Commons:Návrhy na nejlepší obrázky
- Na této stránce najdete obrázky navržené na zařazení mezi nejlepší obrázky. Vemte prosím na vědomí, že nejlepší obrázky nejsou totéž jako obrázek dne.
- Výsledky starších hlasování naleznete v archivu.
- Obnovení stránky: purge this page's cache
Formální záležitosti
[edit]Nominace
[edit]Jestliže jste přesvědčeni, že některý obrázek nahraný na Commons má hodnotu, která by ho opravňovala k zařazení mezi nejlepší obrázky, potom ho prosím přidejte. Můžete navrhnout obrázek, jehož jste autorem, ale i obrázek od kohokoli jiného. Předtím, než obrázek nominujete, zkontrolujte, že je řádně popsán a opatřen správnou licencí.
- 1) zkopírujte název obrázku do tohoto pole, například: Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Váš obrázek.jpg. Potom klikněte na tlačítko "vytvořit novou nominaci".
- 2) postupujte podle pokynů na stránce
- 3) ručně vložite odkaz na vytvořenou stránku nahoru na Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list: klikněte zde, a přidejte následující řádek na začátek seznamu nominací: {{Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Váš obrázek.jpg}}
Hlasování
[edit]Prosím hlasujte použitím příslušného slova ve vaší řeči či použitím šablon uvedených níže:
- Pro - Yes, Sim, Ja, Oui, Sí, Kyllä, 支持, Ano...
- Proti - No, Não, Nein, Non, Ei, 反对, Ne...
Alternativně můžete použít šablony {{Oppose}}( Oppose) a {{Support}}(
Support). Své sympatie k obrázku můžete vyjádřit pomocí šablony {{I love}}(
Support) a svůj neutrální postoj pomocí šablony {{Neutral}}(
Neutral).
Zkuste přidat pár slov o tom, proč se vám obrázek líbí nebo nelíbí, obzvláště pokud hlasujete proti.
Pravidla pro výběr nejlepších obrázků
[edit]- 14denní hlasovací období. Výsledek hlasování bude vyhodnocen 15. den po nominaci.
- Jsou vítány i nominace od anonymních příspěvatelů.
- Příspěvky do diskuse od anonymních příspěvatelů jsou vítány.
- Hlasy anonymních přispěvatelů se nepočítají.
- Nominace se nepočítá jako hlasování. Podpora musí být výslovně vyjádřena.
- Mějte na paměti, že Wikimedia Commons má sloužit jako centrální úložiště svobodných obrázků, které mohou být využity všemi projekty Wikimedia, včetně možných budoucích projektů. Nejde pouze o sbírku obrázků pro wikipedii, navržené obrázky by tedy neměly být posuzovány z hlediska jejich vhodnosti pro tento projekt.
Navržený obrázek bude zařazen na seznam nejlepších obrázků, pokud splní následující podmínky:
- Odpovídající licence (to je samozřejmé)
- Nejméně 5 hlasů na jeho podporu
- Poměr hlasů pro/proti přinejmenším 2:1 (dvoutřetinová většina, tj. přinejmenším 67 % hlasů pro)
Návod na zpracování starých nominací je na stránce Template talk:Featured pictures candidates#What to do after voting is finished.
Kandidáti na vyřazení ze seznamu nejlepších obrázků
[edit]Požadavky na nejlepší obrázky se postupně vyvíjejí. Můžeme dojít k závěru, že některé obrázky, které byly původně "dost dobré", už nevyhovují současným požadavkům.
Zde můžete uvést obrázky, které si podle vás už nezaslouží patřit mezi nejlepší obrázky. Pro vyřazení je třeba 2/3 většina hlasů a minimálně 5 hlasů pro vyřazení. V opačném případě obrázek zůstane zařazen mezi nejlepšími obrázky. Hlasujte pomocí šablon {{Keep}} Keep (zasluhuje si i nadále být mezi nejlepšími obrázky) nebo {{Delist}}
Delist (měl by být ze seznamu vyřazen). Uveďte prosím odkaz na původní nominaci mezi nejlepší obrázky (ta je uvedena na stránce s popiskem obrázku). Jinak platí stejná pravidla jako při hlasování o kandidátech na nejlepší obrázky.
Pro návrh obrázku na vyřazení ze seznamu nejlepších obrázků prosím použijte následující šablonu, kde v řádku za předdefinovaný zápis, za dvojtečku doplňte název obrázku nominovaného k vyřazení:
Nová stránka návrhu na vyřazení by měla obsahovat:
- Informace o původu obrázku (autor, kdo jej náhrál, případně odkud byl obrázek převzat).
- Odkaz na záznam nominace / hlasování (je uveden na stránce obrázku).
- Důvod návrhu vyřazení.
Po tomto je nutno ručně vložit odkaz nahoru na stránku Commons:Featured picture candidates/removal.
Obrázky navržené za nejlepší obrázky
[edit]Featured picture candidates
[edit]Voting period ends on 9 Jul 2024 at 15:03:39 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Natural phenomena#Sun
Info Lonely fishermen crossing the Doce River under the sunset. Created, uploaded and nominated by ★ -- ★ 15:03, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
Support -- ★ 15:03, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 9 Jul 2024 at 10:08:22 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors
Info Belgrade Waterfront, view to Sava River from shoping center Galerija. My shot. -- Mile (talk) 10:08, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
Support -- Mile (talk) 10:08, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
Comment Some very strange distortions on water, sky, people etc. - was it taken through glass? Charlesjsharp (talk) 10:37, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
Comment Well distiortions, banding, strange reflextins in sky are result of glass, cant you see its glass window in front. Glass buidling. --Mile (talk) 10:53, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
- I assumed it was; that's explains it. Charlesjsharp (talk) 11:40, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
Support — Rhododendrites talk | 14:11, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 14:54, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
Support El Golli Mohamed 15:00, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 9 Jul 2024 at 09:19:21 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants#Order_:_Poales
Info created and uploaded and nominated by XRay -- XRay 💬 09:19, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
Support -- XRay 💬 09:19, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
Question What about a small cw rotation? Charlesjsharp (talk) 10:38, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
Support But needs a rotation El Golli Mohamed 15:02, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 8 Jul 2024 at 19:41:25 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals#Family : Cercopithecidae (Old World Monkeys)
Info All by Charlesjsharp-- Charlesjsharp (talk) 19:41, 29 June 2024 (UTC)
Support -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 19:41, 29 June 2024 (UTC)
Support You outdid yourself with this one; what a shot! Wolverine XI 19:44, 29 June 2024 (UTC)
Support Beautiful. --Zzzs (talk) 20:25, 29 June 2024 (UTC)
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 23:54, 29 June 2024 (UTC)
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 01:11, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
Support Ermell (talk) 05:29, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
Oppose But crop is weird, position of head in the middle.--Mile (talk) 08:38, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
- I don't like the suggested crop. Charlesjsharp (talk) 09:03, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
Support Appealing weather and the composition is fine in my view. The monkey is oriented to the right, so lead room to that direction makes sense -- Basile Morin (talk) 12:05, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:27, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 8 Jul 2024 at 09:22:21 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Other#Sweden
Info Helgumannen is a fishing station near the nature reserve of Langhammars at Fårö island (Gotland, Sweden). Created, uploaded and nominated by -- ArildV (talk) 09:22, 29 June 2024 (UTC)
Support -- ArildV (talk) 09:22, 29 June 2024 (UTC)
Support El Golli Mohamed 11:07, 29 June 2024 (UTC)
Oppose Too far. Wolverine XI 19:45, 29 June 2024 (UTC)
Comment Just some info about this place. Fårö is known worldwide for its stark, desolate and minimalist limestone beaches. This photo captures that perfectly with the simple fishing huts and one lone person. This is where Ingmar Bergman lived and made many of his films. He came to the island when he was scouting for locations, fell in love with the place and stayed the rest of his life. This is about as quintessential Fårö as you can get in a photo. --Cart (talk) 21:34, 29 June 2024 (UTC)
Support agree with Cart. --SHB2000 (talk) 23:55, 29 June 2024 (UTC)
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 01:12, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
Support For me, the photo exudes a certain loneliness, partly thanks to the woman on the left.--Famberhorst (talk) 05:01, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
Support --Ermell (talk) 05:19, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
Neutral To be honest, the composition doesn't appeal to me. The horizon in the middle and too many empty spaces are not advantageous. --XRay 💬 09:08, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
Support --Thi (talk) 09:33, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
Question 2x4 crop? Charlesjsharp (talk) 10:38, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:26, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
Support --Berthold Werner (talk) 15:41, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
File:Penutupan Para Asian Games 2018.jpg (delist)
[edit]Voting period ends on 8 Jul 2024 at 05:04:08
Info created by RaiyaniM - uploaded by RaiyaniM - (Original nomination)
Commons:Featured pictures/Historical
Delist -- There were well-reasoned opposes at the last FPC. I'm not sure how this one got by. Photos need to be sharp! ( Schierbecker (talk) 05:01, 29 June 2024 (UTC)
Keep --Yann (talk) 10:28, 29 June 2024 (UTC)
Keep Wow > Sharpness. Period. ★ 10:29, 29 June 2024 (UTC)
Keep The wow replaces the quality in this image (I learned the hard way). This is FP, not QI. --Zzzs (talk) 12:15, 29 June 2024 (UTC)
Keep -- Karelj (talk) 13:03, 29 June 2024 (UTC)
Delist "Wow"—however you define it—is not everything. Wolverine XI 19:48, 29 June 2024 (UTC)
Keep per Zzzs. --SHB2000 (talk) 23:55, 29 June 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 8 Jul 2024 at 04:48:22 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Historical#2000-2009
Info created by Andy Dunaway/U.S. Army - uploaded and nominated by Schierbecker -- Schierbecker (talk) 04:48, 29 June 2024 (UTC)
Support -- It doesn't get more "danger close" than this. Schierbecker (talk) 04:48, 29 June 2024 (UTC)
Support --Yann (talk) 10:27, 29 June 2024 (UTC)
Oppose I will not support a photo showing a bombing killing humans. The atrocious images in the news are already unbearable. El Golli Mohamed (talk) 12:35, 29 June 2024 (UTC)
- The fact that this image was nominated in the first place is mind-boggling. Wolverine XI 19:55, 29 June 2024 (UTC)
Comment I agree with El Golli Mohamed. Charlesjsharp (talk) 19:43, 29 June 2024 (UTC)
Oppose I know we also have other grizzly images (not linking them now because I want to have a good night's sleep) and stuff, but this is too far. I'm not going to examine the details of this image for quality, but this nomination is unethical. --Zzzs (talk) 20:23, 29 June 2024 (UTC)
Comment The problem of this picture is not the subject. Visit the top prizes of photojournalist competitions in famous newspapers and you will find many striking images of this kind. Also in wildlife. COM:FPC is not a care bears platform, and fortunately we have already promoted several FPs of bombings (example) in the past. But here, the quality, the wow factor and the light are not exceptional in my opinion -- Basile Morin (talk) 03:12, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
- Yes, but atomic bomb tests killed people indirectly through radiation sickness not well understood at the time. It may not be relevant, but the nominator is a great admirer of US Armed Forces. Charlesjsharp (talk) 10:44, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
- FPC guidelines: "The meaning of the image should be judged according to the cultural context of the image, not by the cultural context of the observer. An image "speaks" to people, and it has the capacity to evoke emotion such as tenderness, rage, rejection, happiness, sadness, etc. Good photographs are not limited to evoking pleasant sensation" -- Basile Morin (talk) 12:09, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
- And the vote takes into account the context of the observer. Given that the nominator is a great admirer of the US Armes Forces, I don't really think that he wants to evoke rejection or sadness through his image. El Golli Mohamed (talk) 14:33, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
- Having a user on Commons who has a special interest in military matters is useful. That means he can dig through piles of such images for the best ones and nominate them here, and we don't need to see at all those depressing images. --Cart (talk) 15:38, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
- And the vote takes into account the context of the observer. Given that the nominator is a great admirer of the US Armes Forces, I don't really think that he wants to evoke rejection or sadness through his image. El Golli Mohamed (talk) 14:33, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
- FPC guidelines: "The meaning of the image should be judged according to the cultural context of the image, not by the cultural context of the observer. An image "speaks" to people, and it has the capacity to evoke emotion such as tenderness, rage, rejection, happiness, sadness, etc. Good photographs are not limited to evoking pleasant sensation" -- Basile Morin (talk) 12:09, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
- Yes, but atomic bomb tests killed people indirectly through radiation sickness not well understood at the time. It may not be relevant, but the nominator is a great admirer of US Armed Forces. Charlesjsharp (talk) 10:44, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
Support Per Basile. --Podzemnik (talk) 03:51, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
Oppose also per Basile. :) — Rhododendrites talk | 14:14, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
Comment I come back to my old standpoint that a really good encyclopedia needs good images for all articles, however distasteful they are, not just cute or nice things. Cruelties need to be shown correctly too. This photo is good in that it shows how bleak, colorless and depressing this kind of destruction is. Compare with what the news show from Gaza and Ukraine. Unfortunately, most of us have been brainwashed by movies and games to think that war should look "exciting" like this: Hollywood version. --Cart (talk) 15:01, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
- I will vote for this image as a VI to illustrate articles but not as FP with a "wow" of admiration. El Golli Mohamed (talk) 15:08, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
- I don't think anyone here would vote in admiration of this. There can also be a "wow" in the very accuracy of an image. There is a language barrier here in thinking that "wow" is only defined in a positive way. There can also be "wow" for the skill off the photographer to capture something difficult very accurately. "Wow" is the ability for a photo to evoke emotion (good or bad) in the viewer. --Cart (talk) 15:13, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 8 Jul 2024 at 04:33:41 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Natural#Netherlands Groningen.
Info Waterfall. Location, Chinese garden, the Hidden Realm of Ming in the Hortus Haren in the Netherlands. Belichtingstijd 8/1 sec (8) F-getal f/7,1 ISO/ASA-waarde 100
All by -- Famberhorst (talk) 04:33, 29 June 2024 (UTC)Support -- Famberhorst (talk) 04:33, 29 June 2024 (UTC)
Support El Golli Mohamed 11:08, 29 June 2024 (UTC)
NumerousNeutral
chromatic aberrations at the top of the image, but I could be wrong since I'm not a professional. --Zzzs (talk) 12:21, 29 June 2024 (UTC)
Done. chromatic aberration resolved. Thanks for the review.--Famberhorst (talk) 17:47, 29 June 2024 (UTC)
Support given the CAs have been removed. --SHB2000 (talk) 23:56, 29 June 2024 (UTC)
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 01:12, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
Comment I would crop the sky above.--Mile (talk) 08:36, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
Question Do you mean, remove all the air or a small strip?--Famberhorst (talk) 15:40, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
- Weak
Support Nice image. Just an idea: Use a short flash during the long exposure. So you can see some water drops. --XRay 💬 09:10, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 7 Jul 2024 at 22:22:33 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family : Muscicapidae (Old World Flycatchers)
Info created by El Golli Mohamed - uploaded by El Golli Mohamed - nominated by El Golli Mohamed -- El Golli Mohamed (talk) 22:22, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
Support -- El Golli Mohamed (talk) 22:22, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 03:11, 29 June 2024 (UTC)
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 09:47, 29 June 2024 (UTC)
Support crisp. --SHB2000 (talk) 23:56, 29 June 2024 (UTC)
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 04:58, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
Support Ermell (talk) 07:52, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
Support --XRay 💬 09:10, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
Support -- Ivar (talk) 11:02, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
Support — Rhododendrites talk | 14:15, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:24, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 7 Jul 2024 at 21:06:34 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds #Family : Meropidae (Bee-eaters)
Info created by El Golli Mohamed - uploaded by El Golli Mohamed - nominated by El Golli Mohamed -- El Golli Mohamed (talk) 21:06, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
Support -- El Golli Mohamed (talk) 21:06, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 03:11, 29 June 2024 (UTC)
Comment We don't need two so similar. If you prefer this one, can I suggest you nominate your exisitng FP for deletion. Charlesjsharp (talk) 08:24, 29 June 2024 (UTC)
- No, it is a different image and in many cases we find in the FP galleries several FP images of the same species.. El Golli Mohamed (talk) 10:19, 29 June 2024 (UTC)
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 09:47, 29 June 2024 (UTC)
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 23:56, 29 June 2024 (UTC)
Support --XRay 💬 09:10, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:23, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 7 Jul 2024 at 19:28:59 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Arachnida#Family : Araneidae (Orb-weaver Spiders)
Info The web decoration (Stabilimentum) of Argiope spiders changes as the females get older (and bigger). This FP looks like it's a juvenile Argiope flavipalpis. All by Charlesjsharp -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 19:28, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
Support -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 19:28, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
Support --Mounir TOUZRI (talk) 21:38, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
Oppose overexposed, some part have burned out. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:45, 29 June 2024 (UTC)
- I agree with Christian, Poco a poco (talk) 09:07, 29 June 2024 (UTC)
Oppose I second Christian, sorry Charles. --Zzzs (talk) 12:45, 29 June 2024 (UTC)
- OK
I withdraw my nomination Charlesjsharp (talk) 19:35, 29 June 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 7 Jul 2024 at 17:31:23 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Fungi#Family : Strophariaceae
Info created by Plozessor - uploaded by Plozessor - nominated by Plozessor -- Plozessor (talk) 17:31, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
Comment Gallery? --Zzzs (talk) 17:33, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
Comment Sorry, fixed. --Plozessor (talk) 17:35, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
Support: very busy composition, but it works somehow. --The Cosmonaut (talk) 03:12, 29 June 2024 (UTC)
Support --Berthold Werner (talk) 07:46, 29 June 2024 (UTC)
Support El Golli Mohamed 11:10, 29 June 2024 (UTC)
Support --XRay 💬 09:11, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 7 Jul 2024 at 04:11:33 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors/Germany#Rhineland-Palatinate
Info Trier, view from the Petrisberg on the city of Trier. Particularly at the Cathedral of St. Peter and the Dom.
All by -- Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 04:11, 28 June 2024 (UTC)Support -- Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 04:11, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
Oppose Unfavorable weather conditions. With the mist in the background, the main subject seems to be the white building popping up in the foreground -- Basile Morin (talk) 11:38, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
Oppose Sorry, per Basile. --Milseburg (talk) 14:28, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
Oppose The visibility is very poor. Wolverine XI 19:57, 29 June 2024 (UTC)
I withdraw my nomination I thought the fog in December suited the mood of the image. But apparently I was wrong about that. Thanks everyone for the comments.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 05:29, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
File:Pez payaso común (Amphiprion ocellaris) en una anémona magnífica (Heteractis magnifica), Anilao, Filipinas, 2023-08-22, DD 08.jpg
[edit]Voting period ends on 6 Jul 2024 at 20:28:31 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Fish#Family_:_Pomacentridae_(Clownfish_and_Damselfish)
Info Ocellaris clownfish (Amphiprion ocellaris) in a magnificent sea anemone (Heteractis magnifica), Anilao, Philippines. c/u/n by Poco a poco (talk) 20:28, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 20:28, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
Support Found him. --Zzzs (talk) 21:16, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
Support Fish Are Friends. Not Food. -- Radomianin (talk) 21:38, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
- Except sharks 🦈 :-) Basile Morin (talk) 03:06, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
- Finding Nemo? Wolverine XI 19:58, 29 June 2024 (UTC)
- Except sharks 🦈 :-) Basile Morin (talk) 03:06, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
Support --Mounir TOUZRI (talk) 21:43, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 02:29, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
Support Light, color and carpet -- Basile Morin (talk) 03:06, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
Support --Ermell (talk) 05:32, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
Support --C messier (talk) 06:23, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:30, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
Support--Terragio67 (talk) 07:46, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
Support —Bruce1eetalk 08:31, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
Support --نعيم قربوسي (talk) 09:41, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 14:12, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
Support You just found Neno! ★ 14:43, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 05:00, 29 June 2024 (UTC)
Support - Екатерина Борисова (talk) 01:48, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
Support --XRay 💬 09:12, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 6 Jul 2024 at 19:03:49 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family_:_Leiothrichidae_(Laughingthrushes)
Info created & uploaded by JJ Harrison – nominated by Ivar (talk) 19:03, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
Support -- Ivar (talk) 19:03, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
Support Outstanding. Bird POTY. Charlesjsharp (talk) 20:28, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
Strong support I concur with Charles --Zzzs (talk) 20:48, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
Support Harmonious in every way; words are actually superfluous. -- Radomianin (talk) 21:31, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
Support --Mounir TOUZRI (talk) 21:48, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 02:29, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
Support Color and composition -- Basile Morin (talk) 03:08, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
Support Striking colours and composition, exceptionally detailed. --Tagooty (talk) 03:09, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
Support Ermell (talk) 05:33, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:31, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
Support--Terragio67 (talk) 07:47, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
Support --نعيم قربوسي (talk) 09:42, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
Strong support JJ, you've done it again. --SHB2000 (talk) 13:28, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
Support Excellent! --Harlock81 (talk) 14:12, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
Support Poco a poco (talk) 19:57, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 05:01, 29 June 2024 (UTC)
Support Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:46, 29 June 2024 (UTC)
Support El Golli Mohamed 11:14, 29 June 2024 (UTC)
Support colors ! --Mile (talk) 08:40, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
Support --XRay 💬 09:12, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
Support — Rhododendrites talk | 14:16, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 6 Jul 2024 at 17:41:36 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Historical/People#1900-1909
Info created by White Studio - restored, uploaded, and nominated by Adam Cuerden -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 17:41, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
Support -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 17:41, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
Support --Yann (talk) 10:30, 29 June 2024 (UTC)
Support El Golli Mohamed 11:05, 29 June 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 6 Jul 2024 at 10:19:14 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants#Family : Rosaceae
Info created and uploaded by Dots foto - nominated by Красный -- Красный wanna talk? 10:19, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
Support -- Красный wanna talk? 10:19, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 10:29, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
Comment: beautiful scene, but there are a few technical issues: the sky is a bit noisy and has a couple of dust spots, while the whole image is very tilted to the right. Would support if these are corrected. --The Cosmonaut (talk) 16:50, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
Comment There is also a halo effect around the tree. --C messier (talk) 18:08, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
- @The Cosmonaut and C messier: I've fixed the tilt and a bit of noise but halo left me confused — maybe I'm stupid or it's my colour blidnness kicking in, but I don't see any. Красный wanna talk? 19:33, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
- The parts of the image around and especially below (between the foliage and the ground) the tree are unnaturally bright. --C messier (talk) 21:21, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
Suggested version @Красный, The Cosmonaut, and C messier: Dear reviewers, I have reduced the slight halo in the treetop and then adjusted the overall tonal correction accordingly. If you like the result, you can use this edit for an update. Please see the SwissTransfer link. While editing, I realized that the glow in the treetop might have been due to some overly well-intentioned post-processing. But that's just my guess. Best regards, -- Radomianin (talk) 21:24, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
- Looks good for me, but I'm still not sure about the halo. I just don't see it. Красный wanna talk? 21:38, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
- I think the halo mentioned by our fellow photographer C messier refers to the glow of the treetop that I removed in my suggestion. This can be clearly seen in a direct comparison of the two versions. Best, -- Radomianin (talk) 21:50, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
- The sky looks better, but the houses are still leaning to the right. --The Cosmonaut (talk) 02:27, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
Oppose Overprocessed, like other uploads by the same author. Kind of vignetting. The center has been lightened -- Basile Morin (talk) 03:18, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
Weak support per above. --SHB2000 (talk) 23:16, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
Support --XRay 💬 09:13, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 6 Jul 2024 at 10:17:26 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family : Sturnidae (Starlings)
Info Lives alongside the other blue starling recently nominated. No current FP. All by Charlesjsharp -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 10:17, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
Support -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 10:17, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 10:28, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 16:53, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
Support I would go for a bit more contrasty tonality, as current tonality is dream like, but still a well executed image of a beautiful bird. --C messier (talk) 18:06, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks, I over-brightened when I uploaded the second version. Charlesjsharp (talk) 20:34, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
Support I was planning on nominating this. Thank you. --Zzzs (talk) 19:22, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
Support Iridescent plumage -- Basile Morin (talk) 03:25, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
Support Ermell (talk) 05:35, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:32, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
Support--Terragio67 (talk) 07:48, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
Support --نعيم قربوسي (talk) 09:42, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
Support Poco a poco (talk) 19:58, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
Support ★ 22:57, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 05:02, 29 June 2024 (UTC)
Support --XRay 💬 09:14, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
Support El Golli Mohamed 14:58, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 6 Jul 2024 at 09:57:15 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious_buildings#Greece
Info The church of Agios Menas, Fira, Santorini. All by C messier. -- C messier (talk) 09:57, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
Support -- C messier (talk) 09:57, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 10:24, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 16:53, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
Support --Zzzs (talk) 05:40, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
Question Tilted? Yann (talk) 10:31, 29 June 2024 (UTC)
- Weak
Support Sky a little bit grainy, very minor CAs. --XRay 💬 09:15, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 6 Jul 2024 at 09:13:24 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Lepidoptera#Family : Pieridae (Whites and Sulphurs)
Info created by Atanu Bose Photography - uploaded by Atanu Bose Photography - nominated by Atudu -- Atudu (talk) 09:13, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
Support -- Atudu (talk) 09:13, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
{{Oppose}}Sorry, but maybe this one: File:Close wing mud-puddling position of Pareronia avatar (Moore, 1858) - Pale Wanderer.jpg presents more realistic colors of the same butterfly. --Harlock81 (talk) 10:23, 27 June 2024 (UTC)Comment I don't think is FP quality, but there doesn't seem to be any issue with the colour of this male Harlock81. It seems that this butterfly shows colour-variation, possibly seasonal. Charlesjsharp (talk) 14:11, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
- My mistake, I thought the two pictures were taken at the same place, the same day. Thanks for pinging me --Harlock81 (talk) 15:11, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 02:29, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
Oppose Quality is good but not exceptional, composition is routine compared to FPs in the gallery. --Tagooty (talk) 03:13, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
Oppose I agree, furthermore the environment is not so appealing Poco a poco (talk) 13:49, 29 June 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 6 Jul 2024 at 03:30:25 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Portugal
Info: aerial view of west Faial taken from a window of a commercial aircraft; all by -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 03:30, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
Support -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 03:30, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
Support El Golli Mohamed 14:15, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
Oppose Can't find any "wow" in this image. --Zzzs (talk) 10:23, 29 June 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 5 Jul 2024 at 16:52:13 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Land vehicles#Rail vehicles
Info created by Skander zarrad - uploaded by Skander zarrad - nominated by Skander zarrad -- Skander zarrad (talk) 16:52, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
Support -- Skander zarrad (talk) 16:52, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
Support A classic Kabelleger's style! ★ 18:41, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
- Well, not really; never seen one of his like this. Charlesjsharp (talk) 18:59, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
- Is this is a protected area of Tunisia for WLE 2024? Charlesjsharp (talk) 19:02, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
- I said "style". ★ 19:33, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
- Yes ;Gorges de Selja Mounir TOUZRI (talk) 20:14, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
Support -- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 01:41, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
Comment: noise level is a bit high, I think; would support if denoised. --The Cosmonaut (talk) 03:34, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks, I wasn't paying attention, I fixed that :) Skander zarrad (talk) 08:37, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
Support: much better --The Cosmonaut (talk) 12:28, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
Neutral The people captured in the picture aren't doing anything interesting. --Harlock81 (talk) 10:27, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
Support - The people don't bother me. —Bruce1eetalk 08:29, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
Comment Is the white balance OK? It looks like it has a slight yellow-greenish tint. --C messier (talk) 19:04, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
- I'm going to check this at home, I'm traveling, thank you for the remark Skander zarrad (talk) 20:29, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
Weak oppose Interesting but the compo is not convincing to me. I fail to find wow here, sorry Poco a poco (talk) 19:58, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
Oppose Per Poco a poco. -- Karelj (talk) 13:08, 29 June 2024 (UTC)
Oppose No wow. --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 13:26, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 5 Jul 2024 at 16:11:17 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Animals/Arthropods#Orthoptera
Info created by Skander zarrad - uploaded by Skander zarrad - nominated by Skander zarrad -- Skander zarrad (talk) 16:11, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
Support -- Skander zarrad (talk) 16:11, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
Support Nice camouflage! ★ 18:42, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 03:32, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 10:15, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
Support LGTM --Zzzs (talk) 04:56, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
Support Poco a poco (talk) 19:58, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
Support --Berthold Werner (talk) 15:42, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 5 Jul 2024 at 14:17:47 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects#Horology
Info created and uploaded by Ermell - nominated by ★ -- ★ 14:17, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
Support Unusual close-up view of the Elizabeth Tower's clock face (aka Big Ben). -- ★ 14:17, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
Comment I'm not convinced we should have this nice image as an FP as the clock face was recently restored and looks very different. I other words, it's one of many versions but not a particularly notable one. Charlesjsharp (talk) 14:37, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
Support Very sharp, good composition. even if the clock changed, why not featuring it before the change? Yann (talk) 09:43, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 11:57, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
Comment For a perfect encyclopedia, we should ideally have one FP of every version of the clock face on such a notable building. What a great timeline that would make for the article. This excellent photo is a good start. --Cart (talk) 12:33, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
- The file name and description could helpfully indicate it is a historical image. Charlesjsharp (talk) 14:14, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
- The info and reference have been added to the description on the file page. It's up to Ermell to perhaps add the "as of 2009" to the file name when the nom is done. --Cart (talk) 15:46, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
Support El Golli Mohamed 14:14, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
Support: per Yann. --The Cosmonaut (talk) 16:55, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
Support Thanks for the nom ArionStar. Ermell (talk) 05:39, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
Support Bummer that this image is outdated since the clocks were painted dark blue, but still good nonetheless. --Zzzs (talk) 15:59, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
- Look at it from the bright side: The new clock face is there to be photographed any day now, this historic face can't be photographed again. Do you call a photo of Manhattan with the Twin Towers outdated or an historical documentation that we are lucky to have? --Cart (talk) 18:09, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
Support Poco a poco (talk) 19:59, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 05:04, 29 June 2024 (UTC)
Support --XRay 💬 09:15, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 5 Jul 2024 at 12:45:35 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Austria
Info all by Tournasol7 -- Tournasol7 (talk) 12:45, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
Abstain As author. Tournasol7 (talk) 12:45, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 12:48, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
Support Of course… ★ 14:05, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
Support Poco a poco (talk) 17:09, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
Oppose Good image and certainly QI/VI but IMHO not enough wow for FP. --GRDN711 (talk) 21:21, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 11:56, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
Support El Golli Mohamed 14:13, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 05:05, 29 June 2024 (UTC)
Support Appealing light and fair composition, in my view -- Basile Morin (talk) 10:38, 29 June 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 5 Jul 2024 at 07:51:19 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants/Asparagales#Family:Amaryllidaceae (Allium roseum)
Info created by Smailtn - uploaded by Smailtn - nominated by TOUMOU -- Mounir TOUZRI (talk) 07:51, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
Support -- Mounir TOUZRI (talk) 07:51, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 12:49, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
Support ★ 18:42, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 10:14, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 5 Jul 2024 at 05:56:56 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#India
Info Gephan range towering (elev. 8,000 ft (2,400 m)) above the Bhaga river, Lahaul, Himachal, India. Created by Tagooty - uploaded by Tagooty - nominated by Tagooty -- Tagooty (talk) 05:56, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
Support -- Tagooty (talk) 05:56, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
Support A great landscape for me --Famberhorst (talk) 12:21, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
Support -- Karelj (talk) 14:51, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
Support ★ 18:43, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
Oppose The light is not so good, for "one of the best pictures of the site". Hazy. The shadows are too dominant in the mountains, especially at the left. Harsh light. It's almost a contrejour, since the shadows seem to be leaning in our direction. Incidentally lack of sharpness in the corners -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:38, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
- @Basile Morin: Thanks for your comments. I have tweaked the exposure and shadows, plus mild sharpening. Is it better? Note that the direction is to the south, the sun is shining out of the top left corner. At high altitude, lighting tends to be harsh owing to the clear air. Tagooty (talk) 03:16, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
- Are you sure you've uploaded the correct file? I honestly see no difference at all, even looking carefully at full size. Although they seem to be different files in megabytes. So I wonder what has changed -- Basile Morin (talk) 03:40, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
- @Basile Morin: Sorry, my edits accidentally got undone before export from LR. The latest version now has the exposure and sharpness adjustments. Please review this. Tagooty (talk) 04:40, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
- Minor change. I don't see much improvement, sorry -- Basile Morin (talk) 10:57, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
- Are you sure you've uploaded the correct file? I honestly see no difference at all, even looking carefully at full size. Although they seem to be different files in megabytes. So I wonder what has changed -- Basile Morin (talk) 03:40, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 11:52, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
Support El Golli Mohamed 14:11, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
Support --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 22:30, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
Oppose per Basile. --Kadellar (talk) 09:08, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 5 Jul 2024 at 01:25:40 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Objects#Clothing and textiles
Info The final room of the "Camp: Notes on Fashion" exhibit at The Met in 2019. At this point in the exhibit, the narrow corridors open up to this large, two-floor spectacle of wild ensembles. all by — Rhododendrites talk | 01:25, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
Support — Rhododendrites talk | 01:25, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
Support --Kadellar (talk) 09:09, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
Support ★ 00:48, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
File:Φάρος Μελαγκάβι 7382.jpg, featured
[edit]Voting period ends on 4 Jul 2024 at 10:49:24 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Towers#Greece
Info created & ploaded by C messier - nominated by Tomer T -- Tomer T (talk) 10:49, 25 June 2024 (UTC)
Support -- Tomer T (talk) 10:49, 25 June 2024 (UTC)
Support --Berthold Werner (talk) 15:00, 25 June 2024 (UTC)
Support Attractive, balanced composition in good light. -- Radomianin (talk) 18:28, 25 June 2024 (UTC)
Support ★ 19:10, 25 June 2024 (UTC)
Support per Radomianin -- Terragio67 (talk) 19:50, 25 June 2024 (UTC)
Support Πολύ όμορφο, φέρνει αναμνήσεις El Golli Mohamed 22:28, 25 June 2024 (UTC)
Support per Radomianin -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:25, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
Support Time could be diferent. --Mile (talk) 08:00, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 12:00, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 12:49, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 13:02, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
Support Poco a poco (talk) 17:11, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
Support Lovely! --Zzzs (talk) 01:04, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 10:13, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
Support Thanks for the nomination Tomer T. --C messier (talk) 10:49, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 11:49, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
Result: 16 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /FPCBot (talk) 13:01, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 4 Jul 2024 at 00:37:18 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Portugal
Info: Faial Caldera, Azores. Better shadows compared to the previous nomination; all by -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 00:37, 25 June 2024 (UTC)
Support -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 00:37, 25 June 2024 (UTC)
Support I love this landscape.--Famberhorst (talk) 12:05, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 04:24, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 11:48, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
Support El Golli Mohamed 14:09, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 3 Jul 2024 at 22:40:44 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family : Sturnidae (Starlings)
Info created and uploaded by Charlesjsharp - nominated by Zzzs -- Zzzs (talk) 22:40, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
Support -- Zzzs (talk) 22:40, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 00:44, 25 June 2024 (UTC)
Support --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:59, 25 June 2024 (UTC)
Support --نعيم قربوسي (talk) 09:51, 25 June 2024 (UTC)
Support Thank you for the nomination. Charlesjsharp (talk) 11:49, 25 June 2024 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:05, 25 June 2024 (UTC)
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 12:12, 25 June 2024 (UTC)
Support --Berthold Werner (talk) 14:59, 25 June 2024 (UTC)
Oppose The striking male violet-backed starling is already an FP. I don't think the plain female merits FP. --Tagooty (talk) 06:07, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
- @Tagooty Why wouldn't it? It would be fair if the other gender is a FP, like many others. Zzzs (talk) 08:11, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
- An FP is an extraordinary image with wow-factor. This image does not have an unusual pose/activity/colouration/etc that catches my attention. It merits QI and VI. --Tagooty (talk) 08:44, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
- You might have to oppose many bird more bird FPs, Tagooty, if you don't like little brown birds and females. Charlesjsharp (talk) 14:47, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
- @Charlesjsharp: An FP is one "of the finest on Commons". The violet-backed starling is common throughout Africa. Your FP of the strikingly-coloured male has set a high bar. An unexceptional image of a drab female does not cross the bar IMO. I would support an unusual image of a plain brown bird, or an image of a rare brown bird. --Tagooty (talk) 02:57, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
- Fair enough, I agree the setting is not exceptional. Perhaps the FP bar should be raised; as long as there is consensus. We are promoting dozens of unexeptional small brown birds standing on brown earth or sand these days. Thinking about consistency, what do you think about the recent nominations of the white butterfly and brown locust? Neither are rare species. Charlesjsharp (talk) 10:06, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
- I feel that the FP bars for many subjects are getting lower over the past 2-3 years. I wonder how many reviewers compare with FPs in the gallery before voting? Perhaps, its just that I'm getting older and more critical!
Tagooty (talk) 03:25, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
- I feel that the FP bars for many subjects are getting lower over the past 2-3 years. I wonder how many reviewers compare with FPs in the gallery before voting? Perhaps, its just that I'm getting older and more critical!
- Fair enough, I agree the setting is not exceptional. Perhaps the FP bar should be raised; as long as there is consensus. We are promoting dozens of unexeptional small brown birds standing on brown earth or sand these days. Thinking about consistency, what do you think about the recent nominations of the white butterfly and brown locust? Neither are rare species. Charlesjsharp (talk) 10:06, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
- @Charlesjsharp: An FP is one "of the finest on Commons". The violet-backed starling is common throughout Africa. Your FP of the strikingly-coloured male has set a high bar. An unexceptional image of a drab female does not cross the bar IMO. I would support an unusual image of a plain brown bird, or an image of a rare brown bird. --Tagooty (talk) 02:57, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
- You might have to oppose many bird more bird FPs, Tagooty, if you don't like little brown birds and females. Charlesjsharp (talk) 14:47, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
- An FP is an extraordinary image with wow-factor. This image does not have an unusual pose/activity/colouration/etc that catches my attention. It merits QI and VI. --Tagooty (talk) 08:44, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
- @Tagooty Why wouldn't it? It would be fair if the other gender is a FP, like many others. Zzzs (talk) 08:11, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 12:06, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 12:50, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
Support --GRDN711 (talk) 21:14, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 2 Jul 2024 at 14:23:42 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Kazakhstan
Info created and uploaded by Dots foto - nominated by Красный -- Красный wanna talk? 14:23, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
Support -- Красный wanna talk? 14:23, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
Support Beautiful! Henrysz (talk) 19:24, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
Support I like it, too. --Harlock81 (talk) 11:33, 25 June 2024 (UTC)
Support Ю. Данилевский (talk) 20:16, 25 June 2024 (UTC)
Support Breathtaking image. -- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 23:59, 25 June 2024 (UTC)
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 12:14, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 12:50, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
Support Wow! ★ 18:39, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
- Clearly
Oversaturated colors -- Basile Morin (talk) 15:43, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 2 Jul 2024 at 06:36:07 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious buildings#Italy
Info created and uploaded by Luca Aless - nominated by ★ -- ★ 06:36, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
Support -- ★ 06:36, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
Support El Golli Mohamed 11:15, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
Support User:Luca Aless 17:07, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 00:40, 25 June 2024 (UTC)
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 12:50, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 23:58, 29 June 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 1 Jul 2024 at 19:31:14 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Fish#Family_:_Muraenidae_(Moray_Eels)
Info Snowflake moray (Echidna nebulosa), Anilao, Philippines. Note: we have no FPs of genus Echidna. c/u/n by Poco a poco (talk) 19:31, 22 June 2024 (UTC)
Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 19:31, 22 June 2024 (UTC)
Oppose Sorry infortunate crop, we can't see the whole fish. This black thing is disturbing, also the sharpness is not so good.El Golli Mohamed (talk) 21:11, 22 June 2024 (UTC)
- I have applied a slight crop to the right bottom corner, so that what I believe is a feather star (black thing), is not on the way. Even if that could be an improvement, I don't see what is wrong with the crop, morays live in holes and rarely go out during the day as they are nocturnal predators. I also have to say that this animal is rare, and probably that's the reason why we have no FPs of the whole genus. That conditions to take pictures under water are more challenging than over the water is something that I don't need to elaborate, I guess. --Poco a poco (talk) 10:31, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
Support The whole moray would be be too big to fit in the image, so I will assume the author meant to only picture its head. The crop is fine. The black thing is
mildlynot distracting. The bottom of the moray where it turns is a bit blurry, probably OoF. Take my opinion with a grain of salt, as I am not a professional photographer. --Zzzs (talk) 22:49, 22 June 2024 (UTC)- Nothing is big to fit in an image. We managed to photograph galaxy clusters in a single photo. El Golli Mohamed (talk) 22:56, 22 June 2024 (UTC)
- Here's a full body image of this species for comparison. Also, isn't it pretty clear the author only wanted to picture its head? --Zzzs (talk) 23:00, 22 June 2024 (UTC)
- Nothing is big to fit in an image. We managed to photograph galaxy clusters in a single photo. El Golli Mohamed (talk) 22:56, 22 June 2024 (UTC)
Comment The crop is good and intentional; hope this is not an FPC revenge vote. Charlesjsharp (talk) 23:09, 22 June 2024 (UTC)
- I have little doubt after reading the same words I used "Infortunate (sic) crop" in my review. That's an statement that doesn't speak for the reviewer. Again, we have no FP of the genus Echidna, but we have already 4 FPs of the species (not genus) Himantopus himantopus. I've definitely supported more images that I've opposed of El Golli Mohamed, so I have no personal issue here and no problem with the photographer, let alone free-license photographers. If I'm convinced, I support the image if not, I oppose, that has nothing to do with whom is behind the camera and in most of the cases people believe that and are thankful for the feedback. Poco a poco (talk) 10:31, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
- Why don't we have the right to criticize, otherwise it's a revenge vote? Is it a dictatorship here? Is the justification for my vote true or not? El Golli Mohamed (talk) 23:23, 22 June 2024 (UTC)
- Of course anyone may criticise and oppose; that is the essence of FPC. But El Golli Mohamed was banned from Commons in April for two weeks for insulting behaviour stemming from his revenge votes. Charlesjsharp (talk) 00:14, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
- Dear reviewers, normally I am not a fan of repeating old mistakes, but regarding the incident mentioned here again, I would like to refer to the recent discussion from late May/early June. I agree with Poco a poco that we should please focus only on the images and not on the photographer behind the camera. Only through constructive discourse can we work together in a meaningful and healthy way. Behind every username there is a person who has to be respected, no matter if we have a different opinion or not. Best, -- Radomianin (talk) 09:08, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
Support High level of detail for an underwater picture. Interesting close up and the light is fine -- Basile Morin (talk) 04:09, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
Support --Yann (talk) 09:11, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
Support --Ermell (talk) 09:35, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:26, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 03:31, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
Support per Basile. -- Radomianin (talk) 06:34, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 15:02, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 12:50, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
Support ★ 18:37, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 30 Jun 2024 at 10:30:12 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Sculptures#Sculptures indoors
Info Miltiades (Roman replica). My shot. --Mile (talk) 10:30, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
Support Renomination, i have feeling this is FP. Citate from one who use it few days ago "Is the best image on the internet, very clean and high resolution." Nothing to add. Made few improvements.-- Mile (talk) 10:30, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
Support El Golli Mohamed 00:36, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 00:38, 25 June 2024 (UTC)
Support ★ 18:36, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
I withdraw my nomination --Mile (talk) 10:11, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 30 Jun 2024 at 08:29:34 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Non-photographic_media/Religion#Christianity
Info This artwork was made by Giacomo Raibolini, aka Giacomo Francia. He was the son of the more famous artist Francesco Francia, well known as a goldsmith and painter and a close friend of Raphael. This is an author belonging to the mannerism of the late Italian Renaissance. The exact date of the painting is not known, but it can be attributed between 1520 and 1540, when it was influenced by the painter Dosso Dossi, another mannerist tending towards the Venetian Renaissance. This picture is important because shows a Mannerism offspring from the Italian Renaissance. It is worth noting the resemblance of the Saint Sebastian depicted with his [father] to whom he was extremely devoted. The artwork was imported from Google Arts and Culture stitching 7880 tiles. All by Terragio67 -- Terragio67 (talk) 08:29, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
Info Uploaded another version just to verify the artwork, in case the ZoomViewer tool is not working or you cannot download the original file due to its size. Terragio67 -- Terragio67 (talk) 11:46, 22 June 2024 (UTC)
Support -- Terragio67 (talk) 08:29, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
Support Sure! --Yann (talk) 11:30, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
Support ★ 13:36, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 09:30, 22 June 2024 (UTC)
Support El Golli Mohamed 00:10, 25 June 2024 (UTC)
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 15:18, 25 June 2024 (UTC)
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 09:08, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
Result: 7 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /FPCBot (talk) 13:01, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 30 Jun 2024 at 05:09:10 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Historical#1850-1899
Info created by Herbert A. Hale - restored, uploaded, and nominated by Adam Cuerden -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 05:09, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
Support -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 05:09, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
Support ★ 12:49, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
Oppose Sorry, but I can't see anything special in the photo. -- Karelj (talk) 13:25, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
- Not surprised by this comment. --SHB2000 (talk) 09:18, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
- What does this mean? Tedder (talk) 22:50, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
- Not surprised by this comment. --SHB2000 (talk) 09:18, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
Oppose No wow. --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 15:12, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
- It's incredibly good quality for 1898. Adam Cuerden (talk) 19:55, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
Support Per Adam Cuerden's comment --Llez (talk) 09:29, 22 June 2024 (UTC)
Support El Golli Mohamed 00:41, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
Support --Yann (talk) 09:14, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:22, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 09:18, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
Oppose VI since there is historical value, not FP since there is no wow. --Milseburg (talk) 14:31, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
Result: 7 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /FPCBot (talk) 13:01, 30 June 2024 (UTC)