User talk:KENPEI/Archive 1
Image:Hibiscus mutabilis2.jpgをウィキペディア日本語版の「新しい画像」に推薦したいと考えているのですが、ウィキペディア日本語版のja:利用者:Kenpeiさんと同じ方と考えて良いでしょうか。そうだろうと思うのですが、Userページにリンクがなかったので、、、すいません。(「コモンズでアップロードしたユーザーが日本語版に利用者ページを持っている」の条件確認です。)堅苦しく質問してしまい申し訳ありませんが、推薦後にご迷惑を掛けたくなく思っての質問ですので、お許しください。お手数かと思いますが、お返事をよろしくお願いします。コスモスもいい感じですね。これからも素敵な写真で楽しませてください。^^ --Toto-tarou 16:18, 15 September 2005 (UTC)
- コモンズのノートにお返事しました。--KENPEI 13:27, 16 September 2005 (UTC)
- 対応とお返事、ありがとうございました。定期更新後にImage:Hibiscus mutabilis2.jpgを推薦させていただきます。ja:コスモスも綺麗だったので記事に貼り付けてしまいました。(コモンズのリンクも^^;)ja:Wikipedia:メインページ新着投票所/新しい画像投票所にも足を運んでいただいて、コレハ!!とKENPEIさんが思われたものに投票(今回分も含めて)いただければと、、、今後とも綺麗な画像で楽しませてください。^^v --Toto-tarou 14:59, 16 September 2005 (UTC)
Hallo! please see Image talk:Tractrix1.png --W!B: 16:25, 28 November 2005 (UTC)
Why did you request these to be deleted? What is the reason? pfctdayelise (translate?) 11:18, 2 March 2006 (UTC)
- なぜあなたはこれらを削除依頼したのですか? 理由はなんですか?(Pfctdayeliseさんのリクエストにより翻訳しました。--Miya 11:43, 2 March 2006 (UTC))
- 植物の学名をファイル名にしたつもりでしたが、スペルミスに気づいたためです。「Ficus benzyamina」が間違ったスペル、「Ficus benjamina」が正しいスペルです。正しいスペルで、各画像は再アップずみです。(Image:Ficus benjamina1.jpg& Image:Ficus benjamina2.jpg )。 Miyaさん、大変申し訳ないのですが、英訳していただけますか?--KENPEI 15:20, 2 March 2006 (UTC)
ボタンキブネギクについて
[edit]KENPEI様はじめまして、フラボンです。「シュウメイギク」、「ボタンキブネギク」については増補改訂牧野新日本植物図鑑のp.148に記載があります。「シュウメイギク」の花は淡紅紫色の多数の花弁状の萼片(シュウメイギク:フラボン)を有していますが、Anemone vitifolia との雑種は「ボタンキブネギク」、「バラザキシュウメイギク」、「チョクザキシュウメイギク」などとも呼ばれ、これは萼片の数が少なくて幅広く白色又は淡紅色のものを指します。また、高橋勝雄著「野草の名前 秋冬」山と渓谷社p.160、大嶋敏昭著「花色でひける山野草の名前がわかる事典」成美堂出版p.145(フラボン著です)も参考になるでしょう。「秋明菊」はこの仲間の通称名として用いられ、日本に自生がなく、園芸業者が営利目的に語呂のよい名称として使ってきたため混乱しているのではないでしょうか?
- 植物のプロの方でしたか・・・。私は植物写真の好きな素人です。
- (シュウメイギク:フラボン)のシュウメイギク(Anemone hupehensis var. japonica)を見て少し驚きました。世間一般的(園芸的?)に言われている「シュウメイギク」より、相当「がく」が多いみたいに思います。世間一般的に出まわっている「シュウメイギク」はImage:Anemone hupehensis1.jpgみたいな「がく」少ないもので、A. vitifoliaに酷似(あるいはそのもの?)ですね。おっしゃる通り、A. vitifoliaかその雑種が「シュウメイギク」で出まわってるような感じですね(というか、ほとんどコレが「シュウメイギク」で通ってます)。文献の方は、図書館であたってみます。
- ただ、何をもって「シュウメイギク」というかは難しい話もあるようで、オンライン植物アルバムという信用できるサイトでも、A. vitifoliaに見えるものが「シュウメイギク」になっていたりします[1]し、議論になってるようです[2]。
- 植物のプロ相手に素人が色々書いてしまい、お気を悪くされたら申しわけありません。勉強になりました。
- 私がコモンズに登録した画像は、「A. vitifolia?、A. vitifolia × A. hupehensis?」とコメント入れておきます。--KENPEI 12:21, 15 October 2006 (UTC)
Images uploaded
[edit]Konichiwa, domo origato for the quality and number of images and article galleries WayneRay 15:58, 9 November 2006 (UTC)WayneRay
Use of {{Badname}}
[edit]{{Badname}} should only be used when both images are identical and the image you placed the template on was uploaded by you. If the image is identical but not uploaded by you use {{Duplicate}} instead. Please bare in mind that if an image is in a different file format (for example svg and png) they can never be identical. Finally, if you want an image to be renamed but it has not yet been uploaded with the new filename it is suggested you use {{Rename}}. Thank you. Lcarsdata 20:44, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
Image:Shitennoji5.jpgへの出典およびライセンス情報の明記のお願い
[edit]
Image:Shitennoji5.jpgをアップロードしていただき、ありがとうございます。しかし、このファイルには出典が明記されていないため、出典およびライセンス(著作権)の状態が不明となっています。出典やライセンス情報がないファイルは、1週間後に削除されますのでご注意ください。
もし、あなたが、このファイルの作成者でない場合や、あるファイルを改造している場合、そのファイルの原作者やサイトのリンクなどファイルの入手先を明示して、このファイルがウィキメディア・コモンズの利用の方針に沿っているという根拠を示す必要があります。
また、ファイルの著作権表示タグを貼付していない場合は、左のリンク先を参照して、適切なライセンス・タグを貼付してください。例えば、あなた本人が撮影した/作成したファイルの場合、{{GFDL-self}}タグで、GFDLライセンスを適用することができます、{{PD-self}}タグでパブリック・ドメインのライセンスを適用することができます。(その他の種類のライセンスもあります)
注意: 出典やライセンス情報が明記されていないファイルは、アップロードしてから1週間以内に削除されたり、削除の方針に従い、「削除依頼」に出されることがあります。他にもアップロードしたファイルがありましたら、それらも出典やライセンス情報が明記されているか、今一度ご確認をお願いします。あなたのアップロードしたファイルは確認ツールで探すことができます。
Matt314 11:53, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
- 出典等を付け忘れていましたので、記入しました。--KENPEI 11:56, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
Image Tagging Image:Sefukuji3.jpg
[edit]
Thanks for uploading Image:Sefukuji3.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.
If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-3.0}} to release it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you.
This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 20:25, 12 October 2007 (UTC)
Hello, and thank your for sharing your files with Commons. There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. Please remember that all uploads require source, author and license information. Could you please resolve these problems, which are described on the page linked in above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. Thank you. Siebrand 13:41, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
This message was placed by an automated process. Please go to Commons:Help desk if you need help.
Hello, and thank your for sharing your files with Commons. There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. Please remember that all uploads require source, author and license information. Could you please resolve these problems, which are described on the page linked in above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. Thank you. Siebrand 13:41, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
This message was placed by an automated process. Please go to Commons:Help desk if you need help.
Hello, and thank your for sharing your files with Commons. There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. Please remember that all uploads require source, author and license information. Could you please resolve these problems, which are described on the page linked in above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. Thank you. Siebrand 13:45, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
This message was placed by an automated process. Please go to Commons:Help desk if you need help.
- I added Licensing. Thank you!--KENPEI 13:49, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
Hello, please can you specify the problem with this image? Thank you.
- Hello!. The signboard message have copyright. I think that this image is copyright violation of the message. Sorry,I'm a Japanese,My English is very poor.--KENPEI 14:10, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
The same for Image:Mido-Suji Monument.jpg / Commons:Deletion requests/Image:Mido-Suji Monument.jpg. --GeorgHH 13:35, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
- Yes. Thank you.--KENPEI 14:10, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.
This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 12:11, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
- I added Licensing. Thank you!--KENPEI 13:04, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
Flower data
[edit]Hi Kenpei,
I ran across your image (Image:Salix_gracilistyla1.jpg) while looking for a photo of the black variety of this plant, and noticed that you have a lot of very good photos of flowers. I was wondering if you might be interested in also adding some data to the Bloom Clock on English Wikiversity: having bloom time data from Japan would help us make global comparisons (e.g., if something blooms in March in Osaka, when does it bloom in Philadelphia)? Since you've included time and location on most of the images I saw, I'm sure a couple of us could even try to go through those for historical logs as well. Just sign up here using a registered account... I can walk you through the logging process if you're interested (our instruction manual is not very good).
Hopefully the project can be hosted on ja.wikiversity as well, if/when a ja.wikiversity gets started up :). --SB_Johnny | PA! 11:59, 22 March 2008 (UTC)
Wikimedia Commons has a specific scope
[edit]
Thank you for your contributions. Your image or other content was recently deleted, or will soon be deleted, in accordance with our process and policies, because it was not, or is not, within our scope. Please review our project scope, but in short, Commons is targeted at media files including photographs, diagrams, animations, music, spoken text and video clips. Wikimedia Commons does not contain text articles like encyclopedia articles, textbooks, news, word definitions and such. Each of these other kinds of content have their own projects: Wikipedia, Wikibooks, Wikisource, Wikinews, Wiktionary and Wikiquote.
If the content seems to fit the scope of one of those other projects, please consider contributing it there. If you think that the deletion was in error because the contribution really was in scope, you can appeal it at Commons:Undeletion requests, giving a reason why it fits our scope to help others evaluate the matter. Thank you for your understanding. abf /talk to me/ 19:34, 26 April 2008 (UTC)
Scientific name must be in italic
[edit]Hi, thanks for all your nice photos. Please note that the scientific name must be in italic,. Note also that it is a good idea to add a link to the species page, for exemple ''[[Salix gracilistyla]]'', see Image:Salix gracilistyla1.jpg. Yours, Frédéric 17:09, 21 May 2008 (UTC)
Please link images
[edit]
Hello KENPEI/Archive 1!
Thank you for providing images to Wikimedia Commons. Please keep in mind that images uploaded to Commons should be useful to all users of Wikimedia projects. This is possible only if the images can be found by other people.
To allow others to find the images you uploaded here, the images should be in some place that can be found by navigating the category structure. This means that you should put the images into appropriate topic pages, categories, optionally galleries, or both of them (see Commons:Categories). To find good categories for your images, the CommonSense tool may help.
You can find a convenient overview of your uploaded files in this gallery.
The important point is that the images should be placed in the general structure somewhere. There are a large number of completely unsorted images on Commons right now. If you would like to help to place some of those images where they can be found, please do!
Thank you. BotMultichill (talk) 12:50, 26 June 2008 (UTC)
There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.
This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 19:46, 13 August 2008 (UTC)
There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.
This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 19:46, 13 August 2008 (UTC)
There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.
This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 19:47, 13 August 2008 (UTC)
There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.
This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 19:47, 13 August 2008 (UTC)
There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.
This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 19:47, 13 August 2008 (UTC)
There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.
This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 19:48, 13 August 2008 (UTC)
The name of the plants is Anemone flaccida. 213.115.54.124 09:46, 9 October 2008 (UTC)
- Thank you.--KENPEI (talk) 13:04, 9 October 2008 (UTC)
The name of the plants is Anemone flaccida. 213.115.54.124 09:46, 9 October 2008 (UTC)
The name of the plants is Anemone flaccida. 213.115.54.124 09:46, 9 October 2008 (UTC)
Image deletion warning | Image:Anas_acuta3.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. |
217.222.54.249 12:58, 5 November 2008 (UTC)
Categorization of images
[edit]Hi KENPEI, your latest uploads all lack categories. Could you please add one or more categories to an image when you upload it? Thank you, Multichill (talk) 20:34, 19 November 2008 (UTC)