Commons:Propositions d'images remarquables
Cette page recense les images qui sont proposées pour être affichées dans les Images remarquables. Notez qu'il ne s'agit pas de la même chose que l'image du jour ou que les images de qualité.
Les archives des votes précédents se trouvent sur cette page.
Il existe également une liste chronologique des images remarquables.
Voir aussi les Images de qualité, les propositions d'images de qualité et les critiques photographiques.
Procédure
[edit]Conseils avant de proposer une image
[edit]partie en cours de traduction depuis la version anglaise, votre avis est le bienvenu.
Lisez entièrement le guide avant de commencer
Quelques règles informelles à retenir avant de proposer une image (les termes en italiques sont la traduction anglaise des termes).
- Définition (display resolution) : les images de Commons peuvent être utilisées sur d'autres supports qu'un écran d'ordinateur, par exemple pour être imprimées ou vues à très haute résolution. Il est important que les images proposées aient la plus haute résolution possible. Au moins 2 millions de pixels (par ex. 2000 x 1000) semble raisonnable à présent. Les images de définition inférieure sont systématiquement rejetées sauf s'il y a une bonne raison.
- Mise au point (focus) : tous les objets importants de l'image devraient être nets. Dans l'idéal les objets non primordiaux sont nets.
- Avant-plan et arrière-plan (background and foreground): ils peuvent être dérangeants. Le sujet principal ne devrait pas être caché par le premier plan, ni se confondre avec l'arrière-plan.
- Qualité générale (general quality) : Les images proposées devraient avoir une très haute qualité technique.
- Une retouche (digital manipulations) ne doit pas tromper l'observateur. La correction de quelques défauts dans l'image est acceptée pour autant que ce soit limité, bien fait, et non pour tromper. Les retouches courantes sont le recadrage, la correction de la perspective, de netteté, des couleurs ou de l'exposition. Des manipulations plus importantes, tels quel l'élimination d'éléments dans l'arrière plan, doivent être décrites dans la description de l'image, par le biais du modèle {{RetouchedPicture}}. Les retouches non décrites ou mal décrites qui transformeraient le sujet sont inacceptables.
- Utilité (value) : notre but principal est de présenter des images utiles et précieuses. Les images devraient ainsi être spéciales d'une façon ou d'une autre, donc, entre autres :
- La plupart des coucher de soleil sont beaux, et la plupart ne sont pas différents des autres existant déjà.
- Les photos de nuit sont souvent belles mais davantage de détails sont visibles de jour.
- "Beau" ne veut pas dire "utile".
Au niveau technique, nous avons l'exposition, la composition, le mouvement et la profondeur du champ.
- L'exposition (exposure) est l'obturation du diaphragme qui modifie la luminosité (brightness) pour rendre avec qualité les ombres et les lumières au sein de l'image. Le manque d'ombres dans le détail n'est pas nécessairement négatif, cela peut être un effet désiré.
- La composition (composition) est l'arrangement des éléments dans l'image. La "Règle de trois" est un bon guide pour la composition, c'est un héritage des écoles de peintures. L'idée est de diviser l'image par deux lignes horizontales et deux lignes verticales, nous avons donc trois parties dans chaque sens. L'objet ne doit pas forcément être centré. Les sujets intéressants doivent êtres placés aux 4 croisements des lignes. L'horizon ne doit jamais être mis au milieu, car il couperait l'image en deux. L'idée principale ici est de rendre l'image dynamique.
- Netteté (sharpness) renvoie à la manière dont les mouvements sont représentés dans l'image. Ils peuvent être nets ou flous. Ils ne sont pas mieux l'un que l'autre, cela dépend de l'intention du photographe. L'impression de mouvement dépend des différents objets de l'image. Par exemple, photographier une voiture de course qui apparaît nette par rapport à l'arrière plan ne donne pas une idée de la vitesse. Il faudrait en fait que la voiture soit représentée nette, mais avec un arrière plan flou, créant ainsi le mouvement. D'un autre coté, représenter le saut d'un joueur de basket net avec le reste de l'image flou, en raison de la nature peu habituelle de la photo, lui conférerait de l'intérêt.
- La profondeur de champ (depth of field or DOF) renvoie à la zone de mise au point devant et au delà du sujet principal. La profondeur de champ est choisie en fonction des besoins spécifiques à chaque image. Une profondeur grande ou petite peut améliorer ou dégrader la qualité de l'image. Une faible profondeur de champ peut attirer l'attention sur le sujet principal, en le séparant de son environnement. Les lentilles à petite distance focale (grand angle) ont une grande profondeur de champ, et vice versa, les lentilles à grande distance focale (petite ouverture) ont une petite profondeur de champ.
Proposition
[edit]Si vous pensez avoir trouvé ou créé une image qui puisse être considérée comme parmi les meilleures de Commons, avec une description et une licence appropriée, copiez le nom de l'image dans la boîte ci-dessous (en incluant le préfixe File:), après le texte déjà présent :
Après cela, vous devrez insérer un lien vers la page que vous venez de créer en haut de Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list.
Vote
[edit]A l'exclusion de tous autres, vous pouvez utiliser les modèles suivants:
- {{Pour}} (
Support),
- {{Contre}} (
Oppose),
Ainsi que :
- {{Neutre}} (
Neutral),
- {{Comment}} (
Comment),
- {{Info}} (
Info),
- {{Question}} (
Question).
- IMPORTANT: veuillez notamment NE PAS UTILISER les modèles {{weak support}} (
Weak support) ni {{weak oppose}} (
Weak oppose), ils ne sont pas reconnus par le robot, et votre vote serait considéré comme non valide.
Merci d'inclure quelques mots expliquant pourquoi vous soutenez ou non la promotion de l'image, surtout si vous votez contre. N'oubliez pas de signer avec ~~~~.
Règles
[edit]Règles générales
[edit]- Le résultat est donné 9 jours après la proposition (voir le planning en bas de page). Les votes ajoutés le 10e jour ou après ne sont pas décomptés.
- Les utilisateurs non-enregistrés peuvent proposer des images, faire des commentaires, mais pas voter.
- La proposition elle-même ne compte pas comme un vote : il faut l'ajouter explicitement.
- Le proposant peut retirer une image à tout moment, en écrivant : {{Withdraw}} ~~~~
- Souvenez-vous que le but de Wikimedia Commons est une bibliothèque pour tous les projets Wikimedia, y compris des projets futurs ; les images n'ont pas à être utiles uniquement pour Wikipédia.
- Les images peuvent être retirées de la liste dès le 5e jour si elles n'ont reçu aucun vote "pour".
- Soyez attentifs et très sélectifs dans les choix que vous faites, car il ne peut y avoir que deux propositions actives par proposant. Toute proposition supplémentaire sera rejetée sans examen.
- Seulement 2 nominations actives par même utilisateur (qui est, en nomination sous "review" et non encore close) sont autorisées. Le principal but de cette mesure est de contribuer à une meilleure qualité moyenne des nominations, par un choix plus judicieux des photos présentes en nominations.
Règles de promotion
[edit]L'image candidate devient une image remarquable si elle remplit les conditions suivantes :
- Une licence appropriée (bien sûr !)
- Au moins sept votes "pour".
- un ratio de 2/1 de votes "pour"/"contre".
- Deux versions différentes de la même image ne peuvent pas être promues en même temps, mais seulement celle avec le plus grand score.
Contestations
[edit]Avec le temps, les critères d'évaluation évoluent, et il peut être décidé qu'une image qui était auparavant assez bonne pour être dans la liste ne peut plus l'être.
Pour qu'une image soit déchue, il faut qu'une majorité de 2/3 avec au moins 5 votes accepte de retirer l'image, autrement elle reste "remarquable". Pour voter, utiliser les modèles {{Keep}} ( Keep : mérite de rester "remarquable") ou {{Delist}} (
Delist : ne mérite plus le label).
Pour contester une image, copiez son nom avec le préfixe dans la boîte ci-dessous à la suite du texte déjà présent :
Vous devriez inclure les informations suivantes :
- Informations sur l'origine de l'image (créateur, importateur).
- Un lien vers le vote d'origine.
- La raison pour laquelle vous contestez le label, avec votre signature.
Insérez ensuite un lien en haut de Commons:Featured picture candidates/removal.
Sommaire
[edit]Pour ajouter votre proposition à la liste
[edit]Pour ajouter votre proposition à la liste, cliquez ici et ajoutez votre proposition en haut de la liste : {{Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:FILENAME}}
Propositions en cours
[edit]Featured picture candidates
[edit]Voting period ends on 7 Jul 2024 at 19:28:59 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Arachnida#Family : Araneidae (Orb-weaver Spiders)
Info The web decoration (Stabilimentum) of Argiope spiders changes as the females get older (and bigger). This FP looks like it's a juvenile Argiope flavipalpis. All by Charlesjsharp -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 19:28, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
Support -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 19:28, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 7 Jul 2024 at 17:31:23 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Fungi#Family : Strophariaceae
Info created by Plozessor - uploaded by Plozessor - nominated by Plozessor -- Plozessor (talk) 17:31, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
Comment Gallery? --Zzzs (talk) 17:33, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
Comment Sorry, fixed. --Plozessor (talk) 17:35, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 7 Jul 2024 at 04:11:33 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors/Germany#Rhineland-Palatinate
Info Trier, view from the Petrisberg on the city of Trier. Particularly at the Cathedral of St. Peter and the Dom.
All by -- Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 04:11, 28 June 2024 (UTC)Support -- Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 04:11, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
Oppose Unfavorable weather conditions. With the mist in the background, the main subject seems to be the white building popping up in the foreground -- Basile Morin (talk) 11:38, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
Oppose Sorry, per Basile. --Milseburg (talk) 14:28, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 7 Jul 2024 at 00:59:48 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Historical/People#1900-1909
Info created by James E. Purdy - restored, uploaded, and nominated by Adam Cuerden -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 00:59, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
Support -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 00:59, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
File:Pez payaso común (Amphiprion ocellaris) en una anémona magnífica (Heteractis magnifica), Anilao, Filipinas, 2023-08-22, DD 08.jpg
[edit]Voting period ends on 6 Jul 2024 at 20:28:31 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Fish#Family_:_Pomacentridae_(Clownfish_and_Damselfish)
Info Ocellaris clownfish (Amphiprion ocellaris) in a magnificent sea anemone (Heteractis magnifica), Anilao, Philippines. c/u/n by Poco a poco (talk) 20:28, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 20:28, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
Support Found him. --Zzzs (talk) 21:16, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
Support Fish Are Friends. Not Food. -- Radomianin (talk) 21:38, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
- Except sharks 🦈 :-) Basile Morin (talk) 03:06, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
Support --Mounir TOUZRI (talk) 21:43, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 02:29, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
Support Light, color and carpet -- Basile Morin (talk) 03:06, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
Support --Ermell (talk) 05:32, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
Support --C messier (talk) 06:23, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:30, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
Support--Terragio67 (talk) 07:46, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
Support —Bruce1eetalk 08:31, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
Support --نعيم قربوسي (talk) 09:41, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 14:12, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
Support You just found Neno! ★ 14:43, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 6 Jul 2024 at 19:03:49 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family_:_Leiothrichidae_(Laughingthrushes)
Info created & uploaded by JJ Harrison – nominated by Ivar (talk) 19:03, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
Support -- Ivar (talk) 19:03, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
Support Outstanding. Bird POTY. Charlesjsharp (talk) 20:28, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
Strong support I concur with Charles --Zzzs (talk) 20:48, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
Support Harmonious in every way; words are actually superfluous. -- Radomianin (talk) 21:31, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
Support --Mounir TOUZRI (talk) 21:48, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 02:29, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
Support Color and composition -- Basile Morin (talk) 03:08, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
Support Striking colours and composition, exceptionally detailed. --Tagooty (talk) 03:09, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
Support Ermell (talk) 05:33, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:31, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
Support--Terragio67 (talk) 07:47, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
Support --نعيم قربوسي (talk) 09:42, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
Strong support JJ, you've done it again. --SHB2000 (talk) 13:28, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
Support Excellent! --Harlock81 (talk) 14:12, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 6 Jul 2024 at 17:41:36 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Historical/People#1900-1909
Info created by White Studio - restored, uploaded, and nominated by Adam Cuerden -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 17:41, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
Support -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 17:41, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 6 Jul 2024 at 10:19:14 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants#Family : Rosaceae
Info created and uploaded by Dots foto - nominated by Красный -- Красный wanna talk? 10:19, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
Support -- Красный wanna talk? 10:19, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 10:29, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
Comment: beautiful scene, but there are a few technical issues: the sky is a bit noisy and has a couple of dust spots, while the whole image is very tilted to the right. Would support if these are corrected. --The Cosmonaut (talk) 16:50, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
Comment There is also a halo effect around the tree. --C messier (talk) 18:08, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
- @The Cosmonaut and C messier: I've fixed the tilt and a bit of noise but halo left me confused — maybe I'm stupid or it's my colour blidnness kicking in, but I don't see any. Красный wanna talk? 19:33, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
- The parts of the image around and especially below (between the foliage and the ground) the tree are unnaturally bright. --C messier (talk) 21:21, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
Suggested version @Красный, The Cosmonaut, and C messier: Dear reviewers, I have reduced the slight halo in the treetop and then adjusted the overall tonal correction accordingly. If you like the result, you can use this edit for an update. Please see the SwissTransfer link. While editing, I realized that the glow in the treetop might have been due to some overly well-intentioned post-processing. But that's just my guess. Best regards, -- Radomianin (talk) 21:24, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
- Looks good for me, but I'm still not sure about the halo. I just don't see it. Красный wanna talk? 21:38, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
- I think the halo mentioned by our fellow photographer C messier refers to the glow of the treetop that I removed in my suggestion. This can be clearly seen in a direct comparison of the two versions. Best, -- Radomianin (talk) 21:50, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
- The sky looks better, but the houses are still leaning to the right. --The Cosmonaut (talk) 02:27, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
Oppose Overprocessed, like other uploads by the same author. Kind of vignetting. The center has been lightened -- Basile Morin (talk) 03:18, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 6 Jul 2024 at 10:17:26 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family : Sturnidae (Starlings)
Info Lives alongside the other blue starling recently nominated. No current FP. All by Charlesjsharp -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 10:17, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
Support -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 10:17, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 10:28, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 16:53, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
Support I would go for a bit more contrasty tonality, as current tonality is dream like, but still a well executed image of a beautiful bird. --C messier (talk) 18:06, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks, I over-brightened when I uploaded the second version. Charlesjsharp (talk) 20:34, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
Support I was planning on nominating this. Thank you. --Zzzs (talk) 19:22, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
Support Iridescent plumage -- Basile Morin (talk) 03:25, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
Support Ermell (talk) 05:35, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:32, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
Support--Terragio67 (talk) 07:48, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
Support --نعيم قربوسي (talk) 09:42, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 6 Jul 2024 at 09:57:15 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious_buildings#Greece
Info The church of Agios Menas, Fira, Santorini. All by C messier. -- C messier (talk) 09:57, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
Support -- C messier (talk) 09:57, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 10:24, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 16:53, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
Support --Zzzs (talk) 05:40, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 6 Jul 2024 at 09:13:24 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Lepidoptera#Family : Pieridae (Whites and Sulphurs)
Info created by Atanu Bose Photography - uploaded by Atanu Bose Photography - nominated by Atudu -- Atudu (talk) 09:13, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
Support -- Atudu (talk) 09:13, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
{{Oppose}}Sorry, but maybe this one: File:Close wing mud-puddling position of Pareronia avatar (Moore, 1858) - Pale Wanderer.jpg presents more realistic colors of the same butterfly. --Harlock81 (talk) 10:23, 27 June 2024 (UTC)Comment I don't think is FP quality, but there doesn't seem to be any issue with the colour of this male Harlock81. It seems that this butterfly shows colour-variation, possibly seasonal. Charlesjsharp (talk) 14:11, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
- My mistake, I thought the two pictures were taken at the same place, the same day. Thanks for pinging me --Harlock81 (talk) 15:11, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 02:29, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
Oppose Quality is good but not exceptional, composition is routine compared to FPs in the gallery. --Tagooty (talk) 03:13, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 6 Jul 2024 at 03:30:25 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Portugal
Info: aerial view of west Faial taken from a window of a commercial aircraft; all by -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 03:30, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
Support -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 03:30, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
Support El Golli Mohamed 14:15, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 5 Jul 2024 at 16:52:13 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Land vehicles#Rail vehicles
Info created by Skander zarrad - uploaded by Skander zarrad - nominated by Skander zarrad -- Skander zarrad (talk) 16:52, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
Support -- Skander zarrad (talk) 16:52, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
Support A classic Kabelleger's style! ★ 18:41, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
- Well, not really; never seen one of his like this. Charlesjsharp (talk) 18:59, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
- Is this is a protected area of Tunisia for WLE 2024? Charlesjsharp (talk) 19:02, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
- I said "style". ★ 19:33, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
- Yes ;Gorges de Selja Mounir TOUZRI (talk) 20:14, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
Support -- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 01:41, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
Comment: noise level is a bit high, I think; would support if denoised. --The Cosmonaut (talk) 03:34, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks, I wasn't paying attention, I fixed that :) Skander zarrad (talk) 08:37, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
Support: much better --The Cosmonaut (talk) 12:28, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
Neutral The people captured in the picture aren't doing anything interesting. --Harlock81 (talk) 10:27, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
Support - The people don't bother me. —Bruce1eetalk 08:29, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
Comment Is the white balance OK? It looks like it has a slight yellow-greenish tint. --C messier (talk) 19:04, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 5 Jul 2024 at 16:11:17 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Animals/Arthropods#Orthoptera
Info created by Skander zarrad - uploaded by Skander zarrad - nominated by Skander zarrad -- Skander zarrad (talk) 16:11, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
Support -- Skander zarrad (talk) 16:11, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
Support Nice camouflage! ★ 18:42, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 03:32, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 10:15, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
Support LGTM --Zzzs (talk) 04:56, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 5 Jul 2024 at 14:17:47 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Architectural elements#Others
Info created and uploaded by Ermell - nominated by ★ -- ★ 14:17, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
Support Unusual close-up view of the Elizabeth Tower's clock face (aka Big Ben). -- ★ 14:17, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
Comment I'm not convinced we should have this nice image as an FP as the clock face was recently restored and looks very different. I other words, it's one of many versions but not a particularly notable one. Charlesjsharp (talk) 14:37, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
Support Very sharp, good composition. even if the clock changed, why not featuring it before the change? Yann (talk) 09:43, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 11:57, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
Comment For a perfect encyclopedia, we should ideally have one FP of every version of the clock face on such a notable building. What a great timeline that would make for the article. This excellent photo is a good start. --Cart (talk) 12:33, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
- The file name and description could helpfully indicate it is a historical image. Charlesjsharp (talk) 14:14, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
- The info and reference have been added to the description on the file page. It's up to Ermell to perhaps add the "as of 2009" to the file name when the nom is done. --Cart (talk) 15:46, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
Support El Golli Mohamed 14:14, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
Support: per Yann. --The Cosmonaut (talk) 16:55, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
Support Thanks for the nom ArionStar. Ermell (talk) 05:39, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
Support Bummer that this image is outdated since the clocks were painted dark blue, but still good nonetheless. --Zzzs (talk) 15:59, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
- Look at it from the bright side: The new clock face is there to be photographed any day now, this historic face can't be photographed again. Do you call a photo of Manhattan with the Twin Towers outdated or an historical documentation that we are lucky to have? --Cart (talk) 18:09, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 5 Jul 2024 at 12:45:35 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Austria
Info all by Tournasol7 -- Tournasol7 (talk) 12:45, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
Abstain As author. Tournasol7 (talk) 12:45, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 12:48, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
Support Of course… ★ 14:05, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
Support Poco a poco (talk) 17:09, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
Oppose Good image and certainly QI/VI but IMHO not enough wow for FP. --GRDN711 (talk) 21:21, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 11:56, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
Support El Golli Mohamed 14:13, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 5 Jul 2024 at 07:51:19 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants/Asparagales#Family:Amaryllidaceae (Allium roseum)
Info created by Smailtn - uploaded by Smailtn - nominated by TOUMOU -- Mounir TOUZRI (talk) 07:51, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
Support -- Mounir TOUZRI (talk) 07:51, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 12:49, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
Support ★ 18:42, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 10:14, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 5 Jul 2024 at 05:56:56 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#India
Info Gephan range towering (elev. 8,000 ft (2,400 m)) above the Bhaga river, Lahaul, Himachal, India. Created by Tagooty - uploaded by Tagooty - nominated by Tagooty -- Tagooty (talk) 05:56, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
Support -- Tagooty (talk) 05:56, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
Support A great landscape for me --Famberhorst (talk) 12:21, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
Support -- Karelj (talk) 14:51, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
Support ★ 18:43, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
Oppose The light is not so good, for "one of the best pictures of the site". Hazy. The shadows are too dominant in the mountains, especially at the left. Harsh light. It's almost a contrejour, since the shadows seem to be leaning in our direction. Incidentally lack of sharpness in the corners -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:38, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
- @Basile Morin: Thanks for your comments. I have tweaked the exposure and shadows, plus mild sharpening. Is it better? Note that the direction is to the south, the sun is shining out of the top left corner. At high altitude, lighting tends to be harsh owing to the clear air. Tagooty (talk) 03:16, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
- Are you sure you've uploaded the correct file? I honestly see no difference at all, even looking carefully at full size. Although they seem to be different files in megabytes. So I wonder what has changed -- Basile Morin (talk) 03:40, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
- @Basile Morin: Sorry, my edits accidentally got undone before export from LR. The latest version now has the exposure and sharpness adjustments. Please review this. Tagooty (talk) 04:40, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
- Minor change. I don't see much improvement, sorry -- Basile Morin (talk) 10:57, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
- Are you sure you've uploaded the correct file? I honestly see no difference at all, even looking carefully at full size. Although they seem to be different files in megabytes. So I wonder what has changed -- Basile Morin (talk) 03:40, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 11:52, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
Support El Golli Mohamed 14:11, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
Support --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 22:30, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
Oppose per Basile. --Kadellar (talk) 09:08, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 5 Jul 2024 at 01:25:40 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Objects#Clothing and textiles
Info The final room of the "Camp: Notes on Fashion" exhibit at The Met in 2019. At this point in the exhibit, the narrow corridors open up to this large, two-floor spectacle of wild ensembles. all by — Rhododendrites talk | 01:25, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
Support — Rhododendrites talk | 01:25, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
Support --Kadellar (talk) 09:09, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 4 Jul 2024 at 12:04:28 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Food and drink#Fruits (raw)
Info Kiwifruits from Italy in a grocery store, Colatina, Espírito Santo, Brazil. Created, uploaded and nominated by ★ -- ★ 12:04, 25 June 2024 (UTC)
Support -- ★ 12:04, 25 June 2024 (UTC)
I withdraw my nomination Everyone is fed up with my fruit images. ★ 14:16, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
- What do you think about adding a rule so that once someone cancels a nomination they have to wait a while to be able to nominate another image? Wilfredor (talk) 16:15, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
- Wilfredor, rules like that are only added when there is a general problem with many users misusing the site in some way. In this case, ArionStar is the only one with this pattern of quick withdrawals and adding new noms. We can't make a rule just because one person will not follow the general praxis. In this case a sharp reminder should be enough. If that doesn't work, a temporary block could be recommended to let them cool down and give the community some time off from these rapid-fire nominations. --Cart (talk) 08:22, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
- I understand and it makes sense Wilfredor (talk) 21:31, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
- Wilfredor, rules like that are only added when there is a general problem with many users misusing the site in some way. In this case, ArionStar is the only one with this pattern of quick withdrawals and adding new noms. We can't make a rule just because one person will not follow the general praxis. In this case a sharp reminder should be enough. If that doesn't work, a temporary block could be recommended to let them cool down and give the community some time off from these rapid-fire nominations. --Cart (talk) 08:22, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 4 Jul 2024 at 10:49:24 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Towers#Greece
Info created & ploaded by C messier - nominated by Tomer T -- Tomer T (talk) 10:49, 25 June 2024 (UTC)
Support -- Tomer T (talk) 10:49, 25 June 2024 (UTC)
Support --Berthold Werner (talk) 15:00, 25 June 2024 (UTC)
Support Attractive, balanced composition in good light. -- Radomianin (talk) 18:28, 25 June 2024 (UTC)
Support ★ 19:10, 25 June 2024 (UTC)
Support per Radomianin -- Terragio67 (talk) 19:50, 25 June 2024 (UTC)
Support Πολύ όμορφο, φέρνει αναμνήσεις El Golli Mohamed 22:28, 25 June 2024 (UTC)
Support per Radomianin -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:25, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
Support Time could be diferent. --Mile (talk) 08:00, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 12:00, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 12:49, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 13:02, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
Support Poco a poco (talk) 17:11, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
Support Lovely! --Zzzs (talk) 01:04, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 10:13, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
Support Thanks for the nomination Tomer T. --C messier (talk) 10:49, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 11:49, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 4 Jul 2024 at 00:37:18 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Portugal
Info: Faial Caldera, Azores. Better shadows compared to the previous nomination; all by -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 00:37, 25 June 2024 (UTC)
Support -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 00:37, 25 June 2024 (UTC)
Support I love this landscape.--Famberhorst (talk) 12:05, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 04:24, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 11:48, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
Support El Golli Mohamed 14:09, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 3 Jul 2024 at 22:40:44 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family : Sturnidae (Starlings)
Info created and uploaded by Charlesjsharp - nominated by Zzzs -- Zzzs (talk) 22:40, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
Support -- Zzzs (talk) 22:40, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 00:44, 25 June 2024 (UTC)
Support --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:59, 25 June 2024 (UTC)
Support --نعيم قربوسي (talk) 09:51, 25 June 2024 (UTC)
Support Thank you for the nomination. Charlesjsharp (talk) 11:49, 25 June 2024 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:05, 25 June 2024 (UTC)
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 12:12, 25 June 2024 (UTC)
Support --Berthold Werner (talk) 14:59, 25 June 2024 (UTC)
Oppose The striking male violet-backed starling is already an FP. I don't think the plain female merits FP. --Tagooty (talk) 06:07, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
- @Tagooty Why wouldn't it? It would be fair if the other gender is a FP, like many others. Zzzs (talk) 08:11, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
- An FP is an extraordinary image with wow-factor. This image does not have an unusual pose/activity/colouration/etc that catches my attention. It merits QI and VI. --Tagooty (talk) 08:44, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
- You might have to oppose many bird more bird FPs, Tagooty, if you don't like little brown birds and females. Charlesjsharp (talk) 14:47, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
- @Charlesjsharp: An FP is one "of the finest on Commons". The violet-backed starling is common throughout Africa. Your FP of the strikingly-coloured male has set a high bar. An unexceptional image of a drab female does not cross the bar IMO. I would support an unusual image of a plain brown bird, or an image of a rare brown bird. --Tagooty (talk) 02:57, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
- Fair enough, I agree the setting is not exceptional. Perhaps the FP bar should be raised; as long as there is consensus. We are promoting dozens of unexeptional small brown birds standing on brown earth or sand these days. Thinking about consistency, what do you think about the recent nominations of the white butterfly and brown locust? Neither are rare species. Charlesjsharp (talk) 10:06, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
- I feel that the FP bars for many subjects are getting lower over the past 2-3 years. I wonder how many reviewers compare with FPs in the gallery before voting? Perhaps, its just that I'm getting older and more critical!
Tagooty (talk) 03:25, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
- I feel that the FP bars for many subjects are getting lower over the past 2-3 years. I wonder how many reviewers compare with FPs in the gallery before voting? Perhaps, its just that I'm getting older and more critical!
- Fair enough, I agree the setting is not exceptional. Perhaps the FP bar should be raised; as long as there is consensus. We are promoting dozens of unexeptional small brown birds standing on brown earth or sand these days. Thinking about consistency, what do you think about the recent nominations of the white butterfly and brown locust? Neither are rare species. Charlesjsharp (talk) 10:06, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
- @Charlesjsharp: An FP is one "of the finest on Commons". The violet-backed starling is common throughout Africa. Your FP of the strikingly-coloured male has set a high bar. An unexceptional image of a drab female does not cross the bar IMO. I would support an unusual image of a plain brown bird, or an image of a rare brown bird. --Tagooty (talk) 02:57, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
- You might have to oppose many bird more bird FPs, Tagooty, if you don't like little brown birds and females. Charlesjsharp (talk) 14:47, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
- An FP is an extraordinary image with wow-factor. This image does not have an unusual pose/activity/colouration/etc that catches my attention. It merits QI and VI. --Tagooty (talk) 08:44, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
- @Tagooty Why wouldn't it? It would be fair if the other gender is a FP, like many others. Zzzs (talk) 08:11, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 12:06, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 12:50, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
Support --GRDN711 (talk) 21:14, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 2 Jul 2024 at 16:15:14 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family : Sylviidae (Sylviid Warblers)
Info created by El Golli Mohamed - uploaded by El Golli Mohamed - nominated by El Golli Mohamed -- El Golli Mohamed (talk) 16:15, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
Support -- El Golli Mohamed (talk) 16:15, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 03:26, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 08:11, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
Support good for 500 mm. --Mile (talk) 10:22, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 15:00, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
Support --Zzzs (talk) 16:33, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 00:42, 25 June 2024 (UTC)
Support--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:00, 25 June 2024 (UTC)
Support --Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:03, 25 June 2024 (UTC)
Support --Berthold Werner (talk) 14:57, 25 June 2024 (UTC)
Support--Terragio67 (talk) 16:58, 25 June 2024 (UTC)
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 12:12, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 12:29, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 12:50, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
Support ★ 18:43, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 2 Jul 2024 at 14:23:42 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Kazakhstan
Info created and uploaded by Dots foto - nominated by Красный -- Красный wanna talk? 14:23, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
Support -- Красный wanna talk? 14:23, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
Support Beautiful! Henrysz (talk) 19:24, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
Support I like it, too. --Harlock81 (talk) 11:33, 25 June 2024 (UTC)
Support Ю. Данилевский (talk) 20:16, 25 June 2024 (UTC)
Support Breathtaking image. -- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 23:59, 25 June 2024 (UTC)
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 12:14, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 12:50, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
Support Wow! ★ 18:39, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
- Clearly
Oversaturated colors -- Basile Morin (talk) 15:43, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 2 Jul 2024 at 13:11:32 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Natural phenomena#Fire
Info created and uploaded by Friedrich Haag, nominated by Yann
Support -- Yann (talk) 13:11, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
Support --Berthold Werner (talk) 15:56, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
Support --Felino Volador (talk) 02:18, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
Support Wow. Disclaimer: I so desperately miss this German custom. --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 03:28, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 06:48, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 09:17, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
Support--Mounir TOUZRI (talk) 09:44, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 14:59, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
Support El Golli Mohamed 00:08, 25 June 2024 (UTC)
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 00:42, 25 June 2024 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:02, 25 June 2024 (UTC)
Support--Terragio67 (talk) 16:57, 25 June 2024 (UTC)
Support --XRay 💬 19:19, 25 June 2024 (UTC)
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 12:15, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 12:50, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
Support This photo is fire! 🔥 ★ 18:38, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
Support --Zzzs (talk) 05:36, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 2 Jul 2024 at 10:53:10 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Food_and_drink#Food : Processing, preparing and cooking
Info Finalist in Pesto Genovese contest - Pesto Genovese ingrideints. My work. --Mile (talk) 10:53, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
Support -- Mile (talk) 10:53, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
Support The whites are slightly overexposed, but it's a nice well executed photo El Golli Mohamed 11:12, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
Support Very good composition, educational and pleasing for the eye and reminding my tastebuds of pleasant things --Kritzolina (talk) 16:48, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
Support Well done. --Zzzs (talk) 17:33, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
Comment The focus stacking issues around the green leaves and above the pot are a bit distracting at full size -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:13, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
- @Basile Morin True and corrected. --Mile (talk) 09:38, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
Support Well done -- Basile Morin (talk) 12:02, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
Support --Felino Volador (talk) 02:18, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
Support Maybe one of your best food pictures, Mile. Thanks for sharing! --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 03:29, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
- @Frank Schulenburg Thanx, i do put more on food, so need to be good. We are low on "food photo". But i could not pass wining photo. Didnt have much time, flight next day. --Mile (talk) 09:46, 25 June 2024 (UTC)
- Is that a joke by the jury? What's this winning picture all blurry, out of focus, poor light and distracting corner?! -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:34, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
- Was wondering if they judge from smartphone. It is strange, yes. But some serious criteria "foreign jury" as first. --Mile (talk) 07:39, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 06:35, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
Support --Mounir TOUZRI (talk) 09:44, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
Support Overall, well done. Listing the represented ingredients is a definite plus. If I were trying to imrprove this arrangement, a little higher camera perspective and gathering the ingredients more tightly together would let you move in tighter and strengthen the impact. --GRDN711 (talk) 12:24, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:00, 25 June 2024 (UTC)
Support--Terragio67 (talk) 16:55, 25 June 2024 (UTC)
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 12:50, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
Support Poco a poco (talk) 17:14, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
Support ★ 18:38, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 2 Jul 2024 at 06:36:07 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious buildings#Italy
Info created and uploaded by Luca Aless - nominated by ★ -- ★ 06:36, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
Support -- ★ 06:36, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
Support El Golli Mohamed 11:15, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
Support User:Luca Aless 17:07, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 00:40, 25 June 2024 (UTC)
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 12:50, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 1 Jul 2024 at 19:31:14 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Fish#Family_:_Muraenidae_(Moray_Eels)
Info Snowflake moray (Echidna nebulosa), Anilao, Philippines. Note: we have no FPs of genus Echidna. c/u/n by Poco a poco (talk) 19:31, 22 June 2024 (UTC)
Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 19:31, 22 June 2024 (UTC)
Oppose Sorry infortunate crop, we can't see the whole fish. This black thing is disturbing, also the sharpness is not so good.El Golli Mohamed (talk) 21:11, 22 June 2024 (UTC)
- I have applied a slight crop to the right bottom corner, so that what I believe is a feather star (black thing), is not on the way. Even if that could be an improvement, I don't see what is wrong with the crop, morays live in holes and rarely go out during the day as they are nocturnal predators. I also have to say that this animal is rare, and probably that's the reason why we have no FPs of the whole genus. That conditions to take pictures under water are more challenging than over the water is something that I don't need to elaborate, I guess. --Poco a poco (talk) 10:31, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
Support The whole moray would be be too big to fit in the image, so I will assume the author meant to only picture its head. The crop is fine. The black thing is
mildlynot distracting. The bottom of the moray where it turns is a bit blurry, probably OoF. Take my opinion with a grain of salt, as I am not a professional photographer. --Zzzs (talk) 22:49, 22 June 2024 (UTC)- Nothing is big to fit in an image. We managed to photograph galaxy clusters in a single photo. El Golli Mohamed (talk) 22:56, 22 June 2024 (UTC)
- Here's a full body image of this species for comparison. Also, isn't it pretty clear the author only wanted to picture its head? --Zzzs (talk) 23:00, 22 June 2024 (UTC)
- Nothing is big to fit in an image. We managed to photograph galaxy clusters in a single photo. El Golli Mohamed (talk) 22:56, 22 June 2024 (UTC)
Comment The crop is good and intentional; hope this is not an FPC revenge vote. Charlesjsharp (talk) 23:09, 22 June 2024 (UTC)
- I have little doubt after reading the same words I used "Infortunate (sic) crop" in my review. That's an statement that doesn't speak for the reviewer. Again, we have no FP of the genus Echidna, but we have already 4 FPs of the species (not genus) Himantopus himantopus. I've definitely supported more images that I've opposed of El Golli Mohamed, so I have no personal issue here and no problem with the photographer, let alone free-license photographers. If I'm convinced, I support the image if not, I oppose, that has nothing to do with whom is behind the camera and in most of the cases people believe that and are thankful for the feedback. Poco a poco (talk) 10:31, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
- Why don't we have the right to criticize, otherwise it's a revenge vote? Is it a dictatorship here? Is the justification for my vote true or not? El Golli Mohamed (talk) 23:23, 22 June 2024 (UTC)
- Of course anyone may criticise and oppose; that is the essence of FPC. But El Golli Mohamed was banned from Commons in April for two weeks for insulting behaviour stemming from his revenge votes. Charlesjsharp (talk) 00:14, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
- Dear reviewers, normally I am not a fan of repeating old mistakes, but regarding the incident mentioned here again, I would like to refer to the recent discussion from late May/early June. I agree with Poco a poco that we should please focus only on the images and not on the photographer behind the camera. Only through constructive discourse can we work together in a meaningful and healthy way. Behind every username there is a person who has to be respected, no matter if we have a different opinion or not. Best, -- Radomianin (talk) 09:08, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
Support High level of detail for an underwater picture. Interesting close up and the light is fine -- Basile Morin (talk) 04:09, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
Support --Yann (talk) 09:11, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
Support --Ermell (talk) 09:35, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:26, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 03:31, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
Support per Basile. -- Radomianin (talk) 06:34, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 15:02, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 12:50, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
Support ★ 18:37, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 30 Jun 2024 at 10:30:12 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Sculptures#Sculptures indoors
Info Miltiades (Roman replica). My shot. --Mile (talk) 10:30, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
Support Renomination, i have feeling this is FP. Citate from one who use it few days ago "Is the best image on the internet, very clean and high resolution." Nothing to add. Made few improvements.-- Mile (talk) 10:30, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
Support El Golli Mohamed 00:36, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 00:38, 25 June 2024 (UTC)
Support ★ 18:36, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 30 Jun 2024 at 08:29:34 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Non-photographic_media/Religion#Christianity
Info This artwork was made by Giacomo Raibolini, aka Giacomo Francia. He was the son of the more famous artist Francesco Francia, well known as a goldsmith and painter and a close friend of Raphael. This is an author belonging to the mannerism of the late Italian Renaissance. The exact date of the painting is not known, but it can be attributed between 1520 and 1540, when it was influenced by the painter Dosso Dossi, another mannerist tending towards the Venetian Renaissance. This picture is important because shows a Mannerism offspring from the Italian Renaissance. It is worth noting the resemblance of the Saint Sebastian depicted with his [father] to whom he was extremely devoted. The artwork was imported from Google Arts and Culture stitching 7880 tiles. All by Terragio67 -- Terragio67 (talk) 08:29, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
Info Uploaded another version just to verify the artwork, in case you cannot download the original file due to its size. Terragio67 -- Terragio67 (talk) 11:46, 22 June 2024 (UTC)
Support -- Terragio67 (talk) 08:29, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
Support Sure! --Yann (talk) 11:30, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
Support ★ 13:36, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 09:30, 22 June 2024 (UTC)
Support El Golli Mohamed 00:10, 25 June 2024 (UTC)
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 15:18, 25 June 2024 (UTC)
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 09:08, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 30 Jun 2024 at 05:09:10 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Historical#1850-1899
Info created by Herbert A. Hale - restored, uploaded, and nominated by Adam Cuerden -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 05:09, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
Support -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 05:09, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
Support ★ 12:49, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
Oppose Sorry, but I can't see anything special in the photo. -- Karelj (talk) 13:25, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
- Not surprised by this comment. --SHB2000 (talk) 09:18, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
- What does this mean? Tedder (talk) 22:50, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
- Not surprised by this comment. --SHB2000 (talk) 09:18, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
Oppose No wow. --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 15:12, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
- It's incredibly good quality for 1898. Adam Cuerden (talk) 19:55, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
Support Per Adam Cuerden's comment --Llez (talk) 09:29, 22 June 2024 (UTC)
Support El Golli Mohamed 00:41, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
Support --Yann (talk) 09:14, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:22, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 09:18, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
Oppose VI since there is historical value, not FP since there is no wow. --Milseburg (talk) 14:31, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 28 Jun 2024 at 22:05:12 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family : Fringillidae (Finches and Allies)
Info created by El Golli Mohamed - uploaded by El Golli Mohamed - nominated by El Golli Mohamed -- El Golli Mohamed (talk) 22:05, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
Support -- El Golli Mohamed (talk) 22:05, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 04:08, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
Support ★ 12:37, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 14:16, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 15:56, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
Support Poco a poco (talk) 18:41, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:59, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
Oppose Sorry, but I can't see anything special in the photo, sharpness not good. -- Karelj (talk) 13:28, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
- You don't see anything special in the photo is your own opinion but what do you mean by sharpness not good? The head of the bird is very sharp and even the breast has an acceptable sharpness. It's an aperture of 5.6 so the body is less sharp than the head. Moreover it's a very sharp prime lens. El Golli Mohamed (talk) 18:07, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
- Sharpness of the head is very good. Perhaps he means depth of field is not good? Might F8 with a higher ISO have worked better? I wonder if the image is tilted; there's no point of reference but the finch looks as if it might fall over! Charlesjsharp (talk) 21:03, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
- I can't understand why all the bird must be in focus. This is not the style of wildlife photography. The image is not tilted at all, the bird is hopping up this rock in this position. El Golli Mohamed (talk) 23:09, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
- The style of many wildlife photographers is to try to get as much as possible in focus. Charlesjsharp (talk) 15:29, 22 June 2024 (UTC)
- Citation needed. --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 23:00, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
- For which, Frank? The 'authoritative' "This is not the style of wildlife photography", or the reasonable assumption: "The style of many wildlife photographers is to try to get as much as possible in focus". Many just means a large number, such as, say 25,000. You have 25,000,000 wildlife photographers in the USA, so I am guessing, I admit, that 1 in 1000 tries to get as much as possible in focus. Charlesjsharp (talk) 17:23, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
- Citation needed. --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 23:00, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
- The style of many wildlife photographers is to try to get as much as possible in focus. Charlesjsharp (talk) 15:29, 22 June 2024 (UTC)
- I can't understand why all the bird must be in focus. This is not the style of wildlife photography. The image is not tilted at all, the bird is hopping up this rock in this position. El Golli Mohamed (talk) 23:09, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
- Sharpness of the head is very good. Perhaps he means depth of field is not good? Might F8 with a higher ISO have worked better? I wonder if the image is tilted; there's no point of reference but the finch looks as if it might fall over! Charlesjsharp (talk) 21:03, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
- You don't see anything special in the photo is your own opinion but what do you mean by sharpness not good? The head of the bird is very sharp and even the breast has an acceptable sharpness. It's an aperture of 5.6 so the body is less sharp than the head. Moreover it's a very sharp prime lens. El Golli Mohamed (talk) 18:07, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 12:17, 22 June 2024 (UTC)
Support--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:03, 25 June 2024 (UTC)
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 12:50, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
Support Nice dynamic pose. --C messier (talk) 17:14, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 28 Jun 2024 at 17:00:01 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family : Fringillidae (Finches and Allies)
Info No FPs of this species. All by Charlesjsharp -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 17:00, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
Support -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 17:00, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
Support ★ 12:38, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 14:15, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 15:58, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
Support --Cayambe (talk) 16:31, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
Support -- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 21:03, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:57, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
Neutral Nice but level of detail is not the best Poco a poco (talk) 20:46, 22 June 2024 (UTC)
Oppose Sorry the head is overprocessed. You may have tried adding sharpness but it gives a weird result.El Golli Mohamed (talk) 00:32, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 12:50, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 04:27, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 28 Jun 2024 at 06:08:30 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Industry#Poland
Info created by Plozessor - uploaded by Plozessor - nominated by Plozessor -- Plozessor (talk) 06:08, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
Abstain -- Plozessor (talk) 06:08, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 13:55, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
Support ★ 12:38, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
Support El Golli Mohamed 18:09, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
Oppose Interesting subject but a bit too "static"" IMO, likely because of the row of trees. Also, it lacks of dramatic atmosphere. Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:31, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 17:21, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
Weak oppose Quality image but limited wow factor in my view. The lower part with the half cut reflection is not very successful, sorry -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:32, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
Support I'd say the water vapor casting shadows is very impressive looking Henrysz (talk) 19:33, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
Contestations en cours
[edit]Featured picture candidates
[edit]Voting period ends on 7 Jul 2024 at 19:28:59 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Arachnida#Family : Araneidae (Orb-weaver Spiders)
Info The web decoration (Stabilimentum) of Argiope spiders changes as the females get older (and bigger). This FP looks like it's a juvenile Argiope flavipalpis. All by Charlesjsharp -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 19:28, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
Support -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 19:28, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 7 Jul 2024 at 17:31:23 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Fungi#Family : Strophariaceae
Info created by Plozessor - uploaded by Plozessor - nominated by Plozessor -- Plozessor (talk) 17:31, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
Comment Gallery? --Zzzs (talk) 17:33, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
Comment Sorry, fixed. --Plozessor (talk) 17:35, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 7 Jul 2024 at 04:11:33 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors/Germany#Rhineland-Palatinate
Info Trier, view from the Petrisberg on the city of Trier. Particularly at the Cathedral of St. Peter and the Dom.
All by -- Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 04:11, 28 June 2024 (UTC)Support -- Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 04:11, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
Oppose Unfavorable weather conditions. With the mist in the background, the main subject seems to be the white building popping up in the foreground -- Basile Morin (talk) 11:38, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
Oppose Sorry, per Basile. --Milseburg (talk) 14:28, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 7 Jul 2024 at 00:59:48 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Historical/People#1900-1909
Info created by James E. Purdy - restored, uploaded, and nominated by Adam Cuerden -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 00:59, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
Support -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 00:59, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
File:Pez payaso común (Amphiprion ocellaris) en una anémona magnífica (Heteractis magnifica), Anilao, Filipinas, 2023-08-22, DD 08.jpg
[edit]Voting period ends on 6 Jul 2024 at 20:28:31 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Fish#Family_:_Pomacentridae_(Clownfish_and_Damselfish)
Info Ocellaris clownfish (Amphiprion ocellaris) in a magnificent sea anemone (Heteractis magnifica), Anilao, Philippines. c/u/n by Poco a poco (talk) 20:28, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 20:28, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
Support Found him. --Zzzs (talk) 21:16, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
Support Fish Are Friends. Not Food. -- Radomianin (talk) 21:38, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
- Except sharks 🦈 :-) Basile Morin (talk) 03:06, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
Support --Mounir TOUZRI (talk) 21:43, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 02:29, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
Support Light, color and carpet -- Basile Morin (talk) 03:06, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
Support --Ermell (talk) 05:32, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
Support --C messier (talk) 06:23, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:30, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
Support--Terragio67 (talk) 07:46, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
Support —Bruce1eetalk 08:31, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
Support --نعيم قربوسي (talk) 09:41, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 14:12, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
Support You just found Neno! ★ 14:43, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 6 Jul 2024 at 19:03:49 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family_:_Leiothrichidae_(Laughingthrushes)
Info created & uploaded by JJ Harrison – nominated by Ivar (talk) 19:03, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
Support -- Ivar (talk) 19:03, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
Support Outstanding. Bird POTY. Charlesjsharp (talk) 20:28, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
Strong support I concur with Charles --Zzzs (talk) 20:48, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
Support Harmonious in every way; words are actually superfluous. -- Radomianin (talk) 21:31, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
Support --Mounir TOUZRI (talk) 21:48, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 02:29, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
Support Color and composition -- Basile Morin (talk) 03:08, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
Support Striking colours and composition, exceptionally detailed. --Tagooty (talk) 03:09, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
Support Ermell (talk) 05:33, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:31, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
Support--Terragio67 (talk) 07:47, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
Support --نعيم قربوسي (talk) 09:42, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
Strong support JJ, you've done it again. --SHB2000 (talk) 13:28, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
Support Excellent! --Harlock81 (talk) 14:12, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 6 Jul 2024 at 17:41:36 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Historical/People#1900-1909
Info created by White Studio - restored, uploaded, and nominated by Adam Cuerden -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 17:41, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
Support -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 17:41, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 6 Jul 2024 at 10:19:14 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants#Family : Rosaceae
Info created and uploaded by Dots foto - nominated by Красный -- Красный wanna talk? 10:19, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
Support -- Красный wanna talk? 10:19, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 10:29, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
Comment: beautiful scene, but there are a few technical issues: the sky is a bit noisy and has a couple of dust spots, while the whole image is very tilted to the right. Would support if these are corrected. --The Cosmonaut (talk) 16:50, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
Comment There is also a halo effect around the tree. --C messier (talk) 18:08, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
- @The Cosmonaut and C messier: I've fixed the tilt and a bit of noise but halo left me confused — maybe I'm stupid or it's my colour blidnness kicking in, but I don't see any. Красный wanna talk? 19:33, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
- The parts of the image around and especially below (between the foliage and the ground) the tree are unnaturally bright. --C messier (talk) 21:21, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
Suggested version @Красный, The Cosmonaut, and C messier: Dear reviewers, I have reduced the slight halo in the treetop and then adjusted the overall tonal correction accordingly. If you like the result, you can use this edit for an update. Please see the SwissTransfer link. While editing, I realized that the glow in the treetop might have been due to some overly well-intentioned post-processing. But that's just my guess. Best regards, -- Radomianin (talk) 21:24, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
- Looks good for me, but I'm still not sure about the halo. I just don't see it. Красный wanna talk? 21:38, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
- I think the halo mentioned by our fellow photographer C messier refers to the glow of the treetop that I removed in my suggestion. This can be clearly seen in a direct comparison of the two versions. Best, -- Radomianin (talk) 21:50, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
- The sky looks better, but the houses are still leaning to the right. --The Cosmonaut (talk) 02:27, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
Oppose Overprocessed, like other uploads by the same author. Kind of vignetting. The center has been lightened -- Basile Morin (talk) 03:18, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 6 Jul 2024 at 10:17:26 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family : Sturnidae (Starlings)
Info Lives alongside the other blue starling recently nominated. No current FP. All by Charlesjsharp -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 10:17, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
Support -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 10:17, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 10:28, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 16:53, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
Support I would go for a bit more contrasty tonality, as current tonality is dream like, but still a well executed image of a beautiful bird. --C messier (talk) 18:06, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks, I over-brightened when I uploaded the second version. Charlesjsharp (talk) 20:34, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
Support I was planning on nominating this. Thank you. --Zzzs (talk) 19:22, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
Support Iridescent plumage -- Basile Morin (talk) 03:25, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
Support Ermell (talk) 05:35, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:32, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
Support--Terragio67 (talk) 07:48, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
Support --نعيم قربوسي (talk) 09:42, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 6 Jul 2024 at 09:57:15 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious_buildings#Greece
Info The church of Agios Menas, Fira, Santorini. All by C messier. -- C messier (talk) 09:57, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
Support -- C messier (talk) 09:57, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 10:24, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 16:53, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
Support --Zzzs (talk) 05:40, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 6 Jul 2024 at 09:13:24 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Lepidoptera#Family : Pieridae (Whites and Sulphurs)
Info created by Atanu Bose Photography - uploaded by Atanu Bose Photography - nominated by Atudu -- Atudu (talk) 09:13, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
Support -- Atudu (talk) 09:13, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
{{Oppose}}Sorry, but maybe this one: File:Close wing mud-puddling position of Pareronia avatar (Moore, 1858) - Pale Wanderer.jpg presents more realistic colors of the same butterfly. --Harlock81 (talk) 10:23, 27 June 2024 (UTC)Comment I don't think is FP quality, but there doesn't seem to be any issue with the colour of this male Harlock81. It seems that this butterfly shows colour-variation, possibly seasonal. Charlesjsharp (talk) 14:11, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
- My mistake, I thought the two pictures were taken at the same place, the same day. Thanks for pinging me --Harlock81 (talk) 15:11, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 02:29, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
Oppose Quality is good but not exceptional, composition is routine compared to FPs in the gallery. --Tagooty (talk) 03:13, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 6 Jul 2024 at 03:30:25 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Portugal
Info: aerial view of west Faial taken from a window of a commercial aircraft; all by -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 03:30, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
Support -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 03:30, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
Support El Golli Mohamed 14:15, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 5 Jul 2024 at 16:52:13 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Land vehicles#Rail vehicles
Info created by Skander zarrad - uploaded by Skander zarrad - nominated by Skander zarrad -- Skander zarrad (talk) 16:52, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
Support -- Skander zarrad (talk) 16:52, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
Support A classic Kabelleger's style! ★ 18:41, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
- Well, not really; never seen one of his like this. Charlesjsharp (talk) 18:59, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
- Is this is a protected area of Tunisia for WLE 2024? Charlesjsharp (talk) 19:02, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
- I said "style". ★ 19:33, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
- Yes ;Gorges de Selja Mounir TOUZRI (talk) 20:14, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
Support -- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 01:41, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
Comment: noise level is a bit high, I think; would support if denoised. --The Cosmonaut (talk) 03:34, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks, I wasn't paying attention, I fixed that :) Skander zarrad (talk) 08:37, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
Support: much better --The Cosmonaut (talk) 12:28, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
Neutral The people captured in the picture aren't doing anything interesting. --Harlock81 (talk) 10:27, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
Support - The people don't bother me. —Bruce1eetalk 08:29, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
Comment Is the white balance OK? It looks like it has a slight yellow-greenish tint. --C messier (talk) 19:04, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 5 Jul 2024 at 16:11:17 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Animals/Arthropods#Orthoptera
Info created by Skander zarrad - uploaded by Skander zarrad - nominated by Skander zarrad -- Skander zarrad (talk) 16:11, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
Support -- Skander zarrad (talk) 16:11, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
Support Nice camouflage! ★ 18:42, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 03:32, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 10:15, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
Support LGTM --Zzzs (talk) 04:56, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 5 Jul 2024 at 14:17:47 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Architectural elements#Others
Info created and uploaded by Ermell - nominated by ★ -- ★ 14:17, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
Support Unusual close-up view of the Elizabeth Tower's clock face (aka Big Ben). -- ★ 14:17, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
Comment I'm not convinced we should have this nice image as an FP as the clock face was recently restored and looks very different. I other words, it's one of many versions but not a particularly notable one. Charlesjsharp (talk) 14:37, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
Support Very sharp, good composition. even if the clock changed, why not featuring it before the change? Yann (talk) 09:43, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 11:57, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
Comment For a perfect encyclopedia, we should ideally have one FP of every version of the clock face on such a notable building. What a great timeline that would make for the article. This excellent photo is a good start. --Cart (talk) 12:33, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
- The file name and description could helpfully indicate it is a historical image. Charlesjsharp (talk) 14:14, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
- The info and reference have been added to the description on the file page. It's up to Ermell to perhaps add the "as of 2009" to the file name when the nom is done. --Cart (talk) 15:46, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
Support El Golli Mohamed 14:14, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
Support: per Yann. --The Cosmonaut (talk) 16:55, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
Support Thanks for the nom ArionStar. Ermell (talk) 05:39, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
Support Bummer that this image is outdated since the clocks were painted dark blue, but still good nonetheless. --Zzzs (talk) 15:59, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
- Look at it from the bright side: The new clock face is there to be photographed any day now, this historic face can't be photographed again. Do you call a photo of Manhattan with the Twin Towers outdated or an historical documentation that we are lucky to have? --Cart (talk) 18:09, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 5 Jul 2024 at 12:45:35 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Austria
Info all by Tournasol7 -- Tournasol7 (talk) 12:45, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
Abstain As author. Tournasol7 (talk) 12:45, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 12:48, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
Support Of course… ★ 14:05, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
Support Poco a poco (talk) 17:09, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
Oppose Good image and certainly QI/VI but IMHO not enough wow for FP. --GRDN711 (talk) 21:21, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 11:56, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
Support El Golli Mohamed 14:13, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 5 Jul 2024 at 07:51:19 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants/Asparagales#Family:Amaryllidaceae (Allium roseum)
Info created by Smailtn - uploaded by Smailtn - nominated by TOUMOU -- Mounir TOUZRI (talk) 07:51, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
Support -- Mounir TOUZRI (talk) 07:51, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 12:49, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
Support ★ 18:42, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 10:14, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 5 Jul 2024 at 05:56:56 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#India
Info Gephan range towering (elev. 8,000 ft (2,400 m)) above the Bhaga river, Lahaul, Himachal, India. Created by Tagooty - uploaded by Tagooty - nominated by Tagooty -- Tagooty (talk) 05:56, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
Support -- Tagooty (talk) 05:56, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
Support A great landscape for me --Famberhorst (talk) 12:21, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
Support -- Karelj (talk) 14:51, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
Support ★ 18:43, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
Oppose The light is not so good, for "one of the best pictures of the site". Hazy. The shadows are too dominant in the mountains, especially at the left. Harsh light. It's almost a contrejour, since the shadows seem to be leaning in our direction. Incidentally lack of sharpness in the corners -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:38, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
- @Basile Morin: Thanks for your comments. I have tweaked the exposure and shadows, plus mild sharpening. Is it better? Note that the direction is to the south, the sun is shining out of the top left corner. At high altitude, lighting tends to be harsh owing to the clear air. Tagooty (talk) 03:16, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
- Are you sure you've uploaded the correct file? I honestly see no difference at all, even looking carefully at full size. Although they seem to be different files in megabytes. So I wonder what has changed -- Basile Morin (talk) 03:40, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
- @Basile Morin: Sorry, my edits accidentally got undone before export from LR. The latest version now has the exposure and sharpness adjustments. Please review this. Tagooty (talk) 04:40, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
- Minor change. I don't see much improvement, sorry -- Basile Morin (talk) 10:57, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
- Are you sure you've uploaded the correct file? I honestly see no difference at all, even looking carefully at full size. Although they seem to be different files in megabytes. So I wonder what has changed -- Basile Morin (talk) 03:40, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 11:52, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
Support El Golli Mohamed 14:11, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
Support --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 22:30, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
Oppose per Basile. --Kadellar (talk) 09:08, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 5 Jul 2024 at 01:25:40 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Objects#Clothing and textiles
Info The final room of the "Camp: Notes on Fashion" exhibit at The Met in 2019. At this point in the exhibit, the narrow corridors open up to this large, two-floor spectacle of wild ensembles. all by — Rhododendrites talk | 01:25, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
Support — Rhododendrites talk | 01:25, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
Support --Kadellar (talk) 09:09, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 4 Jul 2024 at 12:04:28 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Food and drink#Fruits (raw)
Info Kiwifruits from Italy in a grocery store, Colatina, Espírito Santo, Brazil. Created, uploaded and nominated by ★ -- ★ 12:04, 25 June 2024 (UTC)
Support -- ★ 12:04, 25 June 2024 (UTC)
I withdraw my nomination Everyone is fed up with my fruit images. ★ 14:16, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
- What do you think about adding a rule so that once someone cancels a nomination they have to wait a while to be able to nominate another image? Wilfredor (talk) 16:15, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
- Wilfredor, rules like that are only added when there is a general problem with many users misusing the site in some way. In this case, ArionStar is the only one with this pattern of quick withdrawals and adding new noms. We can't make a rule just because one person will not follow the general praxis. In this case a sharp reminder should be enough. If that doesn't work, a temporary block could be recommended to let them cool down and give the community some time off from these rapid-fire nominations. --Cart (talk) 08:22, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
- I understand and it makes sense Wilfredor (talk) 21:31, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
- Wilfredor, rules like that are only added when there is a general problem with many users misusing the site in some way. In this case, ArionStar is the only one with this pattern of quick withdrawals and adding new noms. We can't make a rule just because one person will not follow the general praxis. In this case a sharp reminder should be enough. If that doesn't work, a temporary block could be recommended to let them cool down and give the community some time off from these rapid-fire nominations. --Cart (talk) 08:22, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 4 Jul 2024 at 10:49:24 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Towers#Greece
Info created & ploaded by C messier - nominated by Tomer T -- Tomer T (talk) 10:49, 25 June 2024 (UTC)
Support -- Tomer T (talk) 10:49, 25 June 2024 (UTC)
Support --Berthold Werner (talk) 15:00, 25 June 2024 (UTC)
Support Attractive, balanced composition in good light. -- Radomianin (talk) 18:28, 25 June 2024 (UTC)
Support ★ 19:10, 25 June 2024 (UTC)
Support per Radomianin -- Terragio67 (talk) 19:50, 25 June 2024 (UTC)
Support Πολύ όμορφο, φέρνει αναμνήσεις El Golli Mohamed 22:28, 25 June 2024 (UTC)
Support per Radomianin -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:25, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
Support Time could be diferent. --Mile (talk) 08:00, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 12:00, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 12:49, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 13:02, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
Support Poco a poco (talk) 17:11, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
Support Lovely! --Zzzs (talk) 01:04, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 10:13, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
Support Thanks for the nomination Tomer T. --C messier (talk) 10:49, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 11:49, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 4 Jul 2024 at 00:37:18 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Portugal
Info: Faial Caldera, Azores. Better shadows compared to the previous nomination; all by -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 00:37, 25 June 2024 (UTC)
Support -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 00:37, 25 June 2024 (UTC)
Support I love this landscape.--Famberhorst (talk) 12:05, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 04:24, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 11:48, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
Support El Golli Mohamed 14:09, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 3 Jul 2024 at 22:40:44 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family : Sturnidae (Starlings)
Info created and uploaded by Charlesjsharp - nominated by Zzzs -- Zzzs (talk) 22:40, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
Support -- Zzzs (talk) 22:40, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 00:44, 25 June 2024 (UTC)
Support --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:59, 25 June 2024 (UTC)
Support --نعيم قربوسي (talk) 09:51, 25 June 2024 (UTC)
Support Thank you for the nomination. Charlesjsharp (talk) 11:49, 25 June 2024 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:05, 25 June 2024 (UTC)
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 12:12, 25 June 2024 (UTC)
Support --Berthold Werner (talk) 14:59, 25 June 2024 (UTC)
Oppose The striking male violet-backed starling is already an FP. I don't think the plain female merits FP. --Tagooty (talk) 06:07, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
- @Tagooty Why wouldn't it? It would be fair if the other gender is a FP, like many others. Zzzs (talk) 08:11, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
- An FP is an extraordinary image with wow-factor. This image does not have an unusual pose/activity/colouration/etc that catches my attention. It merits QI and VI. --Tagooty (talk) 08:44, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
- You might have to oppose many bird more bird FPs, Tagooty, if you don't like little brown birds and females. Charlesjsharp (talk) 14:47, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
- @Charlesjsharp: An FP is one "of the finest on Commons". The violet-backed starling is common throughout Africa. Your FP of the strikingly-coloured male has set a high bar. An unexceptional image of a drab female does not cross the bar IMO. I would support an unusual image of a plain brown bird, or an image of a rare brown bird. --Tagooty (talk) 02:57, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
- Fair enough, I agree the setting is not exceptional. Perhaps the FP bar should be raised; as long as there is consensus. We are promoting dozens of unexeptional small brown birds standing on brown earth or sand these days. Thinking about consistency, what do you think about the recent nominations of the white butterfly and brown locust? Neither are rare species. Charlesjsharp (talk) 10:06, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
- I feel that the FP bars for many subjects are getting lower over the past 2-3 years. I wonder how many reviewers compare with FPs in the gallery before voting? Perhaps, its just that I'm getting older and more critical!
Tagooty (talk) 03:25, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
- I feel that the FP bars for many subjects are getting lower over the past 2-3 years. I wonder how many reviewers compare with FPs in the gallery before voting? Perhaps, its just that I'm getting older and more critical!
- Fair enough, I agree the setting is not exceptional. Perhaps the FP bar should be raised; as long as there is consensus. We are promoting dozens of unexeptional small brown birds standing on brown earth or sand these days. Thinking about consistency, what do you think about the recent nominations of the white butterfly and brown locust? Neither are rare species. Charlesjsharp (talk) 10:06, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
- @Charlesjsharp: An FP is one "of the finest on Commons". The violet-backed starling is common throughout Africa. Your FP of the strikingly-coloured male has set a high bar. An unexceptional image of a drab female does not cross the bar IMO. I would support an unusual image of a plain brown bird, or an image of a rare brown bird. --Tagooty (talk) 02:57, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
- You might have to oppose many bird more bird FPs, Tagooty, if you don't like little brown birds and females. Charlesjsharp (talk) 14:47, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
- An FP is an extraordinary image with wow-factor. This image does not have an unusual pose/activity/colouration/etc that catches my attention. It merits QI and VI. --Tagooty (talk) 08:44, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
- @Tagooty Why wouldn't it? It would be fair if the other gender is a FP, like many others. Zzzs (talk) 08:11, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 12:06, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 12:50, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
Support --GRDN711 (talk) 21:14, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 2 Jul 2024 at 16:15:14 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family : Sylviidae (Sylviid Warblers)
Info created by El Golli Mohamed - uploaded by El Golli Mohamed - nominated by El Golli Mohamed -- El Golli Mohamed (talk) 16:15, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
Support -- El Golli Mohamed (talk) 16:15, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 03:26, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 08:11, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
Support good for 500 mm. --Mile (talk) 10:22, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 15:00, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
Support --Zzzs (talk) 16:33, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 00:42, 25 June 2024 (UTC)
Support--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:00, 25 June 2024 (UTC)
Support --Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:03, 25 June 2024 (UTC)
Support --Berthold Werner (talk) 14:57, 25 June 2024 (UTC)
Support--Terragio67 (talk) 16:58, 25 June 2024 (UTC)
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 12:12, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 12:29, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 12:50, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
Support ★ 18:43, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 2 Jul 2024 at 14:23:42 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Kazakhstan
Info created and uploaded by Dots foto - nominated by Красный -- Красный wanna talk? 14:23, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
Support -- Красный wanna talk? 14:23, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
Support Beautiful! Henrysz (talk) 19:24, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
Support I like it, too. --Harlock81 (talk) 11:33, 25 June 2024 (UTC)
Support Ю. Данилевский (talk) 20:16, 25 June 2024 (UTC)
Support Breathtaking image. -- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 23:59, 25 June 2024 (UTC)
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 12:14, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 12:50, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
Support Wow! ★ 18:39, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
- Clearly
Oversaturated colors -- Basile Morin (talk) 15:43, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 2 Jul 2024 at 13:11:32 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Natural phenomena#Fire
Info created and uploaded by Friedrich Haag, nominated by Yann
Support -- Yann (talk) 13:11, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
Support --Berthold Werner (talk) 15:56, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
Support --Felino Volador (talk) 02:18, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
Support Wow. Disclaimer: I so desperately miss this German custom. --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 03:28, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 06:48, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 09:17, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
Support--Mounir TOUZRI (talk) 09:44, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 14:59, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
Support El Golli Mohamed 00:08, 25 June 2024 (UTC)
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 00:42, 25 June 2024 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:02, 25 June 2024 (UTC)
Support--Terragio67 (talk) 16:57, 25 June 2024 (UTC)
Support --XRay 💬 19:19, 25 June 2024 (UTC)
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 12:15, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 12:50, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
Support This photo is fire! 🔥 ★ 18:38, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
Support --Zzzs (talk) 05:36, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 2 Jul 2024 at 10:53:10 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Food_and_drink#Food : Processing, preparing and cooking
Info Finalist in Pesto Genovese contest - Pesto Genovese ingrideints. My work. --Mile (talk) 10:53, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
Support -- Mile (talk) 10:53, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
Support The whites are slightly overexposed, but it's a nice well executed photo El Golli Mohamed 11:12, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
Support Very good composition, educational and pleasing for the eye and reminding my tastebuds of pleasant things --Kritzolina (talk) 16:48, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
Support Well done. --Zzzs (talk) 17:33, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
Comment The focus stacking issues around the green leaves and above the pot are a bit distracting at full size -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:13, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
- @Basile Morin True and corrected. --Mile (talk) 09:38, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
Support Well done -- Basile Morin (talk) 12:02, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
Support --Felino Volador (talk) 02:18, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
Support Maybe one of your best food pictures, Mile. Thanks for sharing! --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 03:29, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
- @Frank Schulenburg Thanx, i do put more on food, so need to be good. We are low on "food photo". But i could not pass wining photo. Didnt have much time, flight next day. --Mile (talk) 09:46, 25 June 2024 (UTC)
- Is that a joke by the jury? What's this winning picture all blurry, out of focus, poor light and distracting corner?! -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:34, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
- Was wondering if they judge from smartphone. It is strange, yes. But some serious criteria "foreign jury" as first. --Mile (talk) 07:39, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 06:35, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
Support --Mounir TOUZRI (talk) 09:44, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
Support Overall, well done. Listing the represented ingredients is a definite plus. If I were trying to imrprove this arrangement, a little higher camera perspective and gathering the ingredients more tightly together would let you move in tighter and strengthen the impact. --GRDN711 (talk) 12:24, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:00, 25 June 2024 (UTC)
Support--Terragio67 (talk) 16:55, 25 June 2024 (UTC)
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 12:50, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
Support Poco a poco (talk) 17:14, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
Support ★ 18:38, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 2 Jul 2024 at 06:36:07 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious buildings#Italy
Info created and uploaded by Luca Aless - nominated by ★ -- ★ 06:36, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
Support -- ★ 06:36, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
Support El Golli Mohamed 11:15, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
Support User:Luca Aless 17:07, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 00:40, 25 June 2024 (UTC)
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 12:50, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 1 Jul 2024 at 19:31:14 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Fish#Family_:_Muraenidae_(Moray_Eels)
Info Snowflake moray (Echidna nebulosa), Anilao, Philippines. Note: we have no FPs of genus Echidna. c/u/n by Poco a poco (talk) 19:31, 22 June 2024 (UTC)
Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 19:31, 22 June 2024 (UTC)
Oppose Sorry infortunate crop, we can't see the whole fish. This black thing is disturbing, also the sharpness is not so good.El Golli Mohamed (talk) 21:11, 22 June 2024 (UTC)
- I have applied a slight crop to the right bottom corner, so that what I believe is a feather star (black thing), is not on the way. Even if that could be an improvement, I don't see what is wrong with the crop, morays live in holes and rarely go out during the day as they are nocturnal predators. I also have to say that this animal is rare, and probably that's the reason why we have no FPs of the whole genus. That conditions to take pictures under water are more challenging than over the water is something that I don't need to elaborate, I guess. --Poco a poco (talk) 10:31, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
Support The whole moray would be be too big to fit in the image, so I will assume the author meant to only picture its head. The crop is fine. The black thing is
mildlynot distracting. The bottom of the moray where it turns is a bit blurry, probably OoF. Take my opinion with a grain of salt, as I am not a professional photographer. --Zzzs (talk) 22:49, 22 June 2024 (UTC)- Nothing is big to fit in an image. We managed to photograph galaxy clusters in a single photo. El Golli Mohamed (talk) 22:56, 22 June 2024 (UTC)
- Here's a full body image of this species for comparison. Also, isn't it pretty clear the author only wanted to picture its head? --Zzzs (talk) 23:00, 22 June 2024 (UTC)
- Nothing is big to fit in an image. We managed to photograph galaxy clusters in a single photo. El Golli Mohamed (talk) 22:56, 22 June 2024 (UTC)
Comment The crop is good and intentional; hope this is not an FPC revenge vote. Charlesjsharp (talk) 23:09, 22 June 2024 (UTC)
- I have little doubt after reading the same words I used "Infortunate (sic) crop" in my review. That's an statement that doesn't speak for the reviewer. Again, we have no FP of the genus Echidna, but we have already 4 FPs of the species (not genus) Himantopus himantopus. I've definitely supported more images that I've opposed of El Golli Mohamed, so I have no personal issue here and no problem with the photographer, let alone free-license photographers. If I'm convinced, I support the image if not, I oppose, that has nothing to do with whom is behind the camera and in most of the cases people believe that and are thankful for the feedback. Poco a poco (talk) 10:31, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
- Why don't we have the right to criticize, otherwise it's a revenge vote? Is it a dictatorship here? Is the justification for my vote true or not? El Golli Mohamed (talk) 23:23, 22 June 2024 (UTC)
- Of course anyone may criticise and oppose; that is the essence of FPC. But El Golli Mohamed was banned from Commons in April for two weeks for insulting behaviour stemming from his revenge votes. Charlesjsharp (talk) 00:14, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
- Dear reviewers, normally I am not a fan of repeating old mistakes, but regarding the incident mentioned here again, I would like to refer to the recent discussion from late May/early June. I agree with Poco a poco that we should please focus only on the images and not on the photographer behind the camera. Only through constructive discourse can we work together in a meaningful and healthy way. Behind every username there is a person who has to be respected, no matter if we have a different opinion or not. Best, -- Radomianin (talk) 09:08, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
Support High level of detail for an underwater picture. Interesting close up and the light is fine -- Basile Morin (talk) 04:09, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
Support --Yann (talk) 09:11, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
Support --Ermell (talk) 09:35, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:26, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 03:31, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
Support per Basile. -- Radomianin (talk) 06:34, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 15:02, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 12:50, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
Support ★ 18:37, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 30 Jun 2024 at 10:30:12 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Sculptures#Sculptures indoors
Info Miltiades (Roman replica). My shot. --Mile (talk) 10:30, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
Support Renomination, i have feeling this is FP. Citate from one who use it few days ago "Is the best image on the internet, very clean and high resolution." Nothing to add. Made few improvements.-- Mile (talk) 10:30, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
Support El Golli Mohamed 00:36, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 00:38, 25 June 2024 (UTC)
Support ★ 18:36, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 30 Jun 2024 at 08:29:34 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Non-photographic_media/Religion#Christianity
Info This artwork was made by Giacomo Raibolini, aka Giacomo Francia. He was the son of the more famous artist Francesco Francia, well known as a goldsmith and painter and a close friend of Raphael. This is an author belonging to the mannerism of the late Italian Renaissance. The exact date of the painting is not known, but it can be attributed between 1520 and 1540, when it was influenced by the painter Dosso Dossi, another mannerist tending towards the Venetian Renaissance. This picture is important because shows a Mannerism offspring from the Italian Renaissance. It is worth noting the resemblance of the Saint Sebastian depicted with his [father] to whom he was extremely devoted. The artwork was imported from Google Arts and Culture stitching 7880 tiles. All by Terragio67 -- Terragio67 (talk) 08:29, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
Info Uploaded another version just to verify the artwork, in case you cannot download the original file due to its size. Terragio67 -- Terragio67 (talk) 11:46, 22 June 2024 (UTC)
Support -- Terragio67 (talk) 08:29, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
Support Sure! --Yann (talk) 11:30, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
Support ★ 13:36, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 09:30, 22 June 2024 (UTC)
Support El Golli Mohamed 00:10, 25 June 2024 (UTC)
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 15:18, 25 June 2024 (UTC)
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 09:08, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 30 Jun 2024 at 05:09:10 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Historical#1850-1899
Info created by Herbert A. Hale - restored, uploaded, and nominated by Adam Cuerden -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 05:09, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
Support -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 05:09, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
Support ★ 12:49, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
Oppose Sorry, but I can't see anything special in the photo. -- Karelj (talk) 13:25, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
- Not surprised by this comment. --SHB2000 (talk) 09:18, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
- What does this mean? Tedder (talk) 22:50, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
- Not surprised by this comment. --SHB2000 (talk) 09:18, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
Oppose No wow. --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 15:12, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
- It's incredibly good quality for 1898. Adam Cuerden (talk) 19:55, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
Support Per Adam Cuerden's comment --Llez (talk) 09:29, 22 June 2024 (UTC)
Support El Golli Mohamed 00:41, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
Support --Yann (talk) 09:14, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:22, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 09:18, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
Oppose VI since there is historical value, not FP since there is no wow. --Milseburg (talk) 14:31, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 28 Jun 2024 at 22:05:12 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family : Fringillidae (Finches and Allies)
Info created by El Golli Mohamed - uploaded by El Golli Mohamed - nominated by El Golli Mohamed -- El Golli Mohamed (talk) 22:05, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
Support -- El Golli Mohamed (talk) 22:05, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 04:08, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
Support ★ 12:37, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 14:16, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 15:56, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
Support Poco a poco (talk) 18:41, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:59, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
Oppose Sorry, but I can't see anything special in the photo, sharpness not good. -- Karelj (talk) 13:28, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
- You don't see anything special in the photo is your own opinion but what do you mean by sharpness not good? The head of the bird is very sharp and even the breast has an acceptable sharpness. It's an aperture of 5.6 so the body is less sharp than the head. Moreover it's a very sharp prime lens. El Golli Mohamed (talk) 18:07, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
- Sharpness of the head is very good. Perhaps he means depth of field is not good? Might F8 with a higher ISO have worked better? I wonder if the image is tilted; there's no point of reference but the finch looks as if it might fall over! Charlesjsharp (talk) 21:03, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
- I can't understand why all the bird must be in focus. This is not the style of wildlife photography. The image is not tilted at all, the bird is hopping up this rock in this position. El Golli Mohamed (talk) 23:09, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
- The style of many wildlife photographers is to try to get as much as possible in focus. Charlesjsharp (talk) 15:29, 22 June 2024 (UTC)
- Citation needed. --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 23:00, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
- For which, Frank? The 'authoritative' "This is not the style of wildlife photography", or the reasonable assumption: "The style of many wildlife photographers is to try to get as much as possible in focus". Many just means a large number, such as, say 25,000. You have 25,000,000 wildlife photographers in the USA, so I am guessing, I admit, that 1 in 1000 tries to get as much as possible in focus. Charlesjsharp (talk) 17:23, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
- Citation needed. --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 23:00, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
- The style of many wildlife photographers is to try to get as much as possible in focus. Charlesjsharp (talk) 15:29, 22 June 2024 (UTC)
- I can't understand why all the bird must be in focus. This is not the style of wildlife photography. The image is not tilted at all, the bird is hopping up this rock in this position. El Golli Mohamed (talk) 23:09, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
- Sharpness of the head is very good. Perhaps he means depth of field is not good? Might F8 with a higher ISO have worked better? I wonder if the image is tilted; there's no point of reference but the finch looks as if it might fall over! Charlesjsharp (talk) 21:03, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
- You don't see anything special in the photo is your own opinion but what do you mean by sharpness not good? The head of the bird is very sharp and even the breast has an acceptable sharpness. It's an aperture of 5.6 so the body is less sharp than the head. Moreover it's a very sharp prime lens. El Golli Mohamed (talk) 18:07, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 12:17, 22 June 2024 (UTC)
Support--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:03, 25 June 2024 (UTC)
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 12:50, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
Support Nice dynamic pose. --C messier (talk) 17:14, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 28 Jun 2024 at 17:00:01 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family : Fringillidae (Finches and Allies)
Info No FPs of this species. All by Charlesjsharp -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 17:00, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
Support -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 17:00, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
Support ★ 12:38, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 14:15, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 15:58, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
Support --Cayambe (talk) 16:31, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
Support -- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 21:03, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:57, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
Neutral Nice but level of detail is not the best Poco a poco (talk) 20:46, 22 June 2024 (UTC)
Oppose Sorry the head is overprocessed. You may have tried adding sharpness but it gives a weird result.El Golli Mohamed (talk) 00:32, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 12:50, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 04:27, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 28 Jun 2024 at 06:08:30 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Industry#Poland
Info created by Plozessor - uploaded by Plozessor - nominated by Plozessor -- Plozessor (talk) 06:08, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
Abstain -- Plozessor (talk) 06:08, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 13:55, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
Support ★ 12:38, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
Support El Golli Mohamed 18:09, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
Oppose Interesting subject but a bit too "static"" IMO, likely because of the row of trees. Also, it lacks of dramatic atmosphere. Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:31, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 17:21, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
Weak oppose Quality image but limited wow factor in my view. The lower part with the half cut reflection is not very successful, sorry -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:32, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
Support I'd say the water vapor casting shadows is very impressive looking Henrysz (talk) 19:33, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
Planning (9e jour après proposition)
[edit]Wed 19 Jun → Fri 28 Jun Thu 20 Jun → Sat 29 Jun Fri 21 Jun → Sun 30 Jun Sat 22 Jun → Mon 1 Jul Sun 23 Jun → Tue 2 Jul Mon 24 Jun → Wed 3 Jul Tue 25 Jun → Thu 4 Jul Wed 26 Jun → Fri 5 Jul Thu 27 Jun → Sat 6 Jul Fri 28 Jun → Sun 7 Jul