User talk:Lmbuga/Discusións anteriores 9

No entiendo porque deciste que adoras mi imagen (Turtle mazunte oaxaca mexico claudio giovenzana 2010.jpg en feature pictures candidates) y luego solo porque High Fin Sperm Whale ha escrito OPPOSE entonces lo hiciste tu tambien... si te gusta la foto haces SUPPORT porfavor! no hacer oppose solo porque lo ha hecho un otro... Gracias

Feliz año nuevo[edit]

Aunque ya se nos ha ido el primer día del año, espero que los 364 restantes te traigan paz, felicidad, armonía en tu vida personal y tu trabajo, salud y todos los parabienes que mereces.
En cuanto al usuario, ya están borradas un montón de violaciones de copyright y avisado, esperemos que se moleste en justificar el origen de las restantes antes de que sean borradas. Un abrazo. Anna (Cookie) (talk) 02:09, 2 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Happy New Year![edit]

Lmbuga, happy New 2011 Year! --Vizu (talk) 23:59, 1 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Tnanks...--Miguel Bugallo 10:33, 2 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2010. Cobá. Quintana Roo. México.-6.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good. Could you please add to the file descr. how large the fossils are? --Cayambe 17:56, 3 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Ok. approximately 3 cm., a little greater than the cockles--Lmbuga 19:37, 3 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2010. Cobá. Quintana Roo. México.-24.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality, and great job destroying cultural heritage... --Dschwen 15:42, 7 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2010. Ek' balam. Quintana Roo. México.-0.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Dschwen 15:42, 7 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hotel Bahía Príncipe-Chacumal-Estrada federal 307 Cancún-Chetumal-69.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Dschwen 15:42, 7 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cría de porco pelón - Quintana Roo - México.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Facenda Mexicana-Hotel Bahía Príncipe-Chacumal-Estrada federal 307 Cancún-Chetumal-66.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Did you try perspective "correction" on this image? If yes, then you overdid it. --Dschwen 15:42, 7 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
You're right. I have tried it before uploading the image, but I have not been able. what do you think that I must do? If I change the horizontal perspective, I break the vertical perspective--Lmbuga 01:20, 8 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
New version no tilted and without vertical distorion--Lmbuga 19:49, 9 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ramón_Sampedro_no_seu_leito.jpg[edit]

File:Ramón_Sampedro_no_seu_leito.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ magyar ∙ Malti ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ मराठी ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

Polarlys (talk) 14:33, 17 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, I'm think that you're right. It's a Flickr image of Certo Xornal, originally posted to Flickr as Ramón Sampedro no seu leito. I think now that the image can be a copyvio--Miguel Bugallo 18:15, 17 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

¿Sabes...[edit]

cuál podría ser el lugar? Saudos. Anna (Cookie) (talk) 22:13, 17 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

No pensaba que fuera a darte tanto trabajo, mejor ponle el mensaje de sin categoría directamente, es su obligación poner al menos una descripción y no la primera categoría inexistente que se le pase por la cabeza. Bicos. Preciosas fotos de México, ya averigüé tu destino ;-) Anna (Cookie) (talk) 22:56, 17 January 2011 (UTC) Graciñas, sabía que acudía al lugar adecuado.[reply]

¿No tienes nada mejor que hacer?[edit]

Estimado Miguel, Me sorprende tu solicitud de eliminar la imagen que subí a Commons. Cualquier persona sensata que verdaderamente conoce temas de copyright ni siquiera pensaría en hacer dicha solicitud. La imagen es una imagen válida en muchos sentidos, independientemente de que tu conozcas del tema o no. Agradecería que analizaras muy bien tus motivos antes de actuar sin conocimiento de causa. --Tomascastelazo (talk) 22:17, 18 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Me sorprende tu tono

¿Nada mejor que hacer? ¿Como después de titular "¿No tienes nada mejor que hacer?" me dices "estimado Miguel"?. ¿Cinismo?

¿Sabes lo que es una obra derivada? ¿Has hecho tú la imagen de Bush, además de la foto derivada sobre esa imagen? Si es así, hazlo constar en los datos de la imagen.

¿Puedes fundamentar que la foto de Bush está en el dominio libre? Lee las políticas presentes en Commons:Obra derivada. No es solamente una leve observación, he sido durante años burócrata de Commons, no creo que estos dos últimos años la cosa haya cambiado tanto. La gente vota sin saber de los temas. Lee, opina después de leer e indica, después de leer, si es que yo no tengo nada mejor que hacer o si lo que ocurre es que yo me preocupo por el proyecto Wikimedia.

En todo caso, debes indicar la licencia de la foto de Bush y su autor. Esa foto no está en el dominio libre si no lo demuestras, es deber tuyo, no mío.

Ahora bien, yo estoy muy harto de Commons y de sus luchas. Indico. No lucho. Que quereis seguir con un copyvio. Adelante. En todo caso podría responder que sí tengo algo mejor que hacer, pasar de los usuarios de Commons que ante una denuncia de Copyvío votan sin leer las políticas mencionadas.

Te he de aclarar que la he marcado para votación por deferencia hacia ti, pues la podría haber marcado para borrado rápido por copyvio (sé de lo que hablo). Te solicito que añadas al origen de la imagen, los datos necesarios de la imagen de Bush: el autor y los derechos de uso de la imagen de Bush, de la cual tu imagen es una obra derivada y por lo tanto, según lo dicho en Commons:Obra derivada, tiene las mismas restricciones de uso que tu imagen.

Puede haber la votación que desees, pero tu imagen es un copyvio si no demuestras lo contrario. Creo que me he confundido al no haber solicitado un borrado rápido por copyvio.

Sabes ya que tengo mucho conocimiento de causa. Puedes interpretar que actúo por animadversión personal. La única animadversión personal que yo observo es el título del comentario que has dejado en mi página: ¡Cómo te pasas! Lo mío, lo que he hecho, lo habría hecho cualquiera que conozca las políticas. Repito: Lee Commons:Obra derivada. Opina después de leer

Tras el título de tu comentario, no me despido--Miguel Bugallo 01:04, 19 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Otra aclaración

Me ha quedado por decir, por si no lo sabes, que casi todos los países, o todos, firmaron el Convenio de Berna. Según ese convenio, si una foto no presenta constancia de su copyright, tiene todos los derechos reservados. Tu foto, tal y como está ahora mismo, es un copyvio. Insisto: es un copyvio.--Miguel Bugallo 01:14, 19 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Esto se pone interesante.... Si aplicaras este criterio a tu cruzada, seguramente hubieses llegado a mi grave violación de copyright en unos 30 años, después de haber eliminado miles y miles de fotografías de en donde aparecen incontables objetos con copyright, anuncios en la calle de coca cola, mcdonalds, marcas de todo carro imaginable, [[1]], [[2]], [[3]]. Tu ´premisa es erronea. Mi fotografía no es una reproducción de Bush, es una fotografía de un conjunto de objetos encontrados en un mercado de pulgas, sobre la calle, via pública, y en donde aparece coincidentalmente una fotografía de Bush, a su vez, un personaje de la vida pública.

Te copio un segmento interesante de derivative works:

Entonces si le saco una foto a un chico con una remera de Los Simpsons, XX Century Fox tiene los derechos de esa foto?

No, no del todo. Es importante notar y distinguir que hay dos derechos de autor involucrados: el del fotógrafo, aplicable a la foto en sí, y el de Fox, aplicable a la imagen de Los Simpsons. Sin embargo, sólo se los toma en cuenta si dicha imagen es un punto focal de la foto. Una foto de una familia de paseo por un parque sonriendo a la cámara y en la cual el niño tenga puesta una remera de Bart Simpson no afectaría los derechos de autor del dueño de los mismos (en realidad, sí, pero de una forma minúscula y despreciable); pero una en la cual el primer plano esté puesto en el diseño de su remera sí lo hará.

En este caso, la imagen de Bush sería como un dibujo de los Simpson (sin ofender a los Simpson) en una camiseta. Proporcionalmente no ocupa mucho espacio, hay otros objetos que ocupan casi el mismo, hay aprox 24 objetos completos en la imagen, la de Bush representa aprox el 5% de los objetos, espacialmente igual, 5-7%... así es que tu argumento no sigue ni la lógica ni el espíritu de las políticas.

Y sabes, no hay nada mas odioso en este mundo que la censura.

No me despido tampoco.

--Tomascastelazo (talk) 02:13, 19 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Respuesta a tu último comentario y un ejemplo

Voy a coger tu foto mañana mismo (es un decir, este no es el ejemplo) y voy a hacer una obra derivada de tu foto. Mi obra derivada va a consistir en recoger la imagen de Bush (pues tu foto es de 4,368 × 2,912 pixels y permite hacer maravillas) y borrar todo lo demás. Respetaré las licencias, es decir, te voy a nombrar como autor de la imagen de Bush y no voy a nombrar a nadie más, pues tú no nombras a nadie más. La voy a publicar y voy a cobrar. Si alguien protestase, diría que tú (o Commons) eres el responsable: la foto está ahí.

En Commons no solamente ofrecemos imágenes para las wikipedias, las ofrecemos, simplemente las ofrecemos, y permitimos obras derivadas a todo el mundo y para cualquier supuesto siempre que se respeten las licencias. Tú dirás. ¿Estás dispuesto a asumir que algo así pueda ocurrir?

El ejemplo: Una foto mía de hace tiempo que ha sido borrada (semejante a esta otra File:CGAC, Santiago de Compostela Cropped.jpg, que no ha sido borrada, pero podría o debería serlo por el mismo motivo pues es casi igual, menos mal que está presente -no lo sabía- para poder ejemplificar ahora). Fíjate en la discusión y en los motivos del borrado: Commons:Deletion requests/File:CGAC, Santiago de Compostela.jpg.

Tras este comentario, desaparezco de Commons. No me interesa discutir. Seguiré subiendo mis fotos, proponiendolas si me parece, pero no votaré ni colaboraré más. He realizado más de 60.000 ediciones, bastantes más, con varios usuarios que nunca se cruzaron, en los diferentes proyectos en que he participado, y no acepto la desconsideración a la que usuarios como tú me someten, no acepto tampoco que me rayen el coche, que me desatornillen las ruedas..., por eso dejé de ser burócrata.

Encantado con que te parezca que tu imagen no focaliza bastante la foto de Bush aunque te acabo de demostrar lo contrario.

No me interesa discutir, no me interesa hablar de esta cuestión. ¿Quieres tener razón? Pues te digo que tienes razón. ¿Es suficiente?--Miguel Bugallo 02:42, 19 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Question Y quien podría querer o pagar por una mala fotografía de Bush? --Tomascastelazo (talk) 17:35, 19 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Por favor señores, no conviertan esto en una batalla personal. Las políticas del proyecto serán las que diriman la cuestión y basándome en ellas he votado por el borrado porque, evidentemente, es una foto sin origen de un personaje público que puede tener copyright mientras no se demuestre lo contrario. El ampararse en COM:DM podría servir si, como he puesto en mi argumentación y pone claramente en esa política, la photo de Bush fuera incidental, estuviera en segundo plano, medio escondida, fuera lo suficientemente pequeña o desenfocada, nada de lo cual es el caso. Un saludo. Anna (Cookie) (talk) 01:15, 20 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ana, no me preocupan las políticas del proyecto, lo que me preocupa son las personas que interpretan las políticas del proyecto. También me preocupa la promoción del voto. Quien decide que es suficientemente pequeña o que grado de desenfoque es aceptable para satisfacer tu juicio? 1%, 2%, 5%, 10% del área de la imagen es suficientemente pequeña? ¿Cómo determinas el desenfoque? la imagen en cuestión representa el 5% del área y 5% de los objetos presentes, a mi juicio eso es suficientemente pequeña. Tus argumentos, como los de Miguel no los considero válidos y estoy empezando a considerarlos como insultos. --Tomascastelazo (talk) 03:29, 20 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Entendido[edit]

Miguel y no es necesaria ninguna disculpa porque tu prodecer ha sido correcto, acudiste a mí como podrías haber solicitado ayuda a cualquier otro administrador y el sentido de mi voto se ha basado en las políticas, no en ningún canvassing, imagino que al igual que habría hecho otro admin. De todos modos, en una solicitud de borrado es la comunidad la que decide si esa imagen infringe las políticas o no, pero no por la cantidad de votos positivos o negativos que reuna sino por las razones expuestas en cada uno, así que dejemos que el proceso continúe su curso. Un saludo. Anna (Cookie) (talk) 20:33, 20 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Praia do hotel Bahía Príncipe - Quintana Roo - México-18.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments OK; strange building... --Mbdortmund 23:36, 19 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Vida_maia_-_Facendo_arepas_-_Quintana_Roo_-_México.jpg[edit]

File:Vida_maia_-_Facendo_arepas_-_Quintana_Roo_-_México.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Tomascastelazo (talk) 03:18, 24 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Corredoira. El amor y sus penas. c 1916.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Mbdortmund 01:00, 22 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Praza de praterías. Catedral de Santiago de Compostela. 01-2011-9.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments the head is funny :-) --Carschten 19:10, 22 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Praza de praterías. Catedral de Santiago de Compostela. 01-2011-6.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support QI & Useful --Archaeodontosaurus 09:57, 23 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Praza de praterías. Catedral de Santiago de Compostela. 01-2011-3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support QI & Useful --Archaeodontosaurus 09:57, 23 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Praza de praterías. Catedral de Santiago de Compostela. 01-2011-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments also a lot chromatic aberrations, but quality is otherwise good enough --Carschten 19:10, 22 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, you're right. New version. I think that it's better ( chromatic aberrations), but I'm not sure (cache)--Lmbuga 19:28, 22 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Wow, really much better. Thanks! --Carschten 19:34, 22 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Praza de praterías. Catedral de Santiago de Compostela. 01-2011-Detalle.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Mbdortmund 00:22, 24 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Felicitation[edit]

I am very pleased for the spider in FP, I can not vote but we had reason to believe it. If you remove the spot in the sky for Santiago matamouros. Casa do concello de Santiago de Compostela.jpg I would be happy to promote it.--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 19:02, 26 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Santiago matamouros. Casa do concello de Santiago de Compostela.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments A black spot in the sky at the top right --Archaeodontosaurus 13:02, 25 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
New verion without black spot and CA--Lmbuga 19:28, 26 January 2011 (UTC) Support Good now --Archaeodontosaurus 06:38, 27 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

no te parece raro?[edit]

Pregunta: para mi imagen (Turtle mazunte oaxaca mexico claudio giovenzana 2010.jpg) que ha sido candidada a Feature picture escribiste:

---- Oppose Adorable, I love it, but per The High Fin Sperm Whale and not sharp enough--Miguel Bugallo 00:38, 30 January 2011 (UTC)----

Ahora, yo soy usuario nuevo pero queria saber si es normal decir que adoras una imagen y luego hacerte contrario a su promocion porque a un otro no le gusta.

No se.. hazme saber porfavor, y si puedes cambiar tu idea me daria mucho gusto. Saludos

--> RE: Hola Giove.

He estado a punto de no responderte porque el tono de tu comentario no me parece adecuado (el título, en concreto). Al decir que eres un usuario nuevo, lo comprendo, lo respeto y lo acepto. Es cierto que hay muchos usuarios experimentados que son especialistas en ridiculizar y/o denigrar, pero siempre pienso que, cuando te ves ligeramente o muy ridiculizado por un usuario nuevo, es por un defecto de formas o de conocimiento por su parte...

Antes de explicarte mi contribución en FP, deseo decirte que el título de tu comentario no es adecuado o respetuoso: Me preguntas ¿No te parece raro? ¿Me preguntas a mí, cuestionando lo que he hecho? "Por favor, un poco de respeto", podría decirte... y entraríamos en un conflicto absurdo que no tendría sentido.

No todos tenemos que ser iguales, pero podemos respetarnos. Mi opinión no tiene que ser como la tuya, ni la tuya como la mía. Tú no tienes que pensar lo mismo que yo, pero no pensar lo mismo no te da derechos para usar atificios lingüísticos que te sitúan por encima de mí.

Eso sí, a partir de ahí, tu comentario es normal, más que aceptable, por lo que me quedo con todo lo demás -que es lo que importa- e intento responderte.

Yo tengo una pequeña pero considerable experiencia en Commons. No he aprovechado el tiempo como otros, pues preferiría no tener dicha experiencia, pero la tengo, la tengo muy a mi pesar. Desde el año 2005 he subido unos pocos cientos de imágenes (3000?, 4000?, 5000 me parecen demasiadas, como mucho, 4200). La mayor parte de ellas me parecen malas, mucho más malas si pongo la vista en proponerlas para FP.

Entre ellas hay imágenes adorables que no se pueden proponer por no reunir condiciones de calidad técnica adecuadas. Esta foto es una de las pocas que me han intentado comprar (2 veces de EEUU), lo máximo que me ofrecieron fueron 30 dólares: Me negué (que la usen nombrándome a mí y a Commons). Para mí la imagen es adorable, pero no es FP. No es FP porque tiene casi 2 megapixels, pero no llega a tenerlos pues es 1,600 × 1,200 pixels. Si la imagen fuese 2000 x 1500 la popondría.

Tu foto es adorable, preciosa. Propia de una determinada sensibilidad. Dice de su autor. Dice de su intención. Pero... pero... pero tiene problemas técnicos. Los problemas técnicos no son de tamaño como en mi imagen (aunque quizás en mi imagen haya otros problemas), son diferentes

Conseguir que una imagen sea aprobada en FP es francamente difícil. Yo en 5-6 años he conseguido 6. No solamente tienen que ser las imágenes adorables e utilizables enciclopedicamente, tienen que ser además técnicamente intachables. Personalmente, hablando de tu imagen, considero que es preciosa, pero que su calidad no está al nivel de las imágenes FP: "Quality and lighting too poor" dice "The High Fin Sperm Whale". Además para mí no tiene la suficiente nitidez.

No te desanimes por éso. Creo que has estado muy cerca. Tu cámara -que es muy buena- te tiene que permitir hacer fotos que sean FP. Intenta aprender, sigue las votaciones y lee las críticas (aunque muchas pueden ser barbaridades, entre ellas algunas mías). Ánimo

Te recomiendo una cosa. Antes de proponer una imagen a FP, proponla a Imagen de calidad. El ideal de una imagen de calidad está expresado aquí. Es mucho más fácil que una imagen sea promovida como imagen de calidad a que sea promovida como FP. Prueba con QI, yo con QI me atrevo (case 100 imágenes mías son QI); con FP, casi no me atrevo, no digo que las proponga cuando las veo perfectas, porque no es cierto (véase la imagen que aceptaron hoy, la 6ª mía), pero casi.

Creo que ya me he extendido demasiado. Espero que comprendas y seas capaz de leer con buena fe entre líneas. No dudes, si es con buena fe (no sé si en español se escribe "fé", nunca o casi nunca escribo en español) que me tienes aquí. Un cordial saludo--Miguel Bugallo 19:13, 31 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion[edit]

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:Ficheiro-Araña alimentándose de Auchenorrhyncha. Bastavales, Brión, 090905.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Ficheiro-Araña alimentándose de Auchenorrhyncha. Bastavales, Brión, 090905.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 14:00, 31 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Acordeonista en Santiago de Compostela.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very good quality --George Chernilevsky 11:43, 30 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Centro sociocultural de Vite. Santiago de Compostela.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments It can't be faulted (and black+red+gold are the colors of Germany :-)) --Carschten 20:16, 30 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

¡gracias![edit]

Hello, thank you for your support with File:Antonius Kloster BW 15 Retouched.jpg --Berthold Werner (talk) 16:51, 4 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Don't be sorry :-)[edit]

Hola Luis Miguel, Gracias por tus observaciones, la crítica es útil cuando es argumentada. Saludos, --Myrabella (talk) 22:43, 8 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comment[edit]

¡Holà!

This is just to say to you that I think that the comment of Taxiarchos over your own comment about his photo of the canadian city hall (with the thumbnail of glasses and the suggestion to try some) is not only unpolite, but really outrageous and unacceptable, and makes me really angry. Sometimes I disagree with your reviews, sometimes I agree, but it is not a reason for such attacks. At the end, (I read the QIC discussion) if you decide to stay (I hope so), please continue to keep your mind free ! And don't worry about your english : it is not so poor ! ;)

Saludos from Paris --Jebulon (talk) 15:41, 10 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Re:Otra traducción[edit]

Hola Miguel, siento no haber estado para hacer la traducción, llevo unos días con pocos ánimos para andar por aquí, nuestros perros han sido envenenados y están muy graves. Un abrazo. Anna (Cookie) (talk) 22:22, 11 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Bravo[edit]

Bravo pour l'image du jour! --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 09:10, 12 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2011-02-06 Toras. Vilarromarís.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Re:Lmbuga[edit]

Ya sabes que siempre se produce algún encontronazo por aquí, tranquilo, tómate un tiempo de descanso y después te replanteas ese mejor en otro sitio que suena muy definitivo. Escríbeme pronto y me cuentas. Un fuerte abrazo. Anna (Cookie) (talk) 22:10, 12 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Torre de Hércules - DivesGallaecia2012-20.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very good photo --George Chernilevsky 22:39, 12 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Torre de Hércules - DivesGallaecia2012-45.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good--Jebulon 01:24, 13 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Torre de Hércules - DivesGallaecia2012-69.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good--Jebulon 01:24, 13 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Torre de Hércules - DivesGallaecia2012-41.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good--Jebulon 01:24, 13 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Torre de Hércules - DivesGallaecia2012-3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 20:24, 12 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Torre de Hércules - DivesGallaecia2012-46.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good and interesting--Jebulon 01:24, 13 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Torre de Hércules - DivesGallaecia2012-47.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Mbdortmund 23:12, 12 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Torre de Hércules - DivesGallaecia2012-77.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 20:24, 12 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Torre de Hércules - DivesGallaecia2012-42.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good to me.--Jebulon 01:24, 13 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Torre de Hércules - DivesGallaecia2012-62.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 20:24, 12 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Torre de Hércules - DivesGallaecia2012-39.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good. Latine text, french caption, and english and french translations added.--Jebulon 01:21, 13 March 2011 (UTC) A set for a VIS ?--Jebulon 01:24, 13 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks--Lmbuga 23:47, 14 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion[edit]

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:Torre de Hércules - DivesGallaecia2012-62.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Torre de Hércules - DivesGallaecia2012-62.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 22:04, 17 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Araña Mandaio 07-0-2006 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Nice--Holleday 17:13, 18 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Re:Piedra extraña[edit]

Sí es extraña, sí, parece que alguien se hubiera dedicado a hacer encaje de bolillos en ella. Mañana borro las versiones viejas, así permanecen un poco más de tiempo.
Buen plan eso de volver al cole para refrescar el inglés, aunque no está tan mal, si no intentas hacer frases muy complejas se entiende. Un abrazo. Anna (Cookie) (talk) 20:22, 22 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

He borrado todas excepto la anterior a la actual, pesa 1,6 mb más y no veo ninguna diferencia entre ambas ¿la dejo por si fuera de utilidad? Anna (Cookie) (talk) 00:39, 25 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Pues si escribes en gallego lo único que puede ocurrir es que no entienda del todo tu mensaje y venga a que me lo aclares, pero así practico otro idioma más, que también es de nuestra España :-)

He borrado la otra versión, el trabajo es mínimo y si para lo único que puede servir es para criticarla no merece la pena. Lo que es el no ver (o no entender), comparé ambas en pantalla completa (y lo he vuelto a hacer antes de borrarla), pero debe ser que la pantalla de mi portátil no tiene suficiente resolución porque no veo los halos verdes. Enhorabuena por otra imagen de calidad más y a ver si encuentra sitio en algún artículo. Apertas. Anna (Cookie) (talk) 22:12, 25 March 2011 (UTC) Yo y mi despiste, no había visto los enlaces a las wikis.[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pedras estrañas. Praia do Hotel Bahía Príncipe, Quintana Roo, México 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very good -- George Chernilevsky 09:41, 22 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Re:Pregunta[edit]

No se pueden fusionar dos cuentas diferentes cuando las dos están creadas, sinceramente yo tampoco recordaba si se podía, pero he encontrado un escueto comentario aquí Merge requests. It is not possible for bureaucrats to merge two different Commons user accounts, and requests to do so must therefore be declined.. Lo que sí puedes hacer es redireccionar la página de usuario y discusión de Xan de ningures a Lmbuga, pones una explicación en las páginas de Xan y ya está, no creo que nadie ponga en duda que es tu cuenta y si alguien lo hiciera daré fe que es tuya, recuerdo que me lo comentaste por e-mail y hay un par de comentarios míos en esa discusión. Anna (Cookie) (talk) 20:34, 26 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Re-signature[edit]

Hello Lmbuga !

Some informations.

The first comment (and support vote !) under your maya picture was indeed from me. I don't understand what happened with the "tilde signature", and don't know why the name of Berthold Werner appeared instead of mine.

I think that Berthold don't know too, but he support this image too and agree with me.

The last comment is from me too. As the tilde-signature tool was still broken, I used a "manual" signature with only my nickname.

Absolutely no persecution here, I'm sorry if you thought so. Only a joke with the word "immortal".

This maya picture is very nice, and deserves really the QI status.

Friendly from Paris --Jebulon (talk) 16:11, 4 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't worry.

Your english level is not so bad.

Do not hesitate to ask me if problem, even in spanish (I'm not able to write, but I can read and understand.

You are not persecuted !!--Jebulon (talk) 16:26, 4 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2010. Chichén Itzá. Quintana Roo. México.-32.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very nice, interesting, and "pinsharp".--Berthold Werner 12:58, 3 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
That wasn't me, but I agree. --Berthold Werner 15:40, 3 April 2011 (UTC) Sorry, I don't understand what happened with the tildes-signatures. I Jebulon am the author of the first (and immortal) review of this picture. Jebulon[reply]
Comment The signature of Jebulon is not correct. I am accustomed to be persecuted. The image is mine: See the camara, 25 November 2010 is the data of the image and the data of others images (I have been in Chichén Itzá that day). I do not believe that Jebulon wrote the previous commentary--Lmbuga 14:35, 4 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
...but who has written it knows I like Jebulon--Lmbuga 14:42, 4 April 2011 (UTC) Now I understand. Problem with the language: my level of english is too bad--Lmbuga 16:17, 4 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your messages on my talk page[edit]

(the following message was made in french, and translated with google, sorry for mistakes)

Hola Luis Miguel. Perdón por haber esperado tanto tiempo para contestar.

Entiendo sus mensajes con un poco de tiempo, un buen diccionario, y ... Traductor Google!

Gracias por su confianza.

Usted tiene dudas dentro de sus propias afirmaciones, que debe ser más "positivo" en sus comentarios. En mi opinión, nunca es bueno que reconsidere su opinión o dude demasiado y mostrarlo. Tómese su tiempo para elegir y decidir!

Es cierto que no siempre estoy de acuerdo contigo, pero no importa, la regla del juego! No te desprecian, por supuesto! Así que usted puede seguir confiando en mí.

Lamento que tu amor de Galicia que tiene miedo de represalias, en la Wikipedia, o incluso en la vida real. No sé su país, pero sé que un (fotos que he visto) poco de España (Andalucía).

Sigue nos presentan imágenes de Galicia, es muy interesante y muy bonita (Me encantó la serie de faro romano).

He aprendido mucho de ti y de tus fotos, español Celta!

Os saludo amable de París, bajo el sol.

--Jebulon (talk) 11:57, 9 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pedras estrañas. Praia do Hotel Bahía Príncipe, Quintana Roo, México 6.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 07:25, 7 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pedras estrañas. Praia do Hotel Bahía Príncipe, Quintana Roo, México 7.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 07:25, 7 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nueva version, re.[edit]

OK for your new version, thanks for improvements. Which tools did you use ?--Jebulon (talk) 09:15, 11 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Templo votivo do mar - Panxón - Nigrán - Galiza.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Comment nice church, nice photo. The lighting looks like sunshine, but at the left the sky looks grey (lie a try of overexposure-fixing) and the remain of the sky is blown out. What happened? --Carschten 15:54, 8 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Ok, now a lot of more of blown-out-parts are fixed. But looks strange imo... --Carschten 15:57, 8 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I am going to work the image again. But it is difficult. I begin now, in case of I not to be able… “decline”. Thanks--Lmbuga 16:13, 8 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
New version, perhaps not better. The light is at first hour (10:00h-11:00h) but the image was taken in special day because there was African wind warm, full of dirt. To me the image is not overexposed, but... I understand if you decline the image--Lmbuga 17:14, 8 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support yeah! That's very good now imo. Not perfect, but I really like it now --Carschten 19:27, 8 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Salve regina marium - Monteferro - Nigrán - Galiza-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments OK --Jebulon 09:46, 10 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

QI conflicts[edit]

It would be very friendly if you could stop the discussion with Taxiarchos on QI. Keep cool. Please don't comment his pictures for a while in order to calm down. We have a good atmosphere on QI since long time and there are lots of pictures for reviews and discussions. Sometimes it is a better way to avoid conflicts. There is no reason for such emotional debates. --Mbdortmund (talk) 22:21, 12 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hola Miguel, me uno a la petición de Mbdortmund, no merece la pena enrarecer el ambiente de QI por una sola imagen ni por un solo usuario. No he visto que se hayan borrado tus comentarios ni tu voto de la discusión, que es lo que realmente importa y es el lugar correcto donde hacer críticas o comentarios, porque las notas en las imágenes solo se deben utilizar para añadir información neutral a partes específicas, tanto críticas como comentarios de incorrecciones no están permitidas. Como te pide Mb, evita comentar en sus imágenes durante un tiempo hasta que las aguas se calmen y no le des más importancia, de vez en cuando se topa uno con gente poco respetuosa, pero las medidas drásticas deben ser la última opción, porque no ayudan a mejorar el ambiente, sino que suelen estropearlo más. Un abrazo. Anna (Cookie) (talk) 23:51, 13 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Miguel listen to your friends, even if you're right, you do not become angry. I tell you even more frankly, I'm like you, am ready to revolt against injustice.--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 10:23, 14 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

¡Pero cómo no va a tener sentido tu presencia aquí! Eres un usuario valioso, todas las imágenes destacadas y buenas que tienes son la muestra de ello y no solo las imágenes, el resto de trabajo que realizas y has realizado. Mira, no voy a responder a tu pregunta hasta dentro de siete días, ese es el tiempo que te pido que reflexiones y dejes enfriar este asunto, si para entonces continúas pensando en abandonar te responderé, con todo el dolor de mi corazón. ¿Me harás el favor de esperar una semana antes de tomar una decisión definitiva? Te lo pido como amiga. Un abrazo. Anna (Cookie) (talk) 21:48, 15 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

No Miguel, no malinterpretes mis palabras quizás mal expresadas, con información neutral pretendía decir "información descriptiva" nada más. El que tú señalaras en la nota la distorsión del tejado (no recuerdo exactamente lo que era) no es ningún insulto, ni mala fe por tu parte porque otros usuarios han comentado también esa distorsión y el proponente de la imagen admite que existe. El único problema es que en Commons:Notas en las imágenes dice que no se admiten ningún tipo de comentarios sobre la imagen, salvo características descriptivas neutrales, en ningún momento, ni durante la votación, ni antes ni después. Eso no tiene nada que ver con el voto ni los comentarios que has hecho en la votación, que son perfectamente admisibles. Venga, te hago caso, paso de ti, pero solo hasta la semana que viene. Tendrás noticias mías. Anna (Cookie) (talk) 00:29, 16 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Templo votivo do mar - Panxón - Nigrán - Galiza-9.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Mbdortmund 04:27, 13 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Porto de Panxón - Nigrán - Galiza-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 20:42, 12 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Illas Estelas desde Monteferro - Nigrán - Galiza 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very good quality. --Carschten 20:35, 16 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2011-02-06 Toras. Vilarromarís-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good.--Jebulon 08:21, 5 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Templo votivo do mar - Panxón - Nigrán - Galiza-16.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Kitsch sculpture IMO, but very good picture --Jebulon 07:42, 5 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Templo votivo do mar - Panxón - Nigrán - Galiza-14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good--Jebulon 08:15, 5 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Salve regina marium - Monteferro - Galiza-3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good--Jebulon 07:37, 5 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Manuel Reimóndez Portela - A Estrada - Galiza-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Schlaier 14:52, 5 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Manuel Reimóndez Portela - A Estrada - Galiza-3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good. --King of Hearts 19:56, 5 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Torre de Hércules - DivesGallaecia2012-76.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good.--Ankara 23:34, 5 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Torre de Hércules - DivesGallaecia2012-63.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments As for me? QI.--Vizu 13:52, 6 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gonipterus scutellatus from Coira, Portosín, Porto do Son, Galicia, Spain - 20100830-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI to me. --Quartl 06:40, 8 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Escultura de Manuel Vázquez Figueroa - Santiago de Compostela.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Meets the criteria, imo.--MrPanyGoff 18:50, 8 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Torre de Hércules - DivesGallaecia2012-57.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good, informative QI, imo.--MrPanyGoff 18:55, 8 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Texto da escultura de Manuel Vázquez Figueroa - Santiago de Compostela.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Tilted --Jebulon 08:19, 5 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Ok, Withdrawn (Ok, the images QI can not be tilted)--Lmbuga 21:14, 7 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry, I haven't the raw file--Lmbuga 21:19, 7 May 2011 (UTC) No need of the raw file !! I've uploaded a corrected version, please withdraw your withdrawn !!--Jebulon 16:01, 8 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Ok, thanks. Thank you. The image is "nomination"--Lmbuga 22:32, 8 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Very good work, Jebulon--Lmbuga 22:35, 8 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Good now (although a little tight below). --Avenue 01:00, 10 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Torre de Hércules - DivesGallaecia2012-20.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Muy bién.--Jebulon 10:01, 11 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Praza de Baiona e escultura conmemorativa da chegada da carabela La Pinta - Galiza.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. Harrison49 00:35, 13 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Praza de Baiona - Galiza.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. Harrison49 00:35, 13 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Club Náutico de Panxón - Nigrán - Galiza.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good -- George Chernilevsky 17:43, 17 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2011-05-21. Santiago de Compostela-Escultura fronte á Facultade de Filosofía.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Tomer T 05:25, 22 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2011-05-21. Santiago de Compostela-Pelamios.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI for me. --Vizu 18:25, 21 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2011-05-21. Cruceiro. Santiago de Compostela-Pelamios-1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 08:06, 22 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Festicultores. Correlingua. A Estrada. 2011-3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality, albeit the woman passing in the background is distracting. --Slaunger 20:04, 21 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Re:Problema y otras cuestiones[edit]

Hola Miguel, me alegro mucho que sigas por aquí, confiaba que así fuera :)
Bien, empiezo a contestar todos tus mensajes:
He borrado la propuesta que estaba incompleta, creo que no es necesario abrir una propuesta en el caso de un fallo así, simplemente eliminas la imagen de la lista explicando en el resumen el motivo. Por si acaso quieres volver a proponerla o corregir las notas en ella, telaraña es cobweb e hilo de araña thread of spider.
Con respecto a las notas en imágenes propuestas supongo que el límite está en que sean pequeños errores fácilmente subsanables, como esa mota de polvo que quizá fuera una aguja en un pajar encontrar si no la hubieran marcado. Una vez corregida la nota se puede retirar.
Aquí tienes la traducción:

The fundamental reason to consider that the image should be deleted, besides my previous exposition, is the following: Commons provides images throughout the world which allow derivative works and commercial use. This image, if kept with this license here, would allow anyone to use it commercially without commiting a crime. If it was reproduced to simulate the product Commons is commiting a crime, as "Marcolini" has not given his consent for derivative works or commercial use, so OTRS permission is needed.

I'm sorry but I'm thinkng about the image for now. In my opinion, images must be considered individually, almost always so, later I will consider if, in my opinion, wine bottles are copyright violations or not.

Sinceramente, yo también debo ser mala administradora, porque si me hubiera encontrado la imagen antes que tú la habría borrado, pero...quizás habría sido un error, por no considerar antes si es un diseño tan simple que no tenga derecho a copyright. A veces las cosas que parecen evidentes no lo son tanto, sobre todo en estas cuestiones legales.
Un abrazo bien fuerte. Anna (Cookie) (talk) 23:59, 24 May 2011 (UTC)Jeje, me recuerda viejos tiempos, contando hasta los segundos para descansar de los pequeños ruidosos. Anna (Cookie) (talk) 22:02, 26 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

No, no estás confundido. En mi opinión (porque cada uno interpreta las normas a su manera), rebasa el umbral de originalidad, ya que tiene un diseño gráfico ¿simple? sí, pero para mí es un trabajo creativo, no solo un tipo de letra estándar. Además, me pregunto dónde está la caja que se supone ha fotografiado, yo solo veo un cuadrado negro, si hubiera una perspectiva que desviara la atención del logo aún podría alegar que quería mostrar la caja, pero así no. En fin, no te comas el coco, lo que sea será. Anna (Cookie) (talk) 23:07, 26 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cruceiro - Porto do Son 2011-05-27.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good -- George Chernilevsky 07:03, 1 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cruceiro - Porto do Son 2011-05-27b.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Tomer T 03:36, 1 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cruceiro da igrexa de San Vicente de Noal - Porto do Son 2011-05-27.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good -- George Chernilevsky 07:04, 1 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Igrexa parroquial de Doade - Lalín - Galicia[edit]

Good evening Luis, remove the spot (see note) on this picture that I found good ...--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 18:13, 4 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Porto do Son 2011-05-27. Beira do mar de Arousa.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support QI for me --Archaeodontosaurus 10:58, 4 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Doade - Lalín - Galiza-3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support QI for me --Archaeodontosaurus 11:07, 4 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Portrait[edit]

Please create a separate file with separate history. I need this to keep my gallery of my-made photos. Thank you.--PereslavlFoto (talk) 20:43, 6 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the luminosity sample! I will fix my file and re-upload it. What about disturbing elements, they are part of reality in this photo. I would like to keep them :-).--PereslavlFoto (talk) 20:45, 6 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I made some changes per your advice and I would like to thank you for the inspiration.--PereslavlFoto (talk) 13:09, 8 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Tip: Categorizing images[edit]

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ magyar ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ქართული ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ +/−

Hello, Lmbuga!

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]

[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

CategorizationBot (talk) 11:55, 7 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Illas Sisargas.jpg was uncategorized on 6 June 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:55, 7 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Piñeiro - Porto do Son 2011-05-27.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI for me. --Slaunger 08:00, 5 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lonxa en Porto do Son 2011-05-27.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very detailed. The composition is a bit cluttered, but this is hard to avoid given the subject. Like the atmosphere with the gulls. Can almost "smell" the photo:-) --Slaunger 08:13, 5 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Escultura en Porto do Son 2011-05-27.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very nice. Since the main subject is a sculpture, and it is taken in Spain, you may want to add {{FoP-Spain}} to the file page. --Slaunger 08:13, 5 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, added--Lmbuga 11:10, 5 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Igrexa parroquial de Doade - Lalín - Galicia-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Comment Perhaps the cables (wires) are disturbing--Lmbuga 20:30, 3 June 2011 (UTC)*The cables are not a problem the small black spot a little. --Archaeodontosaurus 11:04, 4 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks. New version--Lmbuga 20:09, 4 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very good now --Archaeodontosaurus 07:28, 5 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Praia de Porto do Son con Monte Louro ó fondo 2011-05-27.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments High-quality photo -- George Chernilevsky 07:05, 6 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Río Asneiro- Codesedo- Doade- Lalín-4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good -- George Chernilevsky 07:10, 6 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cabalos en Codesedo - Doade - Lalín - Galicia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Raghith 05:07, 7 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Museo da Paisaxe. Doade - Lalín - Galicia-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments High-quality photo. Very good -- George Chernilevsky 06:20, 7 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Porto de Porto do Son com Monte Louro ó fondo 2011-05-27b.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Tomer T 21:06, 6 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Porto do Son 2011-05-27-16.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. Harrison49 22:01, 6 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Praia de Porto do Son con Monte Louro ó fondo. 2011-05-27.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. Jovianeye 01:39, 7 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Praias en Porto do Son 2011-05-27.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. Jovianeye 01:39, 7 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Igrexa de San Vicente de Noal. Porto do Son 2011-05-27-30.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Lighting could be better, but QI for me. --King of Hearts 10:29, 7 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Edificios. Santiago de Compostela-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments There is a dust spot in the clouds as has already been indicated by an annotation on the file page by Archaeodontosaurus. --Slaunger 21:26, 7 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good now --Archaeodontosaurus 19:53, 8 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Doade - Lalín - Galiza-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 22:22, 8 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 1756-Hispaniarum rex Ferdinand VI.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 20:06, 6 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I prefer to photograph the coin again. Thanks--Lmbuga 08:15, 9 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Casa do Patrón - Doade - Lalín-28.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. Harrison49 19:07, 11 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your QI-reviews[edit]

Dear Lmbuga,

(1) Overexposed or underexposed parts of a picture are not necessary a reason for opposing a picture if the part is not significant for the total view.

(2) If you would apply your standard on my picture to yours you could not even nominate pictures like File:Doade - Lalín - Galiza-2.jpg or File:Edificios. Santiago de Compostela-2.jpg. The last one has clearly overexposured parts that carry much more weight than parts of this File:Malsburg-Kaltenbach - Evangelische Kirche9.jpg.

(3) Your vote (pro or contra) is for me quite equal, but I respond very angry when users write obviously stuff that is illogical or simply wrong and insistence on this balderdash.

(4) Overexposure is described or defined a loss of highlight details, underexposure as a loss of shadow detail. How you would explain the fact that you can see both clouds and windows with a clear structure in the 100 % view?

(5) My English is not perfect but I think it is as well arrogant and embarrassing because your English is not very good as well. Besides this is not a good level for conversation. Also not to imply to me being God.

Greetings --Wladyslaw (talk) 22:03, 14 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Re:Otra vez[edit]

Miguel, no me parece nada acertada tu petición de bloqueo a un usuario por el borrado de una crítica que va dirigida a su persona más que a su imagen. Ya habéis tenido un encontronazo anterior y se solicitó (a ambos) que evitárais comentar las imágenes del otro para no caer en conflictos. Por favor, respeta esta petición. Un saludo. Anna (Cookie) (talk) 01:14, 19 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mono araña - Quintana Roo - México-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. Harrison49 01:56, 17 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Edificios. Santiago de Compostela.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support QI for me --Archaeodontosaurus 05:36, 17 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Request[edit]

Maybe you can initiate deletion of this file? Thanks.--PereslavlFoto (talk) 00:14, 21 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you.--PereslavlFoto (talk) 13:05, 21 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Iguana - Quintana Roo - México 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Mbdortmund 23:27, 18 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:The lion of Egyptian revolution (Qasr al-Nil Bridge).jpg[edit]

Sadly the green chromatic aberrations (right of the lion) is not because of the camera or the image itself. The loin has gone a bit green due to lack of proper care. It sucks -- The Egyptian Liberal (talk) 16:54, 22 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orthetrum coerulescens[edit]

Hi Lmbuga, in supporting only one of your four Orthetrum coerulescens images I didn't want to imply that the other three are not QI. I couldn't support them outright, maybe someone else does.

In File:Orthetrum coerulescens. A Arnoia, Galicia (Spain).jpg, which has a similar view, the tail is slightly out of focus.
In File:Orthetrum coerulescens. A Arnoia- Galicia (Spain).jpg the head is slightly out of focus.
In File:2011-06-19. Libelula. A Arnoia. Galiza.jpg the whole animal is slightly out of focus.

Therefore these three images may narrowly miss QI status, maybe not.

PS: you may think about a more consistent naming scheme for your files, e.g. with running numbers, it helps to better keep track of your own images ;-). Best wishes, --Quartl (talk) 19:03, 26 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Re ->

Sorry, I can not say in English what I want (poor english).

I am thankful to you because you have reviewed in detail the images. I agree with you. The better image is the image that you say.

I consider unnecessary to propose the other images. Commons has more value if the total of images QI is very good. If the images are simply acceptable, Commons is less good. In addition, I am a apprentice and, in order to learn, I do not need prizes (many quality images done by me), I need opinions.

When you chose that image, I understood your reasons because your reasons are my reasons, but I need your reasons because I'm not sure.

I only need learn and I feel helped by you. Thanks--Miguel Bugallo 20:57, 26 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I love your images--Miguel Bugallo 21:03, 26 June 201

Thanks for the praise, but I am also still learning. You are doing very well, your images are way ahead the average quality we get here. It's good to see that we both seem to have the same standards. And your English is also quite good, my Spanish is nonexistent :-). Best wishes, --Quartl (talk) 06:59, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Iguana - Quintana Roo - México 5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.. Please add geotag. --Cayambe 19:10, 24 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, geotag added--Lmbuga 13:00, 24 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pedras estrañas. Praia do Hotel Bahía Príncipe, Quintana Roo, México 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 19:10, 24 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pedras estrañas. Praia do Hotel Bahía Príncipe, Quintana Roo, México 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 19:13, 24 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

congratulations ![edit]

Hi Luis Miguel the Galician.
I like this picture very much. Looks really "celtic" like in french Brittany, where we have almost the sames.
I've add it in another category.
Thanks for nice images from Galicia ! Cheers from Paris,--Jebulon (talk) 23:42, 28 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2011-06-19. Castro de San Cibrao de Las - Galiza-11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good.--Jebulon 23:18, 25 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Orthetrum coerulescens. A Arnoia, Galicia (Spain) 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Quartl 21:15, 25 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2011-06-19. Castro de San Cibrao de Las - Galiza.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Ximonic 12:01, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2011-06-27. Nasas na praia de Louro- Muros.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Saffron Blaze 21:35, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2011-06-19. Castro de San Cibrao de Las - Galiza-5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good -- George Chernilevsky 08:28, 28 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2011-06-19. Castro de San Cibrao de Las - Galiza-17.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Despite the softness below the actual subject seems to be sharp. A QI in my opinion. --Ximonic 12:03, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2011-06-19. Castro de San Cibrao de Las - Galiza-13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very good --George Chernilevsky 08:27, 28 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2011-06-19. Castro de San Cibrao de Las - Galiza-12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good -- George Chernilevsky 08:29, 28 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:2011-06-27. Nasas na praia de Louro- Muros.jpg[edit]

Espero explicações--Miguel Bugallo 01:49, 1 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cruceiro en Corcubión - Galiza-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very nice !--Jebulon 23:37, 28 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:2010-06-06 insectos-31.jpg[edit]

Hello again Luis Miguel This is Sciaridae. Nice photo Robert aka Notafly (talk) 20:41, 1 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Placa con altura e localización - Betanzos - Galiza.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 07:41, 30 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Placa en Cee - Antonio Castro García - Galiza.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality... I like plaques. --Cayambe 07:41, 30 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Edificios en Corcubión - Galiza.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support QI for me --Archaeodontosaurus 19:32, 29 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2011-06-19. Castro de San Cibran de Las - Galicia (Spain) 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 07:43, 30 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Tip: Categorizing images[edit]

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ magyar ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ქართული ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ +/−

Hello, Lmbuga!

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]

[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

CategorizationBot (talk) 11:14, 7 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Image:2011-06-19. Ribadavia - Galicia (Spain)-2.jpg was uncategorized on 6 July 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:14, 7 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Image:2011-06-19. Ribadavia - Galicia (Spain).jpg was uncategorized on 6 July 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:14, 7 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Casa en Ribadavia - Galiza.jpg was uncategorized on 12 July 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:14, 13 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Marca na pedra próxima á igrexa de San Xoan (sec. XII) en Ribadavia - Galiza-8.jpg was uncategorized on 12 July 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:14, 13 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Re:Pequeña traducción[edit]

Hola Miguel, el equivalente en inglés es "Wayside shrine" y ya hay categorías por países Category:Wayside shrines by country. Podrías crear Category:Wayside shrines in Galicia y una galería titulada en gallego donde se puede poner una corta introducción en varios idiomas, si te parece cuando la tengas me avisas y pongo la traducción en inglés. Un abrazo. Anna (Cookie) (talk) 01:58, 10 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Perfecto, pero te has comido la "s" final en shrine, así que antes de que añadas más imágenes voy a crearla bien escrita y a trasladar las que hay. ¿Por qué no te gusta el título, no es así como se dice en gallego? Anna (Cookie) (talk) 20:53, 10 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Entendido, era curiosidad.
Sí existe la categoría soportales -> Category:Arcades y también Category:Porches -> pórticos. Aquí tienes una general sobre elementos arquitectónicos Category:Architectural elements. Bicos. Anna (Cookie) (talk) 01:56, 11 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ribadavia - Galiza-6.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Nice, even if the weather was not perfect...--Jebulon 23:51, 7 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ribadavia - Galiza-3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good composition. QI for me.--Jebulon 23:52, 7 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! A Arnoia - Viñedos de ribeiro á beira do Miño - Galiza.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support QI for me --Archaeodontosaurus 05:42, 8 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! A Arnoia - Plantas acuáticas - Galiza-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support QI & useful --Archaeodontosaurus 14:55, 7 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ribadavia - Galiza-18.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Mbdortmund 03:17, 10 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Thanks, I think that this image is better than the other--Lmbuga 03:53, 10 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! A Arnoia - Plantas acuáticas - Galiza.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Background a bit noisy, but the flower is really good --Mbdortmund 03:15, 10 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Igrexa de San Domingos (XIII-XIV). Ribadavia - Portal.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments I think you need to rotate this image just one tiny bit to the right. I've downloaded your image and tried that. I went by gut feeling not by grid lines. Fred Hsu 18:17, 10 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks. New version--Lmbuga 22:57, 10 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Cool --Fred Hsu 00:12, 11 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Kruchinin-2011-1_(retouched).jpg[edit]

File:Kruchinin-2011-1_(retouched).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

PereslavlFoto (talk) 23:18, 13 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you both for the example of retouching (that made me believe in this) and for the vote.--PereslavlFoto (talk) 23:48, 13 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ribadavia - Galiza-21.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 06:10, 12 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ribadavia - Galiza-22.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 06:11, 12 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ribadavia - Galiza-11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Geocoding would replace the image in the geographical context and come and see ... --Archaeodontosaurus 05:53, 11 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Added. Thanks--Lmbuga 12:33, 11 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Igrexa de San Xoan (sec. XII) en Ribadavia - Galiza-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Mbdortmund 17:19, 12 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Igrexa de San Xoan (sec. XII) en Ribadavia - Galiza-4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Mbdortmund 17:20, 12 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Igrexa de San Xoan (sec. XII) en Ribadavia - Galiza-5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments High quality photo -- George Chernilevsky 19:14, 12 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Igrexa de San Xoan (sec. XII) en Ribadavia - Galiza-7.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good -- George Chernilevsky 19:22, 12 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Igrexa de San Xoan (sec. XII) en Ribadavia - Galiza-6.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good -- George Chernilevsky 19:22, 12 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! A Arnoia. Río Miño-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Nice--Ankara 20:54, 13 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! A Arnoia. Río Miño-8.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Mbdortmund 05:12, 14 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Escudo. Ribadavia. Galiza - 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support QI for me --Archaeodontosaurus 16:49, 13 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2011-06-19. Castro de San Cibrao de Las - Galiza-4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments very good and nice --Carschten 15:26, 13 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! A Arnoia. Río Miño preto da desembocadura do río Arnoia-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 06:54, 15 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! A Arnoia. Río Arnoia na desembocadura no río Miño-1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 06:54, 15 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! A Arnoia. Río Miño-3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support QI for me --Archaeodontosaurus 14:57, 14 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! A Arnoia. Río Miño. Galicia (Spain)-5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Mbdortmund 02:29, 16 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Embarcación no río Miño. A Arnoia - Galicia (Spain).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Mbdortmund 02:31, 16 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Frei Jacinto de Ribera. Ribadavia- Galiza.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very good quality. --Berthold Werner 11:03, 18 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Reloxo na casa do concello. Ribadavia- Galiza.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Mbdortmund 17:43, 17 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ribadavia - Galiza-10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support QI for me --Archaeodontosaurus 06:04, 18 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File tagging File:A Estrada- do hórreo.jpg[edit]

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:A Estrada- do hórreo.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:A Estrada- do hórreo.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

– Adrignola talk 16:39, 20 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File tagging File:A Estrada- Ouzande fiestra.jpg[edit]

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:A Estrada- Ouzande fiestra.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:A Estrada- Ouzande fiestra.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

– Adrignola talk 16:40, 20 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File tagging File:A Estrada- Ouzande románico2.jpg[edit]

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:A Estrada- Ouzande románico2.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:A Estrada- Ouzande románico2.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

– Adrignola talk 16:40, 20 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File tagging File:A Estrada- Ouzande románico3.jpg[edit]

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:A Estrada- Ouzande románico3.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:A Estrada- Ouzande románico3.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

– Adrignola talk 16:41, 20 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File tagging File:A Estrada-Albariza.jpg[edit]

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:A Estrada-Albariza.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:A Estrada-Albariza.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

– Adrignola talk 16:41, 20 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File tagging File:A Estrada-Cores do hórreo.jpg[edit]

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:A Estrada-Cores do hórreo.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:A Estrada-Cores do hórreo.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

– Adrignola talk 16:42, 20 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File tagging File:A Estrada-Cruceiro.jpg[edit]

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:A Estrada-Cruceiro.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:A Estrada-Cruceiro.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

– Adrignola talk 16:42, 20 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File tagging File:A Estrada-O gardián do substento.jpg[edit]

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:A Estrada-O gardián do substento.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:A Estrada-O gardián do substento.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

– Adrignola talk 16:43, 20 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File tagging File:A Estrada-Pazo do prequecido.jpg[edit]

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:A Estrada-Pazo do prequecido.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:A Estrada-Pazo do prequecido.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

– Adrignola talk 16:43, 20 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File tagging File:A Estrada-Ponte romana.jpg[edit]

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:A Estrada-Ponte romana.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:A Estrada-Ponte romana.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

– Adrignola talk 16:43, 20 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File tagging File:A Estrada-Ponte romana2.jpg[edit]

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:A Estrada-Ponte romana2.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:A Estrada-Ponte romana2.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

– Adrignola talk 16:44, 20 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File tagging File:A Estrada-Vida e morte.jpg[edit]

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:A Estrada-Vida e morte.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:A Estrada-Vida e morte.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

– Adrignola talk 16:44, 20 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Igrexa de Santiago (s. XII-XIII). Ribadavia- Galiza.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. The door is quite lovely at full res. --Saffron Blaze 20:47, 18 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Igrexa de San Xoan (sec. XII) en Ribadavia - Galiza-3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support QI for me --Archaeodontosaurus 16:31, 18 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Igrexa de San Domingos de Ribadavia- Galiza-3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 08:17, 20 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Escudo na igrexa de San Domingos de Ribadavia- Galiza.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good. An ID should be helpful... It is a mandatory for living species or minerals, it should be a mandatory too for CoA, in my opinion, as they all are identifiable. Why not ?--Jebulon 22:54, 19 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I think that I understand your words. It is impossible for me to identify the coat. I only can place it in this category, but it's not the same necessarily. Sorry--Lmbuga 23:24, 19 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
If other users think that the image cannot be QI, I will not object anything (I will not put objections)--Lmbuga 23:32, 19 July 2011 (UTC) Oh surely no ! It is a very good picture IMO, and an obvious QI to me. My comment was just a thought, an idea ! --Jebulon 23:53, 19 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Ok, thanks. I also have had that idea, some times--Lmbuga 00:14, 20 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! A Arnoia. Río Miño.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jovianeye 12:31, 20 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Igrexa no barrio xudeu de Ribadavia - Galiza-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --H005 20:50, 20 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Centro de información xudía. Ribadavia. Galiza .jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments not really sophisticated, but good quality --Carschten 18:55, 22 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Escudo na casa do concello de Ribadavia- Galiza.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Carschten 09:37, 24 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Praza Maior de Ribadavia- Galiza.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Carschten 09:19, 24 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Paseo fluvial de Caneirón. Río Arnoia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments OK --H005 17:33, 23 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Tip: Categorizing images[edit]

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ magyar ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ქართული ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ +/−

Hello, Lmbuga!

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]

[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

CategorizationBot (talk) 12:08, 29 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Río Miño. A Arnoia. Galiza-7.jpg was uncategorized on 28 July 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 12:08, 29 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Río Miño. A Arnoia. Galiza-6.jpg was uncategorized on 28 July 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 12:08, 29 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Redondelo - Boa - Noia - Galiza-15.jpg was uncategorized on 13 August 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 12:08, 14 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Escultura en Vilagarcía de Arousa. Galiza-V3.jpg was uncategorized on 22 August 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:33, 23 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Pontona Aldamiz. Porto de Vilagarcía de Arousa. Galiza-V23.jpg was uncategorized on 22 August 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:33, 23 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Escultura de Emilio Mosquera Porto (escultor). O pobo de Vilagarcía de Arousa a Miguel Hernández-V1.jpg was uncategorized on 22 August 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:33, 23 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Desembocadura do río Lagareiros. Praia de Boca do Río - Carnota - Galiza 25 Abr 09.jpg[edit]

Boas, unha pregunta sobre esta imaxe. Vin que quitaches o marco e a marca de auga, ¿cómo fixeches para quitar a marca sin que se notara nada?, ¡está perfecto! :). ¿Hai algún truco ou programa que axude a facer este traballiño?. Saúdos, --Elisardojm (talk) 12:45, 29 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Si, xa sei que a foto era de Flickr. Pois eu teño o Gimp pero non sei sacarlle partido, só sei usalo de forma básica de todo para pequenos amaños e nada máis, se podes dicirme un par de trucos para facer quitar as marcas de auga agradeceríacho. Saúdos, --Elisardojm (talk) 22:20, 29 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Moitas grazas pola explicación a ver si lle pillo tranquillo :). Saúdos,--Elisardojm (talk) 23:18, 30 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Desembocadura do río Arnoia no río Miño. A Arnoia. Galiza.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Raghith 05:18, 28 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Río Miño antes de desembocar o Arnoia. A Arnoia. Galiza.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 08:54, 29 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Igrexa de Santo Antón. Ribadavia-1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 10:05, 29 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Río Avía en Ribadavia - Galiza[edit]

If you have any questions I will always be there for you.

Since you're here there is a problem that haunts me. You were set up in an QI image of a statue of a whale tail in a town in Galicia. I put QI but I say, "the two whales." Behind there was a fat lady and I thought it was great fun (I'm sure you were am deliberately). I thought the comment too bad for the lady and I all removed. It is not just for you. If you put it back I will vote for and I would not comment ...--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 13:26, 2 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Re:Poco importante[edit]

Hola Miguel, lo siento olvidé por completo tu mensaje. Llevo varios días sin entrar aquí y hoy al ver el nuevo de otro usuario he recordado el tuyo. Esas imágenes al no tener una solicitud de borrado no son defendibles, la única posibilidad es presentar el permiso del dueño, pero si dices que no puedes conseguirlo podrán estar más o menos tiempo ahí, por la cantidad de ellas que hay en el mismo caso, pero al final serán borradas. Si quieres subirlas con el mismo nombre desde Flickr puedo borrarlas y así no tienes que volver a enlazar las nuevas a las páginas donde estuvieran las antiguas. Un abrazo. Anna (Cookie) (talk) 22:53, 3 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Je, eso de aprovechar el verano es como el sueño de todo lo que uno haría si le tocara la lotería, al final es un castillo en el aire y el verano se va como el humo, pero bueno, siempre queda el próximo verano ;) Cuando tengas marcadas las imágenes me avisas. Anna (Cookie) (talk) 23:29, 3 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Praia de Sinás - Raxó - Poio - Galiza (Spain).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good.--Ankara 07:12, 3 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Colexiata de Santa María de Sar, Santiago de Compostela-2.jpg[edit]

Hello, I modified your image. If that does not please you you can remove it. It is a practical link. Good day. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 09:15, 9 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Montón[edit]

Ya están todas borradas. Si queda alguna más me avisas, pero no hace falta que las listes en mi discu, las localizo en tus contribuciones y así no trabajs dos veces. Bicos. Anna (Cookie) (talk) 21:59, 9 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Anaco de fresco da Colexiata de Santa María de Sar – Santiago de Compostela-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support QI & Useful --Archaeodontosaurus 09:00, 9 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cruceiro en Laraño – Santiago de Compostela.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 14:20, 11 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cruceiro e vista do monte Pedroso – Santiago de Compostela.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments some overexposed areas, but very nice composition and very good quality --Carschten 14:11, 9 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
New version, I think that it's better--Lmbuga 09:04, 12 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:En lembranza dos condenados pola Inquisición. Ribadavia. Galiza .jpg[edit]

Sorry I'm late, but I was far away from Internet those last weeks. English translation Done (file page and my talk page), I hope it is good. Have a nice day ! Friendly, --Jebulon (talk) 09:39, 16 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Embarcación con aparello en Carril - Vilagarcía de Arousa-1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good. --Ankara 21:27, 13 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Porto do Carril-9.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Carschten 13:40, 13 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Guindastre no porto do Carril coa illa Cortegada de fondo-3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Carschten 13:40, 13 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Monte Pedroso desde Laraño - Santiago - Galiza-4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Carschten 13:40, 13 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ameixas do Carril - Vilagarcía de Arousa-27.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 07:26, 15 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Praia de Portugalete - O Carril - Vilagarcía de Arousa-16.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 07:26, 15 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Praia de Portugalete - O Carril - Vilagarcía de Arousa-12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 07:26, 15 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:01-Segovia Acueducto.jpg[edit]

Hola Lmbuga. Olvidaste poner la fuente. Buena imagen. Un cordial saludo, --JMCC1 (talk) 11:10, 18 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hecho y sustituida en gl y pt. Apertas. Anna (Cookie) (talk) 21:44, 18 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Praia de Portugalete - O Carril - Vilagarcía de Arousa-11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good. --Ankara 09:26, 16 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Farola no Carril - Vilagarcía de Arousa-28.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Redondelo - Boa - Noia - Galiza-3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments CommentToo much water IMO, crop? --Ankara 21:30, 13 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks Done--Lmbuga 01:26, 15 August 2011 (UTC) Thanks. Better now IMO. --Ankara 09:19, 16 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Torre da igrexa de Santiago do Carril-Vilagarcía de Arousa-Galicia-33.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 06:08, 17 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Igrexa de Santiago do Carril-Vilagarcía de Arousa-Galicia-44.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 06:08, 17 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sagrario da Colexiata de Santa María de Sar – Santiago de Compostela.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support QI for me --Archaeodontosaurus 15:49, 16 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Berberechos na lonxa do Carril - Vilagarcía de Arousa - Galiza-52.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 09:10, 18 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2011-08-17 Cidade da Cultura. Santiago de Compostela-C03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 09:10, 18 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2011-08-17 Cidade da Cultura. Santiago de Compostela-C07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 09:10, 18 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Adán e Eva-Santiago do Carril-Vilagarcía de Arousa-Galicia-37.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 09:10, 18 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Igrexa parroquial de Santiago do Carril-Vilagarcía de Arousa-Galicia-32.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support QI for me --Archaeodontosaurus 05:31, 18 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Aparellos de pesca - O Carril - Vilagarcía de Arousa - Galiza-48.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments It's a QI to me.--Jebulon 16:31, 17 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Secundino García Ramos - practicante- O Carril-26.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very good -- George Chernilevsky 20:22, 17 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lonxa e porto do Carril-Vilagarcía de Arousa-Galicia-21.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments OK -- George Chernilevsky 19:05, 17 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! En lembranza dos condenados pola Inquisición. Ribadavia. Galiza .jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 07:26, 19 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2011-08-17 Cidade da Cultura. Santiago de Compostela-C16.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 07:26, 19 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2011-08-17 Cidade da Cultura. Santiago de Compostela-C17.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 07:26, 19 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2011-08-17 Cidade da Cultura. Santiago de Compostela-C18.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 07:26, 19 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2011-08-17 Cidade da Cultura. Santiago de Compostela-C19.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 07:26, 19 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2011-08-17 Cidade da Cultura. Santiago de Compostela-C04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very good -- George Chernilevsky 19:19, 18 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Porto do Carril-Vilagarcía de Arousa-Galicia-23.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 19:02, 18 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Adán e Eva-Santiago do Carril-Vilagarcía de Arousa-Galicia-36.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 19:02, 18 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Igrexa de Santiago do Carril-Vilagarcía de Arousa-Galicia-43.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Nice, but needs a better identification/description IMO--Jebulon 08:26, 17 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Geolocation. I don't know about saints. The next week I will go again to O Carril. I will speak with the neighbors about the sculptures. I have not found data on the author of the sculpture.--Lmbuga 14:42, 17 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
QI for me -- George Chernilevsky 20:05, 18 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Barco en Noia - Galiza.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Nice object and high quality photo. -- George Chernilevsky 08:12, 20 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Áncora e mecanismo no porto do Carril-Vilagarcía de Arousa-Galicia-31.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support QI & Useful --Archaeodontosaurus 09:17, 20 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2011-08-17 Biblioteca de Galicia. Cidade da Cultura. Santiago de Compostela-C11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support QI and Useful --Archaeodontosaurus 09:14, 20 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Embarcacións na praia de Portugalete - O Carril - Vilagarcía de Arousa-2b.jpg[edit]

Done Anna (Cookie) (talk) 00:42, 23 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Portosín - Redeira no porto - Galiza.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good.Ankara 14:24, 20 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cruceiro roto ante a igrexa de Santiago do Carril-Vilagarcía de Arousa-Galicia-34.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Yes.--Jebulon 10:07, 21 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2011-08-17 Biblioteca de Galicia. Cidade da Cultura. Santiago de Compostela-C10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good -- George Chernilevsky 05:26, 22 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Escultura de Emilio Mosquera Porto (escultor). O pobo de Vilagarcía de Arousa a Miguel Hernández-V2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very good -- George Chernilevsky 05:24, 22 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mural na fachada do edificio da Autoridade Portuaria. Vilagarcía de Arousa. Galiza-V5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very good -- George Chernilevsky 05:25, 22 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Praia de Boa Grande - Redondelo - Boa - Noia - Galiza-8.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Needs (maybe) a crop below, but QI--Jebulon 09:21, 21 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks. Cropped--Lmbuga 17:32, 21 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Embarcación da alfándega e bar no porto. Vilagarcía de Arousa. Galiza-V12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good.--Ankara 09:48, 23 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Embarcacións. Porto de Vilagarcía de Arousa. Galiza-V19.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good.--Ankara 09:55, 23 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Aixam - O Carril - Vilagarcía de Arousa - Galiza-46.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality..--Ankara 10:06, 23 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vista desde O Carril - Illas Malveiras e Briñas - Vilagarcía de Arousa-17.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very nice photograph. May be the location of the camera could be added? --A.Ceta 09:47, 22 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Geolocated--Lmbuga 16:37, 22 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Báscula - balanza - pesa.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments DoF not optimum, but QI--Jebulon 09:55, 25 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Embarcacións na praia de Portugalete - O Carril - Vilagarcía de Arousa-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cruceiro en Vilagarcía de Arousa. Galiza-V10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. Please add geotag. --Cayambe 22:59, 26 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cruceiro en Vilagarcía de Arousa. Galiza-V25.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 22:59, 26 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Arrecife. Lanzarote-21.jpg and File:Arrecife. Lanzarote-20.jpg[edit]

Hi Lmbuga, please add the name of the sculptor to the description. Do you know his life dates? --Túrelio (talk) 15:31, 31 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cruceiro en Vilagarcía de Arousa. Galiza-V9.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very sharp, extra quality -- George Chernilevsky 18:46, 29 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Embarcación de Protección civil. Vilagarcía de Arousa. Galiza-V18.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very good photo -- George Chernilevsky 18:54, 29 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Tip: Categorizing images[edit]

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ magyar ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ქართული ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ +/−

Hello, Lmbuga!

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]

[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

CategorizationBot (talk) 12:49, 1 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Arrecife. Lanzarote-31.jpg was uncategorized on 31 August 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 12:49, 1 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Arrecife. Lanzarote-62.jpg was uncategorized on 4 September 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 12:40, 5 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Arrecife. Lanzarote-61.jpg was uncategorized on 4 September 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 12:40, 5 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Arrecife. Lanzarote-63.jpg was uncategorized on 4 September 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 12:40, 5 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Guatiza - Lanzarote - J23.jpg was uncategorized on 12 September 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 13:42, 13 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Los Hervideros - Lanzarote - LH19.jpg was uncategorized on 16 September 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 13:49, 17 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Marina Rubicón - Playa Blanca - Lanzarote - MR08.jpg was uncategorized on 21 September 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 18:55, 22 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Marina Rubicón - Playa Blanca - Lanzarote - MR07.jpg was uncategorized on 21 September 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 18:55, 22 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Marina Rubicón - Playa Blanca - Lanzarote - MR09.jpg was uncategorized on 21 September 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 18:55, 22 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Guindastres e embarcacións no porto de Vilagarcía de Arousa. Galiza-V16.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 09:29, 31 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Guindastres no porto de Vilagarcía de Arousa. Galiza-V15.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 06:47, 31 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gran Hotel- Arrecife- Lanzarote.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality, but the mathematical exactly parallel running edges of the building are not nice, note: less is more in this case --Taxiarchos228 06:47, 31 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks. New version with less vertical perspective correction.--Lmbuga 10:32, 31 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Redondelo - Boa - Noia - Galiza-12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Persons are disturbing IMO--Jebulon 09:21, 21 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Question Sorry, spanish. Quizás tengas razón Jebulon, no lo tengo claro. Una pregunta, ¿las personas estorbarían también si el título de la foto fuese "Revisando el bote en la poco poblada playa de..."? El título que he puesto está simplificado por causa de mis dificultades con el inglés. Gracias--Lmbuga 17:44, 21 August 2011 (UTC) Understood. But I read the title of pictures only after visual review, in general. And I didn't notice the title of this one, especially... Please note that I do not decline !--Jebulon 23:47, 22 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Good imho (and the foregound is really sharp) --Berthold Werner 16:56, 30 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

QIC Obrichhaus[edit]

Hi Lmbuga!

One question about your comment on perspective correction: Because of FOP I only can take a picture from the street. The building is about 15m high, i stood around 12m away (narrow street). So it is clear that the bottom of the building (~12m away) is wider than the top (~19m away). Should i "fake" the straightness of the building, then there would be a problem with the balcony? I really don't know, so please be patient ;) greets --AleXXw 19:09, 2 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

RE: Sorry, I speak very bad english. I have placed the images so that these are discussed and voted. Thus there will be other opinions. Thanks for your images--Miguel Bugallo 09:21, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pontona Aldamiz. Porto de Vilagarcía de Arousa. Galiza-V22.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality, nice dampy mood --Taxiarchos228 11:51, 1 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Arrecife. Lanzarote-21.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Raghith 05:47, 1 September 2011 (UTC) Lacks contrast somewhat, editing problems in the lower right corner. --Quartl 09:56, 1 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, new version--Lmbuga 10:59, 1 September 2011 (UTC) Better, thanks. --Quartl 11:00, 1 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A short message...[edit]

...as congratulations for the very nice and interesting pictures you show us from Galicia. I'm very happy with your photographs like landscapes, details, buildings and others. Thank you ! --Jebulon (talk) 23:51, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Arrecife. Lanzarote-44.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality, also good and reasonable retouch work here --Taxiarchos228 11:40, 2 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Arrecife. Lanzarote-45.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 11:40, 2 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Arrecife. Lanzarote-50.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 11:40, 2 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Barlovento- escultura de César Manrique en Arrecife- Lanzarote.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 10:24, 2 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Arrecife. Lanzarote-26.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments I think it meets the criteria.--MrPanyGoff 09:06, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Arrecife. Lanzarote-5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments I think this also meets the criteria.--MrPanyGoff 09:15, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Santa Mariña Dozo - Cambados-CA33.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI, in spite of the shadow--Jebulon 23:40, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Igrexa de Santa Mariña de Cambados-CA7.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments I'm not sure: The image has a strong perspective correction--Lmbuga 20:12, 2 September 2011 (UTC) not at all, in my opinion. Good picture.--Jebulon 00:06, 4 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2011-08-17 Cidade da Cultura. Santiago de Compostela-C04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI --Taxiarchos228 09:07, 5 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Santa Mariña Dozo - Cambados-CA31.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments * I find it nice and interesting, but isn't the crop a bit tight ?--Jebulon 23:37, 3 September 2011 (UTC)* Support A few imperfections, but it makes you want to see him. QI for me --Archaeodontosaurus 17:02, 4 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lápida nas ruínas de Santa Mariña Dozo - Cambados-CA28.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very good -- George Chernilevsky 12:59, 4 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Arrecife. Lanzarote-69.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very good -- George Chernilevsky 17:38, 5 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Arrecife. Lanzarote-65.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Mbdortmund 02:18, 7 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Escultura na fachada da igrexa de Santa Mariña de Cambados-CA4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments It is a very good image of our common ancestor !--Jebulon 10:17, 7 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cueva de los Verdes - Lanzarote - CV01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI for me Jakubhal 13:14, 6 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Paisaje volcánica con el volcán de la Corona desde la Cueva de los Verdes - Lanzarote - CV05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI for me Jakubhal 13:14, 6 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Escultura na fachada da igrexa de Santa Mariña de Cambados-CA2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Comment (es) No me atrevía a proponerla porque hay usuarios que me solicitan datos sobre la imagen que no puedo ofrecer--Lmbuga 01:42, 8 September 2011 (UTC)Nice picture of our common ancestor (bis)--Jebulon 09:47, 8 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Relevo nas ruínas de Santa Mariña Dozo - Cambados-CA20.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 15:37, 7 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2011-08-17 Cidade da Cultura. Santiago de Compostela-C07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Mbdortmund 02:03, 8 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Re:Otra incidencia[edit]

No es cosa de dejar un bien cultural con faltas de ortografía :) ya están trasladadas. A las nominadas les he dejado una redirección, para no andar trasteando en la página de QI y la enlazada al anexo de gl ya está corregida. Un abrazo. Anna (Cookie) (talk) 23:42, 10 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Answers[edit]

Hello Luis Miguel de Galicia !

1)-IMO means :in my opinion. Something a bit soft to say "that is what I see, or what I think, but maybe it is not the absolute truth, I can mistake, etc."
2)-"pincushion distortion" is a lens distortion, the picture looks like a cushion for pins. Napoleon said:"a good drawing is better than a long speech ". Then, please have a look here, I'm sure you will understand very well. The contrary is barrel distortion, and you may find mustache distortions too.
3)-Have a nice sunday afternoon, my friend !--Jebulon (talk) 11:54, 11 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Relevo nas ruínas de Santa Mariña Dozo - Cambados-CA19.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Comment (es) No me atrevía a proponerla porque hay usuarios que me solicitan datos sobre la imagen que no puedo ofrecer--Lmbuga 02:00, 8 September 2011 (UTC)Good quality--Jebulon 13:52, 8 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Escudo torto do Pazo de Ulloa - Cambados-CA12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Comment (es) No me atrevía a proponerla porque hay usuarios que me solicitan datos sobre la imagen que no puedo ofrecer--Lmbuga 01:57, 8 September 2011 (UTC)Good--Jebulon 13:45, 8 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Torres de Lestrove - Pazo de Hermida 009.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Needs an ID, but very good .--Jebulon 23:34, 7 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Certainly the coat of arms need an ID, but... needs it an ID to be QI? (es: Cualquier día me harto de indirectas tan directas e injustificables: ¿Acaso pretendes que no me atreva a proponer imágenes como esta?)--Lmbuga 01:19, 8 September 2011 (UTC)No, no need of an ID to be a QI, but I'm very interessed with heraldry and I'm curious !--Jebulon 13:53, 8 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cueva de los Verdes - Lanzarote - CV07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 08:37, 9 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Arrecife. Lanzarote-28.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Yes. And CoA identified ! (was easy)...--Jebulon 15:03, 8 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
With this coats of arms (about provinces, states...) is easy (this is a National coat of arms of Spain - 1981), but with coat of arms about last names and families, I don't know.--Lmbuga 08:24, 9 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Prensa de viño nas Torres de Lestrove - Dodro - Galiza.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very nice. Mvg, Basvb 22:08, 9 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Arrecife. Lanzarote-61.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Comment (es) No me atrevía a proponerla porque hay usuarios que me solicitan datos sobre la imagen que no puedo ofrecer--Lmbuga 01:51, 8 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Good quality. --Cayambe 10:16, 10 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Arrecife. Lanzarote-62.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Comment (es) No me atrevía a proponerla porque hay usuarios que me solicitan datos sobre la imagen que no puedo ofrecer--Lmbuga 01:51, 8 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Good quality. --Cayambe 10:16, 10 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

QIC[edit]

Hi,

I habe improved File:Steinen-Hofen - Evangelische Kirche12.jpg, please check if it is okay now for you. Greetings --Wladyslaw (talk) 10:16, 13 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! El Golfo - Lanzarote - G20.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 09:42, 11 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! El Golfo - Lanzarote - G05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good -- Jean-Pol GRANDMONT 07:55, 11 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Escudo nunha lápida nas ruínas de Santa Mariña Dozo - Cambados-CA30.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. Please geotag. --Cayambe 16:58, 9 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks. Geotag added--Lmbuga 17:56, 10 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lápida nas ruínas de Santa Mariña Dozo - Cambados-CA29.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. Please geotag. :-) --Cayambe 16:58, 9 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks. Geotag added--Lmbuga 17:56, 10 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Cool cactus[edit]

Ola, e grazas de novo polo consello. A expresión significa: "Sen embargo, o cactus é chulo (no sentido de "bonito, interesante")". --Iago ^Conversation 07:07, 14 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ferocactus schwarzii. Jardín de Cactus - Lanzarote - J08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality -- Jean-Pol GRANDMONT 09:07, 12 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2011 - El Golfo - Charco de los Clicos -Lanzarote - G06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI for me. Jakubhal 20:59, 11 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Arrecife. Lanzarote-43.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Comment (es) No me atrevía a proponerla porque hay usuarios que me solicitan datos sobre la imagen que no puedo ofrecer--Lmbuga 01:46, 8 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Good quality. --Cayambe 06:31, 12 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Arrecife. Lanzarote-42.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Comment (es) No me atrevía a proponerla porque hay usuarios que me solicitan datos sobre la imagen que no puedo ofrecer--Lmbuga 01:46, 8 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Good quality. --Cayambe 06:31, 12 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ensiladora. Vilarromarís, Oroso. 20091025 0017.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. Please geotag :-) --Cayambe 06:33, 12 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Geolocated, thanks--Lmbuga 11:26, 12 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ensiladora. Vilarromarís, Oroso. 20091025 0016.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good. --Ikar.us 12:13, 9 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Geolocated, thanks--Lmbuga 11:26, 12 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Praia de Portugalete - O Carril - Vilagarcía de Arousa-14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 20:48, 12 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Jardín de Cactus - Lanzarote - J06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Someone35 17:52, 12 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Jardín de Cactus - Guatiza - Lanzarote - J19.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Someone35 16:51, 12 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Euphorbia echinus - Jardín de Cactus - Lanzarote - J16.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Crop a bit tight above and below, but good QI for me.--Jebulon 23:21, 12 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Jardín de Cactus - Lanzarote - J05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. But next time please don't upload many files with the same filename and same subject --Someone35 12:33, 12 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, but the name it's not the same: ...J05, ...J08, ...J14, ...J16. The subject is diferent: Echinocactus grusonii, Ferocactus Schwarzii, Euphorbia barnardii, Euphorbia echinus... I don't understand you. I think that it is easily possible to distinguish the images--Lmbuga 13:31, 12 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Arrecife. Lanzarote-71.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Someone35 12:47, 12 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you![edit]

	The Photographer's Barnstar
	For his outstanding and versatile images of Spain. Wladyslaw (talk) 09:04, 16 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Are you from Canary islands?[edit]

Are you from Canary islands? Because you upload pictures that are mostly from there--Someone35 (talk) 11:48, 16 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Opuntia tunicata - Cylindropuntia tunicata - Guatiza - Jardín de Cactus - Lanzarote - J37.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 09:48, 14 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Opuntia macrocentra - Guatiza - Jardín de Cactus - Lanzarote - J34.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. Please put species names in italic in the descriptions. :-) --Cayambe 10:04, 14 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Done--Lmbuga 11:56, 14 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Euphorbia barnardii- Jardín de Cactus - Lanzarote - J14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Someone35 17:40, 13 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Euphorbia handiensis - Jardín de Cactus - Lanzarote - J07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Someone35 17:40, 13 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Jardín de Cactus - Lanzarote - J10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Nice picture, good quality. --Vassil 15:38, 13 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bodega Suárez - Diama - La Geria - Lanzarote - BS05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI for me. Jakubhal 09:52, 14 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you[edit]

Hi, really thank you that you reduce CA in this file. I had to move for couple weeks to field trip in USA and I did not have access to internet there to fix it! So your work saved this file and helped be QI! Once thank you :) --Chmee2 (talk) 08:00, 17 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your Review of Rösrath-Denkmal-04_Gerottener-Weg_Wegekreuz.jpg[edit]

Hei Lmbuga, following you review of File:Rösrath-Denkmal-04_Gerottener-Weg_Wegekreuz.jpg, I re-edited the photo. --CEphoto, Uwe Aranas (talk) 08:17, 17 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Do I[edit]

have to understand all your megapixel values at my images and at some other ones? --kaʁstn Disk/Cat 10:59, 17 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Me too, please ?--Jebulon (talk) 22:22, 17 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hoy he promovido a QI una imagen con 2,5 mp escasos. Una imagen de 10 megapíxeles, si se presentase con 2,5, reduciría 4 veces su tamaño; una de 20, reduciría el tamaño 8 veces. La reducción es una manera de disimular defectos, pero las imágenes precisan además y con frecuencia de recortes, por lo que la reducción no es demostrable. Solamente se puede considerar que se reduce el tamaño cuando se insiste en proporciones no adecuadas en comparación con las que las cámaras pueden ofrecer. El tema me fastidia. Me fastidia que se me diga que tengo que reducir el tamaño de las imágenes, como se me dijo en QI, a pesar de las recomendaciones de Commons que insisten en no hacerlo. Por todo eso y por la complejidad del caso, nadie tiene que entender nada. Solamente entiende el que lee y el que quiere entender. Si se quiere entender que menosprecio, váyase a mirar que hoy he promovido una imagen de 2,5 megapíxeles (y no era de un insecto). Por cierto, el valor de los megapíxeles no es mío, aunque me he podido confundir en algún caso. Sea como sea, en general, yo no me dedico a controlar las imágenes de otros, y menos las vuestras, pero sí quise hacer con esa manifestación una llamada general a que quizás habría que hacerlo con todos los usuarios--Miguel Bugallo 23:08, 18 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Aehh, with Google Translater I could conjecture the content of your answer a bit, but I'm sure I will understand your bad English much better than your Spanish. So maybe you can translate your text in English? --kaʁstn Disk/Cat 19:41, 19 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Normaly, I write two lines in English in 10 minutes. I only can write simple orations. I use a translator because I only can read, but only a little. I think that to me it's impossible (in order to write this word I need the translator) to translate the text. But I can try it.

Previously, you can see my words in the "Consensual Review" of File:Los Hervideros - Lanzarote - LH02.jpg, File:El Golfo - Charco de los Clicos -Lanzarote - G13.jpg, File:0 Moulbaix - Moulin de la Marquie (1).jpg. You can have a idea of my thoughts ("thoughts" is other new word to me).

I continue now--Miguel Bugallo 18:12, 20 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Translation (It is not a literal translation): Hoy he promovido a QI una imagen con 2,5 mp escasos. Today I have promoted to QI an image with 2.5 mp.; Una imagen de 10 megapíxeles, si se presentase con 2,5, reduciría 4 veces su tamaño; una de 20, reduciría el tamaño 8 veces. A image with 10 megapixels, if it is reduced to 2,5 megapixels, it would reduce its size to a 25%; a image with 20 megapixels, it would reduce its size to a 12,5%; La reducción es una manera de disimular defectos, The reduction is a way to disguise defects,; pero las imágenes precisan además y con frecuencia de recortes, but the images needs, frequently, to be cropped, thus, the reduction is not demonstrable; Solamente se puede considerar que se reduce el tamaño cuando se insiste en proporciones no adecuadas en comparación con las que las cámaras pueden ofrecer It is only possible to be considered that the size is reduced when is insisted on proportions different from which the cameras can offer.; El tema me fastidia. Me fastidia que se me diga que tengo que reducir el tamaño de las imágenes, como se me dijo en QI, a pesar de las recomendaciones de Commons que insisten en no hacerlo. The subject annoys to me. It annoys to me that one says to me that I must reduce the size of the images, as one said to me in QI, in spite of the recommendations of Commons that insist on not doing it.; Por todo eso y por la complejidad del caso, nadie tiene que entender nada. Solamente entiende el que lee y el que quiere entender. Si se quiere entender que menosprecio, váyase a mirar que hoy he promovido una imagen de 2,5 megapíxeles (y no era de un insecto). Por cierto, el valor de los megapíxeles no es mío, aunque me he podido confundir en algún caso. Sea como sea, en general,... (Reference to your previous mesage with little importance: I can't translate it); yo no me dedico a controlar las imágenes de otros, y menos las vuestras, pero sí quise hacer con esa manifestación una llamada general a que quizás habría que hacerlo con todos los usuarios I do not dedicate myself to control the images of others, including your images, but I wanted to make with that manifestation a signal, because it would be necessary to review the sizes of the uploaded and nominated images.

This was the time to translate my words. Sorry, I cannot assure that the translation can be good--Miguel Bugallo 19:06, 20 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Guatiza - Jardín de Cactus - Lanzarote - J46.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI for me. Jakubhal 20:45, 14 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! El Golfo - Lanzarote - G21.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 13:13, 14 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2011 - El Golfo - Charco de los Clicos -Lanzarote - G07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 13:01, 14 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Guatiza - Lanzarote - J24.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments nice composition and colors --Ralf Roletschek 13:33, 14 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! El Golfo - Lanzarote - G04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 12:52, 14 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Torres de Lestrove - Pazo de Hermida 010.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Tomer T 21:13, 14 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Torres de Lestrove - Pazo de Hermida 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Tomer T 21:13, 14 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Los Hervideros - Lanzarote - LH03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 09:01, 16 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Los Hervideros - Lanzarote - LH04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 09:01, 16 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Jameos del Agua - Lanzarote - A09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality, and interesting with the different textures of the volcanic stones.--Vassil 20:21, 15 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Volcán de la Corona desde Jameos del Agua - Lanzarote - A10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Someone35 09:18, 16 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Guatiza - Jardín de Cactus - Lanzarote - J40.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Someone35 09:18, 16 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Guatiza - Jardín de Cactus - Lanzarote - J46.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI for me. Jakubhal 20:45, 14 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Jardín de Cactus - Lanzarote - J01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Someone35 13:19, 15 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Guatiza - Jardín de Cactus - Lanzarote - J30.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Someone35 13:03, 15 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Jardín de Cactus - Lanzarote - J04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Someone35 13:03, 15 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! El Golfo - Lanzarote - G21.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 13:13, 14 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2011 - El Golfo - Charco de los Clicos -Lanzarote - G07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 13:01, 14 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Guatiza - Lanzarote - J24.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments nice composition and colors --Ralf Roletschek 13:33, 14 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! El Golfo - Lanzarote - G04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 12:52, 14 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Torres de Lestrove - Pazo de Hermida 010.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Tomer T 21:13, 14 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Torres de Lestrove - Pazo de Hermida 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Tomer T 21:13, 14 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Los Hervideros - Lanzarote - LH20.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Great for me! --Alchemist-hp 23:52, 16 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
8,4 megapixels--Lmbuga 02:15, 17 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Los Hervideros - Lanzarote - LH12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments sí, también necesitamos esas fotos --Ralf Roletschek 22:01, 16 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Arrecife. Lanzarote-40.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Vassil 22:16, 16 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! El Golfo - Charco de los Clicos -Lanzarote - G10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 20:01, 16 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Los Hervideros - Lanzarote - LH18.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Nice - Jean-Pol GRANDMONT 11:06, 18 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! El Golfo - Lanzarote - G15.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI for me. Jakubhal 11:24, 18 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Los Hervideros - Lanzarote - LH19.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI for me. Jakubhal 12:08, 18 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! El Golfo - Charco de los Clicos -Lanzarote - G12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality and usefull. --Coyau 22:15, 18 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Marina Rubicón - Lanzarote - MR05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very good -- George Chernilevsky 20:50, 19 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Euphorbia echinus - Guatiza - Jardín de Cactus - Lanzarote - J27.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 20:44, 19 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Euphorbia aphylla - Guatiza - Jardín de Cactus - Lanzarote - J28.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 20:44, 19 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

San Francisco de Cambados[edit]

Boas tardes, Luis. Non sei se a categorización das fotografías da igrexa de San Francisco de Cambados dentro da "Category:Church of Santa Mariña of Cambados" foi obra túa ou é que as fotos son túas, pero para o caso non importa moito. Ó que eu vou é que esa é a igrexa de San Francisco, non de Santa Mariña. Resulta que cando a de Santa Mariña comezou a virse abaixo (o tellado) pasaron o culto á igrexa de San Francisco, en teoría de forma provisional pero, como nunca se restaurou a de Santa Mariña, o final a igrexa parroquial é a de San Francisco, aínda que a santa titular da parroquiia sexa Santa Mariña. Non sei se me explico. Ando subindo as fotografías a Commons e paseando polas categorías para tomar nota dos títulos e contidos, e por iso fun bater con esta categoría. Antes de siquera intentar cambiar a categoría das fotos prefería comentarcho. Un saúdo, Pedro --P.Lameiro (talk) 19:17, 23 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Torre das ruínas de Santa Mariña Dozo - Cambados-CA13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Someone35 15:44, 21 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Arcos das ruínas de Santa María de Dozo - Cambados-CA16.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Someone35 15:44, 21 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Los Hervideros - Lanzarote - LH02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Dust Spot over the strange roof[edit]

Gracias, mi amigo. Un saludo de Paris, y un abrazo.--Jebulon (talk) 17:42, 24 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Oportunidade perdida[edit]

You were not covered by my remark, for the photo Jebulon. Your pictures of Galicia made me want to come. Unfortunately I have not exceeded Bilbao, I return to the emergency and cancel my vacation. But I will try again if my agenda allows me. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:34, 25 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Marina Rubicón - Playa Blanca - Lanzarote - MR09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI for me. --Jakubhal 20:21, 22 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Arrecife. Lanzarote-56.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments the quality is (very) good. PRO for cloudy-weather-images with white (and overexposed) skies!! --Carschten 16:14, 21 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks. New version less overexposed, but I don't know if it's better. Please,... If you want, I can revert it--Lmbuga 18:19, 22 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Marina Rubicón - Lanzarote - MR01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 19:54, 22 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! El Golfo - Charco de los Clicos -Lanzarote - G13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

2nd try[edit]

Hello Lmbuga,

After your comments and hesitations (you were right), I've withdrawn the nomination in QIC, but I've reworked the file too, and renominate it today. Do you think it is better now ?? Thanks in advance for your new review.--Jebulon (talk) 13:57, 25 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Good work[edit]

Thank you for a good word! In fact, good pictures are a small quantity among these I already uploaded. I much more like your photos and many others I see on QIC. -- Jakubhal 15:18, 25 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 08-2011. Panthera tigris tigris - Texas Park - Lanzarote -TP04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI for me. --Jakubhal 07:40, 24 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 08-2011. Panthera tigris tigris - Texas Park - Lanzarote -TP00.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI for me. --Jakubhal 07:39, 24 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Puma concolor stanleyana - Texas Park - Lanzarote -PC06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Qi for me. --Jakubhal 09:18, 25 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Puma concolor stanleyana - Texas Park - Lanzarote -PC08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Qi for me. --Jakubhal 09:18, 25 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Los Hervideros - Lanzarote - LH15.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments This picture is a little bit tilted to the right. Please look at the sea on the left. Jakubhal 07:24, 20 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks. I will try to do a new version--Lmbuga 12:09, 24 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Done New version--Lmbuga 16:48, 24 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you. QI for me. --Jakubhal 17:01, 24 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Los Hervideros - Lanzarote - LH14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Comment 6 megapixels, but I can upload a new version--Lmbuga 02:11, 17 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I will try to do a new version with more megapixels and without the signboard--Lmbuga 12:13, 24 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Comment New version with 5,264 × 3,509 pixels, file size: 15.36 MB and without the singboard--Lmbuga 16:38, 24 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
QI for me. --Jakubhal 09:30, 25 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Guatiza - Jardín de Cactus - Lanzarote - J41.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Athene noctua - Rancho Texas Park - Tías - Lanzarote -PC28.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI for me. --Jakubhal 15:19, 1 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

sunk boat[edit]

buena ? Buena ? MUY buena !! I like it very much !!--Jebulon (talk) 23:57, 4 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2011-08-17 Cidade da Cultura. Santiago de Compostela-C06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 20:02, 2 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Building of the Brotherhood of fishermen - Port of Playa Blanca - Lanzarote -B10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 20:01, 2 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chorthippus parallelus en Valverde- Vilarromarís- Oroso- Galicia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support QI & Useful --Archaeodontosaurus 18:21, 2 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Port of Playa Blanca - Lanzarote -B09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very good an sharp--Jebulon 07:36, 3 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Tip: Categorizing images[edit]

Template:Please link images/layout CategorizationBot (talk) 19:37, 5 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Rosalía de Castro - O Carril - Vilagarcía de Arousa - Galicia -3.jpg was uncategorized on 4 October 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 19:37, 5 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Cristo crucificado en Santiago do Carril- Vilagarcía de Arousa - Galicia.jpg was uncategorized on 6 October 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 17:21, 7 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Rochas e planta en Timanfaya- Lanzarote- Illas Canarias- Spain-T16.jpg was uncategorized on 13 October 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 17:53, 14 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:FPpromotion /FPCBot (talk) 21:00, 10 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It is your picture, and your success !

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Template:QICpromoted

Template:Autotranslate[edit]

Template:Autotranslate . HombreDHojalata.^talk 23:05, 14 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Perdón. A foto tomouse na vía pública? --. HombreDHojalata.^talk 20:37, 15 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Template:QICpromoted

Uso externo dunha imaxe túa[edit]

Boas, estes días estiven categorizando e revisando as fotos do escultor Ramón Conde e atopei a imaxe File:Padrón Galicia Xullo 2006 22.jpg e metina na súa categoría. O curioso veu despois, que seguindo a información do escultor atopei a túa imaxe nesta páxina cos datos incorrectos. Coméntocho por se queres poñerte en contacto con el, saúdos, --Elisardojm (talk) 23:46, 20 November 2011 (UTC).[reply]

CAs?[edit]

Hi, thanks for promoting my picture File:Pic Urtijëi.jpg, but since I'd like always to learn, what do you mean by CAs? Maybe I can answer your question. Best regards --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 20:00, 23 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Hello, I've updated one of your photos a little, maybe this version is better?--G eorge, 06:14, 4 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Template:QICpromoted

QI Lesnoy lane, #6[edit]

Retouched the border of green portal. Many thanks for your direct comment.--PereslavlFoto (talk) 23:57, 6 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Template:Autotranslate[edit]

Template:Autotranslate CategorizationBot (talk) 12:59, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Cambados- Galiza. CBD06.jpg was uncategorized on 7 December 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 12:59, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Letreiro do edificio das Hermanitas de los Ancianos Desamparados. Cambados- Galiza. CBD05.jpg was uncategorized on 7 December 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 12:59, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Balcón do Pazo de Fefiñáns. Cambados- Galiza. CBD13.jpg was uncategorized on 8 December 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 12:45, 9 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

re-

I have to be clear, my friend: I have no problem with your decline vote, you are absolutely free to decline my pictures, and your comments are useful to me. I like your pictures too, btw. No problem ! My first comment yesterday evening was something like a joke, obviously !--Jebulon (talk) 12:40, 29 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You ar a very king guy, dear Lmbuga. Un abrazo.--Jebulon (talk) 23:41, 29 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your comments[edit]

Hello Lmbuga!

I am very sad about your comments to my pictures (QI, December 28). I have answered to your comments, but I don't know how to format this, so you cannot see it on the page, but you can see it in the editor window. Greetings, --Haeferl (talk) 02:26, 29 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your 2nd Review and also for repairing the format! Have a good day! Nice greetings, --Haeferl (talk) 10:10, 29 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted