User talk:Anvilaquarius

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Anvilaquarius!

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 10:38, 6 January 2016 (UTC)

Share your experience and feedback as a Wikimedian in this global survey[edit]

  1. This survey is primarily meant to get feedback on the Wikimedia Foundation's current work, not long-term strategy.
  2. Legal stuff: No purchase necessary. Must be the age of majority to participate. Sponsored by the Wikimedia Foundation located at 149 New Montgomery, San Francisco, CA, USA, 94105. Ends January 31, 2017. Void where prohibited. Click here for contest rules.

Your feedback matters: Final reminder to take the global Wikimedia survey[edit]

(Sorry to write in Engilsh)

Please remain calm and collegial[edit]

Català | Čeština | Deutsch | English | Español | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Polski | Português | Русский | Svenska | Українська | +/−


Dialog-warning.svg
It is important to keep a cool head, especially when responding to comments against you or your edits. Personal attacks and disruptive comments only escalate a situation; please keep calm and remember that action can be taken against other parties if necessary. Please try to remain civil with your comments. Thanks!

You do not call idiot other users. I am referring to Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Col_Jacob_Griffin_portrait.jpg. Ruthven (msg) 23:33, 11 March 2017 (UTC)

Well I didn't. I called the request idiotic, and rightly so. --Anvilaquarius (talk) 11:10, 12 March 2017 (UTC)

Ok, that's mean (and completely useless for the closing admin) because the other user could interpret it as a personal attack. In these cases, you simply explain why the file should be kept and that's it. --Ruthven (msg) 13:22, 12 March 2017 (UTC)

Panoramio bot operator[edit]

I opened a complaint about User:Shizhao and his Panoramio uploads at the Administrators' noticeboard. You are invited to share your personal experience and opinion about this user and his abuse of his bot operator rights. Thanks, --CEphoto, Uwe Aranas (talk) 10:12, 17 April 2017 (UTC)

ETH-BIB Mittelholzer-Inland flights[edit]

Hello Anvilaquarius,
Thank you for helping me to categorize the Mittelholzer pictures. For your information, I currently use the sub-categories to help me sort the classified pictures. When the categories of a picture are completed, I move the picture to one of the sub-category. This way, the main category only contains the remaining work. Please feel free to add more categories on the pictures but you should do a move (and not a copy) with Cat-a-lot, otherwise we don't know what remains to do.
Some of the categories have an incorrect name as I did not know their full content when I created them. I plan to reorganize the categories once all the pictures are classified.
Pmau (talk) 19:38, 16 May 2017 (UTC)

I thought I had always moved to the cantonal subcategories, not copied, but I may have made some mistakes. I always tried to add at least one topographical category outside the ETH-BIB tree (e. g. a city, or a mountain, or a lake, if existant the "Historical images of..." variety of those), plus the cantonal subcategory. --Anvilaquarius (talk) 20:08, 16 May 2017 (UTC)

Category:Norway Hall (Seattle, Washington)[edit]

Thanks for your work on Seattle building categories, but wouldn't we want to keep the name Category:Norway Hall (Seattle, Washington) for the present Norway Hall, not the old one that is now a theater for Cornish College? - Jmabel ! talk 16:27, 19 November 2017 (UTC)

Sorry, I don't know about this new building. Feel free to change whatever you want. I just wanted to "get rid" of some multiple entries in "Theaters in Seattle". --Anvilaquarius (talk) 16:32, 19 November 2017 (UTC) PS: I stumbled upon this while working at this at Wikidata: [1] --Anvilaquarius (talk) 16:37, 19 November 2017 (UTC)

File:Ludvik Kohl 14. 4. 1746-21. 6. 1821 - Interier antickeho chramu se sochou Pallas Atheny.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Ludvik Kohl 14. 4. 1746-21. 6. 1821 - Interier antickeho chramu se sochou Pallas Atheny.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

NoJin (talk) 23:27, 3 January 2018 (UTC)

File:Rytec Michael Rentz - Triumf Kristovy obeti - Frontispis k Das Christliches Jahr.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Rytec Michael Rentz - Triumf Kristovy obeti - Frontispis k Das Christliches Jahr.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

NoJin (talk) 22:53, 15 January 2018 (UTC)

File:Rytec Antonio Canaletto 1697-1768 - La Torre di Malghera, z alba Vedute.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Rytec Antonio Canaletto 1697-1768 - La Torre di Malghera, z alba Vedute.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

NoJin (talk) 23:28, 15 January 2018 (UTC)

File:Robert Stöbe Frauen in der Kirche.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Robert Stöbe Frauen in der Kirche.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

De728631 (talk) 16:48, 24 April 2018 (UTC)

ETH-BIB Leo Wehrli[edit]

Hello, thanks for helping me categorize the images in Category:ETH-BIB Leo Wehrli.
However, before moving the pictures in the sub-categories, the categories for locations and descriptions should be completed. Pmau (talk) 11:58, 5 June 2018 (UTC)

I disagree. First, the images should be moved to those main subcategories of cantons/countries. From there it's much easier to get an overview of the images (they are just too many in the main category) and start categorizing. E. g., I don't know anything about certain countries but can do Germany rather quickly. Same goes for many other users, I think. --Anvilaquarius (talk) 12:00, 5 June 2018 (UTC)