User talk:Svenkaj

Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Svenkaj!

First steps tutorial Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki. Getting help More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump.

Goodies, tips, and tricks Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your graphic abilities. You can find the files you have uploaded in your Uploads. Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~. To link to an image page without embedding the image, type: [[:File:Foo.jpg]], which produces: File:Foo.jpg. You may enable gadgets (custom features) for your account. There are several tools to upload files. Have you edited Wikipedia before? This guide might be useful. Made a mistake? Do you want to have a file renamed or moved? Use the move link and wait for an authorized user to rename it. Do you want to have your recently uploaded picture removed? Tag it as {{speedy|reason here}}. For more information read the deletion guidelines.

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 08:23, 1 May 2015 (UTC)

Tip: Categorizing images

---

Hello, Svenkaj!

Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]

[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

--Gampe (talk) 16:16, 14 June 2015 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:A. C. Nor, spisovatel.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:A. C. Nor, spisovatel.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

And also:

• File:Dr Stanislav Nikolau.jpg
• File:Edvard Valenta, spisovatel.jpg
• File:Jaromír John, spisovatel.jpg

No required license templates were detected at this file page. Please correct it, or if you have any questions please check my FAQ or contact me on my talk page. Yours sincerely, Jarekt (talk) 11:09, 13 August 2015 (UTC)

Odkazy z Krameria

Zdravím Vás, pokud odkazujete z Krameria, používejte prosím šablonu {{Kramerius link}}. Jinak pokud se koukám, ty Vaše odkazy jsou většinou špatné. Chtěl bych to postupně opravovat, což není úplně jednoduchý problém. Kramerius je stavěn tak, že každý obrázek ve verzi 4 Krameria má unikátní UUID. Pokud chcete odkázat na konkrétní stránku např. Moravian Library in Brno ({{Kramerius link|mzk|54ea5482-435f-11dd-b505-00145e5790ea}}), tak URL je http://kramerius.mzk.cz/search/handle/uuid:54ea5482-435f-11dd-b505-00145e5790ea, UUID stránky je „54ea5482-435f-11dd-b505-00145e5790ea“. Pokud někde vlezete a chcete UUID té stránky musíte uložit odkaz z té rozklikávací stromové struktury vlevo. Aktuální stránka je zvýrazněna. Teď tam vkládáte URL prohlížeče, které odkazuje úplně jinam. Mějte se hezky. Skim (talk) 13:02, 31 March 2016 (UTC)

Autorská práva

Dobrý den, nemůžete ignorovat autory obrázků (například File:Růžena Šlemrová 1944.jpg), či si přisvojovat cizí díla (File:Letná palace 5953 2.jpg). Porušujete tím nepřípustně autorská práva. --Tlusťa (talk) 13:01, 1 July 2016 (UTC)

Dále jsem jako problematické označil obrázky:

• File:Věra Nohelová.jpg
• File:Gardavska001.jpg
• File:Gardavska002.jpg
• File:Rozpravy Aventina 1925 1.png
• File:Antonín Dvořák Král a uhlíř Brno 1941.jpg
• File:Augustin Mervart, painter.jpg

--Tlusťa (talk) 14:00, 1 July 2016 (UTC)

File:Koňská dráha 1876.png

File:Koňská dráha 1876.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Harold (talk) 13:35, 12 February 2019 (UTC)

File:Vasilij Grossman, 1945.jpg

File:Vasilij Grossman, 1945.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Buidhe (talk) 10:44, 4 May 2020 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Alhambra Praha 1914.jpg

Copyright status: File:Alhambra Praha 1914.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Alhambra Praha 1914.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 17:05, 22 October 2020 (UTC)

Přihlaste své fotky do Czech Wiki Photo 2020!

Czech Wiki Photo

Milí fotografové a editoři projektů Wikimedia,

každý rok společně nahrajete na Commons tisíce svobodných fotografií. Chceme vám všem poděkovat a také vás ocenit. Vyberte ty nejlepší z vašich fotek a přihlaste je do 30. 10. 2020 do soutěže Czech Wiki Photo 2020! Soutěž je otevřená i úplným nováčkům. Autoři tří nejlepších fotek si odnesou vouchery do Foto Škoda a speciální wiki-odznaky. Přihlášené fotky bude hodnotit i Honza Rybář, držitel Czech Press Photo.

Baví vás focení pro Commons i mimo soutěže? Staňte se fotografem Wikimedie, půjčujeme fototechniku a proplácíme cesty - více na Fotíme Česko.

Těšíme se na vaše snímky!
Za spolek Wikimedia Česká republika
Jakub Holzer
jakub.holzer@wikimedia.cz -- MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:06, 24 October 2020 (UTC)

J A Baťa 1933.png

Hello Svenkaj, the picture File:J A Baťa 1933.png was tagged "{{Anonymous-EU}} Published more than 70 years ago, author Anonymous" but at the original there is just below the photo a remark "Foto P.P.S." The text seems to be in the Czech language and I don't understand that. Still I got the impression that P.P.S. are the initials of photographer. But maybe it just means something like anonymous. Can you explain why it is tagged by you as anonymous? - Robotje (talk) 07:00, 6 November 2020 (UTC)

@Robotje: R.P.G. is probably the name of a photo studio existing between World Wars, not generaly known in the Czech Republic and not existing any more. The author of the photo (person) remains anyway anonymous. The photo can be as well tagged "PD-ineligible" (photo lacking evidence of original authorship). Thanks for understanding and regards--Svenkaj (talk) 17:09, 18 November 2020 (UTC)

I asked you about P.P.S. not R.P.G. If P.P.S. is a studio/company, then it's OK with me. - Robotje (talk) 17:26, 18 November 2020 (UTC)

@Robotje: Yes, it should be so. I tried to search in historical sources - scanned Czech newspapers and magazines but did not receive an explanation. As far as I know, there was no between-wars Czech professional photographer having such or similar initials. Believe me, I have no intention to violate copyrights, if they exist. Regards--Svenkaj (talk) 19:05, 18 November 2020 (UTC)

No problem. - Robotje (talk) 19:18, 18 November 2020 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Antonín Horsák překladatel archeolog.jpg

Copyright status: File:Antonín Horsák překladatel archeolog.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Antonín Horsák překladatel archeolog.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Didym (talk) 21:38, 21 November 2020 (UTC)

@Didym: I have used the template „PD-illegible“, as the photo is obviously an anonymous amateur shot, lacking evidence of original authorship. There is no request of copyright on the web page, from which the photo has been taken.

Thanks for understanding --Svenkaj (talk) 09:17, 22 November 2020 (UTC)

This photo may be in the public domain for some other reasons, but it is certainly not lacking evidence of original authorship and PD-ineligible is not applicable. --Didym (talk) 11:31, 22 November 2020 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Bohumil Hasil.jpg

Copyright status: File:Bohumil Hasil.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Bohumil Hasil.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Didym (talk) 22:31, 21 November 2020 (UTC)

@Didym: This is my own cropped photo of the kenotaf (memory desk) on the graveyard in České Žleby (Czech Republic). See also the photo of the complete desk in the article Bohumil Hasil in the Czech Wikipedia (https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:20200306_Hasil_%C4%8Cesk%C3%A9_%C5%BDleby.jpg). The anonymous photo of Bohumil Hasil on the kenotaf was taken in 1949 or sooner (Bohumil Hasil immigrated to Germany in 1949 and was killed in 1950).

Regards --Svenkaj (talk) 09:26, 22 November 2020 (UTC)

This is more or less the same situation as above, the photo may be PD for other reasons or even covered by FOP, but not PD-ineligible. --Didym (talk) 11:34, 22 November 2020 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Ela Švabinská.jpg

Copyright status: File:Ela Švabinská.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Ela Švabinská.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Didym (talk) 13:36, 22 November 2020 (UTC)

@Didym: This is the same case as Antonín Horsák above. I do not share your opinion, nevertheless, if you are convinced that I am violating copyrights, I do not have a chance :-). Regards--Svenkaj (talk) 21:52, 22 November 2020 (UTC)

File tagging File:Ela Švabinská.jpg

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Ela Švabinská.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case. Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Ela Švabinská.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

 

JuTa 10:25, 23 November 2020 (UTC)

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Bohumil Hasil.jpg

This file may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Bohumil Hasil.jpg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work. While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

 

JuTa 10:32, 23 November 2020 (UTC)

File tagging File:Antonín Horsák překladatel archeolog.jpg

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Antonín Horsák překladatel archeolog.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case. Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Antonín Horsák překladatel archeolog.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

 

JuTa 10:50, 23 November 2020 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Ex libris Miloš Klicman.jpg

Copyright status: File:Ex libris Miloš Klicman.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Ex libris Miloš Klicman.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 20:05, 17 May 2021 (UTC)

File:Martin Růžek Encyklopedie Brna.jpg

File:Martin Růžek Encyklopedie Brna.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that. The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: “No credit” on the source site does not mean “anonymous”. The photo is new enough not to be “pre-1951 anonymous”. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

 

Gumruch (talk) 22:26, 5 July 2021 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Dominik Umlauf.jpg

Copyright status: File:Dominik Umlauf.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Dominik Umlauf.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 15:05, 3 October 2022 (UTC)

File:Helena Železná-Scholzová Američanka 1924.jpg

File:Helena Železná-Scholzová Američanka 1924.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Rosenzweig τ 16:40, 9 January 2023 (UTC)

File:Denník Venouška Dolejše 1911 inzerát Humoristické listy.jpg

File:Denník Venouška Dolejše 1911 inzerát Humoristické listy.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Gumruch (talk) 23:11, 23 October 2023 (UTC)

@Gumruch Yes, my error. Author Josef Lada, you can delete. Svenkaj (talk) 08:57, 24 October 2023 (UTC)