a screnshot of a mobile app. Thuresson (talk) 20:53, 15 August 2018 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Files uploaded by Stan Ioan Ovidiu

Request temporary undeletion My understanding from Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Stan Ioan Ovidiu is that the issue with those movies was the soundtrack. I would like the files to be temporarely undelete so I can download them and remove the soundtrack. The affected files are:

Thank you.--Strainu (talk) 09:30, 9 August 2018 (UTC)

 Support temporary undeletion. Ankry (talk) 14:20, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
✓ Done @Strainu: You can overwrite the files with your video-only versions. We can then delete the revisions that include the soundtrack. De728631 (talk) 14:28, 11 August 2018 (UTC)

Working on them... Strainu (talk) 14:43, 11 August 2018 (UTC)

Unfortunately the changed files had over 100MB, so I had to upload them using the wizard. De728631, could you please move File:Centrul Istoric al Municipiului Codlea - Biserica Evanghelică Fortificată și Muzeul Tradițiilor noaudio.webm and File:Documentar Cetatea Feldioara noaudio.webm over the orginals and then recover the current wikitext? Thanks.
I'm having some issues with the third file, still trying to obtain a decent quality file.--Strainu (talk) 14:29, 14 August 2018 (UTC)
@Strainu: I merged the Codlea files, but File:Documentar Cetatea Feldioara.webm seems to have a decent "silent" version made by you. Do we really need to keep the huge noaudio upload for this one? De728631 (talk) 14:42, 14 August 2018 (UTC)
I believe so. While small, that version has some artefacts around the text and in various moments of high movement. I decided the best would be to follow the suggestions from this email (including the quoted emails from Rupert), which got me these huge files.--Strainu (talk) 17:18, 14 August 2018 (UTC)
Alright, Documentar Cetatea Feldioara.webm has also been merged. De728631 (talk) 17:23, 14 August 2018 (UTC)

Done the third one, same method: File:Ghimbav_-_Istoric_al_așezării_noaudio.webm. Thank you!--Strainu (talk) 18:06, 14 August 2018 (UTC)


✓ Done Done, the undeleted files have been overwritten with revisions without audio track, so they can be kept. Thank you, Strainu, for providing the "silent" uploads. De728631 (talk) 18:30, 14 August 2018 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Hi, this file is the logo of the North Korean Football Association, and it can be seen here. The file was deleted from Commons because "the ball makes the logo pass the threshold for originality". However, since there are hundreds of thousands of such football icons, this one cannot be original. We have hundreds of them on Commons, see Category:Association football icons and Category:Association football logos. Please undelete and mark as PD-shape. Thanks, --Gnom (talk) 15:15, 2 August 2018 (UTC)

Presumably OP refers to Commons:Deletion requests/File:Fed coree nord.svg. Thuresson (talk) 17:07, 2 August 2018 (UTC)
Yes, thank you. --Gnom (talk) 21:18, 2 August 2018 (UTC)
 Support. However, I am not sure how high or low North Korean TOO is... Any hints? Ankry (talk) 10:34, 7 August 2018 (UTC)
We don't, except for en:Copyright law of North Korea. It will be the same as in pretty much any other country. --Gnom (talk) 13:57, 9 August 2018 (UTC)

Not restored. I checked the Copyright law of North Korea.

Copyright law §9 Abs. 7. "지도, 도표, 도면, 략도, 모형 같은 도형저작물" = "Shape material such as maps, chart, blueprint, abridged drawings, models"

They are listed just as examples. Therefore, the image is above the threshold of originality. – Kwj2772 (talk) 13:58, 16 August 2018 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

The people trying to upload the photos are trying to make the same article I uploaded the photos for, so they are free to use the pictures under these file names.

Sandleguiz (talk) 02:08, 11 August 2018 (UTC)2018/08/11

 Oppose @Sandleguiz: To publish an image of an artwork made by a modern or recently (<70 years ago) died artist, you need to provide a written free license permission from the artist (or the artist's heirs, if the artist died). See COM:DW and COM:OTRS. Moreover, declaring it to be your Own work is not also violation of Wikimedia Commons rules, but also violation of the artist's copyright/moral rights. Do not do that. Ankry (talk) 13:27, 11 August 2018 (UTC)

 Not done per above. Ankry (talk) 13:17, 16 August 2018 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Please excuse. I am new at writing here and trying to find the right outlet to publish my infos/Bios. As this whole wikipedia is VERY complicated I would be pleased if you can advise.

Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by BarryAK (talk • contribs) 15:14, 12 August 2018 (UTC)

@BarryAK: You have successfully uploaded File:Barry Alexander King Singer Songwriter.jpg (but with a defective description). You seem to be the subject of that photo, so here is some advice: The owner and subject of a photo is not usually the copyright holder, the photographer usually is. Please have the photographer send permission via OTRS with a copy to you. We do not host articles here on Wikimedia Commons, English Wikipedia does. There, you are cautioned to read en:WP:MFA, en:WP:COI, and en:WP:AUTO.   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 22:15, 12 August 2018 (UTC)

 Not done no file to undelete. User page is deleted as improper use of user pages. Ankry (talk) 13:19, 16 August 2018 (UTC)


 Not done: Not currently deleted. --Yann (talk) 13:37, 16 August 2018 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Bangalore Nano National Award 2012.jpg

Photo courtesy is mentioned and reference link is also indicated. Hope this would be accepted for undeletion. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Giridhar U Kulkarni (talk • contribs) August 13, 2018 (UTC)

 Oppose The photo has been published before without a free licence and was attributed to a certain Bhagya Prakash K. To undelete the file, we need a permission by email from the copyright holder via COM:OTRS. De728631 (talk) 08:11, 13 August 2018 (UTC)

 Not done per De728631. Ankry (talk) 13:20, 16 August 2018 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

LaTonyaJeanLawrence.jpg /thumb/ model on casting360 photographer

Requesting my photo uploads to Be undeleted — Preceding unsigned comment added by LaTonya Jean Lawrence (talk • contribs) 07:42, 13 August 2018 (UTC)

 Oppose Your only deleted upload when you added this request was File:Self made - freelance model casting360.jpeg. The file was deleted because you did not specify where it comes from, who holds the copyright and if it was published under a free licence. This information is required to undelete the image.
Please note also that we do not allow selfies and other personal images of users who have not made any substantial contributions at Wikimedia projects like Wikipedia or Wikimedia Commons. Commons is not your personal webhost but only collects images that can be used for educational purposes. I have therefore also deleted your other uploads per Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by LaTonya Jean Lawrence. Please see Commons:Project scope for details about the purpose of Wikimedia Commons. De728631 (talk) 08:06, 13 August 2018 (UTC)

 Not done per De728631. Ankry (talk) 13:21, 16 August 2018 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

I have the rights to use the images.

Ref [Ticket#: 2018080610004179].

NanaYawKesse (talk) 08:44, 13 August 2018 (UTC)

 Oppose This should wait unlil processed by an OTRS agent. Ankry (talk) 18:30, 13 August 2018 (UTC)


  •  Oppose If a free license has been sent to OTRS, then the file will be restored automatically when and if the email is received, processed, and approved. Note that OTRS, like Commons, is entirely staffed by volunteers, and, also like Commons, is shorthanded, so it may be close to 7 days before the email is processed and the file is restored.
If the message was sent to the English language version of OTRS and the email has been properly received there the sender will receive an automatic reply with the ticket number. If the sender has not had a reply, please check that it was sent correctly and try again. Other language versions may or may not provide the automatic reply. De728631 (talk) 14:44, 14 August 2018 (UTC)

 Not done: waiting for an OTRS agent action. Ankry (talk) 13:22, 16 August 2018 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

permissions have been sent for this and New Logo — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jonahgoldmankay (talk • contribs) 16:22, 13 August 2018 (UTC)

 Oppose If a free license has been sent to OTRS, then the file will be restored automatically when and if the email is received, processed, and approved. Note that OTRS, like Commons, is entirely staffed by volunteers, and, also like Commons, is shorthanded, so it may be close to 7 days before the email is processed and the file is restored.

If the message was sent to the English language version of OTRS and the email has been properly received there the sender will receive an automatic reply with the ticket number. If the sender has not had a reply, please check that it was sent correctly and try again. Other language versions may or may not provide the automatic reply. Ankry (talk) 18:28, 13 August 2018 (UTC)


 Not done: waiting for an OTRS agent action. Ankry (talk) 13:23, 16 August 2018 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

This is an old photo which belongs to me of a member of my family. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jthibau2 (talk • contribs) 16:48, 13 August 2018 (UTC)

 Oppose 80 yeats since creation is definitely too recent, unless you identify the photographer and prove that he/she died more than 70 years ago. Ankry (talk) 18:26, 13 August 2018 (UTC)
 Oppose per Ankry. Works from the US that were first published (i.e. made available to the common public) after 2003 are copyrighted for the lifetime of the author plus 70 years, or for 95 years after the first publication if anomymous. However, if this was published in a yearbook or something similar in 1938, there is a chance that it would not be copyrighted. Do you know any details about this photo? De728631 (talk) 15:09, 14 August 2018 (UTC)

 Not done per above. Ankry (talk) 13:24, 16 August 2018 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

أعتقد أن الملف حذف عن طريق الخطأ مستر (talk) 20:19, 13 August 2018 (UTC)

File:ฐิฏา รังสิตพล มานิตกุล - ผู้พันปราง.jpg File:ผู้พันปราง.jpg File:พันโทหญิงฐิฏา รังสิตพล มานิตกุล - ผู้พันปราง.jpg File:Professor Doctor Thitiporn Rangsitpol Suwatanapongched,Sukavich Rangsitpol ‘s Daughter.jpg File:Lieutenant Colonel Thita Rangsitpol Manitkul,WRTA.png File:Sukavich Rangsitpol & Thita Rangsitpol Manitkul.png — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sry88 (talk • contribs) 20:20, 13 August 2018 (UTC)


 Not done: as per Jeff. --Yann (talk) 13:35, 16 August 2018 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: Picture was taken by me and later given to the Nature Conservancy for use on its website. However, they did not pay me for the privilege and I never gave up the rights to the image. Therefore I still own the copyright and can freely publish it under a Creative Commons license. Nedkleiner (talk) 22:42, 13 August 2018 (UTC)

@Nedkleiner: Please send permission via OTRS.   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 03:47, 14 August 2018 (UTC)

 Not done an OTRS permission is required. Ankry (talk) 13:26, 16 August 2018 (UTC)


 Not done: as per Jeff. --Yann (talk) 13:34, 16 August 2018 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Hello,

I had the owner of the copyright of the photo that has been deleted, send you an email indicating the permission of using the photo in Wikipedia. The email was sent yesterday to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org and I have been CC'd. I would like to ask you Please kindly undelete the photo. Thank you! Regards, Alireza — Preceding unsigned comment added by A.razzavi (talk • contribs) 16:32, 14 August 2018 (UTC)


  •  Oppose If a free license has been sent to OTRS, then the file will be restored automatically when and if the email is received, processed, and approved. Note that OTRS, like Commons, is entirely staffed by volunteers, and, also like Commons, is shorthanded, so it may be close to 7 days before the email is processed and the file is restored.
If the message was sent to the English language version of OTRS and the email has been properly received there the sender will receive an automatic reply with the ticket number. If the sender has not had a reply, please check that it was sent correctly and try again. Other language versions may or may not provide the automatic reply. De728631 (talk) 17:04, 14 August 2018 (UTC)

 Not done: waiting for an OTRS agent action. Ankry (talk) 13:28, 16 August 2018 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Hello, I am the author of this book and I own the original picture for this portrait. I have the copyright documents:

https://1drv.ms/b/s!AqHHwOq-hOvMgqpT-jfOCmHpLj-Izw

I own the original picture https://1drv.ms/u/s!AqHHwOq-hOvMgqlSsoZDeDSFTiqzrQ

thank you

--Pinguinossuicidas (talk) 16:50, 14 August 2018 (UTC)

These weblinks don't seem to work. De728631 (talk) 18:31, 14 August 2018 (UTC)
@Pinguinossuicidas: A Wikipedia article about this book has been speedily deleted for being irrelevant to an encyclopedia, see es:Pingüinos Suicidas. Apparently Spanish Amazon do not sell this book. Can you clarify why the Wikimedia project should have an illustration of the book cover? What is the relation between yourself and the artist Maria Paz Matus de la Parra? Thuresson (talk) 23:16, 14 August 2018 (UTC)

 Not done per above: neither evidence of free licence nor scope evidence provided. Ankry (talk) 13:14, 16 August 2018 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

My photo — Preceding unsigned comment added by Amani.jarrar (talk • contribs) 18:57, 14 August 2018 (UTC)

 Oppose "© 2007 - 2018 Knowledge Kingdom For Training And Consultations, All Rights Reserved." from here. Thuresson (talk) 22:28, 14 August 2018 (UTC)

 Not done per Thuresson. Ankry (talk) 13:29, 16 August 2018 (UTC)


 Not done: as per Thuresson. --Yann (talk) 13:34, 16 August 2018 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

I obtained permission from image owner Pat Trueman, who is the campaign manager of the Stefanowski campaign for CT governor. It has been taken down twice, despite an email from Pat Trueman's official email to Wikimedia commons stating his release request. Please advise, instead of deleting repeatedly!

Thank you.

Austinwmcl (talk) 04:16, 15 August 2018 (UTC) Austin McLaughlin August 14, 2018


  •  Oppose If a free license has been sent to OTRS, then the file will be restored automatically when and if the email is received, processed, and approved. Note that OTRS, like Commons, is entirely staffed by volunteers, and, also like Commons, is shorthanded, so it may be close to 7 days before the email is processed and the file is restored.
If the message was sent to the English language version of OTRS and the email has been properly received there the sender will receive an automatic reply with the ticket number. If the sender has not had a reply, please check that it was sent correctly and try again. Other language versions may or may not provide the automatic reply. De728631 (talk) 13:29, 15 August 2018 (UTC)

 Not done waiting for an OTRS agent action. Ankry (talk) 13:30, 16 August 2018 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Why this file deleted? It is my photography work and I have copyright to disseminate as a full member of organization Eurordis. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fcsma (talk • contribs) 10:02, 15 August 2018 (UTC)

Fcsma (talk) 11:49, 15 August 2018 (UTC)

 Oppose The file was deleted because it was found at the Eurordis website with a disclaimer "the materials may not be used for commercial purposes". Non-commercial uploads are not allowed at Commons and we have no means to verify that your Wikimedia account is connected to Eurordis. For the poster to get undeleted at Commons, please send an email from an official Eurordis account as explained in COM:OTRS. --De728631 (talk) 13:38, 15 August 2018 (UTC)

 Not done per De728631. Ankry (talk) 13:48, 16 August 2018 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Example.jpg Can you show me your right for deletation??? I need the picture back please...

This is not the one if you or whoever wanna want proof tell us ,,,, — Preceding unsigned comment added by Adofmusic1 (talk • contribs) 19:53, 16 August 2018 (UTC)


Procedural close.
@Adofmusic1: Please read the instructions at the top of this page if you wish to make a request. Thuresson (talk) 20:14, 16 August 2018 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Regarding your message (from Patrick Rogel):

File:Paul Kossoff Biography - Front Cover.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation.

Please note I have permission from the author to use this image as follows:

"JP James, owns the copyright to the book cover and assigns permission for it to be displayed on this webpage"

If you wish to verify this please contact the author directly. His email address is: (♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦E-mail address removed by Thuresson (talk))


Thank you

Allrightnow1970 (talk) 14:24, 15 August 2018 (UTC)

Not done. Permission only to publish at a specific web site is not enough. Nobody will respond to enquiries at that mail address 50 years from now. Thuresson (talk) 22:43, 16 August 2018 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

It has not been two weeks since I have put this image up on wikibooks, and I am gathering the copyright information. The legal team at the Allen Institute has clarified I may use their images, I just need to update the licensing to "Used with permission from the Allen Institute (c) 2018 Allen Institute https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Falleninstitute.org%2Flegal%2Fcitation-policy%2F&data=02%7C01%7C%7Cbfcf8f6914754f1498d708d6020839bf%7C32669cd6737f4b398bddd6951120d3fc%7C0%7C0%7C636698631680901952&sdata=UsTmhpp2uzk%2BCawUFsqMfWMj2aEc7kCWoj%2FHl8nHuRY%3D&reserved=0". I intend to do this as soon as the image is undeleted. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vmoody373 (talk • contribs) 20:18, 14 August 2018 (UTC)

 Oppose A permission for Wikibooks only is not sufficient. All uploads at Commons must be free for anyone to use for any purpose even outside Wikimedia projects. This includes commercial reuse. De728631 (talk) 13:40, 15 August 2018 (UTC)

 Not done: as per De728631. --Yann (talk) 05:23, 17 August 2018 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

О какой лицензий идёт речь? Мини-футбольный клуб дал разрешение на использование логотипом. Лица, представляющие клуб, не против использования этим логотипом. Тем более это не copyright и не TM.-Rreew (talk) 15:07, 15 August 2018 (UTC)

 Oppose Fair use images are not accepted in Wikimedia Commons, only freely licensed ones. As the logo is quite complex, it is copyrighted. And a written free license permission from the logo copyright owner is required in order to restore the logo. Please read COM:OTRS. Also note, that a written form is required for such a permission by the copyright law. Ankry (talk) 13:47, 16 August 2018 (UTC)

 Not done: as per Ankry. --Yann (talk) 05:22, 17 August 2018 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: I received permission from PushkinPress, and the cover artist via email that I may use the book cover image on my Wikipedia page. I have the email that I would be happy to send in upon request as I am unsure on how to send it on this form. Paxton Campbell (talk) 17:04, 15 August 2018 (UTC)

They would need to use the COM:OTRS process, and send an email directly to Wikimedia Commons. Also note that permission for just Wikipedia is not enough; it needs to be permission for anyone to reuse it elsewhere (even commercially). If they do not wish to grant so permissive a license (which would be understandable), the best bet would be to upload to en-wiki directly as fair use. Carl Lindberg (talk) 17:17, 15 August 2018 (UTC)

 Not done: as per Carl. --Yann (talk) 05:22, 17 August 2018 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

The single cover art is in fair use and should be undeleted.

Thousands of album/single art is uploaded on this website and is displayed without issue, so the file had no reason to be deleted.

Gbadman (talk) 17:46, 16 August 2018 (UTC)

Gbadman: What does it say in the big red box at the top of Commons:Fair use? LX (talk, contribs) 18:07, 16 August 2018 (UTC)

 Not done: Obviously not. --Yann (talk) 05:19, 17 August 2018 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Hi, this file is the logo of the North Korean Football Association, and it can be seen here. The file was deleted from Commons because "the ball makes the logo pass the threshold for originality". However, since there are hundreds of thousands of such football icons, this one cannot be original. We have hundreds of them on Commons, see Category:Association football icons and Category:Association football logos. Please undelete and mark as PD-shape. Thanks, --Gnom (talk) 15:15, 2 August 2018 (UTC)

Presumably OP refers to Commons:Deletion requests/File:Fed coree nord.svg. Thuresson (talk) 17:07, 2 August 2018 (UTC)
Yes, thank you. --Gnom (talk) 21:18, 2 August 2018 (UTC)
 Support. However, I am not sure how high or low North Korean TOO is... Any hints? Ankry (talk) 10:34, 7 August 2018 (UTC)
We don't, except for en:Copyright law of North Korea. It will be the same as in pretty much any other country. --Gnom (talk) 13:57, 9 August 2018 (UTC)

Not restored. I checked the Copyright law of North Korea.

Copyright law §9 Abs. 7. "지도, 도표, 도면, 략도, 모형 같은 도형저작물" = "Shape material such as maps, chart, blueprint, abridged drawings, models"

They are listed just as examples. Therefore, the image is above the threshold of originality.Kwj2772 (talk) 13:58, 16 August 2018 (UTC)


On appeal at Special:Permalink/315063939#File:North_Korea_FA.png

Prior decision canceled.

Restored for File:Fed coree nord.svg: I checked the law again. §8 is defined as "저작권의 대상을 바로 정하는 것은 저작권 보호의 선결조건이다. 해당기관은 과학성, 객관성, 현실성의 원칙에서 저작권 대상을 정하여야 한다." "A proper definition of the object of copyright is the prerequisite to the protection of copyright. The institutions concerned shall determine the object of copyright on the principles of scientificness, objectivity and realism." The Copyright law of NK does not have explicit definitions of "works" and "originality", but some jurisprudence researchs[1] I found state that "original expressions are protected by copyright." Although institutions concered have discretions to determine whether artworks are subject to the copyright law, it doesn't seem to have scientificness, objectivity, realism as well as originality.

Request for undeletion of File:North Korea FA.png is dismissed: There are no file deleted, so no action is taken. – Kwj2772 (talk) 08:47, 17 August 2018 (UTC)

  1. 최경수 (2015), 북한 저작권법 및 남북 간 저작권분야 교류ㆍ협력에 관한 연구, 한국저작권위원회 (Copyright committee of South Korea), (in Korean language)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Прошу восстановить файл. Это моя собственная работа. Birger (talk) 16:41, 11 August 2018 (UTC)

Please undelete the file. This is my own work. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Birger (talk • contribs) 16:43, 11 August 2018 (UTC)

 Support as I disagree with the DR nominator: size is not small; this is a scan of a PD object: metadata from scanner may be not available. Ankry (talk) 08:25, 12 August 2018 (UTC)
 On hold Ankry's comment is quite fair. This is a scan, and the size is not that small. Now waiting for the file to be restored. Birger (talk) 13:08, 15 August 2018 (UTC)

✓ Done: as per Ankry. --Yann (talk) 16:47, 17 August 2018 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Deleted — Preceding unsigned comment added by CrmnMariano1 (talk • contribs) 22:15, 15 August 2018 (UTC)

Please state why this should be undeleted. De728631 (talk) 12:28, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
Also thare is no such file nor file of similar name among files uploaded (deleted or not) by the requester. So it is unclear what we are talking about. Ankry (talk) 13:34, 16 August 2018 (UTC)

 Not done: as per above. --Yann (talk) 16:46, 17 August 2018 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

This file is different from the file used for the deletion request. — Preceding unsigned comment added by BMW USE (talk • contribs) 23:16, 15 August 2018 (UTC)

  •  Oppose The image is in fact different from the one linked in the deletion request. However, a larger version of the same photo does appear at this website without a free licence. It appears that your upload was cropped from this photo. As a derivative work we can't use it without permission from the original photographer. De728631 (talk) 12:27, 16 August 2018 (UTC)

 Not done: as per De728631. --Yann (talk) 16:46, 17 August 2018 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

An image has been deleted from the DaVinci International Film Festival page, and I have written permission from the Festival owner to use any and all images, including the one in question (File:DIFF Coverage 2018.png), posters or creative property associated with DaVinci International Film Festival for this purpose. All material is available to the public, and open source. I also noticed a "Warning" about the DaVinci International Film Festival poster that is on that same page, and I also have permission to use that image to develop this content on Wikipedia.--Veritasmultimedia (talk) 00:34, 16 August 2018 (UTC)

  •  Oppose A permission for use at Wikipedia only is not sufficient. All uploads at Commons must be free for anyone for any purpose even outside of Wikimedia projects. This would also include commercial reuse and the making of derivatives. To undelete the file we need a free licence coming directly from the copyright holder by email. Please see COM:OTRS for details. De728631 (talk) 12:16, 16 August 2018 (UTC)

 Not done: as per De728631. --Yann (talk) 16:45, 17 August 2018 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Tif may be better quality than the jpg, so please restore. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 01:35, 16 August 2018 (UTC)


✓ Done: as per above. Please fix the source (and the author?). --Yann (talk) 16:41, 17 August 2018 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Esta imagem possui uso permitido. Não tem problema eu usar ela. --Nathalianiedja (talk) 02:00, 16 August 2018 (UTC)

 Oppose Fair Use images are not accepted in Wikimedia Commons. Only freely licensed ones. A written free-license permission from the actual copyright owner is required. Read COM:OTRS instructions. Ankry (talk) 13:42, 16 August 2018 (UTC)

 Not done: as per Ankry. --Yann (talk) 16:41, 17 August 2018 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Lessebo_Bruk.jpg is a picture from a video Daniel Ivelind, the CEO LIVE Reklambyrå filmed for our client JOOL Invest. You can see the clip in their corporate video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NPG6awalkRY 16 seconds in. Live Reklambyrå (talk) 11:47, 16 August 2018 (UTC)

  •  Oppose This image has (or these images have) appeared on the Internet without a free license prior to being uploaded here (or appear(s) to have based on the small size and lack of EXIF metadata), and was (or were) thus deleted by an Administrator. Policy requires that the actual copyright holder, which is almost always the photographer or image designer, must send a free license directly using VRTS. De728631 (talk) 12:11, 16 August 2018 (UTC)

 Not done: as per De728631. --Yann (talk) 16:40, 17 August 2018 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: This image is my own creation. I used this image as icon of my software: Dragme IDE, which can be found at https://sourceforge.net/projects/dragme/ and http://www.softpedia.com/get/Programming/Coding-languages-Compilers/Dragme-IDE.shtml . I am Harsh Mishra, and developer of Dragme IDE, which you can verify on the above sites. And can find this image as icon of my software.

Therefore, I am request for undeletion of the image. Devharshmishra (talk) 12:45, 16 August 2018 (UTC)

Maybe. But as it was already used outside Wikimedia Commons without evidence of free license, a permission following COM:OTRS instructions is required. And you need to convince the OTRS agent that this is your and not someboy else's image.  Oppose at the moment. Ankry (talk) 13:39, 16 August 2018 (UTC)

 Not done: as per Ankry. --Yann (talk) 16:40, 17 August 2018 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

EDQM and European Pharmacopeia

Please note that the EDQM is the secretariat of the European Pharmacopeia, it therefore owns the image of the cover of the European Pharmacopeia: https://www.edqm.eu/en/european-pharmacopoeia-ph-eur-9th-edition — Preceding unsigned comment added by PRDD.EDQM.COE (talk • contribs) 14:31, 16 August 2018 (UTC)


 Not done: as per Jeff. --Yann (talk) 16:39, 17 August 2018 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. @Ankry: The two users above were correct that the video did not have it's creative commons license. The way to change the license was not known to me until today. It has been changed since. If there are any other issues please let me know. --KingHering (talk) 20:59, 17 August 2018 (UTC)

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: This file is the SVG version of File:Turing machine 2a.gif. Also exists in en wiki as File:Turing machine 2a.svg. Sreejith K (talk) 04:38, 17 August 2018 (UTC)


✓ Done per Yann. The deletion was bogus: there was a clear license information there. Ankry (talk) 14:38, 17 August 2018 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

The copyright holder, Rett Peek Photography, emailed rights on Monday, August 6, with Ticket#: 2018080610006221, expressly giving rights for public consumption. If he needs to send another email clarifying the rights, please let me know. --Mn479 (talk) 17:40, 15 August 2018 (UTC)


  •  Oppose If a free license has been sent to OTRS, then the file will be restored automatically when and if the email is received, processed, and approved. Note that OTRS, like Commons, is entirely staffed by volunteers, and, also like Commons, is shorthanded, so it may be close to 7 days before the email is processed and the file is restored.
If the message was sent to the English language version of OTRS and the email has been properly received there the sender will receive an automatic reply with the ticket number. If the sender has not had a reply, please check that it was sent correctly and try again. Other language versions may or may not provide the automatic reply. De728631 (talk) 12:29, 16 August 2018 (UTC)

 Not done per De728631. Ankry (talk) 06:12, 18 August 2018 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

After speaking to a secretary of the House of Representatives public relations, I was told that photos of Minnesota legislators are in the public domain and do not need any form of copyright. All of the Legislative Photographer's photos are public (David Oakes). I am not sure how I would signifiy that this is in the public domain when uploading - the only option I can see is if it was taken by a member of the federal government, not a state government. Pharexia (talk) 16:54, 16 August 2018 (UTC)

@Pharexia: Where can this information be found in writing? From the web site of the Minnesota House of Representatives:
  • Images may not be digitally altered in any way, including extreme cropping.
  • The following credits must used: Copyright Minnesota House of Representatives. Photo by (photographer’s name).
  • Images may not be sold or used in any way for profit or commercial purposes, including use in a commercial or professional website or printed materials.
Thuresson (talk) 20:36, 16 August 2018 (UTC)

 Not done per 1st and 3rd requirements listed above: Commons files must be free for any use including derivative work creation and commercial reuse. Ankry (talk) 06:08, 18 August 2018 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Requesting undeletion of this photo. I can supply completed copyright release form from the photographer if you can direct me where to upload it. --Kbankston (talk) 21:16, 16 August 2018 (UTC)Karen Bankston 8/16/2018

@Kbankston: The photographer needs to fill out the form located at COM:ET and send it into the email address mentioned there. Please note, we do not accept forwarded permissions, it has to come from them not you, and they must place the image under a copyright license that allows anyone to use or modify the image, at any time, and for any purpose (including commercial reuse). When our copyright response team gets to it and verifies everything they can request undeletion. Please be patient with this process, we are a little backlogged at the moment. --Majora (talk) 22:47, 16 August 2018 (UTC)

 Not done per Majora. Ankry (talk) 06:19, 18 August 2018 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Files uploaded by Axelschw

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: I am an OTRS agent (verify). I want to process Ticket:2018071310004891. Please restore these files temporarily, so that I can handle the ticket. Thank you 4nn1l2 (talk) 10:08, 17 August 2018 (UTC)

 Doing… Ankry (talk) 14:32, 17 August 2018 (UTC)

@4nn1l2: ✓ Done Ankry (talk) 06:05, 18 August 2018 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

What's the reason for the deletion of this picture, please? I was conferred the rights to use it by both photographer and the person depicted. --Lia Marie Hillers (talk) 10:42, 17 August 2018 (UTC)

The image is marked in its EXIF data as "all rights reserved" which contradicts your declaration that it is freely licensed and constitutes a "reasonable doubt" concerning copyright. In such cases, we need a written permission from the author: either on the initial image publication page (if it was published elsewhere efore upload to Commons) or via email to OTRS. Please read COM:OTRS and COM:PCP.  Oppose undeletion here. Ankry (talk) 14:23, 17 August 2018 (UTC)

 Not done: as per Ankry. --Yann (talk) 16:13, 18 August 2018 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

I own the right to this photo. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kalaboomsky (talk • contribs) 14:18, 17 August 2018 (UTC)


 Not done: as per De728631. --Yann (talk) 16:14, 18 August 2018 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Information on Chicham Bridge is original content and there is no copyright violation

The information on Chicham Bridge has been collected by visiting the site personally and having interviewed local people. — Preceding unsigned comment added by DILIP LAGU (talk • contribs) 13:06, 18 August 2018 (UTC)

Chicham bridge has not been deleted, but it will probably deleted soon. There is no copyright violation, but pages like this are in the wrong place here. Please note that this is Wikimedia Commons and not Wikipedia. We do not publish encyclopedic articles. Instead, Commons is a repository of media files. De728631 (talk) 15:04, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
PS: Even at Wikipedia, an article based on personal research would not be acceptable. Wikipedia does not publish original research but relies on what has been published before by reliable sources. De728631 (talk) 15:06, 18 August 2018 (UTC)

 Not done: as per De728631. --Yann (talk) 16:16, 18 August 2018 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Please undelete this photo. It was falsely claimed by a user that the photo rights belong to WSB. This is incorrect. I gave the photo to WSB and they never claimed they hold the rights. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Scotishdancer (talk • contribs) 18:29, 17 August 2018 (UTC)

 Oppose There are copyright claims for this photo here and here and nothing about authorship of User:Scotishdancer in those locations. For any photo that was published elsewhere prior to upload to Wikimedia Commons we require proper authorship/license information either (1) on the initial publication page, or (2) via email to OTRS. Please read COM:OTRS and follow instructions provided there. Ankry (talk) 06:39, 18 August 2018 (UTC)

 Not done: as per above. --Yann (talk) 10:28, 19 August 2018 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

In his video (can't link because aparently YouTube is a blacklisted site) he clearly allows access to add an image to his Wikipedia page, and we may use any picture. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Flavioflorovits (talk • contribs) 19:02, 17 August 2018 (UTC)

 Oppose The web link is available at en:Talk:Jordan Maron and the permission to use a photo at Wikipedia is at appr. 10:55. A permission for only Wikipedia is not acceptable. Thuresson (talk) 19:20, 17 August 2018 (UTC)
 Oppose Instructions on how to proceed are already listed at that talk page. --Majora (talk) 20:41, 17 August 2018 (UTC)

 Not done: as per above. --Yann (talk) 10:28, 19 August 2018 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Bruce Kulick himself asked me to submit a NEW picture for his WIKI article. The picture is not "strictly" copyrighted, and Kulick used it to promote his activity very often. The picture is vastly better than the previous one used as "front" image of the article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Giallino83 (talk • contribs) 13:44, 18 August 2018 (UTC)

 Oppose The photo appears on Facebook (and probably elsewhere) without a free licence. All uploads at Commons must be free for anyone to use for any purpose, even outside Wikipedia, so we need a permission by email coming directly from the copyright holder. Please see COM:OTRS for details. Other than that, you should also read the English Wikipedia's policy on conflicts of interest, and if you get paid to edit the article, you would have to declare that, too. De728631 (talk) 15:00, 18 August 2018 (UTC)

 Not done: as per above. --Yann (talk) 16:55, 19 August 2018 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Please undelete this file. I obtained authorization for publishing at Wikimedia by the author Andrea Matheisen for the creation of a Wikipedia page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by MW62 (talk • contribs) 20:16, 18 August 2018 (UTC)

 Oppose Permission to publish at Wikimedia only is not acceptable. Thuresson (talk) 20:58, 18 August 2018 (UTC)

 Not done: as per above. --Yann (talk) 18:52, 19 August 2018 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Die Urheberin Andrea Matheisen hat mir die Datei zukommen lassen, damit ich sie auf der Wikipediaseite, die ich über sie erstellt habe, veröffentlichen kann. Ich bitte daher um Rückgängigmachung der Löschung. — Preceding unsigned comment added by MW62 (talk • contribs) 20:28, 18 August 2018 (UTC)

 Oppose Permission to publish at Wikipedia only is not acceptable. Thuresson (talk) 20:58, 18 August 2018 (UTC)

 Not done: as per above. --Yann (talk) 18:52, 19 August 2018 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Please undelete this file. I got the permission to publish this file by the author for the creation of a wikipedia page about the artist Andrea Matheisen. — Preceding unsigned comment added by MW62 (talk • contribs) 20:32, 18 August 2018 (UTC)

 Oppose Permission to publish at Wikipedia only is not acceptable. Thuresson (talk) 20:58, 18 August 2018 (UTC)

 Not done: as per above. --Yann (talk) 18:52, 19 August 2018 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

I am working with the director to promote his new movie and we have no issue with the pictures being used on Wikipedia. For further info, you may contact me at admin@edmontonAfghans.ca, (or the director via FB https://www.facebook.com/emaanafghanistan/).

Thanks --Rs21867 (talk) 22:41, 18 August 2018 (UTC)

 Oppose This is not Wikipedia. A permission for use on Wikipedia only is not acceptable. Thuresson (talk) 11:11, 19 August 2018 (UTC)

 Not done: as per above. --Yann (talk) 18:52, 19 August 2018 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Files uploaded by Pantha.sen86

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: This is the original file that the author himself has given me permission to change Pantha.sen86 (talk) 10:53, 19 August 2018 (UTC)

Pantha.sen86: Please ask the author to send a permission via COM:OTRS. Regards, Yann (talk) 16:51, 19 August 2018 (UTC)

 Not done We need a permission by email from the copyright holder. De728631 (talk) 14:06, 20 August 2018 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Usage of this file in multiple wikipedias suggests that this file is a derivative work of Hong Kong Government Gazette published on May 26th, 1855. Its copyright belonged to the Hong Kong Government and has definitely expired after 163 years. Therefore, I would like to request a review of deletion of this file. (It was not deleted by a nomination. No discussion could be found.)--Roy17 (talk) 11:04, 20 August 2018 (UTC)


✓ Done: as per above. --Yann (talk) 16:58, 20 August 2018 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Is a public photo, the person use that in all his social media like profile


 Not done: Obviously not. --Yann (talk) 16:54, 20 August 2018 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Good afternoon! This photo was used with the permission of Elena https://www.instagram.com/elena_psychology_spb/ And at her own request. If you need any supporting data, please inform me.

Yours faithfully! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Евгений Обломов (talk • contribs) 10:48, 19 August 2018 (UTC)

@Евгений Обломов: You uploaded this as your own work and that you must be credited when the image is used. Why do you need a permission when you claim that this is your own work? Thuresson (talk) 11:10, 19 August 2018 (UTC)

 Not done: as per above. A permission from copyright holder is needed. See COM:OTRS. --Yann (talk) 17:12, 20 August 2018 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

The image has been published by Press Information Bureau (description, direct link) and can be used under {{GODL-India}}Gazoth (talk) 20:09, 11 August 2018 (UTC)

Adding three more:
Gazoth (talk) 21:16, 11 August 2018 (UTC)
Adding three more:
Gazoth (talk) 03:31, 13 August 2018 (UTC)
Adding three more:
Gazoth (talk) 01:23, 14 August 2018 (UTC)
Adding five more:
Gazoth (talk) 15:16, 14 August 2018 (UTC)
Adding three more:
Gazoth (talk) 06:46, 15 August 2018 (UTC)
Adding eight more:
Gazoth (talk) 06:36, 19 August 2018 (UTC)

✓ Done: {{GODL-India}}. @Gazoth: Please check the categories. --Yann (talk) 18:30, 20 August 2018 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Copyright email been sent, see [Ticket#: 2018081910002576] — Preceding unsigned comment added by Terion.name (talk • contribs) 10:30, 19 August 2018 (UTC)

  •  Oppose If a free license has been sent to OTRS, then the file will be restored automatically when and if the email is received, processed, and approved. Note that OTRS, like Commons, is entirely staffed by volunteers, and, also like Commons, is shorthanded, so it may be close to 7 days before the email is processed and the file is restored.
If the message was sent to the English language version of OTRS and the email has been properly received there the sender will receive an automatic reply with the ticket number. If the sender has not had a reply, please check that it was sent correctly and try again. Other language versions may or may not provide the automatic reply. Did you tag the file {{subst:OP}} as instructed at OTRS and COM:CONSENT?   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 18:52, 19 August 2018 (UTC)

✓ Done: Ticket#2018081910002576. Permission verified. --Majora (talk) 22:10, 20 August 2018 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

See Commons:Deletion requests/files from the Press Information Bureau, Government of India Files from PIB are free under {{GODL-India}} Perumalism (talk) 19:05, 3 August 2018 (UTC)

 Doing… --Majora (talk) 04:32, 21 August 2018 (UTC)

✓ Done: Only the first section is done Perumalism. The other section is  Not done as there wasn't enough source information to confirm Indian Government involvement. --Majora (talk) 04:48, 21 August 2018 (UTC)

@Perumalism: Renotify. First one didn't work. --Majora (talk) 04:49, 21 August 2018 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Hi, This is Malan Breton, I sent a full copyright release to wikipedia after being alerted to the issue, I own the full usage and rights of this image, I am not clear after sending you proof of this, why it has been deleted but please reinstate the image, all copyrights were transferred to me for use.--MalanBreton2 (talk) 17:37, 19 August 2018 (UTC)

  •  Oppose If a free license has been sent to OTRS, then the file will be restored automatically when and if the email is received, processed, and approved. Note that OTRS, like Commons, is entirely staffed by volunteers, and, also like Commons, is shorthanded, so it may be close to 7 days before the email is processed and the file is restored.
If the message was sent to the English language version of OTRS and the email has been properly received there the sender will receive an automatic reply with the ticket number. If the sender has not had a reply, please check that it was sent correctly and try again. Other language versions may or may not provide the automatic reply. Did you tag the file {{subst:OP}} as instructed at OTRS and COM:CONSENT?   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 18:50, 19 August 2018 (UTC)

 Not done: Reuploaded as File:Malan Breton 2018.jpg. OTRS received and processing now. Closing since this version isn't needed anymore. --Majora (talk) 04:19, 21 August 2018 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

please it's don't delete it — Preceding unsigned comment added by Patiya Road (talk • contribs) 18:34, 19 August 2018 (UTC)

  • Signing your posts on talk pages is required and it is a Commons guideline to sign your posts on deletion requests, undeletion requests, and noticeboards. To do so, simply add four tildes (~~~~) at the end of your comments. Your user name or IP address (if you are not logged in) and a timestamp will then automatically be added when you save your comment. Signing your comments helps people to find out who said something and provides them with a link to your user/talk page (for further discussion). Thank you.   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 18:46, 19 August 2018 (UTC)
  •  Oppose @Patiya Road: This appears to be a copyvio. Please have the copyright holder send permission via OTRS.   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 18:46, 19 August 2018 (UTC)

 Not done: Per above. @Patiya Road: , your local project may allow local uploads and may allow fair use. To find out please visit m:Non-free content and find the project. If you need assistance please let me know. --Majora (talk) 04:27, 21 August 2018 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Raising the Flag on Iwo Jima

I've been waiting for some time for @Yann: to open an undeletion request after the events in Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Raising the Flag on Iwo Jima. But he didn't. I had forgotten about it, until Slowking4 reminded me.

Either we need to delete the laundered negatives again or undelete the original. (Commons:Deletion requests/File:Raising the Flag on Iwo Jima.png) The current state makes no sense. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 01:31, 11 August 2018 (UTC)

 Question @Alexis Jazz: This is unclear to me which exactly file you wish to be restored? Ankry (talk) 13:31, 11 August 2018 (UTC)
@Ankry: at least File:Raising the Flag on Iwo Jima.png and File:Iwo Jima Flag Raising - LoC copyright notice.pdf. And anything else that would depict w:File:WW2 Iwo Jima flag raising.jpg, I'm not sure how I could find the links. (I assume admins can search deleted files, so I'm not really the right person to ask for exact filenames) - Alexis Jazz ping plz 13:44, 11 August 2018 (UTC)
Ping @Clindberg: who responded quite a bit to Commons:Deletion requests/File:Raising the Flag on Iwo Jima.png. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 21:54, 11 August 2018 (UTC)
Frankly, I'd want to see the contents of that 1945 Associated Press news annual before I'd be comfortable keeping the Rosenthal photos. If the photo is not in there, there may not be any other valid renewal. But that one had some potential for it. Carl Lindberg (talk) 22:30, 11 August 2018 (UTC)
@Clindberg: and perhaps File:Marked-ap-letter.jpg as well? Can that be temporarily undeleted anyway so I can see it? I'm curious what they claim. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 03:43, 12 August 2018 (UTC)
 Support Reading the DR mentioned above, it seems most people agree that it is very unlikely that the copyright was renewed. Regards, Yann (talk) 14:44, 17 August 2018 (UTC)
Offtopic section
@Alexis Jazz: This letter contains AP claim of copyright and information that the image may be ued in Wikipedia as Fair Use (but not copied elsewhere). Not worth undeletion, IMO. Ankry (talk) 08:35, 12 August 2018 (UTC)
@Ankry: I'm curious how they word it exactly. If I (and Clindberg and whoever else is interested) are not allowed to see it, well.. That'll make it harder for anyone to support undeletion. AP made a statement about their copyright, but we can't see it. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 09:27, 12 August 2018 (UTC)
I think, it may be published, eg. on the WMF wiki, but not on Commons. Email me, if you wish to receive it privately. Ankry (talk) 13:43, 12 August 2018 (UTC)
@Ankry: How? There is no mail user link on your page. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 14:42, 12 August 2018 (UTC)
Sorry, I had reason to disable it temporarily on this wiki. @Alexis Jazz: try now. Ankry (talk) 17:08, 12 August 2018 (UTC)

✓ Done: No objection. {{PD-US-not renewed}} according to previous discussion. Since we have a TIFF and a PNG, we don't need a GIF (inferior quality). --Yann (talk) 09:57, 21 August 2018 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

bonjour

je suis a la demande d un de vos administrateur JP ALESSI (qui est jp alessi et quel droit il a) JE suis le manager du site web officiel de EMANUEL PAUL autorisation officiel de Wilhemina Paul sa fille. le site est depose depuis l an 2000 et j estime savoir de quoi je parle . j ai passe des annees a recueillir et trouver des information liees a EMANUEL PAUL et ceci dans un but purement BENEVOLE le livre BLUES for MANNy PAUL est un livre dedie a EMANUEL PAUL et il n parle de sa vie de musicien et de sa complete bibliographye musicale et video. LE livre en est plus a vendre car RUPTURE DE STOCK et j en suis l'editeur. Alors a la personne qui a ecrit qui est ALESSI JP et quelle droit il a je reponds je connais EMANUEL PAUL depuis 1983 date de ma rencontre avec lui et je suis ctalogue dans le monde entier comme la reference mondiale au sujet d'Emanuel Paul. je ne comprends pas je demande que le site OFFICIEL d'emanuaul apparaisee sur WIKIPEDIA et vous refuser ? ? je demande que le livre OFFICIEL dedicace a EMANUEL PAUL soit affiche et vous refuser ? je ne demande ni droit ni taxe ni quoi que se soit je veux juste que les gens sachent qu il y a un site WEB OFFICIEL et c est HTTP://www.emanuelpaul.com MERCI par avance — Preceding unsigned comment added by Alessi JP (talk • contribs) 11:04, 19 August 2018 (UTC)

@Alessi JP: Bonjour,
1. Merci d'indiquer les fichiers concernés. 2. Pour tous documents publiés auparavant ailleurs, une autorisation écrite formelle du détenteur des droits est nécessaire. Voyez COM:OTRS/fr pour les instructions. 3. Merci d'utiliser les majuscules à bon escient, et de respecter l'orthographe, car votre message est difficilement lisible en l'état. Cordialement, Yann (talk) 16:49, 19 August 2018 (UTC)

 Not done: as per my message above. Please send a permission via OTRS. --Yann (talk) 09:40, 21 August 2018 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:Log?type=&user=&page=File%3ACarlBarksFinland.jpg

Can't believe this mess.. Undelete this, I'll overwrite with a proper white balance correction and the abomination that is File:Carl Barks a Finnland 94.jpg, well, there is already a DR for it. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 21:06, 19 August 2018 (UTC)

 Support File:CarlBarksFinland.jpg (now a redirect) was uploaded years before File:Carl Barks a Finnland 94.jpg, so the latter should have been deleted. De728631 (talk) 14:04, 20 August 2018 (UTC)
No longer needed, the author uploaded a better scan of the (analog) photo: File:Carl Barks signing autographs in Finland in 1994.jpg. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 21:36, 20 August 2018 (UTC)

Request withdrawn (better version has been supplied) De728631 (talk) 09:59, 21 August 2018 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Muhd Ailman Aisy (talk) 15:05, 20 August 2018 (UTC)


 Not done: as per Jeff. --Yann (talk) 13:04, 21 August 2018 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

This photograph was taken by Erica Sherman at the Office of Brooklyn Borough President Eric L. Adams in Brooklyn, New York. We have the copyright on this photo and it should not be deleted. We produced this photo and are using it for Eric Adams' Wiki page.

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Bkbpeugene (talk • contribs) 17:52, 20 August 2018‎ (UTC)

  • Signing your posts on talk pages is required and it is a Commons guideline to sign your posts on deletion requests, undeletion requests, and noticeboards. To do so, simply add four tildes (~~~~) at the end of your comments. Your user name or IP address (if you are not logged in) and a timestamp will then automatically be added when you save your comment. Signing your comments helps people to find out who said something and provides them with a link to your user/talk page (for further discussion). Thank you.   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 16:58, 20 August 2018 (UTC)
  •  Oppose @Bkbpeugene: Please have HUNTER COLLEGE NEW YORK CITY FOOD POLICY CENTER and Erica Sherman send permission via OTRS with a copy to you.   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 16:58, 20 August 2018 (UTC)

 Not done: as per Jeff. --Yann (talk) 15:42, 21 August 2018 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

'[T]he author was listed as "My fiancee" (who happens to be my wife right now). I posted them with my account because she doesn't have one, and according to Spanish law, anything we own is shared.' per these edits.   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 12:54, 29 July 2018 (UTC)

 Support Don't think we should be requiring OTRS for uploads from spouses. U.S. law allows for a "duly authorized agent" (not well defined) being able to do almost anything copyright-wise (including file registrations I believe) for the actual copyright owner; a spouse would probably fall under that (unless the author complains of course). Carl Lindberg (talk) 19:34, 29 July 2018 (UTC)
 Support We can accept OTRS permissions from close relatives, why do not do it here? --Ruthven (msg) 16:21, 2 August 2018 (UTC)
 Question @Ruthven and Clindberg: how do you suggest to mark it to avoid redeletion after nominating again by a user who notices that uploader is not the author? Ankry (talk) 12:47, 5 August 2018 (UTC)
@Ankry: When you undelete a file, you always add {{Undeleted}} template in the talk page (and eventually the {{Deleted}} template when the deletion is due to a DR)). It suffices for anyone to be able to check past deletion history. --Ruthven (msg) 16:35, 5 August 2018 (UTC)
@Ruthven: I doubt bots will check that. And checking whether it is uploader's work or not may be a bot job. Ankry (talk) 17:53, 5 August 2018 (UTC)
Offtopic section
@Ankry: When you consider a UDR done or not done, please also close it with {{Udelh}} and {{Udelf}}.   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 16:45, 5 August 2018 (UTC)
@Jeff G.: I consider it done when the OTRS agent added the OTRS template or nominates for redeletion. I would prefer OTRS requests to bo closed by the nominator, but this is to be discussed elsewhere. Ankry (talk) 17:50, 5 August 2018 (UTC)
@Ankry: Fair enough, I hope @Arthur Crbz understands that.   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 18:09, 5 August 2018 (UTC)
Not sure to understand why Jeff G. mentions me in this discussion. Undeletion requests have always been closed by the administrator handling the request. {{Undeleted}} is used to keep track of the request and if permission is insufficient, OTRS agent can ask for speedy deletion.
OTRS agents can close these requests but you need to know that sometimes we need several days before adding the permission template on the file (asking to the uploader to provide permission from another person OR clarifying information for instance). So requests could remain open for days... Unless we create a new page dedicated to OTRS agents ? --Arthur Crbz (talk) 08:33, 6 August 2018 (UTC)

✓ Done: as per above. --Yann (talk) 16:10, 21 August 2018 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

The files were erroneously marked as copyright violations, when they actually aren't. (See the thread at User talk:Secondarywaltz#Re Chomsky photos for a detailed explanation). Σ (talk) 18:49, 7 August 2018 (UTC)

 Info unsure if the uploader's explanation is enough here to prove that the uploader and not UMass DML owns copyright to the photos. IMO, a more reliable information from an identifiable person via email to OTRS might be needed here to explain more precisely relations between the photographer/uploader and UMass DML. However, any other opinions are welcome. Ankry (talk) 12:55, 11 August 2018 (UTC)
@Ankry: Did you read the thread? Because all the objections you note were answered therein. Are there any specific points that you find to be insufficiently explanatory? Σ (talk) 01:48, 13 August 2018 (UTC)
@Σ: Yes, I did. Let's assume, that you are right. And lets assume that in few years, when you are no longer an active user, we (or WMF) receive fake copyright claim from somebody claiming that they have boght copyright for this image from UMass DML, and they wish take-down and fee from reusers. How can we reject such a claim basing on declaration from an anonymous user only? That is the reason, that I think we need some independent or verifiable confirmation of your (an anonymous user's) words, eg. that Umass DML is a company that loans cameras only and do not claim copyright to any images or that you have some real agreement with them. Note, that I do not object undeletion here, I only raise some doubts for consideretion. Fake copyright claims are real. Ankry (talk) 04:59, 13 August 2018 (UTC)
It sounds like you're asking Σ to out themselves.
Did you look at the UMass DML website? It's pretty obviously a university service, and not a company. This is a standard arangement at universities I'm familiar with and have attended - you borrow a camera, and have full rights to copyrights to any media producted. Legoktm (talk) 05:11, 13 August 2018 (UTC)
On what basis, the metadata? The DML website clearly explains their policy on lending equipment to university affiliates. The metadata of a photo is text that can be changed by anyone who has photo editing software. I could do it to any file on Commons. I could do it to yours. You could do it to mine. If a hypothetical copyright troll did somehow manage to buy the copyright to all pictures produced by the university, could they come up with a plausible claim of copyright consistent with the DML's loan policy? Maybe. But based on metadata? That would be pretty thin ice to walk on. Σ (talk) 06:32, 13 August 2018 (UTC)

✓ Done: UMass DML is not a person, so I don't see why these were deleted. --Yann (talk) 16:33, 21 August 2018 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Don't exist copyright problems with this photo. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gpeirano (talk • contribs) 23:00, 19 August 2018 (UTC)


 Not done: as per De728631. --Yann (talk) 16:03, 21 August 2018 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Is not the same photo. This link is an RT of a video, not a picture. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gpeirano (talk • contribs) 14:39, 20 August 2018 (UTC)


✓ Done: as per above. --Yann (talk) 16:50, 21 August 2018 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

The file, Schaeffer in 2016 Profile.png, was flagged and submitted for deletion by user, Patrick Rogel. The reasons for deletion were based on the concern that the video was not a part of a non-free program and/or a part of copy written material. This photo is a part of a publicly broadcasted program and was created by this user, KingHering.

The user who flagged and submitted the file for deletion noted that the image needed to be linked to its original video in description to fit the under WikiCommons. The description was changed and the link was added.

The original issues with this photo have been resolved, and the necessary info has been added. --KingHering (talk) 22:45, 16 August 2018 (UTC)

 Oppose I can't find any information about free license on the source page. Ankry (talk) 15:11, 17 August 2018 (UTC)
 Comment I've already asked the user to change the license on YouTube. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 15:22, 17 August 2018 (UTC)

The original file has been added with a Creative Commons Attribution license. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Uk_jUXU0vh8. This is the original file of File:Schaeffer in 2016 Profile.png. In the description of the file is the link. KingHering (talk) 15:04, 18 August 2018 (UTC)

@KingHering: For verification purposes could you give us a rough estimate of the time when this image appears? The video is over four hours long and we would have to verify that the image exists on that video. Thanks. --Majora (talk) 01:17, 21 August 2018 (UTC)
@Majora: Yes, my approximate would be at 2:01:00. If you have any further questions please let me know. KingHering (talk) 23:37, 21 August 2018 (UTC)
@KingHering: Well I undeleted it only to see that you had already uploaded another copy of it. Which, by the way, is really something you shouldn't do. So thanks for making me do the work for nothing. Closing as done. --Majora (talk) 01:43, 22 August 2018 (UTC)

✓ Done: YouTube source changed to CC-BY. --Majora (talk) 01:44, 22 August 2018 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

该图片确实是中国民兵的标识之一,相应图片为[4][5],适用Template:PD-PRC-exempt。原始速删理由“This is not the Emblem of People’s Militia of China and is a copyrighted work. Source: [6]。”不成立。

The picture is one of the identities of Chinese militia. The actual use is as follows[7][8]. Apply to Template:PD-PRC-exempt. The original speedy deletion reason "This is not the Emblem of People’s Militia of China and is a copyrighted work. Source: [9]." is invalid.Jyxyl9 (talk) 03:35, 12 August 2018 (UTC)


 Not done: Emblems are not listed as one of the exemptions at {{PD-PRC-exempt}} so that license is invalid. No evidence that this is under any type of free license. Your local project may allow images like this to exist under fair use. Please see m:Non-free content to check and if so follow your local project's policy to see if you can upload this logo locally. --Majora (talk) 02:03, 22 August 2018 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

he subido este corte sin fin de lucros o problema en usarlo Flor Amargo como tal no tiene conflicto en que use fotos o contenido de ella ya que llegamos a un acuerdo en que se darán créditos a ella sobre sus fotos o contenidos ajenos a ella, incluidos mis trabajos que fueron usados por ella en 2016 (AnthonyOlivano (talk) 00:18, 21 August 2018 (UTC))

I have uploaded this endless cut of profits or problem in using it. Bitter Flower as such has no conflict in using photos or content of it since we reached an agreement in which credits will be given to her about her photos or contents alien to her, including my works that were used by her in 2016
 
translator: Google Translate via   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 02:57, 22 August 2018 (UTC)

Cierre de procedimiento, el archivo no se elimina. Procedural close, file is not deleted.   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 02:57, 22 August 2018 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

todo contenido referente a Flor Amargo se me ha permitido usarlo del mismo modo que ella usa trabajos que fueron realizados por Arashi Matoi y un servidor en 2016 (AnthonyOlivano (talk) 00:21, 21 August 2018 (UTC))

all content referring to Flor Amargo has allowed me to use it in the same way that she uses works that were made by Arashi Matoi and a server in 2016
 
translator: Google Translate via   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 02:52, 22 August 2018 (UTC)

Cierre de procedimiento, el archivo no se elimina. Procedural close, file is not deleted.   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 02:53, 22 August 2018 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

se me ha permitido sin problemas usar este contenido con total permiso a parte de meter una licencia libre que no perjudica a terceros

(AnthonyOlivano (talk) 00:23, 21 August 2018 (UTC))

I have been allowed without problems to use this content with full permission to put a free license that does not harm third parties
 
translator: Google Translate via   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 02:47, 22 August 2018 (UTC)

Cierre de procedimiento, el archivo no se elimina. Procedural close, file is not deleted.   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 02:49, 22 August 2018 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

es una foto tomada por Lavinia Ekaterina personalmente me ha obsequiado fotos y todo referente a lo que hay en esta biografia (AnthonyOlivano (talk) 04:24, 21 August 2018 (UTC))

is a photo taken by Lavinia Ekaterina personally has given me photos and everything related to what is in this biography
 
translator: Google Translate via   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 02:27, 22 August 2018 (UTC)

Cierre de procedimiento, el archivo no se elimina. Procedural close, file is not deleted.   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 02:31, 22 August 2018 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

It’s art made by me for the TV shows Wikipedia page. I fixed the descriptions to include their names. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Treelearning (talk • contribs) 07:46, 21 August 2018 (UTC)

 Oppose The original characters are copyrighted and non-free. Derivative works like this cannot be published without permission from the original copyright holders. De728631 (talk) 09:36, 21 August 2018 (UTC)

 Not done: Per above. Do not reupload deleted content please. --Majora (talk) 02:29, 22 August 2018 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

la foto aqui proporcionada tiene una licencia libre la cual fue agregada como se me sugería hiciera aparte se ha otorgado el permiso por parte del autor mismo (AnthonyOlivano (talk) 00:09, 21 August 2018 (UTC))

the photo provided here has a free license which was added as it was suggested to me apart, permission has been granted by the author himself
 
translator: Google Translate via   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 03:08, 22 August 2018 (UTC)

Cierre de procedimiento, el archivo no se elimina. Procedural close, file is not deleted.   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 03:08, 22 August 2018 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

se me han otorgado los permisos de está imagen pues es de mi propiedad por compra a la dibujante de el, le encargue la comisión hace 1 año está hecha especialmente para lo que es este articulo (AnthonyOlivano (talk) 00:12, 21 August 2018 (UTC))

I have been granted the permissions of this image because it is my property for purchase to the draftsman of the, I commissioned the commission 1 year ago is made especially for what is this article
 
translator: Google Translate via   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 03:05, 22 August 2018 (UTC)

Cierre de procedimiento, el archivo no se elimina. Procedural close, file is not deleted.   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 03:05, 22 August 2018 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

está foto fue agregada con licencia libre para tener la biografia complementada la misma Flor amargo a aceptado el que se use la foto sin lucros ni problemas https://www.facebook.com/floramargo/ (AnthonyOlivano (talk) 00:16, 21 August 2018 (UTC))

this photo was added with a free license to have the biography complemented the same bitter flower to accepted the one that uses the photo without profit or problems https://www.facebook.com/floramargo/
 
translator: Google Translate via   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 03:01, 22 August 2018 (UTC)

Cierre de procedimiento, el archivo no se elimina. Procedural close, file is not deleted.   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 03:01, 22 August 2018 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Christyn Williams sent me the picture herself and asked that it be used on her wikipedia page.

--Jasongates27 (talk) 18:13, 21 August 2018 (UTC)Jason Gates 8-21-2018

No file by that name has ever existed on Commons. You're either talking about File:CW3.jpg, which hasn't been deleted yet but which is being discussed at Commons:Deletion requests/File:CW3.jpg or File:Christyn Williams in 2018 for Team USA.jpg. Either way, licensing permission will need to come from the copyright holder, which is normally the photographer rather than the subject, and permission to use the photo on a Wikipedia page is not sufficient. LX (talk, contribs) 19:09, 21 August 2018 (UTC)

 Not done: per above. Other file has been deleted. Neither of those images are going to be acceptable here until the copyright holder, which is generally the photographer not the person in the photo, fills out the form located at COM:ET and sends it into our OTRS team. They will verify the permissions and request undeletion when it is confirmed. --Majora (talk) 03:30, 22 August 2018 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Files with NHQ prefixes are solely NASA copyright and taken by their employees, and so fall under {{PD-NASA}}. Alternate source https://www.nasa.gov/image-feature/expedition-52-53-crew-members-in-red-square, which like any other NHQ registered photograph can be easily found by Googling the NHQ ID.

This file was twice deleted by Jcb (talk · contribs) in September 2017 using speedy deletion, there has never been a deletion request for the file. -- (talk) 15:36, 22 August 2018 (UTC)


Procedural closure - file is in an ongoing UDR above, please don't double post. Jcb (talk) 15:52, 22 August 2018 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

i have permission of author to use this photo — Preceding unsigned comment added by Viñalbero (talk • contribs) 06:16, 21 August 2018 (UTC)


 Not done: The copyright holder has to send a permission via COM:OTRS. --Yann (talk) 18:42, 22 August 2018 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

i have permission of the author to use this photo — Preceding unsigned comment added by Viñalbero (talk • contribs) 06:18, 21 August 2018 (UTC)


I'm the author of this photo. The link suggested "bookin.com" is again my own photo. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Viñalbero (talk • contribs) 06:32, 21 August 2018 (UTC)

So are you the author or not? Yann (talk) 09:37, 21 August 2018 (UTC)

 Not done: Your contradictory statements suggest that you are not the author of this image. The copyright holder has to send a permission via COM:OTRS. --Yann (talk) 18:42, 22 August 2018 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

I'm the author of this photo. The link suggested "bookin.com" is again my own photo. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Viñalbero (talk • contribs) 06:34, 21 August 2018 (UTC)

 Oppose In cases like this we need a permission by email coming directly from the copyright holder. Unfortunately the image at Booking.com is not credited to any particular photographer, and we have no possibility to verify your claims through your Wikimedia account. Therefore the Booking.com staff would have to confirm that this photo comes with a free licence. Please see COM:OTRS for instructions. De728631 (talk) 09:49, 21 August 2018 (UTC)

 Not done: Your contradictory statements suggest that you are not the author of this image. The copyright holder has to send a permission via COM:OTRS. --Yann (talk) 18:42, 22 August 2018 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: I am a member of the organisation that created the logo. Therefore, I have been granted the right to upload it on the page. Please let me know when it is back on the page. Conor hollywood (talk) 07:56, 21 August 2018 (UTC)

 Oppose This has been published elsewhere online without a free licence. Therefore we require a permission by email coming directly from the copyright holder. If you are affiliated with the organisation that holds the rights for this logo, please send an email from your official account as outlined in COM:OTRS. However, the processing of such a mail by our volunteers will currently take up to three months. Alternatively you may release the logo under a free licence at the website of your organisation. This latter option would considerably speed up the undeletion process at Commons. De728631 (talk) 09:44, 21 August 2018 (UTC)

 Not done: The copyright holder has to send a permission via COM:OTRS. --Yann (talk) 18:43, 22 August 2018 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Hi there, I believe that the file GinosWinYourWishList.jpg was falsely marked as copyright infringement by OgreBot and deleted by Storkk. The logo for Gino's Win Your Wish List was created by Stellify Media, my employer. My job role is to ensure that all information online is up-to-date, therefore I believe that I have the right to post the logo to Wikimedia Commons. Please correct me if I am wrong on this matter. Could I please request that my warning on Copyright Violations be removed from the system and the file be undeleted. Thanks --Stewartmurdock (talk) 10:47, 21 August 2018 (UTC)

  •  Oppose The deletion was correct because this logo was previously published without a free licence. We have no immediate means to verify that your Wikimedia account is affiliated with Stellify Media or that the logo was really created by this company, so the file was deleted according to our policies. To undelete the image, we need a permission by email coming from a representative of the copyright holder. Please see COM:OTRS for instructions and send a mail from your official account at Stellify Media. De728631 (talk) 12:29, 21 August 2018 (UTC)

 Not done: The copyright holder has to send a permission via COM:OTRS. --Yann (talk) 18:43, 22 August 2018 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

This is the new Nuance B&W logo that replaces the old Green logo that was on the wikipedia page of Nuance Communications. There is no violation, as this is added at the request of Nuance Communications marketing team (who didn't know how to add it). You can see that the webpage you are referring to for the violation (https://www.nuance.com/nl-nl/about-us.html) and the wikipedia page I added the logo to, are the same company.

If you need more confirmation, please contact Nuance Communications Marcom Department: vrichter@nuance.com

cheers, Bart

--Broofthooft (talk) 20:09, 21 August 2018 (UTC)

 Oppose No evidence that this logo is published under a CC license; "© 2018 Nuance Communications, Inc. Alle rechten voorbehouden." here. Thuresson (talk) 20:31, 21 August 2018 (UTC)

 Not done: The copyright holder has to send a permission via COM:OTRS. --Yann (talk) 18:44, 22 August 2018 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

This file has been downloaded according to instructions and cleared for use. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Answ3rback227 (talk • contribs) 20:26, 13 July 2018 (UTC)

 Info Slightly larger version of File:M. Del Priore.jpg, up for deletion at Commons:Deletion requests/File:M. Del Priore.jpg. Thuresson (talk) 20:56, 13 July 2018 (UTC)

@Thuresson: Please see User talk:Answ3rback227#Please don't delete: M. Del Priore.jpeg, which alleges that portrait artist, photographer, and uploader are all the same person.   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 00:12, 14 July 2018 (UTC)
 On hold Ankry (talk) 13:59, 11 August 2018 (UTC)
@Ankry: for how long?   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 18:40, 19 August 2018 (UTC)
I will not restore it before a decision in above DR. If somebody thinks it should be rejected as duplicate, feel free to close. Ankry (talk) 20:20, 19 August 2018 (UTC)

✓ Done: OTRS received. --Guanaco (talk) 19:57, 22 August 2018 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Mistaken speedy deletion. Yesterday I requested deletion of File:A Dog.jpg as a degraded version of what when was available as File:The Dog.jpg. The former has JPEG artefacts one of which is now highlighted as an image note. The latter is compressed milder. Soon I came offline, then a sock puppet tried to remove deletion templates and edit warred, and in the ensuing confusion another file (better quality, or probably the source) was deleted.

I tried to obtain satisfaction from Magog the Ogre but he rejected my request. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 21:11, 12 August 2018 (UTC)

Or, alternatively, just upload the better-quality JPEG over A_Dog.jpg. I am too lazy to search for it in the browser cache, whereas you sysops can extract it quickly. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 21:42, 12 August 2018 (UTC)

 Support I suggest restoring and merging the images. However, as the existing one is subject of a DR I also suggest to delay any action until the DR is closed to avoid larger mess. Ankry (talk) 05:12, 13 August 2018 (UTC)

✓ Done: Restored and merged. --Guanaco (talk) 20:08, 22 August 2018 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Files by User talk:יאיר צפורי Ticket#2018040610008646

The files below handled in Ticket:2018040610008646. The files contain photographs of Prof. Moshe Amirav is historical events around the world. We have permissions from Prof. Moshe Amirav himself. According to him all photographers are unknown bystanders. Also the ticket contain a letter from Israeli lawer - Ya’akov Manor, Law Offices & Notary which claims that according to the old Israeli law from 1911 which applies until 2008 (the photos taken before) section 21: ...the person who was owner of such negative at the time when such negative was made shall be deemed to be the author of the work,... . The copyright owner of these photos is Prof. Moshe Amirav. I am not a lawer and we hed big discussion about bystander selfies, so I'll appreciate community guidance.

-- Geagea (talk) 10:22, 19 August 2018 (UTC)

 Support I think there was no shadow of doubt in the first place. Thanks. יאיר צפורי (talk) 10:36, 19 August 2018 (UTC)
 Oppose - the 'bystander selfie' proposal failed for an obvious reason: no legal base. The depicted person does not somehow become the copyright holder by claiming that the photographers are unknown, nor does copyright somehow disappear if the depicted person does not remember who the photographer was. Jcb (talk) 22:09, 20 August 2018 (UTC)
A closer look to the picture also gives the impression that these are pictures from professional news photographers rather than random bystanders. Jcb (talk) 22:12, 20 August 2018 (UTC)
 Comment Concerning the legal base, there is no binding international law, so the matter of these pictures should rely on Israeli law, as explained by the lawyer, who is an Israeli expert in the field.
I spoke with Prof. Amirav. According to him, during his participation in the 2000 Camp David Summit, his son Iri Amirav accompanied him and apparently he was the one who took two pictures with Prof. Amirav's camera. Although Prof. Amirav was happy to give credit to his son, even the son does not remember what pictures he took.
Professor Amirav indeed have pictures taken at various events by professional press photographers, but certainly not the pictures that are here. יאיר צפורי (talk) 08:10, 21 August 2018 (UTC)
If e.g. File:Moshe Amirav & Bill Clinton.jpg would have been taken by a bystander as suggested, I think they had a serious security issue at the time. Jcb (talk) 16:07, 21 August 2018 (UTC)
Dear Jcb, I think it's better that the discussion will remain in the field of copyright, because it seems to me that you understand less about security circles. יאיר צפורי (talk) 06:14, 22 August 2018 (UTC)
As far as I know you don't even know me IRL. It's not up to you to decide whether I am capable of commenting on an issue. That said, this is clearly about copyright. The pictures show that the claims by depicted person are obviously made up, you don't need to be a lawyer to see that. Jcb (talk) 14:38, 22 August 2018 (UTC)
 Support According the explanathion. Hanay (talk) 09:48, 22 August 2018 (UTC)

✓ Done: as per above. @Geagea: Please complete the permission. Since I don't read Hebrew, and I am not a lawyer specialized in Israeli copyright law, I rely on OTRS volunteers to make the right decision. This permission is probably valid, since we have the opinion of an Israeli lawyer. --Yann (talk) 07:42, 23 August 2018 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Mail bez. Berechtigung wurde bereits gesendet, trotzdem wurde gelöscht. --NOI-init.at (talk) 13:42, 20 August 2018 (UTC)

  •  Oppose Wenn eine Email an OTRS gesendet wurde, wird die Datei letztendlich wieder hergestellt. Die Bearbeitungszeit für die Adresse permissions-commons liegt derzeit leider bei 131 Tagen, also werden einige Bilder zwischendurch routinemäßig gelöscht, wenn sie noch nicht geprüft werden konnten. Die Berechtigungs-Emails werden ausschließlich von Freiwilligen bearbeitet, also hab bitte noch etwas Geduld. De728631 (talk) 13:51, 20 August 2018 (UTC)

 Not done: as per above. --Yann (talk) 07:33, 23 August 2018 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Mail bez. Berechtigung wurde bereits gesendet, trotzdem wurde gelöscht. --NOI-init.at (talk) 13:43, 20 August 2018 (UTC)

  •  Oppose Wenn eine Email an OTRS gesendet wurde, wird die Datei letztendlich wieder hergestellt. Die Bearbeitungszeit für die Adresse permissions-commons liegt derzeit leider bei 131 Tagen, also werden einige Bilder zwischendurch routinemäßig gelöscht, wenn sie noch nicht geprüft werden konnten. Die Berechtigungs-Emails werden ausschließlich von Freiwilligen bearbeitet, also hab bitte noch etwas Geduld. De728631 (talk) 13:51, 20 August 2018 (UTC)

 Not done: as per above. --Yann (talk) 07:33, 23 August 2018 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Ich bitte um Wiederherstellung der Datei, da sie mir von CitéCréation eigens zur Übersetzung der französischen Wikipedia-Seite "La fresque des Lyonnais"ins Deutsche zugesandt wurde --MW62 (talk) 18:36, 20 August 2018 (UTC)

 Oppose Hier benötigen wir eine Freigabe per Email direkt durch die Rechteinhaber (siehe COM:OTRS). Dabei müssen sowohl der Fotograf als auch die Malerin des Bildes ihre Zustimmung zu einer freien Lizenz erklären. De728631 (talk) 09:55, 21 August 2018 (UTC)

 Not done: as per above. --Yann (talk) 07:33, 23 August 2018 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Ich bitte um Wiederherstellung, da mir die Datei von der Urheberin eigens für die Erstellung eines Wikipedia-Artikels zugesandt worden ist.--MW62 (talk) 18:40, 20 August 2018 (UTC)

 Oppose In solchen Fällen benötigen wir eine Freigabe per Email direkt durch den Rechteinhaber (siehe COM:OTRS). Das ist allerdings meistens der Fotograf und nicht die abgebildete Person. De728631 (talk) 09:52, 21 August 2018 (UTC)

 Not done: as per above. --Yann (talk) 07:33, 23 August 2018 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

está foto fue otorgada el permiso a usar totalmente, se le agrego la licencia libre no hay problemas en la utilización de dicha foto ya que el autor está mencionado y todo está en orden (AnthonyOlivano (talk) 00:29, 21 August 2018 (UTC))

this photo was granted the permission to use completely, we added the free license there are no problems in the use of said photo since the author is mentioned and everything is in order
 
translator: Google Translate via   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 02:35, 22 August 2018 (UTC)
  •  Oppose @AnthonyOlivano: Ese fue el nombre de archivo incorrecto. File:Lavinia Ekaterina.jpg se eliminó porque no demostraste que tenías permiso. El propietario y el sujeto de una foto no suele ser el titular de los derechos de autor, el fotógrafo suele serlo. Haga que el fotógrafo envíe un permiso a través de OTRS/es con una copia para usted. That was the wrong filename. File:Lavinia Ekaterina.jpg was deleted because you did not prove you had permission. The owner and subject of a photo is not usually the copyright holder, the photographer usually is. Please have the photographer send permission via OTRS with a copy to you.   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 02:42, 22 August 2018 (UTC)

 Not done: as per above. --Yann (talk) 07:34, 23 August 2018 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Back up Breduardokramer (talk) 04:43, 23 August 2018 (UTC)

 Oppose Please read COM:L. You took the image from Facebook. It is a clear copyright violation. Anything you find online without a clearly marked copyright license that allows anyone to use or modify the image, at any time, and for any purpose cannot be here. --Majora (talk) 04:59, 23 August 2018 (UTC)

 Not done: Obviously not. --Yann (talk) 07:30, 23 August 2018 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

This file is mentioned ticket:2018080210004024, and please temporary undelete this file to make it possible for OTRS agent to check. Thank you. --Stang 05:55, 23 August 2018 (UTC)

@Stang: Done. Yann (talk) 07:12, 23 August 2018 (UTC)
@Yann: Thanks a lot. I have replied that ticket and waiting for a follow-up. --Stang 07:40, 23 August 2018 (UTC)

✓ Done: as per above. @Stang: Please open a deletion request if the file needs to be deleted. --Yann (talk) 07:50, 23 August 2018 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Please restore the following pages:

list
;NASA/Bill Ingalls (temporarily undeleted)
NASA/Beth Weissinger (temporarily undeleted)
NASA/Victor Zelentsov (temporarily undeleted)
NASA/Joel Kowsky (undeleted)
NASA/Aubrey Gemignani (undeleted)
NASA/Carla Thomas (undeleted)

No new arguments, but i disagree with the closing admin Jim that the images are not manageable due to "far too many different issues". All images are from NASA photographers indexed here and eligible for Commons. We already have hundreds of images from the concerning photographers. Thank you. --Ras67 (talk) 20:57, 21 August 2018 (UTC)

FYI, to date all photographs with NHQ numbers are original NASA commissions. -- (talk) 14:49, 22 August 2018 (UTC)
 Oppose per previous UDR. In that discussion we have undeleted all files for which a valid copyright situation could be established and left the rest deleted. I see nothing out of the ordinary in the previous UDR. Jcb (talk) 15:19, 22 August 2018 (UTC)
Out of interest, do you recognize that out of process speedy deletions, as per this case of debatable deletions, are not an acceptable use of sysop tools? Thanks -- (talk) 15:27, 22 August 2018 (UTC)
The files were not deleted out of process. Not sure if you are aware that e.g. in case of the file you double posted below, the file was nominated for deletion several times, but uploader continued to remove the nominations. Jcb (talk) 16:11, 22 August 2018 (UTC)
Link to the DR please. Removing the template from the file does not delete the DR. Thanks -- (talk) 16:13, 22 August 2018 (UTC)
@: File:Expedition 52 Red Square Visit (NHQ201707100001).jpg was tagged {{SD|G4}} multiple times by B dash. There was no DR. Guanaco (talk) 17:31, 22 August 2018 (UTC)
Thanks, now you have undeleted this public domain file, it is obvious from the file history that Jcb acted in error. For any contested speedy, the next step is to raise a DR, not simply delete the file outside of any process. The really sad thing is that Jcb is so confrontational and argumentative that hardly anyone can be bothered to keep on arguing the case when deletions are wrong. In this case the files have stayed deleted for nearly a year and their educational value to the project in that time has been lost. -- (talk) 18:21, 22 August 2018 (UTC)

Refer to the NASA source given in the example image below on this page, "procedurally closed" by Jcb. Apparently UDR cannot work for lists of files, and neither are they allowed for individual files. Perhaps someone could advise as to what UDR process might have any chance of working for PD files that have sources showing they are PD? -- (talk) 15:59, 22 August 2018 (UTC)

In the previous UDR, all files for which evidence of a valid PD license was provided were undeleted. So if you can provide such evidence for the files mentioned about, you can just do it here (but please don't repeat the failed arguments from the previous UDR). Jcb (talk) 16:14, 22 August 2018 (UTC)
I am not going to prove the existence of chocolate teapots, there is such as thing as good faith and "significant doubt" rather than "insignificant doubt". Have a look at Category:Photographs by Bill Ingalls and tell me what the difference is between the example NHQ photograph you deleted and the information about it on the NASA web page, and all the other photographs in that category marked as public domain with NHQ IDs?
In the meantime, please stop taking sysop actions, such as "procedural close", in cases where you have acted out of process and there is an assertion that you have deleted many related public domain files from Commons without giving the community an opportunity to provide sources or evidence. Thanks -- (talk) 16:22, 22 August 2018 (UTC)
  •  Doing… I'll look through these deleted files and try to add more useful information to this UDR. Guanaco (talk) 16:26, 22 August 2018 (UTC)
    • I've undeleted the photos by Aubrey Gemignani. It is clear from web sources that she is an employee of the US federal government and these are PD-USGov. A non-free Flickr license does not change this. Some of the others may be ambiguous as they may be contractors. This should be investigated, instead of mass-deleting NASA files without checking. Obviously, none of these files meet criterion F1 for speedy deletion: "Content is apparently a copyright violation, with no good evidence of Commons-compatible licensing being issued by the copyright holder or status as a free work." Publication by NASA with a NASA credit line is prima facie "good evidence". Guanaco (talk) 16:57, 22 August 2018 (UTC)
    • Joel Kowsky is "currently a contract photo editor and photographer at NASA Headquarters in Washington, D.C."[1] This is ambiguous, and I will leave Kowsky images for further discussion.
The face of a US federal employee
    • Carla Thomas is "one of NASA's two female in-flight photographers."[2] I don't think there can be any doubt here. Undeleting these. Guanaco (talk) 17:11, 22 August 2018 (UTC)
    • As noted in the previous DR, Ingalls asserts copyright for these, and his status as a contract photographer means his work is not automatically public domain. NASA's policy[3] does state: "NASA material is not protected by copyright unless noted." However, I believe the publication on Flickr with a non-free license constitutes "noted". We should only consider keeping/restoring these if they are also found on a NASA website with no copyright notice. Guanaco (talk) 18:13, 22 August 2018 (UTC)
Disagree with the phrasing that appears to assert that something said on a Flickrstream would count as a NASA accepted notice of copyright that might revoke an official release by NASA in the public domain. That makes no sense legally. If photographs or images are released by NASA with no additional notes of copyright on the NASA website, then the standard terms by NASA apply - no odd caveats are needed.
Similarly if a photograph appears on non-NASA websites with various other claims of copyright but has never been published by NASA, then ... it has not been released by NASA. However if the non-NASA website has official status as a NASA site, then ... it is a NASA site. The ellipses here are because it feels weird to be stating literal tautologies, in fact this feels like arguing that chocolate teapots are made of chocolate. -- (talk) 18:31, 22 August 2018 (UTC)
I should clarify, as I think we agree on this. I'll break it down. Where I write "official NASA site", I mean nasa.gov, NASA official Flickrstreams, and any other web content directly controlled by NASA employees, published under the NASA name.
  1. Published on any official NASA site with no copyright claim on the same page: public domain unless there is reason to believe NASA posted the file in error. A copyright claim elsewhere does not negate this.
  2. File is a work of the US federal government, meaning it was created by an employee or officer rather than a contractor: public domain. A copyright claim even on the same page does not negate this. Publication on an official NASA site or lack thereof is irrelevant.
  3. Not verifiably a work of the US federal government, and the only publication on an official NASA site asserts copyright: copyrighted.
We want to keep 1 and 2 but delete 3. Is my interpretation correct? Guanaco (talk) 18:58, 22 August 2018 (UTC)
Er, yes. I don't get it, this is eye-wateringly obvious. The deletions were wrong and removed excellent PD photographs from Commons completely unnecessarily. Had there been a procedurally correct DR, this may have been entirely avoided. -- (talk) 19:18, 22 August 2018 (UTC)

With respect to File:Expedition 52 Red Square Visit (NHQ201707100030).jpg the NASA source page is https://images.nasa.gov/details-NHQ201707100030.html, please undelete the file. You know, these are actually trivially easy to track down considering they have the NHQ ID in the Commons filename, it's astonishing there was never a proper DR for these photographs. -- (talk) 19:15, 22 August 2018 (UTC)

Working from the top of the list, I have added NASA urls to all the files that were marked with the temporarily undeleted template and removed the templates. The one photograph I was unable to find apart from on the Flickrstream was the first sunspot photograph by Ingalls. I have created Commons:Deletion requests/File:Sunrise over Washington, D.C. (NHQ201707150001).jpg where this single exception can be discussed by the community for 7 days as this procedural stage was skipped in the first deletion on 16 September 2017.

In the future, I firmly recommend that any NASA photograph with an NHQ or HQ number in the filename or image description is first searched for at the NASA site using NASA's very simple built in search, using relevant information from the description as NHQ numbers do not always show the matching file. Only then should the file be raised to a deletion request. Speedy deletions should be avoided unless the case is obvious, such as existing as duplicates or a re-upload of a file where a full deletion request has established and documented significant doubt as to its authenticity or copyright status.

Thank you @Ras67: for re-raising this list, despite the deletions being so vigorously defended to the detriment of this project, and thank you @Guanaco: for making the effort to undelete the files so they could be investigated by someone other than the deleting administrator. -- (talk) 11:27, 23 August 2018 (UTC)


✓ Done: Issues resolved. If there are copyright questions about any of these, please start a DR. --Guanaco (talk) 13:14, 23 August 2018 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

OTRS agent (verify): request: Ticket:2018043010006165 alleges permission. I request temporary undeletion to assess the validity of that allegation, mark as {{subst:OR}} or otherwise appropriately, and ping me.   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 14:47, 23 August 2018 (UTC)


✓ Done: @Jeff G.: FYI. --Yann (talk) 17:31, 23 August 2018 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Porträt-Foto Rektor Bergakademie File:Prof. Dr. Klaus-Dieter Barbknecht.jpg

Das gelöschte Foto zeigt den Rektor der TU Bergakademie Freiberg und wurde von einem freien Fotografen Detlev Müller für die TU Bergakademie Freiberg erstellt. Da ich ebenfalls im Auftrag der TU Bergakademie diesen Beitrag verfasse, stellt die Verwendung keine Verletzung des Urheberrechts dar. Das Foto wurde speziell für solche Illustrationszwecke angefertigt. --Bergakademie (talk) 07:44, 22 August 2018 (UTC)

The deleted photo shows the Rector of the TU Bergakademie Freiberg and was created by a freelance photographer Detlev Müller for the TU Bergakademie Freiberg. Since I also write this article on behalf of the TU Bergakademie, the use does not constitute a violation of copyright. The photo was made especially for such illustration purposes.
 
translator: Google Translate via   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 14:13, 22 August 2018 (UTC)

Moin liebes Team, ich würde mir gerne das Bild ansehen da ich das Ticket:2018082210003318 habe. Tschüß -- Ra Boe watt?? 09:41, 22 August 2018 (UTC)

Moin dear team, I would like to see the picture because I have the ticket:2018082210003318. Bye
 
translator: Google Translate via   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 14:26, 22 August 2018 (UTC)
Wiederhergestellt, damit das Ticket geprüft werden kann. --rimshottalk 19:42, 22 August 2018 (UTC)
@Raboe001: Please check the image. Thank you.   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 00:55, 23 August 2018 (UTC)
Perfekt Danke Jeff G. ツ Tschüß -- Ra Boe watt?? 06:42, 23 August 2018 (UTC)

Restored, after OTRS ticket. --rimshottalk 19:33, 23 August 2018 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Moin liebes Team, ich würde mir gerne das Bild ansehen da ich das Ticket#2018081310007108 habe. Tschüß -- Ra Boe watt?? 09:11, 22 August 2018 (UTC)

Habe die Datei wiederhergestellt, damit das Ticket geprüft werden kann. --rimshottalk 19:36, 22 August 2018 (UTC)
@Raboe001: Please check the image. Thank you. --Majora (talk) 00:51, 23 August 2018 (UTC)
Perfekt Danke Majora, rimshot Tschüß -- Ra Boe watt?? 06:42, 23 August 2018 (UTC)

Restored, after OTRS ticket. --rimshottalk 19:34, 23 August 2018 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

This stamp image was deleted based on the reason that Israeli stamps are PD but that applies to those less then 50 years old, which is true were it not for the fact that this stamp was issued between 1914 and 1950, most likely in 1922. At this time British crown copyright would have been in effect but that too is 50 years from issue date. While I can't see this image I believe it to be the same design as these: Category:1922 stamps of Palestine. If not anything prior to 1948 is certainly PD. Thanks Ww2censor (talk) 05:54, 23 August 2018 (UTC)


Restored, it's actually the same as this 1927 stamp. Ww2censor: Could you check the use of the {{Pd-old}} tag on all those stamps, though? It seems both redundant (PD UK Gov should be enough) and incorrect, as Fred Taylor died in 1963. --rimshottalk 20:00, 23 August 2018 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

We've received permission from the copyright holder via OTRS ticket:2018073110005061. --Saqib (talk) 07:35, 23 August 2018 (UTC)


✓ Done @Saqib: Please add the OTRS verification template. De728631 (talk) 20:33, 23 August 2018 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

The file is simply an image of one of the zombies found inside the game with the title over-top of the in-game captured footage. The scene from this exact image were later released in a gameplay trailer and the original picture was released as concept art for the game and shared to the public.

My reason for submitting this request is because the use of this image is to be placed in an info box for the game's wikipedia page and I do not believe it to be copyright, I did receive permission from the author to use this image.

--BarneyHD (talk) 14:35, 23 August 2018 (UTC)


English | français | +/−

This file requires a permission to be undeleted

The information provided didn't allow us to undelete the file for the moment. The file has been deleted because we need to be sure that the author or the copyright holder agrees to release it under a free license. The author (or the copyright holder) needs to send to the OTRS volunteers a permission statement. We will then undelete the file.

Send a permission

--Arthur Crbz (talk) 21:28, 23 August 2018 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

7-8_грудня_2016,_м.Брюссель.jpg — Preceding unsigned comment added by Reina1212 (talk • contribs) 17:23, 23 August 2018 (UTC)


English | français | +/−

This file requires a permission to be undeleted

The information provided didn't allow us to undelete the file for the moment. The file has been deleted because we need to be sure that the author or the copyright holder agrees to release it under a free license. The author (or the copyright holder) needs to send to the OTRS volunteers a permission statement. We will then undelete the file.

Send a permission

--Arthur Crbz (talk) 21:26, 23 August 2018 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

look at the picture, it´s different... it looks like this https://www.hetrik.sk/paradne-choreo-ultrasu-trnavy-pred-dnesnym-duelom-s-crvenou-zvezdou-belehrad-video because 10.000 fans made the same picture at that moment — Preceding unsigned comment added by Spartakovec (talk • contribs) 07:44, 22 August 2018 (UTC)

 Oppose It's the exact same angle in the exact same moment (same position of players, legs, etc.), just clipped a little. With the small size, no EXIF data and that strange border at the left, this is pretty obviously taken from the Web, not from the uploader's camera. --rimshottalk 21:04, 22 August 2018 (UTC)

 Not done: Obviously the same photo from the positioning of the people. No evidence of permission for this specific version of the photo. --Majora (talk) 23:58, 23 August 2018 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

I would like to request Undeletion for File:Pellerano Escudo.jpg since the image is of my property and is intended for use in a wikipedia article. The image is a Picture of a painting of my own authorship so there must be no reasons for an issue with Wikimedia sincerily, Moises Arturo Pellerano Miniño Mpellerano (talk) 04:40, 23 August 2018 (UTC) . --Mpellerano (talk) 04:40, 23 August 2018 (UTC)

@Mpellerano: Please follow the instructions on your talk page regarding sending in permission release information to our OTRS team. If you have already done so please be patient. There is a little bit of a backlog processing permission tickets but the file can be undeleted once permission has been confirmed. --Majora (talk) 04:51, 23 August 2018 (UTC)

 Not done: Follow the instructions on your talk page please and send in the permission form to OTRS for confirmation. --Majora (talk) 23:31, 23 August 2018 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

I would like the image ANA Moises Pellerano.jpg to be undeleted since the image is a picture of a painting of my own authorship and is intended for a wikipedia article that is being generated. sincerely, Moises Arturo Pellerano Minino --Mpellerano (talk) 04:46, 23 August 2018 (UTC)

Same as the one two sections above. Please follow the instructions on your talk page regarding sending in permission release information to our OTRS team. If you have already done so please be patient. There is a little bit of a backlog processing permission tickets but the file can be undeleted once permission has been confirmed. --Majora (talk) 04:51, 23 August 2018 (UTC)

 Not done: Follow the instructions on your talk page please and send in the permission form to OTRS for confirmation. --Majora (talk) 23:32, 23 August 2018 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

I would like the image File:Kinky Trans.jpgto be undeleted since the image is a picture of a painting of my own authorship and is intended for a wikipedia article that is being generated. The photo is also of my authorship so I don't understand the reason for it being deleted in the first place. sincerely, Moises Arturo Pellerano Minino --Mpellerano (talk) 04:57, 23 August 2018 (UTC)


 Not done: Follow the instructions on your talk page please and send in the permission form to OTRS for confirmation. --Majora (talk) 23:32, 23 August 2018 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

I would like the image File:Rape Moises Pellerano.jpg to be undeleted since the image is a picture of a painting of my own authorship and is intended for a wikipedia article that is being generated. The photo is also of my authorship so I don't understand the reason for it being deleted in the first place. sincerely, Moises Arturo Pellerano Minino --Mpellerano (talk) 04:58, 23 August 2018 (UTC)


 Not done: Follow the instructions on your talk page please and send in the permission form to OTRS for confirmation. --Majora (talk) 23:32, 23 August 2018 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

I would like the image File:Playing Doctor.jpg to be undeleted since the image is a picture of a painting of my own authorship and is intended for a wikipedia article that is being generated. The photo is also of my authorship so I don't understand the reason for it being deleted in the first place. sincerely, Moises Arturo Pellerano Minino --Mpellerano (talk) 04:58, 23 August 2018 (UTC)


 Not done: Follow the instructions on your talk page please and send in the permission form to OTRS for confirmation. --Majora (talk) 23:32, 23 August 2018 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

I would like the image File:Buddha Moises Pellerano.jpg to be undeleted since the image is a picture of a painting of my own authorship and is intended for a wikipedia article that is being generated. The photo is also of my authorship so I don't understand the reason for it being deleted in the first place. sincerely, Moises Arturo Pellerano Minino --Mpellerano (talk) 04:59, 23 August 2018 (UTC)


 Not done: Follow the instructions on your talk page please and send in the permission form to OTRS for confirmation. --Majora (talk) 23:32, 23 August 2018 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

I would like the image File:Moises Arturo Pellerano Miniño.jpg to be undeleted since the image is a picture of my own authorship which depicts myself and is intended for a wikipedia article that is being generated. I don't understand the reason for it being deleted in the first place. sincerely, Moises Arturo Pellerano Minino --Mpellerano (talk) 05:00, 23 August 2018 (UTC)


 Not done: Follow the instructions on your talk page please and send in the permission form to OTRS for confirmation. --Majora (talk) 23:32, 23 August 2018 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

See: https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:GigaScience_principles_for_reproducible_research.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1

This was deleted for copyright violation but I'm actually the author of the figure. And I published it CC-BY, see Figure 1. here: https://doi.org/10.1093/gigascience/gix064 Scotted400 (talk) 14:03, 21 August 2018 (UTC) scotted400 21/08/2018

Restore The article has © The Authors and a CC-BY license, both of which is different from the uploaded image. As CC-BY is less restrictive than CC-BY-SA, I'd suggest using that license for the image. As for authorship, I think we can assume good faith and believe the uploader. In summary, I suggest: restore, add the paper's first author to the author field (in brackets, after the user name), change license to CC-BY, possible add a link to the paper somewhere.
This assumes that you are that author and are okay with having your real name put next to your user name. --rimshottalk 21:21, 22 August 2018 (UTC)

✓ Done: as per above. --Yann (talk) 11:02, 24 August 2018 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

¡Hola! El archivo es mío, no sé como esperan que se los compruebe fue tomada hace más de 2 años por mi y es una foto que espero poder usar en mi articulo. Por favor asesorenme pero ya no la borren. — Preceding unsigned comment added by MAOZ (talk • contribs) 18:36, 21 August 2018 (UTC)

Hello! The file is mine, I do not know how you expect it to be verified it was taken more than 2 years ago by me and it is a photo that I hope to use in my article. Please advise me but do not delete it.
 
translator: Google Translate via   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 02:13, 22 August 2018 (UTC)

We've received ticket:2018050110007761 granting permission to this picture. Please restore and verified. Regards. --Ganímedes (talk) 14:44, 22 August 2018 (UTC)


✓ Done: as per above. @Ganímedes: FYI. --Yann (talk) 11:05, 24 August 2018 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[Portuguese-Brazil] Olá, venho desta solicitar o "Undeletion" da imagem em questão. Esta foi fornecida via email pela própria assessoria do artista, tenho a devida permissão para utiliza-la. Me responsabilizo completamente por qualquer problema no que tange a direitos autorais. Atenciosamente, Daniel Branco.

Brancosan --BrancoSan (talk) 20:34, 21 August 2018 (UTC)

Hello, I come from this request the "Undeletion" of the image in question. This was provided via email by the artist's own advice, I have permission to use it. I take full responsibility for any copyright issues. Sincerely, Daniel Branco.
 
translator: Google Translate via   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 02:00, 22 August 2018 (UTC)

 Not done: as per above. --Yann (talk) 11:06, 24 August 2018 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Ishin Black Saree Blouse.jpg Black saree blouse with brocade woven design throughout, has padded cups, a high neck, sleeveless.

Ishin Black Saree Blouse — Preceding unsigned comment added by Riya191 (talk • contribs) 10:06, 23 August 2018 (UTC)

  • Signing your posts on talk pages is required and it is a Commons guideline to sign your posts on deletion requests, undeletion requests, and noticeboards. To do so, simply add four tildes (~~~~) at the end of your comments. Your user name or IP address (if you are not logged in) and a timestamp will then automatically be added when you save your comment. Signing your comments helps people to find out who said something and provides them with a link to your user/talk page (for further discussion). Thank you.   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 13:55, 23 August 2018 (UTC)
  •  Oppose @Riya191: This was a reupload of a copyrighted ("© 2018 www.myntra.com. All rights reserved.") photo on https://www.myntra.com/blouse of a copyrighted blouse design, more specifically one of the blouses on this page. Please have the blouse designer or Ishin and the photographer send permission via OTRS, and do not reupload.   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 13:54, 23 August 2018 (UTC)

 Not done: as per above. --Yann (talk) 11:07, 24 August 2018 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

The file is now with the required Creative Commons license. Source: https://musculacaoefitness.com.br/sobre/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jontsmascarenhas (talk • contribs) 11:01, 24 August 2018 (UTC)


✓ Done Original has been released under a free licence. De728631 (talk) 11:17, 24 August 2018 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Photos of John James allegedly grabbed from campaign videos

I was not given an opportunity to repair link SecretName101 (talk) 23:57, 8 August 2018 (UTC)

So you have the opportunity to do provide the link here.
 Support if this is [10]. Ankry (talk) 14:27, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
Without seeing the image (or the broken link I had originally provided), I have no way of confirming the correct link. SecretName101 (talk) 16:20, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
But quite probably, yes. I beleive that was the source of at least one of the images I am requesting be undeleted.SecretName101 (talk) 20:50, 9 August 2018 (UTC)

I was not given an opportunity to repair link, and will do so if undeletedSecretName101 (talk) 00:01, 9 August 2018 (UTC)

Extracted from video at www.youtube.com/watch?v=OgUqOSzUGcSecretName101 (talk) 00:02, 9 August 2018 (UTC)

This link www.youtube.com/watch?v=OgUqOSzUfGc SecretName101 (talk) 16:18, 9 August 2018 (UTC)

Extracted from video at www.youtube.com/watch?v=OgUqOSzU SecretName101 (talk) 00:03, 9 August 2018 (UTC)

I cannot see any video under the link above. Ankry (talk) 14:24, 9 August 2018 (UTC)

Meant this link www.youtube.com/watch?v=OgUqOSzUfGc SecretName101 (talk) 16:18, 9 August 2018 (UTC)

  •  Oppose because the photos were not found in the videos by the deleting Administrator Ronhjones. Other content uploaded by this uploader may have similar issues. Hyperlink: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OgUqOSzUfGc (cc-by-2.0 on YouTube). One photo in that promotional video is of James in US Army uniform, and may be by a US Army fellow service member on duty, but needs permission via OTRS if not. The video of James was probably shot by members of James' campaign or an outside videographer, and needs permission via OTRS, probably © 2018, JOHN JAMES FOR SENATE, INC. The same goes for the link Ankry provided, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=63hefBINOhY (also cc-by-2.0 on YouTube).   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 13:22, 10 August 2018 (UTC)
You misunderstand. It is not that they were not found in the videos, rather, the videos were not found at the broken links I accidentally provided. Besides, the image of him on duty is not one that I uploaded, so that is utterly irelevent. The youtube account (evidently) is his campaign account, thus its licensing as CC-BY is a licensing by the campaign itself. SecretName101 (talk) 19:20, 10 August 2018 (UTC)

✓ Done: We can allow SecretName101 the standard seven days to add a correct source for these images. They're tagged no source and will be deleted if this isn't fixed. --Guanaco (talk) 18:21, 24 August 2018 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

https://www.yvonnecurtis.net/wiki-authorize.asp

And please add a license review as well. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 21:30, 24 August 2018 (UTC)


✓ Done: Restored and LR added. --Majora (talk) 21:41, 24 August 2018 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Vocaloid singers logo products 300.png VOCALOID TM singers products

Hello,

this file is an image from a product that has been developed for my company. I do not understand why you just deleted it --90.173.145.147 12:20, 23 August 2018 (UTC)[voctrolabs]


 Not done: as per above. --Yann (talk) 09:30, 25 August 2018 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

As Peter Mel's manager, we request this photo be undeleted File:Peter Mel .jpg Our company, Mel Enterprises, owns this image along with many others. Please advise how to add more without pending deletions. Thank you! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Surftym (talk • contribs) 16:18, 23 August 2018 (UTC)


 Not done: as per above. --Yann (talk) 09:30, 25 August 2018 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Please undelete Dhar Mann Updated.jpg

This photo is owned by Dhar Mann (taken by him) and he has requested for me to upload it to his wikipedia page.

Please let me know if further information is needed and see the previously submitted permission form below:

I hereby affirm that I represent Dhar Mann, the creator and/or sole owner of the exclusive copyright of the media work https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Dhar_Mann_Updated.jpg.

I agree to publish the above-mentioned work under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International.

I acknowledge that by doing so I grant anyone the right to use the work, even in a commercial product or otherwise, and to modify it according to their needs, provided that they abide by the terms of the license and any other applicable laws.

I am aware that this agreement is not limited to Wikipedia or related sites.

I am aware that the copyright holder always retains ownership of the copyright as well as the right to be attributed in accordance with the license chosen. Modifications others make to the work will not be claimed to have been made by the copyright holder.

I acknowledge that I cannot withdraw this agreement, and that the content may or may not be kept permanently on a Wikimedia project.

Melissa Perkins Appointed Representative of Dhar Mann (for the purpose of this release) 2018-07-13

Mbperkins (talk) 21:43, 23 August 2018 (UTC)

 Oppose In cases like this we require a confirmation by email from the copyright holder. We have no way to verify the authenticity of your Wikimedia account, so this needs to go through the email request system. Please see COM:OTRS for details. You may also want to read the English Wikipedia's policies on conflicts of interest and disclosure of paid contributions. De728631 (talk) 21:55, 23 August 2018 (UTC)

 Not done: as per above. --Yann (talk) 09:30, 25 August 2018 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Currently there is no image for Yusmadi Yusoff on his page.

--Liyanaadib (talk) 04:32, 25 August 2018 (UTC)


 Not done: Obvious copyvio. --Yann (talk) 09:25, 25 August 2018 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

The reason is I don't quiet understand why it keep deleting my picture. As it is just a ordinary school badge and the content nothing do with it. This Picture is free to use by anyone as it refer to the credit of the owner. The other thing is there is currently no any other Kuen Cheng High School Badge Picture and in the page, there is no image to let the reader refer to. Hope you will understand and keep my picture. Thank You.

--Bryan yew.sh (talk) 05:26, 25 August 2018 (UTC) 25 AUG 2018


 Not done: Not deleted yet. This badge has certainly a copyright. Do not reupload it with a permission. --Yann (talk) 09:23, 25 August 2018 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Bonjour à tous, Je demande la restauration du contenu photographique supprimé par un certains JcB "Utilisant la suppression de manière abusive sur une quantité affolante d'article Wikipédia !", l'article et rédiger depuis 2015 et la photo étant l'oeuvre de mon travail et de ce fait en pleine propriété, je considère que cet suppression et non justifié. C'est pourquoi je demande la restauration du document photographique dans les meilleurs délais. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rédacteur31 (talk • contribs) 14:09, 24 August 2018 (UTC)

  • Signing your posts on talk pages is required and it is a Commons guideline to sign your posts on deletion requests, undeletion requests, and noticeboards. To do so, simply add four tildes (~~~~) at the end of your comments. Your user name or IP address (if you are not logged in) and a timestamp will then automatically be added when you save your comment. Signing your comments helps people to find out who said something and provides them with a link to your user/talk page (for further discussion). Thank you.   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 14:34, 24 August 2018 (UTC)
Hello everyone,

I request the restoration of the photographic content deleted by a certain JcB "Using the abusive removal on a frightening amount of article Wikipedia!", The article and write since 2015 and the photo being the work of my work and this made in full ownership, I consider this deletion and not justified.

This is why I ask for the restoration of the photographic document as soon as possible.
 
translator: Google Translate via   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 14:32, 24 August 2018 (UTC)

 Not done: Uploader admits it was taken on their phone but by another person. Copyright belongs to the photographer not the person in the photo. --Majora (talk) 15:33, 25 August 2018 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

{{PD-textlogo}} that was used on w:Rexsee. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 14:11, 25 August 2018 (UTC)


✓ Done: Restored. PD in both China and the US. --Majora (talk) 15:12, 25 August 2018 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

OTRS agent (verify): request: Ticket:2018042710009034 alleges permission. I request temporary undeletion to assess the validity of that allegation, mark as {{subst:OR}} or otherwise appropriately, and ping me.   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 00:12, 26 August 2018 (UTC)

@Jeff G.: ✓ Done - Jcb (talk) 00:15, 26 August 2018 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

The use of this headshot in relation to the history and publicity of Mr. Irvine's 2018 campaign has been specifically authorized by the campaign; furthermore, I am acting in an official capacity by updating this information. Feel free to make further verification with other campaign staff that this image is acceptable for such use at https://irvineforohio.com/contact/ if you need to, or if you can't accept the fact that this image is acceptable to use in this way, then I can produce other headshots which we haven't already published elsewhere online or that are already published under CC licenses more explicitly online. However, I maintain that this is a perfectly acceptable use of this image in the view of both the Party and the Campaign. --Jimcavoli (talk) 13:28, 24 August 2018 (UTC)


 Not done: @Jimcavoli: We can't take your word for it and the website it came from clearly has an "All Rights Reserved" license on it. If you want to continue someone who is authorized to do so must read, fill out, and send in the form located at COM:ET acknowledging that you are putting this image under a copyright license that allows anyone to use or modify the image, at any time, and for any purpose. The email must come from an email address that can be associated with the campaign and needs to come from either the copyright holder, which is the photographer, or someone expressly authorized by the copyright holder. Once permissions are confirmed the image can be undeleted. --Majora (talk) 06:49, 26 August 2018 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

It's our property — Preceding unsigned comment added by Salu (talk • contribs) 21:51, 24 August 2018 (UTC)

 Oppose The image came from Facebook which was on that site a full 7 months before it was uploaded here. The image also looks like a Twitter circular profile picture. Only the copyright holder can release a photo to us and that person is generally the photographer. If you know the photographer and they agree to do so they can fill out the form located at COM:ET and send it into our OTRS team. At this point there isn't enough evidence that this image is ok to host here, at all, to restore this image. --Majora (talk) 21:56, 24 August 2018 (UTC)

 Not done: Follow the instructions above and have the copyright holder send in the form if you wish to have this undeleted. --Majora (talk) 06:50, 26 August 2018 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Ptudc logo.jpg

Dear,

I got some images from PTUDC as they released publicly for use in articles. Now its delete, how to provide open copy right information to you? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Umar shahid (talk • contribs) 06:33, 26 August 2018 (UTC)

 Oppose See also User talk:Majora#My pictures deleted. --Majora (talk) 06:42, 26 August 2018 (UTC)

 Not done: Given instructions on my talk page on OTRS. --Majora (talk) 07:02, 26 August 2018 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Images from Press Information Bureau

Images have been published by Press Information Bureau and can be used under {{GODL-India}}.

Gazoth (talk) 09:48, 25 August 2018 (UTC)


✓ Done: Partially done.  Not done for the other two. Those ones did not have proper sourcing information and reverse image search didn't bring up anything that can be linked to the Indian Government. One of them was even linked to Facebook instead. --Majora (talk) 07:01, 26 August 2018 (UTC)

@Majora: I have provided links to the original source here. Do the images in the links not match with what was uploaded? They should match as when I try to upload them, I get the above two pages as previously deleted duplicates. —Gazoth (talk) 09:40, 26 August 2018 (UTC)
Whoops. My bad, Gazoth. I didn't even notice the links. This was one of the last things I did last night and there is a lesson there about not working while tired. Thanks for catching that. You're all set. Thanks for your patience. --Majora (talk) 14:04, 26 August 2018 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Should be undeleted as it is from a police report ("Kantonspolizei Graubünden" = cantonal police, canton of Graubünden, Switzerland) where {{PD-Switzerland-official}} and {{PD-Switzerland-photo}} applies, the later due to the purely documentary nature of the picture (police photograph of the accident scene). --46.253.188.175 09:18, 6 August 2018 (UTC)

Even if so, also a US copyright tag is needed. And I cannot find anything aplicable. Ankry (talk) 13:27, 6 August 2018 (UTC)
E.g. {{PD-ineligible}} would be appropriate. --Fraknö (talk) 15:05, 6 August 2018 (UTC)
Let's wait for the outcome of Commons:Deletion requests/File:2018-08-05 Flims Flugzeugabsturz JU52 Bild1 w 1600 h 0.jpg which is related. De728631 (talk) 16:24, 6 August 2018 (UTC)
 On hold Ankry (talk) 13:57, 11 August 2018 (UTC)
Bump. De728631 (talk) 12:01, 24 August 2018 (UTC)
@De728631 and Ankry: Both of you are eligible to rule on that 19-day-old DR.   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 13:05, 24 August 2018 (UTC)
 Oppose I have closed the deletion request as "delete" and I don't see any differences in this image. Other than the image in the latter DR, this one does look more like a snapshot but I believe it would still be copyrightable in the US. De728631 (talk) 21:11, 25 August 2018 (UTC)

 Not done: as per above. --Yann (talk) 18:43, 26 August 2018 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: File permission already mailed to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org. Ticket:2018082110007978. Buddhobuddha (talk) 22:02, 21 August 2018 (UTC)

  •  Oppose If a free license has been sent to OTRS, then the file will be restored automatically when and if the email is received, processed, and approved. Note that OTRS, like Commons, is entirely staffed by volunteers, and, also like Commons, is shorthanded, so it may be close to 7 days before the email is processed and the file is restored.
If the message was sent to the English language version of OTRS and the email has been properly received there the sender will receive an automatic reply with the ticket number. If the sender has not had a reply, please check that it was sent correctly and try again. Other language versions may or may not provide the automatic reply. @Buddhobuddha: Did you tag the file {{subst:OP}} as instructed at OTRS and COM:CONSENT?   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 01:54, 22 August 2018 (UTC)
@Buddhobuddha and Jeff G.: OTRS permission received, file has been restored. KCVelaga (talk · mail) 09:07, 26 August 2018 (UTC)

✓ Done: See above. --Yann (talk) 18:44, 26 August 2018 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

已經從instinctofsight@gmail.com發送郵件驗明和聲明本人是相片的持有和版權持有人。 請重新駁回照片。22:56, 24 August 2018 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jaceypo (talk • contribs) 22:56, 24 August 2018 (UTC)

I have sent an email from instinctofsight@gmail.com to verify and declare that I am the holder of the photo and the copyright holder. Please re-reject the photo.
 
translator: Google Translate via   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 16:24, 25 August 2018 (UTC)
  •  Oppose If a free license has been sent to OTRS, then the file will be restored automatically when and if the email is received, processed, and approved. Note that OTRS, like Commons, is entirely staffed by volunteers, and, also like Commons, is shorthanded, so it may be close to 7 days before the email is processed and the file is restored.
If the message was sent to the English language version of OTRS and the email has been properly received there the sender will receive an automatic reply with the ticket number. If the sender has not had a reply, please check that it was sent correctly and try again. Other language versions may or may not provide the automatic reply. Did you tag the files {{subst:OP}} as instructed at OTRS and COM:CONSENT?   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 16:24, 25 August 2018 (UTC)

 Not done: as per above. --Yann (talk) 18:46, 26 August 2018 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Was deleted by mistake. An author of the photo had requested to delete only File:Рсзо.jpg, but not File:РСЗО Ольха.jpg. --VoidWanderer (talk) 14:50, 26 August 2018 (UTC)

Pinging @Taivo.   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 14:53, 26 August 2018 (UTC)
I restored the image and re-deleted. Small photo without metadata and the user's last remaining upload, found at https://stailker.dreamwidth.org/ since 18th of August. Own work is unlikely, probably copyright violation. OTRS-permission is needed to restore the image again. Taivo (talk) 15:06, 26 August 2018 (UTC)
Thanks for your careful check! The image is indeed most likely a copyvio ( https://stailker.dreamwidth.org/346210.html ). Undeleteion request is withdrawn. --VoidWanderer (talk) 15:10, 26 August 2018 (UTC)

 Not done: Request withdrawn. --Majora (talk) 00:46, 27 August 2018 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

This one has to take the cake for the most frivolous deletion. Two users mention that none of the screenshots meet the threshold of originality and thus should be kept. How does User:Srittau decide to close?

Deleted: Only one image had a proper license tag, all others were "licensed" under a clearly invalid CC license.

Translation: I can't be arsed to change around a few licenses (which could literally be copy-pasted from the page that was kept), so instead I'm just going to throw everything out. This kind of disregard for fixing problems is pretty rampant here and quite disappointing considering it's readers who get affected and reduces the utility of the project. Opencooper (talk) 04:03, 24 July 2018 (UTC)

 Comment This is one of the most frivolous undeletion requests I have seen in a long time. If the uploader (or anyone else) can't be arsed to fix their own license in the 1.5 months this DR was open, it is clearly not the admin's task to do so, especially given our backlog and number of deletion requests and speedy deletions on any given day. But of course it is easy to demand of other people to sacrifice their own free time. Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 09:08, 24 July 2018 (UTC)
Weak excuse. Would have taken you as much time as you typed in this reply to copy-paste the license templates from the non-deleted file. If you're really so pressed for time you could even post a request in the village pump for assistance. It also shouldn't be an admin's task to delete perfectly fine files just because there's a backlog. Opencooper (talk) 02:29, 25 July 2018 (UTC)
The sad thing is, if you had just asked to restore these files and fix the template, I would probably have done it. But given your shitty attitude I am not inclined to do just the slightest bit of work for you. I wonder if any other admin will, just to be abused by you. Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 08:51, 25 July 2018 (UTC)
the deletions will continue until the attitude improves. the civility burden is on the uploader. charming. Slowking4 § Sander.v.Ginkel's revenge 11:16, 2 August 2018 (UTC)
@Opencooper: The remaining File:Osmand street routing.png is licensed:
{{GPLv3 only}}
{{ODbL OpenStreetMap}}
{{PD-textlogo}}
Do you want those licenses to apply to all restored files from this category?   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 02:37, 25 July 2018 (UTC)
If the screenshots only contain simple geometric shapes, then yes (though logos can always be cut out, as has been done in the past). I can only go off of the linked discussion though as the files are all currently deleted and can't be viewed. Opencooper (talk) 02:52, 25 July 2018 (UTC)

✓ Done: Partially. The other images have icons that would have to be removed and that is certainly not the job of admins to deal with. In the future it would be nice if everyone remembered COM:MELLOW and that it works to your advantage to not insult the people who you are trying to get to assist you. --Majora (talk) 21:19, 27 August 2018 (UTC).

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Valid permission in ticket:2018010710001665. Please ping me when undeleted so I can clean up the file page. ~ Rob13Talk 13:49, 27 August 2018 (UTC)


✓ Done: @BU Rob13: FYI. --Yann (talk) 14:42, 27 August 2018 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

This photo has been deleted for improper reasons. I am the owner of the photo (Kevin Basak) and also her agent. I already gave evidence of ownership however the photo still has been deleted. Hereby I again provide 3 evidences

1. I uploaded the photo to her IMDB AGAIN and provided my name beneath it as owner (Kevin Basak) See: https://www.imdb.com/name/nm6230362/mediaviewer/rm1718777856

2. I am her official agent and have acces to her personal IMDB see attached photo 1:
File:Schermafbeelding 2018-08-26 om 23.00.46.png
3. I have all the raw photo's and edits. see attached photo 2:
File:Schermafbeelding 2018-08-26 om 23.03.56.png

If more evidence is needed please inform me. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Johndope67 (talk • contribs) 10:30, 27 August 2018 (UTC)

  • Signing your posts on talk pages is required and it is a Commons guideline to sign your posts on deletion requests, undeletion requests, and noticeboards. To do so, simply add four tildes (~~~~) at the end of your comments. Your user name or IP address (if you are not logged in) and a timestamp will then automatically be added when you save your comment. Signing your comments helps people to find out who said something and provides them with a link to your user/talk page (for further discussion). Thank you.   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 10:40, 27 August 2018 (UTC)
@Johndope67: Who is the photographer?   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 10:40, 27 August 2018 (UTC)

I am the photographer (Kevin Basak) I have uploaded the photo again to her IMDB with my name beneath it for evidence since the the reason of deletion was that the photo was also on her IMDB. Which is also uploaded by me. --Johndope67 (talk) 10:42, 27 August 2018 (UTC)

Hi Jef, how do you mean acceptable license on your website? You mean under the IMDB photo? I don't understand it. --Johndope67 (talk) 11:02, 27 August 2018 (UTC)

@Johndope67: Notable agents and talent represented on IMDB usually have their own websites to showcase at least their headshots, do you or your client have one?   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 11:09, 27 August 2018 (UTC)

Hi Jef, I have added CC under the IMDB photo now see: https://www.imdb.com/name/nm6230362/mediaviewer/rm171877785. Is it OK now? Yes we have our own website (trophie.nl) However we use another picture there. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Johndope67 (talk • contribs) 11:11, 27 August 2018 (UTC)

@Johndope67: Not yet, there is no specific license or version number and "Non Commercial" is unacceptable here on Commons.   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 11:15, 27 August 2018 (UTC)

Hi Jef, Hereby I removed the 'Non Commercial' and added V4.0. See: https://www.imdb.com/name/nm6230362/mediaviewer/rm1718777856 Is it OK now? Let me know --Johndope67 (talk) 11:24, 27 August 2018 (UTC)

@Johndope67: Can you please specify Attribution or Attribution Share-Alike? You could also use the short form CC-BY-4.0 or CC-BY-SA-4.0.   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 11:31, 27 August 2018 (UTC)

Hi Jeff, Done See: https://www.imdb.com/name/nm6230362/mediaviewer/rm1718777856. Can the photo now be undeleted and restored? Let me know. --Johndope67 (talk) 11:36, 27 August 2018 (UTC)

@Johndope67: I see "Photo by Kevin Basak - © CC-BY Kevin Basak-SA-4.0" with your name in the middle of "CC-BY-SA-4.0", that won't fly. Thank you for spelling my name right and signing.   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 11:43, 27 August 2018 (UTC)

Howdy Jeff, Done see: https://www.imdb.com/name/nm6230362/mediaviewer/rm1718777856. Will this fly? --Johndope67 (talk) 11:48, 27 August 2018 (UTC)

Thanks for the support Jeff. Any idea when the photo might be restored? At this moment Aliyah Kolf has no profile picture on her Wikipedia which looks quite unprofessional. If restoring the picture proces takes too long I could upload the photo again to commons. Let me know --Johndope67 (talk) 14:59, 27 August 2018 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Hallo,

ich beantrage die Wiederherstellung des Bildes File:Detlef beim Videodreh zu Feeling Good Juni 2018.jpg, da ich dieses Bild selber aufgenommen habe. Ich bin eine sehr gute Freundin von Detlef Malinkewitz und bin bei allen Videodrehs dabei gewesen. Dieser Schnappschuss entstand im saarländischen Staatstheater während der Videoaufnamen. Ich kann gerne die Videos und Fotos, die ich bei den Videodrehs (auch für das zweite Video) gemacht habe, zusenden, wenn das hilft, zu beweisen, dass das meine Aufnahme ist.

--Ankici (talk) 08:03, 14 August 2018 (UTC)

Hello,

I request the restoration of the image : File: Detlef during the video shoot to Feeling Good June 2018.jpg, since I have taken this picture myself.

I am a very good friend of Detlef Malinkewitz and have been in all the video shoots. This snapshot was taken in the Saarland State Theater during the video recording. I'd like to send the videos and photos I made during the video shoots (including the second video) if that helps prove that this is my shot.
 
translator: Google Translate via   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 08:08, 14 August 2018 (UTC)
  •  Support Dieses Foto ist eindeutig nicht in dem YouTube Video enthalten. Die Kameraperspektive und die erhöhte Bühne unterscheiden sich deutlich von dem Video. / According to Ankici, this is not a still from the YouTube video but a photo snapshot taken by her during the filming. I believe this since I can't find this particular image in the video. Note also the different camera perspectives and the enhanced stage in the photo as opposed to the video. De728631 (talk) 15:25, 14 August 2018 (UTC)

@Raboe001: ✓ Done Ankry (talk) 17:17, 27 August 2018 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

I think the situation on Wikidata was misunderstood. The item there wasn't kept primarily because there is an image at Commons: d:Wikidata:Requests_for_deletions/Archive/2018/08/20#Q46368708.

The image wasn't unused. I don't think images on Commons should be deleted merely because only Wikidata uses them. --Jura1 (talk) 13:03, 27 August 2018 (UTC)


✓ Done: Restored as the image is in use by a sister project. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 19:04, 27 August 2018 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

This image was deleted under the pretense of being an out-of-scope personal image. The image is actually a headshot of a politician who was the Republican nominee in the 2013 New York City mayoral election.SecretName101 (talk) 20:05, 27 August 2018 (UTC)


✓ Done: But we still need permission from the author of the file (CHRIS TAGGART as mentioned in the file metadata). Please send permission to COM:OTRS. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 21:19, 27 August 2018 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Hi There,

Can I please have this file undeleted, I am the creator of this artwork and we are trying to add it to our clubs wiki page: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nelson_Suburbs_FC

Thanks

Bryce Easton bryce_easton@hotmail.com — Preceding unsigned comment added by NelsonSuburbs (talk • contribs) 20:43, 27 August 2018 (UTC)


English | français | +/−

This file requires a permission to be undeleted

The information provided didn't allow us to undelete the file for the moment. The file has been deleted because we need to be sure that the author or the copyright holder agrees to release it under a free license. The author (or the copyright holder) needs to send to the OTRS volunteers a permission statement. We will then undelete the file.

Send a permission
--Arthur Crbz (talk) 21:13, 27 August 2018 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Gary LaBranche

I am unclear as to why you deleted my official photo, which I personally uploaded. What do I need to do to get it undeleted or upload the photo in a way that conforms to your rules? ````— Preceding unsigned comment added by Gary LaBranche (talk • contribs) 21:50, 26 August 2018 (UTC)


 Not done: Per above. We would need the copyright holder, which is the photographer unless the copyright has been transferred by legal action or contract, to fill out the form located at COM:ET and send it into our OTRS team. --Majora (talk) 02:14, 28 August 2018 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Please undelete the file in the subject line. This file is my work and has no use limitations. It's unclear why it keeps getting deleted.--Riverdrain (talk) 21:43, 25 August 2018 (UTC)


 Not done: as per above. --Yann (talk) 07:26, 28 August 2018 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

This image (picture of Abdon Balde) is the original work of uploader Ringer. It was uploaded way back in June 27, 2009. The claim by deleter Turelio that it came from a website (https://www.facebook.com/legazpicity/photos/a.322941402339/10150306089407340/?type=3&theater) is not true. The article he cited as the source of the picture was just created in September 1, 2011. The author of the article could only have gotten the picture from Bicol Wikipedia but he failed to cite his source. Ringer (talk) 17:29, 26 August 2018 (UTC)

Pinging @Túrelio.   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 17:44, 26 August 2018 (UTC)
@Ringer: Where did you upload it June 27, 2009?   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 17:49, 26 August 2018 (UTC)
 Oppose They are talking about bcl:Ladawan:Abdon Balde, Jr. .jpg. Which was taken from Facebook which was taken this page. You have a history of abusing {{Own}} work labels and have been told previously that just because an image is hosted on another project doesn't make it suitable for here. There is zero indication that this was ever under an acceptable license here. No EXIF on the original, no indication on any source of the original authorship, nothing. --Majora (talk) 02:39, 27 August 2018 (UTC)

Request for Undeletioɲ

Ringer uploaded image bcl:Ladawan:Abdon Balde, Jr.jpg on June 27, 2009. This guy Balde is my friend and took a picture of him while we were having dinner. Bikol Wikipedia only acquired the SALAMANGKERO (automatic upload to Commons) in year 2014, reason why so many pictures (my original works at least) uploaded where not in Commons. The article on the website https://www.facebook.com/legazpicity/photos/a.322941402339/10150306089407340/?type=3&theater could only have accessed from bclwiki as you will notice date of its upload was year 2011. Many of these image files, not transferred to Commons should have been transferred by year 2014 but honestly I simply do not have the leisure time to do this work and our active community is very small. It is not because I am a bull-headed consistent violator of copyrights. I also do not have time to engage in endless discussions on these matters so I just let deletions happen without any remark because I see many that were deleted were "derivative work", but performed before 2014. Anyway, this is the first time I am doing this Request for Undeletion not being very knowledgeable in these matters. Ringer (talk) Ringer (talk) 04:19, 27 August 2018 (UTC)


 Not done: as per above. --Yann (talk) 07:27, 28 August 2018 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Hello,

The file (a photo) I wanted to add is form the verified facebook page of the Minister of Health of Armenia - Mr. Arsen Torosyan. The reason I want to upload this file is that I consider it a better picture than the one which is used in his wikipedia page.

Thanks in advance. — Preceding unsigned comment added by GeVardanyan (talk • contribs) 21:10, 26 August 2018 (UTC)

  • Signing your posts on talk pages is required and it is a Commons guideline to sign your posts on deletion requests, undeletion requests, and noticeboards. To do so, simply add four tildes (~~~~) at the end of your comments. Your user name or IP address (if you are not logged in) and a timestamp will then automatically be added when you save your comment. Signing your comments helps people to find out who said something and provides them with a link to your user/talk page (for further discussion). Thank you.   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 21:13, 26 August 2018 (UTC)
  •  Oppose @GeVardanyan: Please have the photographer send permission via OTRS with a copy to you.   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 21:13, 26 August 2018 (UTC)

 Not done: as per above. --Yann (talk) 07:28, 28 August 2018 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File is in the public domain, as an image created by the White House Photo Office during the Nixon presidency (1969-74). It's Nixon White House National Archives identifying number is E2420-18. The proper tag is {{PD-USGov-POTUS}}. Happyme22 (talk) 02:22, 28 August 2018 (UTC)


✓ Done: No reason to delete. --Yann (talk) 10:00, 28 August 2018 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

خودم عکاس هستم --Akherolzaman (talk) 05:27, 28 August 2018 (UTC)


 Not done: Not deleted yet. --Yann (talk) 09:33, 28 August 2018 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File is in the public domain, as an image created by the White House Photo Office during the Nixon presidency (1969-74). It's Nixon White House National Archives identifying number is E2413-09A. The proper tag is {{PD-USGov-POTUS}}. Happyme22 (talk) 02:24, 28 August 2018 (UTC)


✓ Done: No reason to delete. --Yann (talk) 10:08, 28 August 2018 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File is in the public domain, as an image created by the White House Photo Office during the Nixon presidency (1969-74). It's Nixon White House National Archives identifying number is E1999-12A. The proper tag is {{PD-USGov-POTUS}}. Happyme22 (talk) 02:26, 28 August 2018 (UTC)


✓ Done: No reason to delete. --Yann (talk) 10:08, 28 August 2018 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File is in the public domain, as an image created by the White House Photo Office during the Nixon presidency (1969-74). It's Nixon White House National Archives identifying number is E1504-27A. The proper tag is {{PD-USGov-POTUS}}. Happyme22 (talk) 02:46, 28 August 2018 (UTC)


✓ Done: No reason to delete. --Yann (talk) 10:08, 28 August 2018 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File is in the public domain, as an image created by the White House Photo Office during the Nixon presidency (1969-74). It's Nixon White House National Archives identifying number is C9620-36A. The proper tag is {{PD-USGov-POTUS}}. Happyme22 (talk) 02:46, 28 August 2018 (UTC)


✓ Done: No reason to delete. --Yann (talk) 10:08, 28 August 2018 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File is in the public domain, as an image created by the White House Photo Office during the Nixon presidency (1969-74). It's Nixon White House National Archives identifying number is C8253-21A. The proper tag is {{PD-USGov-POTUS}}. Happyme22 (talk) 02:47, 28 August 2018 (UTC)


✓ Done: No reason to delete. --Yann (talk) 10:47, 28 August 2018 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File is in the public domain, as an image created by the White House Photo Office during the Nixon presidency (1969-74). It's Nixon White House National Archives identifying number is C8104-14. The proper tag is {{PD-USGov-POTUS}}. Happyme22 (talk) 02:48, 28 August 2018 (UTC)


✓ Done: No reason to delete. --Yann (talk) 10:47, 28 August 2018 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File is in the public domain, as an image created by the White House Photo Office during the Nixon presidency (1969-74). It's Nixon White House National Archives identifying number is C7339-17. The proper tag is {{PD-USGov-POTUS}}. Happyme22 (talk) 02:49, 28 August 2018 (UTC)


✓ Done: No reason to delete. --Yann (talk) 10:47, 28 August 2018 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File is in the public domain, as an image created by the White House Photo Office during the Nixon presidency (1969-74). It's Nixon White House National Archives identifying number is C8234-17A. The proper tag is {{PD-USGov-POTUS}}. Happyme22 (talk) 02:50, 28 August 2018 (UTC)


✓ Done: No reason to delete. --Yann (talk) 10:47, 28 August 2018 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File is in the public domain, as an image created by the White House Photo Office during the Nixon presidency (1969-74). It's National Archives identifying number is 194277 and was sourced from [11]. The proper tag is {{PD-USGov-POTUS}}. Happyme22 (talk) 02:52, 28 August 2018 (UTC)


✓ Done: No reason to delete. --Yann (talk) 10:47, 28 August 2018 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File is in the public domain, as an image created by the White House Photo Office during the Nixon presidency (1969-74). It's Nixon White House National Archives identifying number is C3796-18. The proper tag is {{PD-USGov-POTUS}}. Happyme22 (talk) 02:53, 28 August 2018 (UTC)


✓ Done: No reason to delete. --Yann (talk) 10:48, 28 August 2018 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File is in the public domain, as an image created by the White House Photo Office during the Nixon presidency (1969-74). It's Nixon White House National Archives identifying number is 2749-18. The proper tag is {{PD-USGov-POTUS}}. Happyme22 (talk) 02:54, 28 August 2018 (UTC)


✓ Done: No reason to delete. --Yann (talk) 10:48, 28 August 2018 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File is in the public domain, as an image created by the White House Photo Office during the Nixon presidency (1969-74). It's Nixon White House National Archives identifying number is 1411-15A. The proper tag is {{PD-USGov-POTUS}}. Happyme22 (talk) 02:54, 28 August 2018 (UTC)


✓ Done: No reason to delete. --Yann (talk) 10:48, 28 August 2018 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File is in the public domain, as an image created by the White House Photo Office during the Nixon presidency (1969-74). It's Nixon White House National Archives identifying number is C3006-34. The proper tag is {{PD-USGov-POTUS}}. Happyme22 (talk) 02:55, 28 August 2018 (UTC)


✓ Done: No reason to delete. --Yann (talk) 10:48, 28 August 2018 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File is in the public domain, as an image created by the White House Photo Office during the Nixon presidency (1969-74). It's Nixon White House National Archives identifying number is 1495-22. The proper tag is {{PD-USGov-POTUS}}. Happyme22 (talk) 02:56, 28 August 2018 (UTC)


✓ Done: No reason to delete. --Yann (talk) 10:48, 28 August 2018 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File is in the public domain, as an image created by the White House Photo Office during the Nixon presidency (1969-74). It's Nixon White House National Archives identifying number is C6311-11a. The proper tag is {{PD-USGov-POTUS}}. Happyme22 (talk) 02:57, 28 August 2018 (UTC)


✓ Done: No reason to delete. --Yann (talk) 10:48, 28 August 2018 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File is in the public domain, as an image created by the White House Photo Office during the Nixon presidency (1969-74). It's Nixon White House National Archives identifying number is C5596-16. The proper tag is {{PD-USGov-POTUS}}. Happyme22 (talk) 02:58, 28 August 2018 (UTC)


✓ Done: No reason to delete. --Yann (talk) 10:48, 28 August 2018 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File is in the public domain, as an image created by the White House Photo Office during the Nixon presidency (1969-74). It's Nixon White House National Archives identifying number is C6712-07A. The proper tag is {{PD-USGov-POTUS}}. Happyme22 (talk) 02:59, 28 August 2018 (UTC)


✓ Done: No reason to delete. --Yann (talk) 10:49, 28 August 2018 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File is in the public domain, as an image created by the White House Photo Office during the Nixon presidency (1969-74). It's Nixon White House National Archives identifying number is 7844-26a. The proper tag is {{PD-USGov-POTUS}}. Happyme22 (talk) 02:59, 28 August 2018 (UTC)


✓ Done: No reason to delete. --Yann (talk) 10:49, 28 August 2018 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File is in the public domain, as an image created by the White House Photo Office during the Nixon presidency (1969-74). It's Nixon White House National Archives identifying number is C8019-08a. The proper tag is {{PD-USGov-POTUS}}. Happyme22 (talk) 03:00, 28 August 2018 (UTC)


✓ Done: No reason to delete. --Yann (talk) 10:49, 28 August 2018 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Hello,

The image mention above was given permission by the original owner and he sent a "template for release of rights to a file" with the permissions-common. Could you please restore the picture to the infobox? Bambino4 (talk) 20:29, 28 August 2018 (UTC)


 Not done: Uploaded locally to enwiki as fair use. --Majora (talk) 21:33, 28 August 2018 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Hello,

The image mention above was given permission by the original owner and he sent a "template for release of rights to a file" with the permissions-common. Could you please restore the picture?Bambino4 (talk) 20:26, 28 August 2018 (UTC)


✓ Done: Restored by Ronhjones. --Majora (talk) 22:08, 28 August 2018 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Recuperação do Arquivo File: Cidade de Coluna (MG)-2018.jpg

Português: Vim pedir a recuperação do arquivo File: Cidade de Coluna (MG)-2018. Venho novamente falar que ele é de minha autoria. Além disso, ele é essencial para a visualização da página da Wikipédia em português Coluna (Minas Gerais). Eu acho que o arquivo foi eliminado por eu não preencher corretamente as informações sobre as licenças (não sou muito bom com isso). E peço que recuperem esse arquivo de minha autoria ou deixem eu carregar uma nova versão do arquivo.

Guerreiro do Vale (talk) 13:09, 4 August 2018 (UTC)Guerreiro do ValeGuerreiro do Vale (talk) 13:09, 4 August 2018 (UTC)

Portuguese of Brazil: I came to ask for the recovery of file File: Cidade de Coluna (MG) -2018. I come again to say that he is my own. In addition, it is essential to view the Wikipedia page in Portuguese Coluna (Minas Gerais). I think the file was deleted because I did not properly fill out the license information (I'm not very good with this). And I ask that you recover this file of mine or let me load a new version of the file.
 
translator: Google Translate via   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 13:28, 4 August 2018 (UTC)


The following is copied from my user talk page; I cannot properly answer because I have access to neither file.   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 14:28, 5 August 2018 (UTC)

Respondendo a sua pergunta da página de recuperação de arquivos, observe bem no vídeo: ele é antigo, e o formato da imagem é em 3×4, enquanto a minha foto está em formato 16×9. Não teria como eu tirar uma foto desse vídeo, senão ele ficaria em péssima qualidade. O arquivo não carrega metadados porque a foto foi tirada de outro celular. Guerreiro do Vale (talk) 13:31, 5 August 2018 (UTC)

Answering your question from the file retrieval page, look closely at the video: it is old, and the image format is 3 × 4, while my photo is in 16 × 9 format. It would not be like taking a picture of this video, otherwise it would be in bad quality. The file does not load metadata because the photo was taken from another cell phone.
 
translator: Google Translate via   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 14:00, 5 August 2018 (UTC)
@Guerreiro do Vale: The image is reasonable resolution (1040×584) but contains no camera info so it may be hard to prove that it is indeed your image and not made by somebody else. You can try to prove that contacting COM:OTRS; however, if you fail, the image may not be stored in Wikimedia Commons due to COM:PCP (reasonable doubt about authorship). Please note, that you may upload a photo as {{Own}} if you made the original photo yourself using your camera (and if you did, it is hard to explain why did you not upload the original photo, full-size with camera info in EXIF). If there is a reason not to publish the original photo, you can also provide it to OTRS, where it will be kept private. As we have many photos, that are claimed to be Own work why they are actually not, we must be extremely carefull axepting photos that atuthorship cannot be verified, even if the image cannot be find in the Internet using services like Google Images.  Weak oppose at the moment and suggest to contact OTRS or upload the original file. Ankry (talk) 15:33, 5 August 2018 (UTC)

 Not done: Per above. The lack of metadata is particularly concerning as true "own" works uploaded directly from a camera image would have it. Even if the photo was taken from another device there should be metadata. Tranferring doesn't scrub such things. If there is a reason that you want the metadata removed please email the original with a filled out COM:ET form to OTRS stating as such. The image can be undeleted once OTRS confirms receipt of the email. --Majora (talk) 23:49, 28 August 2018 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Requesting undeletion of File:David Patrikarakos.jpg

The source of the image is David Patrikarakos and the image was located online by googling his name under images. It appeared at https://www.facebook.com/dpatrikarakos/photos/a.1884312481874072/1884312761874044/?type=1&theater

Le Bijoux (talk) 23:19, 28 August 2018 (UTC)


 Not done: Please see COM:NETCOPYRIGHT. There is no indication of a free license on that page. Just because it is online doesn't mean it can be hosted here. It is not CC0. --Majora (talk) 23:39, 28 August 2018 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

ticket:2018031310014216 verifies the identity of the uploader, who has the rights to this, as now noted on their user page with the {{OTRS identity}} template. As such, whatever the initial release was would be valid if it was released under a suitable free license. Please ping upon restoration. ~ Rob13Talk 02:15, 29 August 2018 (UTC)


✓ Done: BU Rob13 Please make the necessary OTRS related changes. --Majora (talk) 02:21, 29 August 2018 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Hello , you start to delete the photo that have personal taken by my own camera ! this is stupid action that i can not post the photo which i have the all copyright ! your insisting on deleting my own photo is not in the policy of wikipedia ! by deleting those photos you blocked the access of people who try to find my projects . this is the The illegitimate use of power by you. --Emami676 (talk) 05:45, 23 August 2018 (UTC)

File was uploaded 06:45, 10 July 2018. Tagged as "no permission" 01:34, 11 July 2018. Appears to have an OTRS received on 11:05, 15 July 2018 and deleted by User:Jcb 16:32, 16 August 2018 as no OTRS. The re-uploaded out of process on 08:55, 20 August 2018, and deleted by me as a re-upload 18:59, 20 August 2018. Ronhjones  (Talk) 14:18, 23 August 2018 (UTC)
@Ronhjones: If it was tagged OTRS received on 11:05, 15 July 2018, why was it then deleted by User:Jcb 16:32, 16 August 2018 as no OTRS?   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 14:25, 23 August 2018 (UTC)
@Jeff G.: 16:32, 16 August 2018 Jcb (A/P) deleted page File:Janat-abad-mall-sainats.jpg (No OTRS permission for 30 days)
Perhaps I misunderstood, and we just got the OTRS ticket on 15 July, with no corresponding tag.   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 14:42, 23 August 2018 (UTC)
@Jeff G.: that is 2 different project done by my own company " saina company" , I am the photographer of that photo too , i though that i have right to upload some of my photo without logo and label on wiki. if thats ok i will upload my photo with the label to wiki. i send the OTRS once and i sure you will reject that and delete my photo again ! Emami676 (talk) 05:31, 28 August 2018 (UTC)

 Not done: Pending OTRS release. No need to keep this open and sitting here. An OTRS agent can request undeletion if and when the file permissions are confirmed. As of right now we are still waiting for a response to an email sent back in July. --Majora (talk) 04:41, 29 August 2018 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Hi, In Commons:Village pump/Copyright#FoP in UK, Bjh21 says that this deletion was probably a mistake. Regards, Yann (talk) 06:40, 27 August 2018 (UTC)

Has the alleged broadness of UK FOP with respect to a copyrighted wax sculpture in a museum which charges admission been tested in a court in the UK?   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 09:46, 27 August 2018 (UTC)
I have yet to find any cases relating to section 62. The commentary that I've found generally seems to assume that "premises open to the public" covers galleries and museums, even if they charge for entry, but rarely bothers stating this explicitly. --bjh21 (talk) 12:07, 28 August 2018 (UTC)
 Support We have dozens of images from Madame Tussauds already (Category:Madame Tussauds). Many of which have already had community consensus at DR to keep due to FoP allowances. This was in the London museum and COM:FOP#United Kingdom rules are very very broad and all three dimensional works including public interiors are acceptable. Charging entry feeds does not make it "closed to the public". That is not the same as having it inside a private home. Many museums charge some sort of fee to enter them. We don't take that into account when we decided FoP cases, nor should we. This was a bad delete. --Majora (talk) 02:12, 28 August 2018 (UTC)

✓ Done: as per Majora. --Yann (talk) 10:15, 29 August 2018 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Please return the picture because it belongs to the official site of Amira Medunjanin whose administrator I am. Copyright and related rights belong to the singer and are on its official site. Enigma666rock (talk) 07:56, 27 August 2018 (UTC))


 Not done: as per Jeff. --Yann (talk) 10:14, 29 August 2018 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Feel free to get in touch with the artist herself - this file is not a copyright violation. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bshope (talk • contribs) 05:29, 28 August 2018 (UTC)

@Bshope: Hi,
It doesn't work that way. YOU have to provide evidence that the artist agrees to a free license. Please see COM:OTRS for the instructions. Regards, Yann (talk) 09:31, 28 August 2018 (UTC)

 Not done: as per above. --Yann (talk) 10:12, 29 August 2018 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

This is the flag approved by syro Malabar Church and using many parts of the world.. — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 106.193.24.193 (talk) 10:08, 29 August 2018 (UTC)


 Not done: Not deleted yet. Please discuss in the DR. --Yann (talk) 10:11, 29 August 2018 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Photo was taken by the uploader — Preceding unsigned comment added by Chappie390 (talk • contribs) 09:44, 28 August 2018 (UTC)


 Not done: as per above. --Yann (talk) 16:05, 29 August 2018 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

It's a corporate photo provided by the company in the media kit. — Preceding unsigned comment added by F6performance (talk • contribs) 10:25, 28 August 2018 (UTC)

@F6performance: Hi,
A legal representative from the company has to send a permission via COM:OTRS. Regards, Yann (talk) 10:57, 28 August 2018 (UTC)

 Not done: as per above. --Yann (talk) 16:05, 29 August 2018 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

ticket:2018032210006324 contains permission. Please ping me upon undeletion so I can cleanup the file page. ~ Rob13Talk 22:07, 29 August 2018 (UTC)


✓ Done: @BU Rob13: I tagged it OR. --Guanaco (talk) 10:05, 30 August 2018 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

I am Ishu Dixit, one of the employees in CRASS Infotech. I uploaded the file on behalf of CRASS Infotech Pvt. Ltd. Please do not delete the file. Regards, Ishu Dixit, CRASS Infotech. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ishu1998 (talk • contribs) 08:38, 30 August 2018 (UTC)

@Ishu1998: This image has (or these images have) appeared on the Internet without a free license prior to being uploaded here (or appear(s) to have based on the small size and lack of EXIF metadata), and was (or were) thus deleted by an Administrator. Policy requires that the actual copyright holder, which is almost always the photographer or image designer, must send a free license directly using VRTS. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 08:40, 30 August 2018 (UTC)

✓ Done: OTRS permission. --Guanaco (talk) 12:29, 30 August 2018 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Example.jpg 削除撤回の要求

WIKIPEDIANI掲載している写真は全て私が著作権を有しておりますので、削除撤回の要求を致します。何卒宜しくお願い申し上げます。 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ragtimema (talk • contribs) 15:06, 30 August 2018 (UTC)

  • Signing your posts on talk pages is required and it is a Commons guideline to sign your posts on deletion requests, undeletion requests, and noticeboards. To do so, simply add four tildes (~~~~) at the end of your comments. Your user name or IP address (if you are not logged in) and a timestamp will then automatically be added when you save your comment. Signing your comments helps people to find out who said something and provides them with a link to your user/talk page (for further discussion). Thank you.   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 15:19, 30 August 2018 (UTC)
Request for withdrawal of deletion WIKIPEDIANI All photos posted have copyright, so we will request a withdrawal of deletion. I would like to humbly thank you.
 
translator: Google Translate via   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 15:19, 30 August 2018 (UTC)

手続きの終了、ファイルは削除されません。 推測するアップローダの削除済みファイルの数が多すぎます。 Procedural close, file is not deleted. Too many of the uploader's deleted files to guess.   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 15:19, 30 August 2018 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

This is a private picture of my father that I took a photo of with my phone, added a filter on instagram and then sent to my computer via Facebook messenger. If you prefer I can repeat the same process via E-Mail... — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cloic (talk • contribs) 12:17, 26 August 2018 (UTC)

  • Signing your posts on talk pages is required and it is a Commons guideline to sign your posts on deletion requests, undeletion requests, and noticeboards. To do so, simply add four tildes (~~~~) at the end of your comments. Your user name or IP address (if you are not logged in) and a timestamp will then automatically be added when you save your comment. Signing your comments helps people to find out who said something and provides them with a link to your user/talk page (for further discussion). Thank you.   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 13:22, 26 August 2018 (UTC)
  •  Oppose @Cloic: Please have the original photographer send permission via OTRS, including the original photo with intact EXIF metadata and a copy to you.   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 13:22, 26 August 2018 (UTC)

This is an old, personal photo. There is no original photo in electronic version and never has been. Merely my picture of it could be sent, which would me make the photographer... Cloic (talk) 14:07, 26 August 2018 (UTC)

@Cloic: Who took the original, when, and in what country?   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 14:11, 26 August 2018 (UTC)
@Jeff G.: 1998- Berlin, Germany. It was taken on the Camera of my father, most likely by my mother. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cloic (talk • contribs) 15:10, 26 August 2018 (UTC)
@Cloic: Thank you. Can she send permission?   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 15:24, 26 August 2018 (UTC)
@Jeff G.: Yes. Where and how could she do this? Cloic (talk) 09:20, 28 August 2018 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cloic (talk • contribs) 15:10, 28 August 2018 (UTC)
@Cloic: Please see COM:OTRS. Regards, Yann (talk) 16:07, 29 August 2018 (UTC)

 Not done: as per above. --Yann (talk) 17:48, 30 August 2018 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

I am the owner of this image and sent OTRS permission for this but it still hasn't been undeleted. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nedkleiner (talk • contribs) 16:13, 27 August 2018 (UTC)


  •  Oppose If a free license has been sent to OTRS, then the file will be restored automatically when and if the email is received, processed, and approved. Note that OTRS, like Commons, is entirely staffed by volunteers, and, also like Commons, is shorthanded, so it may be close to 7 days before the email is processed and the file is restored.
If the message was sent to the English language version of OTRS and the email has been properly received there the sender will receive an automatic reply with the ticket number. If the sender has not had a reply, please check that it was sent correctly and try again. Other language versions may or may not provide the automatic reply. De728631 (talk) 16:58, 27 August 2018 (UTC)
 Info Same request as on August 13, 2018: Commons:Undeletion requests/Archive/2018-08#File:Elizabeth Kolbert.jpg Thuresson (talk) 20:00, 27 August 2018 (UTC)

 Not done: as per above. --Yann (talk) 17:48, 30 August 2018 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: All entries are 100% correct. We have copyrights on all images. We've sent all the data to you on e-mails; volunteers-otrs@wikimedia.org an permissions-commons@wikimedia.org

you can check the accuracy of the information.

Best Regards Azra Halilbegovic (aka enigma666rock) Admin on Amira Medunjanin official pages Enigma666rock (talk) 15:07, 28 August 2018 (UTC)

 Oppose If a free license has been sent to OTRS, then the file will be restored automatically when and if the email is received, processed, and approved. Note that OTRS, like Commons, is entirely staffed by volunteers, and, also like Commons, is shorthanded, so it may be close to 7 days before the email is processed and the file is restored.
If the message was sent to the English language version of OTRS and the email has been properly received there the sender will receive an automatic reply with the ticket number. If the sender has not had a reply, please check that it was sent correctly and try again. Other language versions may or may not provide the automatic reply. Yann (talk) 10:22, 29 August 2018 (UTC)

 Not done: as per above. --Yann (talk) 17:49, 30 August 2018 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Please restore this file. It was deleted because it was unclear whether Marcello d'Olivio (deceased) had given his permission. However, while d'Olivio was the architect of this sculpture, the Iraqi sculptor, Khaled al-Rahal was responsible for its orignal design and oversaw all phases of its construction. Al-Rahal died in 1987 and is buried beside the monument. I believe tht a case can be made for keeping the image, based on its historical and architectural/artistic significance. It is an excellent surviving example of al-Rahal's work - many of his public monuments were destroyed either in the 2003 US invasion or in its immediate aftermath. Thus, the image illustrates a surviving work for an important Iraqi sculptor. The monument also illustrates part of the history of 20th-century Iraqi art - illustrating how it became increasingly abstract and sophisticated throughout the 20th-century. Comparison with earlier works, including those of al-Rahal, show that their execution was considerably more kitch and the symbolism was very 'in-your-face'. This monument, and other monuments by al-Rahal, are the subject of an important book, The Monument: Art, Vulgarity, and Responsibility in Saddam Hussein's Iraq, written by K. Makiya, K. and S. Al-Khalilm published by IB Taurus in 2004. It may also be worth noting that Wiki Commons has relatively few images of modern Iraqi art - and the image of this important public monument in Baghdad helps to flesh out the collection in useful ways. I am strongly in favour of keeping the image - and would be happy to write a suitable rationale for it, if someone could just tell me where to post such a rationale (have tried previously to locate such a page, but to no avail) . The image is already linked to a number of pages which further suggests something about its importance ̴̴̴̴ (Bronhiggs - I have no idea why Wiki Commons recognises me as "unsigned" even when I use the four tildes) — Preceding unsigned comment added by BronHiggs (talk • contribs) 01:22, 29 August 2018 (UTC)

 Oppose Because of Commons:Fair use. See also Commons:Deletion requests/File:Tomb of the Unknown Soldier - Baghdad.jpg. Thuresson (talk) 11:45, 29 August 2018 (UTC)

 Not done: as per above. --Yann (talk) 17:49, 30 August 2018 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

This is photo Real...Please undeleted — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mannafull islam Rafi (talk • contribs) 01:54, 29 August 2018 (UTC)

Hello,The image mention above was given permission by the original owner and he sent a "template for release of rights to a file" with the permissions-common. Could you please restore the picture to the infobox?Please undeleted — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mannafull islam Rafi (talk • contribs) 02:00, 29 August 2018 (UTC)

  •  Oppose If a free license has been sent to OTRS, then the file will be restored automatically when and if the email is received, processed, and approved. Note that OTRS, like Commons, is entirely staffed by volunteers, and, also like Commons, is shorthanded, so it may be close to 7 days before the email is processed and the file is restored.
If the message was sent to the English language version of OTRS and the email has been properly received there the sender will receive an automatic reply with the ticket number. If the sender has not had a reply, please check that it was sent correctly and try again. Other language versions may or may not provide the automatic reply. Did you tag the files {{subst:OP}} as instructed at OTRS and COM:CONSENT?   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 13:55, 29 August 2018 (UTC)

 Not done: as per above. --Yann (talk) 17:50, 30 August 2018 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

The image was imported by a tool that verifies the license, and is part of importation project that are saving cc files from the massive deletion promote by 500px, there is no argument to delete this photo. You can read more about it Commons:500px licensing data. -- Rodrigo Tetsuo Argenton m 15:37, 29 August 2018 (UTC)

Pinging @Ronhjones.   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 15:45, 29 August 2018 (UTC)
Jeff G. I already talk to him, he didn't want to fix, sending me here. -- Rodrigo Tetsuo Argenton m 16:02, 29 August 2018 (UTC)
The original link (http://www.wallpapercomputer.de/53.html) comes from a site that is clearly "All rights reserved" (http://www.wallpapercomputer.de/copyright.html). How do we know it was not some sort of "License Laundering"? I'm happy to go with whatever the consensus is. Ronhjones  (Talk) 16:47, 29 August 2018 (UTC)
At the bottom, as I already told you Ronhjones there is a link to his 500px account.
The file that I uploaded via 500 px import tool have:"available at http://www.wallpapercomputer.de/53.html"
And the same link, and author linked at the website.
The tool verifies if the file was uploaded at 500px under a CC license, something that you also can verify if you dig into the source.
You should read the documentation, you are delaying the work of others. -- Rodrigo Tetsuo Argenton m 17:07, 29 August 2018 (UTC)
Let's face the facts: The photographer uploaded this picture on his own website (wallpapercomputer.de) and on 500px.
On his own site you can find a statement, that all rights are reserved. (http://www.wallpapercomputer.de/copyright.html)
On 500px there is no statement about licensing. (https://500px.com/photo/199200911/cereal-field-at-sunrise-by-adrian-eissler)
The desription page on Commons provided two links to wayback machine. The first linked to the jpeg itself, without any text/statements. The second one told me, that this page is not archived.
So I find the situation, that one source tells "all rights reserved", and the other source tells nothing about it, even the archive links providing nothing about it.
Instead of attacking the DR requester and the admin in a barefaced way, you should tell us where we may find any proof, that this picture was published under a free license. --Stepro (talk) 17:55, 29 August 2018 (UTC)
Stepro
How many times I need to say to read this page: Commons:500px licensing data
To you read it?
You have a worst posture than this volunteer: Commons:Village_pump/Copyright/Archive/2018/08#File:Dsc 7173 Jpg (106623559).jpeg, but you can read it also.
The prove is in the code, if you want you can dig in and find the correct license.
But you don't want the truth, you want to be right. -- Rodrigo Tetsuo Argenton m 18:27, 29 August 2018 (UTC)
PS:Obviously that 500px do not have a statement about cc license, they announced the removal of cc licensed photos, also at the indicated page. Read it.
Someone should check, if this still running tool meets the criteria for Commons. In my opinion the demand to read some source code is not a proper way to proof, that those pics are former published with a free license. The personal attacks against me I don't want to comment. --Stepro (talk) 18:34, 29 August 2018 (UTC)
Opinions don't have any weight against facts:
"In my opinion the Earth is flat"
The boot read the code, as Flickr2Commons those, to not demand volunteers read the code. I'm just saying to you see inside the code because you don't believe in the other volunteers efforts.
You are unable to read one simple page and want to discuss about proof?
And attacks? Don't make me laugh, you are in this crusade to push your opinion without any bases. You are running against a fact, defending a idea explained to you that is wrong, and to another volunteer by 3 other volunteers. How long you be on this just to "not loose"?
...

Sysops, why this files is not back on air already? -- Rodrigo Tetsuo Argenton m 19:05, 29 August 2018 (UTC)
I'm not convinced that every image on 500px is suitable for here. I just tagged an image that is a clear FoP violation. Ronhjones  (Talk) 19:13, 29 August 2018 (UTC)

q.e.d. didn't read the page...

The tool able us to select the files before upload it, and no, not every photo of 500px should be here, and that's why we created the tool. Volunteers make mistakes, especially in FOP, as this law is not universal, and very different from country to country. And nothing related to this case. -- Rodrigo Tetsuo Argenton m 19:33, 29 August 2018 (UTC)

Despite the continued outrageous attacks against me, I would like to answer factually once again:

  • On the team page I can read: "One consequence of this is that all Creative Commons-licensed images, as well as images where users have opted out of distribution will disappear by June 30th."
  • Fact is: The image is still there, see link above. That means there are two possibilities:
  1. The declaration of the archive team is wrong.
  2. This picture haven't had a CC license.

I really would appreciate if you could start writing in a factual and pleasant way. Thanks. --Stepro (talk) 20:07, 29 August 2018 (UTC)

Stepro if you believe that every volunteer of Archieve Team, and Wikimedia Commons envolved in this project are lying you enter here: Commons talk:500px licensing data and complain there, not here.
Just because you are unable or do not want to check the facts, this do not mean that others didn't verify...
You are accusing that our work is violating copyright, so you need to prove that the Archieve Team imported non CC-license, and the tool create by Chicocvenancio is unable to check the license. Or that DarwIn and I imported 65 k files knowing that we are violating licenses.
Prove all this violations, we don't need to prove, what are doing is reverse onus, you are accusing, prove it.
Who is attacking someone here is you, and only you, you attacking and delaying the work of other volunteers.
You dind't prove that never before this image was under cc-by, as we are declaring.
-- Rodrigo Tetsuo Argenton m 20:33, 29 August 2018 (UTC)
No, I havn't to prove, that the pic wasn't published under CC license, it is up to you, to prove that it was. I wrote the facts about the current state and the archive links above, there is nothing more to say from my side. --Stepro (talk) 20:42, 29 August 2018 (UTC)
We prove using technological vias, you are denying, so prove that this via is unable to secure the prove.
-- Rodrigo Tetsuo Argenton m 20:54, 29 August 2018 (UTC)
PS:A bonus to you, prove this File:Ethevaldo Siqueira.jpg is not under cc-by, you already denying a software work, it's a chance for more deletion.


Stepro and others, I omitted the direct link to archived web page because it is not very useful ([12]) due to it bassically not loading anything due to CORS blocking. You can however, manually check the existence of the snippet "license_type": 4 on that page by viewing the source code. And you can confirm that 4 there means CC-BY in the 500px API documentation (being a bit pedantic, version 3.0 can be confirmed in the archived version of the 500px CC page). This is obviously a lot of work for confirming a license, which is why I created a page for each photograph with that data, eg. In all, the ArchiveTeam provided json files with all metadata scraped for each photo before the CC purge. There is no indication any photo has wrong license data, please warn me if any are found.

This all does not at all mean all photos marked with valid CC licenses in 500px are fine from a license perspective, FoP and other considerations may apply. And there are copyright violations that were uploaded directly to 500px. If there is no indication the author is different than the 500px uploader, it is safe to assume the license for the photograph is valid.

On a final note, 500px did indicate it would purge all photographs with CC licenses but did not do so, this seems to be in violation of the CC licenses, but only the authors may object to this. In fact if you go to the current page for this photo you can see the license snippet in the source code, complete with a link to the license. <a about="https://drscdn.500px.org/photo/199200911/q%3D80_m%3D2000/v2?webp=true&sig=51421b73dbd5c42c71736cd4ac48b2e511d4a4ff63fa645fa67a10b4265d195b" href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/" id="server_photo_cc_license" rel="license"></a> .

In all, this does seem to be a valid license for this photo and I do believe it should be restored. Chico Venancio (talk) 13:26, 30 August 2018 (UTC)


✓ Done: I've reviewed the source code of the archived page and I am convinced that this file was originally uploaded to 500px under the terms of the cc-by-3.0 licence by Adrian Eissler, and that this is is the same Adrian Eissler who operates wallpapercomputer.de. I believe the Archive Team correctly archived the page and that the import-500px tool (as mentioned at Commons:500px licensing data) has correctly identified the license in use at the time it was archived. —RP88 (talk) 23:07, 30 August 2018 (UTC)