User talk:Popolon

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search

Image:Dsc00076.jpg[edit]

Image deletion warning Image:Dsc00076.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Popolon 20:27, 30 June 2007 (UTC)


Image:Dsc00076.jpg[edit]

Image deletion warning Image:Dsc00076.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Popolon 20:27, 30 June 2007 (UTC)

Image:Église_Saint-Jean_de_Béré-Châteaubriant.jpg[edit]

català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | français | galego | עברית | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | lietuvių | Nederlands | norsk bokmål | polski | português | русский | slovenčina | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


Hello, and thank your for sharing your files with Commons. There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. Please remember that all uploads require source, author and license information. Could you please resolve these problems, which are described on the page linked in above? Thank you. --Siebrand 19:30, 24 July 2007 (UTC)

Image:Temple_bouddhique_Linh_Son-Joinville-le-Pont.jpg[edit]

català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | français | galego | עברית | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | lietuvių | Nederlands | norsk bokmål | polski | português | русский | slovenčina | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


Hello, and thank your for sharing your files with Commons. There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. Please remember that all uploads require source, author and license information. Could you please resolve these problems, which are described on the page linked in above? Thank you. --Siebrand 00:22, 2 August 2007 (UTC)

Image:Toit_vegetal-Dali.jpg[edit]

català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | français | galego | עברית | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | lietuvių | Nederlands | norsk bokmål | polski | português | русский | slovenčina | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


Hello, and thank your for sharing your files with Commons. There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. Please remember that all uploads require source, author and license information. Could you please resolve these problems, which are described on the page linked in above? Thank you. Siebrand 21:47, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
This message was placed by an automated process. Please go to Commons:Help desk if you need help.


Image:Magasin Dia de Beijing.jpg[edit]

català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | français | galego | עברית | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | lietuvių | Nederlands | norsk bokmål | polski | português | русский | slovenčina | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


Hello, and thank your for sharing your files with Commons. There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. Please remember that all uploads require source, author and license information. Could you please resolve these problems, which are described on the page linked in above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which information may be missing. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 14:10, 25 January 2008 (UTC)

HD Template[edit]

Hi! I have an HD template for GIMP if you want it. -- carol 06:47, 12 March 2008 (UTC)

Bonjour[edit]

:)

--pfctdayelise (说什么?) 09:28, 9 July 2008 (UTC)

I studied for several years at university and lived in Beijing for 6 months, on exchange. But now it is slowly leaking out of my brain, unfortunately!
BTW, you'll have to show me how to install Chinese input on Xubuntu, if you can :) --pfctdayelise (说什么?) 17:15, 9 July 2008 (UTC)
Done Popolon (talk) 20:55, 15 July 2008 (UTC)


File:Mao et lama.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Mao et lama.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

--Rédacteur Tibet (talk) 14:15, 27 October 2009 (UTC)

File:Palestine_State_Recognition.png[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Palestine_State_Recognition.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Night w (talk) 18:24, 3 September 2011 (UTC)

Tip: Categorizing images[edit]

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | magyar | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски / srpski | svenska | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


Hello, Popolon!

Tip: Add categories to your images

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

Uploadwizard-categories.png

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations"). Pro-tip: The CommonSense tool can help you find the best category for your image.

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

CategorizationBot (talk) 00:45, 30 September 2011 (UTC)

File:Édicule_Guimard-Gare_de_Lyon-Bd_Diderot.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Édicule_Guimard-Gare_de_Lyon-Bd_Diderot.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Léna (talk) 11:10, 16 October 2011 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Monuments 2011 has finished[edit]

Logo Wiki Loves Monuments 2011 català | dansk | Deutsch | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | français | galego | magyar | Lëtzebuergesch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk bokmål | polski | português | română | русский | svenska | +/−

Dear Popolon,

Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments and sharing your pictures with the whole world. You are very welcome to keep uploading images, even though you can't win prizes any longer. To get started on editing relevant Wikipedia articles, click here for more information and help.
You can find all uploaded pictures in our central media collection Wikimedia Commons. Many photos are already used in Wikipedia. The contest was very successful with more than 165,000 images submitted throughout Europe. To make future contests even more successful, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in this survey.

Kind regards,
the Wiki Loves Monuments team

Map of participating countries of Wiki Loves Monuments 2011
Message delivered by Lucia Bot in 00:33, 18 October 2011 (UTC)

Wiki loves monument[edit]

Bonjour,

Comme vous le savez sans doute, un grand concours de photographie organisé par l'association a eu lieu au mois de septembre : Wiki Loves Monuments. L'événement sera conclu par une soirée de remise des prix, qui aura lieu le 9 décembre 2011 à Paris, dans la salle Notre-Dame de l'hôtel de Cluny (qui abrite le musée national du Moyen Âge). La cérémonie aura lieu à 19h30, mais il sera auparavant possible de visiter gratuitement le musée (à partir de 18h).

Pour ceux qui veulent rester ensuite, on pense réserver un restaurant (chacun payant alors sa part), à partir de 22h.

Si tu souhaites venir, merci de me contacter par mail.--Thesupermat (talk) 11:32, 2 December 2011 (UTC)

File:时局图.jpg[edit]

Unfortunately, your edits left something of a mess in the image description, because:
1) It's obviously a lion, not a bulldog.
2) The fact that the eagle has a direct quote from Josiah Tattnall in 1858 is highly relevant, even if the cartoonist was born in 1872. AnonMoos (talk) 02:09, 2 January 2012 (UTC)

Did you already seen lions with bulldog head (flat face and falling ears, have you translated the chinese title of the article, did you look at the first version, do you know the mascot of the UK ??? Bear is for russia, bard eagle for the usa, and frog for the france in the uk point of vue, but not the gaellic frog, for french, the mascot is the gaellic rooster. Do you see ths script to be highly relevant ???Popolon (talk) 20:40, 2 January 2012 (UTC)
I have very little idea what you think you're taking about, but I wrote most of the original English-language annotations to both File:Politcal Map of 19th Century China(時局全圖).jpg and File:时局图.jpg, and a lion is not a bulldog (though sometimes Chinese artists had a way of assimilating the facial features of lions and so-called "lion dogs"). Since your English seems to be a little shaky, maybe you should refrain from attempting to write extended expository passages in it. Merci... AnonMoos (talk) 21:32, 2 January 2012 (UTC)

File:TibetanFlag-before1912.svg[edit]

Are you really basing this solely and exclusively on a chocolate advertisement? AnonMoos (talk) 02:20, 2 January 2012 (UTC)

Added more historical information about this collector card (not advertisement)Popolon (talk) 23:51, 3 January 2012 (UTC)
The page was moved by an admin to File:Fictitious Tibetan Flag-before 1912.svg. This was apparently based on discussion at Commons:Deletion requests/File:TibetanFlag-before1912.svg. Based what may be consensus in the DR, I suggested a move to File:Unidentified flag appearing on Potala illustration. If that is acceptable to you, I plan to ask for a file mover to rename the file. Okay? --Abd (talk) 20:44, 29 April 2015 (UTC)

File:Weihai-Xinwen dasha.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Weihai-Xinwen dasha.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Dereckson (talk) 10:13, 19 March 2012 (UTC)

File:Shenzhen-centreville.jpg[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 07:38, 18 May 2012 (UTC)


COM:AN/U[edit]

বাংলা | Deutsch | English | Español | Français | Italiano | Македонски | മലയാളം | Português | Русский | Svenska | +/−


float  Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems#DR as retaliation tool action review. You've raised concerns with sound arguments I made an abuse opening a DR in this context. I then asked a review of my actions. Thank you.

--Dereckson (talk) 07:59, 18 July 2012 (UTC)

File:Samsung Note II.multi-window and wacom stylus.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Samsung Note II.multi-window and wacom stylus.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Mono 18:12, 10 March 2013 (UTC)

File:Samsung Note II.multiwindow vertical.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Samsung Note II.multiwindow vertical.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Mono 23:57, 13 July 2013 (UTC)

File:Wacom Intuos4 Sasmung Note II et Note 10.1.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Wacom Intuos4 Sasmung Note II et Note 10.1.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Mono 23:57, 13 July 2013 (UTC)

Autopatrol given[edit]

Commons Autopatrolled.svg

Hello. I just wanted to let you know that I have granted autopatrol rights to your account; the reason for this is that I believe you are sufficiently trustworthy and experienced to have your contributions automatically sighted. This will have no effect on your editing, and is simply intended to help users watching Recent changes or Recent uploads to find unproductive edits amidst the productive ones. Thank you. INeverCry 00:45, 3 March 2014 (UTC)

Category:Sigroc[edit]

Xofc (talk) 10:20, 9 March 2014 (UTC)

Transferred to category:Sigrok.

New level {{User VG-4}}[edit]

Hi ; new level 4 for you ?

VG-4

--Medium69 You wanted talk to me? 14:59, 11 December 2014 (UTC)

Anachronisme[edit]

Bonjour. Je viens de voir vos ajouts de notes à l'image de la nativité des Très Riches Heures. Vous indiquez des "anachronisme" mais en fait, sans peut-être de le savoir, vous en faites un vous même. En effet, il est anachronique de vouloir chercher une vraisemblance historique dans une représentation biblique du XVe siècle. Le but des frères de Limbourg, comme de tous les peintres de cette époque, n'est pas de représenter la réalité historique de la scène, mais au contraire, de tisser des liens entre la scène et leur réalité contemporaine de la fin du Moyen Âge. Voilà pourquoi ils ont par exemple représenté la ville de Bourges en arrière plan, ville importante pour leur commanditaire, le duc de Berry et le calice représenté avec une croix a sans doute pour modèle une pièce d'orfèvrerie propriété de ce même duc (et on pourrait en pointer d'autre : l'étole blanche portée par les mages est un symbole des Armagnac pdt la Guerre de Cent Ans, le tapis sur lequel est assis la Vierge est un tapis persan dont était amateur le duc, etc.). Voilà pourquoi pointer des anachronismes dans cette image est... anachronique ! Mel22 (talk) 09:31, 22 December 2014 (UTC)

Merci pour ces informations, cela m'éclaire un peu plus sur le sujet. Je ne pense pas que cela rende mes ajouts anachroniques, mais effectivement, il serait peut être bon de préciser, qu'il s'agit d'une œuvre volontairement anachronique. C'est sans doute déjà le cas sur la page. J'aurais du probablement la lire avant.Popolon (talk) 12:12, 22 December 2014 (UTC)

File:TibetanFlag-before1912.svg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:TibetanFlag-before1912.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

6-A04-W96-K38-S41-V38 (talk) 09:06, 2 April 2015 (UTC)

Admin noticeboard[edit]

Hi, fyi I made a request concerning you at the admin notice board. --Personal attacks and dubious contributions by User:Popolon (talk) 10:25, 2 April 2015 (UTC)

FYI, I have reactivated my request for a formal warning by an admin, as my previous request was archived by a bot without an admin examining it. I hope this will allow to restart on a good base. --6-A04-W96-K38-S41-V38 (talk) 14:30, 15 April 2015 (UTC)
Ah, perhaps he wants to commit wiki-suicide. Popolon, I suggest you sit back and watch, I don't see any response from you as necessary. Responding to something like this, less is more. --Abd (talk) 18:25, 15 April 2015 (UTC)
I have responded there. (permanent link.) I'm loquacious, I write a lot. Not when I have a clear goal in mind. The issues there have become very simple. We will see what admins do. There is zero chance of you being blocked if you do nothing. I'd put the chance of him being blocked this time at above fifty percent. I wasn't going to do anything about his removal of my warning, but, indeed, he set it up for that to be used on AN/U. This user can make positive contributions, so I'd hope he is not indef blocked, and, my guess, he won't be. Not this time. --Abd (talk) 18:52, 15 April 2015 (UTC)

Warning[edit]

As pointed out in the above request on AN/U, (permanent link) you repeatedly called the edits of User:6-A04-W96-K38-S41-V38 "vandalism." That was unnecessary and inflammatory. Please do not use such language about other users, even if you strongly disagree with them. Your edits on File:Qinghai.Mongolian yurt.jpg approached revert warring, and your last revert there repeated the vandalism claim, leading the editor to file the AN/U report.

Some users may be argumentative and difficult to deal with. However, please do not make matters worse with incivility, and please use the Talk page to resolve disputes. Ask for help if you need it. I'm willing to help negotiate consensus, or you may find others willing to mediate. --Abd (talk) 01:09, 8 April 2015 (UTC)

Abd, thank you for your advice, I will try to keep calm, find the good word instead of vandalism. At this time, the user already had reverted or suppressed lot of sourced informations on several articles on fr: wikipedia in a POV-push manner and he started to extend this on commons :(. I still don't know what is the exact word for that. Perhaps I should only add reverted sourced information, or something like that.Popolon (talk) 08:57, 8 April 2015 (UTC)
Right. If it isn't pure vandalism, like "Poop!!!", always see if you can compromise, Assume Good Faith. You don't have to kill yourself, you have the right idea. Keep it simple. This is Commons, there shouldn't be high content conflict here. Yes, there was fr.wiki history. Set it aside for Commons. Don't focus on the "problem user," focus on your goals and our goals. And good luck, and if you ever need any assistance negotiating with a user, where you find yourself nonplussed, frustrated, ask me. If I haven't been active on Commons, send me an email. My goal is to empower users, I get more good content created that way than by creating it myself. I will work for a sane compromise, and if that's impossible, if I find that a user is really and purely a troll (which is rare), I'll report. You won't have to. I suggest reading and understanding meatball:DefendEachOther. That was original wiki culture, it has often been lost, but it works. --Abd (talk) 15:18, 8 April 2015 (UTC)
Thank's a lot for your answer. I will try to follow a little more this rules. In about 13 years of wikipedia, that's the first time I meet a so destructive user.Popolon (talk) 12:57, 13 April 2015 (UTC)
Then be grateful that you have lived a charmed life. Now, this is truly funny. Sure I'm banned on enwiki. What for? Well, if I wanted to trace it back, it would be for warning administrators of policy violations, which were confirmed by ArbCom, and one sysop was desysopped (basically for blocking me -- after I'd warned him), and ... it is not a popular thing to do, warn sysops!
Your response to my warning demonstrated that you are collaborative, that you can learn, that you can stand back and be tolerant, all that good stuff.
His response has demonstrated what you have written. He's looking for something wrong. He might think, "Ah! The user who warned me is Bad and I can prove it!" He's not the first to think that way!
He may not understand that removing the warning has no protective effect. It acknowledges receipt of it. It will only fool the naive. I always look through talk page history to examine removals as distinct from archiving. He can't alter the talk page history, and "Warning" shows in it. So someone looking at his behavior in the future is likely to find that, read it, and see a confirmation, if he has continued the behavior. However, this may be a throw-away account.
And now that I'm engaged and poked like that, I just might watch him occasionally to make sure he's not creating disruption, as might others. This is what we do! It is not personal. It's wiki.
Someone looking at your talk page will also see a warning, but if they look at the warning, they will see your commitment to being more careful. If you are, in fact, more careful -- as I expect you will be -- you will look quite good. All that is needed, usually, is a bit of patience, and a willingness to seek agreement. And I have no reason to think that looking over your contributions will reveal a problem. So ... thanks for your patience, and "the reward of patience is patience." --Abd (talk) 18:15, 15 April 2015 (UTC)

File talk:Baozi - Beijing.jpg[edit]

Bonjour, Pourriez-vous m'illuminer sur le sens de la création de cette page de discussion? Merci,--6-A04-W96-K38-S41-V38 (talk) 15:45, 20 April 2015 (UTC)

Je n'ai rien à ajouter, je trouve juste très étonnant leur ressemblance. Je ne crois pas avoir dit quelque chose de mal à leur encontre.Popolon (talk) 20:32, 22 April 2015 (UTC)
Il s'agit d'une page de discussion d'un project collaboratif, pas d'un blog personnel. S'il n'y a rien à discuter, je vous invite à retirer cette insertion incompréhensible. Merci, --6-A04-W96-K38-S41-V38 (talk) 08:52, 23 April 2015 (UTC)
Je ne comprends pas les problèmes qu'elle vous pose, ou ce que vous y trouver de choquant. Il s'agit de la page de discussion.Popolon (talk) 12:39, 23 April 2015 (UTC)
Précisément, j'essaie de comprendre ce que vous souhaiter discuter pour améliorer la page en question, en conformité avec les règles et recommendations de Wikimedia Commons. Talk pages are not for general chatter; please keep discussions on talk pages on the topic of how to improve the associated article. Si votre ajout n'était pas destiné à améliorer la page en question (comme la présente discussion semble l'indiquer), merci de le retirer.--6-A04-W96-K38-S41-V38 (talk) 14:22, 23 April 2015 (UTC)
Popolon, 6-A04 has a point, but is socially uncivil. That is, small chatty and friendly remarks may be made. This is a community of human beings. The link is to a guideline, not a rigid policy, and was obviously taken from Wikipedia ("article"). I considered removing the comment, since it offended him, but decided that it was not worth creating more burden for Recent Changes patrollers. Tant pis. In the future, Popolon, it appears that 6-A04 does not welcome small talk, so please do not offend him. We may review his contributions and feed him comments of greater weight, as warranted, of course. --Abd (talk) 20:42, 24 April 2015 (UTC)
I will try to refrain on pages this user change, at least when he doesn't remove sourced information, as he does so frequently.Popolon (talk) 13:44, 14 May 2015 (UTC)

Translation cantonese[edit]

Hello Popolon, can you help me a translate in cantonese please? Smitersleon (talk) 10:35, 24 October 2015 (UTC)

@Smitersleon: I better know mandarin dialects than cantoneses one, I only barely understand cantonese speaker on most common subjects. What do you want to translate ? Should be better to ask a native chinese speaker I believe :).Popolon (talk) 13:57, 25 October 2015 (UTC)

Hello, Popolon, I would translate in cantonese this page and this page for copy in this page I asked all users Cantonese but I responded no , I'm waiting . You perhaps can not help but thank you very much for the answer. By Smitersleon (talk) 15:58, 25 October 2015 (UTC)

Popolon, can you help me in simpleenglishwikipedia and zhwikipedia please? Smitersleon (talk) 19:19, 25 October 2015 (UTC)

File tagging File:10 Tugriks - Verso.jpg[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Hrvatski | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lietuvių | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Română | Русский | Sicilianu | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | Türkçe | Українська | اردو | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:10 Tugriks - Verso.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own.

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the OTRS-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:10 Tugriks - Verso.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Jarekt (talk) 13:48, 30 December 2015 (UTC)

Jarekt : This is the problem of any banknotes, there are a lot already on Category:Banknotes_by_country and in this case Category:Banknotes_of_Mongolia. I personnally scanned the banknote, so which rules need to be applied in those cases ?Popolon (talk) 14:44, 1 January 2016 (UTC)
Popolon, scanning does not give you the copyrights to the work scanned. Those rights belong to the person who designed the banknote. Many countries have legislations which explain copyright status of the banknotes, but I do not know Mongolia's copyright laws. --Jarekt (talk) 22:27, 1 January 2016 (UTC)
I understand, but I suppose, this is considered public domain by default ?


File:Politcal Map of 19th Century China(時局全圖).jpg[edit]

Unfortunately, your attempt at dating does not seem to be useful here, since the U.S. was not in the Philippines until 1898, Japan had negligible influence on anything in 1858-1860, the apparent author was born in 1872, etc. Sakhalin was a territorial claim (just as the Republic of China on Taiwan was vetoing the admission of Mongolia to the UN to maintain its territorial claim on Mongolia as late as 1955). AnonMoos (talk) 17:50, 1 February 2016 (UTC) :AnonMoos Thanks for the usefull details, then I was wrongPopolon (talk) 20:49, 1 February 2016 (UTC)

File:Paris IV-Rue Simon-le-Franc.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Paris IV-Rue Simon-le-Franc.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Lophotrochozoa (talk) 19:54, 29 February 2016 (UTC)

Category:Gol_Mod[edit]

Latebird (talk) 12:49, 8 April 2016 (UTC)