User talk:Abrimaal

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Abrimaal!

Tip: Categorizing images[edit]

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | magyar | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски / srpski | svenska | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Hello, Abrimaal!
Tip: Add categories to your images

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:


2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

CategorizationBot (talk) 10:44, 10 September 2011 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Terracrestaarcade.png[edit]

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Terracrestaarcade.png, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Terracrestaarcade.png]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Martin H. (talk) 23:04, 17 September 2011 (UTC)


беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | hrvatski | magyar | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | sicilianu | slovenščina | svenska | українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 02:40, 19 January 2013 (UTC)

Nazwy plików[edit]

Dlaczego dodajesz wykrzykniki na początku nazwy plików? Przecież to nie jest nikomu potrzebne. Zwiadowca 21 16:13, 29 October 2014 (UTC)

Prośba o kontakt w sprawie publikacji fotografii[edit]

Dzień dobry. Bardzo serdecznie proszę o pilny kontakt z biurem prasowym Stowarzyszenia Wikimedia Polska, pod adresem natalia.szafran(at) lub ewentualnie o podanie mi swojego maila na stronie dyskusji. Chodzi o publikację Twojej fotografii. Próbowałam skorzystać z mechanizmu wyślij e-mail, niestety coś nie działa. Dlatego będę bardzo wdzięczna za kontakt. Pozdrawiam serdecznie Magalia (talk) 16:27, 21 November 2014 (UTC)

CC-BY-NC icon at CC-BY-SA licensed images[edit]

Hi Abrimaal, some users at the Forum wonder why you add a CC-BY-NC icon to uploads, such as File:20150901 abc wyskoc kosciol-mk-a.jpg, which you have released under a CC-BY-SA license, which definitively allows commercial use. This may mislead or at least confuse re-users, especially as the NC-icon leaps out more easily than mere the BY-SA-license text. Legally, the CC-BY-NC is likely irrelevant, as you did add only an icon, but not a license text. Did you choose the CC-BY-NC-icon intentionally or did you just confound it with the CC-BY-SA icon? (Just to avoid any misunderstanding: it is fully o.k. to double-license uploads to Commons.) Regards. --Túrelio (talk) 09:10, 21 March 2016 (UTC)

The images I publish at Wikimedia Commons are free for educational and informational purposes. Everyone may copy, share, modify them and print them for personal use. Everyone may use them in informational and educational publications that are not sold for money. However they must not be used in commercial media like books, calendars, postcards, magazines, videos without a contract between the author and the publisher. Because I could not find the template for CC-BY-SA-NC, I added the -NC icon below the main licence template. (User talk:Abrimaal)
Hi Abrimaal,
thanks for this clarification. However, then we have a problem. Per our policy COM:L, media uploaded to Commons have to be free for any kind of use (in regard to copyright; there may be other restriction, such as personality rights). I know that this is regarded as a problem by some authors. But, I cannot change it, as this is one of the pillars of Wikimedia.
This means, that you actually did not intend to license your uploads under CC-BY-SA, which allows commercial use. So far, I have identified a huge number of your uploads which carry this "template" and are therefore incompatible with our policy.
I will ask a :pl-colleague what we can do here. --Túrelio (talk) 11:56, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Marek, I agree with Túrelio this is confusing. All your files are released under CC-BY-SA license, so they can "be used in commercial media like books, calendars, postcards, magazines, videos without a contract between the author and the publisher", along with every other image published on Commons, please see Commons:Project_scope#Non-allowable_licence_terms. You are allowed to use dual license system where you give user choice of one license or the other license. So they can choose CC-BY-SA or CC-BY-SA-NC, but if I were commercial business I would pick CC-BY-SA. Peppering your images with non-commercial icons, is is sending mixed messages but does not make them non-commercial. --Jarekt (talk) 12:58, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
A solution may be to reduce all these images to "low resolution" and transfer the originals to a photo library (say like) Alamy. The low res can remain CC-BY-SA here but for people that want the higher res they need to pay for them at Alamy. A link to the library could be given on each image as 'source' without it appearing to be blatant advertising – I think. But legitimacy of rights would need to be made clear by the means of adding say Source: © Alamy/Abrimaal --P.g.champion (talk) 00:31, 22 March 2016 (UTC)

File:Out of heaven zx spectrum ulaplus palette.png[edit]

File:Out of heaven zx spectrum ulaplus palette.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

BrightRaven (talk) 07:40, 7 July 2016 (UTC)

Hello. I nominated this file for deletion, not because of a copyright problem, but because I think it is out of scope: Commons is not a free repository for images, but it aims at gathering medias with an educational purpose. If you want to discuss about the deletion of this file, please use the deletion request page. Best regards, BrightRaven (talk) 11:35, 7 July 2016 (UTC)

Zaproszenie do konkursu fotograficznego WikiWakacje[edit]

Dzień dobry!

Piszę do Ciebie, ponieważ byłeś jednym z uczestników konkursu Wiki Lubi Zabytki, a zgłoszone wtedy przez Ciebie zdjęcia stały się cenną częścią zasobów multimedialnych Wikipedii (dziękujemy!). Chciałabym dać Ci znać, że właśnie trwa nasz kolejny konkurs fotograficzny - WikiWakacje. W tym konkursie również gromadzimy zdjęcia zabytków, ale też fotografie polskiego dziedzictwa przyrodniczego i sztuki dostępnej publicznie. Podobnie jak poprzednio, wszystkie zdjęcia wzbogacą zasoby Wikipedii. I tak jak wcześniej, mamy dla uczestników nagrody - autorzy najlepszych fotografii otrzymają wybrany przez siebie sprzęt fotograficzny i akcesoria. Więcej informacji o konkursie znajdziesz na stronie Mam nadzieję, że dołączysz do nas! Z niecierpliwością czekamy na Twoje zdjęcia. Natalia Szafran-Kozakowska (WMPL) (talk) 11:06, 1 September 2017 (UTC)