User talk:Katpatuka/Archive 2006-2015
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
— Preceding unsigned comment added by Katpatuka (talk • contribs) 14:51, 09 January 2016 (UTC)
Hi, the copyright owner permits use in Wikipedia but what about use in other places, like WikiCommons? What about commercial use? Can I sell the photo for money? Thuresson 11:34, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
- I don't know... If that's not enough then remove it. I can't imagine commercial use of such a picture at all... --katpatuka 18:36, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
Hello, and thank your for sharing your files with Commons. There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. Please remember that all uploads require source, author and license information. Could you please resolve these problems, which are described on the page linked in above? Thank you. --Siebrand 18:02, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
- Okay okay (sigh - oh this image police...) - I forgot the FAL... --katpatuka 07:39, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
Image Tagging Image:Friedrich Ebert.jpg
![]() |
Thanks for uploading Image:Friedrich Ebert.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.
If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-2.5}} to release it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Polarlys 00:02, 1 August 2007 (UTC)
- I found the picture at the Library Of Congress (LOC) as denoted in the pink box. If something changed with the status of LOC-images I don't know. Was soll ich machen? --katpatuka 17:57, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
- To be more precise: George Grantham Bain Collection - Rights and Restrictions. Maybe one should distinguish the LOC images (and {LOC-image}} template) into sub collections... --katpatuka 07:21, 11 August 2007 (UTC)
Hello, and thank your for sharing your files with Commons. There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. Please remember that all uploads require source, author and license information. Could you please resolve these problems, which are described on the page linked in above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which information may be missing. Thank you.
This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 09:23, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
Image Tagging Image:Augustus_Juilliard.jpg
![]() |
Thanks for uploading Image:Augustus_Juilliard.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.
If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multilicense GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. OsamaK 10:49, 29 June 2008 (UTC)
Image deletion warning | Image:Margaretha Geertruida Zelle 1917.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. |
This is an automated message from DRBot. (Stop bugging me!) 12:45, 2 July 2008 (UTC)
Image:Sar-Comana.jpg
Hi Katpatuka, is the Image:Sar-Comana.jpg by any chance the Kırık Kilise? Thought it looked like it, but was not quite sure. regards Yakcommons (talk)
File deletion warning | File:Italo Balbo.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. |
--User:G.dallorto (talk) 14:20, 23 December 2008 (UTC)
An image
Could I ask, what the source of File:Gen pulitzer.jpg is? It says "source:", but I don't see anything but the copyright tag. Thanx, 76.117.247.55 02:11, 29 March 2009 (UTC)
- It was
and still isthe english wikipedia: en:File:Gen_pulitzer.jpg. --katpatuka (talk) 16:59, 30 March 2009 (UTC) - Hm, as far as I remember I found that file in the english wiki in 2006 and uploaded a copy of it to commons - when now clicking on the link above it reads "This is a file from the Wikimedia Commons"... so maybe it was deleted in en later (the history doesn't give a hint though) the only thing I found is in the upload log [1] - en:User:K-UNIT uploaded it. --katpatuka (talk) 17:13, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
- Ok, found it: deleted in en.wiki on 12.11.2007 [2] - so I fear you'll have to ask en:User:K-UNIT for the original source ;-) --katpatuka (talk) 17:22, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
Please help replace this outdated license
Hello!
Thank you for donating images to the Wikimedia Commons. You have uploaded some images in the past with the license {{PD}}. While this was a license acceptable in the early days of Wikimedia, since January 2006, this license has been deprecated and since October 2008 no new uploads with this license was allowed.
The license on older images should be replaced with a better and more specific license/permissions and you can help by checking the images and adding {{PD-self}} if you are the author or one of the other templates that you can see in the template on the image page.
Thank you for your help. If you need help feel free to ask at Commons talk:Licensing or contact User:Zscout370.
The images we would like you to check are:
BotMultichillT 20:43, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
Re:how was Danjiangkou_Reservoir.svg made?
1.snap the reservoir in google maps, save as jpg. 2.open it in Inkscape, fill the bule water, then delete the background. --Doctoroftcm (talk) 11:27, 27 May 2010 (UTC)
Aristolochia
Servus! Beim Hochladen zweier eigener Bilder von Aristolochia pontica bin ich auf die beiden Fotos File:Aristolochia pontica1.jpg und File:Aristolochia pontica2.jpg gestossen. Beim ersten Hinsehen war mir gleich klar, dass das nicht dieselbe Art sein kann. Unterschiede z.B. schmale Blätter mit abstehenden Basallappen, außen unbehaarte Blüten. Ich hab die Bilder mit der "Flora of Turkey" nachbestimmt. Dabei hat sich ergeben, dass es sich bei den Bildern aus Ürgüp um Aristolochia maurorum handelt. A. pontica kommt übrigens in Kappadokien gar nicht vor, sondern wächst nur in den Bergen entlang der Schwarzmeerküste. Grüße --Franz Xaver (talk) 20:41, 18 June 2010 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Sabiha gökçen.jpg
![]() |
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Sabiha gökçen.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
Stefan4 (talk) 19:53, 25 August 2012 (UTC)
![]() |
Hello, Katpatuka. You have new messages at Stefan4's talk page.
You may remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
|
Stefan4 (talk) 23:52, 26 August 2012 (UTC)
license status of LOC file File:Sabiha gökçen.jpg
Hi Takabeg, Stefan4 wrote me that File:Sabiha gökçen.jpg might get deleted - I saw that you care for File:Atatürk.jpg so you may know which kind of license is required for LOC files (Library of Congress) and can help with this one too.
(konu dışında: emeklilik nasıl gidiyor ;-) ) --katpatuka (talk) 05:41, 27 August 2012 (UTC)
- Ve aleyküm. ABD'de de kamu personel tarafından çekilen fotoğraflar KM oluyor ya, Türkiye'de aynı uygulama olmasa da bir fotoğrafın hak sahibi organizasyon, kuruluş gibi tüzel kişi ise aleniyet tarihinin 70 yıl sonra KM oluyor. Yine ABD'de KM olmadığını düşünüldüğünde ve çok isteniyorsa {{Not-PD-US-URAA}}'nin eklenmesi yeterlidir. Eğer bir dosyanın hak sahibi karşımıza çıkıp Commons'a başvuruyorsa ve hak sabihi olduğunu tespit edebiliyorsa o zaman o dosya Commons'tan silinecek (Ama Türkiye'de KM ise ne kadar ABD'de hakkı tanındıysa da Türkiye'de hak sabihi olamaz). File:Atatürk.jpg'de ise herhangi sorun yok. {{Not-PD-US-URAA}}'ya da ihtihac yok. Kolay gelsin. Takabeg (talk) 06:13, 27 August 2012 (UTC)
Mesela bunun gibi. Jim'e danışıp yüklediğim için sağlamdır. Takabeg (talk) 06:31, 27 August 2012 (UTC)
- Ama benim anlamadığım şey var. LOC kendi ülkesinde KM olmayan dosyaları ne hakla dağtıyor ? Ya Commons'taki yorumlar yanlıştır, ya LOC geniş ölçüde ve ciddi bir şekilde telif ihlal suçlarını işliyor. Takabeg (talk) 06:35, 27 August 2012 (UTC)
- Neyse lisans {{Not-PD-US-URAA}} olarak değiştirdim - şu lisans misans konulardan zaten nefret ediyorum...
- {{Not-PD-US-URAA}} etiketli dosyalar bir gün toplu silmenin hedefi olabilecektir. O yüzden o fotoğrafı başka bir yerde bulmaya çalışıyorum. Zaten LOC hiçbir zaman o resmin telif hak sahibi olmamıştır. Türkiye çıkışlı yüklensin ve {{Not-PD-US-URAA}} etiketi çıksın. Anladığım kadarıyla kullanıcı en:Turkish people maddesinin bilgi kutusuna bakarak (belki canı sıkılmıştır :) onların bir kaçını etiketlemiştir. Takabeg (talk) 06:55, 27 August 2012 (UTC)
- Neyse lisans {{Not-PD-US-URAA}} olarak değiştirdim - şu lisans misans konulardan zaten nefret ediyorum...
- Ama benim anlamadığım şey var. LOC kendi ülkesinde KM olmayan dosyaları ne hakla dağtıyor ? Ya Commons'taki yorumlar yanlıştır, ya LOC geniş ölçüde ve ciddi bir şekilde telif ihlal suçlarını işliyor. Takabeg (talk) 06:35, 27 August 2012 (UTC)
Picture of the Year voting round 1 open
Dear Wikimedians,
Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2012 Picture of the Year competition is now open. We're interested in your opinion as to which images qualify to be the Picture of the Year for 2012. Voting is open to established Wikimedia users who meet the following criteria:
- Users must have an account, at any Wikimedia project, which was registered before Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000 [UTC].
- This user account must have more than 75 edits on any single Wikimedia project before Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000 [UTC]. Please check your account eligibility at the POTY 2012 Contest Eligibility tool.
- Users must vote with an account meeting the above requirements either on Commons or another SUL-related Wikimedia project (for other Wikimedia projects, the account must be attached to the user's Commons account through SUL).
Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. From professional animal and plant shots to breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historically relevant images, images portraying the world's best architecture, maps, emblems, diagrams created with the most modern technology, and impressive human portraits, Commons features pictures of all flavors.
For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topic categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you can vote for as many images as you like. The first round category winners and the top ten overall will then make it to the final. In the final round, when a limited number of images are left, you must decide on the one image that you want to become the Picture of the Year.
To see the candidate images just go to the POTY 2012 page on Wikimedia Commons
Wikimedia Commons celebrates our featured images of 2012 with this contest. Your votes decide the Picture of the Year, so remember to vote in the first round by January 30, 2013.
Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee
Delivered by Orbot1 (talk) at 11:04, 19 January 2013 (UTC) - you are receiving this message because you voted last year
File:Uzbekistan provinces.svg
Thanks for your uploads on WikiCommons. Recently I'm editing an article about Uzbekistan on Chinese Wikipedia and I want to use File:Uzbekistan provinces.svg and I occasionally find an error on the map. Part of the borders between Qoraqalpog'iston autonomous republic and Xorazm Province is missing(check with File:Uzbekistan provinces.png). The same problem exists in File:Uzbekistan provinces numbered.svg as well. I know little about how to edit a svg file and I hope you can help since you are the uploder. Danke!--如沐西风 (talk) 14:43, 17 September 2013 (UTC)
![]() |
Template:JPL Image Copyright has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this template, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. |
WolfmanSF (talk) 07:09, 17 December 2013 (UTC)
Picture of the Year 2013 R1 Announcement
Picture of the Year 2013 R2 Announcement
Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2013 is open!
- ⧼Wikibase-terms/Archive 2006-2015⧽: Deutsch, Ελληνικά, English, français, magyar, italiano, македонски, 日本語, русский, svenska
![](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/3/3f/Merops_apiaster_04.jpg/220px-Merops_apiaster_04.jpg)
Dear Wikimedians,
Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2013 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eighth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2013) to produce a single Picture of the Year.
Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.
There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. The top 30 overall and the most popular image in each category have continued to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just one image to become the Picture of the Year.
Round 2 will end on 7 March 2014. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:MyLanguage/Commons:Picture_of_the_Year/2013/Introduction/en Click here to learn more and vote »]
Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee
You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.
This Picture of the Year vote notification was delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:23, 22 February 2014 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Sabiha gökçen.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Proudbolsahye (talk) 19:09, 27 February 2014 (UTC)
Picture of the Year 2013 Results Announcement
Picture of the Year 2013 Results
- In other languages: Deutsch, español, français, 日本語, Nederlands, русский, svenska, Türkçe, українська
![](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/b/bc/Gl%C3%BChwendel_brennt_durch.jpg/170px-Gl%C3%BChwendel_brennt_durch.jpg)
Dear Katpatuka,
The 2013 Picture of the Year competition has ended and we are pleased to announce the results: We shattered participation records this year — more people voted in Picture of the Year 2013 than ever before. In both rounds, 4070 different people voted for their favorite images. Additionally, there were more image candidates (featured pictures) in the contest than ever before (962 images total).
- In the first round, 2852 people voted for all 962 files
- In the second round, 2919 people voted for the 50 finalists (the top 30 overall and top 2 in each category)
We congratulate the winners of the contest and thank them for creating these beautiful images and sharing them as freely licensed content:
- 157 people voted for the winner, an image of a lightbulb with the tungsten filament smoking and burning.
- In second place, 155 people voted for an image of "Sviati Hory" (Holy Mountains) National Park in Donetsk Oblast, Ukraine.
- In third place, 131 people voted for an image of a swallow flying and drinking.
Click here to view the top images »
We also sincerely thank to all 4070 voters for participating and we hope you will return for next year's contest in early 2015. We invite you to continue to participate in the Commons community by sharing your work.
Thanks,
the Picture of the Year committee
You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.
Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:00, 26 March 2014 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Talat Pasha.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |