User talk:Vacant0/Archive 1

Archive 1

Welcome!

Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Vacant0!

First steps tutorial Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki. Getting help More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump.

Goodies, tips, and tricks Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your graphic abilities. You can find the files you have uploaded in your Uploads. Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~. To link to an image page without embedding the image, type: [[:File:Foo.jpg]], which produces: File:Foo.jpg. You may enable gadgets (custom features) for your account. There are several tools to upload files. Have you edited Wikipedia before? This guide might be useful. Made a mistake? Do you want to have a file renamed or moved? Use the move link and wait for an authorized user to rename it. Do you want to have your recently uploaded picture removed? Tag it as {{speedy|reason here}}. For more information read the deletion guidelines.

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 15:59, 2 January 2020 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Dveri logo new.png

Copyright status: File:Dveri logo new.png

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Dveri logo new.png. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Yours sincerely, Ahmad^talk 03:00, 18 April 2020 (UTC)

SVG (Scalable Vector Graphics)

In other languages (translate this)

Please use SVG Thank you for uploading some images! Did you know that Wikimedia Commons recommends the SVG (Scalable Vector Graphics) format for certain types of images? Scalable Vector Graphics are designed to look appropriate at any scale, and SVG images are easier to modify and translate, helping Wikimedia to distribute knowledge to all of the world. A lot of modern programs support SVG export. If you encountered problems or have questions, don't hesitate to ask me, a member of the Graphic Lab, or the Graphics village pump. Uploading images in SVG format isn't mandatory, but it would help. (To avoid any misunderstandings, please don't just put raster images into an SVG container as embedded raster.) Thanks, and happy editing!

--EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:46, 18 April 2020 (UTC)

File tagging File:PUPS Logo.jpg

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:PUPS Logo.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case. Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:PUPS Logo.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

 

And also:

• File:SPAS Flag.png

Yours sincerely, Smooth O (talk) 16:13, 2 January 2021 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:SPAS Flag.png

Copyright status: File:SPAS Flag.png

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:SPAS Flag.png. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 21:11, 16 January 2021 (UTC)

File:SPAS Flag.png

File:SPAS Flag.png has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that. The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

 

--EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:16, 17 January 2021 (UTC)

File:BSPP Logo.svg was recently deleted

File:BSPP Logo.svg was recently deleted by EugeneZelenko for reasons below. If you disagree with the deletion, you need to file an undeletion request.

Reason for deletion: Commons:Licensing: non-trivial logo

It's best to discuss with the administrator who deleted your file before filing an undeletion request. Deletion Notification Bot (talk) 15:29, 17 January 2021 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Miloš Jovanović 2018.jpg

Copyright status: File:Miloš Jovanović 2018.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Miloš Jovanović 2018.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

And also:

• File:Miloš Jovanović 2018 (cropped).jpg

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 00:07, 11 March 2021 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Ivan Kostić 2020 (cropped).jpg

And also:

• File:Nenad Čanak 2021 (cropped).jpg
• File:Ivan Kostić 2020.jpg
• File:Nenad Čanak 2021.jpg

Yours sincerely, (｀・ω・´) (talk) 13:25, 13 March 2021 (UTC)

File:Eduard Heger 2021.png

File:Eduard Heger 2021.png has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that. The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: Copyright infringement / piracy Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

 

User who nominated the file for deletion (Nominator) : Panam2014.

I'm a computer program; please don't ask me questions but ask the user who nominated your file(s) for deletion or at our Help Desk. //Deletion Notification Bot (talk) 12:40, 2 April 2021 (UTC)

File:Alliance for the Union of Romanians logo.svg

File:Alliance for the Union of Romanians logo.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 19:58, 13 April 2021 (UTC)

PA and Demars

Hello! Please, could You also change the file: Progressive alliance logo.png to the file: Progressive Alliance.svg in the article Foreign relations of the Sahrawi Arab Democratic Republic? It would also be appreciated, if You will change the file: Social Democratic Party of Finland logo.svg to the file: Demars, English.svg in the article Social Democratic Party of Finland and the file: Sozialdemokratische Partei Finnlands Logo.svg to the file: Demaren, Deutsch.svg in the article Sozialdemokratische Partei Finnlands (German) ("sister" files are Demarit, suomi.svg and Demarna, svenska.svg). --2001:999:22:181A:3D0A:EE40:8ABB:2F94 17:04, 5 June 2021 (UTC)

(1)  Done

(2) Since when does the SDP use that logo? I can only change it if this logo is used less. --Vacant0 (talk) 17:11, 5 June 2021 (UTC)

File:Libertarian Party of California logo.svg

File:Libertarian Party of California logo.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

― Tartan357 ^Talk 18:51, 3 August 2021 (UTC)

File:Serbian Radical Party symbol.svg

File:Serbian Radical Party symbol.svg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that. The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

 

And also:

• File:Serbian Radical Party flag.svg
• File:Serbian Radical Party logo.svg

Yours sincerely, Maxinvestigator (talk) 12:01, 17 October 2021 (UTC)

File:Serbian Radical Party symbol.svg

File:Serbian Radical Party symbol.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 23:02, 26 October 2021 (UTC)

File tagging File:Stranka slobode i pravde.svg

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Stranka slobode i pravde.svg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case. Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Stranka slobode i pravde.svg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

 

HapHaxion _{(talk / contribs)} 21:38, 24 December 2021 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Biljana Stojković 2019.jpg

Copyright status: File:Biljana Stojković 2019.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Biljana Stojković 2019.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 20:05, 13 March 2022 (UTC)

File:DUP Advice Centre, Omagh - geograph.org.uk - 132295 (cropped).jpg

File:DUP Advice Centre, Omagh - geograph.org.uk - 132295 (cropped).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

bjh21 (talk) 11:03, 6 May 2022 (UTC)

File:Prime Minister Robert Abela - Official Photo (cropped).jpg

File:Prime Minister Robert Abela - Official Photo (cropped).jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that. The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: https://opm.gov.mt/en/Pages/Prime-Minister.aspx Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

 

Mike Rohsopht (talk) 15:54, 14 July 2022 (UTC)

File:NarodniFront Logo.png

File:NarodniFront Logo.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Yann (talk) 13:39, 24 August 2022 (UTC)

File:Narodni Front Logo.png

File:Narodni Front Logo.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Yann (talk) 13:39, 24 August 2022 (UTC)

File:Eduard Heger's signature.svg

Hello, what is the source of this signature? Lišiak (talk) 10:01, 15 September 2022 (UTC)

I'm not sure. I've only vectorized the png version File:Heger podpis.png. Vacant0 (talk) 10:24, 15 September 2022 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Željko Veselinović.png

Copyright status: File:Željko Veselinović.png

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Željko Veselinović.png. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 12:06, 9 October 2022 (UTC)

File:1966-06 1966年刘少奇访问缅甸 奈温 (cropped).jpg

File:1966-06 1966年刘少奇访问缅甸 奈温 (cropped).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 04:45, 31 October 2022 (UTC)

File:Milan Milutinović, official portrait (cropped).jpg

File:Milan Milutinović, official portrait (cropped).jpg has been marked for speedy deletion. (Reason: G7) Why not upload a picture of a plant, animal, or anything else which fits into our scope. You can contribute any media type you want, including but not limited to images, videos, music, and 3D models. Start uploading now! If you don't have anything to upload at the moment, why not take a look at our best images or best videos, sounds and 3D models. If you have any doubts/questions don't hesitate to visit our help desk.

User who nominated the file for deletion (Nominator) : Smiroje.

I'm a computer program; please don't ask me questions but ask the user who nominated your file(s) for deletion or at our Help Desk. //Deletion Notification Bot 2 (talk) 15:45, 12 January 2023 (UTC)

File:Dijana Vukomanović - May 2015. (cropped).jpg

File:Dijana Vukomanović - May 2015. (cropped).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 17:07, 12 March 2023 (UTC)

Jelena Begović

Dear Vacant0,

This photo of minister Jelena Begović was uploaded by mistake/error. So, please be free to remove it/delete it.

Sincerely, ВАЊА (talk) 19:44, 15 March 2023 (UTC)

@ВАЊА: You can add the {{Speedydelete}} template on that photo with the reason provided, you can check Commons:Criteria for speedy deletion for more info. Vacant0 (talk) 20:02, 15 March 2023 (UTC)

Dear Vacant0,

Thank you very much for your help related to the minister Jelena Begović and particularly your contribution with respect to the new ver. of the file (cropped).

Best Regards. ВАЊА (talk) 18:23, 21 March 2023 (UTC)

No problem. Cheers, Vacant0 (talk) 18:41, 21 March 2023 (UTC)

File:Anti-Kosovo license plate posters.jpg

File:Anti-Kosovo license plate posters.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 17:09, 22 March 2023 (UTC)

Round 1 of Picture of the Year 2022 voting is open!

2022 Picture of the Year: Saint John Church of Sohrol in Iran.

Read this message in your language

Dear Wikimedian,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2022 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the seventeenth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2022) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topical categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you may vote for as many images as you like. The top 30 overall and the two most popular images in each category will continue to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just three images to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 1 will end on 1 May 2023, 23:59:59 UTC.

Click here to vote now!

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2021 Picture of the Year contest.

Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:16, 20 April 2023 (UTC)

Nominations

Hello. Whats happenning, are you well? Why exactly are you nominating my sourced files for fast deletion along with Google sourced lowest grade of lacked uploads? ThecentreCZ (talk) 13:37, 1 May 2023 (UTC)

Because you haven't provided any sources to those flags that would confirm whether they actually exist and are used by those parties. All you've done is put their logos on some coloured background. If these flags actually exist, you should add the source where it belongs. For example, the logos that you've used all have this already. Vacant0 (talk) 14:05, 1 May 2023 (UTC)

They exist, thats why are they uploaded on Commons. These simple files are sourced from the logos, which have their sources and are within license of simple geometric shape logos. These were coded by me to SVG vector code. Any more sources are not needed, any concerns with the flag you can propose within discussion in Wikipedia where used. Are you familiar with the page or are you new user? Why are you nominating exactly these files you've marked, even without any explanation whatsoever? There is about 1000 flags with same license on Wikipedia Commons and even more with even lesser amount of author description. Are you going to nominate for deletion all those 1000+ files? Thank you. ThecentreCZ (talk) 14:33, 1 May 2023 (UTC)

Sources are absolutely needed to confirm the existence of those flags. Otherwise, I could put the logo on some other background, add the flag to Wikipedia, and call it the official flag without providing any sources. Considering that you've said that these flags exist, will you be willing to add the sources then? Vacant0 (talk) 14:40, 1 May 2023 (UTC)

No, these flags are created as adapted logos officially used by the parties. You can upload what you want, if it have licence needed. You can't call anything official on Wikipedia, where questioned information has had to be sourced. This is not Wikipedia, this is Wikimedia Commons. Are you going to nominate for deletion 1000+ flags uploaded here now? ThecentreCZ (talk) 14:56, 1 May 2023 (UTC)

Make up your mind. Do these flags exist and are they used by those parties? You've said that these flags exist but then that they're "created as adapted logos officially used by the parties". If you're creating fictional flags, why are you adding them to Wikipedia if those flags are not official/not used by those parties? Vacant0 (talk) 15:13, 1 May 2023 (UTC)

Yes, these are officially used flags of the parties. Adapted logos are their licence as they are characterized as simple shaped. But you marked exactly those files for deletion. If you have any concern of any file, you can ask for the status of the flag for example on English Wikipedia where it is supposed to be done. Please answer the question, are you going to nominate for deletion these 1000+ flags now? ThecentreCZ (talk) 15:21, 1 May 2023 (UTC)

"Yes, these are officially used flags of the parties". Will you then add the sources that would confirm their existence and that they are officially used by those parties? I'm really asking you a simple question. If you already know that these flags are official, you could put the sources where they belong and we will end this discussion. There might be 1000+ various flags or some other uploads that should be deleted, though that is not what I am currently looking to do. If these flags are fictional though, I'll certainly start a discussion to remove them from Wikipedia articles, like how they were removed from Dutch articles (though the issue with sourcing was not the main problem with the flags, but was/is indeed a problem). Vacant0 (talk) 15:36, 1 May 2023 (UTC)

No, you nominated my files for deletion, sources of origins of the principal shapes are already there. Images like these are completely normal. No, any of those uploads shouldn't be deleted. Lots of them were here on Commons even for more than 7 years and were reviewed as fine by administrators plenty of times. You can add whatever additional information you want to them, thats base of the Wikimedia Commons. You definitely won't nominate random files for deletion by tagging them by no source template without any explanation, which is a case for files with no information at all. Why did you nominate exactly my 4 files and not any made by other users, for example like these flags with even less information here?

File:Flag of Ordem Nova.svg

Bandera del PRT.svg

File:All India Trinamool Congress flag.svg

File:Flag of the Justice Party (Turkey).svg

File:BJP Flag.svg

File:Flagoftip.svg

File:Flag of the National Socialist Movement of Denmark (alternative).svg

File:Bandera del Partido Conservador Colombiano.svg

File:Bandera - Cambio Democrático (Panamá).svg

File:Bandera del Partido Revolucionario Febrerista.svg

File:UDC Nicaragua.svg

File:Generation Identitaire flag (yellow background).svg

File:Generation Identitaire flag (black background).svg

File:Flag of Amplitud.png

File:Флаг ЛДПСС.png

File:Socialist Reich Party flag.png

File:Dj ump-bandera.PNG

and hunders of other fine files. ThecentreCZ (talk) 16:50, 1 May 2023 (UTC)

I did not nominate your uploads for deletion but added a tag so that you could add the sources that would confirm the existence of those flags. They will be only deleted if the tag remains there for a week. And the reason why I nominated your uploads, and not some others, is because you added them to articles that were on my watchlist on Wikipedia. You really are trying to sway this discussion towards the uploads of some other users, which do have issues, but I currently do not care as we are discussing about your uploads. If you do not want to provide sources so that others could verify the existence of the flags, then there is no point of continuing this discussion any longer as you are refusing to do a very simple thing. Vacant0 (talk) 17:15, 1 May 2023 (UTC)

I do not see this as very simple thing as it is not in accordance with rules of Commmons. Thats even worse, that you added some deletion tag nobody uses as it seems you are not even familiar with practice on Commons. Ordinary nomination discussion deletion tag used normally is limited up to few months not a week. As I see you are not removing files you described as unadequate, I ask you to remove all deletion tags you've added on my files and then find what you wanted. Thank you. ThecentreCZ (talk) 20:57, 1 May 2023 (UTC)

I won't be removing anything as you are refusing to add sources where they belong. I wasn't able to find them myself, though, I'll start a discussion so that others could say whether these flags are simply fictional or are actually used by those parties. You'll be pinged. Vacant0 (talk) 11:57, 2 May 2023 (UTC)

Thats not what I asked you for. It is obvious that you targeted exactly my files without any reason for deletion, without any discussion before it whatsoever. Why you are not requesting deletion of all files I've listed here?

If you won't be removing Commons tags which are not even used here for adequate nominations for sourced files at all, right now nominate for deletion also your uploaded file here, without no sourcing you are pleading for in this case.

Nominate it for deletion with same tags right now, or I will:

File:Narodni Front Flag.svg File:Narodni Front Flag.svg

and also others.

I'll be waiting, thank you. ThecentreCZ (talk) 14:39, 2 May 2023 (UTC)

It's ironic isn't it? You are accusing me of not being familiar with practices on Commons, while you don't even know which tags are used for which types of uploads. There is a big difference, so I'll explain it to you. The upload that you've put there is mine and I cannot use the same tags as it was uploaded back in 2020 and it is in my ownership. The flags that you've uploaded are not in your ownership, except if you've been hired by those parties to create those "flags" and logos, so you're not the author and because of that you need a source to prove that the flag is factual and that it exists. There is also an another distinction. You've added them to their Wikipedia articles while my upload has never been used. I'm not going to repeat things over and over because if you don't get what I'm saying, that is your problem. I have only came across the uploads because you've added them to articles that were on my Wikipedia watchlist. The {{subst:nsd}} is totally fine as your uploads are new and do not have a source attached to the flags. As you're the uploader, you are supposed to know the sources behind those flags, if they are real of course, and remain cooperative by adding them where they belong. If you somehow don't know, ask someone else to find the sources. Instead of complaining here on my talk page and then trying to sway the discussion towards some "1000+ flags" that I haven't even asked for, you could've done what I just have said. You are wasting your time by continuing this discussion and I certainly, from now on, won't respond to you here if you continue ignoring the question that I've asked you at the beginning: do you have sources that prove the existence of the flags that you've uploaded? Vacant0 (talk) 15:17, 2 May 2023 (UTC)

I've said to nominate it with same tag! Not proper deletion request which is used normally by normal users. That means template (No source since) which you used to my sourced files. So I'll show you how it is done. Thats very good that you are removing your own files like some toxic autist serb. I've also asked you to add tags to all files I've listed here and you are still not doing it. If you have some articles on your English Wikipedia watchlist that doesn't mean you have authority to remove sourced files on Wikimedia Commons. Thank you. ThecentreCZ (talk) 15:51, 2 May 2023 (UTC)

@ThecentreCZ and Vacant0: It is important that we distinguish official (or semi-official) flags used by actual organizations from things like banners of which a single instance exists, outright fictional flags, or (what a good number of these appear like they may be) taking a legitimate logo and simply presenting it as a "flag". While I don't endorse either of your tone here, User:Vacant0 has a valid point: you have provided little or no evidence that any of these are actually used as flags. There may be some evidence in the wall of argument above, or elsewhere; I don't have the patience to try to find it. Can you link even a few examples of photos showing some of the questioned items being genuinely used as a flag by the organization in question (or places where they appear as flags on the web page of said organization)? If so, then we can have a reasonable discussion. If not, then I think the only question is whether these should be labeled with {{Fictional flag}} or deleted. - ~~

File:SNS billboard, Danica Grujičić.jpg

File:SNS billboard, Danica Grujičić.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 04:31, 11 July 2023 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Muharrem-Demirok-2022 (cropped 1).jpg

Yours sincerely, Komarof (talk) 13:34, 1 September 2023 (UTC)

File:2022 Serbian local elections map.svg

Hi mate. Just to let you know, you missed on of the municipalitis from this elections and I atm do not have an ability to upload new version of this file. I made a new version of it, with missing municipality included. So you can overwrite it when you find the time. Cheers. Nightfall87 (talk) 23:22, 9 November 2023 (UTC)

 Done Seems like I forgot to add Smederevska Palanka. Thanks for spotting that out. Vacant0 (talk) 10:24, 10 November 2023 (UTC)

Was also playing around with creating new map for this year's local election using your work as a base. And it seems to me that base map is missing city municipalities for Vranje (Vranjska Banja) and Užice (Sevojno). Unfortunately this turned out to be beyond my ability, so I just wanted to let you know for that error in case you have time or ability to fix it.Nightfall87 (talk) 22:35, 18 November 2023 (UTC)

I'm aware of that issue and I'll fix it tomorrow. Vacant0 (talk) 22:37, 18 November 2023 (UTC)

 Done, @Nightfall87: I've added Sevojno and Vranjska Banja to all my maps. Vacant0 (talk) 10:56, 19 November 2023 (UTC)

Great job mate! Do you have any idea how we could differentiate between city election and citi municipality elections? Appart from making separate maps, one for city elections and one for both city and regular municipalities elections. At least for me it makes no sense that we colour all of the Belgrade's city municipalities in the colour of the city wide election winner. Even worse would be, though I don't think we have that case this year in any of the cities that have them, if there were both city and city municipality elections held at the same time. I tried looking fot a solution from other countries local elections but failed to find any. Nightfall87 (talk) 13:38, 19 November 2023 (UTC)

What about creating a slightly larger stroke (and colouring it red, for example) around the Belgrade municipalities? In the legend, I could then add a note for the border. Vacant0 (talk) 13:44, 19 November 2023 (UTC)

It would work for this instance. Still not so helpfull in case when there are elections for both city assembly and municipal assembly within that city. Though since we don't have any case of that this year we could ignore it. Nightfall87 (talk) 18:30, 19 November 2023 (UTC)

File:Party of Democratic Action of Sandžak flag.svg

Hello! Just wanted to let you know that the File:Party of Democratic Action of Sandžak flag.svg you uploaded has the middle part transparent while it should be colored white. I wanted to fix it, but I can't overwrite the file.. -SRG372 (talk) 20:14, 22 November 2023 (UTC)

I don't remember how that border ended up there, but I removed it. Thanks for noticing it. Vacant0 (talk) 22:10, 22 November 2023 (UTC)

File:Timișoara Orthodox Cathedral, Timișoara, August 2022 (1).jpg

File:Timișoara Orthodox Cathedral, Timișoara, August 2022 (1).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 05:45, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

File:Timișoara Orthodox Cathedral, Timișoara, August 2022 (2).jpg

File:Timișoara Orthodox Cathedral, Timișoara, August 2022 (2).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 05:46, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

File:Timișoara Orthodox Cathedral, Timișoara, August 2022 (4).jpg

File:Timișoara Orthodox Cathedral, Timișoara, August 2022 (4).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 05:47, 28 November 2023 (UTC)