User talk:Roy17/2010s

Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Roy17!

First steps tutorial

Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content).

You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki.

Getting help

More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump.

Goodies, tips, and tricks

Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your graphic abilities.
You can find the files you have uploaded in your Uploads.
Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~.
To link to an image page without embedding the image, type: [[:File:Foo.jpg]], which produces: File:Foo.jpg.
You may enable gadgets (custom features) for your account.
There are several tools to upload files.
Have you edited Wikipedia before? This guide might be useful.

Made a mistake?

Do you want to have a file renamed or moved? Use the move link and wait for an authorized user to rename it.
Do you want to have your recently uploaded picture removed? Tag it as {{speedy|reason here}}. For more information read the deletion guidelines.

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 07:38, 26 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

歸檔

Roy17/2010s

File:Liu Binyan photo montage and public speech recording.webm

File:Liu Binyan photo montage and public speech recording.webm has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: 严禁播出或重播 RFA 的任何音讯，再版RFA 网站或其九种语言服务网站的任何视频或图片资料。

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ Malti ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ தமிழ் ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 01:33, 22 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Canton (6796465390).jpg

File:Canton (6796465390).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Jcb (talk) 17:11, 19 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Bangla road Phuket.jpg

العربية ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская‎ ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ русский ∙ ไทย ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This file may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Bangla road Phuket.jpg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright.

Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Ronhjones ^(Talk) 23:14, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations, dear license reviewer

If you use the helper scripts, you will find the links next to the search box (vector) or as single tabs (monobook). They are named `license+` and `license-`.

Hi Roy17, thanks for your request for license reviewer status. The request has been closed as successful, and you've been added to the list of reviewers. You can now start reviewing files – please see Commons:License review and Commons:Flickr files if you haven't done so already. We also have a guide how to detect copyright violations. Potential backlogs include Flickr review and files from other sources. You can use one of the following scripts by adding one of the lines to your common.js:

importScript('User:ZooFari/licensereviewer.js'); // stable script for reviewing images from any kind of source OR

importScript('User:Majora/LicenseReview.js'); // contains also user notification when review fails, auto blacklist-check and auto-thank you message for Flickr-reviews.

Please feel free to join us on IRC: #wikimedia-commons ^webchat on irc.freenode.net. You can also add {{User license reviewer}} to your user page if you wish. Thank you for your contributions on Commons! 1989 (talk) 04:43, 13 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@廣九直通車, 1989, Gone Postal, and Davey2010: Thank you very much for your support and advice!--Roy17 (talk) 05:09, 13 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome Roy17, Congratulations on getting the LR tool :), Happy editing, –Davey2010^Talk 10:54, 13 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

By the way, I have made some improvements to the script. It is not ready to be published in any way shape or form, but you may take a look at what I have at User:Gone Postal/licensereviewer.js and User:Gone Postal/LicenceReview. One of the problems I tried to fix is that current script removes the information on what licence the file is actually being reviewed as, thus if the file is later relicenced, then the text "under the stated license" is wrong. What my script generates in the end looks like this. I wish you many trivial reviews. ℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ • ✍ ⏿) 06:01, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Image That Needs Deletion But First...

Hey Roy, I have an image that I borrowed from Flick on President Jiang Zemin that was not approved by the Commons for use because it "violated the Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 2.0 Generic (CC BY-NC-SA 2.0)." Here is the image:

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:President_Jiang_Zemin.jpg

However, before you delete this, this image somehow fits 2 out of the 3 requirements (attribution and sharealike), but what I assume it failed the requirement of noncommercial, which I do not understand. I do not get any money from uploading this and I do not sell it. All I wanted to provide a more quality image of Jiang Zemin to Wikipedia' infobox. But rules are rules, and I am new on Wikimedia Commons, so I guess, to remind you, to delete the image. Thanks. - -- Josephua (talk) 03:28, 26 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Josephua: You've asked Roy17, but I noticed your comment, so I'll answer non-the-less. You want to read COM:L. To put it simply we only allow files that others can use for any reason (and that specifically includes commercial use, modification, and distribution). ℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ • ✍ ⏿) 04:19, 26 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Josephua: You and Gone Postal are right. This photo of Jiang is not allowed here. You may read the page on licensing to know more. Jump to COM:L#Well-known_licenses for a quick overview. The image will be deleted soon by an COM:ADMIN.--Roy17 (talk) 07:35, 26 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

COM:AN/U#警告给予干预，大家一定小心Roy17此人。

Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ Tagalog ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ मराठी ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ العربية ∙ +/−

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at COM:AN/U#警告给予干预，大家一定小心Roy17此人。. This is in relation to an issue with which you may have been involved.

廣九直通車 (talk) 12:21, 1 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please help reviewing.

User:Alexis Jazz/DWDD archief

I rolled back your edit on File:Wereldwijde ophef om genetische modificatie in China.webm as Bing shows the license. - Alexis Jazz ^{ping plz} 17:07, 2 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I see there is some derivative work in the video. Hannolans can cut that out. Please confirm the Creative Commons license for the video before Bing expires and start a DR for the derivative work. - Alexis Jazz ^{ping plz} 17:14, 2 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Alexis Jazz: I saw the YTCC and could confirm anytime, but I cannot confirm the footage 0:19-1:09.--Roy17 (talk) 17:19, 2 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If Hannolans doesn't cut it I will. The same is true for any other DWDD video that contains non-free footage. Any license through Bing you can confirm is greatly appreciated. - Alexis Jazz ^{ping plz} 17:23, 2 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free footage from File:Wereldwijde ophef om genetische modificatie in China.webm has been cut. - Alexis Jazz ^{ping plz} 17:40, 2 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Wrong review template

Hello.I have noticed you are using {{Flickrreview}} instead of {{LicenseReview}} with images not from Flickr!Please correct the template name on these pages.Thanks ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2 (talk) 07:12, 5 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2: I could find 46 files with a frw signed by me. None of them is wrong. Could you please give me a link to problems you found? Thanks.--Roy17 (talk) 11:09, 5 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Example of correction.This file is not from Flickr ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2 (talk) 11:15, 5 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2: Yes I just found the file. Thanks for letting me know! Please include a link next time so that we could sort it out faster.--Roy17 (talk) 11:17, 5 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:Old Bridge (Heidelberg) monkey.jpg

Yours sincerely, Majora (talk) 14:56, 23 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Depicts testing

I noticed that you tried out depicts on Test-Commons. Please take a moment to let the developers know what you think, whether it's answering their direct questions, leaving your own feedback, or even noting if you don't have any feedback to give at this time. It would be much appreciated. Thanks. Keegan (WMF) (talk) 19:28, 27 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Google Earth images

Hi Roy17, I see that The Wikimedia Commons page File:Teror 1-2 (32430145457).jpg has been deleted on 8 April 2019 by Túrelio. I assume that clarification has been or will be received from Google Earth overriding the impression given by: https://www.google.com/permissions/geoguidelines/ that with proper attribution the file(s) are free to use and re-publish. Please advise so that I/we know for future applications. Bengt Nyman (talk) 07:14, 8 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Bengt Nyman: No, Google Earth is not free for any use and thus not compatible with COM:L. For example, when you click on the tab "Advertisements" on this page, it says You may not use Google Maps, Google Earth, or Street View imagery in print advertisements.--Roy17 (talk) 07:50, 8 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Roy17: Good to know. Thanks ! Bengt Nyman (talk) 08:55, 8 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Massey Ferguson 158 - Flickr - Joost J Bakker IJmuiden-crop.jpg

Hallo Roy17, kannst du mir bitte auf die Sprünge helfen, damit ich solche Fehler in Zukunft vermeiden kann. Bisher habe ich die vollständige Beschreibung des Originalbildes vollständig kopiert und für das bearbeitete Bild übernommen. Du hast jetzt die Quelle ausgetauscht gegen |Source={{ef| …}} und durch diese Maßnahme die Verlinkung mit dem Originalbild automatisch hergestellt? Dadurch wurde die Angabe von Retouched hinfällig? Die Angabe User:… kann dann auch wegfallen.

Stimmt das?

Aber bei dem Bild PierreJanet-crop.jpg hast du Retouched unten angehängt. Kannst du mir das bitte kurz erklären?

Vielen Dank, --LMU Dozent Medizin (talk) 18:05, 14 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@LMU Dozent Medizin: wenn du ein Bild geändert von anderen Bildern hochlädst, bitte immer schreib die Quelle als {{ef|Quelle.jpg}} . Danach kann man wissen, wenn die Lizenz korrekt ist.

Du sollst nicht die Vorlagen {{Flickrreview}}, {{Licencereview}}, uzw. kopieren, wenn du kein License Reviewer bist.

Zum Beispiel File:There's no crying in baseball! (4549295140) 2.jpg ist fast identisch mit File:There's no crying in baseball! (4549295140).jpg. Deine Beiträge können wegen Duplikaten gelöscht werden, wenn die andere Benutzer die Untershied nicht sehen. Du kannst {{Retouched}} benutzen. Grüße!--Roy17 (talk) 19:58, 14 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Feliz2019.jpg

File:Feliz2019.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Эlcobbola _talk 11:18, 5 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

University of Calgary Photos

Hi, you attached deletion tags to several U of C related photos for some reason. They are available for public use and I have explicit written permission from the copyright holders to use them on Wikipedia. Please remove the tags ASAP. Shahroze (talk) 22:58, 9 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A Barnstar for You!

		The Copyright inspector Barnstar
		For your work on Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by David290, you really did a great job!廣九直通車 (talk) 10:20, 10 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Need your presence at Featured video candidates

		We request the honor of your presence at Featured video candidates
		Dear Roy17, Featured video candidates needs your help and you can participate by reviewing or nominating your videos for the FV tag. You can start reviewing/nominating videos now. Welcome! -- Eatcha (Talk-Page ) 20:53, 12 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ephesus Ancient City - Celsus Library 4K.webm is actually cc-by, check the URL on archive.org

Hi!

thumb|center|400px|You marked this file for speedy deletion, but if you go here: https://web.archive.org/web/20180426041828/https://vimeo.com/180284772 and select 'View Source' of the page, you can see that the author had released the file under cc-by 3.0 in 2018, and has switched the license. Cc-by licenses are irrevocable as far as I know? VGrigas (WMF) (talk) 21:39, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@VGrigas (WMF): yes you're right, CC licenses are irrevocable. Could you please add the archived pages to your unreviewed uploads? That will help reviewers a lot. Thank you!--Roy17 (talk) 13:40, 29 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Paris Saint-Germain crest.svg

File:Paris Saint-Germain crest.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Yann (talk) 08:44, 8 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mahjong n w s e.png

File:Mahjong n w s e.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Yann (talk) 09:04, 8 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:HK Trappist Dairy Fresh Milk 3.jpg

File:HK Trappist Dairy Fresh Milk 3.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Yann (talk) 15:24, 8 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:七一大遊行 (34846204964).jpg

File:七一大遊行 (34846204964).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Yann (talk) 15:50, 8 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Bot?

Hi, User talk:ZuoBot redirects here, so I assume that account has been created by you. Now we have a problem: If this account is a bot account, it has to be approved. If it isn't the account's user name is misleading and has to be changed. Why did User:ZuoBot remove license reviews? Is it triggerd by Special:AbuseFilter/70? --Achim (talk) 18:12, 25 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Achim55: bots dont have to be approved.--Roy17 (talk) 18:24, 25 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Citing: If you want to run a bot on Commons, you must get permission first. Or more in detail from COM:BOTS: All bots running on Wikimedia Commons must have advance permission to do so. Permission is needed whether or not the bot requires a bot flag. --Achim (talk) 18:40, 25 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Achim55: Oh I didnt pay attention to this part. I wont use it any longer for now. I will probably create another account to handle massive VFC/Cat-a-lot jobs.--Roy17 (talk) 18:49, 25 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Roy, I don't block your bot account for now, you can request permission per the operator should normally be asked to submit a retrospective bot request if you like. However, before doing so User:ZuoBot should have an "own user page". Best, --Achim (talk) 19:08, 25 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Achim55: Those reviews were license reviews by a non-image-reviewer. - Alexis Jazz ^{ping plz} 12:42, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Testing structured data

I saw that you tried out using other statements on Test-Commons. If you get a moment, could you please let the development team know how it went for you? Even if everything was fine and you do not have anything to say, that's good feedback to have as well. Thanks, happy editing to you. Keegan (WMF) (talk) 16:27, 26 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:La Cathédrale engloutie - Claude Debussy - performed by Ivan Ilic.ogg

这回到我打扰您了（因为我一直都不太清楚音频档的版权究竟是什么东西）。最近我接到File:La Cathédrale engloutie - Claude Debussy - performed by Ivan Ilic.ogg的工单，关于一首德布西（1862-1918）的演奏，而该曲在1910年出版。说实话当时又有人说Phonogram producer rights owned by Paraty.，究竟是什么东西？其实该曲的作曲还有没有进入公有领域？感谢指导。廣九直通車 (talk) 13:32, 18 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@廣九直通車: 您客氣了。我啥都不懂，憑常識和自己讀條文理解而已。 XD

Debussy 1918年去世，公有領域。

提刪的人提出按照那個羅馬公約 https://wipolex.wipo.int/en/text/289757 ，具體應該是第10條，「Producers of phonograms shall enjoy the right to authorize or prohibit the direct or indirect reproduction of their phonograms.」，意思是錄音母帶的製作人享有授權/禁止所擁有的母板的複製？

那個自稱鋼琴師的IP，說其實他是母帶的擁有人，他授權唱片公司Paraty發行而已，而該授權已過期了？我猜只要證明了鋼琴師本人擁有母帶的權利而文件由鋼琴師本人授權上傳即可？

如果鋼琴師無權處置母帶的話，那麼很可能應當刪除。我只想到一種可能不刪。法國已ratify羅馬公約。但法國版權法具體有何規定？有沒有和羅馬公約衝突（比如法國版權法可能沒有說/禁止錄音者也享有權利）？萬一有衝突，羅馬公約凌駕法國版權法嗎？鋼琴師不擁有母帶但依然不刪文件的可能就是法國版權法抵觸羅馬公約，規定只有表演者有權，而羅馬公約不凌駕。我不會法文，不曉得，但估計這可能性太小了。--Roy17 (talk) 23:19, 18 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

感谢您的指导！廣九直通車 (talk) 10:34, 19 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

PLA

中国人民解放军, 英文: People's Liberation Army of China 或者 Chinese people's liberation army, 缩写: PLA （http://eng.mod.gov.cn/news/2019-09/06/content_4849920.htm） --Tyg728 (talk) 15:23, 11 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Adminship

Hi, Are you interested in becoming an admin on Commons? If so, you can self-nominate yourself, or I can nominate you for the role. Please let me know, Thanks. 4nn1l2 (talk) 14:35, 29 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@4nn1l2: thank you very much for your trust! I am keen on helping out with maintenance, but now is probably not a right moment. I cannot set aside too much time for wikis. Besides, I often find myself too forthright and have argued with many people. I think I might wait till 2020. :) --Roy17 (talk) 15:39, 29 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

OK. If you think that being nominated is better or more honorable than self-nomination, feel free to drop me a line. I will be glad to nominate honest and forthright users for adminship. 4nn1l2 (talk) 16:18, 29 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Pole of inaccessibility

Hi, I can't recall now. I checked Henry Cookson's Flickr and it's not there, so I must've found it elsewhere. Szczureq (talk) 05:16, 1 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File tagging File:黃英豪2019.png

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:黃英豪2019.png. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

shizhao (talk) 02:27, 21 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:黃英豪2019.png

File:黃英豪2019.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

- Alexis Jazz ^{ping plz} 21:06, 21 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome, Dear Rollbacker!

I've granted your request for rollback rights here on Wikimedia Commons. Please feel free to contact me with any questions. Regards. FitIndia ^{Talk Mail} 02:57, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Details please

Hi. You are right, it's a mistake: image has previously been published here and here and credited to Tessa Szyszkowitz. Yours, --Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:40, 10 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Юлія Клименко.jpg

File:Юлія Клименко.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: https://gordonua.com/news/politics/zamministra-ekonomiki-klimenko-takzhe-podaet-v-otstavku-118389.html

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ Malti ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ தமிழ் ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Patrick Rogel (talk) 13:11, 13 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

20191119

Good morning Roy17. My name is Valerio Loi and I am a personal collaborator of Renato Soru. Before being his personal collaborator I was his parliamentary assistant during his term as MEP (visible on linkedin). Every photo I try to insert in the changes of Renato Soru's page (which I have been trying to correct for more than a month because full of errors and false statements) is rejected, but every photo I try to put is owned by Renato Soru and I have his approval. I ask you at this point the courtesy to give me some help for setting up the photo I just put, supplied to me by Renato Soru, and for the official publication of the page with the corrections I made. I thank you in advance and wish you a good day. --MarcovalerioLoi (talk) 09:17, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@MarcovalerioLoi: hello, please follow COM:CONSENT to properly release photos that had been published elsewhere.--Roy17 (talk) 13:08, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You passed license review of a Ted video ? I have some concerns

File:Kees Moeliker, How a dead duck changed my life.webm's source appears to dubious, the real source appears to be https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vUQLN4o63SY

I don't have enough knowledge about LR but I am Damm sure Ted video are never CC licensed. Sorry if I missed anything, and I am wrong. Best, Eatcha (talk) 13:17, 20 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Eatcha:

https://www.ted.com/about/conferences/past-teds/ted2013-talent-search -> click TED@Amsterdam -> https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLF1961F783A9ECB87 -> 10th video https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Nr3wgHJWRdQ -> the file -> youtube CC.
your link vUQLN4o63SY is not the same video.--Roy17 (talk) 13:48, 20 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Google Code-In 2019 is coming - please mentor some documentation tasks!

Hello,

Google Code-In, Google-organized contest in which the Wikimedia Foundation participates, starts in a few weeks. This contest is about taking high school students into the world of opensource. I'm sending you this message because you recently edited a documentation page at Wikimedia Commons.

I would like to ask you to take part in Google Code-In as a mentor. That would mean to prepare at least one task (it can be documentation related, or something else - the other categories are Code, Design, Quality Assurance and Outreach) for the participants, and help the student to complete it. Please sign up at the contest page and send us your Google account address to google-code-in-admins@lists.wikimedia.org, so we can invite you in!

From my own experience, Google Code-In can be fun, you can make several new friends, attract new people to your wiki and make them part of your community.

If you have any questions, please let us know at google-code-in-admins@lists.wikimedia.org.

Thank you!

--User:Martin Urbanec (talk) 22:04, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Possible additional list

Hi, do you mind taking a look at User:Faebot/SandboxZ?

I am considering mass adding uploads by these accounts to the Anon HK category, but you may be able to see patterns that don't fit. What I am struggling with is that these additional accounts go through to the current day, which makes me wonder if the matching is pulling in different photographers with the same kit and behaviour. Fæ (talk) 03:26, 25 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Fæ: I apologise for messing up your table. I wanted to get a link to the photowalls. I did it without transcluding templates here instead special:permalink/377818687.

I checked the first five accounts for each year. Pretty sure most if not all is him. (My intuition tells me he's more probably a guy rather than a lady.)

His characteristics are consistent in these accounts, even though some only have one or just a few uploads:

Photos mainly from HK (90+% ?), the rest from neighbouring countries.
Very often file names start with abbreviations of the country, e.g. HK, TW.
Same camera used in the same period. In 2006 was a RICOH Caplio R2.
Photographic style is consistent. Most photos are appropriately exposed and focused, clearly conveying the message, but he's not very picky about angles/composition such that many are slightly slanted or have edges of subjects cut off.
Sometimes, more commonly in recent years, he uploads similar composed shots of the same item.
Photos most commonly depict streets, buildings, sceneries, foods, interior deco, all sorts of items, but very rarely humans.
Titles chiefly written in English, but order of words follows Chinese convention, that is, writing concepts from general to specific. For example, country + region + road + location + item.
For batch uploads, file names are almost always using identical strings + sequence numbers.
In later years, he started to mix Chinese in titles. The Chinese phrase matches the English phrase preceding or succeeding it.
Description style is similar to titles. In addition, he likes to add raw interwiki links ([[:en:XYZ]] [[:zh:甲乙丙丁]]).
He uses abbreviations known to HKers but not to other people in titles and descriptions, such as TST for Tsim Sha Tsui, TM for Tuen Mun.
Adds a lot of cats. Common pattern is month yyyy in location, even if the location is as specific as a restaurant. Another common pattern is subject - topic, e.g. Category:Garden Company - Products Category:Garden Company - Signs. He would create the cat pages.
He has no regard for FOP or DW restrictions, sometimes uploading photos of 2D artworks, posters, pamphlets, etc.
Sometimes, he creates a userpage, which is a simple gallery of all his uploads.
On rare occasions, he adds his photos to Chinese, Cantonese, or English wikis.--Roy17 (talk) 14:13, 25 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the feedback. The matching is definitely not perfect, as the inclusion of User:B-LCB A320 demonstrates. Faebot is all set up to go, so I'll let it run with this list. I have a script to find and remove photos by a specific account if other exceptions pop-up, however, the matches seem genuinely very good at this point. There are more subtle ways of examining the files, using the information only found by downloading and testing each file rather than pulling database reports. However as we are not attempting a real "forensic" level of analysis, that does not seem worth the extra volunteer time.

As a courtesy I'll be blanking SandboxZ, but the table is in the history if anyone wants to review it again. --Fæ (talk) 14:20, 25 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Fæ: many thanks for you pulling this together! I believe your script identifying this user's works does not do any damage but rather actually help the community appreciate this photographer's contributions. He's like Vivian Maier of HK of our time.

If the photographer happens to read this, I'd like to say thank you! Please dont be scared, and please continue to upload more!--Roy17 (talk) 14:32, 25 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Can you give me some help?

Hello Roy17, I encountered a claim "which has already been stripped of its sound-track, is useless" per Túrelio, However, That seems nonsense, there is no requirement that uploaded video on Commons must include sound, and Commons doesn't necessarily require files on Commons must be used in Wikimedia projects (If Files uploaded on Commons are must be used in Wikimedia projects then there is no motive to maintain free-license requirements on Commons, because free license files can also be used outside of Wikimedia projects.) .. Puramyun31 (talk) 12:52, 9 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

MOTD Notification

⭐ A file you uploaded is on the main page! ⭐

File:How To Dim Sum - A Beginner's Guide.webm, that you uploaded, is on the main page today. Thank you for your contributions to this project.

//EatchaBot (talk) 00:03, 18 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

MOTD Notification

⭐ A file you uploaded is on the main page! ⭐

File:Leipzig Hauptbahnhof Time Lapse with iPhone 4s 2012.webm, that you uploaded, is on the main page today. Thank you for your contributions to this project.

//EatchaBot (talk) 00:03, 19 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

MOTD Notification

⭐ A file you uploaded is on the main page! ⭐

File:Desh and Parwin - A Punjabi Wedding in Singapore.webm, that you uploaded, is on the main page today. Thank you for your contributions to this project.

//EatchaBot (talk) 00:03, 20 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

MOTD Notification

⭐ A file you uploaded is on the main page! ⭐

File:Timelapse and Aerial of Canton 2014.webm, that you uploaded, is on the main page today. Thank you for your contributions to this project.

//EatchaBot (talk) 00:03, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome, Dear Filemover!

العربيَّة ∙ Deutsch ∙ español ∙ English ∙ français ∙ português ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（中国大陆）‎ ∙ 中文（台灣）‎ ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ +/−

Hi Roy17, you're now a filemover. When moving files please respect the following advice:

Use the CommonsDelinker link in the {{Rename}} template to order a bot to replace all ocurrences of the old title with the new one. Or, if there was no rename-request, please use the Move & Replace-tab.
Please leave a redirect behind unless you have a valid reason not to do so. Other projects, including those using InstantCommons, might be using the file even though they don't show up in the global usage. Deleting the redirects would break their file references. Please see this section of the file rename guideline for more information.
Please know and follow the file rename guidelines.

-- ~riley (talk) 00:10, 31 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

User talk:Roy17/2010s

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Bangla road Phuket.jpg

Congratulations, dear license reviewer

Image That Needs Deletion But First...

COM:AN/U#警告给予干预，大家一定小心Roy17此人。

Please help reviewing.

Wrong review template

Notification about possible deletion

Depicts testing

Google Earth images

File:Massey Ferguson 158 - Flickr - Joost J Bakker IJmuiden-crop.jpg

University of Calgary Photos

A Barnstar for You!

Need your presence at Featured video candidates

Ephesus Ancient City - Celsus Library 4K.webm is actually cc-by, check the URL on archive.org

Bot?

Testing structured data

PLA

Adminship

Pole of inaccessibility

File tagging File:黃英豪2019.png

Welcome, Dear Rollbacker!

Details please

20191119

You passed license review of a Ted video ? I have some concerns

Google Code-In 2019 is coming - please mentor some documentation tasks!

Possible additional list

Can you give me some help?

Welcome, Dear Filemover!

Navigation menu

Search