User talk:Abrimaal

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Abrimaal!

Tip: Categorizing images[edit]

Afrikaans  العربية  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  Esperanto  español  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  magyar  íslenska  italiano  日本語  ქართული  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  +/−


Hello, Abrimaal!
Tip: Add categories to your files
Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

CategorizationBot (talk) 10:44, 10 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File source is not properly indicated: File:Terracrestaarcade.png[edit]

العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Terracrestaarcade.png, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Terracrestaarcade.png]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Martin H. (talk) 23:04, 17 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 02:40, 19 January 2013 (UTC)

Nazwy plików[edit]

Dlaczego dodajesz wykrzykniki na początku nazwy plików? Przecież to nie jest nikomu potrzebne. Zwiadowca 21 16:13, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Prośba o kontakt w sprawie publikacji fotografii[edit]

Dzień dobry. Bardzo serdecznie proszę o pilny kontakt z biurem prasowym Stowarzyszenia Wikimedia Polska, pod adresem natalia.szafran(at)wikimedia.pl lub ewentualnie o podanie mi swojego maila na stronie dyskusji. Chodzi o publikację Twojej fotografii. Próbowałam skorzystać z mechanizmu wyślij e-mail, niestety coś nie działa. Dlatego będę bardzo wdzięczna za kontakt. Pozdrawiam serdecznie Magalia (talk) 16:27, 21 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

CC-BY-NC icon at CC-BY-SA licensed images[edit]

Hi Abrimaal, some users at the Forum wonder why you add a CC-BY-NC icon to uploads, such as File:20150901 abc wyskoc kosciol-mk-a.jpg, which you have released under a CC-BY-SA license, which definitively allows commercial use. This may mislead or at least confuse re-users, especially as the NC-icon leaps out more easily than mere the BY-SA-license text. Legally, the CC-BY-NC is likely irrelevant, as you did add only an icon, but not a license text. Did you choose the CC-BY-NC-icon intentionally or did you just confound it with the CC-BY-SA icon? (Just to avoid any misunderstanding: it is fully o.k. to double-license uploads to Commons.) Regards. --Túrelio (talk) 09:10, 21 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The images I publish at Wikimedia Commons are free for educational and informational purposes. Everyone may copy, share, modify them and print them for personal use. Everyone may use them in informational and educational publications that are not sold for money. However they must not be used in commercial media like books, calendars, postcards, magazines, videos without a contract between the author and the publisher. Because I could not find the template for CC-BY-SA-NC, I added the -NC icon below the main licence template. (User talk:Abrimaal)
Hi Abrimaal,
thanks for this clarification. However, then we have a problem. Per our policy COM:L, media uploaded to Commons have to be free for any kind of use (in regard to copyright; there may be other restriction, such as personality rights). I know that this is regarded as a problem by some authors. But, I cannot change it, as this is one of the pillars of Wikimedia.
This means, that you actually did not intend to license your uploads under CC-BY-SA, which allows commercial use. So far, I have identified a huge number of your uploads which carry this "template" and are therefore incompatible with our policy.
I will ask a :pl-colleague what we can do here. --Túrelio (talk) 11:56, 21 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Marek, I agree with Túrelio this is confusing. All your files are released under CC-BY-SA license, so they can "be used in commercial media like books, calendars, postcards, magazines, videos without a contract between the author and the publisher", along with every other image published on Commons, please see Commons:Project_scope#Non-allowable_licence_terms. You are allowed to use dual license system where you give user choice of one license or the other license. So they can choose CC-BY-SA or CC-BY-SA-NC, but if I were commercial business I would pick CC-BY-SA. Peppering your images with non-commercial icons, is is sending mixed messages but does not make them non-commercial. --Jarekt (talk) 12:58, 21 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
A solution may be to reduce all these images to "low resolution" and transfer the originals to a photo library (say like) Alamy. The low res can remain CC-BY-SA here but for people that want the higher res they need to pay for them at Alamy. A link to the library could be given on each image as 'source' without it appearing to be blatant advertising – I think. But legitimacy of rights would need to be made clear by the means of adding say Source: © Alamy/Abrimaal --P.g.champion (talk) 00:31, 22 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
File:Out of heaven zx spectrum ulaplus palette.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

BrightRaven (talk) 07:40, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I nominated this file for deletion, not because of a copyright problem, but because I think it is out of scope: Commons is not a free repository for images, but it aims at gathering medias with an educational purpose. If you want to discuss about the deletion of this file, please use the deletion request page. Best regards, BrightRaven (talk) 11:35, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Zaproszenie do konkursu fotograficznego WikiWakacje[edit]

Dzień dobry!

Piszę do Ciebie, ponieważ byłeś jednym z uczestników konkursu Wiki Lubi Zabytki, a zgłoszone wtedy przez Ciebie zdjęcia stały się cenną częścią zasobów multimedialnych Wikipedii (dziękujemy!). Chciałabym dać Ci znać, że właśnie trwa nasz kolejny konkurs fotograficzny - WikiWakacje. W tym konkursie również gromadzimy zdjęcia zabytków, ale też fotografie polskiego dziedzictwa przyrodniczego i sztuki dostępnej publicznie. Podobnie jak poprzednio, wszystkie zdjęcia wzbogacą zasoby Wikipedii. I tak jak wcześniej, mamy dla uczestników nagrody - autorzy najlepszych fotografii otrzymają wybrany przez siebie sprzęt fotograficzny i akcesoria. Więcej informacji o konkursie znajdziesz na stronie wikiwakacje.pl. Mam nadzieję, że dołączysz do nas! Z niecierpliwością czekamy na Twoje zdjęcia. Natalia Szafran-Kozakowska (WMPL) (talk) 11:06, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Yours sincerely, Ankry (talk) 20:33, 27 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This photo is not a contest entry. Abrimaal (talk) 22:26, 27 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Wrzesień to czas na Wiki Lubi Zabytki![edit]

Dzień dobry! Piszę do Ciebie, ponieważ w poprzednich latach brałeś udział w konkursie Wiki Lubi Zabytki w Polsce. Bardzo ucieszylibyśmy się, gdybyś włączył się do konkursu również w tym roku i pomógł nam w dokumentowaniu polskiego dziedzictwa kulturowego dla przyszłych pokoleń.

Możesz dowiedzieć się więcej o konkursie na stronie konkursu. Wydarzenie będzie trwało do 30 września 2019. Czekamy na Twoje zdjęcia!

Pozdrawiam Cię serdecznie Natalia Szafran-Kozakowska (WMPL) (talk) 20:23, 17 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2019! Please help with this survey.[edit]

Wiki Loves Monuments logo
Wiki Loves Monuments logo

Dear Abrimaal,

Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2019, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! We would like to ask again a few minutes of your time. Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 210K+ pictures of cultural heritage objects from more than 40 countries around the world.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet). If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help.

To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2019.

Kind regards,
the Wiki Loves Monuments team MediaWiki message delivery 12:33, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation to participate in Wiki Loves Monuments 2019 Participant Survey (Reminder)[edit]

Wiki Loves Monuments logo
Wiki Loves Monuments logo

Dear Abrimaal,

Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2019, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! We would like to ask again a few minutes of your time. Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 210K+ pictures of cultural heritage objects from more than 40 countries around the world.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet). If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help.

To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2019.

Kind regards,
the Wiki Loves Monuments team MediaWiki message delivery 03:42, 23 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Konkurs fotograficzny Wiki Lubi Zabytki 2020[edit]

Drogi Wikimedianinie,

piszę do Ciebie, ponieważ dzięki Twojemu udziałowi w konkursie Wiki Lubi Zabytki Wikipedia zyskała cenne zdjęcia polskiego dziedzictwa kultury. Dziękuję za Twoje zaangażowanie w tej oraz w poprzednich edycjach konkursu oraz zachęcam do przesyłania kolejnych fotografii :)

Pozdrawiam Cię serdecznie - Paulina Studniczka (WMPL) (talk) 10:24, 12 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:2010-gorsko-galeria-rzezby-ptakow.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Sławek Borewicz (talk) 04:14, 15 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Today I would delete all my photos from Commons, seeing that the others use them commercially, releasing calendars, postcards and other stuff, while I get not a single copy of the release. 2A01:114F:CA1:5800:A54E:CBA7:DF9C:5874 14:33, 15 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]