User talk:Svdmolen/Archive

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search

Contents

First[edit]

Hello - thank you for providing images to the wikimedia commons. Please keep in mind that images uploaded to the commons should be useful to all users of wikimedia projects - this is possible only if the images can be found by other people. To allow others to find the images you uploaded here, the images should be in some place that can be found by navigating the category structure. This means that you should either place the images on topic pages (galleries), or put the images directly into a category, or do both. Which of those possibilities is preferred is however a matter of debate, see here.

The important point is that the images should be placed in the general structure somewhere. There is a large number of completely unsorted images on the commons right now, see Commons:Really unused. If you would like to help to place some of those images where they can be found, please do! Thank you. -- Duesentrieb 11:32, 2 Apr 2005 (UTC)

I'm not that familiar with the structure of commmons so for the moment im just contributing some pics. I hope others will organize the structural part of this project. Then it's most efficient in my opinion.-Svdmolen 11:56, 2 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Not really, because it is quite difficult to even find images that need categorisation. Please do put them somewhere, the categorisation structure is not that difficult. To find an appropriate category, start with the categories listen on the main page and work your way down to where you think the images would fit. If you're not sure where to put them exactly, put them in a "general" category. For instance for your pictures of cristaline sulfur, i would suggest Category:Minerals.
You are right that finding and creating good categories can be difficult and time consuming. But keep in mind that if you con't do it, someone has to do it for you. I took part in an effort a few months ago to find and categorize all the "lost" images on the commons - several thousands. It took weeks to sort through them, and there are not many people who are willing to do that. I fear right now there are again many thousand pictures that are lost to the world because thy are not categorized - that's similar to "orphan" pages in the wikipedia: if it is not linkd, it's no good. So, please make your imnages useful for others by putting them somewhere they can be found. -- Duesentrieb 13:51, 2 Apr 2005 (UTC)

I just wanted to say thanks for putting your images into categories now! And thank you for the many images :) sorry for nagging earlier, but structuring our content is really important. -- Duesentrieb 18:56, 3 Apr 2005 (UTC)

No problem at all. It takes little affort to at least give it some category. I can't promish that it will be the correct one but I'll try. -Svdmolen 20:18, 3 Apr 2005 (UTC)


First of all: Thanks for categorizing, we have far too many unsorted images here. As to your problem with User:Factumquintus: as far as I saw he one "uncategorized" images that where already on a gallery page in one of the relevant categories. As long as the pictures can be found by navigating the category structure, I don't see a problem. Cases where there exists a page and a category for the same topic are a little problematic - it is unclear if images should be in both, the page and the category, in such cases...

I belive User:Factumquintus meant no harm - I hope you can work together to find a good solution for structuring that part of the commons. Thanks! -- Duesentrieb 8 July 2005 22:05 (UTC)

Some annoying pictures[edit]

Hi, I have some unidentified species uploaded for determination.

  • [1] no idea... Some kind of a butterfly.
  • [2], [3] These two pictures show a carterpillar that lives at the underside of an acacia leaf. I have seen up to three of them living together on one leaf.
  • [4] Is this a bug?
    Greetings, --Olei 22:12, 15 August 2005 (UTC)
  1. looks like a Eupithecia dodoneata.
  2. link doesn't work
  3. link doesn't work
  4. Could be a Cydnidae tritomegas.

Greetings, Svdmolen 15:27, 16 August 2005 (UTC)

I have repaired the links, thanks for the first hints, I will look over it later. Greetings, --Olei 22:44, 16 August 2005 (UTC)

Category:Unidentified Images of Butterflies[edit]

Hi, thanks for your help ordering these pictures. :-) I have a question about the following picture: Butterfly Morpho Anaxibia (M) KL.jpg

Butterfly Morpho rhetenor helea (M) KL.jpg

. It shows the name Morpho anaxibia you changed it to Morpho helena. Is this same species? Best regards, --Olei 19:07, 23 August 2005 (UTC)

Hi, no its not the same species, but this picture is of a Morpho anaxibia. -Svdmolen 19:09, 23 August 2005 (UTC)
Oops Morpho helena i mean of course lol ;o) -Svdmolen 19:14, 23 August 2005 (UTC)
Yes, I got it! ;-) Here's another one: Moth on white cosmos by pattimeado.jpg. My guess is: Colias phicomone (female). Greetings, --Olei 20:25, 23 August 2005 (UTC)
I agree on the Colias phicomone. What do u think of Image:Swallowtail by Splonko.jpg is it a papilio alexanor? -Svdmolen 20:44, 23 August 2005 (UTC)
I think it's possible, but most of all pictures (found with google) only show the upper side. And I have no idea how variable colors can be. The Tolman says: "females bigger and upper side more yellow (wing basis)". Not much, and nothing about variations. So this guess is very uncertain. --Olei 21:40, 23 August 2005 (UTC)

Triodia.sylvina[edit]

Hi, before writing an article I want to ask you for this little Butterfly. According to [5], [6] it should be Triodia sylvina. Do you agree? Greetings, --Olei 19:05, 28 August 2005 (UTC)

Wow, great pictures. I agree on the determination for the pic's on Triodia sylvina. Best regards, Svdmolen 19:49, 28 August 2005 (UTC)
Thanks! :-) So I have to write this article..., Best regards, --Olei 09:43, 29 August 2005 (UTC)

Deletion request[edit]

You put Image:Butterfly2.jpg up for deletion, claiming it is replaced by Image:Limenitis populi-02.jpg. This is obviously not the case, did you perhaps mean a different photo? Thuresson 21:09, 3 September 2005 (UTC)

Timandra comae[edit]

Hi, I belive this image

Timandra comae

is Timandra comae. The north-east species of europe should be Timandra griseata (according to some german literature). Whats your opinion? Gretings, --Olei 20:53, 4 September 2005 (UTC)

I'm sorry i have no idea :o( -Svdmolen 19:46, 5 September 2005 (UTC)
Hi, I have seen that you have set a redirect from T. griseata to T. comae. Please remember we have two different species here. T. comae is very common and wide spread in middle Europe and griseata has a boreal spreading (Estonia, Sweden, Finland and the north-west of Russia. In case of the "french" picture I agree that this is possibly T. comae. But the 2nd one - I have no idea. Consequently this one should be left in the article T. griseata. So I think the redirect is not a good solution! What do you think about my suggestions? Greetings, --Olei 20:51, 13 September 2005 (UTC)
Hi, ya I'm sorry I forgot this remark by you when I made it a redirect. I think you'r right. I looked on site, I trust, [7] and must say it might be difficult to determinate the specie at all. Perhaps it's best to undo the redirect and leave it like it was. -Svdmolen 15:04, 14 September 2005 (UTC)

deletion warning[edit]

Image:Michelangelo-pieta.jpg[edit]

Image deletion warning Image:Michelangelo-pieta.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Thuresson 08:03, 6 September 2005 (UTC)

Syntomis spec.[edit]

Syntomis spec.

Hi, some time ago I put the following image in the german determination page. But there is no response until now. Maybe you will have a try? I found similar species at www.leps.it . The first is Syntomis kruegeri, second Syntomis ragazzi and last but not least Syntomis phegea. I tend to Syntomis ragazzi, but I have no idea how variable the wings can be. What do you think? Greetings, --Olei 18:53, 17 September 2005 (UTC)

Hi, perhaps this site might be of help. I would say Syntomis ragazzii aswell since colors and size of spots match more but there is only one on the internet to compair the picture with... -Best regards Svdmolen 19:50, 17 September 2005 (UTC)

Paolo[edit]

Hello,
Thanks for your message. Indeed, there is a problem. I will write in Paolo to obtain his agreement (or not) for the use of his images in this way.
If it does not agree, it will be a pity, because there is not much photograph of butterfly on Wikipédia.
Regards.--Valérie75 11:47, 25 September 2005 (UTC)

Hello,
I didn't receive any response but I send a mail today again. Please to wait sometimes still. :-) --Valérie75 18:02, 8 November 2005 (UTC)

Image:Haile Selassie (nps-gov).jpg[edit]

Hi, please add your source for this photo as quickly as possible. Thuresson 00:10, 27 November 2005 (UTC)

Antoni Gaudí[edit]

Hi. I've tagged Image:Antoni gaudi.jpg with {{incomplete license}}: in the upload description you wrote it came from es:, but the image was deleted there because it lacked from source. Regards. --Dodo 11:12, 21 December 2005 (UTC)

quick categorising[edit]

Hi, thanks for categorising Udaspes folus. I just wanted to know how you did it so quickly. I mean I hadn't even categorised the pics and you found them and put them in a category within 2 minutes of my having uploaded them. Its amazing. --Viren 18:44, 2 January 2006 (UTC)

Hi, I was in the proces of categorising other butterflies when I saw your contribution. So it was no problem categorising them quickly :o) -Svdmolen 22:07, 2 January 2006 (UTC) BTW I spotted them using the function "latest files" which can be found on the left under the wikimedia logo.

Image:Oil-spill.jpg[edit]

Hi Svdmolen, can you maybe specify the link where you found this picture? Thanks in advance, --Flominator 13:36, 15 January 2006 (UTC)

It's to long ago for me to remember the exact location of the image. But I'm sure its from NOAA. -Svdmolen 14:45, 15 January 2006 (UTC)

Invitation[edit]

Hallo Sander,

Ik wil je graag uitnodigen voor Commons:WikiProject Tree of Life

TeunSpaans 20:03, 26 January 2006 (UTC)

Awesome picture[edit]

LOL, Image:Procyon lotor (xndr).JPG is great. Paroxysm 03:13, 30 January 2006 (UTC)

Thanks, :o) -Svdmolen 17:08, 5 February 2006 (UTC)

Image:Lechwalesa.JPG[edit]

Hi, please add a link to a resource where the institute release all photos as public domain. Thuresson 22:56, 30 January 2006 (UTC)

If I could I would, but I was trusting the en: source. Do what ever you want with the picture. -Svdmolen 17:08, 5 February 2006 (UTC)

Butterlies[edit]

Hi. I see in the category PD-other reasons a lot of images of butterflies uploaded by you like this. We have the specific template PD-Australia. Do you think that I could change your PD-because with this tag? Is the same law that says that your images are PD? I hope that my sucks english was clean. If not I'm sorry. Bye --RED DEVIL 666 08:48, 26 February 2006 (UTC)

Hi Red, I prefer to let it stay how it is. Now a clear link to the PD statement is given and there is no discussion about the rights. When a standard claim is made I think some over active users here will try to get it deleted. But as long as all links stay in the description, [8] en to the family of butterflies is might be not a big problem. -Svdmolen

Image:Unidentified plant-02 (xndr).JPG[edit]

Hi! This photo shows Pulicaria dysenterica --Franz Xaver 12:55, 15 March 2006 (UTC)

Thanks :o) -Svdmolen 17:00, 15 March 2006 (UTC)

Image: Proba (nasa).jpg[edit]

Image deletion warning Image:Proba (nasa).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests. If you feel that this image should not be deleted, please go there to voice your opinion on its entry.
Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

It is the same picture as Image:PROBA.jpg but only in small Uwe W. 12:08, 10 April 2006 (UTC)


Image Tagging Image:Viola riviniana-02 (xndr).jpg[edit]

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Viola riviniana-02 (xndr).jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is therefore unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{GFDL-self}}to release it under the GFDL or{{PD-self}}to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Rüdiger Wölk 21:57, 6 May 2006 (UTC)

Admin[edit]

You are now an administrator here on the Commons. Congratulations, Sander! Just remember that images cannot be undeleted, so please be careful when deleting them. User:dbenbenn 21:18, 12 May 2006 (UTC)

Thank you. -Svdmolen 13:14, 13 May 2006 (UTC)

Image:Unidentified-02 (xndr).jpg[edit]

Hello Svdmolen,

Firstly I was thinking that was maybe a Neottia nidus-avis or a Neottia or other saprophytic orhid. But now I think it's an 'Orobanche sp. -- Pixeltoo 18:48, 8 June 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for your help Pixeltoo. Someone on a Dutch site suggested Orobanche minor. -Svdmolen 21:04, 8 June 2006 (UTC)

Commons:Village_pump#Caricatural_vandalism.3F[edit]

Hi Svdmolen, I would be grateful if you could do something about this (like block User:Fecal if you think he has acted deliberately harmfully, it looks like it to me) as I feel uncomfortable acting when I can't read the cartoons he uploaded. Thanks, pfctdayelise (translate?) 09:52, 13 June 2006 (UTC)

Hi Elise, I can't even find the cartoon is the history so I geuss it has been deleted already. So I can't judge the situation. On the Dutch wikipedia we are used to give a warning before blocking. Perhaps we should start with that. What do you think? -Svdmolen 20:02, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
Yes, OK. pfctdayelise (translate?) 00:36, 14 June 2006 (UTC)


Image:Chinese soldiers 1939.jpg[edit]

Image deletion warning Image:Chinese soldiers 1939.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Image:Vdwaals.jpg[edit]

Is het je mogelijk om te duikelen waar je dit plaatje vandaan gehaald hebt? Zonder die informatie loop je nl de kans dat het vroeg of laat verwijderd zal worden. Zie Image:Johannes Diderik van der Waals.jpg als voorbeeld hoe je dat kunt vermelden. JdH 14:56, 23 June 2006 (UTC)

Hoi, ik zou niet meer weten waar het vandaan kwam en weet eerlijk gezegd ook niet of ik het puur op ouderdom onder PD heb geupload. Als het weggegooid wordt zal ik het niet tegenhouden..... -Svdmolen 17:06, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
OK. Ik heb een nieuwe versie ge-upload van http://www.science.uva.nl/research/itf/images/vdwaals_large.jpg om zeker te stellen wat de bron is; zal wel dezelfde file zijn want het is dezelfde maat en omvang. JdH 19:09, 23 June 2006 (UTC)

Commons-l subscription[edit]

Hello Svdmolen,

as per Commons talk:Administrators, I am asking all admins to subscribe to commons-l, a mailing list for Wikimedia Commons policy and project discussion. Since many admins are only on Commons infrequently, this is a good way to alert people about important happenings. The mailing list is nominally multilingual, but predominantly English.

If you are already subscribed to commons-l, I apologize for bothering you, and you are free to ignore this message. If you don't want to use your regular e-mail account, feel free to leave me a message, and I can send you a GMail invite. Traffic on the mailing list is relatively low, and we do not expect admins to read all messages to the list, but it would be nice if you could check on it at least every few weeks. Thanks for your time,--Eloquence 23:16, 4 July 2006 (UTC)

Deletion request[edit]

Image deletion warning Image:Antoni gaudi.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests. If you feel that this image should not be deleted, please go there to voice your opinion on its entry.
Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

ALE! 15:45, 10 July 2006 (UTC)

Image:Lichen (xndr).jpg[edit]

Hi Svdmolen, I've identified your image as Parmelia sulcata. So I completed the description and used it in de:Parmelia sulcata. Kind regards --Density 16:41, 10 July 2006 (UTC)

Hi Density, thanks for the determination. Cheers, Sander

Your Photo Orthetrum cancellatum-01 (xndr).jpg[edit]

Hi Svdmolen, your very good photo in commons mentioned above seems to be in the wrong category (Orthetrum cancellatum). It seems to show a female of Sympetrum sp. (possibly S. striolatum or vulgatum) rather than orthetrum cancellatum. So I suggest, you should move it to the category sympetrum. Best regards Günter User:g-u-t


Hi Günter, thanks alot for your correction. I deleted the old picture and uploaded it as Image:Sympetrum sp.-01 (xndr).jpg. Best regards, Sander

Image:Arthur-seyss-inquart.jpg[edit]

Image Tagging Image:Arthur-seyss-inquart.jpg[edit]

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Arthur-seyss-inquart.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{cc-by-sa-2.5}} to release it under the Creative Commons or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. NielsF 15:16, 22 July 2006 (UTC)

Hoi Niels, ik weet niet meer waar deze foto exact vandaan komt. Ik vermoed een .gov site, daar haalde ik toe veel afbeeldingen vandaan. Doe met de afbeelding wat je wilt. -Svdmolen 17:22, 22 July 2006 (UTC)

Category:Unidentified Images of Butterflies[edit]

Hi Sander,

zou je eens een kijkje in deze category willen nemen om te zien of deze category wat opgeschoond kan worden? TeunSpaans 03:28, 24 July 2006 (UTC)

Image:Phlogophora meticulosa-01 (xndr).jpg[edit]

Phlogophora meticulosa-01 (xndr).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Phlogophora meticulosa-01 (xndr).jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Your image was nominated and promted congraulations on such a fine contribution to Commons Gnangarra 11:02, 24 July 2006 (UTC)

That's nice :o) Thank you. -Svdmolen 15:04, 24 July 2006 (UTC)

Idea leuconoe[edit]

Hello Sander, you just identified this butterfly as Idea leuconoe. But there are some subspecies of this species. Are you able to identify the subspecies on this photo, too? Thank you, DocTaxon 18:15, 30 July 2006 (UTC)

Hi Doc, I'm sorry I can't say which subspecies it is. -Svdmolen 21:22, 30 July 2006 (UTC)

Greta morgane[edit]

Hi Svdmolen, some time ago you moved Greta oto to Greta morgane. I can't remember the reason. Actually there is one image thas was determined as G. oto. At The Global Lepidoptera Names Index I did'nt found any hint for a synonym. Greetings, --Olei 20:55, 8 August 2006 (UTC)

Hi Olei, It's along time ago since I made that change. I had to think for a while but I remembered that I did change it because the name was not possible. I again searched a site that I use often for name and date of author an location. That site tells me that Greta Oto is an old name for Greta Morgane Oto. So I resond that Greta Oto is a subspecies of Great Morgane. I remeber that the difference between the Greta Morgane Oto and the Greta Morgane Morgane had something to do with the white band but I can't find it. -Svdmolen 07:34, 12 August 2006 (UTC)

QI[edit]

Pyrrhosoma nymphula (xndr).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pyrrhosoma nymphula (xndr).jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Thanks :o) -Svdmolen 14:55, 13 August 2006 (UTC)


Image Tagging Image:Greta Garbo.jpg[edit]

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Greta Garbo.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{cc-by-sa-2.5}} to release it under the Creative Commons or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Kjetil_r 15:26, 14 August 2006 (UTC)


Image Tagging Image:Aquarium-Melbourne.jpg[edit]

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Aquarium-Melbourne.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{cc-by-sa-2.5}} to release it under the Creative Commons or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Shizhao 08:17, 23 August 2006 (UTC)

Admin news[edit]

Hello,

If you consent for statistics to be published about your actions as an administrator, please sign here: Commons:Administrator permission for statistics. (I expect that most people will not have a problem with it unless you are especially concerned with privacy.)

Also, please be aware that we now have a Commons:Administrators' noticeboard. Please put it on your watchlist, if you haven't already!

cheers, pfctdayelise (translate?) 05:33, 7 September 2006 (UTC) P.S.: Pardon if this is a repeat (bot debugging...)

Image sources[edit]

Hi, despite searching, I have not been able to find Image:Oil-spill.jpg and Image:Thick oil on rocky beach.jpg at the NOAA web site (NOAA Advanced Search). Please add a source who can verify that these photos come from NOAA. Thuresson 02:38, 25 September 2006 (UTC)

Hi do what ever you want with the picture. I'm sure it's from NOAA but cant find it there anymore. Regards, Svdmolen 16:56, 25 September 2006 (UTC)

Image Tagging Image:Nuclear powerplant-01.jpg[edit]

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Nuclear powerplant-01.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{cc-by-sa-2.5}} to release it under the Creative Commons or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Shizhao 02:55, 25 September 2006 (UTC)

Do what ever you want with the picture. The picture came from the en:wiki, original source is not known to me. Regards, Svdmolen 16:58, 25 September 2006 (UTC)

Cicindela maritima[edit]

High, my name is Siga, I am not really a specialist, but I have at least the Freude-Harde-Lohse, which is Standard for beetles, and I know to read it. And from that I mean, that the Cicindela maritima, that you put in the corresponding articel, is a C. hybrida. Somewhere maritima was a subspecies of hybrida, but now it is a species of its own and there are two differences between the two species. The one is, that maritima has spare whity hairs between the eyes and hybrida not. But unfortunatly you usualy don't see that on pictures. The second difference is, that the white waved band in the middle of the elytra with hybrida only soflty goes back, whereas with maritima the inner part is esential more back than the outer part. You can see that very clearly at the picture of Reitter, which is also in the gallery of the article C. maritima. Perhaps you may discuss that with another person and then decide yourself. Cheers --Siga 21:16, 22 October 2006 (UTC) (I'm writing with the same name in german and greek Wiki)

Hi Siga, to start with I'm not an expert myself aswell. The reason why I named it Cicindela maritima was because I read that it had white hairs between the eye's and C. hybrida didn't. If you look at the picture closely and zoom in between the eye's I see some white hairs. Best regards, Svdmolen 17:21, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
I will not insist, so this is my last remark in this matter. C. m. as we both agree, have hairs. They are hairy with thin hair in a field in the middle of the eyes, as you can see in http://www.koleopterologie.de/gallery/, any as you also can well see on your photo, there are only some thicker hairs near the eyes. On those photos you can also compare the white vaved band. But if you don't agree, feel easy with that too. --Siga 11:22, 26 October 2006 (UTC)
Please don't stop this discussion, for me it's important to get it right. Still I'm convinced it Cicindela maritima and after a new search even more. Give me the change to show you more evidence ;o). First look at this link and give special attention to the middle white waved band. Now look at this link, they are similar both Cicindela hybrida. And now the next: please look at this link and notice the broader band like on my picture. Next to that on the russian site the Cicindela maritima has some but not execive hair, like some pictures on the site you mentioned. Those pictures where of an larve I think not of an Imago. I would appriciated it very much if you would take a look to the links and give me your opinion. -Svdmolen 15:19, 26 October 2006 (UTC)

High, here I am again. First of all, I didn't want to stop the discussion, because I feel my knowledges somehow superior to yours, but on contrary don't be enough specialist to decide in this difficult question. So just let me tell what I am thinking: Freude-Harde-Loose has its main aspect in the determination keys. It is speaking about beetles of middle Europe. The furcation for determination is a: middle of the front without hairs, (Only some long hairs at the edge of the eyes). This leads to C.gallica and hybrida. The other posibility is b: middle of the front with long hairs. This leads to C. campestris, C.soluta, C. silvicola and C. maritima. Going on till maritima, it says: formerly as subspecies of hybrida, but from this easily to recognize by the middle band, where the inner splotch is much more back to the outer splotch and the two splotsches of this band are only thinly connected. From this I deduct 1. that the main difference is the hair on the front, which you can see clearly on the link, I gave you. Now about your links. On the first you see three pictures. In the first the band is like maritima, in the last it is like hybrida and in the middle it is middle. But you don't see hairs on the front of either. Now to your second link. There are two pictures, the first is C.hybrida koshanki.... wich is a subspecies that doesn't exist in middle Europe. I would say, the band is really like C. maritima. The second picture is C hybrida hybrida, which is ours here, and you see the typical middle band, discribed by Freude-Harde-Lohse. No hairs in both cases. Now to your last link: C.maritima kirgisica, that is another foreign subspecies. You can see the spare hairs in between the eyes, and the form of the band differs extremely from our C. maritima and in fact looks very like C. hybrida. So alltogether, the form of the band seems to verify, especially in subspecies, but the hair for maritima and no hair for hybrida is right for all the subspecies. Which, by the way, is new to me, but not very astonishing. I see that you are deeply interested and I think you will agree after thinking it over. Let me know your decision. --Siga 21:18, 4 November 2006 (UTC)

Siga, I asked it on a forum and they agree with you [9]. I replaced the picture by Image:Cicindela hybrida-01 (xndr).jpg. Best regards and thanks. -Svdmolen 18:55, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
And I used it already in the greek Wikipedia. Thanks too, --Siga 07:22, 19 November 2006 (UTC)

Image:Rosalind Franklin.jpg[edit]

Pay attention to copyright Image:Rosalind Franklin.jpg has been marked as a copyright violation. The Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content, that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added will soon be deleted. If you believe this image is not a copyright violation, please explain why on the image description page.


Afrikaans | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Luxembourgish | Македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | Malti | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | Українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Kaldari 23:34, 30 October 2006 (UTC)

Image:Rosalind Franklin.jpg[edit]

The creator of the image has made it available for use, under the Creative Commons Attribution ShareAlike 2.5 License. Thank you SionBrown

Would you help me?[edit]

Caterpillar g1.jpg

Hi, I am not able to identify this Sphingidae found on a olive tree in Sardinia. Are you able to give me some information? Thanks --gian_d 08:14, 21 November 2006 (UTC)

This is Acherontia atropos (Linnaeus, 1758). If you have more images, please upload! Best regards, --Olei 09:23, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
Thanks a lot, I never saw the larva of A. atropos although I know well the adult! I have more pictures from various sizes, I'm going to upload them in Wikimedia Commons. Regards --gian_d 18:19, 21 November 2006 (UTC)

Pictures from nl.wiki[edit]

i´ve got 3 pictures from the nl.wiki ([10], [11] and [12]), that would fit very well into the commons, but i don´t know which license is the right one. all of them are from the same author, with the same permission, only the 1. but only the first one does have a license tag. could you please look at them? thx --Kulac 16:15, 13 December 2006 (UTC)

The pictures are uploaded by me. The author hasn't given a specific license but the closes that matches the requirements of his statement is Cc-by. As far as I know that license is not allowed on Commons anymore. -Svdmolen 16:43, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
so we can´t use them in other wikis? thats bad, because there are more of them, showing quite rare butterflies...--Kulac 14:59, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
You could try to contact Cor Zonneveld on his site and ask him if he is willing to release some pictures under GFLD or an other license which is allowed on Commons. -Svdmolen 16:30, 14 December 2006 (UTC)


Image Tagging Image:Stockholm (xndr).jpg[edit]

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Stockholm (xndr).jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-2.5}} to release it under the Creative Commons or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. LX (talk, contribs) 05:10, 22 January 2007 (UTC)


Image Tagging Image:Blue hall stockholm city hall (xndr).jpg[edit]

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Blue hall stockholm city hall (xndr).jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-2.5}} to release it under the Creative Commons or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. LX (talk, contribs) 05:23, 22 January 2007 (UTC)

Wow! Thank you ...[edit]

... for this marvellous picture of the blossoms of Crataegus monogyna; its one of the best I've ever seen in the Wikipedia. I add it to the "European Trees"-WikiReader (German Wikipedia). Best wishes, Migas 22:50, 1 February 2007 (UTC)

Nice to hear that :o), thanks -Svdmolen 19:05, 2 February 2007 (UTC)


ToL Newsletter issue 1[edit]

The inaugural newsletter of the Tree of Life project has been published. You are welcome to read the newsletter, comment on its contents, frequency and form, or unsubscribe by putting your name on my talk page.

Teun Spaans 21:45, 2 February 2007 (UTC)


Image Tagging Image:Smoke.jpg[edit]

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Smoke.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-2.5}} to release it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Siebrand 08:07, 5 February 2007 (UTC)


Tip: Categorizing images[edit]

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | magyar | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски / srpski | svenska | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


Hello, Svdmolen!

Tip: Add categories to your images

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

Uploadwizard-categories.png

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations"). Pro-tip: The CommonSense tool can help you find the best category for your image.

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

--gildemax 13:30, 8 February 2007 (UTC)

Image:Six degrees of separation.png [edit]

Six degrees of separation.png

Please delete the current version and make the new currend. I had made a mistake in the nubbers of middleman. Thanks in advance. LaurensvanLieshout.

Ik heb de 2006 versie verwijderd, maar het vreemde is dat de 2006 versie nog steeds blijft verschijnen op de artikelen. Waarschijnlijk laad de computer het plaatje uit mijn tijdelijke geheugen (of zoiets). Als het zo blijft is het het makkelijkst om het bestand onder een nieuwe naam te up loaden, dan wis ik de huidige versie. -Svdmolen 08:03, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
versie Image:Six degrees of separation 01.png up loaded . LaurensvanLieshout
Waar de oude versie gebruikt werd heb ik de nieuwe geplaats. Het oude bestand is genomineerd voor verwijdering. -Svdmolen 20:05, 30 April 2007 (UTC)

Image:Vogelmeer.jpg[edit]

Hello

thanks for your uploads

Unfortunetaly, when you uploaded pic in reference, you forgot license and by this way this one runs risk of deletion. Could you tag it with a valid license as your other pics.

friendly Oxam Hartog 11:54, 1 May 2007 (UTC)

FP Promotion[edit]

Ethmia bipunctella-01 (xndr).jpg
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image Image:Ethmia bipunctella-01 (xndr).jpg, which was nominated by D-Kuru at Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Ethmia bipunctella-01 (xndr).jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

Cscr-featured.svg

--Simonizer 11:53, 19 June 2007 (UTC)

Well thanks alot I appreciate that :o), Best regards -Svdmolen 16:54, 19 June 2007 (UTC)

Image:Viking2lander1.jpg[edit]

I noticed you uploaded this image. I'm interested to know how you created the picture or where you found it, as it is one of the few Viking lander pictures on the wiki with correct colors (blue is blue instead of purple). Thanks, Van der Hoorn 17:43, 12 July 2007 (UTC)

Image:Morpho_peleides-03_(xndr).jpg[edit]

català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | français | galego | עברית | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | lietuvių | Nederlands | norsk bokmål | polski | português | русский | slovenčina | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


Hello, and thank your for sharing your files with Commons. There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. Please remember that all uploads require source, author and license information. Could you please resolve these problems, which are described on the page linked in above? Thank you. --Siebrand 11:00, 12 August 2007 (UTC)

Campaea margaritatia[edit]

Hoi Sander, Ik zag dat je C. margaritata hebt gecorrigeerd in C. margaritatia. Moet het niet C. margaritaria zijn? Groetjes, Floor. Fvlamoen 20:58, 12 October 2007 (UTC)

Je hebt gelijk. Trouwens al een flinke hoeveelheid nieuwe vlinderartikelen van jouw hand op nl. Mooi werk. Groeten, Svdmolen


Image Tagging Image:Flu Vaccine.jpg[edit]

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Flu Vaccine.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-3.0}} to release it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Raymond Disc. 07:52, 25 October 2007 (UTC)


Image Tagging Image:Silk road.jpg[edit]

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Silk road.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multilicense GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. 82.126.54.91 19:45, 10 November 2007 (UTC)


Image Tagging Image:Thick oil on rocky beach.jpg[edit]

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Thick oil on rocky beach.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multilicense GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Shizhao 00:38, 13 November 2007 (UTC)

Commons:Picture of the Year/2007[edit]

Hi, I'm writing to let you know that an image of yours that became a Commons Featured Picture during 2007 is now part of the 2007 Picture of the Year competition. If you have > 200 edits you are welcome to vote too. Thanks for contributing your valuable work and good luck. -- Bryan (talk to me) 20:27, 14 January 2008 (UTC)


Image:Malcolm_X_-_child.jpg[edit]

Image deletion warning Image:Malcolm_X_-_child.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

dave pape 21:24, 30 January 2008 (UTC)


Image:Malcolm_X_-_mosque.jpg[edit]

Image deletion warning Image:Malcolm_X_-_mosque.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

dave pape 21:31, 30 January 2008 (UTC)

Please write deletion reason before deleting. Now, undelete these images, which was deleted by you and write a reason in deletion log. Thanks!--OsamaK 19:33, 8 February 2008 (UTC)
All images that are deleted were uploaded by my under temperary names for determination perpuse. Next time I'll put it in the deletion log -Svdmolen 20:55, 8 February 2008 (UTC)

Administrative notice[edit]

Deutsch

Dear Svdmolen/Archive. I am writing to you to inform you that because of inactivity, you may lose your adminship on Commons.

Commons has a new policy on admin activity, Commons:Administrators/De-adminship, taken into use on June 13, 2007 (after a two-week poll on the proposed policy's talk page).

If you want to keep your adminship, you have to sign at Commons:Administrators/Inactivity section within 30 days. Note that if you don't make 5 admin actions in the following 5 months, you will then lose the adminship anyways.

Thank you,
abf /talk to me/ 18:42, 9 February 2008 (UTC)

Inactivity[edit]

Hi Svdmolen/Archive. Thanks for signing at this page. Please note that your sysop-rights will be removed the next time we run an inactivity-section without any new notice, if you do not do 5 admin-actions till then.
Thank you for your long and helpfull work on Commons! abf /talk to me/ 12:52, 11 March 2008 (UTC)

Image:Mary Wollstonecraft.jpg[edit]

Image deletion warning Image:Mary Wollstonecraft.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

This is an automated message from DRBot. (Stop bugging me!) 22:47, 15 March 2008 (UTC)


Image:Meissner effect.jpg[edit]

Image deletion warning Image:Meissner effect.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

--GeorgHHtalk   11:07, 20 March 2008 (UTC)


Image Tagging Image:LocationKaliningrad.png[edit]

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:LocationKaliningrad.png. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multilicense GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Cecil 19:13, 13 May 2008 (UTC)


Image Tagging Image:Wolframite.jpg[edit]

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Wolframite.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multilicense GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Jodo 23:29, 30 May 2008 (UTC)


Image Tagging Image:ManWithPetriDishes.jpg[edit]

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:ManWithPetriDishes.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multilicense GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Jodo (talk) 18:54, 18 June 2008 (UTC)