User talk:KlaudiuMihaila

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Hi Klaudiu, please be aware that fair use images are not allowed at the Commons and will be deleted. Please check Commons:Criteria for inclusion. It's not enough to just say "it's from en.wikipedia". Thanks, pfctdayelise (translate?) 09:55, 9 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]


العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Basalt_Formation_Frodba.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multilicense GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. OsamaK 13:23, 29 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The quality of the chemical structure Image:Hydroxybenzene.png is disputed

[edit]
Dispute notification The chemical structure Image:Hydroxybenzene.png you uploaded has been tagged as and is now listed in Category:Low quality chemical diagrams. Images in this category might be deleted after one month if there is no upload of an improved version, if there is no objection from the uploader or other users and if a better version exists. Please discuss on the image talk page if you feel that the dispute is inappropriate. If you agree with the dispute, you can either upload an improved version or simply allow the image to be deleted.

In all cases, please do not take the dispute personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! --Leyo 02:26, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]



The factual accuracy of the chemical structure Image:Alkene5.png is disputed

[edit]
Dispute notification The chemical structure Image:Alkene5.png you uploaded has been tagged as disputed and is now listed in Category:Disputed chemical diagrams. Images in this category are deleted after one month if there is no upload of a corrected version and if there is no objection from the uploader or other users. Please discuss on the image talk page if you feel that the dispute is inappropriate. If you agree with the dispute, you can either upload a corrected version or simply allow the image to be deleted.

In all cases, please do not take the dispute personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! --Hystrix (talk) 17:38, 14 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]



File:Hexitol.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

--Yikrazuul (talk) 13:58, 6 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Fructose_small.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Yikrazuul (talk) 12:27, 9 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Tip: Categorizing images

[edit]

Afrikaans  العربية  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  Esperanto  español  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  magyar  íslenska  italiano  日本語  ქართული  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  +/−


Hello, KlaudiuMihaila!
Tip: Add categories to your files
Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

CategorizationBot (talk) 11:43, 29 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! I created the Commons:WikiProject Romania as a sister project to the multilingual WP:ROMANIA versions (currently en, fr, ro and ru) to better organize, categorize and improve the quality of media and galleries related to Romania and the Romanians. From your contributions, I think you might be interested and maybe you wish to join and support the project. Your input is welcomed! Thanks and best regards!

--Codrin.B (talk) 22:50, 3 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The quality of the chemical structure File:Alfa-naftilamina.svg is disputed

[edit]
Dispute notification The chemical structure File:Alfa-naftilamina.svg you uploaded has been tagged as and is now listed in Category:Low quality chemical diagrams. Files in this category might be deleted after one month if there is no upload of an improved version, if there is no objection from the uploader or other users and if a better version exists. Please discuss on the file talk page if you feel that the dispute is inappropriate. If you agree with the dispute, you can either upload an improved version or simply allow the file to be deleted.

In all cases, please do not take the dispute personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! --Cwbm (commons) (talk) 20:23, 24 October 2012 (UTC)


File:Alfa-naftilamina.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Leyo 13:56, 20 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The quality of the chemical structure File:Ethyl methyl phenyl amine.svg is disputed

[edit]
Dispute notification The chemical structure File:Ethyl methyl phenyl amine.svg you uploaded has been tagged as and is now listed in Category:Low quality chemical diagrams. Files in this category might be deleted after one month if there is no upload of an improved version, if there is no objection from the uploader or other users and if a better version exists. Please discuss on the file talk page if you feel that the dispute is inappropriate. If you agree with the dispute, you can either upload an improved version or simply allow the file to be deleted.

In all cases, please do not take the dispute personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! --Cwbm (commons) (talk) 12:26, 14 January 2013 (UTC)


File:Methyl aniline.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Leyo 11:12, 19 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Methylamine.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Leyo 11:58, 19 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Dimethyl aniline.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Leyo 11:59, 19 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Romanian pronunciation

[edit]

Hey, I noticed you have uploaded some Romanian sound files. Currently the article w:en:Palatalization (phonetics) mentions ban, bani as an example. Would you be willing to record these words in a single sound file to provide an audio illustration? Erutuon (talk) 07:57, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Erutuon! I now uploaded this, please let me know if it is what you needed. Best, KlaudiuMihaila (talk) 20:07, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
That's exactly what I was looking for. I've added it to the article. Thanks a ton! :-) — Erutuon (talk) 03:50, 17 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Another set of requests! For w:en:Romanian phonology#Vowel alternations, could you record these words to illustrate Romanian vowel alternations? Each pair of words would go in a single sound file, for a total of 6 soundfiles. And they can be placed in the category Category:Minimal pairs as well as Category:Romanian pronunciation.

  • carte 'book', cărticică 'book' (diminutive)
  • casă 'house', căsuță 'house' (diminutive)
  • beat 'drunk', bețiv 'drunkard'
  • seară 'evening', înserat 'dusk'
  • poartă 'gate', portar 'gatekeeper'
  • coastă 'rib', costiță 'rib' (diminutive)

I may have other requests later. At any point, if you are tired of recording examples, let me know, and I will stop requesting more. Erutuon (talk) 22:42, 17 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Done. KlaudiuMihaila (talk) 23:20, 17 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Cool; added to the article. I've been curious to hear the unique Romanian diphthongs. It seems you pronounce /oa/ in coastă like ua /wa/, which is different from what I expected. And Rom. beat sounds very much like how English bat would be pronounced in the Great Lakes region of the US, though the English word would typically be transcribed /bæt/. Erutuon (talk) 00:21, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Now that you mentioned coastă and cuastă, I've been pronouncing them continuously trying to figure out whether they are the same or not. Still can't tell, so maybe they are the same in my case. KlaudiuMihaila (talk) 18:07, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
That would not be surprising. Across languages, diphthongs with [e] or [o] as less prominent components, as in Romanian, are rare; diphthongs with [i u] are more common. Sometimes in diphthongs with the mid vowels [e o] as less prominent components, mid [e o] change to the close vowels [i u], or the semivowels [j w]. This happened with Old French [o̯i], a very rare diphthong, which I think changed to [wi], [we], and then finally [wa] as in Modern French.
Thus maybe in your Romanian pronunciation, /oa/ changes to [wa] ua. It would be "symmetrical" if /ea/ changed to [ja] ia, but it doesn't sound like that's true of your pronunciation. If anything, it sounds like /ea/ has become similar to [æ] (English bat), a change that is called monophthongization or "smoothing". If /oa/ changed in a symmetrical way, or was monophthongized or "smoothed", it would change to [ɔ], a mid vowel close to a. But it doesn't, so your pronunciations of ea and oa are different, or "asymmetrical".
These are my guesses. Sorry if this is overly detailed, or hard to understand (not sure what your level of English or linguistic understanding is), but historical sound changes fascinate me. ;-) Erutuon (talk) 05:27, 19 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Klaudiu. Any chance you could do some minor adjustments to the picture? I'm thinking of M43 piece to have a continuous middle line to show its status as "completed", A10 to have a dotted middle line to show its status as "under construction" and also to add A0 intersecting A1 near Bucharest, more or less mimicking their status from File:Romania Motorways DE.svg. Shadow Caster One (talk) 13:08, 1 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hey! Will give it a try. KlaudiuMihaila (talk) 20:29, 1 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Many thanks Klaudiu for the quick response and edit! Shadow Caster One (talk) 07:01, 2 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Taking a closer look I saw that on the picture we have "Pitești Vest" instead of "Pitești Nord" as the end of the Bucharest - Pitești opened section. Can you please also update this? Shadow Caster One (talk) 10:10, 8 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you Klaudiu for the update! Shadow Caster One (talk) 14:39, 16 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Klaudiu. Can you please update again the picture in light of the fact that now the segment between Remetea Mare and Șanovița is now operational? Many thanks and happy holidays! Shadow Caster One (talk) 08:04, 26 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done KlaudiuMihaila (talk) 12:45, 26 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks again for the quick edit. Shadow Caster One (talk) 09:22, 27 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Klaudiu. One more segment opened on A1 between Traian Vuia and Margina on Lugoj-Deva lot 2. Can you please give an update to the map with that? Shadow Caster One (talk)

✓ Done KlaudiuMihaila (talk) 14:32, 29 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks Klaudiu! :) Shadow Caster One (talk)
File:Tereftalic acid.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Leyo 22:07, 27 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Romanian road signs

[edit]

Hi Klaudiu. Since I see you're doing well with images/graphics I was wondering if you could render some assistance on editing creating some road signs as well? Shadow Caster One (talk) 08:38, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I can give it a try. Which ones do you need? KlaudiuMihaila (talk) 11:08, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I would need a road sign for 143B and 572 one similar to this one DJ401A. Thanks in advance. Shadow Caster One (talk) 11:14, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I've done one for DJ143B. The one for DJ572 already exists. Let me know whether or not the one I created is fine. KlaudiuMihaila (talk) 11:28, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Both of them are just fine. Thanks for pointing out the one for DJ572, had no idea it was there. Thank you again for the help and "Happy New Year!" Shadow Caster One (talk) 12:34, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
File:1,2,3 Propantriol.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

GKFXtalk 18:57, 26 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Propandioic acid.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

GKFXtalk 09:05, 7 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:ETANDIOL.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

GKFXtalk 19:05, 14 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:1 Butanol.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Chem Sim 2001 (disc) 09:12, 11 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Glucose small.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Leyo 10:37, 17 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Hexitol small.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Leyo 10:38, 17 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Copyright status: File:Dimitrie Nistor.jpg

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Dimitrie Nistor.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

JuTa 09:00, 14 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:2-propil-amine.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 08:02, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Friedel-Crafts-Acylierung.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

DMacks (talk) 21:47, 4 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Carboxyl Group (Space Filling).JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

DMacks (talk) 21:59, 4 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Maleic acid.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 08:52, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Trimethyl amine.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 06:58, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Dimethyl amine.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 20:09, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ethyl amine.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 21:29, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Diethyl methyl amine.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 21:35, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Autopatrol given

[edit]

Hello. I just wanted to let you know that I have granted autopatrol rights to your account; the reason for this is that I believe you are sufficiently trustworthy and experienced to have your contributions automatically marked as "reviewed". This has no effect on your editing, it is simply intended to make it easier for users that are monitoring Recent changes or Recent uploads to find unproductive edits amidst the productive ones like yours. In addition, the Flickr upload feature and an increased number of batch-uploads in UploadWizard, uploading of freely licensed MP3 files, overwriting files uploaded by others and an increased limit for page renames per minute are now available to you. Thank you.

Cheers, VIGNERON (talk) 11:41, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ethyl methyl amine.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 15:07, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Fumaric Acid.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 21:07, 1 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Iasi county coat of arms.gif has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Glorious 93 (talk) 21:04, 18 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Bună ziua şi un început bun în Noul Anǃ Vă rog să actualizaţi în harta de sus capătul autostrăzii de la Ungheni la Tg. Mureş. A fost dată în folosinţă de Crăciun. Vă mulţumesc. --F.hilbert (talk) 13:33, 12 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Rezolvat! Numai bine! KlaudiuMihaila (talk) 21:25, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Bună seara şi vă mulţumesc. Deşi am modificat şi eu harta (am lăsat Ungheniul, aceasta fiind ieşirea la aeroport), crezând că ceva nu a funcţionat bine la mine, vă rugasem pe dumneavoastră să o actualizaţi, dar constat că greşeala nu este la noi. Deşi imaginea actualizată este pe poziţia actuală în Commons, miniatura este reprezentată greşit, dar la deschiderea ei, este în ordine. O ciudăţenie asemănătoare se întâmplă şi la inserarea în articole a tăbliţelor cu cifra 1, sau , (de ex. A10), apare cifra 1 cu "talpă" în loc de cel bun. Putem oare afla unde e baiul? Numai bineǃ --F.hilbert (talk) 17:42, 28 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@F.hilbert: De obicei este o problemă de cache. O reîncărcare (sau mai multe) fără cache a paginii (ctrl+shift+r) poate rezolva situația. KlaudiuMihaila (talk) 18:11, 28 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Ca un comentariu la Ungheni, nu știu dacă își are rostul prezența pe hartă. De obicei sunt incluse doar capetele de segmente, acolo unde șoseaua este finalizată sau în lucru. Nici Turda nu știu dacă își mai are locul, având în vedere că autostrada este terminată împrejur. În plus, am observat că versiunile cele mai recente pe care le-ați încărcat includ o cantitate mare de spațiu gol în imagine, în cadranul din stânga sus - există un motiv anume sau este doar o greșeală? Pot să ajut, dacă este nevoie. KlaudiuMihaila (talk) 18:22, 28 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Evident, este o greşeală, o văd şi din mărimea Datei-ului. Am corectat greşeala dar vă mărturisesc, svg-ul cam îmi dă bătăi de cap pentru că abia acum am început să-l folosesc.
Dacă vedem autostrada doar ca atare ar ajunge doar capetele ei. România are autostrăzi doar de câteva sute de km, chia şi când vor fi gata, aşa că nu cred că deranjează dacă sunt trecute şi ieşirile, cu atât mai puţin joncţiunile cu celelalte autostrăzi (cum este la A1). Păcat că nu s-au trecut şi exit-urile, pentrucă sunt informaţii importante, chiar dacă se găsesc pe Google-Map actualizate la zi. Vara trecută, fiind în RO, am fost pe A10 de la Ungheni-Turda la Sebeş (la Aiud şi Alba Iulia încă era şantier), acuma este complet deschisă. Doresc să actualizez şi A10 şi cum vă spuneam, mare experienţă la svg încă nu am şi dacă sunte-ţi de acord, am să vă cer un pic de ajutor. Vă doresc un Weekend plăcut. F.hilbert (talk) 12:12, 29 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
P.S. Totuşi cred că aveţi dreptate cu nodurile intermediare (Ungheni, Turda etc. le-am scos). F.hilbert (talk) 16:29, 29 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Bună ziua. Existând doar această hartă de ansamblu cu autostrăzile din RO dar neactualizată, am considerat că nu este greşit să creez una actuală. Aş avea rugămintea să verificaţi harta dacă e bine şi să o corectaţi/ajustaţi şi dacă doriţi să o completaţi.
Am mai completat la File:Romania Motorway A8 RO.svg şi la File:Romania Motorway A7 RO.svg tăbliţele indicatoare (vedeţi vă rog fişierul meu de sus), dar încă nu le-am încărcat. Ca să nu fie prea multe File-uri fără rost, am solicitat la Commons pentru unifomizare, redenumirea Romania East-West Motorway în Romania Motorway A8 RO, ca să fie la fel cu celelalte hărţi de autostradă din RO, dar cererea a fost refuzată. În acest caz, cred că e mai bine să se facă un File nou, pentru a nu "răvăşi" paginile unde fişierul a fost deja inserat, nu-i aşa? F.hilbert (talk) 10:40, 5 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

P.S. Desigur, dacă îmi daţi câteva indicaţii, cu plăcere ce ştiu, le voi face şi eu. F.hilbert (talk) 11:30, 5 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]